20200258 Ver 1_[External] RE_ B-4844 impacts_20200218

From:
Alsmeyer, Eric C CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
To:
Coaains, Tony C
Cc:
Clarke, Matthew
Subject:
[External] RE: B-4844 impacts
Date:
Tuesday, October 8, 2019 8:54:08 AM
Attachments:
imaae001.Dna
External email. Do not click in s or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
ttachment to reoort.soamlcDnc.eov
Chad: Per our discussion this AM, Tom S. sent me these NCDWR conditions, which we will modify for
our permit special conditions, if applicable for this project:
24. The post -construction removal of any temporary bridge structures must return the project
site to its preconstruction contours and elevations. The impacted areas shall be re -vegetated with
appropriate native species including woody species. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(2)
25. Due to the possibility that compaction and/or other site alterations might prevent the
temporary wetland impact area from re -attaining jurisdictional wetland status; the permittee shall
provide an update on the wetland areas temporarily impacted by the temporary on -site detour. This
update shall be conducted two growing seasons after completion of the work and shall consist of
photographs and a brief report on the progress of the areas in re -attaining wetland jurisdictional
status. Upon submission of this update to the NCDWR, the permittee shall schedule an agency field
meeting with the NCDWR to determine if the wetland areas temporarily impacted by this project
have re -attained jurisdictional wetland status. If the wetland areas temporarily impacted by this
project have not re -attained jurisdictional wetland status, the NCDWR shall determine if
compensatory wetland mitigation is to be required. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2) and (b)(3)]
Also, we didn't discuss NWP 14 vs. GP 31. It looks like the project would be eligible for combined
NWPs 14 and 33 (permanent loss impacts <1/2 acre); also, unless GP 31 is re -issued before you
apply, it expires in April 2020, so it would have a closer expiration date than the NWPs.
Please reply or call if you have any questions or if I may serve you in any other way.
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help
us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.
Thank you,
Eric
Eric Alsmeyer
Project Manager
Regulatory Division Office
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District

3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105, Wake Forest, NC 27587
Tel: [phone], x23
Fax: [phone]
Regulatory Homepage: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx
From: Coggins, Tony C [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 8:14 AM
To: Alsmeyer, Eric C CIV USARMY CESAW (US)<[e-mail]>
Cc: Clarke, Matthew <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] B-4844 impacts
I thought I would go ahead and discuss this project with you while I await sturgeon concurrence. See
attached alt analysis. Does this meet Section 404(b)(1) guidelines? Should I apply for a NWP 14 or
GP 31?
Chad Coggins
Environmental Officer
NC Department of Transportation Div. 4
252 640 6427 office
252 717 8699 cell
509 Ward Boulevard
PO Box 3165
Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Facebook Twitt r YouTube
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.