430003_Inspection_20190411

111 l"\.7 It '-TV r- I i '1 N L -./
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number FqT71 - e&F-31 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: (D ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: CG'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival - e: «'C Departure Time: U!
Farm Name: �
�A�� Owner Email:
1
Owner Name: (C ,� Ct ' Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Ph, ' �y (� Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:`
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Latitude:
County:Region:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: %
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -Layer
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
-7 Ze,
S 15
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Dry Ponitry C'.anaeity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
DischarjZes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
ffj'�&
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
Q A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [:]Yes [:]No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of inspection: / c
aste Collection & Treatment
Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q-le—❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No � ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
I-1 96-
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑-10
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
r o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): LA
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated/in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
(o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑14o'
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
D"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
0o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑-N-o--
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M-190
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑'NIo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 47 - Date of Inspection: 7 7 a
�. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑-ITo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑,Ko—
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
M-5o
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 50- ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I9 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes E No
[:]Yes E No
❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: _ L 2) ft�Cz Phone:
(Cf
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015