20000254 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20000211

DWQ ID: _ CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #) 14.26
"
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1. NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2. APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3. COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD
OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN (7)
COPIES MUST BE SENT TO THE NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY,
ATTN: JOHN DORNEY, 4401 REEDY CREEK ROAD, RALEIGH, NC
27607. PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE.
1. OWNER'S NAME: Mr. Don Moss, Citizens for Economic Development, Inc.
2. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 205
SUBDIVISION NAME
CITY: Wentworth STATE: NC ZIP CODE: 27405
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE):
Reidsville Industrial Park, Sands Road, Reidsville, NC
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER: (HOME) _ (WORK) [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
Denise M. Poulos, Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd., 5-C Dundas Circle, Greensboro, NC 27407. [phone]
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Rocking - NEAREST TOWN: Reidsville
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.) The site is located on
Sands Road in Reidsville.
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Little Troublesome Creek RIVER BASIN: Haw/Cape
Fear
7. (a) IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER, (SA),
HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER
SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES ? NO X IF YES, EXPLAIN:
(b) IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES ? NO X
(c) IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF
COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
j-
8. (a) HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROJECT? YES ? NO X IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF PREVIOUS PERMIT AND
ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401 CERTIFICATION):
(b) ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE?
YES X NO ? IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK: Possible: future road crossings.
9. (a) ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBERS OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: 307.4
(b) ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
15.07 acres
10. (a) NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: X EXCAVATION:
FLOODING: X OTHER :
DRAINAGE : TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 2.74
(b) (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF RELOCATED,
PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION:
LENGTH BEFORE: _ FT AFTER: _ FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): _ FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
(b) (2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: _ PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL: X
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: _ CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING: X
OTHER:
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED
DRAINING TO THE POND? 440.91 acres WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? See
attached exhibit.
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT TO BE USED? (ATTACH PLANS; 81/2 BY 11 DRAWINGS ONLY) The site is being
developed with an industrial park. Roadways and water gualityponds will be constructed. Trucks, loaders,
excavators, backhoes, bulldozers, etc. will be used to develop the site.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: The purpose of the work is to construct roadways and water
guality ponds
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN
WETLANDS (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS)
Due to the topography of the site the water quality ponds must be constructed in the drainage ways. The
road crossing at Stream Impact #2 has been combined with the pond dam to reduce impacts.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AND/OR
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY
LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL
HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
DATE CONTACTED:
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA
WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED -
From: Cheryl Wall To: D. Poulos Date: 2/7/00 Time: 2:17:52 PM rage ;e or 1
F
Feb-07-2000 11:25an Fror-ENCINEERINC CONSULTING SRVS LTD [phone] T-182 P.002/002 F-345
17. DOES THE PROJECT INV E Ali EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND? YES;NO X(IF NO, GO TO 16)
(a) IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN :ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQ OF THE NORIX CAROLINA
ENVIRONIAMI'AL POLICY ACT? YES ? NO
(b) IF YES. HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINCIROUSE YES rj NO ?
IF ANSWER 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE STATE
CLEAR NOHOUSE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIMV PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS SAGGETT. DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE. NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET. RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-2003. TELEPHONE [phone].
18. TtM FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD 9E INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PROPOSED
ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHA]LC'E OF EXCAVATED OF FILL MATERIAL. INTO
WETLANDS:
(a) WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS. STREAMS, LAKES. AM
PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NA77ONWMIC PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 12, 21,16.29, AND 38).
ALL STREAM (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY MUST HE SHOWN ON
THE MAP. MAP SCALE$ SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 30 FEET OF I INCH EQUALS 100 FEET
OF THEIR EQUIVALENT.
(b) IF AVAILABIA REPP"ENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO HE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT.
(a) IF DMIN ATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SUE67S
RELEVANT TO TUB PLACENdENT OF THE DELDMATION LINE.
(d) ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORUWATER MANAGMAENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
(4) WHAT I5 LAND USE OF SUTRROUN13ING PROPERTY?
(1) IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL? Smkwv sower
;t 2m
9I010D AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION UTTIM, IF APPLICABLE.
NO'T'E: W2~ MANDS OR WATERS OF THE US MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1. ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT.
2. ErIHHR THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
CIERTTFICATION, AND
3. (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE NORTH
CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGE,MBN'T STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WrM THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGFUENT
PROGRAM,
DV NM'WAGENTS SIGNATURE DATE
(AGENTS SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
TIM OWNER 15 PROVIDED).
SEPA 00 0:54
Subject: SEPA 00 0254
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:47:46 -0500
From: Jennifer Frye <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Water Quality
To: John Domey <[e-mail]>, Cyndi Bell <[e-mail]>
I've attached a letter that I will be sending out regarding the project
needing a SEPA document. I spoke with Gloria and based on the interim
thresholds and their application, it would appear that a SEPA is needed.
If there is something wrong with the letter or you would rather sent it
out, let me know - I won't be sending it out until Friday.
Cyndi - I left your name and number ( in addition to mine) as contact
person.... if you want it removed., let me know.
Thanks,
jen
Name: SEPA.doc
[SEPA.doc ` Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
Encoding: base64
lDownload Status: Not downloaded with message
I of 1 3/29/00 12:53 PM
I.
March 31, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL Z 097 215 049
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Don Moss
Citizens for Economic Development, Inc.
PO Box 205
Wentworth, NC 27405
SUBJECT: 401 Water Quality Certification
Reidsville Industrial Park
DWQ Project 00 0254
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Moss:
The Division of Water Quality is currently reviewing your plans for the
discharge of fill material and water impoundment into approximately 3971 linear
feet of stream channel and 2.25 acres of wetland in Rockingham County. We
believe that this project will require review by the State Clearinghouse under the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). In accordance with NCAC .01C.0402,
DWQ cannot issue the 401 Certification until the project has received a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) from DWQ and the
EVEIS has been circulated through the State Clearinghouse. Therefore, the
project will be placed on indefinite hold until the State Clearinghouse advises
DWQ that the SEPA review requirements have been met. We will continue to
review the project and make you aware of any concerns through the SEPA review.
Please contact Gloria Putnam, the DWQ SEPA Coordinator, to discuss the
SEPA application and review procedures. Ms. Putnam may be reached at (919)
733-5083, ext. 567. When the NEPA/SEPA process is complete, we recommend
that you notify us so we can reactivate the project.
In addition, by this letter, we are also notifying the US Army Corps of
Engineers that this project should be placed on hold.
Additionally, this Office sent a request for more information on March 17,
2000. Please keep in mind that this information is still needed for review of your
401 Certification Application.
If you believe that this decision is in error, please call Mrs. Jennifer Frye at
[phone] or Ms. Cyndi Bell at [phone] to discuss the matter.
e
Reidsville Industrial Park
Page 2
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
WQ Regional Supervisor
cc: Denise Poulos, ECS Ltd., 5-C Dundas Circle, Greensboro, NC 27407
Neal Tucker, Stimmel Associates, P.A., 305 W. Fourth St., Suite 1-A, Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Raleigh Field Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Ms. Gloria Putnam
Wetlands/401 Unit Central Office
Central Files
WSRO
/* 1-11, ? ?IJL
April 17, 2000
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Attn: Ms. Jennifer Frye
Re: Request for Additional Information
Reidsville Industrial Park
DWQ Project 000254
Rockingham County
Ms. Frye:
APR 18
- WETLANDS
"'A-TER QUAUT'
I am writing as a follow up to our telephone conversation of today regarding the above referenced project
and to address two additional issues raised by Larry Coble of your office, that were not covered in my
previous letter.
The first issue relates to stormwater management for the site. The stormwater management plan for the
site has not been completed. Since a major part of our proposed stream and wetland impacts relates to
the location of the ponds, we will wait until we have a better indication of whether the permit will be issued
to proceed with the design of the stormwater management ponds. We are fully aware that the permit will
have onsite stormwater management as a condition.
The second issue relates whether the project will be subject to SEPA review. Denise Poulos with
Engineering Consulting Services is handling this.
If you have any other questions or need additional information please call either myself at [phone]
or Denise Poulos at [phone].
Sincerely:
. J. Neal Tucker, P.E.
Stimmel Associates, P.A.
Cc: File
Denise Poulos
Don Moss
John Dorney
STIMMEL
ASSOCIATES, P.A.
LANCeCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNIN6
CIVIL EN6INEERIN6
305 HE5T FOURTH 5T., SUITE I-A
HIN5TON-SALEM, NC 27101
PHONE [phone]'1
FAX [phone]q
5TI M MEL A550CIATE5, I.A.
LAND5CAFE ARCHITECTURE • LAND PLANNING • CML ENGINEERING
305 WWT FOURTH STREET, SUITE 1-A WINSTON-SALEM. NC 27101
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
ATTN: Mr. John Dorney
TO: NCDENR - DWQ
Wetland / 401 Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
? PRINTS ? CALCULATIONS ? BASE DRAWINGS
? REPRODUCIBLES ?0 INFORMATION ? CORRESPONDENCE
? ORIGINALS ? SPECIFICATIONS ? CHANGE ORDER / ADDENDUM
SENT VIA: ® ATTACHED O UNDER SEPARATE COVER
?0 U.S. MAIL ? OVER NIGHT SERVICE ? BY HAND ? FOR PICK-UP
? FAX # # OF PAGES TOTAL=
DATE : March 23, 2000
JOB NO.: 99139
PROJECT: Reidsville Industrial Park
? DISKETTES
? EMAIL WITH ATTACHMENTS
11
? E-MAIL
COPIES SHEET DATED DESCRIPTION
REMARKS, COMMENTS, & DETAILS:
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Attached you will find a copy of a letter to Mr. John Thomas addressing justification for stream and wetland
impacts proposed on the above referenced project. Please call me at [phone] if you have any
questions.
\ 'T
t.
t% tI
IF NOTED ENCLOSURES ARE NOT RECEIVED, PLEASE NOTIFY US.
COPIES TO: File BY: J. Neal Tucker, P.E.
March 21, 2000 --
l,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
6512 Falls of Neuse Road Q ?C?a
Suite 105
°`•?,
Attn: . John Thomas (V,"
Re: Stream and Wetland Impacts at the Reidsville Industrial Park Project
Rockingham County, NC
Dear Mr. Thomas:
I am writing in response to your request for additional information to support justification of the proposed
stream and wetland impacts for the above referenced project. This request has come to my attention
through Denise Poulos with Engineering Consulting Services, LTD.
The proposed Phase 1 impacts are due to a road crossing and three new ponds. This road serves as the
main road through the park and connects the lots on the north and south sides of the existing stream.
The road is an integral part of the industrial park and represents a small portion of the overall impacts.
The purpose of the ponds is to satisfy stormwater management requirements for both the City of
Reidsville and the NCDENR - Division of Water Quality (anticipated 401 water quality certification
condition). We are proposing that the stormwater management requirements be satisfied using these
"common" ponds for practicality, economics and land use efficiency. The City of Reidsville's ordinance
requires reduction of the post-developed runoff rate to pre-developed rates. DWQ rules require 85% TSS
removal for water quality.
DESIGN CONCEPT
The design concept for stormwater management for this project involves using two of the existing ponds
and building three new ones. The ponds will be designed to meet the requirements of the City of
Reidsville's Stormwater Management Ordinance, and the NCDENR - Division of Water Quality. We
propose to place dams in the existing streams as shown on the Preliminary Stormwater Management
Plan to build the ponds. Every effort was made to minimize the impacts to streams and wetlands.
References will be made to specific ponds and lots that may be keyed to the Preliminary Stormwater
Management Plan attached.
Pond A / Pond B System: Pond A impact was minimized by maximizing the use of Pond B for water
quality treatment and peak reduction. By maximizing the use of Pond B, the dam for Pond A is lower
resulting in the shortest possible stream impact.
Pond C / Pond D / Pond E System: Pond D is existing and will be used to the fullest extent possible for
water quality treatment and peak reduction. Pond C is designed to provide treatment for all areas above
the park roadway (offsite and Lots 3A, 3B, & 3C). The Pond C dam and the roadway are one fill section
which minimizes stream impacts when compared to separate fill sections for each. This fill section,
however crosses two streams within approx. 150 feet. This fill section could be moved downstream
STIMMEL
ASSOCIATES, P.A.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
305 WEST FOURTH ST., SUITE I-A
HINSTON-5ALEM, NO 21101
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
i
w
toward the Pond E dam which would minimize the stream impact, but it would cause water to be
impounded offsite onto the adjacent property. It would also cause water to be impounded on Lot 4 unless
a substantial amount of fill material is brought in to raise the grades of this lot. Pond C cannot be feasibly
eliminated. There is an existing sanitary sewer outfall that parallels the stream impounded by Pond E,
and crosses the stream running from Pond D to Pond E. The outfall is far enough off the stream that it is
not affected by Pond E. If Pond C were eliminated, however the surface area and the storage capacity
of Pond E would have to be increased to account for its loss. To do so would impound water over the
sewer outfall where it crosses the stream between Pond D and Pond E. The Pond E dam cannot be
moved far enough downstream to avoid the above problem since doing so would require part of the dam
to be build on the adjacent property. Even if Pond C could be eliminated, only a small portion of the total
impact at Stream Impact #2 would be eliminated, since the majority of the impact length is due to the
roadway width and not the width of the dam.
ALTERNATIVES
Alternatives to the proposed design concept of in-stream ponds could take on several forms including: 1)
off-line or out-of-stream common ponds, 2) underground storage systems for each site, 3) onsite ponds
for each site, etc. I believe that using large, in-stream ponds provide a more practical, economic and
efficient solution to meet the requirements for the following reasons.
Off-line common ponds will be far more expensive Jo build than in-line ponds due to the fact that the
excavation-to-storage volume ratio will be much higher. The primary cost factor in building a pond is the
excavation cost. For the in-line ponds the excavation volume will be that required to obtain dam and core
trench fill material, which will be a very small percentage of the total storage volume of the pond.
Conversely, the off-line ponds will have to be excavated into the existing slopes with top of dam levels
being several feet below existing grade on the upslope sides. This will drive the excavation-to-storage
percentage very high. There is also insufficient area between the existing stream and the proposed lot
lines to build off-line ponds. To dedicate adequate common area for building off-line ponds would reduce
the amount of sellable land for development. Another factor will be the increased cost of storm drainage
outfall lines required to convey the stormwater to the ponds, in lieu of releasing the stormwater into the
streams as would be done otherwise. The net effect of the off-line pond option is substantially higher
construction costs and reduced revenues from land sales.
An onsite pond for each site is an option for both peak reduction and water quality management. These
ponds will be much more expensive to build than the common ponds for a couple of reasons. First of all,
these ponds will be located along the lower perimeter areas of the lots as close to the discharge point as
possible. Pond construction in these areas will result in higher excavation-to-storage ratios for the
reasons stated above. The cost efficiency of individual ponds will be much than for common ponds due
to having to build many small storage containers as opposed to a few larger ones. More acreage will be
required for a given size user since that site will have to accommodate a pond. The net effect of the
individual onsite ponds is higher construction costs for the purchaser of the lots, which could in turn drive
the competitive market value of the lots down as a result of having to compete with other parks without
such requirements.
Underground stormwater storage systems for each lot are an option for peak reduction stormwater
management on individual sites, however they are not recognized by DWQ as an acceptable water
quality treatment device. Other approved water quality treatment devices or measures would have to be
used in conjunction with the underground storage system. For small systems (2 to 5 acre sites), the cost
of an underground system can range from three to five times that of a properly sized pond for peak
reduction stormwater management. I would expect comparable order of magnitude cost multiples on
large systems such as the ones we would be dealing with, then the costs of the water quality components
would have to be added on top of that. The net effect of the underground storage systems with a water
quality component for each lot is the same as for individual onsite ponds, except to a much higher
degree.
To recap, the stormwater management option proposed was chosen because it is the most logical and
the most economical. All of the other options will result in substantially higher construction costs, and
M
V
potentially lower market value for the lots. I would also expect that the larger ponds would provide for a
higher degree of water quality treatment than smaller ponds placed on each site.
CONCLUSION
The layout of the ponds may appear to be random and unimportant, but the explanation above shows that
the layout has been well thought out and is very much dependent upon all the components being where
they are proposed at their intended sizes. Any option other than in-stream ponds will impose tremendous
additional cost burdens on the project and / or reduce the competitive market value of the land.
Elimination of any of the ponds would prevent the project as a whole from meeting the above stated
requirements of water quality and peak reduction. Elimination of any of the ponds would also cause
adjacent properties to be inundated and the sanitary sewer outfall to be under an upper reach of the
pond, neither of which can be tolerated.
If you have any questions or would like to further discuss any of the above issues please call me at (336)
723-1067.
Sincerely:
gy6z," c
5. Neal Tucker, P.E.
Stimmel Associates, P.A.
Attachments
cc: File
Don Moss
Denise Poulos
John Dorney
Jennifer Frye
00 t%%?11111 fit,
SEAL =
= 14985 = -
Ms t.?;n
1
dV,
NCDENR
March 17, 2000
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
----
JAMES B. HUNT JR. Certified Mail Z 097 215 049
rl
I r f ?V ??
GOVERNOR Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Don Moss MAR 2 0 2000
BILL HOLMAN Citizens for Economic Development, Inc.
SECRETARY PO Box 205 ?V 775ws riozi'
Wentworth, NC 27405 'T` 0uAtiE' SECTIOn'
KERR T. STEVENS SUBJECT: Request for Additional Information
DIRECTOR Reidsville Industrial Park
DWQ Project 00 0254
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Carter:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill
material and water impoundment into approximately 3971 linear feet stream channel
and 2.25 acres of wetland in Rockingham County for the purpose of commercial
development. Insufficient evidence is present in our files to conclude that your project
must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below,
we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A
NCAC 2H .0507(e) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive
this additional information. We are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U. S.
Army Corps of Engineers place your project on administrative hold.
(1) Please provide us with information supporting your position that states
your project must be constructed as planned and that you have no
practicable alternative to placing fill in these waters and/or wetlands.
Documentation such as maps, narratives, economic analyses, that you
can supply to address alternative designs for your project may be
helpful in our review of your 401 Certification request.
(2) Please provide documentation detailing you position that the project
has been designed such that adverse impacts to surface waters have
been minimized and existing uses have been protected to the best of
your ability.
SSS WAUGHTOWN STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27107
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
_. r?ee..e......r.. i A-1-A-r A-InN EMPLOYER - SON. RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER

Reidsville Industrial Park
Page 2
(3) On-site stormwater management will be required as a condition of any
DWQ approval. Please provide the appropriate plans and
specifications for your proposed water quality ponds.
(4) The project will also require compensatory mitigation as described in
15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). Your application references the employment
of James Matthew, HARP, for the purpose of preparing a mitigation
plan. If on-site mitigation is found to be viable, please provide the
detailed mitigation plan for construction, restoration, and monitoring,
as outlined in Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Guidelines,
NCDENR-DWQ. If a suitable area is not found on-site, please
examine the possibilities of local (off-site) mitigation and provide any
supporting documentation. If payment into the Wetlands Restoration
Program is determined to be your final and only option, please submit
written verification from Mr. Ron Ferrell that WRP will conduct this
mitigation.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending one
copy of this information to me and one copy to John R. Dorney, 4401 Reedy
Creek Road, Raleigh, NC 27607. If we do not hear from you in three weeks, we will
assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project
as withdrawn. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mrs.
Jennifer Frye or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
WQ Regional Supervisor
cc: Denise Poulos, ECS LTD, 5-C Dundas Circle, Greensboro, NC 27407
Raleigh Field Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands/401 Unit Central Office
Central Files
WSRO
reidsville industrial park, 00 0254
Subject: reidsville industrial park, 00 0254
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 15:51:43 -0500
From: Jennifer Frye <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Water Quality
To: Cyndi Bell <[e-mail]>
stick this one on hold, just like all the others.
Without going into too much detail right now (I'm cold, tired and
soaking wet!), I just met at the site today with the Corps and the
consultant and even John Thomas said that the Corps will be looking for
some alternatives analysis/avoidance/minimization for this project.
Real nice bottomland hardwoods, from what we could tell with the rain
pouring down. Made it easy to see the hydrology, though! I'll get a
letter out tomorrow.
Later,
Jen
1 of 1 3/17/00 9:16 AN
r l
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical - Construction Materials - Environmental
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetland/401 Unit
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification Application
Reidsville Industrial Park
Reidsville, Rockingham County, North Carolina,
ECS Project G-2339C
Dear Mr. Dorney:
R E~ C `w ;. .
N
6 rl 9

Cgavt' al Ofti
February 10, 2000

Please find seven copies of the Pre-Construction Notification Application for the above referenced site.
The site is approximately 307 acres in area and is located on Sands Road in Reidsville (Figure 1). The
site is being developed with the Reidsville Industrial Park.
Tributaries of Little Troublesome Creek cross the site. As shown on the Stormwater Management
Preliminary Layout, several roadways and water quality ponds must be constructed in order to develop
the site. The roads/ponds will cross the streams in three locations. Stream Impact #1 is related to the
construction of a water quality pond. The dam will impact approximately 150 linear feet of stream
channel. The dam and the resulting impoundment will impact approximately 0.51 acres of wetlands.
Stream Impact #2 is related to the construction of a roadway and a water quality pond. Two streams are
located in this area. The road/dam have been combined to reduce impacts to streams and wetlands. The
road/dam will impact approximately 545 linear feet of stream channel. The road crossing and the
resulting impoundment will impact approximately 0.31 acres of wetlands. Stream Impact #3 is related to
the construction of a water quality pond. The dam will impact approximately 150 linear feet of stream
channel and 1.92 acres of wetlands. We are requesting a Water Quality Certification for the impact to
845 linear feet of stream channel and 2.74 acres of wetlands related to the construction of roads and
water quality ponds.
We have contacted Mr. Todd St. John of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to inform him of
our intent to identify a viable area on-site to conduct mitigation. We are planning to contract with Mr.
James Mathews with HARP to prepare a mitigation plan. We will forward this plan to you for your
5-C Dundas Circle, Greensboro, NC 27407 - [phone] - Fax [phone]
Offices: Washington, DC; Baltimore, MD; Frederick, MD; Richmond, VA; Norfolk, VA; Fredericksburg, VA; Danville, VA;
Roanoke, VA; Williamsburg, VA; Raleigh/Durham, NC; Wilmington, NC; Charlotte, NC; Greensboro, NC; Greenville, SC; Atlanta, GA
i
P
k
Section 401 Permitting
Reidsville Industrial Park
ECS Project G-2339C
approval. If there are no suitable areas on-site to conduct mitigation, we propose making payment to the
WRP.
Several ponds are present on the site. In order to remove 85% TSS, it will be necessary to retrofit these
ponds and construct several others. Mr. Neal Tucker with Stimmel Associates is currently preparing the
stormwater management plan for the site. This information will be forwarded to you for your approval.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions concerning this request or f
additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Denise M. Poulos, LSS
Principal Scientist
Attachment: Pre-Construction Notification Application
$475.00 Application Fee
2
Division of Water Quality
MEMO From: EN V R f_ Date VI/ 25/oa
To. IJ._c3_L4Aits 0?1or- Subject: Exr?eT p,? s
<S ?D ?4r__ C a U
S V r_Aj c -S o f
?oo ?? t y p iv r- L' o-?Q y Am
240

A LF-KWA
A'El?
T*?GA_
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Telephone [phone]

lip
~774 '
\ q South Par i i
00
^ B'\ ?MO??F• • ?• I' - - isposa jl4'\
It bvr'
Com
?' B00 ?? Nf V!/
zopo C\
986
x V
opo
• \ ?? ?' T
//?\??\??\ \ ?`? ? ?•' ass ? 2s'ss u 0 !' ?' - --- i.J°?, 2 s
8.00
/ n
ZZI
•T, 2600
All A
FIGURE 1
REFERENCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SITE LOCATION MAP
REIDSVILLE, NC QUADRANGLE LTD
DATED 1972, REVISED 1994 REIDSVILLE INDUSTRIAL PARK
ENGINEERING REIDSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1"= 2,000 CONSULTING
SERVICES,LTD ECS PROJECT G-2339
llc?
(.C
C
C
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: - S ti A? Date:
Applicant/Owner: r ivt F- C County:
Investigator: % State: ?r G
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: ?? / !/NB foPece
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? s Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. _i->nCUS C?{LS?c' f1G f3 ,Et 9.
2. ?N?CG?? Z/r/?C?Ur Cf1 /V 6N 6i 6 10-

/?XrC?l?rtc?' i7
3.
'rCs?C V/jVF?G_
11.
4. 7y)?n&je gTYP9Cr? /UA ?/ 12.
IZZ
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC ?O D/O
(excluding FAC )
Remarks:
UcC?r?T/CJ-Z7 /`t'/2-?Gr ???T?c,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
h
l Ph
t
A
i Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches"
o
o
_
er
a grap
s
_ Other
V _No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
-Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
-
d
W
tl
i
an
s
e
n
-Drainage Patterns
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Field Observations: Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
-
Depth of Surface Water: - (in.) water-stained Leaves
_
Depth to Free Water in Pit: S (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
L•?ETGhi?`'? /ty???? -rs=??C/5?'TC'r?S /9.i?E ?.??S?JT
0-_ r, . r_ //i _ !l 0' i A. "J?A / Pane 2 of 2
3UILJ r,vc {_.L. - ". - -
Map Unit Name / nn L
lo
?zh //
Drainage Class: ?!'e' i
e'
(Series and Phase):
C
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): TyPiL F/Ut?i9(? ( r_ ?7,tS Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Horizon) Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol -Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor -
-Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:
2vcQ
S
.sc
o<
.
Wt 1 LANLJ Lit I tKI1411NA 1 lulu
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es
Hydric Soils Present? es Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No (ED
Remarks:
Til E T?f 2 EE CAF ? c&17-o e /,3 f o r ?J?cSCu>-, i ti E S•f?r?i v(57 fie"
rs ticr ?.4:c?vd?r? i,7 1 40 c r? 0 2:? ,
Annrnved by HQUSACE 3/92
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: eC u, ??? J:? ?r9? Date: /h9?G /471
Applicant/Owner: r. County: 'w
Investigator: - / State: /VC
it
? Yes Community ID: -?. CCJG?
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the s
e
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes N Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. SYrh OOL, FEET?(JS hll__ j_ 0'6 4- 9.
9
&
?
2. L? rJ'Z, i1 4/Z,? s
, e
-,, FVC 10.
??
?
,
_
f
3. /316/DCLr 4 I//21?iNi.9,y? `zi'T_ ?fIGGv' ?`" 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAG /DO d/
d
(excluding FAC -)
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge /Inundated
-
-Aerial Photographs
Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches'
Water Marks
_
No Recorded Data Available Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: (9-6 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: S[;2{{!r (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: l (in.) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
(?ETG9 v2> -2 ! Y./- e?S ig2E ?St?c ?T?
D„ ^ . //_ ---n 1 T/1_ 1 pane 7 of 7
SUIL3 r[w ... nc. {mot- r ? --
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): COclli -Lec c Sr CT Gc Z22
Drainage Class:

<'
' Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ?YP?I FLU I/f} A-
Qce^
Profile Description:
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Horizon) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
? - ? ? ? E S X09 ih
?_

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol -Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor -
-Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
ZReducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:
n
Sa/G ?v?/ri3TO2S Gf%C?G ?fSS?2l?e?/

WETLAND UEIt_KMINAIIUN
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? a No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? es No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? es No
Remarks:
TnE 7h? Gv?rrJ9U?? C2ir?/? sec ?02?SrNrr T ? ??i???yG ?o,Nr .<S
Approved by HQUSACE 3192
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
0 Date: 1J142C,4 9
Project/Site: County:
Applicant/Owner:
State: Nr.-
Investigator:

?
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es Community ID: gip- 3 CL?A?
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es " Transect ID:
Plot ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum indicator
1. Z'nw/cr'-? Sf}?/biD,GB _ ?&,- 9.
2. 1-6;U, bl"692 Si ri c?G<< /ug Y? c ?- 10.
3. ri4Q',411yjS L2ec1_1,01J,U,1 F/JL 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC p
?
(excluding FAC) O
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches'
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
Z -Water Marks
_
ocorded Data Available -Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
-
in Wetlands
P
tt
a
erns
-Drainage
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Field Observations: Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
-
Depth of Surface Water: ?- (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 7 a (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: / O (in.) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

/? _ rL .. //' .,.1 / Yd a :R panty 9 of 9
JVILJ
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ?CiC? r SGT Lc,?rJ
Drainage Class: ^ G/ti

Taxonomy (Subgroup): rv?i/U!/? GaJG>J.GS Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Horizon) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

Q
- ? S`? 2
?X
y /0,1 e4
•
?,
D
/y
/ a - cZ J - /0 k DDB
.2 ?i
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions
4 -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
ztelr
WETLAND DETERMINAIIVN
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? % No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? es No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
is L.cc,91?tJ
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
e? Date: Qc
Project/Site: L County:
Applicant/Owner:
- State: /V
Investigator: D
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? N Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Qes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
I
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. 1nn;ilC?? Ti??Cn>irr) !/iti?? 9.
2. ?Ji?iS`/r1J-v?llrrifJ?f.,?T21!C 10.
3. C- 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC -) --,
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge -Inundated
-
Aerial Photographs -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches'
-
Other -Water Marks
_
Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
-
tl
d
i
W
an
s
n
e
-Drainage Patterns
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Field Observations: Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: > 1 (in.) _-Water-Stained Leaves
7 a
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in)
-Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
G?cT?1?4? 1?/?2c?o?? -?i?%?•?`ro2-f' ??? ;L-O? ?2c?sPUT
/,_ /-?-.,.// _ r_,n DeD'4- 110 U panw7nf2
SVILS rI V c-,ao. r. i --- r ILI

??
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): P? Si

G? GC??/l/

Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): 7 Y?iC f /lJl/? Q X?T? Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Horizon) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
(-):./a D-T /?/? FYI
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol -Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor -
-Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks

Remarks:
f}/G2<G So/C L,tJ?CUI?c C ? ' , ??> -
YYC 1 L.AIVU UC 1 r-MV11"M 11V1\
(Circle) (Circle)
[Hdrophyfic Vegetation Present? N
land Hydrology Present? Yes
ric Soils Present? Yes o Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes Co
Remarks:
7?6 T72cc
/VOT Goc-,-2r ,0 ?cc. 7 -Z L-A
3/92
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: e Date: ' C
Applicant/Owner: i County:
Investigator: I State: A2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? e Community ID: ??? ClJ2
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? o Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
1. ?rJ.tJl?c24 J14p001u "nf V/ A,)G
2. _ S 1Z,91x 4e07&lizujcoLis V/tiC ?- 10. _
3. AL-69 Ro"Urrl 1'letc FAC 11.
4. &TUCA /UL I2,t S << Fi?C 12.
5. 13.
6. ?pPA7GLS l}^!>4 LL f ?i9fL.J f 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC r} 2 a/
(excluding FAC -) Q
Remarks:
?/hG 1?it/i,va,vT l/csGT?9'r?o'J ,?s .?y?P-?P•{Y?/.L
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Inundated
-
_ Aerial Photographs Saturated in Upper 12 Inches'
_ Other
XNo Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
-Drift Lines
_ -Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):

? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
-
(in.)
Depth of Surface Water: water-stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 5.0 f4?C (in.)
' -Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
/
Depth to Saturated Soil: .SUQri9?C (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

T_.n AI10(_ pana2nf7
Map Unit Name /,,
(Series and Phase): Cc cLf-L1 e SiGT? LO/l AJ
Drainage Class: ?G /iUc
Field Observations oll?
Taxonomy (Subgroup): a!, Ic- ?L lJI//9QU?yT. Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Horizon) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
-7. Y,12 ?? 30a? .U
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
l?%DQ ? c ?So ?c rn??U}.-zs2S ?c?c ct?Sc2 Ucc?.
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No
Wedand Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? es No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? es No
Remarks:
TtiE 7-,1,2,G TI/?? G2lTr??i3 .4?G ,DeS??N7? / /f c S/?i?t /??< ??iv>
l.S GoG??c? (01741 /Zl /j U, ':-7 ZZPIA ? . ?J
Aooroved by HQUSACE 3/92

M ? s
\Mu
z WETLAND LINE
" M^Mh
RISER
STRUCTURE
i
I
{
It
?S
CARS
" 1".?
v?. GLlil
J

MMhh,M

PROJECT: REIMALLE NOUSTRIAL PARK JOB" 98164
DESCRIPTION: NORTHERN TRACT DATE 2/8/00 BY: AT
STREAM IMPACT 01 -- 150 LF OF IMPACT SCALE P-40'
I 056 AC OF INLAND ; STREAM IMPACT SHEET I OF 3
J=A. 305 UJIMST ST. SUITE
3SFOUIRTEM,NC21101 I-A "TCN PHONE (36) 1231
St t 1 IMMEL ASSOCIA-M8 ?
LANDBC.AM ARCHII'1<MM - LAND PLA4NWs 9 CIVIL 040NEERMG PAX (336) 923-lobe
;y
i
£Y
iI '
02/10/00 THU 15:30 FAA 810713ul Oa b'fiMm :L eaaut,.
wuuc
I
i
i
}i I
i
i
t
11,01
IO
? i
t
! i g
_ rT-
i
I
t
:
File _ t
i
'700
1 i
t
'GIs
149 ;,
- - ----------
i ?
O '
F ROJEGTs REID8v1 INDMTRIAL PARK
DESCRIPTION: NOWN-M TRA91
gTpeAm Pr M PROFILE-
STI1"lMEL. ASSOCIATES, PA
JOBO 99139
DATE 2/8/00 BY: JNT_
SGA :I" : ".4i
SHEET IA OF 3
Doe US? FOAM eT4 GUM 1-A
MOTGN->lAUK NG 21KH
M424 e3ft)193-Ml

rr'
r
? 5g3
i?
waM tMJ.
T
2.
.....%% w
3 .. w \
1 ..... ......... ....wu..., .,m..w..,. .....w.w. r?w+3?a? ?.....1 ... ?f?`r....1 ?L?.•??? .^?y1..
s r,?
a' 3r
t'? ' z j •r 8 S' 750
t ?a i' Sr t 9
-10
1 ,r 740
? ? #? ? ? ?rg 6 f r
VETL > 8 = ?? ; ^3 r3
' 10 LIE IS ; f ?a,..` P a r?r
11111 1111//??? i; i }s / S r
Abp '1'
` `_ ? gg5 S E r
s° • ?' ? / ? ? ; f' it ?'
.5 ? ? if ? I?/??3(??f ?(? 'ate L..?I ? F j ? '•'a° ; ep ?.
I?? ?.• "" ? ? ` fir' ? ?""r."Ha." ? ! ....,n". re'p'
s r r ,.. "
TOP OF BANK ?f?' ate. tea,"
PROJECT: REIDSVILLE MDUSTRIAL PARK JOB• 98164
DESCRIPTION: NORTHERN TRACT DATE 2/8/00 BY: JNT
STREAM IMPACT »Z -- 545 LF OF IMPACT SCALE P-50'
031 AC OF WETLAND 4 STREAM IMPACT SHEET 2 OF 3
[TO
UNOTCN-SALEM, NC 305 ," 3 ? I I_A
u"T ST I111 DEL ASSOCIATES, P.A- ,q
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • LAND PLo"NG 9 CIVIL E 40MRING FAX [phone]
OZ/10/00 THU 15:31 FAX. [phone] STIMMEL ASSOC.
Lo vUJ
MWAECTs REID6yIL61 INDll6MAL PARK
L)E$CRIPTION: NOI7t'WM TRACT
g 1
ST l tw E L ASSOCIATES, P.A.
JOBS X139
DATE 2/8/00 BY_ AT
SCALE H:I"•40' v:i"¦4'
SHEET ZA OF 3
US MOT powl 1 6r, lUrM 1-A
WHATCN-a iN, M, Na 31101
PH" f 'l%; V3-1061
?....ww. ? www wa?

A s t 3
t
af / f f f
? t f
..'n?
WETLAND LINE
i
f?
r
RISER
STRUCTURE
f?a
mss,.:, .::»'»^'i, ,
jol?
• >, „„.w,>-• - ...."," Nom" •r ?'' / Ss S`
"?„[phone]/ ??? ?? ",•'v'"".. •??" ?.• ...••`?' , r`1 ?r'S? SS;? /?.'
14
PROJECT: REIDSVILLE INDUSTRIAL PARK J050 98164
DESCRIPTION: NORTHERN TRACT DATE 2/8/00 BY: AT
STREAM IMPACT 03 -- 150 LF OF IMPACT SCALE P-40'
_ I 192 AC OF WETLAND 4 STREAM IMPACT SHEET 3 OF 3
iHST, SITE I-A
3 I
St t 1 1 MME L ASSOCIATES, FA. 305 WIEST
LANDSCAPE Amc44r ECr-M - LAND PLANING - GML EWNEERMG PAX [phone]

f 1'/•
,t• t` 1
02./10/00 THU 15:32 FAa 9107231UUU ,'1111 MKL AbbM.
*J VV9

I

I
I

I
I

,

t
,

1

•
•

1 1 1
1
1 1 , 1
I 1 ! I
i i
I i t t

i t
? i 1 I
i I
I
I

t
?
ww
„J ! I i !

1 , i
1 20
t
1
I
i 0

1
j

`

I

t

3 0 M INIS
1

1
I 1
I ?
i
- #

!
, I ! ! f
! I :
i
i
1

!
I
I i
!
i t
' I !
I 1 ! `` 11111 11!/ I

ID ? 71
t

PmaXGT= PREID&VILLS MUSIM-AL PARK
DEGM10TIONs NORTHERN TRACT
ATREAM IMPACT 03 PROFILE
STIMMEL ASSOCIATES, PA
1 At.MVrAIiii!• AMW-LJPPW0- 1? .1 A\t1 wl AA,W&Jm. r.IVll ¦MIAMM OM.
Jose 99139
PATE 2i8i00 SYs JNT
SCALE H•I'¦4O' y1111¦4'
SHEET 3A OF 3
X30 WEST PallWW Sr, GUIIV I-A
wbwmW-aAurt MC "IV
wore ???'n?-IOrI?
etv rasa l ?»a.l?w
d Q t t Q t
m N m ? q N
N ? N
o- do o - _0
D

2 Z
W
g
G
w $

C L] ? Q QQ ? J i

a N N N N

in oo m Sul ,'no
0 o p c; O r o
D
O D
.. W W
W 0
CL.
1Ola
?
? W

4. ? ? ? {? ? to N h r

G d d Q d d Q IL IL
? (4
U*J
O
03
iinn 0

Ifl t
In
0 0 O o d p in o r

O
z
I

D
ci
° D

a o2
oc z° o °'J

N
G Z
S
?QO a a

U) tnN ?? ??
6 Q (QQ? ?QI
N 7 lD 4]
d66 v
r- -0
Q
?z °
Z
D ? D
Q ?
h QQ
O O= 0 O a
m ? Q m
to c

4 ? a a

D
Z

U LU
ILL F4 O

01,

Q O d o
n Q d Q
O N 4T N
It

N
z

OL Z
3
°
a ?
J
a
0 0O.

?-
J ,...1
a a
0O0 o0
7nn M 13099V Imils 690TCZLOTS %V3 9T:CT MU 00/OT/ZO
e/p ?b d
Mill
4? ,.?• ? ? . ? ? ? ? ,? * ?? ?? ? b ?? 11
I It,
[? 6 ?3 ? O9'9SZl SS 94005
leas 3 as
i
`0
I-?{M`
- -
00410
v
Q
f
• ? pd
O!
in nn
eo-al N
4 ri
W
a
to
,off Q + , ? ? ? 4 w
?? a q
FqK l'` 1 1 M 1
v g N
fir • Z
Li w emi cs sooty
L19
? M1 ? 6
.x...

10,
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO February 14, 2002
Regulatory Division
Action ID. 200220054
Mr. Don Moss
Citizens for Economic Development
Reidsville Industrial Park
P.O. Box 205
Wentworth, NC 27405
Dear Mr. Moss:
Reference is made to our letter dated October 17, 2002, concerning your then recent
discharged of fill into 0.10 acre of stream channels to effect the relocation of approximately two
hundred linear feet of unnamed tributaries of Little Troublesome Creek, on the Reidsville
Industrial Park property located off of Sands Road, near Reidsville, in Rockingham County,
North Carolina. These activities, conducted in waters of the United Sates without authorization
by a Department of the Army (DA) permit, are violations of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act
(33 U.S.C. 1311). As a response to this letter you agreed to cease and desist from any further
work in jurisdictional waters or wetlands and to restore the stream channels impacted by your
unauthorized fill activities.
Reference is also made to the site inspection conducted on February 7, 2002, by me at the
site of your unauthorized fill activities. This inspection confirmed that the required restoration
has been completed. The site has also been planted. Accordingly contingent on the successful
establishment of the planted vegetation, we have decided to take no further enforcement action in
this case and consider the matter closed.
If you have any questions, please contact me at the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office at
telephone [phone], ext. 25.
Sincerely,
John T. Thomas, Jr.
Acting Chief, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office
Copies Furnished:
U.S. Attorney
Middle District of North
Carolina
Post Office Box 1858
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Dr. Garland Pardue
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Ronald J. Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
NCDENR
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
State Property Section
North Carolina Department of
Administration
116 West Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
Wetland / 401 Unit
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Ms. Jennifer Frye
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Ms. Denise M. Poulos
Engineering Consulting Services, LTD.
6909 International Drive, Suite 102
Greensboro, NC 27409
0 0O WATF90G
Cl)
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
June 25, 2001
Memorandum To: John Dorney
From: Todd St. John V11-
Subject: Reidsville Industrial Park
Rockingham County
DWQ# 000254
The stormwater management plan appears meet the very long stormwater condition in the 401
WQC. However, the applicant should be reminded that in order to occupy the future phases we need
to approve the plans for these phases per the WQC.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Reidsville Ind. Park
Subject: Reidsville Ind. Park
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:40:40 -0400
From: "Todd St. John" <[e-mail]>
Organization: DWQ Wetlands Unit
To: [e-mail]
CC: "Todd St. John" <[e-mail]>, Jennifer Frye <[e-mail]>
DWQ# 000254
In regards to your letter dated 8/6/01 and our conversation today, it
will be acceptable to meet the stormwater requirements if level
spreaders are constructed to provide diffuse flow for the 2.21 acres of
the substation area not discharging to Ponds A or B. The level spreaders
should be sized to be 70 ft long per 10 cfs of discharge from a 10 year
storm.
Todd St. John, P.E.
Environmental Engineer II
DWQ
Wetlands Unit
1 of 1 8/10/012:41 PIN
August 6, 2001
LAW 9 2mm

NCDENR-Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/ 401 Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Attn: Mr. Todd St. John
Re: Reidsville Industrial Park - Duke Power Electrical Substation Site
Dear Mr. St. John:

4vo(-1.l j
I am writing as a follow-up to our telephone conversation of last Friday, August 3. As we
discussed, Lot 10A of the park is being subdivided to provide a lot for an electrical substation and
telephone equipment. Right-of-way is being dedicated along the southern property line of Lot
10A to access this lot. The private access road, substation pad and telephone pad will all be
covered with gravel (compacted ABC). Areas not receiving gravel will be seeded to reestablish
vegetation. The private road will also provide access for maintenance of the ponds. There will be
no asphalt paving on the access road or the equipment sites. The substation lot totals 9.14 acres
and the road right-of-way totals 2.09 acres.
The attached drawing represents the approximate drainage areas and their dire ' runoff.
Approximately 0.96 acres will flow to Pond B, 2.39 acres will flow to Pond A, a d 2.21 Gres will
flow through areas densely vegetated with weeds and grass prior to reaching th"grounding
woods.
Given the nature of the proposed development of this lot, I am requesting that your office approve
our plan and not require all runoff to be directed through both ponds. Please call me at (336)
723-1067 if you have any questions.
Sincerely: ,p
Neal Tucker, P.E.
Stimmel Associates, P.A.
Attachment
cc: File
Don Moss
Michael Pearce
STIMMEL
ASSOCIATES, P.A.
LANPWAPE ARCMITEGTURE
LAND PLANNING
CAVIL ENGINEERING
305 VEST FOURTH ST., SUITE I-A
WINSTON-SALEM, NG 21101
PHONE (336) "123-1061
FAX (336) 123-I0bq
u6 02 01 11:17a Front Desk 3367231069
Poo,
5TI M M EL A550C1ATE5, P.A.
LANPWAM AIOCFNt XnW . LMD nM MW • CWN. 194MI ERMK;
soowwRouaz?flown MMM wINbR7N-8A1MKNco"
rFam tie) w-um FAX (Zi "7E61M
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Ate: Mr. Todd SL John
TO: NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh. NC 27607
DATE: August 2, 2001
JOB NO.: "138
PROJECT; Reidsvilie Industrial Park
WE ARE SEN XM YOU THE FOi.LOW IN0 ITEANG:
? PRINTS ? CALCULATIONS D BASE DRAMNGS ? Discs
? REPRODuasLEs ?a DEFORMATION 0CORRESPOPONCE ? EMAIL wrm ATTAa*vrrS
? ORIGINALS ? SPECIFICATIONS D OIANGE ORDER / ADDENDUM O
SM VNk: ® ATTA M O UNDER SEPARATE COYER
? U.S. MAIL D OVER NIGHT SERVICE D BY NAND ? FOR PIOC UP ? E-MAIL
FAX #(91973"M 0 OF PAGES TOTAL= 2
COPIES SHEET DATED DESCMPTION
1 Exhibit Drawing of Substation Site
REM ARKS COMMENTS & DETAILS:
Todd:
Attached you will find the above referenced exhibit drawing for an electrical substation site
and telephone equipment site at the Reidsville Industrial Park. The access road is gravel as
are the sites - there will be no paving. Will runoff from these areas be required to go into the
store water ponds? I'll call you after lunch to discuss.
COM TO: File 8Y:
P.1
Aug 02 01 11:17a
Front Desk
3367231069
p.2
LOT 10B
10.81 A. C. f

?r-
f

v
PROPOSED
POND A

PROPOSED I
POND B
LOT 11
6.1 A. C. f
-?Q T 11B
13.7 A. C. +?
PROJECT: 1006%4LLE ND. PARK J0150 01-112
DESCRIPTION: NORT1- M TRACT DATE 8/2/01 BY= JNT
W96TATION SITE B--ALE i"-200'
SWEET 2 OF 2
St IMMEL ASSOCIATES , P.? ?? ?" 21101
F40M (M)123.1067
LANp6cAPE Amcmnac1Ul1E 9 LAND FLA*0b • C& L W40NORM PAX MW 723-IMS
STIMMEL ASSOCIATES, P.A.
LANDSCAPE MCCHff1Xn KS • LAND PLANNING • CML ENGINEERING
306 WEW FOURTH 81 KWr. SWTE 1-A WMIVN-SAWK NC 2 KH 9
Riot* (" 725-toe! FAX (3W 725-1080 r „.a
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Ate: Mr. Todd St. John
TO: NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
AUG
JOB NO.: 99139 "?,,,.??"`?W,Ai'
PROJECT: Reidsville Industrial Park
F?
L
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
? PRINTS ? CALCULATIONS ? BASE DRAWINGS ? DISKFrrEs
? REPRODUCIBLES INFORMATION ? CORRESPONDENCE ? EMAIL WITH ATTACHMENTS
? ORIGINALS ? SPECIFICATIONS ? CHANGE ORDER / ADDENDUM ?
SENT VIA: ® ATTACHED 0 UNDER SEPARATE COVER
? U.S. MAIL ? OVER NIGHT SERVICE ? BY HAND
n Fey A(919) 733-9959 # OF PAGES TOTAL=
? FOR PICK-UP
2
? E-MAIL
COPIES SHEET DATED DESCRIPTION
1 Exhibit Drawing of Substation Site
REMARKS. COMMENTS. & DETAILS:
Todd:
Attached you will find the above referenced exhibit drawing for an electrical substation site
and telephone equipment site at the Reidsville Industrial Park. The access road is gravel as
are the sites - there will be no paving. Will runoff from these areas be required to go into the
stormwater ponds? I'll call you after lunch to discuss.
IF NOTED ENCLOSURES ARE NOT RECEIVED, PLEASE NOTIFY US.
COPIES TO: File BY: J. Neal Tucker, P.E.
LOT 10B
10. 81 A. C. f
T
1
?r-
y

2.
r s

g
f
t } +
f .f {

J/

PROPOSED
POND A
;1 PROPOSED J
POND 8
LOT 11
6.1 A. C. f
?T 11 B
13. 7 A. C. +
PROJECT: REIDSVILLE NO. PARK J050 01-112
DESCRIPTION: NORTHERN TRACT DATE 8/2/01 BY: JNT
WMIATION 811E SCALE I" ¦ 200'
SHEET 2 OF 2
St Il II"E L ASSOCIATES, FA. " ? e NO 21101 I.A
F )W (336) 123-"l
LANDGCAI" 1!: ARC 4TECTLM • LAND M ANdIN3 • CIVIL lN3M RM PAX (336) 123-"1
OF W ATFR
Q Michael F. Easley
o -7 Governor
C William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Q Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
June 25, 2001
Mr. Don Moss
Citizens for Economic Development
P.O. Box 205
Wentworth, NC 27405
Subject: Stormwater Ponds
Phase I
Rockingham, County, NC
DWQ# 000254
Dear Mr. Moss:
This Office is in receipt of the plans dated May 31, 2001 for the stormwater management ponds and
May 7, 2001 for the conceptual plan for the remaining phases at the subject site prepared on your behalf by
Stimmel Associates and submitted to the Division on June 18, 2001. Staff from the Wetlands Unit reviewed the
plans and found them acceptable. Please note that the stormwater management plans for the future phases
must also be approved by this Office before any buildings on those sites are occupied per the 401 Water
Quality Certification dated May 3, 2001. Please note that this approval shall not be construed as an approval of
the dam design for Dam Sa
fety purposes.
71
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Todd St. John at [phone].
n er
J R. Dorney
e ands Unit Supe isor
cc: Mr. Todd St. John, Wetlands Unit
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Neil Tucker, Stimmel Assoc., 305 W. Fourth St., Suite 1-A, Winston Salem, NC 27101
File
t
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
hone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/

o?Cl? W a r?Rpc
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Memorandum To:
From
Subject:
June 25, 2001
John Dorney
Todd St. John 6
Reidsville Industrial ark
Rockingham County
DWQ# 000254
The stormwater management plan appears meet the very long stormwater condition in the 401
WQC. However, the applicant should be reminded that in order to occupy the future phases we need
to approve the plans for these phases per the WQC.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), ham://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/

June 13, 2001
JUN 18 ,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Attn: Mr. Todd St. John
Re: Reidsville Industrial Park
Stormwater Management Plan Review Comments
Dear Todd:
I am writing in response to your review comments relating to the above referenced project. My
responses are as follows:
1. Permanent Water Quality Pool, Temporary Water Quality Pool: - The original submittal
for Pond A does meet the (SA/DA) criteria specified in the NCDENR Stormwater Best
Management Practices Manual, April 1999. The 4.8 feet depth shown on the design
spreadsheet is the average depth. In complying with Item #3 of your comments, we have
increased the surface area even more than originally provided, so this should not be an
issue. I have included revised design calculations for Pond A.
2. Forebay: - You and I discussed leaving off the forebay baffles for Ponds A & B before I
submitted the original package since they are designed as a single system. Pond B is
essentially the forebay for the system. The drawings have not been changed with
respect to forebay baffles.
3. Vegetative Shelf: - The drawings have been revised to drop the shelf below permanent
pool elevation. Three prints of each revised pond grading plan are attached.
4. Butyl Rubber Seals: - I am not sure of the life expectancy of these seals, however I would
expect it to be as long as any other component of the outlet structure. The drawing
details specify that all joints be parged inside and out with non-shrink grout. This grout
will provide protection of the sealant from the elements.
5. Operation and Maintenance Agreement: - The signed agreement was mailed to your
office on May 23, however I have attached a copy to this letter.
6. Private Systems: - I have redlined approximate locations and sizes for the referenced
future ponds.
STIMMEL
ASSOCIATES, P.A.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
LAND PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
305 WEST FOURTH ST., 54JITE I-A
HINSTON-SALEM, NG 2-7101
PHONE 036) -123-106-1
FAX (336) -723-1064
Please contact me by phone at [phone] or by e-mail at ntucker -stimmelaa.com if you
have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely.-
Neal Tucker, P.E.
Stimmel Associates, P.A.
Attachments
cc: File
5TIMMEL A550CIRTE5;- .A.
LANDSCAPE MOiffECnM • LAND PLANNING • CML ENGINEERING
506 WEST FOURTH 91 M SUITE 1-A WMd1ON4MUS K NC 27101
MVW MM 725-1067 FAX MM 725-MG
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Ate: Mr. Todd St. John
TO: NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
DATE; May 23, 2001
JOB NO.: 99139
PROJECT: Reidsville Industrial Park
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
? PRINTS ? CALCULATIONS ? BASE DRAWINGS ? DISKETTES
? REPRODUCIBLES Q INFORMATION ? CORRESPONDENCE ? EMAIL WITH ATTACHMENTS
? ORIGINALS ? SPECIFICATIONS ? CHANGE ORDER J ADDENDUM ?
SENT VIA: O ATTACHED O UNDER SEPARATE COVER
Q U.S. MAIL ? OVER NIGHT SERVICE ? BY HAND
? FAX 1 # OF PAGES TOTAL=
? FOR PICK-UP ? E-MAIL
COPIES SHEET DATED DESCRIPTION
1 Operation and Maintenance Manual
RAM ARKS. COMMENTS $ DETAILS:
Todd:
Attached you will find the above referenced Operation and Maintenance Manual. Do not
hesitate to call me if you need any additional information.
IF NOTED ENCLOSURES ARE NOT RECEIVED, PLEASE NOTIFY US.
COPIES TO: File BY: J. Neal Tucker, P.E.
C)
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
PERMANENT WET DETENTION POND
REIDSVILLE INDUSTRIAL PARK - PONDS A. B & D
(PROJECT NAME)
MAY 17, 2001
(DATE)
POND OWNER: CITIZENS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC
CONTACT PERSON: DON MOSS
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 205
WENTWORTH, NC 27375
PHONE NUMBER: [phone]
RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR ALL MAINTENANCE ITEMS: CITIZENS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC
POND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE -Routine maintenance shall include minor upkeep such as mowing, debris removal,
minor slope repair, periodic inspections, inspection of the valves and gates, tree and brush removal, and annual
inspections. These maintenance items may be performed by the owner without the review of a Professional
Engineer.
NON-ROUTINE MAINTENANCE - Non-routine maintenance shall include such Items as sediment dean-out,
channel stabilization, problems regarding the principal spillway conduits, emergency spillways, dam failure, and
seepage. These items require a Registered Professional Engineer to prepare a plan and/or details and to certify
completion of the maintenance. All revisions and repairs to permanent runoff control structures other than the
dam and its appurtenances shall be done in accordance with CITY OF REIDSVILLE guidelines and
specifications, NCDENR BMP's Manual and good engineering judgement. The dams of ponds A, B and D are
under the jurisdiction of the NCDENR Division of Land Resources - Land Quality Section. Modifications and/or
repairs to the dam and/or its appurtenances that become necessary shall be done in strict accordance with the
North Carolina Dam Safety Law of 1967 only after the proposed work has been approved and permitted through
the State Dam Safety Office.
1. Monthly, or after every rainfall.
A. Mowing of side slopes will be accomplished according to the season. Maximum grass height
will be 9". (Routine)
B. Remove debris from the trash rack. (Routine)
C. Check and clear the drawdown orifice of any obstructions. (Routine)
D. Check the pond side slopes; remove trash; repair eroded areas before the next rainfall. (Routine)
II. Every 6 months, or after major storm event (more than 2 inches of rainfall)
A. Inspect the collection system (i.e., catch basins, piping, grassed swales) for proper
functioning. Clear accumulated trash from basin grates and basin bottoms, and check
piping for obstructions. (Routine)
B. Pond inlet pipes will be checked for scour, rip-rap will be replaced, and broken
pipes will be repaired. (Non-routine)
C. Check the operation of the drain valve. All valves should be operated from the fully closed
to the fully open position. (Routine)
D. Remove trees and brush from embankment surfaces and vegetated spillways. (Routine)
iIll. Yearly
A. Remove accumulated sediment from the bottom of the outlet structure. Check rip-rap and
replace if necessary. (Non-routine)
B. Check pond depth at various points in the pond. If the average depth of the sediment is below the
normal pool elevation shown below then the sediment will be removed to at least the original design
depth. (Non-routine).
Sediment Depth Below Top of Sediment
Qom Normal Pool Elevation
A 4.80 Feet 709.60
B 6.20 Feet 731.10
D 9.25 Feet 736.25
C. Check riser and barrel for improper alignment, elongation and displacement of joints, cracks,
leaks, loss of protective coating, corrosion and blockage; repair as required. Any repairs to the riser
or barrel requires a permit from the Dam Safety Section. (Non-routine)
D. Check the emergency spillway and repair as necessary - Pond A only - Ponds B & D have no
emergency spillways. (Non-routine)
Miscellaneous Items
Excessive plant growth, algae blooms, odors, discoloration, perceived animal
pests, etc. should be addressed on an as needed basis. Solutions to these types of problems should be non-
chemical and deemed safe for drinking water supply reservoir application.
Owner: Date: a
OF I
I, _3`f?c.? ?rt2 > • T• ?CX , a Notary Public of the County of
State of North Carolina, hereby certify that
Appeared personally before me this day ar
By him.
duly swdrn acknowledged that the above form was executed
.boo t
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this day of Maw
, ;?9A9
NM?MNNNN????
Notary
G?..?a) ?, '? ..•..«
1'
My Commission expires %0TA#9y 0
pos?oVBLIC :v r
J

Project: Reidsville Industrial Park - Northern Tract - Pond A
Project No.: 99139
Designed By: CHB
Checked By: JNT Date: 2/2/00
Revised: 6/13/01
WATER QUALITY POND DESIGN
Total Project Site Area = 74.27 acres
On-Site Drainage Area to Pond = 74.27 acres
On-Site Proposed Impervious Area = 51.99 acres
On-Site Future Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Total On-Site Impervious Area = 51.99 acres
Off-Site Drainage Area to Pond =
Offsite Impervious Area =
Offsite Future Impervious Area =
Total Offsite Impervious Area =
WATERSHED INFORMATION
Watershed = N/A
Classification = N/A
70.00% On-Site Impervious Percentage
0.00 acres
0.00 acres
0.00 acres
0.00 acres 0.00% Offsite Impervious Percentage
Total Watershed Area to Pond = 74.27 acres
Graded Area to Pond = 0.00 acres
Temporary Sediment Storage Used = N
Temporary Sediment Storage = 0.50 in/ac
Permanent Sediment Storage = 0.125 in/ac
Composite Impervious Percentage = 70.00%
Permanent Water Quality Pool Depth (3'min.) = 4.80 FT
Surface Area / Drainage Area Ratio = 2.14%
Temporary Water Quality Depth to be Controlled = 1.0 Inch
Elevation at Bottom of Pond = 708.00
Elevation at Bottom of PSS = 708.00
Elevation at Bottom of PWQ = 708.00
Elevation at Bottom of TWQ = 714.40
Elevation at Top of TWQ = 716.90
Elevation at Emergency Spillway = 719.71
Elevation at Top of Dam = 721.40
Invert of Barrel = 706.00
Surface Area = 11494 Square Feet
Surface Area= 11494 Square Feet
Surface Area = 11494 Square Feet
Surface Area = 72440 Square Feet
Surface Area = 83033 Square Feet
Elevation at Bottom of Pond = 708.00
Elevation at Bottom of TWQ = 714.40
Surface Area= 11494 Square Feet
Surface Area = 72440 Square Feet
Allow 75% of Basin Volume To Water Quality Orifice =
OKI
305 West Fourth 5treet, Suite 1-A
5timmel A55ociate5, P.A. Winston 5alem, NC 27101
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

Elevation at Bottom of PSS = 708.00
Elevation at Middle of PSS = 711.20
Elevation at Top of PWQ= 714.40
OK
PERMANENT WATER QUALITY SURFACE AREA REQ'D 69233 Square Feet
Normal Pool Elevation = 714.40
Surface Area Provided = 72440 Square Feet
OK
Rv=
Elevation at Bottom of TWO = 714.40
Elevation at Top of TWO = 716.90
Surface Area = 11494 Square Feet
Surface Area = 44647 Square Feet
Surface Area = 70881 Square Feet
Volume Provided = 278361
Surface Area = 72440 Square Feet
Surface Area = 83033 Square Feet
Volume Provided = 194341
0.680
Elevation at Top of Riser = 716.90
Elevation at Bottom of Water Quality Release Hole = 714.40
Minimum Drawdown Period = 2 Days
Maximum Drawdown Period = 5 Days
Maximum Hole Size = 0.275321749 7.10 in. dia.
Minimum Hole Size = 0.1101287 4.49 in. dia.
ation at Normal Pool = 714.40
ation at Bottom Of Pond = 708.00
argency Drain Period = 1 Day (From Perm. Pool)
mum Hole Size = 0.881029596 12.71 in. dia.

305 West Fourth Street, Suite 1-A
5timmel Aooociatea, P.A. Winston Salem, NC 27101
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
F wATF
???O 9pG Michael F. Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
May 17, 2001
Mr. Neat Tucker, PE
Stimmel Associates
305 West fourth Street, Suite 1-A
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Subject: Reidsville
DWQ Project No. 000254
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Tucker:
The Wetlands Unit staff reviewed the stormwater management plans for the subject project and determined that additional
information is necessary to complete the technical review process. The required additional information is as follows:
1. Permanent Water Quality Pool, Temporary Water Quality Pool
The submitted design does not meet the Division criteria for permanent water quality pool surface area for pond A.
The surface area to drainage area (SA/DA) should be based on the average depth. Reference NCDENR
Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, April 1999. Please revise the plans to meet this criteria.
2. Forebay
All stormwater wet detention basins are required to have a forebay to facilitate TSS removal. The forebay should
be approximately 20% of the total basin volume. Reference NCDENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual, April 1999. Please explain how ponds A and B meet this requirement.
3. Vegetative Shelf
A submerged vegetative shelf around the perimeter of the pond is required. The shelf shall begin at the permanent
pool level and be gently sloped (6:1 or flatter) and shall consist of native vegetation. Please specify this on the
engineering plans. The shelves indicated on the plans are above the permanent pool level.
4. Butyl Rubber Seals
Please specify the expected life and maintenance of the butyl rubber seals on the outlet structures in the Operation
and Maintenance Agreement below.
5. Operation and Maintenance Agreement
The operation and maintenance agreement must be signed by the responsible party and notarized. A sample
agreement can be found at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/PDF Files/State SW Program forms/SWU102 Wet Pond Supplement.pdf.
6. "Private Systems"
Please specify the location and approximate sizes of the "private systems" described in item no. 4 on the plan sheet
labeled C-1 and dated May 7, 2001.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
(li(1 - 1-.. /..L.......1 (1111 - -01 14..111 4. N..•/IL..1......-..-...... .. /....•....I.....1../
Page 2 of 2
Division wetlands unit staff will strive to complete a final technical review within 10 working days of receipt of the
requested information. Completing the enclosed worksheet will greatly decrease the staff review time. If you have any
questions or would like to discuss this project, please contact me at [phone]. Also, please note that the NCDENR
Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, April 1999, and other documents and information can be downloaded
from the Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/.
Sincerely,
Todd St. John, PE
Environmental Engineer
cc:
Winston-Salem Regional Office
File
Project No. DWQ 254

Project Name:
Reidsville Ind. Park p(??q
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 708
Permanent Pool (ft) 714.4 6.4 ft. depth check depth
Temporary Pool (ft) 716.9 2.5 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft)
70881
57911 sq. ft.
ok
Drainage Area (ac) 74.27
Impervious Area (ac) 51.99 70.0%
-
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft) 304050
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 192393 183331 cu. ft. ok
Forebay (cu ft) 0.0% check forebc
other parameters
SA/DA 0 1.79
Orifice Diameter (in) 6 1.06 cfs drawdown
Design Rainfall (in) 1 2.1 day drawdown ok
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA***
6.4 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
% Impervious SA/DA from Table
Next Lowest 70 1.79
Project Impervious 70.0 1.79
Next Highest 80 2.1
41
r
k D fm ? a,( [ ?A J
le" a
Project No. DWQ 254
Project Name: Reidsville Ind. Park
pond B
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 725
Permanent Pool (ft) 737.3 12.3 ft. depth check depth
Temporary Pool (ft) 740 2.7 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 46848 47553 sq. ft. check surfac per- ???
Drainage Area (ac)
A
i 60.98
42
69
70
0% ?c
rea (ac)
Imperv
ous . .
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft) 219637
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 171773 150536 cu. ft. ok
Forebay (cu ft) 0.0% check forebt
other parameters
SA/DA 0 1.79 -
Orifice Diameter (in) 4 0.49 cfs drawdown
Design Rainfall (in) 1 4.1 day drawdown ok
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA***
12.3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
% Impervious SA/DA from Table
Next Lowest 70 1.79
Project Impervious 70.0 1.79
Next Highest 80 2.1
C a4 ?, ,Goy G°?/
Project No. DWQ 254
Project Name: Reidsville Ind. Park
pond C
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 734
Permanent Pool (ft) 742.25 8.25 ft. depth check depth
Temporary Pool (ft) 745.5 3.25 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 35360 32437 sq. ft. ok
Drainage Area (ac) 41.6
Impervious Area (ac) 29.12 70.0%
-
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft) 159200
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 140114 102685 cu. ft. ok
Forebay (cu ft) 31906 20.0% ok
other parameters
SA/DA 0 1.79 -
Orifice Diameter (in) 4 0.54 cfs drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 3.0 day drawdown ok
Linear Interpolation of Correct SA/DA***
8.25 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
% Impervious SA/DA from Table
Next Lowest 70 1.79
Project Impervious 70.0 1.79
Next Highest 80 2.1
() ?e, vLt? k ruf4 f00l
I-)

74
4 ! j
May 4, 2001
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Attn: Mr. Todd St. John
Re: Reidsville Industrial Park
Stormwater Management Plan
Dear Todd:
Attached you will find the stormwater management submittal for the above referenced project.
Three stormwater management ponds are proposed for this phase of construction. The following
specific items are included for each of the three ponds A, B & C for your review and approval:
• One copy - Form SWG100 - DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION
BASIN WORKSHEET
• One copy - Water Quality Pond Design Spreadsheet
• Two copies - Construction Drawings with Specifications (on drawings)
• One copy - Stormwater Management Masterplan
The Operation and Maintenance Plan has been transmitted to the Owner for signature. I will
send it to you as soon as I receive it signed.
Pond A and Pond B have no forebay baffles. This is due to the fact that you required these two
ponds to be designed as a single system; therefore Pond A is in essence the forebay of the
system.
Please contact me by phone at [phone] or by e-mail at ntucke ,-stimmelpa.com if you
have any questions or need additional information.
Sincere
J. Neal Tucker, P.E.
Stimmel Associates, P.A.
Cc: File
Don Moss
Michael Pearce
STIMMEL `1vl
AA60GIATES, PA
LANDSCAPE AROHITSGTURE
LAND PLANNING
CAVIL EN91NEERJN9
305 HE5T FOURTH 5T., SUITE I-A
HINSTON-SALEM, NG 71101
PHONE [phone]
FAX (336) 123-I0bq
b
Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN WORKSHEET
DWQ Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a wet detention basin worksheet for each basin,
design calculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure details, and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional
information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
(to be provided by DWQ)
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: Reidsville Industrial Park
Contact Person: Don Moss Phone Number: [phone]
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: Pond A
Basin Bottom Elevation
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
708.00 ft.
71 4. 4 0 ft.
716.90 ft.
(average elevation of the floor of the basin)
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area 7 0 , 8 81 sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area _ 74.27 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area 51 .99 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Permanent Pool Volume 3 0 4 , 0 5 0 cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and forebay)
Temporary Pool Volume 1 9 2 , 3 9 3 cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
Forebay Volume _ N_/ A -cu ft.
SA/DA used 2. 14 % (surface area to drainage area ratio)
Diameter of Orifice h" in. (draw down orifice diameter)
H. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices manual
(N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, November 1995) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H .1008. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have
been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of
thy.
The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch storm event.
The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf at less than 6:1 is provided.
Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet (required minimum of 3 feet).
The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the total basin volume.
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
Access is provided for maintenance.
dt>A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet.
W A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is provided.
A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan.
Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan.
A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed after every storm event.
A specific sediment clean-out benchmark is listed (elevation or depth) in O&M ?Ian.
A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan.
100 09/97 Page 1 of 1
Reidsville Industrial Park
Reidsville, NC
Rockingham County
Attachment to 401 Wet Detention Basin Worksheet - Pond A
A minimum 30 foot vegetative filter is not provided at the outlet of the pond due to
the fact that the pond is built in a live stream and discharges directly into the
stream.
fr
Project: Reidsville Industrial Park - Northern Tract -- Pond A
Project No.: 99139
Designed By: CHB
Checked By: JNT Date: 2/2/00
Revised: 5/7/01
WATER QUALITY POND DESIGN
DESIGN DATA
otal Project Site Area = 74.27 acres
?n-Site Drainage Area to Pond = 74.27 acres
In-Site Proposed Impervious Area = 51.99 acres
?n-Site Future Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
otal On-Site Impervious Area = 51.99 acres
Off-Site Drainage Area to Pond = 0.00 acres
Offsite Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Offsite Future Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Total Offsite Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Total Watershed Area to Pond = 74.27 acres
Graded Area to Pond = 0.00 acres
Temporary Sediment Storage Used = N
WATERSHED INFORMATION
Watershed = N/A
Classification = N/A
70.00% On-Site Impervious Percentage
0.00% Offsite Impervious Percentage
Temporary Sediment Storage = 0.50 in/ac
Permanent Sediment Storage = 0.125 in/ac
Composite Impervious Percentage = 70.00%
Permanent Water Quality Pool Depth (3'min.) = 4.80 FT
Surface Area / Drainage Area Ratio = 2.14%
Temporary Water Quality Depth to be Controlled = 1.0 Inch
POND ELEVATION-SURFACE AREA DATA
Elevation at Bottom of Pond = 708.00
Elevation at Bottom of PSS = 708.00
Elevation at Bottom of PWQ = 709.60
Elevation at Bottom of TWQ = 714.40
Elevation at Top of TWQ = 716.90
Elevation at Emergency Spillway = 719.71
Elevation at Top of Dam = 721.40
Invert of Barrel = 706.00
,%% J%JIM11ifill/
AL •S =
1498 I
FH5/9?Q,• f `?
,,,yFA? ?i?
Surface Area = 11494 Square Feet
Surface Area = 11494 Square Feet
Surface Area = 31590 Square Feet
Surface Area = 70881 Square Feet
Surface Area = 83033 Square Feet
Elevation at Bottom of Pond = 708.00
Elevation at Bottom of TWQ = 714.40
Surface Area = 11494 Square Feet
Surface Area = 70881 Square Feet
Allow 75% of Basin Volume To Water Quality Orifice =
305 West Fourth Street, Suite 1-A Phone [phone]
Stimmel A55ociate5, F.A. Winston Salem, NC 27101 Fax [phone]

Elevation at Bottom of PSS = 708.00
Elevation at Middle of PSS = 708.80
Elevation at Bottom of PWQ = 709.60
Volume Provided =
PERMANENT WATER QUALITY SURFACE AREA REQ'D 69233 Square Feel
Normal Pool Elevation = 714.40
Surface Area Provided = 70881 Square Feet
OH
Rv= 0.680 in/inl
Elevation at Bottom of TWQ = 714.40
Elevation at Top of TWQ = 716.90
Surface Area= 11494 Square Feet
Surface Area = 21542 Square Feet
Surface Area = 31590 Square Feet
Surface Area = 70881 Square Feet
Surface Area = 83033 Square Feet
Volume Provided =
O
Elevation at Top of Riser = 716.90
Elevation at Bottom of Water Quality Release Hole = 714.40
Minimum Drawdown Period = 2 Days
Maximum Drawdown Period = 5 Days
Maximum Hole Size = 0.269396478 7.03 in. dia.
Minimum Hole Size = 0.107758591 4.44 in. dia.
Elevation at Normal Pool =
Elevation at Bottom Of Pond =
Emergency Drain Period =
Minimum Hole Size =
714.40
708.00
1 Day (From Perm. Pool)
0.86206873 12.57 in. dia.
305 West Fourth Street, Suite 1-A
5timmel Associates, F .A. Winston Salem, NC 27101
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Project No. DWQ (to be provided by DWQ)
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN WORKSHEET
DWQ Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a wet detention basin worksheet for each basin,
design calculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure details, and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional
information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: Reidsville Industrial Park
Contact Person: Don Moss Phone Number: ( 3 3 6) 342-8138
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: Pond B
Basin Bottom Elevation 725.00 ft.
Permanent Pool Elevation 737.30 ft.
Temporary Pool Elevation 740.00 ft.
(average elevation of the floor of the basin)
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area 4 6 , 848 sq. ft.
Drainage Area _ 60.98 ac.
Impervious Area 4 2 - h 9 ac.
Permanent Pool Volume 21 9 , 6 3 7 cu. ft.
Temporary Pool Volume 171 , 773 cu. ft.
Forebay Volunic _N / A cu ft.
SA/DA used 1 _ 745k
Diameter of Orifice 411 in.
(water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(combined volume of main basin and forebay)
(volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
(surface area to drainage area ratio)
(draw down orifice diameter)
H. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices manual
(N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, November 1995) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H .1008. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have
been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of
.:•hy.
(Av The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch storm event.
The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf at less than 6:1 is provided.
Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet (required minimum of 3 feet).
The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the total basin volume.
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
Access is provided for maintenance.
5&& A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet.
I,_ht
... FoLkbyJ A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is provided.
A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan.
Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan.
A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed after every storm event.
A specific sediment clean-out benchmark is listed (elevation or depth) in O&M ?Ian.
A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan.
FORM WG100 09/97 Page 1 of 1

Reidsville Industrial Park
Reidsville, NC
Rockingham County
Attachment to 401 Wet Detention Basin Worksheet - Pond B
A minimum 30 foot vegetative filter is not provided at the outlet of the pond due to
the fact that this pond is existing and is located in a live stream and discharges
directly into the stream.
.'S
Project: Reidsville Industrial Park - Northern Tract - Pond B
Project No.: 99139
Designed By: CHB
Checked By: JNT Date: 2/2/00
Revised: 5/7/01
WATER QUALITY POND DESIGN
Total Project Site Area = 60.98 acres
On-Site Drainage Area to Pond = 60.98 acres
On-Site Proposed Impervious Area = 42.69 acres
On-Site Future Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Total On-Site Impervious Area = 42.69 acres
OFFSITE DATA
Off-Site Drainage Area to Pond = 0.00 acres
Offsite Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Offsite Future Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Total Offsite Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Total Watershed Area to Pond = 60.98 acres
Graded Area to Pond = 0.00 acres
Temporary Sediment Storage Used = N
Temporary Sediment Storage =
Permanent Sediment Storage =
Composite Impervious Percentage =
Permanent Water Quality Pool Depth (3'min.) _
Surface Area / Drainage Area Ratio =
Temporary Water Quality Depth to be Controlled =
Elevation at Bottom of Pond = 725.00
Elevation at Bottom of PSS = 725.00
Elevation at Bottom of PWQ = 731.10
Elevation at Bottom of TWO = 737.30
Elevation at Top of TWO = 740.00
Elevation at Top of Dam = 746.10
Invert of Barrel = 725.00
WATERSHED INFORMATION
Watershed = N/A
Classification = N/A
70.00% On-Site Impervious Percentage
0.00% Offsite Impervious Percentage
CARO
WIT
EAL
149801
0.50 in/ac
0.125 in/ac vFNGIN???.'I?G Q?`
70.00% ,y?•..•«.».•ie
6.20 FT ',,et i k ,TU,,,```
1.74%
1.0 Inch
Surface Area = 568 Square Feet
Surface Area = 568 Square Feet
Surface Area = 14441 Square Feet
Surface Area = 46848 Square Feet
Surface Area = 65199 Square Feet
Elevation at Bottom of Pond = 725.00
Elevation at Bottom of TWO = 737.30
Surface Area = 568 Square Feet
Surface Area = 46848 Square Feet
Allow 75% of Basin Volume To Water Quality Orifice =
305 Weot Fourth Street, Suite 1-A Phone [phone]
5timmel Aooociatco, P.A. Winston Salem, NC 27101 Fax [phone]
."
Elevation at Bottom of PSS = 725.00
Elevation at Middle of PSS = 728.05
Elevation at Bottom of PWQ = 731.10
Surface Area = 568 Square Feet
Surface Area = 7505 Square Feet
Surface Area = 14441 Square Feet
Volume Provided = 45779
OK
PERMANENT WATER QUALITY SURFACE AREA REQ'D 46219 Square Feet
Normal Pool Elevation = 737.30
Surface Area Provided = 46848 Square Feet
OK
Rv= 0.680
Elevation at Bottom of TWQ = 737.30 Surface Area = 46848 Square Feet
Elevation at Top of TWQ = 740.00 Surface Area = 65199 Square Feet
Volume Provided = 151263
,ation at Top of Riser = 740.00
,ation at Bottom of Water Quality Release Hole = 737.30
mum Drawdown Period = 2 Days
imum Drawdown Period = 5 Days
imum Hole Size = 0.18503974 5.82 in. dia.
mum Hole Size = 0.074015896 3.68 in. dia.
Elevation at Normal Pool = 737.30
Elevation at Bottom Of Pond = 725.00
Emergency Drain Period = 1 Day (From Perm. Pool)
Minimum Hole Size = 0.789888298 12.03 in. dia.
305 West Fourth Street, Suite 1-A
5timmel Associates, P.A. Winston Salem, NC 27101
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

Project No.
(to be provided by DWQ)
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN WORKSHEET
DWQ Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a wet detention basin worksheet for each basin,
design calculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure details, and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional
information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: Reidsville Industrial Park
Contact Person: nnn Mns s Phone Number: (3 3 6) 342-8138
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: Pond D
Basin Bottom Elevation 734.00 ft. (average elevation of the floor of the basin)
Permanent Pool Elevation 7 4 2 . 2 5 ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation 745.50 ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area 3 5 , 3 6 0 sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area _ 41 .60 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area 2 c) _ 1 2 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Permanent Pool Volume 1 5 9 , 2 0 0 cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and forebay)
Temporary Pool Volume 14 0 , 114 cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
Forebay Volume 3.1 , 9 0 cu ft.
SA/DA used 1 .79% (surface area to drainage area ratio)
Diameter of Orifice 411 in. (draw down orifice diameter)
H. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices manual
(N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, November 1995) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H .1008. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have
been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of
thy.
The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch storm event.
The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf at less than 6:1 is provided.
Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet (required minimum of 3 feet).
The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the total basin volume.
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
Access is provided for maintenance.
A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet.
IJ_h A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is provided.
A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan.
Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan.
A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed after every storm event.
A specific sediment clean-out benchmark is listed (elevation or depth) in O&M ?Ian.
r A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan.
FORM WG 100 09/97 Page 1 of 1
y
Reidsville Industrial Park
Reidsville, NC
Rockingham County
Attachment to 401 Wet Detention Basin Worksheet - Pond D
A minimum 30 foot vegetative filter is not provided at the outlet of the pond due to
the fact that this pond is existing and is located in a live stream and discharges
directly into the stream.
Project: Reidsville Industrial Park - Northern Tract -- Ex. Pond D
Project No.: 99139
Designed By: CHB
Checked By: JNT Date: 5/7/01
WATER QUALITY POND DESIGN
DATA
Total Project Site Area = 41.60 acres
On-Site Drainage Area to Pond = 41.60 acres
On-Site Proposed Impervious Area = 29.12 acres
On-Site Future Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Total On-Site Impervious Area = 29.12 acres
Off-Site Drainage Area to Pond =
Offsite Impervious Area =
Offsite Future Impervious Area =
Total Offsite Impervious Area =
WATERSHED INFORMATION
Watershed = N/A
Classification = N/A
70.00% On-Site Impervious Percentage
0.00 acres
0.00 acres
0.00 acres
0.00 acres 0.00% Offsite Impervious Percentage
Total Watershed Area to Pond = 41.60 acres
Graded Area to Pond = 0.00 acres
Temporary Sediment Storage Used = N
emporary Sediment Storage = 0.50 in/ac
ermanent Sediment Storage = 0.125 in/ac
omposite Impervious Percentage = 70.00%
ermanent Water Quality Pool Depth (3'min.) = 6.00 FT
urface Area / Drainage Area Ratio = 1.79%
emporary Water Quality Depth to be Controlled = 1.0 Inch
Elevation at Bottom of Pond = 734.00
Elevation at Bottom of PSS = 734.00
Elevation at Bottom of PWQ = 736.25
Elevation at Bottom of TWQ = 742.25
Elevation at Top of TWQ = 745.50
Elevation at Top of Dam = 746.00
Invert of Barrel = 734.00
SEAL
14 8?
Surface Area = 4912 Square Feet
Surface Area = 4912 Square Feet
Surface Area = 12246 Square Feet
Surface Area = 35360 Square Feet
Surface Area = 50864 Square Feet
Elevation at Bottom of Pond = 734.00
Elevation at Bottom of TWQ = 742.25
Surface Area = 4912 Square Feet
Surface Area = 35360 Square Feet
Allow 75% of Basin Volume To Water Quality Orifice =
OKI
305 West Fourth Street, Suite 1-A
5timmel A55ociatco, F.A. Winston Salem, NC 27101
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

Elevation at Bottom of PSS = 734.00
Elevation at Middle of PSS = 735.13
Elevation at Bottom of PWQ = 736.25
Volume Provided =
PERMANENT WATER QUALITY SURFACE AREA REQ'D 32437 Square Feet
Normal Pool Elevation = 742.25'i
Surface Area Provided = 35360 Square Feet
OK
Rv= 0.680 in/inl
Elevation at Bottom of TWQ = 742.25
Elevation at Top of TWQ = 745.50
Surface Area = 4912 Square Feet
Surface Area = 8579 Square Feet
Surface Area = 12246 Square Feet
Surface Area = 35360 Square Feet
Surface Area = 50864 Square Feet
Volume Provided =
OK
Elevation at Top of Riser = 745.50
Elevation at Bottom of Water Quality Release Hole = 742.25
Minimum Drawdown Period = 2 Days
Maximum Drawdown Period = 5 Days
Maximum Hole Size = 0.153230779 5.30 in. dia.
Minimum Hole Size = 0.061292312 3.35 in. dia.
Elevation at Normal Pool =
Elevation at Bottom Of Pond =
Emergency Drain Period =
Minimum Hole Size =
742.25
734.00
1 Day (From Perm. Pool)
0.488271415 9.46 in. dia.
305 Weet Fourth Street, 5uite 1-A
5timmel Aooociatee, F.A. Winston 5alem, NC 27101
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 3, 2001
Rockingham County
DWQ Project # 000254
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS, WRP
Mr. Don Moss
Citizens for Economic Dev.
Post Office Box 205
Wentworth, NC 27405
Dear Mr. Moss:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
material in 0.54 acres of wetlands and 351 linear feet of streams for the purpose of constructing road
crossings and dam construction at Reidsville Industrial Park in Rockingham County, as you described in your
application dated August 15, 2000. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered
by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3127 and 3108. These certifications allow you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 3 and 26 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. In addition, you should get any
other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification. This replaces the Certification issued January 5, 2001.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as
modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland
fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in
the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1) Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all remaining jurisdictional wetlands and
waters to notify the state in order to assure compliance for future wetland and/or water impact. These
mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit
(whichever is later).
2) "An overall stormwater management plan shall be provided for written approval by this Office before the
impacts specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification occur. This Office understands that the project will
be phased; therefore, phased engineering, construction and implementation of the stormwater
management plan is acceptable.
The above stormwater management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater
management facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NCDENR
Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual for the first phase. The above plan shall also illustrate in
concept the future stormwater management facilities to be built and the drainage areas that the facilities shall
serve. For each of the above drainage areas, a final written stormwater management plan shall be approved
by this Office and the stormwater management facilities as approved by this Office shall be constructed and
operational before any building in the drainage area served by the facility(ies) is occupied. Deed notifications
or similar mechanisms shall be put into place for all lots informing the purchaser of each lot of the 401 Water
Quality Certification requirements."
Division of Water Quality • Wetlands/401 Unit
1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27669-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
2
We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Wetland Restoration Program in order to
compensate for these impacts to wetlands and/or streams. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402, this
contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h) 201.
According to 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h), feet of restoration will be required. Until the Wetland Restoration
Program receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Wetland Restoration Program), wetland
or stream fill shall not occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at 919-733-5083 ext. 358 if you have any
questions concerning the Wetland Restoration Program. You have one month from the date of this
Certification to make this payment.
For accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill of 0.54 acres of riparian wetlands or 351
feet of streams, in 030601 river and subbasin and 201 linear feet of stream restoration are required. Please
be aware that the Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) rules require rounding of acreage amounts to one-
quarter acre increments (15A 2R .0503(b)).
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and
binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Sincerely,
.S v s
Attachment
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Ron Ferrell; Wetland Restoration Program
File copy
Central Files
Todd St. John
Denise Poulos; ECS
Neal Tucker; Stimmel Associates
NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, Citizens for Economic development has permission as outline
below for the purpose(s) of proposed industrial park development. All activities associated with these
authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached citification transmittal letter.
THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM
LOCATION Reidsville Industrial Park
COUNTY: Rockingham
BASIN/SUBBASIN 030601
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands
and surface waters as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the
state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the wetland Restoration Programs must be
rounded to one-quarter acre increments according to 15 2r .0503(b)
acres of Class WL wetlands
acres of riparian wetland
acres of non-riparian wetlands
acres of Class SWL wetlands
201 linear feet of stream buffers
(other)
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the
payment of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option, please sign
this form and mail it to the Wetlands Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the
appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form.PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE
IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVED NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS
BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM.
igna ure
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
WA
T FRpG
Co
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 27, 2001
Memorandum To: John Dorney
From: Todd St. John f
Subject: Reidsville Industrial Park
Rockingham County
DWQ# 000254
The applicant has requested a revision to the subject 401 WQC dated January 5, 2001. Specifically,
the applicant has requested that condition no. 2 be revised per the attached email form the applicant
dated February 20, 2001. The proposed language is basically acceptable with some revisions. I have
included my proposed language below:
"An overall stormwater management plan shall be provided for written approval by this Office before the impacts specified
in the 401 Water Quality Certification occur. This Office understands that the project will be phased; therefore, phased
engineering, construction and implementation of the stormwater management plan is acceptable.
The above stormwater management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater management facilities
designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual for the first phase. The above plan shall also illustrate in concept the future stormwater management
facilities to be built and the drainage areas that the facilities shall serve. For each of the above drainage areas, a final
written stormwater management plan shall be approved by this Office and the stormwater management facilities as
approved by this Office shall be constructed and operational before any building in the drainage area served by the
facility(ies) is occupied. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be put into place for all lots informing the
purchaser of each lot of the 401 Water Quality Certification requirements."

0 4! / V

C-? ?

A
OIL
Alnrfh (:-rnlina N%Aeinn nf1A/afar rl-Wii dn1 %A/Mianrle (-r ifirnfinn I Inif

j
April 18, 2001
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Attn: Mr. Todd St. John
Re: Reidsville Industrial Park
Stormwater Management Condition of the 401 Certification
Dear Todd:
Thank you for the opportunity to propose revised language for the stormwater management
condition attached to the 401 Water Quality Certification for the Reidsville Industrial Park. The
revised language will enable the park to be developed with the stormwater management facilities
being constructed in a practical sequence, while also insuring compliance with the spirit of the
401 stormwater requirement.
The proposed language is as follows:
"A written stormwater management plan shall be approved by this Office before the impacts
specified in this Certification occur. This Office understands that the project will be phased;
therefore, phased engineering, construction and implementation of the stormwater management
plan is acceptable.
This Office also understands that there will be public stormwater management facilities that will
serve a portion of the lots; that a portion of the lots will be required to provide their own private
stormwater management facilities; and that some of the lots will be served by a combination of
public and private facilities. Phasing of the construction of the stormwater management facilities
will be done such that prior to any permanent building within the industrial park being occupied for
business, the stormwater management facility (or facilities) serving the lot on which the building is
constructed shall be built in accordance with stormwater management plans approved by this
office.
The initial stormwater management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater
management facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the
NCDENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual for all facilities proposed to be built in
the first phase of construction. The initial plan shall also illustrate in concept the future public
stormwater management facilities to be built and specify which lots will require private stormwater
management facilities. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be put into place informing
the purchaser of each lot that stormwater management is required for the development of each
lot and that it is the purchaser's responsibility to provide stormwater management facilities for the
lot if it is not served by public facilities. Prior to the construction of future stormwater
management facilities, plans for these facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the
aT?? most recent version of the NCDENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual shall be
A%Tmli,tp?iite I #?iis office for approval."
LANDSCAPE A ZCHITMTURE
LAND PLANNIN9
CIVIL EN9INEEWN9
305 WEST FOURTH ST., SUITE I-A
HINSTON-SALEM, NG 2.7101
PHONE (336)'123-106'7
FAX (336) '123-106q
I
Please review this proposed language and let me know if it is acceptable. Thank you again for
your cooperation.
Sincerel
J. Neal Tucker, P.E.
Stimmel Associates, P.A.
Cc: Don Moss
Denise Poulos
2
For accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill of 0.54 acres of riparian wetlands or 351 feet of
streams, in 030601 river and subbasin and 201 linear feet of stream restoration are required. Please be aware that
the Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) rules require rounding of acreage amounts to one-quarter acre
increments (15A 2R.0503(b)).
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh,
N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Attachment
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Ron Ferrell: Wetland Restoration Program
File copy
Central Files
Todd St. John
Denise Poulos; ECS
Neal Tucker; Stimmel Assoicates
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 5, 2001
Rockingham County
DWQ Project # 000254
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS, WRP
Mr. Don Moss
Citizens for Economic Dev.
Post Office Box 205
Wentworth, NC 27405
Dear Mr. Moss:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in
0.54 acres of wetlands and 351 linear feet of streams for the purpose of constructing road crossings and dam construction
at Reidsville Industrial Park in Rockingham County, as you described in your application dated August 15, 2000. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3127
and 3108. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit Number 3 and 26 when the Corps of Engineers issues
it. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified
below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application for a new
certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed
one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be
valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters to notify
the state in order to assure compliance for future wetland and/or water impact. These mechanisms shall be put in
place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
2. An additional condition is that a final, written stormwater management plan shall be approved by this Office before
the impacts specified in this Certification occur. The stormwater management plan must include plans and
specifications for stormwater management facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent
version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Also, before any permanent building is
occupied at the subject site, the stormwater management facilities, as approved by this Office, must be constructed
and operational, and the stormwater plan, as approved by this Office, shall be implemented.
We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Wetland Restoration Program in order to compensate for
these impacts to wetlands and/or streams. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402, this contribution will satisfy our
compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). According to 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h), feet of
restoration will be required. Until the Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check (made payable to:
DENR - Wetland Restoration Program), wetland or stream fill shall not occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at
919-733-5083 ext. 358 if you have any questions concerning the Wetland Restoration Program. You have one month from
the date of this Certification to make this payment.
Division of Water Quality • Wetlands/401 Unit
1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27669-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
3
NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, Citizens for Economic development has permission as outline below for
the purpose(s) of proposed industrial park development. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be
conducted with the conditions listed in the attached cetification transmitttal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT
VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM
LOCATION Reidsville Industrial Park
COUNTY: Rockingham
BASIN/SUBBASIN 030601
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to compensate for
the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands and surface waters as
outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the wetland Restoration Programs must be rounded to one-
quarter acre increments according to 15 2r .0503(b)
acres of Class WL wetlands
acres of riparian wetland
acres of non-riparian wetlands
acres of Class SWL wetlands
201 linear feet of stream buffers
(other)
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment
of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail it
to the Wetlands Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be
sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL
YOU RECEIVED NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS
RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Signature
Date
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
4
DWQ Project No.:
Applicant:
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
County:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1621.This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the
project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Agent's Certification
1, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
as a duly registered Professional
Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, ect.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to
observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that,
to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that
the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No.
Date
Reidsville Industrial Park
Subject: Reidsville Industrial Park
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:50:01 -0400
From: Neal Tucker <[e-mail]>
To: "Todd St. John (E-mail)" <[e-mail]>
Todd:
The Owner has reviewed the revised SWM Condition to the 401 Certification
and is in agreement. I am sending you a hard copy in the mail, but am also
e-mailing it. Let me know if this is acceptable.
Thanks
J. Neal Tucker, P.E. (((
Stimmel Associates, P.A. /
[e-mail] t?
[phone]
[phone] fax
<<Todd St John - rev 401 SWM wording.doc>>
Name: Todd St John - rev 401 SWM wording.doc
Todd St John - rev 401 SWM wording doc Type: Microsoft Word Document
(application/msword)
Encoding: x-uuencode
1 of 1 4/20/01 1:52 PN
April 18, 2001
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Attn: Mr. Todd St. John
Re: Reidsville Industrial Park
Stormwater Management Condition of the 401 Certification
Dear Todd:
Thank you for the opportunity to propose revised language for the stormwater management
condition attached to the 401 Water Quality Certification for the Reidsville Industrial Park. The
revised language will enable the park to be developed with the stormwater management facilities
being constructed in a practical sequence, while also insuring compliance with the spirit of the
401 stormwater requirement.
The proposed language is as follows:
"A written stormwater management plan shall be approved by this Office before the impacts
specified in this Certification occur. This Office understands that the project will be phased;
therefore, phased engineering, construction and implementation of the stormwater management
plan is acceptable.
This Office also understands that there will be public stormwater management facilities that will
serve a portion of the lots; that a portion of the lots will be required to provide their own private
stormwater management facilities; and that some of the lots will be served by a combination of
public and private facilities. Phasing of the construction of the stormwater management facilities
will be done such that prior to any permanent building within the industrial park being occupied for
business, the stormwater management facility (or facilities) serving the lot on which the building is
constructed shall be built in accordance with stormwater management plans approved by this
office.
The initial stormwater management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater
management facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the
NCDENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual for all facilities proposed to be built in
the first phase of construction. The initial plan shall also illustrate in concept the future public
stormwater management facilities to be built and specify which lots will require private stormwater
management facilities. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be put into place informing
the purchaser of each lot that stormwater management is required for the development of each
lot and that it is the purchaser's responsibility to provide stormwater management facilities for the
lot if it is not served by public facilities. Prior to the construction of future stormwater
management facilities, plans for these facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the
most recent version of the NCDENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual shall be
submitted to this office for approval."
Please review this proposed language and let me know if it is acceptable. Thank you again for
your cooperation.
Sincerely:
J. Neal Tucker, P.E.
Stimmel Associates, P.A.
Cc: Don Moss
Denise Poulos
RE: Reidsville Industrial Park
Subject: RE: Reidsville Industrial Park
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 17:09:18 -0400
From: Neal Tucker <[e-mail]>
To: "'Todd St. John"' <[e-mail]>
Todd:
You are correct. At your offering, I am going to suggest the revised
wording to the stormwater management condition. I appologize for not having
that done yet. Things have been extremely busy. I will get it out to you
next week.
Thanks,
Neal
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd St. John [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:42 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: re: Reidsville Industrial Park
I spoke to you on March 7, 2001 regarding the subject project. It was my
understanding that you were going to propose some revised language in
order to modify the 401 Water Quality Certification so that the project
can be constructed in phases (I.e. so the stormwater BMPs do not have to
be designed and built all at once). This was in regards to your letter
dated February 26, 2000... Please advise the status.
thanks, todd
1 of 1 4/9/017:09 AM
re: Reidsville Industrial Park
Subject: re: Reidsville Industrial Park
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 15:41:38 -0400
From: "Todd St. John" <[e-mail]>
Organization: DWQ Wetlands Unit
To: [e-mail]
I spoke to you on March 7, 2001 regarding the subject project. It was my
understanding that you were going to propose some revised language in
order to modify the 401 Water Quality Certification so that the project
can be constructed in phases (I.e. so the stormwater BMPs do not have to
be designed and built all at once). This was in regards to your letter
dated February 26, 2000... Please advise the status.
thanks, todd
Todd St. John, P.E.
Environmental Engineer II
DWQ
Wetlands Unit
1 of 1 4/5/01 3:42 PIV
r
February 16, 2001
NCDENR
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Re: Reidsville Industrial Park - Reidsville, NC - Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Dorney:

Plate
h?
I am writing as a follow-up to an e-mail you received from Denise Poulos regarding the
stormwater management condition placed on the 401 water quality certification for the Reidsville
Industrial Park. Please refer to the attached sheet C-1 - Stormwater Management Plan for
graphic explanation of the remainder of this letter.
The industrial park will be developed in three phases as shown on the plan. The colored areas
on the plan represent areas to be served by stormwater ponds that will be built by the developer.
This work will be done as part of the Phase I Construction Contract that will be released for bids
soon. Pond C will be built as part of Phase III and will serve Lots 5, 6 and part of Lot 7. Lots 4, 8,
the lower part of Lot 7 and Lot 10C will not be served by stormwater management facilities
constructed by the developer, therefore the lot purchasers will be required to build their own
facilities onsite.
A condition was placed on the 401 water quality certification that requires a stormwater
management plan to be approved and implemented for the project prior to the occupancy of any
facility. I interpret this condition literally to mean a comprehensive, all-inclusive plan that covers
the entire park. This condition is impractical given the fact that the park is being phased, and that
some of the stormwater facilities will be built by the lot purchasers. Holding to this condition
would force the developer to spend a significant amount of money 'out-of-phase', and would also
force the design and construction of stormwater management facilities on individual lots without
regard to how the total lot ultimately needs to be developed to best serve the purchaser. I am
proposing that a phased stormwater management plan be approved for the project that will allow
the stormwater management facilities to be designed and built as the lots are developed. It
seems that a basic requirement stating that "before any building is occupied, the stormwater
management facility serving that lot shall be approved and implemented" should achieve the
bottom line goal of the Division of Water Quality, i.e. protecting the surface waters of the state.
The specifics of the current stormwater plan are as follows:
1. Ponds A & B
Stormwater management ponds A & B are proposed to be built as part of the Phase I
Construction Contract that will be released for bids soon. Pond A will be a new pond and pond B
is an existing pond that will be retrofitted to meet the requirements of the NCDENR - Best
Management Practices Manual. These ponds are designed to operate in series with the total
drainage area being routed to pond B then through pond A. This design concept has been
STII'11'1EL I ? f _
ASSOCIATES, P.A.
LLA PLAMII ITEGTIIRE
CIVIL EN61NEEMN6 tttYYY ` V
305 WEST FOURTH ST., SUITE I-A
WINSTON-SALEM, NG 71101 v ?(
PHONE [phone]
r?? I ?/? GZ? '7
FAX [phone]
i
FFB 2 6 gyp(!'
r
discussed with Todd during previous conversations. These ponds will treat runoff from Lots 1, 2,
12, 10A, 10B, 11 A, 11 B, 11 C 11 D and a portion of the roadway as shown in red on the attached
plan. Lots 10A, B & C will be developed by a single user. Since Lot 10C will not feasibly drain
into pond B, a separate stormwater management system will be provided by the purchaser of that
lot as part of their site development plans. Likewise, if all of Lot 11 cannot be feasibly drained
into pond B, those areas will be managed by facilities designed and built by the lot purchaser,
however the pond system is designed to handle these areas.
II. Pond D
Stormwater management pond D will also be retrofitted as part of the Phase I Construction
contract. Pond D is an existing pond that will be retrofitted to meet the requirements of the
NCDENR - Best Management Practices Manual. This pond will treat runoff from Lots 3A, 3B,
3C, Lot 9 and a portion of the roadway as shown in green on the attached plan.
III. Pond C
Stormwater management pond C will be retrofitted as part of the Phase III Construction Contract.
Pond C is an existing pond that will be retrofitted to meet the requirements of the NCDENR -
Best Management Practices Manual. This pond will treat runoff from Lots 5,6 and the upper
portion of Lot 7. The lower portion of Lot 7 will not likely drain into pond C, therefore runoff from
this area will have to be managed by facilities designed and built by the lot purchaser.
Stormwater management facilities for Lots 4 and 8 will be managed by facilities designed and
built by the lot purchaser.
I hope this explanation of how the project is being phased and the various responsibilities for
building the stormwater management facilities helps bring into focus the need to allow a phased
approach to the stormwater management for this park. I hereby request that the condition placed
on the 401 water quality certification be amended to allow this phasing.
Please feel free to call me at [phone] if you have any questions or issues that we need to
discuss.
Sincerely,
Neal Tucker, P.E.
Stimmel Associates, P.A.
Attachment
Cc: File
Denise Poulos
Don Moss
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Neal Tucker, PE
Stimmel Associates, P.A.
305 West Fourth Street, Suite 1-A
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Dear Mr. Tucker:
e
??
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
December 21, 2000
Subject: Reidsville Industrial Park
DWQ Project No. 000254('?)
Rockingham County
This letter is in response to your correspondence dated November 30, 2000 and is based on the assumption
that your correspondence refers to an application that is currently on hold for the subject project. I have
carefully reviewed the stormwater management proposal for the subject project and determined that
insufficient information was provided to show that two ponds in series, sized as proposed in your
correspondence, will provide the same or better treatment as one pond sized for the entire watershed
tributary to it. Specifically, it is not clear that the lower pond would provide sufficient settling to remove
8517c of TSS (total suspended solids) from the runoff tributary to it.
My calculations predict the terminal settling velocity of a I micron particle (the smallest particle considered
to be TSS) with a specific gravity of 2.65 in 60° F water would be 2.61 X 10,6 fps or about 0.23 feet per
day. At this velocity the particle will not reach the bottom of the pond in two to five days. As such, it is
clear that not all of the settling will occur in two to five days and that additional removal of TSS occurs
beyond the two to five day draw down period. This would make the volume stored at normal pool an
important factor in the efficiency for removing the smaller diameter suspended solids. Presumably this is
one reason the surface area of the pond is an important aspect in the design of the pond.
I also developed a model to predict flows resulting from a I inch rain that flows through two ponds in
series with 18,000 ft` surface areas and 50% impervious drainage areas of 20 acres, each. The pond orifices
were designed to draw down the normal pools from the rain in 2 to 5 days independently or in series. The
model showed that the lower pond would draw down in 5 days in series and 2.3 days independently. The
results of the model also showed that the subsequent average velocity and flow (assuming plug flow)
through the lower pond would be roughly double that of the upper pond. As such, these results based on the
given parameters, the model shows that the lower pond should function less efficiently in series than it
would independently. Please keep in mind that the size of the ponds, watersheds, and outlets were picked
to ensure that the draw down would be achieved in 2 to 5 days in the lower pond in series and
independently. In any event, it appears that the lower pond (in my model) would receive twice the volume
of runoff in any given rain event of an inch or less which would effectively decrease the detention time
necessary for removing smaller diameter TSS.
My evaluation is based on many assumptions and may not reflect in situ performance. However, I do not
believe that enough information was provided in your above correspondence to indicate that ponds in series
that are sized as you proposed will function with the same efficiency as ponds sized for the entire
watershed tributary to them. It is the belief of this Office that any extended wet detention pond must be
4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
sized to treat the watershed tributary to it. Unless you can provide a model that clearly shows that the ponds
in series, as you proposed, would be as efficient as having the ponds sized to treat the watershed tributary to
them, it is recommended that the stormwater management plan include stormwater facilities designed to
remove 85% of TSS from the water shed tributary to them per the NC DENR Stormwater Best
Management Practices Manual, April 1999. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this project,
please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Todd St. Joh , PE
Environmental Engineer
cc: John Dorney, Wetlands/401 Unit
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Bradley Bennett
File
•

fjlRzl. - ??-?u?ZN R£«?YT G?fQu£5T?
IVV,y • ?V? PL355
?? x -? N c

•
Rel. ? 4? yk RA5)a
oas?/
lu?ti? Cm?
J'?n air ?' ourc 3
06
4?
Co v - - c, y
/van'?L+wq? 'Y ""'k1??3? cN ?'??.a/?m?Y4 ?
u?12k+?wFK ? ?+ 9.?x ? x? ?
o A'm 0
0-0
qA??i j U?yo) - 90.
,??.d ?@?,E.?
t
C(A
Idy
?ue eo LAl?sj FCS
0
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
November 3, 2000
DWQ Project # 000254
Rockingham County
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Don Moss
Citizens for Economic Development, Inc.
Post Office Box 205
Went Worth, NC 27405
Dear Mr. Moss:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill material 351 linear
feet of streams in Rockingham County for industrial park development as described in your application
dated August 15, 2000 (received September 19, 2000). Based on this review, we have identified significant
uses, which would be removed or degraded by this project. Insufficient evidence is present in our files to
conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below, we will
have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(e) and will place
this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information, we are requesting (by copy
of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers place your project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must be
constructed as planned. Specifically can you address the mitigation shortfall described below. Any
documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to address alternative designs for your
project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Also this project will require compensatory
mitigation as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). Your mitigation proposal is insufficient because
I. DWQ has not visited the potential stream sites to see if they are available and viable or
2. the NC Wetlands Restoration Program has not accepted payment.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending a copy of this information to
me and one copy to Ms. Jennifer Frye Regional Office at Winston-Salem. If we do not hear from you in
three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project
as withdrawn. I can be reached at 919-733-9646 if you have any questions.
SincereLy, \
J R. Dorney '
i
cc: Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Denise Ponlos; ECS Ltd.
Wetlands/401 Unit • 1621 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, North Carolina 27669-1621
Telephone [phone] • FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Atfirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 101,"(, post consumer paper
Rcidsvillc Inilusuial Park. 00 0254. Rockingham Co.
Subject: Reidsville Industrial Park, 00 0254, Rockingham Co.
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:43:28 -0500
From: Jennifer Ft-ye <.Ieiiiiil'ei-.I'[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Water Quality
To: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
CC: "cyndi.karoly" <[e-mail]>
John,
Just faxed the copies of the Nationwide Permits for this project - NWP 3
for Road "maintenance"/crossing and NWP 26 for pond. I called Denise -
I got her voice mail (thank God!) and left her the message. So it is my
understanding that you will be sending an additional letter to them,
detailing the need for an individual Cert.? Let me know if I can help.
Jen
Jennifer Serafin Frye
Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: 336-771-4608 ext. 275 Fax: [phone]

! of 1 12/1/00 9:14 A NI
a& ''11/30/2000 08:32 3367714630
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
FAX TRANSMITT,` L
Division of Water Qu ity
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 2 107
PAGE 01/03
AM a"
MCDENR
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
TO:
FAX NUMBER: 4 g
FROM:
DATE: / / ?4 a C
Number of pages (including cover page): ?-
COMMENTS:
P 3

P
I
DIV 0 WATER QUALITY

111/30/2000 06:32 3367714630 DIV 0 WATER QUALITY PAGE 02/03
11-30-2000 OO:ZO?m Fran-ENGINEERING CONSULTING SM LTD +3 fiB6611Q0 T-038 P.0031003 F-T15
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF *MERS
Wilmington Die
bo
Action 10: ' County: RadinshAm
' NWIriT VERIFICATION

Property
Address
Economic
adjacent t
an exu"1311
impacts to
GENERAL PRRMrT REGIONAL AND 11"'11 LW
Authoriz
Citizens for Economic Development ECS
Reidsville Industrial Parr Denise Poulos
c% bon Moss
P.O. Box 205 ? A"EM' ?5-C Dunda Circle
?? NC 27407
Wentword4 NC 27405
336 3424138 ho e: 336 856-7150
frvelopment's proposed Reidsvib Indnstr
Little Troublesome Crock, near Reidsville,
r/nnmbe A town, ems Citizeas for
property ImAted off of Sands Road,
naham County, North Carolina.
A193dw proposed industrial park devel
vert Sands Road with a new pipe culvert
jurbdlrtlonal waters of an unnamed trit
XSec ' x{04 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only''
,,,
S a 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) ona?.
_„secti n 404 and Section 10.
-2LNatio de permit Number _ 3
Any via
subject
relieve
beginning
please con
SURVEY
ATTACB
CFt
)q of the conditions of the Regioual General a
permktee to a sop work order, a restoration
Department of the Array Regional General
pormi(tee of the responeib0it)? to obtain a
)ermits. The permittee may need to contact
Tone, if you have any questions regatrdi t
19
act John Thomas at telephone number
Project Manager Signature
,ATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND 1
TO THE FILE COPY OF TINS FORM,
at including replacement / ateusion of
ins to approximately 0.03 acres of
of Little Troublesome Creek.
Nationwide Permit referenced above may
order, and or appropriate 100 action.
/ Nationwide permit veriileation does not
y other required Federal, State, or local
appropriate State and local agencies before
e Corps of Engineer` regulatory program,
^raG?ddi_ extmdon 25.
LINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
REQU1RED OR AVAILABLE.
'11/30/2000 08:32 3367714630 DIV 0 WATER QUALITY PAGE 03/03
11-30-2000 0MORN From-ENGINE[NING CONSULTING SM LTD ?'! 99697190 1-039 P.002/003 F-T11
I7.3. ARMY CORPS OF (IIRS
Wilmington Ais
' O
Acfioais 1187 County; _ Roc ngham
I
GENERAL PERMIT REGIONAL AND NA'T'IONWIDE VMMICATION
I II
Property Authorind
Luna: Citizens for Economic Development AMP ECS
Deni
es P°AO$
Reidsville Industrial Park
c% Don Moss I
AdJrM: P.O. Box 205 A5-CDubn? NC Circle
le
i Wentworth, NC 27405 27407
Teknhonat! 336 342-8138 1 lto : 336 956-700
Size and Lcati. o a wa t Citizens for
Economic evelopment's proposed Reid"Me Indgstrtal park property located off of Sands Road,
adjacent tol Little Troublesome Creek, near Reidsville, in eklugham County, North Carolina.
Proposed Industrial park develo mast including Mi for pond construction
OSl acres ine1-9 ISO linear feet of strum impaca) of the
resulting ' impacts to Approumately
juriadictbal waters of an unnamed and above headwat? tributary of Little Troublesome Creek.
?. --? ._-t..A r t.,,s.e, 7 -AM_ Revised vermh reawe
_JLSecd+ 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) orx -
Sectign 10 (f ver and Harbor Act 0( 18") on1q.
___Seal n 404 and Section 10.
_JL_Natio wide Permit Numbor P
Any viola OR of the conditions of the Regional general or Nationwide permit ref teed above may
subject the permfittee to a atop work order, a restoration order, and oar appropriate legal action.
Th Depuftent of the Army Regional Gmeri / Nationwide Permit vert"catlou does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain a my other required Federal, State, or local
appro its. The parwittee auy need to contact pr Ante State and local agencies before
beginning ork. If you have any questions rego'ding a Corps of Engine regulatory program,
please cool aaet John Thomas at telephone Rum 19) 76-8441, extension 25.
Ilegulator? Project Manager Signature t
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WE REQUIRED OR AVA ETC-, EMUST BE
ATTAC D TO TM FII.E COPY OF TMS FORK IF
CF: i
.:r
2,
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Charles R. l 1.111W MI, FACCutivc DIrcCIM,
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney, Supervisor, Wetlands/401 Water Quality Certification Unit
Division of Water Quality
PROM: I,ranklin T. McBride, Program Manager
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 17 November 2000
SUBJECT: Revised Pre-Construction Notification Application for Reidsville Industrial Park,
Reidsville, Rockingham County, DWQ 11) No. 000254
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the
revised pre-construction notification application. On-site investigations of the project area were
conducted on 16 and 30 March 2000. These comments arc provided in accordance with
provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended), the 1, ish and Wildlife Coordination Act
(48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-
131 et seq.).
Citizens for Economic Development, Inc. have revised their original pre-construction
notification application, and currently propose to impact a total of approximately 351 linear feet
of stream and 0.54 acres of wetlands due to the construction of a road crossing and water quality
pond. This proposed 307-acre industrial park in Reidsville will directly impact at least two
perennial tributary streams to Little "Troublesome Creek and their associated wetlands. Habitat
found on the proposed construction site appears to be diverse and consists of upland forest,
agricultural fields, at least three small ponds, and high-quality, vegetated streams and wetlands.
We are encouraged by the applicant's revised efforts to minimize impacts to streams and
wetlands on the project site. However, we remain concerned about the construction of such a
large-scale industrial park in Reidsville, with resulting stormwater, pollutants, and impacts to
Mailing Address: DIV1.sWn oI Iiihnd Fisheries • 1721 MaII Scrvicc Ccutcr • Ralcigh, NC 2 7699-1 72 1
Telephone: [phone] cit. 2e 1 • Fav [phone]
Page 2
17 November 2000
Reidsville Industrial Park
DWQ ID: 000254
natural wetlands and streams. Little Troublesome Creek, the nearest major stream, is well-
known for its recent toxic conditions, both above and below the adjacent Reidsville Wastewater
Treatment Plant (RWWTP). According to Division of Water Quality and RWWTP's self-
monitoring data, the RWWTP discharge was diverted to the Haw River to achieve greater
dilution as a result of such poor water quality conditions. To replace wastewater discharge from
RWWTP into Little Troublesome Creek with runoff from a 307-acre industrial park appears to
be extremely counterproductive to improving water quality conditions in this degraded stream.
We are unable to concur with this Section 401 certification application at this time due to
the absence of detailed mitigation and revised stormwater management plans. However, if the
401 certification is issued for the project as proposed, the following specific comments regarding
the proposed construction and preliminary stormwater management plans should be addressed.
We recommend undisturbed, forested buffers of at least 100 feet in width along all
perennial streams and ponds. We also suggest that undisturbed, forested buffers of at
least 50 feet in width remain along smaller perennial and intermittent headwater streams
and wetlands. These buffers will assist in maintaining water quality and afford protection
from high, flashy flows resulting from impervious surface runoff, as well as provide
protected travel corridors, and feeding and nesting habitat for wildlife.
2. Areas located outside the proposed lot configuration should remain relatively
undisturbed, and preferably forested.
3. A 4-6-foot wide littoral shelf, planted in native herbaceous aquatic plants, should be
constructed along the edge of the water quality pond to help mitigate some of the lost
wetland functions and aquatic habitat. In addition, native trees and shrubs should be
planted around the upper portion of the detention structure to provide avian and terrestrial
habitat and to reduce exposure of the water surface to sunlight.
We request that bridges be utilized for all stream and wetland crossings rather than
culverts. This keeps stream channels open, while preserving their habitats and functional
capacity.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If we can provide
further assistance, please contact Danielle R. Pender, Piedmont Region Coordinator, at (919)
528-9886.
cc: John Thomas, USACOE
RJS/drp
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: lam Coble
Date: 1 g?'?? ??pgg
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Reidsville Industrial Park c/o Don Moss
Project Number 00 0254
Recvd From APP
Received Date 2/11/00 Recvd By Region
Project Type commercial fill, road crossing
County Rockingham
County2
Region Winston-Salem
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
14 Stream 01 OO N ?- I6 7 I NSW 30,601. 0.03 201.00
F sw F- 0.51 150.00
26 BLH O v p N F-rr C N
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Stream restoration F_ I F_
F_ I F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? QQ Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue 0 Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 361904
Longitude (ddmmss) 793932
Comments:
The WSRO recommends that this WO Certification be essued with the following condltlons:
j .. They submit and obtain written approval of a mitigation plan, (They are proposing stream
restoration if a suitable location is found on-sits If not, they propose WRP.) This office supports
payment into WRID only if they have exhausted all of the on-site AND local,, off-site possibilities.
7 Deed restrictions on remaining lots Their plan shows a "possible future crossing" - they need to
he aware that any future impacts will count as cumulative impacts
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Reidsville Industrial Park c/o Don Moss
Project Number 00 0254
Comments (continued from page 1):
Date: 10/31/2000
County Rockingham
Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
Wetlands Tracking
Projects
Facility Name Reidsville Industrial Park do Don Moss I
Project Number 00 0254
O Inactive
Project Type purpose o/' commercial fill, road crossing
Location Little Troublesome Creek
County Rockingham
County2 J
Region Winston-Salem
DCM Office
COE Office Raleigh
Last
401s Total Total Total Mit
Total
Recvd Sent to Recvd Action 401 401 s Mit
Acres
Recvd From Date Region Region Date Last Action Acres Feet Feet
APP 2/11/2000 2-16-2000 1 3-20.2000 Hold
.401.
7 VII
Total for Project:
Inspections/ Violations
Insnection Date Inspector Compliant Letter Twe
Date Sent Replv Date Current St
IIIIQY.QN
Inspect., `
00 0254, Reidsville 11111. Park
Subject: 00 0254, Reidsville Ind. Park
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:48:13 -0500
From: Jennifer Frye <jennif'[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Water Quality
'Co: "cyndi.kamly" <[e-mail]>
Cyndi,
I just noticed that Larry added the item #4 on the staff report (SEPA) - I told
him that since their impacts are under 500 If, they probably don't need to do a
SEPA - I think that he was thinking that they might need a SEPA for another
reason, outside the 401. The sewer line might trigger it, but that's already in
place. Sorry for the confusion -
Jen
Jennifer Frye wrote:
> Hello Cyndi,
> Staff report for Reidsville industrial Park completed (00 0254).
> One comment - the mitigation requirements - they have a total of 351 LF of
> impact to mitigatible channels - However, 150 LF of that is for dam fill, so
> based on our recent "enlightenment" of the pond/dam policy, I would assume
> that they are only required to mitigate for 201 LF.
> Have a great day!
> Jen
> Cyndi Karoly wrote:
> > Hi Jen.
> > Below is this week's 401 Tracking Notice for the Winston-Salem Regional
> > Office. As we've already discussed last week, this application had not
> > gotten to you in the mail as it should have a month ago, and now you've
> > got a faxed version and hopefully the mail version will get to you soon.
> > TRACKING:
> > DWQ No. Project County Permit Type Received Expires
> > 00-0254 Reidsville Industrial Park, Nash County, TPBR 9125100
> > 11124/00
> > Please use the staff recommendation sheet in Filemaker Pro, and then
> > notify me that the report has been filed. My e-mail address is
> > [e-mail]
> > There are no tardy projects for your region this week.
> > Thanks very much for your attention.
> Jennifer Serafin Frye
> Division of Water Quality
> NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> Winston-Salem Regional Office
> Winston-Salem, NC 27107
> Voice: 336-771-4608 ext. 275 Fax: [phone]
Jennifer Serafin Frye
Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: 336-771-4608 ext. 275 Fax: [phone]
142 11/6/00 2:57 PM
Rc: WSRO Tracking Noticc, 10/24/00
Subject: Re: WSRO Tracking Notice, 10/24/00
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:25:53 -0500
From: Jennifer Frye <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Water Quality
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Hello Cyndi,
Staff report for Reidsville Industrial Park completed (00 0254).
One comment - the mitigation requirements - they have a total of 351 LF of
impact to mitigatible channels - However, 150 LF that is for dam fill, so
based on our recent "enlightenment" of the n /dam policy, I would assume
that they are only required to mitigate r 201 LF
Have a great day!
Jen
Cyndi Karoly wrote:
> Hi Jen.
> Below is this week's 401 Tracking Notice for the Winston-Salem Regional
> Office. As we've already discussed last week, this application had not
> gotten to you in the mail as it should have a month ago, and now you've
> got a faxed version and hopefully the mail version will get to you soon.
> TRACKING:
> DWQ No. Project County Permit Type Received Expires
> 00-0254 Reidsville Industrial Park, Nash County, TPBR 9125100
> 11/24/00
> Please use the staff recommendation sheet in Filemaker Pro, and then
> notify me that the report has been filed. My e-mail address is
> [e-mail]
> There are no tardy projects for your region this week.
> Thanks very much for your attention.
Jennifer Serafin Frye
Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: 336-771-4608 ext. 275 Fax: [phone]

-t)

101,1 10/31/00 12:58 PM
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: I arry Coble
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Reidsville Industrial Park
Project Number 00 0254
Recvd From APP
Received Date 2/11/00 Recvd By Region
Project Type commercial fill, road crossing
County Rockingham
County2
Region Winston-Salem
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
F14 Stream PT O N F- 16-7 F-c - NSW 30,601. 0.03 201.00 201.00 I -
26 BLH O Y O N ??-r -cNSW F- 0.51 150.00 150.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Stream restoration ? F_ F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y 0 N
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 361904
Recommendation: 0 Issue (0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Longitude (ddmmss) 793932
Comments:
The WSRO recommends that this WO Certification be issued with the following conditions:
1.. They submit and obtain written approval of a mitigation plan. (They are proposing stream
restoration if a suitable location is found on-site. If not, they propose WRP.- ? This office supports
payment into WRP only if they have exhausted all of the on-site AND local, off-site possibilities.
2__ Deed restrictions on remaining _lots_ Their plan shows a "possible future crossing" - they need to
he aware that any future impacts will count as cumulative impacts.
3._ Their stormwater management plans and specifications meet DW0 requirements and gain
approval,
c/o Don Moss
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Reidsville Industrial Park c/o Don Moss
Project Number 00 0254
Comments (continued from page 1):
County Rockingham
Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
Date:
cc: Regional Office Page Number 2
Central Office
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment MAI
and Natural Resources • •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E N R
Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch & Wetlands/401 Unit
Location: 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Mailing Address: 1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699
FAX: [phone]
FAX TO: \J t ki h 1-/c. e , I FAX NUMBER:
FROM:
PHONE:
S36-77/-- LIC30
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:
If you receive this fax by mistake call: ESB [phone] or Wetlands [phone].
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical - Construction Materials - Environmental
(9 0 August 15, 2000
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality j
Wetland/401 Unit !....f ;;,
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
?Q
Subject: Revised Pre-Construction Notification Application
Reidsville Industrial Park oo
Reidsville, Rockingham County, North Carolina
ECS Project G-2339C
DWQ Project 00 0254
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Please find seven copies of the Pre-Construction Notification Application for the above referenced site.
The site is approximately 307 acres in area and is located on Sands Road in Reidsville (Figure 1). The
site is being developed with the Reidsville Industrial Park.
Tributaries of Little Troublesome Creek cross the site. As shown on the Stormwater Management
Preliminary Layout, several roadways and water quality ponds must be constructed in order to develop
the site. The roads/ponds will impact streams in two locations. Stream Impact #1 is related to the
construction of a water quality pond. The dam will impact approximately 150 linear feet. of stream
channel. The dam and the resulting impoundment will impact approximately 0.51 acres of wetlands.
Stream Impact #2 is related to the construction of a roadway. Two streams are located in this area. The
road will impact approximately 242 linear feet of stream channel and 0.03 acres of wetlands. Please
note, an existing road crossing is currently located in this area. This crossing has impacted
approximately 41 linear feet of stream channel. Therefore, the proposed crossing at this location will
impact only 201 linear feet of stream channel.
We have contacted Mr. Todd St. John of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to inform him of
our intent to identify a viable area on-site to conduct mitigation. We are planning to contract with Mr.
James Mathews with HARP to prepare a mitigation plan. We will forward this plan to you for your
approval. If there are no suitable areas on-site to conduct mitigation, we propose making payment to the
WRP.
5-C Dundas Circle, Greensboro, NC 27407 - [phone] - Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen, MD - Atlanta, GA - Austin, TX - Baltimore, MD - Chantilly, VA - Charlotte, NC - Chicago, IL - Frederick, MD - Frede>icksburg, VA
- Greensboro, NC - Greenville, SC - Norfolk, VA - Raleigh, NC - Richmond, VA - Roanoke, VA - Williamsburg, VA - Wilmington] NC
Section 401 Permitting
Reidsville Industrial Park
ECS Project G-2339C
August 15, 2000
We are requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification for the impact to 201 linear feet of stream channel
and 0.03 acres of wetlands at Stream Impact #2 and for the impact to 150 linear feet of stream channel
and 0.51 acres of wetlands at Stream Impact #l. Please note, the planned impacts for the site have been
reduced from 845 linear feet of stream channel to 351 linear feet of stream channel and from 2.74 acres
of wetlands to 0.54 acres of wetlands.
Several ponds are present on the site. In order to remove 85% TSS, it will be necessary to retrofit these
ponds and construct several others. Mr. Neal Tucker with Stimmel Associates is currently preparing the
stormwater management plan for the site. This information will be forwarded to you for your approval
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions concerning this request or if
additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
4e?nise M. Poulos, LSS
Principal Scientist
Attachment: Pre-Construction Notification Application
2
DWQ ID: _ CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #) 14,26
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1. NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2. APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3. COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD
OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN (7)
COPIES MUST BE SENT TO THE NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY,
ATTN: JOHN DORNEY, 4401 REEDY CREEK ROAD, RALEIGH, NC
27607. PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE.
1. OWNER'S NAME: Mr. Don Moss, Citizens for Economic Development, Inc.
2. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 205
SUBDIVISION NAME
CITY: Wentworth STATE: NC ZIP CODE: 27405
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE):
Reidsville Industrial Park, Sands Road, Reidsville, NC
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER: (HOME) _ (WORK) [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENTS NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
Denise M. Poulos Engineering Consulting Services Ltd. 5-C Dundas Circle, Greensboro, NC 27407, [phone]
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Rockingham - NEAREST TOWN: Reidsville
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.) The site is located on
Sands Road in Reidsville.
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Little Troublesome Creek RIVER BASIN: Haw/Cape
Fear
7. (a) IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER, (SA),
HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER
SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES ? NO X IF YES, EXPLAIN:
(b) IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES ? NO X
(c) IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF
COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
8. (a) HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROJECT? YES ? NO X IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF PREVIOUS PERMIT AND
ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401 CERTIFICATION):
(b) ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE?
YES X NO ? IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK: Possible future road crossings.
9. (a) ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBERS OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: 307.4
(b) ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
15.07 acres
10. (a) NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: X EXCAVATION:
FLOODING: X OTHER :
DRAINAGE : TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0.54
(b) (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF RELOCATED,
PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION:
LENGTH BEFORE: _ FT AFTER: _ FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): _ FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
(b) (2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: _ PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL: X
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: _ CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING: _X
OTHER:
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED
DRAINING TO THE POND? 440.91 acres WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? Pond
A will be constructed and will have a surface area of 2.14 acres. In addition, two other ponds are located on
the site that will be retrofitted.
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT TO BE USED? (ATTACH PLANS; 81/2 BY 11 DRAWINGS ONLY) The site is being
developed with an industrial park Roadways and water quality ponds will be constructed Trucks loaders,
excavators, backhoes, bulldozers, etc. will be used to develop the site.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: The purpose of the work is to construct roadways and water
quality ponds.
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN
WETLANDS (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS)
Due to the topography of the site a new water quality ponds must be constructed in the stream channel In
addition a roadway will be constructed that will cross two stream channels. Impacts to streams and
wetlands have been significantly reduced since the initial PCN application was submitted in February.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AND/OR
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY
LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL
HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
DATE CONTACTED:
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA
WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED -
From: Cheryl `Nall To: D Poulos Date: 2/7/00 Time: 2:17.52 ?M rage 4 o? 4
Feb-07-2000 11:25an From-ENGINEERING CONSULTING IRVS LTD [phone] T-182 P.002/002 F-345
17. DOES THE PROJECT INV EA1i EXPENDTIURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PURR-JC (STATE) LAND? YES N0 X(IF NO, GO TO 16)
(a) IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO TUE REQ OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACTT YES ? NO
(b) IF YES. HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINCHOUSS YES M NO ?
IF ANSWER 176 IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUA4ENTATION FROM THE STATE
CLEARINC?HOUSE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS SAGGETT. DL RECTOR STATE CLEARLNGHOUSB, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET. RALEI0H,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPIHONB [phone].
is. THE FOLLOWING ITEI+ES SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PROPOSED
ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OF FILL MATERIAL INTO
WETLANDS:
(a) WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES, AND
PONDS ON TIE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14,18,21,26.29. AND 38).
ALL STREAM (INTERMITTHNT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON
THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OF 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET
OF THEIR EQUIVALENT.
(b) IF AVAU.AT3 A REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO HE II"ACTED BY
PROJECT.
(c) IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHI=RTS
RI3LEVANT TO THS PLACEMENT OF THB DEIMSIRATION LINE.
(d) ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORUWATER MANAtMMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
(s) WHAT IS LAM USE OF SURROUN13ING PROPERTY? Rasidential/conwllemial
(Q IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL? Swisarv sewer
ly3m
SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTW, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: V41VMANDS OR WATERS OF TUE US MAY NOT 13E IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
I. ISSUANCE OF A. SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT.
2. EITHER TETs ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
CERTIFICATION, AND
3. (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE NORTH
CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEM$NT
PROGRAM,
2- 7- Mn
(AGENTS SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORJZA77ON L FROM
THE OWNER 15 PROVMED).
?,` _•? , y ? /' rye ? •_r ? • ? ? i? ? Q• • ? ?_
? 9 • Sontli Par ? _ ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
i / ?Ch • Ie •' \ 0 1? v t e 'A
87
igh
6cp
s? <F
ill osa?,
- (---.fir I\,:,?
ilk ''l?`?( ?, ,f • Y?
11
??' -???• ?°?? ?? Cam- A1? ? .? ?'? V?
f ,
bop
_ 98r
u
ge:
l( J? ??? j Bf6 245 ' u C J
?J ?'• u
?? ? u•/ ?_ L_
fill
?
i 'TM I _ 2600 ? 1 V--`-
0 > ?c
FIGURE 1
REFERENCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SITE LOCATION MAP
REIDSVILLE, NC QUADRANGLE SLTD
DATED 1972, REVISED 1994 REIDSVILLE INDUSTRIAL PARK
ENGINEERING REIDSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: i"= 2,000' CONSULTING
SERVICES,LTD ECS PROJECT G-2339
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecUSite: ?i r%Sr>r// r Iti f ry Date:
?
Applicant/Owner: fig L'4 C County: v
Investigator: !ll
J J:? i r r,/r c State: .r?r
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: J7? / VE co'exa- 1
J
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? 'mss Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

2. /Ur 10.
3. /?XtC?-rt2oi1 ,P'?ot?+?yi?tJF ?G- 11.
4. !? Qom/ ??.nfvRQ STy P9CI?/UA _4?? 1 Pty C Z_ 12.
5. ?}GE? QLrc ?/?L?/?1 ???` 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC ?O D/D
(excluding FAC -)
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Inundated
Saturated in upper 12 Inches'
_ Other
V _'No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
-Drift Lines
- -Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
-
Depth of Surface Water:- (in.) water-stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: S (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

'0 _ /"i-. , !j_ rl dw i f. "_ / Panw 7 of')
SOILS r1v WlW aJ- F__V_ f Sri. -
Map Unit Name n L /
-
Ph
?C?z4
Drainage Class:
n
_
ase):
(Series and Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): jyPlL `/U???QUry?yS Confirm Mapped Type? es No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Horizon) Munsell Moist _ Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor ,-
-Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime
-Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:
2Lc?
S
?«4ra?? ?:c2? .ter
z
?cic
° ,
Sc
o<
.
t
h?yv?
ic
WETLAND Dt I tKMINA I iVn
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? es
Soils Present? es Ao Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Hydric No
Remarks:
E T•f 2c`E C?F,z Cuero e i,???E DoT ???SeuT, i! S•f?r?:civ? ?x v? 17
to A !.?c rte .
Aooroved by HQUSACE 3192
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: EC u• ?% J'.? 41'-?t Date: lh4,-c
Applicant/Owner: County: M
Investigator: - / State: /UC
Y
s Community ID: ?-? CCJG
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? e
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes N Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. SYrh p/?r.¢?? ! c / GETc?L1S fl L 9.
2.y1?T s n.4/!? STY?r°C?Ui9 Sig ?rP r=?C 10.

4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC d
(excluding FAC
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge /Inundated
-
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
/ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches'
Water Marks
_
No Recorded Data Available Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
l
ands
-Drainage Patterns in Wet
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water:- (in.) TWater-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: S[;2{{!r (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
S!> ! (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

,?_ n ., n lJ„D Lr x/1_'1 0-1 MI
SOILS rro ecuoite:
Map Unit Name
ilc SGT Gc^i9/+?
(
?c UQ?,
Drainage Class:
/
?
(Series and Phase):
S Field Observations
ed Type? es No
Confirm Ma
Taxonomy (Subgroup): % YPlI FLU L-'JLQGf1 ' % pp
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Horizon) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.

/off r?
? - ? a- ?
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol -Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Histic Epipedon -
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime -
-Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:

^rC
WETLAND DETERMINA I wN
(Circl
(Circle)
[Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No
etland Hydrology Present? es No
yddo Soils Present? es No TIshis Sampling Point Within a Wetland? D No
Remarks:
TAE
by
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
o Date: 1)7'42G'X 9
lfz O
Project/Site: L
t E G County:
Applicant/Owner: i State: ?V(?
Investigator: u

Na-
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? le
l \
ID:
s
s
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
1. L?u?cr?r9 S?Jc.u?c.g 9.
??p??
2. D?ma')Q -:5 1-, :C, 10.
3.Di ?? CA cGiNiRN?9 STDT r'/JG 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
?
OX
(excluding FAC) oG
?
Remarks:
rhG ?in?,vi9Ni ?E6.E?,y7/a,? -zS /?yT?o?ifylrC•
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches'
-Aerial Photographs
Other -Water Marks
o Recorded Data-Available -Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
-
rns in Wetlands
P
i
tt
e
nage
a
Dra
-
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Field Observations: Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: /_ (in.) -
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 7 / a (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: / O (in.) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

_ n //' ,.1 / YQD` -J-N.44_ :R pnno 9 of')
OWN- -
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):
Drainage Class: 2 .

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? /. s1 No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
L'nches) (Horizon) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
iz Z/ h, _ o'l T
S-,Q /O
-T
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions
4 -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
r
Wt I LANU Ur- I CKMINA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present? es

No
No
No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No

Annroved by HQUSACE 3/92
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: Date: C

Count
:
L_
Applicant/Owner: y
State: nV r
Investigator:
N Community ID:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
F
'
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? s Transect ID:
Plot ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. 9.
2. 10.
t 14A
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
15.
$ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC G/
(excluding FAC)
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge -Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches"
Aerial Photographs -
_
Other -Water Marks
_
_&,46 Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
-
tterns in Wetlands
P
i
a
nage
-Dra
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Field Observations: Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: ? (in.) -Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 7 (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
G??cr ? D 16?4zs/
l) , ./?-' " // r,,;-) Q.11?i' 1,,40- U Pane 2 of 2

Map Unit Name
?
a
-
S
r` nn
e Class:
Draina
ia,,
-Pe
-
ita
(Series and Phase): ?/h
r Gr g
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): 25?L/r f-/(?!!? ? ?GlJTS Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Horizon) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:

WETLAND Ut I tKMINA 11UN
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? N
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes o Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
7_ j e ,77,g_-6 C?CTnG9%vv C2!!Y2 / /} ?p2 c /1i07'
IVCI- Z-CC 60,17-4 /,0 1'9

Annroved by HQUSACE 3/92
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
,d "ame
Project/Site: _Zw PPi . Scli
Date: mwme
Applicant/Owner: ,. , 5 County:
Investigator: F o /o S State: A,-C
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? e Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? o Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on revers .)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. t7l?co? Ji9po/C1 iCA V/ VC F/fC - 9.
2. /L/4X e07U/1D/?'OL/.f t///fJC 1r;97C_ 10.
3. 19CG2 /lu&eo,*! Tetc ?C 11.
4. &TU 6S N ?g lO f S P<< /rW C c.) 12.
5. Z1QU1hAM4_4e_Sr_ 13.
6. (__eoA2ws AMGOYL;f 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC 2 ?j
(excluding FAC -)
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators
-
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Inundated
-
_ Aerial Photographs Saturated in Upper 12 Inches'
_ Other -Water Marks
)(No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
_ -Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Pattems in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: S (in.) -water-stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 5-0ec (in.) -Local Soil Survey Data

sUe4eC
i _FAC-Neutral Test
R
k
i
i
n.)
(
Depth to Saturated Soil: I emar
s)
n
n
Other (Expla
Remarks:
017254,,J? ?r©??? -z,??CXf/2>?-S__ ©?- ,eat ?,
7-.n A111- Pnne2nf2

Map Unit Name
SiL> LD/1 ?J
ItJGI
¢?
Ph
Drainage Class: ?G2 {NCG/
?
I ?
ase):
(Series and Field Observations P!.
Taxonomy (Subgroup): rY?lC, FLQ?/¢Qyz!'_Q Confirm Mapped Type? No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) (Horizon) (Munsell Moist)
°? Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
-7.5-v ?i 306' 4- /V
C?-' (07
?T`T
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
?
'
'
`
.
Ucc
c o?St?
n?'??U?,?2S ?vGG
/?yD2?c ,so?c Z
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? es No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? es No
Remarks:
TtiE T.G?c Lc7G7-(/f? C?lTc?l?s ??G ?OeG"g?NT / tic S/3i??/.t'c ?O?,v>
!.S GaGA7c? X17 X11,7 /f G?GTL/J'va. ?J
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD. _
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetland/401 Unit
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
December 11, 2000
DEC 1 4W
Subject: 401 Water Quality Certification
Reidsville Industrial Park
Reidsville, Rockingham County, North Carolina
ECS Project G-23390
DWQ Project #000254
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This is in response to your November 3, 2000 letter concerning the 401 Water Quality Certification for
the Reidsville Industrial Park. We understand that mitigation will be required for 201 linear feet of
stream channel impact associated with road construction. Ms. Jennifer Frye with the NCDENR
Winston-Salem Regional Office has agreed to visit the site on December 20 to determine if there are
available and viable streams that could be restored in order to satisfy the mitigation requirement. Upon
completion of that visit, we will submit a conceptual mitigation proposal.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions concerning this request or if
additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
(Z2111A?
Denise M. Poulos, LSS
Principal Scientist
cc: Mr. Don Moss
Ms. Jennifer Frye
6909 International Drive, Suite 103 • Greensboro, NC 27409 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen, MD • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, IL • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA
• Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Raleigh, NC • Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA • Williamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC
ot0 W A r?q
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIPT
March 9, 2001
Mr. Don Moss
Citizens for Economic Development
Post Office Box 205 IR 1 4 2001
Wentworth, North Carolina 27375
Subject: DWQ #: 000254
County: Rockingham
The Wetlands Restoration Program has received a check in the amount of
$ 25,125.00 check number 1272 as payment for the compensatory mitigation
requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification issued for the subject project.
This receipt serves as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements
for this project have been satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all
other conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local
government permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the
NCWRP is responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated
with this project and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified.
As specified, the NCWRP will restore 201 linear feet of stream in subbasin 030601
of the Roanoke River basin.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Ronald E. errell,
Program Manager
REF/cvb
cc:
NCDENR
Customer Service
Rob Ridings, DWQ
file
Division of Water Quality 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Wetlands Restoration Program [phone] Fax: [phone]
1 800 623-7748