NCG210290_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20160324

111 ,hl4 (4-)�
STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
L)� HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ a o I c) 3d 7
YYYYMMDD

Larsen, Cory
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 11:51 AM
To: Larsen, Cory
Subject: Follow up At6V 210z70
Cory I have received the letter to implement the changes to the stormwater management program
We will take action on this
Thanks
Kevin Williams
Jerry G. Williams and Sons Inc.
Please call me if you have any questions
919 934 4115

m —
r;:-may
Air Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
March 7, 2016
JERRY WILLIAMS PRESIDENT
JERRY G. WILLIAMS & SONS, INC.
PO BOX 2430
SMITHFIELD, NORTH CAROLINA 27577
PAT MCCRORY
u iJ Govemw
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
sewe-y
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc.
Johnston County
Dear Permittee:
Department of Environment and Natural Resources staff from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
multimedia compliance inspection of Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. on December 11, 2015 for permits
and programs administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Division of Waste
Quality
Mineral, and Land
Resources
Management
Resources
We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our
initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at
your facility. The results of each applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary
corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a
Division report is not attached, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and
regulations at the time of inspection.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection or the results of each program inspection,
please contact the Raleigh Regional Office at (919) 7914200 and ask to speak with the appropriate Division
staff. Thank you for your cooperation.
encl: Air Quality Inspection Report
Stormwater Inspection Report
cc: DAQ RRO Files
DEMLR RRO Files
DWR RRO Files
DWM RRO Files
Slate of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Air Quality
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, NC 27609
919 7914200 T 1919 8912261 F

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
Raleigh Regional Office
AIR QUALITY
Jerry G Williams and Sons Inc
NC FacilityID 5100047
Inspection Report
Caunty/FIPS: Johnston/16i
Date: 12/16/2015,
Facili Data
ty .
"' Permit Data
Jerry G Williams and. Sons Inc
Permit . 03235 / R12
524 Brogden Road
Issued. 2/15/2013
Smithfield, NC 27577
Eiplres 1/31/2018
Lat: 35d 29.7490m Long: 78d 20.9970m
Classification Synthetic Minor
SIC: MI / Sawmills & Planing Mills General '
Perii k Status' Active
NAICS: 321113 /Sawmills
Current Permit Application(s) None
Program Applicability
Sip
Contact Data,
Facility Contact Authorized Contact . Technical Contact
John Fox ! John Fox John Fox
MACT Part 63: Subpart 6J, Subpart ZZZZ
Vice President of Vice President of Vice President of
NSPS: Subpart Dc,
Operations ;.' Operations ., Operations
[phone] [phone] [phone]
Compliance Data
Comments:
Inspection Date. 12/11/2015
Inspector's Name Maureen Conner
Inspector's Signature:,.
Operating Status Operating
Compliance Code Compliance inspection
Action Code FCE
Date of Signature:
On Site;In spectlon Result Compliance
IZ-201rj
I(o
Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR:
"
TSP..
S02
NOX
VOC
t
CO
PM10
* HAP
2010
71.54
0.5500
4.87
3.90
13.27 -
9.18
840.64
2005,
34.99
1.27
10.80 .
23.05
28.29
12.21
7645.00
.,Id.,. ;r-
* Highest HAP Emitted (in pounds)
Five Year Violation History: None .
Date Letter Tyne I RWe Violated
Violadon'ResolutioiYDate
Performed Stack Tests since last FCE: None
Date Test Results Test Methods)
Source(s) Tested
(1) DIRECTION TO SITE: From the RRO, take the Inner Beltline (h440 N/E) to the Highway 401/70 East exit (number 298).
Turn right at the bottom of the exit and go east on Highway 70 for about 10 % miles. At that point, you will enter the town of
Clayton (Johnston County). After another 7 %: miles you will enter the town of Smithfield, where Highway 301 (South/West)
will be on the right. Tom right onto 301 and Brogden Road will be a left turn. Jerry G Williams and Sons, Inc. will be on the
right side, just before the railroad tracks.
9

Page 2 of 7
(II) FACILITY DESCRIPTION: Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. is a woodworking operation that primarily processes
hardwoods into plank type material for decking, cabinetry, etc. The facility receives raw logs and ships dried lumber. The
facility primarily uses wood from red oak, white oak, and poplar trees. The facility generates steam for its kilns by a wood
fired boiler. The oak woods take np to 30 days in the kiln while poplar and the softer woods are dried in 34 days. A
portion of their processed material is exported to countries such as China that use the lumber for making furniture.
Due to difficulty in finding suitable hard wood logs, the facility is processing more pine than it has in the past:: .
Currently the facility operates eight -Hour shift five days a week. Presently the facility has about 60 employees
(III) SPECIAL SAFETY CONCERNS: As with all facility visits, standard safety gear (steel -toed shoes, hard hat,' safety
glasses and hearm rote s to be worm
ga. B P otion) i
(IV) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On December 11, 2015, I, Maureen Conner of DAQ, Cory Larsen of DWQ and Ray
Williams of DWM arrided at Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. to conduct an air,quality inspection as part of a multimedia
inspection that had been pre -arranged with the facility. We met with John Fox and Keith Inman to conduction our,
inspections. We reviewed the facility records which appeared to be in compliance.
During the inspection I was able fo observe the stack to the wood boiler. At the time of my.visit the opacity from the wood
boiler was in the range of 5 to 10%. No visible emissions were observed from the kilns. A couple of the planners and one
boiler was not operating during the inspection. .
- 1TvJ PtRiVII TEFi-EMISSIONS-SOURCES:

Page 3 of 7
_ -- -.
Emission ' Emission Source Control Control System
Source ID Description
i System IDi Description
--
Planer Mill Operation,
contained within an enclosed building,
with the following
outside emission points:
ES-PM-1
Planing mill waste collection system
CD -CA
simple cyclone (184 m dia.) 1
f
46 CD I
(CD -CA 46) m senes with a
{
BF-316
bagfilter (4,0802 filter area)
(CD BF 316) +
ES-WW�PMLO
- _
Planer Mill Wood Waste Storage Bin
Loadoui
N/A
N/A `
ES-WW PMSB
Planer Mill Wood Waste Storage Bin
N/A
N/A
Boiler Operations
ES-BSRV 1,
ES BSRV 2
Three sawdust silos
N/A
I
N/A
ES BSRV 3
ES B 1 (NESHAP)
_. _ ..
Wood fired boiler (21 million Btu per hour i
CD -BC 1 i
multicyclone (12 9 m. tubes)
maximum heat input)
(CD -BC 1)
ES-B-2 (NSPS
Wood feed boiler (28.7 million Btu per hour
CD -MC 1,;j
multicyclone (18 9 m tubes)
NESHAP),
maximum heat input)
CD-MC-2
(CD-MC-1) in series with a
multicyclone (49 6 m tubes)
D
Wood Kihi Operations ;
ES K 1 ES-K 2
Seven wood kilns
f
ES K 3 ES-K-4
ES K 5 ES K 96,
711"N/AES
K 7..S
The list appeared to be in compliance. At the time of the inspection the equipment list appeared to reflect the equipment
at the site that is required to be permitted
(V) PERMIT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
Al. The Permittee shall comply with Title 15ANCAC, Subchapter 2D .0202, 2D .0504, 2D. , 05 1 2,2D .0516, 2D .0521, 2D .0524
(40,CFR 60, Subpart Dc), 2D..0535, 2D .0540, 2D .1111_ (40 CFR 63, Subpart 6n, 2D 1806, 2Q .0102 and 2Q .0315.
Appeared to be in compliance. See specific conditions below for more detail
A.2. PERMIT RENEWAL AND EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENT - At least 90 days before this permit's expiration
date, the Permittee shall request permit renewal and submit the air pollution emission inventory report (with Certification
Sheet) in accordance with 15A NCAC 2D .0202, for the 2016 calendar year
Appeared to be in compliance. The Company was made aware that in 2017 they will need to supply a 2016 emission
inventory.
A.3. PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0504, particulate matter emissions from the
wood burning indirect heat exchangers shall not exceed the allowable emission rates listed below:
Source Emission Limit,
_.......... ._. __ .. _ (lbs/million Btu)
Wood fired boiler (21 mmBhOu maximum heat input) (ES-B 1) I 0 59
.... _.
Wood-fired
mmaximum' heat
B 0.49
Appeared to be ncompliance, perpereview. Theflty has not madany changes to these units since the last
inspection.

Page 4 of 7
A.4. The flyash collected in the multicyclones (ID Nos. CD-BC-1, CD-MC-1 and -2) shall not be reinjected into their respective
wood -feed boilers (ID Nos. ES-B-land ES-B-2).
Appeared to be in compliance. The fly ash is shipped off site.
A.5. PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0512 the Permittee shall not discharge
particulate matter caused by the woodworking without providing, at least adequate duct work and properly designed collectors.
Appeared to be in compliance. All wood 'working emissions appeared to be under controb
A.& - SULFUR DIOXIDE CONTROL REQUIREMENT -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0516, S02 emissions from.
combustion sources shall not exceed 2.3 lbs/mmBtu heat input. Appeared to be in compliance. The company is currently
only burning wood
A.7. VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0521, VE from emission sources
manufactured after July 1, 1971 shall not be > 20 % opacity when averaged over a six -minute period. Appears to be in
compliance. VE was 0% opacity from all of the sources, with the exception of the wood boiler, ID No. ES-B-1. The boiler
had an opacity of about 10%...
AX 15A NCAC 2D .0524 "NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS" - For the following equipment ,The Permince
shall comply with 15A NCAC 2D .0524 (NSPS) as promulgated in 40 CFR 60, Subpart indicated below, and including Subpart
A "General Provisions."
Emission Sources) Regulation
(wood fired boiler (28.7 mmBtu/ hr max heat mpi Subpart Do Small Industrial -Commercial Institutional Steam
�tGc t. TTnitg A.. _ .
a. Recordkeepmg Requirements:
i. Except as provided under paragraphs ii and iii of this section, the owner or operator of each affected facility
shall record and maintain records of the amount of each fuel combusted during each operating day. [40
CFR 60.48c(g)(1))
ii.. As an alternative 'to meeting the requirements of paragraph i of this section, the owner or operator of an
affected facility that combusts only natural gas; wood, fuels using fuel certification in 40 CFR 60.48c(f) to
demonstrate compliance, with the sot standard, fuels not subject to an emissions atandazd (excluding
opacity), or a mixture of these fuels may elect to record and maintain records of the amount of each fuel
combusted durine each calendar month. [40 CFR 60.48c(g)(2)] ".
iv. All records required under this'section shall be maintained by the owner or operator of the affected facility
for a'period of two years following the date of such record. [40 CFR 60.48c(i)]
Appears to be in compliance. The facility produced 10,477 tons of steam
Assume:70%efficiency for the boiler (as documented to Joe Voelker's R10 review).
4,500BtuRb'ojwet wood, and,;
970.3 BtuAb steam, heat of vaporisation A2120E-1 atmosphere.,
Tons of wood = (10,477 ton; eam *970 Btu/ltiae;m) l (0 7*4,500 Bnu m „o ff ;
3,226.25 tons of saw dust
A.9. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT'- As required by 15A NCAC 2D,.0535 the Permittee of a source of excess emissions
that > 4 hr and that results from a malfunction, a breakdown of process or control equipment or any other abnormal
conditions, shall notify DAQ by the next business day:. Appeared to be in compliance. The facility stated that they had not
operated in an upset state
A.10. FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As'required by 15A NCAC 2D,0540, the Permittee shall not cause or
allow fugitive dust emissions to cause or contribute to substantive complaints or excess visible emissions beyond the property
boundary. Appeared to be in compliance = no dust was observed leaving the property; no dust complaints are on file against
the facility.

Page 5 of 7
i
A.11. GENERALLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY - For ]I):Nos. ES B-1 and ES-B-2, the Permittee shall comply
with 15A NCAC 2I)..1111, as promulgated in 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJJ,," National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers", including Subpart A;"General Provisions.
Appear to be in compliance; The'Company received a NOD in January forforgetiing to do a tune-up on the only operating
boiler. The following table summarizes the stipulations and the facilityresults
Boiler ES-B 1 ES-B-2 IE9-NGFB ;.j
Fuel Wood Bio Mass Wood Bio Mass Natural Gas'
Initial Notification (c.i) 9-8-2011 .: " 9-8-2011;(Boder has not :: 9-8-2011, this is a'gas
been is operation) fuel boiler and the rule
' ..'...
4oes nOt a I.
Notification of Compliance Pending
Status c.ii110
Compliance Report (due every Not required until2016
other year, starting March 1,
the year ,following the fi rst
tune'u c.iii
Tune-
upda
te 1/23/2015 Boiler, has not been 'in , • • o eration
>Next tune -tip required by: 1/23/2017 Within 30 days of
start-
Y.
>CO concentration before
tune -a �'. .
>CO concentration after
rune-up1 ..
>Any corrective actions
taken
>Amount offuel used in the '
fuel used if.a,duel fuel '1
One Time Ener Assessment
>date of assessment ' 1211812014
>weie the required Yes
elements meet .liLA-G
The tune-ap has been performed but the facility has yet to receive the report
7.
A.12. CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS - As required by 15A NCAC 2D 1806 the, Permitter: shall
prevent odorous emissions from the facility from'causing or contributing to objectionable odors beyond the facility's boundary.
Appeared to be in compliance, no odors were detected.
A.13. Federal and State Rules Applicable to Sources Exempted from Air Permitting Requirements Your facility is subject to the
following.federal and state rule:`r
r. _,..
40 CFR 63 NESHAP/MACT Subpart ZZZZ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine l
which is applicable to some of the listed Insignificant/Exempt emission sources at the facility. ;
Appeared to be in compliance. There is a non-resettable meter. The Company is keeping written,records, and is
using ultar low sulfur fuel. The unit was not in operation at the time of the visit.
A.14. LIMITATION TO AVOID 15A NCAC 20.0501 - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q 0315 ."Synthetic Minor Facilities," to avoid
the applicability of 15A NCAC 2Q .0501 "Purpose of Section and Requirement for a Permit," as requested by the Permittee,
facility -wide emissions shall be less. than the following:
Appears to be in compliance.
Operations Restrictions:: .
L Allowed to produce up to107,000 tons ofsteam / 12-month period. The facility produced
10;477 tons of steam in 1014.

Page 6 of 7
ii. Allowed to produce up to 125,000, 000 board feel of lumber per consecutive 12-month period. The facility
did 12,604,645 board feet in 2014.
Inspection and Maintenance Requirements =
i. ' Baefilter Requirements - the Permittee shall perform periodic inspections and maintenance (I(W) as
recommended by the manufacturer, and perform an annual internal inspection of each bagfilter system.
ii.. Cyclone Requirements - the Permittee shall perform an annual inspection of the cyclone system, and
perform periodic I&Mas recommended by the manufacturer:
iii. Multi -Cyclone Requirements - the Permittee shall perform an annual internal inspection of the multi -
cyclone system; and perfgrm periodic I&M as recommended by the manufacturer.
The facility is doing preventive maintenance on a weekly basis, and does internal inspections in March.
The facility is keeping digital and written records.
- Recordkeepine Requirements%
is ' The Permittee shall record monthly and total annually the following: ".
A.' The tons ofsteam produced,by the wood fired boilers (ID Nos. ES-B-1 and 2).
B:; Board feet oflamberproduced by the Rough Sawing Operation.
iii : A log book shall be kept on site for each control device and made available to DAQ personnel upon request.
The Permittee shall record all inspections, maintenance and monitoring requirements listed above in the
log book. Any variance from the manufacturer's recommendations,shall be investigated with corrections
made and date of actions recorded in the log book.
` The facility is keeping written records .: =
" t(e ortin Re uirements within s!t 30 da a -er each calendar, ear,'rhe rermiriee shaii submit the oiiowin
P4 Y, y f g:!".
if. emissions and/or operational data listed below. The data should include monthly and 12 month totals for
the previous 12 month perod:'..; '
A.: The tons ofsteam produced by the. wood -fired boilers (ID Nos. ES-B-1 and 2).
10,477 tons of steam
B' The facility -wide carbo' n monoxide emissions. 8.739'tons
C..,' The board feet of lumber produced by the Rough Sawing Operation. 12,604,645 board feet
(`'II) IN
r
SIGNIFICANT EXEMPT ACTIVITIES " '
Source Eaem on Re u Source of 7 Sour
ce of Title
p g Pollutants? I
IES-PSG diesel fired peak shaving generator
(max allowable.electncal generation of 325,000 kW hr/yr) ( 2Q 0102 (c)(2)(B)( Yes Yes
max. hp 1,500 kW max output) NES_HAP - i
IES;-NGFB natural gas feed boiler 2Q 0102 (c)(2)(B)( Yes Yes '
(16.7 mmBtu/lir heat input)'
Appears to be in compliance, no new equipment was detected
(VIII) SOURCE TEST REVIEW: There have been no stack tests at the facility, during the past year. The current permit does not
have a source test requirement However, the following source test is on record:
• b December 22, .2006 the oilei (ES-13-2) aas tested for PM emissions for compliance with the existing
permit testing• requirement:` Results were 0.19 lb/mmBta,` under the limit'of'0.49: lb/mmBtu,. demonstrating
compliance.
(Up EMISSIONS INVENTORY REVIEW. Emissions had mostly decreased substantially (25-83%; but mostly —55%) from
Emissions Inventory years 206 to 2010 due to a drop in business. Exceptions include a 100% increase in PM (TSP), 26%
increase in Acetaldehyde; and 10% increase in Phenol emissions (see attached Facility Total CY 2010 Emission Summary
report): Acetaldehyde and Phenol emissions were not reported for the kil i (OS-4) in 200 ; explaining the increase in these
emissions in 2010. For PM (TSP), two factors can explain the increased 2010 emissions. Different estimations were used for
the Rough Sawing operation (OS-5): AP-42 in 2005 and NC Spreadsheet in 2010. And the Debarking operation (OS-9) was
not reported in 2005. See the attached table of these emissions by operating scenario and EI year for numerical details.

M
Page 7 of 7
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY: A review of I -Beam revealed the following actions against the facility:
• October 19, 2007 — an NOV was issued for failing to submit requested estimated annual emissions from two cyclones
connected to the fine sawing operation (ES-FS-1) by the established deadline. This violation was resolved by a
response from the facility.
• April 28 2006 —.an NOV/NRE was issued for failing to comply with bag£uter, cyclone and testing requirements.
Thus is.an amendment to a NOV/NRE submitted earlier on January 17, 2006 (see below).. A response was received
on May 31, 2006. A total fine .of $3763.00 was assessed, and was paid in fall and the case closed 6n January9, 2007.
• January 17, 2006'_ an NOWNRE was issued for failing to comply with bagfilter, cyclone and test ng requirements.
The response, received on February 21, 2006, was insufficient to return the facility to compliance, and triggered an
amendment NOWNRE to clarify the violations and what is required to return to compliance. See above for
assessment details.
• November 12, 2003 - an NOV was issued for failing to submit required quarterly reports as well as required NSPS
notification of construction and initial startup of a permitted wood -fired boiler (ID No. ES-B-2), discovered during
an inspection. These violations were resolved by a response from the facility.
• NOD issued on December 9, 2012, for not doing the require tune-up or facility assessment.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: At the time of this inspection, Jerry G Williams and Sons Inc appeared to be
in compliance with permitting requirements. The facility should be re -inspected within one year.

Nz
WoterResoumes
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ni a .,
February 29, 2016
MR. JERRY WILLIAMS — PRESIDENT
JERRY G. WILLIAMS & SONS, INC.
PO Box 2430
SMITHFIELD, NORTH CAROLINA 27577
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection
COC Number NCG210290
Jerry G. Williams Wet Decking Log Storage Site
NCG210000 General Permit for Lumber and Wood Products
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Williams:
Staff from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) conducted a stormwater compliance
inspection on December 11, 2015 for permit no. NCG210290, as part of a multimedia inspection of the
subject facility. We appreciate the assistance provided.by John Fox and Keith Inman during the
inspection. Please reference the attached inspection report checklist and summary in addition to the
comments provided below.
The facility was operating the day of the inspection and appeared to be well -kept and maintained. The
stormwater management program has been implemented, however, a number of items do require your
attention to achieve full compliance as follows:
A discernable stormwater outfall was observed draining the area nearby the aboveground fuel
tanks and scragg mill with discharge to the ditch downstream of the existing stormwater and
wastewater outfall locations that currently are monitored. This SDO will need to be added to the
SPPP and monitored for analytical and qualitative parameters going forward. Please reference
Figure t and 2 (enclosed) illustrating site topography and, revised sampling locations. Please
implement these changes to the stormwater management program immediately.
Please provide a written acknowledgement of the above items within 30 days of receipt of this.letter.
Your response should include measures taken to address the above compliance items and/or'a schedule
for their completion. If you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact me at
cory.larsen(@,ncdenr.gov or 919-791-4200.
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section www.ncwaterquality.org
1628,Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

Map provided by NCDED'
''�'x. Division of Water Resources x Gob n.a 5nhm W ntl wcsuPrm G;�.ez,�. e..�'"'x
I,egendt��=K �a gn y Locations are approximate and :: xpo a wcsw �F ei
are Provided for reference only
File Name. NCG210290 I Drawn by: WM � "� s� � �,'.�'�...'ssreat�`�-� � •,'�`'t-k. � s�
� ,Drainage Features -*per .,'���� ��—wy„ Date:1/5/16 lCheckedbv:CL

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG210290 Effective: 081O1113 Expiration: 07/31/18 Owner: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Wet Log Deck Storage site
County: Johnston 524 Brogden Rd
Region: Raleigh - Smithfield NC 27577
Contact Person: Jerry Mark Williams Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: - Phone:
Secondary ORC(s): - -
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 12/11/2015 EntryTime: 10:OOAM Exit Time: 12:30PM
Primary Inspector: Cory Larsen _.Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): t.
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: • Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Timber Products Stormwater Discharge CDC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant .
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG210290 Owner- Facility: Jerry G Williams& Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 12/1112015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Inspection Summary: - -
A multi-mediaprogram Compliance inspection was conducted by staff from Ihe,Division of Water Resources, Air duality,'
-
and Waste Management on December 11, 2015 to evaluate compliance with NPDES stormwater and air quality permits "
issued to the facility. The stormwater inspection results for NCG210290 are presented below:-
The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP) was reviewed and appeared to be complete and being implemented. The
facility provides stormwater training for employees at annual training event. The SPPP has not been revised recently but
facility staff indicated that no changos have occurred affecting the plan.-. Note: SPPP will require revisions baseH`drlfindings
of site walkthrough below. - .. -. ,.-
Analytical and qualitative monitoring of stormwater discharges at the at,cmwater outfall Is conducted twice per year.
Results were within applicable benchmark values. The wet decking outfall (#1) is pomii ted under NPDES permit ..- .
NC0085936. Reclaimed water provided by Johnston County is utilized to spray logs as necessary during the,wann season.
Bulk fuel storage CASTS) was observed near the maintenance shop/scragg mill area: Adequate secondary containment and
roof covering is provided.. The outlet was secured. A discernable stormwater outfall was observed draining this area and
discharging to the ditcK downstream of the existing stormwater and wastewater outfall locations currently monitored. It will
'need to be added to the SPPP and monitored likely for analytical parameters going forward. See Figure 1 and 2 in file.,
In general, the site was fairly well kept and properly managed..

Permit: NCG210290 Owner- Facility: Jerry G Williams&Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 12/11/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Roubne
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan -
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan Include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
# Does the Plan Include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?'
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the,Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible. Party(s)?
i
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? -
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted Its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted Its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
E ❑ ❑ ❑
0 0 ❑
E❑❑❑
io❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
0. ❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
1
Yes'No NA NE
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Permit and Outfallis
f Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the Inspection? N ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, Is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 1111 ❑
Comment: Additional SDO observed near scrafG mill / fuel tanks Total number of outfalls increase to 3
two stormwater, one wastewater).
Page: 3

tic
PAT MCCRORY
' Governor
is
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Air Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITV .
March 7, 2016
JERRY WILLIAMS—PRESIDENT
JERRY G. WILLIAMS & SONS, INC. .
PO Box 2430
SMITHFIELD, NORTH CAROLINA 27577
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc.
Johnston County
Dear Permittee:
Department of Environment and Natural Resources staff from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
multimedia compliance inspection of Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. on December 11, 2015 for permits
and programs administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Division of Waste
Quality
Mineral, and Land
Resources
Management
Resources
We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our
initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at
your facility. The results of each applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary
corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a
Division report is not attached, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and
regulations at the time of inspection.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection or the results of each program inspection,
please contact the Raleigh Regional Office at (919) 7914200 and ask to speak with the appropriate Division
staff. Thank you for your cooperation.
encl: Air Quality Inspection Report
Stormwater Inspection Report
cc: DAQ RRO Files
DEMLR RRO Files
DWR RRO Files
DWM RRO Files
Slate of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Air Quality
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barren Drive I Raleigh, NC 27609
919 7914200 T 1919 8812261 F

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
Raleigh Regional Office
AIR QUALITY
Jerry G Williams and Sons Inc
NC Facility ID 5100047
Inspection Report
County/FIPS: Johnston/lot
Date: 12/16/2015
Facility Data
Permit Data
Jerry G Williams and Sons Inc
Permit 03235 / R12
524 Brogden Road
Issued 2/15/2013
Smithfield, NC 27577
Expires 1/31/2018
Lat: 35d 29.7490m Long: 78d 20.9970m
Classification Synthetic Minor
SIC: 2421 / Sawmills & Planing Mills General i
Permit Status Active
NAICS: 321113 / Sawmills
Current Permit Application(s) None
Program Applicability
Contact Data
Facility Contact
Authorized Contact
Technical Contact
SIP
John Fox
John Fox
John Fox
MACT Part 63: Subpart 6J, Subpart ZZZZ
Vice President of
Vice President of
Vice President of
NSPS: Subpart Dc
Operations
Operations
Operations
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
Compliance Data
Comments:
Inspection Date 12/11/2015
Inspector's Name Maureen Conner
Inspector's Signature:
Operating Status Operating
Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code FCE
Date of Signature:
On -Site Inspection Result Compliance
I7--1(0-?1115
Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR:
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
*HAP
2010
71.54
0.5500
4.87,
3.90
13.27
9.18
840.64
2005
34.99
1.27
10.80
23.05
28.29
12.21
7645.00
* Highest HAP Emitted inpounds)
Five Year Violation History: None
Date - Letter Tyne Rule Violated Violation Resolution Date
Performed Stack Tests since last FCE: None
Date Test Results Test Method(s) . Source(s) Tested
M DiRE%, r iON TO Si t E: From the xKO, take the inner Belthne (1-440 N/E) to the Highway 401/70 East exit (number 298).
Turn right at the bottom of the exit and go east on Highway 70 for about 10 '/z miles. At that point, you will enter the town of
Clayton (Johnston County). After another 7'/2 miles you will enter the town of Smithfield, where Highway 301 (South/West)
will be on the right. Tom right onto 301 and Brogden Road will be a left turn. Jerry G Williams and Sons, Inc. will be on the
right side, just before the railroad tracks.

Page 2 of 7
(II) FACILITY DESCRIPTION: Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. is a woodworking operation that primarily processes
hardwoods into plank type material for decking, cabinetry, etc. The facility receives raw logs and ships dried lumber. The
facility primarily uses wood from red oak, white oak, and poplar trees. The facility generates steam for its kilns by a wood
fired boiler. The oak woods take up to 30 days in the kiln while poplar and the softer woods are dried in 3-4 days. A
portion of their processed material is exported to countries such as China that use the lumber for making furniture.
Due to difficulty in finding suitable hard wood logs, the facility is processing more pine than it has in the past.
Currently the facility operates eight -hour shift five days a week. Presently the facility has about 60 employees.
(III) SPECIAL SAFETY CONCERNS: As with all facility visits, standard safety gear (steel -toed shoes, hard hat, safety
glasses and hearing protection) is to be wom.
(IV) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On December 11, 2015, I, Maureen Conner of DAQ, Cory Larsen of DWQ and Ray
Williams of DWM arrived at Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. to conduct an air quality inspection as part of a multimedia
inspection that had been pre -arranged with the facility. We met with John Fox and Keith Inman to conduction our
inspections. We reviewed the facility records which appeared to be in compliance.
During the inspection I was able to observe the stack to the wood boiler. At the time of my visit the opacity from the wood
boiler was in the range of 5 to 10%. No visible emissions were observed from the kilns. A couple of the planners and one
boiler was not operating during the inspection.
(1V) YL'Kivl111CL-b1vuJD1v14JbVUIII.ES: `
Enussron
Emission Source
Control Control System
Source ID
Descnption (System
IDjDescription
Debarking Operation
DBO HOG Bark hog mill with pneumatic discharge
DBO LDL
Large diameter log debarker, utilizing
mechanical spinning heads to remove the
N/��
j
N/Abark
DBO-SDL jFbark
l diameter log debarker, utilizing
��in
spinning heads to remove the
N/A
IN/A
— --- — --
DBO CV1 Conve or N/A N/A
Y I __. .......,
DBO-CV2 Conve or N/A N/A
DBO CV3 j Conveyor N/A N/A
Rough Sawing Operation, contained within an enclosed building, with the following outside emission
points: ... ....
ES W W RCLO Green sawdust bin loadour
__.
ES W W-RCSB Green sawdust conveyor going to the sawdust N/A N/A
lbin
RSO CHP-AUG ;Auger discharging into a railcar N/A
-Fi
N/A
—
RSO CHP per CD-C
mC-1 simple cyclone (72 dial
_ .
(CD-CC-1)
RSO CHP CVR ' Conveyor
RSO-SCR Screen N/A N/A
RSO-SWD-CVR-1' Conveyor discharging into a truck trailer
N/A N/A

Page 3 of 7
-- - - -
Emission Emission Source iControl Control System
Source ID 3 Description I System ID Description
(Planer Mill Operation, contained withinan enclosed building, with the_ following outside emission points:
_
ES-PM-1 Planing null waste collection system simple cyclone (184-in. dia.)
7 (CD-CA-46) in series with a
FBF-31bagfilter (4,08882 filter area)
(CD-BF-316)
ES-WW PMLO PlBinaner Mill Wood Waste Storage B
_ Loadout - N/A N/A
ES-WW PMSB Planer Mill Wood Waste Storage
-. --..
N/A
N/A
-
1 Boiler Operations
- -
ES-BSRV 1
ES
re.esawdustsilos
N/A
N/A
ES-BSRV 3'
ES-B-1 (NESHAP)' Wood fired boiler (21 million Btu per hour i
CD -BC 1
- - - - - -
mulucyclone (12 9-in. tubes)
! maximum heat input) .J
(CD-BQ 1)
..........__
' ES-B-2 (NSPS, 'Wood -fired boiler (28.7 million Btu per hour ;
CD-MC-1,�
mulucyclone (18 9 m tubes) j
maximum heat input)
CD-MC-2
I (CD-MC-1) in series with a
7SHAP)
mulucyclone (49 6-in.mbes)
(CD-MC-2)
_
Wood Kiln Operations
ES-K-I, ES-K-2, I Seven wood kilns
ES-K-3, ES-K-4,
I
N/A N/A
•
i
' ES-K-7 I
The list appeared to be in compliance. At the time of the inspection the equipment list appeared to reflect the equipment
at the site that is required to be permitted. '
(V) PERMIT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
Al. The Pemiittee shall comply with Title 15A NCAC, Subchapter 2D .0202, 2D .0504, 2D .0512, 2D .0516, 2D .0521, 2D .0524
(40 CFR 60, Subpart Dc), 213.0535, 2131.0540, 2D .1111 (40 CFR 63, Subpart 6J), 213.1806, 2Q .0102 and 2Q .0315.
Appeared to be in compliance. See specific conditions below for more detail -
A.2. PERMIT RENEWAL AND EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENT - At least 90 days before this permit's expiration
date, the Permittee shall request permit renewal and submit the air pollution emission inventory report (with Certification
Sheet) in accordance with 15A NCAC 2D .0202, for the 2016 calendar year
Appeared to be in compliance. The Company was made aware that in 2017 they will need to supply a 1016 emission
inventory.
A.3. PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0504, particulate matter emissions from the
wood burning indirect heat exchangers shall not exceed the allowable emission rates listed below:
---
Source Emission Limit I
m(Ibs/million Btu)
od-fired bo Woiler (21 mBtu/hr maximum heat input) (ES-B-1) 0.59
Wood -fired boiler (28.7 mmBtu/hr maximum heat input)
0.49
-------------- ------ -- --.
Appeared to be in compliance, per permit review. The facility has not made any changes to these units since the last
inspection.

Page 4 of 7
AA. The flyash collected in the multicyclones (ID Nos. CD-BC-1, CD-MC-1 and -2) shall not be reinjected into their respective
wood -fired boilers (ID Nos. ES-B-1 and ES-13-2).
Appeared to be in compliance. The fly ash is shipped off site.
A.S. PARTICULATE CONTROL REOUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0512 the Permittee shall not discharge
particulate matter caused by the woodworking without providing, at least adequate duct work and properly designed collectors.
Appeared to be in compliance. All wood working emissions appeared to be under control.
A.6. SULFUR DIOXIDE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0516, SO2 emissions from
combustion sources shall not exceed 2.3 Ibs/mmBtu heat input. Appeared to be in compliance. The company is currently
only burning wood.
A.7. VISIBLE EMISSIONS CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0521, VE from emission sources
manufactured after July 1, 1971 shall not be > 20 % opacity when averaged over a six -minute period.. Appears to be in
compliance. VE was 0% opacityfrom all of the sources, with the exception of the wood boiler, ID No. ES-B-1. The boiler
had an opacity of about 10%.
A.B. 15A NCAC 213.0524 "NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS" - For the following equipment, The Permittee
shall comply with 15A NCAC 2D .0524 (NSPS) as promulgated in 40 CFR 60, Subpart indicated below, and including Subpart
A "General Provisions."
Emission Sources) i Regulation
Iwood-fired boiler (28.7 mmBtu/ hr max heat iupi Subpart Dc Small Industrial -Commercial -Institutional Steam
a. Recordkeeping Requirements:
i. Except as provided under paragraphs ii and iii of this section, the owner or operator of each affected facility
shall record and maintain records of the amount of each fuel combusted during each operating day. [40
CFR 60.48c(g)(1)]
ii. As an alternative to meeting the requirements of paragraph i of this section, the owner or operator of an
affected facility that combusts only natural gas, wood, fuels using fuel certification in 40 CFR 60.48c(f) to
demonstrate compliance, with the SOz standard, fuels not subject to an emissions standard (excluding
opacity), or a mixture of these fuels may elect to record am maintain records of the amount of each fuel
combusted durin¢ each calendar month. [40 CFR 60.48c(g)(2)]
iv. All records required under this section shall be maintained by the owner or operator of the affected facility
for a period of two years following the date of such record. [40 CFR 60.48c(i)]
Appears to be in compliance. The facility produced 10,477 tons of steam.
Assume:70% efficiency for the boiler (as documented in Joe Voelker's R70 review).
4,500 Btu4b of wet wood, and
970.3 Btullb steam, heat of vaporization (212017--1 atmosphere. .
Tons of wood = (10,477 ton.. *970 Btugti ¢am) / (0.7*4,500 Btu/1b„„oa)
= 3,226.25 tons ofsaw dust.
A.9. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0535, the Permittee of a source of excess emissions
that > 4 hr and that results from a malfunction, a breakdown of process or control equipment or any other abnormal
conditions, shall notify DAQ by the next business day.. Appeared to be in compliance. The facility stated that they had not
operated in an upset state.
A.10. FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REOUIREMENT -As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0540, the Pennittee shall not cause or
allow fugitive dust emissions to cause or contribute to substantive complaints or excess visible emissions beyond the property
boundary. Appeared to be in compliance — no dust was observed leaving the property; no dust complaints are on file against
the facility..

Page 5 of 7
A.11. GENERALLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY - For ID Nos. ES-B-I and ES-11-2, the Permittee shall comply
with 15A NCAC 2D .I 111, as promulgated in 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJJ, "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers", including Subpart A "General Provisions.
Appear to be in compliance. The Company received a NOD in Januaryfor forgetting to do a tune-up on the only operating
boiler. The following table summarizes the stipulations and the facility results:
Initial Notification (c.i)
/ I
9-8-2011 (Boiler
been in operation)
Notification of Compliance/
/\\\\\\
Status /\\
Compliance
l I l
1
/wi
\
yearlo//
tune t
Tun• / date
/
Boiler/ / I been
\\\\\\\\\\\
opera
>011 concentration before
0
I concentration after/ns
// (If V
rrective /
At
>Amount offuel used in the
fuel used if it duelfuel
boiler
.h nv i/Mu+..c fli tl/nTYA../Md..
One,;*,me Ener.J Assessment
/?i.iit5netl �.4��kv..'ii.�/d�2P�93..T14
4..U✓/12{.i wYC4}'"IKtl..u}"i�`S.'��
i'W r/..'.�Mv11�5f. l'&_
i'VOI
/
l' he tune-up has been perjormea but the facility has yet to receive the report.
A.12. CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .1806 the Permittee shall
prevent odorous emissions from the facility from causing or contributing to objectionable odors beyond the facility's boundary.
Appeared to be in compliance, no odors were detected.
A.13. Federal and State Rules Applicable to Sources Exempted from Air Permitting Requirements - Your facility is subject to the
following federal and state rule:
40 CFR 63 NESHAP/MACT Subpart ZZZZ -- Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine
which is applicable to some of the listed Insignificant/Exempt emission sources at the facility.
Appeared to be in compliance. There is a non-resettable meter. The Company is keeping written records, and is
using ultar low sulfur fuel. The unit was not in operation at the time of the visit.
A.14. LIMITATION TO AVOID 15A NCAC 20.0501 - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0315 "Synthetic Minor Facilities," to avoid
the applicability of 15A NCAC 2Q .0501 "Purpose of Section and Requirement for a Permit," as requested by the Permittee,
facility -wide emissions shall be less than the following:
Appears to be in compliance.
Operations Restrictions::
4 Allowed to produce up to] 07,000 tons ofsteam / 12-month period. The facility produced
10,477 tons of steam in 2014.

Page 6 of 7
ii. Allowed to produce up to 125, 000, 000 board feet of lumber per consecutive 12-month period. The facility
did 12,604,645 board feet in 2014.
Inspection and Maintenance Requirements -
i. Barfi[ter Requirements -the Permittee shall perform periodic inspections and maintenance (MrM) as
recommended by the manufacturer, and perform an annual internal inspection of each bagtiilter system.
ii. Cyclone Requirements -the Permittee shall perform an annual inspection of the cyclone system, and
perform periodic IBM as recommended by the manufacturer.
iii. Multi -Cyclone Requirements - the Permittee shall perform an annual internal inspection of the multi -
cyclone system, and perform periodic I&M as recommended by the manufacturer.
The facility is doing preventive maintenance on a weekly basis, and does internal inspections in March.
The facility is keeping digital and written records. .
RecordkeepinQ Requirements .
i. The Permittee shall record monthly and total annually the following:
A. The tons of steam produced by the wood -fired boilers (ID Nos. ES-B-1 and 2).
B. Board feet of lumber produced by the Rough Sawing Operation.
i. A log book shall be kept on site for each control device and made available to DAQ personnel upon request.
The Permittee shall record all inspections, maintenance and monitoring requirements listed above in the
log book. Any variance from the manufacturer's recommendations shall be investigated with corrections
made and date of actions recorded in the log book.
The facility is keeping written records. - -
-ReporimK-Reel uire //Ier1 is IY 4h in JV'da J'a lei eueii'�ai-i-1_- ai, iFie Peimittee shall
Y J Y J,,..,,...,.6.
i. emissions and/or operational data listed below. The data should include monthly and 12 month totals for
the previous 12 month period.
A. The tons of steam produced by the wood -fired boilers (ID Nos. ES-B-1 and 2).
10,477 tons of steam. .
B. The facility -wide carbon monoxide emissions. 8.739 tons
C. The board feet of lumber produced by the Rough Sawing Operation. 12,604,645 board feet
(VII) ,INSIGNIFICANT / EXEMPT ACTIVITIES:
Source Exemption Regu Source of 7 Source of Title:
0
.. _. Pollutants.
IES-PSG - diesel -fired peak shaving generator
(max. allowable electrical generation of 325,000 kW hr/yr) ( 2Q 0102 (c)(2)(B)( Yes Yes
max. hp 1 500kW max output) NESHAP��-
IES-NGFB - natural gas -fired boiler 2Q .0102 (c)(2)(B)( Yes ! Yes
(16.7 mmBtu/hr heat input) ....
Appears to be in compliance, no new equipment was detected..
(VIII) SOURCE TEST REVIEW: There have been no stack tests at the facility during the past year. The current permit does not
have a source test requirement. However, the following source test is on record:
• December 22, 2066 — the wood -fired boiler (ES-13-2) was tested for PM emissions for compliance with the existing
permit testing requirement. Results were 0.19 lb/mniBtu, under the limit of 0.49 lb/mmBtu, demonstrating
compliance. '
J
(IX) EMISSIONS INVENTORY REVIEW: Emissions had mostly decreased substantially (25-83%, but mostly —55%) from
Emissions Inventory years 2005 to 2010 due to a drop in business. Exceptions include a 100% increase in PM (TSP), 26%
increase in Acetaldehyde, and 197% increase in Phenol emissions (see attached Facility Total CY 2010 Emission Summary
report). Acetaldehyde and Phenol emissions were not reported for the kiln (OS4) in'2005, explaining the increase in these
emissions in 2010. For PM (TSP), two factors can explain the increased 2010 emissions. Different estimations were used for
the Rough Sawing operation (OS-5): AP-42 in 2005 and NC Spreadsheet in 2010. And the Debarking operation (OS-9) was
not reported in 2005. See the attached table of these emissions by operating scenario and EI year for numerical details.

Page 7 of 7
(X) ENFORCEMENT HISTORY: A review of I -Beam revealed the following actions against the facility:
• October 19, 2007 — an NOV was issued for failing to submit requested estimated annual emissions from two cyclones
connected to the fine sawing operation (ES-FS-1) by the established deadline. This violation was resolved by a
response from the facility.
• April 28, 2006 — an NOWNRE was issued for failing to comply with bagfilter, cyclone and testing requirements.
This is an amendment to a NOV/NRE submitted earlier on January 17, 2006 (see below). A response was received
on May 31, 2006. A total fine of S3763.00 was assessed, and was paid in full and the case closed on January 9, 2007.
• January 17, 2006 — an NOVINRE was issued for failing to comply with bagfilter, cyclone and testing requirements.
The response, received on February 21, 2006, was insufficient to return the facility to compliance, and triggered an
amendment NOV/NRE to clarify the violations and what is required to return to compliance. See above for
assessment details.
• November 12, 2003 — an NOV was issued for failing to submit required quarterly reports as well as required NSPS
notification of construction and initial startup of a permitted wood -fired boiler (ID No. ES-B-2), discovered during
an inspection. These violations were resolved by a response from the facility.
• NOD issued on December 9, 2012, for not doing the require tune-up or facility assessment.
(XI) CONCLUSIONSIRECOMMENDATIONS: At the time of this inspection, Jerry G Williams and Sons Inc appeared to be
in compliance with permitting requirements. The facility should be re -inspected within one year.

ND
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
February 29, 2016
PAT MCCRORY
G,eemor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
MR. JERRY WILLIAMS —PRESIDENT
JERRY G. WILLIAMS & SONS, INC.
PO Box 2430
SMITHFIELD, NORTH CAROLINA 27577
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection
COC Number NCG210290
Jerry G. Williams Wet Decking Log Storage Site
NCG210000 General Permit for Lumber and Wood Products
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Williams:
Secretory
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ni-1 .
Staff from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) conducted a stormwater compliance
inspection on December 11, 2015 for permit no. NCG210290 as .part of a multimedia inspection of the
subject facility. We appreciate the assistance provided by John Fox and Keith Inman during the
inspection. Please reference the attached inspection report checklist and summary in addition to the
comments provided below.
The facility was operating the day of the inspection and appeared to be well -kept and maintained. The
stormwater management program has been implemented, however, a number of items do require your
attention to achieve full compliance as follows:
A discernable stormwater outfall was observed draining the area nearby the aboveground fuel
tanks and scragg mill with discharge to the ditch downstream of the existing stormwater and
wastewater outfall locations that currently are monitored. This SDO will need to be added to the
SPPP and monitored for analytical and qualitative parameters going forward. Please reference
Figure 1 and 2 (enclosed) illustrating site topography and, revised sampling locations. Please
implement these changes to the stormwater management program immediately.
Please provide a written acknowledgement of the above items within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
Your response should include measures taken to address the above compliance items and/or a schedule
for their completion. If you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact me at
coly.larsen(@,ncdenr.gov or 919-791-4200.
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section www.ncwaterquality.org
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

February 29, 2016
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,
Cory rs n, E
Environmental Engineer
Raleigh Regional Office
Encl: Compliance Inspection Report
Figure 1: Site Layout
Figure 2: Revised Sampling Locations
cc: RRO/SWP Files

Map provided by NCDEQ -
¢""''„'-r< Division of Water Resources 6. n�... a J
� 3 usP 1 11 n Pl MC b' tt2f h4-NpT ..z �h-�J..y�'4 Yy� N '3
Le end a r v Locations are approximate and :: gip„ wss e��
bf. k:,3F st��x"f p. 7�'"'F
u`ar its, - ': are provided for reference only :: ,E,l.0 Iv r ,%sr'``-' �'� `� .,.'�`
File Name: NGG210290
I Drawn by: WM
Dale: 1/5/16
lChecked by: CL

Compliance Inspection
Report
Permit: NCG210290 Effective:
08/01/13 - Expiration:
07/31/18 Owner:
Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
SOC: Effective:
Expiration:
Facility:
Wet Log Deck Storage site
524 Brogden Rd
County: Johnston
Region: Raleigh
-
Smithfield NC 27577
Contact Person: Jerry Mark Williams
Title:
Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s): '
On -Site Representa0ve(s(:
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 12/11/2015
Primary Inspector: Cory Larsen
Secondary Inspector(s): .
Certification:
EntryTime: 10:00AM Exit Time: 12:30PM
.Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Timber Products Stormwater Discharge CDC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
e
Page: 1

Permit:
NCG210290
Owner - Facility: Jerry G Williams R Sons Inc
Inspection Date:
12/11/2015
Inspection Typo :Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit
Routine
Inspection Summary:
a
A multi -media program, compliance inspection was conducted by staff from the Division of Water Resources, Air Quality,
and Waste Management on December 11, 2015 to evaluate compliance with NPDES stormwater and air quality permits
issued to the facility. The stormwater inspection results for NGG210290 are presented below.
The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP) was reviewed and appeared to be complete and being implemented. The
facility provides stormwater training for employees at annual training event. The SPPP has not been revised recently but
facility staff indicated that no changes have occurred affecting the plan. Note; SPPP will require revisions based*oh findings
of site walkthrough below.
Analytical and qualitative monitoring of stormwater discharges at the atormwater outfall is conducted twice per year.
Results were within applicablebenchmark values. The wet decking outfall (41) is ponnired under NPDES permit ,
NC0085936. Reclaimed water provided by Johnston County is utilized to spray logs as necessary during the warm season.
Bulk fuel storage (ASTs) was observed near the maintenance shop/scragg mill area. Adequatesecondary containment and
roof covering is provided. The outlet was secured. A discernable stormwater outfall was observed draining this area and
discharging to the ditch downstream of the existing stormwater and wastewater outfall locations currently monitored. It will
need to be added to the SPPP and monitored likely for analytical parameters going forward. See Figure 1 and 2 in file.
In general, the site was fairly well -kept and Drooerlv managed- -... b
Page: 2

Permit: NCG210290
Ins ectl D t 12/11/ 0 5
Owner- Facility: Jerry G Wlllams & Sons Inc
p on a a: 2 1 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NANE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
N El 0 El
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®� ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan Include a detailed site map Including outfall locations and drainage areas?
®El Q
# Does the Plan Include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
0 Q ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
ME] E10
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■ ❑ O ❑
# Does the Plan Include a BMP summary?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
I
0 El Q El
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
. ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
# Does the Plan Include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■ ❑
Comment
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?El El 0
.
Comment:
Analytical Monitorin
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ 11 ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ■
El
Comment: , 2 x year monitoring performed Recent results have been compliant with benchmark values
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? S
El 1:1 El
# Were all outfalls observed during the Inspection? ❑
El
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? El ❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all Illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ®El ❑
El
Comment: Additional SDO observed near scrafg mill / fuel tanks Total number of outfalls increase to 3 1
two Stormwater, one wastewater)
Page: 3

PAT MCCRORY
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
k
Gowmar
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretory
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
M-1rr,
February 29, 2016
MR. JERRY WILLIAMS — PRESIDENT
JERRY G. WILLIAMS & SONS, INC.
PO Box 2430
SMITHFIELD, NORTH CAROLINA 27577
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection
COC Number NCG210290
Jerry G. Williams Wet Decking Log Storage Site
NCG210000 General Permit for Lumber and Wood Products
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Williams:
Staff from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) conducted a stormwater compliance
inspection on December 11, 2015 for permit no. NCG210290 as part of a multimedia inspection of the
subject facility. We appreciate the assistance provided by John Fox and Keith Inman during the
inspection. Please reference the attached inspection report checklist and summary in addition to the
comments provided below.
The facility was operating the day of the inspection and appeared to be well -kept and maintained. The
stormwater management program has been implemented, however, a number of items do require your
attention to achieve full compliance as follows:
A discernable stormwater outfall was observed draining the area nearby the aboveground fuel
tanks and scragg mill with discharge to the ditch downstream of the existing stormwater and
wastewater outfall locations that currently are monitored. This SDO will need to be added to the
SPPP and monitored for analytical and qualitative parameters going forward. Please reference
Figure 1 and 2 (enclosed) illustrating site topography and, revised sampling locations. Please
implement these changes to the stormwater management program immediately.
Please provide a written acknowledgement of the above items within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
Your response should include measures taken to address the above compliance items and/or a schedule
for their completion. If you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact me at
corv.larsenno ncderingov or 919-791-4200.
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section www.ncwaterquality.org
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

February 29, 2016
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,
Cory rs n, E
Environmental Engineer
Raleigh Regional Office
Encl: Compliance Inspection Report
Figure 1: Site Layout
Figure 2: Revised Sampling Locations
cc: RRO/SWP Files

low
ji

Figure 2: Revised Wastewater and Stormwater Sampling Locations
'f
�} r
Stormwater Drainage 02
�.
lop
I% W
WastewaterOutfall
Nk Map provided by NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources t" cowawrsy.r�vbna-vroswrrw c.n..
Legend ;.."� f.
�a��,��; :: Locations are approximate andau
are provided for reference only :: u : F.m us A
• Sampling Points O Parcel Boundary
e Name FiNCG210290 Oravm M� WM rba,so r.m
Drainage Features U % too
Date- 1 /5/1 R Checked bv. CL F,,,

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG210290 Effective: 08/01/13 Expiration: 07/31/18 Owner: Jerry G Wlliams & Sons Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Wet Log Deck Storage site
County: Johnston - 524 Brogden Rd
Region: Raleigh
Smithfield NC 27577
Contact Person: Jerry Mark Williams Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 12/11/2015
Primary Inspector: Cory Larsen
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
EntryTime: 10:OOAM Exit Time: 12:30PM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Timber Products Slormwater Discharge COG _
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG210290 Owner- Facility: Jerry G Williams B Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 12/11/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
A multi -media program compliance inspection was conducted by staff from the Division of Water Resources, Air Quality,
and Waste Management on December 11, 2015 to evaluate compliance with NPDES stormwater and air quality permits
issued to the facility. The stormwater inspection results for NCG210290 are presented below.
The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP) was reviewed and appeared to be complete and being implemented. The
facility provides stormwater training for employees at annual training event. The SPPP has not been revised recently but
facility staff indicated that no changes have occurred affecting the plar...Note:SSPPP will require revisions based;on findings
of site walkthrough below. " — - _ ' . _
Analytical and qualitative monitoring of stormwater discharges at the at,.�rmwater outfall is conducted twice per year. ,oc:
Results were within applicable benchmark values. The wet decking outfall (#1) is peroMed under NPDES permit .. - .
NCG085936. Reclaimed water provided by Johnston County is utilized to spray logs as necessary during the warm season.
Bulk fuel storage (ASTs) was observed near the maintenance shop/scragg mill area. Adequate secondary containment and
roof covering is provided. The outlet was secured. A discernable stormwater outfall was observed draining this area and
discharging to the ditch downstream of the existing stormwater and wastewater outfall locations currently monitored. It will
need to be added to the SPPP and monitored likely for analytical parameters going forward. See Figure 1 and 2 in file.
In general, the site was_faidy_well kept and rroPedv mi.
f
Page: 2

Permit: NCG210200 Owner -Facility: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 12/11/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
-
Yes No NA' NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
. ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan Include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
® ❑ 11 ❑
# Does the Plan Include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?0
El Q
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
0 Q ❑ El
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
El ❑ 0
# Does the facility to all necessary secondary containment?
0 ❑ � ❑
# Does the Plan include a EMP summary?
. ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? -
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? _
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■11❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■ 1:1 El El
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
. ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment
Qualitative Monitoring
Yee No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitorin
Yee No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ` e O E3 ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? El ❑ E El
Comment: 2 x Year monitoring performed Recent results have been compliant with benchmark values
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
1
# Is a copy of the Permit and ,the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?0 11 El El
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 0❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ 0
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? . ❑ ❑
Comment: Additional SDO observed near scrafg mill / fuel tanks Total number of outfalls increase to 3
two stormwater, one wastewater)
Page: 3

jV�W "ic f W_� td Q-A-W
ix(I1, CZyO
1VW21
Farrah: Owner -Facility:,
Inspection Oato: 1 j?iltf
)f; Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No
NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
�©❑
/
',I 11
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
L D
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
,-+
` ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
Wn
n n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
Ui D
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
— 0 ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
E ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
C! ❑
❑ ❑
iF Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ,ems❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? A-D'yv"ItL VA--A—_'t L� ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? C7 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? A-S CkA*(U t-T tK n ❑ n
N 2s `�,q'�
it Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? VE) n n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? I-� ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ZK
Ym
1/ ❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No
NA NE
-
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 2ec / n
+ p r°I
p-�f o
F_ ❑
❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
t9/0
❑ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? - LY ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ` ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? - u❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: 1
wn� 8sWF��I Yt
t c (A s >
iJw Pe,� r✓�(�o8sq}C d��� frpt��nll I
INQ I 4&, d c✓�'U �r�, �o I%�Cvt �� �M lgit t
b-we a an fv
a
5410 ,

Permit No. NCG210000
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG210000
TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
For establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing:
Lumber and Wood Products
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, this permit is hereby issued to all owners or
operators, hereinafter permittees, which are covered by this permit as evidenced by receipt of a Certificate
of Coverage by the Environmental Management Commission to allow the discharge of stormwater to the
surface waters of North Carolina or to a separate storm sewer system conveying discharges to surface
waters in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
Coverage under this General Permit is applicable to:
All owners or operators of stormwater point source discharges associated with establishments
primarily engaged in activities classified as Lumber and Wood Products, Except Furniture [Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) 24], including Wood Chip Mills;
Stormwater point source discharges from like industrial activities deemed by The Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) to be similar to these operations in the process, or the discharges, or the exposure of
raw materials, intermediate products, by-products, products, or waste products.
Except upon DWQ determination of similarity as provided immediately above, the following
activities and associated discharges are excluded from coverage under this General Permit:
♦ Establishments primarily engaged in: Logging [SIC 2411]; or manufacturing Wood Kitchen Cabinets
[SIC 2434]; or Wood Preserving [SIC 2491].
The General Permit shall become effective on August 1, 2013.
The General Permit shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2018.
Signed this day July 31, 2013.
Original signed by Matt Matthews
for Thomas A. Reeder, Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit No. NCG210000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I INTRODUCTION
Section A: General Permit Coverage
Section B: Permitted Activities
PART IIMONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR PERMITTED DISCHARGES
Section A: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Section B: Analytical Monitoring Requirements
Section C: Qualitative Monitoring Requirements
Section D: On -Site Vehicle Maintenance Monitoring Requirements
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS
Section A: Compliance and Liability
1. Compliance Schedule
2. Duty to Comply
3. Duty to Mitigate
4. Civil and Criminal Liability
5. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
6. Property Rights
7. Severability
8. Duty to Provide Information
9. Penalties for Tampering
10. Penalties for Falsification of Reports
11. Onshore or Offshore Construction
12. Duty to Reapply
Section B: General Conditions
1. General Permit Expiration
2. Transfers
3. When an Individual Permit May be Required
4. When an Individual Permit May be Requested
S. Signatory Requirements
6. General Permit Modification, Revocation and Reissuance, or
Termination
f

Permit No. NCG210000
7. Certificate of Coverage Actions
8. Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee Requirements
Section C: Operation and Maintenance of Pollution Controls
1. Proper Operation and Maintenance
2. Need to Halt or Reduce not a Defense
3. Bypassing of Stornwater Control Facilities
Section D: Monitoring and Records
1.
Representative Sampling
2.
Recording Results
3.
Flow Measurements
4.
Test Procedures
S.
Representative Outfall
6.
Records Retention
7.
Inspection and Entry
Section E: Reporting
Requirements
1.
Discharge Monitoring Reports
2.
Submitting Reports
3.
Availability of Reports
4.
Non-Stormwater Discharges
S.
Planned Changes
6.
Anticipated Noncompliance
7.
Spills
8.
Bypass
9.
Twenty-four Hour Reporting
10.
Other Noncompliance
11.
Other Information
PART IV DEFINITIONS
ii

Permit No. NCG210000
PART I INTRODUCTION
SECTION A: GENERAL PERMIT COVERAGE
All persons desiring to have facilities covered by this General Permit must register with the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) by the filing of a Notice of Intent (NOI) and applicable fees. The NO] shall be
submitted and a certificate of coverage issued prior to any point source discharge of stormwater
associated with industrial activity to the surface waters of the state.
Any owner or operator not wishing to be covered or limited by this General Permit may make
application for an individual NPDES permit in accordance with NPDES procedures in 1SA NCAC 2H
.0100, stating the reasons supporting the request. Any application for an individual permit should
be made at least 180 days prior to commencement of discharge.
This General Permit does not cover activities or discharges covered by an individual NPDES permit
until the individual permit has expired or has been revoked. Any person conducting an activity
covered by an individual permit but which could be covered by this General Permit may request
that the individual permit be revoked and coverage under this General Permit be provided.
If industrial materials and activities are not exposed to precipitation or runoff as described in 40
CFR §122.26(g), the facility may qualify for a No Exposure Exclusion from NPDES stormwater
discharge permit requirements. Any owner or operator wishing to obtain a No Exposure Exclusion
must submit a No Exposure Certification Notice of Intent (N01) form to the Division; must receive
approval by the Division; must maintain no exposure conditions unless authorized to discharge
under a valid NPDES stormwater permit; and must recertify the No Exposure Exclusion annually.
Any facility may apply for new or continued coverage under this permit until a Total Maximum
Daily Load (TMDL) for pollutants for stormwater is established. A TMDL sets a pollutant -loading
limit that affects a watershed, or portion of a watershed, draining to a specific impaired water. For
discharges to watersheds affected by a TMDL, coverage under this permit may depend on the
facility demonstrating it does not have reasonable potential to violate applicable water
quality standards for those pollutants as a result of discharges. If DWQ determines that
discharges have reasonable potential to cause water quality standard violations, the facility shall
apply for an individual permit 180 days prior to the expiration date of this General Permit. Once
that individual permit is effective, the facility will no longer have coverage under this General
Permit. Note that the permittee must identify impaired waters (scheduled for TMDL development)
and waters already subject to a TMDL in the Site Overview, as outlined in the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan, Part II, Section A. A list of approved TMDLs for the state of North Carolina can be
found athttp://12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/ps/mtu/­`tmdl.
Part I Page 1 of 2

Permit No. NCG210000
SECTION B: PERMITTED ACTIVITIES
Until this permit expires or is modified or revoked, the permittee is authorized to discharge
stormwater to the surface waters of North Carolina, or separate storm sewer system, which has
been treated and managed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this General Permit.
Any other point source discharge to surface waters of the state is prohibited unless it is an
allowable non-stormwater discharge or is covered by another permit, authorization, or approval.
The discharges allowed by this General Permit shall not cause or contribute to violations of
Water Quality Standards. This General Permit does not authorize discharges which have been
determined by the Division of Water Quality to be wastewater discharges.
This permit does not relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other
applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree.
Part 1 Page 2 of 2

Permit No. NCG210000
PART II MONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR PERMITTED
DISCHARGES
SECTION A: STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
The permittee shall develop and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). The
SPPP shall be maintained on site unless exempted from this requirement by the Division. The SPPP
is public information in accordance with Part III, Standard Conditions, Section E, paragraph 3 of this
permit. The SPPP shall include, at a minimum, the following items:
1. Site Overview. The Site Overview shall provide a description of the physical facility and the
potential pollutant sources that may be expected to contribute to contamination of stormwater
discharges. The Site Overview shall contain the following:
(a) A general location map (USGS quadrangle map or appropriately drafted equivalent map),
showing the facility's location in relation to transportation routes and surface waters; the
name of the receiving waters to which the stormwater outfalls discharge, or if the discharge
is to a municipal separate storm sewer system, the name of the municipality and the
ultimate receiving waters; and accurate latitude and longitude of the points of stormwater
discharge associated with industrial activity. The general location map (or alternatively the
site map) shall identify whether any receiving waters are impaired (on the state's 303(d)
list of impaired waters) or if the site is located in a watershed for which a TMDL has been
established, and what the parameters of concern are.
(b) A narrative description of storage practices, loading and unloading activities, outdoor
process areas, dust or particulate generating or control processes, and waste disposal
practices. A narrative description of the potential pollutants that could be expected to be
present in the stormwater discharge from each outfall.
(c) A site map drawn at a scale sufficient to clearly depict: the site property boundary; the
stormwater discharge outfalls; all on -site and adjacent surface waters and wetlands;
industrial activity areas (including storage of materials, disposal areas, process areas,
loading and unloading areas, and haul roads); site topography and finished grade; all
drainage features and structures; drainage area boundaries and total contributing area for
each outfall; direction of Flow in each drainage area; industrial activities occurring in each
drainage area; buildings; stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs); and impervious,
surfaces. The site map must indicate the percentage of each drainage area that is
impervious, and the site map must include a graphic scale indication and north arrow.
(d) A list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants during the previous three (3) years and
any corrective actions taken to mitigate spill impacts.
(e) Certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-
stormwater discharges. The permittee shall re -certify annually that the stormwater
outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges. The
certification statement will be signed in accordance with the requirements found in Part 111,
Standard Conditions, Section B, Paragraph 5.
Part it Page I of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
Stormwater Management Strategy. The Stormwater Management Strategy shall contain a
narrative description of the materials management practices employed which control or
minimize the stormwater exposure of significant materials, including structural and
nonstructural measures. The Stormwater Management Strategy, at a minimum, shall
incorporate the following:
(a) Feasibility Study. A review of the technical and economic feasibility of changing the
methods of operations and/or storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of
materials and processes to rainfall and run-on Flows. Wherever practical, the permittee
shall prevent exposure of all storage areas, material handling operations, and manufacturing
or fueling operations. In areas where elimination of exposure is not practical, this review
shall document the feasibility of diverting the stormwater run-on away from areas of
potential contamination.
(b) Secondary Containment Requirements and Records. Secondary containment is required
for: bulk storage of liquid materials including petroleum products; storage in any amount of
Section 313 of Title Ill of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) water
priority chemicals; and storage in any amount of hazardous substances in order to prevent
leaks and spills from contaminating stormwater runoff. A table or summary of all such
tanks and stored materials and their associated secondary containment areas shall be
maintained. if the secondary containment devices are connected to stormwater conveyance
systems, the connection shall be controlled by manually activated valves or other similar
devices, which shall be secured closed with a locking mechanism. Any stormwater that
accumulates in the containment area shall be at a minimum visually observed for color,
foam, outfall staining, visible sheens and dry weather Flow, prior to release of the
accumulated stormwater. Accumulated stormwater shall be released if found to be
uncontaminated by any material. Records documenting the individual making the
observation, the description of the accumulated stormwater, and the date and time of the
release shall be kept for a period of five (S) years. For facilities subject to a federal oil Spill
Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC), any portion of the SPCC plan fully
compliant with the requirements of this permit may be used to demonstrate compliance
with this permit.
(c) BMP Summary. A listing of site structural and non-structural Best Management Practices
(BMPs) shall be provided. The installation and implementation of BMPs shall be based on
the assessment of the potential for sources to contribute significant quantities of pollutants
to stormwater discharges and on data collected through monitoring of stormwater
discharges. The BMP Summary shall include a written record of the specific rationale for
installation and implementation of the selected site BMPs. The BMP Summary shall be
reviewed and updated annually.
3. Spill Prevention and Response Procedures. The Spill Prevention and Response Procedures
(SPRP) shall incorporate an assessment of potential pollutant sources based on a materials
inventory of the facility. Facility personnel responsible for implementing the SPRP shall be
identified in a written list incorporated into the SPRP and signed and dated by each individual
acknowledging their responsibilities for the procedures. A responsible person shall be on -site
at all times during facility operations that have increased potential to contaminate stormwater
runoff through spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility operations. The SPRP
must be site stormwater specific. Therefore, an oil Spill Prevention Control and
Countermeasure plan (SPCC) may be a component of the SPRP, but may not be sufficient to
completely address the stormwater aspects of the SPRP. The common elements of the SPCC
with the SPRP may be incorporated by reference into the SPRP.
Part II Page 2 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
4. Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program. A preventative maintenance
and good housekeeping program shall be developed and implemented. The program shall
address all stormwater control systems (if applicable), stormwater discharge outfalls, all on -site
and adjacent surface waters and wetlands, industrial activity areas (including material storage
areas, material handling areas, disposal areas, process areas, loading and unloading areas, and
haul roads), all drainage features and structures, and existing structural BMPs. The program
shall establish schedules of inspections, maintenance, and housekeeping activities of
stormwater control systems, as well as facility equipment, facility areas, and facility systems
that present a potential for stormwater exposure or stormwater pollution where not already
addressed under another element of the SPPP. Inspection of material handling areas and
regular cleaning schedules of these areas shall be incorporated into the program. Timely
compliance with the established schedules for inspections, maintenance, and housekeeping
shall be recorded and maintained in the SPPP.
S. Facility Inspections. Inspections of the facility and all stormwater systems shall occur as part
of the Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program at a minimum on a semi-
annual schedule, once during the first half of the year (January to June), and once during the
second half Only to December), with at least 60 days separating inspection dates (unless
performed more frequently than semi-annually). These facility inspections are different from,
and in addition to, the stormwater discharge characteristic monitoring at the outfalls required
in Part II B, C, and D of this permit.
6. Employee Training. Training programs shall be developed and training provided at a
minimum on an annual basis for facility personnel with responsibilities for: spill response and
cleanup, preventative maintenance activities, and for any of the facility's operations that have
the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff. The annual training shall be documented by
the signature and printed or typed name of each employee trained.
7. Responsible Party. The SPPP shall identify a specific position or positions responsible for the
overall coordination, development, implementation, and revision of the SPPP. Responsibilities
for all components of the SPPP shall be documented and position assignments provided.
8. SPPP Amendment and Annual Update. All aspects of the SPPP shall be reviewed on an annua
basis. The permittee shall amend the SPPP whenever there is a change in design, construction,
operation, site drainage, maintenance, or configuration of the physical features which may have
a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters. The annual
update shall include at a minimum:
(a) an updated list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants forth e previous three (3)
years, or the notation that no spills have occurred (element of the Site Overview);
(b) a written re -certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the
presence of non-stormwater discharges (element of the Site Overview);
(c) a documented re-evaluation of the effectiveness of the on -site stormwater BMPs (BMP
Summary element of the Stormwater Management Strategy).
(d) a review and comparison of sample analytical data to benchmark values (if applicable)
over the past year, including a discussion about Tiered Response status. The
permittee shall use the Division's Annual Summary Data Monitoring Report (DMR)
form, available from the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website (See'Monitoring
Forms' here: http://I)ortal.ncdenr.org/web/lr/ni2des-stormwater).
Part II Page 3 of 10

Permit No. NC6210000
The Director may notify the permittee when the SPPP does not meet one or more of the
minimum requirements of the permit. Within 30 days of such notice, the permittee shall submit
a time schedule to the Director for modifying the SPPP to meet minimum requirements. The
permittee shall provide certification in writing (in accordance with Part 111, Standard
Conditions, Section B, Paragraph 5) to the Director that the changes have been made.
9. SPPP Implementation. The permittee shall implement the Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan and all appropriate BMPs consistent with the provisions of this permit, in order to control
contaminants entering surface waters via stormwater. Implementation of the SPPP shall
include documentation of all monitoring, measurements, inspections, maintenance activities,
and training provided to employees, including the log of the sampling data and of actions taken
to implement BMPs associated with the industrial activities, including vehicle maintenance
activities. Such documentation shall be kept on -site for a period of five (5) years and made
available to the Director or the Director's authorized representative immediately upon request.
SECTION B: ANALYTICAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
A facility that retains exposed accumulations (either exposed to incident precipitation or exposed
to stormwater run on) of sawdust, wood chips, bark, mulch, or other similarly sized material on site
for more than seven (7) days is required to monitor and report all the site stormwater discharges
for the parameters in Table 1.
The permittee may petition the DWQ Regional Office Surface Water Protection Supervisor to he excused from
the required monitoring:
a) upon a DWQ Compliance Evaluation Inspection, and;
b) on the basis that DWQ concludes that taken as a whole, site -wide conditions support the
assessment of very limited risk of stormwater pollution from the site.
c) Among any other factors deemed relevant in his or her own considerations, the Regional Office
Supervisor shall consider whether the amount of accumulated exposed materials may be deemed
de minimis with respect to the potential to generate stormwater runoff pollutants. Given that all site
conditions may be relevant to the determination of what constitutes a de minimis amount, such
determinations shall be made on a'case-by-case basis', and shall not be assumed to be generally, or
specifically, transferrable to any other permitted site, regardless of superficial similarities.
d) The Regional Office Supervisor will communicate any such determination in writing, and shall state
any qualifying conditions for the permittee's continuing release from monitoring. DWQ's release
letter may remain in effect through subsequent reissued versions of this permit, unless the release
letter provides for other conditions or duration.
e) If released from monitoring, the permittee must still continue to submit semi-annual Discharge
Monitoring Reports, with the notation: "Released from Monitoring by DWQ Regional Office."
If at any time there are changes to DWQ's initial site assessment, or to the initial site operating
circumstances, the permittee must immediately begin analytical monitoring and reporting in accordance
with Tables 1 and 2, and must immediately inform the DWQ Regional Office that analytical monitoring has
been instituted.
Part 11 Page 4 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
Table 1 Analytical Moni oring Re uirements
Discharge t
Characteristics
Units
Measurement
Fre uenc 1
Sample
Type2
Sample,
Location3
Chemical Oxygen Demand
m L
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Suspended Solids
m L
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Rainfal14
inches
semi-annual
Rain gauge
Footnotes
1 Measurement Frequency: Twice per year (unless other provisions of this permit prompt monthly sampling)
during a measureable storm event, until either another permit is issued for this facility or until this permit is
revoked or rescinded. See Table 2 for schedule of monitoring periods through the end of this permitting cycle. If
the facility is monitoring monthly because of Tier Two or Three response actions under the previous General
Permit, the facility should continue a monthly monitoring and reporting schedule.
2 Grab samples shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of discharge.
3 Sample Location: Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) unless representative
outfall status (ROS) has been granted. A copy of the DWQ letter granting ROS shall be kept on site.
`l- For each sampled measureable storm event, the total precipitation must be recorded. An on -site rain gauge
reading must be recorded. Where isolated sites are unmanned for extended periods of time, a local rain gauge
reading may be substituted for an on -site reading.
All analytical monitoring shall be performed during a measureable storm event at each
stormwater discharge outfall (SDO).
A measurable storm event is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted
site outfall. The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior. The 72-
hour storm interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is
representative for local storm events during the sampling period, and the permittee obtains
approval from the local DWQ Regional Office. See Definitions.
A minimum of 60 days must separate Period 1 and Period 2 sample dates unless monthly
monitoring has been instituted under other requirements of this permit.
The permittee shall complete the analytical samplings in accordance with the schedule specified in
Table 2, unless adverse weather conditions prevent sample collection (see Adverse Weather in
Definitions). Inability to sample because of adverse weather conditions must be documented in the
SPPP and recorded on the DMR. Sampling is not required outside of the facility's normal operating
hours.
Failure to monitor and report semi-annually per permit terms may result in the Division requiring
monthly monitoring and reporting for all parameters for a specified time period. "No discharge'
from an outfall or inability to collect a sample because of adverse weather conditions during a
monitoring period, for example, does not constitute failure to monitor, as long as it is properly
reported.
Part ll Page 5 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
Table 2 Monitoring Schedule
, Monitoring
Sample
Start
End
Year 1— Period 1
1
August 1, 2013
December 31, 201.3
Year 1— Period 2
2
January 1, 2014
June 30, 2014
Year 2 — Period 1
3
July 1, 2014
December 31, 2014
Year 2— Period 2
4
January 1, 2015
June 30, 2015
Year 3 — Period 1
5
July 1, 2015
December 31, 2015
Year 3 — Period 2
6
January 1, 2016
June 30, 2016
Year 4 — Period 1
7
July 1, 2016
December 31, 2016
Year 4 — Period 2
8
January 1, 2017
June 30, 2017
Year 5 — Period 1
9
July 1, 2017
December 31, 2017
Year 5 — Period 2
10
January 1, 2018
July 31, 2018
Footnotes:
1 Maintain semi-annual monitoring and reporting during permit. renewal process unless other
provisions of this permit prompt monthly sampling.
2 If no discharge occurs during the sampling period, the permittee must submit a monitoring report
indicating "No Flow" or "No Discharge" within 30 days of theend of the sampling period.
The permittee must report the results from each sample taken within the monitoring period (See Part
III E). However, for purposes of benchmark comparison and Tiered response actions, the permittee
shall use the analytical results from the first sample with valid results within the monitoring period.
The permittee shall compare monitoring results to the benchmark values in Table 3. The benchmark
values in Table 3 are not permit limits, but should be used as guidelines for implementation of the
permittee's SPPP. Exceedances of benchmark values require the permittee to increase monitoring and
reporting, increase management actions, increase record keeping, and/or install stormwater Best
Management Practices (BMPs) in a tiered program. See descriptions of Tier One, Tier Two, and Tier
Three response actions below. In the event that the Division releases the permittee from continued
monthly monitoring and reporting under Tier Two or Tier Three, DWQ's release letter may remain in
effect through subsequent reissuance of this permit, unless the release letter provides for other
conditions or duration.
Table 3 Benchmark Values for Analytical Monitoring Requirements
Discharge Characteristics
Benchmark Value
Chemical Oxygen Demand
120 m L
Total Suspended Solids
100 m L
Total Suspended Solids HQW, ORW, Trout (Tr), and PNA waters
50 m L
Part 11 Page 6 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
Tier One
IF. The first valid sampling results are above a benchmark value for anv parameter at anv outfall:
Then: The permittee shall:
1. Conduct a stormwater management inspection of the facility within two weeks of receiving
sampling results.
2. Identify and evaluate possible causes of the benchmark value exceedence.
3. Identify potential and select the specific: source controls, operational controls, or physical
improvements to reduce concentrations of the parameters of concern.
4. Implement the selected actions within two months of the inspection.
S. Record each instance of a Tier One response in the SPPP. Include the date and value of the benchmark
exceedence, the inspection date, the personnel conducting the inspection, the selected actions, and the
date the selected actions were implemented.
6. Note: Benchmark exceedances for a different parameter separately trigger the several tiered response
requirements.
Tier Two
If: The first valid sampling results from two consecutive monitoring periods are above the benchmark values
for any specific parameter at a specific discharge outfall;
Then: The permittee shall:
1. Repeat all the required actions outlined above in Tier One.
2. Immediately institute monthly monitoring and reporting for all parameters at every outfall where a
sampling result exceeded the benchmark value for two consecutive samples. Monthly (analytical and
qualitative) monitoring and reporting shall continue until three consecutive sample results are below
the benchmark values.
3. If no discharge occurs during the sampling period, the permittee is required to submit a monthly
monitoring report indicating "No Flow" to comply with reporting requirements.
4. Alternatively, in lieu of steps 2 and 3, the permittee may, after two consecutive exceedances, exercise
the option of contacting the DWQ Regional Office Supervisor as provided below in Tier Three. The
Regional Office Supervisor may direct the response actions on the part of the permittee as provided in
Tier Three, including reduced or additional sampling parameters or frequency.
S. Maintain a record of the Tier Two response in the SPPP.
6. Continue Tier Two response obligations throughout the permit COC renewal process.
Tier Three y
If the valid sampling results required for the permit monitoring periods exceed the benchmark value for
any specific parameter at any specific outfall on four occasions, the permittee shall notify the DWQ
Regional Office Supervisor in writing within 30 days of receipt of the fourth analytical results. DWQ
may but is not limited to:
• require the permittee to revise, increase, or decrease the monitoring and reporting frequency for
some or all parameters required herein, including requiring sampling of additional or substitute
parameters;
• rescind coverage under the General Permit, and require that the permittee apply for an
individual stormwater discharge permit;
• require the permittee to install structural stormwater controls;
• require the permittee to implement other stormwater control measures;
• require the permittee to perform upstream and downstream monitoring to characterize impacts
on receiving waters;
• require the permittee implement site modifications to qualify for a No Exposure Exclusion; or
• require the permittee to continue Tier Three obligations through the permit COC renewal process,
and possibly into the next permit cycle.
Part 11 Page 7 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
SECTION C: QUALITATIVE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
All facilities covered by this permit must perform Qualitative Monitoring. The purpose of
qualitative monitoring is to evaluate the effectiveness of the SPPP and to assess new sources of
stormwater pollution. Qualitative monitoring of stormwater outfalls must be performed during a
measurable storm event.
Qualitative monitoring requires a visual inspection of each stormwater outfall associated with
industrial activity regardless of representative outfall status. Qualitative monitoring shall be
performed semi-annually as specified in Table 4, and during required analytical monitoring events if
applicable (unless the permittee is required to perform further qualitative sampling per the
Qualitative Monitoring Response below). Inability to sample because of adverse weather
conditions must be documented in the SPPP and recorded on the DMR (see Adverse Weather in
Definitions). Only SDOs discharging stormwater associated with industrial activity must be
monitored (See Definitions).
In the event an atypical condition is noted at a stormwater discharge outfall, the permittee shall
document the suspected cause of the condition and any actions taken in response to the discovery.
This documentation will be maintained with the SPPP.
Table 4 Qualitative Monitoring Requirements
Discharge Characteristics
Frequency'
Monitoring
Locationz
Color
Semi -Annual
SDO
Odor
Semi -Annual
SDO
Clarity
Semi --Annual
SOO
Floating Solids
Semi -Annual
SDO
Suspended Solids
Semi -Annual
SDO
Foam
Semi -Annual
SDO
Oil Sheen
Semi -Annual
SDO
Erosion or deposition at the outfall
Semi -Annual
SDO
Other obvious indicators of stormwater pollution
Semi -Annual
SDO
Footnotes:
1 Measurement Frequency: Twice per year (unless other provisions of this permit prompt monthly
sampling) during a measureable storm event. See Table 2 for schedule of monitoring periods. The
permittee must continue qualitative monitoring throughout the permit renewal process.
2 Monitoring Location: Qualitative monitoring shall be performed at each stormwater discharge outfall
(SDO) associated with industrial activity, regardless of representative outfall status (ROS).
A minimum of 60 days must separate monitoring dates, unless additional sampling has been
instituted as part of other analytical monitoring requirements in this permit.
If the permittee's qualitative monitoring indicates that existing stormwater BMPs are ineffective, or that
significant stormwater contamination is present, the permittee shall investigate potential causes, evaluate
the feasibility of corrective actions, and implement those corrective actions within 60 days, per the
Part I I Page 8 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
Qualitative Monitoring Response, below. A written record of the permittee's investigation, evaluation,
and response actions shall be kept in the SPPP.
Qualitative Monitoring Res�onse r "
Qualitative monitoring is for the purposes of evaluating SPPP effectiveness, assessing new sources of
stormwater pollution, and prompting the permittee's response to pollution. if the permittee
repeatedly fails to respond effectively to correct problems identified by qualitative monitoring, or if
the discharge causes or contributes to a water quality standard violation, DWQ may but is not
limited to:
• require that the permittee revise, increase, or decrease monitoring frequency for some or
all parameters (analytical or qualitative);
• require the permittee to install structural stormwater controls;
• require the permittee to implement other stormwater control measures;
• require the permittee to perform upstream and downstream monitoring to characterize
impacts on receiving waters; or
• require the permittee implement site modifications to qualify for a No Exposure Exclusion.
SECTION D: ON -SITE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Facilities that have any vehicle maintenance activity occurring on -site which uses more than 55
gallons of new motor oil and hydraulic oil per month, combined, when averaged over the
calendar year shall perform analytical monitoring as specified below in Table S. All analytical
monitoring shall be performed during a measureable storm event at all stormwater discharge
outfalls (SDOs) that discharge stormwater runoff from vehicle maintenance areas.
Table 5 Analytical Monitoring Requirements for On -Site Vehicle Maintenance
Discharge Characteristics
Units
Measurement
Fre uenc 1
Sample
Type! .
Sample
Locatidn2l
Non -Polar Oil & Grease by
EPA Method 1664 SGT-HEM
mg/L
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
m L
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Rainfall4
inches
semi-annual
Rain gauge
New Motor Oil Usage
gallons/month, I
semi-annual
Estimate
Footnotes:
1. Measurement Frequency: Twice per year (unless other provisions of this permit prompt monthly
sampling) during a measureable storm event, until either another permit is issued for this facility or
until this permit is revoked or rescinded. If the facility is monitoring monthly because of Tier Two or
Three response actions under the previous General Permit, the facility should continue a monthly
monitoring and reporting schedule.
Z Grab samples shall be collected within the first 30 minutes of discharge.
Part 11 Page 9 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
Sample Location: Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) that discharges
stormwater runoff from area(s) where vehicle maintenance activities occur, unless representative outfall
status (ROS) has been granted. A copy of the letter granting ROS shall be kept on site.
For each sampled measureable storm event, the total precipitation must be recorded. An on -site rain
gauge reading must be recorded. Where isolated sites are unmanned for extended periods of time, a local
rain gauge reading may be substituted for an on -site reading.
The permittee shall complete the analytical samplings in accordance with the schedule specified in
Table 2, unless adverse weather conditions prevent sample collection (see Adverse Weather in
Definitions). Inability to sample because of adverse weather conditions must be documented in the
SPPP and recorded on the DMR. Sampling is not required outside of the facility's normal operating
hours.
Failure to monitor and report semi-annually per permit terms may result in the Division requiring
monthly monitoring for all parameters for a specified time period. "No discharge" from an outfall
or inability to collect a sample because of adverse weather conditions during a monitoring period,
for example, does not constitute failure to monitor, as long as it is properly reported.
The permittee shall compare monitoring results to the benchmark values in Table 6. Exceedances of
benchmark values require the permittee to increase monitoring, increase management actions, increase
record keeping, and/or install stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) in a tiered program. See
descriptions of Tier One, Tier Two, and Tier Three response actions in Part II Section B above. In the
event that the Division releases the permittee from continued monthly monitoring under Tier Two or
Tier Three, DWQ's release letter may remain in effect through subsequent reissuance of this permit,
unless the release letter provides for other conditions or duration.
The permittee must report the results from each sample taken within the monitoring period (See Part
HIE). However, for purposes of benchmark comparison and Tiered response actions, the permittee
shall use the analytical results from the first sample with valid results within the monitoring period.
Table 6 Benchmark Values for On -Site Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Activities
Discharge Characteristics
Benchmark Values
Non -Polar Oil & Grease by
EPA Method 1664 SGT-HEM
15 mg/L
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
100 m L
TSS ORW, HQW, Trout (Tr), and PNA waters
50 m L
Partll Page 10 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES STORMWATER GENERAL PERMITS
SECTION A: COMPLIANCE AND LIABILITY
ENNEW• • d74�
The permittee shall comply with Limitations and Controls specified for stormwater discharges in
accordance with the following schedule:
Existing Facilities already operating but applying for permit coverage for the first time: The
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be developed and implemented within 12 months of the
effective date of the Certificate of Coverage and updated thereafter on an annual basis. Secondary
containment, as specified in Part 11, Section A, Paragraph 2(b) of this general permit, shall be
accomplished within 12 months of the effective date of the issuance of the Certificate of Coverage.
New Facilities applying for coverage for the first time: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan shall be developed and implemented prior to the beginning of discharges from the operation of
the industrial activity and be updated thereafter on an annual basis. Secondary containment, as
specified in Part 11, Section A, Paragraph 2(b) of this general permit shall be accomplished prior to
the beginning of discharges from the operation of the industrial activity.
Existing facilities previously permitted and applying for renewal under this General Permit:
All requirements, conditions, limitations, and controls contained in this permit (except new SPPP
elements in this permit renewal) shall become effective immediately upon issuance of the
Certificate of Coverage. New elements of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for this permit
renewal shall be developed and implemented within 6 months of the effective date of this general
permit and updated thereafter on an annual basis. Secondary containment, as specified in Part II,
Paragraph 2(b) of this general permit shall be accomplished prior to the beginning of discharges
from the operation of the industrial activity.
2. Duty to Comply
The permittee must comply with all conditions of this general permit. Any permit noncompliance
constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and is grounds for enforcement action; for
permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit upon renewal
application [40 CFR 122.41].
a. The permittee shall comply with standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a) of
the CWA for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish these
standards or prohibitions, even if the general permit has not yet been modified to incorporate
the requirement.
b. The CWA provides that any person who violates section[s] 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of
the Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any such sections in a permit issued
under section 402, or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under
sections 402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act, is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $37,500 per
day for each violation. [33 USC 1319(d) and 40 CPR 122.41(a)(2)]
c. The CWA provides that any person who negligently violates sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308,
318, or 405 of the Act, or any condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a
permit issued under section 402 of the Act, or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment
program approved under section 402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act, is subject to criminal
penalties of $2,500 to $2S,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than 1 year, or
Part III Page 1. of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a negligent violation, a person shall be
subject to criminal penalties of not more than $50,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment
of not more than 2 years, or both. [33 USC 1319(c)(1) and 40 CFR 122.41(a)(2)]
d. Any person who knowingly violates such sections, or such conditions or limitations is subject to
criminal penalties of $5,000 to $50,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment for not more than
3 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing violation, a
person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than $100,000 per day of violation, or
imprisonment of not more than 6 years, or both. [33 USC 1319(c)(2) and 40 CFR 122.41(a)(2)]
e. Any person who knowingly violates section 301, 302, 303, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of the Act,
or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under
section 402 of the Act, and who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in
imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury, shall, upon conviction, be subject to a line of
not more than $250,000 or imprisonment of not more than 15 years, or both. In the case of a
second or subsequent conviction for a knowing endangerment violation, a person shall be
subject to a fine of not more than $500,000 or by imprisonment of not more than 30 years, or
both. An organization, as defined in section 309(c)(3)(B)(iii) of the CWA, shall, upon conviction
of violating the imminent danger provision, be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000 and
can be fined up to $2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions. [40 CFR 122.41(a)(2)]
f. Under state law, a civil penalty of not more than $25,000 per violation may be assessed against
any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements
of a permit. [North Carolina General Statutes § 143-215.6A]
g. Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Administrator for violating section
301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318 or 405 of this Act, or any permit condition or limitation
implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 4 02 of this Act.
Administrative penalties for Class I violations are not to exceed $16,000 per violation, with the
maximum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to exceed $37,500. Penalties for Class 11
violations are not to exceed $16,000 per day for each day during which the violation continues,
with the maximum amount of any Class Il penalty not to exceed $177,500. [33 USC 1319(g)(2)
and 40 CFR 122.41(a)(3)]
3. Duty to Mitigate
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this
general permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the
environment [40 CFR 122.41(d)].
4. Civil and Criminal Liability
Except as provided in Part III, Section C of this general permit regarding bypassing of stormwater
control facilities, nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from any
responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143-215.3, 143-215.6, or
Section 309 of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1319. Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for
consequential damages, such as fish kills, even though the responsibility for effective compliance
may be temporarily suspended.
S. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this general permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or
relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the.permittee is or
may be subject to under NCGS 143-215.7S et seq. or Section 311 of the Federal Act, 33 USC 1321.
Part III Page 2 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
6. Property Rights
The issuance of this general permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal
property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any
invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations [40
CFR 122.41(g)].
7. Severability
The provisions of this general permit are severable, and if any provision of this general permit, or the
application of any provision of this general permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the
application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this general permit, shall
not be affected thereby [NCGS 150B-23].
8. Duty to Provide Information
The permittee shall furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time, any
information which the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for
modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the general permit issued pursuant to this general
permit or to determine compliance with this general permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the
Permit Issuing Authority upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this general permit
(40 CFR 122.41(h)).
9. Penalties for Tampering
- The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders
inaccurate, any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this general permit
shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by
imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or by both. If a conviction of a person is for
a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph, punishment is a
fine of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or
both [40 CFR 122.41].
10. Penalties for Falsification of Reports
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be
maintained under this general permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or
noncompliance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation,
or by imprisonment for not more than two years per violation, or by both [40 CFR 122.41].
11. Onshore or Offshore Construction
This general permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore
physical structures or facilities or the undertaking of any work in any navigable waters.
12. Duty to Reapply
Dischargers covered by this general permit need not submit a new Notice of Intent (N01) or renewal
request unless so directed by the Division. If the Division chooses not to renew this general permit,
the permittee will be notified to submit an application for an individual permit [15A NCAC 02H
.0127(e)].
SECTION B: GENERAL CONDITIONS
General Permit Expiration
General permits will be effective for a term not to exceed five years, at the end of which the Division
may renew them after all public notice requirements have been satisfied. If a general permit is
renewed, existing permittees do not need to submit a renewal request or pay a renewal fee unless
directed by the Division. New applicants seeking coverage under a renewed general permit must
Part HI Page 3 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and obtain a Certificate of Coverage under the renewed
general permit.[1SA NCAC 02H .01.27(e)].
2. Transfers
This general permit is not transferable to any person without prior written notice to and approval
from the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122.61. The Director may condition approval in
accordance with NCGS 143-215.1, in particular NCGS 143-215.1(b)(4)b.2., and may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage, or a minor modification, to
identify the new permittee and incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the
CWA [40 CFR 122.41(I)(3), 122.61] or state statute. The Permittee is required to notify the
Division in writing in the event the permitted facility is sold or closed.
3. When an Individual Permit May be Required
The Director may require any owner/operator authorized to discharge under a certificate of
coverage issued pursuant to this general permit to apply for and obtain an individual permit or an
alternative general permit. Any interested person may petition the Director to take action under this
paragraph. Cases where an individual permit may be required include, but are not limited to, the
following:
a. The discharger is a significant contributor of pollutants; .
b. Conditions at the permitted site change, altering the constituents and/or characteristics of
the discharge such that the discharge no longer qualifies for a general permit;
C. The discharge violates the terms or conditions of this general permit;
d. A change has occurred in the availability of demonstrated technology or practices for the
control or abatement: of pollutants applicable to the point source;
e. Effluent limitations are promulgated for the point sources covered by this general permit;
f. A water quality management plan containing requirements applicable to such point sources
is approved after the issuance of this general permit;
g. The Director determines at his or her own discretion that an individual permit is required.
4. When an Individual Permit May be Requested
Any permittee operating under this general permit may request to be excluded from the coverage of
this general permit by applying for an individual permit When an individual permit is issued to an
owner/operator the applicability of this general permit is automatically terminated on the effective
date of the individual permit.
S. Signatory Requirements
All applications, reports, or information submitted to the Permitting Issuing Authority shall be
signed and certified [40 CFR 122.41(k)].
a. All Notices of Intent to be covered under this general permit shall be signed as follows:
(1) For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Section, a
responsible corporate officer means: (a) a president, secretary, treasurer or vice president
of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who
performs similar policy or decision making functions for the corporation, or (b) the manager
of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided, the manager is
authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated
facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment
recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure
long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager
can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete
Part III Page 4 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign
documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate
procedures.
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,
respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive
officer or ranking elected official [40 CFR 122.22].
b. All reports required by the general permit and other information requested by the Permit
Issuing Authority shall be signed by a person described in paragraph a. above or by a duly
authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if:
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above;
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the
overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager,
operator of a well or well field, superintendent, a position of equivalent responsibility, or an
individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company.
(A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual
occupying a named position.); and
(3) The written authorization is submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority [40 CFR 122.22]
c. Changes to authorization: If an authorization under paragraph (b) of this section is no longer
accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of
the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section must
be submitted to the Director prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications
to be signed by an authorized representative [40 CFR 122.221
d. Certification. Any person signing a document under paragraphs a. or b. of this section shall make
the following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION WILL
BE ACCEPTED:
'7 certify, under penalty oflaw, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction orsupervision in accordance with a system designed to assure thatqualified personnel
properlygother and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible forgathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties forsubmitting false information,
including the possibility affines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
6. General Permit Modification Revocation and Reissuance. or Termination
The issuance of this general permit does not prohibit the Permit Issuing Authority from reopening
and modifying the general permit, revoking and reissuing the general permit, or terminating the
general permit as allowed by the laws, rules, and regulations contained in Title 40, Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 122 and 123; Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H
.0100; and North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 et al.
After public notice and opportunity for a hearing, the general permit may be terminated for cause.
The filing of a request for a general permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination
does not stay any general permit condition. The Certificate of Coverage shall expire when the
general permit is terminated.
Part III Page S of 10

Penn it No. NCG210000
Certificate of Coverage Actions
Coverage under the general permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause.
The notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any general permit
condition [40 CFR 122.41(f)].
8. Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee -Requirements
The permittee must pay the administering and compliance monitoring fee within 30 (thirty) days
after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee in timely manner inaccordance with 1 SA
NCAC 2H .0105(b)(2) may cause this Division to initiate action to revoke coverage under the general
permit
SECTION C: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROLS
1. Proper Operation and Maintenance
The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment
and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve
compliance with the conditions of this permit Proper operation and maintenance also includes
adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires
the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee
only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit [40
CFR 122.41(c)].
2. Need to Halt or Reduce Not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary
to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this
general permit [40 CFR 122.41(c)].
3. Bypassing of Stormwater Control Facilities
Bypass is prohibited and the Director may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass
unless:
a. Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury or severe property damage; and
b. There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary control facilities,
retention of stormwater or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime or dry
weather. This condition is not satisfied if adequate backup controls should have been installed
in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during
normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
c. The permittee submitted notices as required under, Part III, Section E of this general permit
If the Director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above, the Director may
approve an anticipated bypass after considering its adverse effects.
SECTION D: MONITORING AND RECORDS
Representative Sampling
Samples collected and measurements taken, as required herein, shall be characteristic of the volume
and nature of the permitted discharge. Analytical sampling shall be performed during a measureable
storm event Samples shall be taken on a day and time that is characteristic of the discharge. All
samples shall be taken before the discharge joins or is diluted by any other waste stream, body of
water, or substance. Monitoring points as specified in this general permit shall not be changed
without notification to and approval of the Permit Issuing Authority [40 CFR 122.410)1.
Part III Page 6 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
2. Recording Results
For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this general permit, the
permittee shall record the following information [40 CFR 122.41]:
a. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;
b. The individuals) who performed the sampling or measurements;
c. The date(s) analyses were performed;
d. The individual(s) who performed the analyses;
L. The analytical techniques or methods used; and
f. The results of such analyses.
3. Flow Measurements
Where required, appropriate Flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted
scientific practices shall be selected and used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurements
of the volume of monitored discharges.
4. Test Procedures
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the CIVIC regulations published
pursuant to NCGS 143-215.63 et. seq, the Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts, and to regulations
published pursuant to Section 304(g), 33 USC 1314, of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
Amended, and Regulation 40 CFR 136.
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this general permit, all test procedures must
produce minimum detection and reporting levels and all data generated must be reported down to
the minimum detection or lower reporting level of the procedure. If no approved methods are
determined capable of achieving minimum detection and reporting levels below general permit
discharge requirements, then the most sensitive (method with the lowest possible detection and
reporting level) approved method must be used.
S. Representative Outfall
If a facility has multiple discharge locations with substantially identical stormwater discharges that
are required to be sampled, the permittee may petition the Director for representative outfall status.
If it is established that the stormwater discharges are substantially identical and the permittee is
granted representative outfall status, then sampling requirements may be performed at a reduced
number of outfalls.
6. Records Retention
Qualitative monitoring shall be documented and records maintained at the facility along with the
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP). Copies of analytical monitoring results shall also be
maintained on -site. The permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including
o all calibration and maintenance records,
o all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation,
o copies of all reports required by this general permit,
o copies of all data used to complete the Notice of Intent to be covered by this general permit.
These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least S years from the date of the
sample, measurement, report or Notice of Intent application. This period may be extended by
request of the Director at any time [40 CFR 122.41]. If this volume of records cannot be maintained
on -site, the documents must be made available to an inspector upon request as immediately as
possible.
Inspection and Entry
Part III Page 7 of 10

Permit No. NCG210000
The permittee shall allow the Director, or an authorized representative (including an authorized
contractor acting as a representative of the Director), or in the case of a facility which discharges
through a municipal separate storm sewer system, an authorized representative of a municipal
operator or the separate storm sewer system receiving the discharge, upon the presentation of
credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to:
a. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted,
or where records must be kept under the conditions of this general permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions
of this general permit;
c. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control
equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this general permit; and
d. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as
otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any location [40
CFR 122.41(i)].
SECTION E: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Discharge Monitoring Reports
Samples analyzed in accordance with the terms of this general permit shall be submitted to the
Division on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms provided by the Director. DMR forms are
available on the Division's website (http�///aortal ncdenr.orncdenr.org/web�npdes-stormwater).
Submittals shall be delivered to the Division no later than 30 days from the date the facility
receives the sampling results from the laboratory.
When no discharge has occurred from the facility during the report period, the permittee is required
to submit a discharge monitoring report, within 30 days of the end of the specified sampling period,
giving all required information and indicating "NO FLOW" as per NCAC T15A 02B .0506.
If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this general permit using
test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 and at a sampling location specified in this general
permit or other appropriate instrument governing the discharge, the results of such monitoring shall
be included in the data submitted on the DMR.
The permittee shall record the required qualitative monitoring observations on the SDO Qualitative
Monitoring Report form provided by the Division and shall retain the completed forms on site.
Qualitative monitoring results should not be submitted to the Division, except upon DWQ's specific
requirement to do so. Qualitative Monitoring Report forms are available at the website above.
2. Submitting Reports
Two signed copies of Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) shall be submitted to:
Central Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
3. Availability of Reports
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143-215.3(a)(2) or Section 308 of the
Federal Act, 33 USC 1318, all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be available for
public inspection at the offices of the Division. As required by the Act, analytical data shall not be
considered confidential. Knowingly making any false statement on any such report may result in the
Partlll Page8of10

Permit No. NCG210000
imposition of criminal penalties as provided for in NCGS 143-215.6B or in Section 309 of the Federal
Act.
4. Non-Stormwater Discharges
If the storm event monitored in accordance with this general permit coincides with a non-
stormwater discharge, the permittee shall separately monitor all parameters as required under all
other applicable discharge permits and provide this information with the stormwater discharge
monitoring report.
5. Planned Change
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned changes atthe
permitted facility which could significantly alter the nature or quantity of pollutants discharged [40
CPR 122.41(1)]. This notification requirement includes pollutants which are not specifically listed in
the general permit or subject to notification requirements under 40 CFR Part 122.42 (a).
6. Anticipated Noncompliance
The permittee shall give advance notice to the Director ofany planned changes at the permitted
facility which may result in noncompliance with the general permit [40 CPR 122.41(1)(2)].
7. S ills
The permittee shall report to the local DWQ Regional Office, within 24 hours, all significant spills as
defined in Part IV of this general permit. Additionally, the permittee shall report spills including:
any oil spill of 25 gallons or more, any spill regardless of amount that causes a sheen on surface
waters, any oil spill regardless of amount occurring within 100 feet of surface waters, and any oil
spill less than 25 gallons that cannot be cleaned up within 24 hours.
8. Bypass
Notice [40 CFR 122.41(m)(3)]:
a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit
prior notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass; including an evaluation of
the anticipated quality and affect of the bypass.
b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice within 24 hours of becoming aware of
an unanticipated bypass.
9. Twenty-four Hour Reporting
a. The permittee shall report to the central office or the appropriate regional office any
noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment Any information shall be
provided orally within 24 hours from the time the permittee became aware of the circumstances.
A written submission shall also be provided within S days of the time the permittee becomes
aware of the circumstances.
The written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its causes; the
period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not
been corrected, the anticipated time compliance is expected to continue; and steps taken or
planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance [40 CFR
122.41(1) (6)].
b. The Director may waive the written report on a case -by -case basis for reports under this section
if the oral report has been received within 24 hours.
c. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be reported to the Division's Emergency
Response personnel at(800) 662-7956, (800) 8.58-0368 or [phone].
10. Other Noncompliance
Part III Page 9 of 10

Penn it No. NCG210000
The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under 24 hour reporting at
the time monitoring reports are submitted [40 CFR 1.22.41(1)(7)].
11. Other Information
Where the Permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a Notice of Intent to
be covered under this general permit, or submitted incorrect information in that Notice of Intent
application or in any report to the Director, it shall promptly submit such facts or information [40
CFR 122.41(I)(8)].
Part III Page 10 of 10

PART IV DEFINITIONS
Act
See Clean Water Act.
Permit No. NCG210000
2. Adverse Weather
Adverse conditions are those that are dangerous or create inaccessibility for personnel, such as local
Flooding, high winds, or electrical storms, or situations that otherwise make sampling impractical.
When adverse weather conditions prevent the collection of samples during the sample period, the
permittee must take a substitute sample or perform a visual assessment during the next qualifying
storm event. Documentation of an adverse event (with date, time and written narrative) and the
rationale must be included with your SPPP records. Adverse weather does not exempt the permittee
from having to file a monitoring report in accordance with the sampling schedule. Adverse events
and failures to monitor must also be explained and reported on the relevant DMR.
3. Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges
This general permit regulates stormwater discharges. Non-stormwater discharges which shall be
allowed in the stormwater conveyance system are:
a. All other discharges that are authorized by a non-stormwater NPDES permit.
b. Uncontaminated groundwater, foundation drains, air -conditioner condensate without added
chemicals, springs, discharges of uncontaminated potable water, waterline and fire hydrant
flushings, water from footing drains, irrigation waters, Flows from riparian habitats and
wetlands.
c. Discharges resulting from fire -fighting or fire -fighting training, or emergency shower or eye
wash as a result of use in the event of an emergency.
4. Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Measures or practices used to reduce the amount of pollution entering surface waters. BMI's may
take the form of a process, activity, or physical structure. More information on BMPs can be found
at: http //cf12ub.el)a.gov/nl2des/stormwater/menuofbmps/iiidex.cfni.
S. Bypass
A bypass is the known diversion of stormwater from any portion of a stormwater control facility
including the collection system, which is not a designed or established operating mode for the
facility.
6. Bulk Storage of Liquid Products
Liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials or by-products with a single above
ground storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above
ground storage containers located in close proximity to each other having a total combined storage
capacity of greater than 1,320 gallons.
7. Certificate of Coverage
The Certificate of Coverage (CDC) is the cover sheet which accompanies a general permit upon
issuance and lists the facility name, location, receiving stream, river basin, effective date of coverage
under the general permit and is signed by the Director.
8. Clean WaterAc[
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended, 33
USC 1251, et. seq.
9. Division or DWQ
The Division of Water Quality, Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
10. Director
Part IV Page 1 of 4 Pages

Permit No. NCG210000
The Director of the Division of Water Quality, the permit issuing authority.
11. PMC
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission.
12. Grab Sample
An individual sample collected instantaneously. Grab samples that will be analyzed (quantitatively
or qualitatively) must betaken within the first 30 minutes of discharge.
13. Hazardous Substance
Any substance designated under 40 CPR Part 116 pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act.
14. Landfill
A disposal facility or part of a disposal facility where waste is placed in or on land and which is not a
land treatment facility, a surface impoundment, an injection well, a hazardous waste long-term
storage facility or a surface storage facility.
15. Measureable Storm Event
A storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted site outfall. The previous
measurable storm event must have been at least 7"2 hours prior. The 72-hour storm interval may not
apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is representative for local storm
events during the sampling period, and obtains approval from the local DWQ Regional Office. Two
copies of this information and a written request letter shall be sent to the local DWQ Regional Office.
After authorization by the DWQ Regional Office, a written approval letter must be kept on site in the
permittee's SPPP.
16. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4)
A stormwater collection system within an incorporated area of local self-government such as a city
or town.
17. No Exposure
A condition of no exposure means that all industrial materials and activities are protected by a storm
resistant shelter or acceptable storage containers to prevent exposure to rain, snow, snowmelt, or
runoff. Industrial materials or activities include, but are not limited to, material handling equipment
or activities, industrial machinery, raw materials, intermediate products, by-products, final products,
or waste products. DWQ may grant a No Exposure Exclusion from NPDES stormwater permitting
requirements only if a facility complies with the terms and conditions described in 40 CPR
§7.22.26(g).
18. Notice of Intent
The state application form which, when submitted to the Division, officially indicates the facility's
notice of intent to seek coverage under a general permit
19. Permit IssuingAuthority
The Director of the Division of Water Quality (see "Director" above).
20. Permittee
The owner or operator issued a Certificate of Coverage pursuant to this general permit.
21. Point Source Discharge of Stormwater
Any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance including, but not specifically limited to, any pipe,
ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, or discrete fissure from which stormwater is or may be
discharged to waters of the state.
22. Representative Outfall Status
Part IV Page 2 of 4 Pages

Penn it No. NCG210000
When it is established that the discharge of stormwater runoff from a single outfall is representative of the
discharges at multiple outfalls, the DWQ may grant representative outfall status. Representative outfall
status allows the permittee to perform analytical monitoring at a reduced number of outfalls.
23. Secondary Containment
Spill containment for the contents of the single largest tank within the containment structure plus
sufficient freeboard to allow for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event.
24. Section 313 Water Priority Chemical
A chemical or chemical category which:
b. Is listed in 40 CFR 372.65 pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right -
to -Know Act of 1986;.
c. Is present at or above threshold levels at a facility subject to SARA title 111, Section 313 reporting
requirements; and
d. Meets at least one of the following criteria:
i. Is listed in appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on Table 11 (organic priority pollutants), Table
III (certain metals, cyanides, and phenols) or Table IV (certain toxic pollutants and
hazardous substances);
ii. Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40 CFR
116.4; or
iii. Is a pollutant for which EPA has published acute or chronic water quality criteria.
25. Severe Property Damage
Substantial physical damage to property, damage to the control facilities which causes them to
become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be
expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss
caused by delays in production.
26. Significant Materials
Includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic
pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in food processing or
production; hazardous substances designated raider section 101(14) of CERCLA; any chemical the
facility is required to report pursuant to section 313 of Title III of SARA; fertilizers; pesticides; and
waste products such as ashes, slag and sludge that have the potential to be released with stormwater
discharges.
27. Significant Spills
Includes, but is not limited to: releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable
quantities under section 311 of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.3and 40 CFR 117.3) or section
102 of CERCLA (Ref: 40 CFR 302.4).
28. Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
The point of departure of stormwater from a discernible, confined, or discrete conveyance, including
but not limited to, storm sewer pipes, drainage ditches, channels, spillways, or channelized collection
areas, from which stormwater Flows directly or indirectly into waters of the State of North Carolina.
29. Stormwater Runoff
The Flow of water which results from precipitation and which occurs immediately following rainfall
or as a result of snowmelt
30. StorinwaterAssociated with Industrial Activi
The discharge from any point source which is used for collecting and conveying stormwater and
which is directly related to manufacturing, processing or raw material storage areas at an industrial
site. Facilities considered to be engaged in "industrial activities" include those activities defined in
Part IV Page 3 of 4 Pages

Permit No. NCG210000
40 CFR 1.22.26(b)(14). The term does not include discharges from facilities or activities excluded
from the NPDES program.
31. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ($PPPI
A comprehensive site -specific plan which details measures and practices to reduce Stormwater
pollution and is based on an evaluation of the pollution potential of the site.
32. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDLI
TMDLs are written plans for attaining and maintaining water quality standards, in all seasons, for a
specific water body and pollutant. A list of approved TMDLs for the state of North Carolina can be
found at httll://liortal.ncdenr.org/web/wil/lis/mtu/tmdl.
33. Toxic Pollutant
Any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act.
34. Vehicle Maintenance Activity_
Vehicle rehabilitation, mechanical repairs, painting, fueling, lubrication, vehicle cleaning operations,
or airport deicing operations.
35. Visible Sedimentation
Solid particulate matter, both mineral and organic, that has been or is being transported by water,
air, gravity, or ice from its site of origin which,can be seen with the unaided eye.
36. 25-year. 24 hour Storm Event
The maximum 24-hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded, on the average, once
in 25 years.
Part IV Page 4 of 4 Pages

A
NCD NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October 26, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1300 0000 1105 7043
RETURNED RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. J. Mark Williams, President
Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc.
P. O. Box 2430
Smithfield, NC 27577
Dear Mr. Williams:
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. Wet Deck Storage Site
NPDES Permit No. NCO085936
Stormwater Permit No. NCG210290
On October 13, 2010, 1, Mitch Hayes, of the Raleigh Regional Office, conducted a compliance
evaluation inspection at the subject facility. The assistance of Kevin Williams, Vice President, with this
inspection was greatly appreciated. Below is a list of findings and recommendations developed from the
inspection:
1. The subject NPDES permit was reissued and became effective July 1, 2008 and will expire
March 31, 2013. Request for permit renewal must be made 180 days before permit expiration
date.
2. Logs are brought in by tractor trailer trucks and unloaded onto a concrete pad. Logs are
sprayed with overhead irrigation from wells to prevent bacteria growth that causes blue
staining in the wood. Discharge from the irrigation flows through screens to prevent large
pieces of bark from entering a drainage ditch. Screens and drainage areas are cleaned daily
to prevent bark from building up. The color of the effluent at Outfall 001 appeared to be dark
brown most likely due to high tannin content.
3. Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) for the review period July 2009 through July 2010 were
reviewed for compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. Permit limit for total
suspended solids were exceeded on 09/15/2010 and 09/22/2010 and for the month of
September 2010. There were no other violations for the review period.
Commercial lab results, chain of custody records
submitted on the DMR for the month of July
Laboratory, Inc. performs all analyses.
Stormwater Permit Number NCG210290
, and bench sheets were compared with data
2010. No discrepancies were noted. Tritest
5. Permit NCG210290 was issued and became effective on August 1, 2008 and will expire
midnight July 31, 2013. Permit renewal is required 180 days prior to permit expiration to avoid
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet w .ncwatemuality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609
One
NorthCarolina
An Equal ODPonunity/Affirmr ative Action Employe50%Recycletl/10%Post Consumer Paper Natura!/y

-{ ) '.?tm � ' Mr; e)
Jerry q. W illiarris &uSo a III
Page 2
penalty assessment. A review of the permit requirements was conducted after the CEI for
NC0085936.
6. The facility processes logs into various lumber products. All processing occurs inside various
buildings. Finished lumber is stored outside and inside buildings. Sawdust generated during
processing is stored outside on a concrete pad and loaded onto trucks. Stormwater flows from
the northeast toward the southwest side of the property and discharges into a drainage ditch.
There is one discharge point.
7. A review of the Stormwater Permit indicated the following:
a) A site plan for the facility could not be found. Please ensure that your facility has a site
plan that includes all requirements listed in Section A (1).
b) A stormwater management plan was available however; the BMP Summary was not
being reviewed and updated annually.
c) There is no record for annual employee training for spill response and cleanup,
preventative maintenance, or for any of the facilities operations that have the potential to
contaminate stormwater runoff.
d) Qualitative and analytical monitoring was completed July 2010. Results for analytical
monitoring were below cut-off concentrations. Tritest analyses all parameters except pH.
Please respond within twenty days receipt of this letter, actions taken to correct stormwater permit
deficiencies. I would like to thank Kevin Williams again for his time and assistance with this inspection.
If you have any questions about this letter or the inspection, please contact me by phone or email
mitch.haves(o)ncdenr.gov
Sincerely,
Mitch Hayes
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Permit Files
Central Files

_ NIL
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG210290 Effective: 08/01/08 Expiration: 07/31/13 Owner: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Wet Log Deck Storage site
County: Johnston 524 Brogden Rd
Region: Raleigh
Smithfield NC 27577
Contact Person: Jerry Mark Williams Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s)
Certification:
Phone:
24 hour contact name J Mark Williams Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Kevin Williams Phone:
Related Permits:
NC0085936 Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc - Wet Log Deck Storage site
Inspection Date: 1011312010 EntryTime: 10:15 AM Exit Time: 11:.1 AM w 1�
Primary Inspector: Mitchell S Hayes �j't � �. � U Z O/ Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): 11..
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Timber Products Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page:1

Permit: NCG210290 Owner - Facility: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 10/13/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The facility processes logs into various lumber products. All processing occurs inside various buildings. Finished lumber is
stored outside and inside buildings. Sawdust generated during processing is stored outside on a concrete pad and loaded
onto trucks. Stormwater Flows from the northeast toward the southwest side of the property and discharges into a
drainage ditch. There is one discharge point,
A site plan for the facility could not be found.
A stormwater management plan was available however; the BMP Summary was not being reviewed and updated annually
There is no record for annual employee training for spill response and cleanup, preventative maintenance, or for any of
the facilities operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff.
Qualitative and analytical monitoring was completed July 2010. Results for analytical monitoring were below cut-off
concentrations. Tritest analyses all parameters except pH
Page:2

Permit: NCG210290 Owner - Facility: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 10/13/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
Cl
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
Cl
Cl
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
■
❑
Cl
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: A site plan could not be found during inspection. BMP Summary was not
being reviewed and updated annually. There is no record for annual employee training
for spill response and cleanup. Kevin Williams stated he is the responsible party but this
is not listed. The SWPPP is not being reviewed or updated annually.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Monitoring was last completed July 2010.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Montoring was completed in July and September 2010. Results for July
were below cut-off concentrations. Results for September monitoring have not been
returned.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
Cl
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 3

Jp
Permit: NCG210290 Owner - Facility: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 10/1312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: Facility has one discharge outfall that is located at the end of the concrete
pad and the drainage ditch just before confluence with the road ditch.
® ❑ ❑ ❑
Page:4

I
I
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
A. Signature
❑ Agent
X ❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
MR. J. MARK WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT
JERRY G. WILLIAMS & SONS, INC.
PO BOX 2430
SMITHFIELD INC 27577
3.�rvice Type
CEI.N00085936. NCG210290
Certified Mall
❑ Express Mail
JERRY.G WILLIAMS&SONS INC. JOHNSTON CO.
❑insuredM
'�' Return Receipt for Merchandise
10/26110.MAILED. 10126110.SWP. HAYES
❑ Insured Mail
❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7008 1300
0000 1105
7043
(Transfer from service laben
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02-M-15a0

IJ
��wv� —i
� ® Y
February 25, 2008
Mr. J. Mark Williams, President
Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc.
P.O. Box 2430
Smithfield, North Carolina 27577
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
co a o�
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc., Wet Deck Storage Site
NPDES Permit No. NCO085936
Stormwater Permit No. NCG210290
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Williams:
Mitch Hayes performed the subject inspection on February 11, 2008. The assistance of Bill
Langley was appreciated. Attached to this letter is the Basinwide Information Management System
(BIMS) inspection checklist summarizing the inspection. Some items noted during the inspection are
noted below:
1. The subject NPDES permit was reissued and became effective January 1, 2004 and expires
February 29, 2008. I have reviewed the permit renewal and will foreword my comments to
the NPDES Unit. The subject facility has no classification and requires no Operator in
Responsible Charge (ORC).
2. Discharge from the facility occurs when spraying of logs occurs. There was no discharge at
the time of inspection. Screens are placed in the main flow area to catch any large pieces of
bark that flow down with the wash water. Water in the ditch downstream of the wet
decking operation appeared clear with no indication of sediment build-up.
3. Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) for the period January 2007 through December
2007 were review for compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. It is
noted that the parameter code for oil and grease 00556 and settleable solids 00545 are not
written in the column on the DMR. Parameter code 00600 for Total Nitrogen should also
be used when reporting Total Nitrogen in pounds per quarter and Total Nitrogen in pounds
in pounds per year. There were no other violations noted during the period.
4. Commercial lab results, chain of custody records, and bench sheets were compared with
data submitted on the DMR for the month of November 2007. No discrepancies were
noted. Microbic Laboratory, Inc. performs all analyses. Field parameter pH is being
analyzed although pH is not a required parameter in the permit. You may choose not to
analyze pH if you want to.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet. www.ncwatergtiality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
0.
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper NJ rt hCwojinna

Jerry Williams & Sons CEI
Page 2
Stormwater Permit NCG210290
5. The General Permit NCG210000 will expire April 30, 2008. The Certificate of Coverage
NCG210290 will become effective when the General Permit NCG210000 is reissued.
Please continue to operate under the last permit issued. A review of the permit
requirements was conducted after the CEI for NC0085936. Qualitative monitoring and
reporting requirements for June and October 2007 were checked and found to have all
R �e necessary required fields. Analytical monitoring for on -site vehicle maintenance was
momtored,-and reported for 2007. Cut-off concentrations for the parameters were being
--,...,..met.. Documentation of employee training is monthly. Records of monitoring secondary
containments occur monthly.
I would again like to thank Bill Langley his assistance with this inspection. If you have any
questions about the inspection or this letter, please contact me at 919.791.4261.
Sincerely,
Mitch Hayes
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Central Files
Stormwater, Permit Files

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG210290 Effective: 05/01/03 Expiration: 04/30/08 Owner: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Wet Log Deck Storage site
County: Johnston - 524 Brogden Rd
Region: Raleigh
Smithfield NC 27577
Contact Person: Jerry Mack Williams Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative Bill Langley
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 02/11/2008 Entry Time: 02:20 PM
Primary Inspector: Mitchell S Hayes
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
Exit Time: 03:55 PM
Phone:[phone]
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Timber Products Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: M Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG210290 Owner - Facility: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 02/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The stormwater pollution prevention plan as required by NCG210290 was reviewed and found to be compliant and up to
date. Training, annual review, monitoring, inspections of secondary containment are being accomplished as required.
Page:2

Permit: NCG210290 Owner - Facility: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 02/11/2008 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?N
Cl
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
m
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
E
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? -
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
0
❑
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: SPPP is up to date and being maintained.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
❑
❑
Comment: 2007 sampling was completed 06/29/2007 and 10/26/2007.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
E
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: Grease and oil are monitored weekly due to possible disccharge from
machinery and AST's on site.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available atthe site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
0
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment
Page:3

O
:4
i
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
rNorth
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
April 20, 2007
Mr. J. Mark Williams, President
Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc.
P.O. Box 2430
Smithfield, North Carolina 27577
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc., Wet Deck Storage Site
NPDES Permit No. NCO085936
Stormwater Permit No: NCG210290
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Williams:
Mitch Hayes performed the subject inspection on April 04, 2007. The assistance of Bill
Langley, John Fox, and Kevin Williams was appreciated. Attached to this letter is the Basinwide
Information Management System (BIMS) inspection checklist summarizing the inspection. Some
items noted during the inspection are noted below:
1. The subject NPDES permit was reissued and became effective January 1, 2004 and expires
February 29, 2008. Please ensure to reapply for permit renewal by September 30, 2007 to
avoid penalty assessment. The subject facility has no classification and requires no
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC).
2. Discharge from the facility occurs when spraying of logs occurs. There was no discharge at
the time of inspection. Drainage areas where water would flow on the concrete pad are kept
swept of bark. Addition of screens in the main flow areas catches any bark that flow down
with the wash water. The discharge point has been change since the last inspection. The
new discharge point is more representative of the discharge of the wet decking operation,
as it does not receive flow from other stormwater drainage. The other two discharge points
from the concrete pad should be covered under the stormwater permit NCG210290. Water
in the ditch downstream of the wet decking operation appeared clear with no indication of
sediment build-up.
3. Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's) for the period February 2006 through January
2007 were review for compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. Daily
permit limit for TSS was exceeded on 12/04/2006. Monthly permit limit for TSS was
exceeded for December 2006. Quarterly Total Phosphorus has not been monitored and
reported for the review period. It was determined that Quarterly Total Phosphorus was
being analyzed but not being reported on the DMR. Yearly and Quarterly Nitrogen is not
being reported in pounds per month for the review period. This was noted in last year's
inspection. Total Nitrogen, Total Nitrogen components and Total Phosphorus should be
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.newateraualitv.ore 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
On�
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50%Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper N�`nCarolina
Wma!!y

Jerry Williams & Sons CEI
Page 2
monitored and reported each quarter on the same day as other samples are collected. This
was noted in last year's inspection. Please submit amended DMR's for 2006 to include
Total Quarterly Phosphorus and Quarterly Total Nitrogen in pounds/quarter and mg/quarter
and pounds per year on the correct Quarter DMR. White out has been noted on submitted
DMR's. According to Laboratory Certification rules, white out is not permitted. If a
mistake is noted, cross out the incorrect value with a single line, write in the correct value
for the parameter,.initial and date beside the correction.
+.i, ti.t `.
4. �Cmromrcial�lab'results, chain of custody records, and bench sheets were compared with
data,submitted-on1the DMR for the month of January 2007. No discrepancies were noted.
Microbic Laboratory, Inc. performs all analyses except pH, which the staff is field certified.
5. Mr. Langley inquired about other laboratories with N.0 wastewater certification. A list can
be found at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us./Iab/nccert.htm Laboratories outside N.C. with N.C.
wastewater certification can be found at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us./lab/notnccert.htm
Stormwater Permit NCG210290
6. Permit NCG210290 was issued and became effective on May 01, 2003 and will expire on
April 30, 2008. Permit renewal is required by November 30, 2007 to avoid penalty
assessment. A review of the permit requirements was conducted after the CEI for
NC0085936. Qualitative monitoring and reporting requirements for June and November
2006 were checked and found to have all necessary required fields. Analytical monitoring
for on -site vehicle maintenance was monitored and reported for 2006. Cut-off
concentrations for the parameters were being met.
7. The stormwater permit could not be located during inspection but was found the next day.
A review of the permit was done during a recon site visit on April 13, 2007. The
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has not been reviewed or evaluated since it
was written July 01, 2005. Inspection of equipment and tanks has not been documented.
Documentation of employee training on proper spill response and cleanup procedures is not
being documented. A facility site map drawn to scale indicating location of industrial
activities, drainage structures, drainage areas for each outfall and activities occurring in the
drainage area, building locations, existing BMPs and impervious surfaces, and the
percentage of each drainage area that is impervious has not been completed. Certification
that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater
discharges has not been completed. Detailed information on the SWPPP can be found in
the Stormwater Permit in Part 11, Section A. All components of the SWPPP were required
to be developed and implemented within 12 months of the effective date of the initial
certificate of coverage. Please implement the above deficiencies by June 04, 2007 to avoid
enforcement action being taken.
I would again like to thank Bill Langley, John Fox, and Kevin Williams for their assistance
with this inspection. If you have any questions about the inspection or this letter, please contact me
at 919.791.4261.
Sincerely,
Mitch Hayes
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Central Files
Stormwater, Permit Files

Permit: NCG210290
SOC:
County: Johnston
Region: Raleigh
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 05/01/03 Expiration: 04/30/08 Owner: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Wet Log Deck Storage site
524 Brogden Rd
Contact Person: Jerry Mack Williams
Directions to Facility:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative Bill Langley
24 hour contact name J Mark Williams
Related Permits:
Smithfield NC 27577
Phone:[phone]
Certification: Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Entry Time: 02:/0/0 PM /// Exit Time: 04:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Mitchell S Hayes /i�L ,/l a.(/v� �n Phone: [phone]'//Z(/ Z1 7
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Timber Products Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

A
Permit: NCG210290 Owner - Facility: Jerry G Williams 8 Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Permit NCG210290 was issued and became effective on May 01, 2003 and will expire on April 30, 2008. Permit renewal
is required by November 30, 2007 to avoid penalty assessment. Qualitative monitoring and reporting requirements for
June and November 2006 were checked and found to have all necessary required fields. Analytical monitoring for on -site
vehicle maintenance was monitored and reported for 2006. Cut-off concentrations for the parameters were being met.
The SWPPP has not been reviewed or evaluated since it was written July 01, 2005. Facility site inspection and
documentation of employee training on proper spill response and cleanup procedures are not being documented. A
facility map has not been done. All components of the SWPPP was required to be developed and implemented within 12
months of the effective date of the initial certificate of coverage.
There are two distinct stormwater outfalls. These outfalls receive discharge from the concrete pad that slopes downhill of
the wetdecking operation. The outfalls dicharge into a stormwater ditch that also receives flow from the wetdecking
operation and stormwater from an adjacent subdivision behind the facility. Flow in the stormwater ditch drains into a
roadside ditch where it mixes with stormwater draining from a pipe under the road. This stormwater eventually flows to an
unnamed tributary to the Neuse River. Screens are placed on the pad in drainage area to catch bark. Water in the
stormwater ditch at the stormwater outfall discharge point was brownish and turbid.
Page:2

Permit: NCG210290 Owner -Facility: JerryG Williams & Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
■
Cl
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
E
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
■
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has not been
reviewed or evaluated since it was written July 01, 2005.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Qualitative monitoring was performed on 06/12/2006 and 11/08/2006.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Analytical monitoring was performed on 06/12/2006.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
Y
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
Cl
❑
■
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCG210290 Owner - Facility: Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment: Facility site plan needs to be completed. Two stormwater discharge outfalls
were noted during inspection.
Page:4

JIM
P.O. Box 2430
524 Brogden Road
Smithfield
North Carolina 27577
919-934-4115
919-934-4956 Fax
June 1, 2007
t2007
�I"
OEN(; RALEIGH RLG!OIdi;L OFFICE
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURNRECEIPT REQUESTED
7006 3450 0001 8829 5668
Mr. Charles Wakild
Regional Supervisor
NCDENR — DWQ Surface Water Protection
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
RE: Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWP3)
Stormwater Permit No. NCG210000
Certificate of Coverage. NCG210290
Dear Charles:
In accordance with the requirement for SWP3 completion and implementation
in your April 20, 2007 letter, Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. has completed
the SWP3 required by the Certificate of Coverage NCG210290 following
guidelines set forth in Part 11, Section A of their current Stormwater Permit
NCG210000. Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. has begun scheduling employee
training on proper spill response and cleanup procedures. The training should
be completed within the coming weeks and will utilize the new SWP3 as a
training tool.
If you have any further questions or need additional information, please
contact me at [phone] or Tim Monroe or Wes Brummer of Bensinger
& Garrison Environmental at [phone].
Sincerely,
JERRY G. WILLIAMS & SONS, INC.
John Fox
Vice President of Operations

Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc.
P.O. Box 2430 - 52.4 Brogden Road
Smithfield, NC 27577
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Training Overview
We have a written Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for this site as required by the
North Carolina Department of Environmental Natural Resources. Two written copies of
the plan exist on site. One copy is located in the Front Office Conference Room and the
other is located in the office of John Fox, VP Sales, Marketing, Admin, and HSE. Please
familiarize yourselves with this plan in detail if need be.
The intent of the plan is as follows: to identify and be aware of all potential stormwater
pollution sources that may be generated on site; to develop and implement practices to
minimize, control and/or eliminate these sources; and to ensure compliance with this
plan. Some of the potential stormwater pollution sources might be any one of the
following — oil, fuel, sawdust, bark waste, mulch, waste water from the boilers, sewage,
boiler and/or cooling tower blowdown, boiler water treatment chemical, etc. Point
sources would then be such things as all oil storage tanks, all fuel storage tanks, bark
waste loading area, sawdust piles, sawdust silos, log delivery area, log storage area,
dry kiln condensate return tanks, air compressors, electrical transformers, cooling tower,
boiler, lumber storage area, mulch pile, trash bins, vehicle maintenance shop area, etc.
The key to the implementation and compliance of this plan is to recognize all sources,
and to take measures to minimize the possibility of these sources getting into
stormwater. This can be done in several different ways. Some include building dykes
around storage tanks, fixing leaks immediately, installing high level switches on storage
tanks to prevent overflows, storing waste cans inside, good housekeeping practices, etc.
Two semi-annual inspections will be done each year by management representatives as
a part of this plan in order to identify areas needing attention. Action should then be
taken as soon as possible to correct any deficiencies that are found. All employees can
help by being careful not to create spills, by properly cleaning up spills when they occur,
by practicing good housekeeping, etc.
In the event of a spill, evidence of chemicals or petroleum products in stormwater runoff,
or obvious exposure of the same to an eventual rain storm event, please contact your
supervisor immediately. And/or contact one of the following — John Fox, Craig Gray, or
Bill Langley. Spills that are minor in nature, or that can be controlled and properly
cleaned up by the employee in the immediate area, and do not contact soils or waters of
the state, do not require reporting.
Taking care of the environment is the responsibility of each and every one of us. We all
want our children and families to be able to enjoy this beautiful world that God has so
graciously given us. Let's all do our part to protect the soil, the air, and the water of the
land in which we live — it's the least we can do to show appreciation for what we have.

\0" W ATF9OG
co r
O -C
J Mack Williams
Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
PO Box 2430
Smithfield, NC 27577
Dear Permittee:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 28, 2003
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
COC Number NCG210290
Johnston County
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCG210000, the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. This
permit is reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
• A new Certificate of Coverage
• A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCG210000
• A copy of the Analytical Monitoring Form (DMR)
• A copy of the Qualitative] Monitoring Form
• A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does
not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, or relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any
other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Bill Mills of the Central Office
Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone], ext. 548.
Sincerely,
Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
cc: Central Files
Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files
Raleigh Regional Office
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
MNR�
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG210000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG210290
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Jerry G Williams & Sons Inc
524 Brogden Road
Smithfield
Johnston County
to receiving waters designated as the Smithfield MS4 to a UT to Polecat Creek, a class C NSW
stream, in the Neuse River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring
requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No.
NCG210000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective May 1, 2003.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day April 28, 2003.
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANO NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Mr. Mark Williams
Jerry G. Williams and Sons, Inc.
P.O. Box 2430
Smithfield, NC 27577
Subject:
Dear Mr. Williams:
December 3, 2002
Stormwater Permit
Jerry G. Williams and Sons, Inc.
Permit No. NCG210290
Johnston County
Enclosed is a copy of the stormwater requirements for facilities in the N'CG210000
category as requested. If you have questions please call.
Sincerely,
Ted Cashion
Environmental Chemist
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

i
STATEOFNORTHCAROLINADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTANDNATURAL
RESOURCES
DI V I S IONOF WATE RQUALITY
GENERALPERMITNO.NCG210000
TODISCHARGESTORMWATERUNDERTHE
NATIONALPOLLUTANTDISCHARGEELIMINATIONSYSTEDI
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North CarolinaEnvironmental
ManagementCommission andtheFederal WaterPollutionControlAct, asamended,thispermit
isherebvissuedtoallownersoroperators,hereafterpermittees,whicharecoveredbythispermit
as evidenced by receipt of a Certificate of Coverage by the Environmental Management
Commission to allow the discharge ofstormwater to the surface waters of North Carolina or
separate storm sewersystems conveying stormwaterto surface waters in accordance with the
termsandconditionssetforthherein.
Coverage underthisgeneral nerrnitisapplicabletoall owners oroperatorsofstormwaterpoint
source discharges associated with activities classified as establishments primarily engaged in
TimberProducts[standardindustrialclassification(SIC) 24].
The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this General Permit:
Wood Kitchen Cabinets [SIC 24341. Wood Preserving [SIC 2491 ], Logging [SIC 241], and
WoodChipMills.
TheGeneralPermitshallbecomeeffectiveonApril1,1995.
TheGeneralPermitshallexpi reatmidnightonMarch31:2003.
SignedthisdayApril l ,1995.
Ori: ina lsi znedbrA. PrestorrHo mard.Jr.
A. PrestonHoward,Jr.,P.E.,Director
D i v i s i ono f\VaterQual ity
BytheAuthorityo ftheEnvironmentalM anagementCommi ssi on

DivisionofW aterQuality/W aterQualitySection
NationalPollutantDischargeEliminationSystem
NCG21000O
NOTICEOFINTENT
NationalPollutantDischargeEliminationSystemapplicationforcoverageunderGeneraIPermit
NCG210000:
STORMWATERDISCHARGESassociatedwithactivitiesclassifiedas:
SIC34 Tim berProducts(exceptasspecifiedbelow)
Thefollowingactivitiesarespecificallyexcluded fromcoverageunderthisGeneralPermit:
Wood KitchenCa binets (SIC 2434)
• Wood Preserving (SIC 2491)
• Logging(SIC 241)
Woodchipmills
1) Mailingaddress 'ofownerloperator:
Name
StreetAddress
City
TelephoneNo.
2) Locationoffacilityproducingdischarge:
FacilityName
FacilityContact
StreetAddress
City
County
TelephoneNo.
•Stan dardInd ustrialCIassificationCode
(Pleaseprintortype)
State
Fax:
ZIPCode
*Add resstowh ichall pe rm ilcorrespond encewil I bemai led
State ZIPCode
Fax:
3) PhysicalLocationlnformation:
Pleaseprovideanarrativedescriptionofhowtogettothefacility(usestreetnames,stateroadnumbers,a nd
distanceanddirectionfromaroadwayintersection).
(AcopyofacountymaporUSGSquadsheetwithfacilitycleadylocatedonthemapisrequiredtobesubmittedvrithlhisappli cation)
4) ThisNPDESPermitApplicationappliestowhichofthefollowing:
NeworProposedFacility Dateoperationistobegin ----- ________
Existing
5) StandardlndustrialClassification:
Providelhe4digitStandardlndustrialClassificationCode(SICCode)thatdescribestheprimaryindustrial
a ctivityatth i sfac i I ity
SICCode:_______
Pagelof3
S W U-236-101701

7
r-
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
J
September 4. 2002
J MACK WILLIAMS
JERRY G WILLIAMS & SONS INCORPORATED
PO BOX 2430
SMITHFIELD. NC 27577
[)car Pernliueci
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Duality
� qr1
Subject: NPDES Stormwatcr Permit Coverage Renewal
Jerry G Williams & Sons Incorporated
COC Number ncg210290
Johnston County
Your I;icility is curremly covered for stornnyatur discharge under General Permit NCG210O00. This permit expires
on March 31. 2(N)3. The Division staff is currently in the process of rewriting this permit and is scheduled to have
the permit reissued by Early spring of 2003. Once the permit is reissued. your facility would be eligible for
continued coveru�Ic under the reissued permit.
In order to assure your continued coverage under the general permit, you must apply to the Division of Water
Lualily (DWQ) for renewal of your permit coverage. To make this renewal process easier, we are informing_ you in
advance that your permit coverage will be cxpirine. Enclosed you will find a Permit Coverage Renewal
Application Form. life application must be completed and. returned by October '_'-'_002 in order to assure
continued coverage under the general permit. Due to staft and budget constraints. letters confirming our receipt of
the completed application will not he sent.
Failure to request renewal within the time period specified, may result in a civil ❑SSCSsnlenl of at least $250.W.
Larger penalties may be assessed depending on the dclinquencv of the request. Discharge of stormwater from Your
(aciliry without cuveraee Wider a valid stormwater NPDES permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-2 15.1
alhi could rc.,ulI m a,>..conlr nls of civil pcmtpie,< of up to $10.000 per day.
Please note that recent federal legislation has extended the "no exposure exclusion" to all operators of industrial
facilities in any of the I I categories of "storm water discharges associated with industrial activity," (except
construction activities). If you feel your facility can certify a condition of "no exposure". i.e. the facility industrial
materials and operations are not exposed to stormwater, you can apply for the no exposure exclusion. For additional
information contact the Central Office Stormwatcr Staff member listed below or'check life Stormwatcr , General
Permits Unit Web Site at hup://hlo.enr.stitte.nc.us/su/stormwater.html
If the subject stormwater discharge to waters of life state has been terminated. please complete the enclosed
Rescission Request Form. Mailing instructions arc listed on the bottom of the form. You will be notified when the
rescission process has been completed.
If you have any questions regarding the permit renewal procedures please contact Joe Alhimon of lire Raleigh
Regional Office at 919-571-47W or Bill Mills of the Central Office Stormwatcr Unit at [phone], cst. 548
Sincerely.
Bradlcv BCmlell, Supervisor
Stormwatcr and Gencral Permits Unit
ec: Central Files
Stormwatcr and General Permits Unit Files
Radcielt Regirmal 011iac
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Oualily 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[phone] Customer Service
1- 800-623-7748