20141077 Ver 2_401 Application_20200213

DWR
mrislon Of Water Re ..l
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20110567
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Crabtree Creek Sanitary Sewer Interceptor - Phase II
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Keven Arrance
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
2/13/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Crabtree Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.8170-78.6286
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r- Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
V Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
Version#*
3
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple Ni
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record onlyfor DWR 401 Certification:
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
fJ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r- Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
fJ Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Raleigh
2b. Deed book and page no.:
utility easement
2c. Responsible party:
Eileen Navarrete
2d.Address
Street Address
1 Exchange Plaza, Suite 620
Address tine 2
Oty
Raleigh
RD tal / Zip Code
27602
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
State / Frovince / Fegiai
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
f Yes r No
4a. Name:
Keven Arrance

4b. Business Name:
Hazen and Sawyer
4c.Address
Street Address
4011 WestChase Blvd, Suite 500
Address Line 2
aty
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27607
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Authorization_signed.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Rovince / Region
NC
Coup ry
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Postal / Zip Code Country
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Crabtree Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010804
4. Project Description and History
43.32KB
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project is located within the city limits of Raleigh and almost entirely inside the 1-440 Beltline. The proposed pipeline will roughly parallel epsting sewer lines that run along Crabtree
Creek from near North Hills Drive to near Capital Boulevard. The pipe will be within and abutting an wasting maintained sewer easement. The pipe corridor is located in public parks,
adjacent to existing greenways, adjacent to residential properties, and under existing pavement (roadways and parking areas). The pipe corridor crosses several roadways, including
the 1-440 Beltline, Yadkin Drive, Lassiter Mill Road, Wake Forest Road, Atlantic Avenue, Hodges Road, and Capital Boulevard.
The project is currently under construction. The construction started in 2015 and is anticipated to be completed in October 2020. Work that remains to be completed includes portions
of the open -cut segments, as depicted on the attached figure, and also includes six open -cut crossings of Crabtree Creek.
The project vicinity is characterized by urban development, consisting of residential, commercial, and industrial land uses. Small areas of undeveloped lands are present in the vicinity of
the project. The project is located in the Crabtree Creek watershed, which feeds the Neuse River.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
Action ID SAW-2014-02049; DWR #11-0567
Project History Upload

404 Permit for Crabtree Conveyance (Phase II).pdf
DWR #11-0567 v2 - 401-Buffer Approval 20160810.pdf
SAW-2014-02049 CORPUD 404 Approval - CBWSCI Phase II.pdf
401 WQC 2014.10.20.pdf
7.71 MB
1.16MB
1.24MB
937.57KB
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
PCN TOPO.pdf
4.93MB
4e. Attach an 8 112 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soil Survey excerpt.pdf 1.03MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.18
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
23,240
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to provide additional sewer capacity necessary to convey wet -weather flows and future flow increases along with the existing interceptors and significantly
reduce the potential for sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). The new pipe generally parallels existing sewers - one pipe in some areas and two pipes in other areas. The new pipe will not
provide service to areas that are not currently served by the existing pipe network.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project is approximately 4.1 miles long, following Crabtree Creek from near Generation Drive to the east side of Capital Boulevard. Construction of the project commenced in 2015
and is currently ongoing. Roughly two-thirds of the project length has been installed, with 1.7 miles remaining to be completed. Construction is anticipated to be completed in October
2020. The impacts presented herein do not include the impacts associated with portions of the project that have already been completed. Impacts presented herein represent the areas
of active or future construction activities. Changes from the 2014 permit application package include 9 areas of expanded limits of disturbance, per the contractor's request. Raleigh
Water notes that all construction work performed to date has been in accordance with the original 404/401/buffer permits issued in 2014 and the subsequent modifications issued in
2016. This application constitutes Raleigh Water's request for reauthorization of current and future impacts that were previously authorized under the 2012 Nationwide Permits,
associated 401 General Water Quality Certification, and Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules and authorization of the impacts associated with the nine aforementioned areas of
expanded limits of disturbance.
The project entails installation of approximately 4.1 miles of new 54-inch diameter gravity sewer within the Crabtree Creek basin. Each end of the new pipe will tie into the existing pipe
network. The proposed pipe will include segments of fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) pipe and of ductile iron pipe (DIP). Interconnections with the existing pipe network along the
length of the proposed pipe will be established with new manholes. At the upstream end of the project, the proposed 54-inch pipe will be connected to the existing 36-inch pipe by a 24-
inch DIP, which will cross Crabtree Creek. Eight additional interconnections with the existing pipe network will be established along the project, with interconnecting pipes ranging from 8
inches to 24 inches in diameter. Four existing segments of 36-inch sewer will be removed and replaced in -kind to provide adequate pipe spacing and meet required pipe crossing
standards. Existing utilities in the project area may be relocated slightly as needed to accommodate the proposed 54-inch sewer. Equipment to be used includes, but is not limited to,
track -mounted backhoes and/or excavators, front-end loaders, dump trucks, sheepsfoot compactor/roller, and a drilling rig for rock drilling and blasting. Additional smaller grading and
excavation equipment may be utilized if determined appropriate for the site conditions by the contractor.
Stream crossings will continue to be installed as shown on Drawing D9, enclosed. Coffer dams and temporary pump -around systems will continue to be utilized to establish and maintain
a dry work area. The bypass pumps outlet onto a sandbag or riprap dissipator in order to protect the stream against scour at the outlet. A temporary woodmat bridge shall be used at
each stream crossing to allow the in -stream work to be performed from above the stream bed. Double row of high -hazard silt fence will continue to be utilized in the vicinity of stream and
wetland crossings to protect against fugitive sediment entering waters of the US. Silt fencing with stone relief outlets are in use throughout the project area.
Open -cut stream crossings are designed to be reinforced with riprap that will be keyed in to maintain the existing cross -sectional area of each channel. The riprap reinforcement will be
placed on the streambanks above the ordinary high water mark. Anti -seep collars and concrete encasement of the pipe are included in the design at all crossings of Crabtree Creek.
Anti -seep collars will be installed along the pipe at the downgradient edge of jurisdictional wetlands as well as at 150-foot intervals if more than 150 feet of pipe is to be installed within a
single wetland area.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
_PHASE II IFC Set w-revised C30.pdf 85.56MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r: Yes
Comments:
r No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary C Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2014-02059
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: SEPI Engineering
Other:
C Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made bythe Corps or DWR
Corps PJD signed 11/12/2014
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
PJD_extracted.pdf
812.97KB
6. Future Project Plans

6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are anyother NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
See information provided above in 4b and 4c relative to the previously issued permits for the project.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
® Wetlands m Streams -tributaries V Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
2g. Impact
area
Utility installation
T
Unknown
W-7
�
Both
0.050
(acres)
WC
Utility installation
T
Unknown
W-C
Yes
Both
0.007
(acres)
W44f
Utility installation
T
Unknown
F-44
Yes
Both
0.020
(acres)
W44nf
Utility installation
T
Unknown
W-44
Both
0.010
(acres)
W-2f
Utility installation
T
Unknown
W-2
Yes
Both
0.050
(acres)
W-2nf
Utility installation
T
Unknown
W-2
I to
Both
0.070
(acres)
W-3
Utility installation
T
Unknown
W-3
Yes
Both
0.001
(acres)
W-4f
Utility installation
T
Unknown ]W-4
Yes
Both
0.050
(acres)
W-4nf
Utility installation ��T
Unknown
W-4 �E_]Both
0.004
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.262 0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.262
2h. Comments:
Impacts to forested wetlands have been characterized as temporary in previous permits but consist of conversion to non -forested wetlands.
Conversion will impact a total of 0.13 acre of wetlands, for which mitigation has previously been provided.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact O
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width*
�3h. Impact
❑
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
g1
Utility installation
Temporary
Excavation
Crabtree Creek
Perennial
Both
103
60
Average (feet)
(lirxsrfeet)
S2
Utility installation
Temporary
Excavation
(Stream 8) UT1 to Crabtree
Perennial
Both
27
72
Creek
Average (feet)
(lirx�rfeet)
�
Utility installation
Tem ora
p ry
Excavation
Crabtree Creek
Perennial
Both
109
60
Average (feet)
(lirxerfeel)
S4
Utility installation
Temporary
Excavation
(Stream 7) U1­2 to Crabtree
Perennial
Both
17
61
Creek
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S5
Utility installation
Temporary
Excavation
Crabtree Creek
Perennial
Both
85
62
Average (feet)
(Iirx�rfeet)
S6
Utility installation
Temporary
Excavation
Crabtree Creek
Perennial
Both
104
60
Average (feet)
(lirx�rfeet)
S7
Utility installation
Temporary
Excavation
Crabtree Creek
Perennial
Both
108
62
—]
Average (feet)
(lirxerfeet)

gg
gg
Utility installation
Utility installation
Temporary
Temporary
Excavation
Favation
(Stream 5) UT3 to Crabtree
Creek
(Stream S2) UT4 to Crabtree
Creek
Intermittent
Intermttent
Both
Both
9
Average (fed)
20
Average (fed)
91
(linearfed)
71
(linearfed)
S10
Utility installation
Temporary
Excavation
Crabtree Creek
Perennial
Both
79
Average (feet)
60
(linearfed)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
702
3j. Comments:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Qeckall that apply.
RJ Neuse
❑ Catawba
❑ Goose Creek
❑ Other
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
659
r Tar -Pamlico
r Randleman
r Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
B2 - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek
No
3,687
2,411
133a - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek
No
0
10,302
133b - allowable with mitigation
T
Crabtree Creek
No
10,709
0
134 - allowable
T
(Stream 8) UT1 to Crabtree Creek
No
6,484
2,357
135 - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek
No
0
1,002
66 - exempt
67 - exempt
138a -allowable
BSb -allowable with mitigation
T
T
T
T
Crabtree Creek
(Stream S7) U172 to Crabtree
Creek
(Stream S7) U172 to Crabtree
Creek
(Stream S7) Ui2 to Crabtree
Creek
No
No
No
No
3,076
3,650
0
312
2,049
2,422
1,679
0
139 - exempt
T
Crabtree Creek
No
3,061
2,033
B10a - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek
No
0
1,102
1310b -allowable with mitigation
T
Crabtree Creek
No
755
0
611 a - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek I
No
0
470
1311b - allowable with mitigation
T
Crabtree Creek
No
1,556
0
612a - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek I
No
0
9,307
612b -allowable with mitigation
T
Crabtree Creek
No
1,674
0
613 - exempt
T
Crabtree Creek =1No
4,973
2,705
614a - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek
No
0
9,005
614b - allowable with mitigation
T
Crabtree Creek
No
4,619
0
616a - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek
No
0
23,938
616b - allowable with mitigation
T
Crabtree Creek
No
15,700
0
B17a - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek
No
0
2,814
B17b - allowable with mitigation
T
Crabtree Creek
%
2,370
0
618a - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek
No
0
13,661
618b - allowable with mitigation
T
Crabtree Creek
No
16,900
0
619 -exempt
T
(Stream S2) U174 to Crabtree
Creek
No
4,424
3,872

B20a - allowable
T
Crabtree Creek
No
0
3,199
B20b - allowable with mitigation
T
Crabtree Creek
No
3,691
0
1322 - exempt
T
Crabtree Creek
No
3,609
2,396
B21 - allowable with mitigation
T
Crabtree Creek
No
4,339
0
B15 - exempt
T
Crabtree Creek
No
3,853
2,612
136 - exempt
P
Crabtree Creek
Flo
621
413
139 - exempt
P
Crabtree Creek
N.
615
426
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 99,442.00 99,336.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 1,236.00 839.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 100,678.00 100,175.00
61. Comments:
Buffer impacts have been minimized by locating the project within the existing maintained easement to the extent feasible. Where new easement is
required, the project corridor abuts the existing easement. The project will not require increasing the existing maintained buffer width by more than 10
feet. Additional limits of disturbance are accounted for in the impact numbers associated with B7, B14a, B14b, B18a, and B18b.
Mitigation is not proposed for temporary impacts to Zone 1 buffer resulting from non -electric utility construction parallel to stream channels. Mitigation
was previously required by DWR and provided prior to the initiation of construction in 2015.
Supporting Documentation
Impact Site Indexpdf 3.43MB
Exhibits A-G.pdf 11.69MB
404 EXHIBITS —Impact Sites Labeled.pdf 6.67MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Full avoidance of impacts is possible only with a no -build alternative, which does not allow Raleigh Water to continue to provide high -quality sewer
service to its customers in the Crabtree Creek basin or to improve water quality in the Crabtree Creek basin by reducing the risk of SSOs. The
majority of the project corridor is within existing, maintained sewer easements. Where the project is outside the existing, maintained sewer easements,
the project abuts the existing easement and was designed to minimize disturbance outside the existing easement. Stream crossings were designed to
be within 15 degrees of perpendicular to minimize impacts to the streams and associated riparian buffer areas. Wetland encroachments were avoided
to the extent feasible while keeping the project corridor within or abutting the existing easement. Access roads, staging areas, and construction limits
of disturbance have been situated to avoid impacts to jurisdictional resources to the extent practicable.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Best management practices for erosion and sediment control measures are incorporated in the project design. Measures include the installation of a
double row of high -hazard silt fence with double stone relief outlets at all crossings of waters of the US, concrete washout pit, construction access exit
wash rack, and stabilized construction entrances. The contractor is and shall continue to perform weekly inspection of erosion & sediment control
devices and maintenance as needed to ensure maximum efficacy of all devices in use.
All in -stream work is to be performed in the dry. Coffer dams and temporary pump -around systems are specified for establishing and maintaining dry
work areas in surface waters. A temporary woodmat bridge shall be used at each stream crossing to allowthe in -stream work to be performed from
above the stream bed. No live concrete shall be allowed to be in contact with surface waters. Vehicle and equipment maintenance activities are
required to be performed outside of jurisdictional areas. Disturbed soils Will be final graded and seeded in a timely manner.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
C Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
® Mitigation bank r Payment to in -lieu fee F7 Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank

3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
EBX Neu -Con Cox II Site
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
......... ......... ......... .........
Type: Quantity:
Riparian wetland 0.13
Attach Receipt and/or letter
3c. Comments
Mitigation was secured as noted above prior to initiation of construction activities in 2015. No additional mitigation is needed under the 2020 permit
application.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
C Yes C No
What type of SCM are you providing?
(I Level Spreader
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHVVT)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
® Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flowthrough the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan notes.pdf 77.47KB
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
C Yes C No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
C Yes C No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
f• Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
r' Yes r No
Comments:*
Project involves expenditure of local funds and does not meet the minimum criteria to require a NEPA or SEPA document.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes C No
2b Provide an explanation of the violation(s):
The project was previously authorized under the USACE Nationwide Permit Program, the DWR water quality certification rules, and riparian buffer
rules. The Nationwide Permit and associated general water quality certification were unintentionally allowed to expire without reauthorization in 2017.
Upon realization that the permits had expired, the City immediately initiated the process to re -apply for necessary regulatory approvals.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.

The project will accommodate future flows anticipated as a result of organic population growth. The project is not anticipated not result in additional
development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
f Yes r No r WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property.
Trenching for Utlities Spec.pdf 430.85KB
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Hazen consulted the USFWS IPaC tool for information on federally protected species and designated critical habitats. Listed species include red -
cockaded woodpecker, Michauxs sumac, and dwarf wedgemussel. Habitat is not available in the project area for red -cockaded woodpecker.
Pedestrian surveys for suitable habitat for Michaues sumac and dwarf wedgemussel were performed by Hazen biologists in November 2019. Within
and immediately adjacent to the areas of active or future construction, Michawes sumac was not observed, and habitat for dwarf wedgemussel was
found to not be present in the tributaries to Crabtree Creek.
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC_20191104.pdf 519.4KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Hazen reviewed the NOAA Habitat Conservation online mapper for EFH in and adjacent to North Carolina.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Hazen reviewed the HPOWEB online mapper of historic resources. The nearest National Register of Historic Places listed property is more than 2,000
feet from the project area.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
HPOWEB_20191104.pdf 299.05KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMArequirements:
Encroachments into the floodplain consist of temporary impacts for installation of an underground utility line and permanent impacts due to
construction of manholes. For compliance with FEMA requirements, the manholes are designed to either extend above the 100-year base flood
elevation or to be sealed and vented such that they are protected against flooding.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*

FEMA FIRM panels 3720079600J, 3720079500J, 3720170600J, 3120170500J, and 3120171500J, effective May 2, 2006.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Due to the constraints of the a-PCN, new impact site identifiers are used herein for stream and buffer impacts. A table detailing the original and current impact site location identifiers for
stream and buffer impacts is attached. Wetland impact sites are labeled as they were in the 2014 permit application.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Stream and Buffer Impact Site Identifiers.pdf
Signature
® By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
81.36KB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
. I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
. I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Keven Arrance
Signature
Date
2/13/2020

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
The Raleigh Water proposes to install approximately 3.5 miles of wastewater line in an approximately
60-foot wide corridor that traverses numerous parcels located along Crabtree Creek between North
Hills Drive and Capital Boulevard in the City of Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina.
STREET ADDRESS: N/A —project site is a transmission line corridor easement
PROPERTY OWNER: Multiple
The undersigned, Eileen Navarrete, Construction Projects Administrator for Raleigh Water, do
hereby authorize
Keven Arrance o f Hazen and Sawyer
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached, excluding any
and all financial obligations.
SIGNATORIES ADDRESS:
City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department
PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Telephone: [phone]
I hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature:
Date:

Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
Project Status
Construction Completed
Future Construction
Active Construction
Crabtree Creek Sanitary Sewer Interceptor - Phase IIRaleigh Water, Raleigh, North Carolina®1 inch = 2,000 feet
0 2,0001,000 Feet
jfl l C AROLINA SI°IMF-r NUIVIRLR 38 - T Ap7 Arc_
AgCl.a {,€:C'2 P Cn nCg6 e nl i
A C n ,I. _, A�C2 fC
ti C e i+ C$C2 1 ro i CcF .
cf cz
50 cgc'+
• , cgcz 1 cau IIlcgcz Ceti
c D r n a cgc2 9 i`
A_17 � � Gnt
F { r CaF -•�� t;LF I 5 C RJ b
ApD
WkE i C.. l MdB2 'C
ApD CIE3 [ n Ce7
� Cg62
kE AgC2 q4^v / Y CgB2 da. G2 r 1 reJ friC
C B '
A I j l CIE3 V"ItC7 CP,C2 CeF Y L!r
�\ AIiG Me 1 ` Cr U \ CBC2 y
_ j x Wkf CSt;2 I f� { l fki62 C
c I'. CcF cril M
:'±kr If33 .; Cry CkC7 L:gC7 — Au
CeU h1dC" CcO�
GgQ
sAIiS7CtC JgC2 gl37 r
f
fcu, r 4 4 ;, ! Cin
w 1;�C1 eC_ cir'r F,.% �I �' ! CeF CCB -
-Af3 CgB2 tet) \�.�..�. _ Cm
fryf%NI d D'[
Cef f
tu/ Ge;F 'I L } f `' c CeF
Wkl y ✓ J _ �2 i }rJ I'
01
+el= ti �. CgBz Golf ,+
Ape CgC? �-
7 r�, m
t co c
4 �_ w14E RC2 -----teCeD cm
xr
CgB2 CRCr.
17 ,"o�ryry�
Co
CgBl ^ui.i r6Lr ' CgB2/f3?.
Ce
CeD AP62Ce
�
!A,
C7 CgC2 i Ma o ` . CeD I �_ , a; 1 — CeCL lv1r_
ri { CeC2 CeB7 r:nt C� f.
w1 ] C;
AgC2, ryi J `� wnd�fA ACM, treD
_ �" �rhfA
C
W k E r �T Au
F I� _ AfA _ —
Y -I AfA_ -
...
UE ry
,eC3Y
62 CeD CgC2�I
I^ 4p ^g {,. Wks i y ug"Z4% ~ ff ' 41� WkE q~
Mci
�j v h1ti17? G ` C.
.c,L �,:` �^ . � « 'RJNdC2 CeC2 �,�..Cu
CeF u CgC2 WkE
r 'r
M ! r ff ' cecz .l' +� UB2.
.�` L • `l, 4 ri r ;' Cg42 't W� � y fN�6? C:tS) ,
kE
eD
Ggc"
' " ctyf�
f�.r'� f};e ` CgC7 �i l✓' h7SlIJ2-
i CeC2 G
r
M d B 2
Ce
CeC2UEDZ U
CeD J t GkfJ.b Q dE7. CeD W
gC2/+}'a Ji Ua I MdDz th hi
"MdC� , — (�F!Ei2 "eC ; �,—�,,�w� r -�_ � •' �1 ��
M ra L�'1,F ApD

�y'• Cl Zoo ZJa� �a -aAm ��
`a Z�7: lr 7,9a� Z8� f ro
CJ J
r �
\\k
3MM
y' A aJ
Z80co P
��� •y'' � � i� i'�q of
LLD
JAAM
Y**
aoa� `laJ z090
3MM f F1a:J +4
,f Z�3� S } I' it � , Z"J1) + - �•.
Z fi � QaJ Z900
QaJ ! adV Z083
\ F 1
ZJ00 Qa��. - W Zf3tiD
JdH Z8d
I Q E-
4dH f,o� J. 9e� `7' a'°M: , ^ may .�`' ,�`� r.::)�J .� I'• "
JdH y1 :" Z,Ia. fig'
OD
_ ZJaJ
,� •r fly;} ti ��.__1 z���
JaJ ZflaJ
JdH - ZdaJ
Zddy C, 1
itzl
" .
7,SaJBmm
4, ayp co s
lBdV Z:JaJ �. �`'�- `\ t 4 ��e, ti - .'.JaB\ ��' .:.• yam•'%� µ 2£i?:i�. I
I AMA
/ JdH
! — 1 as AM LflaJ r �1
�tvM
1 JdH
ZjdV r7' ZJ Z9a7 I JaJ;3'3 1 b
- r-•, �L� ,�- \ ti � 1 �� ' •`emu �'" t9�'1 " ��``-�3 ' a"r' I
y r1
oa
}p C12J` ZJaa y L�aJ ��
\ ! ID �
JaJ Fr'4h Z��V i �� LRs�
t
GGI
rapt) ��'�' � `; '�� •7dt"• - ; •
QaJ ( u, � z9,yVIlk
c�aa
Ja , 73dy Ljd y
lov
i ZJaJ
b
0 fAAA' 10
d8o QaJ :)dV 0d Zi8 • �� 1
,7
,-)d i F39:J - Z9�3 ZJ$V -, Z9�J
7,)dV ZBdV�1..,
�_

.1
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLIN'
-�[
I
CeC2
M, Cm 7
�L �l r' C4U� . CeC2 - CeC2 CeD
A p U 1` --.; j - III
`.. r, J i CeC2
f Cm r �. LIi', ifl !� f'F \ i �, j' Cel)
WkE j Cm CeB2
1C` 1 Jt ✓"� co e�I
r Crn U.
GeF APD .I A,A t,.� CeC2 i y�
CeC2 1 Cm CeD i"
COD'.., — G�sU CeC2 CeC2
+r 1 ; J� Ma
, � - f � y /�� ��� - CeD,
AA rfi. CeC2 t'�J ,1 [ls, f R❑ -'� l
Wh !
CeD ' CeB2 F3u fir, me
ceo
CeB2
^
CeC2bL�
CeB2
Cm 1
l;. � .e = \ \, M
r ` CeD I \ r
B2,� d nCy - Sf CeC2
A1A
CeD f Ma ' �
' 11 rl Cm Cm
i e CeB2
CeC2
CeC2 FaB2
CeD
l r r FaB 2
- Ma
Ima �p r CeF APC2 A!A Vic, W
IVFr:
CeC2 ApC2 !
CeC2 7
ccCeC2 + ApC2 1• i
V
CeB2
�,. r Ap62
i 7 C+ r x
0 �CeC2 CeC2 FaB2 S
cl1Nei Q
ro \- CeD �ii C„ 'yr,
U i i CeC2 ApC2 + y v 2
0 / !
v v' `! CeB2 I CeB2
r h 4.e'2
_ c \ CeC2 \ //
c _ l ti / J ApC2
o �1 .- CeB2 1 f
J
CeC2 RALEI ApC2
CeD CeC2 �r �
ApC2
APD
62 � I
� � �'' hlrJ62
Ap62 `
C A f 1
AP62
Q CeB2 ApC2 �yti Ma
�� Ceti2 ApC2
CeFS2 Ce(32 CeB2
I CeC2
GaD.. CeC2 '
C,rn J
Oi) '� J� AP62 GG ,,•I
CeD ! f ApC2 ApC2 f
` CeF 111a \ Mal
CeC2 Goa.
Ci , Ma - `� e
Ce
-.� Ce132: 1 _ ApC2 \ i
CeD A B2
i CeB2 p
;eC2 CeC2 CeC2 +'e CeC2
Ni.
Q 1f+I Ma \
APC?
CeC2 tifil CeD +
CeB2 CeB2 Crn
C,
CeC2 reF i si ilktl� f, CeB2
CeB2 CeC2 '3µ CeB2
ME]
San Iti CeB2 CeC2
x� 4 1'
r CeC2 CeC2

OLINA SHEET NUMBER 49 LoI, (loins sheet 39)
a - _ CeC2 WoMeApB2 0 l W
LnC o¢ ApC n wkr.
CeC2 CeD
LoB
r
CeC2 Mu WWE LoC WkC I [.oC:
CeB2 Me 1 � Ap62
r. 1
LoC �
C eC f �'
WwE CeB2
CeB
A CP _ CeC2 G� CeC2 i r
a •% ApD AgC2 LoC � -_�. C.g.0 Wo... .+ {� ,Uf �i UrYr wry.
{ d+ 0 �®
ff Pp� APB CeB2 CeC2 t Ma
AgC2 Cm \ ApC
/i VVki_ Lof) C Me Ma
v'
CeC2 G� o Cm CeC2
fE 1
1 AgB2 40 L��k APD
o f CeC2 ApC2
Ma 'rf APC CeC2 qoG flq e132 Ma
anez..
WkE
ApC2 - ....
Me 1� C8C2
6 AfA Ma APD
4_� A48 r
Ma Cm'
CeB2 ApC2 % _....1.
U f CeC2:-
1 & 401 AfA ', WY CeB2
�i fn r
� n CeB2 �i f , ApD
Au FaB2 Me "+4
h
Cm
FaB2
v
._ Cp �•.:.. Air �•) Me APC r
%° Fat3[, F � ` ItcGi ., CeC2
Cm
� ApD
q. Cn AA[A Cm
fA
!f `ti`
c 1 I r �y Ce[i
i ` I r'r r -'.`.• Au\� FaB2
FaB '} fy Cp l CI[ 3 ri C _
Ma / CeC2 �� PD
AfA
,• ApC2
Cp CiB3
CeC2 Q Drn WmE ti \ CeC2 I AP67• CeC2 CeB2 U �. � Wo i - �` Cm
r. C, }?y CeC2
\
f Ce82 �LoB p APD
7
CeC2
ApC2 CeD `\ y Air \ \,
\ CeC2 f :'r CeC2 I CeC2 Cps ti
ApB2 Cm
n CeB2 Mc Wn .._
Ma CeBAPB .
2' WkC WkE Cp '• "pSe,
i' 14 1
CeB2 ApC2 sy
LIONS PARK A
0
0
0
0
AfA
f CIE3 A02 CeB2
s
APB2 ApC2 G?� tf CeB2 n G
� h4a AfA O.r.
WkE _
CyC2
CeC2 CeC2 APC2
�\ CeB2��
CeC2CeB2 CeB2 CQ I ' C �r co
jr
CeC2 APB2 L C 3.. !f } WkE
1 % ecru - _ — Alle, AP[i2 LoEi
CiC.` (Joins sheet 59)
6
I
00
rn
a,

c�
3
z
_m
T
x
Li
i
m
In
c-
0
n
1-1
In
C
.3
I
0
00
0
0
a
O
a
a
d
I
0
O
i
0
7)
N
T
V
In
0
In
c
O
T
70
c
0
L
0
to
cl
N
O
Ln
N
O
N
(D
N
r
a
c
I
d
V)
I-
m
T
x
w
N
0
T
0
.6
d
m
0
a_
-
'~`�`.`
/
DRETSCH, HEATHER J
DRETSCH, COLLIN M
1001 MARLOWE ROAD
FRANTZ, STUART M
-.. 1705361626
BM 017159. PG 00339
�___ FRANTZ, ELLA P
909 MARLOWE ROAD
y_
1705362771
BM 017633. PG 02107
- NEW LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE, I _. w
00 ./
DISTURBED AREA= 0.02 AC
EX SSMH
RIM=216.0>
F NOW /
.100
LOD
TPF LOD >• LOD
�`\,•`-.._ TPF '
�"`�-----
TREE PROTECTION
FENCE (TYP.)
1163-+•00
f//fI
- zZ - zz - ZZ z'-
1 +00
:: •.::.....::.. .... 1 zz
zz zz
CRABTREE CREEKr��' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET `"
0 20 40 80
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE cis JOB
CRABTREE BASIN WASTEWATER SYSTEM NUMBER
isCONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS 6-26-2019 201-003
ruc ADDITIONAL LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CHECKED SHEET
EXHIBIT A CAW 1 OF 1
MIDWAY PROPERTY ASSOCIATES LLC
3504 CHAUCER PLACE _
1705486047
BM 016686. PG 00930
OHERRON, KENNEDY C do BARBARA M
3500 CHAUCER PLACE
1705455942
EX SSMH', BM 003515PG 004M
NEW LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE,
MH #107A DISTURBED._ AREA=_0.32-AC__
STA: 1146 .00
„ RIM:21 3
MH #107
STA:1143+05.2
RIM: 210.83
nu •• •q,
EX SSMH
%
\ \\ \ �\��� � �•' ,� �� � � EX SSMH
MH #106
STA: 1142+05.89• s
RIM:209.79
Z2 ro = E '+
\ / / \ r,:
CITY OF RALEIGH ` I e�'�• •`'"` a 1;=l�:s�
3400 L1R MILL ROAD 7054
1215454589
BM 002150. PG 00352 \ � \ \` -•-^` _
if
at :: _:
Gi SCAL3`IN� EST
0 N 80 i 16
� 7 /� `
,
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE cis JOB
CRABTREE BASIN WASTEWATER SYSTEM NUMBER
is
CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS 6-26-2019 201-003
ADDITIONAL LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CHECKED SHEET
EXHIBIT E Bw 1 OF 1
No. REVISIONS
MARLOWE ROAD %� CITY OF RALEIGH
301 MARLOWE ROAD
417
COMBINATION SILT tG
V BM 003861. 861. PG 00155
9� FENCE/TREE
�,�- y,✓'�j'' � PROTECTION (TYP.)
NEW LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE,
i' DISTURBED AREA= 0.07 AC
1nn EXISTING ASPHALT
, P GREENWAY TRAIL
MH #95 "
STA: 1112+43.57
z RIM:203.60 d
i I r
1 � 1112+00
/
/C
1-e p
M-203.78
Ss
/ 1 R
i
WALKWAY �<
/
s /
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE cis JOB
CRABTREE BASIN WASTEWATER SYSTEM NUMBER
CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS 6-26-2019 201-003
ADDITIONAL LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CHECKED SHEET
EXHIBIT B BY 1 OF 1
/ EX SSMH; rd
NEW LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE," i
DISTURBED AREA= 0.18 AC
UTT, PAUL
3328 ALLEGHANY DR (r tn
1705260928
BM 015970. PG 02689 1
SUPER SILT W
FENCE (TYP.)
Q- GLOVER, JOHN C & SALLIE H
3301 DRYDEN COURT
1 1705262893
S V 1 BM 013091. PG 01809
77
1
TREE PROTECTION
`a I FENCE (TYP.)
w
r *r < ffiY 1
MH #118B
.� STA:1173+55.92
~� N ,yam RIM:211.67
FLYTHE, EDW�N E JR & AGNES P
3316 AlNY DR
170516985169836
BM 007854. PG 00126
`� •t � � EX SSMH
MH #RD3
STA: 2+85.67,.
DIXON, USA J RIM 211.27 "y
I
3312 A NY OR // ,, ` ✓
1705168775
BM 014048. PG 00717MH 1
LAMBETH, WILUAM A III & DIANE E STA: 4+71` �'� C+' SQL FE
512 HERTFORD ST .10
1705260564 STA EQ:1172+63.53 \ a 4 80
BM 004320. PG 00111 RIM: 210.86
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE CJS JOB
CRABTREE BASIN WASTEWATER SYSTEM NUMBER
6-26-2019
CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS 201-003
w caw°ancePLLE ADDITIONAL LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CHECKED SHEET
EXHIBIT F CY LW 1 OF 1
• = Cone ance PLLC
y 030468 = '
OpNGINE��;\���� 320 S. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, NC 27511
DATE 77BYSEAL: 77//I�IIII
�_ ��_�„� SEAL: NC LICENSE #P-1611 WWW.CJSCONVEYANCE.COM
MOORE, THOMAS EDWIN & SARAH H
3815 YADKIN DRIVE
1705180994
BM 002434. PG 00369
SUPER SILT FENCE (TYP.)-1
MH #127
STA:1200+47.65
RIM: 215.43
EW LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE,
ISTURBED AREA= 0.20 AC
CREECH, DAVID J & EARLA J
3816 YADKIN DRIVE
1705182779
y BM 007743. PG 00767
FMH #126
STA:1198+76.43
RIM:214.63
ar �Cy CITY OF RALEIGH
3400 ALAMANCE DRIVE 1
�O "fir 1705087835 \
BM 002369, PG 00294 \
GRAPHIC SCALE I T
20 40 0
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE CJS JOB
CRABTREE BASIN WASTEWATER SYSTEM NUMBER
f CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS s-2s-2o1s 2001-003
ADDITIONAL LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CHECKED SHEET
EXHIBIT G BYiN 1 OF 1
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT
CRABTREE BASIN WASTEWATER SYSTEM
CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS
1
TREE PROTECTION
FENCING (TYP.)
R32 ydC(
o
NEW LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
\ DISTURBED AREA= 0.04_AC
MH #104
STA: 1138+81.40 ��\• ,��"-� `��
RIM:208.65
.r
EX SSMH Q!
y
S
,r
T
T•
00 \
ION
ys
MH #103
STA:1136+07.25'
RIM:208.551,
GRAPHIC SZ`ACE IN FEET
0 20 40 -813
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE CJS JOB
CRABTREE BASIN WASTEWATER SYSTEM NUMBER
'v CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS s-2s-2o1s 201-003
;AN CHECKED
rrw ADDITIONAL LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SHEET
EXHIBIT D Bw 1 OF 1
ADDITIONAL LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
EXHIBIT A-G
CJS PROD. #: XXXXXXX
DATE: 8-20-19
SCALE: SCALE
PROJECT VALUE EC1
ENGINEER:
DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER
DRAWN BY: AGIV SHEET NUMBER
CHECKED BY: CLW 2 OF 7

40"
7046.1
00
b
S$_SS
REVISIONS
Qj l
�o�F`rp � n
40D
MH #74
STA:1043+11.6
RIM: 201.2A
0
c_7—
ail ctu
�,8' "•-'
elli
19'�—
Qij
0
798
CITY OF RALEIGH \
1020 HODGES ST
1715214431
BM 4341, PG 915
/J
c� 200 /
196 PROPOSED 35 LF
`�— — zer. OF 15" RCP
3� UNDER DRIVEWAY
u
11 MI
'►yam k , -�:��' !"� R'�'�•�,i'y.` >
/
BOUNDARYWI S
0 PA(NTf
.r r ::-- rr r CE� RE
•.. _ 2 YQ
z :' t 0 ,
kjvv
F `. 1. R
SILT FENCE � •.l tr_ � s N
Ip /
I
�i
tWW o -_ UT � L T E T YP
__ rM
J:
l 9
� 4
1 9
..............
/ < 1
i-
1 7 i
WOWWWWWW-
1 .. ......:.
194
S
\ r
S
S _ EXIST SSMH�j::"
SS \ 4* ' r
\ —�SFE NOTE .1) ' "::•::'ei '�
�•0 1
__
/ THPROPER REEQUATESRSFULLCLL -
��" 1090 MILLS ST
i 1715211211
��., _ BM 14829, PG 1124 _ THREEQUARTERSFULL
OHO
\\\\111111I/I////
WOW
•oF •.
•�
WWW
WWW
ALWWW-
030468
//0,NERu �W. \I
DATE BY SEAL:
SEAL:
COMBINATION TREE
PROTECTION/SILT
FENCE (TYP)
V,
ti
222
22�
,LSO
C\
PROPERTIES, LLC
1084 MILLS ST
1715213157
BM 16418, PG 2026
may:
Conveyance, PLLC
320 S. ACADEMY STREET
CARY, NC 27511
NC LICENSE #P-1611 WWW,CJSCONVEYANCE.COM
S6
THREEQUARTERSFULL
PROPERTIES, LLC
1042 MILLS ST
1715214027
BM 16418, PG 2026
LA
0.30000000 =
1'-0"(REF KREF
♦�♦�i♦♦♦♦♦. r%..
e ♦♦
♦
♦ ♦ ♦
♦
♦ ♦ a
♦
♦♦ i
♦♦
► LFro
♦ cam♦
♦ t
♦ems♦��♦♦.♦i♦♦i
f ♦
♦ a
♦ G r
0
♦♦
e
0
e♦
♦
o♦
TREE PROTECTION
AREA PER
PROPERTY '
OWNER, (TYP)
NEW LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE,
DISTURBED AREA= 0.80 AC
i
co
c-1
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT
CRABTREE BASIN WASTEWATER SYSTEM
CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS
NOTES,
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE
NECESSARY MEASURES TO PROTECT
EXISTING UTILITIES AGAINST DAMAGE,
i�
MH #70
STA:1035+67.74`
'RIM' 199.89
J n f WI
SS `\
1
ADDITIONAL LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
EXHIBIT H
r �
r-_
.r
ddd
rr. •
CJS PROJ. #: 201-003
DATE: 8-20-19
SCALE: SCALE
PROJECT EC2
VALUE
ENGINEER:
DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER
DRAWN BY: xxx SHEET NUMBER
CHECKED BY: CLW 3 OF 7

EX SSMH
`� �� �� O v v � SEVEN PROPERTIES BDM,
\ � i L i
LLC JAD PROPERTY, LLC
2511 WAKE FOREST ROAD
—u— - 1715023641
EX SSMH -0 Fo �� BM 016656. PG 01849
�
v �� ��4�OTEMPORARY CONSTRUC I v _
i r ENTRANCE (TO BE
�v� ! s INSTALLED AT ACTUAL
E% SSMH N ACCESS POINT) /
�-
MH
iSTA 3N43
Z2 RIM: 200.85 N `
I DISTURBANCE,
DI A�
. '�'� \ •,, � �_� \ � \�. � �J DI URBEBED AREA=0.42 AC
EX SSMH �\
79,
41
g
& ASPHALT
s?�\�FFp<gF//v °— h, PARKING LOT
syFCfaT \
aR1701y \
m
CRFF
STA:2+88.34-7---- .....��
�
y S _
SUPER SILT � i �v FENCE (TYP.)
° MH #79 9
o STA: 7+33.85 / �� ) ��
S
( ON EQUATION) STA:1069+37.20 STATI
>�J
/ RIM:199.301919
\ G \
Al
CITY OF RALEIGH / -,1 L
z PIN #1705922836
I
ocy
r
N
}� a
e \
ADDITIONAL LOD BEING
REQUESTED FOR v
�
APPROVAL
J� 1 AMH #78
STA:4+18.77
L
STA:1+00 A
v
(INTERCONNECT LINE)
RIM:199.93 �
1
V A o CITY OF RALEIGH , A ,,.------s
PIN #1705928375 -- v, \ s
ix
\ 96
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
5 milt/ �� ✓ �� PLAN �� A ��� o ,s 30 so
�J\ q
1:30�CREF.X, `�� \- \
REF � - � \•Q,4v .. ,��
0
CJS PROD.: 201-003
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DATE: 8-20-19
DEPARTMENT
SCALE: 1 1.=30'
_ E L _ ADDITIONAL LIMITS OF PROJECT EC 1
030458 - ConveyanCe,PLLC ENGINEER -
ER
REVISIONS PER LQS COMMENTS 9-11-19 CLW �Jt FNGINEF�v` CRABTREE BASIN WASTEWATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION DESIGNED BY: CLW
.,,„ .✓'\��� 320 S. ACADEMY STREET DRAWN BY: ACM SHEET NUMBER
li , LOS SUBMITTAL a- ATE By %, �` cARY, NC 27611 CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS
No. REVISIONS DATE BY SEAL: -%�-I SEAL: NC LICENSE #P-1611 WWW.CJSCONVEYANCE.COM
CHECKED BY: '.L''" 2 OF 6

S2 (S-8)
S1 (CROSSING 4)
S4 (S-7)
S3 (CROSSING 5)
S5 (CROSSING 6)
S6 (CROSSING 7)
S7 (CROSSING 8)
S8 (S-5)
S9 (S-2)
S10 (CROSSIN G 9)
W2, W3, W4
W44
WC
W7
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
Status
Construction Completed
Active Construction
Future Construction
USACE Impact Site Index MapCrabtree Creek Sanitary Sewer Interceptor - Phase IIRaleigh Water, Raleigh, North Carolina®1 inch = 2,000 feet
0 2,0001,000 Feet
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan notes
The project is not expected to create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer. Stormwater
flow patterns will be monitored during and immediately following construction. If concentrated flow of
stormwater through the buffer is observed, then corrective measures, which may include the
installation of level spreaders where appropriate, will be identified and implemented to ensure
compliance with the Neuse River Basin Riparian BufferRules and protection of water quality.
Crabtree Creek Sanitary Sewer Interceptor - Phase II
Table of Stream and Buffer Impact Site Location Identifiers
2014/2016 Site Identifier 2019 Site Identifier
Crabtree Creek 4 S1
S-8 S2
Crabtree Creek 5 S3
S-7 S4
Crabtree Creek 6 S5
Crabtree Creek 7 S6
Crabtree Creek 8 S7
S-5 S8
S-2 S9
Crabtree Creek 9 S10
Crossing 4 B2
Area 19 B3a, B3b
S-8 B4
Area 19-A B5
Crossing 5 B6
S-7 (perpendicular)B7
S-7 (parallel)B8a, B8b
Crossing 6 (perpendicular)B9
Crossing 6 (parallel)B10a, B10b
Area 19B B11a, B11b
Area 20 B12a, B12b
Crossing 7/S100 B13
Area 21 B14a, B14b
Crossing 8 B15
Area 22 B16a, B16b
Area 23 B17a, B17b
Area 24 B18a, B18b
S-2 B19
Area 25 B20a, B20b
Area 25A B21
Crossing 9 B22
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively
referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or
expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur
outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires
gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with
jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species,
Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources
addressed in that section.
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
[phone]
[phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaCInformation for Planning and Consultation
Page 1 of 8IPaC: Explore Location
11/4/2019https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/6VCEGM732FFQHP6OWP5ZLUAP6Q/resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could
be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does
not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream).
Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on
or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific
information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any
project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a
species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the
Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an
official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species
and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact
NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information.
2.NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
Amphibians
Fishes
1
2
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the
critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the
critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Proposed Endangered
Page 2 of 8IPaC: Explore Location
11/4/2019https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/6VCEGM732FFQHP6OWP5ZLUAP6Q/resources
Clams
Flowering Plants
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species
themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation
Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for
birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where
birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool
(Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast,
additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available.
Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird
list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to
migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when
these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the
critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Proposed Threatened
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and
their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures,
as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-
assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
1 2
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IF A BREEDING
SEASON IS INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
Page 3 of 8IPaC: Explore Location
11/4/2019https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/6VCEGM732FFQHP6OWP5ZLUAP6Q/resources
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your
project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts
to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report” before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps
during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher
probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the
presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the
species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there
were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted
Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This
is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example,
imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY BREED IN
YOUR PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS A
VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE DATES
INSIDE WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS
ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT THE BIRD
DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA.)
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds May 1 to Jun 30
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds elsewhere
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
Page 4 of 8IPaC: Explore Location
11/4/2019https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/6VCEGM732FFQHP6OWP5ZLUAP6Q/resources
no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is
0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all
possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If
there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that
species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for
example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The
exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data
in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non-BCC Vulnerable (This
is not a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act
or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore
areas from certain types
of development or
activities.)
Blue-winged Warbler
BCC - BCR (This is a Bird
of Conservation Concern
(BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA)
Kentucky Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This is a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This is a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Prothonotary Warbler
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This is a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This is a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Page 5 of 8IPaC: Explore Location
11/4/2019https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/6VCEGM732FFQHP6OWP5ZLUAP6Q/resources
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This is a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide (CON)
(This is a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) throughout its
range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year
round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds
may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact
minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence
Summary.Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)and other species that may warrant
special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is
based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds
reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention
because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability
to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all
birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology
Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how
the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on
the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may
refer to the following resources:The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the
bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding
season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe
specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the
USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act
requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or
activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize
impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation
measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for
these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
Page 6 of 8IPaC: Explore Location
11/4/2019https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/6VCEGM732FFQHP6OWP5ZLUAP6Q/resources
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within
your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about
other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files
underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration.
Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving
Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such
impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more
about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What
does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location”. Please be aware this report provides the
“probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs
provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no data”
indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence
score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack
of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have
the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present).
The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation
measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set.
We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1/4A
PFO1A
RIVERINE
R2UBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Page 7 of 8IPaC: Explore Location
11/4/2019https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/6VCEGM732FFQHP6OWP5ZLUAP6Q/resources
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location,
type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on
vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection
of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and
quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine
the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences
in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary
data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal
and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have
also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner
than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary
jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government
agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of
appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
Page 8 of 8IPaC: Explore Location
11/4/2019https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/6VCEGM732FFQHP6OWP5ZLUAP6Q/resources