Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG200335_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20151222STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET NCG PERMITS PERMIT NO. DOC TYPE. LAC HISTORICAL FILE ❑ MONITORING REPORTS DOC DATE ❑ an 5 a as YYYYM M D D Robinson Bradshaw VIA EMAIL AND US MAIL Nicolette Fulton, Esq. Associate City Attorney City of Raleigh PO Box 590 Raleigh, NC 27602-0590 ` 8A HC26"Vb NC DENR Raleigh Regional Office December 22, 2015 William W. Toole Chnrtone Office 704.377.8373 Direct Phone 704.373.3973 Direct Fan wtoole®rbh.com rbh.com Re: Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal, LLC ("Raleigh Recycling") 2310 Gamer Road, Wake County ("Site") Response to Correspondence of City of Raleigh dated November 23, 2015 ("City Correspondence") Dear Ms. Fulton: This firm represents Raleigh Recycling with regard to the City Correspondence. This letter and the attachments are timely submitted in response to the City Correspondence Raleigh Recycling received on November 23, 2015. As requested in the City Correspondence, this response includes the following: 1. A detailed report on all progress made on implementation of the Stormwater Management Plan ("SWMP") 2. A timeline for completion for the SWMP 3. A detailed report on all progress made on the Remedial Action Plan ("RAP") 4. A timeline for completion for the RAP 5. Details of any remediation plan for capping! the Site; and 6. A timeline for completion for capping the Site This response also corrects certain errors and a misapprehension that Raleigh Recycling has deliberately delayed implementation of the Stormwater Management Plan, Containment Remedy Proposal, and/or the Remedial Action Plan. As the attached. detailed timeline shows, on April 17, 2014 Raleigh Recycling volunteered to correct a historical problem created by others, and Raleigh Recycling has taken the initiative to move a comprehensive solution forward that had i The City Correspondence incorrectly refers to the "containment remedy barrier" as a "cap." The 2012 Containment Remedy Proposal, which is different from the RAP, proposed a barrier solution that does not meet criteria traditionally applied to "cap" solutions. 80623440 19853.00020 Robison Bradshaw 6 Hinson, PA. r Attorneys at Law Is 101 North Tryon Street, Suite 1900 A Charlotte, NC 28246 n 704.377.2536 Charbne n Research Triangle it Rook Hill Nicolette Fulton, Esq. December 22, 2015 Page 2 stalled. Raleigh Recycling has faced delays that are not of its making despite aggressive efforts to address problems it did not create. At this time, the principal delay in project implementation is negotiating the required access agreements with the North Carolina Railroad and Norfolk Southern. These agreements are necessary to because North Carolina Railroad owns and Norfolk Southern operates land where certain stormwater upgrades, installation of a portion of the containment barrier, and certain land use restrictions must be implemented. Raleigh Recycling initiated contact with the railroads on June 3, 2014, six weeks after taking control of environmental matters at the Site. Raleigh Recycling did not receive a first draft of documents until November 17, 2015, eighteen months after the initial contact was made. By way of reminder, the contamination and stormwater discharge problems are the result of historic activities dating back to the 1940's that were undertaken by previous site owners and operators, primarily Seymour Brown Investment Co., Inc., formerly named Goldsboro Iron and Metal ("SBIC'). That historic soil contamination included lead, cadmium and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The PCBs were introduced in connection with a transformer cracking operation that SBIC operated during the 1960's and 1970's. Raleigh Recycling has never allowed PCBs to be transported to the Site and, since first becoming a tenant in 2007 of a portion of the Site, has maintained a strict screening process to prevent PCBs from being introduced to the Site. Raleigh Recycling, formerly known as GIMCO Acquisition LLC, first had dealings with the Site when it purchased certain operational assets and leased a portion, but not all, of the Site on August 3, 2007. Raleigh Recycling never had any control over SBIC operations and did not own the Site. Until April 23, 2014, Raleigh Recycling had no right to implement necessary cleanup2 to control the legacy contamination affecting stormwater discharges from the Site. Nonetheless, Raleigh Recycling voluntarily entered North Carolina's voluntary clean up program on April 17 and Raleigh Recycling Scrap Metal NC LLC, an entity related to Raleigh Recycling, purchased the Site on April 23, 2014 because Raleigh Recycling believed SBIC was not acting aggressively enough to address the legacy contamination that directly and adversely affected stormwater discharges from the Site. On May 2, 2014, after gaining control over the Site environmental response from SBIC, Raleigh Recycling prepared and submitted a Stormwater Management Plan to the Water Quality ] The statement in the City Correspondence that the 2012 RAP was prepared on behalf of Raleigh Recycling is not correct. The RAP was prepared on behalf of SBIC. Raleigh Recycling has proposed improvements to the 2012 RAP that consist of two stormwater retention ponds and improvements to the proposed containment barrier consisting of asphalt and/or concrete. These improvements render sections of the 2012 RAP obsolete. a Pursuant to the Voluntary Clean -Up Program, Raleigh Metals has engaged Mid -Atlantic Associates, Inc. as the Registered Environmental Consultant and Daniel Nielsen to act as the Registered Site Manager. The Registered Environmental Consultant, through the Responsible Site Manager, is responsible to the state for certifying to DEQ that the actions taken by Raleigh Metals comply with the rules of the Voluntary Clean -Up Program. 80623440 19853.00020 Nicolette Fulton, Esq. December 22, 2015 Page 3 Operations of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (now Department of Environmental Quality) ("DEQ") that proposed the installation of two stormwater ponds designed to manage stormwater from 14.5 acres of the Site. The City of Raleigh received a copy of that correspondence. On July 2, 2014, Raleigh Recycling submitted the Stormwater Management Plan to the City of Raleigh for its review and comment. See generally "Detailed Timeline on Stormwater Management Plan, Containment Remedy Proposal and Remedial Action Plan Activities" ("Timeline'), attached as Exhibit 1. The location of the two Stormwater retention ponds is shown on the survey of the Site attached as Exhibit 2. An essential component of the comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan is the installation of a containment barrier over those areas with soils contaminated by PCBs or metals above certain limits, because the constituents exceeding the stormwater discharge targets adhere to soil being mobilized during storm events.4 Beginning in August 2014 Raleigh Recycling had a number of discussions with DEQ to expand the size and improve the barrier material that SBIC had proposed in the 2012 Containment Remedy Proposal, and also to confirm the placement of the two stormwater retention ponds described in the Stormwater Management Plan. See Timeline. As a result of those discussions, Raleigh Recycling now plans to expand the area subject to the containment remedy to that shown as Area A on the survey of the Site attached as Exhibit 2. In addition, at the request of DEQ Raleigh Recycling has elected to improve the durability and imperviousness of the barrier by using either asphalt, concrete, or both, rather than the geotextile fabric overlain by approximately 12 inches of recycled concrete or aggregate base course cover originally proposed by SBIC in 2012. On March 30, 2015 Raleigh Recycling received from EPA a Risk Based Clean-Up/Disposal PCB approval ("EPA Approval"), based upon SBIC's 2012 Remedial Action Plan ("RAP") containing a 2011 Containment Remedy Proposal. EPA's approval process, which included a community meeting in June 2014, had been stalled until Raleigh Recycling took control over the Site environmental response. Because the EPA Approval is based upon the 2012 RAP and the 2011 Containment Remedy Proposal, the EPA Approval will have to be amended to reflect a revised RAP, a key component of which will be a DEQ approved Containment Remedy Proposal showing the installation of the two stormwater retention ponds, the expanded area subject to the containment barrier, and the use of either asphalt, concrete, or both to construct the barrier. See Timeline, April 15, 2015. Because land use restrictions will be required to implement the Containment Remedy Proposal, DEQ informed the Registered Site Manager that a revised Containment Remedy Proposal should not be submitted to DEQ for final approval until after obtaining the approval of all affected landowners. See Timeline, April 29, 2015. 4 PCBs do not readily dissolve in water and instead adhere to soil. This means that PCBs become mobile only to the extent the soils to which they have adhered become mobile. Similarly, the metals exceedances are due primarily to mobilized contaminated soil. 80623440 19853.00020 Nicolette Fulton, Esq. December 22, 2015 Page 4 Legacy contamination exists on and appears to be migrating from the right of way owned and/or operated by NC Railroad and Norfolk Southern ("Railroad Right of Way"). The Stormwater Management Plan includes placement of the containment barrier on the Railroad Right of Way and the upgrading of an existing outfall, the retention of a second outfall and the removal of an existing outfall, all of which are located on the Railroad Right of Way. See generally Survey of Railroad Right of Way, attached as Exhibit 3. As stated by the Registered Site Manager, the permission of the railroads is required before a revised Containment Remedy Proposal may be submitted to DEQ for concurrence. See Correspondence from Daniel Nielsen to William Toole (December 21, 2015), attached as Exhibit 4. Because NC Railroad owns the Railroad Right of Way, its permission is also required to install the containment barrier and to improve and maintain the stormwater outfalls that pass over and under the Railroad Right of Way. On June 3, 2014, six weeks after first entering the voluntary cleanup program, Raleigh Recycling approached North Carolina Railroad about access to the Railroad Right of Way, implementation of the containment barrier, and conducting the necessary upgrades to the stormwater outfalls located on the Railroad Right of Way. Since then, Raleigh Recycling has aggressively pursued the required access and permissions, promptly responded to all requests for information in a comprehensive way, and waited for the railroads. See Timeline. Despite numerous contacts, Site visits, and information submittals, the railroads failed to deliver a single draft access document to Raleigh Recycling until November 17, 2015. See Timeline. The railroads' five proposed separate and distinct legal agreements consist of a Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restriction; an Agreement for Land Use Restrictions and Indemnity; an Environmental Right of Entry; a License Agreement; and a Flowage Agreement. On December 14, Raleigh Recycling delivered to the railroads a comprehensive review and mark up of the five agreements and proposed specific dates for an in -person meeting to discuss open issues and party positions. That meeting is scheduled for December 23, 2015. As stated in the December 21, 2015 correspondence of the Registered Site Manager, Raleigh Recycling cannot submit to DEQ for its approval a revised Containment Remedy Proposal showing stormwater retention ponds, expanded barrier area, use of asphalt and/or concrete as construction material until Raleigh Recycling has obtained the approval of the railroads. See Exhibit 4. Raleigh Recycling is doing and will continue to do all it can to obtain final access agreements as soon as possible, but it has no control over railroad review. Raleigh Recycling welcomes action from the City of Raleigh that will encourage the railroads to make the negotiation and execution of appropriate agreements a priority. Once DEQ has approved the revised Containment Remedy Proposal, the Registered Site Manager can then append the revised Containment Remedy Proposal to the revised Remedial Action Plan and obtain a revised EPA Approval to reflect the two stormwater retention ponds and containment barrier improvements. Once the revised EPA Approval is issued, DEQ will then issue the revised RAP for public notice and comment. The Registered Site Manager must, 80623440 19853.00020 Nicolette Fulton, Esq. December 22, 2015 Page 5 in coordination with DEQ, respond to any substantive comments and revise the RAP, as appropriate. Once complete, the Registered Site Manager can certify the RAP to DEQ, and implementation can begin. See Exhibit 4. As is evident from review of Exhibit 3, Railroad access is required even if the Site were not in the Voluntary Clean -Up Program. Legacy contamination is located on the Railroad Right of Way, that contamination is contributing to the stormwater discharge problems, and can only be addressed by access to the Railroad Right of Way. Attached as Exhibit 5 is the project timeline. The timeline for project construction is dependent upon receipt of access to the Railroad Right of Way. Raleigh Recycling does not know when the railroads will be prepared to finalize the necessary access agreements. Raleigh Recycling encourages the City of Raleigh to engage the railroads on this matter. Raleigh Recycling shares the frustration of the City of Raleigh over the length of this process and the delay that has been imposed by parties over which it has absolutely no control. Raleigh Recycling took control of this process so that it could push the project forward, and to some extent it has been successful. Until November 17, however, Raleigh Recycling could not point to any progress towards obtaining the essential railroad access, despite its many and best efforts to do so. See Timeline. Raleigh Recycling requests that the City of Raleigh engage the railroads on this matter so that Raleigh Recycling may proceed to project implementation. Raleigh Recycling has promptly responded to every request of the City of Raleigh. See Timeline. Raleigh Recycling understands that the City of Raleigh would benefit from regular project status reports, and beginning January 2016 will have the Registered Site Manager start sending quarterly status reports to the City at the same time such reports are sent to DEQ. Raleigh Recycling is also prepared to meet with you on Wednesday, December 23, 2015 to discuss this matter in more detail. Raleigh Recycling welcomes the continued engagement of the City of Raleigh, and will continue to respond promptly to all requests it is able to honor. Sincerely, ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON, P.A. William W. Toole 80623440 19853.00020 Nicolette Fulton, Esq. December 22, 2015 Page 6 W WT/tbm cc: Mr. Gregory Brown Daniel Nielsen (Responsible Site Manager, Mid -Atlantic Associates, Inc.) John Holley (NCDEQ) Danny Smith (NCDEQ) Matt Aufman (NCDEQ) Terri Crosby -Vega (EPA) 8062344v3 19853.00020 EXHIBIT I Timeline on Stormwater Management Plan, Containment Remedy Proposal and Remedial Action Plan Activities Detailed Timeline on Stormwater Management Plan, Containment Remedy Proposal and Remedial Action Plan Activities YEAR MONTH DAY ACTIVITY GIMCO Acquisition LLC leases a portion (but not all) of the larger property tract located at 2310 Garner Road, Raleigh, NC (the entire tract being the "Site') and undertakes certain operations August 3 scrap metal operations; Landlord (Goldsboro Iron and Metal Company, subsequently Seymour N Brown Investment Company) retains all rights and obligations with regard to PCBs and other $ contaminants discovered at the Site N Seymour Brown Investment Company, Inc. (SBIC) enters 2310 Garner Road, Raleigh, INC (Site) into North Carolina Inactive ; Hazardous Site Branch Registered Environmental Consultant Program by November 28 due to the discovery of contamination by PCBs and other chemicals a, Phase I Remedial Investigation Report submitted to NCDENR by SBIC $ N May 15 o Phase II Remedial Investigation Report submitted to NCDENR by SBIC o N August 20 .. Containment Remedy Proposal submitted to NCDENR by SBIC 0 August 9 N ry Revised Containment Remedy Proposal submitted to NCDENR by SBIC 0 N April 3 N Remedial Action Plan submitted to EPA by SBIC 0 N June 21 Meeting with Raleigh Recycling Scrap Metal NC LLC ("Raleigh Metal Recycling INC") (legal name later becomes Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal LLC), SBIC, City of Raleigh, NCDENR (stormwater October 7 and Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch) to discuss stormwater discharges from property owned by SBIC, and a portion of which was leased by Raleigh Recycling Scrap Metal NC m 0 N Attorney for City of Raleigh (Nicolet[e Fulton) requests a final stormwater Plan and timeline for 18 implementation no later than January 3, 2014 December Raleigh Recycling Scrap Metal NC delivers Stormwater Management Plan and timeline to City of 26 Raleigh, ahead of schedule Stormwater NOV from NCDENR regarding complaint from City of Raleigh regarding stream March 27 standard violations City of Raleigh (Mark Senior) provides comments to Stormwater Management Plan delivered by B Raleigh Recycling Scrap Metal NC on December 26 Raleigh Metal Recycling NC Scrap Metal enters Adminstrative Agreement for Registered April Environmental Consultant -Directed Assessment and Remedial Action to conduct voluntary 17 remedial action pursuant to North Carolina Voluntary Clean -Up Act (NCGS 13OA-310.9(c)); Daniel Nielsen is the Registered Site Manager 23 Related entity Raleigh Recycling Scrap Metal NC, LLC purchases Site Raleigh Recycling Scrap Metal NC submits revised Stormwater Management plan to NCDENR for May 2 review and comment; copies provided to City of Raleigh (Nicolette Fulton) EPA hosts community availability session regarding barrier detailed in Containment Remedy Proposal submitted to NCDENR in 2011, as revised; Raleigh Metal Recycling NC participates in 3 event and begins discussions with North Carolina Railroad ("NCRR") regarding site access issues Raleigh Metal Recycling INC sends to NCRR map illustrating proposed location of stormwater retention ponds on property owned by Raleigh Metal Recycling NC and need for access to 5 implement Containment Remedy Plan and Remedial Action Plan on NCRR property; NCRR reports June that Norfolk Southern Railroad ("NSR") must also be brought into access discussions Discussions begin with NCRR regarding access agreements, to include Environmental Right of Entry and Land License for the work associated with the Stormwater Management Plan, 21 Containment Remedy Proposal, and Remedial Action Plan, to be drafted by NCRR Raleigh Metal Recycling INC meets with NCDENR (Danny Smith, others) regarding Stormwater e 0 25 Management Plan N 2 Stormwater Management Plan submitted to City of Raleigh for review and comment July Construction drawings (draft) for stormwater management facility prepared September October November December January February 29 NCRR involves NSR in discussions after prodding by Raleigh Metal Recycling NC 15 Second Revision of Containment Remedy Proposal submitted to NCDENR 19 NCDENR provides comments to Second Revision of Containment Remedy Proposal NCRR requests a conference call to involve an NSR environmental remediation engineer and to 26 provide an overview of the scope of the project and proposed activities; Raleigh Metal Recycling NC agrees and requests availability dates 30 NCRR proposes meeting dates Registered Site Manager (Dan Nielsen) has conference call with NSR engineer (Scott Pittenger); 8 Pittenger concludes site visit would be helpful, which is agreed to on call Response of Raleigh Metal Recycling NC to NCDENR comments to Second Revision of 24 Containment Remedy Proposal, including Stormwater Management Plan ftesonsible Site Manager (Dan Nielsen) reiterates offer of site visit to NSR engineer (Scott 3 Pittenger) and requests specific dates Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling INC (William Toole) sends follow up email to NSR and NCRR 13 requesting dates to schedule site visit 13 NSR responds with available dates NSR, NCRR, Raleigh Metals Recycling INC meet on Site to discuss the proposed Stormwater Management Plan, Containment Remedy Proposal, and Remedial Action Plan; it was agreed that 25 NCRR and NSR would wait to review the stormwater management design system after receiving comments, if any, from NCDENR Raleigh Metal Recycling NC meets on -site with NCDENR (Danny Smith) and others to discuss 16 stormwater plan submitted by Raleigh Metal Recycling INC on May 2, 2014 NCDENR provides comments to Raleigh Metal Recycling NC October 24, 2014 comments regarding 16 Second Revision of Containment Remedy Proposal Raleigh Metal Recycling INC requests a status update from NCRR, informs NCRR of the December 16, 2014 Site meeting with NCDENR regarding the stormwater management plan, and of the 2 desire to move the matter along quickly; NCRR states that though it is the owner of the right of way, NSR is the more appropriate lead negotiating entity for the railroads Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) follows up by email and then by phone with NCRR (Cathy Deeley) expressing urgency about the failure to make progress and again requesting drafts of the access agreements from NCRR; NCRR confers with NSR and requests 14 copies of the July 25, 2014 construction drawings (draft) for the Stormwater Management Plan which had been previously delivered to the railroads; Raleigh Metal Recycling NC delivers the requested plans within 30 minutes Registered Site Manager (Daniel Nielsen) follows up by email to NSR engineer (Scott Pittenger) to see what additional information, if any, was needed by NSR since the November 25, 2014 Site visit 21 and expressing eagerness to get the necessary railroad agreements in place so as to implement the Stormwater Management Plan, Containment Remedy Proposal, and Remedial Action Plan Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) sends email to NCRR (Cathy Deeley) informing railroad of upcoming meeting with NCDENR, again expressing urgency about the failure to make progress and again requesting drafts of the access agreements from NCRR; Deeley asks 28 that NSR be communicated with directly, which Raleigh Metal Recycling INC promptly does by voicemail followed by email on January 30 Raleigh Metal Recycling NC makes direct contact with the NSR attorney assigned to this matter 30 (Helen Hart) and provides a brief overview regarding conditions on the railroad right of way and the responses proposed by Raleigh Metal Recycling NC Representatives for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) and Registered Site Manager (Daniel Nielsen) have conference call with representatives for NSR (Helen Hart, Scott Pittenger) and NCRR (Cathy Deeley, Mary Dillon [outside attorney]); discussions involved contamination 3 history, stormwater management plan and barrier installation; Raleigh Metal Recycling INC expressed urgency and the need to have the necessary railroad agreements in place and construction underway by July/August Raleigh Metal Recycling NC and Registered Site Manager meet with NCDENR to discuss and 5 resolve remaining issues assocated with the Containment Remedy Proposal Stormwater consultant for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (Jon Aldridge) meets with City of Raleigh, 13 Wake County and NCDENR regarding stormwater issues, informs regulators of negotiations with railroads over required access, delays in receiving EPA approval Raleigh Metal Recycling INC provides NSR with revised draft land use restrictions required in 18 connection with Containment Remedy Proposal 20 Attorney for City of Raleigh requests status report Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) provides status report to City of Raleigh (Nicolette Fulton) describing status of pending EPA Approval, the fact that an amendment to the approval (once issued) will be necessary to reflect the planned stormwater retention ponds and 23 the asphalt/concrete barrier, the slow progress of the railroad negotiations that first began June 3, 2014, and that approval from the NC Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Branch was close, but not yet final. Raleigh Metal Recycling NC provides NSA with written narrative description of Stormwater, Containment and Remedial work proposed to be conducted in railroad right of way, with 3 accompanying exhibits and again expresses need to move the matter along quickly so that agreements would be in place by June, allowing construction to begin by early August Raleigh Metal Recycling NC provides NSR with draft survey plat showing the geographic extent of 23 the proposed barrier installation and related land use restrictions, and again expresses an urgent desire to keep the process moving March Raleigh Metal Recycling NC informs NSR that the EPA Risk Based Clean-Up/Disposal PCB Approval is imminent, which means the railroad access is the single largest issue open before project 25 construction may begin; NSR states it has requested the drafting of the necessary Environmental Right of Entry Agreement EPA issues Risk Based Clean-Up/Disposal PCB Approval; a revised approval will be necessary once NCDENR provides final approval of the stormwater retention ponds and the more durable 30 asphalt/concrete barrier, both of which are different from the 2012 containment proposal that EPA approved Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC requests a status update from NSR by phone, then by 8 follow up email EPA informs Registered Site Manager that Risk Based Clean-Up/Disposal PCB Approval will need to be modified to reflect revisions to 2012 Containment Remedy Proposal due to inclusion of 15 stormwater retention ponds and changes in the materials used in the containment barrier only after DENR approves those changes to the Containment Remedy Proposal, as included in the final Remedial Action Plan Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC requests a status update from NSR by phone, then by follow up email, and again expresses the need to move the matter forward so that construction of 16 the containment barrier and stormwater retention ponds may begin Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) informs attorney for City of Raleigh April (Nicolette Fulton) of ongoing difficulty obtaining meaningful responses from the railroads, 16 reporting that email correspondence with the railroads began in June 2014, and that there are regular efforts to instill the railroads with a sense of urgency about the matter DENR project manager (Matt Aufman) informs Registered Site Manager (Daniel Nielsen) that despite delays with railroads it would be best to obtain railroad access agreements before 29 submitting final revisions to Containment Remedy Proposal reflecting the proposed installation of two stormwater retention ponds and use of asphalt/concrete for the containment barrier Raleigh Metal Recycling NC informs NSR of increased regulatory interest in moving the project 30 forward, and expressing both concer and urgency about delays getting meaningful responses from the railroads Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) calls, then emails, representatives for 20 each of NSR and NCRR again requesting draft access agreements, expressing the matter is an "urgent priority" Registered Site Manager (Daniel Nielsen) sends email to NSR engineer (Scott Pittenger) reporting May' the issuance of the EPA Approval, the non -responsiveness of the NSR and NCRR representatives, reporting the impatience of regulators and requesting Pittenger's help to move the matter 28 forward; Pittenger responded that Raleigh Metal Recycling INC should submit a Right of Entry request to NSR, and that NSR planned to send a list of "clarifying questions" to Raleigh Metal Recycling NC "soon" Railroads submit comprehensive 16 question written request for information to Raleigh Metal July Recycling NC; many questions had been answered previously 21 Complete Existing Impervious Soil Survey 11 Permitting for Impervious Surfaces August Raleigh Metal Recycling NC provides comprehensive response to Railroad requests for 26 information, including technical support memoranda Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling INC (William Toole) emails representatives for each of NSR September 16 and NCRR again requesting status of railroad review of August 26 response, and asking whether additional information is needed 27 NCRR states its review of the August 26 response is ongoing Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) emails representatives for each of NSR 9 and NCRR again requesting status of railroad review of August 26 response, and asking whether additional information is needed NSR (Helen Hart) reports it and NCRR are working on the required access agreements and 9 requesting some additional information, which Raleigh Metal Recycling INC had previously provided but which was again provided on the same day as the request 12 Tree location survey October Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) emails representatives for each of NSR 22 and NCRR requesting status of draft access documents previously promised by the railroads Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) emails representatives for each of NSR and NCRR requesting status of draft access documents previously promised by the railroads; 27 NCRR (through outside counsel) reports it is drafting the agreements and hoped to distribute them within a week Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) emails representatives for each of NSR 12 and NCRR requesting status of draft access documents previously promised by the railroads NSR distributes five separate access agreements: (1) Declaration of Land Use Restrictions; (2) 17 Agreement for Land Use Restrictions and Indemnification; (3) Flowage Agreement; (4) Environmental Right of Entry; (5) Land License November City of Raleigh complains of delays by Raleigh Metal Recycling NC, non -responsiveness, and excuses, and demands by December 23 detailed report on all progress made towards 23 implementation the Stormwater Management Plan and Remedial Actioni Plan, and timelines for completion Attorney for Raleigh Metal Recycling NC (William Toole) emails demand from City of Raleigh to 23 representatives for each of NSR and NCRR and again requests focused attention from railroads Raleigh Metal Recycling NC delivers Comprehensive review and mark up of the railroad access 14 agreements; proposes in -person meeting to discuss the open issues and provides dates 15 NCRR requests additional information Raleigh Metal Recycling NC delivers requested additional information, which had been previously December 16 delivered to railroads Railroads set December 23 as date to meet with Raleigh Metal Recycling NC for initial page 17 through of railroad access documents and to discuss open issues and party positions Meeting (planned) between Raleigh Metal Recycling NC and railroads for initial page through of 23 railroad access documents and to discuss open issues and parry positions Activity Related to Approval or Implementation of Stormwater Management Plan Related to Response to City of Raleigh Requests for Information Related to Effort to Obtain Access from Railroads Related to Approval or Implementation of Containment Remedy or Remedial Action Plans Related to Site Ownership or Operation p[j' V £ ahl u Qi' Mawr c ,MS Me"aenx. wux . uro sw Z 2 [-2G1f. 0a [ 5 I AIIMKr 6W(tls1lW 1. LA IAR[5 6 LA. +w acs nr wcn,(n rt. smal n aws .. (nsrnc smerr _ / / X JY/r G L9ft1N. MV[SSA'4 tuO 4MKIM Nc !-}dtt / RENSED 2-2J-M'5 / ADDED RZ714 D AREA a"R£R NAP BY MID AMANM ENWNEER1W & ENWOVEN" / sauPWS DAMD ✓AN. 2015 cA T 105 n .B7 P N wl Mw � ' q��� STEE TION 9B IIJ1. 90 Iq 11]D] Af a' N MW-1 MW-22 MW-12 "AREA AIf MW-6 _- l/ %/��►;ter.- � 3 � I I y I I_ c r0 H]i]rwlnl 3 S �r-erosznorw lrt) ALL IW57ANG'ES ARE HMIZLWIAG GRPVNO NLES D,STA A QA BY L1JMDlwNAt£ MEMM [ cc - wmSC= mu AV916 1 -nEL----_—_— -$ �5BN92D" (iiE) 2 — D. H. GRIFFIN n�N D. RN ; 11` �n II CONSTRUCTION iW51,CO., LLC °IN l vozm5�5e �W „e�[°�au N0 B]G � M LLC — p`��JI lg B]/L PO I8I2 _ _ BDJ ]B», l- 'L"O" 4 / _ / / l]D2B669J1 R 11. gENYD ]-J/-Nr/a N�j SBB]l'O!' AG S 1-7 M D rr 2 AND � Fsurz,?STANC,' I NOTES I-] M SNEEt 1 B D. H. GRIFF K mo NAo n D.+[� I ^ N�R]IO]JIN TI ~ M/S MAP /5 RECMDFD W 2 9/LEIS 2 (sI S4 r 2 EM 9 A LORE$ ANO NOIES) M] Ha.¢ (49.CD FW ].CI r20Id669J1 R_ ^ °°'®366I OPCE OF INAC77VE HAZARDOUS OR WASTE DISPOSAL S/TE " °"" """` J/MMYBARBOURSURVEYING, PA RALEIGHMEM. PROCESSORS ..,ns.i:.""s ..m ui[m imµm miss s ass[ L.mw na vss rwxo ^P No. w Ew.mv JIMMY C. BARBOUR, PLS, GSI a NUMBER NDDDas9rssse fE LRTxG POM 51ML [PM /SI/N 40/ER PoE[/SCNxLE PolE/NIFA 11LM OKa ¢u [vi*vx coxcx[[[ uavuvrt ramo asa [—,—OhtMVD ro w urt /� /� CJ108 RAsr.Cal RECKY/Nc NC 5[RAv "CIAT GGC E—.—.fro-B—c-mEwmL o[ Iwo n [annm auNr rw. eLr[wcrn samca 213 S. SECOND STREET .Na. .0 mao cs mLra sr.aL s[] 'O1"'s"° sr. NAR ✓5 [a^'^ IIA.YE EAIR [x¢*w wuo•o srw[ r— /. -- wort n us P. O. BOX 28 NC Eu nm xc nw w[ [auo _ _. _._._._._ SMITHFIEIO, N.C. 27577 swrrcn er nnil e. Ez Ec5 L M' M' ✓ SR NRM �/ o SFE NOIEs CIM1DA N0.WE 6mG W[IW Sam0.f [dm0 918889182 Bt388B-3013 y,( Sut( nns4w ro. EW FATnG �uG£IC x.l fglM B-1I-2�YY I'�IMII-OS6A NOTES' I. A OELIARA IRIN LY PERPETUAL LAND USE RESMCRONS LIMDM IHE USES 6 WS PROPERTY IS RECDPDED AT BLW . PAGE 2 AREA A OF PB PROPERTY RAS SUBSURFALY IXWTAMINAROW ME RCCLWDED DEOARA RW OF KRPCTUA[ LAND USE RESMCRMS FOR ME PRDPERIY FOR SP[OAC WFORMARCW J. WEN /HIS PROPERTY OR ANY PART OF IT 15 SLED LEA5E0, CON1£YED Do IRAR5 Rf0• NC. GS IJOA-JIaS(e) REWIRES WA WE FILL OWNG LANWAC£ BE PLACLD /N WE DESCMPRON SECnW OF RC OCEO OR OTHER NSIRUMENT W TRANSFER W NO SMALLER TYPE WAN NA USED IN R/C BOGY CY NC OELD RAS PR W RTY HAS BEEN USED AS A HAZA OUS WBSTANCE OR WASTE p5PO 91E. A WDLT O9• NACPW HAZAROWS SUBSTAALX OR WASTE DISPoSAL 9i[ IS RfCORLCD N WAKE COUNTY RCdSRR CY XLDO OYAOY AT BOOK PAX WESRONS LVNXRNING RAS MATTER YAY BF OIRCCTEO TO PLC N00?N CMLl1NA aW90N LY WASH MANAC£NENT, SLADWZINO SECONN NACnW HAZARDOUS VMS BRANCH 1646 MAIL SfRNLC OYNMR, RAUZIO NC 27699-1646 4 APPROYEO FOR TNC PIMPOSCS LY NCGSIMA-310.8 DAM SIFWA LURE INNIDD SYG ARMC AM BATESLN LG ewrR SUPERNND WCRW aWY N Of WASTE WALAXWNT NORTH CAROINA CWNTY / A NOTARY RL W SAID LWNIY AND STATE, DO LLRERY CERRFY NAT DID PERSLWALLY APPEAR BEFORE AND S BEFORE ME NIS THE_ DAY OK_ NOTARY PUBIC MY GOWN/SSttN EXPIRES S HAZA.WYX/5 WAS]£ LIST ARSCN/L B£NZq'B,VMCNE BENZLd/RANR/ENE BNZLNWC Ado CAOYR/Y dEOROYOPY d ROR COPPER !,4-p•CHLLIPWENZCNC 1.z-adrccmxmENr LEAD MAMAWX MEWVRY PER 9L 4ER NALANLORCRIENE HuwM ;24- MpROPLCIHEOCNIOBENIfNE NE M w YNn dncwrx 6. I E AREAS AND Tl'Po OF CONIANNADOW XRCRD UPON MIS MAP IS APPROMMA DDNS DEFYKD FROM R/F BEST AMIABLE ROMMA DON AT WE RUE OF RUNG INFORYARDY WAS TAKEN FROM YAPS PRONDED BY MLD-ARANOC AS A MS INC DATED AUGUST Mll FOR RUE METAL PRIXiSSORS SEYMWR BROW WIE WR T C PANY. LLC L ME SOL EXCAYATKN BARBER RACEMENT AND TREATMENT AREAS AM SITE MAP REINDIAL ACTLON RAN 1. NO TELO AIRILY AT TMS RYE. WFORYAWLI TAKEN FRW ABOW REFERENCED MAPS AND BWMARY WFOPMATKN FMM/ NAPS BY AMMY BARBOIR SURW.L2 ENRILED "SUR4 Y FDP ARANRC SCRAP AND METAL PROC Na N/F K A' L SCRAP AND WTAL DATN B-Sr-06' RENSED 7-JI-MI4 ADDED PROPOSED PONDS AND NOTES 1-7 ON 514CN 2 RENSEO 2-2J-2015 ADDED RENSEO AAEA A" PER YAP BY MID ARANIM IAL WEERWG R ENNRO WTAL SOURONS OA IN AN 2015 CURVE DATA TABLE CUPW RApVS LEWN OLL TA CHOVO CN.BCARWG CI 157194' IJ 54' 0Z9'49 1161' W77B'OB'W C2 9249J' $572' 2'4955' 4571' S144J'49'W CJ 9B49J' 159.0' 9t5'JI 15900' S11J0'59'W CI 6=55' 16104' 1576'40" 162.55' W219D6'W C5 9849J' 44J4' SB446' 44.34' SO479T#E C6 9549J' JB535' 21W'17' MJ IJ N0571'DBE O 9549J' 29156' 17; '4B" 292MY N027072T L/VE DATA TABLE L.E N.P. GLPEC➢W DLSFAIICE [I .SZJSYIIT JOW' [1 SZJSIYIE JOOO' LJ NB47JWT JOW' W OU Z Q Pom ! O OLE? BO X JCSVTS DEED BO.N 248p PACE J22 LY W BEEP BOOK 1412 PAGE O J92 DENS" 12, PAGE J91 O Z BEN BOOK 21211), PAX 28 - W 0 BLKN' P/ YAPS 1946, PAGE JI REFERENCES' 0, DEfD BOOK 8516. PALE 896 0 O OEfD BOOK 1764 PALE 281 I DEED BOgY 1764 PALL 289 , LI OEEO BOCK' JS59. PACE 94B O J BOOK PT MAPS 1961, PAGE 222 4 BiXW PI MAPS 1959. PAX 42 N BULW of MAPS 19J5 PAX 104 BIXM' of YAPS SO'Ax PAGE 662 AN / IM28M149 SYMBOL LEGEND MW—MONITORING WELL APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BARRIER AREAS --—---—---•---— — — BOUNDARY OF "AREA A" CHAIN —LINK FENCE --BULKHEAD — — — — — — — — — GIS PARCEL LINE GIS RAILROAD CENTERLINE GIS STREAM CENTERLINE GIS PLANIMETRICS LINE Rx xm.un ws WaW1c x.A m 1 uxa ___________" LB6B xm wmmo w .xrz� xcrt. / urzA vw.c Ire miss cvmmc (rox .Lew +AaANn snzL m [v wOx rtAro /1 M. M IWRRr P6INL MM SUM iRIO T/9/It MR11 qy' L/YKXLL W=L/MFA lOR EiTnc aMPRI[ V6NNEM RAM �.——cLMLgML a aR—L—ItMmFI➢ LP LwW tM LCWILD 19xr iPo11 t SWMC¢ ILA-YMW WL RVM a61,N is U,,T. CORW YMIXL m w arsnxc waxa6 m¢ Law n -- mOF a [A61NG MSi FVF iGM .-.-.-.-.-.-.- [�S M'w4FI I STAI(V APM WAF[ .1 .QpSoU. AI x. MOSRF (I R[65 OO.YL T( Attu¢v W P.b.' RA¢ LAURA M. R1Up'L\ IzpS or L BY 04NERS ACK WEPYNENT GREGCRKB .. PREVOCIr RALEDI RECYCLING W SCRAP METAL LLC DATE WG ATURF PRNIED SIGNATURE NORTH CARIXNA OYY/NTY 4 A AOTARY RLac K SAID Ld/NTY AND STATE, Lp HEREBY CERNFY NAT DID PERSOWALLY APPEAR AND STGN BEFORE ME TMS NE DAY OF "I4 MY O .590, [CONES TWS MAP IS RFOYWDED N 2 SNECrs SNEET 2 OF 2 NOTJCE OF INAC77VE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE OR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE ✓IMMYBARBOUR SURVEYING, PA RALEIGH METAL JIMMY C. BARBOUR. PLS. GSI D —WR MD— n T Bx^BB R4E/dl RECY¢WG MC SL 213 S. SECOND STREET v..9s sL uARYs wAKe BT' P. O. BOX SMITHFIELO. N.C. DS]] scwWxB B. rW..a. 5£C NOR3 ONOA MOORS 919 BI19i8AY MALT T l .1 a 9I... MV[SRNAI . ARK KN Ma l-lm Q "` / N O[MA0M Mr MAAAK SI 7CM OMMX Art. 215 1 I 1 [a � sR l I gg ' I II ua 6 3 .1 a RAx6vR. nm[ay.M 1. AnKrt R. e_eau � I I W..ar�wff SV I RENSEB 2-23-M15 AWED PENNED AREA A- PER MAP BY MW ARANAC MPNEERIN6 & ENNRWENrA( F g S UPCNS DA RD NN M15 W ,S• m / / I N I 14 P MMN £ LORID STET TION 1 AMr'd� il h / OB nJ1. 90 I r Jsz J2275 R / ' x Mµ, / MN._ r VICINITY MAP - NO SCALE / Ps crt 560 Ba' MW-22 , Rv MW-IZ �S i P N pp MW-BR BARRIER 14YC MW-27 al ------ --- YM1 , MW-7 / e Jim' (170 Z �� o „AREA A ° MW-6 d� �Q. 4Ati MW 9R B ESED I 9 cma I v Ire) P f0. I [-nmmo,w lnj `R r.a RN (aaw m wl rs amaevseu NORTH:--'.LbJL MW-„ PONO P MW-26 a A(L &'STANCES ARE IIPiIZWTA( (T'IX/NO 01SrAN[YS AREA BY C"&NA)E MERIW MW-5 1 5'6'J!Y I00 0 100 200 OOOEE 2 Ie b�'WIN ' /[jJ a^ 6 .......... l 1 JJ9[ GRIPNIC SCr1E - PEEI tl h Y-y, ! 561' �59A99T5 Jlr" (R£) I� 1 (NfL — — — — — — — �� � n sic �✓ F-0r/ N,� 5,677'-01W 11A051' x/F It — — — — g`' D. H. GRIFFIN :I: D. FlN $ 11= jln s CONSTRUCT/ON CO., LLC P'^rI Mzersz56 {V' oe" HO C CO., LLC Ip9ul F Ar OR 6— aG 1611 6pJ >6' / 1PoIB669J1 i I� E � a ____------- R I: I 7-JI-Mlf >• gY@ '� / M/F SS6'Il'0/"W — — I A&)E�IES 1PRCWOYD� ET 2 ANO �! nhr• CR H D. H. /FF rr w r"wrou n.[a) NS �33� THIS MAP IS Mz H seer 1 a z (m SEET 2 FTRSA AWES A D NORSJ 8 YY AIw mwWo w rAcro. -y. 3 % ms0 ac Joz m w) 6 awrevAm 1 NO7/CE OF /NAC77VF HAZARDOUS -� % /1mze669Jr j2_ �� en. ea.mM romr SUBSTANCE OR WAS7F DISPOSAL S17F $ a M .� u ✓ R RALEIGH METAL PROCESSORS ; ' H a N m--------------- w bR m ma .a m JIMMY BARBOUR SURVEYING, PA NP M LAt WA RAVIpAp C PANE R T OF WAY . € ram' .Artn JIMMY Ea C. BARBOUR, PLS, GSI AxweER N 159r5566 urs�nw ww�sn�c m@row rr�/m/u .mxx ea[rs[wa w�/ uurt o.rnv F Y '^F`x cA [GmC Cpf C uwudf tG.M aNL�[�,�QLNrGa T.'m IM L-31W RA(E/d REL KY/NG NC SCRAP METAL [LC 2�Ip rt-------coam.c v +rs'a cawnm naia ,.w x[rrx.cm w++vs 213 S. SECOND STREET a p } 4 EM Qb 4 .Y. n-V N Ml ld U m a �Ad• aMAf sr. MAR T @Rry N ME R gp [ws o-¢rem wnxaw vAs mMo /. -- al P. 0. BOX 28 Nc 6 ��i �oq [r nosrra mw .xir mw _._._._._._.-emuorwrn'wu .' SMIiHEIELD, N.C. 27577 SfRKI[a Wr ay... e. R g X' nar ut rtusry A ceamo SEE NOl£S [C OA uLaRE E. rnrmw zwlur mno sle eeeasaz aie-Nm�ml3 arr scNr [w.�.c na a.h �� [w rmrw ..were wa muo 6-zlaoee 1--rm" rz-Q16A NOTES 1. A XCLARADON LY PER DML LAND USE RCSMCPON% LNNIM THE USES Of 1//lS PRp'EFTY, IS RECORDED AT BDCM PACE_ 2. AREA • OF JM PRCRERIY NAS SUBSURFACE IXN/lauWA ]WW SCC RECGROED DEaARA DO! OF PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTMCPONS FOR MC PROPERTY FCN ,SPEOAC AFORYA nO/ J WILN ]MS PRPERTY OR ANY PART O- IT a SLCO LEASED, CMl£1ZD LN MANSEERRLD, NCGS 1JOA-JIO.B(e) REWIRES THAT ME FULOWNC LANWAGE B£ PLACID W DN OCSGWPnON YCAOJ LY DIE DEED OR O1 R WSWRUYCNT LP TRAN9(R W NO SMALLER T1PE DIAN MAT UMV W THE BODY Or NE DELD.' 7M15 PRWERT✓ HAS BEEN USED AS A HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE OR wASTF OSPOSAL SIR. A NODCF U INACPW HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE OR WASP£ OSPOSAL 91E 15 RCCORMD W walE CO/NTY RCOSRR OF XML PTLY AT BOOK , PAX WE5nWS CYRCERMNC IRIS YA TRR YAY BE DIRECRD TO D? NCRM CAROLINA O'N90V Cr wA5TE MANAXAM T. SUPERFUNO SCcnw, WACnW HAZARDOUS STIES RRAMYL 1616 YM STANCE CC . RALEWOL NC 27699-1646 A APPROKD TOP ME PIMFOWS O' NCCS IJOA-JIQd OAIF SIGNA IURE PDW RD 9CNA MOE JM BATFSON LG CNl£F, WP0?FZ O 56CDON &N9ON OF WASTE MANAGEMENT NORM CAROWA COUNTY /, A NOTARY PUBLIC CR SAID COUNTY AND STATE, CO NLALBY CERTFY MAl OO PCRSLWALLY APPEAR BEFORE AND 9W t3ETOPF ME MIS 1HE DAY Or - NOTARY PUBLIC MY CCWMIS9CN EXR'RES S HAZARDOUS WASTE L15F ARSFMC BEND0(,PMENE BENZO'6)FL0URANMENE BCNZONC ACID CRLORCRORY CHROMIUM COPPER 1,1-OCHLONDWNZENE 1.2-OCNOROEDICNE LEAD MAM ANLSF MERCURY PCB 9L WR ?WALNL MCT12NE PiALLA,M, RICHL0RO9CNZENE MCNL INILHLCRLCMENC ZWC NNK OKNBOE 6. DIE AREAS AND TYPE CY CCWTAYWAD N OEPLCIED UPON MIS MAP IS APPRONMA PONS OEMKO FROM IN£ BEST AMAKABL£ WFCRYA MN AT PAC WE O' fZNG INFORMA DW WAS TAKEN FROM YAPS PRONOEO BY MID -A RANDC ASSO]ATES INC DATED AUWST 10I1 FOR RALEIOI METAL PROCESSOR$ SEWWR BROWN INKSOIENT COAPANY, LED OF M£ SOL EXC AADN, SARMER PLACYYENT ANO IREAIMENT AREAS AND 9TE YAP REMEOAL ACPW PLAN. 2, NO REED AARWY AT INS TIME RPDRUADON WEN FROM AWW RCFEBENCED MAPS AND BWWARY INTOPYATKW TRW MAPS BY JMYY BAM19O'/R WRI£) EVRRED WRLEY FOR ARANPC SCRAP AND PETAL PRCCESSANL N/F K & L SCRAP AND METAL DATED 8-21-06 CUR I/E DATA TABLE CURK RA S LENON OEL TA CHORD WBEARWG O 157J94' IJ 64' O2948' 116I' SO778'O9'w C2 9219J' 4572' 1M9-55' 12 A' 511-IJ19V CJ 98!93' 1590' 975'J1' 159.00' SI19O59'w CA 60155' 16101' 1528.40_ 16255' W279-MW C5 9B49J' 14J1' 2JA'46" 11.J1' S012909T C6 9549JM5M' 11W'17' J6 13' ND5]IOST C2 954 SJ 29156' D¢6LB_292.40' 1022022T LAE DATA TABLE L111E No. OL?ECAOv DISTANCE Ll S23301T JO00' L2 .i2J3Y11T MOD' LJ NBI7J'29T MOD IA U1 U U Z Z LAROWA E h LIGHT £SVIS ~ o 2 OLEO 600o 21BB PACT J22 OE£O BOO' N21 PACE 509 ' K W W O D q 1922 PACE J92 DIM U 2 bl DECO BO..N' 1117 PACE 18 K O BOO' of MAPS 1946. PAX JI REFERENCES' I O M O£FD BOM' 8516, PACE 8M O GEED XOK IM'B PACE 287 GEED BUM' I266. PACE 289 ti N DEED BUM' JJ59, PACE 91B I i' O W BOOM of MAPS 1962, PALE 222 BUM' of MAPS 1959, PACE 4 Z Q i VI BOOK of MAPS 793A PACE 101 BUM" o/ YAPS 2000. PACE 662 PW / 12018)8219 SYMBOLLEGEND MW—MONITORING WELL APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 1J BARRIER AREAS — — — ­— --- —•---— BOUNDARY OF "AREA A" CHAIN —LINK FENCE BULKHEAD — — — — — GIS PARCEL LINE GIS RAILROAD CENTERLINE — — — — -------GIS STREAM CENTERLINE GIS PLANIMETRICS LINE M fIR MMM'1 v/S WfARK W 4t REN5F0 7-JI-1011 W IMES IT65 M SVTf2D LR [FISTXG 2M RCBM ApOED PRC1oO5E0 PWOS AID w/ r+ RRTLR WEiLR / vim vALri RR55 Rranom sPn[ SD MISS I-T W 9IE£T 2 n¢ nM�¢ M wN/nL wRDt Ait WKA CLv E>47xG GKAEIE u}IIKJR [PRU P0.[-[PfMxFAO iRP tM c/L----axrtwxL a RWO IX c rwwLR-xM6x rue rpno cr qs wrnnLD rvnn raw RLrtRL.R.w swRLn cmron cxRm[[ WAY RENSEO 2-2J-2015 LRM [FrSRW PMPWO SA£ fblU /r ROF K MAY YAP BY d [Tbik MW .VIE IdM ......... .�.�.�p�MWp{K'YVW WD A 7LANSEOAREAA'PER MO ARAN'DC ENO S FNNRCW£NTA< 6 %" iRw Is[ Rl tuAr r/ 4nuw AN AN 2O SIXU11W5 DA Ri) 1015 KRriL �^6x �"� LMna ExTNG W4MiC wl i0'AO AErIIDA ¢ LC[D.T mrcc aTCD'Qm x waY: r�¢ LAURA M. FYOOKW r(Lf51p orKIDS eY OWNERS ACNNOMLEOCEMENT GREG RY BROWN. PRE9C£NT RALDO't RECYCLING NC SCRAP METAL LLC DATE VOIAWRE PRWW£O 96WA WAT I, , A NOTARY PUBLIC Oo SAID COUNTY AM STATE W HEREBY CERTIFY TNAT OO P£RSCN4LLY APPEAR AND 9GN BEFORE ME M15 IHE DAY CY 2014 NOTARY HIAK MY coutes4ON EXPIRES IMS YAP IS WCOMED W 2 9IEET5 SHEFT 2 Oe 2 NOTJCE OF INACTIE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE OR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE JIMMY BARBOUR SURVEYING, PA RALEIGH METAL PROCESSORS JIMMY C. BARBOUR, PLS, GSI I W MN96R NLD01591s n M O RALERN RECKLWC NC SCRAP METAL LED 213 S. SECOND STREET mwrsw Sz MAR✓s �"'^ -KF T" P. 0. BD% 29 SMITHFIELD. N.C. PS]] awtnm n5EF IpIES •xt BYONDA MLYPE 91998E 2 Bt0-BBP3p13 _A.. EXHIBIT 4 Correspondence from Daniel Nielsen to William Toole (December 21, 2015) ["ri d Atlantic Engineering & Environmental Solutions December 21. 2015 William W. Toole Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A. 101 N. Tryon St., Suite 1900 Charlotte, NC 28246 Subject: REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN CERTIFICATION PROCESS RALEIGH METALS RECYCLERS RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27610 SITE ID 045915568 Dear Mr. Toole: 409 R,e.s Vic, Cm,,, R,,16,1 . NC 2 16 10 OR: 919.250.991a ltsinid 919.250.9950 MAAONLINE.COM I am the Registered Site Manager (RSM) for the Raleigh Recyclers Site and, as such, I am responsible for certifying to NCDEQ that the actions to be taken by Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal, LLC pursuant to the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) comply with the rules of the Registered Environmental Consultant (also known as the Voluntary Clean -Up) Program. Per your request, I have prepared this letter describing the process required in order to certify the RAP for the Raleigh Metals Recyclers project. As described below, the RAP certification process cannot go forward until the North Carolina Railroad and Norfolk Southern (the railroads) agree that the historic contamination may remain on certain portions of the railroads' right-of-way (Railroad Right -of -Way) at levels above unrestricted use standards. This project is in the Registered Environmental Consultant Program (REC Program). This is a voluntary program whereby the Remediator engages a Registered Environmental Consultant (REC), acting through a Registered Site Manager (RSM), to conduct environmental assessment and remediation activities in accordance the REC Program Rules (15A NCAC 13 .0300 Voluntary Remedial Action Oversight By Registered Environmental Consultants). For the Raleigh Metals site, Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal, LLC as the Remediator, Mid -Atlantic Associates, Inc. as the REC and me as the RSM executed an Administrative Agreement (AA) with NCDENR (now NCDEQ) on April 17, 2014. After extensive assessment activities conducted from 2007 to 2012 by a previous, unrelated party, a RAP was developed to address soil and groundwater impacted by releases of metals, petroleum compounds, chlorinated solvents and PCBs at the Raleigh Metals site. Because the RAP calls for some contaminated soils above unrestricted standards to remain in place, Land Use Restrictions (LURs) are a part of the remedy. Therefore, a Containment Remedy Proposal (CRP) must be developed and receive NCDEQ concurrence before the RAP can be implemented. The project is complicated further because PCBs are present at the Raleigh Metals site and the remediation of PCBs is regulated by EPA through the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA). Therefore, in addition to NCDEQ concurrence of the CRP, the RAP for the Raleigh Metals site must also receive EPA approval and permission to use LURE; to address the PCB impacted soil. In 2011, a CRP was developed and concurrence with NCDENR achieved. In 2012 the RAP was submitted to EPA, before Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal, LLC entered the program as EXPERIENCED CUSTOMER FOCUSED INNOVATIVE RAP Certification December 21, 2015 Raleigh Metals Recyclers Page 2 Remediator in April 17, 2014. EPA gave its approval to implement the PCB -related portions of the RAP in 2015. In the intervening years between the time NCDENR approved the CRP and EPA provided approval (approximately 3 years), two significant revelations occurred in association with the project. First, stormwater quality issues were identified at the Raleigh Metals site requiring the RAP to be modified to address stormwater quality. .These modifications include the construction of two stormwater retention basins and a change to hard surface pavement. Secondly, surveys revealed that Railroad Right -of -Way proposed to be subject to the land use restrictions, barrier and certain stormwater upgrades described in the RAP is much greater than originally thought. In order to implement a RAP that uses a CRP and thus requires LURs, NCDEQ requires documented permission from all property owners where LURs will be used to address contaminated soils remaining in place at levels above unrestricted use standards. The RAP calls for the removal of some contaminated soils from the Railroad Right -of -Way and three other adjacent or nearby properties, and so LUR approval from these properties is not required. However, it is not feasible to remove all contaminated soils from the Railroad Right -of -Way. Thus, permission from the North Carolina Railroad and, we are informed, from Norfolk Southern, to leave soil in place that does not meet unrestricted land use criteria must be obtained before a revised CRP can be resubmitted to NCDEQ for its concurrence. Looking forward, once permission to implement the LUR on the Railroad Right -of -Way is obtained, we will submit the revised CRP to NCDEQ. After receiving NCDEQ concurrence, we can then submit the revised RAP (including the revised CRP) to EPA to request an amendment to the EPA PCB Approval issued in March 2015. With the approval of these changes documented, NCDEQ will put the RAP out for mandatory public notice and comment. After the public comment period is concluded, we will coordinate with NCDEQ to address public comments (if any) and modify the RAP as necessary. Once complete, the RSM can then submit the REC-certified RAP to NCDEQ and implementation of the RAP can commence. I trust this letter clarifies the process mandated by 15A NCAC 13 .0300 (Voluntary Remedial Action Oversight By Registered Environmental Consultants) to certify the RAP. Sincerely, Cd�Rp1 V e — SEAL Dan` Nielsen, PE, RSM r o 10S. 149 Principal Engineer �;;, kt lT'J;-" CC: Mr. Greg Brown — Raleigh I J 1TASN� DURATION START FINISH __ __ Receive Required Written Access to Railroad ROW Unknown Day 0 Day 0 Remedial Action Plan Approval 165 days Day 1 Day 165 NCDEQ Approval of Containment Remedy Proposal 45 days Day 1 Day 45 EPA Approval of Revised Remedial Actoin Plan 45 days Day 46 Day 90 Finalize and Submit RAP for Public Notice 15 days Day 91 Day 105 Public Notice Period Complete 30 days Day 106 Day 135 Address Public Notice Comments 15 days Day 136 Day 150 REC Approval of RAP 15 days Day 151 Day 165 Construction Drawing & Permitting 190 days Day 165 Day 355 Mass Grading Submittal 60 days Day 165 Day 225 Prepare Site CD's 30 days Day 166 Day 195 Submittal to City of Raleigh 0 day Day 195 Day 195 First Review by City 10 days Day 196 Day 205 Respond to Comments / Resubmit 30 days Day 206 Day 215 Approval / Issuance of Land Disturbance Permit 30 days Day 216 Day 225 Railroad Construction Submittal 100 days? Day 195 Day 295 Submittal to Railroad 0 day Day 195 Day 195 First Review by Railroad 60 days? Day 196 Day 255 Respond to Comments / Resubmit 10 days Day 256 Day 265 RR Review / Approval 30 days? Day 266 Day 295 Infrastructure Construction Plans Submittal 60 days Day 295 Day 355 Prepare Site CD's 30 days Day 296 Day 325 Submittal to City of Raleigh 0 days Day 325 Day 325 First Review by City 10 days Day 326 Day 335 Respond to Comments/Resubmit 10 days Day 336 Day 345 Approval of Infrastructure Construction Plans 10 days Day 346 Day 355 Construction & Implementation 435 days Day 225 Day 660 Selection of Contractor 30 days Day 226 Day 255 Demo/Movement of Material Onsite 45 days Day 255 Day 300 Soil Treatment Leachable Metals 60 days Day 301 Day 360 Barrier Placement North 90 days Day 361 Day 451 Construction of North Basin/Infrastructure 60 days Day 361 Day 420 Relocation of Onsite Material 60 days Day 421 Day 480 Barrier Placement South 90 days Day 481 Day 571 Construction of South Basin / Infrastructure 60 days Day 481 Day 540 Certification of Basins 30 days Day 541 Day 570 Post Construction Stormwater Quality Evaluation 90 days Day 571 Day 660 s;•.�r.. ,r,.: use., .}}yy Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCG200335 , - Effective: 01/01/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Elite Newco I LLC SOC: .Effective: Expiration: Facility: Raleigh Metals County: Wake ,•*;_t�.•.. 2310 Garner Rd Region: Raleigh Raleigh NC 27610 Contact Person:, . Dan , Wall Title: Phone: 919-650-8353 r: Directions to Facility:• ' System Classifications: Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: .: Secondary ORC(s). On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Irspection Date: 08/27/2013`j: ' Entry Time: 09:30AM Exit Time: 12:OOPM Primary Inspector: David R Parnell Phone: 919-791-4260 Secondary Inspectors): , � j . Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Wholesale Trade of Metal Waste and Scrap Stormwater Discharge CDC Facility Status: Compliant ® Not Compliant Question Areas: ® Storm Water (See attachment summary) d - Page: 1 permit: NCG200335 Inspection Date: 08/27/2013 Owner - Facility: Elite Newco I LLC Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: This facility was inspected after a report to DLR of an illicit discharge which flowed onto an adjacent property. DLR RRO reported that the clean up had been concluded. M Page: 2 I1t,•t 1 �' f � . .eF �'fi Permit: NCG200335 Owner- Facility: Elite Newco I LLC Inspection Dale: 0812712013 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine 1 ' Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Does the site have a Slormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? r, # Does the PIan include a General Location (USGS) map? # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'? # Does the Plan, include a'detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? rv, ,# Does the Plan Include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? µ•# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? tip # Does,the;f Ian include aBMRsummary? # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? 17.1# Does the: Plan include a,list of Responsible Party(s)? # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? Does the,Plan includesSlormwater. Facility Inspection Program? �':';Has-the Stormwate.Pollution�Preyention Plan been implemented? Comment, Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE ■ " ■ ■ No ■ ■ ■ ■■■ it ■ ■ ■ ■ �� A+■■■■"■� Yes No NA NE .r Has the facility,conducted. its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: For previous monitoring periods the facility was not sampling all six of the outfalls. The monitoring period for the last six months of 2013 was conducted properly. .. AnalyticalMonitoring .yes No NA NE Has -the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? i ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ `# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ i Comment: For the previous sample periods the facility was not sampling all six of the outfalls. It conducted the required outfall sampling in on June 2013. However the sample results were beyond "•,.r ; benchmarks for many of the parameters at the outfalls. Above benchmarks at one or more of the outfalls'Induced Cadmium. COD. Copper, Iron, Lead, Oil and Grease, TSS and Zinc. Please adhere to the requirements of the permit with respect to the Tier program. `PermrtLand outfalls yes No NA NE \ # Is a, copy of the Permit and the •Cenificate of Coverage available at the site? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ . :.' # Were all oulfalls observed during the inspection? ! ❑ ❑ ❑ #-If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Page: 3 Permit: NCG200335 Owner- Facility: Elite Newco I LLC Inspection Date 08/27/2013 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Comment: An illicit discharge of oil/water was reported to DLR RRO on 8/23/2013. Highlands Environmental Solutions. Inc: handled the cleanup. The discharge was discussed during the inspectionand prevention actions were suggested. The facility reports that appropriate measures have`been implemented in order to prevent such a spill from reoccuring. �r; .x ,�! 4 ° tea:. _, ;:{ r •:8.. Page: 4 A NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III Governor Secretary December 16, 2014 RALEIGH METAL RECYCLERS—NCG20O335 Memo to file by Dave Parnell: Subject: On site meeting between Raleigh Metal Recyclers representatives and Raleigh Regional Office staff. Representatives present: Danny Smith - DWR RRO Supervisor Dave Parnell - DEMLR Stormwater RRO Jon Aldridge - McAdams Dan Nielson - MiclAtlantic Bill Toole - Robinson Bradshaw Greg Brown - Raleigh Metal Recyclers Meeting at the Raleigh Metal Recyclers conference room at 2:00PM - 12/16/14 The meeting was requested by RRO staff to assess the progress of the facility towards the resolution of their NOV issued by DWR. The NOV was for DWR Stream Standard Violations. In conjunction with a prior NOV issued by DEMLR Stormwater as well as, the installation of a barrier (to be approved by EPA/REC) to hold in place PCB affected soil; a timeline was submitted to DWR for implantation of those measures. Mr. Brown described some improvements that had been implemented, but no implementation of stormwater treatment units has been installed. Mr. Toole asked if the stormwater treatment units had been approved by DENR, indicating this was a reason for the delays. No comments have been issued by either DWR or DEMLR on their stormwater plan. It was suggested that a sedimentation and erosion control plan be submitted to the City of Raleigh, which would include the proposed stormwater treatment units. This action would enable the process to begin as soon as possible. Mr. Parnell suggested that Mr. Aldridge be in contact with Mike Randall, of DENR Stormwater Permitting Program, as well during this process. He could advise on the metal reduction techniques required for these units. Mr. Brown suggested that RRO staff come to the site every 30 days to observe the stabilization of areas of the site with vegetative cover. Mr. Smith suggested that Mr. Brown and his consultants provide a unified response to the delays. Mr. Brown and his consultants agreed to submit a S&E Plan to the City of Raleigh in the next two to four weeks. Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources Energy Section - Geological Survey Section • Land Quality Section 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612.919-707-9200 / FAX: 919-715-8801 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 • Internet: htto://Portal.ncdenr.orgtweb/Ir/ An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper 3 800 Ba.,ti� /2s awe CJm' IJco�- qly-V-(-370 DEMLft sruj6y &n "VA nrcF4.-4nJ/2 v bijj"5. %wli Ca A(JIM r. 9ft �qnn ���/� (%Iff �l �I�y � � j`�yC, �Yilic'1�►�G�P• old J / 9 i9 bl -S� ►^KJ►�"S ►�'u���ce£@r�'cn ��,,Sc�. �p2�Dc gill i 5�� i�LSc^I °tom IMAfl awl i1Z ` l qi� rA��iwry El r�: j\ �r NC®ENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Division of Water Resources Water Quality Programs Pal McCrory Thomas A. Reeder Governor Director March 27, 2014 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested 7012 0470 0001 3843 0822 Seymour Brown Investment Co., Inc Registered Agent: W. Harrell Everett Jr. 507B Spence Ave Goldsboro NC 27534 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested 7012 0470 0001 3843 1034 Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal LLC 327 Hillsborough Street Raleigh NC 27603 Subject: Notice of Violation NOV-2014-PC-0047 Notice of Intent to Enforce Notice of Injunction Relief Recommendation Stream Standard Violations 2310 Garner Road Wake County Dear Sirs: Natural Resources John E. Skvarla, III Secretary The Division of Water Resources Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) received a complaint from the City of Raleigh detailing concerns about waste/pollutants coursing off the subject property and entering into surface waters. In response, on January 11, 2014, Danny Smith, Autumn Romanski, and James Graham of the RRO Water Quality Operations Section conducted a site visit and collected water samples. The subject 2310 Garner Road tract is owned by Seymour Brown Investment Co., Inc. The current business operating at the site is Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal LLC and is known as Raleigh Metal Recycling. Prior to the operations of Raleigh Metal Recycling, the footprint of this site has been industrial use and the site is confirmed to be contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Water Oualily Regional Operaions Section 1628 Mail service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1629 Location: 3800 Barrett Dr., Raleigh, Noah Carolina 27609 Phone. 919-791-1200 \ FAX: 919-571-4718 haerner www.newaterqualay org An Equal Opponunily \ Allimwlice Action Gmployer Raleigh Recycle -Seymour Brown Investment Co. 3/27/ t 4 Page 2 of 4 At present, 2310 Garner Road facility is being operated as a metal recycling center. Scrap/waste metal (e.g. vehicles parts, machinery, construction debris etc.) is brought to the facility by the public and savage businesses. This material is weighed and sorted into different piles for processing, shredding, storage and eventual shipping (truck/railcar) such that the metal may be reused. The scrap metal is moved, stockpiled, and eventually shipped off site. Vehicle traffic (trucks, tow motors/forklifts, cranes etc.), capable of moving, dragging, sorting, dumping waste metal are a requisite for this type of operation. Due to this industrial traffic and land use the site is not stable. Sediment, turbidity; -and pollutants'that are on the site from both current and past industrial activities are easily transported from the site dining stor`ra events. The January 11, 2014, site visit revealed/identified water discharging though an under drain from the footprint of the site. This under drain outlet is located at the retaining wall along the edge of the railroad tracks. This water flowed along the railroad tracks and into a culvert (pipe). This water coursed through a pipe/outlet that discharges into an unnamed tributary to Wildcat Branch a Class C, Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) in the Neuse River Basin. Raleigh Recycle -Seymour Brown Investment Co. 3/27/ 14 Page 3 of 4 Water samples were collected from the following locations: 1) retaining wall outlet, 2) the unnamed tributary to Wildcat Branch, 3) the confluence of the unnamed tributary and Wildcat Branch, and 4) Wildcat Branch (upstream). Water discharging from the 2310 Garner Road facility contained extremely high concentrations of lead, cadmium, mercury, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), nickel, copper and zinc. This waste Flowed into surface waters and caused stream standard violations to occur, as listed in Attachment 1. Accordingly, the sample results confirmed violations of North Carolina General Statutes and North Carolina Administrative Codes which states the following: "North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1(a) states that "no person shall do any of the following things or carry out any of the following activities unless that person has received a permit from the Commission and has complied with all conditions set forth in the permit: 1) Make any outlets into the waters of the State. 6) that no person shall cause or permit any waste, directly or indirectly, to be discharged to or in any manner intermixed with the waters of the State in violation of the water quality standards applicable to the assigned classifications or in violation of any effluent standards or limitations established for any point source, unless allowed as a condition of any permit, special order or other appropriate instrument issued or entered into by the Commission under the provisions of this Article." "15A NCAC 02B .0211 (3) k Turbidity: the turbidity in the receiving water shall not exceed 50 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) in streams not designated as trout waters and 10 NTU in streams, lakes or reservoirs designated as trout waters; for lakes and reservoirs not designated as trout waters, the turbidity shall not exceed 25 NTU." "15 A NCAC 02B (1) Toxic substance: numeric water quality standards (maximum permissible levels) for the protection of human health applicable to all fresh surface water are in Rule .0208 of this Section. Numerical water quality standards (maximum permissible levels) to protect aquatic life applicable to all fresh surface waters: "15 A NCAC 02B (1) (iii) Cadmium: 0.4ug/I for trout waters and 2.0 ug/I for non -trout waters; attainment of water quality standards in surface waters shall be based on measurement of total recoverable metals concentrations unless studies have been conducted to translate total recoverable metals to a toxic form. 15A NCAC 02B (1)(viii) lead 25uq/L 15A NCAC 02B (1)(ix) mercury 0.012 uq/L 15A NCAC 02B (1) (x) nickel 88 uq/L 15A NCAC 02B (1) (xii) polychlorinated biphenyls: (total PCB and carcinogens identified .0.001 ug/1) 15A NCAC 02B (4) Action Level Substances: (a) Copper 7ug/I (d) Zinc: 50 uq/I" Raleigh Recycle -Seymour Brown Investment Co. 3/27/ 14 Page 4 of 4 The concentrations of mercury, PCBs, lead, silver, aluminum, iron, chromium, barium, copper, nickel, zinc, semivolatiles organics, documented discharging from this site is a significant concern. It is a concern to not only aquatic life but to the public health. This office requests that both parties respond to this Notice of Violation in Writing within 30 days of receipt. Your response should minimally address the following items. 1. Please explain how you plan to stop pollutants from discharging/moving off of your site into surface waters. 2. Please explain how you will stabilize the site such that infiltration, erosion, and pollution that are coincident to past and current land uses will be addressed to prevent ongoing and continued transport of waste to surface waters of the state. 3. Provide a clear schedule with dates detailing how this will be accomplished such that surface water standard violations do not continue to occur. This office requires that the violations, as detailed above, be abated immediately and properly resolved. Environmental damage and violations of North Carolina Administrative Codes and Statutes have been documented for the subject site as stated above. Your efforts to undertake activities to bring the subject site back into compliance is not an admission, rather it is an action that must be taken in order to begin to resolve ongoing environmental issues. Thank you for your attention to this matter. This office requires that the violations, as described above, be properly resolved. These violations and any future violations are subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation. The discharge of PCBs, mercury, semi volatiles and other metals cannot continue to occur. As requested above, this office will review your written response and remediation schedule that you provide. This office will consider your response as a part of any civil penalty assessment, as appropriate. In addition, the failure to provide a clear adequate response with clear schedule to eliminate ongoing impacts to this office will move forward an injunction relief request. This request will be forwarded to Attorney General's Office such that a court ordered compliance schedule/injunctive relief may be secured in order to abate continuing violations, worsening downstream impacts and to protect the public health. Should you have any questions regarding theseVan matters,please contact me a 919) 791-4252. ly, /�v7/Smit egional Superysox Water Quality Operations Raleigh Regional Office cc: Division of Energy Mining and Land Resources - John Holley Division of Energy Mining and Land resources — Bradley Bennett Division of Waste Management - Hazardous Waste Section - Phil Orozco Division of Waste Management — Charlotte Jesneck City of Raleigh — Mark Senior Attachment 1: Notice of Violation NOV-2014-PC-0047 Parameter/Water Outlet from Confluence Wildcat Branch Quality Standard retaining wall Outlet to Raleigh Metals Waters Recycling Conductivity 972 805 103.4 Turbidity: 50 NTUs 550 170 75 Cadmium: 2.0 ug/I 65 ug/L 4.3 ug/L 2.2 ug/L Lead: 25 ug/I 4300 uq/L 250 ug/L 36 ug/L Aluminum: 100,000 ug/L 7,200 ug/L 24,000 ug/L Human Health 8000 ug/L Aquatic Life 87 ug/L Mercury 0.012 16 uq/L 0.98 ug/L Non detected polychlorinated biphenyls: (total PCB and 1.8 ug/L 0.58 uq/L Non detected congeners identified) (PQL 1.0 uq/L) 0.001ug/I Nickel: 88 ug/I 620 ug/L 53 ug/L 9.8 ug /L Action Level Substances: Copper: 7 ug/I 5000 ug/L 340 ug/L 150 ug/L Zinc: 50 ug/I 15000 ug/L 1100 ug/L 280 ug/L Silver: 0.06 ug/L 9 ug/L Non detected Non detected s 4 a :r NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Land Quality Section Pat McCrory, Governor Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM John E. Skvarla, III, Secretary Director September 12, 2013 CERTIFIED MAIL #7012 1640 0001 9605 7874 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Paul Perrotti Raleigh Metal Recycling 2310 Garner Road Raleigh, NC 27610 Subject. Notice of Deficiency NOD-2013-PC-0361 Raleigh Metal Recycling NPDES Stormwater Permit NCG200335 Wake County Dear Mr Perrotti: On August 27, 2013, Dave Parnell and Chris Pullinger, from the Raleigh Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR) conducted a compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) at your facility, located at 2310 Garner Road in Raleigh, North Carolina. The facility lies in the watershed of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Walnut Creek, Class C NSW waters, in the Neuse River Basin. The following observations were noted during the DEMLR inspection and file review. This facility is a scrap metal processing company, which has on -site tanks utilized for used oil and petroleum derived from junked vehicles. Andy Sanderson and you were on site during the inspection and provided valuable assistance to DEMLR staff. 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Phone: 919-791 A2001 FAX: 919-5714718 Internet: http:portal.ncdenr.orgAvebllrl An Equal Opponunily, 1 Affumalive Action Employer Nne orthCarolina Naturally Stormwater run-off generated at such facilities is regulated by general NPDES stormwater permit NCG200000. The DEMLR Stormwater Program has issued certificate of coverage (COC) NCG200335. The permit was on site and current. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) was reviewed by DEMLR staff. The SPPP was developed during the first half of 2013 and satisfied most of the requirements of the permit. The plan lacked the following: documented employee training records and a list of significant spills - for the last three years. The monitoring reports were reviewed during the inspection. Prior to the last sampling period, only three of the six Stormwater Discharge Outfalls (SDO) noted in the SPPP were being monitored. During th-e last monitoring period, six SDO were monitored, qualitatively and analytically. Results from the last analytical monitoring indicated exceedences of benchmarks at one or more of the SDO, which were for Cadmium, COD, Copper, Iron, Lead, Oil and Grease, TSS and Zinc. The stormwater collection system location and the drainage area flowing to each SDO were reviewed during the inspection. Unfortunately, we were not able to determine the originating location of the stormwater, as it flowed to each SDO and then offsite. This will make the reduction of benchmark exceedences difficult to address, as you advance through the Tier system of your permit. Containment and storage of oils, fuels and other liquids were adequate, with respect to secondary containment. General housekeeping, within the shop, appeared to be adequate, as well. DEMLR Staff and Raleigh Metal Recycling staff discussed the cause and effect of an illicit discharge that was reported to DEMLR staff on August 23, 2013. The facility reports that measures have been taken to assure that no further spill such as the one noted, will reoccur. Requested response: You are directed to respond to this letter in writing to DEMLR at the address provided below within 30 days of receipt. Please address the following items noted in bold: • Please fully develop the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan by placing a list of significant spills during the last three years, as well as documenting employee training annually. • The latest analytical monitoring indicated benchmark exceedences. Please adhere to the requirements of the NPDES permit with respect to the Tier program. • Please provide a final account of th'e illicit discharge which was reported to DENR on August 23, 2013. (It maybe helpful if your consulfa`nfprovides the report on your behalf). 1628 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699.1628 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Ralegh, North Carolina 27609 One Phone: 919-79142001 FAX: 919-5714718 North Carol i n a Internet: Opportunity .Ac Affirmative AdonlE Naturallil An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Aolion Employer Please respond to: Dave Parnell NCDENR/DEMLR Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-162 Should you have questions regarding these matters, please contact Dave Parnell at (919) 791-4200. Sincerely, L. F%oVey,yr., PE,/C I Engineer V Regional Office cc: Stormwater Permitting Program Files - with attachment DEMLR Raleigh Regional Office Files - with attachment DWR Raleigh Regional Office Files -with attachment City of Raleigh Stormwater Utility Division- with attachment 1628 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1628 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 One t Phone: 919-79IA2001 FAX: 919-5714718 NorthC1ro11❑a Internet hitp:portal. nity\Acden rmativ Action �%i�" tu"" ��lf An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer !4 l !i Permit: NCG200335 SOC: County: Wake Region: Raleigh Compliance Inspection Report Effective: 01/01/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Gimco Acquisition LLC Effective: Expiration: Facility: Gimco Acquisition, LLC 2310 Garner Rd Contact Person: Gregory W Brown Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 08/27/2013 Primary Inspector: David R Parnell Secondary Inspector(s): Title: Entry Time: 09:30 AM Raleigh NC 27610 Phone: 734-740-9514 Certification: Exit Time: 12:00 PM Phone: Phone: 919-791-4260 Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Wholesale Trade of Metal Waste and Scrap Stormwater Discharge CDC Facility Status: 0 Compliant ■ Not Compliant Question Areas: 0 Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 Permit: NCG200335 Owner -Facility: Gimco Acquisition LLC Inspection Date: 08/27/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: This facility was inspected after a report to DLR of an illicit discharge which flowed onto an adjacent property. DLR RRO reported that the clean up had been concluded. Page: 2 Permit: NCG200335 Owner - Facility: Gimco Acquisition LLC Inspection Date: 08/27/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ■ Cl ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The facility has a SP3 that was developed in the spring of 2013. A list of spills for the previous three years and documented records of employee training is not included in the plan but is required. Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: For previous monitoring periods the facility was not sampling all six of the outfalls. The monitoring period for the last six months of 2013 was conducted properly. Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: For the previous sample periods the facility was not sampling all six of the outfalls. It conducted the required outfall sampling in on June 2013. However the sample results were beyond benchmarks for many of the parameters at the outfalls. Above benchmarks at one or more of the outfalls included Cadmium, COD, Copper, Iron, Lead, Oil and Grease, TSS and Zinc. Please adhere to the requirements of the permit with respect to the Tier program. Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE Page:3 Permit: NCG200335 Owner -Facility: Gimco Acquisition LLC Inspection Date: 08/27/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? Comment: An illicit discharge of oil/water was reported to DLR RRO on 8/21 /2013. Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. handled the cleanup. The discharge was discussed during the inspection and prevention actions were suggested. Page: 4 A NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Land Quality Section Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM Director September 12, 2013 CERTIFIED MAIL #7012 1640 0001 9605 7874 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Paul Perrotti Raleigh Metal Recycling 2310 Garner Road Raleigh, NC 27610 Subject: Notice of Deficiency NOD-2013-PC-0361 Raleigh Metal Recycling NPDES Stormwater Permit NCG200335 Wake County Dear Mr Perrotti: Resources Pat McCrory, Governor John E. Skvarla, III, Secretary On August 27, 2013, Dave Parnell and Chris Pullinger, from the Raleigh Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR) conducted a compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) at your facility, located at 2310 Garner Road in Raleigh, North Carolina. The facility lies in the watershed of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Walnut Creek, Class C NSW waters, in the Neuse River Basin. The following observations were noted during the DEMLR inspection and file review: This facility is a scrap metal processing company, which has on -site tanks utilized for used oil and petroleum derived from junked vehicles. Andy Sanderson and you were on site during the inspection and provided valuable assistance to DEMLR staff. 1628 Mail service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628 Location: 3800 Barrett Dnve, Ralegh, North Carolina 27609 One Phone: 919-791 A2001 FAX: 919-571 A718 No rth C arol ina Internet: ppo:portaLncdenr mative M1ton El Nahma�ly An Equal OpportunirylAtirmative Action Employer K `Lt Stormwater run-off generated at such facilities is regulated by general NPDES stormwater permit NCG200000. The DEMLR Stormwater Program has issued certificate of coverage (COC) NCG200335. The permit was on site and current. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) was reviewed by DEMLR staff. The SPPP was developed during the first half of 2013 and satisfied most of the requirements of the permit. The plan lacked the following: documented employee training records and a list of significant spills - for the last three years. The monitoring reports were reviewed during the inspection. Prior to the last sampling period, only three of the six Stormwater Discharge Outfalls (SDO) noted in the SPPP were being monitored. During the last monitoring period, six SDO were monitored, qualitatively and analytically. Results from the last analytical monitoring indicated exceedences of benchmarks at one or more of the SDO, which were for Cadmium, COD, Copper, Iron, Lead, Oil and Grease, TSS and Zinc. The stormwater collection system location and the drainage area flowing to each SOO were reviewed during the inspection. Unfortunately, we were not able to determine the originating location of the stormwater, as it flowed to each SDO and then offsite. This will make the reduction of benchmark exceedences difficult to address, as you advance through the Tier system of your permit. Containment and storage of oils, fuels and other liquids were adequate, with respect to secondary containment. General housekeeping, within the shop, appeared to be adequate, as well. DEMLR Staff and Raleigh Metal Recycling staff discussed the cause and effect of an illicit discharge that was reported to DEMLR staff on August 23, 2013. The facility reports that measures have been taken to assure that no further spill such as the one noted, will reoccur. Requested response. You are directed to respond to this letter in writing to DEMLR at the address provided below within 30 days of receipt Please address the following items noted in bold: • Please fully develop the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan by placing a list of significant spills during the last three years, as well as documenting employee training annually. • The latest analytical monitoring indicated benchmark exceedences. Please adhere to the requirements of the NPDES permit with respect to the Tier program. • Please provide a final account of the illicit discharge which was reported to DENR on August 23, 2013. (It may be helpful if your consultant provides the report on your behalf). 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 One Phone: 919-791-42001 FAX: 919a71-4718 NorthCdCO�IIIa Internet httorpnity nA tlmative coon r/ Naturally An Equal Opportunity) Affirmative Action Employer K !bt Please respond to: Dave Parnell NCDENR/DEMLR Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-162 Should you have questions regarding these matters, please contact Dave Parnell at (919) 791-4200. Sincerely, L. NoVey, jr., PE� mal Engineer gh Regional Office cc: Stormwater Permitting Program Files - with attachment DEMLR Raleigh Regional Office Files - with attachment DWR Raleigh Regional Office Files -with attachment City of Raleigh Stormwater Utility Division- with attachment 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 One Phone: 919-79142001 FAX: 919-571-4718 NOrt�'1 CiirO/�/I ❑ a Internet pponunily htIp.pertaI.noJenr.org/webIIr` AdonlE �%1%jtlfl' llb( An Equal Opportunity 1 Affumative Action Employer Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCG200335 Effective: 01/01/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Gimco Acquisition LLC SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Gimco Acquisition, LLC County: Wake 2310 Garner Rd Region: Raleigh Raleigh NC 27610 Contact Person: Gregory W Brown Title: Phone: 734-740.9514 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 08/27/2013 Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM Primary Inspector: David R Parnell Phone: 919-791-4260 Secondary Inspector(s): Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Wholesale Trade of Metal Waste and Scrap Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant Question Areas: ■ Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: i A. Pernik NCG200335 Owner -Facility: Gimco Acquisition LLC Inspection Date: 08/27/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: This facility was inspected after a report to DLR of an illicit discharge which flowed onto an adjacent property. DLR RRO reported that the clean up had been concluded. Page: 2 Permit: NCG200335 Owner -Facility: Gimco Acquisition LLC Inspection Date: 08127/2013 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ Cl # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ At Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ■ Cl ❑ ❑ Comment: The facility has a SP3 that was developed in the spring of 2013. A list of spills for the previous three years and documented records of employee training is not included in the plan but is required. Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: For previous monitoring periods the facility was not sampling all six of the outfalls. The monitoring period for the last six months of 2013 was conducted properly. Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: For the previous sample periods the facility was not sampling all six of the outfalls. It conducted the required outfall sampling in on June 2013. However the sample results were beyond benchmarks for many of the parameters at the outfalls. Above benchmarks at one or more of the outfalls included Cadmium, COD, Copper, Iron, Lead, Oil and Grease, TSS and Zinc. Please adhere to the requirements of the permit with respect to the Tier program. Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE Page: 3 Permit: NCG200335 Owner • Facility: Gimco Acquisition LLC Inspection Date: 0812712013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? Comment: An illicit discharge of oil/water was reported to DLR RRO on 8/21/2013. Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. handled the cleanup. The discharge was discussed during the inspection and prevention actions were suggested. Page:4 Parnell, David From: Greg Brown [Browng@benlee.com] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:24 PM To: Parnell, David Cc: David Gibb Subject: Follow Up Attachments: storm10.14.13r1.pdf; storm. 10.14.13.pdf Note, the below is also coming via Overnight UPS pack Subject: NOD 2013-PC-0361 Mr. Parnell NCDENR/DEMLR Raleigh Regional Center 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-162, This is to respond to the letter of September 12, 2013 and signed for on the 16th that asked to address the items in bold. 1) Please fully develop the Storm water pollution Prevention Plan by placing a list of significant spills during the past three years, as well as documenting employee training. Address: A log form to record significant spills is now in the Dian book. Related. this email is serve to document that there have been zero significant spills during the past three years -see attached. Also, the documentation of "recent" training was in a different file and was not shown when asked to Andy Sanderson, whom you met with on 8/27/13. He was not working there in April, nor was the General Manager Paul Perrotti, so they were not aware that training had been done by Dennis Gehle, the General Manager of our Goldsboro Operation on April 12, 2013. Documentation of that training is now in the book. See attached. 2) The latest monitoring indicated benchmark exceedence. Please adhere to the requirements of the NPDES permit with respect to the Tier Program. Address We are adhering to the reauirements and are now treatina the site as a Tier 2. We are hiring a comoanv to do monthlv testing. (thev will take samples) because we want to ensure we are testing correctl 3) Please provide a final account of the illicit discharge which was reported to DENR on August 23, 2013. (It may be helpful if your consultant provided the report on your behalf). Address: See below email from the consultant with the `final' account of what Hiahland did that day. A complete analvtical report can also be sent if requested. Related significant remediation work was done since the event, which was witness by you and others during the tour of 10/6/13. More has been done since then and more continues to be done. Note the discharge was due to the our sm was water North. The onsite team, wanted to stop or slow this so they engaged a pump to take the water to the SOUTH, away from the property to the North. Note in a published article it was said "Workers had apparently been pumping the liquid onto a neighbor's property", which is not true. Also, we did not send, let alone we were never planing on sending more hazardous waste into the city's storm water pipes, which the article said the city was concerned about. Laslty, what we believe to be the causes of the petroleum have been addressed. From: Joe Beaman [mailto:JBeamanCalhesnc com] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:21 PM To:'asanderson@goldsboroscrapmetalrecycling.com'; poerrottiCalraleighscrapmetalrecycling.com Subject: Analytical data Good afternoon. We finally received all of the analytical data for the soil sample that we collected during our initial response activities. Only petroleum compounds were detected in the sample. Metals concentrations were very low, and well below hazardous waste standards. The hydrocarbons detected consisted of diesel range organics (at a concentration of 3400 ppm), and total oil and grease (at a concentration of 2320 ppm). Both diesel and oil and grease were well above their state action limits. Please contact me with questions or concerns. Joe � Highlands I Errvtronrcierttal Solutions, Frrc. Please visit our website at www.HESfast.com Joe Beaman, P.G., RSM Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. 8410-D Falls ofNeuse Road Raleigh, NC 27615 P — 919-848-3155 F — 919-848-4265 C — 919-414-7081 24-Hour Emergency Response: 1-855-HES-FAST (855-437-3278) Submitted by: Gregory Brown Raleigh Metal Recycling Goldsboro Metal Recycling "Excellence in Recycling and Services" "We Pay Cash for Your Metal Trash" Tel: 919-828-5426 Cell: 734-740-9514 Email: gbrown(cDraleighscrapmetalrecycling.com Web Addresses: www.raleighscrapmetairecycling.com www.goldsboroscrapmetairecycling.com Parnell, David From: Senior, Mark [Mark.Senior@raleighnc.gov] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 10:50 AM To: Bennett, Bradley; Holley, John; Smith, Danny Cc: Duffy, Peter; Rall, Todd; Boyer, Kevin; Parnell, David; 'Eric.Green @wakegov.com'; Fulton, Nicolette Subject: RE: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling Attachments: ATT00002.c; ATT00005.htm Hi folks. Just want to keep everyone up to date on this site. The operator has enlisted the local engineering firm McAdams to help them develop an appropriate stormwater management plan. Raleigh staff met with their representative, Amos Clark, yesterday to discuss our concerns with the site. I told him that there were other regulators involved at the state and county level and that any plan developed would have to be coordinated among the different agencies. It appears they will be proposing a plan with several large sediment type basins along with diversion features to direct all runoff from the site to the basins. They may also incorporate some kind of inverted outlet structure to contain petroleum products. My intent is to follow up with the operator to insure that a plan is developed and implemented in a timely manner. We may need to get together to discuss what kind of timetable is acceptable. We have collected one runoff sample from one outfall at the site and intend to collect at least one more from another outfall to verify what's in the stormwater leaving the site. I will provide that data when we receive it. As I noted in our meetings, I would highly recommend that this site be considered for an individual NPDES Industrial Stormwater Permit based on the amount of disturbed soil, the quantity and types of exposed materials, and the fact that it is a PCB and metals hazardous waste site with noted offsite contamination. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Mark Sr. Mark T. Senior, PE, Senior Project Engineer Stormwater Utility Division City of Raleigh Public Works Department PO Box 590 Raleigh NC 27602 Work Phone (919) 996-4012 Fax (919) 996-7633 Email mark. seniorCa raleighnc.gov www.raleighnc.gov From: Bennett, Bradley [mailto:bradley.bennett@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 4:38 PM To: Senior, Mark; Holley, John; Smith, Danny Cc: Duffy, Peter; Rall, Todd; Boyer, Kevin; Parnell, David Subject: RE: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling Mark Here is the most recent permit issued in 2010. Two files are attached, their cover letter and COC are in one and the permit is in the second file. The permit was first issued in 2001. Bradley Bennett Stormwater Permitting Program Phone: (919) 807-6378 NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Fax: (919) 807-6494 1617 Mail Service Center Email: bradlev.bennettencdenr.gov Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 1 Web: hftp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/stormwater Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws From: Senior, Mark [mailto:Mark.Senior@raleighnc.gov] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 11:20 AM To: Holley, John; Bennett, Bradley; Smith, Danny Cc: Duffy, Peter; Rall, Todd; Boyer, Kevin Subject: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling Hey guys, thanks much for meeting with us last week. I think that was very worthwhile in terms of everyone better understanding the different parties involved and their roles. City staff are discussing the issues we are having with this site with our attorneys and could really use a copy of their signed permit (or permit application) if you have it. We could also use any monitoring data associated with this site including any self monitoring data they may have supplied. Our plan is to collect and analyze samples from the site and we will forward that data to you when we have it. Our Fire Marshal is also looking into the site based on the kinds of material stored there. They are very concerned that this site could be hazardous to their responders. Thanks, Mark Sr. Mark T. Senior, PE, Senior Project Engineer Stormwater Utility Division City of Raleigh Public Works Department PO Box 590 Raleigh INC 27602 Work Phone (919) 996-4012 Fax (919) 996-7633 Email mark. senior(Qraleighnc.gov www.raleighnc.gov q1q-Su'1-1,378 DSMLR biz„l4y. hrl,,,tlCa nC�Mr,9°" .L7 dM44a �G/1n ��� Cy l rIWIIC"I�r• Dv, 111��I �M a Qr�� goy 9 i9 rtve �p2�D6L 9►q�i opu► Sgi4 �l�" , lSerJ 70y_ 377 8373 �a,� 11 El Actions to improve Storm Water Situation 7/20/14 Update Completed between 8/21/13 and 10/15/13 1. Pumped out water with residue from small storm water pond near Maintenance building, Rai 2. Made small pond larger near Maintenance Building, Rai 3. Removed dirt that had petroleum residue near Maintenance building, Rai 4. Added pipe elbow to outflow to keep residue on site in small pond near Maintenance building 5. Rebuilt water flow channel, near maintenance building, with internal dams, Rai 6. Installed barriers around channel to keep channel maintained, Rai 7. Replaced water flow pipe, from small pond in Maintenance area, to Northern property. Had been blocked, causing over land flow, Rai 8. Added significant rock over dirt to slow water and limit dirt migration to North overland, to the West of Maintenance Building, Rai 9. Cleared small pond near West of property to allow large pipe with elbow to flow when pond is high, to keep floating material on site, Rai 10. Placed booms at all outflows, including at some inflows, City, Rat 11. Began using only sealed boxes in Nonferrous area to stop residue from going in drain, Rai 12. Began policy of taking equipment out of service same day, if leaking, Rai 13. Moved steel turnings from SW corner of property to concrete pad and removed soiled dirt, Rai 14. Hired McAdams on 10/14 to advise on storm water issues 10/18/13 1. Implemented new policy of all electric motors and sealed units are stored inside (copper), Rai 2. Implemented new policy of all electric motors to be stored inside within 24 hours of being taken off incoming large equipment, Rai 3. Implemented policy of daily ensuring all copper wire removed from roadways, Rai 10/22/13 1. Fired General Manager of site that was responsible for hiring firm to power clean crane on dirt outside maintenance facility and did not see issue with building gutters allowing petroleum based material to flow out > of building with rain water. Key reasons for 8/21 issue, Rat 1 /27/13 1) Hired Baker Roofing redo gutters on building to stop issue in #1 in first section. Rai 12/11/13 1) Constructed new channel, stone lined by outflow #6 to reduce sediment leaving site, Rai 2) Had conference call to review 1 s' draft of McAdams report 3) Contacted Applied Polymer Systems, re Floc Logs, per McAdams. Was given name of local distributor - Green Resource and then call them about purchasing Floc Logs. 12/13/13 1) Fired Ferrous yard leader that was not being as responsive as he should have been, with leaks on equipment that was causing the need for clean ups, Rat 12/19/13 1) Installed dams in Outflow #3 channel, per McAdams 2) Date approx.-hired firm to install silt fence, N and W, per McAdams. Finish date target 1/10/14 12/23/13 1) Met with Floc Company, ordered units and took water samples. Delivery said to be 1-2 weeks 2) McAdams report issued with recommendations. Implementation began earlier, based on draft of 12/11/13 12/27/13 1) Completed redo of gutters on Maintenance Building, Rai 12/30/ 13 1) Added Boom to outflow pipe at outflow #2, Rai 1 /4/14 1) Completed construction of'siit' fence, along North side of property and West (were no wall), McAdam. 1/13/14 1) While all but outflow #2 Flocs were installed last week, #2 was installed, McAdam r30/14 ,) 1) Began, weekly inspection of all booms and inspection after every rain, Rai CONTINUED PAGE TWO 3/12/14 1) Asked Environmental Lawyer to see if we can breakout building a storm water pond West of building, from total site plan (which continues to be delayed) and implement it now (start in weeks), Ral -!13/14 1) Started new policy of no customers "breaking down" copper items in parking lot, effects outflow #1, Ral 2) Started new policy of no open trailers stored with material in parking lot, if rain, effects outflow #1, Ral 6/15/14-approx 1) Contracted to add curb to parking lot, which will have major reduction of sediment to outflow 1 2) Found two major roof gutters need to be reworked, replaced 6/30/14 1) Installed curb in parking lot -see above Week of 7/14/14 1) Replaced roof gutters in Nonferrous areas (D Tier' sf�,d ,r,—I r►,�n —,o rtiC I M cl5 �12tc ��a,i� i" �prnp�y 2�/° J Parnell, David From: Rall, Todd [Todd.Rall@raleighnc.gov] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 9:44 AM To: Smith, Danny; Parnell, David; Holley, John Cc: Fulton, Nicolette; Duffy, Peter Subject: Raleigh Metal Recycling Attachments: ATT00001.c; ATT00002.htm Gentlemen, Could you provide us a status on the temporary measures that were proposed for Raleigh Metals? Thanks, Todd Rall Senior Stormwater Engineer City of Raleigh 919-996-4006 todd.rall(@raleighnc.gov Ci 5 d c) r /2- 2� 3-,r,o V P ry--� ALL#1 OUTFALL02 OUTFALL 03 156 004DO 01113 01119 00980 01114 01094 D0530 0034D 00556 004D0 01113 Wig 00980 01114 01094 D0530 00340 00556 DD400 01113 01119 D0980 01114 01094 nd Taal Chemical Oil and Total Chemical Oil and ase P.H Cadmium Copper Iron Lead Zinc Total Susp.Sol Ox. Dem. Grease P.H Cadmium Copper Iron Lead Zinc Taal Soap. Sol Ox. Dem. Grease P.H Cadmium Copper Iron Lead Zinc ngll 6.0-9.0 s.u. .001mgn .007mgn NIA mgn .03mgn .067 mgn Rainfall 100mgn 120mgn 301mgn 6.0-9.0 s.u. .001mgn .007mgn NIA refill .03mgn .067 mg11 Rainfall 100mgn 120mgn 301mgn 6.09.0 s.u. .00lmgn .007mgn NIA mgn .03mgn .067 mgn 16 7 000359 0443 32.1 0.325 1.25 107' 850 270 10A 8.1 0,00862 0,994 39 0785 204 1.77' - 30 78 1.6 7.5 0,00177 0D474 175 0.0278 0.364 4 8.3 00059 0,932 55.8 0737 2.31 9' 300 210 6.37 82 0.D0534 0.649 30.4 0482 1.62 9' 19 130 4.08 7.7 0,00223 0.124 4.29 0,0752 0.715 January 31, 2014 No discharge M period of January 2 thru January 31, 2014 No discharge for period of January 2 thou January 31, 2014 A 8 0.0137 1.74 933 1.35 49 l' 120 560 43 83 0.00174 0.298 6.81 0,174 0626 1' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 7.6 0.00111 0.143 6.7 0,122 0,356 14 270 420 27.2 8.6 0.00362 0.453 19 0.369 1.24 14' 75 89 1.6 78 0.00216 0.108 7,19 0.1 0.781 269 75 0000612 0,112 238 005 0.16 15' 230 300 244 8.7 0,00245 0.404 14.3 0.304 0.82 1.5- 19 70 16 7.6 000102 0.0687 3.06 0.051 0.342 y 31, 2014 No discharge for period of May 1 thru May 31, 2014 No discharge far period of May 1 Nm May 31. 2014 ALL 94 i56 OD400 nd ase P.H ngll 6.09.0 au. 01113 Cadmium .001mg11 01119 Copper .007mgn 00930 Iron NIA mgn 01114 Lead .03mgn 01094 Zinc .067 mg11 Total Rainfall 00530 Taal Susp. Sol 100mg11 0034D Chemical Ox. Dem. 120mg11 OUTFALL95 00556 00400 Oil and Grease P.H 301mgn 6.0-9.0 s.u. 01113 Cadmium .001mgll 01119 Copper .007mgll 0093D Iron NIA mgll 01114 Lead .03mgn 01D94 Zinc .067 mg11 Taal Rainfall 00530 Total Soap. Sol 100mgn 0034D Chemical Ox. Dem. 120mgn OUTFALL06 00556 00400 Oil and Grease P.H 301mgn 6.0.9.0 sm. 01113 Cadmium .ODimgll 01119 Copper .007mg0 00980 Iron NIA mgn 01114 Lead .03mgn 01094 Zinc .067 mg 6 7.5 000194 00486 1,58 00221 1.21 1.77' 7.6 47 16 78 DD019 0,131 18 00226 0,234 1.07' 1400 350 3,67 8.6 0.00036 1.73 71.9 1.23 3.65 )9 7.6 000224 00439 2,23 00171 0.78 .9' 11 43 16 7.8 0.00259 0,194 3.04 00397 0.33 .9' 2600 550 7.31 8.5 0.0349 443 217 332 11 January 31, 2014 No discharge for period of January 2 thru January 31, 2014 No discharge for period of January 2 thou January 31, 2014 13 7.5 OD0171 0.0549 4.21 0.5 0.644 1 1 140 2.02 7.7 0.00209 0.0364 0.116 0.0021 0.223 1 900 220 5.61 9.2 000628 0.729 446 0.614 206 .7 85 0.00556 0.377 24 0.335 1.69 IA' 24 28 3.8 7.8 0.00151 0,0961 1.27 00179 0.231 1.4' 330 93 7.34 8.2 0.00361 0421 169 0,279 431 .4 7.7 0,0139 1.02 52.9 0.858 3.51 1.5' 43 55 1.6 7.7 0.00365 0346 9.13 00973 0.577 1.5' 31 51 37 86 0000535 0.0811 2.5 0.0333 0,153 y 31. 2014 No discharge for period of May 1 thru May 31, 2014 No discharge for period of May 1 thru May 31. 2014 �®1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 DIIee1eWWI111111111111111111111111111111111111111111ee111111111e111 oeeelee111e11eeeleeeeeeeelleeelleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeellellellllelleeeeeee BIIIIIIe111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 BIIn1u111111e111111111111111111111n111111111111111111111111111111111 D�O�D�D��DDDDD�O��O�O�OO����O�D��DD�DOOD�DOD�I10000000�UDO�O�ODOOO�OD�OC 9�DDO�DDDDDD000DOOO�OOOO��O�D��D�DO�D�DO�O�DOO��O�O�DDDDDOOOOOOOODODf�10� 91111111111111111111111111111111111111eeeen1111111111111nI11O1111111 ©eleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeleeelele1111eeeleeleeleeeleeelleeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeellelllll1111111ellelllellleeleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeleelle111111 DIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeleeeleeuellllll111111111ellleeleeeeeleeeeeeeeellelllel 91111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 eeleeeleeeeeleeellelllellellleleeleleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIee111e111ee BI111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 CIIIIIIIIIIIIIIu11u11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 oleelleeleeeeeeeelleleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeleelleelllllllelleeeeleeeeeeleeeeee IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlI11111eeeeeeeelelllee CIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIn1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII G1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ollllleeleeeleeeleleelelleeeeeeeeeeleeeeeeeeeeelleeelleeleeleeleeeeeeell Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllll .. R'FF'.FRCCRR;. OHMmHAAMA Parnell, David From: Bennett, Bradley Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 8:54 AM To: Parnell, David Subject: Raleigh metal Dave, Thanks for all your help on this one. I was wondering if you would mind checking with Raleigh Metal sometime and make sure that they send the monitoring data they have? 12 Bradley Bennett Stormwater Permitting Program NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources 1612 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 Phone: (919)807-6378 Fax: (919)807-6494 Email: bradley.bennettpncdenr.gov Web: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/stormwater Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws RALEIGH METAL RECYCLING STORM WATER SAMPLING REVIEW Date of 12/10/2013 1/30/2014 2/5/2014 3f7/2014 4/31/2014 5130/2014 Date of 11/112013 and 11/27/13 12/10/2013 1/31/2014 21512014 3f7/2014 4131/2014 5/30/2014 OUTFALL#1 00530 00340 00556 00400 01113 01119 00980 01114 01094 Total Chemical Oil and Total Susp. Sol Ox. Dem. Grease P.H Cadmium Copper Iron Lead Zinc Rainfall 100ma1I 120mall 301mall 6.0.9.0 s.u. .001mall .007mall NIA mall .03mall .067 mall .9' 680 290 94.4 8.3 0.0059 0.932 No discharge for period of January 2 thru January 31, 2014 1' 2000 730 44.4 8 0.0137 1.74 1.4' 75 59 3.8 7.6 0.00111 0.143 1.5' 68 32 2.89 7.5 0,000612 0.112 No discharge for period of May 1 thru May 31, 2014 OUTFALL#2 00530 00340 00556 00400 01113 01119 00980 Total Chemical Oil and Total Susp. Sol Ox. Dem. Grease P.H Cadmium Copper Iron Rainfall 100ma1I 120mall 301mall 6.0.9.0s.u. .001mg11 .007mall NIAmq 55.8 0.737 2.31 I I .9- 300 210 6.37 No discharge for period of January 2 thru January 31, 2014 93.3 1.35 4.9 1' 120 560 43 6.7 0.122 0.356 1.4 270 420 27.2 2.38 0.05 0.16 �1.5* 230 300 24.4 00530 00340 00556 00400 01113 01119 00980 01114 01094 Total Chemical Oil and Total Susp. Sol Ox. Dem. Grease P.H Cadmium Copper Iron Lead Zinc Rainfall 100mg11 120mg11 301mg11 6.0.9.0 s.u. .001mg11 .007mgll NIA mgll .03mg11 .067 mgll 1.77' 19 140 1.6 7.5 0.00194 0.0486 .9' 10 190 3.09 7.6 0.00224 0.0439 No discharge for period of January 2 thru January 31, 2014 1' 59 230 5.43 7.5 0,00171 0.0549 1.4' 240 130 14.7 8.5 0.00556 0.377 1.5' 550 470 16.4 7.7 0.0139 1.02 No discharge for period of May 1 thru May 31, 2014 1.58 0.0221 1.21 2.23 0.0171 0.78 No discharge for per 4.21 0.5 0.644 24 0.335 1.69 52.9 0.858 3.51 No discharge for period of May 1 thru May 31, 2014 8.2 0.00534 0,649 30.4 8.3 0.00174 0.288 6.81 8.6 0,00362 0.453 19 8.7 0.00245 0.404 14.3 OUTFALL#5 00530 00340 00556 00400 01113 01119 00980 Total Chemical Oil and Total Susp. Sol Ox. Dem. Grease P.H Cadmium Copper Iron Rainfall 100mg11 120mg11 301mg1l 6.0-9.0 s.u. .001 mg1l .007mg11 NIA mgll 1.77' 7.6 47 1.6 7.8 0.0019 0.131 18 .9' 11 43 1.6 7.8 0.00259 0.194 3.04 Dd of January 2 thru January 31, 2014 1 1 140 2.02 7.7 0.00209 0.0364 0.116 1.4' 2.4 28 3.8 7.8 0.00151 0.0861 1.27 1.5' 43 55 1.6 7.7 0.00365 0.346 9.13 No discharge for period of May 1 thru May 31. 2014 Parnell, David From: Greg Brown [Browng@benlee.com] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:24 PM To: Parnell, David Cc: David Gibb Subject: Follow Up Attachments: storm10.14.13r1.pdf; storm. 10.14.13.pdf Note, the below is also coming via Overnight UPS pack Subject: NOD 2013-PC-0361 Mr. Parnell NCDENR/DEMLR Raleigh Regional Center 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-162, This is to respond to the letter of September 12, 2013 and signed for on the 16th that asked to address the items in bold. 1) Please fully develop the Storm water pollution Prevention Plan by placing a list of significant spills during the past three years, as well as documenting employee training. Address: A loq form to record significant spills is now in the plan book. Related, this email is serve to document that there have been zero significant spills during the past three years -see attached. Also, the documentation of "recent" training was in a different file and was not shown when asked to Andy Sanderson, whom you met with on 8/27/13. He was not working there in April, nor was the General Manager Paul Perrotti, so they were not aware that training had been done by Dennis Gehle, the General Manager of our Goldsboro Operation on April 12, 2013. Documentation of that training is now in the book. See attached. 2) The latest monitoring indicated benchmark exceedence. Please adhere to the Jrequirements of the NPDES permit with respect to the Tier Program. Address: We are adhering to the requirements and are now treatinq the site as a Tier 2. We are hirina a companv to do mohthly testina. (thev will take samples) because we 3) Please provide a final account of the illicit discharge which was reported to DENR on August 23, 2013. (It may be helpful if your consultant provided the report on your behalf). Address: See below email from the consultant with the 'final' account of what Hiahland did that day. A complete analvtical report can also be sent if requested. -Related significant remediation work was done since the event, which was witness by you and others during the tour of 10/6/13. More has been done since then and more continues to be done. Note the discharge was due to the e that went from our small 'storm water pond to the North that was blocked. 're storm water pond filledi and was overflowing causing water to go over ground to the North. The onsite team wanted to stop or slow this so they engaged a pump to take the water to the SOUTH away from the property to the North Note in a published article it was said `Workers had apparently been pumping the liquid onto a neighbor's property, which is not true. Also, we did not send, let alone we were never planing on sending more hazardous waste into the city's storm water pipes, which the article said the city was concerned about. Laslty what we believe to be the causes of the petroleum=have been addressed. . ' From: Joe Beaman [mailto:JBeamanColhesnc.com] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:21 PM To:'asanderson@goldsboroscrapmetalrecycling.com'; pperrottiCalraleighscraometalrecycling. com Subject: Analytical data Good afternoon. We finally received all of the analytical data for the soil sample that we collected during our initial response activities. Only petroleum compounds were detected in the sample. Metals concentrations were very low, and well below hazardous waste standards. The hydrocarbons detected consisted of diesel range organics (at a concentration of 3400 ppm), and total oil and grease (at a concentration of 2320 ppm). Both diesel and oil and grease were well above their state action limits. Please contact me with questions or concerns. Joe a.,.a ISolutions, hsc. Please visit our website at www.HESfast.com Joe Beaman, P.G., RSM Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. 8410-D Falls ofNeuse Road Raleigh, NC 27615 P — 919-848-3155 F — 919-848-4265 C — 919-414-7081 24-Hour Emergency Response: 1-855-HES-FAST (855-437-3278) Submitted by: Gregory Brown Raleigh Metal Recycling Goldsboro Metal Recycling "Excellence in Recycling and Services" Y` �O "We Pay Cash for Your Metal Trash" Tel: 919-828-5426 Cell: 734-740-9514 Email: gbrown(cDraleighscrapmetalrecycling.com Web Addresses: www.raleighscrapmetairecycling.com www.goldsboroscrapmetaIrecycling.com i Parnell, David From: Greg Brown [Browng@benlee.com] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 3:51 PM To: Parnell, David Cc: David Gibb; todd.rall@raleighngov; Clark, A comark@mcadamsco.com); WToole@rbh.com, dnielsen@ aon ne.; Andy Sanderson (asanderson@raleighscrapmetalrecycling.com) Subject: RE: Follow Up Dave, I hired McAdams company this afternoon to build on the major work we have done in the past 6 weeks and help us do what we need done going forward. Note sure whom else needs to know, but thought I should tell you and Todd. I know what we have done already has had a major impact. We are working on more issues as we speak and I am sure with McAdams help we will have even more again. Greg Brown Raleigh Metal Recycling Goldsboro Metal Recycling "Excellence in Recvclina and Services" "We Pay Cash for Your Metal Trash" Tel: 919-828-5426 Cell: 734-740-9514 Email: gbrown(aDraleighscrapmetalrecycling.com Web Addresses: www.raleighscrapmetairecycling.com www.goldsboroscrapmetairecycling.com From: Greg Brown Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:24 PM To: david.parnell@ncdenr.gov Cc: David Gibb Subject: Follow Up Note, the below is also coming via Overnight UPS pack Subject: NOD 2013-PC-0361 Mr. Parnell NCDENR/DEMLR Raleigh Regional Center 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-162, This is to respond to the letter of September 12, 2013 and signed for on the 16th that asked to address the items in bold. i 1) Please fully develop the Storm water pollution Prevention Plan by placing a list of significant spills during the past three years, as well as documenting employee training. Address: A log form to record significant spills is now in the plan book. Related, this email is serve to document that there have been zero significant spills during the past three years -see attached. Also the documentation of "recent" training was in a different file and was not shown when asked to Andv Sanderson, whom you met with on 8/27/13. He was not working there in April nor was the General Manager Paul Perrotti, so they were not aware that training had been done by Dennis Gehle, the General Manager of our Goldsboro Operation on April 12, 2013. Documentation of that training is now in the book. See attached 2) The latest monitoring indicated benchmark exceedence. Please adhere to the requirements of the NPDES permit with respect to the Tier Program. Address: We are adhering to the requirements and are now treating the site as a Tier 2 We are hiring a company to do monthly testing (they will take samples) because we want to ensure we are testing correctly. 3) Please provide a final account of the illicit discharge which was reported to DENR on August 23, 2013. (It may be helpful if your consultant provided the report on your behalf). Address: See below email from the consultant with the `final' account of what Highland did that day. A complete analytical report can also be sent if requested. Related significant remediation work was done since the event which was witness by you and others during the tour of 10/6/13. More has been done since then and more continues to be done. Note the discharge was due to the pipe that went from our small storm water pond to the North that was blocked. The storm water pond filled and was overflowing causing water to go over ground to the North. The onsite team, wanted to stop or slow this so they engaged a pump to take the water to the SOUTH, away from the property to the North. Note in a published article it was said "Workers had apparently been pumping the liquid onto a neighbor's property", which is not true. Also, we did not send, let alone we were never planing on sending more hazardous waste into the city's storm water pipes, which the article said the city was concerned about. Laslty, what we believe to be the causes of the petroleum have been addressed. From: Joe Beaman [mailto:JBeaman(a hesnc.com] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:21 PM To:'asanderson@goldsboroscrapmetalrecycling.com'; PperrottiCobraleighscrapmetalrecyclino.com subject: Analytical data Good afternoon. We finally received all of the analytical data for the soil sample that we collected during our initial response activities. Only petroleum compounds were detected in the sample. Metals concentrations were very low, and well below hazardous waste standards. The hydrocarbons detected consisted of diesel range organics (at a concentration of 3400 ppm), and total oil and grease (at a concentration of 2320 ppm). Both diesel and oil and grease were well above their state action limits. 4► Please contact me with questions or concerns. Joe 4 � Highlands I Emlronmerrtal Sdutions, hic. Please visit our website at www.HESfast.com Joe Beaman, P.G., RSM Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. 8410-D Falls ofNeuse Road Raleigh, NC 27615 P — 919-848-3155 F — 919-848-4265 C — 919-414-7081 24-Hour Emergency Response: 1-855-HES-FAST (865-437-3278) Submitted by: Gregory Brown Raleigh Metal Recycling Goldsboro Metal Recycling "Excellence in Recycling and Services" "We Pay Cash for Your Metal Trash" Tel: 919-828-5426 Cell: 734-740-9514 Email: gbrownAraleighscrapmetairecycling.com Web Addresses: www.raleighscrapmetairecycling.com www.goIdsboroscrapmetalrecycIing.com 4 Mid -Atlantic Associates Field Notes Job Name: Date: Job Number: Technician: Task Number: Weather: Location: Arrival: Departure: D /Nip ¢Raze, &,,, egvzr" %/i-�212 �so1 r, 4Av 1264-(' PPP WCti- Jz,�K Qc,IC',,— Jinn .�G�ch �_ nco%n/,fad (&SI? 19 (9 70 -74?36 6 Gr%cam G%ePrr., e,;c. 5,,.,.. Q i.✓G�:c gov. Gvn.- y�y" '7`7S =.�/yy M���Y Ik'Aw H_ i bsodl s . h nwij) (� ncA.ni. ��U q0 _a -639,Y n �IpQ•C�N,� Equipment / Expendables Used: Page of Signature maafieldnotes.xl Parnell, David From: Smith, Danny Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:37 AM To: Bolich, Rick; Bennett, Bradley; Holley, John; Parnell, David Cc: Payne,John Subject: FW: Raleigh Recycling - 10:30 am June 25 This email is to confirm a meeting with Raleigh Metal Recycling for 10:30 on Wednesday June 25th at the RRO (see Mr. Toole's email below). • Also, we are schedule to discuss the Raleigh Recycling nov response during an internal pre -meeting on Monday at 3:00 pm at the RRO. Thanks! Danny Danny Smith Regional Supervisor Raleigh Regional Office NCDENR-Division of Water Resources 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 (919)791-4252 DannV.Smith@ncdenr.gov Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Low and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other reaulotion. From: Toole, William [mailto:WToole@rbh.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:20 PM To: Smith, Danny Subject: Raleigh Recycling - 10:30 am June 25 Danny —Thanks for your call yesterday. This is to confirm that Greg Brown (President, Raleigh Recycling), Dan Nielsen (MidAtlantic), Jon Aldridge (McAdam) and I will meet with you and your team 10:30 am June 25 in Raleigh. Please send me the address of the meeting place at your convenience. Thanks for your help in this matter. Bill William W. Toole Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson 101 North Tryon Street, Suite 1900 Charlotte, NC 28246 P: 704.377.8373 (direct) F: 704.373.3973 wtoole@rbh.com www.rbh.com This message is intended solely for the addressees and may contain information that is confidential and received this message in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail or telephone. If you have STATES k ;F al i U.S. POSTAGE>>PITNEY BOWES UNITED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 1 31 w!,-I-''I. REGION 4 '''{ t 0 ZIP 30303 $ O 48 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER r.t<€ '"+ ' G'•' • 02 1YV 0001387202MAY 06 2014 61 FORSYTH STREET, S.W. ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 OFFICIAL BUSINESS .PENALT.Y FOR PRIVATE USE, $300 o `1� Q 1_. .G G991 GO 1 99 Mr. John Holley Regional Engineering Supervisor, NC Department of Environment & Natural Resources 1601 Mai en e — tgh, NC 27699-1601 ,pli,III,IIdII,I++hllhl911r11lld,ydl4hllPll,II+1g111 I EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency PCB APPROVAL PUBLIC NOTICE FACT SHEET Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal, LLC (RRNCSM) Raleigh Metals Processors 2310 Garner Road, Raleigh, North Carolina EPA ID. NCD045915568 Why am I receiriag this Fnct Slteet? You have been designated through tax records that you own property within a'/ mile radius of this facility. The EPA wants everyone to be aware of the actions that are being proposed in order to have opportunity to learn more about the action and the permitting process. What isPCB? PCB stands for polychlorinated bipheny,I. PCBs area mamnade chemical that were manufactuied from 1929 until their manufacture was banned in'1979.PCBs - were used in hundreds of industrial and commercial applications before they.were banned. (i'.e. paint, plastics, and rubber products, pigments, dyes, and carbonless.copy paper), Information regarding PCBs may also be found online at the EPA website with the following, address: http://www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/tsd/pcbs/ Once in the environment. PCBs do.noticadily break down and therefore may remain for long periods of time. PCBs have a range oftoxicity and vary in consistency. PCBs have been demonstrated to cause cancer and other adverse health effects. Eor more information on the health effects of PCBs refer to the Agency for l oxic-Substances & Disease Registry at: http://www..atsdr..Cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tEasp?id=140&ti d=26 Background The Raleigh Metal Processors site (the site) is located at 2310 Garner Road in Raleigh, North Carolina, and has operated as a scrap metal recycling business since the 1940s. r' Nklj 1 . :! 0 The site is currently owned by Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal, LLC (RRNCSM). The site was entered into the North Carolina Inactive Hazardous Site Branch's Registered Environmental Consultant Program in November 2007. Both the State environmental agency and EPA have jurisdiction on the corrective actions performed at the site. Under the State Program, the site has undergone corrective action that have identified soils contaminated with PCBs as well as all other contaminants of concern identified at the site. Raleigh Metal Processors ongoing activities. At the facility in 2009, measures were completed to remove PCBs contained in shallow soil in some areas. Other areas were tested for PCBs. Based on the results of PCB testing, an excavation area was planned and corrective action was then performed. Soils were removed to an approximate depth of one foot and 1,326 tons of soil in the area were removed and transported to an offsite landfill that accepts PCB contaminated waste for disposal. After soil removal, soil replacement consisted of crushed concrete fill placed on top of a liner. After this action, the areas for outstanding regulatory action of remaining PCBs is approximately 7 acres in size. These areas were defined by having PCB concentrations above 1 mg/kg. PCB Risk -Based Cleanup and Disposal Approval EPA will have jurisdiction over the outstanding PCB clean-up and disposal activities. Before any other work can be performed on the PCB soils, a PCB Approval must be issued that identifies what is required. The draft approval that is the subject of this public notice identifies barrier restrictions, inspection requirements, recordkeeping requirements, and reporting requirements for the work to be' performed on the PCB soils. Additionally, the draft approval would require RRNCSM to adhere to its Spill Prevention, Control, and Response plan. The proposed remedy for soils exceeding 1 mg/kg total PCBs is to construct a barrier to human exposure. The protective barrier will consist of a fabric overlain by recycled concrete. In two areas near the southern property line existing concrete pads will be . used as the barrier. The shear in the west central portion of the site will also function as the barrier. The small accessible areas of PCB soil along the railroad tracks and the drainage ditch west of the site will be moved onsite where they will be covered by the protective barrier. After PCB soil is removed from the areas, soil samples will be collected. The results of the sampling will be used to determine if excavation activities are Sample liner installation over contaminated soil. The EPA has determined that implementation of the proposed remediation plan for the site in accordance with the approved Remedial Action Plan (Mid -Atlantic Associates, Inc., June 21, 2012), and the approval conditions established within the Approval will not pose an unreasonable risk of injury to human health or the environment. This draft approval shall become effective on the date of signature and shall expire ten years from the date of signature, unless revoked, suspended, or terminated in accordance with the approval conditions stated therein. Community Involvement The draft PCB Risk -based Cleanup/Disposal Approval is open for public comment from May 8, 2014 to June 12, 2014. All comments received by June 12, 2014 will be considered in the final decision to issue the Approval. The EPA will respond to all written comments submitted. Copies of the draft Approval and supporting documents (i.e., the Remedial Action Plan and the Approval request) are available for review in hard copy at the Southgate Community Library, 1601-14 Cross Link Road, Raleigh or online at http://www.epa.gov/region4/rcra/PublicNotices. htm. Comments are being accepted on the draft PCB Approval, not the supporting documents. Comments on any other contamination or other constituents at the site should be addressed to the State Project_ Manager, Mattlrew Aufman at (919), J07-8348. In order to give area residents an opportunity to meet and discuss the proposed PCB Approval, the EPA will hold Availability Sessions (Open House) on Tuesday, June 3, 2014 at 3:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. at the Garner Town Hall Complex, Building `B," 900 7°i Avenue, Garner, NC. Each session will start with a brief presentation to provide an overview of the PCB requirements. Following the presentation, an informal session will be held to provide opportunities to discuss and ask questions. EPA Contact for the PCB Approval: Terri Crosby -Vega Environmental Engineer RCRA Division US EPA Region 4 61 Forsyth Street SW Atlanta, GA 30303 E-mail crosbv-vega.terri a ena.eov (404) 562-8497 e=,.EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Availability Sessions (Open House) In order to give area residents an opportunity to meet and discuss the proposed Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) Approval for Raleigh Metals Processors located at 2310 Garner Road, Raleigh, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will hold Availability Sessions. Date: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 Time: 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Brief project presentation at 3:30 p.m. 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Brief project presentation at 6:30 p.m. The open house sessions will begin with brief presentations; the same information will be provided during the 3:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. presentations. We hope all residents who are interested will be able to attend one session or the other. Location: Garner Town Hall Complex Building `B" 900 7 " Avenue. Garner, NC Sponsor: United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Region 4 Format: Each session will start with brief presentations to provide an overview of the PCB requirements and the need for a PCB Approval. Following the presentation, an open house or availability session will be held. The availability sessions are opportunities for residents to discuss issues and ask questions one-on-one or in small groups with representatives from U.S. EPA and other project participants. The two public availability sessions will end promptly at their designated times of 5:30 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. Background Information: The Raleigh Metals Processors site is located at 2310 Gamer Road in Raleigh, North Carolina, and has operated as a scrap metal recycling business since the 1940s. The site is currently owned by Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal, LLC. Residents are encouraged to review the project documents available for review in hard copy at the Southgate Community Library, 1601-14 Cross Link Road, Raleigh. Information regarding PCBs may also be found online at http://www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/tsd/pcbs/. Contact: For additional information about the availability sessions, please contact: Terri Crosby -Vega, Environmental Engineer, RCRA Division, U.S. EPA Region 4 Phone: (404) 562-8497 or crosby-vega.terri@epa.gov Permit: NCG200335 Owner - Facility: Gimco Acquisition LLC Inspection Date: 08/27/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: This facility was inspected after a report to DLR of an illicit discharge which flowed onto an adjacent property. DLR RRO reported that the clean up had been concluded. Page:2 Permit: NCG200335 SOC: County: Wake Region: Raleigh Compliance Inspection Report Effective: 01/O1/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Gimco Acquisition LLC Effective: Expiration: Facility: Gimco Acquisition, LLC 2310 Garner Rd Contact Person: GregoryW Brown Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 08/2712013 Primary Inspector: David R Parnell Secondary Inspector(s): Title: Entry Time: 09:30 AM Raleigh NC 27610 Phone: 734-740-9514 Certification: Exit Time: 12:00 PM Phone: Phone: 919-791-4260 Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Wholesale Trade of Metal Waste and Scrap Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant Question Areas: 0 Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 I Parnell, David From: Greg Brown [Browng@benlee.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 8:11 PM To: Parnell, David Cc:' David Gibb; pperrotti@raleighscrapmetalrecycling.com; Andy Sanderson (asanderson@raleighscrapmetalrecycling.com) Subject: RE: Follow Up Attachments: rear mini pond.jpg, old turnings area.storm water.jpg Dave, While not an official part of the requested response, I wanted to let you know that we remain on path to hire a firm within the week of our meeting Monday to help us with Storm water issues. We are also looking to hire a firm to do the actual sampling of storm water. Also, see the attached. We are not waiting for any engineering firm. One photo is of the mini storm water pond by the back, by the rail road tracks. This was done yesterday. When you were here it was a watery pit, with a pipe in it with a bottom unknown. It is now cleared with the pipe exposed so oily water will stay in the pit onsite. Also on Friday we are installing an ninety degree "elbow" on the mini storm pond in the area where we had the issue, so any material that has a sheen will stay in the pit as well. Importantly though when all were here this week, you saw there was not sheen in this area. I have also attached a photo of the area where the messy turnings were. Greg Brown Raleigh Metal Recycling Goldsboro Metal Recycling "Excellence in Recvclina and Services" "We Pay Cash for Your Metal Trash" Tel: 919-828-5426 Cell: 734-740-9514 Email: abrown(aDraleiahscraometalrecvclina.com Web Addresses www.raleighscrapmetairecycling.com www.goldsboroscrapmetairecVcling.com From: Greg Brown Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 7:10 PM To: david.parnell@ncdenr.gov Cc: David Gibb; pperrotti@raleighscrapmetalrecycling.com; Andy Sanderson (asanderson@ra leighscrapmetal recycli ng.com ) Subject: Follow Up Dave, See below. Do you also need a hard copy of this delivered to the1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC address? Subject: NOD 2013-PC-0361 Mr. Parnell 1. re NCDENR/DEMLR ( r s Raleigh Regional Center 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-162, This is to respond to the letter of September 12, 2013 that asked to address the items in bold. 1) Please fully develop the Storm water pollution Prevention Plan by placing a list of significant spills during the past three years, as well as documenting employee training. Address: A log form, to record significant spills is now in the plan book. Related, this email is serve to document that there have been zero significant spills during the past three years. Also, we apologize. The documentation of "recent" training was in a different file and was not shown when asked to Andy Sanderson, whom you met with on 8/27/13. He was not working here in April, so he was not aware that training had been done by Dennis Gehle the General Manager of our Goldsboro Operation on April 12 2013. Documentation of that training is now in the book. 2) The latest monitoring indicated benchmark exceedence. Please adhere to the requirements of the NPDES permit with respect to the Tier Program. Address: We are adhering to the requirements. 3) Please provide a final account of the illicit discharge which was reported to DENR on August 23, 2013. (It may be helpful if your consultant provided the report on your behalf). Address: See below email from the consultant. A complete analytical report can also be sent if requested. Related significant remediation work was done since the event, which was witness by you and others during the tour of 10/6/13. From: Joe Beaman [mailto:JBeaman(@hesnc.com] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:21 PM To: 'asanderson@goldsboroscrapmetalrecycling.com'; pperrottiCalraleighscrapmetalrecvcling.com Subject: Analytical data Good afternoon. We finally received all of the analytical data for the soil sample that we collected during our initial response activities. Only petroleum compounds were detected in the sample. Metals concentrations were very low, and well below hazardous waste standards. The hydrocarbons detected consisted of diesel range organics (at a concentration of 3400 ppm), and total oil and grease (at a concentration of 2320 ppm). Both diesel and oil and grease were well above their state action limits. Please contact me with questions or concerns. UO ; A Highlands 1: r, Ernironrrrental Solutions, tnc. Please visit our website at www.HESfast.com Joe Beaman, P.G., RSM Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. 8410-D Falls ofNeuse Road Raleigh, NC 27615 P — 919-848-3155 F — 919-848-4265 C — 919-414-7081 24-Hour Emergency Response: 1-855-HES-FAST (855-437-3278) Submitted by: Gregory Brown Raleigh Metal Recycling Goldsboro Metal Recycling "Excellence in Recyclinq and Services" "We Pay Cash for Your Metal Trash" Tel: 919-828-5426 Cell: 734-740-9514 Email: gbrownAraleighscrapmetalrecvcling.com Web Addresses: www.raleighscrapmetairecycling.com www.goldsboroscrapmetairecycling.com _ he � 0 8 • J L � � - s' r "��` � `��'" f '6�S'� c'S• "�- j � ` "� Yfi`S4�:s- �° ° ,tx�'•+y � -A-. ���lyy�„ '2' ♦ a.. c ���_ yS� S Sbf��w, � •."��'K.✓.a .R `� 'X"�. y '�%r'r y<,�'{ -�+u���. �-' ' �S$� ,- �tr;;,. �1^�rS���i�3��eS,�r��Fl�i�p�b. tl. Y 4r •.YI�"J��iJ.�,yX"-�.y�:t 'r"� yt�Y .�...cq„1'•\y�a�. N ±+ �. '� .ice' "?Ti����y� ✓ � L+�-c��tj��1'aCr .".4/� �cyi.0 �'>i+4 �T>�°-{. y- rx w -> � Y./�'C/'� .r/ �.� ..ts�'.. n J• � P/Y ''�'� _ �� `Y ( �"1 w�r�.l u+t � �J^� .I � G.�:.�%',�-$�•���' Tr .• .�J�:. c � �r nS � .S'�`t �oT o �m �`^�. 3. a'r`Ar`r'Y�cj ,� °�� „ Fi ��`'.y z ��� .y, `, ,� �t•u�'�`*'Ad a4a,�, WfA � 'Y T 9/ � i� • o �� �m 1 � c y , L�a� 1� �"' A�C'��Y� �^`s �.� J ". r L 0''f>• � ,r.. t�.� 7� -�>? ir Ilk � G .' q e+ � � q r, x« +. i F � .s�To fi ✓ L1s- d) '^-pup, ,.�F "'�7t�,r � � 'C-'�`j '��r 2 ,�v.'. �i r. t--/ �"(�' v � Qy� � t }c � %�i•,Q�4�V'�t o"�''`..� _i{ -,S � � e��7Yr :Y.""r.•! '�}. ,.� \ � 'ra r+. n�'jn ' 'C�� I" ..'-� w7 .ia^wi � ��+.Y��•_ ^ .,�_ ;. - Il i, • r .IJ � • � l v.. -Q�u� •;h7'�o �T�rJU- . ��c: r^�' `�+. .ti rr�n'�'�•ti `Z1 't •� . _�., s .a q - t . ) T��� ate} S'i .�'. CV ' ,y ♦Y ... � �� � r °P y��"�;ff! .. � � ..i.y V 9 v9 � un c. � s r� r ✓ /- � � t f " e (� .^. t i. �i' '!r ��Y !. Q_. ` ? i .� Y /ice - ✓ _ � .r r . '�'Ea4r y r i'= l.._• � - :��� � .�•t�, ./�:k - ^+rv'�lt `, �,Ci � Y' '� �� � ,� .t��+�� � C ttµ y r�ry� ;ty •. :��-��` l4' .�r5t .. `^{.. � y �+4' +1. ` ). fl J� . � . ,r�.t.•ey�y'.o t C ��� . � � „ � �i• 'J� . -�� +�'� :i.•.��ry. . ••'£'i��•. �1..+1��..It/4" . ~.i� r r� `�Z. `'i����{�� ,_ � J�J r� �}� �,;��.�Pa�•f. - r :_`�'CYs: .w at•:YJi:�@�i-L _ . . •� on�i :1' �v,�li'�+�M1:.:I �3c:. -r 1 / .'�"';� i�e�Y_�rS-�c u1r'S m e` m InC. h ,r �`(1 All D r dy P 0 l O1 , 1 Y I µ ,J e t f it c NCG0200335 - Stormwater Permit Violations Options • Individual Permit Option - TMDL (11g) pathway (Permit Coverage) - Violation of applicable water quality standards (Part 1, Section A) Requiring Individual Permit- Discharger is a significant contributor of pollutants (Part III, Section B, 3a) Violation of the terms of the General Permit (Part 111, Section B, 3c) Required at Directors Discretion (Part I1I), Section B 3g) • Permit Conditions Violations Option 1- (DLR/DWR Joint Approach) Through Use of Part 1, Section B All Discharges in accordance with Permit Conditions Prohibits other point source discharge which causes standard violation Prohibits discharges determined to be Wastewater Through Use of Part III, Section A 2. - Duty to Comply - Must comply with all conditions of the General Permit Through Use of Part III, Section C 1. - Proper Operation and Maintenance • Permit Conditions Violations Option 2- Allowing the use of the permit for implementation of requirements of Tier Program - specifically Tier 3 Enforce downstream sediment monitoring & require measures to be installed / / / P / / / / / / / / / / / / r ____________- r } a8 I I ----- -_-_ --- _-j-=-==-- I - I I I I I I I I I I ID_ATLANTIC SEYMOUR BROWN INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. =>a:. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION I`v/■ ASSOCIATES, INC. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH METALS PROCESSORS ^ J RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA °®^ Engineering & Environmental Solutions SOIL EXCAVATION, BARRIER PLACEMENT .nef.+.�..aR.u,w..^a.ewen.n..rc..a m..va,�ma.�.i ..w.nv,.m.n.o+unc.aarrx.c swa r.mnniva.n m1m.,w+s.:rmra.s .maaccxs NEwcanr mavc,nim zwsnie assFmK we nsio rwc Nrslz»esso AND TREATMENT AREAS .1 ^ OOOR1869.00 3 Sampling. Raleigh metal will need to begin sampling stormwater discharges monthly, from July 2014 through construction efforts and then for 12 month after the completion barrier installtiona and stomwater pond installation. The following paramaters are to be sample: • On site rain gauge data (daily monitoring and recording) • Total Suspended solids, Turbidity, potassium, Cadmium, Chromium, Nickel, Lead, Zinc, Vanadium, Aluminum, Silver, Beryllium, calcium, Cobalt, Molybdenum, Antimony, Tin, Thallium, Titanium, Mercury, Lithium, Magnesium, Manganese, Sodium, Arsenic, Selenium , barium, base/neutral extractable organics TPH Diesel range Polychlorinated Biphenyl • The sampling results will need to be provided to DWRs and DEMLR monthly. • Outfall sample locations Sneed to YIdenhfy`�locahon(s)� This data will be used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed remedy and ongoing operation and maintenance expectations. Stormwater Pond. • Stormwater pond design(s) — Provide engineered sealed plans to DWRs and DEMLR by ���rN m -" Septembe`r1; 201'4, • Provide DWRs and DEMLR stormwater monitoring plan by Septemtiet" 1 20!1'4 for the stormwater pond influent and effluent. Using the abovementioned parameters, both the influent and effluent samples will need to be collected monthly. These results are to be provide to DWR and DEMRL monthly. • Operations and Maintenance (O&M) agreement that also includes the development of a plan for removal and testing of accumulated sediments from the stormwater basin must be developed. (parameters?) • Provide a written account detailing how drainage/stormwater/ and/or accumulated groundwater behind retaining wall located adjacent to the railroad spur, will be captured or prevented from discharging. Will this water be routed to the stormwater pond? What treatment will this pond provide? Provide DWRs and DEMLR this written account by Septemlieil 2014. If discharges occur after barrier placement monthly monitoring is required to continue to occur. 1W • Upon installation of the stormwater pond, Raleigh Metal will need to sample stormwater pond influent and effluent for one (1) year. This sampling must include the above mentioned parameters. Schedule (Starting July 1, 2014) • Monthly stormwater outfall monitoring beginning July 2014— July 2016. • Construction Drawings and Railroad Permitting —complete by September 1, 2014 (60 days) ��4`.?=Sedimentation�andaEiostonlControlPlan;�;sec�plan�approvahSeptemberkl r20;,14;(60. ORD • Contractor selection — complete by October 1, 2014 (90 days) • Site Demo/movement of onsite material December 1, 2014 (complete 150 days) • Barrier Placement, permanent Stormwater Basins installation April 12, 104 (270 Days) Your letter states that new stormwater retention ponds will contain plants that will be "selected for their propensity to assimilate metals". Please provide more detail about the species of plants to be used, their compatibility for use in stormwater retention ponds, and their ability to remove the specific contaminants noted in the on -site stormwater. The proposed schedule for the implementation of stormwater control measures related to the June 21, 2014 Remedial Action Plan for the PCB contaminated soil may be adequate to address the PCB contaminated soil contamination under the DWM IHSB program, but this does not relieve you of your obligations to stop stormwater contaminated by current waste handling activities on site that have resulted in the contravention of state surface water quality standards. Please provide a clear schedule with dates detailing your proposed corrective actions to mitigate the on -going surface water quality standard violations such that these violations do not continue to occur. The remedial action plan that you submitted to DENR's Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch and to the EPA does not in any way relieve you of your obligations to control pollutants that are generated and discharged by your current waste handling practices. Parnell, David From: Aufman, Matt Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 8:12 AM To: Senior, Mark; Matthew Starr (Upper Neuse River Keeper 2013) (matthew@neuseriver.org); George Matthis (River Guardian) (george@riverguardfdn.org) Cc: Fulton, Nicolette; Holley, John; Smith, Danny, Bennett, Bradley; Randall, Mike; Eric Green (eric.green@wakegov.com); Parnell, David; Kenneth Rhame (EPA) (Rhame.Kenneth@epa.gov); Boyer, Kevin Subject: FW: Proposed Cleanup for PCBs, Raleigh Metals Recycling, Raleigh, NC Mark/All- I have received the City of Raleigh's comments on the proposed containment remedy for the site. I wanted to share with everyone the comments the REC program sent to the EPA regarding the remedy. Please note that the REC has not submitted the final containment remedy for our concurrence, following comments that were submitted to the REC on October 4, 2013. Matt Matthew Aufman Phone: (919) 707-8348 http://portal. ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/recprog ram From: Aufman, Matt Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 4:16 PM To: 'Crosby -Vega, Terri' Cc: Feely, Ken; Holtzclaw, Brian; 'dnielsen@maaonline.com'; Caulk, Kim Subject: Proposed Cleanup for PCBs, Raleigh Metals Recycling, Raleigh, NC Hi Terri - I received a copy of your Public Notice, the Fact Sheet, and the proposed Cleanup for PCBs at the Raleigh Metals Processors Facility on May 6, 2014. Upon review, I have a few comments and clarifications regarding the documents. • The Public Notice states that the Administrative Agreement (AA) executed on November 28, 2007 was between the NCDENR Registered Environmental Consultant (REC) Program and Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal, LLC (RRNCSM). The 2007 AA was actually executed between the REC Program and Seymour Brown Investment Company, not RRNCSM. A new AA between the REC Program and RRNCSM was executed on April 17, 2014. • The Public Notice references the June 21, 2012 Remedial Action Plan (RAP) prepared by Mid -Atlantic Associates. In the REC Program, all draft RAPS must undergo a 30-day public notice period before the REC may certify the RAP as complete. A final RAP has not been submitted by the REC and has not been through the public notice period; therefore a final RAP has not been approved and certified by the REC as complete. • The Public Notice states that " The Inactive Hazardous Site Branch's (IHSB) RECP is responsible for the remediation for soil and groundwater for all constituents except PCBs. The EPA is responsible for the PCB remedial activities and will address only the requirements for PCBs in the proposed Approval." Similar to work performed under CERCLA, remediating parties (RPs) may have to meet the substantive requirements of permitting regulations (or obtain a permit). In this case the EPA may permit and approve PCB remediation activities. However, this remediation project is being conducted under the state's IHSB Response Act and REC regulations. Thus, the Division of Waste Management also hasjurisdiction for the PCB remediation at this site and are responsible for the cleanup of the entire site, including PCBs. The IHSB will be overseeing the long-term cleanup of all media and the monitoring and maintenance of the Land Use Restrictions (LURs) described in the draft RAP. • Page I of the Fact Sheet states "EPA will have jurisdiction over the outstanding PCB clean-up and disposal activities". See previous comment on jurisdiction. The fact sheet indicates that implementation of the approved June 21, 2012 RAP will not pose an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment. As stated above, the June 21, 2012 RAP is a draft and has not been approved by the REC. At this time, to ensure information provided to the public is clear and accurate, please contact us prior to any mailings that mentions our agency's personnel so we can review the details. Section A (1)(c) of the Draft Approval (Approval Conditions) discusses jurisdiction of the PCBs and other contaminants. See the previous comment onjurisdiction. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me. Regards, Matt Matthew Aufman Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch - REC Program NCDENR - Division of Waste Management 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Phone: (919) 707-8348 matt.aufman(ncdenr.gov http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/recprogram Parnell, David From: Senior, Mark (Mark.Senior@raleighnc.gov] Sent: Friday, June 13. 2014 3:33 PM To: Matthew Starr (Upper Neuse River Keeper 2013) (matthew@neuseriver.org); George Matthis (River Guardian) (george@riverguardfdn.org) Cc: Fulton, Nicolette; Holley, John, Smith, Danny; Bennett, Bradley; Randall, Mike; Aufman, Matt; Eric Green (eric.green@wakegov.com); Caulk, Kim; Parnell, David; Kenneth Rhame (EPA) (Rhame.Kenneth@epa.gov); Boyer, Kevin Subject: FW: City of Raleigh Comments on PCB Approval for Raleigh Recycling INC Scrap Metal, LLC - EPA ID NCD045915568 Attachments: ATT00002.c; ATT00003.htm Matthew/George; since you shared your comments I thought I would share ours with you as well as the State and County. Thanks, Mark Sr. From: Senior, Mark Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 4:12 PM To: Crosby -Vega, Terri Cc: Fulton, Nicolette; Rall, Todd; Duffy, Peter; Boyer, Kevin; Kirsch, Daniel Subject: City of Raleigh Comments on PCB Approval for Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal, LLC - EPA ID NCD045915568 Ms. Crosby -Vega; Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the PCB Approval for the above referenced site. City of Raleigh staff has reviewed the Approval and would like to offer the following comments: 1. The City of Raleigh supports the PCB Approval for the installation of a barrier to prevent human exposure. Because it has been confirmed that PCB's are currently leaving the site, contaminating adjacent properties, and entering surface waters in concentrations that exceed State standards, the City would encourage EPA and the State to do whatever they can to expedite the implementation of this plan to protect the health and welfare of the citizens of Raleigh. 2. Since this is an active site with exposed soil and it will be some time before the proposed barrier is in place, we would encourage EPA and the State to require the implementation of interim measures to insure that PCB's and other contaminants remain within the site until such time as installation of the barrier is complete. 3. We would recommend that compliance with the remediation plan be incorporated as a requirement of the site's NPDES Industrial Stormwater Permit so that failure to comply with the plan would constitute a violation of the NPDES Stormwater permit. Sincerely; Mark T. Senior, PE, Acting Stormwater Manager Stormwater Division of the City of Raleigh Public Works Department Robinson Bradshaw May 2, 2014 VIA EMAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL Danny Smith Regional Supervisor Water Quality Operations, Raleigh Regional Office North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 William W. Toole chadocto Office 704.377.8373 Direct Phone 704.373.3973 Direct Fax wtoole®rbh.cam Re: Notice of Violation NOV 2014-PC-0047 dated March 27, 2014 ("NOV") 2310 Gamer Road Wake County Response of Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal LLC ("Raleigh Recycling") Dear Mr. Smith: This firm represents Raleigh Recycling with regard to the NOV. This letter and the attachments are timely submitted in response to the NOV that Raleigh Recycling received on April 3, 2014. As requested in the NOV, this response includes the following: (i) a comprehensive plan to stop pollutants from discharging from the site into surface waters; (ii) a plan to stabilize the site such that infiltration, erosion and pollution will be addressed to prevent ongoing transport of contaminants to surface waters of the state; and (iii) an implementation schedule. On April 23, 2014 an entity related to Raleigh Recycling obtained control over the site from the previous owner and operator, allowing Raleigh Recycling to speed the responses necessary to stop pollutants from discharging from the site. As detailed below, Raleigh Recycling proposes a comprehensive approach that will stabilize PCB and metals contaminated soils with a cover expected to be 95% impervious, treat soils with excessive metals contamination, and install two stormwater ponds designed to manage site stormwater from 14.5 acres of the site, essentially all but a minor gravel parking lot. Raleigh Recycling will then evaluate discharges from this holistic system and make additional improvements as necessary and appropriate to meet stormwater discharge requirements. Such additional measures might include some combination of direct treatment of stormwater prior to discharge from the site. 4751031A 19853.00020 Robinson Bradshaw 6 Hinson, PA I Attorneys at Law 1%101 North Tryon Street, Suite 1900 a Chadotte, NC 28246" 704,377.2536 Chacecto a Research Triar4e 4 Rock HM Danny Smith May 2, 2014 Page 2 I. Current Efforts A. April 23, 2014 Purchase of Site Raleigh Recycling has proceeded aggressively and through a related entity bought the site so as to speed efforts to address problems it did not create. These problems are the result of historic activities dating back to the 1940's that were undertaken by previous site owners and operators, primarily Seymour Brown Investment Co., Inc., formerly named Goldsboro Iron and Metal ("SBIC") which acquired the property in 1968. Raleigh Recycling, formerly known as GIMCO Acquisition LLC, first had dealings with the site when it purchased certain operational assets, but not the land nor responsibility to respond to historic contamination, from SBIC on August 3, 2007. Raleigh Recycling never had any control over SBIC operations and, until April 23, 2014, neither owned the site nor had the right to implement necessary cleanup to control the legacy contamination affecting storrrlwater discharges from the site. Nonetheless, Raleigh Recycling Scrap Metal NC LLC, an entity related to Raleigh Recycling, purchased the site on April 23, 2014 so that the measures necessary to address the historic contamination could be implemented aggressively. B. Identification of and Proposed Response to Historic Contamination 1. Comprehensive Identification of Historic Contamination Before its purchase of operational assets in 2007, Raleigh Recycling identified to SBIC site contamination that has affected stormwater discharges from the site. In August 2010 Mid - Atlantic Associates submitted to North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch — REC Program, a comprehensive remedial investigation report that identified the vertical and horizontal extent of the historic contamination ("RI"). The RI may be downloaded from the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch portal at https://edm.nc.gov/DENR-Portal/ and referencing Site ID NCD045915568. That historic soil contamination included lead, cadmium and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), constituents which the Water Quality Operations of DENR identified in the stormwater discharge from outfall 4 (retaining wall outlet). The PCBs were introduced in connection with a transformer cracking operation that SBIC operated during the 1960's. Raleigh Recycling has never allowed PCBs to be transported to the site and since becoming an operator in 2007 has maintained a strict screening process to prevent PCBs from being introduced to the site. 2. Historic Contamination is Primary Source of Stormwater Exceedances PCBs do not appreciably dissolve in water. Instead, they tend to adhere to soil. This means that PCBs become mobile only to the extent the soils to which they have adhered become mobile. Similarly, the metals identified in the stormwater discharges are not particularly soluble in water. The characteristics of these constituents are such that the primary source of stormwater exceedances is likely to be contaminated site sediments that are caught up in stormwater, not 4751031v4 19853.00020 Danny Smith May 2, 2014 Page 3 stockpiled scrap. In fact, turbidity sampling conducted by Water Quality Operations staff in connection with the NOV identified high levels of sediments at outfall 4 and demonstrated that as turbidity decreased further downstream from the outfall, so did levels of metals and PCBs in the stormwater samples analyzed. 3. Proposed Response will Stabilize Site Raleigh Recycling regularly pressed SBIC to develop and implement a comprehensive response to the legacy contamination at the site. In April 2012 SBIC submitted its Revised Containment Remedy Proposal (April 3, 2012) to the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch, and later in June 2012 SBIC submitted the Remedial Action Plan (June 21, 2012) to Region 4 of the Environmental Protection Agency. These documents describe a remedial action plan to install a cover over those areas with soils contaminated by PCBs higher than 1 ppm (approximately 9 acres of an operating yard comprised of roughly 14.5 acres). The cover would consist of geotextile fabric overlain by approximately 12 inches of recycled concrete or aggregate base course cover. Small volumes of soil with high levels of metal contamination that are not amenable to fixing (e.g., soils with concentrations of lead over 10,000 mg/kg) would be excavated and disposed off -site in a permitted landfill. Remaining site soils contaminated with metals at levels that could to leach into water would be amended with a fixing agent to prevent leaching. These metal -contaminated soils are generally located within the upper two feet of the soil and coincident with the PCB contaminated soils that would be subject to the protective barrier. The Revised Containment Remedy Proposal (April 3, 2012) may be downloaded from the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch portal at https://edm.nc.aov/DENR-Portal/ and referencing Site ID NCD045915568. I understand you have already received access to the Remedial Action Plan from Mid -Atlantic Associates. If not, let me know and I will make the necessary arrangements. The protective cover will stop contamination of stormwater associated with turbidity by preventing mobilization of contaminated soils into sediment. The metal excavation and fixing process will also stop those metals contaminated soils from contributing to stormwater exceedances. The cover is predicted to be 95% impervious, and as such the volume of stormwater permeating through the cover and coming into contact with site soil will be limited. C. Obtaining Required State and Federal Approvals for Response to Historic Contamination The remedial action described above has been approved in concept by both DENR's Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch and Region 4 of the Environmental Protection Agency. The required formal approval by EPA had been delayed for over 18 months, until Raleigh Recycling was able to assert control over the regulatory negotiations from which SBIC had previously excluded Raleigh Recycling. EPA has now committed to make approval issuance a priority and plans to initiate mandatory 30 day public notice on May 12. Once the EPA approval has been obtained, Raleigh Recycling will seek the required formal DENR approvals, which also involve mandatory public notice and comment periods. 4751031v4 19853.00020 Danny Smith May 2, 2014 Page 4 Il. Two Stormwater Management Ponds The remedial action plan submitted by SBIC did not include any stormwater management ponds, though a small pond was contemplated by Raleigh Recycling in the northeast portion of the site. After receiving the results that accompanied the NOV, and in connection with obtaining control over site remedial efforts, Raleigh Recycling engaged McAdams Co. to design permanent stormwater control devices that would augment the site stabilization to be performed by the protective cover. In order to assure a comprehensive solution to controlling contaminant loading in stormwater discharges from the site, McAdams proposes the installation of two stormwater management ponds along the western boundary of the property that will control discharges from over 14.56 acres of the 18.64 acre site. A large portion of existing discharges to outfall numbers 2 and 6 will be re-routed to the stormwater ponds, and outfall 4 will be eliminated. These ponds are designed to control stormwater from a 100% impervious drainage area during 100 year storm events. The ponds will include plants required for erosion control purposes. These plants will also be selected for their propensity to assimilate metals. A detailed description of McAdams' two -pond concept to manage stormwater is attached. III. Evaluation and System Improvements as Appropriate Within 90 days after the site has been stabilized with the protective cover, the soil with excessive metals contamination fixed, and the stormwater ponds installed and functioning, Raleigh Recycling will evaluate stormwater discharges to determine what, if any, additional controls and polishing of discharges will be necessary and appropriate to avoid exceedances. These improvements could include direct treatment of stormwater discharges by installing polyacrylamide (Floc Logs(D by Applied Polymer Systems) upstream of the forebay for each stormwater pond; or filtration between pond risers and pond outfalls. Until the holistic system is in place and operating, it is not possible to determine what, if any, additional measures may be necessary and effective. IV. Schedule of Specific Milestones Attached please find a schedule of specific milestones for implementing the system. This schedule has been prepared based upon the experience and expertise of McAdams and Mid - Atlantic Associates in such matters. Where possible, activities will be conducted concurrently to shorten the duration of project implementation. * e x Raleigh Recycling has moved aggressively to seize control over the implementation of measures necessary to eliminate stormwater discharge exceedances and to stabilize the site. Since 4751031 v4 19853.00020 Danny Smith May 2, 2014 Page 5 obtaining control, there has been identifiable progress. Raleigh Recycling is committed to managing this site in a responsible manner. We look forward to your review and approval of the comprehensive, holistic approach that has been designed and submitted. Sincerely, ROBINSON BR/nA/DSHHAAW & HINSON, P.A. William W. Toole W WT/tbm Attachments cc: Gregory M. Brown (Raleigh Recycling NC Scrap Metal LLC) Nicolette Fulton, Esq. (City of Raleigh) Daniel H. Nielsen (Mid -Atlantic Associates) Jon Aldridge (McAdams) 4751031 v4 19853.00020 FINAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ®SUMMARY On March 27, 2014, a Notice of Violation (NOV) was issued by the North Carolina Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (DEMLR). The NOV stated that exceedances existed for lead, cadmium, mercury, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), nickel, copper and zinc for stormwater runoff on the western portion of the Raleigh Metals Site (Outfall #4). This narrative and the attached conceptual plans provide detail for the proposed stormwater management measures that will be put in place to control sedimentary runoff and contaminants to meet applicable stormwater discharge standards. ®DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED MEASURES There are six existing stormwater outfalls onsite. These outfalls are shown on the attached conceptual plans. The proposed stormwater management plan includes a variety of measures including the placement of a cover over much of the site to stabilize contaminated sediment, installation of two large ponds and rerouting of storm drainage to minimize the number of outfalls present onsite. After construction of the proposed stormwater management plan, approximately 85% of the site will be directed to one of the two stormwater management facilities. Please refer to the attached conceptual plans that detail the proposed measures and drainage areas for each of the outfalls described below. A conceptual plan of the existing conditions is provided as well. COVER STABILIZING SITE A cover will be installed over approximately nine acres of the site in those areas with soils contaminated by PCBs higher than 1 ppm. Metal -contaminated soils are generally located within the upper two feet of the soil and coincident with the PCB contaminated soils that would be subject to the protective cover. The cover would consist of geotextile fabric overlain by approximately 12 inches of recycled concrete or aggregate base course cover. OUTFALL #1 The drainage area for this outfall consists primarily of the northeast parking lot. Please note that no operational procedures are performed in this area. Inlet protection is proposed at each inlet in this area. Additionally, silt fence is proposed on the north side of the parking lot (recently installed). Both measures will aid in controlling sediment laden water from flowing to downstream properties. OUTFALL #2 A large portion of the existing drainage directed to this outfall will now be directed to the North Pond at Outfall 43. There will be a small amount of area that will still sheet flow to this outfall. However, silt fence is proposed to handle any sediment laden water. OUTFALL #3 To control contaminants at this discharge point, a stormwater management facility (North Pond) is proposed. This facility will collect approximately 5.5-acres of drainage, and as stated above, will treat the majority of the existing drainage to Outfall #2. The North Pond is designed such that it Raleigh Metal Recycling May 2, 2014 9 MCADAMS I controls and provides a 2-day drawdown of the 1" water quality storm event for the associated drainage area. The proposed facility is designed such that peak flow rates at the outfall do not exceed the pre -development condition for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events. The facility includes several measures to help control sediment and contaminants. These measures include riprap berms, a skimmer attached to the outlet structure, and plantings that provide uptake of metals. A detailed cross-section of this facility is provided on the conceptual plans provided. OUTFALL #4 This outfall will be eliminated and the entirety of the existing drainage directed to this outfall will now be directed to the stormwater management facility at Outfall #5. OUTFALL #5 To control contaminants at this discharge point, a stormwater management facility (South Pond) is proposed. This facility will collect approximately 9-acres of drainage and includes portions of the existing drainage to Outfalls #2, #4, and #6. The proposed facility is designed such that peak flow rates at the outfall do not exceed the pre -development condition for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events. The facility includes several measures to help control sediment and contaminants. These measures include riprap berms, a skimmer attached to the outlet structure, and plantings that provide uptake of metals. OUTFALL #6 A large portion of the existing drainage directed to this outfall will now be directed to the South Pond at Outfall #5. There will be a small amount of area that still drains to Gamer Road. Inlet protection will be used in this area. ® MAINTENANCE, MONITORING, & FURTHER CONTROL. MEASURES A component in the performance of the stormwater measures provided is maintenance. It is recommended that each of the practices provided be inspected monthly or after each significant rainfall. Sediment shall be removed in each of the basins routinely and disposed of properly. Detailed operations and maintenance manuals will be provided to the owner at the time of final approval. Routine monitoring will be conducted at each outfall in connection with applicable NPDES Permit requirements. This will help in determining the effectiveness of the measures proposed. Although we feel that the stormwater management plan proposed is adequate, additional modifications may be needed to further enhance the proposed measures ability to remove contaminants. Depending upon the results of 90 day post -implementation monitoring and evaluation, additional improvements may be necessary and appropriate. These include covering all or a portion of the operating site with an impervious cover, installing-polyacrylamide (Floc Logs® by AppliedPolymerSystems) upstream of each of the forebays for the stormwater ponds, and installing filtration devices immediately downstream of the ponds. Raleigh Metal Recycling May 2, 2014 9MCADAMS 2 We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project, and look forward to beginning work as soon as possible. Sincerely, THE JOHN R. MCADAMS COMPANY INC. .•" Jon Aldridge, PE Project Manager Water Resources and Infrastructure SEAL. 33782 A. L rAAY 14 Raleigh Metal Recycling May 2, 2014 'J MCA DA M s 3 c= "-------- % ~ \ P , ', ail+ 1 N �- �Vi 75="1 - • i\ ; ,��',,-_� •x` 'i• • _ ; __�__�=-'a pow \ .� ICI \ •__ ' {li `� :��"'-•. \ • /; :._, y--'' � - - �k _- ¢'��" _,=�'" � 1 ``'\ ',I V A A ' A •rr �__- '�i'i',i � � � .: � �� / BSI ', 'i \ I' ___�.� , •r•�•// �'••�•` , 1 1 �rr•r � _ _ _ 11 ' Ii ii irr: ,, J _ ,III C 1'I I \ •�• r r••! ,•,� i�!r `•------ -'-- \ Ik Ord, • %// . ,' d I'il I` _ all • I 11 �/J —! v • II /�s,h / _ ____y cnnYere •• •i '\' ice`-�i P�frr III �l 10 a s�lj 1 �— �' S S 1 RALEIGH METAL RECYCLING M�ATER19" •M♦AIAGM PIANS ��JAF­ RPLP.IC.N NR.1L RP.CYCLIAC RnL21cx, n'omx c.wauIA 27610 McADAms "•"a.r 9 g eusmvo corromory nwry somuanm.aen_r� �. nY5 xAu:¢n utaAL xeoxum 2]IO CARN[R ROAD RA�x�m�. Nc el.�. MCADAMS w� m — PLAN & PROFILE xmm�wm RALEIGH METAL RECYCLING STORMWA7ER MANAGEMENT PLANS xumon. xoxni cAwmuA P-' JM AaaAxx I a I ------------- 1 _ � 1, �\ • _" tl ���1t �y�y n1, 2@' 'L"�+��Y t'� µ�,y '�\. "m��i � , �. �I , , I 1 � �� 1F � � fin A trA `L �%Ab'i��i .�a ,h • Pl � / \ > 1 � "• `° .0.r t !(- \��a' Y � � �„� � ram. % ��qqpp¢y ��� ___- •�'� / ,'i ,'' it ��Is 'r _'a�'/,,�li \ Illli r / � ••• Y�14,1i��'lyr�,y� a�'%`,�}, ' / I•. i' v�� ��� r'� �"_ � �I� "\.. f. j�,�l •• , jL ,U;r ` C� „74t tHft`,�( UTI\ ', ; r i' I U)*y'f 'i � `�'`., ,• /' 'I \ • I Kim •.� - •� ,Y 11 .. U>✓1`A ,.4 �,.`�i 1�G'!4�1 � .' l i �^��^— �9�� Nv �� ,� s. '� • � II ��, • I� r 'aP " • i I ' I/ _ I i � I Y Sry �!1�1.y�.�y��`F:� �•• 11� ___,` ( �•' II III � / � � .....a•..........•• P1� aQ\\ •• 11 � `` o `- L II I � � it i ii I '� .� .• •r' f \ \ �,I,� ___ £ _ cnky •• • -\'p-\•fit_ I '( �1{•• ' II �' 11 �. �`�__�_T�/ �_�_ €,\`__ ea xone •i ��+:.•.I ©�G3 ••Y� I �/ � Iit '`� B N s n rit 'A d f "� Rp� SIGH METAL RECYCLING S[ORMWAIER MANAGEMENT PIM'S �wncx nvmr cwwmn •N^L 2310 GARNER ROAD "Nf. .1cx, NO. cA.OUNe MCADAMS .we `-• .. �° @ "s on m UM EJRM30x 4'O:YII eLIV 0* Neto oller -- I tbv loP... Q Goede @ City d Rdeiph and wale C... :65uaaeStad Re - Fee tlonnee @ web Sete Geaery eURl (-9 AALSl 1:11 (J L'•�J'• Pa r—snout—Feenoack--Links --Data Dov AM At- - ,,, Q SheAlZor QRaleigh Pl OamerPo Q County Fin ❑ Raleigh FI I�� i \�/))1 {' Q EMS Franc G+"e�'e o EMS Rasp jj{��t • PImSc U�laa u I'n,� &r• 1 .'�1 / " J z0e ze &�r� • ❑ Easements —� W Q access Ea Major Until / t ono A^. �'dJ.% 1 • ❑ Ra Sewe Sootily -l/31 QSewer Mai Force Malr ROCM OraviN Set DC'A ♦ NetSc Waks ♦ 0 LeNCollecpo Leaf Cope ♦ Q RdlNph Stern Q InletsU Q Junctions • � ( �/ \ \� I q.-hfisc Q Ploelo , Stub Point Trace Polr Break Pol' \ �J 1 15•' \ /—/_ Cgo Q Channel 1A� /`/'��196 l- Q Curtain $ iilr v�ry 8,di f \✓�-Q Pipes Drainage l 41 0� !��i)� % _ : ;J„9l ti _r- I.`_ I i= f l vkSeNor... �pjF.W:uWC9carim9ate,�(a T R—nlCte rd4'�epadr macals.�ecrcM7�©�Nocasf amyNiC�!'hti&ie§w«ixs><sPn�.11 �''Crycf Rale:W and w..kl �.r ;' : r'M„kl< Attachment 1: Parameter/Water Outlet from Confluence Wildcat Branch Quality Standard retaining wall Outlet to Raleigh Metals Waters Recycling Conductivity 972 805 103.4 Turbidity: 50 NTUs 550 170 75 Cadmium: 2.0 ug/I 65 ug/L 4.3 ug/L 2.2 ug/L Lead: 25 ug/I 4300 uq/L 250 ug/L 36 ug/L Aluminum: 100,000 ug/L 7,200 ug/L 24,000 ug/L Human Health 8000 ug/L Aquatic Life 87 ug/L Mercury 0.012 16 uq/L 0.98 ug/L Non detected polychlorinated biphenyls: (total PCB and 1.8 ug/L 0.58 uq/L Non detected congeners identified) (PQL 1.0 uq/L) 0.001ug/I Nickel: 88 ug/I 620 ug/L 53 ug/L 9.8 ug /L Action Level Substances: Copper: 7 ug/I 5000 ug/L 340 ug/L 150 ug/L Zinc: 50 ug/I 15000 ug/L - 1100 ug/L 280 ug/L Silver: 0.06 ug/L 9 ug/L Non detected Non detected AIC Condenser Cores Aerosol Cans -With Holes Air Conditioners AlternatorstSlarlers Aluminum Awnings Aluminum Cans Aluminum Gutters Aluminum Ladders Aluminum Sidine, Aluminum Signs Aluminum Wire Aluminum Rims Appliances -All Including Microwaves Autos & Engines, Parts, Rines i Ballasts -No PCBs Barrels -Aluminum, Steel Batlnubs-Cast Iron Batteries-Car,'Fruck, Forklift -Lead Acid, Ups, Lithium, Ni-Mh, NI Cad BBO Grills Revcmae Can "--' Bicycles Blenders Blowers_Leaf, Other Boals-Mclal Aluminum BrasslBronze-All Types Bronze-AIITypes Cable-Slccl, Copper, Aluminum - Canocs-Metal/Aluminum - Cans -Aluminum, Steel Carbide -Tooling, Other Cars & Enainey, Batteries, Rims Cast Iron -Sinks, Bathtubs. Etc. Catalytic Converters Coaxial Cable Chain Saws -Drained Christmas Lights Circuit Breakers Coat hangers Steel Compressors Computers (Not Monitors) Computer Printers Conduit-Pipe-Alunlinn nt/S(eel Capon -Nitre Tube, Wim, Gutters Crutches -Aluminum\ s Demolition Scrap Diesel Engines)Blocks�\ Diecas-All Types DishwashersV,VVs\� Cans `vv\ / Duct Work,. E-Scrap, &Waste - - Electric Meters `-Eleclric Molois Electric Wire-StrippecYUnstripped Electronic Scrap Enginas-Drained-Car, Mower —Exercise Equipment (Most) Extension Cords Fans Fencing -Nu Concrete Fire Extinguisher- With Holes Or Cut 1'aeplace Grates, Doors (No Glass) -'Forklifts Trucks. Etc. Freezers Fuse Panels Furniture „ Fir rnace Gas lhnki Cut In IIaBOnly, , Genera\ors-Home, Car, Larg; Gutters Alum. Copper, Steel I-huger,_Coiat-Slat r ' -I Him % Ilot Water ITeatars I-BeamsStcel - In igalion Pipe -Aluminum, Steel Raleigh Metal Recycling 2310 Garner Road Raleigh, NC 27610 Phone: 919-828-5426 Iron -Cast, Other Soda Cans Insulated Wim-Copper, Ahtminum Stainless Steel -All -Including Sinks LaddcrsAluminum. Steel Starters/Alternators Lawn Mowers-Gas/Oil Out Lawn Furniture ��- Steel -All, Cabinets, Cans. Hangers, Scams, Etc. Lead -Weights; Wheel Weights -Shields, Etc, Steel Bor'gs'lurn gs, Stampings Leaf Blowers -Gus Out Slaves -Electric, Gas Wood ' Light Fixturc,a-With & Without'� stovepips Balles'tsIrrrmsformers Struclur l Steel Litho Plates F "-- - 'lanks-Alum, Stainless, Steel MlulgallelC � � � -Cbi In llulf Orl.arpu llol�n Metal -Galvanized, Shect, Iron, Cast, Etc. Telephone Wire Microwaves • Tin, Mixers Tin I+oil-Clean Motors & Blocks-Elec& ' lbbacco Rucks Gas -With Gas/Oil Out 4 tractors -Farm, Lawn, Other Nails -Steel, Aluminum Ovens -All Types T'rnsformcrs-Oil Free Plumbing Fixtures Trapsmissions-Drained Pipe -Copper, Galvanized, Steel Triplex -Wire ll�J L'A�LlMW1A°UIII I�LUU C+ 3 cep1 ¢ is PER POUND Note: Canrwt be used with "New Customer" offer, nut is good for new and exisarrg customers! Poles -Aluminum, Steel Pop Cans , Pots And Pans Printers Radiators -Auto, house Railroad Rail, Plates, Nails Rebar Refrigerators Rims -Steel, Aluminum . .� Romex / Roof Vents. Roof A1etaly '- Screen Doors/Windows ,Screws -Steel, Brzias, AhrmiilunI Scaled UnitslCompressors Shells -Casings, Brass, Other % 'Siding -Aluminum .Signs -Aluminum, Steel .Sinks -Stainless, Cast iron, McVd Slartcn/Alternators Trucks & Truck Pan Tungsten Vacuum Cleaners Washing Machines/Dryers Water Heaters Weed Wackers-No Gasoline Wheel Rims-Slml Aluminum Whecl Wcights-Lead/Steel Wim-Coritar,Uum Steel Triplet / Slrimiellf nsulattd Wiring Harness-Car,T'ruck, Other i� While Goods -Appliances Wrought Iron X-Rav Film -Line TvDoNot Bon 'Fvs, Monitors, Se:ded'lanks, Ifecr Kegs Raleigh Metal Recycling GG Uo o BRING A COPY OF THIS SHEET OR MENTION CODE &407 AND GET: E3 cents + 15 cents W wNON-FERROUS METALS ps hmdxd pounds foFERROJS METAtS pper.Abumirum) (a.St�,PPpla^[a) p to the first 500 pounds. Good up to the first 2.000 pounds. -Offer only good far fire areac stares. Rd L�J..Ld�GH METAL RECYCLN"—' OPENTO THE E M � �Q ((° � 2310 GARNER ROAD, RALEIGH, NC o 919-828-5426 • u �o MON-FBI B:OOAM-4:30PM AND SATUDDAY 1:06AM-2:001"M wwwlww.raleighscrapmetalrecycling.com 0 RALEIGH METALS RECYCLING RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PROJECT NUMBER: DESIGNED BY: DATE: F SPEC-13290 JON ALDRIDGE, PE DECEMBER 2013 ' MCADAMS 2905 MERIDIAN PARKWAY DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27713 NC LIC. # C-0293 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Raleigh Metals Recycling site is located along Garner Road, approximately 0.70 miles north of the intersection with Rush Street and Garner Road in Raleigh, North Carolina. The facility provides services that include the collection, sorting, and exchange of scrap metal. As such, the facility is covered by General Permit Number NCG200000. As a condition of this permit, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was developed by Golder Associates dated April 2013. In summary, this plan provides a description of processes onsite and discusses implementation of measures to be taken to minimize contaminants in runoff from the site. One component of the SWPPP is a Stormwater Management Plan that addresses practices to be taken onsite to minimize exposure of contaminated materials with stormwater runoff. These practices include storage procedures and good housekeeping policies. On September 12, 2013, a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) was issued by the North Carolina Division of Environmental and Natural Resources (DENR). Upon review of further testing results, it was noted that additional exceedances of several other benchmarks existed for Cadmium, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Copper, Iron, Lead, Oil and Grease, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and Zinc. Noted in the NOD was that secondary containment and general housekeeping appeared adequate. The exceedances are most likely a result of uncontrolled sedimentation from the site. This report discusses measures taken since the NOD was issued and further details stormwater measures that should be put into place to help control sedimentary runoff. The drainage patterns onsite as identified in the SWPPP, include six_stormwater outfalls. These outfalls are referenced throughout this report and are the same as those identified -in the SWPPP. Also provided is a brief explanation of the contributing drainage area to each of these outfalls. Please reference the included maps that indicate each of these outfalls. For each outfall, the nine parameters mentioned above were tested, each with a benchmark value that they are required to meet. The facility currently does not exceed any pH or Oil and Grease benchmarks. However, many of the other parameters are exceeded at each outfall. Both COD_and TSS can be treated by incorporating practices that allow for controlling sedimentation_through the use of barriers, mats, settling, and dispersion. Similar methods can be -used -to remove heavy metals and PCBs from the runoff since most of these contaminants attach themselves to particles and are transported by the particles in suspension. Thus, the most appropriate BMPs to control pollutants onsite will be those that minimize release of contaminant laden sediment. It should be noted that at this time a Remedial Action Plan (Rhas been submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency for review. This RAP will provide measures that limit exposure of surface runoff with the contaminated soils. These measures include amending the top layers of the soil and installation of a protective barrier -covering roughly half of_the_17_acre site consisting of cgeoteztile fabric overlain by recycled concre— top ssed'to resemble aggregate st3ne TfiFRAP-also' calls-forconstruction—oot-a-stormwater-detention-pond-on-the-north side of"tl e property. This plan dated June 21, 2012 was prepared by Mid -Atlantic Associates- Inc. Implementation of these measures is awaiting federal approval ofthis plan. Raleigh Metal Recycling December 23, 2013 tJ MCADAMS I © EXISTING CONDITIONS At the time of our site visit on October 18, 2013, several measures had already been taken by the tenant to control contaminated sediment/oil from leaving the site. These measures included the expansion of a small basin on the north-side.of-ttie-property, the construction of a small basin on the west- ide ofihe ssiteanplacement of booms. _ Additional handling and pro eessing`policies have been -put 'intoplace'to-avoid spills and contamination of the ground surface. Below is a brief synopsis of the, measures currently installed for each outfall along with testing data. Please reference the r, attach'ed map (EC-f,). q I � h Testing d'ata`Oor each outfall is provided abelow. This information is from testing by both 4! Environmental Cohservation Laboratories;] Inc: (ENCO) and Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. (HES). The benchmark values shown below are from the SWPP and the North Carolina General NPDES Permit # NCG 200000. OUTFALL#1 The area draining to this outfall appears to be minimized to the parking lot at the northeast corner of the property and some roof drainage. Booms have been added to the outflow. v 0\ V1 \ o 41 J E J \ J O. \ V J y J O. U E ~ E 06 V U Sample ID _ ENCO 6/7/2013 7.5 130 rr490& 8.1 f§f03#mot [2691L t147� [_948 ENCO 11/1/2013 7.0 „ f300] 480 8.76 t359 / C443� �325� 1250J Benchmark' '6.0-9.0 _ 120 100. 30 1 7 30 . 67 OUTFALL#2 The drainage to this point is comprised of areas draining to the North Basin and some bypass along the most northern portion of the site. It is estimated that about a third of the site drains to the North Basin. The North Basin drainage includes runoff from the Fueling Area, Vehicle Processing Area, Bailer, Non -Ferrous Area, and portions of the Ferrous Yard. This drainage is collected in a piped system that discharges to a channel and ultimately enters the North Basin. Check dams have been placed in the channel to help minimize sediment entering the basin. A turn -down elbow has been recently installed on the upstream side of the outfall to minimize the amount of oil or floating debris from being conveyed offsite. At the time of our inspection, it was noted that this basin had been expanded and cleaned.out. Several housekeeping improvements relating to storage and containment of materials were made upstream that should help in minimizing pollutants coming into contact with stormwater runoff. One such improvement was a relocation of storage from outside to inside for electric motors and sealed units. Improvements to the bypass areas discharging to Outfall #2 were made as well. These include the addition of gravel in high traffic areas to minimize the amount of sediment runoff, removal of petroleum laden sediment, ,placement of booms upstream and downstream of the outflow, and modifications to the gutter system of the maintenance building to Raleigh Metal Recycling , December 23, 2013 �� MCADAMS avoid water flowing into and out of the building during storm events, adding to pollutant loads in runoff. w £ = O on QY vi oo H££ l7 m £ m a o\n f0 m m F V £ J V V q Samole ID Ei ENCO 6/7/2013 7.7 52 53 4.09 0.693 �_66.8 j r76:5' 293 HES 10/10/2013 7.7 r156 3231 503 i 346 1-11067 ENCO 11/1/2013 8.1 )270 I '850f 10.1 r8.62 994 I CZ-8-57 (2046_1 HES 11/27/2013 6.0 �174 1 �1701 C3.25' `326j C215J 868 Benchmark 6.0-9.0 , 120 100 30 1 7 30 67 1 OITI ALL #3 The area draining to this outfall consists of primarily brush and grasses away from areas containing metals. It is unclear as to the extents of this drainage area, as the site subsurface drainage system is undefined at this point. It may include a portion of the Ferrous Yard. A small channel discharges water to the adjacent railroad at the northwest corner of the site. Small booms were added to the outflows in this area. a xSample ID' ENCO 6/7/2( Benchmark 7.6 v £ H \ao l7 £ m E on 0 ou fJ ptf v � j,£ H 0 13 3.95 1 6.0-9.0 120 100 30 1 7 16.1 68: 30 67 OUTFALL #4 The drainage area to this point is comprised of areas draining to the West Basin and some bypass to the adjacent railroad. It is unclear as to the limits of the drainage area going to the West Basin, but it is believed to mostly consist of the Shearing Unit, Metal Torching Area, and the Ferrous Yard. This basin is lined with stone and discharges to the adjacent railroad. It also includes a turn -down elbow to minimize the oil or debris from being conveyed offsite. It appeared that this basin discharged to the adjacent railroad in the direction of Outfall #5. It is unclear as to the extent of this drainage area (due to the same undefined drainage system), but as shown on the attached aerial map, there is a limited amount of Wake County GIS information available for this outfall. The pipe exiting the property discharges stormwater runoff to the adjacent railroad along the western portion of the site. Booms have been installed on the pipe coming from the yard into the basin and on the pipe exiting the property. Raleigh Metal Recycling 9 MCADAMS December 23, 2013 3 a n a v E = Q J J G1 J J J J \ 00 Vf 00 l.7 00 \ UU J U J ry \ C \ a a E: ~ E: J O CIOJ N U - U Sample ID ENCO 6/7/2013 7.8 1100 2.8 3.28 F.321 32:9 6.3 843 HES 11/27/2013 5.5 Fmj 13 3.33 f 66 38 } 1240) Benchmark 6.0-9.0 120 100 30 1 7 30 67 The area draining to this outfall mostly consists of the Metal Torching Area and Ferrous Yard. At the time of initial testing, turnings soaked with petroleum were stored in the southwest corner of the site. These have since been removed. Booms have been installed in the outflow. m,:. E. C ... a -u' .E F E Z J N J U tp .. . O Sample ID ENCO 6/7/2013 8 43 3.2 �2705—� 65.1 7.1 /layl Benchmark 6.0-9.0 120 , 100 30 1 7 30 67 1 OUTFALL#6 It is unclear as to the extents of this drainage area. It is believed to include a portion of the Ferrous Yard, Scales, and parking area at the southeast corner of the site. This outfall is also identified on the Wake County GIS information provided on the aerial map. The pipe exiting the property discharges stormwater runoff into` the existing storm drainage system in Garner Road. A channel lined with stone has been constructed to minimize sediment transport. Additionally, small booms have been placed around the inlet draining into this system. J O J Vf Op n d-. C7 00 E \ O. \ Cbo o U E E E ,a E v °�° O D J N 5 U 0 Sample ID ENCO 6/7/2013 8.2 )200 _tt [680 j 8.74 FS-.96-1 932 (-570 1740 ENCO 11/1/2013 8.6 1 350J 1400 3.67 0.36 1730 1230J 3650 Benchmark 6.0-9.0 120 100 30 1 7 30 67 1 Raleigh Metal Recycling U MCADAMS December 23, 2013 4 ® STORMWATERMANAGEMENT PLAN — PHASE I This initial phase of stormwater management onsite is intended to expand upon measures already taken to improve sediment capture onsite. These measures are intended to be implemented quickly and are also considered temporary until the final stormwater management plan for the site is R approved and/or developed. Once these measures are in place, additional testing will be completed to rl' monitor how the Phaserj practices are working. At that time review of the testing data may show that additional measures are necessary (i.e. Phase II). Please reference the included Phase I map (SW-1) for additional information. One of the main goals of Phase 1 is to determine -conclusively the 1r— —�-- d�rainage areas to each of the outfalls, and locating all subsurface drainage and inlets. Once the drainage boundaries are known conclusively to each outfall—it will -be possibl o tailor the stormwater management to the drainage area of the outfall. OUTFAU, #1 The extents of this drainage area as shown on the attached map are believed to be fairly accurate. Where possible, inlet protection should be placed around each inlet in accordance with the North Carolina Erosion and Sedimentation Control Manual. This will help to minimize the COD and TSS loading to the benchmark values. To address the heavy metal pollutants, the placement of a polyacrylamide (Floc Logs® by Applied Polymer Systems or an approved equivalent) is recommended at-each_inlet.,A data sheet fTr the Floc log product is provided at the end of this report. It is also recommended that silt -fence -be installed on the north side of the parking lot to 6 minimize anv sediment Paden water from flowing to downstream properties. OUTFALL #2 As part of Phase 1, it is recommended that further exploration into the exact drainage area for this outfall be provided. Based on the testing results it appears that the North Basin is providing equate COD and TSS removal. To address the heavy metal pollutants, the placement of a couple Floc Logs® is recommended in each of the ditches draining to -the basin. It is also recommended that silt 'fence be installed on thenorth sidee of the ssife tominimize any sediment laden water from flowing to downstream properties. OUTFALL #3 As part of Phase 1, it is recommended that further exploration into the exact drainage area for this outfall be provided. To aide in the remova of COD and TSS. check dams or waddles are recommended in the existing ditch. To address the hea metal pollutants, the placement of a couple Floc tiogs®-is recommendedin the ditch draining to the outfall. It is also recommended that silt fe cn e be ni stalled on the west side of the site to minimize any sediment laden water from flowing to downstream properties. OUTt ALL#4 ; A As part of Phase 1, it is recommended that further exploration into the exact drainage area for this outfall be provided. Where possible, inlet protection should be placed around each=inlevdraining to this outfall. This will help to minimize the COD and TSS loading to the benchmark values. To address the heavy metal pollutants, the placement of a Floc Log® is recommended at each inlet. It is C:: Raleigh Metal Recycling December 23, 2013 9 MCADAMS 5 also recommended that silt fence be installed on the west side of the site to minimize any sediment laden water from flowing to downstream properties. OU'rFALL #5 As part of Phase 1, it is recommended that further exploration into the exact drainage area for this outfall be provided. Based on the testing results it appears that the West Basinasin —providing adequate COD and TSS removal. To address the heavy metal pollutants, the placement of a Floc Log® is recommended at each inlet contributing to the drainage to the basin. It is also recommended that silt fence be installed on the west f the site to minimize any sediment laden water from Flowing of downstream properties. OUTFALL #6 As part of Phase 1, it is recommended that further exploration into the exact drainage area -for this outfall be provided. Where possible, inlet protection should be placed arouned each inlet draining to this outfall. This will help to minimize the COD and_TSS_loading to the benchmark values. To address the heavy metal pollutants, the placement of a Floc Log® is recommended at each inlet. For Outfall 46, we suggest that this phase of the study _determi� ne wh to her or not to redirect discharge to a In addition to the data sheet for the Floc Logs®, details for the silt fence, inlet protection, and check dams are provided. A key component in the functionality of all of the stormwater measures mentioned above is maintenance. It is recommended that each of_ the -practices -provided be inspected monthly or after ne — -- each significant rainfall -Sediment shall -be removed in each of the basins'routinely-and'disposed off pro e The facility shall continue monitoring at each outfall as outlined in the NPDES General Permit Number NCG200000. This additional testing shall be provided to the civil engineer to determine how the data is trending and will be helpful in determining what BMPs and measures taken onsite are working to control the contaminated runoff. Raleigh Metal Recycling,i„„ December 23, 2013 9 MCADAMS 6 USTORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN —PHASE lI This phase of stormwater management is intended to serve as an ultimate/final remediation plan. Once additional drainage area and testing data are received as part of the Phase I plan and approval of the RAP is received, modification or additions to the stormwater management plan will be evaluated. We anticipate this might include expansion/addition of larger traditional stormwater facilities (i.e. dry detention basins or wet ponds). The extent of Phase 11 cannot be clearly defined until the drainage boundaries to each of the outfalls are determined and installation of measures proposed in the RAP are complete,_ since the stormwater treatment facilities will be designed specifically -for -each -drainage area. Raleigh Metal Recycling 1111 MCADAMS December 23, 2013 7 © STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN SCHEDULE The suggested plan of action by the client is as follows: • Installation of perimeter silt fence, check dams, inlet protection, and Floc Logs as detailed on the provided Phase I plan. Upon receipt of the draft of this document on December 10, 2013, the client began installation of several of these measures. Estimated completion — 21112014 t� • Determination of onsite drainage systems/boundaries by survey, smoke testing, video camera, or other means. Estimated completion — 21112014 • Continued monitoring at each outfall to determine whether further modifications to the proposed stormwater management plan is required. If the site is not reaching compliance as required in the NPDES General Permit, additional measures may need to be taken. Estimated completion — Ongoing • Installation of protective barrier and sto` rmwater_management.pond as outlined in the RAP. Estimated completion — 12 months after final approvals by U.SEPA and NCDENR • Evaluation of effectiveness of protective barrier and stormwater management pond. Estimated completion — 6 months after completion of installation Raleigh Metal Recycling 'December 23, 2013 TIMCADAMS 8 I ff'PIC. lu i AM, ol n ,� 'EE !� E RALEIGH MECAL RECYCLING SfOFQ.tWA'fER MANAGEMEM may, HALRIGH R z]11 c.UV:eH so.neRNllN41.VR111 MUICH. NC 27CIH (BIB) R20-N29 IMCADOl,`i.5 ��CQl Mom ® III 1 I 9 A g 4 RAIZIGH METAL RECYCLING $�'0]i��Q�A7 li M1NA(iEiY1R.1`i[ PAII®lpDPfl yyA IINf.IGP Y2IAL PECYCIING Via GAI4�'EP ROAU (p.,e1) 'ez0-a.28ze MCADAMS ' d4 mow. �� cmvc�lwc sl�ww�l eeAYno�rr nnn - nun 1 4 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ------------- / / 2 1 - f Y LLvm � 83su EEHI ID -ATLANTIC SEYMOUR BROWNINVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. N e A S S O C 1 A TES, INC. RALEIGH, NORTH CARODNA R=;FE� ORS Enginccnng & Enviro=cnlal Solulioo SOIL EXCAVATION, BARRIER PLACEMENT A .�...m..,a,•...m,. .m. .a'°^""m""......m..mo.e..a.m..ed..�.. a AND TREATMENT ARFAS �, • • o• • �r <�_.}1'" � 'i•�t f 7 /l t4 1 r ` S1 ,y��� "•• 1 `' I y�i' � �d i yIlk— J t I _ • ... • � I'�rr-';��7�.�t^�} �-r•^'� �1:1Yiy�Z-,T., i� ait ..t! ... (s+,i� a !1 - 71 S` ;: [• \E, rf.- fI/jj('� r,���(��.'r T t i x - / ♦i �� f� J Ji.' ' j I 4 t % C A� II •ti' ��,`1�'�'� t3� .�.3aRD" � �p I �' t l� n • ✓f, $ to `+, i• M ��`,�"i�},'' A �� yy iF'V i)(� t� `Ily A..,yf� }v :A ` � r� ?`. 11P��•`�>- � � �. 1 1 Jt.R' 11A' r�t ���'Y�/ t k' y �"n (#4' .rT1�M't �Sr � tY�. y ' `Ef i ,� .fi' F � '� f u�( �i�li.} jS}n I ' \ i <cy,' *u•�•]/r��` ! ry ` • � � ry ti,� n3 t��, } ';• '' rt41' �� �� � � _ l` ! '4f�t (� i l fi � fh •'U 7 gyl.T� Fyi' i Ii, +k l •hf4. 7 ! � `c� < "M .�`3 irf . i1t `r'•'a� � � r I / .: l �i .,. ,��_ r- i«: i .''';, � ,:�C..._,: f. S ;�ikM ys ... �R'_'.�3�CRi e-a�i_ �. _ �?y„�'L•'_� .J} � 1. n� �k 4„'1'71�r`e�,,�'�l �'�_ J t., s -E r r f� y' �';'• yI -�1�., r-'�� \��•�•r' �Y L �gry�`: r V y • �� � .F'.� / !i a •v- � rn u _ p :. x .i t f ({J7� xT r a� T,�.e ifia ���i°s�-i. �, �y�K vr���*^�4 _ r �•F itr Y.y `I' 3 � F� �'B �+"�,r K_a ��}Y"�Y•, �C q`it �� A ! y� % ,R7 �i r ✓"k .s'l ..i/c r1 .: / /�+ . >1•f) b y 4e �.?`i xc��: '4+ rt , / � ;;i tT:'i i � •*'i J t" / _ x- tiiy Jll #4 � Q t J{�y �.� ^^��,a'r�-.� -.. ria � 1 �! r '�� f/'cr''"i l.-� z r+ / • J � Is i K �`^r i �'� ...i � 3b-r CG. {f / y. Ys' a� / � i �. �I� '��`q. a�.' .�E"� r i✓ 1; /` % � �" - � '�v�r'.-: 'Ty'` '�`"4x'T►g"{'� �'. 2 � 2 2 •t,'!+ T . i \�'� _ „ �� t�- � '� T_ � � I ..� � / R J� � � t'i' fro✓ ��•"...r Pr ;.. ''A '. 'i � •j +.n�•u -�..I/ 'ly c q"��v �� ~S'�' i�.A;, ,�ry"F�t� +r �q s�� � ck r % kr ib�, w; ti �E s ,rr ,�, � $'i. r•+fs ''. i �S � ir. (� �� r 3l,/r f� .e I�¢�.�t �} 1 4' `� � ; C':" Y,r t.'tk'� 4 1 �_• - ,C•�:isi COUN OATH CAAOLC! EFFECTIVE: 01/31 TOP ELEVATION OF STORMWATER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - #5 WASHED EXISTING SLOPE EXISTING SLOPES KEYED RIP RAP #5 WASHED STONE FRONT VIEW NOTE: REMOVE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION FROM BEHIND CHECK DAMS TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO CHANNEL VEGETATION. FLOW SHOULD BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE DAM. STANDARD CHECK DAM 0.5'-1' MAX. y 1 A a N #1 SIDE VIEW CONSTRUCTION NOTES: HEIGHT & WIDTH DETERMINED BY EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND SEDIMENT STORAGE REQUIRED. KEY RIP RAP INTO THE DAM FOR STABILIZATION. EXISTING - GROUNO STEP SEQUENCE STANDARD METAL POSTS 7-0" IN GROUND GALVANIZED HARDWARE WIRE EXTENDS TO TOP OF BOX 0 -\ NOTE: 1. INSPECT INLET PROTECTION AND REMOVE SEDIMENT AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. GRAVEL SHOULD BE REPLACED� V # 57 WASHED STONE PLACED TO A HEIGHT OF 12"-18` MINIMUM ABOVE TOP OF BOX AND REPAIRS MADE AS NEEDED. STANDARD GRAVEL YARD INLET PROTECTION i MINIMUM 10 LINE WIRES 8'-0" MAXIMUM IMUM 12-1/2 GAUGE RMEDIATE WIRES GRADE NOTE: 1. USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NEVER IN AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW. 2. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITED AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REMOVE PRESSURE ON THE SILT FENCE. FRONT VIEW STEEL POST WOVEN WIRE FABRIC �3 SILT FENCE FABRIC 0 M � FILL SLOPE io `�~•�GRADE 6NIMUM COVER oTO'VERSKIRT `,HOR SKIRT AS DIRECTED ENGINEER ' SIDE VIEW STANDARD TEMPORARY SILT FENCE TOP OF MUST BE ABOVE T THE WAS STEEL FENCE WIRE FENCE HARDWARE CLOTH BURY WERE FENCE AND HARDWARE CLOTH 0I /3 U CLOTH IN TRENCH SIFIl FENCE POST I SET LIA% Y' APART MIN. 18' WTO SOU GROUND J' FILTER FABRIC ON GROUND . NOTES: 1. REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN HALF OF STONE OUTLET IS COVERED. 2. REPLACE STONE AS NEEDED TO ENSURE DEWATERING. 8' OF UPPER EDGE OF FABRIC IN TRENCH SECTION VIEW STANDARD SILT FENCE OUTLET Applied Polymer 519 Industrial Drive, Woodstock, GA 30189 WWW.siltstoo.com Phone: 678-494-5998 Toll -free: 866-200-9868 Fax:678-494-5298 Systems APS 700 Series Floc Logs° Polyacrylamide Sediment and Turbidity Control Applicator Logs APS 700 Series Floc Logs are a group of soil -specific tailored log -blocks that contain blends of water treatment components and polyacrylamide co -polymer for water clarification. They reduce and prevent fine particles and colloidal clays from suspension in stormwater. There are several types of Floc Logs designed to treat most water and soil types. Contact Applied Polymer Systems, Inc. or your local distributor for free testing and site -specific application information. Primary Applications • Mine tailings and waste pile ditches • Stormwater drainage from construction and building sites • Road and highway construction runoff ditches • Ditch and treatment system placement for all forms of highly turbid waters (less than 4% solids) • Dredging operations as a flocculent Features and Benefits • Removes solubilized soils and clay from water • Prevents colloidal solutions in water within ditch systems • Binds cationic metals within water, reducing solubilization • Binds pesticides and fertilizers within runoff water • Reduces operational and cleanup costs • Reduces environmental risks and helps meet compliance Specifications / Compliances • ANSI/NSF Standard 60 Drinking water treatment chemical additives • 48h or 96h Acute Toxicity Tests (D. magna or 0. mykiss) • 7 Day Chronic Toxicity Tests (P. promealas or C. dubia Packaging APS 700 Series Floc Logs are packaged in boxes of four (4) Technical Information Appearance - semi -solid block Biodegradable internal coconut skeleton Percent Moisture - 40% maximum pH 0.5% Solution - 6-8 Shelf Life — up to 5 years when stored out of UV rays Placement Applied Polymer Systems 519 Industrial Drive, Woodstock, GA 30189 www.siltstop.com Phone: 678-494-5998 Toll -free: 866-200-9868 Fax:678-494-5298 Floc Logs are designed for placement within ditches averaging three feet wide by two feet deep. Floc log placement is based on gallon per minute flow rates. Note: actual GPM or dosage will vary based on site criteria and soil/water testing. Directions for Use (Water and Floc Log Mixing is Very Important!) APS 700 Series Floc Logs should be placed within the upper quarter to half of a stabilized ditch system or as close as possible to active earth moving activities. Floc Logs have built in ropes with attachment loops which can be looped over stakes to ensure they remain where placed. Mixing is key! If the flow rate is too slow, adding sand bags, cinder blocks, etc., can create the turbulence required for proper mixing. Floc Logs are designed to treat dirty water, not liquid mud; when the water contains heavy solids (exceeding 4%), it will be necessary to create a sediment or grit pit to let the heavy solids settle before treating the water. Floc Logs must not be placed in areas where heavy erosion would result in the Floc Logs becoming buried. Where there is heavy sedimentation, maintenance will be required. APS 700 Series Floc Logs can easily be moved to different locations as site conditions change. Water quality will be improved with the addition of a dispersion field or soft armor covered ditch checks below the Floc Log(s) to collect flocculated particulate. Construction of mixing weirs may be required in areas where short ditch lines, swelling clays, heavy particle concentrations, or steep slopes may be encountered. Cleanup: Latex or rubber gloves are recommended for handling during usage. Use soap and water to wash hands after handling. Precautions / Limitations • APS 700 Series Floc Logs are extremely slippery when wet. • Clean up spills quickly. Do not use water unless necessary as extremely slippery conditions will result and if water is necessary, use pressure washer. • APS Floc Log will remain viable for up to 5 years when stored out of UV rays. • APS 700 Series Floc Logs have been specifically tailored to specific water and soil types and samples must be tested. Testing is necessary and is free. • For product information, treatment system design assistance, or performance issues, contact Applied Polymer Systems. t, Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc. 102-A Woodwind, Industrial Court Cary NC, 27511 Phone: 919.467.3090 FAX: 919.467.3515 Friday, June 21, 2013 Goldsboro Iron & Metals Recycling (G0014) Attn: Dennis Gehle 801 N. John Street Goldsboro, NC 27530 RE: Laboratory Results for Project Number: [none], Project Name/Desc: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water ENCO Workorder(s): C305031 Dear Dennis Gehle, Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on Friday, June 7, 2013, Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative, all samples were received in acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures. Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted. The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except as noted in the project narrative. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the Laboratory. This report contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from outside organizations will be reported under separate cover. If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, �n Stephanie Franz By Project Manager Enclosure(s) "C 0 �'i AUG 26 2M Page 1 0f30 www.encolabs.com PROJECTPRpIECT-nVE Date: 21 June 2013 Client: Goldsboro Iron & Metals Recycling (GO014) Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Lab ID: C305031 Overview Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc. (ENCO) analyzed all submitted samples in accordance with the methods referenced in the laboratory report. Any particular difficulties encountered during sample handling by ENCO are discussed in the QC Remarks section below. Quality Control Samples No Comments Quality Control Remarks The determination of pH is considered a field parameter, and as such, has a holding time of approximately 15 minutes. As this time passed prior to receipt by ENCO, the analysis was conducted outside of hold time, and the results are appropriately qualified (Q-Flagged). Other Comments The analytical data presented in this report are consistent with the methods as referenced in the analytical report. Any exceptions or deviations are noted in the QC remarks section of this narrative or in the Flags/Notes and Definitions section of the report. Released By: Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc. Stephanie Franz Project Manager FINAL To's report reldtAS only to me sample as reoeivm M roe laboratory, and meV oMv Le ieyropucey m roll. Page 2 of 30 SAMPLE SUMMARY/LABORATORY CHRONICLE Parameter - Hold Date/T1me(s) -. p - EPA 1660A Prep Date/Time(s) Analysis Date/Time(s) 07/05/13 06/13/13 11:00 4 2 1' ... ....................... 6/14/2013 09:44 EPA 200.7 12/04113 06/10/13 09:57 6/12/2013 12:22 SM 2540D-1997 D6/14/13 06/11/13 10:10 6/11/2013 10:10 SM 4500H+B-2000 06/07/13 14:59 06/10/13 14:24 SM 5220D-1997 D7/05/13 6/10/2013 14:24 06/17/13 14:21 6/17/2013 17:56 Parameter Hold Date/Time(: EPA 1664A-- 07/OS/13 EPA 2DO.7 12/04/13 SM 2540D-1997 06/14/13 SM 4500H+B-2000 06/07/13 15: 14 SM 5220D-1997 07/05/13 ..:.................. Prep Dat 06/13/13 06/10/13 06/11/13 06/10/13 O6/17/13 11:00 6/14/2013 09:44 09:57 6/12/2013 12:25 10:10 6/11/2013 10:10 14:24 6/10/2013 14:24 14:21 6/17/2013 17:56 Parameter. -� � � - - � Hold Dale/Time(s) -._ (s Pre p Date/Time(s) ueeetveo:-P6/07/13.16:36,a;.. EPA 1664A 07/OS/13 /1 Analysis Dale/7me(s) EPA 200.7 06/13/13 I1:00 6/14/2013 09:44 12/04/13 06/10/13 09:57 6/12/2013 12:34 SM 2540D-1997 06/14/13 06/11/13 10:10 6/11/2013 10:10 SM 4500H+e-2000 06/07/13 14:29 06/10/13 14:24 SM 5220D-1997 07/05/13 6/10/2013 14:24 06/17/13 14:21 6/17/2013 17:56 Parimeter Hold d Dale/Time(s) Prepe Date/Time(s) _ Analysis Date/Times) EPA 1664A 07/O5/13 06/13/13 11:00 6/14/2013 09:94 EPA 200.7 12/04/13 06/10/13 09:57 6/12/2013 12:37 SM 2510D-1997 06/11/13 06/11/13 10:10 6/11/2013 10:10 SM 45DOH+9-2000 06/07/13 14:29 06/10/13 14:24 6/10/2013 14:24 SM 5220D-1997 07/05/13 06/17/13 14:21 6/17/2013 17:56 Parameter — ..... ........ -- Hold Dal EPA 1664A 07/05/13 EPA 200.7 12/04/13 SM 2540D-1997 06/14/13 SM 4500H+B-2000 06/07/13 SM 5220D-1997 07/05/13 rmets) Prep Do 06/13/13 06/10/13 06/11/13 13:59 06/10/13 06/12/13 Imets) Analysis Date/Tin 11:00 6/14/2013 09:44 09:57 6/12/2D13 12:39 10:10 6/11/2013 10:10 14:24 6/10/N13 14:24 12:06 6/12/2013 16:23 FINAL t his report r dates only to the sample as receme0 try the IaM1oram,,, xnrl may only W raprw]ucea in full. N.3 of 30 1 70 Parameter - .......... -.-_. --___ Hold DateI Ime(s) .,--a ,,. a;,l, nampled'D6 /07/13'1435 ..._.. Rece vedi 06/07/13, 16:261 ni EPA 1669A ....... ... ... - ......... OJ/OS/13 Pre D P rate/rme(s) � � - ..... Anal ' - Ysls Dale/T'ime(s) EPA 20p.J 12/09/13 06/13/13 11:00 _ .. -"--"----.. 6/14/2013 09:44 ' SM 254OD-1997 06/ 06/10/13 09:57 6/12/2013 12:42 SM 9500H+8-2000 06/07/13 /13 Iq:99 06/11/13 10:10 6/11/2013 10:10 SM 5220D-1997 07/OS/13 06/10/13 14:24 6/10/2013 14:24 06/12113 12:06 6/12/2013 16:23 - FINAL This report helatea oFl Y mthe sample a; reccven by the le WmWry, ana may only pe reprpaucetl In lull. Page 4 0130 SAMPLE DETECTION SUMMARY Analyte ..._.-.o-' ,Ux I.. N.t� ss,, L.3u1 :..a'$..5'a�si:lxC'6'i.F''`"tr ..- ���-�-� Cadmium - Total "-'-" Results Fla 9 MDL "�-xxS, "T?'-t 3^; Chemical Oxygen Demand 3.03 0,360 PQL Units - " ... - Method Notes Copper -Total 130 10 1.00 o L EPA 200.7 Leon - Total 269 1.60 30 mg/L SM 5220D-1997 Lead - 7obl 1780800 22 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 Oil & Grease HEM-5 ( GT) Nan 147 2 1 50 ug/L EPA 200.7 -Polar Material PH 8.10 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 Total Suspended Solids 75 2.49 1.0 7.79 mg/L EPA 1664A Zinc - Total 9 1.0 1.0 pH SM 4500H+B-2000 Q 948 1.0 m mg/L SM 2540D-1997 lent ID vfr`pp - 9' / 3.8 100 ug/L EPA 200,7 .-. C 4 •'k '. 1 .t'r Lab Analyte Im-C305031-02 Results u,P11 .L.. ., 1`i3 ,,.;;V, k�L �.:... Cadmlum Total _ qa g MDL .. PQL vx_.�x•r Chemical 0 Oxygen Demand 0.693 .-.-. J 0360 - _ .....Units Method Notes Copper - total S2 . 10 1.00 .. .. ..... .. ... EPA 200.7 Iron - Total 66.8 1.60 10 mg/L SM 5220D-1997 Lead - Total 3010 22 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 Oil &Grease HEM-S ( � Non 76.5 2.1 50 ug/L EPA 200.7 -Polar Material 4.09 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 PH Total Suspended Solids 77 J 1.92 1.01.0.0 6.01 mg/PH EPA 1664A Zinc -Total 53 1.0 PH SM 4500H+B-2000 Q 293 1.0 mg/L SM 254OD-1997 lient ID 3�30utfall 003 ' "`+'9 a - 3.8 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 �(V.A YC''L N 'r Analyte- ,rs'v Loh ID ... Cadmum iobl Results ,"{�0503103`� Fla '. ..t'.$ 0 MDL ..a n�.;�:, '_;;vy>;j x :. ..t^ r t, ,' ' Chemical Oxygen Demand . - . 1.99 - - 0,3 0.360 - PQL -'1.- - Units - � � ....... - - ._�,� _ Method Notes Copper - Total 130 10 ug/L EPA 2D0.7 -'-"- Iron -Total 62.7 1.60 10 mg/L SM 5220D-1997 Lead - Total 1680 22 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 Oil & Grease HEM-S ( G1) Nan lfi.l 2 1 50 10.0 ug/L EPA 2007. -Polar Material 3.95 J ug/L EPA 200.7 PH Total Suspended Solids 7.6 2.11 10 6.58 my/L EPA 1664A Zinc -Total 13 1.0 1.0 OM SM 4500H+B-2000 Q 681 1.0 mg/L SM 2540D-1997 ,.r 3.8 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 Analyte Cadmium - TPtal........... ...... .. ............ Chemical Oxygen Demand Copper - Total Iron -Total Lead - Total Oil & Grease (HEM -SG) Non -Polar Material PH Total Suspended Solids Zinc - Total Results Fla 9 MDL ., .::.. ._. 2.32 -' 0.360 .60 Units " ' M ethod Notes 100 ug/L EPA 200.7 32.9 10 3. mg/L SM 5220D.1997 1120 1.60 oD u0/L EPA 200.7 6.3 22 50 ug/L EPA 200.7 3.2B J 2.1 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 7.8 1.81 5. mg/ EPA 1664A 1.0 1.0.00 PH PH SM 4500H+B-2000 Q 893 0 mg/L SM 2540D-1997 3_8 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 Analyte ....'.. . .........- Cadmium Total .... Results Fla 9 MDL .,. '.. Chemical Chemical Oxygen Demand _ 2.05 PQL ....... 0.360 Units � -' Method � Notes Copper -Total 43 1.00 10 u0i, � � EPA2D07 -' Iron -Total 65.1 10 1.60 mg/L SM 0 FINAL 436 10.0 ug/L EPAPA 2200.7.7 This "'Pnn relates only to the Sample+' receivud by the lalui al22 SD ory, EPA 200.7 and may only be reproduced in full. 1. POBo 5 0130 Ij Analyte - Lead .. - . Lead - Total ........ . .... Results ............ ... .... Fla fl ..... MDL PQL Units Method es PH 7.1 3 2.1 10.D ...... ....... ug/L ...Notof EPA 200.7 Total Suspended Solids8.0 1.0 1.0 PH SM 4500H+B-2000 Q Zinc - Total 3 2 1.0 1.0 m9/L SM 2540D-1997 18 3.8 10.0 u9/L EPA 200.7 Client .Outiall 006 ID - '� A lyt ¢Lab C305031 O6 tti fiY"t 9r g i Results Hag MDL t � k F Cadmium - Total .. .... ....... ...-...-.. .. .. . pQL Units Method Notes Chemical l Oxygen Demand 1.60 ug/L ..0. ....... EPA 200.7 ........ Copper - Total 200 10 ID mg/L SM 5220D-1997 Iron - Total 93 1.60 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 Lead - Total 39800 22 50 ug/L EPA 200.7 Oil & Grease (HEM-SCTr) Non -Polar Material 571 2.1 10.0 ug/L EPA 2D0.7 PH 8.74 2.15 6.72 m9/L EPA 1664A Total Suspended Solids 8.2 1.0 1.0 PH SM 4500H+B-2000 Q Zinc - Total 680 680 1.0 1.0 mg/L SM 2540D-1997 3.8 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7 FINAL This report lel.tu, only to the sample as receivac by Ire ladorato and may Y only tat reproduced in lull. Fapo 6 of a0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Description: Outfall 001 Lab Sample ID: C305031-01 - Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Matrix: Surface Water Sampled: 06/07/13 14:45 Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Work Order: C305031 Sampled By; CLIENT Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods ^ - ENCO Cary certifiedana/yfe(NC 591] Analyte rCAS Numb,,I ResYlC4 F[aq Unru PE MDL MRRL Balch cadmium [744043-9] ^ 3.03 Methotl Analwe -BY25 copper [)440-50.8]RO1 U9/L 1 0.360 l.W 3F10p16 EPA 200.7 D6/12/1312:22 JDH ^ 269 ug/L 1 1.60 1D.0 3FLOO16 EPA 2DOJ IronO6/12/1312:22 3DH 1)439-89-6]^ 17800 Ug/L 1 22 so 3F10016 EPA 2DO.7 06/12/1312:22 3DH Lead [7439-92-11 ^ 147 ug/L 1 2.1 10.0 3F1o016 EPA 200.) 06/12/1312:22 3DH Zinc [)440-66-61 " 948 u9/L 1 3.8 10.0 3F10016 EPA 2DO.7 06/1211312:22 Jon FINAL This report rdalm unly to the sample as recaved by the IaOoralory, and mdy only M rnprMnttd In full. Pnyn) of 30 r Description: Outfall 001 www.encolabs.com Lab Sample ID: C305031-01 Matrix: Surface Water Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Sampled: 06/07/13 1q:g5 Sampled By: CLIENT Work Order: C305031 Classical ChemistryParameters _................- - - - - ENCU -. - _. _............._._. ^ . �ry rediliedawtyre (NC 591J - . - ............... ........... ........... .... Anallo- [ CAS NumbNumberl - Chemialo Results �R nits DF MDL MRL ^ rygen oemana [ECL-0035] 130 mOh 1 10 10 Itch Mna -By Note, PH [Ett-0062] ^ 3F12022 SM 5R01>106199) 06/ll/ll D:56 7.5 lapN 1 Total Suspended Solias [ECL-0169]^ 990 1.0 1.0 3FIM21 SM 06/10/13 14:29 Cly Q m9/L 1 1.0 LD 9500Ha&2000 3F11009 SM 25oc,1992 05/11/1310:10 CV FINAL This reppn relates only to me lamplc m fe d'W by me OWratry, anp may only he regotlu[e0 in run. FaOe 8 of 30 ' w .encolabs.com Received: 06/07/ 13 16:76 Work Order: C305031 Classical Chemistry Parameters Analvte 1 A N b l Oil & Grease (HEM-&GT) Non -Polar Material Description: Outfa II 001 Matrix: Surface Water Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Lab Sample ID: C305031-01 Sampled: 06/07/ 13 14:45 Sampled By CLIENT R8.10 esults 19 Units m9/L UE MDL MRL Batch Meth od 2.49 7.79 3F12018 EPA 1664A Ana_lwed 1Y Natu 06/14/13 09:44 MlF FINAL IDis,port relates only to the eamnlr as rxeivM 6y Ne klvrmory and may only pe reFnWUC 0 in full. Page 9 0f 30 Description: Outfall 002 w .encolabs.com Lab Sample ID: C305031-02 Matrix: Surface Water Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Sampled: 06/07/13 15:00 Work Order: C305031 Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Sampled BY: CLIENT Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods ............. E_._..........._..__.._......._._._......_.... _....... _.. ...... ^ - NCO (try certifiedana/yfe(NC 591J .. .. ........ ......... AnalYte fCAS Numberl Cadmium [2H0-43-9] ^ Result FJa_9 0.693 Units DF MDL MR1, Batch Method Analyzed Copper [2H0-50.81 ^ ] u9/L 1 IAO 3FIM16 EPA 200.7 _13 6610 u9/L t L60 LAO 06/12/13 12:25 12: ]d1 Iron [7039-89-6] ^ 3010 Iso 3FJW16 EPA 200J 06/12/1312:25 JEH Leaa[743"2-1]^ 765 u9/L 1 50 3FI0016 EPA 200.7 06112/1312:25 Jw Zinc [7H0-fib-6] n 293 u9/L 1 .1 10.0 3FIN16 EPA 200.7 JDH u9/L 1 3.1 3.a 30.0 3F10016 EPA 200.7 06112/1312:25 06/12/138:25 ]py FINAL Thla repnn relates only tp th, sample ea ia,,al 0y me NOcratpry, and may only ba reprnr0irrq in NII. Poge lu o130 ly.......�........��.�`r. "eJ Description: Outtall 002 wwW.encolabs.com Lab Sample ID: C305031-02 Matrix: Surface Water Received: O6/07/13 16:26 Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Sampled: 06/07/13 15:00 Work Order: C305031 Sampled By: CLIENT Classical Chemistry Parameters ^ - ENCO Carycerr/{/eyarolyre [NC 591] . ........ .. ..... A naIK [CASNumberl Result, Had Chemical Oxygen Demand [ECL-0035] Units DI. I—I'D—S FRS Batch Method Anal .. 52 m9/L 1 10 10 3F17022 SM 5220c-1997 Notes 06/17/13 17:56 30C PH [ECL-00631 ^ 7.7 Topl suspended holies [ECL-0169] ^ 53 pM 1 1.0 1.0 3F10021 SM 4S00.Ya&2000 06/10/13 14:24 C1V Q m0A 1 L0 1.0 3F110U9 SM 254UD-1997 06/11/13 10:10 N FINAL This report rdau, only to fl,e sample es r..W by the laborat ory, and mdY only M raprMoree In full. page 11 0l aU Description: Outfall 002 Lab Sample ID: C305031-02 d: 06 07/13 -com Matrix; Surface Water Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Sampled: 06/07/13 15:00 Work Order: C305031 Sampled By; CLIENT Classical Chemistry parameters An IK I M mb 1 Oil a Grease (HEM-SGr) Nan -Polar Material [ECL-01041 Results Flag Units DF MDL MRL BatCb Method ethod 1 1.92 6.01 3F12018 EPA 1664A Ana_ lyg By NSF 06/11/13111:, M]F FINAL 3M5 report F6auc onlv In ffi✓ sample a: rttelvdl by Ine laoorau,, and may only b reproduced in full. Page 12 of 30 Description: Outfa II 003 Matrix: Surface Water Lab Sample ID: C305031-03 16�.encolabs.com Project; Raleigh Metal Recycling Sampled: 06/07 /13 14:15 Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Storm Wa[er Sampled By: CLIENT Work Order: C305031 Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods ^-ENCO CaY (NC 59lJ .... Fmtified anaNre ..... .. ............... ......... . AnaA� 1CA5 Nlmbl ... .......... ......... Caamlum [)ga013-91 ^ Results ag nits DF MOL Met. c^ooe. [)a40.50.9J ^ c' [7 1.99 uyL MRL 1 Batch Method An I M ��- iron - 9-6 1 ^ 62'7 ug/L 2.00 1 1.60 3FIM16 EPA 200J BY Notes 06/12113 12:34 Lead [7439-92-1) ^ 1"D ug/L 10.0 1 22 3F10016 EPA 200J IDH 06/12/13 12:39 Zinc I)+90-fib-6 1 ^ 16.1 ug/L 60 1 3FI0016 EPA 2DD.7 ]OH O6/II/1312:34 691 ug/L .1 l0A I 3.8 10.0 3F10016 EPA 2pOJ 3DH O6/12 13 12:39 / 3F10016 EPA 2DDJ IDH 06/II/13 12:34 IDH FINAL This report related only t0 the semolg as rpreivad by the tllW'1tory, and may only De reproduced in lull. Page 13 of 30 Description: Outfall 003 WMM-encolabs.com Lab Sample ID: C305031-03 Matrix: Surface Water Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Sampled: 13 14:15 Work Order: C305031 Sampled By: C CLIEN LIEN T Classical Chemistry Parameters ^ - fNCO Gry cedifiedawly/e (NC 59fJ A IMA !�,rl ResultsF� units OF Chemical Oxygen Demand [ECL-00351 MDI, MRL Batch Method d 0 _ pM [ECL-0063] ^ mgn' 1 ID 30 3Fll011 5M 92106199J -nnn�-lyze� 61' Nate 06/17/13 17:56 30C � 6 Total Spspentled Solitls [ECL-0169 ] ^ PH 1 1.0 1.0 3F10011 5M 06/10/1319:14 �1y Q 13 fpg/L 1 1.0 1.0 3F110p9 a500H1 5M 1540&pD1997997 06/11/13 10:10 CV FINAL This romp rWates only to the sample ae ImOved by On laboratory, and may only M r✓produc9d in full. Pape 14 o130 Description: Outfa II 003 Lab Sample ID: C305031-03 �w.encolabs.com Matrix: Surface Water Received: 06/07/1316:26 Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Sampled: 06/07/13 14:15 Sam led e Work Order: C305031 Classical Chemistry parameters P y. CLIENT Analvre frill N Berl Oil B Grease (HEM-SGn Non -Polar Material [E4-0100] Result, Bag units DF MDL MRL Batch Method M90. 1 2.11 6.56 3FI2018 EPA 1664A Ana_yld BY Notes 06/14/130a:44 MY FINAL T AS report relates only in the sample a feceil J W Me lapnee , and may only ,reproduced in lull. Pogo 15 o130 Description: Outfall 004 Matrix: Surface Water Lab Sample ID: C305031-04 11w'encolabs.com Project: Raleigh Metal 'RI ecyding Storm Wa[er Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Sampled: 06/07/13 I9:15 Sampled B Wark Order: C305031 Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods Y: CLIEFIT A - ENCO Ca tl'�etr6edana/y(e INC 59IJ - ............. nal�_FCAS Numberl ...... . ............ . Catlmium [)ggpy3-91 ^ Result, Bag Un_irs - C9pper [7"0-50-B] • 2.32 u9/L OF MDL MRL Batch Me Iron od [)439-89-6] ^ 32.9 u9/L I 0.360 1.00 3FI0016 EPA 00) Ana[vZ d S— I 92- 1120 22 1p,0 3F10016 06/B/13 B:3) 10H Leatl )939- 11 ^ u0/L 1 EPA 200.) 06/12113 12:3I Zinc [)440.66-6] ^ 6'3 J 22 Sp 3F10016 EPA 200.7 JDH 943 u9/L 1 2.1 10.0 06/12/1312:3) 3F10016 Jp1 ug/L 1 3.8 MCI EPA 2pp,) 0611211312:37 Jay 3F10016 EPA 200.7 06/12/1312:37 JDH FINAL r% rewq tdJ trS chly t, [he 5anlple d5 tetelvetl by the abOlalety, dntl r ay Only be lep,M... d In rnli. Page 16 of 30 Description: Outfa11004 Matrix: Surface Water Lab Sample ID: C305031-04 '" .encolabs.com project: Raleigh Metal Reryding Storm Water Sampled: O6/07/13 1 4;15 Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Classical Chemistry parameters Sampled By: CLIENT W ork Order: C305031 ^ -ENCO !aryce?i/&dana .N......... A"alVIA ICAS N —mob 1 ............... ^hemiwl Ozy9en Demand [EC1-00351 Result, F[_ag Units DF MDL pM [ECL.0062]+ 100 mg/L 1 30 MOL Batch 3F17022 Method SM Anal PA N 7.e Torol Suspended Solids[Ea-01691• 1 ON 1.0 5220619W 06/17/—�g6 a 26 I.0 3F10021 S^1 06/10/1314.24 m90. 1 1.0 1.045Wrya&2000 3F11009 SM 25 oo-1997 CiV Q 06/11/13 10:10 CV FINAL This Iepon Idw, oily y the ssoiple aS reccyved by the Wp IatM, and may only by reooduced in fuff Pege 17 o130 Description: Outfa II 004 Matrix: Surface Water Lab Sample ID: C305031-04 "FAr .encolabs.com Project; Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Sampled: 06/07/13 14:15 Work Ord Sampled By; CLIENT er• C305031 Classical Chemistry parameters Analyte fCA_ g_-6 rl . oil & Grease (HEM-5GT) Hon Polar Material [EC1--03UGI Re ul Flag mUnits DF MDL MRL B, ch3.28 Method 9A 1.61 e 5.66 3F12018 EPA 1664A Ana�ed B uy Nolte 06/14/1300:44 MY FINAL This report relates mly la tnc MMPle ds receive] by are and "Y only he reprwp ec in lull. Page 19 0130 Description: Outfa II 005 Matrix: Surface Water Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Lab Sample ID: C305031-05 Sampled: 06/07/13 13:45 Sampled By: CLIENT WW Nencolabs.com Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Work order: C305031 - - _-- -. -• -• -�� ��r m5 mecnods ^ - ENCO Cary redirkd 8Wryre (NC 5911 ..... . . . . . ....... . Arlalyte FCAS Number] Cadmium [7440-43-9] ^ R su is FI SJ_ �9 Uni DF NUI NR�I Batch Copper I7440-50-e] ^ 2.05 1 0.360 1.00 Method An z Notes lme [7439-89-6] ^ 65.1 p9/L 1 1.60 10.0 3F10016 EPA 200.7 06/12/1 g.39 3DN Lead [7439-92-1] ^ 436 A/L 1 22 50 3FI0016 EPA 200,7 06/12/1312:39 1P4 Zinc [7"0-66-6] ^ 7.1 3 u9/L 1 2A 10.0 3F10016 EPA 20pJ 06112/13 12:39 Jon 189 u9/1 1 3FIN16 EPA 200.] 06/12/13 12:39 3DM 3.6 1D.0 3F10016 EPA 2pOJ 06/12/13 8:39 ]pry FINAL Thic report relate; only W the -niple 35 rOOOyed b the la Y bpratnry, anq may only be rcprodueN iu roll. Pa90 19 of 30 Description: Ou[fall 005 Matrix: Surface Water Lab Sample ID: C305031-05 yyvr ✓-encolabs.c°m Project; Raleigh Metal Recycling Sampled: 06/07/ 13 13: q 5 Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Storm Water Sampled 6 Y: CLIENT Work Order: C305031 Classical a Chemistry Parmeters ...................................... ^-61VW Cary mrtil�yanayte (NC 59t/ ....... - AmalYte I[A N --""' Chemical oxygen Derv, IECL-0036 Result' Flag ] ni DF MDL M3L <3 pH IECL-0062]+ Batch m9/L 1 10 10 3F12020 thod SM MSg0 9J Ana> fyi� MY Notes 1 06/12/13 16:23 Xc Tobl6uspentled 6glitls IECL-0169] + 1'0 1.0 3F10021 yt 3.2 mg/L 1 1.0 1.0 15004'a-20M 06/10/1314.21 C1V Q 3F11009 SM 2590P1992 06/11/13 10:10 CV FINAL I his report no," m1Y [g me ampe of r"C w by the WOmatow. end maY only 6e relxwuceo in Full. Po9e 20 of 30 Description: Ou[fall 005 Matrix: Surface Water Lab Sample ID: C305031-05 Sampled: 06/07/13 13: q5 Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Sa I W`A"vencolabs.com Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Work Order: C305031 Classical Chemistry Parameters PIP ed By: CLIENT Analvt !` r�� OY & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Malenal [ECL-01M] Result, Units 2.03- MMDL MRL Bat b Method m9/L I2.03 6.35 �� 3FBDIa EPA 1669A Analn,d @Y Not,, 06/14/13 D9:44 M3F FINAL. This lelgn "`ItQ d'1y [O the Llmltle a6 feCCivGI by nle dbdUPP11, and mdy only bQ IQOIptl�Cetl In full. Page 21 of 30 Description: 011tfall 006 W Ww.encolabs.com Lab Sample ID: C305031-06 Matrix: Surface Water Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Sampled: 06/07/13 14:35 Work Order: C305031 Sampled By: CLIENT Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods ^ - ENCO Cary re?ified ana/y(e (NC 5911 A alyte fCAS Number] Reesu_IL FLaq Units DF MD MRL Cadmium [7440-43-9] A S.9fi _5 Method A I 8 No copper [7440-50-8] ^ 93= u9/L 1 0.360 1.00 3FI0016 FI 01 EPA 200.7 —� 06/12/13 12:42 Iron [7439.89.61 A 39800 1.60 nex 3F10016 EPA 200.7 JpH 06/12/13 12:12 Jd1 Lead [)d39-92-1]^ 9-92-] 511 71 09/L 1 22 50 3FIN16 EPA 200.7 06/12/1312:42 Lint [(74 ^ i ug/L 1 2.1 10.0 3FI0016 EPA 200.7 JnH 06/12/13 12:42 og/L 1 3.8 10.0 3FI0016 EPA 20D.7 JOH O6/12/13 II:42 JDN FINAL This rcmq n6aWb unly to the sample as received bV the abpratery, and may only be reproduced in lull. Page 22 of 30 Description: Outfall 006 Matrix: Surface Water Project; Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Lab Sample ID: C305031-06 Sampled: 06/07/13 14:35 Sampled By: CLIENT wwtv.encolabs.com Received: 06/07/ 13 16:26 Work Order: C305031 ... ..... _.._._. - _......«c,a ^ - ENCO bry cad/fiedanaly(e /NC 59y Analyte IrAS Nlmb,l Chemical Pgpen Demand IECL-00351 Results2_9 unitsOF MDL MR Batch PH [ECL-0062] ^ m9/L _S 1 10 10 3F12020 Method 5M 52 6g9) A —nalnd Y NotCf 9.2 1 06/12/13 16:23 3DC Total 15uspended Solids [ECL-0169]^ 660 1.0 1'0 3FI0021 5M 06/10/1319:24 mg4 0 1.0 3F110m 9600H+e-2000 C1V Q SM 259pP1997 06/11/1310y0 cy FINAL This rePon relate, only 1P the Sample as FMMW by pie Wboratwy, and may only be raooduced in full. Page 23 of 30 Description: Outfall 006 �® Lab Sample ID: C305031-06 �1vvr•encolabs.com Matrix: Surface Water Received: 06/07/13 16:26 Project: Raleigh Metal Recycling Storm Water Sampled led BY: : CLIENT O6/07/13 1q:35 Work Order: C305031 Classical Chemistry Parameters .................................... AnalVt f AS N b l Oil & Grease (HEM-IGT) Non -Polar Material (EQ-01041 Results.m9/L Units DF MOIL MRL Bpsb Method t 2.15 6.72 3F12018 EPA t66aA Anahozed BY Not 06/11/13 W,;A FUF FINAL This teri wlate5 only to the >eIrryle a5 received b, the laboratory, and may only ber,producedinfull. Page 24 of 30 Meals by EPA 200 Series Batch 3FIO016 - EPA 3OO5A Blank (3FLDD36-BLKI) LC • Y•`,r,l j f i....,., �O, :.a.°J QUALITY CONTROL Prepared: 06/10/2013 09:57 Analyzed: 06/12/2013 12:02 Caemium "c'-`5aS\ m :.. F,?a LeveJ ^s,�i.J ResulLp--,, NREC.,. 1 i _F- Li mits'(e a360 :e':RPD z.yl.(.Limi[} t41 `F. Copper Iron ,No[e3 1.60 U 10.0 Ug/L Lea! 2 U 50 ogA Zinc 2.1 U 10.0 ug/L 3.8 U 10.0 o9A LCS (31`10016-11SI) ... .......... eta '.-is1 0130957 Analyzed 06/12/201312:05a Rd Anals 1e J na ? r .�,. c Y Results "Flag /MRL / � U t 't SP,_ So � y hIV / REC 1 IRPD Catl z04 t 00 Level ) R ult /REC LI t dyRV �gPpe 9/L 20.0 102 85-115 01 Iron 0.0 u9A 200 101 65-115 977 Led0 50 u9/L I000 98 BS116 02 zinc 10.0 uga zoo 101 207 BSlls 10.0 ug/L zoo Matrix Spike (3F10016-MS1) Source: C211747-01 Prepared: 06/10/2013 09:57 Analyzed: 06/12/2013 12:11 Analy[e1 rp,r�,ttF4 li yr t S.i � 4 1! , t......9S rr.141 ly ',Result k y �45 y� (�0 P ket t ,, Sources( c'Y' t t s;,i hREC ° - Calmrum,.Level ., t. Result, ':'�' tI �S tia: RPDxi§`�S, 23.9 u94 20.0 aNa REC;;�Llmlts ,,,,L`! RPD, _r Limit i' S Notes 1.00 3.6] - 319 99 70130 Imn 10.0 u9e1 200 22.2 99 6600 70-130 Lead 50 ug/L I000 SNO 76 70-130 13 Zinc 10.0 1490 °g/L 200 10.6 101 70-130 .. 10.0 ug/L 200 1330 89 70-13D Matrix Spike Dup (3F10036-MSD1) ...... Source: C211747-01 Prepared: 06/10/2013 09:57 Analyzed: 06/12/2013 12:13 � r Spike ark„ry Source Analyteu�^6k�Result ry.. i? S rs�7M )6 1F' - *+a -r a.rn'I ..ikr t eery r ,tyr Calm �" Flay +.:MRL1 qx',.)-Units (Result,";` o nl / RECk 1 3ty i RPD`,r,,*, r r rj um ,yLevelib wr/oREC.,n i{tj Limits Y.,ORPD y, Limltt;; 23.8 100 Notes Copper Ug/l 20.0 k'.+.r e_..:.. 229 3.67 101 70�130 2 30 Iron ug/L 200 22.2 6120 10.0 IN 70-130 4 30 Lead 213 50 ug/L I" 5090 IN 70-130 5 30 Zinc 10.0 IS50 u9/L 20p 10.6 101 ]0.130 0.1 30 t0.0 ug/L 200 1330 30 ............................................................ Post Spike (3F10016-PSI) ...... . ... -- ................... Source: C211747-01 Prepared: 06/10/2013 09:57 Analyzed: 06/12/2013 12:15 �.. I „T 4r rt; •...3 r GCYte,A LVIdM 5 e Result' Flag MRL v, kREC RPD 2 Result W REC, LI k 0 @9 0 D01 RPD Ll t N t C PC 9/L 0 0200 0.004 IDI 80.B0 0.23 Iron 01 0.m9/L 0.200 0.02 103 80-120 6 Lead 0.05 mg/L LW 5 90 86120 0.2 Zinc 0.01 m9/L 0.200 0.01 1W 80-120 1.5 0.01 mg/L 0.200 Batch 3FIOO21 - NO PREP LCS (3F10D21-BSl) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/10/2013 11:23 FINAL This report nste, only to the..enrple as receive! by the laborat IXy, And may only pe repmducc! In lull. Page 25 0130 Classical Chemistry parameters - Batch 3F10021 - NO PREP LCS (3F30021-BSI) Continued QUALITY CONTROL Prepared & Analyzed: 06/10/2013 11:23 1 nro J""9, _-._._.,,,.,,av .mnL'aal._`+.Umtr'ei'-, Leveh ,_.._• .+.,er -e.a RPu PH J0 Ei .d.: Result a -_%REC: rUmrtr �y�u_RPD .. n „�" LO PH ]Ol Im 99-101-sLimi[ �i-Notesp,_,� Duplicate (31`10021-DUPI) Source: C304753-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/10/2013 14:24 Batch 3F11009 - NO PREP Blank (3F11009-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed 06/11/2013 10:10 Tpblunl[s"•i.( omen SPlitls VUeve1 *,,'a'.Re p, ,, RFC,,.k ,t Limltr ry; RPD w uT" 1 -sult '�'- y °"Limltdt`Notes'rrl. U t.0 mg/L LCS (3F13009-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed 06/11/2013 10:10 m Analyte y ^�imy r, 2 �' a4 r a "Spike 0' Source ij r °- T ta15 ceeee Sole 9 t MRL U ts'� /REC L e11 Res It /REC L P- F PRPD tUmitr 90 0 9/L is 100 N .............................................................. 90 60.1]0 Duplicate (3F13009-DUPI) ............................... ...... ... .. .. Source: C211747-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/2013 10:10 .. _.._..__._...._._. a 10 (3F11009-DUP2) ......................................................................................... ................. Duplicate SOUR¢: C211747-02 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/2013 10:10 Batch 3F11010 -Same Blank(3F12020-BLKl) Prepared: 06/12/2013 12:06 Analyzed: 06/12/2013 16:23 Cheml-1 Oavgen O mane - .�I"'^ l'¢evel VI f Result ryVS %RECp t'...` 10 U 10 mg/l ..Limits l .;,RPI).. ,„� ❑mrt1 ,, Notesk�i° LCS (3F12020-BS1) .. 1 Prepared 06/12/2013 12:06 Analyzed: 06/12/2013 16:23 a..':i.._s:. .. ° M,g ;a' ,..'.,.:r *u .a...a,.., y ,R. e:. .....t .,.,. ,I ...<.> _in.. o���u ., wq .Level "_}`' .Result=.^ill 2. Chemical Oggen oemane 520 10 /REC .,y; Liinitr RPD xnt LImR .jy Notes'4' m9/L 500 90.110 Maui: Spike (3F12020-MS1) Source: C305031-05 Prepared: 06/12/2013 12:06 Analyaed: 06/12/2013 15:23 CM1emical Orygm .: e's. Result �,�Fla9al .v ..MRL Units'. Y Level nt w l /REC l Result ':,?/ I.zr RPD °% 7• {, . �s �a Demane 550 10 ,: .u„'�tx REC a iaLlmitr K .. RPD° iY r Q 'i' 4mlt I NotesIx mB/L S00 43 02 90.110 •. • FINAL ThIs rPPort relates _ly W Ili¢ Sample as recerval6r me W6ara1 nry, are may only 4 reproeucee'n full. POBe 26 of 30 QUALITY CONTROL Batch 3F12020 - Same ® 211- =- r Matrix Spike Dup (3F12020-MSD3) Source: C305031-05 Prepared: 06/12/2013 12:06 Analyzed: 06/12/2DI3 16:23 Geml[al Orygeo Oemand 550 10 mg/L S00 43 DREG Limits RPD gLlmit Notes 101 90.110 0.0 10 Batch 3F17072 -Same Blank (3F37022-BLKi) Prepared: 06/17/2013 14:21 Analyzed: 06/17/2013 17:56 __-„r..,o ,.�arxren.eve: ffi4�ResulL %'RECr`t _ .•• k Chemlral Orygen Demand t0 U mg/L aLimits RPD, , Lfin(t 'Notes LCS(3F17022-BS1) Prepared: 06/17/2013 14:21 Analyzed: 06/17/2013 17:56 ..--�+-��=.0rtevainesm[La1kL%REC^ limits _ --""' emieal Orygen Demand 520 10 m9/L 500 RBU Limit Notes,: 106 95110 Matrix Spike (3F17022 -MS 1) Source: C305703-02 Prepared: 06/17/2013 14:21 Analyzed: 06/17/2013 17:56 Chemical Oxygen Demand 560 " "eJava®I!nesurz,L, v/o REC LimitrRPD Limi`9allotes �!.. m9/L 500 96 109 90.1ID Matrix Spike Dup (3FD022-MSD1) � � � � ' ' "' - "' ' ' ' ' ' ' Source: C305703-02 - Prepared: 06/17/2013 14:21 Analyzed: 06/17/2013 17:56 Ge iral Orygen 4mand 560 10 mg4 SW 46 Omifs RPD_, Limit Notes 109 90.110 0 10 QUALITY CONTROL Classical Chemistry parameters - Quality Control Batch 3FI2018 - EPA 1664A Blank (3F12018-BLKi) Prepared: 06/13/2013 11:00 Analyzed: 06/14/2013 09:33 .... 0f ,. '_. :`!?.'•tlKcm.lro r..w+�ivo-rrcew.�::�...._.�..—_._.. Oil a Grease(HEM-SGT) Non -Polar --- ---- "" •r''nesm[ %RECijmits`31RPD limit Notes ram„( Material 1.60 U 5.00 mg/L LCS (31F12018-851) .mLuaeevmm �_wa _-._ Prepared: 06/13/2013 11:00 Analyzed: 06/14/2013 09:33 Ojl &Grease (HEM-SGi) NoroPolar Material :w&iR En:Reaun;;{jNyj,YalteC "Limits. RV0 limit N es 30.1 5.00 mg/L 20.3 .............. 99 64132 Matrix Spike (3F12018-M53) Source: B30254402 Prepared: 06/13/2013 11:00 Analyzed: 06/14/2013 09:33 1.60U -,- {1tg;36+132 RPD :;Llmi[ air:" Oil &Grease (HEM-SGT) Non-Pdar Material 19.6 600 mg/L 20.4 L60 U a96 6413] .......... .......... Matrix Spike Dup (3F12018-MSD1) Prepared: 06/13/2013 11:00 Analyzed: 06/14/2013 09:33 FINAL This report relates only b the sample as rectived 6/ Me laboratory, and may only M roproduecd in full. Page [I pt 30 . _ a O)UALrrY CONTROL Batch 3FI2018- EPA 1664A Matrix Spike Dup (3F12018-MSDI) Continued Source: 0302544-02 Prepared: 06/13/2013 11:00 Analyzed; 06/14/2013 09:33 wr a> Analyte fr_n a��r�`S"?M ,�= m _ yResul-4rFla9k \rMRL,.,� .d+« Units �"�Ss��ke r Source s'�F"' n /REC ^'! 7 : �' S. RPD s I A t t - 01 &Grease (HEM sC� Nan Polar Meterlal 20 5 5.00 m L F a §Level!{s: ResNt > ?, / R E C E"3y�`Limllsijtl RPD xNOtes"` 9/ 20.5 1.60. t00 6 132 '1 34 FINAL This report relates mly W Na ample as mceivW by llm 1,1xi atory, ane may only be rexxjX,,, in fu". Page 28 a130 i www.encolabs.com FLAGSINOTES AND DEFINITIONS B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank. D The sample was analyzed at dilution. _ I The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) and the laboratory method reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable. D The analyte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable. E The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the instrument. This value is considered an estimate. MRL Method Reporting Limit. The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor, dilution factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content. 2 Analysis performed outside of method - specified holding time. FINAL IDis IaPalt Idatee only to me samole as rxry , M the labors[ ary, and may only4 reµ Wu«J In luLL Page 29 of 30 24Hour No46f , ion of Discharge Forme For Mon -UST This form should be completed and submitted to the UST Section's regional office following a known or suspected release of Relensae of petroleum from a source other than an underground storage tank This form is required to be submitted within 24 hours of Petroleum In NC discovery of a known or suspected petroleum release (DWM USE ONLY) Suspected Contamination? (Y/N) Y Release discovered incident if Priority Rank (H,LL,U) _ Confirmed GW Contamination? (YIN) w (tima/date): Received (sms/date) Confirmed Soil Contamination ?(YIN) r 841-2013 Rt 1200 hours Received by Reglon Samples taken?(Y/N) N Free product? (YIN) N Reported by (circle one): Phone. Fax or Report If Yes(free product), state greatest thickness: _feet INCIDENT DESCRIPTION Incident Name: Oil -Water MICH Discharge Address (street numberhrama):;231 Gamer Road County: Wake ciryrtown: Raleigh zip Code: 27610 R tonal Office (circle one): Asheville, Mooresville, Fayetteville, le' ashin ton VVI]mlnc cn,Winston-Salem Latitude (d mmi d.rr.N.): 35.749844 Longitude (d.dma dw ) :-78.632680 Obtained by: 0 GPS Describe suspected or confirmed release (nature of release, time/date of release, quantity of release, amount of free product): O Electronic; topographic map 0 GIS Address matching 0 Other Illicit discharge of oil and water. Discovered @ 1200 hours. Unknown quantity, Unknown prod. volume Describe initial response/abatement (timalidate release stopped, cleanup begurdcomp/etod, quentay of product soe removed confirmation sampling): 0 Unknown Describe location: Outlets plugged. Impacted water on ground surface recovered. Sorbent booms installed. Describe impacted receptors: Soil. No known surface waters Impacted. Stormiwater Inlets Impacted and water/oil recovered. HOW RELEASE WAS DISCOVERED (Release code) (Chock one) 0 Observation of Release at Occurrence 0 Water Supply Well Contamination 0 Visual or Olfactory Evidence ❑ Surface Water Contamination 0 Soli Contamination ❑ Other (specify) ❑ Groundwater Contamination SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION Source of Release Cause of Release Type of Release Product Type Released (Check one Indicate primary (Check one to Indicate prmary (Check one) (Check one to Indicate primary petroleum product type released) 0 AST (tank) 0 Spill (Accidental) 0 Petroleum 0 Gasoline/ Dleselt ❑ DlsseWeg. Oil 0 AST Pipagl Dispenser ❑ Spill (Intentional) 0 Both Petroleum Kerosene Blend 0 AST Delivery Problem 0 Corrosion & Non -Petroleum 0 El I - E20 ❑ Vegetable Oil 100% 0 OTR Vehicle Tank ❑ Physical or Mechanical ❑ E21 - E94 0 Heating Oil 0 OTR Bulk Transport Tank Damage Locatlon ❑ E85-E99 ❑ waste oil 0 RR Bulk Transport Tank 0 Equipment Failure (Check one) ❑ Ethanol 100% ❑ Mineral Oil -no 0 Traraknner 0 AST Overfill I] Facility PCSS ❑ '0 Unknown 0 AST Installation Problem Mineral OlI-PCBs 0 Residence ❑ Unknown 0 Other 0 Highway/Road +❑ Other Petroleum 0Other w.Maaan.�.... Products �w 0 Railway . Definitions presented on revsrss DegMUons presented on reverse 0 Other Ownership 1. Municipal 2. Military 3. Unknown 4. Private 5. Federal 6. County 7. State Operation Tvpe 1. Public Service 2. Agrlcukurel 3. Residential 4. EducationR2elg. 5. Industrial 4cCommerda 7. Mining Guidance presented on reverse UST Form 62 (5rn u) Page t of 2 IMPACT ON DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES Water Supply Wells Affected? 1. Yes 2. No . Unknown Number of Water Supply Wells Affected Ust of Water Supply Wells Contaminated: (Include Users Names, Addresses and Phorre Numbers. Attach addlllonal sheet If necessary) 1. 2. 3. PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR RELEASE ('tithe source of the release is not an AST system or ff It Is an AST system and there is a responsible party other Man fire AST sysfam owneN operator) Name of PersonlCompeny Address Raleigh Metals Re clin 2310 Gamer Road C State Zip Code Telephone Number Raleigh NC 27610 919-828-5426 AST SYSTEM OWNER (if the source of Me release is an AST system) AST Owner/Company Address na City Sfafe Zip Code Telephone Number AST SYSTEM OPERATOR (if the source of the release is an AST system) UST Operator/Company -Address na city State Zip Code Telephone Number LANDOWNER AT LOCATION OF INCIDENT Landowner Address — Seymour Brown Investment Co., Inc. P.O. Box 10809 City Goldsboro State NC 23 Code 27532-0609 Telephone Number To Be Determined Draw Sketch of Area or Provide Map (showing incident site, iocatlon of release, two mq)orroad Intersections, potential receptors) Attach sketch a map to form. Give Directions to Incident Site Attach directions to form ffnecessary. See Attached Person Reporting InctdwtjOe Be Co ny Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. Telephone Numbergl9-848-3155 Title principal Geologist dress 8410-0 Falls of Neuse Road: Raleigh, NC 27615 Date 8-21-2013 UST Form 62 (uvr iu) Page 2 of 2 Definition, of Sourm AST (Tank): means the tank is used to store product AST Piping: means the piping and connectors running from the tank to the dispenser or other end -use equipment AST Dispenser. inchades the dispenser and the equipment used to connect the dispense to the piping AST Delivery Problem: identifies releases that occurred during product delivery to the mak. OTR Vehicle Tank: means the tank is used to store product to fuel an over the road vehicle OTR Bulk Transport Tank: means a tank that is used m transport product in bulk over the road (by truck) RR :bulk Transport Tank: mesas a tank that is used to transport product in bulk by train Tmnsformcr. means electrical transformer Other: serves as the option to use when the release source is known but does not fit into one of the preceding categories Unknown: identifies releases for which the source has not been determined De6nldons of Cause Spill (Accidental): use this raise when a spill occurs accidentally(e.g., when the delivery host is disconnected from a fill pipe) Spill (Intentional): use this cause when a spill occurs intentionally (e.g., intentional dumping or breakage) Corrosion; use when a metal tank, piping or other component has a release due to corrosion Physical or Mechanical Damage: use for all types ofphysical or ravehanical damage, except corrosion Equipment failure: use when a release occurs due to equipment failure other data conosion or physical or mechanical damage AST Overfill: use when an overfill occurs (e.g, overfills may occur from the fill pipe at the tank or when the nozzle fails to shut offer the dispenser) AST Installation Problem: use when the problem is determined to have occurred specifically because the AST system was not installed properly Other: use this option when the cause is known but does not fit into one of the preceding categories Unknown: use when the cause has not been determined Guidance: Ownership and Operator Type Ownership select the category which d.-bes owner of the AST system, bulk transport tank, or other release source Opcmtor Type select the category which desenbes the operation in which ow ea uses the AST system, bulk nanspon tank, or other release sours Kaleigh, North Carolina, United States ' '1 7 (i V 1.40 Exit / {"y^— I .•� I 1 . 1-0 a EW RalegFy NC 27610Slat Location . T5- M, COPY19M O 1ggg.20p1 M= Gory. anNm ib weglWn. Al rlghla reserved. htlpJArvw.INoroaoll coMttreeb 00 Cepydght 200D M G«grepMc Oma T«hnoto . Inc. NI dgha maery .O2000 NWpUm Tethnlogb . MI dght, raeerved. Thb eels IndWm IMor Son taken w aem le w from Gmudan aomodgea 0 H Malady IM Queen in FagM of Ce ". CDpydpM 2000 M Caryosearch Mc rkeNq DM end SWema Ltd. . I/ / r r ------------- I 1 -- s �6V jd:Ll ID ATLANTIC CIENI./IF SEYMOUR BROWN INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. --•- REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONf A S S O C I A T E S, INC. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA o. RALEIGH METALS PROCESSORS n RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLIN4 ^®^- Engineering & Environmental Solutions SOIL EXCAVATION, BARRIER PLACEMENT ^ �wM. o°�gu�m`m^"ro"Ofn..`rc. a-`:re.".`c`"•'ffi•'�au�w...c•.�..5�...eo Kw a..m....r�, ffw.a o. .mwn.an .m noecAS HeweouAr vroxE: �a,e�isome AND TREATMENT AREAS •� •m•••m• .o�'i'"nm:e°F.o9n4.w."�`.4m•`�s'..�c e"E`. 276u .u: 014. _ � - _ OOOR1E69.00 3 Parnell, David From: Bennett, Bradley Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 11:24 AM To: Parnell, David; Pullinger, Robert C Subject: FW: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling Attachments: ATT00002.c; ATT00005.htm FYI Bradley Bennett Stormwater Permitting Program Phone: (919) 807-6378 NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Fax: (919) 807-6494 1617 Mail Service Center Email: bradlev.bennettcDncdenr.gov Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Web: httpalportal.ncdenr.org/web/Irlstormwater Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws From: Senior, Mark [mailto:Mark.Senior@raleighnc.gov] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 11:20 AM To: Holley, John; Bennett, Bradley; Smith, Danny Cc: Duffy, Peter; Rall, Todd; Boyer, Kevin Subject: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling Hey guys, thanks much for meeting with us last week. I think that was very worthwhile in terms of everyone better understanding the different parties involved and their roles. City staff are discussing the issues we are having with this site with our attorneys and could really use a copy of their signed permit (or permit application) if you have it. We could also use any monitoring data associated with this site including any self monitoring data they may have supplied. Our plan is to collect and analyze samples from the site and we will forward that data to you when we have it. Our Fire Marshal is also looking into the site based on the kinds of material stored there. They are very concerned that this site could be hazardous to their responders. Thanks, Mark Sr. Mark T. Senior, PE, Senior Project Engineer Stormwater Utility Division City of Raleigh Public Works Department PO Box 590 Raleigh NC 27602 Work Phone (919) 996-4012 Fax (919) 996-7633 Email mark. seniorCcDraleiohnc.00v www.raleighnc.00v Name Greg Brown William Toole Jay Butler Dan Nielsen Mark Senior Pete Duffy Todd Rall Nicolette Fulton Phil Orozco Kim Caulk John Walch Chris Pullinger Matt Auffman Bradley Bennett Danny Smith David Parnell Eric Green Organization/Role Raleigh Scrap Metal Recycling Attorney for RSMR Representative for SBIC (Owner) Mid -Atlantic Associates (Engineer) City of Raleigh (Stormwater) City of Raleigh (Stormwater) City of Raleigh (Stormwater) City of Raleigh (Attorney) NCDENR (Hazardous Waste) NCDENR (REC Program) NCDENR NCDENR NCDENR (REC Program) NCDENR NCDENR NCDENR (Stormwater) Wake County E-mail Rbrown@raleighscrapmeta Irecycli ng.com wtoole@rbh.com laybutler@pa rkerpoe.com dnielsen@maaonline.com mark.senior@raleighnc.gov peter.duffv@raleighnc.gov todd.rallc@raleighnc.gov nicolette.fulton@raleighnc.gov phil.orozco @ncden r.gov kim.caulk@ncdenr.gov iohn.walch@ncdenr.gov chris.pullinger@ncdenr.gov matt.aufman@ncdenr.gov brad ley. bennett@ncdenr.gov dannv.smith@ncdenr.gov david.parnell@ncdenr.gov eric.green@wakegov.com Telephone (734)740-9514 (704)377-8373 (919) 890-4144 (919) 250-9918 (919) 996-4012 (919)996-3940 (919)996-3940 (919) 996-6560 (919) 212-2501 (919)707-8350 (919) 707-8356 (919) 807-6400 (919)707-8348 (919)807-6378 (919)791-4200 (919) 791-4260 (919)795-3144 Fli NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management Pat McCrory Dexter R. Matthews John E. Skvarla, III Governor Director Secretary October 4, 2013 Mr. Daniel Nielsen, P.E. Mid -Atlantic Associates, Inc. 409 Rogers View Court Raleigh, NC 27610 Re: Project Meeting and Proposed Containment Remedy Status Raleigh Metal Processors Raleigh, Wake County, NC Site ID No.: NCD45615568 Dear Mr. Nielsen: As you are aware, the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (Branch) held a meeting on September 26, 2013 to discuss concems regarding surface water discharge issues at the Raleigh Metal Processors Site (Site). The proposed containment remedy that is part of the long -.term cleanup for the historical soil contamination was also discussed. Representatives of the City of Raleigh, Wake County, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the Division of Water Resources (DWR), and the Division of Energy, Minerals, and Land Resources (DEMLR) were present in addition to staff from the Division of Waste Management. Based on our meeting it is my understanding that in August 2013, DEMLR staff conducted inspections of the surface water discharge practices at the facility, with DEMLR issuing a Notice of Deficiency on August 271 2013. On September 20, 2013, local, state, and federal representatives performed a follow-up inspection at the facility, and the inspection results indicated surface water run-off continues to be a concern. At the conclusion of our meeting, the representatives agreed that City of Raleigh staff will work with the DWR/DEMLR to address any surface water discharge issues caused by current site operations. We also discussed the proposed containment remedy for the long-term remedy and its effect on surface water discharge issues from the current site operations. We explained that concurrence on the proposed containment remedy is tentative pending additional review and public comment. The meeting resulted in the following important issues associated with the proposed containment remedy that will need to be addressed: 1) Concern was expressed over the durability and thickness of the proposed barrier. Several representatives have conducted site inspections and are concerned that heavy machinery operations will regularly damage the barrier. They also noted that the area on the southern portion of the site that was covered with the barrier material in 2010 is not in a high traffic area (area with significant active operations). Therefore, just as the Branch has expressed concerns regarding the barrier thickness, many of the representatives are concerned about the long term durability of a 1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646 Phone: 919-707-82001Internet: ht1p://podal.ncdenr.orglweblwm An Equal Oppotluniry 1 AKrmatve Action Employer— 50 % Recycled 110%Post Consumer Paper Project Meeting and Proposed Containment Remedy Status Raleigh Metal Processors October 4, 2013 Page 2 one -foot thick cover material for adequately protecting public health. The barrier thickness design needs further evaluation. 2) Just as the Branch has expressed reservations regarding the ability to effectively monitor the proposed barrier location within "Area A" of the proposed containment remedy, the representatives were also concerned. Additionally, the survey plat shows two separate areas where contaminated soils must be covered. It is the Branch's understanding that the contaminated soil will be consolidated into one larger area and covered by the barrier for monitoring. Additional evaluation and clarification of the cover location and monitoring is needed. 3) As indicated above, recent inspections have revealed current site operations are contributing to surface water discharge to neighboring properties. The proposed remedy will need to address the long-term surface water flow and discharge at the site. The remedy must also address surface water flow issues that may affect the integrity of the proposed barrier. The above items will need to be addressed by the proposed containment remedy. Please be aware that any actions required by federal, state, and local agencies to abate the on -going surface water issues are not barred by actions of the REC Program. The property owner/operator must comply with those requirements. If you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss these items or have additional questions regarding the ongoing project activities, feel free to contact me at (919) 707-5348 or matt.aufmanaa ncdenr.00v. Sincerely, Matthew S. Aufman REC Program Superfund Section, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch cc: Ms. Jo Brown, Seymour Brown Investment Company, Inc. lp V 2 o a -� 13 NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Land Quality Section Pat McCrory, Governor Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM John E. Skvarla, III, Secretary Director September 12, 2013 CERTIFIED MAIL 47012 1640 0001 9605 7874 Mr. Paul Perrotti Raleigh Metal Recycling 2310 Garner Road Raleigh, NC 27610 Subject: Notice of Deficiency NOD-2013-PC-0361 Raleigh Metal Recycling NPDES Stormwater Permit NCG200335 Wake County Dear Mr Perrotti: On August 27, 2013, Dave Parnell and Chris Pullinger, from the Raleigh Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR) conducted a compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) at your facility, located at 2310 Garner Road in Raleigh, North Carolina. The facility lies in the watershed of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Walnut Creek, Class C NSW waters, in the Neuse River Basin. The following observations were noted during the DEMLR inspection and file review: This facility is a scrap metal processing company, which has on -site tanks utilized for used oil and petroleum derived from junked vehicles. Andy Sanderson and you were on site during the inspection and provided valuable assistance to DEMLR staff. 1628 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1628 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Ralegh, North Carolina 27609 One Phone: 919.791-42001 FAX: 919-5714718 NorthCarolina Internet: http:pnitytAcdmative Action rl Naturallr� An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer Stormwater run-off generated at such facilities is regulated by general NPDES stormwater permit NCG200000. The DEMLR Stormwater Program has issued certificate of coverage (COC) NCG200335. The permit was on site and current. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) was reviewed by DEMLR staff. The SPPP was developed during the first half of 2013 and satisfied most of the requirements of the permit. The plan lacked the following: documented employee training records and a list of significant spills - for the last three years. The monitoring reports were reviewed during the inspection. Prior to the last sampling period, only three of the six Stormwater Discharge Outfalls (SDO) noted in the SPPP were being monitored. During the last monitoring period, six SDO were monitored, qualitatively and analytically. Results from the last analytical monitoring indicated exceedences of benchmarks at one or more of the SDO, which were for Cadmium, COD, Copper, Iron, Lead, Oil and Grease, TSS and Zinc. The stormwater collection system location and the drainage area flowing to each SDO were reviewed during the inspection. Unfortunately, we were not able to determine the originating location of the stormwater, as it flowed to each SDO and then offsite. This will make the reduction of benchmark exceedences difficult to address, as you advance through the Tier system of your permit. Containment and storage of oils, fuels and other liquids were adequate, with respect to secondary containment. General housekeeping, within the shop, appeared to be adequate, as well. DEMLR Staff and Raleigh Metal Recycling staff discussed the cause and effect of an illicit discharge that was reported to DEMLR staff on August 23, 2013. The facility reports that measures have.been taken to assure that no further spill such as the one noted, will reoccur. Requested response. You are directed to respond to this letter in writing to DEMLR at the address provided below within 30 days of receipt. Please address the following items noted in bold: Please fully develop the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan by placing a list of significant spills during the last three years, as well as documenting employee training annually. The latest analytical monitoring indicated benchmark exceedences. Please adhere to the requirements of the NPDES permit with respect to the Tier program. Please provide a final account of the illicit discharge which was reported to DENR on August 23, 2013. (It may be helpful if your consultant provides the report on your behalf). 1628 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1628 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 One Phone: 919-791A2001 FAX: 919-571 A718 NorthCarolina Internee httorporty LAffi mJve coon rl a�ryturallff An Equal Opponunityl A�rma6ve Action Employer J�/K a Please respond to: Dave Parnell NCDENR/DEMLR Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-162 Should you have questions regarding these matters, please contact Dave Parnell at (919) 791-4200. Sincerely, John L. Holley, Jr., PE, CPESC Regional Engineer Raleigh Regional Office cc: Stormwater Permitting Program Files - with attachment DEMLR Raleigh Regional Office Files - with attachment DWR Raleigh Regional Office Files -with attachment City of Raleigh Stormwater Utility Division- with attachment 1628 Mail service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628 Location, 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609.,i One Phone: 919-791-4200 1 FAX: 919-571 A718 ��i.:��.1 ��' ~' NorthCarolina Internet http:portal.ncdenr.orgANeb/ir/ t/�y� An Equal Opportunity1ARrmative Action Employer ;Vat LQLL// %ff Parnell, David From: Smith, Danny - Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 3:28 PM �� 1, To: Hayes, Mitch; Parnell, David l/ JJJ Subject: FW: Incident report (UST-62) Lets all discuss this so we can ensure we are providing Raleigh the support that is appropriate. Danny Danny Smith Regional Supervisor Raleigh Regional Office NCDENR-Division of Water Resources 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 (919) 791-4252 Danny.Smith@ncdenr.gov Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation. 12012 From: Sullivan, Shelton Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 2:12 PM To: Randall, Mike; Smith, Danny; Pickle, Ken Subject: RE: Incident report (UST-62) The RRO, which you have copied should follow up. DEMLR or DWR? Maybe both Shelton Sullivan NCDENR I Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Programs Wetlands, Buffers, Streams - Compliance and Permitting (Webscape) Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Phone (919)807-6361 Fax:(919)807-6494 Email: shelton.sullivan@nedcnegov Website: http://Vortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ws/webscape U S C S • ��� Lit S%sltLim_ Zhd('—� -- BAP V S' /0 R P Pre M4,'r)_ C-/k �M /%� l �,1- /LF-;-V- rR- CE SI-'- J v .� L�13 J Js `�J� E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties �A Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Randall, Mike Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 1:47 PM To: Smith, Danny; Ken Pickle; Sullivan, Shelton Subject: FW: Incident report (UST-62) Apparently, Raleigh Metals Recycling on 2310 Garner Road in Raleigh needs to be inspired to bring their facility into compliance. Any suggestions? Not really my area but I would love to help anyway I can. Mike From: Duffy, Peter[mailto:Peter. Duffv(a)raleighnc.gov] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 1:41 PM To: Randall, Mike Cc: Senior, Mark; Bowden, Danny Subject: FW: Incident report (UST-62) Mike, Per our conversation, here is the UST spill report for the discharge at 2310 Garner Rd. Pete Duffy Water Quality Technician www.raleighnc.a,,ov/waterpollution City of Raleigh Public Works Department Stormwater Utility Division (919) 996-4013 office (919) 278-6473 cell From: Joe Beaman [mailto:JBeaman(-Ohesnc.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:49 PM To: Powers, Mark; danny.smith(@ncdenr.gov; Brenda. hafshe]ani(0)ncdenr.gov; Duffy, Peter Cc: asanderson(algoldsboroscraometalrecvcling com Subject: Incident report (UST-62) Greetings. Attached, please find a UST-62 for a release of oil and water from the subject facility. Initial response activities included the recovery of oil -impacted water (surface water puddles), construction of a containment dam, plugging of stormwater outfall piping, and installation of hydrocarbon sorbent boom downgradient of the stormwater outfall. We will be visiting the site again tomorrow, and developing a workplan for remediation of impacted soils at the site. Please contact me with questions or concern. Joe Please visit our website at www.HESfast.com Hlghhuxls '� Emrironrnerrtal Sokirdons, hx - Joe Beaman, P.G, RSM President/Principal Geologist Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. 8410-D Falls of Neuse Road; Raleigh, NC 27615 p: 919-848-3155 f: 919-848-4265 B _ I l ' / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / V _}-_:, u ___ ____ _ II _=--�e-:<--:ate-:-'-:=�--A= - ----'-:- f--- i------------------ I II I I I I ID_ATLANTIC SEYMOUR BROWN INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. _ REVZDIAL INVESTIGATION --- -- e--' M A S S O C I A T F S, INC. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH METALS PROCESSORS — — Lnginccnng k LneiEom icnWl $oW(iop5 my SOIL EXCAVATION, BARRIER PLACEMENT RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA ��.�__ .a<......o,..�,,.A.e...R®...< _.e....s.o.....—... �s...........o_..�... a.r+mm ... mn.n® AND iREATMENi AREAS ,.< oowieeRoo R Y Parnell, David From: Bennett, Bradley Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:22 PM To: Smith, Danny, Holley, John; Parnell, David Subject: FW: Raleigh Metal Processors Meeting Scheduled for Thursday Attachments: RMP—Site Map.pdf FYI More on meeting tomorrow. L*- Bradley Bennett Stormwater Permitting Program Phone: (919) 807-6378 NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Fax: (919) 807-6494 1617 Mail Service Center Email: bradley.bennett(d)ncdenr.gov Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Web: http://portal.ncdenr.org/webllr/stormwater Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws From: Caulk, Kim Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 10:14 AM To: 'peter.duffy@raleighnc.gov'; 'amy.ikerd@wakegov.com'; Bennett, Bradley; 'eric.green@wakegov.com'; 'Rhame. Ken neth@epa.gov'; 'todd.rall@raleighnc.gov'; Holley, John; Parnell, David; Orozco, Phil; Smith, Danny; feely.ken@epa.gov; todd.rall@raleighnc.gov Cc: Jesneck, Charlotte; Aufman, Matt Subject: Raleigh Metal Processors Meeting Scheduled for Thursday In case it is not clear after my Outlook glitch yesterday, the meeting is still scheduled for tomorrow (Thursday) at 1:30 in the video Conference Room at DENR- Green Square. If you need additional information/directions, please let me know. Prior to our meeting on Thursday, I would like to provide everyone with the attached map of the Raleigh Metal Processors Site. It was taken from one of the consultant's documents in our files regarding the planned remedial action. If anyone would like to review more information, the files are available to the public electronically. The instructions for reviewing the files can be found on the Branch's web site at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihshome. So we can all understand the concerns and observations of each other's program area regarding the Site, the following is a brief agenda that I thought might help: Explanation of the REC Program & status of the long-term remedial action program (DENR-DWM, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch) • Recent Site Inspections/Field Observations o City of Raleigh o Wake County o DENR — Division of Water Resources o DENR—DWM, Hazardous Waste Section o EPA —Emergency Response • Status of EPA TSCA review of PCB remediation • Discussion/Conclusions Hopefully after the meeting everyone's concerns will be clear, so we all understand the remedial path forward for everyone's program. Regards, Kim Kim T. Caulk, P.G. Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch - REC Program NCDENR - Division of Waste Management 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Phone: (919) 707-8350 e-mail: Kim.Caulkancdenr.gov hftp://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/recprogram E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. CNVIRONPJIENTAL CONSERVATION LNBOHATOHIES CHAIN•OF-CUSTODY RECORD '��"` •$`•Z`% ..zi.'a'�ii:Y•'� I f I ti. .I. A p FI, 11) 111.1't -:4 J _ Irnl a iol4a �.e (I 1' 4 L�(fi II d If ac6^F .. I i.l<:;,J I'r da Sl :. iv.ptls x )wI -ai Daun =, (7�01E:.. Z;7',L. tls' I ^lae. raL �rtlruro J G 1 # IL C I <V I v Ft a u 4 44410 p fi 111aC116..1. 3+. 5�. 251Dt i:P.rl-t;�f p.?Ilncl . _�_.f �nL ny p:•+s �. �.. an14Y�:rl�e••n• LK nabl www.encola bs.coln �-� -- Page �1 FiBlp/9S:p(1 TIf(Iblf lUl9p iimr. •; _ S4nxla;tl —_ ExixGiled Due Page 30, 30 Parnell, David From: Caulk, Kim Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 1:04 PM To: Parnell, David Subject: RE: Raleigh Metal Processors Meeting 9/26/13 Thanks for clarifying. It will take awhile to get adjusted to the changes. Kim T. Caulk, P.G. Phone: (919) 707-8350 hftp://portal,ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/recprogram E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Parnell, David Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 10:10 AM To: Caulk, Kim; 'peter.duffy@raleighnc.gov'; 'amy.ikerd@wakegov radley; 'eric.green@wakegov.com'; 'Rhame.Kenneth@epa.gov'; 'todd.rall@raleighnc.gov'; Holley, Joh ; rozco, Phil- ith, Danny; feely.ken@epa.gov; todd.rall@raleighnc.gov; andrew.potter@wakegov.com; gbrig h't@ gov.com; mark.senior@raleighnc.gov; timothy. henshaw@raleighnc.gov Cc: Jesneck, Charlotte; Aufman, Matt; Pullinger, Robert C Subject: RE: Raleigh Metal Processors Meeting 9/26/13 Kim, Thank you for the summary. As a result of the recent reorganization of some sections of DENR, there may have been some confusion concerning the Notice of Deficiency (NOD) that was issued. You are correct that DWR (Division of Water Resources) responded to the discharge, but the NOD resulted from an NPDES Stormwater inspection by Stormwater Staff of DEMLR — Land Quality Section, on August 27, 2013. The facility is currently within their 30 day response time to our office. Thank you, Dave Parnell Environmental Senior Specialist North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources Division of Energy, Minerals, and Land Resources Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 0: (919) 791-4200 F: (919) 571-4718 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Caulk, Kim Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 3:15 PM To: 'peter.duffy@raleighnc.gov'; 'amy.ikerd@wakegov.com'; Bennett, Bradley; 'eric.green@wakegov.com'; 'Rhame.Kenneth@epa.gov'; 'todd.rail@raleighnc.gov'; Holley, John; Parnell, David; Orozco, Phil; Smith, Danny; feelv.kenOepa.gov; todd.rallCalraleighnc.gov; andrew.potterCalwakegov.com; gbright@)wakegov.com; mark.senior0raleighnc.gov; timothy. henshaw(alraleighnc.gov Cc: )esneck, Charlotte; Aufman, Matt Subject: RE: Raleigh Metal Processors Meeting 9/26/13 Everyone: Thank you all for participating in the meeting last Thursday. I believe it was beneficial in that everyone was able to gain a better understanding of each program's perspective of the situation. The following is a brief summary of our discussions: The Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (Branch) is within the Superfund Section of the DENR-Division of Waste Management. The Branch has limited staff resources available to work on high priority sites (typically those sites with threatened or impacted water supply wells). The Branch's Registered Environmental Consultant (REC) Program is a privatized voluntary remedial action program available for the cleanup of sites determined by the Branch to be lower priority compared to other sites across the state. The Raleigh Metal Processors Site is not considered a higher priority site for the Branch. • For the long-term remedial action Site, the REC Program executed an REC-Administrative Agreement (REC-AA) with Seymour Brown Investment Company (the remediator) for a voluntary remedial action on 11/28/07. The REC overseeing and approving the remediation under the REC Rules is Mid -Atlantic Associates. A remedial investigation (RI) has been completed by Mid -Atlantic and a final certified RI Report (Site Assessment Report) dated 8/20/10 is in the state's files. In accordance with the REC Rules, the remediator and REC have submitted a proposed containment remedy that has been given tentative concurrence by the Branch, however, details regarding a surface barrier that is to be placed over contaminated soil and perpetual land use restrictions for the property owner have not been finalized (see state files). The remedial design has been delayed while awaiting a permit from EPA under the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) authority for PCBs that are present at the Site. EPA Region IV has resource limitations, but they will try to re -assign staff so review of the permit for PCB remedial action can move forward. If final concurrence is given by the Branch, the containment remedy will become part of the overall long-term remedy for any contaminated media (soil, groundwater, sediment, surface water, vapor intrusion) for the entire Site and will be included in a REC-certified Proposed Remedial Action Plan (RAP), which will go through a required 30-day public notice as required by the REC Rules. Depending on the public comments, the proposed containment remedy and RAP may have to be revised by the REC before the RSM's certification and approval of the remedy can be made. • Representatives from the City of Raleigh and Wake County have performed inspections and responded to public complaints regarding operations at the Site on several occasions. In late August, they, along with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), responded to a surface water discharge from the Site onto neighboring properties. Subsequently, the DWR issued a Notice of Deficiency on 8/27/13 for the surface water discharge. • City of Raleigh and Wake County officials along with representatives of the Hazardous Waste Section of the DENR-Division of Waste Management and EPA performed an inspection of the operation on September 20, 2013. Based on the inspection findings, surface water run-off is a continued concern at the facility. City of Raleigh representatives will work with the DENR-Division of Water Resources to address the surface water issues from the current facility operations. Interim remedial measures of the contamination can take place to correct any current short-term surface water issues caused by the operations, but the measures need to be coordinated appropriately with the Branch and comply with the REC Rule requirements. The REC Program staff will continue to review the proposed containment remedy as part of the cleanup at the Site, including additional concerns from other representative regarding the planned barrier. Also, the REC will be informed that surface water issues for the facility operations need to be addressed in the long-term remedy as well. Attached is a scanned image of the meeting attendees. As I mentioned near the end of the meeting, after the proposed RAP is completed and public noticed by the REC, I encourage each interested party to review it and provide any comments. Matt Aufman is the Branch's main point of contact for the project, so please contact him if you want to be on the public notice mailing list. In the meantime, please contact Matt or me if any information is needed or there are questions regarding the Site. Regards, Kim Kim T. Caulk, P.G. Phone: (919) 707-8350 http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/recprog ram E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Caulk, Kim Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 10:14 AM To: 'peter.duffy@raleighnc.gov'; 'amy.ikerd@wakegov.com'; Bennett, Bradley; 'eric.green@wakegov.com'; 'Rhame.Kenneth@epa.gov'; 'todd.rall@raleighnc.gov'; Holley, John; Parnell, David; Orozco, Phil; Smith, Danny; feely.kenCoepa.clov; todd.rall(a)raleighnc.gov Cc: Jesneck, Charlotte; Aufman, Matt Subject: Raleigh Metal Processors Meeting Scheduled for Thursday In case it is not clear after my Outlook glitch yesterday, the meeting is still scheduled for tomorrow (Thursday) at 1:30 in the video Conference Room at DENR- Green Square. If you need additional information/directions, please let me know. Prior to our meeting on Thursday, I would like to provide everyone with the attached map of the Raleigh Metal Processors Site. It was taken from one of the consultant's documents in our files regarding the planned remedial action. If anyone would like to review more information, the files are available to the public electronically. The instructions for reviewing the files can be found on the Branch's web site at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihshome. So we can all understand the concerns and observations of each other's program area regarding the Site, the following is a brief agenda that I thought might help: Explanation of the REC Program & status of the long-term remedial action program (DENR-DWM, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch) • Recent Site Inspections/Field Observations o City of Raleigh o Wake County o DENR — Division of Water Resources o DENR—DWM, Hazardous Waste Section o EPA —Emergency Response • Status of EPA TSCA review of PCB remediation • Discussion/Conclusions Hopefully after the meeting everyone's concerns will be clear, so we all understand the remedial path forward for everyone's program. Regards, Kim Kim T. Caulk, P.G. Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch - REC Program NCDENR - Division of Waste Management 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Phone: (919) 707-8350 e-mail: KIm.Caulk(aAncdenr.gov hftp://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/recprogram E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. For Non-11,187 This form should he completed and submitted to the UST Section's regional office following a known or suspected release of Releases of petroleu i from a source other than an underground storage tank This form is required to be submitted within 24 hours of Petroleum In NC discovery of a known w suspected petroleum release I (DWM USE ONLY)- Suspected Contamination? (Y/N) Y Release discovered btcklentfl Priority Re(H,I,L,U) _, Confirmed GW Contamination? (YM) " (11 alo): Receved (tlmddats) - Confirmed Soil Contamination ?(YIN) r &21-2013 fe 1200 hours Received by -Region Samples taken?(Y/N) N Free product?(YIN) Reported by. (circle one): Phone. Faxllor Report ' If Yes(free product), state greatest thickness: _feet INCIDENT DESCRIPTION ?rodent Name: Oil -Water Illicit DI are Address (street number/name): 2310 Gamer Road County: Wake CltyRown: Raleigh ZIP Code:27610 R tonal Office (circle one): Asheville, Mooresville, Fayetteville, ta ashi ton Wllmin n Winston-Salem Latitude (deamn dnlram): 35.749W Longitude (d.mm,d dm�) :-78.832680 Obtained by. ® GPS Describe suspected or confirmed release (,ature ofrefease, time/date of release, quantify of release, amount offrse vox: I 0 Electronic topographic map 0 GISAddressmatthng 0 Other Illicit discharge of oil and water. Discovered Q 1200 hours. Unknown quantity. Unknown prod. volume Describe initial response/abateme It OkWdate release stopped, dearule begw/aorripleted, quantify dWoduct so# removed confirmation i 0 Unknown location: Outlets plugged. Impacted water on ground surface recovered. Sorbent booms installed. Describe impacted receptors: IDescribe Soil. No known surface water impacted. Storrnwater Inlets impacted and water/oil recovered. NOW RELEASE WAS DISCOVERED (Releeee code) (Check one) 0 Observation of Release at Occurrence ❑ Water Supply Well Contamination 0 Visual or OHactory Evidence 0 Surface Water Contamination O Soil Contamination \ ❑ Other (specify) 0 Groundwater Contamination SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION Source of Release Cause of Release Type of Release Product Type Released (Check one to lndlcets pnmery (Check one to Indicate primary (Check we) (Check one to Indicate primary petroleum product sauce) I cause) / type released) 0 AST (tank) Spill (Accidental) 0 Petroleum 13 Gasoline/ Dlesw 0 DlesalfVeg. Oil ❑ AST Piping? Dispenser ❑ Spill (imerdonal) 0 Both Petroleum Kerosene Bland 0 AST Delivery Problem ❑ Corrosion 8 Non -Petroleum 0 Ell - F20 ❑ Vegetable Oil 100% 0 OTR Vehicle Tank ❑ Physical or Mechanical 0 E21- E64 ❑ Heating Oil 0 OTR Bulk Transport Tank Damage L lon ❑ E85- E99 ❑ Waste Oil 0 RR Sulk Transport Tank 0 Equipment Failure (Check one) ❑ Ethanol 100% ❑ Mineral Oil -no • err 0 AST PCBS El Facility ❑ (3 0 Unknown AST Installation Problem Minarsl Oil -PCBs 0 Residence (] 0 Other ❑ Unknown Other Petroleum 0 Highway/Road 0 Other ewas.a d a .r Products —W RWmy DeflMLons presented on reverse Derarkins presented on reverse O Other chimemblis 1. Municipal 2. Military 3. Unknown 4. Pmrete S. Federal 6. County 7. State Oneredm Tvoe 1. Public Service 2. Agricultural 3. Residential 4. Edumfion/Re%. 5. Industrial Canmenia 7. Mining Guidance presented an reverse us I i-orm to (uanu) 1Page 1 of 2 IMPACT ON DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES t Water Supply Wells Affected? 1i Yes 2. No . Unknown Number of Water Supply Wells Affected_ List of Water Supply Wells Contaminated: (Include Users Name, Addresses and Phone Numbers. Affach addlilonal sheet Ifnecessary) 1. 2. 3. PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR RELEASE (ff the source of ffte release la not an AST system orffIt Is an AST system and there Is a responsible party other than dre AST system owner/ operator) Name of PetsonlCompeny Address Ralei h Metals R li 2310 Gamer Road CNNyy State Zip Code Teleepphone Number Rate' h NC 27610 919826-5426 AST SYSTEM OWNER (if are source of the release Is an AST system) AST Owner/Company .I Address na Clry State Zip Code Telephone Number AST SYSTEM OPERATOR Cif the source of the release Is an ASTsystem) UST OperamdCompany Address nor City State Zip Code Telephone Number LANDOWNER AT LOCATION OF INCIDENT Landowner Address Seymour Brown Investment Co., Inc. P.O. Box 10809 I State ZI Code Telephone Number Go taro NC 27g32-0609 To Be Determined Draw Sketch of Area or Provide Map (showing incident site, location ofralease, t m mglor rowtatorsacffons, potential ors) ACach sketch ormep to form. Give Directions to Incident Site Affachdtredlonstormmnnacessary. See Attached Person Reporting Incident Joe Ba Gom y H' hlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. Telephone Number 919-848-3155 Title Pdncliml Geologist rear 8410-D Falls of Neuse Road; Raleigh, NC 27615 Data 8-21-2013 UST Form 62 (04110) Page 2 of 2 Definitions of Sources AST (Tank): meaty the tank is used to store product AST Piping: means the piping and comcctom mmung from the tank to the dispenser an other end,use equipment AST Dispenser. inchdes the dispenser and the equipment used to coma t the dispenser to the piping AST Delivery Problem: identifies releases that occurred timing product delivery to the bank: OTR Vchicle Tank: means the tank is unction more product to mrel an over the mad vehicle OTR Dugs Transport Tank: means a tact that is used to transport product in bulk over the road (by truck) RR :bulls Tnm.pwt Tank: means a tank that is wed to transport product in bulk by tram ltnnafomer. meaty electrical transformer Other: serves as the option to use when the release source is known but does not fit into one of the preceding categories Unkmown: identifies releases for I hick the source has not been determined De6m ni6oof Causes Spill (Accidental): use this cause when a spill occurs accidemally(e.g., when the delivery hose is disconnected from a fill pipe) Spill (intentional): use fills cause when a soil] occurs intentionally (c.g., intentional dumping or breakage) Corrosion: use when a metal tanI ng, or other component has a release clue to corrosion Physical w Mechanical Damage: or all types of physical or mechanical damage, except corrosion Equiprtreat failure: use when a release oue to equipment failure other than corrosion wpbysical w mechanical damage AST Overfill: use when an overfill (e.g., overfills may occur from the fill pipe at the tank or when the nozzle fails to shut off at the dispenser) AST Installation Problem: use when the problem is determined to have occurred specifically because the AST system was not installed properly Other: use this opfionwhea the cause is Item own but does not fit into one of the preceding categories Unknown: use when the cause has not been determined Guidance: Ownership and Operator Type 1 Ownership select the category which descnbcs owner of the AST system, bulk transport ink, or other release source Operator Type select the category which deseribe the operation in which owner wes the AST system, bulk transport tank, or other mime somce Parnell, David From: Parnell, David Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:43 PM To: Holley, John Cc: Pullinger, Robert C Subject: Raleigh Metal Recycling Requested Response - NCG200335 John, Chris Pullinger and I reviewed the response from Raleigh Metal Recycling, thoroughly. Their response was required by October 16, 2013. We received the response electronically on October 14, 2013, and by UPS Overnight on October 15, 2013. The response was written by Mr. Gregory Brown. It adequately addressed all of the items in the Notice of Deficiency. There was a small discrepancy concerning the list of spills required in the SPPP, but this can be corrected during the next site visit. One thing of note is that Mr. Brown states that they are currently on Tier 11 of their NPDES Permit. Let me know if you have questions. Dave Parnell Environmental Senior Specialist North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources Division of Energy, Minerals, and Land Resources Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 0: (919) 791-4200 F: (919) 571-4718 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Greg Brown From: Greg Brown Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:24 PM To: david.parnell@ncdenr.gov Cc: David Gibb Subject: Follow Up Attachments: storm10.14.13rl.pdf, storm.10.14.13.pdf Note, the below is also coming via Overnight UPS pack Subject: NOD 2013-PC-0361 Mr. Parnell NCDENR/DEMLR Raleigh Regional Center 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-162, ova This is to respond to the letter of September 12, 2013 and signed for on the 16th that asked to address the items in bold. 1) Please fully develop the Storm water pollution Prevention Plan by placing a list of significant spills during the past three years, as well as documenting employee training. Address: A log form to record significant spills is now in the plan book. Related. this email is serve to document that there have been zero significant spills during the past three years -see attached. Also, the documentation of "recent" training was in a different file and was not shown when asked to Andy Sanderson, whom you met with on 8/27/13. He was not working there in April, nor was the General Manager Paul Perrotti, so they were not aware that training had been done by Dennis Gehle, the General Manager of our Goldsboro Operation on April 12, 2013. Documentation of that training is now in the book. See attached. 2) The latest monitoring indicated benchmark exceedence. Please adhere to the requirements of the NPDES permit with respect to the Tier Program. Address We are adherina to the reauirements and are now treatina the site as a Tier 2. We are hirina a comoanv to do monthlv testina. (thev will take samples) because we want to ensure we are testing correctl 3) Please provide a final account of the illicit discharge which was reported to DENR on August 23, 2013. (It may be helpful if your consultant provided the report on your behalf). Address: See below email from the consultant with the 'final' account of what Hiahland did that day. A complete analvtical report can also be sent if requested. Related significant remediation work was done since the event, which was witness by you and others during the tour of 10/6/13. More has been done since then and more continues to be done. Note the discharge was due to the pipe that went from our small storm water pond to the North that was blocked. The storm water pond filled and was overflowing, causing water to go over ground to the North. The onsite team, wanted to stop or slow this, so they engaged a pump to take the water to the SOUTH, away from the property to the North. Note in a published article it was said "Workers had apparently been pumping the liquid onto a neighbor's property", Which is not true. Also, we did not send, let alone we were never planing on sending more hazardous waste into the city's storm water pipes, which the article said the city was concerned about. Laslty, what we believe to be the causes of the petroleum have been addressed. From: Joe Beaman [mailto:JBeaman@hesnc.com] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:21 PM To:'asanderson@goldsboroscrapmetalrecycling.com'; pperrottiCalraleighscrapmetalrecycling.com Subject: Analytical data Good afternoon. We finally received all of the analytical data for the soil sample that we collected during our initial response activities. Only petroleum compounds were detected in the sample. Metals concentrations were very low, and well below hazardous waste standards. The hydrocarbons detected consisted of diesel range organics (at a concentration of 3400 ppm), and total oil and grease (at a concentration of 2320 ppm). Both diesel and oil and grease were well above their state action limits. Please contact me with questions or concerns. Joe "atal Inc- Please visit our website at www.HESfast.com Joe Beaman, P.G., RSM Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. 8410-D Falls ofNeuse Road Raleigh, NC 27615 P — 919-848-3155 F — 919-848-4265 C — 919-414-7081 24-Hour Emergency Response: 1-855-HES-FAST (855-437-3278) Submitted by. - Gregory Brown Raleigh Metal Recycling Goldsboro Metal Recycling "Excellence in Recycling and Services" "We Pay Cash for Your Metal Trash" Tel: 919-828-5426 Cell: 734-740-9514 Email: gbrown(a)raleighscrapmetalrecycling.com Web Addresses: www.raleighscrapmetairecycling.com www.goldsboroscrapmetalrecycling.com 1 + O E e G. F For NaM/8T This form should be completed and submitted to the UST Section's regional office following a known or suspected release of Ralwsas of petrolour from a source other than an underground storage tank This form is required to be submitted within 24 hours of Petroleum In INC discovery of a known or suspected petroleum release (DWM USE ONLY) Suspected Contamination? (Y/N) r Release discovered Incident ft Prlortty Ra (H,I,L,U)_. Confirmed GW Contarnmation7(YIN)N (time/date): Reoelved (time/dste) . �gion Confirmed Soil Contamination 7(Y/N) r 8-21-2013 ma 1200 hours RoceNed by R Samples taken7(Y/N) N Free product? (Y/N) x Reported by. (circle one): Phone, Faxior Report- If Yes(free product), state greatest thickness: _feet incident Name: Oil -Water Illldt DI I INCIDENT DESCRIPTION charge Address (street numbedname): 2310 Gamer Road I County: Wake CltylTawn: Raleigh Zlp Code:27610 Re lonal Office (clro/e one): Asheville, Mooresville, Fayetteville, lei ashi ton Wilmin on Winston-Salem Latitude (morel dopwo): 35.749844 Longitude (down dear..,) :-78.632680 Obtained by: GPS Describe suspected or confirmed release (nature of release, timardefe of release, quantity of release, amount of free producjt: O Electronic topographic map 0 GIS Address matching O Other Illicit discharge of oil and water. Discovered @ 1200 hours. Unknown quantity. Unknown prod. volume Describe initial response/abatemedt (firnWdefe release stopped, cleanup beguNcomplefed, quent ly of product soil romoved confirmation so l : 1 l] Unknown Describe location: Outlets plugged. Impactedl water on ground surface recovered. Sorbent booms installed. Describe impacted receptors: Soil. No known surface waters Impacted. Storrnwater inlets impacted and waterloil recovered. �iOW RELEASE WAS DISCOVERED (Release code) (Check one) m Observation of Release at Occurrence ❑ Water Supply Well Contamination 0 Visual or Olfactory Evidence ❑ Surface Water Contamination • Soil Contamination ❑ Other (specify) (] Groundwater contamination SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION Source of Release Cause of Release Tyne of Release Product Type Released (Check one to�� to primary (Check one to Inca primary (Check orre) (Check one to indicate primarypefrleurn product s edke type released) 0 AST (tank) ❑ Spill (Accidental) '❑ Petroleum 0 Gasoline/ DleseU 0 DleselNeg. Oil ❑ AST Plping/ Diapenser ❑ Spill (Intentional) 0 Both Petroleum Kerosene Blend 0 AST Delivery Problem ❑ Corrosion d Non -Petroleum ❑ Et 1 - E20 ❑ Vegetable Oil T00% ❑ OTR Vehicle Tank ❑ Physical or Mechanical ❑ E21 - E84 ❑ Heating Oil ❑ OTR Bulk Transport Tank Damage Location ❑ Ea5-Egg ❑ Waste Oil ❑ RR Bulk Transport Tank ❑ Equipment Failure (Chock one) ❑ Ethanol 100% ❑ Mineral Oil -no ❑ (] Transfa ner AST Overfill PCBS 0 Facility [3Mineral 0 Unknown ❑ AST Installation Problem Oil -PCBs 0 Residence 0 Other Petroleum ❑ Other ❑ Unknown ❑Highway/Road Products —w IZI Other w asw...^wu,. 0 Railway Definitions prosented fir reverse Dell Idons presented on reverse ❑ Other Ownership 1. Municipal 2. Military 3. Unknown 4. Private 5. Federal 6. County 7. Slate Operation Type 1. Public Service 2. Agricultural 3. Re Idential 4. Education/Relig. 5. Industrial Commends 7. Mining Guidance presented on reverse LIST Form 62 (04/10) 1 Pago 1 of 2 IMPACT ON DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES Water Supply Wells Affected? 1 Yea 2. No . Unknown Number of Water Supply Wells Affected List of Water Supply Wells Contemin ad: (Include Users Names, Addresses and Phone Numbers. Attach additional sheet Hnecessery) 1. 2. 3. PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR RELEASE (if the source of Me release la not an qST system or if it Is an AST system and there la a responsible parry other Aran th ASTsystem owned operator) Name of PersordCompeny Address Raleigh Metals Re clin 2310 Gamer Road CIry State Zip Code Telephone Number Rate' h NC 27610 919-8285428 AST SYSTEM OWNER (tithe source of the release is an AST system) AST Owner/Company I Address na City State Zip Code Telephone Number AST SYSTEM OPERATOR (If the source of the release Is an AST system) UST OperatodGnmpany Address na cityState Zlp Code Telephone Number LANDOWNER AT LOCATION OF INCIDENT Landowner Address Se ur Brown Investment Co., In . I P.O. Box 10809 C'' State ZI Code Telephone Number Goldsboro NC 27A32.0809 To Be Determined Draw Sketch of Area Oi Provide Map (showfnglncldon ire, location ofralease, two mq(orroadintersecdons, potential receptors) Attach sketch or map to form. Give to Incident Site Attach directions to form Ifnacessary. See Attached directions Person Reporting Inddentj0e Be Cum _ y Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. Telephone Number919-848-3155 'Me Pdndpel Geologist dress 641" Fails of Nauss Road: Raleigh, NC 27615 Data 6-21-2013 UST Form 62 (04110) Page 2 of 2 Definitions orsoarces AST (Tank): means the tank is used to store product AST Piping: means the piping and tors running from the tank to the dispenser o other cad -we equipment AST Dispenser includes thq disponser and the equipment used to connect the dispenses to the piping AST Delivery Problem: identifies releases that occurred timing product delivery to the tank. OTR Vehicle Tank: means the tank is us sires product to fuel an over the read vehicle OTR Hulk Transport Tank: means a the is used to transport product in bulk over the road (by took) RR :bulk Transport Tank: means a that is used to transport product in bulls by Cain Transformer. means electrical bans£ rmer Other: serves as the option to use when rite mime source is known but does not fit into one of the preceding categories Unknown: identifies releases for hick the source has not been determined Definitions of Clam Spill (A"fi enrol): use this came when a spill occurs accidentally(e.g., when the delivery hose is disconnected from a fill pipe) Spill (Intentional): use this cruse when e M occurs intentionally (e.g., intentional dumping or breakage) Corrosion: use when a metal tank, ipk& or other wmponmt has a release due to wrrosion Physical or Mechanical Damage: for all typos of physical or mechanical damage, except corrosion Equipment failure: use when a release occurs due to equipment failure other then corrosion or physical or mechanical damage AST Overfill: use when an overfill rs (e.g., overfills may occur from the fill pipe at the tank or when the nozzle fails to shut off at the dispenser) AST Installation Problem: use when th problem is determined to have occurred specifically because the AST system was not installed properly Other: use this option when the cause is known but does not fit into one of the preceding categories Unknowns uu when the cause has pot been detmmined Guidance: Ownenhlp and Operator Type Ownership select the category which describes owner of the AST system, bulk transport tank, or other release source Operator Type select the category which describes the operation in which owner uses the AST system, bulk transport tank, or other release source SPCC Training - Sign In Sheetpoi t 3 1 1 l 1 L 31 32 33 Greg Brown From: Greg Brown Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:24 PM To: david.parnell@ncdenr.gov Cc: David Gibb Subject: Follow Up Attachments: storml0.14.13rl.pdf, storm.10.14.13.pdf Note, the below is also coming via Overnight UPS pack n03 Subject: NOD 2013-PC-0361 Mr. Parnell Oct NCDENR/DEMLR Raleigh Regional Center 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-162, \. This is to respond to the letter of September 12, 2013 and signed for on the 16th that asked to address the items in bold. 1) Please fully develop the Storm water pollution Prevention Plan by placing a list of significant spills during the past three years, as well as documenting employee training. Address: A log form to record significant spills is now-i+�-t plan book. Related, this email is serve to document that there have been zero significant spills during the past three years -see attached. Also, the doclimentatior of "recent" training was in a different file and was not shown when asked to Andy Sanderson, whom you met with on 8/27/13. He was not working there in April nor was the General Manager Paul Perrotti, so they were not aware that training had been done by Dennis Gehle, the General Manager of our Goldsboro Operation on April 12, 2013. Documentation of that traininq is now in the book. See attached. 2) The latest monitoring indicated benchmark exceedence. Please adhere to the requirements of the NPDES permit with respect to the Tier Program. Address We are adherinq to the requirements and are now treating the site as a Tier 2. We are hiring a company to do monthly testing, (then will take samples) because we want to ensure we are testing correctl 3) Please provide a final account of the illicit discharge which was reported to DENR on August 23, 2013. (It may be helpful if your consultant provided the report on your behalf). Address: See below email from the consultant with the 'final' account of what Hiqhland did that day. A complete analvtical report can also be sent if requested. Related significant remediation work was done since the event I Permit: NCG200335 Owner -Facility: Gimco Acquisition LLC Inspection Date: 08/27/2013 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ At Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The facility has a SP3 that was developed in the spring of 2013. A list of spills for the previous three years and documented records of employee training is not included in the plan but is required. Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: For previous monitoring periods the facility was not sampling all six of the outfalls. The monitoring period for the last six months of 2013 was conducted properly. Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: For the previous sample periods the facility was not sampling all six of the outfalls. It conducted the required outfall sampling in on June 2013. However the sample results were beyond benchmarks for many of the parameters at the outfalls. Above benchmarks at one or more of the outfalls included Cadmium, COD, Copper, Iron, Lead, Oil and Grease, TSS and Zinc. Please adhere to the requirements of the permit with respect to the Tier program. Permit and Outfalls Yes . No NA NE Page: 3 Permit: NCG200335 Inspection Date: 08/27/2013 Owner • Facility: Gimco Acquisition LLC Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? # If the facility has representative oulfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? Comment: An illicit discharge of oil/water was reported to DLR RRO on 8/21/2013. Highlands Environmental Solutions, Inc. handled the cleanup. The discharge was discussed during the inspection and prevention actions were suggested. ■00Q ■0D0 n0■0 n■❑O Page:4 A 1 2 Date D t 8 LRaleigh Metal Recycling Spill Tracking Area Amount of Spill Action Taken Manager on Duty 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 SPCC Training - Sign In Sheet 21 2E 2 c. 3C 31 32 33 ,70/3 Parnell, David From: Senior, Mark [Mark.Senior@raleighnc.gov] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 10:50 AM To: Bennett, Bradley; Holley, John; Smith, Danny Cc: Duffy, Peter; Rall, Todd; Boyer, Kevin; Parnell, Nicolette Subject: RE: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling Attachments: ATT00002.c; ATTOOOO5.htm David; 'Eric.Green@wakegov.com'; Fulton, Hi folks. Just want to keep everyone up to date on this site. The operator has enlisted the local engineering firm McAdams to help them develop an appropriate stormwater management plan. Raleigh staff met with their representative, Amos Clark, yesterday to discuss our concerns with the site. I told him that there were other regulators involved at the state and county level and that any plan developed would have to be -coordinated -among the different agencies. It appears they will be proposing a plan with several large sediment type basins along with diversion features to direct all runoff from the site .to..the,basins. They mmay also incorporate some kind of inverted outlet structure'to contain'petrdle'um products`Mlyintent is to follow up with the operator to insure that a plan is developed and implemented in a timely manner. We may need to get together to discuss what kind of timetable is acceptable. We have collected one runoff sample from one outfall at the site and intend to collect at least one more from another outfall to verify what's in the stormwater leaving the site. I will provide that data when we receive it. As I noted in our meetings. I would highly recommend that this site be considered for an individual NPDES Industrial Stormwater Permit based on the amount of disturbed soil, the quantity and types of exposed materials, and the fact that it is a PCB and metals hazardous waste site with noted offsite contamination. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Mark Sr. Mark T. Senior, PE, Senior Project Engineer Stormwater Utility Division City of Raleigh Public Works Department PO Box 590 Raleigh NC 27602 Work Phone (919) 996-4012 Fax (919) 996-7633 Email mark.senior(a)raleighnc.gov www.raleighnc.gov From: Bennett, Bradley [mailto:bradley.bennett@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 4:38 PM To: Senior; Mark; Holley, John; Smith, Danny Cc: Duffy, Peter; Rall, Todd; Boyer, Kevin; Parnell, David Subject: RE: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling Mark Here is the most recent permit issued in 2010. Two files are fttached, their cover permit is in the second file. The permit was first issued in 200. 11- Bradley Bennett Stormwater Permitting Program Phone: (919) 807-6378 NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Fax: (919) 807-6494 1617 Mail Service Center Email: bradlev.benneft a&cdenr.gov and CDC are in one and the Parnell, David From: Holley, John Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 5:10 PM To: Bennett, Bradley; Smith, Danny; Zimmerman, Jay Cc: Parnell, David; Dupree, Joe; Vinson, Toby Subject: FW: Raleigh Metals Draft RAP Attachments: 2013-12-23 SWMP to G. Brown.pdf As I mentioned to some folks earlier, EPA and DWM facilitated a telephone conference call today regarding the Raleigh Metals site that we all have been working on for some time. The primary agenda was to ensure DENR concurrence with a proposed EPA approval of the remedy for past PCB contamination at the property where this facility exists. This remedy involves a pervious cap for contaminated areas to prevent exposure of contaminated soils and direct human contact with PCB's and other toxins. This remedy is a component of a broader remedial action plan (RAP) that addresses the PCB contamination, but does not address stormwater and surface water contamination that has been monitored recently by DWR and the City of Raleigh (the data indicates significant violations of stream standards). A consultant for the operator has recently submitted a temporary stormwater plan to the city in response to their concerns, and the city staff have found it to be inadequate, largely because it does not provide designed stormwater basins sufficient to abate sediment loss and subsequent discharge of pollutants to waters of the state. After much discussion, the city (Mark Senior and an Assist. Attorney) made it clear that they are ready to take an enforcement posture if something is not done quickly (within 30-60 days) to begin abatement of the offsite pollution. I noted that DWR is currently considering the most appropriate and effective legal steps to ensure that the site is addressed. I noted that we are working in support of their actions and encourage a comprehensive plan addressing all pollutants affecting waters below this site. I recommended that they not move forward with approvals, etc. until this matter is discussed with staff representing Jay Zimmerman and Bradley Bennett to ensure that a comprehensive plan is being developed that will be satisfactory to DWR/DEMLR SW. It was encouraging to hear that EPA is willing to allow flexibility with incorporating SW BMP's with the RAP, allowing onsite SW measures to be taken concurrent with implementation of their approved PCB remedy. Note the access information below for the current RAP. EPA has asked all to review/consider this plan in any actions being considered, and to provide any feedback regarding portions that we do not believe will work to improve water quality and overall operation. Although I believe we still need to take an aggressive stance in this case, I would suggest that we facilitate a discussion with the EPA and DWM representatives before moving forward, if possible. If there are any questions, please advise. Attached is a copy of the SWPlan submitted to the city back in December. From: Dan Nielsen [mailto:dnielsen@maaonline.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 3:07 PM To: Mark.Senior@Raleighnc.gov; eric.green@wakegov.com; Holley, John; Fulton, Nicolette; michael.orban@wake.gov.com Cc: Feely, Ken; Crosby -Vega, Terri; 'Butler, Jay' Subject: Raleigh Metals Draft RAP f:UE The draft of the Remedial Action Plan for the Raleigh Metals site which is dated June 21, 2012 is available. However, the file size is too large to efficiently e-mail, so we have posted it to our FTP site. You can access the Plan by clicking on this link ftp://remote.maaonline.com/ . Follow the instructions there and use these access codes: Username: Raleigh Metals Password: Raleigh Please pass this link on to appropriate parties (Jay Zimmerman, Bradley Bennett, etc). If you have problems accessing the documents, please call Beverly Oglesby at 919-250-9918 to ask for assistance. Thanks, Dan UMM Mid Atlantic Enllnauin! f F�6LdnFheAGC ia�aliani Daniel H. Nielsen, PE, RSM, LEED-AP ... Vice -President, Principal Engineer MID -ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC. 409 Rogers View Court I Raleigh, NC 27610 919-250-9918 1 919-250-9950 (Facsimile) 1 919-614-3988 (Mobile) www.MAAONLINE.com 120-Years of service 1993 - 2013 Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.lts contents (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message. Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 1 Web: hftp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/stormwater Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws From: Senior, Mark [mailto:Mark.Senior@raleighnc.gov] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 11:20 AM To: Holley, John; Bennett, Bradley; Smith, Danny Cc: Duffy, Peter; Rail, Todd; Boyer, Kevin Subject: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling Hey guys, thanks much for meeting with us last week. I think that was very worthwhile in terms of everyone better understanding the different parties involved and their roles. City staff are discussing the issues we are having with this site with our attorneys and could really use a copy of their signed permit (or permit application) if you have it. We could also use any monitoring data associated with this site including any self monitoring data they may have supplied. Our plan is to collect and analyze samples from the site and we will forward that data to you when we have it. Our Fire Marshal is also looking into the site based on the kinds of material stored there. They are very concerned that this site could be hazardous to their responders. Thanks, Mark Sr. Mark T. Senior, PE, Senior Project Engineer Stormwater Utility Division City of Raleigh Public Works Department PO Box 590 Raleigh NC 27602 Work Phone (919) 996-4012 Fax (919) 996-7633 Email mark. senior(3raleiohnc.00v www.raleighnc.c�ov Parnell, David From: Smith, Danny Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 1:25 PM To: Subject: Parnell, David 7 FRaleigh Metals Recyclin Wg f Attachments: 2013:12-23-SWMP to-GGBrown.pdf; ATT00001.c fyi Danny Smith Regional Supervisor Raleigh Regional Office NCDENR-Division of Water Resources 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 (919)791-4252 Danny.Smith@ncdenr.eov Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation. From: Senior, Mark [mailto:Mark.Senior@raleighnc.gov] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 11:38 AM To: Eric.Green@wakegov.com; Bennett, Bradley; Smith, Danny; Holley, John Subject: FW: Raleigh Metals Recycling Hi folks, I received the attached stormwater management plan for Raleigh Metals Recycling from the operator's consulting engineer. Personally I am concerned that it lacks an accurate map of the site's storm drainage system and inlets, the drainage area to those inlets, and calculations or designs for devices capable of capturing and removing the high concentrations of sediment, metals, and PCB's identified in both their sampling and ours. I simply don't see how what is proposed will provide any meaningful reduction in pollutant loads leaving the site. I would welcome your thoughts regarding the adequacy of this plan and where we should go from here. Thanks, Mark Sr. Mark T. Senior, PE, Senior Project Engineer Stormwater Utility Division City of Raleigh Public Works Department PO Box 590 Raleigh NC 27602 Work Phone (919) 996-4012 Fax (919) 996-7633 Email mark. senior(o)raleighnc.gov www.raleighnc.gov From: Aldridge, Jon [mailto:aldridge@mcadamsco.com] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 11:29 AM To: Senior, Mark Cc: Clark, Amos; Browng@benlee.com; Toole, William (WToole@rbh.com) Subject: Raleigh Metals Recycling Mark, Attached is the stormwater management plan for the Raleigh Metals site for your review and approval. I will be sending you a hard copy as well. Please let Amos or myself know if you need anything further. Thank you. Jon Aldridge, PE Project Manager Water Resources & Infrastructure Office: 919-361-5000 Direct: 919-287-0889 Mobile: 919-614-0500 McAdamsCo.com 2 MCADAMS Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities Parnell, David From: Senior, Mark [Mark.Senior@raleighnc.gov] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:56 AM To: Holley, John Cc: Vinson, Toby; Bennett, Bradley; Smith, Danny; Parnell, David; Boyer, Kevin; Rall, Todd; Duffy, Peter Subject: RE: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling stormwater pollution Attachments: ATT00001.c; ATT00004.htm Hi John, I was not sure what you have been copied on so I wanted to take a moment to provide a brief update on the status of our efforts with this site. We received the results from our second round of sampling and the results were similar to the first round with a number of the NPDES permit thresholds exceeded (including sediment and metals) and extremely high PCB levels`(I'II"follow up this email with a copy of those results) -Based -on -our results, a unit of runoff from that site would have to be diluted 53,000 times in order to meet NC in stream standards for PCBs. We received a draft-stormwater management plan prepared by McAdams on December 26`h which we shared with your folks and Wake County. I received comments from the County and am hoping to get.some comments from the State before we formally respond, hopefully by next week. Unfortunately, the plan was less than 1 expected and I don't see anything in it that would lead me to expect its implementation will provide a significant reduction in pollutants leaving the site. On January 2, 1 received a call from Dan Nielson with Mid -Atlantic who is working for the owners (not the operator Mr. Brown) on the PCB remediation plan which involves covering the site with a.barrier' He is trying to speed things along with EPA by greaas g the wheels of the local communities that may comment on plan when EPA sends it out for comment. He had also contacted Eric Green with Wake County. We concluded that getting some kind of cap on this site is a step in the right direction and agreed we would support approval of the plan in order to expedite its G' implementation. This is with the understanding that the plan requires monitoring by Mid -Atlantic and any deficiencies would have to be remediated. In discussions with our attorney, Nicolette Fulton, we have a continuing concern that we may have difficulty with any enforcement action taken by the City because the site has a valid State permit for their stormwater_discharge. Since the permit includes only thresholds and not specific concentration -limits, -the City ymay 'have difficulty demonstrating that their discharges violate the conditions of their permit. With that in mind, the City may require your assistance in pursing enforcement based on either the permit conditions or violation of surface water quality -standards. -Other options for getting this site to adequately control'the pollstan in theidischarge might include placing additional conditions in the permit based on exceeding the thresholds or by requiring anlirsd ivi d� or the site based on the fact that a general permit is inappropriate for a site which has been revealed"to Be a federal remediation site contaminated with PRaleigh would certainly support the need for an indiv� I permit.Have you given any thought to potential ways the State might address surface water contamination from this site? I am also curious as to whether your staff has had an opportunity to conduct any in -stream sampling to confirm any State standard violations. Thanks for your help with this John. Mark Sr Mark T. Senior, PE, Senior Project Engineer Stormwater Utility Division City of Raleigh Public Works Department PO Box 590 Raleigh NC 27602 Work Phone (919) 996-4012 Fax (919) 996-7633 Email mark.senior(o)raleiohnc.gov www.raleighnc.gov From: Holley, John [mailto:john.holley@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 5;Q3..PM To: Bennett, Bradley; Smith, Danny; Parnell; David Cc: Vinson, Toby; Senior, Mark Subject: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling As I have discussed with Toby and Danny today, this is a heads -up about sampling reported bythe city regarding this site. Mark Senior indicated that while the expected presence of sediment and metals was not extraordinary, the concentration of PCB's was. He indicated that the concentration beyond acceptable levels was extreme, and he suggested that we look specifically for PCB's in any sampling the state may perform downstream from the site. He also noted that the city will be taking an additional sample to confirm the current results. I asked him to,;share,the specific readings as soon as practical. You may want to discuss this further with him directly. Have a great Thanksgiving everyone! i MI ps= oegv Ls a sv a� Am•rovvM�Yem9 tln3ppry O aO9 m021 YWI ywAwp S3pJN 0[® .l KO I(L [Stl WW1 oN oN WL[ pN aN Oti O[•L [16'A1g1 _ 4 � 3 _Zz 5% up^' NSO LO s 3e — '° —= sF Q—Z yy" _° zE —P _v 3 wwNa •vp ai Xpw•a _S = 3o a pS�w •YrNn� •• .kwp •• w. a uo mcz ce u IxLz •s w en ozY a ee rs L wa .... Apmp uuM.wln9 tlH3O]N ..ff YwI NY•1>w+B e30tlX pX Wao Wwzz aN sr pieI I zep eeo mpm mp qwl —3 —: —d z a a� —9~e —m �, >alw. pinm��•s d{ 3�O 3� $$ a3 54 $_ €z § g_$ jy g'q �� �8 ee33 L0 � waawj Nlw • � puoa pe•a pnW wmmv vXNm� ea limno- b1W wo"IV jo A~wns LWOLt Xpof 53H rolN/J W oNV6!aleN'proy Aawe0 pe(L ,.'UM a6JNVo [ale wMe Alllosj sjo 46ul¢y s opal Parnell, David From: Holley, John Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 5:03 PM To: Bennett, Bradley; Smith, Danny; Parnell, David Cc: Vinson, Toby; mark.senior@raleighnc.gov Subject: Old Garner Road Metal Recycling As I have discussed with Toby and Danny today, this is a heads -up about sampling reported by the city regarding this site. Mark Senior indicated that while the expected presence of sediment and metals was not extraordinary, the concentration of PCB's was. He indicated that the concentration beyond acceptable levels was extreme, and he suggested that we look specifically for PCB's in any sampling the state may perform downstream from the site. He also noted that the city will be taking an additional sample to confirm the current results. I asked him to share the specific readings as soon as practical. You may want to discuss this further with him directly. Have a great Thanksgiving everyone! V✓' I / �/l/�A/ v i l 250- 99l�