20010438 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20010323

w
O?OF AT F9Q
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
April 19, 2001
DWQ# 01-0438
Wake County
Roe O'Donnell
Town of Wake Forest
401 Elm Avenue
Wake Forest, NC, 27587
APPROVAL of 401 Water Duality Certification and Neuse Buffer Rules
Dear Mr. O'Donnell:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to construct the Richland Creek Interceptor
sewerline in Wake County, as described in application materials received by the Division of Water Quality on March 23,
2001. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this work is covered by General Water Quality Certification
Number 3288, which can be downloaded from our web site at htti)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands . This Certification
allows to use Nationwide Permit Number 12 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. This approval is also valid for the Neuse
Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .033). In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead
with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge, State
Stormwater and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit
expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is
sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying
with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in
the attached certification.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh,
N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Attachment
Sincerely,
1
Ste
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Tom Beebe, 6729 Falls of the Neuse Road, Raleigh, NC, 27615
010438
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
non -0 47OC 1..4.......\ non BOO CO- //....\ -- ll{.n.. ........... .... .... /.........,N..-A-I
DEM ID:
CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #) _.
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE.,:
010438.
I) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE. APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
(SEI AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: (Easement Owner)
2. MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: Wake Forest
Town of Wake Forest
401 Elm Avenue
SUBDIVISION NAME: N/A
STATE: North Carolina 'LIP CODE: 27587
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): Replacement of an existing sewer line within the existing seweline
right-of=way in Wake Forest, North Carolina.
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME): (WORK):
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PITONS NUMBER:
Roe O'Donnell Phone Number: [phone]
Town of Wake Forest
401 Elm Avenue
Wake Forest, NC 27587
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Wake NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Wake Forest
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
The project is located in northern Wake Count in the town of Wake Forest east of US HigIn ay I and
north of West Stadium Drive. See Figure 1.
r
r?
DEM ID: CORPS ACTION ID:
NA"TIONWIDI? PI:RMff RI?QUI?S'1'1?U (PROVIDE? NATIONWIDE: III'ItMIT #)
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NO'T'IFICATION APPLICA'T'ION
FOR NA'I'IONWIDP, PERMI'CS'I'HA'I- REQUIRE':
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF F,NGINF,ERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH TIIE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL, MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO TILE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF TI IE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO TILE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAI, MANAGEMENT
(SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME,: (Easement Owner) Town of Wake Forest
2. MAILING ADDRESS: 401 Elm Avenue
CITY: Wake Forest
SUBDIVISION NAME: N/A
STATE: North Carolina ZIP CODE: 27587
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE?): Replacement of a Sewer line in Wake Forest, North Carolina.
3. TELEPHONF NUM 13F.R (IIOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE?: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE' OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
Tom Beebe
"fillet Development Company, Inc.
6729 Falls of the Neuse Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Wake NI:ARES'I "I'OWN OR CITY: Wake Forest
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, FTC.):
The project is located in northern Wake County in the town of Wake, Forest east of US Hig hway I and
north of West Stadium Drive. See Figure 1.
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Richland Creek
RIVER 13ASIN: Neuse
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER (SA),
HIGII QUALITY WATERS (IIQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER
SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [ ] NO [XI IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL,
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES [ ] NO [X ]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF
COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION? N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ANY ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [ X ] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: 3.63 Ac
9b. ESTIMATED "TOTAL, NUM13ER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
0.41 Ac
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: EXCAVATION: 0.41
FLOODING: OTI I ER:
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0.41
I Ob. (1) STREAM Cl IANNEL TO 13E IMPACTED BY -1.1IE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE 80771B FORE ANT) AFTER RELOCAT 101):
LENGTH BEFORE;: N/A FT AFTER: N/A FT
WIDTII BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): N/A FT
WIDTI I AFTER: N/A
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: N/A FT AFTER: N/A FT
(2) STREAM _ Cl IANNEI(MPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
2
UPEN CI IANNI?.L RI?LO('A1'ION: N/A PLACEMENT OF PIPI? IN CI IANNFL: N/A-
CI IANNFL EXCAVATION: N/A CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING: _N/A
OTHER: Placement of 10 inch aerial sewer line across one channel near Ilarris Road and under one
Channel near Stadium Drive. The channel near Stadium Drive will be directional drilled, while the
channel at Harris Road will be an aerial crossing. The other two channels depicted on the site map will be
avoided by the construction.
H. II- CONS"I'RUC"PION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHA"f IS '1'I IF S17,F, OF 1'1IF, WA1'ERSIIEI)
DRAINING TOP TIIE POND? N/A
WIIAT lS TI IE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? N/A
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECI IANICAL EQUIPMENT TO 13F USED (A"I"1'ACII PI,ANS: 81/2" X 1 I" DRAWINGS ONLY):
Mechanical equipment to be used will include trenching devises to excavate a trench to have a 10" sewer line
placed in the bottom of the trench. The trench will be backfilled with the side castings from the original
excavation. The disturbance will be graded and returned to its prcconstruction contours. No other fill material
will be brought in from offsite and placed in the wetlands. See Figures 2 and 3.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: The purpose of the proposed work is to upgrade existing
sanitary sewer service to the Town of Wake Forest by installing a new 10" sewer line in the existing
easement to replace the existing sewer line.
14. S'I'A'I'E REASONS WI IY I'I' IS 13ELIEVED TIIA'I''I'IIIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OU1'
IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKF,N TO MINIMIZE' WETLAND IMPACT'S):
Approximately 7,817 feet of new 10" sewer line will be placed adjacent to the existing 6" sewer line in the
existing easement. The new sewer line will upgrade the sanitary sewer services for the Town of Wake
Forest. The wetland impacts will be temporary consisting of excavation and side casting. The trench will
be backlilled with the side casting from the new trench. The disturbance will be graded and returned to its
preconstruction contours. 'T'hese impacts are only temporary, wetlands will be allowed to revegetate
naturally alicr the new sewer line is constructed.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT TIIF U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICF, (USFWS)
AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICF, (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES
SHIFT) REGARDING TI IE PRESENCF OF ANY FEDFRALLY LISTED OR PROPOSFI) FOR
OR '1'I IRl;A'1'ENIU SPIC11?S OR CRIT[CAI, HAI3I'fA'I' IN "f II1; PERMIT
LISTING ENDANGFRED
AREA THA'I' MAY 13F AFFICI'FD 13Y TIIF, PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED:
(ATTACH RESPONSES FROM TIIFSF AGENCILS.)
NO'T'E: CORPS NOW INDICATES THIS ACTION NOT REQUIRED)
16. YOI.J ARE. REQUIRF.D'I'O CON'['ACT"fill S'rA"TL', IIIS"I'ORIC PRBSI,,RVA"PION OFI?ICER
(SIIPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE? OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIFS IN'TIIF' PFRMTT ARFA WHICH MAY RI? AFFFCII?D RY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED:
3
NO'T'E,: CORPS NOW INDICATES THIS ACTION NOT REQUIRED
17. DOES THE. PROJECTINVOLVE AN I?XPI?NDI'I'URI? OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR'THE USE OF
PuBI.TC (STATE) LAND?
YES [ X ] NO [ ] (Municipality Funding) (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANTTO THE REQUIREMENTS OF TIIE. NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT'?
YES [ ] NO [XI
b. IF YES, HAS TIIE, DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED TIIROUGH TIIE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [ ] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE. CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL, MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE, NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SIIOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGI IOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTII CAROLINA 27603-8003, TFLEPIIONI? [phone].
18. THE FOLLOWING I'T'EMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES TI IF, DISCI LARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WF.I'LANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAI' SHOWING ALL WI?T'LANDS, STEAMS, LAKES AND
PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, AND 38).
ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN
ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE. 11NCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR I INCH EQUALS 100
FT OR THF,IR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESI?NTA'TIVE PHO'[-OGRAPII OF WETLANDS'1'O BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
c. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALI, DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO TI IE PLACEMENT OF TI IE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF'TTII: STORMWATER MANAGFMI?NT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WI IA"I' IS TIIE LAND IJSI,,OP SURROUNDING I']ZOPI:R'I'Y?
40% of the land use of the surrounding property is a golf course, 40% of the land use is imatural
vegetation, while remaining 20% is urban disturbed.
IF APPLICABLE, WI IAT IS PROPOSED MF TIIOD OFSF.WAGI? DISPOSAL,?
Sanitary Sewer
4
Sanitary Sewer
g. SIGNED AND DA'ril) AGENT AUTIIORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT RE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER TILE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND,
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE NORTH
CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVI'T'Y IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
- A rj'-"j
OWNF,R'S/AGENT'S SIGNA'T'URE
Zooll © 3/ZD
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION I+'XI'ER FROM
'I'll E OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
_5
0
N
O co
7
`

??
klD

R9 Y
?

yNj
'S n

9
N y W
CD

N ?"U
1 r bp o N

b 311
3a3nv Sb61 '1S DN t
0
N
a
a,

h
? Zo a
oy
? 13`
?
O ?a? Qw
? RT Q
N
Q9'

V) 3?j'>I?
A
6} RfLl
9
Z

'aA f ? C
O

Ate. cti
L U

1f?r
?lry
? O c
Q
?
'?• 7 J
FORESTVIIIE RD. a) 0
V Z

+?
1932
is 3t?
H^
6bOZ Q
Rf a) '
? - ?

? .S m U

^ LIGON 0..O CFJ

1925 Z
hl? J
a
r
?y?l
•

baO
J
C
U N
1pq(SON RD ,
J` ? cc O
11_

b ?q' Pd
ti ?
co
0
a%
+
b26 t • tiA yes
aa ruN
rtb NI INS an% ,?
?6
44s o?
l
j
2261 POO.

df ??
y
6f
vy 41 St-1 2261

u
y p

m p v;
it
Y
?u c
J N W (?
fC
N U
U?
o
En
No 4FS:
IIIF ONLY WFTI.ANUS' DISIURHANC- I`) IN ARFA °I A"
I.i' AVG UEPTII X 4' TRENCH WII)TII X 86`> FI -. 2.'050 CE = 961 +/ CY DISTURBANCE
- - \\\\//\\//?
18" SANITARY SEWFR DIP -
4'
WIUTI I

7.5' AVG DEPTFI
?
,
T1l?
?.? 1}}1 !?I ?? (
I?,1
I.(-(!k 111, eA c
1) P r
Ih

II\?
lnter Civil Technolo 1 s PLLC

P
x o
Wnkc County
NC t
,
, \ j 6729 F.n..r me new.. Im.a
too

- a.lelLn. North ar.un. 27615
; z

?? n -

Z
- - ----- ? __ -_. _ ,-
_ - -- - - - - _._ - - - --_.. __.--- _. ___ -
- - -
Wnkc Forest Tuwnahip, Wakc County. Nnltn Car.lmn
I..nd SuneyinL •nd
1'Irll Fn LlneerinL Tn•liuoloLle.
[phone]
[phone] F..
Second?w Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Weak Moderate strong
Absent
1. Geornorpttotogy
1) Is There A Head Cut Present 0.5
In Channel?
2) Is There A Grade Control r 0.5
Point in Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate A 0.5
Natural Drainage Way? 0tP
_ _ Hnt .MICAL
II. Hydrology
1) is This Year's (or Last's)
Leaflitter Present Inn Channel?
2) Is Sediment On Plants (or
Debris) Present?
3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
4) Is Water in Channel And >`
hrs Since Last Known Rain?
5) is There Water In Channel
During Dry Conditions (or in
Growing Season)?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present L
cm r,f rhannel or Headcut?
111. Biology
1) Are Fis'
2) Are An
3) Are Aq
4) Are Cr
" A- AAM:
GEOMOL
Ahcent
1 1.5
L 1.5
a
TORTO Op?INI
Moderate
Weak
1.5
- 1.5 -.. ..l
0
0
0 0.5
Note: If Ditch Indicated in
0.5
Absent
nt?
0 -'
05 --?
1 1.5
1 - 1.5
1.5
99 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below
1 1.5
es=1.5 No
:AL INDICATOR POINTS: 2,
Weak Moderate Stron
.5 1 1.5
.5 1 1.5
5 1 1.5
.5 1 1.5
5 1 1.5
'Note: If Total Absence of All rtanu 1 .75 D
in Streambed As noted above skip this Z
step UNLESS SAV Present*
SECONDARY BIOLOGICAL INDICATOR PINTS: y
TOTAL SECONDARY INDICATOR POINTS: _
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= -21-
(If Greater Than or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is
At Least Intermittent)
\\NT SERVER\SYS\ADMr"A'1 'PNCDWQ Stream Classification Form.doc
r
s YE
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name- AF"4 " ""it River Basin: 10ru5L . County: W c, kc Evaluator: r'St
DWQ Project No.: Newest Named Stream: Ae'41,,0e"`/cLatitude: Signature:
Date: USGS Quad: wc- ke ?fe s ?_ Longitude: Location/Direction: 5, v F G?/rt Ae le
'PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature Is a man-made ditch, then the use of this form is not
necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator , the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural
stream-this rating system should not be used' .
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate
1) Is there a Riffle-Pool
2 3
Sequence? 0 ,
2) Is the USDA Texture in
Streambed Different From
3
Surrounding Terrain? 0 1
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 1 2 3
4) Is the Channel Sinuous? 0 2 3
5) Is There Active (or Relic))
Floodplain Present? 0
0
2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits
Present? 0 2 3
8) Is There a Bankfull Bench? 0 UL "l j
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank
Present? 0 I ?? 3
'Note: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And W/O Sinuosity Then
Score =0'
10) Is A 2" Order or Greater
Channel (As Indicated on USGS
and/or In Field) Present? Yes=3 Noo
PRIMARY GEOMORPHO
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/ Discharge Present? 0 (2) 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present in 2 1 0
the Streambed?
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In 2 1 0
the Streambed?
3) Is Periphyton Presentl
4) Are Bivalves Present?
ICATOR POINTS: :-
TOTAL PRIMARY INDICATOR POINTS:
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present
In Channel? - r3t) 0.5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control
Point in Channel? 0 0.5 t 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 0.5 1.5
1UK rU1Pf1J:
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (or Last's)
Leaflitter Present Inn Channel? -1.5 m 0.5 0
IN rc Co.tt.ne..? ll.. DI-#. f-
Debris) Present? 0 <:Dp 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0.5 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48
hrs Since Last Known Rain? 0 0.5 1
Note: If Ditch Indicated in #9 Above Skip This Step And 95 Below
5) Is There Water In Channel
During Dry Conditions (or to 0.5 1 1.5
Growing Season)?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Yes=1.5 0-
Sides of Channel or Headcut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGICAL INDICATOR POINTS:
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Stro
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 S 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing
Bacteria/Fungus Present? Q
(351 1
1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? .5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants in Sreambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly UPI,
'Note: If Total Absence of All Plants
in Streambed As noted above skip this 2 1 .75 .5 0
step UNLESS SAV Present*
SECONDARY BIOLOGICAL INDICATOR PINTS:
TOTAL SECONDARY INDICATOR POINTS: _ 7
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= _ 3 I
(If Greater Than or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is
At Least Intermittent)
\\NT SERVER\SYS\ADMTN\MATPNCDWQ Stream Classification Forrn.doe
5 `I C-
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: kxl River Basin: /VeW e- County: t44?- Evaluator: CI
DWQ ProjectNo.: Nearest Named Stream: &4,4 ,N(11(kUtitude: Signature:
SGS uad: r Longitude: Location/Directy t n? S&J 4 S(z iqz
Date: tj I -pD U Q Walre ro e4
'PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then the use of this form is not MAP.4--MA rZe
necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator , the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural
stream-this rating system should not be used'
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate
1) Is there a Riffle-Pool
1
Sequence? 0 2
2) Is the USDA Texture in
Streambed Different From _
lain Present?
Present? 0 I 3
8) Is There a Bankfull Bench? 0 1 2
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank
Present? 0 1 2
ote: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And W/U 5mu
Score =0'
10) Is A 2" Order or Greater
Channel (As Indicated on USGS
and/or In Field) Present? Yes=3 10???
Y GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/ Discharge Present? 0 0 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: /
TOTAL PRIMARY INDICATOR POINTS:
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present in 2 1 0
the Streambed?
2) Are Rooted Plants Present in 3 2 1 0
the ctrP%mherl?
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Absent Weak Moderate
I. Geomorpnotogy
1) Is There A Head Cut Present
In Channel?
2) Is There A Grade Control
Point in Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate A 0
Natural Drainage Way?
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
1 1.5
ICAL INDICATOR POINTS: O.

Weak Moderate - Strong
Absent
IL Hydrology
1) Is This Year's or Last's) 0
Leaflitter Present Inn Channel? 1.5
2) Is Sediment On Plants (or 1 1.5
Debris) Present? 0
0 0.5 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 0 5 1.5
hrs Since Last Known Rain? 0
Note: If Ditch Indicated in #9 Above Skip This Step And 05 Below
5) Is There Water in Channel C 0.5 1 1.5
During Dry Conditions (or in
Growing Season)?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in yes=1.5 0
.
Sides of Channel or Headcut?
ROLOGICAL INDICATOR POINTS:
SECONDARY D
HY
III. Biology
Are
5) Are t
6) Are
Bacteria
Absent Weak Moderate titron
.5 I 1.5
.5 I 1.5
5 I 1.5
.5 1 1.5
0 Q I I.5
41-3 1.5
TOTAL SECONDARY INDICATOR POINTS:
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)=--
(If Greater Than or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is
At Least Intermittent)
\\NT SERVER\SYS\ADMf,MATTNCDWQ Stream Classification Form.doc
Strong
01- .. ........- - -----
'Note: If Total Absence of All Plants 1 75 5 0
in Streambed As noted above skip this 2
step UNLESS SAV Present*
SECONDARY BIOLOGICAL INDICATOR PINTS: 1_____
sY13
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: R,th?,,,,?( f rrtk River Basin: yrKS L County: W a kd- Evaluator: F?
DWQ Project No.: 'rr'IIOr Nearest Named Stream: ti(Almd (r.rk Latitude: Signature:
Date: 61-16-c9e USGS Quad: WAVe, Q p'F Longitude: Location/Direct on: N W ffN?* la3
'PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature Is a man-made ditch, then the use of this form Is not
necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural
stream-this rating system should not be used'
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorpbology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is there a Riffle-Pool
Sequence? 0 6 2 3 '
2) Is the USDA Texture in
Streambed Different From
Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 67' 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 1 2 3
4) Is the Channel Sinuous? 1 2 3
5) Is There Active (or Relic))
Floodplain Present? 0 Q 2 3
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0y 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits
Present? () 1 2 3
8) Is There a Bankfull Bench? 0 1 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank
Present? 0 1 l 3
'Note: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And W/O Sinuosity Then
Score =0'
10) Is A 2" Order or Greater
Channel (As Indicated on USGS
and/or In Field) Present? Yes=3 NqO?
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/ Discharge Present? 0 1 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present in 3 2 1 0
the Streambed?
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In 2 1 0
the Streambed?
3) Is Perivhvton Present? 0 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? R 1 2 3
P
R POINTS:
TOTAL PRIMARY INDICATOR POINTS: ??
(Circle One Number Per Line)
ary Field Indicators:
Second
Ahcent Weak Moderate
I. Geomorpnolov
1) is There A Head Cut Present 0 5 1 1.5
In Channel? 0
2) Is There A Grade Control r 0.5 i 1.5
0
Point in Channel? 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A „ 0 0.5 1
Natural Drainage Way?
SEC01?MARY GEOMORPHOLOGICAL iNDICATOR,PO?TS:
• ?
g
Absent Wear Moderate Stron
II. Hydrology -.
1) Is This Year's (or Last's) I 0 5 0
1.
Leaflitter Present Inn Channel?
2) Is Sediment On Plants (or 0 0.5 I 1.5
0 5 i 1.5
Debris) Present? 0
3) Are Wrack Lines Present?
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 0.5 10 1.5
hrs Since Last Known Rain? 0
Note: If Ditch Indicated in #9 Above Skip is Step And #5 Below 11 5) Is'There Water In Channel ? - 0.5 1 1.5
During Dry Conditions (or in
Growing Season)? Yes=1.5 No=O
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in
Sides of Channel or Headcut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGICAL INDICATOR POINTS:
Weak Moderate Strong
III. Biology Absent •5 I I.5
1) Are Fish Present? 0
2) Are Amp 5 1 l.5
hibians Present? o I 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? .5 5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 1.5
6) Are Iron oxidizing .5 1 -
Bacteria/Fungus Present? 5 1 1.5
7) Is mentous Algae Present? 0 Iviostl FACW Mostly FAC Mostly UPL
8) Are Wetland Plants in Sreambed? SAV Mostly Uji, Y O
'Note: If Total Absence of All Plants 1 75 5
in Streambed As noted above skip this 2
step UNLESS SAV Present* SECONDARY BIOLOGICAL INDICATOR PINTS: d
TOTAL SECONDARY INDICATOR POINTS:
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary= 2$
(If Greater Than or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is
At Least Intermittent)
\\NT SERVER\SYS\ADMIMMATT\NCDWQ Stream Classification Fonn.doe
_ yV
SM1-14
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
ProjectName:k"^? River Basin: I?Cuset. _ County: Y4aef_ Evaluator. LY11C
DWQ Project No.: Nearest Named Stream: Q;ehlane? Latitude: . Signaturca: &z j.
Date: 10(plDV USGS Quad:l,kee Fbfesf CTOK Longitude: Locatio t tron• F/1
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature Is a man-made ditch, then the use of this form is not
necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator , the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural
stream-this rating system should not be used'
PRIl1ZA11Y FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is there a Riffle-Pool
Sequence? 0 1 3
2) Is the USDA Texture in
Streambed Different From
Surrounding Terrain?

0

1

2 '
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Is the Channel Sinuous? 0 1 3
5) Is There Active (or Relic))
Floodplain Present?
I
2
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits
Present?
1
2
3
8) Is There a Bankfull Bench? 0 1 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank
Present?
0
1
2 ?
r3
J
'Note: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And W/U Sinuosity'l hen
Score =0•
10) Is .A 2" Order or Greater
Channel (As Indicated on USGS
and/or In Field) Present? Yes No=O
Y GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
IT. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/ Discharge Present? 1 2 3
YH
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present in 3 2 1 0
the Streambed?
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In 3 2 1 0
the Streambed?
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 I • 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGICAL INDICATOR POINTS: -- o
TOTAL PRIMARY INDICATOR POINTS: 22
.r

SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Crass: Oe r'K
(Series and Phase): KA ewad-4 se lc5 Field
Confirm Observati Mapped ons Type-
e t't/C Yes
Taxonomy (Subgroup): '?" ywto`DY
Profile Description:
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth Matrix Color Abundance lConttast- Structureetc
c es Horizon (Munseq 3?? IMunsep Moi
p _? l0 YR ? `oar
cc
Hydric Sol Indicators:
_ Histosol
_ Histic Epipedon
_ Sulfidic Odor
_ Aquic Moisture Regime
_ Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
_ Concretions
_ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils
_ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? As No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Remarks:
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Approved by HOUSACE 2/92
HJL
8/93
EAvp
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
11987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 'e,,eALnJ lsaeL .YA) e" df Date: a a
Applicant/Owner: iJ?wy?,?,E- ? yar-??- County: t--J tke_
Investigator: 65T State: i?G
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ?s o Community ID: ,
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Ye Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Ye N Plot ID: LeP
(If needed, explain on reverse
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicat
or Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. t-xfA?{i Rea*loo S "
s
_F,CW 9.
2.1:tAAVrAAM glAeae S?? C/OG 10.
3. 11.
4. ?f?/DSrIS?N?r, V ?r.r ntliwl JL_ r,Q ? 12.
5. .L-5 4,,%JJ r 7 rt C _ L_ ?/QCbi' ? 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or 3?u
FAC (excluding FAC-) I
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream. Lake OF Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs -Inundated
Other A_Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-
,x-No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
-Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: -
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):

Depth of Surface Water: -'" (in
) -Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
. Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > /? (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: y lin.) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map. Unit Name IfC? J? Drainage Class: / 06
L?
(Series and Phase): CI1 ?.1 ar? /? Field Observations
N?ly1L Doy,re?/G1f Confirm Mapped Type: Yes -?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): -?>-
profile Description:
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth Matrix Color
nc es orizo IMunsell Moist) (Mu sell Moist t_ Abundance/ Cont[Rst Sttueture. etc.
H-
()-/Y ?, g as/l _ y /ma7
Hydric Sol Indicators:
_ Histosol
_ Histic Epipedon
_ Sulfidic Odor
_ Aquic Moisture Regime
_ Reducing Conditions
Gleyed OF Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
_ Concretions
_ High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils
_ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No No
Hydric Soils Present? a No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
Remarks: I
(Ne1?pr?:l A?tu Gtr /'eu. ?a ?t r' ?r?.feNndvxPn
Approved by HOUSACE 2192
HJL
8/93
CA We i
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Grey ?.l?,,YV14r Date: Orr
Applicant/Owner: TOW, County: _ _"ake
Investigator: a ( State: N6-
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 4?fis No Community ID: r? fates
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. (aY)rlvtd a?r<Q ?oylha T 9.
2. ???tor
??n sfvrcrJ H.1 _ 10.
11
3. t7a?w nHr?y Z_ {1K?! 11.
4. 12.
5• ?rtnaptfLI.f NS FrL`W f 13.
6. L r j4 J SqV _ of 14.
7. C/ NI ?i ?w??/tfriM t /? 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or 64
FAC (excluding FAC•)
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake or ride Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-
je No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
----Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: -
Secondary Indicators 12 or more required):

Depth of Surface Water: o-
IS (in
) ---Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
. --Water-Stained leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: V (in.) _
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
ER00095/figure2.dgn

i?
?aQn
C o00
Y
0
EnvirenmentJ
Services, Inc.
wL
a?
ST42._
Cj \ ly
?'1 I f
? I I
I I
I I
I I
I
f I
I? I
I '? I
I I I

/
\\ .._.
MI /
/ \
gyp/ ,
ba

I
N ,.

I m
'
gig i a
D

i I

I D

I !
x i ?
?_yyyy
buF lu BB
\
\ n

I \?
S

A? Imo.
k.,
J ti1 ,A'l?
,7 S,
'i??Jn
.
, Ix I
, I I

I
Planview Drawing
Richland Creek Interceptor
Wake County, North Carolina
.s'""? k r ? ? ?l tl
? ?; Ik PPE
r'

i

i

\

\
\
m \

z
\
Y ? O
5 U) \.
D

M

CO

M

i
i
i
Drawn By: Tillet Figure: 2
Checked By: Project: ER00095
Scale: 1'=100' Date: Feb 2001
00-oozS
1
00' ooz Tol ZV E
09V
?o?da?za?uz xaaza PupTgai?i
30; _,,,,,d SPU'e
-G DR
? o u 0q tn?-----'.''
'y, , , :v:»...ANI 1391
i' ??7y M
AV
i
a. GRAVEL PAD TO BE 12'x 50' AND 6" THICK MINIMUM
b. TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO
ACCOMMODATE LARGE TRUCKS IS TO 8E NOTES:
PROVIDED. 1. SINCE CONSTRUCTION IS SEGMENTED (ONE SECTION OF SS AT
c. ENTRANCE(S) SHOULD BE LOCATED TO
PROVIDE FOR MAXIMUM UTILITY 8Y ALL A TIME) THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE
CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES. FOR THAT SEGMENT BEFORE CONSTRUCTION MAY BEGIN.
d. MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION 2 SILT FENCE IS TO BE FIELD LOCATED SO AS TO PROTECT
WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR
DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO STREETS. NIN. to GA. RICHLAND CREEK FROM SEDIMENTATION CAUSED BY
PERIODIC TOPDRESSING WITH STONE UNE WWES SILL BE NECESSARY; KEEP SOME HANDY. g EF ~ CONSTRUCTION.
3. USE ROCK CHECK DAMS IF NEEDED IN AREAS WHERE DRAWS
e. ANY MATERIAL WHICH STILL MAKES IT
ONTO THE ROAD MUST BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY. CROSS THE CONSTRUCTION.
4. USE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES IF NEEDED IN ORDER TO
MINIMIZE SEDIMENTATION FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT.
5. COMPLETED SECTIONS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED.
FRONT VIEW SEED (OR SOD) USED WHILE ON THE GOLF COURSE MUST BE
~p0 APPROVED BY THE GOLF COURSE. SEEDING AND MULCHING OF
GR ~^°g* OTHER COMPLETED SECTIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SEEDING
P
Sp. ~ ~a,~,.E SCHEDULE.
MiN tio~
-USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NE4ER IN
AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW w R • idt ~ERVIt a 9LT iENGE iA11pE; IRE
O -END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO 8E TURNED UPHILL. fiE lUlm URiL ~ ' ~ Na 6'! W~g1ED STONE /.s `~r qty iqi ANCHOR WEM b1LT
\R~ 6 MIN EJ iE~!!fE q MOlEC11NG GTpI BAgN.
5~ 8' 111 W~fR
T OVER 9aRT
~ J REVISIONS DATE DESCRIP110N .VIfl10R SORT ~S
COARSE AGGREGATE gXEC1FU BY ENpIEIIf
2-3"
SIDE VIEW
NOTES: APPLICABLE AT ALL POINTS OF
INGRESS & EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS C•
STABILIZED, FREQUENT CHECKS OF DARD TEMPORARY SILT FENCE 1
THE DEVICE AND TIMELY
MAINTENANCE MUST BE PROVIDED.
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT
Ti ~roa ~vnnon or sror~uwnteR 0.5'-1'
/57 WASHED NAK ~
STONE A
QESIGN OF SPILLWAYS m N
1 EXIS E%IS71NG SLOPE
SEEDING SCHEDULE DRAINAGE AREA WEIR LENGTH
(ACRES} (FT) 1 4.0 CLASS 1 RIP-RAP FlL7ER FABRIC
PERMINANT SEEDING: SHOULDERS, SIDE DITCHES, SLOPES (Max. 3:1) 2 6.0 V ES
3 8.0 DATE TYPE PLANTING RATE 4 t0.0
Aug 15 - Nov t Tdl Fescue 200 lbs./acre 1 5 12.0
Nov 1 Afar 1 Tdl Fesaie 200 Ibs./acre DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM SIDE VIEW
dt Abruzzi Rya 25 lbs./sae Mar 1 -Apr 15 Tdl Fescue 200 lbs./acre EXISTING SLOPES SLOPES
Apr 15 -Jun 30 Hulled Common Barmudagroas 15 iba./ocre NOTE:
HEIpiT do NIDiH DETERMINED BY
EXISTNG TOPOGRAPHY AND SEDIMENT STORAGE REQUIRED.
PERMINANT SEED: SLOPES (3:1 UP TO 2:1) VARIES ~~ES
Aug. 15 - Nov. 1 Tall Fescue 200 lbs./acre KEY RIP RAP INTO 7HE OAM
do Sericea Lespedeza (unhulled, unacarifled) 60 to 70 Ibs/acre FOR STABIL12AilON.
Nov 1 - Mar. 1 Tall Fesa~e 200 Ibs./acre 6"-1' 6._~.
do Sericea Lespedeza (unhuiled, unacarifled) 60 to 70 Ibs/acre & Abruzzi Rye 60 to 70 Ibs/acre N ,,'~;...•"t•„ WEIR•:i~'`' ,z:..
y' . K . i4 .11 Nov. 1 - Mar. t Tdl Fescue 200 Ibs./acre ~ • • WEIR':; c KEYED RIP RM
do Serlcea Leapedeza (unhulled, unacarifted) 60 to 70 Ibs/ocre > . , • x • • • ::.ai:
/l57 WASHED STONE
Consult Conservotiap Engineer or Soil Conservation Service for additional in- FRONT VIEW
formation concerning other alterrlatlvea for vegetation of denuded areas. The above VIEW
vegetation rates are those which do well under local conditiais; other seeding rate combinations are possible. REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION e~snroc
•+kTEMPORARY -Reseed according to optimum season for desired permanent vegetation. to/ee NOTE AD~110N N.H.p. Do not allow temporary cover to grow over 1Y in height before mowing, otherwise 4/SB App SPE.LWAY CHART G.N.A. STEP SEQUENCE
fescue may be ahoded out.
1 CHECK DAM 6
0 ,.`Q~H~~
? RICHLAND CREEK INTERCEPTER
Hunter Ci Hunter Civil Teehnologiea, PLLC , ESL
A7$Y Fe SCALE:
~ = WAKE COUNTY
n_iv~.
0WUw&&R4 nvr%u uasvuua a rvav `r V `I I J ry
(919) "7-87727
au Ragim.riog *.onnoma.. ca k lift (919) "7-9926 Fat 4t(V) \\43) DETAILS 8 b
0:\SDSKLDD2\TDC\TD000004\1-dwgs\INDEX 4 EROSION CONTROL.dwg 11/02/2000 01:42:37 PM EST

e l«~
•T, NORTH CAROLINA
~ ~
T CONSTRUCTIONS DRAWINGS
TROL ONLY
l
~PE~:
?IENTS, LLC
ELOPMENT
b
f~ SE ROAD, STE.200
~AROLINA ~'~615
9
-18 5'7
s Oi0438
4 k
N y P ~ ~ ~
g SITE s~~
• 1909 ~ ~ o-a s N q N
Jy~ ~ ~ a ; 2 ~ss W ~R'
Pa Y Y N A
22 1P y~ l9~6 ~a 931e lA a
~g Iyf4 ~ Q fie' gry^1 p 4g ,~p~ ~
'ti r qP qp 4 S b,,q ,qua.
fE• g ~ 5~'
r 9d ~
N ~ ,~pVM RA AV[ E ~
a 1 yq~r a W ~f U L 'K c Q
r9 6~ ~q67 9NJj ve O
~ ~ ~0~~ S $
H
2055
Po °o lA ~•r~ ry° ® ~Rr qy~ ~ ne
~ S~' ~a S
4~ ~ 4 l~R~ `~x~?
P ry°p ~
l 0 m ~ 20g2 20 2 32 X59 $G
m O A N ~ F
Hunter Civil Technologies, PLLC ~r4
r 4
e~ Yom/ Ot ~1M I~IfU/! 1;OlQ
BuitA 110 ~ ~ 2°~~
, North 87816 y ~U 2051 M~.yq'~g2o3~ ~eax q 23p5~
o alt kq S LIIQ t;Ur1l~ and (Ylo) 847-787 I N qdi En8lneerla8 Teohaolosie~ (910) 847-Y686 Yu ~
~9
7
1
MAP
NOT TO SCALE A~ gyp, . INDEX TO DRAWINGS

A ~q~ SHEET TITLE
~ I. SHEET INDEX FOR PROFILES
1-7. SANITARY SEWER PLAN & PROFILES
8 DETAILS AND NOTES

i
0:\SDSKLDD2\TDC\TD000004\1-dwgs\cover erosion control.dwg 11/02/2000 09:39:56 AM EST

i
" 'v
9
o~ r.
0
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ a
~fCOE D
RIl$ i
Q
~ s
e c
~ x 0 IUY111C~ PLACE b 0 00' 1200'
150 3 600 900 ~
~ 4
b ~'0~ W
. ~
o ~ a
9~
e~S ~ ~ ~j 9 ~ C
d ~ ~ r ~
~1
1
~ ~ ~
a~
b
~ ~
u~ ~a "f'
_ amau ra¦. uan r~~ u` ~
Q~,~
~6?~4~ r4E ~6?~4~ W~aW~ ~ MO UataNO~ ~ a/a
' ~rasav~~
r REIdNGTG~OG / • r
1 ® ~ ,a I
O
~raa+~wa 10' o~ c y ~ ~
r ~ Oi° ,a ~n • ~ ~ ~ ~
f D?~J" ~ b
~ ~ b
~ ~
0 t
~
• • ~ ® ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
D ` ti~ ~ ~ ,
~ - ~ ~ ~
• ~ ~ ~ ~ 9
O p y a a ,~ettcxouen eotm ~
w~L e~
t, 0
ra ~ gpR1t7G &GAD
~pp811'
f "L J
~~6 ~,l.SQ ! y~r we '4, ~ ~ ~
'N/e„ lw`~ 'Y/
~ ~ a 7 ~ ~
A~
*,.'y
st'~T
~IGA'~ ~ ~ NG~ ' 9
~
~ ~
b ~
a ~ ~ ~'v scc~T
gQ1G~ d ~ b d d v ~i01~ ~
ro + 1
~0M 1 ~ ~
1 ~ p~u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i a
0
Hunter Civil ~ nter Civil Technologies, PLLC
e~ F.n. o~ A72Y treW of the Name RoRd
snl Snite 110 ~
s.~. x~ Baleirb. North Carolina 27616 4 ~ N
Unit 8on"lo{ and ' (919) C6rD Engawdog Technologies (910) AI c =o> ~~'•ax I 4'(V) PROFILE INDEX SHEET I
0:\SDSKL.DD2\TDC\TD000004\1-dwgs\INDEX.dwg 11/02/2000 09:43:13 AM EST

I
- ;,Naar
1 N
N .
' ~ CP o
, ~ o ~ C~ `1 o
~N . o
(.P ~ . o
r OQ
~ (v
~ ~
~m~ r r ~
1 as o < / , ~ ~ o ;.i - i, r . e P • i
~ . ~ ~l / ~ r ~
EE ,T T.:i
~ . ~ ~ j . ~ ~ . - RI~rILAN r D
L~ _ .
i' f ~ _ . \ CREEK g
~ ~ ~ / AN ~ ~ K
Y , ~ ELK 6 cn CR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ -
~ x ~ , w _ \ _ i.~ r~ _ _ \ \ r
_
1 _ - -
3n, 1 2 ` z. ,
~'~1 ' % ~ r- - - ~ - MH 1 1A
~ F ~
~p ..,E~ - MH 105
o ~ - ,8 - 105
MH 1016
M H 104... ~ vw~
J OX O '(fEB
`i C~ Z
k
W Y NOTE: TOPO IN PLAN VIEW IS GIS NOT SURVEYED ~ )
AND IS FOR A VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY. IN
AREAS. WHERE THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT IS
WITHIN 50' OF RICHLAND CREEK THE BANK WAS
~,y SURVEYED AND IS REPRESENTED ON THE PLANS
AS A SOLID LINE LABELED CREEK BANK.
Paschals Golf Club
` Post Office Box 222 - MH RIMS BETWEEN STATIONS 1+21 THROUGH Paschals Golf Club
Wake Forest, NC 27588-0222 26+90 PASCHALS GOLF CLUB TO BE SET FLUSH \ ( ) Post Office Box 222
1841.17 11 7920 ~ WITH THE GROUND. (SAME AS EXISTING MH s) ALL Wake Forest, NC 27588-0222
MH TO BE SEALED AND BOLTED. 1841.17 11 7920
0 272.
272
270.0 270.0
0
J
W
Q ~ M
~ 265.0
265.0
N ~
r• N O N O , M > + O
~ ~ r ~ Q:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d
N Z Q Z
. Z 260.0 - N~ z 260.0
Q~
Z
255.0
255.0
LE 17.6
LOE2.2~ SL P 0 20 o IA 24i .D P
in. SOE .2~ n'
E 4 9. 0
LPE0.0 250.0 0 250.0
P 0 50
NtASEMENT: PIPE q, E ,~N; X 36 DIA;'
60 MIN.' AL C N TR CT ON SH LL BE IN DA A
IA 24 .D P
245.0 C A T I U E TE T N GR TY W n H ES F sP cl Ic Tlo s. 245.0
E IS G MA H AF R IN T LAO O N W 4" LI E.
ST 0 0 M NH
IN R I 2 5. 7 XI TI G 0 E RE O D T EIR E TIR TY (P R 0 PE S).
IN R I 2 7. 7 XI TI G 6
240.0
240.0 IN R 0 T 24.6
d' f0 f~ ~ W M N 'd' 0~ M O1 ~ d' cV N) ~ N1 'f ~ ~ 'C 10 ~ N t0 rC d' ~0 i~ QO O M ~ N M 'd M ~ m m ~ ~ r ~ N N a ~ vri N uri
N ~ t0 N N h N ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o N o ~ o a o N o 0 0 0 0
N O N O O O N O N O ~ O N O ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? + + + + + + + + + + + + +
O O O ~ N N M M ~ N t0 I t0 t0 I~ I~ OD OD Gs Oi O O ~
,1
"~~u~nuunnuuunuui
0 0 CA ~
~ ~ ~ c~ESSIp
a y9 y
Hunter Cis Hunter Civil Technolo ies, PLi.C - ~ ~ g _ EL
872Y Fall 1 8720 Falb o! the News Road '
8aite 110 ~ ~
Bald~L, 1 North carollna 27615 ~
- - ,,,...1 FF _
Land Muveying and (9: (919) "7-NM 4) (v)
(alt Rmghmring 7sohoolo~W (919 ( „rreiuiun`nmi~uer WAKE COUNTY [phone] Fm
0:\SDSKLDD2\TDC\TD000004\1-dwgs\erosion control ss8000.dwg 10/19/2000 12:50:34 PM EDT

i_
/
'
_ ` ~ / .
'
P~ • ~ E~ i
N . RE i G
i . ' ~
i i ~ .
o ~ / .
r. o m 111 : . r MH
N < D r. N LA ~ t~ n RIB T
. , ~ n ~
.
~ r _ ~ . ~
~ O ~ r
~ r / 0
. ~ f~l . ~ ~ i
~ ~ . ~ m / i
_ , _ £Fk ~ _ _ _ BANK . v i •I ~
\ .~i.~ i~
. . , ~ ~ ~ / / ~i . ~
SF = ~ - . _ y . i
_ - . n ~ \ i ~ / ~ ~
~ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ ~
~ ~ /i . ~ ~
MH 1066 _ _ ~ . . ~ _ _ \ MH 110 -r.-. .
_ ~ ,
_ T SURVEYED NOTE: TOPO IN PLAN VIEW IS GIS (NO )
~ R fER NCE ONLY. IN AND IS FOR A VISUAL E E
M 06C MH 109 e, AREAS WHERE THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT IS ~ ,
s WITHIN 50 OF `RICHLAND CREEK, :THE:- BANK WAS
M 6E 6E SURVEYED AND IS REPRESENTED ON THE PLANS
INE LABELED CREEK BANK: AS A SOLID L
' MH RIMS BETWEEN STATIONS 1+21 AND 26+90 MH 108
UB ARE TO BE SET FLUSH (PASCHALS GOLF CL ) ~o n p
` WITH THE GROUND. (SAME AS EXISTING MH's) ALL NOTE: ANY SEWER LATTERAL, INCLUDING 4 & 6 , ,
MH TO BE SEALED AND BOLTED. MANHOLE AT SERVICE CONNECTIONS, ENTERING A
AN ELEVATION GREATER .THAN 2.5 FEET ABOVE H INVERT OF TH .MANHOLE SHALL HAVE AN' TE E
' ` Paschals Golf Club Fy 9 INSIDE DROP.
Post Office Box 222 ~ a+. n
Wake Forest, NC 27588-0 o ~ 1841.17 11 7920 o 282.0
9 MH 106D a 9 ~ 1841.14 23 5038 0
282.0 ,
280.0
280.0
0
0
o =
Z 275.0
275.0 _
J W c ~
~ v !a< r Q
~ O
~ Q
N ~ ~ 270.0 J Q N ~
270.0 ~ •Z O ~ N w + -
r 00 ON ~ ~ 2 ~
~ ~N O ~ Q
N N~ ~ ~ N O N = F-
Q O ~ N = ~ - -
D t0 ~ t0 I- .0 265
~ ~ 1-
265.0 ~ - Z m~
~ Z

260.0
260.0
14 .1 L PE 0. 09~ DI 2 in. 255.0 EN
255.0 E 1 L N 14 .6 L a m• E 1 4. 9
LOE0.07
A 2 in. IP OP .20 o I L
n. L LN 4.2 SOP
250.0
250.0
N ao o m ao a~ M r o r r ~ ~ ~ ui
tp P ~ M ~ W r0 N ~ P 0~ N N ~ f~ Oi 01 Cl 01 ~ ~ ~ ~p O C Of t0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N
~ ~p i I N N iq ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ Q 0 ~ Q ~ ~
0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O in G ? ? ? ? ? ? + ~ j
D1 ~ N O If1 O IA O IA O If) D + + + + ~ If1 1n t0 10 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N
~ ~ r N N M M ~ ~
,~~UIIIIIUI I IIIillffllff!!
0 ~ +I ~ D ~~i ~ l
~ tiSS/p ~ ~ of y 9 ~ 9l
Hunter Civil Te ter Civil Technolo ies, PLLC S A g
3
d78Y >'~L of 87SY >E~L of the Neuee Sad
Sdte o ~ ~ suite li I N
Rtlekh, NortL North Cerollna 2'x815 % ~ Sdsldh, l,,,~!!
Ln~l Anr~tln~ ~n8 (9191 a (9101 847-8727 I ~ 'f'nr"flumllmuml~ao~. TA7 A V iP r n T T l\T my
fop gndysdeg Tooh¢ologlu (919) B4 0:\SDSKLDD2\TDC\TD000004\1-dwgs\erosion control ss8000.dwg 10/19/2000 12:50:34 PM EDT (919) Uy_ Fu y V rr 1~i1L' V V V IN 1 1
P1~~51a`I~ ~

• . 1~ Iv . o
C
- \ ° N
• • . . ~ . ~ ~ ~
. _ ~ ~ • - •
~ N
~ '--..,0
w>.. ~~o 0
/ ,
N
~ ~ -
= ~ 114 ~ . -
~ ~ . ~ ~ ` ~
~ i ~ ~ •
i~ i ~ • • • . ~
i ~ . i i ~ 0
;N i ~ MH#..~~~ ~
i
i ~ . • MH 115 . \
i \
'l MH 112 , ao . ~
RE & ~q
Ck • MH 116
~ 1
• ~
B R~ ~q .
Ck
1 • ~
MH 1128
~ •
1
•
• . ~
I;

NOTE: TOPO IN PLAN VIEW IS GIS NOT SURVEYED
.AND IS FOR A VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY. IN
I'' AREAS WHERE THE PROPOSED ALIGNfuIENT IS
1841.14 23 5038 o I;; A MH RIMS BETWEEN STATIONS 1+21 AND 26+9 THIN 50' OF RICHLAND CREEK THE BANK. WAS WI ,
C U TO BE SET FLUSH WITH (PASCHALS GOLF L B) SURVEYED AND IS REPRESENTED ON THE PLANS
TING MH's ALL MH THE GROUND. (SAME AS EXIS ) AS A SOLID LINE LABELED CREEK BANK.
TO BE SEALED AND BOLTED. 282.0
:282'.0
280.0
280.0
= M 11 IA SALDMH
RI 24.4 _
~ IN R 1 2 7. 2 .S Q
~ IN R 0 T 25 .4 ' cWn o 275.0
Q ~ ~ 275.0 -
- ' o Q
r- ~ o ~ o
w Q co ~ ~
_Z z ~ - N ~ ~ N (r
~ _ ~ 270.0 _Z -Z
270.0
265.0
265.0 I C S AB VE TH 1 0 YE R A O D LE AT ON.
260.0
260.0 LN23.0 LPE0.0
E 2 1.1 LO °
EN 21 .8
LE 2 0. 6 IA 24 n. IP IP L '
LO E .2 ~ T PIPE ENCASEMEN 255.0
' 30"DIA: MIN. 255.0 12o LEN. x
250.0 250.0
m m u~ o m m o m m ~ a m m 0 0 o M o ~ .t N m N n a0 of m M ri ri ri ri M ri ri d .r .t
~i a m ~ ~ ~ ~ N n ~ n ~ n m ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O ~ O G O O O O O O O O O O
~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ p p p ~ ~ O O O O O ~
~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 d0 O ~ O In O IA O tf1 O IA O If) O O IA O If) O IA O ~ O In O IA ~ + ~
s} In N t0 t0 I~ 1~ 00 00 C1 ~ e} d' It') to O O N7 M N M M M M M M t7 M M M M
N N N N N N N N N N N N N M
`````~~~puun,W °°°uu~i~jr
0 ~ 0 ~ l ~
o ~~ssia ~ ~0 ~9 y
Hunter Civ Hunter Civil Technolo iea, PLLC ~ ~ _ L
d72Y Fal er~9 F.u. of the Nan.e Boad finite 110 G ~E
iidelih, DD Rei North Ceroltna E7815
land snre~ln~ and 1 „ EE , [phone] ~ 'u~uu„ unnnnaon
Cull 13~lnaerlnd TeoLaolotlea (91f lee (919j 847-~26 lhz
~l~t,van i ~ int. ~f
0:\SDSKLDD2\TDC\TD000004\1-dwgs\erosion control ss8000.dwg 10/19/2000 12:50:34 PM EDT

i N
N
~I I~, N ~
o
o .
~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~
/ r ~ . ~ ~ r ~ . O
. Q O O ~ p ~
C ~ o i
N _ ~ , / . ~ ~ r m r
_ . m 1 m
/ u MH u
. .
. .
i _ ~
. 5.9 1 , , PIN# 1841.10 2 24 - . ~
~ ~ .
~ ~
ii" ~ . ~
~ .i=" ~ ~ ~
~
M M / ~ I M
"1 .iii i
~
, V
o
M 116 f ,
0
~ ~ _
~ ~ ~ ~
` ` 1 ~ ~ ~ .
.
~ ~
~ z \
• •
. • - • NOTE: TOPO IN PLAN VIEW IS GIS (NOT SURVEYED) AND IS FOR A VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY. IN ~ ~
WHERE THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT IS AREAS 1•
WITHIN 50' OF RICHLAND CREEK, THE BANK WAS -
PLANS ' ~ SURVEYED AND IS REPRESENTED ON THE ~ ~ ~ ~
NK. ~ AS A SOLID LINE LABELED CREEK BA ~ 2 .0
287.0
285.0
285.0
0
J
~N
280.0 Q
280.0 •ON
,Z
o. N-
N ! _ ~
-Z
~ N 275.0
~ Z_ N +
275.0 ~
o
~ z M ~
~ Z
270.0
270.0
265.0
265.0
L N 8 •4 °
L P 0 30 S
IA 18i .D P 260.0
EN 4 0. 260.0
255.0
255.0
ap N ~ ~ n o ~ ~o w t0 amd ~ m °i m
N ~ to r N M p OD 00 ~ ~ n o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m a7 n ~ ~ ~ ~ 0) N N N N N
t~ iA N s0 ~p s0 t0 N N ~0 ~0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N N ° ° O ° ° ° ° ~ O ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ lO ~
0 0 0 °o o ° o 0 0 ° ° ° 0 0 0 d d a d 0 0 ~ 0 Q in ~ In ~ N ~ ~ ~
d o 0 o d d ° o o N o ~ o ao o ~ ° ° ~ + + + + + + + + + + + N ~ ~ ~ .r
+ + + + + + ~ rn o o ~ ~ ~ 1I) cC cG r M M M M d' ~ d• N N M M ~ ~ ~ ~t d' st d'
M M M M M
\``\Ilpumnurnauulnuyllll/
a o°~ CR I/'''/'. o` O \ <
~ DE ~ 9 ~ 9l
SR -
Hunter Civil Techn Civil Technologies, PLLC 13 -
6?'2~ Felb ad the 1 Nen~e Road • Falb ad the ~ ~
finite 110 finite 110 b ~
Reiei~h~ North Ceti I~h, North Carolina 87A16 1 ~1~\0`` tl „ EE 1. 111/lllllllllllllllll°III
Land g~~ and (919) "7-W
pvLL fteeesd" TwhnoloQm (019) 847-96 0:\SDSKLDD2\TDC\TD000004\1-dwgs\erosion control ss8000.dwg 10/19/2000 12:50:34 PM EDT "1V' 7-25 4 (V) W AKE U U U l~ l Y (919) 84788za Fu Pl~vS+U(~,

~ ~ ~ I
~ o i
I ~ s O V
. ~ ,
N i .
~ J
s"" ~ o
_ A C L 6~ C . A . L . \

• ~
N ~ ~
~ ~ ~ .
~ .
~ / /
1 ~ ~ ` / . ~
122 ~ ~ .
~ _ . ` _

t
sir _ ~
\ r ~
~ -
~ ~ MH 120 ~ a \ ~~~==s

~
~ Town of Wake Forest
400 E. Elm Street
Wake Forest, NC 27587-2933
1841.10 36 6292
MH 119 .
~ Will L. Walker
illi Ha wood Ph P 9
7524 Buffalos Road NOTE: TOPO IN PLAN VIEW IS GIS (NOT SURVEYED)
North Carotin 1 -6810 ~ Ralel h, a 276 6 9 AND IS FOR A VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY. IN ~ AREAS WHERE THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT IS
Gordon & Rob J.' Munro ~ 1841.10 35 0592 Yn WITHIN 50' OF RICHLAND CREEK, THE BANK WAS
~ SURVEYED AND IS REPRESENTED ON THE PLANS -
6004 Ho e Farm Drive P AS A SOLID LINE LABELED CREEK BANK.
Wake Forest NC 27587-9654 -
1841.10 25 9241 > . .
~
2 7.0
287.0
285.0
285.0
" 280.0
280.0 H 21 5 D A. E LE H I
o' o ~
I TIN 26 .11 8 S.. I SI E R P ( )
_ T 5 +1 .3 c° IM 2 .0 a ~
„ ~ .z I T OU 64. 4
RT IN 26 .0 ~
Q 275.0
275.0
270.0
270.0
Q 0 IA 18i .DI
L PE 0. 0 D A 8in.01
L N 57 50
EN24. S SOP .3~
SOE .3% 265.0
265.0 0 LO
EN 4 .4
260.0
260.0
255.0 255.0
U1 d 10 N ~h t0 t0 CD N N d t n o M In o N rn o ~ o r: lV N CI lV N d' 17 N M M
ai a of d d o ~ ~ ~ ~ n° n n n n n n ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N O N O ~ O N O N O O to O !A O In O N O to ~ ~ ~ + + ~
I~ O oD O 0) O O ~ N N N ~ ~ ~ s} i(1 IA (0 f0 I~ r ~ ~ ~ 0~ IQ IA to to !Q !n to tQ IQ In IQ IA In
•t d' ~ ~t d' u? N ~
``tttttgl001111IIIIIIIIIIfIf gg111j6
a l~hi J~ \ ` O ~i
~ l ~ ~ O SESSIp ~
y99 ~ ~
Hunter Civil Tech • Civil Technolo ies PLLC SEAL = g ~ - =
• 151
A729 FaW of the Snits 11 9 FaW of the Neese 1Road • ~ Snits 110
Reieijh, NorW Ce ~~D eijh, NorW Ceroiina 87616 ~
Lead Surro~ln~ end (91O) 8d7- Uql MP .1~.,4¢. (919) 6!7-Irk/Ifif ~ ,IllUllllltlll„
CM1 B~Iaeerlar Teetuwiodia (91®) 8t7-91 (91®) 8t7-9686 Fes
AAb56M /1M~`D \ t1V~ ,lM
v V v-
0:\SDSKLDD2\TDC\TD000004\1-dwgs\erosian control ss8000.dwg 10/19/2000 12:50:34 PM EDT

_
- 0 o N
o _ IV ~ ~
w ~ ~ ~ C
. ~ ~ cfl O
~ r.. .
r ti O O
O ~ O
,m r'1
r _ m
~m < ~ i
. . . .
1 . /
/
r ~
i ~
~ ~ . . i...
~ \
~ ~
. ~ ~
~ ~ \ . i
. _ \ . \ - SST
~ ~ --,~~F
~ SF
1 4
r - ~ -

- MH 125

-
~ -

H 1 1 .
~ - ~
~ - ~ -
-
L
1 Geor e D. N 9 Ir r e Wa ke NOTE: TOPO IN AN VIEW IS GIS NOT SURVEYED g PL
Town of Wake Forest 1 451 W. Oak AND IS FOR A VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY. IN W. Oak Avenue
- - 400 E. Street _ Elm AREAS WHERE THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT IS /
- Wake Forest _ .e Forest NC 27587-2163 ~ WITHIN 50' OF RICHLAND CREEK THE BANK WAS / ,
_ ~ Wake Forest NC 27587-2933 _ ~ 1841.10 46 SURVEYED AND IS REPRESENTED ON THE PLANS 1.10 46 3865
_ _ 1841.10 36 6292 _ - AS A SOLID LINE LABELED CREEK BANK.
~ 9 .0 2
292 0 -
290.0 290.0
W
w
x 285.0
285.0 o~,
0
Z
0 N~ ~
0 Q
- 280.0
280.0
~Z
275.0
275.0 D A 6i .DI
SL PE 0.5
EN fit .2
i 270.0
LPE0.5 270.0
LE
265.0
265.0
60.0 2
260.0
IA M M f0 I(~ tt t0 CD N O ~
o m n ro w a n ~ ~ N n r rn ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ao ao ro ro anu ~ ~ n
v~ M M M M ~ ui ~ n n n ~ n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O O O O O O O O O O p p0 ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O ~ O ~ O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p p If1 O IA O IfI O N O If) O Its O O I(1 O In O IA O to O In O iQ 00
'I' .a~ + .t. 'F' + I~ 00 00 01 Qr O ~
+ p ~ N N M M ~ ~ t0 ~ cp0 s0 f0 s0 s0 t0 s0 s0 c0 s0 t0 c0 t0 tp tD t0 t0 c0 t0
II1d1UIi11/1111111A1Upllll//l/ ` 0```JO V 7 1 I/'',~~~~
0~ O ~~i ~ l ~ o F~ssio ~
~ ~4 ~ 9
Hunter Civil inter. Civil Technologies, PLLC _ a _ S~ _ -
erg F.n, • = 1 e7a9 FaIL of the xewe Roafl
Sn snlte uo
B.leyh, Nw xorth crolina 87616
r.~a suee~lns .nd (91Yj ,1 ,11,1 EE „ [phone] /l"lnnuuunnnmo
Civu S4yineerin~ TeoLnolo~lee (910) ~ [phone] F~ Qjla~~ w~~ _
0: \SDSKLDD2\TDC\TD000004\1-dwgs\erosion control ss8000.dwg 10/19/2000 12:50:34 PM EDT

i
r ~
s;Afi,
N
00
t
O ~ . ~ ~

~ 1
- ~ ~ 1
. ~
~
. ~ _ ~ ' V ~ / .i
- ~ - - O
, - ~ / O r ' ~ ` . W
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /
. ~ )r \ - - ~ I~ i /
,r \ ~ / / ~1
r` O
O
N ~ /
SE.T FENCE i - - , 00 . /
- , ` < -p RICHL ~
H ~ i- ~ i
, ~ ~ i ~ ~
~ -
.
. ~ o
Z Q / ~s y
_ , Geor e D. a er . . - 0 9 ' 9 ~ ~ % ~ ~
9 451 W. Oak Avenue p sue
Geor e D. Walker ~ 9 ~ o Wake Forest NC 27587- 1 ~ 27587-2163
451 W. Oak Avenue . Y ~ , ~ ~o
1841.10 46 Wake Forest, NC 27587-2163 0 N i
MH i ~
1841.10 46 3865 ~ ~ ~
_ ~ ~ T _ -
r ~ a , - ~ _
~ • _ 1
~
NOTE: TOPO IN PLAN VIEW IS GIS (NOT SURVEYED) ~
' AND IS FOR A VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY. IN - - MH 129 ~s
AREAS:-WHERE THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT IS MH 128 1
WITHIN 50 OF RICHLANR CREEK, THE BANK-WAS
SURVEYED AND IS REPRESENTED ON THE PLANS , AS A SOLID LINE' LABELED CREEK BANK. 1 G ~ REENWAY
1
, 302.0
..302.0" ,
Z
300.0 _ ~ 300.0
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z w
F ~ N
~ W NNM Q O lD ~F 01
- = Q~ ~ ~ pp Oi Oi N
~ pM O Mri Qrn dir U' (`r
W Y~ Q ~N Z~NNN~ o '`N ~ N~- ~~'~zz~ 295.0
9 = Q Q+ 2 5.0 r , o r` - aoo __o ~ ~ Z X I- H
o H12 IA SALD H
~ ST 7+8.8 J Q ,d. f~ N I ~ 7 r =
Q - - ~ cv N R I 20.0 °.S.INID DO) Z
~ o .z Z
Q ~ ~n- N R O T 7 .61
N 290.0 290.0
Z = ~
- -Z
_ ~ -Z
285.0
285.0
0 280.0 xl c 280.0 E
3, 1 SL P O 55 o EN 7 2fi LE f
DI m. SOP 1
5~ DI m. LE 130.2 L PE 0. n.
L E0. o '
IA 16i .D P
21 .6 275.0
275.0 N
0"IAM.
FO ES AN 0 E U BE IN NN T 10 /NNTIO SEIFIATIN.
270.0 270.0
t0 N m 0~ O 'f f0 01 OD O f~ Ol of r w rn ro .r
of of C Nj M1 ~ ~ COD C~0 ~ CND oND N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ro m ago ~ ro a°'o N N N N N N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 O ~ ~ O ~ In
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 f\
00 O ~ O O O N O N O N O N O O IQ O In O f7
d' ~ N N t0 tG I~ I~ r h r r 00 OD
`,~tlµllt00B;lB!!d < ~
s' Q r~r, ~`r~~'
0 ~ F~
Q~ t o Q S
$E~(,
Hunter Civi] c olo ies PLLC f3T57 iunter Civil Te hn g o ~a c H
672E Falb 6728 FaW at the Nerve Road " ,
I Snits 110 ~ ~ E
&1viFL. N &1 North Carolina w:7Ai6 n n I I
Lud 8arvsylog and (91 Clvll Bne¢eu1ng 4eohnoWsla (019) (919) 544-SlS7 I 47(V) (019) M7-9676 H= ~~~3lco WAKE COUNTY
0:\SDSKLDD2\TDC\TD000004\1-dwgs\erosion control ss8000.dwg 10/19/2000 12:50:34 PM EDT

H(N ~ NTS This certiti~ that this copy o hat this copy of this plot identiftes ca waters of the U.S., or
GENERAL NOTES I, Charles R. Brown, NC PLS, do hereby cietify that this map was pr~ared wetlands, all areas of watero under my supervision, and occurotely depicts the locations of Section 404 auant to Section 404 of the I rose of watero of tha U.S., including wetlands, regulated pur- p'' on 404 of the Clean Water Act as determk~ed by the under- ~
Jurisdictional Areas as delineated by Enveromentd Servkxs, Inc. of Raleigh signed on this date. Unless i date. Unless there is a change in tha law, ar our publidhed y ~
1) Grid lk based on NCGS Grid Monument GOLDUR ,with grid coordinates North Carolina. regulation, this determination as shown h~~n, NAD 83, and g Combined (;rid Factor of 0.999988152 ~ determination of Section 404 justhtdictfon may be relied up- WETLANDS LINE TABLE WETLANDS UNE TABLE ~ ~ ~ d not to exceed five years from this date. This determination UNE BEARING LENGTH UNE BEARING LENGTH ~0 ~ ~ ~ w
2 2 The Wetlands Delineation Exhibit down hereon does not meet all of on for a period not to exceed ) was made utilizing the 1987 zing the 1987 Corps of Engieers Wetlands Delineation manual. Wi N 65'36'27" E t4.23 W22 N 39'24'49" E 20.20 0 c ~ ~ ,a
the requirements of GS 47-30, as amaided, and is NOT FOR p RECOIi~ATION. W2 S 53"16'27" E 19.87 W23 N 09'31'56" W 30.63 q z ° F ~ ~
3 All dhtanoee are horizontal ground. W3 S 4734'12" E 16.81 W24 27.30 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ W 48 42 07 E v i
c ~ 4 Ail areas computed using coordinate from measured field data \``~111NIillillllfill/p//~~ in m n - 97 ~~~~\'~N ~~'~~i W4 S 63'06'51" E 23.46 W25 N 4719'43" E 51.65 0 ~ ~ ~ r
_ ~ ~ Charles R. Brow , NC PLS L 35 ~ i~ W. PINE ST. 0 e W5 S 80'2013 E 14.13 W26 N 78'55 31 E 23.05 ~ o o, W6 S 40'34'56" 20.59 W27 N 18'08'27" W 43.07 00 z ~W
~ 6SS/ SITE ~ ~ OF y ~ S 12'55'21" E 27.57 W28 N 24'46'12" w 23.62 ~ j w .q ~
Q~ GENERAL NOTES = SEAL W8 S 34'54'00" E 39.71 W29 N 05'49'59" E 23.22 ~
_ a ~ L-359 z ;n ~ r ~ W9 S 42'21'31" E 22.47 W30 S 8749'87" E 62.47 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 " m a
~ 1) As noted hsrean, Wake County Register of Desch. :y 9 3: ~ 0. e Wi O S 57'26 41 E 19.97 W31 N 06'04 05 E 396.56. q W11 S 53'11'39" E 25.35 W32 S 06'04'05" W 143.04 q
o 9'Q S Q W. STADIUM DRIVE ~~i~f Nh 2 S 70'17'02" E 19.90 W33 N 66'09'52" W 54.25 ~
~ii~iii S R ' /41NIiIIIpp111111 W13 S 51'30'33" E 6.28 W34 S 52'56'51" W 32.85 4 e
~J r{(-{{~' ~ , , ~l , ~ ~ W14 S 51'30'33" E 18.35 W35 N 88'48'26" W 35.59 'd ,oy
W15 S 88"13 34 E 15.83 W38 S 88'48 26 E 6.84 A Date W16 S 51'02'09" E 46.62 W37 S 00'09'42' W 18.83 Q0 ~
qE W17 S 58'11'48" E 26.05 W38 S 0709'10" W 62.18 r ~
Wt8 N 28'53'54" E 74.05 W39 7 404.00 c q S 0'0910. W •M
W19 N 43'08'28" E 25.11 W40 S 26'14'58" W 235.39 ~ a~
W20 M 00'36'30" E 32.48 W41 S 26'24'01" W 139.13 b q W21 N 11'31'43" E 31.26 ~ 00
q aw
U
'
~ '
.
/ '
'
EXISTING PK NAIL ' ' / ~
AT INTERSECTION OF ~ z • ~ o
CENTERLINE OF ' RICHLAND CREEK AND • WETLANDS AREA TABLE " N
CENTERLINE QF W. STADIUM . y
DRIVE (SR 1930) \ w AREA 'EA" 83,211.27 OR 1.91 ACRES a
TROL CORNtDt N\F CON SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST
THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ' DB 7416\381 AREA "EC" 13,106.18 OR 0.30 ACRES
r " \ UREA SYA 1.056.18 OR 0.02 ACRES
TOTAL AREA 97 373.63 OR 2.23 ACRES ~ /
~ A
E'+ ~ Z O
W
CENTER LINE OF ~ W ~ a7 ~
y RICHLAND CREEK ' ~ . S PROPERiY LINE az~ m
°s ~ o~~
a; a ~ o E" W At U
N ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ M . z wax _ _ w Z ~ .
NCGS GOLIHIR" N\F ~ F SOUTHEASTERN BAPnST ~ W ~ w x
E= 811,709.8201 ~ N= 2,142,796.0850 IOMM OF WAKE FOREST A o~~ THEOLOGCAL SEMINARY
COMBINED GRID FACTOR= ~ PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT N~ N~ DB 7416\381 ~ W SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST ~ ?a a
0.999988152 (10' WIDE) SOUTHEASTERN CONTROL CORNER - - - - - - - . - - 1HEOLOGICAL ! F ~ d THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ~ d ~
- DB 7416 DB 7416 ~ W ~
N 02 4 55 ~ _ ~ - - - 274.10 ~ - ~ a W
~ N ~ a m
~ N
~ ~
~ ~ ~
/ ~ ~ ~ 'b ~ ~ ~
~ \
>r ~ 4r
CENTER UNE OF ~
T1E LINE N 30'48'17"W ~ NAREA RICHLAND CREEK p IS PROPERTY UNE
2580.20 SYA . 0
1056.18 SQ. FT. 0.02 ACRES ~ ~ _ CENTER UNE OF c6
' RICHLAND CREEK U
IS PROPERTY UNE ~ ~
N 02'38'08' W TIE LINE 330.08' ~ s . ~ ~`o . 9 F p
N27~D4'30'W ~ ,y ~0•
2342.31 ~ ~ Q'
"4 J°
a ~ 11E LINE ~ w w ~ x ~
~e ~J N19'42 58 E ~ •Q 4.00' z ~ ~
N\F ~3 o ~ o • N\F ~ W U
WAIrE COUNTY GORDON MUNRO ~ x
BOARD OF EDUCAliON DB 1996\PG 541 N AND WIFE W ~ ~ • ROBYN JONAS-MUNRO z ~ ~
W39 DB 8361\PG 463 ~ ~ a ~ ~
w o
W A a
~ z ~ W37 f0 ~
AREA 'EA' ,~28 83,211.27 Sf~ FT. ~ ~ A m z ~ o ~
1.91 ACRES VIA h ~ ~ N 00 42 E C
NCGS "GOLDUR' 3¢-------------- F' H
E= 811,709.8201 N= 2,142,796.0850 ~ \ W \ ~
COMBINED GRID FAC10R= \ ai
0.999988152 CENTER LINE OF . \ \ 0
CONTROL CORNER STADIUM DRIVE IS \
PROPERTY LINE \ v
\ \ ~ \ \ ~
• ~ \ \ ~ 3
. \ \ 1--1
• \ \ \ \
\ \
\ \
\ \ PBOJ~~' N0• TDC-00002 N 03'23'05" E \ \
LEGEND N\F 118 q,' ' • ~ \ ~r~xeao3: WETLAND1
a~ WAKE COUNTY ~ 09~3•~" \ \
~ Existing Iron Pipe BOARD OF EDUCATION 124~rv~~' E \ ~ OBA~IV BY: nee
DB 1996\PG 541 AREA "EC" / \ \ N %AND
GRAPHIC SCALE • Iron Pipe Set , N
so o 25 ao 1eo 200 A Computed Point 13,106.18 SQ. FT. cBMEB BY: 0.30 ACRES 9y 803, SCALE:
F4-1o-1l Lot Address N\F N F 3S~F 1 = 50
=ONO WAKE COUNTY Boundary Line Not Surveyed BOARD OF EDUCATION \ GORDON MUNRO BATE' 01 04 01
IN FEET DB 1996\PG 541 AND WIFE ROBYN JONAS-MUNRO SEM NO.
1 inch = 50 R DB 8361\PG 463
1 OF 2