NCG020920_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20170816

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
w
DOC TYPE
5( HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ � � � � O �
YYYYM M D D

Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY
August 16, 2017
Lynwood Everett
Everett's Lot Clearing and Grading, Inc.
2401 Fred Everett Road
Kinston, NC 28504
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Sbcmiary
TRACY DAVIS
Inrecror
I,
FAU12011
Y
"r ASHINGTON
Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000
Turkey Path Pit
COC NCG020920
Lenoir County
Dear Mr. Everett:
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on June 16, 2017, we are forwarding
herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state —NPDES general permit.
This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated
October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division of
Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources. The Division may require modification or revocation and
reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Energy, Mining, and Land Resources, or permits required by the Division of Water
Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or local governmental permit that may be
required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Richard Riddle at telephone number
[phone].
Sincerely,
Ougaw digxed 4 Rle(sevrd Z. 7R4(d&, ?x.
for Tracy E. Davis, P.E., CPM
cc: Ewashington Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Program Files
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center 1512 North Salisbury Street I Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
919 707 9200 T

f -m,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL, AND LAND RESOURCES
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020920
STORMWATER AND MINE DEWATERING DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Everett's Lot Clearing & Grading, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater and mine dewatering-from a facility located at
Turkey Path Pit
2112 Fred Everett Road
Kinston
Lenoir County
to receiving waters designated as Gum Swamp Creek, a class C, Sw, NSW water in the Neuse
River Basin, in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, IV and V of General Permit No. NCG020000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective August 16, 2017
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day August 16, 2017.
0%4iC Dd Q gafed 4 ,R"aad .Cr. R4&&, &.
for Tracy E. Davis, P.E., Director
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

;S
0(
/I.
J -
�l
Turkey Path Pit L
NCG020920 Everett's Lot Clearing and Grading, Inc
Turkey Path Pit
N
Latitude: 350 19' 28" N
�� ' E Longitude: -770 40' 55" W
County: Lenoir
S ' Receiving Stream: Gum Swamp Creek
Stream Class: C, Sw, NSW
Map Scale 1:24,000 Index Number: 27-77-3 Neuse River Basin) Facility Location

Energy, Mineral '
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Mr. Samir Dumpor, P.E.
Washington Regional Office %
943 Washington Square Mall .
Washington, North Carolina 27889
PAT MCCRORY
(/nl'2nlOr
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary•
TRACY DAVIS
July 13, 2017 Oov,lrr
Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000
Turkey Path Pit
COC No. NCG020920
Lenoir County
Dear Mr. Dumper:
Enclosed is a copy of the site plan for the above NOI Mine application for your review.
previously sent you the NOI and location map via email. if you need any more information, please give
me a call at telephone number [phone] or email me at [e-mail].
Thanks,
Richard Riddle, Jr.
Stormwater Engineer
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Attachments
t
JUL 2 7 2017
nu,luTY SFC r�ON
State of North Carolina I Environmental Qahty I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail service Center 1 512 North Salisbury Street I Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
919 707 9200 T

PARAMOUNTE
JL EN G 1 N E E FRI N G. I N C.
1 2 2 C I N E M A D R I V E
W I L M I N G T O N, NC 2 8 4 0 3
9 1 0- 7 9 1- 6 7 0 7( O) 9 1 0- 7 9 1- 6 7 6 0 ( F)
L E T T E R O F T R A N S M I T T A L
To:
NCDEQ — DEMLR — Stormwater
Permitting Program
Date
1 6/14/17
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
Re:
Turkey Path Pit
MINE DEWATERING NOI
Attn:
Stormwater Staff
Project No.
17234.PE
e ate sendin ® Originals
he following items: ❑ Correspondence
® Prints ❑ Shop Drawvags ❑ Calculations
® Plans ❑ Specifications ® Other as fisted below
Quantity
Date
Dwg. No.
Description
1
Ml, N12
Mine Maps and Details (24"x36")
1
New Mine Permit Application
1
NCG020000 — NOI — Mining
1
Cover Letter
1
$100 Permit Fee
Issue Status: ® For Approval ❑ As Requested ❑ Construction ❑ Bid
❑ For Your Use ❑ For Review and Continent ❑ Approved as Noted ❑ See Remarks
ction Taken: ❑ No Exceptions Taken ❑ Make Corrections Noted ❑ Amend & Resubmit
❑ Rejected -See Remarks ❑ approved as Submitted ❑ Other
Remarks:
Please contact me with any
additional information or questions. Thanks.
mith a aramounte-en .c
m
Cc: _ Lynwood Everett
Signed: 4YV
77'J. Branch Smith
RECEIVED
JUN 16 2011
DENR•LAND QUALITY
STORMWATER PERMITTING

NCG020000 N.O.I.
0�Y/N�� 1
28) Have you been required to obtain a wetland delineation certified by the US Army Corps of Engineers?
nX No ❑ Yes If yes, please attach to application submission.
Stormwater BMPs and Vehicle Maintenance:
29) Does this facility employ best management practices for stormwater control?
❑ No nX Yes If yes, please briefly describe: Flocculant Pumped Device plus sediment
30) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
RX No ❑ Yes If yes, when was it implemented?
31) Are vehicle maintenance activities (VMA) occurring or planned at this mine site?
nX No ❑Yes, If yes, will VMA area runoff discharge into the wastewater treatment system(s)?
❑ No, VMA runoff will discharge separately through a stormwater outfall
❑ Yes, VMA runoff will drain back to the mine pit or other wastewater system
Wastewater Treatment Facilities:
32) Will mine dewatering occur? (Yes, we are asking about dewatering again.)
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes, will the mine discharge this water?
33) Will this facility wash mined materials?
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes, will the mine discharge this water?
34) Will discharges of process wastewater treatment systems occur (including possible recycle system
overflows)?
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes, describe what kind of systems:
35) Will this facility employ chemical additives to flocculate suspended solids?
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes, provide the name, manufacturer, and the quantity of average daily usage of the chemical
additive (if known):
Note: Please see our website for a list of evaluated polyacrylamide (PAMS) products for use in North
Carolina: htto://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/construction-stormwater
36) Will any of the wastewater treatment facilities at this mine overflow only during rainfall events that
exceed the 10-yr, 24-hr rainfall event?
❑ Yes If yes, which treatment systems are those?
❑ No, all wastewater treatment facilities will discharge more frequently (i.e., during smaller rain events)
Page 8 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
37) Are wastewater treatment facilities (including recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain?
❑ No
❑ Yes
E 138) A Wastewater treatment alternatives review is required by 15A NCAC 2H.0105 (c)(2)
for any new or expanding water pollution control facility discharges in North Carolina. You may
attach additional sheets. List the types of wastewater this mine site will discharge:
❑ Mine Dewatering
❑ Process Wastewater (such as washing or recycle system overflows, other mining activity wastewater)
a) What wastewaters were considered for this alternatives review? ❑ Dewatering ❑ Process WW
b) Connection to a Municipal or Regional Sewer Collection System:
i) Are there existing sewer lines within a one -mile radius? ..................................... ❑ Yes ❑ No
(1) If Yes, will the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) accept the wastewater? .... ❑ Yes ❑ No
(a) If No, please attach a letter documenting that the WWTP will not accept the wastewater.
(b) If Yes, is it feasible to connect to the WWTP? Why or why notT
c) Closed -loop Recycle System (meets design requirements of 15A NCAC 2T .1000):
i) Are you already proposing a closed -loop recycle system (CLRS)? ......................... ❑ Yes ❑ No
(1) If Yes, for what type of wastewater at this mine site? ❑ Dewatering ❑ Process W W
(2) If No, is this option technologically feasible (possible)? Why or why not?'
(3) If No, is it otherwise feasible to build a CLRS at this site? Why or why not?`
(4) What is the feasibility of building a CLRS compared to direct surface water discharge?'
d) Surface or Subsurface Disposal System (e.g., spray irrigation):
i) Is a surface or subsurface disposal technologically feasible (possible)? ..................... ❑ Yes ❑ No
Why or Why not?'.
ii) Is a surface or subsurface disposal system otherwise feasible to implement?*............ ❑ Yes ❑ No
Why or Why not?"
Page 9 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Ili) What is the feasibility of employing a subsurface or surface discharge as compared to a direct
discharge to surface waters?*
e) Direct Discharge to Surface Waters: Is discharge to surface waters the most environmentally sound
alternative of all reasonably cost-effective options for the wastewaters being considered?*
❑ Yes ❑ No
f) If this review included all wastewater discharge types, would excluding some types (e.g. mine
dewatering) make any of the above non -discharge options feasible for some of the wastewaters?
❑ Yes ❑ No
* Feasibility should take into account initial and recurring costs. You may be asked to provide
further information to support your answers�to these questions after the initial review.
Other:
39) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
PX No ❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
❑ No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
❑ No ❑ Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s) of waste:
How is material stored:
Where is material stored:
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport / disposal vendor: _
Vendor address:
40) Is your facility providing appropriate secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials? (See
permit text for secondary containment requirements.)
FX No
❑ Yes
41) Does your site have an active landfill within the mining permit boundary?
RX No
❑ Yes If yes, specify type: ❑ LCID (Land Clearing and Inert Debris) ❑ Other:
Page 10 of 12
SW U-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
What is the feasibility of employins a suburfade or surface tli charge as compared
discharge to surface waters?' E CL t� VIS Ly C iC % FIACI
,4�1-,CNN n .f-n-l-Y1(7Y. --v\nY) ((-\nn
e) Direct Discharge to Surface Waters: Is discharge to surface waters the most environmentally sound
alternative of all reasonably cost-effective options for the wastewaters being considered?'
❑ Yes 19 No
f) If this review included all wastewater discharge types, would excluding some types (e.g. mine
dewatering) make any of the above non -discharge options feasible for some of the wastewaters?
❑ Yes 5 No
Feasibility should take into account initial and recurring costs. You maybe asked to provide
further information to support your answers to these questions after the initial review.
Other:
39) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
RNo ❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
19 No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
(9 No ❑ Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s) of waste:
How is material stored
Where is material stored:
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport / disposal vendor: _
Vendor address:
40) Is your facility providing appropriate secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials? (See
permit text for secondary containment requirements.)
R No
❑ Yes
41) Does your site have an active landfill within the mining permit boundary?
n No
❑ Yes If yes, specify type: ❑ LCID (Land Clearing and Inert Debris) ❑
Page 10 of 12
SWU-NCG02•NOI I Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater Permitting Program
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee coverage under
the NPDES NCG02 General Permit. Upon review of the submittal, the
Division may determine that coverage under an individual permit is
more appropriate. Also be advised that renewed and continued
coverage under NCG02 may be dependent upon the permittee's
compliance success and/'or status of the receiving waters.
For questions, please contact the DEMLR/Land Quality Section Regional Office for your area.
DEMLR/Land Quality Section Regional Office Contact Information:
Asheville Office ......
[phone]
Fayetteville Office ...
[phone]
Mooresville Office ...
[phone]
Raleigh Office ........
[phone]
Washington Office ...(252)
946-6481
Wilmington Office ...
[phone]
Winston-Salem ......
[phone]
Central Office .........(919)
707-9220
Page 13 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

sr®•`First National Bank - ' .- 1 O'J O
PARAM++))OUNTE'ENGINEERING INC. !
- 122 CINEMA DHIVEf 66-967/531
WILMINGTON, NC 29403 _ _/ 6/14/2017
ORDER OF TO E - NCDEO .$ Y•100.00
fflfifNYNNYffffftfYNNYRNRRRfRRfRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRfRRRRHRRRMRRkHfRMRRRYYNINRRRRRNfN1
One Hundred and 00/9.00 DOLLAR:
NCDEQ '
1
C at _
IaShidd
MEM0e , - 4- - f�
#17234.PE Everett Farms Pit- NPDES Permit. 'a. R
o
c

Permit Number NCG020920
Program Category
NPDES SW
Permit Type
Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Primary Reviewer
rick.riddle
Coastal SWRule
Permitted Flow
Facility
Central Files: APS _ SWP _
8/17/2017
Permit Tracking Slip
Status Project Type
In review New Project
Version Permit Classification
CDC
RECEIpp--I
VED
Permit Contact Affiliation
AUG 17 2017
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
Facility Name
Major/Minor Region
Turkey Path Pit
Minor Washington
Location Address
County
2112 Fred Everett Rd
Lenoir
Kinston INC 28504
Owner
Owner Name
Everett's Lot Clearing and Grading Inc
Dates/Events
Facility Contact Affiliation
Lynn Everett
PO Box 6025
Kinston NC 28501
Owner Type
Non -Government
Owner Affiliation
Lynn Everett
PO Box 6025
Kinston NC 28501
Scheduled
Ong Issue App Received Draft Initiated Issuance Public Notice Issue Effective Expiration
6/16/2017
Regulated Activities Requested /Received Events
Mine dewatering RO staff report received 8/15/17
RO staff report requested 7112117
Outfall 001
Waterbody Name Streamindex Number Current Class Subbasin
Gum Swamp Creek 27-77-3 C;Sw,NSW 03-04-05

Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
August 16, 2017
Lynwood Everett
Everett's Lot Clearing and Grading, Inc.
2401 Fred Everett Road
Kinston, NC 28504
ROY COOPER
ccmern ,
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TRACY DAVIS
Director
Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000
Turkey Path Pit
COC NCG020920
Lenoir County
Dear Mr. Everett:
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on June 16, 2017, we are forwarding
herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state —NPDES general permit.
This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated
October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division of
Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources. The Division may require modification or revocation and
reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Energy, Mining, and Land Resources, or permits required by the Division of Water
Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or local governmental permit that may be
required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Richard Riddle at telephone number
[phone].
Si cerely,
for Pracy. Davis, P , CPM
cc: Washington Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Program Files
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center 1 512 North Salisbury Street I Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
919 707 9200 T

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL, AND LAND RESOURCES
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020920
STORMWATER AND MINE DEWATERING DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Everett's Lot Clearing & Grading, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater and mine dewatering-from a facility located at
Turkey Path Pit
2112 Fred Everett Road
Kinston
Lenoir County
to receiving waters designated as Gum Swamp Creek, a class C, Sw, NSW water in the Neuse
River Basin, in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, 111, IV and V of General Permit No. NCG020000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective August 16, 2017
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day August 16, 2017.
for Tracy E. Davis, P.E., Direct
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

NCG020920
0
Map Scale 1:24,000
Everett's Lot Clearing and Grading,
Turkey Path Pit
Latitude: 35° 19' 28" N
Longitude: -770 40' 55" W
County: Lenoir
Receiving Stream: Gum Swamp Creek
Stream Class: C, Sw, NSW
Index Number: 27-77-3 Neuse River Basin)
�i�iOS1►1i�1�:! ��a r+
r:►liry►7�ri�l�V��j ��..iy.�
Facility Location

'W'
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources /
Land Quality Section - Stormwater Permitting Program
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NCG020000
NOTICE OF INTENT - General Permit Application
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year Month
Da
Certificate
of Covera
Ch #
mount
Permit Ass' ed to
t lli
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit
NCG020000:
STORMWATER ANDIOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as:
SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code - 14XX Mineral Mining Industry (except as specified below) and
like activities
The following activities are included:
Active or inactive mining operations (including borrow pits —except for NCDOT borrow pits) that discharge
stormwater contaminated with or that has come in contact with, any overburden, ra"� f .\er%� to
products, finished products, byproducts or waste products located on the site of suc14 D er�ll;v u—
Stormwater from vehicle maintenance activities (VMA) at mining operations; J{;N 16 2017
Overflow from facilities that recycle process wastewater; and/or
Mine dewatering (wastewater) cr DENR-LAND QUALITY
The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this GeneralC&iiii�i �R PERMITTING
Stormwater discharges associated with peat mining, coal mining, and metal mining;
Stormwater discharges from mining operations which are intermixed on site with stormwater from concrete
operations;
Stormwater discharges associated with oil and gas extraction operations; and
Stormwater discharges associated with tourist gem mines
NCDOT borrow pits (covered under individual permit NCS000150)
The following discharges are covered by NPDES -general permit NCG520000 instead of NCG020000:
Point source discharges of stormwater and wastewater from in -stream sand mining operations (sand dredging
or dipping operations) are covered instead by NPDES'General Permit NCG520000, administered by the Division
of Water Resources NPDES Wastewater Permitting Program. Please contact DWR for more information.
Please print or type all entries in this application form.
1) Mailing address m
11owner/operator official address to which all permit coes ondence will be mail
Legal Owner Nam Everett's Lot Clearing and Grading Inc
(Attach the most recent Annual Report to the NC Secretary of State showing the current legal name or the corporation or entity.
Alternatively this permit can be given to an individual or government authority. This name must be the same name as appears on the
Division o/ Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources' Mining Permit.)
Signee's Name (as signed for in question 41. at end) Lynn Everett
Street Address 2402 Fred Everett Road
City Kinston State NC _ ZIP Code 28504
Telephone No. [phone] E-mail Lynn(a) candg.com
Alternate Contact Name' Lynwood Everett (landowner) E-mail (if different)
Page 1 of 12
SWU-NCG02-N0I Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Alternate Contact Telephone (if different) [phone]
'Alternate contact should be affiliated with the Owner/Operator. Consultant information can be provided
in question 5.
2) Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name TURKEY PATH PIT
Facility Street Address 2112 Fred Everett Road, Kinston NC 28504
Facility City State ZIP Code
Facility County Lenoir
Facility Contact Lynwood Everett
Telephone No. [phone] Fax:
Contact E-mail
3) Physical Location Information:
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). 1.60 miles west from US Hwy 258 on SR 1534
4) Facility Location Coordinates:
Latitude 35.3245 N Longitude 77.6820 W (degrees / minutes / seconds or decimal
degrees)
5) Consultant Information (if applicable):
Consultant: Branch Smith, PE
Consulting Firm: Paramounte Engineering,
Mailing Address: _122 Cinema Drive
City: _
State:
Phone:(_910) _791-6707
E-mail: bsmith(a),oaramounte-eno.com
Zip Code:
Fax: ()
Permits:
6) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following:
WX New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin:
❑ Existing Date began mining:
7) Standard Industrial Classification:
(Optional)
Staple Business Card Here
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility SIC Code: _ _ _ _ I u � 1, � i
8) Provide a description of the types of minerals mined at this facility: I "j
9) Is this a PROCESSING -ONLY facility for materials mined elsewhere?
10) Is this an inactive mine site?
❑ No
No ❑ Yes
Page 2 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

r
NCG020000 N.O.I.
RX Yes If yes, have you certified to the Stormwater Permitting Program that all portions of the site where
clearing, grading, and/or excavation activities have occurred have been stabilized?
❑ No ❑ Yes (If yes, the site may be eligible for "Dormant Status" and reduced BMP
inspections. See the General Permit.)
11) Does this facility already have a valid Mining Permit from DEMLR's Land Quality Section?
RX No If no, please indicate the status of the Mining Permit application: _In Process
❑ Yes If yes, please provide the Mining Permit number: . Also provide a copy of
the DEMLR Mining Permit with this NPDES application.
12) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits?
nX No
❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility:
13) Are you applying for a discharge permit in the same location as a previously permitted mine?
WX No
❑ Yes If yes, specify permit number and mine name if known:
14) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits from DWR (e.g., recycle permits)?
nX No
❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility:
15) Does total area of this mine site include ready -mixed concrete plant and/or asphalt plant areas?
nX No
❑ Yes If yes, do they have separate NPDES stormwater permits? ❑ No ❑ Yes (provide permit
number(s) )
If not owned by the same company, who is the owner?
Development Activities and Buffers:
16) Will this mining operation precede development activities at this site?
RX No
❑ Yes
17) Is this mine located within one of the 20 Coastal Counties, and will it add more than 10,000 ftZ of
impervious surface?
❑ Yes (to both)
❑ No, this mine site IS in one of the 20 Coastal Counties but will NOT add 10,000 ftz of impervious surface.
OX No, this mine site is NOT in any of the 20 Coastal Counties.
If this site is in one of the 20 Coastal Counties, you may be required to apply for an additional State
Stormwater Permit. Check with your local Regional Office (see contact information and checklist below).
Page 3 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

v
NCG020000 N.O.I.
18) Is this mine located the Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, or Catawba River Basins, or the Randleman or Jordan
Water supply Watersheds?
❑ No
�X Yes If yes, what size stream buffers are included on site? ft. You must show buffers on site
plans. Also include information and plans showing diffuse flow through buffers as required.
Discharge Points, Receiving Waters & Wetlands:
19) Receiving waters:
What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater
and/or wastewater discharges will end up in? The site drains into an unnamed tributary of Gum Swamp (C:
SW7 NSW) in the Falling Creek Watershed of the Neuse River Basin.
To find the waterbody, please see the "MAPS" tab on http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq for a map of NC
Surface Waterbody Classifications.
Receiving water classification(s) for the waters:
If the site will discharge to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm sewer
system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer).
Discharge of wastewater to receiving waters classified as WS-II through WS-V, or SA, must be
approved by the Division of Water Resources (DWR) or Division of Marine Fisheries
(DMF). DEMLR cannot grant coverage under NCG020000 without that approval. Also be advised that
no new discharges of wastewater are permitted in receiving waters classified as WS-1 or
freshwater ORW. Wastewater discharges to saltwater ORW will not be approved under General Permit
NCG02 but may be eligible for an individual permit.
20) Will this mine site discharge wastewater or stormwater to waters classified as High Quality Waters
(HQW), Primary Nursery Areas (PNA), Trout (Tr) waters, or a class with a symbol like "+" or "@" that
denotes a special management strategy is in place?
�X No
❑ Yes, PNA"
❑ Yes, HQW' ❑ Yes, includes "+" or
❑ Yes, Trout (Tr)
21) Will this mine site discharge wastewater or stormwater to waters classified as Shellfish (SA) waters?
1X No
❑ Yes, SA`
'For questions 19-20, be advised that the NCG02 General Permit limits the discharge volume of total combined
wastewaters to 50 percent of the receiving water in -stream flow under 7Q10 conditions in HQW waters (PNA and
SA waters are considered HQW by definition). You maybe required to contact USGS to obtain a 7010 flow.
SW U-NCG02-NOI
Page 4 of 12
Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
22) Will this mine site discharge wastewater or stormwater to impaired waters, or to waters with an
approved "Total Maximum Daily Load" (TMDL)?
To find impaired waters, please see the "Impaired Waters" map on the "MAPS" tab on
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq.
To find approved TMDLs in North Carolina, please see DWR's Water Planning Section website:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/mtu/tmdl/tmdls.
RX No
❑ Yes, these waters are impaired for (list pollutants):
❑ Yes, these waters have a TMDL for (list pollutants):
Page 5 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/1012015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
23) List discharge points (outfalls) that convey discharge from the mine site (both on -site and off -site) and
location coordinates. Attach additional sheets if necessary, or note that this information is specified
on the site plan. Include proposed maximum daily flow rate for each wastewater outfall.
You must show all discharge points clearly on the submitted site plan. Be advised
that NCDEQ may require you to apply,for an individual permit, based on proposed
discharge rates and receiving stream conditions (low flows, impairments, etc.)
Stormwater
Stormwater Outfall No.
Latitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): _ N
Longitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): _ W
Stormwater Outfall No
Latitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
N
Longitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
W
Stormwater Outfall No.
Latitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
N
Longitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
W
Stormwater Outfall No.
Latitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
N
Longitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
W
Stormwater Outfall No.
Latitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
N
Longitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
W
StormwaterOutfall No.
Latitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
N
Longitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
W
Mine Dewatering
Mine Dewatering (Wastewater) Outfall No. _1
Proposed maximum flow rate:
Latitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): 35.325 deg
_ N
Longitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees): 77.682 deg
_ W
Mine Dewatering (Wastewater) Outfall No.
Proposed maximum flow rate:
Latitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
N
Longitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
W
Process Wastewater
Process Wastewater Outfall No. Wastewater Description:
Proposed maximum flow rate:
Latitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
N
Longitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
W
Process Wastewater Outfall No. Wastewater Description:
Proposed maximum flow rate:
Latitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
N
Longitude (degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees):
W
Page 6 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
24) Help us understand what will happen to the dewatering water at this mine site:
❑ N/A — this mine is not dewatering at all and will not dewater in the future.
a) Will this mine be dewatering and discharging to waters of the state? (Answer only if dewatering)
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes, where to? ❑ Surface Waters and/or Wetlands (on -site or off -site)
❑ Other (on -site or off -site) Describe:
b) Will this mine be dewatering but not discharging to waters of the state? (Answer only if dewatering)
❑ No
RX Yes If yes, explain how you are dewatering, and where that water will be directed:
Pumped and Filtered groundwater from the excavation pit will be discharged onto the ground which will drain
into farm field ditch.
25) Are there wetlands or surface waters within 400' of the mine pit perimeter?
RX No
❑ Yes If yes, what distance are they from the mine pit perimeter?
26) Will mining operations require dewatering near wetlands or other waterbodies, and will dewatering
potentially impact any wetlands or other waterbodies?
RX No, dewatering will not occur near (within 400') of wetlands or other waterbodies (e.g., streams, lake, etc.)
❑ Yes, dewatering will be near wetlands or other waterbodies
Wetlands must be CLEARLY DELINEATED on the site plan. Mine dewatering activities that
have the potential to drain wetlands or otherwise impact surface water or groundwater MUST develop and
implement a Pumping Operation and Monitoring (POM) Plan that has been approved by the
Department.
For sites that may drain wetlands — approval of a POM Plan may be required prior to coverage under
this permit. The POM Plan should be submitted to the appropriate Regional Office and in all cases must be
approved prior to operation.
The plan shall include, but is not limited to: (1) Groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the effect of
pumping and to establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce impacts, and (2) Detailed plans to maintain
surrounding hydrology and respective monitoring to demonstrate compliance. See checklist at the end of the
application. Contact the Regional Office for questions specific to your mine.
27) Have you been required to obtain 404/401 Certification permits?
RX No
❑ Yes If yes, please briefly describe below (include information such a required mitigation, BMPs,
setbacks, and/or O&M plans for on or off -site wetlands or other pertinent information). Attach other sheets as
necessary:
Page 7 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9110/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
28) Have you been required to obtain a wetland delineation certified: by the US Army Corps of Engineers?
RX No ❑ Yes If yes, please attach to application submission.
Stormwater BMPs and Vehicle Maintenance:
29) Does this facility employ best management practices for stormwater control?
❑ No nX Yes If yes, please briefly describe: Flocculant Pumped Device plus sediment
storage bag
30) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
nX No ❑ Yes If yes, when was it implemented? _
31) Are vehicle maintenance activities (VMA) occurring or planned at this mine site?
OX No ❑Yes, If yes, will VMA area runoff discharge into the wastewater treatment system(s)?
❑ No, VMA runoff will discharge separately through a stormwater outfall'
❑ Yes, VMA runoff will drain back to the mine pit or other wastewater system
Wastewater Treatment Facilities:
32) Will mine dewatering occur? (Yes, we are asking about dewatering
IX No I"'I JUL 1 2 2017.'
❑ Yes If yes, will the mine discharge this water?
33) Will this facility wash mined materials?
® No
❑ Yes If yes, will the mine discharge this water?
34) Will discharges of process wastewater treatment systems occur (including possible recycle system
overflows)?
9 No
❑ Yes If yes, describe what kind of systems:
35) Will this facility employ chemical additives to flocculate suspended solids?
N No
❑ Yes If yes, provide the name, manufacturer, and the quantity of average daily usage of the chemical
additive (if known):
Note: Please see our website for a list of evaluated polyacrylamide (PAMS) products for use in North
Carolina: http:/Iportal_ncdenr.org/web/ir/construction-stormwater
36) Will any of the wastewater treatment facilities at this mine overflow only during rainfall events that
exceed the 10-yr, 24-hr rainfall event? N/A i U Y I� COCA-�M`IN Cd
❑ Yes If yes, which treatment systems are those?
CZ No, all wastewater treatment facilities will discharge more frequently (i.e., during smaller rain events)
Nl"e�
Page 8 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

C
NCG020000 N.O.I.
37) Are wastewater treatment facilities (including''recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain?
® No
❑ Yes
38) A wastewater treatment alternatives review is required by 15A NCAC 2H.0105 (c)(2)
for any new or expanding water pollution control facility discharges in North Carolina. You may
attach additional sheets. List the types of wastewater this mine site will discharge:
W Mine Dewatering
❑ Process Wastewater (such as washing or recycle system overflows, other mining activity wastewater)
a) What wastewaters were considered for this alternatives review? X Dewatering ❑ Process W W
b) Connection to a Municipal or Regional Sewer Collection System:
i) Are there existing sewer lines within a one -mile radius? ..................................... ❑ Yes 0 No
(1) If Yes, will the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) accept the wastewater? .... ❑ Yes ❑ No
(a) If No, please attach a letter documenting that the WWTP will not accept the wastewater.
(b) If Yes, is it feasible to connect to the WWTP? Why or why not?'
c) Closed -loop Recycle System (meets design requirements of 15A NCAC 2T .1000):
i) Are you already proposing a closed -loop recycle system (CLRS)? ........ ❑ Yes Ur No
(1) If Yes, for what type of wastewater at this mine site? ❑ Dewatering ❑ Process WW
(2) If No, is this option technologically feasible (possible)? Why or why not?'
(3) If No, is it otherwise feasible to build a CLRS at this site? Why or why not?'
(4) What is the feasibility of building a CLRS compared to direct surface water discharge?'
d) Surface or Subsurface Disposal System (e.g., spray irrigation):
i) Is a surface or subsurface disposal technologically feasible (possible)? ..................... [9 Yes ❑ Nc
WhyorWhyri 'Ora-�'j 1�CLA- C)n
ii) Is a surface or subsurface disposal system otherwise feasible to implement?*............ 0 Yes ❑ No
Why or Why not?` a c,4 S t h \ e hor-r" 0 r 6 C) O +') ©y\
Page 9 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9110/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Final Checklist:
This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included and
— initialed for. Please show that the following required information has been included by initialing in each
space below.
_Fee of $100 made payable to NCDEQ.
Completed application and all supporting documents.
n/,.;- Copy of the valid approved mining permit (MP) for the facility or indication of MP application status.
__4.— Copy of a county map or other general location map that shows the mining site and nearest major roads.
Copy of USGS topographic map showing the mining site and surrounding areas, or other map that clearly
shows site location in relation to nearby streams, wetlands, and other waters, etc.
_,,,,-2 copies of large-scale (minimum 24" x 36") site plan with topographical lines with
all outfalls, applicable buffers and wetlands clearly delineated, receiving waters, and
100-year flood plain line if applicable,
A copy of your US Army Corps -approved wetland delineation if you marked "yes' to question 27 above.
,,W A line drawing of the water flow through the facility or block flow diagram. A pictorial description of the
nature of any sources of water and any collection and treatment measures.
VA- If mine site is in one of the 20 Coastal Counties:
• Applicant has checked with the appropriate regional office to verify the need for a Coastal State
Stormwater permit. Indicate the Regional Office Contact:
• Applicant has included a detailed list of impervious surface areas and percentages, sub -drainage
areas, and total drainage area.
AIA- If the mine is dewatering and near wetlands, or may otherwise impact surface waters or groundwater,
include the following and contact your local regional office about a Pumping Operation and
Monitoring (POM) Plan. An approved POM plan may be required prior to NCG02 issuance.
_2 copies of detailed Full Size Plans (at least 24" x 36") delineating areas on the
plans and listing acreage (including: wetlands, ditches, well -placements, pits,
borrow areas, overburden storage, stormwater controls/BMPs, vehicle
maintenance areas, settling basins, product process (such as screening,
stockpiles, waste piles), total drainage area, impervious surface percentages (if
state SW programs apply), applicable buffers, and access and/or haul roads).
_Pump dewatering size and information on its specifications.
_Well information (design, depths, maintenance).
_Physical monitoring for the wetlands areas.
_Settling pond sizing information, if applicable.
_Level spreader design, if applicable.
_Details about dewatering method.
_Cone of influence calculations.
_Description of measures to prevent erosion and flooding.
_Description and information about 401/404 permits that have been obtained.
_Copy of US Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineations or approved wetland delineation (if
applicable).
_I have contacted my local regional office about a POM Plan.
Regional Office Contact: Date contacted:
-OR-
./ I will not impact any nearby wetlands, surface waters, or groundwaters by dewatering.
Page 11 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Certification: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b (i) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other
document fled or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
[Environmental Management] Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
41) Signatory Requirements (per 40 CFR 122.22)
All applications, reports, or information submitted to the Director shall be signed and certified.
a. All notices of intent to be covered under this General Permit shall be signed as follows:
(I) For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this permit, a responsible corporate officer means: (a) a president,
secretary, treasurer or vice president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar
policy or decision making functions for the corporation, or (b) the manager of one or more manufacturing production or operating facilities
employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding 25 million (in second quarter 1980 dollars), if
authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures.
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or
(3) For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official.
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. I understand that coverage under this permit will
constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) 'and is enforceable in the same manner as an individual
permit. .
I agree to abide by the following as a part of coverage under this General Permit:
1. 1 agree to abide by the approved Mining Permit for this mining activity. (A copy of the valid mining
permit must be attached to this request.)
2. 1 agree to not discharge any sanitary wastewater from this mining activity except under the
provisions of another NPDES permit specifically issued therefore.
3. 1 agree that bulk storage of petroleum products and other chemicals shall have adequate protection
so as to contain all spills on the site.
4. 1 agree that solid wastes will be disposed of in accordance with N.C. statutes and rules governing
solid waste disposal.
5. 1 agree that maintenance activities for vehicles and heavy equipment will be performed so as to not
result in contamination of the surface or ground waters.
I agree to abide by the provisions as listed above and recognize that the provisions are to be considered as
enforceable requirements of the General Permit.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge
and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing:
Title:
(Signatur of Applicant) (Date Signed)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $100.00 made payable to NCDEQ.
Page 12 of 12
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 9/10/2015

PARAMOUNTFE
E N G I N E E R I N G. 1 N c,.
June 14, 2017
Ms, Judith Weimer
NCDEQ — DEMLR — Mining Section
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
RE: Request for Mining Application for TURKEYPATHPIT
Lenoir County, NC
Dear Ms. Weimer,
On behalf of Lynwood Everett, we are submitting an application for a mining permit located at 2112 Fred
Everett Rd, Kinston, Lenoir County, NC.
This property was recently permitted as a one -source permit under erosion control permit LENOIR-
201709 for a single job at the Molter Plant Expansion in Kinston. That was permitted by Everett's
Clearing and Grading, Inc. under the name Everett Farms Pit. The landowner, Lynwood Everett, is a
relative to the owner of the grading company, but not part of the company. Lynwood is a farmer on the
subject property, and he was the one who requested the site be re -permitted into a mining operation for
sand and fill dirt. The site will be reclaimed as a private fishing pond for Lynwood Everett.
However, a dewatering permit is being requested by Everett's Clearing and Grading to NCDEQ Land
Quality & Stormwater Permitting Section for this site, since the sand cannot be excavated without
lowering the groundwater. The max withdrawal rate'will be less than 100,000 GPD and will only be
temporary.
Please find 6 copies of the application and mine maps, along with the property notice return receipts. Let
us know if you need additional information.
Sincerely,
Paramo me Engineering, Inc.
J ranch Smith, PE
bsmithnnaramounte-eng com
Encl:
USGS Map Image
c ; Avon- tw 000mi7m-4-
2 2 C I N E M A C R I V E, W I L M I N G T❑ N, N C 28 40 3
P N: 49 1 ❑) 7 9 1- 6 7❑ 7 F A X: (9 1 ❑) 7 9 1. 6 7 6❑

9

Everetts Farm Pit.
2112 Fred Everett Rd
Legend
Y 2112 Fred Everett Rd
L
f,
_- _
h`
.3s"r

r • :,. i. :.L ..:.: ..: : :. .. .. _�:r tr, ,i 14 lulu 1` . [....
15:
�53 53910
s
t1
514
4 \ stitut 4 540
153
628:
1530 1
/
SR
i
ardlson ,
Crossr \ /
r_ V
_.nllllIiill 111111ln...
LEGEND
1540
s
m
0
1536
VICINITY MAP
NTS
LOD LOD — LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SF SF SILT FENCE
100 PROPOSED CONTOURS
- - - - 100 - - - -- EXISTING CONTOURS
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
COUNTY PARCEL: 26239
2112 FRED EVERETT ROAD, KINSTON, NC 28504
ZONING: LENOIR COUNTY (RURAL -AGRICULTURE)
TOTAL ACREAGE: 21.96t
DEED REFERENCE: DB 1682, PG 825
PROPERTY OWNER:
i 151 LYNWOOD EVERETT
2112 FRED EVERETT RD
, 4 ` PIT OPERATOR AND EXCAVATION: LYNWOOD EVERETT
D MINE DEWATERING PERMIT HOLDER: EVERETTS CLEARING AND GRADING, INC.
1541
Y
1. PARCELS TAKEN FROM LENOIR COUNTY GIS PARCEL SHAPEFILES VIA NC ONE MAP DATED DEC. 2016.
2. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM NCONE MAP LIDAR 2-FT CONTOURS DATED 2013.
3. THIS TRACT IS NOT SUBJECT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS AS SHOWN ON NFIP MAP NUMBER 3720359700K
EFFECTIVE DATE 4/16/2013.
4. THE ONE -SOURCE BORROW PIT WILL SERVE A PERMITTED SITE.
5. THE ORTHOIMAGERY SOURCE IS FROM NC ONE MAPS DATED 2016.
20' INGRESS -EGRESS
ALONG EXISITING SOIL PATH
PER MAP CABINET 6, PG 260
SEQUENCE OF MINING OPERATIONS
1. Obtain NCDEQ erosion control permit and other state and local applicable permits as necessary.
2. Install gravel construction entrance at Fred Everett Rd as shown. If additional drainage or erosion control measures
are needed, contact Engineer for confirmation.
3. If necessary, install gate with lock or post "Warning - Open Pit" signs to provide additional safety during non -working
hours.
4. Survey and stakeout limits of disturbance (LOD), pit boundary, and silt fence as shown.
5. Immediately begin excavating pit top area to a min. depth of 2-ft for sediment storage. If immediate excavation
does not occur, a skimmer sediment basin will have to be constructed per Engineer's design and specifications, and
be re -approved by NCDEQ.
6. Ensure all stormwater runoff flows into excavation pit. De -watering is proposed as shown. See details and permit
conditions for NPDES NCG020000.
7. Contractor shall use water truck or other means necessary to control dust onsite.
8. After excavation is complete, regrade side slopes to min. 3:1 side slopes. Prepare seedbeds and re -vegetate per the
permanent seeding specifications. Reclamation must be complete within 1-yr.
MINE PERMIT BOUNDARY
±22.50 ACRES
TO BE FIELD LOCATED
ALCOKE INVESTMENT, LLC
PARCEL 4321
DB 1305 / 807
F�
EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH
FLOWS NORTHEAST
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED STOCKPILE
AND/OR WASTEPILES,
SEE TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
PROPOSED TIGERFLOC TUBE
WITH SEDIMENT BAG
(SEE DETAILS)
TRTON, 31298
PAa 1e3- j 3,1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 40 80 160
SCALE: V = 80'
EXISTING GRAVEL ENTRANCE
SHALL BE MAINTA, INED
TO PREVENT SAND FROM WA HING INTO
I- NCDOT RICE -OF-WAY.
F&'g
e <
V� '
+°op
jOaR r Riper
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. CLEAR AND REMOVE FROM SITE ALL TREES, SHRUBS, ROOTS, ROOT MAT, ETC. FROM THE AREA WITHIN DESIGNATED CLEARING LIMITS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING AND RESTORING TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE
PROJECT LIMITS THAT MAY INADVERTENTLY BE DAMAGED DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE EROSION MEASURES DURING GRADING AND
AFTER GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL FINAL RECLAMATION IS
COMPLETE.
4. CONTRACTOR TO DIRECT MOST OF THE SEDIMENT RUNOFF INTO THE BORROW PIT OR TO APPROVED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
PRIOR TO DRAINING OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
PROPOSED MINE PIT
tNOW & P�`15ON
FREEMP PP'RC�511 11p7
PARCF LYtvwco
Og 1j45 32896 O
670 LF SILT FENCE -
FZ,N,ERL31^2 0
PD�,E36 j394
'4?7
T77S,
OY
IR,FRP`31306
FPR�Ew 1552
-•,„rL
,�2THERINEi
om
WILLIyML
PARCEL DAM
OB 28747
1656/177
6i
z
O
w
Of
2
0
0
0
z
Z
I-
z
w
J
0
7l
ct
O
a-) c
4-4 U4-A 00
✓ti � N
WU
O �Z
w o
44 N
r 0
lam/ Z `n
I
H
w
� �OZ
HZa
rr mmmm
vlm mll�»
0 0 0
Z o�
0o O
F
Q
0
Q » O
00 o LL
35 X
U< , (D _Z
Q v ❑ 0
W azww w 0
w��1INQQJ W z Y
Z W QJ f-QtnQ W
D_ �U d4 K <UW §U
SEAL v�v((nuw(///
\,\O5tN CAR......
\ 13 S/0,
z SaL -
034354
6-12-17
O O
N I�
�
Z
N
W
CZO C
t� w
�- •ti
�/f
o
�� r
✓o
�Z
A w
M-1
-- - -
�.�
- —
FYI �41
rl (' ill
• 4�4 l
! 141
I 1 11114 Y%I .l
�,(
• 1 I r 1 I l 1'�I �
!
1 �'1 1 1 �'l•1r t111J I1.,1 t� is :t
Jf�hT'
I PEI JOB#: 17244.PE

Al
0
0
10.0' Min.
25' Max.
I
ry ii
SPECIFICATIONS:
10% SETTLEMENT
EXCAVATION
AREA
1. ADD SILT FENCE AROUND STOCKPILE IF NEEDED.
2. CONSTRUCT STOCKPILE TO FULL DIMENSIONS AS NEEDED -ALLOW 10% FOR
SETTLING.
3. SEED AND MULCH PER STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES.
CROSS-SECTION OF STOCKPILE(S), TYP°
NOT TO SCALE
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE
1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING
EVERY RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF
EVERY HALF INCH RAINFALL.
2. ALL POINTS OF EGRESS WILL HAVE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES/EXITS THAT WILL BE PERIODICALLY TOP -DRESSED
WITH 2-3" COARSE STONE TO MAINTAIN 6" THICKNESS. ENTRANCES/EXITS WILL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION TO
PREVENT MUD OR SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL SPILLED,
WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT OR PUBLIC ROADWAYS. (NCDENR PRACTICE 6.06)
3. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES HALF-FILLED. THE SEDIMENT
FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A BARRIER. STAKES MUST BE STEEL. STAKE SPACING WILL BE 6
FEET MAX. WITH THE USE OF EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC, WITHOUT WIRE BACKING. STAKE SPACING WILL BE 8 FEET MAX.
WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC AND WIRE BACKING ARE USED. IF ROCK FILTERS ARE DESIGNED AT LOW POINTS IN
THE SEDIMENT FENCE THE ROCK WILL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF IT BECOMES HALF FULL OF SEDIMENT, NO
LONGER DRAINS AS DESIGNED OR IS DAMAGED. (NCDENR PRACTICE 6.62)
4. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS NECESSARY AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN
THE VEGETATIVE PLAN TO MAINTAIN A VIGOROUS, DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER. THE ANGLE FOR GRADED SLOPES AND
FILLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN THE ANGLE THAT CAN BE RETAINED BY VEGETATIVE COVER OR OTHER ADEQUATE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR STRUCTURES. IN ANY EVENT, SHORT, FLAT SLOPES (FLATTER THAN 3:1 AND LESS THAN
501) LEFT EXPOSED WILL, WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY GRADING, BE PLANTED OR OTHERWISE
PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT GROUND COVER, DEVISES, OR STRUCTURES SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN
EROSION. ALL OTHER AREAS SHOULD BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER ANY PHASE OF ACTIVITY.
Rye Grain
Secale cereale
Triticum aestiwm
SPECIES
SEED RATES
FERTILIZATION 8
PLANTING
Ibstacre
LIMESTONE
I DATES
Nurse Crop
40
By Soil Test
8/15-4/15
Nurse Crop
30
By Soil Test
8/15-4/15
German Millet
Setaria italica
Nurse Crop
10
By Soil Test
4/15-8/15
Browntop Millet
Urochloa ramosa
Nurse Crop
10
By Soil Test
4/15-8/15
Kobe Lespedeza
Kummerwia striate v. kobe
Nurse Crop
10
By Soil Test
5/1-9/1
Sercicea Lespedeza
Lespedeza cuneata'Dumont'
Non-native
15
By Soil Test
10/1-4/1
Centipede Grass
Eremochloa ophiuroic
Non-native
5-10
By Soil Test
9/1-5/1
KY 31 Tall Fescue
Schedonorus phoenix
Non-native
100
By Soil Test
9/30 - 3115
Bermuda Grass
Cynodon dactylon
Non-native
25
By Soil Test
4/15 - 6/30
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Native 3.50 By Soil Test 12/1 - 4/1 3.50 w/ 3 other seed species
Carthage, shelter, & blackwell
3.00 3.00 w/ 4 other seed species
2.50 2.50 w/ 5 other seed species
Rice Cutgrass
Leersia cryzoides
Native 6.00 By Soil Test 12/1 - 4/1 6.00 w/ 3 other seed species
5.00 5.00 w/ 4 other seed species
4.00 4.00 w/ 5 other seed species
Sweet Woodreed
Cinna arundinacea
Native 2.50
By Soil Test 12/1 - 4/1
2.50 w/ 3 other seed species
Cheyenne
2.00
2.00 w/ 4 other seed species
1.50
1.50 w/ 5 other seed species
Soft Rush
Juncus effusus
Native 2.50
By Sal Test 12/1 - 4/15
2.50 w/ 3 other seed species
Eal
2.00
2.00 w/ 4 other seed species
1.50
1.50 w/ 5 other seed species
Shallow Sedge
Carexpincidea
Native 2.50
By Soil Test 12/1 - 4/15
2.50 w/ 3 other seed species
Fox Sedge
Carexlurida
2.00
2.00 w/ 4 other seed species
1.50
1.50 w/ 5 other seed species
A zL A PERMANENT SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RECLAIMED EXCAVATION AREAS
MULCHING SPECIFICATIONS
1. MULCH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEEDINGS IMMEDIATELY. AREAS THAT CANNOT BE SEEDED
ACCORDING TO THE PLANTING DATES SHOULD BE MULCHED TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OF
OPEN AREAS, SHRUBS, AND TREES. USE AN ORGANIC MULCH EXCEPT WOOD FIBERS FOR THE
TEMPORARY PROTECTION.
2. CHEMICAL STABILIZERS MAY BE USED, BUT IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR VEGETATION GROWTH.
REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL MANUAL FOR A LIST OF STABILIZERS AND FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING AND RESTORING TO
PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROJECT LIMITS THAT MAY INADVERTENTLY
BE DAMAGED DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE EROSION MEASURES DURING GRADING AND AFTER GRADING
HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
3. THE FOLLOWING TABLE IS REFERENCED FROM NC EROSION CONTROL MANUAL SEC. 6-14.
MATERIAL
RATE
QUALITY
ORGANICS
tons/acre
Straw
1-2
Dry; avoid weeds
Wood Chips
5-6
Air dry
Wood Fiber
0.5 - 1
Bark
35 cy/acre
Air dry; shredded; chipped
Corn Stalks
4-6
Cut in 4-6 inch lengths
Sericea:
1-3
Green or dry; mature seed within
lespedeza
seed -bearing
stems
Cover area
heavy & uniform
NETSIMATTING
Jute net
Fiberglass net
Coverarea
Excelsior
Cover area
(wood fiber mat)
Fiberglass roving
0.5 - 1
Continuous fibers with non -toxic agent
8' MAX. STD. STRENGTH FABRIC W/ WRE FENCE STEEL POST
TOP STRAND MIN #14 GAUGE
z
-STAYI AND INE RES)_u11N #'4 UGE x
ice. `' .'�'ti•=lir ✓,�%,.!i, i�� Gi'� � ,, �%���
BOTTOM STRAND MIN. #14 3AUGE
l i% ii 7 g 1 ii i�
4" X 8" TRENCH LINED W/ 17'
l
OF FABRIC AND COMPACTED FILL ON TOP
NOTES:
1. WIRE FENCE (IF USED) SHALL BE MINIMUM 14 GAUGE WITH A MAXIMUM MESH
OPENING OF 6-INCHES.
2. SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST 95% BY WEIGHT OF POLYOLEFIN'S OR
POLYESTER, WHICH IS CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER AS
CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN ASTM D 6461 AND ALSO SHOULD
CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS ACCORDING TO ASTM
D 4355.
3. SEE THE NC EROSION CONTROL MANUAL FOR SPECIFICATIONS
INSTALLING SEDIMENT FENCE USING THE SLICING METHOD MACHINERY.
SILT FENCE
NOT TO SCALE
GROUND STABILIZATION CRITERIA
STABILIZATION
STABILIZATION
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
TIMEFRAME
TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
7 DAYS
NONE
DITCHES AND SLOPES
HIGH QUALITY WATER ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
IF SLOPES ARE 10 FT OR LESS IN
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
IN LENGTH AND ARE NOT
STEEPER THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE
ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER
THAN 50 FT IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES
NONE (EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS
FLATTER THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
AND HQW ZONES)
NPDES PERMIT NCG 010000 PLAN NOTES:
1. ACCORDING TO NPDES NCG 010000 EFFECTIVE AUGUST 3, 2011: THE PLANS SHALL CONFORM
TO GROUND STABLIZIATION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION II.B.2 GROUND STABILIZATION.
2. ACCORDING TO NPDES NCG 010000 EFFECTIVE AUGUST 3, 2011: THE SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL CONFORM
TO SURFACE WITHDRAWAL REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 11.B.4 SEDIMENT BASINS.
VEGETATION PLAN SPECIFICATIONS
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE DRESSED TO THE EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION AND TILLED
OR RIPPED TO A MIN. DEPTH OF 4-INCHES. THE TOP 2 INCHES SHALL BE PULVERIZED TO
PROVIDE A UNIFORM SEEDBED.
2. LIME AND FERTILIZER SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE SOIL PRIOR TO SEEDING OR
SOD. FOLLOW SOIL TESTS OR AS FOLLOWS:
AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE - 2 TONS/ACRE
FERTILIZER -1GOO LBS/ACRE (1&10-10)
SUPERPHOSPHATE -500LBS/ACRE(20%)
MULCH - 2 TONS/ACRE (SMALL GRAIN STRAW)
ANCHOR - ASPHALT EMULSION AT 450 GAL/ACRE
3. FOR OPEN AREAS, USE STRAW MULCH AS A MINIMUM FOR STABILIZATION IF THE AREAS
CANNOT BE SEEDED ACCORDING TO THE PLANTING DATES. OTHER MULCHING PRACTICES
ARE LISTED IN SECTION 6.14 OF THE EROSION CONTROL MANUAL FOR MULCHING.
4. FOR DITCHES AND SLOPES, USE EXCELSIOR MATTING AS A MINIMUM FOR STABILIZATION IF
THE AREAS CANNOT BE SEEDED ACCORDING TO THE PLANTING DATES. OTHER MATTING
PRACTICES ARE LISTED IN SECTION 6.14 OF THE EROSION CONTROL MANUAL FOR
MULCHING.
5. CHEMICAL STABILIZERS MAY BE USED, BUT IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR VEGETATION
GROWTH. REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL MANUAL FOR A LIST OF STABILIZERS AND
FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
6. THE FOLLOWING TABLES ARE REFERENCED FROM NC EROSION CONTROL MANUAL SEC.
6.10 AND 6.11, AND THE STABILIZATION TABLE IS REFERENCED FROM NPDES NCG 010000.
y •e y •e
e• ,e e0 #e
•7 . ee HAUL RD •i . q
e
eie to a (Typ) eve to e
tie � 15-20FT � ♦ ye
♦ t
.. r _. ..";;Ll.-. ...-.
SILT FENCE, TYP,
FARM PATH/HAUL ROAD
NOTE:
1. RE -COMPACT ROAD WITH MIXTURE OF GRAVEL, SILT, AND
EXISTING SOIL IN SPOTS AS NECESSARY ALONG PATH.
2. VEGETATE PER STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES.
CROSS-SECTION OF HAUL ROAD
NOT TO SCALE
A) Tigerfloc Tube: 84" (L) x 4" (W) Layflat hose secured with 2%4" camlock fittings; with
Tigerfloc Belts which are inserted individually or two at a time into the Tigerfloc Tube.
B) 2" Pump Hose: min 50' length for optimal unit performance.
C) Dewatering Bag: 15' x 15' size manufactured by Floc Systems Inc. The Dewatering Bags
are custom cut and assembled with seam fold to ensure sediment material does not escape
at the seam as it does with other dewatering bags.
NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWING TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVED
EQUAL SETUP OR PRODUCT(S).
TIGER -FLOC TUBE AND SEDIMENT BAG DEWATERING TREATMENT DEVICE
NOT TO SCALE
TOP OF BORROW PIT= 1 00't
TOP POND= 96' t
MAX. BOTTOM = 90't
:I
RECLAMATION NOTES:
1. RECLAIM SLOPESTO 3:1 OR FLATTER.
2. VEGETATE PER PERMANENT SEEDING AND MULCHING SPECIFICATIONS.
3. IF ANY GROUNDMTER IS PRESENT, AND A POND IS DESIRED, THE WATER DEPTH
MUST BE MIN. 4-FT PER STATE RECLAMATION STANDARDS.
CROSS-SECTION OF EXCAVATION PIT & FINAL RECLAIMED POND
NOT TO SCALE
Z
0
Q
G_
O
z
Z
H
Z
W
0
66
Z
O
W
W
G
yrW
�O
` Z
p
�
N
0
Z
N p U
OQ
ll
E74S�4t
C) 'au
(LI0O a
CJ2�
w
yyu
N L" O H
z
'z
Z
C
H
�oz
W^
CFO
H
H
�
�zW
r"
r¢mmul
m
0 o
N N
O O
Z
O
O
O
Q
Z
O
tL
F
U)
00 o
Z
U
CY
< , (D �
ZZ_
-Wi
W SOW
>
z
w
O
of
zwQ3
O�Zw
Ww�QQU
QU W
a'M
CL
0 Ow00c-
SEAL
���w a uuiir�
\p p�ZN
CAROZss
�N .
L
= 034354
__
S `
1BRAN&
6-11-17
M-2
TPT,�
' i
I IVY O114
I PEI JOB#: 17244.PE I

' �':,..'.' .I'�.: ..__ .1 i.. �.—._��_'��� �.1 `,. _. _.. _......'i __�.t�'�.1�_ 11'�. J'..11:5•L i�.]_��il.�.'.
r
1538
i
COUNTY PARCEL: 26239
2112 FRED EVERE7T ROAD, KINSTON, NC 28504
15.3
539 ,Ao
—
1540 a
ZONING: LENOIR COUNTY (RURAL -AGRICULTURE)
TOTAL ACREAGE: 21.96±
,
256
DEED REFERENCE: DB 1682, PG 825
1.1
` _
PROPERTY OWNER:
i sNtuf
540
00
eEt . 15
"
LYNWOOD EVERETT
14
4`
I /
2112 FRED EVERETT RD
/
1 1' `
PIT OPERATOR AND EXCAVATION: LYNWOOD EVERETT
153
,, 628
�- sf
[�i
�z� D
1�d1
MINE DEWATERING PERMIT HOLDER: EVERETT'S CLEARING AND GRADING, INC.
r-
f(-lardison ,
Crossr, /
I Gal
, Crc
VICINITY MAP
NTS
LEGEND:
LOD LOD — LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SF SF SILT FENCE
100 PROPOSED CONTOURS
-- -- --- -'-- --- 100 - -'- -- --- -- EXISTING CONTOURS
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 40 80 160
SCALE: 1" = 80'
1. PARCELS TAKEN FROM LENOIR COUNTY GIS PARCEL SHAPEFILES VIA NC ONE MAP DATED DEC. 2016.
2. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION TAKEN FROM NCONE MAP LIDAR 2-FT CONTOURS DATED 2013.
3. THIS TRACT IS NOT SUBJECT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS AS SHOWN ON NFIP MAP NUMBER 3720359700K
EFFECTIVE DATE 4/1612013.
4. THE ONE -SOURCE BORROW PIT WILL SERVE A PERMITTED SITE.
5. THE ORTHOIMAGERY SOURCE IS FROM NC ONE MAPS DATED 2016.
20' INGRESS -EGRESS
ALONG EXISITING SOIL PATH
PER MAP CABINET 6, PG 260
EXISTING GRAVEL ENTRANCE
SHALL BE MAINTAINED
TO PREVENT SAND FROM WAINd INTO
NCDOT RIE$ -OF-WAY.
SEQUENCE OF MINING OPERATIONS
1. Obtain NCDE erosion control permit and other state and local applicable permits as necessary.
Q P PP p rY
2. Install gravel construction entrance at Fred Everett Rd as shown. If additional drainage or erosion control measures
are needed, contact Engineer for confirmation.
3. If necessary, install gate with lock or post "Warning - Open Pit" signs to provide additional safety during non -working
hours.
4. Survey and stakeout limits of disturbance (LOD), pit boundary, and silt fence as shown.
5. Immediately begin excavating pit top area to a min. depth of 2-ft for sediment storage. If immediate excavation
does not occur, a skimmer sediment basin will have to be constructed per Engineer's design and specifications, and
be re -approved by NCDEQ.
6. Ensure all stormwater runoff flows into excavation pit. De -watering is proposed as shown. See details and permit
conditions for NPDES NCG020000.
7. Contractor shall use water truck or other means necessary to control dust onsite.
8. After excavation is complete, regrade side slopes to min. 3:1 side slopes. Prepare seedbeds and re -vegetate per the
permanent seeding specifications. Reclamation must be complete within 1-yr.
MINE PERMIT BOUNDARY
±22.50 ACRES
TO BE FIELD LOCATED
ALCOKE INVESTMENT, LLC
PARCEL 4321
DS 1305 ! 807
��
roO
be,
4-2
EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH
FLOWS NORTHEAST
Owe 7�0/3301
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED STOCKPILE
AND/OR WASTEPILES,
SEE TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
PROPOSED TIGERFLOC TUBE
WITH SEDIMENT BAG
(SEE DETAILS)
3RTONI 1298
Pp9,E3A 1311
P PRGE� 31l
A'1
p8.1094 I , ..
EROSION CONTRO NOTES
1 CLEAR AND REMOVE FROM J ALL TREES, SHRUBS, ROOTS, 00 , ROOT MAT ETC. FROM THE AREA WITHIN DESIGNATED CLEARING LIMITS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESP )NSIBLE FOR CLEANING AND RESTORING TO PRF-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE
PROJECT LIMITS THAT MAY IN, DVERTENTLY BE DAMAGED DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE EROSION MEASURES DURING GRADING AND
AFTER GRADING HAS BEEN CCMPLETED.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINLG TO MAINTAIN PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL FINAL RECLAMATION IS
COMPLETE.
4. CONTRACTOR TO DIRECT MOEr OF THE SEDIMENT RUNOFF INTO THE BORROW PIT OR TO APPROVED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
PRIOR TO DRAINING OUTSIDE HE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
Rgj?c LY,yN;
s3289
7688 �D
PN CE 30
2 8
P 01�3613g4
IR,FRN�3�308
P B 1�3A 1552
PARCEL 8 Kq.
D` 1 1209
WOODS TO RE�
UNnISTI)RBED
PARCEL Ill ANI
pg 8747
656 / 111
6
z
O
w
X
^�
l Z
C
N v,
CI
q r-
17V
r Z
'✓ p r
%
N
L.
`oJ r-
�~
-
�z
�w
<
G0,0
aN0 R�
�
�oz
�HP4
Z
C�
Z
;~
�4
nr
nO�VJ
��mmm
UJ
0o
0 0
Z
O_
o�
F-
U)
Q
55 Z
00
O
LL
O
Z
(3<,O�
¢ U O
Z_
0
O
0
WhLEI
oa
Z_,<
ZWaJ
wZzw
ul
Ir
n
a x
0
<Ww
p WOOL)
SEAL
\\ o�\H CARoZ
034354 -
:9 •FNGINE�Q f �R
%FS /&RANCN\C�_ �
6-12-17
M-1
PEIJOB#: 17244.PE
I l;lf,�,i,

Al
0
A
SPECIFICATIONS: _1�1
1. ADD SILT FENCE AROUND STOCKPILE IF NEEDED.
2. CONSTRUCT STOCKPILE TO FULL DIMENSIONS AS NEEDED -ALLOW 10% FOR
SETTLING.
3. SEED AND MULCH PER STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES.
CROSS-SECTION OF STOCKPILE(S), TYP.
NOT TO SCALE
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE
1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING
EVERY RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF
EVERY HALF INCH RAINFALL.
2. ALL POINTS OF EGRESS WILL HAVE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES/EXITS THAT WILL BE PERIODICALLY TOP -DRESSED
WITH 2-3" COARSE STONE TO MAINTAIN 6' THICKNESS. ENTRANCES/EXITS WILL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION TO
PREVENT MUD OR SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL SPILLED,
WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT OR PUBLIC ROADWAYS. (NCDENR PRACTICE 6.06)
3. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES HALF-FILLED, THE SEDIMENT
FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A BARRIER. STAKES MUST BE STEEL. STAKE SPACING WILL BE 6
FEET MAX. WITH THE USE OF EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC, WITHOUT WIRE BACKING. STAKE SPACING WILL BE 8 FEET MAX.
WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC AND WIRE BACKING ARE USED. IF ROCK FILTERS ARE DESIGNED AT LOW POINTS IN
THE SEDIMENT FENCE THE ROCK WILL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF IT BECOMES HALF FULL OF SEDIMENT, NO
LONGER DRAINS AS DESIGNED OR IS DAMAGED. (NCDENR PRACTICE 6.62)
4. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE FERTILIZED, RE -SEEDED AS NECESSARY AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN
THE VEGETATIVE PLAN TO MAINTAIN A VIGOROUS, DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER. THE ANGLE FOR GRADED SLOPES AND
FILLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN THE ANGLE THAT CAN BE RETAINED BY VEGETATIVE COVER OR OTHER ADEQUATE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR STRUCTURES. IN ANY EVENT, SHORT, FLAT SLOPES (FLATTER THAN 3:1 AND LESS THAN
50') LEFT EXPOSED WILL, WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY GRADING, BE PLANTED OR OTHERWISE
PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT GROUND COVER, DEVISES, OR STRUCTURES SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN
EROSION. ALL OTHER AREAS SHOULD BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER ANY PHASE OF ACTIVITY.
IMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
SPECIES
SEED RATES
FERTILIZATION &
PLANTING
Ibslacre
LIMESTONE
DATES
Grain
Secale cereale
Nurse Crop 40 By Soil Test 8/15-4/15
at
Triticum aestivum
Nurse Crop 30 By Soil Test 8/15-4/15
German Millet
Setaria italica
Nurse Crop
10
By Soil Test
4/15-8/15
Browntop Millet
Urochloa ramosa
Nurse Crop
10
By Soil Test
4/15-8/15
Kobe Lespedeza
Kummerwia striate v. kobe
Nurse Crop
10
By Soil Test
5/1-9/1
Sercicea Lespedeza
Lespedeza cuneata'Dumont'
Non-native
15
By Soil Test
10/1-4/1
Centipede Grass
Eremochloa ophiuroic
Non-native
5-10
By Soil Test
9/1-5/1
KY 31 Tall Fescue
Schedonorus phoenix
Non-native
100
By Soil Test
9/30 - 3/15
Bermuda Grass
Cynodon dactylon
Non-native
25
By Soil Test
4/15 - 6/30
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Native 3.50 By Soil Test 12/1 - 4/1 3.50 w/ 3 other seed species
Carthage, shelter, & blackwell
3.00 3.00 w/ 4 other seed species
2.50 2.50 w/ 5 other seed species
Rice Cutgrass
Leersia cryzoides
Native 6.00 By Soil Test 12/1 - 4/1 6.00 w/ 3 other seed species
5.00 5.00 w/ 4 other seed species
4.00 4.00 w/ 5 other seed species
Sweet Woodreed
Cinna arundinacea
Native 2.50
By Soil Test 12/1 - 4/1
2.50 w/ 3 other seed species
Cheyenne
2,00
2.00 w/ 4 other seed species
1.50
1.50 w/ 5 other seed species
Soft Rush
Juncus efrusus
Native 2.50
By Soil Test 12/1 - 4/15
2.50 w/ 3 other seed species
Eel
2.00
2.00 w/ 4 other seed species
1.50
1.50 w/ 5 other seed species
Shallow Sedge
Carexpincidea
Native 2.50
By Soil Test 12/1 - 4/15
2.50 w/ 3 other seed species
Fox Sedge
Carexlurida
2.00
2.00 w/ 4 other seed species
1.50
1.50 w/ 5 other seed species
zLA A PERMANENT SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RECLAIMED EXCAVATION AREAS
MULCHING SPECIFICATIONS
1. MULCH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEEDINGS IMMEDIATELY. AREAS THAT CANNOT BE SEEDED
ACCORDING TO THE PLANTING DATES SHOULD BE MULCHED TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OF
OPEN AREAS, SHRUBS, AND TREES. USE AN ORGANIC MULCH EXCEPT WOOD FIBERS FOR THE
TEMPORARY PROTECTION.
2. CHEMICAL STABILIZERS MAY BE USED, BUT IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR VEGETATION GROWTH.
REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL MANUAL FOR A LIST OF STABILIZERS AND FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING AND RESTORING TO
PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROJECT LIMITS THAT MAY INADVERTENTLY
BE DAMAGED DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE EROSION MEASURES DURING GRADING AND AFTER GRADING
HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
3. THE FOLLOWING TABLE IS REFERENCED FROM NC EROSION CONTROL MANUAL SEC. 6-14.
MATERIAL
RATE
QUALITY
ORGANICS
tonslacre
Straw
1-2
Dry; avoid weeds
Wood Chips
5-6
Air try
Wood Fiber
0.5 - 1
Bark
35 cy/acre
Air dry; shredded; chipped
Corn Stalks
4-6
Cut in 4.6 inch lengths
Sericea:
1-3
Green or dry; mature seed within
lespedeza
seed -bearing
stems
Cover area
heavy & uniform
NETS/MATTING
Jute net
Fiberglass net
Cover area
Excelsior
Cover area
(wood fiber mat)
Fiberglass roving
0.5 -1
Continuous fibers with nontoxic agent
F B' MAX. STD. STRENGTH FABRIC W/ WIRE FENCE I
1 TOP STRAND MIN. #14 GAUGE I
BOTTOM STRAND MIN. #14 GAUGE
' 4
fV
STEEL POST
q�
N
4` X S' TRENCH LINED W/ 12'
OF FABRIC AND
COMPACTED FILL ON TOP
NOTES:
1. WIRE FENCE (IF USED) SHALL BE MINIMUM 14 GAUGE WITH A MAXIMUM MESH
OPENING OF 6-INCHES.
2. SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST 95% BY WEIGHT OF POLYOLEFIN'S OR
POLYESTER, WHICH IS CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER AS
CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN ASTM D 6461 AND ALSO SHOULD
CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS ACCORDING TO ASTM
D 4355.
3. SEE THE NC EROSION CONTROL MANUAL FOR SPECIFICATIONS
INSTALLING SEDIMENT FENCE USING THE SLICING METHOD MACHINERY.
SILT FENCE
NOT TO SCALE
GROUND STABILIZATION CRITERIA
STABILIZATION
STABILIZATION
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
TIMEFRAME
TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
7 DAYS
NONE
DITCHES AND SLOPES
HIGH QUALITY WATER ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
IF SLOPES ARE 10 FT OR LESS IN
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
IN LENGTH AND ARE NOT
STEEPER THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE
ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER
THAN 50 FT IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES
14 DAYS
NONE (EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS
FLATTER THAN 4:1
AND HQW ZONES)
NPDES PERMIT NCG 010000 PLAN NOTES:
1. ACCORDING TO NPDES NCG 010000 EFFECTIVE AUGUST 3, 2011: THE PLANS SHALL CONFORM
TO GROUND STABLIZIATION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION II.B.2 GROUND STABILIZATION.
2. ACCORDING TO NPDES NCG 010000 EFFECTIVE AUGUST 3, 2011: THE SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL CONFORM
TO SURFACE WITHDRAWAL REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 11.B.4 SEDIMENT BASINS.
VEGETATION PLAN SPECIFICATIONS
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE DRESSED TO THE EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION AND TILLED
OR RIPPED TO A MIN. DEPTH OF 4-INCHES. THE TOP 2 INCHES SHALL BE PULVERIZED TO
PROVIDE A UNIFORM SEEDBED.
2. LIME AND FERTILIZER SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE SOIL PRIOR TO SEEDING OR
SOD. FOLLOW SOIL TESTS OR AS FOLLOWS:
AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE - 2 TONS/ACRE
FERTILIZER - 1000 LBS/ACRE (10-10-10)
SUPERPHOSPHATE - 500 LBS/ACRE (20%)
MULCH - 2 TONS/ACRE (SMALL GRAIN STRAW)
ANCHOR - ASPHALT EMULSION AT 450 GAUACRE
3. FOR OPEN AREAS, USE STRAW MULCH AS A MINIMUM FOR STABILIZATION IF THE AREAS
CANNOT BE SEEDED ACCORDING TO THE PLANTING DATES. OTHER MULCHING PRACTICES
ARE LISTED IN SECTION 6.14 OF THE EROSION CONTROL MANUAL FOR MULCHING.
4. FOR DITCHES AND SLOPES, USE EXCELSIOR MATTING AS A MINIMUM FOR STABILIZATION IF
THE AREAS CANNOT BE SEEDED ACCORDING TO THE PLANTING DATES. OTHER MATTING
PRACTICES ARE LISTED IN SECTION E.14 OF THE EROSION CONTROL MANUAL FOR
MULCHING.
5. CHEMICAL STABILIZERS MAY BE USED, BUT IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR VEGETATION
GROWTH. REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL MANUAL FOR A LIST OF STABILIZERS AND
FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
6. THE FOLLOWING TABLES ARE REFERENCED FROM NC EROSION CONTROL MANUAL SEC.
6.10 AND 6.11, AND THE STABILIZATION TABLE IS REFERENCED FROM NPDES NCG 010000.
'e 00
r
e� HAUL RD OP
•• (TYP) .e
15 - 20 FT e
t � � • t
SILT FENCE, TYP.
FARM PATH/HAUL ROAD
NOTE:
1. RE -COMPACT ROAD WITH MIXTURE OF GRAVEL, SILT, AND
EXISTING SOIL IN SPOTS AS NECESSARY ALONG PATH.
2. VEGETATE PER STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES.
CROSS-SECTION OF HAUL ROAD
NOT TO SCALE
A) Tigerfloc Tube: 84" (L) x 4" (W) Layflat hose secured with 2"-4" camlock fittings; with
Tigerfloc Belts which are inserted individually or two at a time into the Tigerfloc Tube,
B) 2" Pump Hose: min 50' length for optimal unit performance.
C) Dewatering Bag: 15' x 15' size manufactured by Floc Systems Inc. The Dewatering Bags
are custom cut and assembled with seam fold to ensure sediment material does not escape
at the seam as it does with other dewatering bags.
NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWING TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVED
EQUAL SETUP OR PRODUCT(S).
TIGER -FLOC TUBE AND SEDIMENT BAG DEWATERING TREATMENT DEVICE
NOT TO SCALE
TOP OF BORROW PIT= 100' t
it
I�
v lli TOP POND= 96' t l
IIIIi �� II'
MAX BOTTOM 90't
RECLAMATION NOTES:
1. RECLAIM SLOPES TO 3:1 OR FLATTER.
2. VEGETATE PER PERMANENT SEEDING AND MULCHING SPECIFICATIONS,
3. IF ANY GROUNDWATER IS PRESENT, AND A POND IS DESIRED, THE WATER DEPTH
MUST BE MIN. 4-FT PER STATE RECLAMATION STANDARDS.
CROSS-SECTION OF EXCAVATION PIT & FINAL RECLAIMED POND
NOT TO SCALE
Z
0
0
O
LL
z
z
z
W
zi
C)
6
Z
O
rn
W
W
WO
Z
C
Co
N
0
v ti 00
00
2
N
�RS"
0 �
Y �
w
G O ^2
W
�1 Z
~ v U
0
Z
� o
-
A W
z
c/�
a
�
O
HU
Q
�xx
P-4
HOZ
W
CFO
Q
00
n
z M M h lm
o»�
00
O
N
o
Q
C
55
00 z
O
L L
o
'S3
~
V
0<5o
0
Z
d
WOfaitzo
O
0
whoa
ZwZJ
WJ03U
WzzY
d L)aEir
O oaiooc=)
SEAL \llnllln/�
\\ o�1N
CARP �y
? : O S`L
034354
=
%9�F
:FNGINE��
s BRANCH
\ `
6
I�I I1117
M-2
(
I PEI JOB#: 17244.PE I