20010505 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20010406

?0F \ NA jF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
,O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
co 7 _ 5S &X-- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
= I Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
p `C C/ ( Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIPT
August 14, 2001
Mr. Stuart Jones
Jones & Cnossen Engineering
Post Office Box 1062
Apex, North Carolina 27502
Dear Mr. Jones:
Subject: DWQ #: 010505
COE #: 200120939
Project: Smith Farms
County: Wake
The North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) has received a check
in the amount of $ 12,000.00 check number 1044, as payment for the compensatory
mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification, Certificate of
Authorization, and/or Section 404 Permit issued for the subject project. This receipt serves
as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project have been
satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization
associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCWRP is
responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated with the subject
permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit. The
NCWRP will restore 0.50 acres of riparian wetlands in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the
Neuse River Basin.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal
Braswell at [phone].
Sincerely,
/Ronald E. F rrell,
Program Manager
cc: Rob Ridings, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACOE
Steve Mitchell, RRO
file
S"b
NCDERPt
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 [phone] Customer Service
320 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603 Fax: [phone] 6237748
`yob,-??9 ???+ak
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11,610 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
C ? June 7, 2001
S&EC, Inc. Project # 00-5470
010505
Department of )environment and Natural Resources
Division of Wa er Quality., u .? .... .
Attn: John D rney ?1 $ 2nol
2321 Crabtree oulevard IWI?
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 2 604 N
Re: Reply to th Division of Water Quality's May 18, 2001 letter requesting further information
for the propose Smith Farms, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Dorn?y:
This letter is in Iresponse to your letter dated May 18, 2001 (copy attached), which requested
additional info ation concerning lots 12 and 18 as shown on the impact map sent to you on April
5, 2001. Altho gh the letter is dated May 18, 2001, the letter was not received by my client until
June 4, 2001. The letter says that it was sent certified mail, but it was not. Also, once again I was
copied at the b ttom as being sent a copy of this correspondence and yet again I did not receive a
copy. Due to 01 of these circumstances my client and I, acting as my client's authorized agent,
request that the, three-week response time begin on June 4, 2001 and extend until June 25, 2001,
rather than M4 18, 2001 to June 8, 2001 as described in your letter. Unless I have heard
otherwise through personal conversation, specific voice mail, email, or written letter, I will assume
that this is acceptable and will provide further justification for the impacts sited during this three-
week period.
To further aid ' our office in corresponding with my co-workers and 1, the following is a list of
individuals located in this office that your office may need to contact followed by their email
addresses:
Jennifer Burdette [e-mail]
Jim Cooper [e-mail]
Sean Clark [e-mail]
Peter Jelenevsky PJelenevsky(a;SandEC.com
Kevin Martin KMartin(a;SandEC.com
Todd Preuninger [e-mail]
Brad Suther BSuther(a,)SandEC.com
Also, our offic¢ address, phone number, and fax number are located at the top of page I of this
letter.
This letter is n t meant to be demeaning or disrespectful, but is meant to convey a very high level
of frustration 'th respects to the way in which your office handles important correspondence. If
this were an e eption I would not be as concerned, however this has become normal operating
Charlotte Office:
PMB 291, 3020-I Prosperity Ch4rch Road
Charlotte, NC 28269-7197
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hickory Office:
910 Boston Road
Taylorsv lle, NC 28681
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]
procedures for our office in the last five to six months. Based on conversations you have had with
Kevin Martin, ou believe the problem lies with the mail service center which is beyond your
control. To po sibly solve this problem, we are asking if it would be possible to copy us via email
instead of thro4h the mail service center. We eagerly await your response to this request.
If I can be of arty further assistance or if you have any questions, please let me know. I am certain
you and your s ,;further
as frustrated with the problems as we are.
Sincerely,
Sean Clark
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated May 18, 2001
i
cc: Mr. Steve I itchell (Raleigh DWQ Regional Office) via fax
2
Jr, 04 01 10:53a Stuart Jones
M, ON 11 :4:7 PM
919 387 3375 p.2
P.01
Warms Mlohael F. Eaaloy
dti? P? Governor
'h r waam n Rm. Jr, SaCret0ly
=t pepartmcnt of Environment and Natural Rwowces
a
Kerr T. 9tevene
Olviaion or VMOr Quality
r
May 18, 2001
DWQ Project # 010505
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Tin, !"c-
130 Edinburgh Drive. Ste 102
Cary, NO 27511
Dear sirs:
The Division of Water Quolity has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill material
Into 108 linear feet of streams, 0,3087 acres of wetlands and 0.1833 acres of buffers located at
UmAh Farms We In Wake County ror residential development. Insufficient evidence is press nt in
our tiles to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands In
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made
as described below. we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by
15A NCAC 2H .0507(e) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until wo receive this
additional information, we are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers place your project on administrativo hold.
Ploaso provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must
be constructed as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing fill in these
waters and/or wetlands. `806Cifieally can you Construct a home on lots 12 and 18 without
imfasctin$ wetlands? Please provide a building plan fur those lots in order for us to make this
determination. Any documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to address
441 certtfrcat;QOtCf'thin
alternative designs for your p%jed m be helpful in our review of your
?,fit'Ii?INr`eg?iro??iir?dellis?Y?lir?tyldh-?!d?r??' ?,
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending a copy of this
information to me and one copy to Steve Mitchell, Raleigh Regional Office at [phone], If we
do not hoar from you in three weeks. we win assume that you no longer want to pursue this project
and we WIII Consider the project as withdrawn. I can be reached at 919-733-9646 if you have any
qu*Mlons.
Sin
n R. Domey
9 go, Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Ofrtcc Corps of Enginorars
Central Files
File Copy
Soon Clark; Soil & Environmental Consultants
oohmon of vveter Quality
weutimW40t Unil: [phone]
Fox, [phone]
1 eSo Mail Service Center Raleigh, Nc 27699.1690
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
June 7, 2001
S&EC, Inc. Project # 00-5745
DWQ Project # 010656
Department of E vironment and Natural Resources
Division of Wat?r Quality
Attn: John DorIney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27004
Re: Reply to the 'Division of Water Quality's May 21, 2001 letter requesting further information
for the proposed Deep River Forest, Lee County, North Carolina
Dcar Mr. Dome:
This letter is in tesponse to your letter dated May 21, 2001 (copy attached), which requested
additional justification for impacts 5, 16, and 18 as shown on the impact map sent to you on April
25, 2001. Although the letter is dated May 21, 2001, the envelope (attached) was not post marked
until May 31, 200 ,1, which means my client did not receive the letter until sometime after May 31,
2001. Also, the Metter says that it was sent certified mail and it was not. Also, once again I was
copied at the bottom as being sent a copy of this correspondence and yet again I did not receive a
copy. Due to all of these circumstances my client and I, acting as my client's authorized agent,
request that the three-week response time begin on May 31, 2001 and extend until June 21, 2001,
rather than May21, 2001 to June 11, 2001. Unless I have heard otherwise through personal
conversation, specific voice mail, or written letter, I will assume that this is acceptable and will
provide further J6stification for the impacts sited during this three-week period.
To further aid ypur office in corresponding with my co-workers and I, the following is a list of
individuals located in this office that your office may need to contact followed by their email
addresses:
Jennifer Burdette Jburdette@SandEC,com
Jim Cooper Jcooper(a;SandEC.com
Sean Clark Sclark(?;Sand.EC.com
(Peter Jelenevsky PJelenevsky(a;SandEC.com
Kevin Martin [e-mail]
Todd Preuninger TPreuninger(a,)SandEC.com
Brad Suther BSuther(a,SandEC.com
Also, our officejaddress, phone number, and fax number are located at the top of page I of this
letter.
This letter is no meant to be demeaning or disrespectful, but is meant to convey a very high level
of frustration w th respects to the way in which your office handles important correspondence. If
this were an ex ption I would not be as concerned, however this has become normal operating
procedures for }our office in the last five to six months. Based on conversations you have had with
Wetland Delineation/Permit I ng/Mitigation Soil/Site Evaluations On-Site Septic Systems Environmental Assessments/Audits
Neuse Bas n and Watershed Buffer Evaluations Groundwater Hydrology Endangered Species
Branch Offices: [phone] • [phone] • [phone]
Kevin Martin, y u believe the problem lies with the mail service center, which is beyond your
control. To pos bly solve this problem, we are asking if it would be possible to copy us via email
instead of throu the mail service center. We eagerly await your response to this request.
If I can be of a0 further assistance or if you have any questions, please let me know. I am certain
you and staff are as frustrated with the problems as we are.
Sincerely,
Sean Clark
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated May 21, 2001
2) Copy of envelope that the letter was sent in (post marked May 31, 2001)
I
cc: Mr. Steve itchell (Raleigh DWQ Regional Office) via fax

C1 04:OGp
AOF vJ A f ?q
Pr
Y
[phone]
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr, secretary
Department of Environment and Natural ReSourCes
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
May 21, 2001
DWQ Project * 010656
Lee County
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
GPG Development, LLC
106 Cimmaron Court
Cary, NC 27511
Dear Sirs:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of till material
into 200 linear feet of perennial streams and 1,130 linear feet of intermittent streams and located
at Deop River Forest in Lee County for residential golf Course development. Insufficient. evidence
%s present in our files to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or
wotlands in accurdance with 15A NCAC 2H 0506, Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal
are made as described below, we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as
required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(e) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we
receive this additional information, we are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers place your project on administrative hold.
Please provide us Witt) Information supposing your position that states your project must
be constructed as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing till in these
waters and/or wetlands. Specifically since the permanent impacts at sites 5, 16 and 18 exceed
>0 linear feet on one channel, mitigation will be required. P_tease discuss on-site stream
ftigation potentials. Any documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to
address alternative designs for your project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification.
Also this project will require compensatory mitigation as described in 15A NCAC 2H ,0506(h).
Your mitigation proposal is insufficient because none was proposed.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending a copy of this
information to me and one copy to Steve Mitchell, Raleigh Regional Office at [phone]- If we
do not hear from you in three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project
and we will consider the project as withdrawn. I can be reached at 919-733-y646 if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
r-,
J. ty
D ey
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Utti
ice
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark; Soil & Environmental Consultants
Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Serviro Center Ralcigh, NO 27699-16'30
ds/-C1 Unit. (919) 733-178p
FPr.: [phone]
George Phelps
p.2
(?-
c?

.r.
?_.
`?.

f.
o?OF W A TF, Q
r
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
June 6, 2001
DWQ Project No. 01-0505
Wake County
Tin, Inc.
130 Edinburgh Drive, Suite 102
Cary, NC 27511
Cc: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. (S&EC, Inc.)
Attn: Mr. Sean Clark
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
919-846-9467 (fax)
Re: Smith Farms Subdivision, Fuquay-Varina, Wake County, NC
S&EC, Inc. Project No. 00-5470
Unnamed Tributary to Terrible Creek (03-04-03, 27-43-15-8; B & C NSW]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Sirs,
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill within 0.3087 acres of wetlands, 108 linear
feet of jurisdictional waters and 0.1833 acres of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing the residential development,
as described within your applicar dated 4/5/01 with additional information provided within S&EC, Inc.'s response letter dated
6/11/01. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers
3287 and 3289. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 39 and 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). This letter will also act as your Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A
NCAC 213 .0233(8). In addition, you should get any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404
permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application dated 4/5/01 with additional
information provided within S&EC, Inc.'s response letter dated 6/11/01. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may
be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre
of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers as identified within
15A NCAC 213 .0233(5).
2. Upon completion of all work approved within this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate, and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
3. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective
buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in
place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval
and Authorization Certificate.
4. The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these boundaries approved
under this authorization shall be clearly marked by orange fabric fencing for the areas that have been approved to
401 WETLANDS CERTFICATION UNIT
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Page -2 of 2
infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A
NCAC 2B .0233 and GC 3287 and 3289.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within
60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This
certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,
e T Steven
N D Q, Director
Cc: US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
NC Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
E

DWQ 010505
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
i Web Page: www.SandEC.com
\\ June 11, 2001
C, nc. Project # 00-5470
Norv
WQ Project # 010505
gineers
N.C. Division of Water Quality As of En
Attn: John Do ey Attn: Amanda Jones
2321 Crabtree B§ulevard 6508 Falls of Ncusc Road
Suite 250 Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 276104 Raleigh, NC 27615
I
Re: Reply to th N.C. Division of Water Quality and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers'
request for furt er justification and information for the proposed Smith Farms, Wake
County, Nort Carolina
Dear Mr. Dorn?y and Ms. Jones
The attached i ormation further explains the site plan for the proposed Smith Farms
residential sub ivision. In response to the specific concerns expressed in the May 18,
2001 letter fro DWQ (attached), the attached letter from Mr. Peter Cnossen and the
attached maps how the planned building footprints on lots 12 and 18. Also, Mr.
Cnossen's lette explains why the proposed road crossing of the creek and adjacent
wetlands wasp laced where it is.

The attached letter from the DWQ states that mitigation will be required by the DWQ in
accordance wit 15A NCAC 21-1.0506(h). This section specifies that the DWQ may ask
for wetland mi gation if the project proposes wetland impacts that exceed 1 acre. This
site plan propo es wetland impacts that total 0.3087 acres (i.e. less than 1 acre) as stated ?
in the first sentence of your May 18, 2001 letter. It is also our understanding that the \II,?
DWQ does not require stream mitigation for impacts less than 150 linear feet per channel -
or buffer mitig require
for buffer impacts less than 1/3 acre and/or 150 feet. As stated in the %0_
first sentence o your May 18, 2001 letter, this project proposes stream impacts of 108
linear feet (i.e. ess than 150 linear feet) and buffer impacts of 0.1833 acres (i.e. less than
1 /3 acre). If o r understanding of the current DWQ mitigation thresholds is incorrect or if
these threshold have changed please let me know. If mitigation is required, we propose
payment into t e N.C. Wetland Restoration Program as specified in 15A NCAC
2H.0506(h) as ?he preferred method of mitigation.

As suggested b' the DWQ office, a stamped self-addressed envelope is included with this
submittal to ai your office in sending further correspondence relating to this project to me
in a timely ma er. If email correspondence is more convenient for your office, my
address is: SO k(a,SandEC.com
Wetland Delineation/Permitti g/Mitigation Soil/Site Evaluations On-Site Septic Systems Environmental Assessments/Audits
Neuse Basi and Watershed Buffer Evaluations Groundwater Hydrology Endangered Species
Branch Offices: [phone] • [phone] • [phone]
i
I
If I can be of ar y further assistance or if you have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Sean Clark
Attachments: ) Letter from Peter Cnossen of Jones & Cnossen Engineering
Enlarged copy of lots 12 and 18
Site map showing realigned roads
DWQ letter May 18, 2001
Self addressed, stamped envelope (to DWQ central office only)
cc: Mr. Steve
(Raleigh DWQ Regional Office) via fax
1)
?? JONES &
CNOSSEN
ENGINEERING, PLLC
A&7=:i
LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING, PLANNING & MANAGEMENT
June 7, 2001
Mr. John Domey
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Re.: Smith Farms
DWQ Project # 010505
Dear Mr. Dorney,
106 W. Chatham Street
P. O. Box 1062
Apex, N.C. 27502
[phone]
Fax: [phone]
This letter is provided to present you with additional information that we
believe supports our design of the planned residential subdivision. This information
pertains to the stream and wetland impacts of the planned Street A crossing and
building impacts in relation to wetlands on Lots 12 and 18. As part of this letter,
please find a copy of the Site Plan that shows revised street locations for Streets B &
C. Also, copies of Lots 12 and 18 are attached that show building footprints in relatic^
to wetlands.
The Street A alignment shown on the Site Plan is controlled by the tie to Sunset
Lake Road that must be made within a previously established access easement within
the Johnson Property. Between this established access easement and creek, sufficient
length does not exist to substantially alter the Street A alignment using required Town
of Fuquay-Varina (Town) horizontal design criteria. Furthermore, the Town has
supported this alignment so that a planned connection to future Judd Parkway, a
planned collector, can be made. This alignment and future connection has been
established to avoid the potential need for additional creek crossings as this subdivision
extends further north and west. For these reasons, we request that the alignment of
Street A be approved as planned.
Building footprints on Lots 12 and 18 show that house construction can occur
without impacting the wetlands. The revision to Streets B & C has allowed us to
provide additional lot depth around the cul-de-sac, thereby more distance between the
house and wetlands is provided. We believe sufficient separation from the wetlands
now exists and that the lots contain enough high ground to avoid any impacts to the
jurisdictional areas (see attached lots 12 and 18 building footprints).
9934 DWQ Letter
06/08/01
It is hoped that the information provided is sufficient and has adequately
addressed your concerns and allows approval of the planned development as designed.
Should you require any additional information or have any questions regarding the
contents of this letter or attached information, please feel free to call. We would be
happy to meet with you to discuss these issues if needed.
Sincerely,
Peter D. Cnossen, P.E. 17252
W/attachments
Cc: Joey Iannone - TIN, Inc.
Steve Mitchell - Raleigh Regional Office
Sean Clark - S&EC
9934 DWQ Letter
06/08/01
-77
r

77
L _ - J

.ar 04 01 10:53a Stuart Jones 919 387 3375 p.2
UN-194-N1 MOH 11 :42 PM P. 01
^ r y t W I4IrP. M10haet F. Eaaky
U1? 4? Governor
Wiliam CA ROW, Jr, SaCretary
? 66- Oepirtmcnt of Envlronmont and Natvral RaaourceL
a ?c
Kerr T. SDevcne
Dlviaian of Mter Quality
May 18, 2001
DWQ Project # 010505
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Tin, !nc.
130 Edinbtirgh Drive. Ste 102
Cary, NC 27511
Dear Sirs:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharg© of fill material
Into 108 linear feet of streams, 0.3087 acres of wetlands and 0.1833 acres of buffers loomed at
srndh Farms site In Wake County ror rosidenbal development. Insufficient evldenco is present in
our tiles to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands In
accomanoe with 15A NCAC 2H .0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the pmposal are made
as described glow, we will have to move toward dental of your 401 Certification as requirod by
15A NCAC 2H .0507(e) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information, we are requesting (by copy of this letteo that the U.S. Army Corps cif
Enolneers place your project on administrative hold.
Plesso provide us with information Supporting your position that states your project must
be Gonstfupted as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing fill in these
waters and/or wetlands. `;;'O&ifidAIIJ•.,.cun you construct a home on Tots 12 and 18 without
impacting wetlands?,'Please provide a building plan for those lots in order for us to make this
determination. Any documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to address
alternative designs for yoarpject ma robe hem Iptul in our review of your 401
Please respond within three wocks of the, date of this letter by sencting a copy of this
information to me and one copy to Steve Mitchell, Raleigh Regional Office at [phone]. If we
do not hear from you in three weeks. we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project
and w0 will consider the project as withdrawn. I can be reached at 819-733-9645 it you have any
quoStlons.
Sin
n R
oo: Raleigh D1NQ Regional Ocoee
Raleigh Ficid office Corps of Engineors
Central Files
File Copy
Scan Clark; Soil S Environmental Consultants
omwon of water 4uality
Viral tmiomof Unit. (919) 733-1)86
Fox: (919) 73UO95
1650 Mail Service Gentar Raleigh, Nc 27699.16%
QF W A 1'F
? 9Q Michael F. Easley
?O Governor
f William G. Ross, Jr, Secretary
0 Y Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
May 18, 2001
DWQ Project # 010505
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Tin, Inc.
130 Edinburgh Drive, Ste 102
Cary, NC 27511
Dear Sirs:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill material
into 108 linear feet of streams, 0.3087 acres of wetlands and 0.1833 acres of buffers located at
Smith Farms site in Wake County for residential development. Insufficient evidence is present in
our files to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made
as described below, we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by
15A NCAC 2H .0507(e) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information, we are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers place your project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must
be constructed as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing fill in these
waters and/or wetlands. Specifically can you construct a home on lots 12 and 18 without
impacting wetlands? Please provide a building plan for those lots in order for us to make this
determination. Any documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to address
alternative designs for your project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Also this
project will require compensatory mitigation as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h).
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending a copy of this
information to me and one copy to Steve Mitchell, Raleigh Regional Office at [phone]. If we
do not hear from you in three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project
and we will consider the project as withdrawn. I can be reached at 919-733-9646 if you have any
questions.
Sinc
FnR.orney
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Sean Clark; Soil & Environmental Consultants
X",
A90A.
NMU
Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Wetlands/401 Unit: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
OF 630, ROG
7
O sa?srL:*.:1tY?i:lC-? ?
N ?o , 2001
Project # ??s
County
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J,J,V,f, 14
04
Cr,S;Rs oZ???) SV1?)
The Division of Wat Quality has reviewed your plans for the ischarge of fill aterial'
into V linear feet streams -wd 030M acres of wetland located at in S?
No kS_ County for . Insufficient evidence is present in our files to conclude that your
project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below, we will have
to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(e) and will
place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information, we are
requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers place your project on
administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must
be constructed as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing fill in these
waters and/or wetlands. Specifically can you ? Any documentation such as maps and
narrative that you can supply to address alter14thaty ns for your project may be helpful in our
review of your 401 Certification. Also thiill require compensatory mitigation as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). Your miosal is insufficient because
Please respond within three weeks of this letter by sending a copy of this
information to me and one copy to egional Office at . If we do not
hear from you in three weeks, we wil assumlonger want to pursue this project and
w e will consider the project as with rawn. I can be reached at 919-733-9646 if you have any
questions.
Sieve, Sincerely,
dY)
n? Q
John R. Dorney
cc' DWQ Regional Office
Field Office Corps of Engineers
Centr Files
File Copy d"?)
Sao,
.:gin
?,k is
ruoJ??Q ??-
OPP-
Uk_$ _?b ?? 5
Michael F. Easley
Governor
Sherri Evans-Stanton, Acting Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Wetlands/401 Unit [phone]
Fax [phone]
What Else
Subject: What Else
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:18:02 -0400
From: Steve Mitchell <[e-mail]>
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
01-0559 concerns over previous impacts..... This is OLD STAGE ROAD ?j?
GOLF COURSE, aka Eagle Ridge. Failed restoration area.etc. Road PLI "1
crossing needs to be moved up if in buffer around lake. Can not tell.
May be the case. RE-Zoning for project not granted by Garner
01-0555 Need to determine existing conditions so the new required r o
buffer around the new pond can be addressed.
01-0504 ISSUE road crossing is big but locatedin best place
01-0505 ISSUE but fill in lot 12 is a whole bunch )??V G f 12
01-0506 HOLD Two additional crossings state they are on
unimportant/intermittent. Has DWQ been to site to determine importance ??ll
or stream feature?
01-0386 Not wild about crossing on page EC3, not really parralell
need to calculate for the removal of the old channel where it was and /SSl/e--
the loss of it in the new non parallel straight channel and ask
for$$$$$.EC 4 xing is parallel. Have Todd check numbers on level
spreaders
01-0484 Something wrong with packet. Maps of location are not the I?11
same as the plat maps. Quad map states site on south side of SR2700.
Plat maps indicate to the north and off of SR2555
01-0656 Crossing is 220 feet of significant stream.... NEEDS $$$$$ KU
1 of 1 5/16/01 10:56.
0 1 0505
April 5, 2001
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Amanda Jones
2321 Crabtree Blvd. 6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Parkview Bid. Raleigh, NC 27615
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Nationwide Permit 14 & 39/401 Water Quality Certification/Buffer Compliance
Request
Smith Farms Site
Fuquay Varina, Wake County, North Carolina
(UTM Coordinates: Zone 17, 701400, 3941800) ?r
S&EC Project #: 00-5470 ' T r=n
rT-'
Dear Mr. Dorney and Ms. Jones:
On behalf of Tin, Inc., (property owner), we hereby request authorization from the US
Army Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permit 14 to cover permanent impacts to a
stream channel and wetland and Nationwide Permit 39 to cover permanent impact to a
wetland resulting from construction of the proposed Smith Farm development. We also
request confirmation from the NC Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project
complies with the 401 Water Quality Certification associated with NWP 14 and the
Neuse River Basin (NRB) buffer rules. A Pre-construction Notification Application
(PCN) is attached, which includes an agent authorization form.
The proposed project consists of construction of a residential subdivision. It is located
approximately 0.5 mile north of the intersection of Sunset Lake Road and US 401. The
property is approximately 20 acres in size and is about 225' west of Sunset Lake Road
(SR 1301). Please refer to the attached map (Figure 1) for the location of the proposed
project on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
S&EC delineated the wetlands and jurisdictional waters present on the subject property
on January 24 and 26, 2001. We request a USACE site meeting or office determination,
whichever is most convenient, to verify the delineation. Three paper copies and a digital
file of the wetland delineation map are enclosed. Wetland and upland data forms are also
Wetland Delineation/Permitting/Mitigation Soil/Sitc Evaluations On-Site Septic Systems Environmental Assessments/Audits
Neuse Basin and Watershed Buffer Evaluations Groundwater Hydrology Endangered Species
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
Western Branch Offices: [phone] - [phone] - [phone]
April 5, 2001
S&EC Project #: 00-5470
Page 2
attached. Please keep the digital file for your records and returned the signed paper
copies for the client's records. Mr. Charles Brown, of the NC-DWQ, conducted and on-
site determination on March 26, 2001, and his determinations are reflected on the
attached 3/27/01 "buffer subjectivity" letter.
A headwater forest wetland and an unnamed tributary to Terrible Creek divide the
property, making it necessary to impact this area to allow access to the property west of
the wetland and stream. In order to provide access to the western half of the property, the
applicant proposes to construct a road crossing (crossing 1) that will impact 0.2613 acre
of wetlands, 108 linear feet of a 3-foot-wide stream (324 sq. ft.), and 7, 983 square feet
(0.1833 acre) of riparian buffer (see impact map). An additional headwater forest
wetland is present west of the stream, on the northern boundary of the property, which
lies within the access road's proposed alignment. The applicant proposes to construct a
road crossing (crossing 2) that will impact 0.0474 acre of this wetland in order to provide
road access to the western half of the property (see impact map). The road alignment
through the northern half of the property is necessary to provide connectivity to the
subdivision's access corridor to Sunset Lake Road, which is on the northeast corner of
the property. The total cumulative impacts for this project consist of 0.3087 acre of
wetlands, 108 linear feet of stream channel, and 0.1833 acre of riparian buffer.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the thresholds for notification (0.10 acre) or if a discharge causes the loss of any
open waters. The applicant requested a detailed delineation of wetlands prior to site plan
development in order to avoid jurisdictional wetlands and waters to the maximum extent
practicable. However, a wetland and an unnamed tributary of Terrible Creek separate the
western and eastern portions of the property, making it necessary to construct a road
crossing (crossing 1) to provide road access to the western half of the site. A wetland
also falls within the subdivision's access road alignment, which was designed to provide
efficient connectivity to the site's access corridor to Sunset Lake Road. Though the
majority of this wetland will be avoided, construction of a road crossing (crossing 2) over
the southern tip of this wetland will also be necessary. To minimize impacts, both road
crossings are designed to be perpendicular to the wetlands and stream channel. In
addition, a portion of the headwater forest wetland impacted by crossing two is included
in a 0.19 acre open space which will not be impacted. S&EC does not believe
compensatory mitigation should be required by the USACE for this project.
NC-DWQ's current 401 Water Quality Certification policy requires written concurrence
for impacts to wetlands and stream channels associated with NWP 14. As noted above,
the proposed road crossings will impact less than 150 feet of stream channel and less than
1 acre of wetlands. Current NC-DWQ policy does not require wetland or stream channel
mitigation for impacts below 1 acre and 150 linear feet. Because the impacts associated
with this project do not exceed the aforementioned thresholds, S&EC believes wetland
and stream channel mitigation should not be required.
April 5, 2001
S&EC Project #: 00-5470
Page 3
As noted above, the stream on site is subject to the NRB riparian buffer rules. The
applicant proposes to construct a road crossing over this channel that will impact 108
linear feet of stream channel and 7,983 square feet (0.1833 acre) of riparian buffer.
Current NC-DWQ policy allows road crossing without mitigation if the impacts are less
than 150 linear feet of stream channel and less than 1/3 acre of riparian buffer. Because
the buffer impacts are within these thresholds, S&EC believes that riparian buffer
mitigation should not be required.
Sincerely,
Brad Suther
Wetland Scientist/Soil Scientist in Training
1
Kd (4
Sean Clark
Environmental Scientist
Enclosures:
Wetland and upland data forms (USACE copy only)
Wetland delineation survey (USACE copy only)
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Agent Authorization
Site Location Map (Figure 1)
Wetland & NRB Impact Maps (2 Sheets)
3/27/01 Buffer Subjectivity letter and map
DWQ ID:
Corps Action ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #): 14 & 39
Pre-Construction Notification Application
For Nationwide Permits that Require:
1) Notification to the Corps of Engineers
2) Application for Section 401 Certification
3) Coordination with the NC Division of Coastal Management
Send the original and (1) copy of this completed form to the appropriate field office of
the Corps of Engineers (see agency addresses sheet). Seven (7) copies should be sent to
the NC Division of Environmental Management (see agency addresses sheet). PLEASE
PRINT.
Owner's Name: Tin Inc.
2. Mailing Address: 130 Edinburgh Drive, Suite 102
Subdivision Name:
City: Cary State: NC Zip Code: 27511
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address
above): The subject property is approximately 20acres in size and is bounded to the
east by Sunset Lake Road (SR 1301. The property is approximately 0.5 mile north of
the intersection of Sunset Lake Road and US 401.
3) Telephone Number (Home): NA (Work): [phone]
4) If applicable, agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone
number:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc Phone: [phone]
11010 Raven Ridge Road Fax: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27614
5. Location of work (provide a map, preferable a copy of USGS topographic map or
aerial photograph with scale):
County: Wake Nearest town or city: Fuquay-Varina
Specific Location (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
See item #2
6. Impacted or nearest stream/ river: Unnamed tributary of Terrible Creek
River Basin: Neuse
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high quality
waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-I or WS-
II)? YES ? NO a If yes, explain:
7b. If the project is located within a North Carolina division of coastal management
area of environmental concern (AEC)? YES ? NO 0
7c. If the project is located within a coastal county (see page 7 for list of coastal
counties), what is the land use plan (LUP) designation?
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
YES ? NOD If yes, provide Action ID number of pervious permit and any
additional information (including photocopy of 401 certification).
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
YES ? NO El If yes, describe anticipated work: None known at this
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 20 acres
9b. Estimated total number of acres of wetlands located on project site: 1.812 acres
10a. Number of acres of wetlands* impacted by the proposed project by:
Filling: 0.3087 acres
Flooding:
Excavation:
Other:
Drainage: Total acres to be impacted: 0.3087* acres
*The acreage reported above includes stream channel impacts.
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated,
provide distance both before and after relocation):
Length before: 108 linear feet After: N/A
Width Before (based on normal high water contours): 3'
Width After: N/A
Average depth before: less than 5" After: N/A
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from: (check all that apply)
Open channel relocation: ? Placement of pipe in channel: [Z]
Channel Excavation: ? Construction of a Dam/Flooding: ?
Other:
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to
the pond? NA
What is the expected pond surface area? NA
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical
equipment to be used (attach plans 81/2" x 11" drawings only):
The project entails construction of a residential subdivision using_
conventional heavy equipment
13. Purpose of proposed work: The purpose of the project is to provide
approximately 49 residential lots with road service in southern Wake County.
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands
(include any measures taken to minimize wetland impacts): The applicant
requested a detailed delineation of wetlands prior to site plan development in
order to avoid jurisdictional wetlands to the maximum extent practicable.
However, wetlands and an unnamed tributary to Terrible Creek separate the
western half of the site from Sunset Lake Road, making it necessary to impact the
area with a road crossing to provide access to the property. An additional wetland
is present west of the stream, on the northern boundary of the property. The
lid 'cant proposes to impact this wetland with a road crossing in order to provide
road access to the western half of the property. This road alignment is necessary
in order to provide connectivity to the subdivision's access corridor to Sunset Lake
Road, which is on the northeastern corner of the property. Road crossings will be
perpendicular to wetlands and stream channels.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (see agency addresses sheet) regarding
the presence of any federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or
threatened species or critical habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the
proposed project. Date contacted: (attach responses from these agencies).
To be performed by USACE
16. You are required to contact the state historic preservation officer (SHPO) (see
agency address sheet) regarding the presence of historic properties in the permit
area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date contacted:
To be performed by USACE
17. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (state)
land?
YES ? NO 1] If no, go to 18.
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document
pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act?
YES ? NO ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina
Department of Administration State Clearinghouse?
YES ? NO ?
If answer to 17b is YES, then submit appropriate documentation from the state
clearinghouse to division of environmental management regarding compliance
with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Questions regarding the State Clearinghouse review process should be directed to
Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director State Clearinghouse, North Carolina Department of
Administration, 116 West Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003,
telephone [phone].
18. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity
involves the discharge of excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on
the property (for Nationwide Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 29, 38 and 39). All
streams (intermittent and permanent) on the property must be shown on the
map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50 feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or
their equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant
to the placement of the delineation line. Included
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan, if required.
e. What is land used of surrounding property? Residential & Agricultural
If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal?
municipal sewer
g. Signed and dated agent authorization letter, if applicable. Attached
NOTE: Wetlands or Waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1. Issuance of a Section 404 Corps of Engineers Permit,
2. Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental
Management (Water Quality) certification, and
3. (in the twenty coastal counties only) A letter from the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management stating the proposed activity is consistent
with the North Carolina Coastal Management program.
Owner' gent s Signature at
[Agent's signature valid only if Agent Authorization Letter from the owner is provided
(18 g.0)]

Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Pax: (919) 846454-5;
Web Page, www,SandEC.COM
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled in B The Current Landowner
Name: I 1 I? 4 `???
A(I dress: 11') i V -h 12. god.
Phone: _+ a Project Name/ Description: M I P, tZ,
Date: Q ?
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box
Wilmington, NC 284x2
Attn: Amanda ones
Field Office: R&eli
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1, the current property owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. to
act in 1ny behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request-
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The , I s _ day of
_q 1 - 0
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Print Property Owner's Name
cc: Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR -- DWQ, Water Quality Planning
Prope Owner's Signature
M. Mr. Kevin Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc .
.-?:s J s
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607 blank agent auth form-doe
Wetland Delinea N?c 13it6nottWate?hed Buffersl?va1 8etlonsons Groundwater Ttydrology ms EndFnvironmental angered Sped a ssessments/Audits
Western Branch Offiic- [phone] • [phone] • [phone]
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
FUQUAY-VARINA QUADRANGLE yry?????
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
°37'30"
000
00 W *1
N
J?la?yr,/?' \
Qk-
L :
?O F ? F
n a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Reso?rcf-? -
,
Raleigh Regional Offic
Michael F. Easley, Govern
William G. Ross, Secretar
Mr. Sean Clark
S&EC,Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
MAR 2 9 ZOM
4 ?f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 27, 2001
Subject: Neuse River Basin
Riparian Buffer Rules
NBRRO 01-098
S&EC Project No. 00-5470
T.I.N. Property
Wake County
Dear Mr. Clark:
On March 26, 2001, I conducted a site visit of the feature involved in the above referenced
project. It was determined as a result of the site visit that the channel present on the property is
subject to the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy; Protection and
Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:02B.0233 (NCAC 0233). The'
approximate start of the channels are indicated on the attached map. The chaimel is an unamed
tributary of Terrible Creek.
This office has assigned the reference number of NBRRO 01-098 to this project. Thank you
for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be of any assistance or if you have any
additional questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 571-4700 ext. 237.
Xaarr * own
Environment al Specialist
cc: John Dorney, DWQ
\neusbuf. let\nbr01098.1et
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
- i 7
Soll & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]\' i
r,mject: T.I.N. Property. S&EC Project No. 00-5470 3hh.4
?` 38h\
Preliminary Wetland Approximation
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only \_\
SNEC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork,
surveyed delineations and any other additional information. \ 3s4.t
Approximations were mapped using topographic maps and ground truthing.
If these areas are to be used, they must be approved and
Permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. _

304.2
393.7

398.1
_ , \\,
;
RAI.
i •
I?
384.0 %
378.2
I 374.1
JB]S ? I
3B1A ' \
?? 7r yo
381
4 \
LEGEND:
• ?= WATERS OF THE U.S. SUBJECT TO THE NEUSE RIVER 50 ft. BUFFERS [i.e., intermittent
streams; must be confirmed by the USACE and DWQ]
J
= JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS [must be confirmed by the USAGE]
I-T- = TIE TO
L =PROPERTY LINE jj&q" 0 47 it
= BOUNDARY OF EVALUATED AREA

O 388.1
V)
l? N
? eo
38].2
0
Q e
394.2 ? ? to
I
, L,
400.7
Apo-
0
11:26
JAN 26, 2001

? N 00' QJI' CJI" W '?hh.fY`Y' N C7Z' II'

O
f0
\ \ \ I _
2115
J
\ l
1??

zzz
7?
N
Qrn

/ n I ;.
.

I ? / ? ' // ?'' ? _ ///? ? it '? •?'. .
O n
y
? N y

?`9(bJ?NAV?N- rn
i
u
NNNNNN N ron? 1??
rnrn rnrnrn
-vtmpnmD 9 ? NDi ?g
rn
6 P. g
n -?1 N a ?v
? ? @ ?NNgAT?N
?? DD
g? god D
1
MR r; 7;, iTH>
<?
i
i
A
ale
N I cif^? ? / lam,
L.IO
?, I I I I ? v i IO
,I-- J L----1 L__J L__J L_J
a
a
6
I °?I
_f
I I
II
Ihs.n2' ` '?
? 4N jJ
1 ?? I
L_.J
I f n I
O A
I I, N
LJ u
Iv
71
-L__J
F__]
I ? I
L_-J
Lf -? -
\ 00 N b N 7 ZN Z
D
?

A C
C
¦
O
Q ? N
i
~ m
z

? a

N
z z
N
a Q?
? -------__--51JN5Fi'LAKEtz0At7 -----
ITI --
s? 1
0 ozz?Z6?
70p 1OmOC? ? D
$ N
0 Rt

cONI-N
I
?
N ?U
?CI
?I UNQQ??

i
$
SMI? N ?AI2MS
_ JONES a
106 W. CHATHAM $T.
P. O. Box 1062 062
_ _ CNO8SEN Arlx, NC 27502
W ENGINEERING, PLLC [phone]
y
9
Y
R

S I I? I an

LAND DiviLO?noNT CNYINaIRINO• PLANNING 6 MANAGNMONT

PAX: [phone]
Slr~ f~/-~rA
N01~5
SN~~1' # 1'111~~ ~ r, ~ M
1130UNI~AI:Y IN~OI:MA1"ION ~pDM A MAp 13 A MAf~ 13Y ~LING13UpG LANb ~'O~'AI, AI?~A - 19,~~ AC1~~S a M
I 511 PLAN SUpV~YING bA1~1~ OCT013~p 17, 2000, ENO I 00~ ~pIVA~ I~Af~K A~'~A - 0,19 ACI~~S a,o N ~
2 U1'1L1'f"Y PLAN 2, 1'OpOG~NIC IN~Or;MA1"ION ~pOM WAKE _ ~ 00 ~M WAKE COUNTY GIS. l o ~ n
3 51'Of?M b~:AINAG~ ANb ~I~OSION CONII~OL PLAN 3, ,ql.-L CON511:UC1'ION ANb MA1~pIALS SNAI A~/~ ~Or SIZE I 500 5~ ~ - a _ ~ ALS SHALL CON~Of'M 1"O TOWN O~ a i~
112 1' A ~ ~ ~ ~UQUAY-VApINA 51"ANbAp1~5 ANb Sp~CI~ICA1 MIN, ~Or 51Z~ 10,000 5~ = x ~CI~ICA1'IONS, ~ 0+
w 5 5112~~1'S A, l3, ANb C ACCESS 1'O SUN5~1' ~AK~ pOAb pip AGf:~ ~ _ ~ 0 00 - ~p AGf:~~M~N~' WITH WITH MApY rOrA~ NO, LC)r5 ~9 , m Z p+ M
Y 6 51T:~~1'S b, ANb ~ I ~ JOHNSON, OL V
7 OU11%ALL A 5 , I01'S 23 ANn 25 WIUL N01" NAVE t~121V~1 I~IN~A~ ~~~r O~ Sr12~~r5 = 2 9~5 3 ' o o~ ~ n{21V~WAY ACC~55 ON 5T12~~1' A, ~ _ w _ x
SITE ~ w 8 OUT~AL~ A, 6, ANb SUN5~1' LAKE pOAI~ 6 , 5112~~1' A SHALL NAVE 511~~WALK ON ONE f~IN 0~~~,0~}--5~-8~9q- C I~Af?rlAl,~ ~ , ~ a ON ONE Sips, SII~~WALK ~LS~WN~p~ o Q
~ 9 CON5~1?UC1'ION b~1"AIUS ZONING - f?-10 C,U, - ~ ~
z I S Op1'I ONAL . ~ 10 ~pOSIDN CONI~OL b~1'AIIS 7, TNT pt;IVA1~ pAF:K SNAI..I OWN~b ANA
~I~p ANp MAINT"AIN~p f3Y TNT NOME
- OWN~pS ASSOCIAI"IDN,
8. CONTP~..AC1"Ot2/ n~V~LOp~p SNAIL SCN~C ,L SCN~pUL~ A pp~-CONSTpUC1'ION u
CON~~p~NC~ WI1'I-f ~I-i~ TOWN O~ ~UQUAY-V, ,IQUAY-VAf?INA f~plOf2 r0 z S~r13ACK5 J W
CON51lUC1"ION , J E
TI2 1' NAMES 9, ~L~C11?ICAI S~pVIC~ LINES ANb ALL 011-11 oPO 5 ~ ~ ALL OTN~?? UT1L11'1~5 SNOULp 13~ a, W
RP~~R 13Uf?I~n, ~~oNr - ~o a
,ERN 10, ppOp~f2TY OWN~f;; 1"IN, INC, o~~ 511~~~~' A 51"ON~ LION bplV~ ~ z SI1~~ 8 a
S qp1 130 ~I~IN13UpGN, SU11~ o~~ W~, 5`I~?~~T 6 ~Op~ST 13~ppY COUp1" 'GN, SUITS 102 _ I Z F p~Al~ 20 _
pRF S. N CA12Y, NC 2751 I N ~ 51"P~~1" C AUGU51' MOON COUp1' 51 I _ ~ dS
\ p1' < 919 ~F68-0620 51~~~1' b AZALEA SppINGS COU cO~N~K~ 18 0620 W
I I . SUpV~YOt?; ~LINGI3UpG LAN1~ SUI'V~Y CO c~ I'V~Y CO,, p,A, W z
5112~~1' ~ GOL1~~N 13LU~~ LAND 108 W, CNA11-IAM 51~?~~1' Z Z z
SfiP~~T ~ 51"Af21~U51' COUI?1" Ap~X, NC 27502 W z ~N_ a
C 919> 303-5371 J N a
N Z 0
W W Z
Z z U ~
0 W
~ ~ W Z_
~ ~ ~ \ Z
N/ ~ ~ ~ ~ W I I
SM1~1-~ pf?O~'~I?'I'Y I~O~' 2 ~ 0 N 1 I
~ ~ ZONING ~?-20 N/ ~ Z I I w
~ ~ ~ E JOHNSON pf~Op~~:~1'Y I I d
i i o ZONING f?-20 ~
1 W ~ ~
I I i W
1 I I oI o
I I I I o I Z
I 588 ° ~ ~ I ~I ICI a
- 42 I3 ~ ..1441,50' 1 J I I
5 88', 42' 13" ~ 18 I Z I 4 ,08 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ pI:IVA`f~ At~K N ~ I- ~ I~~ ~ I I z
50' p/ 0,19 ac ~ ~l 9' 6-
o ~ . ~3 ~9 0 I o~
~6 ~5 ~8 ~2 10,354 sq.ft. 10,198 sq.ft. 10,266 sq.ft. I I ~ I I
10,105 sq.ft. ~ , I 10,248 sq.k, 10,105 sq.ft. 10,784 sq.ft. ~~r ~i~ w ~~,r ct~ ~ U
_ 10,926 sq.ft. ~ ~ J ~.r.- - ~ ~ _ ~.J II II / L-~ ~ L. I I I c No Gurr~r`> / io~ n~N ~~M~Nr N 88 ° 42 13 W 183,04' I I _ - - ~
N ~ - - s~Gti~~
0 ci ~ cr~~ - ;r~~~ - - ~ I I _ _ _ ~ I I
~ ~ io~ - -
ar~~~ e;, 10,2 sq.ft. r I I 18
`9 ~a 1 3 `.19 17 I _ i
16 818 s .ft. ~ . . q I~ ~ ti ~ ~ 21,334 sq.ft. 21,334 sq.ft. 10172 s .ft. I I ' q 10,908 sq.ft. gX5-
_ ~ p
~ 20 ' I I -
= 20' LANC75C~'f= ~A~.M,EI I' \ ~ ~I
a ~ ~ ~ - - ~ 21 I 2,
T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~6 I I
~ \ 15,830 sq.ft. rX5r1G 10_062 ~q.ft. - ~1(~511~1'G - ~/V.' p~
z 23 1o,o3a sq,ft. 3~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ W
f- - ,,,224 sq:ft. > 22 ~ 10,238 sq.fi. 10,104 sq.ft. ~ / W~11..AN ~ 16 N ~ / - ~
/ 19,839 sq.ft. ~ TYl'' , ~ 1 l- 13,320 sq.ft, JOHNSON ppO~~f?'I'Y
25 / ~ l So ~ r2i N
/ ~ ~ / ~ 17,644 sq.ft. - - - 9' b- a ZONING p-20 -
V / ~ 3~ a
~ 50' >z/ / / ` b~ 10,057 sq.ft. 9 b- / ~ . . ~ 10,191 sq.ft. 1f~
9 - ~ 13 ~ / ~ ~ - 13
2~ / o 0 ~ 21,900,, q.ft. 15 21,900,sq.ft.
33 V / 26 ~ ~ / ,,,696 sq.k. / ~ . ~ ~ 12,769 sq.ft. I11
10,168 sq.k. 11,384 sq.ft. ~ ~ 11.E - -
~ ~ , - ~8 / i
~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ 10,191 sq t
10,043 s .it, ~ \ / ~ ~ - -
t~ IZ \ ~ ~ ~ - -
12,234 sq.ft.
~ 32 27,502 sq.ft. / r
- 27 - 12,487 sq.ft.
~ uru~r; 39 / - - - - - ~VE;~Of'M~N1" 15,016 sq.ft. 50' fZAt~, 50' f~,
/ O' boc C 0,39 ACS / - - - - ~O'-boc ~ typlcal~ 10,191 scL.ft. [Q
O 10,326 sq.fi. ~ ~ C typlcal~ / ~ / L
~I ~ \ 0 ~ ~ Srl2~ ~ r C - ~
n / _ \ / ~ ~ J ~ 16,068 sq.ft. ~ ~
1' v / z ~ 30 z - ~0 / / / ~ s i ,Q
~I 28 / 29 / ~ 11,773 sq.ft. 34,642 sq.ft. 3
10 822 s .ft. 13,276 sq.k. 16 41 .f . / q 11,135 s .ft. ,6 sq t / 6 ~ 3
Q q / e~` / z / 10,191 sq.ft. ~
~ - ---.1 0
/ 10 ~ / ~ ~ 10 - 9 8 -
r 5,670 sq.ft. 4-
5 88 ° 59' S0~-176 ,3~ _ N 87 ° 582" V~/ 30 ,85 ' ~ / 15,670 sq.ft. / N / / 10,261 sq.ft. 10,117 sq.f . 1
84 ° 18' 03' ~ _ w 3 1 .f. 500° ' Ila I . - - - - 10, 64 sq t 42 I5 W I 60 Kf3J
, - - - L~ , ~p - - - - 40,01
~~f? ZONING LINE
A12~A 1~~ i3~ p~1`AIN~b 62° I I ' 00" ~ 23,63' S 9 ~f~I.1P~'Y 9, 2001 590,82'
f3Y S~LL~12 N88 ° 42 13 ' W '
~XI511NG SOIL I~f21V~ C typ~cal> ACAS, ~roACrs. Ane 02/ 2f/ OI NOTES & SIRCCT NAME5
STY~ET NAMES ANI7 Ol/09/01 ~A~ELING
05/ IB/ OI ~EVISEJ LAYOl7f
0 30 60 120
N/ ~
/V/l.UI.I\ I I\tJI L- I-- I 1 \
ZONING p-20 77tm=
GENIC SCALD
993~F