NCG160155_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20080530

Sl iN - 1 JU
STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
w U& I to uLS5
DOC TYPE,
EC HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ d�� 0 ��
YYYYMMDD

WATf9qG Michael F. Easley, Governor
O� 111ppp��� William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
9 �- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r �}}� /l C�
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
`C nivi,mn n(Water nunl iry
May 30,2008
Mr. James Washburn
S.T. Wooten, Inc.
P.O. Box 2408
Wilson, NC 27894
Subject: Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspections
S.T. Wooten Readymix Concrete & Asphalt Plants
Permit No. NCG140317 and NCG160155
Wake County
Dear Mr. Washburn:
On May 29, 2008 Mr. Myrl Nisely of the Raleigh Regional Office of Division of Water Quality made an
inspection of the adjoining concrete and asphalt facilities for stormwater permit compliance. The help
you provided was greatly appreciated. Both were in compliance. The inspection checklists are attached.
A few observations are offered:
With reference to the last inspection carried out by Ron Boone on July 23, 2007, the corrective
actions he requested had been made. A) A sediment retention basin with an overflow standpipe had
been erected around the exit pipe at the lowest point near the entrance road. This measure was
effectively holding back the considerable volume of dirt, sand and asphalt manufacturing particles
that erode from the piles and travel down the hillside. Maintenance has been done as needed to keep
the device in good operation. It is recommended that a record be kept in the SP3 manual
documenting when cleanout events are made for any of the basins and sediment devices. The outlet
end of the overflow pipe showed no accumulation of sediment. Be reminded that water leaving must
meet the permit limits, and B) the lay down area for old equipment had been cleared of items that
could potentially pollute stormwater. The few remaining steel parts were on pallets.
2. Along the low end of the plant property are two additional sediment basins. Both have three baffles,
and contain collected sediment. These are maintained periodically by removing sediment as needed.
It is the inspector's opinion that removal should be done pretty soon, especially before large rains
from hurricanes occur.
Two earthen pits near the loading area are used for drum washouts on an alternating basis. Drum
washings are discharged rarely, only when colored concrete batches are transported or upcoming
batches must meet DOT specifications. Otherwise, Delvo and small volumes of water are used
overnight in the drums, with new batches made on top of that material the next day. When a basin
develops a hardened concrete slug at one end, workers begin using the second basin. The hardened
concrete is removed and recycled. The second pit continues to be used until it, too, must be cleaned
out, at which time workers switch to the first basin again. Both pits had about 3 feet of freeboard.
4. There exists a third pit that serves to capture the solids washed from trucks before they leave the plant
site. If any of the pits described in Item 3 and 4 were to overflow, the water would enter the systems
described in Items 1 and 2 before leaving the site. Effective solids removal has been achieved, but
there is no intentional treatment to lower pH. The company is urged to check and document pH
during a few discharge events to establish compliance or non-compliance of that parameter.
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center phone [phone]
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 facsimile [phone]
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
VMA
<TDEfvR

Wooten Youngsville CEI 5/29/08 Page 2 of2 � ,
5. Finally, there is a perimeter ditch around the plant that directs any other runoff to the sediment basins
at the low end of the facility.
6. All elements of the SP3 manuals were present and up to date.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at [phone]
Sincerely,
Myrl A. Nisely
Raleigh Region Environmental Chemist
Surface Water Protection
xc: SWP/RRO Files
Central Files

Permit: NCG160155
SOC:
County: Franklin
Region: Raleigh
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 08/01/04 Expiration: 07/31/09 Owner: S. T. Wooten Corporation
Effective: Expiration: Facility: S T Wooten Corporation - Youngsville Asphalt
255 Material Dr
Contact Person: _@@W`G Lam{-1ru. Title:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 05/29/2008 Entry Time: 09:15 AM
Primary Inspector: Myrl Nisely
Secondary Inspector(s):
Franklinlon NC 27525
Phone: ===4-6"5
H19-9 k-9?09
Certification:
Exit Time: 10:35 AM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

k
Permit: NCG160155 Owner - Facility: S. T. Wooten Corporation
Inspection Data: 05/29/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (l1SGS) map?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■ ❑ 110
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: Sampling for the permit renewal should be done after July 31, 2008 (in the
5th year of the permit) for submittal with the permit renewal application in Janua ry 2009.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment
Page: 3