Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200233 Ver 1_WetStreamdata Stokes 15 revised 20190801_20200212i/ F,t„ Y Legend Vade Mecum Creek Intermittent Pond Stokes 15 Study Area au SA-1 TT Study ,,• , -. ' SA-11 TT Vade Mecum Creek s•` �J is'� \C:� t .•4t .�v:]�'a III �RYf r '•i r 0 100 200 1 "=100' OF NOHTN 0 '990G NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT q OF TRANSPORTATION * DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS A DIVISION 9 Y PP OF TiiAN5P0 rob PA-14 TT PA-1 +R@� PA-8 TT Study — PA-7 TT Study � ' r NC Center PGOMWriaphimforrr FLAGGING MAP BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STOKES BRIDGE 840015 2014 Aerial NC Onemap County: Stokes Division: 9 WBS: 176P.9.R.98 Date: August 2019 N i Figure 1 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: 4/30/2018 Project/Site: Stokes 15 Latitude: 36.397936 Evaluator: H. Smith County: Stokes Longitude:-80.331404 Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 least perennial > 3f 21.0 Stream Determination Other: Stream A Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 8.5) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 Q3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 i1 2 3 3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 10 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade Control 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural Valley 0 .5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel o= 0 Yes= 3 aartificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal= 7.5) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 03 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria CD 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plant or debris QO 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 1 0 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table I No= 0 1 Yes= 3 C. Biology (Subtotal= 5.0) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 CD 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 03 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish QO 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish OO 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae QO 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75; OBL= 1.5; ther= 0 * perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual Notes/Sketch: NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: 1/30/2018 Project/Site: Stokes 15 Latitude: 36.397864 Evaluator: H. Smith County: Stokes Longitude:-80.330998 Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 l e perennial t > 3f 42.5 Stream Determination Other: Vade Mecum Creek Ephemeral Intermittent( A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 22.0 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 G3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 1 2 03 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 10. Natural Valley 0 0.5 1 05 11. Second or greater order channel No= 0 Yes= 3 aartificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal= 8.5) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 03 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria CD 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plant or debris QO 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 01 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table No= 0 Yes= 3 C. Biology (Subtotal= 12.0) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed (3) 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 Cp 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 23. Crayfish OO 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1. 25. Algae QO 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75; OBL= 1.5; ther= 0 * perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual Notes/Sketch: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: Bridge 840015 City/County: Stokes Sampling Date: 1 /30/2018 Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: Upland Investigator(s): H. Smith Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hilislope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 36.397729 Long:-80.330383 Datum: 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Riverview and Toccoa NWI classification: N/A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes F v I No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No 0✓ Are Vegetation 0, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F No 0 Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No = Remarks: The area was hit by a tornado within the past year. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No Q Depth (inches): N/A Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches): N/A n Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches): N/A Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Bridge 840015 Sampling Point: Upland Tree Stratum (Plot size: 9.1 m ) 1. Ilex opaca 2. Juniperus virginiana 3. Acer rubrum A Liriodendron tuliDifera 6. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 10 FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 10 FACU Total Number of Dominant 5 FAC Species Across All Strata: 4 40 Y FACU Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25% 6 50% of total cover: 32.5 Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 9.1 m ) 1. Ilex opaca 5 2. Juniperus virginiana 1 5. 6. 50% of total cover: 7.5 Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 9.1 m ) 1 Ligustrum sinense 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 10 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 9.1 M ) 1. Juncus effusus 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 50% of total cover: 2.5 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 9.1 m ) 1. No rooted vines 4. 5. (A) (A/B) 5 = Total Cover 0 Prevalence Index worksheet: 20% of total cover: 13 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Y FACU FACW species 5 x 2 =10 FACU FAC species 5 x 3 =15 FACU species 95 x 4 = 380 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 105 (A) 405 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.9 15 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 3 Zu = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 4 ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0' ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: - Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. 5 Y FACW (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 5 = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 1 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No� US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Bridge 840015 Sampling Point: Upland Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-6 7.5YR 5/4 100 loam 6-12 10YR 4/4 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol (Al) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Stratified Layers (A5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11: ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type Depth (inches): Remarks: RM=Reduced MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc ❑ Dark Surface (S7) 0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0