NCG160082_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20160630

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
E� HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑cowl ly 6 �� 3
YYYYM M DD

1 � r u, a tirFi.
f
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
Environmental
Quality
June 30, 2016
Mr. Hal Byrd, Assistant Plant Manager
The Lane Construction Company
3010 Gresham Lake Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
soomlary
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
Lane (Garner)
Wake County
Dear Permittee:
Department of Environmental Quality staff conducted a multimedia compliance inspection of Lane
(Garner) on June 20, 2016 for permitted and/or other activities administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Mineral .
Division of Water
Division of Waste
Quality(DAQ)
and Land Resources
Resources (DWR)
Management
(DMLR)
(DWM)
We hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our initiative to provide a single inspector capable of
handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at your facility. The results of each applicable
inspection area and any associated response actions or necessary corrective measures are detailed in the
Division specific areas of the attached report. If there are no notes or comments under a specific Division
header, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and regulations at the time of
inspection. Should violations be noted in the attached report, you may receive separate enforcement related
correspondence in addition to this report.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection, please contact Gary Perlmutter at 919-
791-4200 or [e-mail]. Thank you for your cooperation.
cc:
DAQ RRO Files
DEMLR (DWR) RRO Stormwater Files
Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh Regional Office Website: http://dcq.nc.gov/
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive. Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

PAT MCCRORY
Govemor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secramry
June,30, 2016
Hal Byrd, Assistant Plant Manager
The Lane Construction Corporation
3010 Gresham Lake Rd
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG160082
Lane (Garner)
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Byrd:
Staff from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) conducted a stormwater inspection on June
20, 2016, as part of a multimedia inspection of your facility. The assistance provided by Mr. Greg Davis
and Mt. Jamie Backus, during the inspection was greatly appreciated. The inspection report is attached.
Findings during the inspection were as follows:
1. Certificate of Coverage (COC) No. NCG160082 under NPDES General Permit NCG160000
was issued to Lane (Garner) to discharge stormwater runoff to White Oak Creek (Austin
Pond), a Class.C, NSW stream, in the Neuse River Basin.
2. The facility has developed and implemented a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP)..
A review of the plan indicated that it included all components required by the general permit.
Semi-annual qualitative and analytical monitoring has been conducted at two stormwater
discharge outfalls (SDOs), as required by the General Permit. However, some reports were
missing and two exceedences were reported that were not followed by response actions,
which are considered violations of permit conditions in your general permit. A Notice
of Violation has been sent to you separately.
4. Both SDOs were observed and found accessible.
5. No separate wastewater discharges were observed.
Raleigh Regional Office1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: fttp://portal.nedenr.org/web/Ir/
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

Page 2 of 2
Please respond in writing to DEQ Raleigh Regional Office regarding Item 3 within 60 days of
receipt of this letter. If you have any questions regarding the attached report or any of the findings,
please contact Gary Perlmutter at 919-791-4200 (or email: gary.perlmutter(iDncdcnr.gov).
Sincerely
` 9
Gary Perlmutter
Environmental Specialist
NC Dept. of Environment Quality
Division of Air Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
Enclosure: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Form
cc: Central Files
RRO SWP/Stormwater files

Compliance
Inspection Report
Permit: NCG160082 Effective:
10/02/14
Expiration: 09/30/19 Owner:
The Lane Construction Corporatlon
SOC: Effective:
-.
Expiration: " Facility:
LANE (Gamer)
County: Wake
1201 E Gamer Rd
Region: Raleigh
-
Garner NC 27529
Contact Person: Jamie Backus
Title:
Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Certification:
Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Corporate Responsible Official
Greg Davis
704-395-3264
On -site representative
Jamie Backus
919-772-6366
Related Permits:
.Inspection Data: 06/20/2016
EntryTime:_
09:30AM Exit Time:,.
12:45PM
Primary Inspector: Gary Perlmutter
Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG160082 Owner -Facility: The Lane Construction Corporation
Inspection Date: 06/20/2016 Inspection Typo: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary: .
On June 20, 2016, 1 (Gary Perlmutter, DAQ-RRO) visited Lane (Garner) for a multimedia inspection. There I met with Mr.
Jamie Backus, Plant Supervisor, and Mr. Greg Davis, Environmental Coordinator. We first rewiewed permit stipulations and
required records for complaince with General Stormwater Permit No. NCG160082, dated September 30, 2014, The SPPP
was found to be dated 2014, to which Mr. Davis indicated that he is currently reviewing it as one of his tasks as the
Company's new Environmental Coordinator. The SPPP was fairly well organized, however some Qualitative and Analytical
reports were found missing. Facility personnel contacted the analytical laboratory for the missing reports, of which they
were e-mailed one report for samples collected in July 2015. Reports for the second half of 2012 and the first half of 2014
were still unaccounted for. The analytical report for sampling in December 2014 showed an exceedence of 109 TSS, and
that for samples collected in December 2013 showed an exceedence of 329 mg/L TSS. Neither exceedence was followed
up with TIER ONE investigation. Mr. Backus and Mr. Davis noted that moving forward they will plan to sample for the
current Monitoring Period ending June 30, 2016, as rain is expected on Friday, June 24, 2016. During the tour all tanks
were observed with secondary containment walls, in which Mr. Backus indicated are empited via pump (no valves or
open-ended pipes were observed). Both outfall pipes were observed, and they appeared well maintained for easy sampling
access.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG160082
Inspection Data: 06/20/2016
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
Owner - Pacility:The Lane Construction Corporation
Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑®❑❑
If Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comment: Analytical Reports missing for 2nd half of 2012 & 1 st half of 2014. No response actions taken for
TSS exceedences in 2nd half of 2013 (329 mq/L) & 2nd half of 2014 (109 mq/L).
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it property documented by the Division?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwaler) discharges?
®❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Two outfalls were observed: SDO 1 and.SDO 2. which lie on opposite sides of the facility. The
facility's Certificate of Coverage was observed with the recieving waters identified as White Oak
Creek (Austin Pond). The pond is the receiving water for SDO 2 which appears to have no
outflow, but is situated above an unnamed intermittent stream of White Oak Creek. SDO 1 lies
above a slope that drains to White Oak Creek. The facility has no representative outfall.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ i ❑ ❑
Comment: Qualitative Monitoring Reports missing for 2nd half of 2012, first and second half of 2014
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevenllon Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan Include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan Include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
Z�E7:f•7:Li.L
®❑ ❑ ❑
® Cl ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
®❑❑❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
FEW ".I■T
Page: 3

permit NCG160082 Owner • Facility: The Lane Construction Corporation
Inspection Date: 06/20/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
# Does the Plan Include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ® ❑ ❑ El
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ®El El ❑
Comment: The facility's SPPP is being reviewd and revised by Company's new Environmental Coordinator
Greg Davis. at time of inspection.
Page: 4

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY
r
Inspection Report
Date: 06/21/2016
Facility Data
LANE (Garner)
1201 East Gamer Road
Gamer, NC 27529
Lat: 35d 42.1080m Long: 78d 34.0140m .
SIC: 2951 / Paving Mixtures And Blocks
NAICS: 324121 / Asphalt Paving Mixture and Block Manufacturing
Contact Data
Facility Contact, Authorized Contact Technical Contact
Jamie Backus
Robert Spencer
Greg Davis
Plant Supervisor
District Manager
Environmei
[phone]
[phone]
E 6.' inato:
Comments: Appeared to be in compliance•`
Inspector's Signature: 7
Date of Signature:
I . Total Actual -emissions in TONCNFAR-
Raleigh Regional Office
LANE (Garner)
NC Facility ID 9200338
County/FIPS: Wake/183
Data
Permit 05747 / R14
Issued 1/10/2013
Expires 12/31/2017
Classification Synthetic Minor
Permit Status Active
Current Permit Application(s) None
Program Applicability
SIP
NSPS: Subpart I
Compliance Data
Inspection Date 06/20/2016
Inspector's Name Gary Perlmutter
.Operating.Status.Operating . _
Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code FCE
On -Site Inspection Result Compliance
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
*HAP
2011%
1.20
15.86
5.20
0.9000
3.30,
1.0000
56.90
2006
4.80
15.37
7.50
4.20
12.00
3.00
550.00
Five Year Violation History:
Date Letter Type
10/19/2011 NOV
Date
(n
Test Results
Rule Violated
Part 60 - NSPS Subpart I Hot Mix Asphalt Facilities
None
Test Methods)
* Highest HAP Emitted (i
Violation Resolution Date
11/08/2011
Source(s) Tested
DIRECTIONS: From RRO take the beltline east to 140 East toward Wilmington/Benson. Take exit 303 for Jones Sausage
Rd and turn right. Tom left on East Gamer Rd. (SR 1004). Go north over 140 and facility will be approx. 1/2 mile on left
(after the Martin Marietta Quarry).
i

P p.. J 2 �
9290338 fit, ection Re �>>t Pa,_g-,.,-..
(H) FACILITY DESCRIPTION: LANE produces hot -mix asphalt. The LANE (Gamer) Plant is a parallel flow, drum -type Hot
Mix Asphalt (HMA) plant. When operational, the plant typically has 3 employees on site and operates 40 hours/week. The
facility started in 1985 and began production in 1989. The plant makes various mixes, dependent on the job requirements.
Base mixes and binder mixes are produced, although several types of surface mixes constitute 60-65% of their operations.
Aggregate mixes will vary, although a typical mix would be 25% stone, 33% regular screening, and 42% washed screening.
The plant does re -introduce the particles caught in the baghouse back into the mix.
Safety notes: Standard PPE (steel toe shoes, hard hat, safety glasses) is required plus a reflective safety vest.
(IH) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On June 20, 2016, I (Gary Perlmutter), inspected the Lane asphalt facility in Garner as part of
a multimedia inspection. I met with Mr. Jamie Backus who is the foreman of the site and Mr. Greg Davis, the company's new
Environmental Coordinator. We reviewed the permit conditions and required records — all seemed in order. We then toured
the facility, where all equipment was seen running with only steam emissions observed from atop the asphalt silos; Overall,
the facility appeared well nun from an air quality standpoint — further details follow.
(IV) PERMITTED EMISSION SOURCES: 4
Emrssion
Emission Source
Control Control System'.
Source ID j
Description
System ID Description
Portable Drum Mix Asphalt Plant (400 tons per hour maximum design production rate, 300 tons per hour
Permitted Production rate) consisting of:
ES-5 1Ihot mix storage silo (200 ton capacity) with associated conveyor 41 N/A ;� N/A !
_... _ .....
ES 6 !Ihot mix storage silo (200 ton capacity) with associated conveyor 1 N/A N/A
natural gas/ No. 2 fuel oil/ No. 2 recycled fuel oil / No. 4 fuel oil /
ES-1A' J No. 4 recycled fuel oil / No. 5 fuel oil / No. 5 recycled fuel oil -fired bagfilter (10 067 j
i CD-lA.+ , square feet of filter I
(N! 1 rotary drum mix asphaltic concrete plant (100 mmBtu/hr maximum area),
heat input)
ES-2A Aggregate screen unit (5 feet by 12 feet) with six (6) associated j N/A N/A
storage bins
Recycled asphalt product (RAP) screen unit (4 feet by 8 feet) with
ES-4A ; N/A N/A
;three (3) associated storage bins r
ES 7 truck loadout N/A
_ - _ -- -.-
natural gas/No 2 fuel oil -fired hot oil heater (2.20 million Btu per i N/A N/A
ES-8 Ihour maximum heat input)' it
All equipment was verified and observed imoperation.. ; r
(V) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS:
Al The Pemrittee shall.comply with NCAC, Subchapter 2D-.0202, 2D .0506, 2D .0516 2D :0521, 2D .0524 (40 CFR 60,
Subpart I), 2D .0535, 213.0540, 2D .0611, 2D .1100, 2D .1806, 2Q .0315, 2Q .0317, 2Q .0700 and 2Q.0711.
Appeared to be in compliance — see below. a r
A.2 PERMIT RENEWAL AND EMISSION INVENTORY REOUIREMENT - The Permittee, at least 90 days prior to the
expiration date of this permit, shall request permit renewal and submit the air pollution emission inventory report for the 2016
calendar year.
Appeared to be in compliance — I reminded the facility personnel of this condition.
A.3 PARTICULATE CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0506 "Particulates from Hot'Mix Asphalt
Plants,"
a. Particulate matter emissions resulting from the operation of a hot mix asphalt plant shall•notexceed ;allowable
emission rates.
b. Visible emissions from stacks or vents at a hot mix asphalt plant shall be < 20 % opacity averaged over six, minutes.
c. Fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled as required by 15A NCAC 2D .0540.
d. Fugitive emissions for sources at a hot mix asphalt plant not covered elsewhere under this Rule skull not exceed 20

9 20033 8 Inspection Report
Pane 13
percent opacity averaged over six minutes.
e. All hot mix asphalt batch plants shall be equipped with a scavenger process dust control system for the drying,
conveying, classifying, and mixing equipment. The scavenger process dust control system shall exhaust through a
stack or vent and shall be operated and maintained in such.a manner as to comply with the allowable particulate
emission rate and opacity limit of this Rule. .
Appeared to be in compliance — no visible emissions other than steam were observed from the asphalt plant during the
inspection.
AA SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0516, S02 emissions from the
combustion sources shall not exceed 2.3 pounds per million Btu heat input.
Appeared to be in compliance — the facility runs only on natural gas for over three years according to Mr. Backus. Natural gas
is inherently low in sulfur, so compliance is espected.
A.5 VISIBLE EMISSIONS (VE) CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0521, VE from the emission
sources, manufactured after July 1, 1971, shall not be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged over a six -minute period.
Appeared to be in compliance — no VE other than steam were observed from the asphalt plant during the inspection.
A.6 15A NCAC 2D .0524 "NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NSPS)" - For the asphalt plant (ID No. ES -IA),
the Permittee shall comply with NSPS as promulgated in 40 CFR 60, Subpart I, including Subpart A "General Provisions."
a. NSPS Emissions Limitations - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0524, the Pernuttee shall not discharge or cause the
discharge into the atmosphere from any affected source any gases which:
i. Contain particulate matter in excess of 90 mg/dscm (0.04 gr/dsco; or
ii. Exhibit 20 percent opacity, or greater.
b. Recordkeeping Requirement - As a result of the March 1, 2012 compliance test, the asphalt production shall not
exceed 300 tons per hour. For each day of operation, the Permittee shall maintain records showing the total
production in tons, the hours of operation, and the highest targeted hourly production rate for that day.
Appeared to be in compliance — no VE other than steam were observed from the asphalt plant during the inspection. I
reviewed the facility production records, which showed daily averages to be about 140 tons'per day.
A.7 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0535, the Permittee of a source of excess emissions
that last for more than four hours and that results from a malfunction, a.breakdown of process or control equipment or any
other abnormal conditions, shall notify DAQ by the next business day. .
Appeared to be in compliance — Mr. Backus indicated that no such incidents have occurred. Mr. Backus added that if any
upset were to occur, Company policy dictates to shut down the plant immediately.
A.8 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENT - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0540 "Particulates from Fugitive Dust
Emission Sources," the Permittee shall not cause or allow fugitive dust emissions to cause or contribute to substantive
complaints or excess VE beyond the property boundary.
Appeared to be in compliance — no fugitive dust was observed leaving the property; no complaints are on file against the
facility.
A.9 FABRIC FILTER REQUIREMENTS - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .0611, particulate matter emissions shall be controlled
as described in the permitted equipment list.
a. Inspection and Maintenance (I&M) Requirements - the Permittee shall perform at least an annual internal inspection
of each bagfilter system. The Permittee shall perform periodic I&M as recommended by the equipment
manufacturer.
b. Recordkeeping Requirements - The results of all inspections and any variance from manufacturer's
recommendations shall be investigated with corrections made and dates of actions recorded in a logbook. Records of
all maintenance activities shall be recorded in the logbook. The logbook shall be kept on -site and made available to
DAQ personnel upon request.
Appeared to be in compliance — I reviewed the baghouse logbook and found it complete and up-to-date with entries made
every 2-3 months.

9200338 Inspection Iteport----v`----------------_.__.. 11_`'b 14 .
A.10 TOXIC AIRTOLLUTANT EMISSIONS LIMITATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENT -Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2D
.1100 "Control of Toxic Air Pollutants," and in accordance with the approved application for an air toxic compliance
demonstration, the following permit limits shall not be exceeded (see permit for list).
Appeared'to be in compliance - compliance was determined during permit review. Provided the facility is properly run,
compliance is assumed. The facility appeared well run and maintained from an air quality standpoint during the inspection.
A.11 CONTROL AND PROHIBITION OF ODOROUS EMISSIONS - As required by 15A NCAC 2D .1806, the Pennittee shall
prevent odorous emissions from the facility from causing or contributing to objectionable odors beyond the facility's
boundary.
Appeared to be in compliance - while mild asphalt odors were detected onsite during the inspection, no objectionable odors
were detected outside:the property. No complaints are on file against the facility.
A.12 LIMITATION TO AVOID 15A NCAC 20 .0501 - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0315 "Synthetic Minor Facilities," to avoid
the applicability of 15A NCAC 2Q .0501 "Purpose of Section and Requirement for a Permit," as requested by the Permittee,
facility -wide emissions shall be less than the following:
Emission Limit
consecutive. I2-month period)
SOi' 100
CO 100
a. Operations Restrictions - the following restrictions shall apply:
i. The amount of asphalt produced shall be less than 1,300,000 tons per consecutive. I 2-month period.
ii. The sulfur content of all fuels shall be limited to 0.5% sulfur by weight.
iii. If multiple fuels are used, emissions should be determined using the sum of the individual emissions rates.
b. Recordkeepine-Requirements- .. -- -- - - - - - -- -
i. The Permittee shall recordmonthlyand total annually the following:
A.. The amount of asphalt produced in tons.
ii. Fuel supplier certification shall be kept on -site and made available to DAQ personnel upon request.; .
c. Reporting Requirements - Within 30 days after each calendar year, the Permitiee shall submit the following:
i. Monthly and 12-month totals for the previous 12-month period of:
A. Amount of asphalt produced in tons. .
B. SO2 and CO emissions:
Appeared to be in compliance - I reviewed facility production spreadsheets to find them complete and up-to-date with the
current 12-month rolling average of 10,975 tons asphalt from May 2014 to May, 2015. The facility only burns natural gas to
operate the plant, although permitted to run on other fuels. I had reviewed the 2015 annual report, which was received on
January 28, 2016 and contained the following totals: 9,256 tons asphalt produced; 0.60 tons CO and 0.27 tons SOz emitted.
A.13 VENDOR SUPPLIED RECYCLED No(s). 14 and 5 FUEL OIL REQUIREMENTS - In accordance with Rule 2Q .0317,
the Permittee is avoiding, the applicability of Rule 2Q .0700 by using recycled fuels which are equivalent to their virgin
counterparts. The Permittee is allowed to use the recycled fuel oil(s) supplied by a DAQ-approved vendor.
Appeared to be in compliance - The facility is not using recycled fuel oil at this time and has not for over three years.. The
previous inspection report notes:. "The last delivery of No. 4 fuel oil was December 4, 2013 for 6,743 gallons''The facility
maintains copies of the fuel certifications.
A.14 15A NCAC 20.0700 ARSENIC TPER REVIEW. This stipulation is a statement that the TPER for arsenic is under review.
Once the review is completed, and if the current threshold is changed then the facility may have to show compliance with the
new level.
Appeared to be in compliance - the previous inspection report notes that the review process is now complete and that this
stipulation will be removed in the next permit revision.,
A.15 TOXIC AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS LIMITATION REQUIREMENT Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2Q .0711 "Emission
Rates Requiring a Permit," for each of the permit listed toxic air pollutants (TAPS), the Permittee has made a demonstration
that facility -wide actual emissions do not exceed the Toxic Permit Emission Rates (TPERs) listed in 15A NCAC 2Q .0711.
The facility shall be operated and maintained in such a manner that emissions of any listed TAPS from the facility, including
fugitive emissions, will not exceed TPERs listed in 15A NCAC 2Q .0711.
Appeared to be in compliance - the facility appeared well run and maintained during the inspection; compliance is assumed.

r,92j0338 1nspcctian Rep 6rt
I' age 15
(VI) GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS:
B.5 REPORTING REOUIREMENT - Any changes that would result in previously unpermitted, new, or increased emissions
must be reported to the Regional Supervisor,.DAQ.
Appeared to be in compliance — Mr. Backus and Mr. Davis said that no such changes have been made nor are any planned.
B.14 PERMIT RETENTION REOUIREMENT - The Permittee shall retain a current copy of the. air permit at the site. The
Permittee must make available to personnel of the DAQ, upon request, the current copy of the air permit for the site.
Appeared to be in compliance — Mr. Backus presented a copy of Air Permit No. 057471114 during the Inspection.
B.15 CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 112(r) REOMREMENTS - Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2D .2100 "Risk Management Program," if
the Permittee is required to develop and register a risk management plan pursuant to Section 112(r) of the Federal Clean Air
Act, then the Permittee is required to register this plan with the USEPA in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68.
Not Applicable — the facility is not subject to the 112(r) rule.
(VII)
Source ! Exemption Regulation Source of i Source of Ti a V!
TAPS. Pollutants.
IS-1 -liquid asphalt cement tank ! j
c)(
(30,000 gallon capacity) 2Q .0102 (1)(L)(xu) Yes Yes
IS-2 - anti -strip additive tank
2 500 allon ca acit 2Q 0102 (c)(1)(L)(xu) Yes I Yes
IS-9 - fuel oil storage tank
(29,000 gallon capacity)
2Q .0102 (c)(1)(D)(t)
Yes
l
!=Yes
IS-10 -fuel oil storage tank
2Q, 0102 (c)(1)(D)(t) Yes Yes
(20,000 gallon capacity)
All tanks were observed onsite; no additional insignificant / exempt sources were observed during the inspection.
(VIM EMISSIONS INVENTORY REVIEW: Between emission inventory years 2006 and 2011, nearly all criteria pollutants plus
the highest HAP emissions, have decreased..Only SOi emissions had increased, but not significantly at 3.2%. Per Yuki
Purham's review of the 2011 emissions inventory: "Corrected tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin emissions to 0 from 37 lbs/yr on
July 25, 2013. It was supposed to be 3.75e-09. "
(DC) PERFORMANCE TEST REVIEW: A review of DAQ files revealed the following testing:
• March 1, 2012 — the asphalt plant was tested by Methods 5 and 9 for NSPS Subpart I compliance. Yuki Purham
observed the test. Results of 0% opacity average VE demonstrated compliance.
• June 26, 2008 — the asphalt plant was tested by Method 9 for NSPS Subpart I, for the use of No. 4 recycled fuel oil.
Matt Mahler observed the test. Results of 2.5% opacity average VE demonstrated compliance.
The current permit does not have a testing requirement.
(X) COMPLIANCE HISTORY: A review of DAQ files revealed the following permit violations by the facility:
• October 18, 2011 — an NOV was issued for a late report.
• June 30, 2010 - an NOV was issued for failure to maintain the facility (B.6) and for failure to maintain production
recordkeeping.
All violations have been resolved.
(XI) CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: At the time of the inspection, LANE (Gamer) appeared to be in compliance
with its air permit. I recommend to inspect the facility again next year.

:��
���, �i
1y1r`F
%l f�M1
�.
h L
'k`i ��
- ,,F��,.

North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Robert spencer
'I ile LANF, Construction Corp
3010 Gresham Lake Rd
Raleigh, NC: 27605
Dear Mi. Spencer:
gq�
c d
NCDE ` R
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
November 30, 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
DEC - 5 2012
FdC--- OEN—E R
eleigh Regional Office
Subject: NPDES General Permit NCG 160000
Certificate of Coverage NCG 160082
LANE (Garner)
Formerly Rea Contracting (GarllerO83)
Wake County
Division personnel received your request to revise your stormwater permit Certificate of Coverage to
accurately reflect your new company and facility name.
Please find enclosed the revised Certificate of Coverage. "file terms and conditions contained in the
General Permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This revised Certificate of Coverage is issued under
the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
If you have any questions, please contact the Stormwater Permitting Unit at 919-807-6300.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED 6)
KEN PICKLE
for Charles Wakild, P.E.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 91 M07-6300 t FAX 919_807-6494 \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: w .nmaterquality.org
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
North Carol i n a
Naturally

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OI' WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG 160000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG160082
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations pronndgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission,
and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
The LANE Construction Corp
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
LANE (Garner)
1201 E. Garner Rd
Garner
Wake County
to receiving waters designated as a UT to Bi-, Branch, a class C NSW, waters in the Neuse River Basin in
accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts
I, II, III, IV, V and VI of General Permit No. NCG 160000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective November 30. 2012.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day November 30.2012. ORIGINAL SIGNED Bl
KEN PICKLE.
for
Charles Wakild, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

I11
rY
YA
�C® NR
North Carolina Department of.Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
December 4, 2009
Marcus I -tackler t
Rea Contracting, A Division of The Lane Construction Corp. � �E� — �
8205 Wilkinson Blvd. ! 2M9
Charlotte, NC 28214-7006
Subject: NPDES General Permit NCG160000
Certificate of Coverage NCG 160082
Rea Contracting (Garner)
Formerly Rea Contracting, LLC
Wake County
Dear Mr. Hackler:
On October 1, 2009, division personnel received your request to revise your storinwater pcnnit
Certificate of Coverage to accurately include your new company name.
Please find enclosed the revised Certificate of Coverage. The terms and conditions contained in
the General Permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This revised Certificate of Coverage is issued
under the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
If you have any questions, please contact the Stonnwater Permitting Unit at 919-807-6303.
Sincerely,
Coleen 1-I. Sullins
cc: DWQ Central Files
Raleigh Regional Office
'`Storn water Penmitting Unit
.Wake County
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] I Customer Service: 1.877-623-6748
Internet: w .ncwaterquality.org
One
NorthCa-rolina
Natural&
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMIINT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG160000
CF,RTIF[CA1'Is OF COVERAGE No. NCG160082
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215. I, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Rea Contracting, A Division of The Lane Construction Corp.
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Rea Contracting (Garner)
1201 East Garner Road
Garner
Wake County
to receiving waters designated as a UT of Big Branch Creek in the Neuse River Basin in accordance with
the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, IT, III, IV, V
and VI of General Permit No. NCG 160000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 4, 2009.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day. December 4, 2009.
pp �P
J Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

o
nnnn r
Q
Mr. Gene Mills
Rea Contracting, LLC
8205 Wilkinson Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28214-7006
cs ) Michael F. Easley
v Governor
`O William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rJ Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r/ Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Coieen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
i
/ Division of Water Quality
September 7, 2004
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties
Rea Contracting, LLC — Garner 083
Wake County
Case No. PC-2004-0007
Dear Mr. Mills:
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Rea Contracting, LLC in the amount of
$3.177.03 which includes $177.03 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of the assessment document
explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the Secretary
of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of
Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s), including the failure to resolve the enclosed violations,
may be the subject of new enforcement actions, including additional penalties.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following three items:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made to the order of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources. Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement
action for any continuing or new violation(s). Do not include the attached waiver
form if making payment.
Please send payment to the attention of:
Mr. Shelton Sullivan
DWQ — NIPS Assistance & Compliance Oversight Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
_
NCOENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/AKrmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% postconsumer paper
hhp://h2o. encstate. nc. us

w•
Rae Contracting, LLC
Wake County
PC-2004-0007
Page 2 of 3
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a -detailed '
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness of the
amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of any of
the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request forecloses the
option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your
right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver form and the attached
"Justification for Remission Request" which should describe why you believe:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 14313-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of
Mr. Shelton Sullivan
DWQ — NPS Assistance & Compliance Oversight Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to the Office of
Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes. You must file your original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
hnp://h2o. enr.state.nc.us
NQDENR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

AND
Rae Contracting, LLC
Wake County
PC-2004-0007
Page 3 of 3
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley �^
NCDENR S�
O� +f
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
/f
And to:
Mr. Shelton Sullivan
DWQ — NPS Assistance & Compliance Oversight Liiti6)
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date stamp (not a
postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being referred to the
Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the penalty. Please be advised
that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which occur after the review period of this
assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shelton Sullivan at [phone] extension 544.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey 0. Poupart
Division of Water Quality
JOP/sos
■/ICIC.uiT`7
cc: Ken Schuster - Raleigh Regional Office Supervisor
(Jerry-Rimmer-_Raleigh.Regional_Offic
DWQ — NPS Assistance & Compliance Oversight Unit
Water Quality Central Files
Susan Massengale, PIO
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-8T7-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
h ttpY1h2o. en r s to te. n c. us
AE
!4C{{MENR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

JUSTIFICATION FOR RENIISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: PC-2004-0007 County: Wake
Assessed Party: Rea Contracting, LLC Amount [Assessed: $3,177.03
Permit No. (if applicable): NCG160000, COC # NCG160082
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of
Facts" form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you.believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remainin- necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION (attach additional pages as necessary):

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF Wake
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
Rea Contracting. LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
CASE NO. PC-2004-0007
.Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $ 3,177.03 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated August 26. 2004 the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
This the
day of
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
SIGNATURE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
1*1*19jff &9Td&T.r.40
IN THE MATTER OF )
REA CONTRACTING, LLC )
FOR VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT CONDITIONS )
OF NPDES PERMIT No. NCG160000 )
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG160082 )
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES -
Case No. PC-2004-0007
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL
PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey 0. Poupart of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ),
make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Rea Contracting, LLC is a company organized and existing under the laws of North Carolina.
B. Rea Contracting, LLC owns and operates an asphalt plant located at 1201 East Gamer Road, Garner,
Wake County, North Carolina.
C. Gene Mills is Facility Services Manager for Rea Contracting, LLC and is legally responsible for the
permit.
D. Rea Contracting, LLC was issued a Certificate of Coverage # NCG160082 for the Gamer 083
location under NPDES Permit No. NCG160000 on July 27, 1999 with name change approval issued
December 19, 2003 effective August 1, 1999 with a permit expiration date of July 31, 2004.
E. On March 31, 2004, DWQ - Raleigh Regional Office staff performed an unannounced permit
compliance inspection of the facility.
F. Permit NCG160000 Part 11 Section A (8): requires facilities to have an Inspection Program.
Facilities are required to inspect all stormwater systems on at least a semiannual schedule, once in
the fall (September— November) and once during the spring (April —June). The inspection and any
subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented, recording date and time of
inspection, individual(s) making the inspection and a narrative description of the facility's
stormwater control systems, plant equipment and systems. Records of these inspections shall be
incorporated into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
Stormwater discharge characteristic monitoring as required in Part 11 of this permit shall be
performed in addition to facility inspections.

Rea Contracting, LLC - Garner 083
Page 3 of 3
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Rea Contracting, LLC is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ 1 000 For I of six (6) violations of NCG160000 (COC 160082) Part II
Section A (8) and Part H Section B for failure to sample, monitor and
record stormwater discharged from the site.
$ 4 OHO For of sixteen (16) violations of NCG160000 (COC 160082)
Part II Section A (8) and Part II Section C for failure to monitor and
record stormwater discharged from the site.
$ 177.03 Enforcement costs.
$ 3,17703 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of penalty I considered the factors set out in G.S.
143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures
�4 0
(Date) frey O. Poupart
Division of Water Quality

I
(9)
8205 Wilkinson t30ulcvard
Charlouc, NC 28214
Telephone [phone] • Facsimile 704 394 5354
June 1, 2004
VIA FACSIMILE & U.S. MAIL
Mr. Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Re: Response to Notice of Violation (NOV-2004-PC0025) issued to Rea
Contracting, LLC's Garner Road Asphalt Facility regarding its
Stormwater General Permit NCG160082
Dear Mr. Schuster:
On May 12, 2004, Rea Contracting, LLC ("Rea Contracting") received a Notice of
Violation (NOV-2004-PC0025) ("NOV") for its Garner Road Asphalt Facility (`Rea
Contracting" or "Gamer Road Facility" or "Facility") regarding its Stormwater General Permit -
NCG160082. I currently serve as the "Responsible Party" for the Garner Road Facility's
Stormwater General Permit (`General Permit") and as requested, respond below to the alleged
violations specified in the NOV.
As a preliminary matter, we note that the NOV (and accompanying Inspection Checklist)
correctly indicate that our records of employee training are complete. However, the NOV also
states that the Facility's Stomiwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) does not contain a
description of employee training conducted at the Garner Road Facility. Upon review of the
General Permit, we are not aware of any requirement that the SPPP contain a description of
employee training. Furthermore, documents on site and present at the time of the inspection
contained information regarding the scope and content of our employee training. Accordingly,
we do not consider the reference within the NOV to a description of employee training to be a
violation. We appreciate, however, your recommendation to include a description of our
employee training in our SPPP and are currently working on preparing a description and
including it in our SPPP. We anticipate that the description may include the following:

I
From the inception of its Stormwater General Permit, Rea Contracting has
annually trained its employees on its Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,
proper spill response and cleanup procedures, as well as preventative maintenance
activities to minimize and prevent stormwater pollution. Our employees are
trained in stormwater pollution prevention during their initial orientation. At
orientation, each employee receives specific instructions on housekeeping,
maintenance and spill response techniques relative to stormwater pollution
prevention. Employees also receive detailed instructions on how to conduct and
document the Facility's Qualitative and Analytical Monitoring. In addition, every
six months, each employee receives retraining on stormwater pollution
prevention. Finally, a copy of our SPPP, which specifically addresses stormwater
discharges at our Facility, as well as how to conduct Qualitative and Analytical
Monitoring, is located in the Plant Supervisor's office at all times.
Please let us know whether you have comments regarding the above description so that
we may expeditiously address your recommendation. Nonetheless, I have outlined and
responded to each of the alleged violations detailed with the NOV below:
1. Alleged Violation 1: No evidence that any analytical sampling had occurred as
required by permit, and no documentary evidence that the analytical portion of the
SPPP was implemented as required in the permit.
We are currently in the process of ensuring that Analytical Monitoring occurs on an
annual basis at our Facility and that records are generated and maintained regarding such
monitoring in compliance with our General Permit.
Specifically, we are currently taking the necessary steps to ensure that adequate sampling
and records of our Analytical Monitoring are maintained at the Facility. We have appointed our
Plant Supervisor the responsibility of both performing the sampling and adequately recording the
results. We have also directed the Area Manager to conduct a quarterly inspection of all SPPP
records, and I will perform annual inspections to ensure that both the Plant Supervisor and the
Area Manager are generating and maintaining adequate records of our Analytical Monitoring.
11. Alleged Violation 2: No record of semiannual inspections as required by the permit.
At the time of the inspection, we were unable to produce records reflecting the Facility's
Qualitative Monitoring. Nonetheless, our employees, having been trained in our SPPP,
periodically inspected our two stormwater outfall locations for the visual factors listed within the
General Permit. In addition, both of these outfall locations are in close proximity to the Facility
so any visual pollution would have also been readily apparent to employees at the Facility when
they were not undertaking their periodic inspections. Finally, our employees are instructed under
the SPPP training to inform me if any stormwater pollution is apparent at our outfalls. None of
our employees have reported any visual signs of pollution (sheens, sediment, foam, etc.) at either
of our stormwater outfall locations.

However, we are currently taking the necessary steps to ensure that adequate records of
all Qualitative Monitoring are maintained at the Facility. We have appointed our Plant
Supervisor the responsibility of performing the testing and adequately recording the results. As
an additional "back-up," we have directed the Area Manager to conduct a quarterly inspection of
these records. Finally, I will perform annual inspections to ensure that both the Plant Supervisor
and the Area Manager are keeping adequate records of our Qualitative Monitoring.
III. Alleged Violation 3: Monitoring is not being performed and compliance is not
known without these results as required by the permit.
We recognize that necessary Analytical Monitoring has not been conducted as required at
the Gamer Road Facility. We also recognize that adequate records of our Qualitative Monitoring
have not been maintained at the Facility. However, we have recently conducted Analytical and
Qualitative Monitoring at the Facility and are attaching our reports for your convenience. As you
can see, the discharge in stormwater outfall #1 is well below the 100 mg/I requirement for Total
Suspended Solids. The Qualitative Monitoring of stormwater outfall #1 yielded results
consistent with low or minimal stormwater pollution. We are currently in the process of
inspecting and testing stormwater outfall #2 and should be in possession of those records in the
near future.
IV. Enforcement
Rea Contracting believes that given its strong compliance history, its efforts to create and
maintain a complete SPPP and its actions in response to the deficiencies noted above, no civil
penalty should be assessed in this case. Nevertheless, should this matter be recommended for
enforcement, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14313-282.1(b) provides that DENR must consider several factors
in determining whether to assess a civil penalty and if so, the amount of such penalty.
Accordingly, Rea Contracting respectfully requests that DENR consider the following factors in
making its determination.
• the degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the
public health, or to private property resulting from the violation
Our failure to maintain adequate records has not resulted in any harm to the natural
resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property. In addition, although we failed
to conduct Analytical Monitoring, our current Analytical Monitoring results of stormwater outfall
#1 yielded a TSS quantity of 44 mg/l, an amount well below the 100 mg/1 limit. We also point
out, as recognized by the Inspection Report, that the Facility's stormwater discharges to two farm
ponds and that any rare overflow from these ponds discharges to a quarry area —not a surface
water of the State. These ponds would permit TSS to settle out of the stormwater and would also
provide for dilution of any other stormwater constituents. Therefore, there is no evidence that any
violation on our part resulted in harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or
to private property.

• duration and gravity of the violations and the effect on ground or surface
water quantity or quality
The alleged violations addressed in the NOV have not caused harm to people, natural
resources or private property. Furthermore, these alleged violations have not affected ground or
surface water quality or quantity. There is no evidence that the alleged violations resulted in a
stormwater discharge above and beyond 100 mg/l for TSS. Instead, our current data (44mg/1)
indicates that we are well below this standard, and because we have maintained the same
processes and standards from the inception of our permit, there is no evidence we have ever
discharged above the TSS standard. Furthermore, as recognized by the Inspection Report, the
Facility's stormwater discharges to two ponds and these ponds rarely overflow/discharge. (In the
event of an overflow, the discharge is directed to a quarry area rather than the surface waters of
the State). As you are aware, the farm ponds settle the TSS out of the stormwater and also
provide for dilution of any other stormwater constituents. Finally, we have immediately
addressed all alleged violations set forth in the NOV. Therefore, the duration and gravity of the
alleged violations is slight (particularly in light of the fact that the alleged violations substantially
address problems with our records) and have had no effect on the surrounding ground or surface
water quantity or quality.
• the cost of rectifying the damage
Since no damage has resulted from our alleged violations, the State would not be required
to expend any money on Rea Contracting's behalf to remedy any of the alleged violations.
• the amount of money saved by noncompliance
Rea Contracting has saved a negligible amount of money ($10 per TSS sampling test per
year) by its noncompliance. Instead, any alleged violations were the result of not having
"checks" in place to ensure that certain necessary documentation occurred and was maintained.
These "checks" do not require additional employees at the Facility and as such do not represent
cost savings resulting from noncompliance.
• the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with
programs over which the Environmental Management Commission has
regulatory authority
Rea Contracting has a strong compliance history and has never been assessed a penalty
for violations of its stormwater general permit. Rea Contracting has "gone the extra mile" in
ensuring that all of its employees are trained in its SPPP by offering orientation training,
retraining every six months and maintaining a copy of the SPPP at all times for employee
reference.

In light of the foregoing factors as well as our responses to each alleged violation, Rea
Contracting respectfully requests that DENR reconsider its issuance of the Notice of Violation
and Notice of Initiation of Enforcement. We have a strong history of compliance with our
stormwater General Permit and are committed to following our SPPP. Moreover, at our Facility,
we immediately addressed all alleged violations set forth in the NOV. Therefore, we request that
DENR's Division of Water Quality reconsider the Notice of Violation and Initiation of
Enforcement it issued to Rea Contracting's Garner Road Facility.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. If you have any questions or
comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Gene Mills
Rea Contracting, LLC
Enclosures
cc: Jerry Rimmer

3909 Beryl Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone] NC/WW Cert. #: 067
Fax: [phone] NC/DW Cert. M. 37731
Laboratory Report
--- Prepared for --- 1 of 1
Ms. Michelle Jacobs Report Date: 4/2712004
Rea Construction Company Date Received: 4/15/2004
3010 Gresham Lake Road
Raleigh, NC 27615 Work Order #: 0404-00980
Project ID: 01
Project ID: GARNER PLANT STORMWATER
No. Sample ID
001 OUTFALL #1
Cust. Code: RE4550
Cust. P.O.#: 083-280080
Date Sample( Time Sample, Matrix
4114/2004 14:45 SW
Condition
4n2oC .
Test Performed
Method
Results
. Analyzed Qualifier
Total Suspended Solids
EPA 160.2
44.0 mg/L
4115/04
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
EPA 405.1
5.1 mg/L
4/15/04
pH
EPA 150.1
7.11 S.U.
4122/04
Oil & Grease in Water
EPA 1664
<5.0 mg/L
4/16/04
pH disclaimer
Exceeds holding time.
4/22104
Report Certified by:
for Tritest, Inc.

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG160000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: I
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG16 00 t.Z (This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME � >� CONY2f1 CJ L� (e L _ Q- �-,g Aky,t PLgj✓y- COUNTY L✓44(f
PERSON COLLECTINGSAMPLE(S) TO11nn✓ G✓ //'n. J PH N NO. O �77=—lo�lolt
CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Tr; Lab # (o'7 8 wA i=
Lab # S %7 s / IG URE OF PERMIT I'EE Ott DESIGNEE)
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate
complete to the best of my knowledge
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
Outfall
No. '
Date
Sample
Collected..
50050 -:
(10530
00556'.t:,
00400 .
Total -
Flow
Total
Suspended .:_y
Solids
Oil and
Grease'
pH
mo/dd/ r
MG
m
in - -
units
Does this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? _yes 4/no
(if yes, complete Fart 13)
ran n: vcmcie omuuenance Acuvuv avromrurur • ne urremenrs
Outfall. ":
Date, ;,
50050 _ :. ..'';::00556..
, , :--;,
00536 F
00400
No.
Sample
Total Flow
Othand
Total
pH ;, ;
New Motor
Collected
j,
Grease
r: t
Suspended
Oil Usage
nio/d8/vr
MG
ma/1
unit ''
gal/mo
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS:
� �(4� g'-`V^
Dale -X0) r
Total Event Precipitation (inches): il'v
Event Duration (Ifours):AC..t_ 1-/9r <..r,,yln.vy� 01'6
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Form MR 16
Page l of 2

(if more than one storm event was sampled)
Dale
"Dotal Event precipitation (inches):
Event Duration (hours):
"1 certify, tinder penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prebared tinder my direction or supervision in accordance with it
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person
or persons who manage the system, or Ihose persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best
of illy knowledge and belief, tree, accurate, and complete. I lun aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false Information,
including the possibility of lines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
of Pernrillee)
(Date)
Form NIR16
Page 2 of 2

Permit No.: N/0— 0/
Facility Name: 2 l=A
County: Lk 16,
Inspector:
Date of Inspection: _
By this signature, I cerd
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
U/_L/At / or Certificate of Coverage No.: N/C/a/ lklC1/Q/,?-/ 24
u" i — C C
Phone No. 9 l �!� % % z — (D 3 (0
this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
#gnar ! of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfail No. �_ Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.) (z 01 ,"ri
Receiving Stream:
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge. using asic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) as descriptors: �y(
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge y have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak chlorine odor,
etc.) /y 0 JI (/ %/ ( 1 C) U C /
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
cloudy: y
1 2 3 40 6 7 8 9 10
Page 1
SWU-242-101599

S. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids:
1 2 � 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy: y
1 2 & 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge?
3. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge?
Yes 6
Yes e
9, Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution
List and describe
Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen may be indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further investigation.
Page 2
SWU-242-101599

Garner
JOB# ZE00115-003
DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN
DATE 04/14/04
Duration of the Storm Event in Hours 8
Rain Fall Rate in Inches per Hour 0.5
LOCATION
FROM TO
DRAINAGE
AREA
(acre)
_ RUNOFF
C C weight 1 0 area Outlets
(in/hr) (cfs)
Drainage Area 1
GRAVEL
1.5448
0.5500
GRASS
0.0911
0.3000
0.1149
1.0POND 000
SUM
1.7508
0.5665
7.03
M71
Drainage Area 2
GRAVEL
3.0955
0.5500
ASPHALT
0.2001
00
GRASS
4.6989
0.3607
13000
00
SUM
8.3552
0.4384
7.03
25.75
1
Drainage Area 3
1
ASPHALT
0.0633
0.9500
GRASS
1.3871
0.3000
SUM
1.4505
0.3284
7.03
3.35
1
Total Volume of Water During Event of Known Duration
(60 minutes)X(60 seconds)X(Hours and Decimal Portion of Duration)
X(Flow(Q)) = Total Cubic Feet of Water
Example - 3 hour event at 1 in/hr Intensity
(60)(60)(3 hours)(2.04 in/hr) = 22,032 cubic feet = 164,800 gallons
foot = 7.48 gallons
Area 1 Cubic Feet 200,827 Area 1 Gallons 1,502,182 Outfall #1
Area 2 Cubic Feet
741,626
Area 2 Gallons
5,547.360
Outfall #2
Area 3 Cubic Feet
96,432
Area 3 Gallons
721,312
Outfall #3
Total Cubic Feet
942,452
Total Gallons
7,049,543

Alhtestjna
3909 Beryl Road, Raleigh, NC 27607
ph:[phone] fax:[phone]
NCWW Cen467, NCDW Cenn31131
Report Results To
Company:�FCCA LLQ
Address: �p) (i , Ga 121VE Q- RED
TG ►tivG o— /AI C 2?5.41
Attn: . 1 IAlylYilli W rt )'rtArYt f'
Phone:R,JJ 47j2-r1jk Fall:
Sampled by (signature):
Ch e deff(custody
Billl To:
It i, A- C01VT-14iK d—nAD Project Reference:
�5 O l () Q,fh (J`,n-r LA)C.P 41 Project Number:
-4 1 C 2 y Purchase Order #:
Tritest W.O.# aLI'Dq - Q0960
a 1�
$d--Siandard Report Delivery
❑ Rush Report Delivery (wr surcharge)
"emn oropmat are suLjecl to prior a namal a, Ne IaMrardy
Requested Due Date:
Sampl"ei[)esonpOOn' '^ W2 �
_
- , .. ,stF
C 6 ,
G
StartrDate
-"_-..
Stan Tone
/T,i7u
End Datej `
"7
'EndkTrme w
y_ W
hilatrix" '+
wn,'ow`sv'"ia
ratt �x .t?
,
Analy""sesReques'[ed'}' r. i� .t:, °�' - ra _ '"t ftu
n r.3`u sr ..�.. t.'`, F c fir-
: ra. .+�4:R.�t6111"I .±x .na. .. f,€t, .a, -w'. . saF ... ._,; !r
a.. ..
17oD 7o�A�lurj�ecc�ee;fs�l�cls� of%d-
rnie`sc
am`plega
$ ...:
a:
)'fix _--------"
t
- -
-
x
Rerinq by ignawrel "�
R yed by (signature) �71
Date
0-1 J U�
rme
V ' —2� 5
Receipt Conditions (Lab Use Only)
❑ 4±2 ❑ TernP: °C
Res. Chlorine El t Present El We
Acid preserv. < ❑ Yes o ❑ n/a
Base pr rv.>12? ❑Yes��y�cJ "n��(
A,
Relirlgoish y (signature)
eceiv d by (signature)
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature)
'
Received by (signature)
Date
ran.

I

MR
t&
m'Ad'i't
y �nv
�111
`
SAMPLE PRESERVATION CHECK -IN SHEET
WON:
Received
RV:
j
�J
Date:
_ rs _
Time:
Temp:
O
Route:
CD
TTS
TTPU
USM
FEDX GC
UPS
Preservative
Sample
No.
Analysis Requested
Sample
Type
Composite
Grab
Container
Chlorine
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
N.OH
THIO
OTHER
.�-S S
.�
C i D
P G I
pas Ineg
,Nana
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
TRIO
OTHER
pn h
C i. G�
P�G
posing
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
THIO
OTHER
C G
P i Q
pos i
None
HCL
H2S
HNO3
NaOH
THIO
OTHER
CIG
P I G
pos i nag
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
TRIO
OTHER
C i G
PIG
pos i nag
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
TRIO
OTHER
C i G
PIG
pos i nag
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
N.OH
THIO
OTHER
C i G
PIG
pos i nag
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
THIO
OTHER
C I G
PIG
pos i neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NoOH
TRIO
OTHER
C i G
PIG
pos i nag
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
THIO
OTHER
C i G
PIG
pos i neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
THIO
OTHER
CIG
PIG
pos i nag
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
TRIO
OTHER
C i G
PIG
pos i nag
Nona
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
N.OH
THIO
OTHER
C i G
PIG
pos i neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
TRIO
OTHER
CIG
PIG
pos i nag
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NoOH
THIO
OTHER
CJG
PIG
pos I neg
Nona
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
TRIO
OTHER
CJG
PIG
pos I neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
TRIO
OTHER
CIO
PIG
pos 1 nag
on.
HCL
H2504
HNO3
N.OH
THIO
OTHER
C I G
PIG
pos i neg
None.,
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
THIO
OTHER
CIG
PIG
pos I neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NBOH
THIO
OTHER
Lab Comments:

x
INVOICE NUMBER: 299104
INVOICE DATE: 04/28/2004
WORK ORDER # : 0404-00980
Please return one copy of invoice and remit payment to:
Tritest, Inc.
P.O. Box 33190
Raleigh, NC 27636-3190
Attn: Accounts Receivable
Rea Construction Company
3010 Gresham Lake Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Attn: Ms. Michelle Jacobs
phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
Client Number. RE4550
PROJECT INFO: GARNER PLANT STORMWATER
YOUR ORDER DATE: 04/15/2004 INVOICE TERMS: NET 30 DAYS
PURCHASE ORDER REF: 083-280080
Quantity
Done
1 WC-BOD
1 WC-OGW
1 WC-PHW
1 WC-TSS
Procedure Performed
Unit Extended
Price Price
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 20.00
Oil & Grease in Water 35.00
pH 6.00
Total Suspended Solids 10.00
20.00
35.00
6.00
10.00
Total $71.00
A finance charge of 1.5% (18% annually) will be assessed to invoices over 30 days. Paid 0.00
Balance 71.00

I
e Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
North Carolina DENR DWQ
Attn: Mr. Ken Schuster
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 227699-1628
A. Signature
X ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item l? ❑Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
J. SeMce Type
a Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
2. Article Number 7001 1940 0006 9013 0647
(Transfer from service label)
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPR600-P- 081
U.S. Postal Service
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT
(Domestic Mail Only,; No Insurance Coverage Piovided)
sz�rj'2,'Xa4riai
PS Form 32ee, January,2001 See Reverse for Instructions

F W ATF
9
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William
OG
G. Ross Jr., Secretary ;
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
\��
�
r
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
>
Colleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
p r
Division of Water Quality
May 5, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETUERN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Gene Mills
Rea Contracting, LLC
8205 Wilkinson Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28214-7006
Subject: Notice of Violation, NOV-2004-PCO025
Notice of Initiation of Enforcement
Rea Contracting, LLC
Garner Road Asphalt Facility
Stormwater General Permit NCG160082
Wake County
Dear Mr. Mills:
On March 31, 2004 Mr. Jerry Rimmer of the Raleigh Regional Office, Division of Water
Quality conducted an inspection of the subject site for compliance with conditions contained in
the General NPDES Permit NCG160082; Stormwater Discharge Permit for Asphalt Paving
Mixtures and Blocks.
Findings during the inspection are noted in the attached inspection checklist and herein as
follows:
General Stormwater Permit NCG160066-condition violations
Part II. Section A requires the permittee to develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan. The site plan present at the site was adequate to meet permit requirements. The
Secondary Containment devices are secured with locking mechanism. The oil drums storage
area containment was covered. The current plan was adequate in narrative description of storage
practices, loading and unloading activities and Best Management Practice Summary also. The
facility has installed a silt fence around the property to insure control of silt in stormwater
discharge.
The Spill Prevention and Response Plan did contain current inventory and the Responsible Party
List was correct.
There was no description of employee training, although records of training were present.
Part II Section B requires analytical monitoring annually per Table 1 unless arithmetic
mean of results is below levels specified in Table 2. There was no evidence that any analytical
sampling had occurred; therefore, this facility has not complied with this requirement.
Sampling must be implemented.
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
o«A
NENNR
phone [phone] Customer Service
facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Page 2 of 2
Gene Mills
Rea Contracting -Garner
Part II Section C requires semiannual Qualitative Monitoring per Table 3 that is a visual
inspection at each stormwater outfall. Per the site stormwater pollution prevention plan the
facility is required to inspect all stormwater systems on at least semiannual schedule, once in the
fall (September -November) and once in the spring (April -June). There was no record of
inspections.
There was no documentary evidence that the analytical portion of the Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan was implemented as required in the permit.
This was to commence with the initial analytical event, but was not continued per the permit
requirements.
Part II Section D requires analytical monitoring per Table 4 if vehicle maintenance is done
utilizing 55 gallons of oil per month. This facility does not have a major vehicle maintenance
program on site; therefore this provision does not apply.
Part 3 Section C requires the permittee to properly operate and maintain all facilities to
achieve compliance with all conditions of the permit. The monitoring is not being
performed and compliance is not known without these results.
Please submit a written response to these violations within 20 days of receipt of this
notification. You need to respond with plans to address each described item with immediate
implementation of corrective action to begin compliance with the General Permit as issued.
Your response will be reviewed by this office and forwarded for consideration in any
enforcement action taken. Please note that these and any other violations are subject to civil
penalties in the amount of $ 5,000 per day per violation for oil discharge Statutes and up to
$25,000 per day per violation for other violations.
If you have any questions concerning this notification please contact Jerry Rimmer of my
staff at 919-571-4700-extension 273.
Sincerely,
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Cc: Johnny Williams, Rea Contracting
NPDES Compliance Unit
Central Files

Asphalt Facilities Stormwater Inspection Checklist
Type of Visit ZCompliance Inspection/Program Audit E]Tech Assistance or Recon
Location: Rea Construction Asphalt Plant, 1201 E. Garner Rd., Garner, NC 27529
Facility Number NCG160082 Date 3/31/2004 Time In 10:55AM Time Out 11:48 AM
People Interviewed, and Titles: Johnny Williams, Supervisor
Inspector: Jerry Rimmer
SPPP Documentation (Site Plan Part II (A)(1)
1. Copy of Certificate of Coverage ®Yes ONo Copy of Permit ®Yes pNo Requested but not required
w�
2. General Location (USGS) Man shows plant ®Yes ❑No, lines of discharge Part II(A)(1)(a)
to water of State ®Yes MNo, Stream labeled p. Yes pNo X NA, Latitude and longitude &Yes pNo
Comments: Discharge is collected in farm pond.
3. Narrative Description of Practices ®Yes ❑No , Part II(A)(1)(b)
4. Site map NYes'ONo Shows flows & areas served with arrows and Part II(A)(1)(c)
% impervious surface ®Yes pNo, buildings ®Yes pNo, process areas ®Yes ONo,
disposal areas ®Yes ONo X NA, drainage structures ®Yes ONo, existing BMPs such as secondary
containment ®Yes�—
❑No, list of potential pollutants ®Yes pNo
Comments:Oil tank dike locked.
5. List of significant spills in last 3 years or certif if none ®Yes ONo None Part II(A)(1)(d)
RRO called? pYes ❑No X NA
6. SW outfalls have been evaluated for process water ®Yes pNo No contamination. Part II(A)(1)(e)
7. Feasibility of Changing Practices pYes ONo X NA Part II(A)(2)(a)
8. Secondary Containment ®Yes pNo Schedule needed? pYes ®No Part II(A)(2)(b)
Drums storage area contained and covered.
Records of Draining Containment, Observations Made pYes ®No Not drained.
9. BMP Summary ®Yes ONo Part II(A)(2)(c)
10. SPRP Plan ®Yes pNo, Responsible personnel still employed here? ®Yes ONO _4iPart II(A)(3)
11. PM and Housekeeping Plan ®Yes pNo Record of Inspections? ®Yes pNo Part II(A)(4)
12. Employee training ®Yes ONo — for everybody ®Yes pNo ark Part II(A)(5)
13. Responsible parties, chain of command page ®Yes pNo y j Part II(A)(6)
14. Plan updated/reviewed annual ®Yes pNo " Part II(A)(7)
15. Stormwater Facility Inspection Program ®Yes pNo Gene Mills QTRLY. Not done Part II(A)(8)
16. This Plan Has Been Implemented (documents in manual, Part II(A)(9)
employees show awareness ®Yes ONo Comments:Qrtly. Inspections not completed per plan in
2003.
Sampling and Analytical Data Part II(C)
All Stormwater and Process Water is Recvcled (IICO Oyes ®No
Rain Gauge on site (not required) ®Yes pNo
Record of an overflow Oyes ®No Details None
If not all recycled, what is allowed to discharge? Vehicle Cleaning (IIC2)Q Recycle overflow (IIC3
above)) Wetting of Aggregate (IIC4)Z Mixing drum cleanout (IIC5) Q Vehicle Maintenance 0
Note: this checklist does not take the place of your permit. You are fully responsible for
following the permit.

For the topics checked in last question, Analytical data present OYes ®No, Compliant? pYes ®No
Details:Check with Gene Mills -Sampling not done. Rea has a good sampling and training plan
which now must be implemented. _
iv: vrs rrn -� rvnar :. re
Total precip pp Yes ONO, Storm duration Yes'wNo, Total flow Est. 'byes pNo,Field pHr-'Yes psNo,
Chain of custody pYes pNo No records.
Qualitative Monitoring performed semiannually pYes ®No Need records on site Part H(F)
Stormwater not combined with process wastewater — general runoff PartII(C)(1)
Analytical data pYes ®NO, Chain of Custody pYes ®No, Qualitative Monitoring performed
semiannually (Section F) pYes ®NO, No records on site.
If using cutoff policy, how many sample rounds Discuss with Gene Mills
Cutoff Concentrations met Oyes "pNo " Ever have a Bypass? pYes ®No PartIII (C)(4)a(1 &2)
Notification given? OYes pNo
Outdoor Inspection
I located all discharge_ points ®Yes pNo No. of areas served 2
pP
Sample points appropriate ®Yes pNo 1
P p
Location if different from discharge point;
Housekeeping: Trash pYes ®No Dust pYes ®No r
-tt
Take pH pYes ®No Value(s)+Fa,
Take photos Yes ONO
t
Containment Area satisfactory ®Yes«ONo, Loose drums'Yes ®No. Locked drain ®Yes ONO
How is asphalt tank heated?: Fuel Oil
Asphalt recovery pile comments Well maintained.
Inspection Summary Comments:
Drainage from northeast from material piles to silt catch basin overflow to ditch near quarry
fence which flows toward quarry. Farm pond west of plant collects most of SW with occasional
discharge toward Quarry area. Piping is run through PVC overpipe to catch any leaks or pipe
breaks. Valves and containment drains are locked.
Recommendations: Keep analytical (Quantitative & Qualitative) onsite.
Requirements: Institute sampling program, submit reports and keep records at site.
Document training.
Letter is to go to:
Name Gene Mills 704-395-3220
Title: Facility Services Manager
Address: Rea Contracting, LLC, 8205 Wilkinson Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28214-7006
Helpful Information at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Manuals Factsheets htm
Note: this checklist does not take the place of your permit. You are fully responsible for
following the permit.
Revised 03/ 19/04

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Rewit
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding i.e., PCS)
Transaction CoId_eI NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 INI 2 31 NCG160082 111 121 04/03/31 117 181LC1J191s1 20 U
u u —u
Remarks
211111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111166
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 81 OA��-----------------------Reserved-------------------
67 I 169 70 U 71 U 72 U 73 W 74 75I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Dale
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:55 AM 04/03/31
99108101.
Rea Contracting LLC-Garner 083
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
1201 F. Garner Road
Garner NC 27529
11:48 All 04/03/31
04/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representalive(s)rTitles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Gene Mills,8205 Wilkinson 21vd Charlotte NC Contacted
28214//704-395-327.0/7043945354 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Records/Reports E Facility Site Review 0 Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Names) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Jerry Ri. miner RRO WQ//91.9-571-4700/919-571-4718
?� Y f
Signature of Mana ement O e iewe Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
lDate
1l 3 d
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.

Asphalt Facilities Stormwater Inspection Checklist
Type of Visit " Compliance Inspection/Program Audit QTech Assistance or Recon
Location:: q' (� /ice �� io/ %. G A, v 12,6
Facility Number NCGI6 oo,y,e. Date3/"/kV Time In �o'L. rTime Out 7/i y/ y
People Interviewed, and Titles:
SPPP Documentation (Site Plan Parl II (A)(1)
1. Copy of Certificate of Coverage es pNo Copy of Permit ❑Yes 6K'0 Requested but not required
2. General Locatio USGS Ma shows plant Oes ONo, lines of discharge Part II(A)(1)(a)
to water of State Yes ®No, Stream labeled pYes o, Latitude and longitude RYes ONo
Comments.i � �
3. Narrative De scri tion of Practices [des ❑No ,.._`; Part II(A)(1)(b)
4. Site map 01yes ONo Shows flows & areas sSTved with arrows and Part II(A)(1)(c)
% impervious surface iryes ONo, buildings Ves ❑No, process areas pYes ❑No,
'3
/1/�dis sal areas Oyes pNo, drainage structures . e[-]No, No, existing BMPs such as secondary containment
es pNo list ofpotentia�Iohlutan�ts Ces�ONo
5. List of significant spills in last 3 years or certif. if none �Pies ❑No'G:—t Part II(A)(l)(d)
RRO called? pYes ❑No
6. SW outfalls have been evaluated for process water es EN o 4'/VU i
7. Feasibility of Changing Pra tices ❑Yes l7No ; jt// Part II(A)(2)(a)
8. Secondary Containment es ONo) u� Schedule needed? Oyes ONo � Part II(A)(2)(b)
Records of Dr inm Containment Observations M de OYes No r
g _ Tn
9. BMP Summa_ � es ONo : �� Part II(A)(2)(c)
10. SPRP Plan Yes ONo Responsible personnel still employed here? es -No k ��' Part II(A)(3)
1 l . PM and Housekeeping Ian' es ON ',v� Re cord of Inspections [�es pNo Part II(A)(4)
12. Employee training bes ONo —for everybody L ❑No ! - Part fl(A)(5)
13. Responsible parties, chain of commapd page wes ONo ; ; Part II(A)(6)
14. Plan updated/reviewed annually' es ONo ? Part II(A)(7)
"-
15. Stormwater Facility Inspection Program Wa es ONo f �✓ y Part II(A)(8)
16. This Plan Has Been Im let nted (documents in manual, 1 Part II(A)(9)
employees show awareness es pNo Comments:{', . j
Sampling and Analytical Data (' -e r -0 . lls Part II(C)
All Stormwater and Process Water is Recycled IIC 3 OYes ONo
Rain Gauge on site (not required) es ONo
Record of an overflow pYes dKO Details
/f not all re cled, what is allowed to discharge? Vehicle Cleaning (IIC2 ecycle overflow (IIC3
above) LL?Wetting of Aggregate (IIC4)E] Mixing drum cleanout (IIC5) �a Vehicle MaintenanceEl
Note: this checklist does not take the place of your permit. You are fully responsible for
following the permit.

For the topics checked in last question, Analytical data present Oyes ONo, Compliant? El -Yes pNo
Details::
Total precip pYes pNo, Storm duration pYes pNo, Total flow Est. pYes ONo,Field pH ❑Yes pNo,
Chain of custody pYes pNo
Qualitative Monitoring performed semiannually pYes pNo Part II(F)
Stormwater not combined with process wastewater — general runoff Part[I(C)(1)
Analytical data OYes pNo, Chain of Custody pYes pNo, Qualitative Monitoring performed
semiannually (Section F) pYes pNo,
If using cutoff policy, how many sample rounds;
Cutoff Concentrations met ®Yes ONo 'Ever have a Bypass? pYes ONo (III (C)(4)al &2)
Notification given? pYes pNo
Outdoor Inspection
I located all discharge points , es ONo No. of areas served
Sample points appropriatepYes pNo �
Location if different from dischargpoin l
Housekeeping: Trash Oyes It7do Dust OYes o p,
Take pH pYes QNo Value(s)
Take photos pYes CINo
Containment Area satisfactory Ex/es pNo, Loose drums OYes IBNo, Lee ed dr Yes [ 40
�c' m _
Asphalt recovery pile comments iy
Inspe !ionSummary Comments
✓tom L �. wQ. _ . .w.-Cte-c✓ Jc.*"'"' ' c .
Recommendations:('";. Vc,���, ✓%�,' , lei"
Requirements:
Letter is to go to:
Name
Title %G�; �. j StZ/ �i �-A /0117l1
Address,'
Helpful Information at http://Ii2o.enr.state.no.us/su/Manuals_Factsheets.htm
Note: this checklist does not take the place of your permit. You are fully responsible for
following the permit.
Revised 7/23/03

State of North
Department of
Carolina
Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan. W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Mr. Gene Mills
Rea Contracting, LLC.
8205 Wilkinson Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214-7006
Dear Mr. Mills:
NCDENmKm'h
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 19, 2003
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification — Name/Ownership Change
Permit NCG160082
Rea Contracting LLC — Garner 08:
(Formerly Rea Construction Company)
Wake County
In accordance with your request received November 10, 2003, the Division is forwarding the subject
permit modification. This modification documents the change in name/ownership at the subject facility. All other
terms and conditions in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This permit modification is issued
under the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit modification are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days
following receipt of this letter. This request must be a written petition conforming to Chapter 150E of the North
Carolina General Statutes, filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other Federal or
Local government permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact
Valery Stephens at the telephone number or address listed below.
cc: Central Files
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
NODES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Sincerely,
flk�
iimJek,` P`.E.
919 733-5083, extension 520 (lax) 919 733-0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET @ htlp #h20.enr.state.nc.us/ [e-mail]

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA;
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALM
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG160000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG160082
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Rea Contracting LLC.
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Rea Contracting LLC — Garner 083
1201 E Garner Road
Raleigh
Wake County
to receiving waters designated as unnamed tributary to Big Branch a class C NSW water in the
Neuse River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and
other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG160000 as
attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 19, 2003.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day December 19, 2003.
1
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

9 . State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
GENE MILLS
REA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY -GARNER
P.O. BOX 32487
CHARLOTTE, NC 28232
Dear Permittee:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 27. 1999
Subject: Reissue - NPDES Stormwater Permit
Rea Construction Company -Garner
COC Number NCG160082
Wake County
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCG160000, the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. This permit is reissued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6. 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
* A copy of general stormwater permit NCG160000
* A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) Certification Form. Completion of this form is required to
certify that you have developed and implemented the SPPP as per the conditions of the permit. This form
must be completed and returned to the Division within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
DO NOT SEND the SPPP with the signed form.
* Five copies of the Analytical Monitoring form and five copies of the Qualitative Monitoring form
* A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit which outlines changes in the permit, key requirements,
and addresses frequently asked questions
* A Certificate of Coverage
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from responsibility
for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or
decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Tony Evans of the Central Office Stormwater
and General Permits Unit at [phone], ext. 584
Sincerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Central Files
Stormwater and General permits Unit Files
Raleigh Regional Office
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG160000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG160082
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
REA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY -GARNER
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
REA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY -GARNER
1201 E GARNER RD
RALEIGH
WAKE COUNTY
to receivinL waters designated as a UT of Big Branch in the Neuse River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1,11. 111,
IV, V. and VI of General Permit No. NCG160000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective August 1, 1999.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day July 27, 1999,
for Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority,of the Environmental Management Commission

n ,State of North Carolina
`Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 30, 1995
Paul Schulz
Rea Construction Co -Garner
P.O. Box 32487
Charlotte, NC 28232
JU�I ,3 p 1995
Subject: General Permit No. NCG 160000
Rea Construction Co -Gamer
COC NCG 160082
Wake County
Dear Paul Schulz:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on May 2, 1995, we are forwarding
herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general permit. This
permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated
December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit
application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division
of Environmental Management. The Division of Environmental Management may require modification or
revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal
Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any question concerning this permit, please contact MR. ANTONIO EVANS at telephone
number 919/733-5083.
Sincerely, iriginal Signed By
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GENERAL PERMIT NO, NCG160000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG160082
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Rea Construction Co.
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Rea Construction Co.
1201 E. Gamer Road
Raleigh, NC
Wake County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Big Branch in the Neuse River Basin, Class C, NSW
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Pans I,11, III
and IV of General Permit No. NCGI60000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective June 30, 1995.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day June 30, 1995.
C;_..
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission