20001199 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20000914

7-m . }log
FacIIIty Na
,r Project Num
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources / Tk.W;W? •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor D E N R
Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director
October 27, 2000
D W Q# 00-1199
New Hanover County
Figure "8" Beach Homeowners Association
C/o Art Poineau
15 Bridge Road
Wilmington, NC, 28411
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Dear Mr. Poineau:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to conduct maintenance dredging of 42.19 acres of
Rich Inlet Channel, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality on September 14, 2000. After
reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3274.
This Certification allows you to use your CAMA Permit when it is issued by the NC Division of Coastal Management. In
addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also this approval will expire
when the accompanying CAMA Permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be
required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the
attached certification and the additional condition listed below.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B
of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447.
This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Sincerely,
f?
e . Steve
Non-Discharge Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post consumer paper
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: J. Steenhuis
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Birk Shiver
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Figure 8 Homeowners Association
Project Number 00 1331
Recvd From DCM
Received Date 10/18/00 Recvd By Region
Project Type dredge excavation
County New Hanover
County2
Region Wilmington
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
LAMA SM O Y _0N I 18-87-20 SA rORW 30,624. 0.39 F_ r?- ?-
f ?-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
F_ I F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue * Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
This office has no objection to the project but this office is concerned about the turbidity and the
constant turbidity that will be associated with a eject of this magnitude,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Figure 8 Homeowners Association County New Hanover
Project Number 00 1331
Regional Contact:
Date:
J. Steenhuis
10/24/2000
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office Page Number 2
Central Office
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Figure 8 Beach Homeowners Assoc., Inc.
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Figure 8 Island, adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean, between
Rich and Masons Inlets in northeast New Hanover County.
Photo Index -149: 24-294-296 1M: 4 176-10 & 11
State Plane Coordinates - X:2384160 Y: 196447 0 0 1 1 9 9'
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA & D&F
4. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 7/14/00
Office - Wilmington
5. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - New Hanover Co. /Wilmington
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation/Resource Protection
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW,PT, OH
Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Private/Community
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - Individual septic tanks
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Single-family residences
Planned - N/A
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 2 ft. /yr.
Source - 1992 LTAASCR-pg 4 of 17
6. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
rAn1:7nnVn Mi T 7:27% l1TryT1'"
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
en water 1837845 sa_ft
C Other - Beach area 1800000 s ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 3,637,845 sqft.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(I) Water Classification: SA-ORW Open: YES
7. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicants propose to complete maintenance dredging of Rich Inlet
Channel (Nixon Creek) area and deposit the excavated sediments along the northern beachfront
of Figure 8 Island.
Figure 8 Beach Homeowners Assoc., Inc. f
Page 2
8. PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Figure 8 Island is a private residential barrier island located in the northeast comer of New Hanover
County, adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean and Middle Sound, between Masons and Rich Inlets. The island
is accessed from the mainland at the end of Edgewater Club Road (SR 1402), by a private bridge over
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW) and an earthen causeway which traverses Middle Sound.
In the project area, the waters of the are classified as SA-ORW, by the NC Division of Water Quality,
and they are OPEN to the harvest of shellfish . The extensive salt marshes between Figure 8 Island and
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway are designated as Primary Nursery Area (PNA), by the NC Division
of Marine Fisheries, however, the open water area of Nixon Channel, and Rich Inlet are not designated
as PNAs.
Over the years, the property owners of Figure 8 Island have obtained a number of State permits for
channel maintenance, beach renourishment, and beach bulldozing. In 1989, the Association initiated the
development of a long range plan that addressed channel maintenance and beach restoration on an island-
wide basis. The resulting State permits, #26-92 and #21-93, authorized channel maintenance projects at
the north and south ends of the island, both with beach deposition of excavated materials. This beach
reconstruction project was completed in 1993. In 1996, hurricanes Bertha and Fran caused extensive
damage and serious erosion of the beach on Figure 8 Island. Following the storms, the Figure 8
Homeowners Association and the Shell Island Resort Association began discussions of a potential joint
project which included the dredging of Masons Creek, Banks Channel, and relocating the Masons Inlet
Channel. Excavated materials would be used to close the current channel of Masons Inlet which is
threatening Shell Island Resort, and also provide the renourishment material to renourish Figure 8 Island
beaches. A draft Environmental Assessment for the project was prepared and circulated to various State
and federal review agencies in January 1997. However, efforts to obtain the necessary property rights for
the project were unsuccessful and a modified project alternative was developed. A draft Environmental
Assessment for the modified project was prepared and distributed in October 1997. Based upon
preliminary comments from various agencies concerned about the Masons Inlet relocation and the
potential need for an Environmental Impact Statement, the applicants opted to place the modified proposal
on hold, and pursue a reduced project, involving only the areas that had been authorized by previous
permits. In December of 1997, the applicants filed an application that proposed the maintenance dredging
of the Banks Channel and Rich Inlet areas, with beach disposal of excavated material (previously State
Permits # 21-93 & #26-92). Due to the concerns of several review agencies about the potential impacts
of the Rich Inlet area dredging, the applicant withdrew that portion of the proposed project from the
application. State Permit # 29- 98 was issued to authorize maintenance dredging of the Banks Channel
portion of the project. Subsequently, in 1998, the applicants applied for and were issued State Permit #
12-99, to excavate an existing USACOE spoils disposal island, located on the AIWW near Masons Creek,
for beach compatible sand to be placed on the beach (southern & central areas). In the interim, Hurricanes
Bonnie in 1998, and Dennis and Floyd in 1999, again devastated the beachfront at Figure 8 Island. The
Masons Inlet Relocation Project, now sponsored by New Hanover County, has continued to evolve and
is currently under review by State and federal agencies. Figure 8 Beach H.O.A., Shell Island Resort, the
Town of Wrightsville Beach, and New Hanover County all remain integral parties in that pending
application.
Figure 8 Beach Homeowners Assoc., Inc.
Page 3
This application constitutes the re-submittal of the Rich Inlet Channel (Nixons Channel) Maintenance
Dredging Project. The applicants propose to dredge the area. previously excavated under State Permit No.
21-93. The proposed area to be dredged would be approximately 3300 feet in length and vary from 250
feet to 750 feet in width (1,837,845 S.F.). The proposed excavation depth is -9 feet at MLW. All
excavation would be accomplished by a hydraulic pipeline dredge. The excavated sediment would be
pumped to the northern end of the Figure 8. Island oceanfront to be utilized in beach renourishment and
reconstruction. The resulting beach profile is anticipated to be a continuous dune, constructed to
approximately 9.5 feet elevation MSL, with a berm width of at least 100 feet, and then tapering at a 20:1
slope to the -2.0 MSL contour. The applicants have completed a recent hydrographic survey (10/22/99)
of the shoaled area which indicates that approximately 400,000 cubic yards of sand would be excavated
from the area. Grain size analysis of the sediments within the borrow area indicate compatibility with the
existing beach sand.
9. ANTICIPA n IMpA TS
The project would result in the excavation of 1, 837,845 square feet (42.2 acres) of shallow bottom within
the Rich Inlet Channel (Nixon Channel) project area. The projected 400,000 cubic yards of dredged sand
sediments would be placed over the northern end of Figure 8 Island's upper beach shoreline (9,000 L. F.).
The dredging and beach renourishment activities would create some short-term turbidity, and impact the
intertidal macro fauna and benthic communities within the project area. The applicant's consultants
contend that if the project is timed to avoid periods of peak biological activity and outside of sea turtle
nesting season, no long-term adverse impacts would be anticipated, and that affected species populations
would return to pre-project distributions within one or two years. The Rich Inlet Channel (Nixon
Channel) is a very high traffic area for boating activity and the proposed excavation would allow for
easier and safer navigation in the badly shoaled area of the waterbody, however, the scope of the project
exceeds the dimensions of maintaining traditional navigation channels. The project would serve to
reconstruct and renourish the beach at Figure 8 Island, thus affording additional protection to oceanfront
property owners from seasonal and storm erosion.
%
001199

t wresmLL & RANwr. L.L.P.
ATTommys AT LAW
107a N40RTH anooNb STRMT
Poaw OrrloA Box 1049
W7*_*•*NGTorr. NonTa CAmoLiwA 8408
Josh C. wsasm*• III
WTI*-*Au A RAMgY. JA.
July 10, 2000
TWjraosm 910?784r7475
PAZ 910.764-7667
$-MJR,WAFn-1®IIEISA c W T9.l61T
Mr. Robert Stroud
NC Division of Coastal Management
127 N. Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 29405
Mr. Jeff Richter
Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
001'9.9
Re: Xaintenance Dredging (Rich Inlet) and Beach
Rebuilding, Figure 8 Beach Homeowners Assoc., Inc.
Dear Messrs Stroud and Richter:
Following is a revised permit application for in-place
maintenance of previously permitted CAMA permit 21-93 and USACE
permit 1992-03352. This application was submitted in December
1999 and was -suspended by DCM in mid-February 2000 as deficient
in the following respects:
1. Failure to pay the recently increased application
fee,
2. Lack of current data on sediment samples to
determine beach compatibility,
3. Submission of hydrographic survey and plan view
information on maps of improper scale, and
-4. Incomplete dimensions of the excavation on the
DCM-MP-2 form.
All the deficiencies have now been corrected and a
complete new application package is submitted herewith. The
package contains the original transmittal letter for your
reference.
This continues to be a matter of some urgency for
Figure Eight as the shoaling continues in Nixon Channel and beach
erosion has increased in the vicinity of the disposal area. In
view of the prior submittal, the Association would hope that this
application can be reviewed as quickly as possible.
+v .-- . , . . - "J
Mr. Stroud & Mr. Richter
July 10, 2000
Page 2
Twelve copies of the application are being provided to
Mr. Stroud and five copies to Mr. Richter by hand delivery. One
copy is being sent to the Division of Coastal Management in
Raleigh by first class mail.
Sincerely,
WESSELL& RANEY, L . L . P .
`nn
W. A. Raney, Jr.
WAR: jn
Enclosures
VM\8avizon\R59-233-C295
cc: Mr. Doug Huggett-DCM Raleigh

d
I'
TOTAL P.©3
`VESSELL & RaNEy, L.L.P.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
107-B NORTH SECOND STREET
POST ONCE BOX 1049
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402
JOHN C. WESSEI"T. III TELEPHONM 910-762-7475
Wrrj-TA3f A. RANEY. JR. PAX 910.762.7557
E-N- LUMWANDR®WU_NM GTON.NET
December 22, 1999
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Mr. Robert Stroud
( NC Division of Coastal Management
127 N. Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Mr. Jeff Richter
Corps" of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Maintenance Dredging (Rich Inlet) and Beach
Rebuilding Figure 118" Beach Homeowners' Association
Dear Messrs. Stroud and Richter:
Delivered herewith are permit applications for
L maintenance dredging and beach rebuilding at the north end of
Figure Eight Island. The application is for a project that is
essentially the same as the project permitted in CAMA Permit 21-93
and Corp Permit 1992-03352. It involves dredging a portion of a
shoal area in Rich Inlet Creek (Nixon Channel) and the placement of
the dredged sand on the ocean beaches of Figure Eight Island
beginning at Inlet Hook and proceeding southward. The prior
project proposed dredging a smaller volume of sand than was
actually available within the footprint of the project and a
smaller volume than is being requested in this application. The
., prior project also proposed rebuilding a shorter segment of beach
than the current application.
The area to be dredged has shoaled considerably since the
dredging that took place in December 1996 under Permit 21-93. The
ocean beach proposed for rebuilding was seriously eroded by
Hurricanes Dennis, Floyd and Irene in the summer and fall of 1999.
The applicant requests that the project be considered
under the provisions of 15A NCAC 7K.0202(1) in which "In-place
Maintenance of Previously Permitted Projects" is exempted from
major development permit requirements. In support of this request
the applicant submits that the three conditions for exemption as
stated in the rule are met as follows:
Mr. Robert Stroud
Mr. Jeff Richter
- December 22, 1999
Page 2
(a) "Project dimensions remain the same as. . . those
dimensions authorized under the previously permitted project. . .;
and"
(b) "The project is for similar purposes as those of the
previously permitted project; and"
(c) There has been no "change of conditions in the area,
newly found facts or newly reached opinions," to the knowledge of
the applicant which "would cause negative impacts to the
environment and/or adjacent property owners."
In support of item (c) I am enclosing a brief statement
from Dr. William Cleary indicating that the project should have a
beneficial effect on the property owners located closest to the
area being dredged. the benefit to the property owners in the area
of beach rebuilding is obvious. Impacts to the environment should
be no different than for the previously permitted project.
I am providing twelve copies of the application to Mr.
Stroud and five copies to Mr. Richter as well as a copy to the
Division of Coastal Management in Raleigh by first class mail.
Sincerely,
WAR: dc
Enclosures
CC: Doug Huggett
- DCM Raleigh
WE,?SSELL & RANEY, L . L . P .
VV, - G. -
W. A. Raney, Jr.
WAR\environ\R96-233-C251
William J. Cleary
Professional Consulting
5425 Marina Club Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina. 28409
William 1. Cleary, Ph.))., P.G.
e-mail: clcaryw®oooatalnct.com
21 December 1999
Telephone: Home [phone]
Office: [phone] 11251
F= [phone]
Mr. Art Poineau
f Figure Eight Beach
Homeowner's Association
IS Bridge Road
Wilmington, NC 25405
Dear Art:
1 am responding to a request by Mr. Bill Raney to evaluate the potential impacts of the
proposed dredging of a portion ofNixon's Creek on Figure Eight Island. The major
concern of a number of individuals was an increase in the rate of erosion of lots # 540-
552 along the estuarine shoreline that border the proposed project. 1 have reviewed the
permit application and discussed the project's design with Mr. Bud Davis and Mr. Bill
Raney. In my opinion it appears that the proposed dredging operations will not have any
adverse impact on the shoreline bordering the channel.
A review of available historic aerial photographs indicates that the erosion of the
shoreline along lots 540-552 has increased markedly during the past five years. The
recession of the sound side shoreline in this region steins From the expansion of the large
elongated flood tidal delta (sand shoals) that has developed immediately landward of the
main channel of Rich Inlet. During the past three years large lobate sand bodies have
migrated into the channel segment bordering lots 544-550. The continued movement of
these lobes of sand has prompted the eastern margin of the: channel to encroach onto the
Figure Eight Island shoreline. The extensive exposures of high mush peat and lagoon-
material that is commonly observed along this reach of shoreline testifies to the erosion
associated with the channel encroachment.
Dredging of the channel as indicted in the permit application will mitigate the erosion of
both the upland areas along the above mentioned lots as well as portions of the marsh
currently being eroded. Removing the sand that has been transported into this segment of
the channel will likely have a positive impact on the soundside property. if additional
information or clarification on any of the above points is needed please advise.
Best regards,
William 1. Cleary P
FOR PERMITS TO DEVELOP IN NORTH CAROLINA'S COASTAL AREA
COMPLETE THIS
FORM TO BEGIN
THE APPLICATION
PROCESS UNDER
THE LAWS LISTED
BELOW.
r ? k
4;x•ra ..•lN??t•n?
STATE
Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA)
N.C.G.S.113A-118
Dredge and Fill
N.C.G.S.113-229
Water Quality Certification
N.C.G.S.143-215
Easements in Land
Covered by Water
N.C.G.S.146-6,146-12
?y y kr. yJty? 1
••1%?y? `ayjinr.
r?n
•ayi??
,.?lf??sn`g4ti ?y?•
t.'ati ?•
???rfti ?SwR4?Fl%
FEDERAL
Construction, Dredging,
Filling, or Other Work in
Navigable Waters
Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899
Discharge Dredged or
Fill Material into any
Waters or Wetlands
Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act
t
DIVISION OF
COASTAL
MANAGEMENT
NORTH CAROLINA
Dept. of Environment,
Heohh and Natural
Resources
Forms DCM-MP-I-MP-b
JANUARY 1995
,Form (DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
FIGURE EIGHT ISLAND
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name FIGURE "8" BEACH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Address 15 BRIDGE ROAD
City WILMINGTON
State NC
Zip 28411 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name ART PO I NEAU
Address 15 BRIDGE ROAD
City WILMINGTON
State NC
Zip 28411 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
C. Project name (if any) RICH INLET CHANNEL
MAINTENANCE DREDGING AND BEACH RE-BUILDING
NOTE. Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), and/or
project name.
2, LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County
NEW HANOVER
c. Street address or secondary road number
ADJACENT TO BEACH ROAD NORTH (FIGURE 8 ISLAND)
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? " Yes No
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) ATLANTIC OCEAN/RICH INLET
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
EXCAVATION IN VICINITY OF RICH INLET
BEACH FILLING INLET HOOK SOUTHWARD
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? EXISTING PROJECT
c. Will the Droiect be for public, private or commercial
use? PUBLIC-DREDGING; PUBLIC/PRIVATE-BEACH FILLING
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. CHANNEL MAINTENANCE WILL FAC1L1-
TATE INCREASED AND IMPROVED USE OF EXISTING NAVI-
GATION CHANNELS; BEACH RENOURISHMENT WILL ENHANCE
RECREATIONAL USAGE OF THE BEACH AND HELP COUNT ES
EROSION PROCESSES. EXCAVATION IN RICH INLET CREEK
WILL BE BY HYDRAULIC PIPELINE DREDGE. DREDGED
SAND WILL BE CONVEYED BY PIPELINE TO THE OCEAN
BEACH FOR PLACEMENT SEAWARD OF VEGETATION/ESCARPMENT
LINE.
Revised 03/95
Corm 6CM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
EXCAVATION 43 ACRES; FILL 31 ACRES
a. Size of entire tract
h. Size of individual lot(s) SEE .ATTACHED SKETCH MAP
-c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NrV;L RICH INLET -2 TO -11 MLW (NGVD)
FIGURE EIGHT ISLAND +0.0 TO +6
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
NEW HAN FINE SAND; MADELAND; NATURAL BEACH/FOREDUNE
e. Vegetation on tract NONE I N R I CH I NLET CREEK -
NO VEGETATION IN FILL AREA
f. Man-made features now on tract BEACHFRONT HOMES,
DUNE CROSSOVERS
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation
Developed
Rural
Transitional
Community
. Other
'?. How is the tract zoned by local government?
R-20 SINGLE FAMILY
1
Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? ? Yes No
r
(Attach Zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes ? No
If yes, by whom?
-c. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes ? No
Are there wetlands on the site? ?Yes No
Coastal, (marsh) Other ?
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available)
ENTIRE EXCAVATION AREA IS INTERTIDAL OR SUBTIDAL.
NO VEGETATION IN WETLANDS.
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial /commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) PROJECT WILL
NOT CHANGE ANY EXISTING STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEM - DEEP WELLS
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by I V white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
tevited 03/49
Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name GEORGE HENRY HUTAFF TRACT NO. 2
Address C/O DAVID WARD, P.O.BOX 867, NEW BERN, NC 28563
Phone [phone]
Name ALL PROPERTY OWNERS ON FIGURE EIGHT
Address (SUBLOTS) WILL BE NOTIFIED.
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
NCDNRCD CAMA PERMIT #89-83 (4 APRIL 1984)
NCDNRCD CAMA PERMIT #21-93 (20 JANUARY 1988)
CORRESPONDING CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMITS NOT AVAILABLE
° A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 14th day of July, 2000.
Arthur Poineau
Print Name
Signature /1CQ_c2I,(-
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in th<
space provided at the bottom of each form.
RP%;cP,i niias
dorm pCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
'Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
_-Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
--proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
RICH INLET
CREEK NAVIGATIO
CHANNEL
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
OCEAN BEACH
FILL AREAS
Revised 03195

Varies
Varies 515'Avg 3.5'
3,300' 750'Max MLW 9' MLW
Max.

ah ? .
: Rs.. I

ii?4G
?
:J?... . :T.
i
9,000' VARIES* +0 TO +6
MSL
*SEE SKETCH (SHEET 4)
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below .
MHW or NWL in cubic yards 400,000 CY
b. Type of material to be excavated FINE TO MEDIUM
SAND
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic ve etation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards NONE
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area UPPER BEACH
b. Dimensions of disposal area APPROXIMATELY
9,000 LF OF OCEAN BEACH
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes * No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner. *ACTING UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? / Yes No
If yes, where? SAME BEACH AREA
,form D,CM-MP-2
.a. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
? Yes No UPPER BEACH FORESHORE
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
? Yes No
If Yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water INDETERMINATE
(2) Dimensions of fill area LESS THAN OR EQUAL
TO 50 CY/LF TO EL +9.5' X +175' BASE WIDTH
(3) Purpose of fill TO REBU I LD ERODED BEACH AND
PROVIDE STORM PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURES
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization N/A
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length N/A
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
N/A
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
0 TO 100 FEET
(Source of infor=tion)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material N/A
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area UPPER FORESHORE
WIDTH VARIES 0' TO 1001+
(2) Purpose of fill REBU 1 LD ERODED BEACH AND
PROVIDE STORM PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURES
5. GENERAL.
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? BERM WILL BE CONSTRUCTED
PARALLEL TO SHORE LINE BY BULLDOZER ON SEAWARD
EDGE OF BEACH FILL AREA
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
HYDRAULIC PIPELINE DREDGE, DOZERS, BACKHOE
c. Will wetlands be cr3ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes ? No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. TIDAL SHORELINE WILL BE
CROSSED ONLY WHERE NO VEGETATION EXISTS.
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level - APPROX. 100,000 CY ON FORESHORE BEACH AREA
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
Al
h. Type of fill material MED I UM/F I NE SAND
i. Source of fill material RICH INLET SHOAL AREA
(ALL TIDAL)
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
? Yes No
_ MATERIALS FOR BEACH RE-BUILDING TO BE BROUGHT BY
DREDGE PIPELINE
FIGURE 8 BEACH HOMEOWNERS ASSN.
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
Tulv 14, 2000
Date
Revised 03/95
1
MAINTENANCE DREDGING (RICH INLET) AND
BEACH RE-BUILDING
FIGURE EIGHT ISLAND, NORTH CAROLINA
Background
I The small boat and navigation access channel approaching Rich Inlet from the
1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW) has shoaled and shifted since Hurricanes Fran
and Bertha in 1996, Bonnie in 1998, and Dennis and Floyd in 1999, making navigation
dangerous. Correspondingly, the oceanfront at the north end of Figure Eight Island
adjacent to Rich Inlet has suffered an accelerated rate of erosion, depleting material on
the open beach and seriously eroding the primary dunes on the upper beach in this
area._ It is proposed to accomplish maintenance dredging in the inlet area in the same
footprint of previous CAMA permits. CAMA permits authorizing maintenance dredging
of the Rich Inlet access channel and placement of the dredged material on the ocean
beach as.renourishment of the sand beach have been issued twice in the past (CAMA
Permit Nos. 89-83 (4 April 1984) and 21-93 (20 January 1988)).
Project Description
It is proposed to dredge intertidal and sub-tidal shoal`areas in the generally open
water area behind Rich Inlet which connects to the AIWW. The primary channel within
the inlet proper is interrupted by shoals as it traverses across and in front of the middle
ground shoal. Behind the inlet shoal, extensive additional sub-tidal shoaling has taken
place that interferes with safe navigation of this normal-appearing open water area.
This project proposes to interconnectthe deep channel segments with deep water cuts
which would be wide enough to accommodate some stabilization shift and yet result
- in more stable approaches.
All of the sand materials removed from the Rich Inlet approach channel area will
be discharged along approximately 9,000 linear feet of beachfront, extending from
Comber Road southward about 9,000 feet. A transition adapted to the existing
beach profile with a transition section 300 to 400 feet long will be provided at both
ends of the beach fill. The basic dimensions of the beach fill will be to an elevation of
approximately 9.5 feet mean sea level_(MSL) with a berm width of at least 100 feet,
with the remainder of the materials shaped to an approximate 20 to 1 slope between
Elevation 7 and -2.0 feet MSL (see Sheets 1 and 3 of the permit application sketches
for beach fill location and proposed beach profile sketch). It is estimated that
-- approximately 400,000 cubic yards of medium to fine sand materials will be excavated
from the proposed area to be dredged by hydraulic pipeline dredge. The material will
be transported by the dredge pipeline and deposited along the beachfront using a
temporary protective berm parallel to the shoreline to control the effluent runoff,
insuring maximum upland beach deposition of the material and minimizing of
turbidities within the surf zone.
Test borings and sand samples were taken in May-June 2000 along the length
of the proposed channel maintenance dredging areas and on the ocean beach as
shown on Sheet 2 of the attached report (Appendix 6A). The sampling and testing were
done by an independent geotechnical agent with samples extracted from the near-
bottom area with a second sample about 5 feet lower and another at -18 feet. A grain
size analysis of the materials sampled is attached hereto.
Test borings and sand samples were taken in the proposed dredge area at Rich
Inlet and also on the beach strand to determine compatibility as shown on the attached
boring and testing report from ECS, Ltd., an independent geotechnical professional.
Samples were extracted from the near-bottom area with a second sample taken from
the soil column near -12 feet and the third taken at -17 to -18 feet. A grain size analysis
of the materials sampled is attached hereto.
There is reasonable compatibility between the insitu beach sand and that to be
excavated from the sound areas behind the island. Most notably, the percentages of
material ranging between 0.20 and 0.24 millimeters (mm) are typical for the beach area
as well as the sound area. Both the borrow material and the natural beach sand
contain a higher percentage of "fines" (material smaller than the No. 50 sieve) than is
considered ideal, but this is the coarsest available in the area.
All excavations are to be done by hydraulic pipeline dredge. All materials
excavated will be pumped to selected beach locations to reconstruct the beach
sections as described above. Pipeline corridors will be established to ensure that no
marsh areas or sensitive vegetation will be crossed in any case during the operation.
All dredging will be done during the winter season when biological activities in both
- the sound and beach areas will be at a minimum. During beach reconstruction
operations, dredge effluent will be directed behind the oceanward dike.
Environmental Impacts
In general, the environmental impacts resulting from the work proposed in this
' project will be relatively minimal in that all work will be done during the winter season
when biological activities are at a minimum. Inlet and estuarine tidal bottom areas that
will be disturbed during dredging operations have been previously dredged during
channel maintenance operations. Much of the area to be dredged consists of
deposited sand from Hurricane Floyd, as evidenced by comparison of aerial
photographs. The environmental effects of nourishment of the beach with beach
suitable sand should be far less than the much larger approved beach nourishment
projects at Wrightsville, Carolina, and Kure Beaches.
T l Y 3 Zg??.?
?4 ?' ,4'RvC Mi rr. r--.AT x.. .; 4' ?T ti ,-- i ? ?y??}T-?,?J'J ? ? ?y a•Yf e?'?6 f.
+t .t L#?-F•re'y/s ei qtr - - Y t+- t f,.H?.Y 3 ? 3 r ,?? ? ti 't'k'.
t r {R
wr s eb ??`Pg ' ^ i
?? .? ? ?i f A ti F F1 ? : ? ,t ?'Y-? t t -..,y s x' ? \Y?'t•L."' w+ ?' .i ?wcye
S,
71
r ??_ u - ?9 m. r tl ,v R3xI?r" 1 "{? ry, tom.' Kaa,3 -mows':
?' ? `F4,. a < J „ 1+^ ray '^. a+{ ,ng' m6 w' t n. ,R ' a?ty?] t _ .Snu
e+ -_ a r ..f'•.T.? -E?"*e-.? t *??i Mrwl tsY+ Nix??'L Z4..e ''?. .a.` '.!t?
t L t ;
??- .^.,?x4.> r.? ~ - l ,. xi• w i ,4 a - a? ???? , ? r :fit ? :_ Y..? a. ?y -sJ.s"
lL6Z f0Y9L(" WC) Nta?N6L% 6marim
FZ6t? 9 ?0 l OOOZ-L-L ?N1H 0ONVISI 8 38noij ® 13lNl HOIN 'OOSS`d S83NM03WOH LOl u^S WOMY ?V
:31V0 alb'd3i? HOd38/9N19a321a - Ndld MIS oN` ISI 8 3anOl3 Smamima ?H?rznsnroO
oN eor xvN irlozi j aasi o
¢
R\CN IN?E?
w
C9
0
w
?LL
°vi} ,
N J C4
ocqo au
a
O Po O
o
? w
°
CL
° N LO <
U
a? C wor Z
r ° t m
U
aa3 lnd ? o X o
W _,o -1
0 C)
oo°
C> ?
am II
U
tr
Q
Li 0-
P W
ry
o?
° ? 4 U
w
a? m
o U
CD
Z C)
W p Q
W w O
W W
O U
r, 0
Z
6
o G Z Q z
x33?O S3 d z
a ?
,. m
3 ?
3
rn Q V
¢ O
L) 4 ° W O
Z a Li ?I
I r
cn
?Z ?R?EK 1? I I
MPS°N ?N ? ?`^\vII I i o
X13383 3MOH \ 1 ) -'
w
\ \ No
I
Vp

usZtots&(vW30Wj HUION m6m
£Z6t? 9 .?0 Z OOOZ-L-L IMH O30 ONVISI S 38(1013 6131N1 H018 '00SSV S213NM031N0H LoL U+s 'ter muiwia m
111N213d Sf101A3bd 30 V32lV 30032lO ONVISI 8 32!(1013 SURaNI?Ha 1.)XI asxo0
ON 80t' 133HS 3140 NMd21U N?i534 IQvwlflozlLL ?g 2iasmo
I
I / I
I ? I A
1 I I
Cj
11 1 i '? I
11 i i11 4zY / 0
I 'j I ~
\ ( ` Q W
\ 1 ~
4 \ \ 1 \?\
\ v \
\
? l
\\1
L
rn Ob \\?
t o
F
a o
o
a. z Z CL
m==
O 3 3 ?
x
c? a cr
=_ m
W Q Q -1
V)
J ;? T
I
m
\\ I
\ I
1\
t)
\I
oS
y \e
,cI- o ZZ?
\ ?
!??? l Ll
s?
s ,
'pe
Ln
W
2
0
S?? 1

?d
?b
M
a_ rn
E NjnoL-
0
N
1
n
o < 1
o n
o =
? O
w U
0
AVERAGE
AREA SURFACE AREA CUT DEPTH VOLUME
TO 9.0 : 27
1 600 + 750 X 430 = 290,250 5' 53
750
2 ,
2 750 + 620 X 1,300 = 890,500 6' 197
888
2 ,
3 620 + 370 X 530 = 262,350 5' 48
583
2 ,
4 514 X 335 = 86,095 3' 9
566
2 ,
5 468 X 142 = 33
228 3' 3
692
2 , ,
6 250 + 468 X 458 = 164,422 4' 24
359
2 ,
7 250 + 250 X 444 = 11
1, 000 2' 8
222
2 . ,
TOTAL = 1,837,845 346,060
OVERDEPTH TOLERANCE TOTAL
55,000
USE 400,000 C.Y.
401,060 C.Y.
0
Z
Z J
O N
V
Z 00
Ld w
Q "
LLB
Q
W
w Z
cy-
? U
cr_
U
00
Z fn
4 (n
_j ¢
Lv)
cl?
co w
W
DO
2 w
m
t,. O
Z y
Ci CS r
W °^:c
F Z krm"
E
Wti
1?

\q5xc
it
.. _1
-lq vi-I-- i
lfsk?
0P
} }
£8'Z ?
• x
*an
EOM
}
L-

?Z

?Z l? 1
1NIOd S3Nna
w a- x } rfv x i
90.8 " _ - - _ _ •L- ? 0 1
x 9Y'Yl- " - 90'f- _
9S'£L- x 90'Zt- x 9 = x - x 94 94 0-
9Y'YL- x 90'Yt- x 9£'£L- x
991L- x
90'OL- x x Z=
.
f-
" 91r'£t- x
' 90'YL- x
' 9L'Yt- x 99'LL- x 91P'LL- x 94'6- x c
J "
£t- x
90 98
£L- x 94'Yt- x 94Zl- x 90'Zl- x
9'OL- x
- x
- x
' . ?. §ML= xx 91rG1+•??
, 99ZL- x g 9- x J
99
9
0*
- 99
01-
9L'Zt- x
99•£L- x _

x
9L'lL- x r

9f -
x
9
*
' 9 -
' 94'6- x 94'rL- x
' 91't x- 9L'OL- x 99'4 =
£- x
80 91
9- x 99'9- x ZL- x
9£
' _
?9 Ot- x 99'1.-
-901- x 98•£- x 91.'9- x 98
LL- x
x
' x
9
S'OL- 90 -? 9£ 9-
96
8- x
90,0 L

90'Z- x 99•£- x S 9£'9- x 9006- x

90'Z- x 90'1.- ¦ 96'1- xI Y- x
9t t- x
x
"
9S'£- x 9'Y- x x
965- 99'9- x 49'4-
x
:
9£'
'
997- x
'
9Z'9 x v 9Z l- 9£
.
S- x
'
-
'
£- x
96 _
x" 9611 x
?...
94,9- x ... 9- x? gp
9
x
98
g? g x

ggr, .,xy. .
.
'
x
90`f- 91; 9Y 9- x 90
9-
:
' 9Z'Y- x ?!!'fir.1L 98x -'
. x
95
1.
99'Z-
9C
90 £° x .: 98 £-• x ..' 9Z'8-' x 98'9- K : I
YL'0 x
99 5.. ¦
99'Z-- x

x
S £
90•£90 £- x - x
91. 8 .- " 99'Y..
L x .
N
9
-,
x
8 96£-•'x'
9
'Z- '
-' 9CL- x 6'Z-

90'Z= x
9S'£- x'..
"
9C Y`.
96
9
x

90 9- ¦
98Y- =
9L'L- x n
9
x V
9£. l- x
.. .
90'Z- x 98 5 • 9D B x 9L'L- !£'L-
9CL- x 9£Z-:•'
'
' S-
L- x
8Y 9B
Y- x I 95L x 99 8- _ x

'
'
' 4L'9-
a
9
' 9a ff
?
to... . .. Wo 3t
o Y9 x ¦
YZ
0 S
" Y9
..
x
.

L .
9i: x
10
.x
9
-

9Zb-
x

1
'

'

6-.x 9-
99
96
A:B xk `

; x
Y0
,? •
?..?• L x
o 9t
£- x q
89
8- x
*g m
ri
o X
.
_
'.r+
' 903 - x S x x
-Qir $
m m
YY'0 x YZ
O x *9.0 x 91'0- x x

Yf'l x
Y6'0 x
Y1'0 =
Y0'0 x
99'0- =
99 big- m

C% s \
901- v9wo .e 16
x
?
941- x 9Z'£- x * _
iOi
YB'0 x o
9Y'O- x Y9'0 x 80£- x
90'£- x 9L'L- x
9Z'£- x ..
m??. :o \.. \ * `

Ys o x

9Z'0- =

997- x

9L'Z- x m
?. . *:...
o o \
?
'
*
?+
•
'
Y6'0 x Y- x
90 WE - x
- x
WE
?. \ * y
YO'O f0.0 x 90'r- x 9Z'£- " 0 ?-

YO'o x
90'Z- x
91p'1- x
97- x 99'Z- x '
x -. \
99Z- x 99'9- x
x
9lZ-
\*

u "
'
9151.- x
9Z'S- x
9Y'S- x
9L'L- x
94
4)SL
=
'
9911- x l
x
9
_
9YY x 91..9- x Z61- ¦ YS't- % L
99'9- x (^
99 S- = 7
L9'L- x BL'0- x x
9Y'L
LO £ x
.
9l'S- x SZ'0- x 19'1. x Y x x
98'£- x
OZ'L x ZOZ x Z x 8£Z x
Z6'Z x

9L'L- x 697 x }

OY'l- x L9T x ?
9 f'0- ¦ LZZ x x 96Z x LS'f x 09'£ x
10 L x 6£Z ¦ O1.'£ r?. 66Z x ri'£ x L01'Yxx ? ?
+

b' l
'.
9Y.
"3
a ¦ QY3; OCT ? t
Z ? %, ?•, +
d'
0A
op't .

t Z£' L x A ??\ ;? + +
a ?O
+AfA?

+
(`
+
O
e 0 +
.. l
`Q+ +
Q
OC
+
K•
?
V
+
rd lp S
r
r? +

c
Y?
x 1.14
x 1.14
x 0.98 Xx11?14
4
O
x 1.24 x 0.34
k
x 1.29 x 1.04 x 144 1
x 0.

x 222 x 2.28
? 1.19
t 1.04 -V.14
A. x x0;74 x -ZT8

1'
M 0.99 .
% 0•94 -0.341 x 0.34 x _&30
114 x 0.414 w -1.76
x -0.26 -368 X -8.88
54 475x 1.49
!6;
A x 1.04 -0.98
x -6.88
x -2.36

X 1.48

X -5.76
x -338
8 88
-
x 1.58
x x 0.28 x -0.48 x -1.06 x -4. x -8.28
x -888
x 1.58 X 1.33
x =} Q? x -1.88 X -2.46 -6.36 X -8'88 x -10.26
88
Z
x -1.89 x -
x -2.26 .
x -7 x -8.88 x -10.28
8
:.48 x -1.00 x -1.56 x -2.26 x 4.*86 x -8.98 x -10.28 x -12.68
;
78 x -2.56 x -1.66 x -2.26 36 X -6.96 X -9.25 x -11.88
% -5
.
x -3.88
x -3
58 `3a! x -1.56
% _201 • -1'?
x -2.28 .
x -11.88
86 x -10.28
x -8.38 % _9

,58
.
x -4.28 96 'te
X -2.06
x -2.28 .
% _11.28
X -5.48 x -9
86 x -11.36
7
e X
16 .
66
7
-
•.28 ``
x -4.06 SOB
'lo
- x -1.88 , _
x _ .
x -9.96 X -10. x -
x +8.31;28
w,aa
J?
?.t re x -1.81 x
x -10.38 -7.91 x -7.88
x -A-01t96
?.96 x -3.18 ??lB-348 >B x -2
05 -S 26
76 x x -8 x -3.76 x -7.26

?l -2.36 38 . gg
X g
28
6 x -7.26
x -9.38 -7.98 k 4
98

??5?-1.96 ?QOB
x -2.91
M _
. .
x
x -9.01 x -7.78 -5.76
x -1.96 O,B x -4. x x -7.78 x -6. k -5.36 x -4.16
.18 B
x -1.96 10•BB
-5.06
_
X -9.08 x _ x -2.78 x -6
38 x -4.42

%
>>B 1.98 -ve x
-5.46

_ .
x -0.96 _3,30
x -8.58 -7.26 x
58 ?? x -0.96 j _??. i• - X -8.38 x -1.38 x -7.78 x -0.58
x- ,3.98 -6.08 x : .x -7.06 % x x ? 388 x -0.24
-Z36

' -2.78 ??• -4.48
x3 98 '
' •BB ."
' ':
x -3
46 x -8:48•. ' .

'- X..} X-7:48 -138 x -0.54

'
1.28
. .
.
.
. x
6.96.

.:. -0.28
.
x -4.76
J
6
-5.46
. x -1.05
.

72.10 -5.4

s` % -
...

: x -3.89
-0.96 X.
2

3 X.
;r
.. x _

06
5 x -8
38. x' _i x _0.88....
56 .
'
., .
Ot x .x
.
' ' -Z48 -0.33.
x ._0.72

9t X .3*8'.. %
100
6 4t
- x -8.08

x -5.56.

gg
` .
k :-
7.36:. x X0.32
x: r
y
x
BB
'?
4
3.9
_ x
t.'
a 7
6 _ 396
1 ,
x.
.
-O.
l:>30
:
10.. _3.96.
.
.
x`-:2.283 x. -2.88'.
' % _
x M -328 :
..
x
-Z76 . x ._238 .
78 "K
x '2.20 -?- x _3.58•
?B
" x -4.08
x 56 x 3g ?. `` : x 1.14[ k -338 x. 54: k.-0.82:..
W4
.
ie =2.86 x -2.86 .
.* g6
k
..
%; 358
88- x -- 88

t ' x
.
a<: -4:73
.. Y
/4
0
x
,
t.
x .-1.
2 38
' .88
x.- a -0.44. ` .
.
x 0.14::.

2.16 .: •
!
-
X -?
x -376
x.._-0.48'
x -1.27
X -6
98

x
B.

x. -2.18 .

x -1.38 \
MV
'

'
ib'
.
!?
x -Z36 :
n -1.86'? x::.2 38
.te. '...

x ?g
7B ?... a,.A04- _1.88
x -1.39

38 x -2.96
96 x -1.88
x -0
96 ?
4
4
7
.
- .
?..
t;
'
' -
x -0.06

1 % -
.
.
.
-1.6
x -1.63
-1.48 _501 x -8 x -1
86_2.15
6 ?. ?,
_
1• ?? x -1.98 s?,_
' .
x -1.48
x -1.98
138
x -. x -1.48 % ey
??7
B x -0.88 x -1.64
x -3. x -6.46 -7.98 Z88

3
x -1. x -1.48
38
` x -2.88
6 1

%

6 x -3.36 X? -2.37
-
x -5.06 x =7.06' -396 _ 2.80 x -2.04
x -1.3
x -2.46 x -0.64 x -1'9
e i k'i46' !% -7.56 % 43 -328 x -2
25

8 x -1.36 x -1.96 x -1.86 O
76
- .
x 58 A -303
-7
48

k -1.38 x -1
x -1.88
8
X37,B..
x -7
26 k
.
x -7.58 x -2.38 -3.71 X30641 x -2.98
x x -7.86
t

b .
x -1.46 ??
x s5. .
ax-7 oR ?- $ x -5.48 3.93 0:1
?% =3.58
x -9.05 758 x -2A FA - .• x -2.28
15
3 \aam" _9.96
ib 96
7
8 12 98
b ?s 2

INI

?x -806
'
?
.
- x -8.18
??' .08 x -9.88 M
?8a06 x -10.66 x'
x -8.18
x - x
??r1
? x - 8 x
98
B x -7.06 x
- x -8.18
x•
• _ X
x
_O 15
x 1.93 x 2.
x 2.04
t
31
g1
x Z$9 4• .

V )
s'
rod
r)9

k - .
x -9.06 x -7.98
x -9.06
x -6.46
x -9.06 x -8.88
Q x-9.
?? v .--6.895 X-

x -1-
x rwa?- x 3.99
% 384 x 4.70
x 4.79 x
4.88 x 438
x -1 74
x -2.46
x -2.44./
~x 1.04 ' x 2.42
x Wass 1.72 t 2.44
xx2,!•1',?5
1
22L
1 x 0.38
w
1
37 4 -0.46
I x 0.38
1x1.18 x0.41
10.04
k1.42 I xa11
1 x 0.43
1 Jr 1.03 I
I x 0.79
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
aNVISI 8 321f101j m 13W H012i . co?u",ow? )?° az-.°-M
?Z6? 9 30 5 00 -L-L 2MIN01103S SV S?l3NM03YYOH ZoL Mns ?v v>w? colic lop
dlVd3d HOV30/ON13O03dO ONVISI 2 3dnoi3 GOO 2 3 (1011 SSOHO 71J HOV30 1V01d,11 Nvrcinouy ii:ISI2Io
w
Q:
LO
r
w U
W (7 ?
~ w m O
_Q
1 O H F
XxU7Q
a= x z
w
a4.ww0
Q(n0U.
? Z
Z O
oQ
rz >
U J
co W
W
¢'a
U 1--
or
ZM
_m
J
=?

U7 g

LO a
O O tL7
N o

-

o 1
{?

Wo

ail

I [C)

Cl )
> 400

CD 0
_ t-Lu m

\ 0
Q

57< w 4
O Q X 0
CL
:D
a_wU-0
Qv)OLL.
5si
LL
L
C;
o?
+ )C
Q
W
D W^
C /
E-
V
LJ..? j
W
If--
W
U
U
C 1J
V d'
u
2
r'
W -?
z
f--
o
N_
Q:
O
U -o
w
z?
U
N
Q
l
O
L i.
ro
?O
0 +
O
N W
W Z
r_
Q J
U W
E U')
zQ
J
U
ti
a
Z?
U
o?
' LJ
m z
O
N
O
0
X11
U?
? Q?
?' N
c0 z-c0r (010) AYJ OLDS-toC Wto)
Mir 9 30 9 X00 -L-L. M E-NOISM aNVISi 8 32JnOlj 131N1 HOI?1 V S83NM03YIOH oros Yw"vo rte' zot. ?Unv dlVd3d HOV3a/0NOOMa Wnsi Q 32Jnou aNV?SI 9 3?ln013 oclls.anatsoo lop
:'ON OOP 38V 3003aj ndHJ_ NOIIO3S
l xvNCSnouy :?g uasliio
0
0
00
r
o
0
r`
T
0 0
r
o O
0
U-) z
T
0
0
r o
0
r I,t
O
O ?/?
N V /
r
o
n
r ' 1
O t .
ry
W
Q O
? II
o Q
W
CD
? Q
i W N
D O
> a
Jy o
= N
(- II
zr
o
U J
W Q
V) V)
0

T-
O LO 0 LO O LO N I
T- r r
1 1 1 1
FIGURE "8" BEACH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Figure Eight Island, North Carolina
Property Owner North of Inlet
Property Owners South of Inlet
George Henry Hutaff Tract No. 2
c/o David Ward
P. 0. Box 867
New Bern, NC 28563
[phone]
All property owners on Figure Eight
(sublots) will be notified.
Note: Figure Eight Island property owners will be notified by Certified mail.
A list will be provided, if requested.
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER FORM
Name of Individual Applying For Permit:
Address of Property:
(Lot or Street #, Street or Road, City & County)
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above-
referenced property. The individual applying for this permit has
described to me as shown on.the attached drawing_.the-development
they are proposing. A description or drawing, with dimensions,
should be provided with this letter.
I have no objections to this proposal.
If you have objections to what is being Proposed , please write
the Division of Coastal ManaGement, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension,
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405 or call 910 395-3900 within 10
days of receipt of this notice No response is considered the
same as no objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail
Signature
Date
DEHNR
Print Name
Telephone Number With Area Code
l
F �5
fir"
:
- •
Cl.- -
b
'�7
� -
N
a$
b ?'
,r

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
The Figure "8" Beach Homeowners Association proposes that this project be
exempted from the requirement to prepare an environmental assessment under the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act because it is characterized as a "non-major
activity" under 15A NCAC 1 C.0504(f). The project constitutes an "approved navigation
project", thereby precluding the application of 1C.0504(f)(iii).
a
WSW-
I c ,
- y?
W.Y
44
.
"t jiikt?
1
*• J? xl - > rf-
k kf f r Y
Vie
?_aa? ti? + L; J ?r ' j
i
, ma
L'f 5 4S? Rtir-
1 ,
n'''om r1R+W y4 - I -fir •?
x + t .".c s - ? Lat s $. ..
1` ??' •?+°..t K?`X'? x rfat ta_•+.. 'r`?e.a a?s?`. - rS.. i ".i T;;'?,,a s +' ? -
SUMMARY OF SOIL TESTING
Test borings and sand samples were taken in May-June 2000 along the length
of the proposed channel maintenance dredging areas and on the ocean beach as
shown on Sheet2 of the attached report (Appendix 6A). The sampling and testing were
done by an independent geotechnical agent with samples extracted from the near-
bottom area with a second sample about 5 feet lower and another at -18 feet. A grain
size analysis of the materials sampled is attached hereto.
Test borings and sand samples were taken in the proposed dredge area at Rich
Inlet and also on the beach strand to determine compatibility as shown on the attached
boring and testing report from ECS, Ltd., an independent geotechnical professional.
Samples were extracted from the near-bottom area with a second sample taken from
the soil column near -12 feet and the third taken at -17 to -18 feet. A grain size analysis
of the materials sampled is attached hereto.
There is reasonable compatibility between the insitu beach sand and that to be
excavated from the sound areas behind the island. Most notably, the percentages of
material ranging between 0.20 and 0.24 millimeters (mm) are typical for the beach area
as well as the sound area. Both the borrow material and the natural beach sand
contain a higher percentage of "fines" (material smaller than the No. 50 sieve) than is
"" considered ideal, but this is the coarsest available in the area.
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
June 22, 2000
Charles E. Davis, P.E.
Criser & Troutman Consulting Engineers
Post Office Box 3727
Wilmington, North Carolina 28406
ECS Job No. 8492
Reference: Report of Soil Borings and Testing, Figure 8 Island, Wilmington, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Davis:
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS, Ltd.) is pleased to present the following report for
professional services for the referenced project. Our services were provided under the direct
supervision- of a professional engineer registered in North Carolina, in accordance with our
agreement dated May 11, 2000.
Soil Borinizs
We performed soil borings in locations you selected on May 24, 2000. While performing each
boring, we collected soil samples for laboratory testing. We also collected soil samples at mid-tide
level at walkways 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15. Boring logs and drawing showing approximate boring
and sampling locations are attached.
In each soil boring, we encountered fine to medium grained, poorly graded sand to the maximum
depth of penetration, about 18 feet below existing water surface. The sand is in a loose to medium
- dense condition.
Laboratory Analyses
We performed laboratory grain size analyses on one sample from each boring and on each
walkway sample. Laboratory grain size analysis results are included in the attachment.
-ECEIVED
JUN 2 2000
CRISER & TR0UIWt11V
P.O. Box 10434, Wilmington, NC 28405 • [phone] • Fax [phone]• Jacksonville, NC [phone] • www.ecslinlited.com
Aberdeen, MD - Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, IL • Danville, VA* • Dallas, TX • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA
Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Research Triangle Park, NC • Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA • Williamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC • Winchester, VA`
'Testing Services Only

We are pleased to have been of service to you on this project. If you have any questions, or need
additional information, please call.
Respectfully,
Engi eering Consult' g Services, Ltd. If
Llvk A R, I%,
?'44%oFESS?G
Christop r S. Laude, P.E. _ Si?L
C) 2 G a'
Senior Engineer . y
CSL:cl
Ayttachments: Boring Logs, Soil Grain Size Analyses
J
i
t
_ ?? ?ccr.-ccc <o?e) ><r3 GZGL-LGf (0?6)
6 Z OO/ lMH/H8 a30 ONt/ISl £3 32J(1`JLj Q) 131N1 HOW •OOSSd S?13NM03WOH ioi°? Ms"?' ?v »?? ec
2ltt/d32! HOd3fl/9NI390321(] aNdlSl 8 3ZJf191j GNV ISI 8 38nou szi3afgmNa omxinsmoC)
I133N$ 31tl0 r1MV)JO I)ot57o 1?IVI?I.T.f102iy ?g uasi C)
'I33?10 S30bd i
3
Q
3
J
.Q
N
Q
0
U
Q
Z
1
1
X3321010H ?Y x
?C
W
L1_
<
W
wx
0
0
Ld
V) o
v f-
IL,
I
0
aN
?v
V
N
F;
r
I
z
Q
n
W
m
U
Q
W
m
(.D
z
WI
?I
0
z
Q
V)
CD
W
W
0
Q ?
Q?
r1 •
Lu
L)
I
?n I I
o
ly??
Q?
a
T
?I
0
0
0
N
II
W
J
Q
U
()
lW
SA.
?M
y
0
L
n?
a
i
I voseir .
w??j ,.
m

0
N
q
a
U
to
IL
JUN-20-2000 10:26 ECS LTD.
919 544 9082 P.02
CLIENT
Criser & Troutman

PROJECT NAME JOB / BORING SHEET

1
8441 B-1 1 or
ARCHITECT-ENCINM

1E
Q?
Rich Inlet Soil Boring/Testing
SITE LOCATION
Figure 8 Island in Wilmington. NC -0- MUM= P&METROMM

W". a
4 8+
I e 70 3

r er

b DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

NCUSH UNITS

m € PLAMC MATER uqum
IJ]IIT x cowl T % Lwr x
X--------- ?------ ---a
10 Y.O 90 40 go+

°
SURFACE ELEVATION MANDAND FOSTRATION
® BLOC "

0 .
10 !A 90 40 60+
5 Mudline
I SS 18
1

18

Loose to medlum dense gray fine
sand (SM)
10-
2 SS 18 18 21
- -
15 3 SS IS 18 24

20
25
30 END OF BORING ® 17.5'

'

THE STRATIrICATION LINES REPTCSCNT THE APPROXIMATE 3OUNDA4Y LINE= NETVEEN SOIL TYPES IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GU"L
R Ms 0R ® Bomr, srArarm 05 /24/00
ML BcIt ACR BOBDIG GOMPIZTED 05/24/00 CAVE IN DEPTH 0
rL RIC TvNg]1AN SAGE Omumc mmoo
JUN-20-2000 10:26 ECS LTD. 919 544 9082 P.03
CLIENT JOB / BORING SHEET
Criser do Troutman i
8441 B-2 1 or 1
PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT-ENGINEER

Rich Inlet Soil Boring/Testing
SITE LOCATION -0- CAIzMnw PC11LS1101lETER
Fi ure 8 Island in Wilmin
NC
ton T°Ne;IT''
g
, 1 z
4 e+
q DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL PLAMC WATER LIQW0
- LOU X CONTTaxT x um ><
3 x --------- *------ -- e
Y

ENGLISH UNTTS io 20 30 40 s0+

SURFACE ELEVATION MAND
nOR
?
0 10 20 30 - 40 Sot
5
Mudllne
1 -SS 18 18 Loose to medium dense gray fine e

10 sand (SM)
2 SS 18 18 13'
15
3 SS 18 16 Medium dense gray medium to course 19
sand and shall (SC)

END OF BORING ® 18.0'
20-
25-
30

TNC STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT TIE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES ACTVECN SOIL TVVEZ IN-SITU TNC TRANSITION NAT BE GRADUAL
rL wo OR 4D somr, srARTSo 05/24/00
vL BCR ACR BORING COWMED 05 24 00 cAvz IN OEM •
RT. RIC PORESAGE DRIIIM urmoo
JUN-eu-euUU IU--'b tC5 LID. 919 544 9082 P.04
CLIENT

Criser & Troutman JOB /
8441 BORING /
B-3 SHERT
1 or 1
PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QD
Rich Inlet Soil Boring/Testing

SITE 14CATION
Fi ure 8 Island in Wilmington, NC -O- CAUBRATLD PRiflTRDIdTBR
I z TOW".
? S+

_+
E

Y z

0 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

NGLISH UNITS

-- _
L
o PLAunc WATER LIQUID
uyrc X CONTE" z u1QT IR
x -------- ----------- A

10 so 90 40 60+

1
3URf'ACE ELEVATION
e STANDARD PXNETRATION
®

0 5
Y BIMIs/rr.

l0 20 30 40 D0+

5 Mudline
M
i

1
SS
19
18 ed
um dense gray medium sand
and shell (SM)
I2
10
2 SS is le 25

15-

3

SS

18

18 Medium dense gray fine sand (SM)

24

20
25
301 ENO OF BORING ® 17.5'

THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE IGUNDART LINES ICTNCEN SOIL TYPES IN-STTV THE TRANSITION MAY SE GRADUAL
WL WS OR ID BORDIa BTARTED 05/24/00
WL RCR ACR BORSNC Calmu M 05/24/00 CAVE a m TH •
MI. RHS TORN SAGE DRISIM urrHOO
JUN-20-2000 10:26 ECS LTD. 919 544 9062 P.05

CLIENT
Criser & Troutman JOB / 80RINC / SHEET
8441 8-4 1 or 1
PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT-ENGINEER

Rich Inlet Soil Boring/Testing
SITE LOCATION -O- CALMRATED PENEiR0lRT81f
Figure 8 Island in Wilmington, NC I s TON 3 4 6+
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL FLANTIC WATER U=0
- o. LIMIT X CONTENT X IJwr x
X --------- '.------ --a
0 a
is m ENCASH UNITS To xO ?o to --

°
SURFACE ELEVATION
< STANDARD FK f 9MTTON
®

e DIOTT3/FT.
0 IQ 20 OO 40 60+

5 Mudllne
I SS i6 15 Medium dense gray tine sand to 13:
medium of 16
5' (SM)
.
10
z SS 181 18
14
15-
3
SS
18
18
18
END OF BORING ® 18.0'
20-
25-
30-

THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT TIC APPROXIMATE 1"AART LINES VC7WM SOIL TTPCS IN-SITU TIC TRANSITION MAY K GRALUAL
rL f3 OR a BOILING. STARM 05/24/00
TTL ern ACII BORING COM PLX= 05/24/00 cn" IN ° •
TTL Ric romm" SAGE DR111fc ucmoo
JUN-20-2000 10:27 ECS LTD. 919 544 9082 P.06
CLIENT
Criser & Troutman JOB / BORING / SHErr
8441 B-S 1 or 1 _
PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT-ENGINEER Q'p

Rich Inlet Soil Boring/Testing

SITE LOCATION ¢ CJUJffi1ATIO PEn ROXMi't
Figure S Island in Wilmin
NC
ton ". It
70K
g
, 3
I z
, a+
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL PLAWIC r= UQUM

a Lairr X CONTERr x Ul(IT x

c
z r°
Q
ENGLISH UNITS s 10 TO 90 AO 50+

° F

a
A.
IL `!
IL
SURFACE ELEVATION >
°
9 dTANDARD PQILTRAnOR
A.
IL
I
a
m
s
101,11"/M
0 10 SO 70 40 60+
Mudline
5
1 SS 18 18 Medium dense gray tine sand (SM) 1
17
10
2 SS 18 18 24
15
3 SS lol ls 32'

END OF BORING ® 17-5-

25-
30-

THE STRATIFICAT113N LINES REPRESENT THE APPRIMMATE IMADARY LINES KTVEEN SOIL TYPES IN-SITU TIE TRANSITION NAT K GRADUAL
VL WS OR ® BORING STAMI) 05/25/00
TR. 11CR ACR BORING COIEPIF7iD 05/25/00 CAYC Of Dwm •
WL RIC /OR "IN SAGE OR111dNC xrmo
JU14-20-2000 10:27 ECS LTD. 919 544 9082 P.07
_ f

CLIENT
Criser & Troutman JOB / BORING SHE1{f
8441 8-6 1 or 1
PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
Rich Inlet Soil borin
/Testin
g
g
SITE LOCATION -0- r-1 RATED PCHICTROMMIlt
Figure 8 Island in Wilmington, NC t P TOE' 4 e+
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL. PLABMI C WATER uqum
UNIT X COM IEN I X UXT Z

A
ENGLISH UNITS n t0 20 so 40 50*

SURFACE ELEVATION

r.'

STANDARD /rr
RATION
OTr9/rT
®
Bt
r .
.
.
0 to 20 so 40 60+

5 Mudline
1 SS 18 18 Medium dense gray fine sand (SM) 19
10-
2 SS 18 19 k6
15
3 SS 19
1

18

Medium dense gray medium sand

14
and shells (SM)

END OF BORING 0 18.0,
20
25

THE STRATIFICATION LINES RCPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNRANY LINCS RETVEEN SOIL TYPES IN-SITU 11[ TRANSITION MAY HE 0RA11 ^
R we OR 0 Bormla QrAn= 05/25/00
n 11CR ACE BORMC C0W%rrW 05/25/00 CAPE a DOnM e
n Rift mv=m SAGE DRnjfflc UMCID
JUN-20-2000 10:27 ECS LTD. 919 544 9082 P.08
CLIENT JOB / ROBING SHRET
Criser & Troutman 8441 /
B-7 1 or 1
PROJECT NAYS ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
Rich Inlet Soil Boring/Testing
SITE LOCATION
Figure 8 Island in Wilmington, NC ?- CALODIAITO PpNETREDIZ10t
TM/FT. R
1 a a { a+

x z
C
'°
u

b DESCRIPTION OF MATERLAL

NGLISH UNITS
w
--

? PLIBTIC WATER UQV10
U]U! X CONTENT x u1uT x
x -------- t--------G

T ZO 90 b !O+
9
a SURFACE ELEVATION PENE RATION
® STA"A
ID
10 a0 00 b 60+
5 Mudline
I SS 18 18 Medium dense gray fine sand (SM) I1
10
2 SS 18 LB 26
]5
3 SS 19 38 Medium dense ray fine sond wlfh
trace shell (SM? 22

20
25
30 END OF BORING 0 17.0'

MC STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPRMn)4ATE RoUNDARY LINES SCTVEEN SOIL TYPES IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY ME GRADUAL
*L Ws OR ® RORMC STARTS) 05/25/00
rL 80t ACR HORDIG C019PIZI 05 25 OO CAVa N "Em •
n RIC rORMW SAGE UIVIAZIC VZMD
TOTAL P.08
1
i
1 .?
z
i? U)
U)
r-
U)
0
N
U

O -
N _
a -
q g-
T
C) ?1 TMI
--
+
- -

HE F 4 ? T H ;-
.O

O
d'
-

D

- - - - - -

--I

- -, - -

r-i
O
N
1N
N
d?
O
r-i
r-I
N
N
O
O
r-I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 CT) cc i` I'D to 'IT c") N r-i
0
0
?o
U
+ro-J
B
S
coo
o J
Z U
L
U "?-
N
•n A
V.?
-? U
U
N
r-i
0
U)
N N
r-I
U
z Z O
U)
U ?
N
•n ? 4-I
P4 U
Za
CC - N
wow
LUAU
Z U) 5:
z0w
w in
III????
i
I
:.I
W
z
U)
ui

- MM
ERE

T _ _

o
-
-
- - v
-

T
.

LT
-

t fi r- - t--- _ -- - - _
- - K W- _ -
? - _ - -

0
O
,4
A
a?
N
ro
c?
O
O
?-I
O O O O O O O O O O O
Ql co r Ln d M N -I
O
a
?a
4-1
OD
J
d
+J
.O
f-1
U
9? C]
U • -i
,O
VJ
u)
N
ro
U
O
z 0
U
N 4-1
M
O
a
Z
Ft Z Z J
U)
111 J W
LU :D U
Zink
z0w
w C) U)
III_? IrlLL
O
O
N
O
I O
H
I O
I O
_I.
0
U1 N
,a
z
a?
N
I ?
U)
_l U)
0

- - NOW -

l - - - - - - T- F J TT
-
-
-
1 -

._ c

-

Mm L

- -_ - T- - _ - -.-_f_ _ _ N -i _ =t - -- _
-I O
O
1
ril
O
0
r-i
-1
4-1
A
N
N
.H
U)
c?
O
O
r-i
O CD O O O O O O O O
01) r- ?D ll) ct fn N r-1
0
?c
a?
-P40
U
N d
^ o

?I
y .o
4J
a

J
v N
0
U

M N
ru
U

4-J
U
N
n Z O
U)

4-I
• r-I
a U
0
ZZ~1
CC p
Ul JUJ
U1 = U
ZN?
ZOW

,I
-l?
-j
v
a?
I
1 4-J
_I
I ?
N

--
O -
N

t

0
ri t

=C _T
O
?O

O L- =c

0

-- -
_
E :E
-

a ffi

O
O
H
O
0
U
A
?i
•r•1
E
a?
N
.H
ul
.9
(Ti
0
O
O O O O O O O O O O
m co r- ?D Ln 'I r1 N -4
0
0
-J
P
T'
CEO L
J
U
U

q? O
U
J ?
V can
V
N
? U
ii?b
O H
Z z 0
U
N ?L 4-I
P4 u
O
Z Z J
R Z N
w U
ZN?
Z0W

z
a?
I ?
N
H
U)
I ro
2
ul

mall

O rL
-

O
2k
-

V - -
- - - - - - --
- - -?k - - - - - - T?? - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

.-I
O
O
.-1
-?i
E
N
N
U)
O
O
r-I
O O
O O O O O O O O O
01) OD r- Ln
0
0
4J
T ?
z t
W
•n
O
Z
4-
Y C
`- O
a
O
c-
u o
U1
oL m
ro
d
z z O
4
Q)
•n ?
Z Z J
a: p
w -j w
W D U
Zw5:
z0w

I
I-
i
I
I O
O
i N
I
O
O
I ?
O
?O
O
v
CD 0 o O o 0 o O
0 OD r- ?D to M

--?_ ? T_ C - - __L- - - -

r
_

-

r-i
0
O
U
A
•i
N
N
U)
.9
c?
O
O
r-i
CD 0 o
0
0
m
-P
T
z
4J
U
•n
O
Z
O
r1
.Q'
N
t? U
c?Ul
U o
07 m
U
z° o
4-J U)
U
4-4
•O r{
a U) a
0
ZZJ
Q - N
n1 ? U
in 5:
z 0 w
Lu U)
it
i
c L.
f
{1 O
O
f ?
I
.? O
O
.-I
.I O
?O
I. O
-1
O
Ul N
.Q
•r{ r-I
4-1
C-J
?-1
O
0
.-I
4)
N
?ro
O
O
9
O O O O O O O O O O O
O m OU lIl dr M N .--I

1 -7-

-
W * -r

- - -

a
B
4-
? J
0
Z .?
U
•n ?
t'l
t-
l
(-9

a
0

p

in

L) ?

J ?
N

z z o

u Q)

4-1
n •ri

a vJ
Z Z J
E _ N
Wow
uJ=U
in 5:
Z [t
z0W
w C) U)
I
I
t
1
C
N'
0
,I o
.I. O
?o
_I o
O
UI N
a?
z
In .H
ui

0
O
14
-i
a?
N
•rl
.ro
O
O
O O 'O O O O O O O O O
? ? a7 ? ? Lfl d' M N .-I

J
4
-?
_

z 1 -f

HA I

N
N
O
z
O
Q)
O
q
O
U
?y in
U o
U) rA
vl
vi
? ro
U
O -?-I
z o
u
(4-4
134 Cl) ?
'?R/ ?
Z '
- ,^
W j U
z0w
w U)
1
1
C
(V
1
O
1 O
rI
O
O
x
O
{f1 N
Z

O O O O O O O O O co
Q? OJ I? lIl d M N rl

f
IFF
1
T -`r La t - WiT '- - - -
-

}-

_ -i

i- -

J A E

.-I
O
O
N
U
A
a)
N
.ri
U)
.9
O
O
O
Dr-
a
U
N
•n
O
L
C
4) a
RJ
U
N
o
DL N
ro
U
O ,'•{
Z tin
^,
U ?
N 4-4
PL4 C!]
Z 0
C7J
Z
UJ J W
W?U
ZN?
Z 0 W
w V)
a)
a)
HA
ul
a)
ul
Cn
VA
N

o
-- - =? _ - - -
O

- ?-?
t } - - - - - - -

r j
} = r ti - - - - -

.O

O

?- A I
-
-
-
-
-
-

w ME
0 O p? O O O O O O

0r- I
O
r-i
Q)
H
a?
N
9
0
O
t-I
O
0
0
Q)
ro-J
Ca
'T
7
_ Z
U
•n
l?
kt
O
H
a
.H
N
U
to
-r-I
V ?
O
cn c-3
ro
U
z z° o
Ul
U (1)
Q) -{
O H
a U) ?D
ZZJ
? - N
UJ
ZN>
z0w

O
O
M
N
a
.I
1 p
O
N
I
O
-i
xt
I
I O
110
I O
d'.
O
v o
cn ?
N
I ?
1 ?
i
N

=c =`c

- -
_

L- _ [_
?
?
- - _? F= ?• . -,fit- t
-??- _ 1-?-- - - - -
-

O O O O p O O O O O
0 OD l? l0 Ul d M N r-I
0
O
O
z
4-J G
v R?
.n
W G
v
C
0
1 4-J
H
4
U
N
r-i
V o
cn
U)
U
O H
2 O
+? O
U ?
N 4a
u
Z Z J
C ( i
Wow
W?U
Z in
ZOW
w U)
?IL I
L
1- O
O
N
O
O
I O
O
O
U] N
T Q
U) 41tz
a?
.H
y
U)
i
a-,
-? U.)
1
N
r-I
O
O
r-I
a)
+-)
A
a)
N
•H
U)
.9
ro
c?
O
O
r-I
O O O O O O O O O O O
co h ?D to d M N r-i

M um

_L1 1_- - -

}
-
-
?
L LI A

-
_
i
-
- 4 T T
-
-
T - 4-r - - -
- ; - r

i to-

C =?

- TH

-
=z= -. _ - ---? - - •
-- - - - ? f= Lam = - -

0
N
a)
4-Jroro
G7
rn?
`%
Z
T
U
Q1
•n
O
w, O
W 4-J
a
U
UI
y
V O
U) M
c? in
t U
O -H
z z ?O
-N
U
v 4-i
Q4 U)
0
Z z J
w .]
w?U
ZU) ; i
zow
w c) in
i
0
!
i
i
A?-'

I ?
Q)
(n
m
H
U)
4J
U)
N

o - -

i =
7

-
L
LI
- - ff
r -1y

.7 cC

-
, i - - ?L -

-i

=- r- --. -

0
O
r-I
Q)
A
rA
-I
.H
-9
Q)
N
0
O
r-i
O O O O O O O O O O O
m co r- ?.o Tfl V T") N -i
O
0
CJ
?Up
4-1
Ll
?l ^^
z
U
Q)
•n

L
L9
1
f•-1
U
V ?
U p
v \ N
J ?
? U
z z° o
-P
U Q)
Q)
`H
M
a U) n
0
Z 0
CC ? N
UJ J W
W U
Z N ?
ZOW