NC0062413_Wasteload Allocation_19930330

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNINL COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0062413
Linville Ridge Country Club WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Compliance
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
March 30, 1993
This aooumeat is printea on reuse paper - igaoz-e any
coanteat on the reverse side

DRAFT 3/6/2018 - SUBJECT .TO. CHANGE r .
[Bracketeditalicized comments are'temporany disclosures for Buyers]
specifically depicted on the Plans.
Section 1.20 "Mortgage" shall mean and refer to a mortgage or deed of trust constituting a first
lien on a Unit.
Section 1.21 "Mortgagee" shall mean and refer to the owner and holder of a Mortgage that has
notified the Association in writing of its name and address, and that it holds a Mortgage on a Unit. Such
notice will be deemed to include a request that the Mortgagee be given the notices and other rights described
in Article XVI.
Section 1.22 "North Carolina Condominium Act" shall mean and refer to Chapter 47C of the
North Carolina General Statutes.
Section 1.23 "Owner" shall mean and refer to the record owner, whether one or more persons
or entities, of fee simple title to any Unit but shall exclude those persons or entities having an interest in
any Unit as merely security for the payment or performance of an obligation.
Section 1.24 "Parking Facility" shall refer to the one (1) story at grade parking garage to be
constructed under the Buildings which will generally be a Common Element (containing Limited Common
Element spaces, land perhaps garages and storage spacesl) the use of which shall be restricted as more
particularly described in Section 3.1 of this Declaration.
Section 1.25 "Plans" shall mean and refer ' to the Condominium plat and plans, prepared by
Wilbur and Associates, PA and recorded under the name of the Condominium in the Unit Ownership File
under the file number stamped or written on the first page of this Declaration in the Registry. The Plans are
hereby incorporated herein by reference as if the same were attached to this Declaration.
Section 1.26 "Pro e " shall mean and refer to the Land, the Buildings (including all Units and
Common Elements therein or comprising the same) and all other improvements and structures located on
the Land, and all easements, rights and appurtenances belonging or appertaining to the Land. [if not all
Property for all Buildings is added initially then the -remaining Property that may be added shall be
defined as the "Additional Property"1
Section 1.27 "Registry" shall mean and refer to the Office of the Register of Deeds of
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Section 1.28 "Special Declarant Rights" shall mean has the meaning given in N.C.G.S.
§47C-1-103 .
Section 1.29 "Supplemental Declaration" shall mean any supplement or amendment to this
Declaration pursuant to which Declarant exercises any right of Declarant reserved herein to add construct
and add additional Buildings, Common Elements and Units to the Condominium, in conjunction with its
phasing of the Condominium.
Section 1.30 "Unit" shall mean and refer to a portion of the Property located within a Building
that is the subject of individual ownership by an Owner (as more particularly described in Article IV of this
Declaration). ;
ln' addition; the definitions set forth. in §47C-1-103 of the North Carolina General Statutes are
incorporated in this Declaration by reference, and the terms defined therein shall have the meanings set

m5oz.,k tN Bps-io Stit-ctia+tat.i r-G
rW YC .lk. tY LA)"
hoc m�-rz- A� (3F�taa ac, o� s� c3g+ si NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0062413
PERM1= NAME: Linville Ridge Development Company
FACILITY NAME: Linville Ridge Development
Facility Status: _ Existing
Permit Status: Modification
Major
Minor J
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.015 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
f
II
Comments:
Relocation of discharge point to defined positive 7010 flow
STREAM INDEX: 11-29-4
RECEIVING STREAM: an warned tributary to West Fork Linville River
Class: C-Trout
Sub -Basin: 03-08-30
Reference USGS Quad: C11SE, Grandfather M (please attach)
County: Avery
Regional Office:
Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/95 Treatment Plant Class: I (III?)
Classification changes within three miles:
C-Trout to Linville Falls( B-Tr )ca. 10 mil
Requested by: Jule Shanklin ,Date: 10/5/92
Prepared by: A ate: 3 S0 93
Reviewed by: Date: 0
3o 3
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
J
l0
4z
713Z
Drainage Area (mil ) , /9 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): yb
7Q10 (cfs) -,'. Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 'z 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (m )
So
30
NH3-N (mgA)
D.O. (mg/1)
ry
TSS (mg/1)
6
�o
F. Col. (/100 ml)
Zoo
Zoo
pH (SU)
_ 9
6-7
Comments: �1C refer: Basinwida / Streamline WLA file
at front of subbasin

Cranston, Robertson & Whitehurst, P.C. �Pw - t
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS j
• OLD ENGINE COMPANY NO. 1 POST OFFICE BOX 2546
452 ELLIS STREET AUGUSTA. GEORGIA 30903 '
TELEPHONE [phone]" I
TELECOPIER (404) 722.M9
JOHN T. ATTAWAY
J. CRAIG CRANSTON, RE G. WAYNE COX
THOMAS H. ROBERTSON, P.E. June 29, 1992 JAMES B. CRANFORD, JR, P.E
ELDRIDGE A. WHITEHURST. At, P.E. VAUGHN L MAXWELI, Ill
P. FRANK PURNELL
WAYNE SWAM, L&
North Carolina Department of Environment, ANDREW R. WIGGERS
Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P. O. Box 29535 `�' �
ry t' y
Raleigh, North Carolina 2.7626-0535 c, ?c?
Attention: Mr. Jgl hanklin A
rnp
-v
Re: NPDES Permit No. RC0062413a
Linville Ridge Development
Avery County, North Carolina w
Our File No. 90-13 co
Gentlemen:
On July 2, 1990, your office issued a renewal of NPDES Permit
No.. NCO062413 to the Linville Ridge Development Company for
discharge from a wastewater treatment plant serving their clubhouse
facilities. As a condition of the permit, it was required that an
engineering evaluation be conducted within 12 months to evaluate
non -discharge alternatives. The result of the evaluation was, -a
determination and recommendation that the effluent be piped
downstream some 21000 feet to a point of positive 7Q10 flow rate.
On behalf of our client, Linville Ridge Development Company, we had
transmitted to you our initial report and had 'subsequently sent
additional supporting documentation. It was our understanding that
your office had agreed with our.findings and recommendations.
We now understand through a June 9, 1992, letter to Linville
Ridge Development Company that the proposed relocating of the
discharge constitutes a major modification to the NPDES Permit and
as such must be submitted through a formal application with
supporting documentation. Therefore, we hereby request on behalf
of the Linville Ridge Development Company that you. modify- the
current NPDES Permit -,so as to approve the relocation of the
discharge to a point approximately 2,000 feet downstream.
Attached please find three (3) copies of "Application for
Permit to Discharge -Short Form Dll which have been executed by Mr.
Gary G. JohnsTon of Linville Ridge Development Company, together
with a check for $400.00 to cover the processing fee. Also
included are the design calculations supporting our proposed
discharge•point relocation which is indicated on an accompanying
map. These calculations are appended to a copy of a letter to Mr.
Dale Overcash of your office marked as Exhibit A.

North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
June 29, 1992
Page 2
We trust that this submittal is complete and- satisfactory for
your organizational review. Should you have additional questions
or wish to discuss the matter further, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
CRANSTON, ROBERTSON & WHITEHURST, P.C.
Eldridge A. Whitehurst, Jr , P.E.
EAW/jk
cc: Mr. Gary G. Johnston

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Perot Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACE SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Linville Ridge Development
NCO062413
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Modification /Relocation
UT West Fork Linville River
C-Trout
030830
Avery
Asheville
Shanklin
10/6/92
C11SE
Request #
7132
0 on��
FEB 111993
ASHE E IRALIlY S 010 �CTIFON
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
0213828888
Date:
12/92
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.19
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
0.07
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.12
Average Flow (cfs):
0.46
30Q2 (cfs):
0.16
IWC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting relocation of discharge for stream with positive 7Q10 flow. Tech Support
recommends issuance of NPDES permit at relocation site.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineerin
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
Date:_1/29/93_
MAR 0 7 1993

CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits: OAUd+-
Y"q ldCQ 8�
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.015
0.015
BOD5 (mgft
30
30
NH3N (mg/1):
1
1.8
DO (mg/1):
6
6
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
Fecal Col. (1100 ml):
200
200
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µgh):
17
17
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
IN (mg/1):
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
PH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Beginning
7/1/93
Summer
Winter
0.015
0.015
5
10
1
1.8
6
6
30
30
200
200
6-9
6-9
17
17
/ /OCCc�&-n 6 L fP
Monthly Average
Summer Winter WQ or EL
0.015 0.015
30 30
3 10 WQ,AT
30
30
200
200
6-9
6-9
28
28
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
NH3, Chlorine
_X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity
of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
0
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
0
Wasteload sent- to EPA? (Major) _ _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

r-
is STATE
Vd
1. t" i ,•� � Vj r
State of North Carolina 'k��i.�'��BRA
�
Department. of Environment, Health, and Natural . esourCe�
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan R Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 12, 1993
Mr. Gary G. Johnston
Linville Ridge Development'Company
Post Office Box 704
Linville, North Carolina 28646
Subject: Change in Effluent Limitations
for Discharge -Relocation
Linville Ridge Development
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
NPDES Permit No. NCOO62413
Avery County
Dear Mr. Jonnston:
In accordance with your permit modification request, the
Technical Support Branch of the Division of Environmental Management
has completed a wasteload allocation for the requested change in
location of your wastewater discharge. Attached to this letter is a
copy of the wasteload which lists the existing permit limits and the
proposed effluent limits to be included in the permit if the discharge
is relocated.
Please advise this office as soon as possible as to your choice
of maintaining the existing discharge location and complying with the
more stringent effluent limits or relocating the discharge point to a
location where the stream has more flow. Additionally, I would like
to point out that effluent data -submitted for your facility indcates
that there maybe a problem complying with the ammonia nitrogen limit
without additional treatment facilities. It is recommended that you
discuss this situation with your engineers to determine the best
solution for this problem.
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 • Telephone [phone]

Mr. Gary Johnston
February 12, 1993
Page Two
If you have questions or wish to discuss this matter, please call
me at 704/251-6208.
Sincerely, /f
;;E-��
Michael R. Parker v
Environmental Specialist
xc: James B. Cranford
Technical Support

L
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits: OALO-HrlqllJ CU)'B?-�
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Monthly
Average
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.015
0.015
BODS (mg/1):
30
30
NH3N (mg/1):
1
1.8
DO (mg/1):
6
6
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
200
200
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1)
17
17
Recommended Limits: @
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/l):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP. (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Beginning
7/l/93
Summer
Winter
0.015
0.015
5
10
1
1.8
6
6
30
30
200
200
6-9
6-9
17
17
/'.2 %Oca'4 " 6 (- 0
Monthly Average
Summer Winter WQ or EL
0.015 0.015
30 30
3 10 WQ,AT
nr
nr
30
30
200
200
6-9
6-9
28
28
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
Parameter(s) Affected
NH3, Chlorine
X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity
of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

ILI
-- O,/Smiy
�� Q3G �� Zy (O•ISM!'�
/%IlJGs O2/3, ?-2rV b
0..,25'
nr� �s ,(� 1Sz��p •.4i
0'7 �•/sue D./Ldx
`i
3oc?-L (a,36/"l -- 30 L _ o,3fJ�o,sBJ
c{s 3g�z

linville ridge dev.
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10: 0.0700 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 7.7500 mg/l
AL (1/1.8 mg/1) : 1000.00 ug/l
Upstream NH3 Conc.: 220.0000 ug/l
Design Flow: 0.0150 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 2097.45 ug/l
2.097453 mg/l
NH3 Limit: 3348.387 ug/l
3.348387 mg/l
AMMONIA ANALYSIS (WINTER)
7Q10: 0.1200 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 7.7500 mg/1
AL '(1/1.8 mg/1) : 1800.00 ug/l
Upstream NH3 Conc.: 220.0000 ug/l
Design Flow: 0.0150 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 1442.15 ug/l
1.442146 mg/l
NH3 Limit: 9954.838 ug/l
9.954838 mg/l

r
linville ridge dev.
CHLORINE ANALYSIS
7Q10: 0.0700 cfs i
CL2 Effl. Conc:� 0.0000 mg/l
AL (17/19 ug/1): 17.0000 ug/l
Upstream CL2 Conc.: 0.0000 ug/l
Design Flow: 0.0150 MGD
Predicted CL2 Downstream: 0.00 ug/l
0 mg/l
CL2 Limit: 68.18279 ug/l
0.068182 mg/1