20191349 Ver 1_Updated PCN_20200213

Strickland, Bev
From: Daniel Kuefler <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 4:59 PM
To: Johnson, Alan
Cc: Len Rindner ([e-mail])
Subject: [External] Re: FW: Cannon Run 19-1349
Attachments: Cannon Run PCN _Updated 021320.pdf
• External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Mff-rt-s—[e-mail]
Alan,
It took a little more back and forth with the engineer, but I've attached a fully updated PCN packet here that
reflects the changes per our previous discussions. Ultimately, they redesigned the commercial layout and
crossing and were able to reduce the permanent impacts to the discontinuous intermittent stream segments by a
total of 173 linear feet. Figure 12 (page 31 of 94 in the packet) highlights these changes and I've added an
updated impacts table (page 10 of 94) that summarizes the updated impact totals.
Please let me know if you have any other questions or would like me to submit these updates in another format.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:36 AM Johnson, Alan <alan.johnson o,ncdenr.gov> wrote:
think they just had one minor revision for me to kick this out the door. Can you push
whomever to get this done? Otherwise I may have to move to withdrawal.
Thanks
Alan
From: Johnson, Alan
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 12:46 PM
To: Len Rindner ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (US)' <[e-mail]>; Munzer,
Olivia <[e-mail]>
Subject: Cannon Run 19-1349

AREA I
The entrance off Davidson Rd. They should avoid impacts, above the road and the area of
wetland A. Not as concerned with the wetland (0.06 ac), but the feature provides various
benefits to downstream water quality especially as the watershed is built out. The
AVOIDANCE of these impacts will get the project below IP threshold. THESE IMPACTS
ARE EXCESSIVE for typical residential/commercial development.
Bottomless culvert should be removed and the stream day lighted, if not to be utilized.
Area 2
Your S1, stream BBB, 8 ft diameter culvert for a 5 ft channel, that has an even smaller base
flow. What about two 60 inch "circular" culverts (one perched)
Area 3
No issue, Wetland PP
Area 4
No issue, stream BB
Area 5,
Stream AAA to be French drained
No issue, wetlands
Thanks
Alan
z

DWR
bl41-pn of Waftr RC-50UrcCs
Alan D Johnson — Senior Environmental Specialist
NC Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
Daniel Kuefler
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
www.wetlands-epg.com
336.554.2728

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions WEPGWetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
SAW — 2019 - 01946 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Cannon Run
2. Work Type: Private ❑� Institutional ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Assign Action ID Number in ORM 1-1
Government ❑ Commercial
PCN and AJD Request for a mixed use development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
Charlotte Real Estate Development
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC / WEPG
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
35.4345N/-80.7302W - NW of intersection of Harris Rd & Odell School Rd, Concord, NC
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: numerous parcels - please refer to attached parcel map.
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Cabarrus
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Concord
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Rocky River
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03040105 - Rocky
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑� Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
❑Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29, 39
❑ Regional General Permit #
✓❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
n Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
October 3, 2019
Ms. Catherine Janiczak
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301, Moorseville, NC 28115
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street, Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Approved Jurisdictional Determination Request and Pre -Construction
Notification for NWPs 29 & 39 for the Cannon Run site, Concord, Cabarrus County, NC.
Mses. Janiczak and Higgins, and Messrs. Johnson, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request and Pre -Construction Notification
for Nationwide Permits # 29 & 39 for the approximate 128.5 -acre site known as the Cannon Run
site located northwest of the intersection of Harris Rd and Odell School Rd in Concord, NC. The
current project area is a proposed mixed use development and consists of fourteen streams and
fifteen wetlands. Additionally, there are two non jurisdictional ponds excavated in upland
landscape positions and one isolated, non jurisdictional wetland. The site has been field verified
by Alan Johnson (NCDEQ) on 6/14/18 and 10/9/18. A pre -application site meeting was
conducted on 10/31/18 during which the current site conditions for the commercial section of the
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd- Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] 1
[e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
project were field -verified by Catherine Janiczak and Scott Jones (USACE). Please refer to the
Jurisdictional Determination section for updated information on onsite surface waters.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include permanent impacts to four
wetlands and three streams for fill associated with a road crossing, lot fill and grading in addition
to minor temporary impacts to one stream for the installation of a sanitary sewer to serve the
proposed residential development. Overall impacts to site surface waters associated with the
proposed development were limited through site selection location, design, location/orientation
of the proposed lots and access routes. Due to the location of the features in relation to existing
roads and municipal infrastructure, opportunities to completely avoid these features were limited.
The total permanent wetland impacts proposed include 0.069 ac of wetland (Wetlands A, PP,
CCC & DDD). The total permanent stream impacts proposed include 4001f of stream channel
(Streams AAA, BBB, and AJ-AJS-AJSS).
Efforts of impact minimization were implemented during the design to preserve the existing
channel hydrology and limit adverse effects to existing, onsite natural habitat. Large headwalls
will be used for the residential road crossing and sidewalks have been pulled in to the maximum
extent in order to keep the crossing as narrow as possible and avoid the need for additional rip
rap. Additional retaining walls and 2:1 slopes are used throughout the site where practicable to
avoid additional impacts to streams and wetlands. A catchment will direct runoff to the head of
stream AAA to maintain hydrology just below the grading impact. One temporary open cut for a
sewerline installation will be restored to pre-existing conditions per the attached stream
stabilization detail. The applicant has demonstrated substantial avoidance and minimization
efforts in which 93.6% of the 6,334 linear feet of stream channels and 93.4 % of the 1.05 ac of
wetlands onsite will be avoided on the project.
The applicant requests a waiver for 225 linear feet of impacts to streams AJ, AJS, and AJSS.
These features are a series of disconnected intermittent stream segments separated by non -
jurisdictional swales, as field -verified by the USACE (Catherine Janiczac and Scott Jones) on
10/31/18. These features bisect the portion of the site slated for commercial development and are
unavoidable due the constraints imposed by commercial construction requirements (i.e. flat
grades for commercial buildings, pedestrian/handicap requirements, heavy truck access routes,
etc.) The attached NCSAM indicates that these stream segments are of relatively low functional
quality characterized by relatively low hydrological connectivity with limited aquatic habitat
opportunity. Please see the enclosed assessment form for matrix scores and overall functional
ratings derived from the NCSAM. Additional forms and photographs of these features are
provided in the Waiver Request Study section of the permit application.
To compensate for the anticipated permanent impacts, the applicant is proposing payment to the
NCDMS at a 0.5: 1 ratio for 225 if of discontinuous intermittent stream segments, a 1:1 ratio for
50 linear feet of intermittent warm water stream and a 2:1 ratio for 125 linear feet of perennial
warm water stream. Please refer to the enclosed conditional acceptance letter from NCDMS.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] 2
Ien. ri ndner@wetlands-e pg.com

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
details on the terrestrial species evaluation. Thank you for your consideration and please contact
me if you have any questions, [phone] or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Daniel Kuefler
Environmental Scientist
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.wetlands-epg.com
Len Rindner, PWS
Principal
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Permit Application

��oF wArE�Q�
0 vfllll::� ^Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29,39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X❑ Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Cannon Run
2b.
County:
Cabarrus
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Concord
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Rocky River Crossing, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Please see attached parcel map
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
4350 Main Street, Ste 201
3e.
City, state, zip:
Harrisburg, NC, 28975
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Developer
4b.
Name:
Mark Swartz
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Charlotte Real Estate Development
4d.
Street address:
4350 Main Street, #201
4e.
City, state, zip:
Harrisburg, NC 28075
4f.
Telephone no.:
704-454-7807
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Daniel Kuefler
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c.
Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28227
5e.
Telephone no.:
336-554-2728
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Please refer to attached parcel map.
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.4345 Longitude:-80.7302
1 c.
Property size:
128.5 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Rocky River
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
03040105 - Rocky
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is a mosaic of partially rough graded land and wooded slopes. There are numerous dirt roads and trails lacing the site and it is disturbed
throughout. There is roadside frontage along Hwy 73, Odell School Road and Harris Road. Two unnamed tributaries to Rocky River flow southwest
through the site. General land use in the vicinity is a mixture undeveloped land and residential/ commercial developments.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.05
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 6,334
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project consists of one road crossing, grading, fill & sewer installation for a residential development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, dump trucks, track hoe, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments: See comment below
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination is requested as part of this PCN package. The site was field -verified by Alan Johnson (NCDEQ) on 10/9/19.
The northern portion of the site was field -verified by Catherine Janiczak & Scott Jones (USACE) on 10/31/18.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
A
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.061
W2 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.005
W3 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.002
W4 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.0008
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.0688
2h. Comments:
Permanent impacts include Wetland A (0.061 ac), Wetland PP (0.005 ac), Wetland CC (0.002 ac), & Wetland DDD (0.0008 ac)
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
PLEASE
-
S2 -
Choose one
SEE
-
S3 -
Choose one
ATTACHED
-
S4 -
Choose one
TABLE
-
S5 -
Choose one
BELOW.
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
520
3i. Comments:
A waiver is requested for impacts to intermittent streams AJ, AJS, & AJSS. These are a series of disconnected intermittent stream segments with a
hydrology primarily driven by flashy overland flow. Permanent impacts to these features (225 If) are unavoidable due to the engineering and design
constraints of the commercial development. Please refer to the cover letter and Waiver Study section enclosed for more details.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Table 2. Proposed Impacts Inventory/ Stream Impacts -
Stream Impact
number Permanent
(P) or Temporary
Type of Impact
Stream Name
Perennial (PER) or
Intermittent (INT)
Type of Jurisdiction
Average Stream Width
(feet)
Impact Length (linear
feet)
S1 - P
Culvert
Stream BBB
PER
Corps
5
125
S2 - T
Dewatering
Stream BBB
PER
Corps
5
40
S3 - P
Fill
Stream AAA
INT
Corps
3
50
54-T
Access
Stream AAA
INT
Corps
3
20
S4 - T
Excavation
Stream BB
PER
Corps
5
40
S5 - P
Culvert
Stream AJ
INT
Corps
3
148
S6 - P
Culvert
Stream AJS
INT
Corps
3
77
S7 - T
Access
Stream AJS
INT
Corps
3
20
Total Impacts
520
*A waiver is requested for impacts to intermittent streams AJ, AJS, & AJSS. These are a series of disconnected intermittent stream
segments with a hydrology primarily driven by flashy overland flow. Permanent impacts to these features (225 If) are unavoidable due to
the engineering and design constraints of the commercial development. Please refer to the cover letter and Waiver Study section enclosed
for more details.

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: 0.231 ac of permanent impacts to non-jurisidictional, isolated open water pond Y are not listed in the above table.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B 1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the location of the on site streams and wetland, opportunities to avoid these areas were limited. Impacts to site surface waters associated with
the proposed development were limited through site selection, location, design, & location/orientation of the proposed lots and access routes.
Headwalls and 2:1 slopes are used throughout the site where practicable to avoid additional impacts to streams and wetlands. The impacts to streams
AJ, AJS, & AJSS are unavoidable to due the constraints imposed by commercial construction requirements (i.e. flat grade & access requirements).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
Large headwalls and 2:1 & 3:1 slopes are proposed to keep the road crossing as narrow as possible and avoid the need for additional riprap. A
catchement will direct runoff to the top of stream AAA to maintain hydrology below the minimal impact. One temporary open cut for a sewerline
installation will be restored to pre-existing condition per the attached stream stabilization detail.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
572 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Proposed ratios are 0.5:1 for discontinuous intermittent stream, 1:1 for intermittent stream, and 2:1 for perennial stream impacts.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
49
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Storm
water on the site will be handled by facilities shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has
not yet been submitted to the City of
Concord but will be designed to meet their criteria.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Concord
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Concord
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened/Endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat does exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat
but the project is exempt as noted in the included T&E report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
https://gis.cabarruscounty.us/mycabarrusgis; www.fema.gov
Daniel Digitally signed by Daniel Kuefler
DN: cn=Daniel Kuefler, o=WEPG,
ou, email=daniel.kuefler@wetlands-
c=US
epg.cDate:
Daniel Kuefler
01
Kuefler Date: 29.10.03 12:06:30-04'00'
10-03-2019
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Cannon Run
Property Address: NW of Harris Rd & Odell School Rd.
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): See Map Exhibit
Select one: Other
Name: Mark Swartz
Company: Charlotte Real Estate Development
Mailing Address: 4350 Main St, Suite 220, Harrisburg, NC 28075
Telephone Number: 704-454-7807
Electronic Mail Address_ [e-mail]
2-VU
Property Owner / Interested Buyer * / Other*
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: www.wetiands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PM 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
[e-mail]

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretory
TIM BAUMGARTNER.
oftftmr
Steve Schreiner
Schreiner Design
403 Gilead Road, Suite H
Huntersville, NC 28078
NORTH CAROLINA
En roninental Quality
September 16, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 3/16/2020
Project: Cannon Run County: Cabarrus
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-digit HUC
Impact Type
Warm Stream
Impact Quantity
Yadkin 03040105
572
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Daniel Kuefler, agent
Sincerely,
Ja es B Stanfill
As anagement Supervisor
aEQ.�
Oyr�d9alldr�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Millgatton Services
2F Ions Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

N
cd
N
Q
rd
►u
Maps/Plans

.c5triu9.0 err
ML INGTON -CHASE
m
m
avenscrof�j,
VGI_�S CREEK Ilk
IT
hNsP.
FIGURE NO.
1 A
511!�t3Ei rUME
PELHEM
PONY
• Dav�s�n
SITE
v i�y�d
• mt
•:�nc•Rfc�_ �-
Cox Mill
;�:4DESAT
IYI R�0.1
hifiP" WOCoS -
�n
MILKERS GLEN HA RRIS WOODS
CANNON RUN
Cabarrus Co., NC
Johl-pstflri ,t
.4r
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
NRN LSR
VICINITY MAP DATE:
-WATERS OF THE U.S.- 9/3/18
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION

�N
FIGURE NO.
2
CANNON RUN
Cabarrus Co., NC
AERIAL MAP
-WATERS OF THE U.S.-
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
NRN LSR
DATE:
9/3/18

I LL
N :;77.9 7'.
AL t43.
•� f ,
- Ar
7.
k ll
Icy I IJ� � • ' _. r t .
l APPROXIMATE f
' PROJECT BOUNDARY ,
41t rJ
dp STUDY LIMITS-�
I
01 r{ I
ROCKY
jam. a
f RIVER fyl'rL
i
LOCATION
Lat: 35.4345 °N
Long:-80.7302 °W
H U C: 03040105
UPPER ROCKY RIVER
FIGURE NO.
3
Iit J
SCALE
1:24,000
P Ir_ta]
k
USGS QUAD Ll N
Kannapolis, NC
CANNON RUN Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Cabarrus Co., NC NRN LSR
USGS MAP DATE:
-WATERS OF THE U.S.- 9/3/18
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION

714
,�
d, �16,
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Kl ft
Acras In ADI
Parearrt of A01
CcB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 ID B
28.0
21.1%
percent slopes. moderately
eroded
ChA
Chowiscla sandy loam, 0 to 2
18_0
percent slopes. frequently
flooded
EnB
Enon sandy loam. 2 to 8
34_9
26.3%
percent slopes
EnD
Enon sandy loam. 8 to 16
0.2
D_2%
percent slopes
PoB
Poindexter lnam, 2 to B
6_8
5.6%
percent slopes
36.9
30. ,
PoD
Poindexter loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
100.0% �
Totals for Area of Irnsrast 122.7
FIGURE NO.
4
CANNON RUN
Cabarrus Co., NC
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
NRN LSR
DATE:
NRCS PUBLISHED SOILS MAP 9/3/18
-WATERS OF THE U.S.-
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION

Parcel:46813976020000
Rocky River Crossing, LLC
4350 Main St, Ste. 201
Harrisburg. NC. 28075
I- - __L J I I
Parcel:46813948300000
Harrisburg Town Center IX, LLC
4350 Main St, Ste. 201
Harrisburg, NC, 28075
Parcel:46813885470000
J&B Dev & Mgmt Inc, LLC
4350 Main St, Ste. 201
Harrisburg, NC, 28075
Parcel: 46813727630000
Rocky River Crossing, LLC
4350 Main St, Ste. 201
Harrisburg, NC, 28075
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
Parcel: 46813713910000
Rocky River Crossing, LLC
4350 Main St, Ste. 201
Harrisburg, NC, 28075
Parcel:46814702320000
Elizabeth Mayes
4 Reynolds Place
Asheville, NC, 28804
Parcel:46814702320000
Bill & Mary McCord Trust
1703 Woodside Lane
Virginia Beach, VA, 23454
Parcel: 46814903800000
Rocky River Crossing, LLC Parcel: 46814926790000
4350 Main St, Ste. 201 Rocky River Crossing, LLC
Harrisburg. NC. 28075 4350 Main St, Ste. 201
Harrisburg, NC, 28075
7 �L:� _":
Parcel: 46814873030000
-- Erjola 550 Kinderkamack, LLC
4350 Main St, Ste. 201
Harrisburg, NC, 28075
Parcel:
46815860810000
David McCord
8825 Harris Rd
Concord, NC,
28027
Parcel: 46815860810000
David McCord
8825 Harris Rd
Concord, NC, 28027
Parcel:
46815743850000
James Hood
8900 Harris Rd
Concord, INC,
28027
Parcel:
16815765640000
David McCord
8825 Harris Rd
Concord, NC,
28027
FIGURE NO. CANNON RUN Drawn By: Reviewed By:
5 �AIEFW" Cabarrus Co., NC DCK LSR
TAX PARCEL MAP
-WATERS OF THE U.S.-
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION
DATE:
8/29/19

riuuiG v
OFFSITE WETLAND
I WETLAND A WETLAND G
2636 SO FT) I (1642 SO FT)
(
PERENNIAL STREAM C I (26 61 (0.038 AC)
ON -SITE LENGTH = 527'
(0.017AC)
INTERMITTENT STREAM IE
ON -SITE LENGTH = 207' I I
(0.008 AC)
INTERMITTENT STREAM AJSS
LENGTH = 121' (0.006 AC)
INTERMITTENT STREAM AJS
PEA A LENGTH = 193' (0.016 AC)
PROJECT BOUNDARY INTERMITTENT STREAM Ai
(NP) _-__ LENGTH = 148' (0.014 AC)
INTERMITTENT STREAM SS NON -JURISDICTIONAL
•'�• / LENGTH = 332' (0.031 AC) OPEN WATER POND Y
WETLAND CC / (10072 SO FT) (0.231 AC)
(206 SO FT) IRRIGATION POND Z -•.
(0.005 AC) (54488 SO FT) (1.25 AC)
i I NON -JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND X
PERENNIAL STREAM BB �••�.•� 1 (3910 SO FT) (0.090 AC)
ON -SITE LENGTH = 1322'
(0.185 AC) WETLAND ILL WETLAND PP
WETLAND E/EE (1853 SO FT) (0.043 AC) (223 SO FT)
(9388 SO FT) WETLAND MM (0.005 AC)
(0.216 AC) (66 SO FT)(0.002 AC)
WETLAND JJ
INTERMITTENTLENGTH2S ((453 SO )
0.007TRE�nAC) (0.010 AC)
INTERMITTENT STREAM HH WETLAND NN
LENGTH = 367' (0.036 AC) (764 SO FT)
(0.018 AC)
PERENNIAL STREAM DID
OFFSITE
/ WETLAND II
(� (0 SO FT)
(0. 0.003 AC)
( PROJECT BOUNDARY
\ (TYP) ,.
INTERMITTENT STREAM GG I PERENNIAL STREAM BBB
\ LENGTH = 155' (0.018 AC) 1 LENGTH = ) AC �•-_„
WETLAND 00 (0.144) AC
(23615 SO FT)
(0.542 AC) i
PERENNIAL STREAM FF
ON -SITE LENGTH = 283'
(0.017) AC
HARRIS ROAD
250' 0' 250' 500' 1000' - -
SCALE: I" = 500'
iL-
WETLAND EEE
(96 SO FT)
(0.002 AC)
— WETLAND CCC
(88 SO FT)
(0.002 AC)
INTER I i ENT STREAM AAA
LENGTH = 345'
(0.019 AC)
1'1
WETLAND DDD
(34 SO FT)
(0.0008 AC)
I �
I
U
Z
C3)
7
m
Q =
Z ,
J
O
Q� N
Q Cn
U
0 w
�O
Z N
O O
c U o
c Z
Uc)5
V)
z
O
Z
O
U
z_
N
X
w
of
w
Z)
z
z
c�
Z
U
N�
p
—
N I
0
m
LL
o
U
ii ¢
Dina
�—
¢

mine
Ord
e✓'' �< , '`� ,Iw dill �0

Figure 8
,r/ ,� / ,r / \ PROP. PUBLIC UTILITY' //,/' .� _ / ,---EASEMENTgYP) �r �� f / _��
\I 1 Mi
I INTERMITTENT STREAMLLJ
\
wEXIST. STREAM
\ w
WETLAND NN:amTOPOF BANK Li \ NO IMPACT PROPOSED iij
\ \ (0.018 AC)/ r '/
EXIST STREAM
CENTERLINE__LLJ
-jam- / ' -/�5'� . •Y`_ _ / /' ,r ,r�i, �,iirr v=" _ J j / / r-//, \ �
= Q
W
'// %�/^ — /��'•'•'` ( \�\%�`-+�� -- / /' ' i /// / j PERENNIAL STREAM af
/125'PERMANENTIMPACTS
�SEE SHEETS 4TO6
PROJECT BOUNDARY.
(TYP) /
\ .'/ / / `-- I' '•'.�' c %)ice I I I l I / 1 Y / / I \I \ \ \`� \` \�\ \ \ /' z U)
I;.'.'.' .'.'�.. tt'.' v i'.' --_-- PERENNIAL STREAM BB `, \\ `�� \ \� \\ 1 // / Q (n m
\\ 1/'••'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•' •/J/ / ' i (
:.........
Vol., U ':' ':'.(.'.'.'.'.'r +r /i'/�/ii'. WETLAND 00 // / I i I / l l r \ / / \ 1 j w_
NO IMPACT PROPOSED c�- ---' I I I I / z N
r`(0.542 AC)
z
LLJ
U U U
LEGEND:
ON -SITE BUFFER z
(8.74 AC) z
WETLANDS Y M
(J N
(0.902 AC) o o CV
(0.069 AC TO BE FILLED) Z co
o —
0 N n
STREAM CENTERLINE o 0
(400 LF PERMANENT 50' 0' 50, 100, 206 °' 4) a)
J 2 U LO 2
IMPACTS) SCALE: I" = 100' Q < "' a c'^''

Figure 9
`— 15" RCP
PROP. HEADWALL — /
(DESIGN BY OTHERS) — — 15" RCP _
15" RCP —
— PROP. COFFER DAM \
(OR APPROVED EQUAL) \ _
<(20
LF TEMP STREAM IMPACT)
\
`
EXIST. STREAM
OF BANK
_TOP
\;\FLOwp,RE CTj pN
✓
_
� J
EXIST. STREAM- /
CENTERLINE
PROP. PUMP /
_ DISCHARGE LOCATION / / (INV: 3649.42) /
x —L
20 LF TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
FOR DEWATERING
z%
PERENNIAL STREAM BBB
/ \ ` PROP. PUMP
I \ INLET LOCATION
/ 20 LF TEMP. STREAM IMPACT FOR DEWATERING
l / J (SEE RESTORATION EXHIBITS) _ Z-/
15" RCP (WT) / / — — — - 7
h / / PROP. COFFER DAM (OR APPROVED EQUAL) — -0
/(20 LF TEMP STREAM IMPACT) —'
(INV:±650.00)'/�� ' / --��--
y— '3:1 SLOPE
/
>
—
/PROP. 116.4 LF OF 102" — _ — — / � � (..) U)
—CIRCULAR CONCRETE CULVERT
(SEE RESTORATION EXHIBITS) / / / — — — / '
/ LL
Oo 0
I /I/ C z
LEGEND:
7--im ON -SITE BUFFER
L — J� (8.74 AC)
WETLANDS
0.902 AC
(0.069 AC TO BE FILLED)
STREAM CENTERLINE
(400 LF PERMANENT
IMPACTS)
NOTE:
CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT ALL
TEMPORARY IMPACTS TO WATERS 25' 0' 25' 50, 100'
OF THE U.S. TO LESS THAN 90 DAYS. 6 SCALE: I" = 50'
i
W_
z
Q
o_
00
m
OD
w
Q
z
z
LJ
LU
D_
z
z
(7
z
Y
U
M
N
p)
~
Z
NO o
N
cV
—
o
H
LL
o
U
a0
¢
Dina
rn

Figure 10
675
670
665
.m
655
650
645
■■■■■■■I/■■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■mil
!■■■ii■
■■■■■■■■■■■r.:■■■II■AWmm
.■■■■■■■
■■■
■■■
■■■
ROAD
I
CENTERLINE
I
I
' '
I I■■■■■`■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■II■
r■■■I1■II■
\
■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■Ill■■■■■■■■■
.
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
675
670
665
655
650
MIR
SCALE: I " = 6' V
3'
0'
3'
6'
12'
SCALE: I" = 60' H
30'
0'
30'
60'
120'
U z
z O
U
Lu
N
cu V)
Q= O
z U�
::j U
< m
U � m
m a
LU
Ow
Q
ccl) z
00
c(-) o z
cz - cu LU
U cLU
Of
W
m
z
Z
0
Z
T 3 N_
o °'
� rn o
L
Z
N U)0
0 ¢
LL
¢
t5
Zo
U
16
Q U)

Figure 11
675
670
665
.. ,
655
650
645
.-:
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
00000000000000'''7■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■�\■/"Idldll'dlllp���''�••�p
- .
�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\.
II�7�fFIIbEPbEF:IIS
�lp��ll''\■
S�'1�1IM
'N"
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�nlF�ilril'eil:I�iII�iIdn:'eil:':'eil:'eile°1■
u €u:IIuI,
II
•_
_
_■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M,�I.IEIIEIII
II
111 II
I.IEIIEIEIII II
�II �III
II,II,c''.
PROP.
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.I�E1IeIEF'.�"IIjj
p Ant+n"-"I[�I'I!1,,
■,
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
rEJ'dlldll.�'dlEldEll.�'dlEldEll�'dlldf
E1IjjE'.;IIlE1IIIE'I.I.jIIj�E'�j1IjE""'.11�E'1IE'.,111E�1III?E'If,F
°.�'d.IEE1dEEII�Id,I,1,dII�ItiT'II,�'��,'Ep,,
�;�IICII!dI=ICl=1p�p■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■,3�11�!S�dn:'dndn:'�IIbI,
Il�ldlldlltt'dIICI
Ill�'Il
ldlf
�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■
_..
■ .■•_�
..
BY
M,M■■■,,mmllll
o�1111
■■11■■■■■�■�■�■�■�■�■�■�■
MENEM
"INN"
. 'E ECI[[.iompIIIIImIIkd['IId['I'Im�dl[lCl[l■p�■�■�■�■�■�■�
■■■■■■■■■■■■■,■,m�jl
llo;lm;I
II�jII��jIIIIII�IIindnll'!Ilindnll'!Iell'I�'i
llllCl'ii
ll�I
'llldn�tl+n11=F1������
1 •'
..1 .�����������
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■."
3'll�ll:'ll�-ICI.-:'Ibl.-II.1--:'Ibl.-II7'-
j�jlI.�EjIEI!�jII
III-III--:'IdI--III,-:'!',1=1If'I
III I�IIKII'
I'=lf=''lf+'lr_I
��
������
�����
�����
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■„
�_®®��
�����
���
■■
�li.■■■
OMEN■
OMEN■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
� ��N■■
■■■■■
■■■I
■■
■■NNE
■■NNE
■■NNE
■■NNE
NNNNMNNNNMNNNNM�INNNMMMMMMMINE
-moo■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�I■■■
CIRCULAR
CULVERT@0.50%
1
CONCRETE
■■I
iii■■iii■■iii■M
EXIST. GRADE
MMMjjMMM
MENEMM■■■■■■Ll■■lI■■■■■■■■■■■■IG
11
■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
MMMMM
� I■■■■
MONO■
■■■I
���
■■■■■
■MIS■■
■MOON
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■►tee
a I_MiM
r�■■■■
■■■I
��
M■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■�■■■
�■■��
���
/ ��s�
fir®A
��1�175�
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
MEN■M■NEM
■■■■��■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1+00
2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00
SCALE: I" = 6' V 3' 0' 3' 6' it SCALE: I" = 60' H 30- 0, 30' W 120'
[1010V
U
L
Z
Q
655
u
w
In
i
J
Q
LL
0
Z
650
J
Q .L
m
Q °'
m
0
a
645
wLU
N
oco�
a
o0
z
c U
z
LU
c Z
640
Ir
m
z
Z
Z
Se
U
?� N
N
6+00
N
co s
Z
N In -
o Q
U-
U
�O
a U
0 U) a
co%D
ai

Figure 12
biii(Ip11�il,� Li
I�
/ WETLAND G IIII I
(0.038 AC),/
NO IMPACT PROPOSEDU
AREA TO REMAIN
i / UNDISTURBED TO ENHANCE
r/7 // /1 r /'//// /// / //�/
r-Ul
�� /�//�i //////� � � r�OFOFF-SITESTORMWATER 0.69AC
h�\\\\ q 1 \ � f 11 II 1 jJ � 3' � � �� i/•: 1 ( _ �I ) I I111�14�Ji//I�p i ;� �> m
1 ��\\ ��/ 1 ll) II\`� I!1/// - - iii/ 4�%'r' \ rl I IIII / II✓1
C PROJE T BOUNDARY X �
LU
/��/ / \ — 14�III II I\I�I1�J\
LU
/ lP y
is%� fJ �� I i II I�I+�I II II�V\\ \\I \ \ / ILL
— \ III`IIII\i Iv \I\ / li
� _ t v � IlnIJhl\�\�I\�>;:.\\�\\\ I ILL
EXIST. STREAM J 11\\T\I\\\\ \\\\\ 1
CENTERLINE" \+\ \ m
f . RMITTENT STREAM AJSS I\\\ \ I Z
-f,'l---N�O IMPACT
PROPOSEDMWi
EFED 1/
(0.061
I
/ll
U QQ� w
17
V I - //' / - i r I I / 1 ~
PROP. BMP , � \ � \tl// ' ♦ � ��t - � � /'� /'' l�� !: \ / / I I I I 1 c4 U
INTERMITTENTSTREAM AJS
LF PERMANENT IMPACTS ;\ I y'1 I (>3
20 LF TEMPORARY IMPACTS 7 /� J' I t Z
V
\\\ STREAM C
\ NO IMPACTs `�'�'��
17
PROPOSED'/%�\ f//, i \ \\ Q Cn w
STREAM AJ \` /' \ \ \\ U
TO BE FILLED
\\ �\1 H
1411 LF PERMANENT IMPACTS ! \� r \ N
\0y��� PROP. OFF -SITE BYPASS CULVERT \ `I \ \I \p % \I - 1 I \\ Q
TO BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE
// l yf(\ _' y \ ' ��� APPROX. LOCATION OF FLOW VELOCITY t \ / \ �/ / ``\\� / I
Arf -i / / EXISTING BOTTOMLESS (SEE SHEETS 8-9) - \ er �= / h 0 0
/(/ i ARCH CULVERT J \ `\ \ \`\I \\ \ \ /4/ - �\` � 11 I C U w
\? / / ��\� \ \ \- i�-I\\�� ly r�"r \\ • 1\ I 1 ! I II Z IM
IM
EXIST. STREAM TOP OF BANK \
\\ I U U Z_
�1 II h-, INTERMITTENT STREAM SS
NO IMPACT PROPOSED \ \�
LEGEND:
ON -SITE BUFFER z
(8.74 AC) z
WETLANDS Y M
U A N
( ) of 0.902 AC
O
o CV
(0.069 AC TO BE FILLED) Z o o —
O N n
STREAM CENTERLINE o * ILL.
LF PERMANENT 501 �� 50, 100, 2001 0 ° U a)
J 0
IMPACTS) SCALE: III = 100' ¢ < a

Figure 13
690
.01
ze
PROP. GRADE
@
°
ROAD
CENTERLINE
u g
685
r$i
680
675
PROP.
308
LF
72"
CULVERT
z
RCP
O
U
EXIST. GRADE @
z �z
670
ROAD CENTERLINE
2) w
7 N
N
(1) N
L OL
Q 2 U
Z ui
UO
0 Q
665
.2
E
U w
= N �
Y
w
is N
660
PROP.
GRADE
LL
0 W
z cu w
EXIST.
GRADE
Ow
o
z
LU
�
Z
c 0 O W
co 0 z
U U U —
655
00 N
CO cM
Lq
c�
w
00
I—
C
'-O I—
� ti
00 CAD
00 CAD
0
00 z
�
ro �
ro co
r
ms (.0Lfl
z
(7
z
Y
M
-0+50 0+00 1 +00 2+00 3+00 4+00
N y c`4
o
N II
O
U
o mat LW
ZO
�9 a)
—
o 00
SCALE: I" = 10' V s o s I0, 20' SCALE: I" = IOO' H 50' o' 50' I00' 200' ¢ <
`� a `�

Figure 15
oil
/it
// �/ // 4/, EXIST. STREAM
/ EXIST. 20' SANITARY/// /TOP OF BANK // / /
/ SEWER EASEMENT (TYP) / / // / I // / / /// // / A// 0, E
\ \ / //
PERENNIALS REAM BB
40 LF TEMPORARY IMPACT -
FOR OPEN CUT OF SEWER
SANITARY
SEWER (TYP) /
l /
EX-SSMH-10
/ v
sS I 11 I II I I I 1 1/ I Ti / SSMH4 j z
SSMH 2
J \ ( N\ �\— _ ' PROP. SANITARY SEWER
G \ \ \ \ .EASEMENT (TYP)
>/—/ 30' STREAM BUFFER /1 f `l/%' / z w_
\\SSMH-1 ///'\0_ / I �f I ��\\�_ E > Q
/ r / 10' VEGETATED SETBACK Q N J
/ PROP. SANITARY SE ER\ _
TIE IN LOCATION
4" //� 1 \l / \\\\\ / %� \ lj z
c U
\`Y\\ / EXIST. STREAM 7 ) rl / ��// // / / I 0 0
J r / \ J / \ / CENTERLINE c z O 'W'
J/ / /1 /1 I // // U 0 U w
LEGEND:
ON -SITE BUFFER z
(8.74 AC) z
WETLANDS Y M
U
N
0.902 AC
(J
� 000—
(0.069 AC TO BE FILLED) Z N o IL
0
STREAM CENTERLINE o Q
(400 LF PERMANENT 25' 0' 25' 50, 1002 u ° a) a)
o r0
IMPACTS) u' a 0—
S
CALE: <

Figure 16
—
I_
11
II
\\1PROP. 20' STORM DRAINGE 1 \ Ii,
EASEMENT (TYP) \\„ // I /i //�
Ill
it
ITT 141 NON -JURISDICTIONAL /
\ III II 1 111 OPEN WATER PONDDO
TO BE FILPMENT0.231 AC
( )LED FOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT ( ♦ \` \ 2 I-��/ 1
IIII � 1\ ♦I ��% / �r r_ � r /� �m�
1 ELO
- IIII\ 1 _
\ \I 11 � I \ ! I ♦\ /' / ram\ �'\ � �. /
\ II II III IIII \ \ I '�� / � 1 1 I l ♦ 7\\\ / \ r-'� / \
I
P. ♦��.. /W i0-' - � \ I \�_-` --_ '
�\R�rj
t\\\ ROJECTBOUNDARY\ I I) I IIII 1 {.cj'^ NON -JURISDICTIONAL -- 6g?' /
; \ 1 \ ` 1 1 \ I I I 1 A* ` 4 II — WETLAND X TO BE FILLED ` /� / �'
LU
— ' :_'i? —LU
— �--'�� /
ILL
ILL.
Z
w
PROP. STORM ''\ I \ / '-- = U
— r WETLAND PP TO BE FILLED / 1 \ \ \I I \ `\\ `� \\ DRIANAGE (TYP) _ `y \ + / — ' \ Z Uj 0-
\ �1 (0.005AC) ,r , ' ` ��\� —1 —_ __— \—/ / O
*������F�� �/ 1/ Idyl III / / &\ 1 I 1 I \ _ / / U
--- -- \ 777
�'` 1 V / /'/ it / I i w —rc__� �� _'_ \ 6���� — -- --- r� /i — Q
V / / /
LLJLU
RESPECTST _ _ -- ---�� I - c z w
IY
LEGEND: In
1 ON -SITE BUFFER z
�—� (8.74 AC) z
WETLANDS "
� N N
0.902 AC � o —
o
(0.069 AC TO BE FILLED) Z co o 0
U N n
_ STREAM CENTERLINE U .. 6 z 0
(400 LF PERMANENT 50, �` 50, 100` 200` ¢ M o a) _
J 0 U L _
IMPACTS) SCALE: I" = 100' ¢ < � � a co

Figure 17
PROP. 20' STORM DRAINGE'—
i /— EASEMENT (TYP)
\ / �- -- --(
q
O ,
\
I�
II
I
g
m
I
`
'
I
?:
I
E
\
z%
I
/ \ WETLAND EEE '
NO IMPA67rAC)
PROPOSED__ - - \
(M02 AC \ ` \\`\ \ \� ,' \ 11 1 \ \ \ I 1 I I ( II I /, ' I \\ I =
w
LLJ
LL
WETLAND CCCCi ' -1 ' \ �I\ \I \ / / ' 11 II U w
TO BE FILLED /\' ' ` X
/ --------- —_ -----'/ \\`\ (0.002AC) I
, �.��/� — — — � --' _---------• / \ l ) � � %.I
'INTERMITTENT STREAM AAA
�_� __ _ y\\ ` -' I50LFPERMANENT IMPACTS /^ /'� J� I Q U
_-''
20 LFTEMPORARY IMPACTS
(SEE NOTE)
Q =
WETLAND DOD / \I I I l I Z
-' _ -_ iA \ `� \ --- (TO BE FILLEDI� I' \ I _� , -1 \ 4 Q
\I 1• \ \\--"(0.0008 AC) j I I .�� I \ 1/ I I / �' \ ��j _ Q
, I 1P I q �' / , / Y� //
I I / /
-- ` \ I 1 \\ `\V -i / O �/ / /_ L '" -/i .`-'`=----�1 I-u
\r[ `\\\ A i �'l l i i i I (/T, -i_ i = N H
\ / W H
�\ , \I 1 , , / / l ��/ ► / r' �'' / / i / O Z
LLJ
ED
O
/fc /� / 00fffff
LEGEND:
— ON -SITE BUFFER
NOTE:
— -J (8.74 AC)
WALL DRAINAGE TO
DISCHARGE AT TOP
WETLANDS
OF STREAM
0.902 AC
(0.069 AC TO BE FILLED)
STREAM CENTERLINE
(400 LF PERMANENT
IMPACTS)
w
In
z
z
(D
z
Y
M
m N
C`I
z
ao
N
ILLII
O
H
o
50' 0' 50, 100,
200
1
a) N
SCALE: I" = 100'
a a
`%' a
co —
¢ !n

FIOTES FOR STREAM BANK STA8I11-I27ATTCN=
1. UPON OONPLET10NOFSTREAM CRDMaNGWM3 CONTRAGTOR SKkLL &k>T-ILL
AND MIMPA CALLY TAMP (NOSPECtFIC DE4ISrrf)-01LS INTO R..4CEAND CRESS
DISTURRED SURFACES
2. BgommNGATAPONT ZAj+]vEWATER $WFAtEKLEVAPOKGRAGSbiSrlj EO
AREAS (MED. FE'.RTILLMR B STRAW MULN) GTRFAM BANK: TOP OF KWIC AKD
W7LIP9@D AREAS UPLAND OF STREAM
�. INSTAU WIR FIQER NETAm-r 5TARTIHQ MINIMUM 7r U"bw WATER SLFF'AAI E
ELEVATION AND E AIDING A NffNIMLmorOrY%C TOP OF SANK. MAWN
SPECIPoG4TIONS MR 0= FIBER NETIMAr AS FOLLO6M5:
• MIN. THICKIsF—I OP 8,3W INCHES
• 100%000ONLITFREZAND WOVEHIWOTWINE
AVG. WEIGHTOF A OLINCESISQYCL
& COIRPRIER NETJFLAT$HWLLMSECVArLYHELDINPLACE WffHLLSEOP'NOMEN
STAKES AND MRE &TAPLES OG NEEDED
EL INSTALL LP/E SMAK0 BEONW1,10AT WAT1W 9URFAC�E rL kvAIONAND Ex7rNbiNG
2 VERTICAL FF0 UP THEf,TREAM BANK. SEE LIVE STAKO dETAL FOR ADM MI&
RMUMMENTS.
Q, INJTALL$ZT FENCE WYWRE FWNFORUENENT ALONia TbF OF 114NL(AC46,CENT To
END OF CeHk FIBCR NE MAYf FOR MOTH OF 9J19TLIPBE6 SOILS.
GM FBER NERFMT
GRASS (MM. MULCTH $ PrRtX-129}
REMAINING CISTURBED STREAM &4
mWAS f?4WA3NG TOFS OF BANK
(UNDER MfI NETMNT
LjY2 STAKE WCLONS OR
9PECIE5APPI<NW BA'
a0rini£OF FOR FIRST 241
ABME NOFM6.L WATER
SURFACE ELEVATIOH
WATER SURFAM ELEVATION
1- LWE STAKES SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY 24C IN LENGTH
7- OVIE,$'fAKrSSHxLLArO.U?-urINDIAMr FRATT1W
OF PL4HrlNG
Z. LNE f,1M(9t tHML Rr BLACK INLLOW M SPECIES
SRMRED BY COEJDHEG OR CDNSLLTANT
a GPMAES SH%LL BE boRmANr AT rLME OP ACOu&T"
AND PLANTING AND LOCALLY GROV014K&AVESTED
s uvE$TAKE$SHALL 9ESPACMI'MC.
9: LIVE STAKES SF" k L BE PLANTEII A MINIMUM OF 14r:N
DEPTH WITH r,,O MORE THAN 4'.E'OK STAKE EXPOSED
LIVE- STAKF DETAIL
EXTENh COIR F19GFL L%AT
A
INSTALL UILT FENCE
� REINFORCED NTH HOG
WIF& ATTAP OF BANK
(EDGE OFCCPR FIRER
HETJMAT)
i
ANSlt HV K {*w I Vx lme oM I
'AAY BE LISED TO REFORM
3T1=;EAMQANKj3TACi=1TPF
3WS;Hs CVP-RGTRFAM
31DE FACE OF ROCS yTA(X
LbE OF ROCK rO ANCHOR BANK
S OPT1Crtm)
1 — FIND COIR Ffif.R NETNAT
I I ^-•�--x' 1Y SELQW WATER SURFACE
EAVATIOF!
STRFA BANK STABILIZATION -LIVE STAKE
TYPICAL DETAIL - K,-M
FIGURE NO. CANNON RUN Drawn By: Reviewed By:
18 Cabarrus Co., NC HAC LSR
DATE:
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION
Typical Detail — N.T.S. 8/26/2019
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDEQ VERIFICATION

O
.4-J
c�
.E
rdi
.Jurisdictional
Determination Information

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Missions/Re ul�ato!3 PermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Intersection of Harris Rd & Odell School Rd
City, State:
County:
Concord NC
Cabarrus
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): please see attached parcel map
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, WEPG
Mailing Address: 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
Charlotte NC 28277
Telephone Number: 336-554-2728
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Rocky River Crossing LLC - J. Murphy
Mailing Address: 4350 Main Street, Ste 201
Harrisburg, NC, 28975
Telephone Number: 201-857-3771
Electronic Mail Address: not available
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Er'ola 550 Kinderkamack, LLC - Joseph Murphy
Print Name
Capacity: 0 Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
9/24/2019
Date
E. REASON FOR JD REQUItST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
deigned to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
0 I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
pr
ocess.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCI)OT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Rocky River Crossing, LLC - Joseph Murphy
Print Name
Capacity: ❑X Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
9/24/2019
Date
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
X❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
pr
ocess.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confn-m that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/ JSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,a
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Harrisburg Town Center IX, LLC - Joseph Murphy
Print Name
Capacity: � Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
9/24/2019
Date
Si
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
0 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOTIUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Must provide agent authorization formaetter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3°4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the Owner of record of the property.
Ann McCord Harper, Trustee of the William H. McCord Sr. Revocable Trust
Print Name
Capacity:IVI
kN Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
9/24/2019
-1 l , A i k
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ l intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCOOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
° if there are multiple parcels owned by di f Brent parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization forni/letter signed by owners).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION'.4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Glenn Mayes
Print Name
Capacity: k2!,j Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
9/24/2019
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
a
igned to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop aprojector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which.is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOTfUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owners).
Page 3
Version: May 2417

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
David McCord
Print Name
Capacity: K Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
9/24/2019
Date _
Si
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

LIrMiOcn3l Determinatio n Req L<t-gt
F� eCM CCWpilM M tO CM4C3 MMM dk rx I?PM F FSf I f I rr demon ho fQf ft py rM*x q d S VWAk d WE an
1 {1 r iltii! Iskfunir illu-ILjIdf}Oali dcLaml^-'r-E �ayI r. I FV Sed Han
-W of Lhe Cie 1Iti'sbm *a and-W SOCI 600 1Q @fft lbtiym apd IIwt I ti AU oI i w';-Y. 1. ak
urtth rLdgf4& am ti prrr a dkal V Ilu homml uwvw cd a pow 4 4 f �w pmpwTy 1 knu dl mLL Nmr6k� �m
&Ct� as me srnhfM MJ WM Of ft ft ncr of MC OFd -0 f the pnn:CY .
Jim+# S Lirb-da Iioa'd
K. � w'. �rM4ti } �S}� CIS � F:i,���T� ��'betick as rt�� a � I
1 Ir+ICH4 :0 dMVI%KL &n ck)p a pmico'3a pp-ibm &7uY m cc %knE ".:r<I WtLuh -murL,l be
JC, tiIIc61a xL-qmd iIL Agi-UC Nquaw uL
❑ 1 irllClltl Itti Kt��6� ■ i�'J�� �Ir p.315orfr� a�ItitiLlei •�, 71'sir ��r �$.�b zti.wl�l �'r
rl �Ir No%Lki a■I i*Y1 K rMM eN Irrdlff COtM JMOUM �
1 IRllcnd go OumM cL deralap i pr i <or rw fgm a riwmr} an 4FIe56 par tI VLlti1tih I IIs%r
rC amlbmvjLt: rl *LF -1 HW Cam, arAJ Ilic I vpD l d be uiL%a hD lt7IW md aft thI rc
,rnp,K1}a 4��f>��f�ai ayva[Ic r�Klrt�1 amr� s� rir +r�+�L �'' Iti � ter �miWn�
U'll", vacM go r-Au IIrurL &me k�p -k fwi�ICdf1 W p"fc#tn sdFVMRis ae Ih1$ puggi wW M14y
t4rlrr` awlhanmur-n fFam *c ['LwTim, +rtio ltquqD61 q} atC&Slpirrtd by m}' PMR14 : WliC4klkM
C] 1 I r4k nd brr t i+n q6 I fl rat'&ifw Wq a fv4 jcc R *r p;TfDrra mrwm Ili 4 rr a Iraq' Im W& wa w <kf 4 hr
thr �
A Co" ID a roqui" m cira arol4 IAt' I�arG'a4a[a a1i�FI+NIY7�1{'r>t
1 InIENW io auer4•u ft•+r WKgicm if'rxr a pari5tilar & uairc rfs"dc" rcqw11 Rk C cnn
confirm eh4e Jw hJ10 9PA dkx%•'dxl " r:xitil w•*r ft Kw c ft-ficpme Ora the p-irxl
L bcl kvc dw Gib %ek may to couqz&M -omImeIv of4jr Lam - - —
�l
Frr WMOT h&pwuig Aar MUM U-bQ'T UM rl d* r. !wt E
tb=EL s 4rq
' M� �+'''•+� �' � �+iLBifi'� rti �'r_ .c i r ti 1-rti ' t . •., r rr�+�
IV� 3it MI' fW }

F.
IN
NO
G.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 128.5 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑✓ Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.4345
-80.7302
❑✓ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re _ug latory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
❑ Vicinity Map
✓❑ Aerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App A Prelim_JD Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/N4issions/Re ulatoiy-Permit-Prop-ram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the proj ect area subj ect to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District; Asheville Regulatory Office
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Cabarrus City: Concord
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.4345' 1, Long.-80.7302' W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: WGS84
Name of nearest waterbody: Rocky River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Rocky River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03040105
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RUA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
® Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 6,334 linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 1.05 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: The site contains 0.09 acres of wetlands and two open water ponds that are being considered isolated and non -
jurisdictional. Specifically, as identified on the attached delineation map, Isolated Ponds Y & Z, and Isolated/Non-
Jurisdictional Wetland X are being considered isolated and non -jurisdictional. These areas are classified by Schafale &
Weakely (Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina Third Approximation, 1990) as an Upland
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
s For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

Depression Swamp Forest community type which are found on broad upland flats and high ridge tops. Based on
extensive past experience with these wetland communities which are only found in this region, they are typically
naturally isolated with no surrounding drainages (overland or jurisdictional) that connects them to downslope
features. The areas surrounding these isolated wetlands have been maintained for agricultural use and there are no
signs of overalnd flow, drainage patterns, ditches, grassed swales, or any other kind of drainage system that may
connect these areas to downslope jurisdictional areas.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 7,213 square miles
Drainage area: 0.5 square miles
Average annual rainfall: 44 inches
Average annual snowfall: 0 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: .
Project waters flow SW from the site through an unnamed tributary to the Rocky River (TNW).
'Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 4 feet
Average depth: 2 feet
Average side slopes: 4:1 (or greater).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime: Streams C, BB, FF, OS & BBB are perennial. All others are intermittent.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
®
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
®
sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: 0.109 acres
Wetland type. Explain:Numerous small bottomland forested wetlands occur across the site.
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Ephemeral flow. Explain:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: Channelized surface flow.
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 1 (or less) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 500-year or greater floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Vegetation type/percent cover. ExplainTorested/ 100% cover.
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: typical wetland species - aphibians, etc.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: 1M
Approximately ( 1.05 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Wetland A - does not abut (0.061 ac)
Wetland CC - does not abut (0.005 ac)
Wetland E/EE - directly abuts (0.216 ac)
Wetland G - does not abut (0.038 ac)
Wetland PP - does not abut (0.005 ac)
Wetland DW - directly abuts (0.1 ac)
Wetland MM - directly abuts (0.002 ac)
Wetland LL - directly abuts (0.043 ac)
Wetland EEE - directly abuts (0.002 ac)
Wetland CCC - directly abuts (0.002 ac)
Wetland DDD - directly abuts (0.0008 ac)
Wetland II - directly abuts (0.003 ac)
Wetland JJ - directly abuts (0.01 ac)
Wetland NN - directly abuts (0.018 ac)
Wetland 00 - directly abuts (0.542 ac)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: Wetlands A, CC, G & P are adjacent but not abutting onsite jurisdictional RPWs and are connected by channelized
surface flow.

D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Perennial Streams onsite exhibit geomorphology, hydrology, and biological indicators consistent with
perennial flowing streams in the piedmont ecoregion as documented by the attached NCDWQ Stream Identification
Assessment Form(s).
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Intermittent Streams onsite exhibit geomorphology, hydrology, and biological indicators consistent with
intermittent flowing streams in the piedmont ecoregion as documented by the attached NCDWQ Stream Identification
Assessment Form
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: 6335 linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Jurisdictional Wetlands E/EE, II, JJ, NN & 00 directly abut onsite perennial tributaries
with no break in jurisdiction.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: Jurisdictional Wetlands DW, MM, LL, EEE, CCC & DDD directly abut onsite intermittent tributaries
with no break in jurisdiction..
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.94 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.11 acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
'See Footnote # 3.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):'"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
® Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
® Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:There are two
pond on the property that are excavated in an upland landscape position and one isolated wetland that is not hydrologically
connected to any Waters of the U.S..
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
® Lakes/ponds: 1.48 acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
® Wetlands: 0.090 acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
'"Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

IN
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):.
or ® Other (Name & Date): Site photographs (1/7/19).
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify): .
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

-- -
Discontinuous Intermittent Streams:
LEGEND
AJ (148 If), AJS (193 If), AJSS (121 If)
Wetland IS
a Project boundary study limits
0.038 ac
�
Iu Stream
�
F _
}
M Wetland
-0.06].ac
T
f, fx
,, w�1 } ,� _��j
F •I
Intermittent Stream SS
Landscape pho#aldirection
ti Ja r
��
-332 If
l
i
Perennial Stream C
527 If
Non -Jurisdictional
(Isolated) Pond Y�
r
`eY { 0.231 ac
Intermittent Stream IEr3
,� ( -Y
Wetland PP
-207 If
`.
0.005 ac
Wetland MM
3 ,r f f
Non -Jurisdictional
0.002 ac
+ y ,
(Isolated) Wetland X
Wetland DW
; "5Lrs}�}
0.090 ac
x•
Wetland LL
-0.1 ac%M�
Non -Jurisdictional Pond Z
+
Wetland EEE
(irrigation
pond dug in upland)
1.25ac
1 f.•+, 6
J i ;;-
0.002 ac
� •5 Y r
I
Wetland CCC
Perennial Stream OS
r
-
0.002 ac
800If
NCDEQ STREAM r 'f • x__- _
rr{`k
8
{ �,� FORM BBB i
4`
Intermittent
Stream AAA
Wetland CC
7
345 If
0.005 ac
I NCDEQ }
USACE WET
STREAM
DATA FORM O
i
FORM
_J�
Wetland DDD
Perennial Stream BB
_'; ; =s +
t+
:4f��sr+
-0.0008 ac
1,3221f
GG x r
x , •rr. r - - _ 4 '`
7
Wetland II
-0.003 ac
2 irr {r 5
y
}f
I
Perennial Stream BBB
Wetland JJ
1,415 If
Wetland E/EE
UPLAND 0.010 ac
.t
-0.216 ac
+
Intermittent Stream HH DATA POINT I '
Intermittent Stream KK
l
367 If i ,5 _ I
-121 If
Wetland NN
,
Intermittent Stream GG
-0.018 ac
/'.
•�♦
- 155 If
yti ti
Perennial Stream FF Wetland 00
I
- 283 If + 0.542 ac
i
*** USACE VERIFICATION 10/31/18 ***
*** NCDEQ VERIFICATION 6/14/18 & 10/9/18 ***
Drawn By:
Reviewed
FIGURE NO.
CANNON RUN
19
Cabarrus Co., NC
NRN
LSR
DATE:
•
DELINEATION MAP
-WATERS OF THE U.S.-
9/3/18
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
.. .. ...
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION

'4
4. 4
°. - .• .. �`�`• ,�� � fir... �
�..`4•
• !
-
a ij�.�.., C,
v �,

�'•` - `.•='y�.;.r�i ', �iA` � � �. ��J1rV{, �[IaG y���rh.' �'.7• ,' x �.
. `rl�t �. .,. s ."s4x rr % : rert Z+ rt �,,� ,.1• �'• ••+ , tw
� 3�. I .tom 1 a i.•4 < i ��� •�8 ��.� 1, -,1 5
•t �R�' Rid •, + 1.S � � ,i ��, .
l•
r • � '� �� � � f ' - ��/"� � .yam'
goet
�!�
770,
4• jj�i
�. �y _ �fK. .• -`ram _!S � - pr,.c )4..)IY;
..,fit - t1 �' . ' •. ��' _ � , -.'�� A � �- s N

�1
WETLAND 00 - PHOTO 5
NON -JURISDICTIONAL (ISOLATED) OPEN WATER POND Y - PHOTO 6
Cannon Run
Cabarrus Co., NC — 4/3/18
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
8/27/18 1 Evaluator: I NRN
Easting:
-80.7332
Project:
I Cannon Run: Intermittent Stream B
Northing:
35.4374
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
F27.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
7.5
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
8/14/17 1 Evaluator: I NRN
Easting:
-80.7336
Project:
I Cannon Run: Intermittent Stream GG
Northing:
35.4336
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
F25.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomor hology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
7.5
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
4/3/18 1 Evaluator: I NRN
Easting:
-80.7304 W
Project:
Cannon Run: Perennial Stream BBB
Northing:
35.4345 N
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
38.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
L 20.0
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
1111111111L 12.0
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
L 6.0
* perennial streams may also be identified usinq other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Cannon Run City/County: Concord/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 4/3/18
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: wetland 00
Investigator(s): NRN, LSR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 - 15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4336 Long:-80.7335 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: PoD: Poindexter loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
x Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
x High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
x Drainage Patterns (B10)
x Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
x Sediment Deposits (B2) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (B3) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wetland 00
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
35
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer rubrum
25
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
3.
Platanus occidentalis
15
Yes
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88.9% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
OBL species 45 x 1 = 45
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 85 x 2 = 170
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
Yes
FACW
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
2.
Acer rubrum
15
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
Sambucus nigra
15
Yes
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Platanus occidentalis
10
No
FACW
Column Totals: 200 (A) 425 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.13
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 153.0'
55
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
28 20% of total cover:
11
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
30
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Carex crinita
25
Yes
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex lurida 20 Yes OBL
4.
Juncus effusus
10
No
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
85
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
43 20% of total cover:
17
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Wetland 00
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-10 7.5YR 5/1 75 5YR 5/8 25 C PL/M Sandy Prominent redox concentrations
10-20 7.5YR 5/1 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL Sandy Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (All)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
X Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
x Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Cannon Run City/County: Concord/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 4/3/18
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Investigator(s): NRN, LSR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 - 15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4336 Long:-80.7335 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: PoD: Poindexter loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
Upland Data Point 1 was taken approximately 30' north of Wetland O
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (B3) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Quercus alba
35
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Quercus rubra
30
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
85
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
43
20% of total cover:
17
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Elaeagnus angustifolia
65
Yes
FACU
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
Ligustrum sinense
25
Yes
FACU
FACU species 305 x 4 = 1220
3.
Quercus alba
5
No
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Quercus rubra
5
No
FACU
Column Totals: 305 (A) 1220 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 153.0'
100
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
50
20% of total cover:
20
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
AI/ium vineale
35
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Polystichum acrostichoides
10
Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
45
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
23
20% of total cover:
9
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Lonicera japonica
75
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
75
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
38
20% of total cover:
15
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-20 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (All)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

Waiver Request
Study

®-umE Field -verification of disconnected streamsegments Ez31/e ®-
.
■ � .
��■ ' ` —� _
�/ �` ��■. � �
.
..■.■ ' r_ —
AP
-_ ■ �. magi &N2m
STREAM FORM
_ . I■
qs
' -- — INTERMITTENT STEAmgs
INTERMITTENT STREAM qs �CPA -21�
3 If
k
\ % � �
INTERMITTENT STREAM q , '
-148 I ) Jr.'� If mom � X �
_ �—
r , 22Af
�!
3 � jp_a
�AV
��_ � � ■
. . _ a ��-- �
NOES TEE
FORM kGDReach
� 1601 ' _� %
Nd_
46 _ -
�
` % _ '
, dF � IL
_
ƒ_�fAt
f -- -_
Al —
* . 00 P,' --
FIGURE NO. CANNON RUN Dawn: Reviewed By:
2 CbRyC,INC Da 3R
WAIVERSTUDY DATE:
-WATERS OFTHE us gg/g
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO u ac VERIFICATION

4
!"+ rl .-1,
T
L 1 ,
�.' 1 �t .r It ',�•.. \ 9� YF.7�l �. -r'
Photo 2: Non -Jurisdictional gap between streams AJS & AJSS
(view downslope).
Cannon Run
Cabarrus Co., INC — 8/14/17, 8/2/19
We6ands and Environmentai Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

b,'
Photo 3: Intermittent Stream AJS (view downstream).
1E PSG
We6ands and Environmental Planning Group
Cannon Run
Cabarrus Co., NC-8/14/17, 8/2/19
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Photo 4: Non -jurisdictional gap between Stream AJ & culvert
(view downslope).
Cannon Run
Cabarrus Co., INC —8/14/17, 8/2/19
We6ands and Environmentai Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC,

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
8/2/19 1 Evaluator: I HAC
Easting:
-80.7317
Project:
Cannon Run: Non -Jurisdictional Swale
Northing:
35.4385
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
11.75
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Hydrology Subtotal
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
0
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0.75
Biology Subtotal
0.7
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Ori ins.
(version 4.11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date:
8/2/19 1 Evaluator: I HAC
Eastin :
-80.7313
Project:
I Cannon Run: Intermittent Stream AJS
Northing:
35.4389
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
19.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Majority of hydrology to stream appears to be from stormwater. Little stream structure/continuity
throughout.
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
(version 4.11)
Ori ins.

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any):
Cannon Run
3. Applicant/owner name:
Charlotte Real Estate Services
5. County:
Cabarrus
7. River basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
2. Date of evaluation: 8/2/19
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach):
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
Stream
9. Site number (show on attached map): AJ/AJS/AJSS 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 300
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): .5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 1.5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
Assessor name/organization: H.Caldwell/WEPG
Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Rocky River
35.4345N/-80.7302W
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A\ El
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
®C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses . ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) F M ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o w ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation NC El Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
'********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS`***************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ❑Yes ®No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ®No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/am phi pod/crayfish/sh rimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ®Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >- 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ON
16. Baseflow Contributors - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
❑A ®A ❑A
®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
®C ❑C ®C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E
❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure -
streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A
Mature forest
❑B ❑B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Medium to high stem density
®B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity - assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >- 230
Notes/Sketch:
Segmented intermittent stream adjacent to sewer line causing flow alteration to stream area. Multiple debris dams causing altered pattern and
overwidening.

Draft INC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Cannon Run Date of Assessment 8/2/19
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization
H.Caldwell/WEPG
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
OMITTED
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For: Cannon Run
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
March 26, 2019
Charlotte Office: www.wetiands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
I [e-mail]

Cannon Run - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Cannon Run site (+/- 128.5 acres) is located just south of Hwy 73, just
north of Harris Road, and just west of Odell School Road in Cabarrus County,
North Carolina. It can be found on the Kannapolis NC USGS Topographic
Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.4345 N, longitude is 80.7302 W. The topography
is gently to moderately sloped with the elevation ranging from 640 to 700 ft.
(Figure 1). The site is a mosaic of partially rough graded land and wooded
slopes. There are numerous dirt roads and trails lacing the site and it is
disturbed throughout. There is roadside frontage along Hwy 73, Odell School
Road and Harris Road. Two unnamed tributaries to Rocky River flow
southwest through the site.
Figure 1:
tY.
'
171Syn.i I".
r
.,
r
i -
-
,.- •� '".
7
I
r
APPROXIMATE
P ROI ECf BO UN DqRV
ST tl DV LIMBS
�yG
I
r[,
I
R III ER
LOC AT ION
La1:35.4345°N
?
.A
Long: ;30.7302 °-W
0
!40
-
N
17`
HUC:03040105
LGGSQUA❑
UPPER ROCKY RIVER
Nannapo lis, NC
FIGURE NO.
CANNON RUN
bra wn 6Y:
wev ie wed By:
1
Caban"is Co., NC
NRN
LSR
USGS MAP
DATE:
-MIATE
9f3f18
CO0ITHEUS:
E%STING CO N � fil] NS Sill �Y
5 UVE Cf 0LaAff UEVH CMi ON
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Cannon Run - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/cabarrus.html was referenced to
determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and Protected species for
Cabarrus County North Carolina, the results of which are listed below (Table 1).
Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and the site was investigated
during the week of March 26, 2019
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Cabarrus County
County: Cabarrus, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on March 26, 2019
Federal
Group Name Status Record Status
Vascular Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus Endangered Current
Plants schweinitzii)
Vertebrate Northern Long -Eared Bat (Myotis Threatened Probable/Potential
septentrionalis)
Vertebrate Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Protected Current
Invertebrate Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) Endangered Historic
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Cannon Run - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
PROTECTED SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
One plant species with federal protection was the focus of the survey efforts:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and
utility rights -of -way (ROW).
A total of three animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially
occurring in Cabarrus County:
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large
bodies of open w ater such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers,
where there are suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and
roosting.
• Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is restricted to cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable,
silt- free stream beds are required for this species. Typically stable areas
occur where the stream banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
• Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened. During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead
trees. Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Cannon Run - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
RESULTS:
The site is a mosaic of partially rough graded land and wooded slopes. There
are numerous dirt roads and trails lacing the site and it is disturbed throughout.
There is roadside frontage along Hwy 73, Odell School Road and Harris Road.
Two unnamed tributaries to Rocky River flow southeastward through the site.
The western and northern sections of the site are disturbed from previously
abandoned rough grading and sediment basin construction, with stockpiles, cut
slopes, open expanses of scrub/shrub cover, thickets, hedgerows, strips of
wooded stream buffers, and disturbed, early successional tree cover.
Abandoned construction materials, concrete pipes and fittings, and trash piles
are scattered on site.
These previously rough graded and disturbed areas are dominated by Sericea
Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) which is commonly planted for soil stabilization,
along with Blackberry (Rubus sp.), Winged Sumac (Rhus copallina), Japanese
Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and Catbrier (Smilax sp.). Also present are
Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense), Broomsedge (Andropogon virginianum),
Goldenrod (Solidago spp.), Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifoila), Brazilian Vervain
(Verbena brasiliensis), (Pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), Sneezeweed
(Helenium sp.), Ragwort (Packers sp.), Rabbit Tobacco (Gnapthalium
obtusifolium), Indian Hemp (Apocynum cannabinum), and Foxtail (Setaria sp.).
Some areas are more overgrown with small saplings of Red Cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), Virginia Pine (Pinus virginiana), Shortleaf Pine (P. echinata), Winged
Elm (Ulmus alata), and Black Cherry (Prunus serotina). Invasive shrub species
present include Russian Olive (Elaeagnus umbellate) and Chinese Privet
(Ligustrum sinense).
The wooded slopes and stream buffers have scattered large tree species present
with Willow Oak (Q. phellos), White Oak (Q. alba), Black Oak (Q. velutina),
Southern Red Oak (Q. falcata), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Virginia
Pine (Pinus virginiana), Short -leaf Pine (P. taeda), Cottonwood (Populus
deltoides), and Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). Subcanopy species include
Red Maple (Acer rubrum), Redbud (Cercis canadensis), Sourwood (Oxydendrum
arboreum), Ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and American Holly (Ilex opaca).
The shrub layer is dominated by Autumn Olive (Elaeagnus umbellate).
Additional shrubs present include Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), Black Haw
(Viburnum prunifolium), Paw Paw (Asimina triloba) and Chinese Privet
(Ligustrum sinense). Vines present are Catbrier (Smilax spp.), Japanese
Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Crossvine (Bignoinia capreolata), Trumpet
Creeper (Campsis radicans), Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia),
Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), and Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Cannon Run - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Results
• All potential habitats for Schweinitz's Sunflower along the roadsides; open
areas; hedgerows; and woods edges were closely examined, and no
plants were found.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings
nor were any nesting sites observed.
• The streams on site do not have the habitat characteristics required to
support populations of the Carolina Heelsplitter. No mussels were
observed during the survey nor would any be expected on -site
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/protect review/NLEB in WNC.html) it
appears that the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no further
action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the northern
long eared bat.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
#
Lisa R. Gaf ney, Biologist
March 26, 2019
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Cannon Run - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist / Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist, and has
conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of cumulative acres in
both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 1997-1998. Organized,
directed, and worked in field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 2000-2001. Organized, directed,
and worked in field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 45,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 - present.
• Located and identified at least six previously unreported populations of Federally
Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified four previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora).
• Located a previously unknown population of Federally Endangered Schweinitz's
Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC. This discovery led (in part) to
the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant Conservation
Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has become a Recovery
Site for the species.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in Mecklenburg,
Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.