20200192 Ver 1_U-5108_Northcross_PCN_Compiled_20200131_20200205

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: TIP U-5108 Northcross Drive Extension
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government El Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NC DOT) proposes to extend Northcross Drive from NC 73 in the Town of
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County to Westmoreland Road in the Town of Cornelius, Mecklenburg County (TIP U-5108). The purpose
of this project is to improve the roadway connectivity within the surrounding area by providing an alternate north -south route for local
traffic parallel to Interstate 77, U.S. 21 (Statesville Road), N.C. 115 (Old Statesville Road), and West Catawba Avenue (S.R. 5544).
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: NC DOT
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS (Kimley-Horn)
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Project area is located northwest of the 177 and Sam Furr Road interchange. Project coordinates
(Decimal Degrees): 35.456395 N,-80.875820 W
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: Multiple - Linear Transportation project
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Huntersville / Cornelius
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: McDowell Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Upper Catawba (HUC 03050101)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 14
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
HCompliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

STATE.,�
q�m
�y
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
January 31, 2020
Ms. Nicholle Braspennickx
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Re: Nationwide Permit #14 — NC DOT TIP# U-5108
Extension of Northcross Drive to Westmoreland Road
Cornelius and Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Ms. Braspennickx:
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
NCDOT is submitting the attached PCN application for authorization under Nationwide Permit
(NWP) 14 for the proposed extension of Northcross Drive from NC 73 (Sam Furr Road) in
Huntersville to Westmoreland Road in Cornelius, Mecklenburg County. (NCDOT TIP# U-5108).
The proposed extension will also include a I I0-foot bridge over McDowell Creek, realignment of
the existing McDowell Creek Greenway, and a single -lane roundabout at the intersection of
Eagleridge Way Lane and Westmoreland Road. The following information is enclosed:
• Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
• Project Site Figures
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
• NC Stream Assessment Method Forms
• Approved Categorical Exclusion
• Permit Drawings
The purpose of this project is to improve the roadway connectivity within the surrounding area by
providing an alternate north -south route for local traffic parallel to Interstate 77, U.S. 21 (Statesville
Road), N.C. 115 (Old Statesville Road), and West Catawba Avenue (S.R. 5544). Existing north
south routes that run through the Town of Cornelius and Town of Huntersville are congested and
used primarily by through traffic and commuters to Charlotte and Statesville.
The proposed extension seeks to construct approximately 1.0-mile of new location roadway
through an undeveloped area of Cornelius. The proposed extension will result in permanent impacts
to 38 linear feet (LF) of Stream SA (McDowell Creek). Additionally, 225 LF of permanent impacts
are proposed to install a 60" RCP within Stream SB (UT to McDowell Creek), including riprap
outlet protection which will be placed along stream banks only. The proposed bridge over Stream
SA (McDowell Creek) will avoid additional stream impacts by limiting riprap stabilization to the
bridge abutments only. Based on an NCSAM quality assessment of Stream B, compensatory
mitigation for unavoidable stream impacts to are proposed at 2:1.
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] WEST MAIN STREET
HIGHWAY DIVISION 10 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 ALBEMARLE, NC 28001
716 WEST MAIN STREET
ALBEMARLE, NC 28001 Website: www.ncdot.gov

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
TAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
Existing channel morphology will be maintained at the proposed riprap embankment protection
sites (Sites 1-3) and upstream/downstream of the proposed culvert (Site 4). Riparian vegetation will
be reestablished along disturbed areas associated with the project.
Kristi Lynn Carpenter, NC Division of Water Resources, Transportation Permitting Unit and
Donna Hood, NC DWR Mooresville Regional Office, will review the project through the electronic
form (https:Hedocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Pre-Construction_ Notification_ Form). Please charge the
application fee of $570.00 to WBS element # 42370.1.1 Please forward comments directly to the
Corps with copy to Division 10 Environmental Officer.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional
information is necessary.
Sincerely,
Larry Thompson, PWS, LSS
Division Environmental Officer
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY DIVISION 10
716 WEST MAIN STREET
ALBEMARLE, NC 28001
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
716 WEST MAIN STREET
ALBEMARLE, NC 28001

O�O� W AT F9QG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer
1 h below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
U-5108 Northcross Drive Extension
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville and Cornelius
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
U-5108
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
NCDOT (Linear Transportation Easement)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
N/A
3e.
City, state, zip:
N/A
3f.
Telephone no.:
N/A
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: NCDOT
4b.
Name:
NCDOT- Division 10; Attn: Larry Thompson
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
N/A
4d. Street address:
NCDOT Highway Division 10, 716 West Main Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Albemarle, NC 28001
4f.
Telephone no.:
704-983-4400
4g.
Fax no.:
704-982-3146
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
S.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Chris Tinklenberg
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Kimley-Horn
5c.
Street address:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
5e. Telephone no.:
704-409-1802
5f.
Fax no.:
N/A
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
N/A
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.456395 Longitude: - 80.875820
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
183 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
McDowell Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV
2c. River basin:
Upper Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project is located from NC 73 in the Town of Huntersville in Mecklenburg County to Westmoreland Road in the Town
of Cornelius in Mecklenburg County. Land use within the project area consists of forestland, residential neighborhoods,
and an executive park. The project area is bound to the east by I-77 and McDowell Creek bisects the project. The project
vicinity is comprised of high -density residential areas and a few pockets of undeveloped forestland.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.61 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
4334 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to improve the roadway connectivity within the surrounding area by providing an alternate
north -south route for local traffic parallel to Interstate 77, U.S. 21 (Statesville Road), N.C. 115 (Old Statesville Road), and
West Catawba Avenue (S.R. 5544).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project proposes to extend Northcross Drive from NC 73 to Westmoreland Road for approximately 1.0 mile. The
proposed extension also includes a 110-foot bridge over McDowell Creek and a roundabout proposed at the intersection
of Eagleridge Way Lane and Westermoreland Road. Equipment typical of roadway construction would be used, including
cranes, track hoes, back hoes, graders, dump trucks, bulldozers, and pavers.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: SAW-2019-00199
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Name (if known): Chris Tinklenberg
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination dated 04/18/2019 is attached for your reference.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question
for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑P❑T
No
El DWQ
_2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: No wetland impacts will result from the proposed construction.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Site 1 (SA)
Embankment
McDowell Creek
® PER
® Corps
10
® P [IT
Protection
❑ INT
El DWQ
Site 1 (SA)
Embankment
McDowell Creek
® PER
[I Corps
10
20
❑ P [IT
Protection
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 2 (SA)
Embankment
McDowell Creek
® PER
® Corps
10
16
® P ❑ T
Protection
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 2 (SA)
Embankment
McDowell Creek
® PER
® Corps
10
20
❑ P ® T
Protection
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 3 (SA)
Embankment
McDowell Creek
® PER
® Corps
10
12
® P ❑ T
Protection
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Site 3 (SA)
Embankment
McDowell Creek
® PER
® Corps
10
20
El ® T
Protection
❑ INT
El DWQ
Site 4 (SB)
Culvert Installation
UT to McDowell
® PER
[I Corps
4
225
® P El
Creek
❑ INT
El
Site 4 (SB)
Culvert Installation
UT to McDowell
® PER
® Corps
4
20
❑ P ®T
Creek
❑ INT
❑DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
343
3i. Comments: Unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional streams will result form the proposed extension of Northcross Drive.
Impacts to streams will result from the installation of culverts to carry the stream beneath the proposed extension and from
embankment protection on McDowell Creek.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open water impacts will result from the proposed construction.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: No ponds or lakes will be constructed as part of the proposed project.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
131 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: No buffer impacts will result from the proposed construction.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to streams within the project area have been avoided and minimized to the extent practical through design. The
footprint of the proposed roadway was specifically aligned to avoid streams SC and SD. A bridge is proposed over Stream SA
McDowell Creek to avoid impacts to the channel bed and banks. Impacts to Stream SB have been minimized to the greatest
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

extent practicable by proposing a perpendicular crossing and maximizing side slopes at headwall locations. The 60" RCP will
be buried 1-ft below the existing channel bed to promote aquatic passage. Embankment protection sites have been limited to
the lengths necessary to reduce discharge velocities and maintain bank stability.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to streams within the corridor will be avoided and minimized to the extent practical throughout the construction
process. To avoid unnecessary impacts to streams within the project area, staging, storage, and construction access will
occur in upland areas where feasible. Silt fencing will be installed along the construction limits to ensure all equipment and
work stays within the permitted boundaries. Stormwater and erosion control measures will be utilized to avoid sedimentation
impacts to downstream waters and control runoff from the construction site.
1. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
2. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
3. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes ❑ No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
225 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ®cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Stream mitigation is proposed at a 2:1 ratio for the 225 linear feet of permanent impacts resulting from the
culvert installation and embankment protection. Mitigation will be secured through the NCDMS ILF program. The Credit
Reservation Letter will be provided once it is received.
4. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
32.2%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The project plans to maintain existing drainage patterns to the maximum extent practical. The proposed drainage
systems were designed and sized with future development taken into account and the following items were incorporated
to minimize water quality impacts: the alignment was designed to minimize wetland and stream crossing impacts, 2:1
slopes are going to be utilized to reduce structure length, grassed swales will be implemented to the maximum extent
practical, and open channel designs with riprap on the banks will be implemented where practical to reduce jurisdictional
stream impacts.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Mecklenburg County
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
® Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 8of11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
® Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
® Yes ❑ No
Comments: A Categorical Exclusion has been prepared for the proposed project
and is attached.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is designed to provide connectivity and interstate access west of 1-77, and to create a safer route for local
commuters. No additional or cumulative impacts are anticipated due to the construction of the proposed project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated as a result of the proposed project.
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS lists six federally protected species for Mecklenburg County: Northern long-eared bat (NLEB), Rusty -
patched bumble bee, Carolina heelsplitter, Michaux's sumac, Schweinitz's sunflower, and Smooth coneflower.
Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac, Schweinitz's sunflower, and Smooth coneflower were found in the study area,
however, it is determined that the project will have no effect on these species due to lack of recorded occurrences and
lack of observed individuals in the project area. No effect was also determined for the Carolina heelsplitter as suitable
habitat was not present within the study area.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) records indicated there are no known roosting sites or
hibernacula of the NLEB within 1.0 mile of the study area. Based on the presence of potentially suitable habitat within the
project area but the lack of known occurrences, hibernacula, or roosting sites, the proposed project "May Affect, Not
Likely to Adversely Affect" the NLEB.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
FEI Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper was reviewed on January 8, 2020. No essential fish habitat was found within
the project area or within the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service (Accessed January 9, 2020) shows no
National Register or Nation Register Study List sites within the project study area.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: An individual floodplain development permit application and flood
impact analysis was completed for the project. The results of the flood study are as follows:
The Revised model which represents the proposed Northcross Drive bridge over McDowell Creek demonstrates this project
would create a maximum increase in base flood level of 0.84 ft at a location directly upstream of the proposed bridge. This
increase does not affect any structures. A floodway revision is necessary for this project, to show the floodway limits within the
proposed bridge opening, as the structure does not overtop during the base flood event. The revised floodway limits match
the effective floodway widths at all other locations except for at the bridge location.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM)
Panels 3710464200K and 3710463200K (effective September 2, 2015).
Larry Thompson, PWS, LSS
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
1/31/2020
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Date
is provided.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

FIGURES

O
® Project Study Area
1-5715 Project Study Area
Streams
Rd
\.
Miles
0 0.25 0.5
Cornelius Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Huntersville TIP U-5108
Mecklenburg County Northcross Drive Extension
Mecklenburg County, NC

I ,
10
.0" .
01
2M
Legend
©� _ Feet
Project Study Area I _ 1 •. 0 500 1,000
Noarp
Figure 2
USGS Topo (Lake Norman South/Cornelius)
m o
TIP U-5108
Northcross Drive Extension
�FN, OF TfkpN�Q°Q Mecklenburg County

west °re\a
e va\\ey Gt o
U
ge C \la\\ey fir` a
CD
ea
fl7 N' -
a aF
Q
A„
t' o
YPY L" 77Y
SUS
b .t
p
m .K e
' s '
P\\\ R y b 4 -
t,
5`�a� �C�dgetOd Na\\
,star �
Legendpm 87
_ Project S• .rea
o/
Wetlands �0-
Streams
1-5715
�
Project Study ` -

E B ' N
- . V8B
Ce82
'B I ��
CR
I i L f a - C eN f
r ¢ CeD2
77 4
Ce
C('02HeB .
l` k8 CeR2
Tr M
F ' f
CeD2
U-5108 Hydric Soil Table
Map Unit
Map Unit Name
H dric
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2-8% slopes
No
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8-15% slopes
No
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8-15% slope
No
HeB
Helena sandy loam, 2-8% slo es
No
Mo
Monacan loam, 0-2% slopes
I No
WkB
I Wilkes loam, 4-8% slopes
I No
Legend - r
Project Study Area n Feet
NWI Wetlands 01 IEnD D 0 500 1,000
Z
OF NORiN c
�0 Figure 4
NRCS Soil Survey and NWI (1980)
TIP U-5108
9� r Northcross Drive Extension
��N' OF 'Mk pN$eoQ Mecklenburg County, NC

� � � �...�:�."ay�F .,�, - . ..v era••- `�
14
�a
SD a x.
Site 4 (SB):
sy,60ARCP�Installation "
y 225 LF,Permanent Impacts
-20 LFyTemporary ,Impacts"
f
r r�
r'
Embankment Protection
10 LF Permanent Impacts
t0 LF Temporary Impacts'
e
r, r ev ti it a Site 4 (SA): e
.. �' Embankment Protection
., r 16LF Permanent Impacts w
' 20 LF Temporary Impacts
Embankment Protection
< ° 12 LF, Permanent Impacts °
20 LF;Temporary Impacts
,ems
gryla�
„ n
Legend
Project Study Area
- --- -- Proposed Alignment
Proposed Right -of -Way (ROW)
Proposed Greenway
Proposed Pipes
Wetlands
Streams
0 500 1,000
Feet 10 -1
Figure 5
Proposed Conditions
TIP U-5108
Northcross Drive Extension
Mecklenburg County, NC

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (PJD)

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW No. 2019-00199 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Cornelius, Lake Norman South
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mr. Larry Thompson
Address:
716 W. Main Street
Albemarle, North Carolina 28001
Telephone Number:
704-983-4437
E-mail:
lthompsonAncdot.2ov
Size (acres)
170 acres Nearest Town Cornelius
Nearest Waterway
McDowell Creek River Basin Santee
USGS HUC
03050101 Coordinates Latitude: 35.456395
Longitude:-80.875820
Location description: Northcross Drive extension from NC 73 in Huntersville to Westmoreland Road in Cornelius,
MecklenburLy County.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation maps, Sheets 1-4, Figures 1-3a,
dated 2/5/2019. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other
resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW No. 2019-00199
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Nicholle Braspennickx at 704-510-0162 or
Nicholle.M.B raspennickx.usace. armv. mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 04/18/2019.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 04/18/2019 Expiration Date of JD:Not applicable

SAW No. 2019-00199
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: North Carolina Department of
File Number: SAW No. 2019-00199
Date:04/18/2019
Transportation, Mr. Larry Thompson
Attached
is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.aimy.nul/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ulatoaProjzramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REOUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR OUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: IF — 1
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Nicholle Braspennickx
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of anv site investisation, and will have the oDDortunity to DarticiDate in all site investigations.
Date: I Telephone number:
of appellant or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Nicholle Braspennickx, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 04/18/2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: North Carolina Department of Transportation, Mr.
Larry Thompson, 716 W. Main Street, Albemarle, North Carolina 28001
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, NC DOT/U 5108, Northcross Drive
extension, SAW No. 2019-00199
D. PROJECT LOCATIONS) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Northcross Drive extension from NC 73 in
Huntersville to Westmoreland Road in Cornelius, Mecklenburg County.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Cornelius
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.456395 Longitude:-80.875820
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: McDowell Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: January 29, 2019 and February 5, 2019
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
review area (acreage
"may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non -
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
wetland waters)
applicable
10/404)
Stream A
35.456451
-80.877785
1048.4 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
(SA)
Stream B
Str
35.458483
-80.881653
2068.5 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Stream C
35.456653
-80.876527
755.6 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
(SC)
Stream D
35.455594
-80.878612
461.5 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
(SD)
Wetland A
4242.5 square feet
35.458748
-80.879529
Wetland
Section 404
(WA)
(0.10 acre)
Wetland B
22142.3 square feet
35.458748
-80.879805
wetland
Section 404
(WB)
(0.51 acre)
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.

2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Figures 1-3a,
prepared by North Carolina Department of Transportation, dated February 5, 2019.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Cornelius, Lake Norman South
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:

❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify):
Delineated Streams A-D flow to McDowell Creek which flows to the Catawba River, an
interstate water of the U.S. Corps of Engineers regulations at 33 CFR Part 328.3(a)(5) assert
Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction over tributaries to other waters of the U.S. Therefore,
Streams A-D may be considered waters of the U.S.
Wetlands A & B are adjacent to the above delineated streams. Corps of Engineers regulations at
33 CFR Part 328.3(a)(7) assert CWA jurisdiction over wetlands adjacent to waters of the U.S.
Therefore, Wetlands A & B may be considered waters of the U.S.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
04/ 18/2019
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

® Project Study Area
1-5715 Project Study Area
Streams
N
A
11
Miles
0 0.25 0.5
■❑
cklenburg
County
Cornelius Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Huntersville TIP U-5108
Mecklenburg County Northcross Drive Extension
Mecklenburg County, NC

• rsa � � N
40
'r lip
O J
I
QN%
"Legend - red •'
Project Study Area _ ` '-_` 0 500 1,000
gowrk
Figure 2
USGS Topo (Lake Norman South/Cornelius)
m TIP U-5108
Northcross Drive Extension
Mecklenburg County

arm
it
S6
SID
X—Rawr
Legend
Project Study Area
'7Potential Wetland WoUS 73
Potential Non -Wetland WoUS (Streams)
1-5715 Project Study Area
9 0 500 1,000
mommow-1 Feet
Figure 3
PJD Field Sketch
TIP U-5108
Northcross Drive Extension
Mecklenburg County, NC

N
nq
, as p 1.Y" � '4 q N• y. ,
'6 1 ii?•' 1 i - t I
I no to
.�' ,1I 1 y ,� .w ���1��„" "�i-•`, • �• � 1. � 1 j � �'1
IAI
4.1
A
SB WA
111111W4
r + yc 3
INA
SA .
,. i.► 6 SC
2
`
-41
Legend
® Project Study Area I
Potential Wetland WOUS
Potential Non -Wetland WoUS (Streams) _
o Wetland Data Point
i 0 200 400
Photos Locations Feet
ORTf} Figure 3a
' PJD Field Sketch
TIP U-5108
Northcross Drive Extension
�fi Of Mecklenburg County, NC

NC STREAM ASSESSMENT METHOD
FORMS

ies user manuai version c.i
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): U-5108 2. Date of evaluation: 02/02/2017
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDOT 4. Assessor name/organization: Chris Tinklenberg / Kimley Horn
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: McDowell Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.458665,-80.880455
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SB 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): -150 If
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 7' r Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 3' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? [ Yes [-,No
14. Feature type: F;Perennial flow [, Intermittent flow [-,Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: [,Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) [ Inner Coastal Plain (I) [;Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic \ J
valley shape (skip for [tea ��� [+;b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip [,Size 1 (< 0.1 mi`) F, Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi`) [ Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi`) [;Size 4 (>_ 5 mi)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? FYes [-,No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
F Section 10 water F Classified Trout Waters F Water Supply Watershed ( [-,I [;II [,III [;IV [-,V)
r Essential Fish Habitat F Primary Nursery Area r High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
r Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
F Anadromous fish r 303(d) List r CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
r Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? [+ Yes r-, No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
[+;A Water throughout assessment reach.
[; B No flow, water in pools only.
[;C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
[ �A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
�B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
[+;A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
[;B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
�A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
[�B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
[;A < 10% of channel unstable
[+; B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
[;C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
[�A [;A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
[ B [; B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
�C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
r A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
r B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)

r— C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
F D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
F E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
F F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
F G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
F H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
f— I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
F J Little to ho stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
(— A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
(" B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
{: C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
Yes Co— No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. (: Yes { -,No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
f— A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses N r F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) r m r G Submerged aquatic vegetation
r B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o CO � r H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation L o r l Sand bottom
r C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) L m r J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
r D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 02 F K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
F E Little or no habitat
********* .* REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS**********************...
11. Beciform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. r Yes {+; No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
F A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
F B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
Sand (.062-2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11 d. [-,Yes [ , No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. (—Yes F, No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. [—,No Water Other:
12b. {: Yes { -,No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa° for size 3 and 4 streams.
F r Adult frogs
F r Aquatic reptiles
r r Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
F r Beetles (including water pennies)
F r Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
F r Asian clam (Corbicula )
F r Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrim p)
F r Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
F r Dipterans (true flies)
F r Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
F r Megaloptera (alderfly, fishily, dobsonfly larvae)
F r Midges/mosquito larvae
f— r Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
F r Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula )
F r Other fish
F r Salamanders/tadpoles
r r Snails
F r Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
f— r Tipulid larvae

r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB
RB
[;A
A
Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
[; B
B
Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
[+;C
C
Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
�A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water> 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
�C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
[;Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
r A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
r B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
r C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
F D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
f✓ E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
r A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
r B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
17 C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
17 D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
r E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
r F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
�A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
�B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
�C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
[ �A
A
A A >t 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
[;B
B
[;B B From 50 to < 1 00-feet wide
[;C
C
[;C C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
[+;D
D
[+;D D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
[;E
E
[;E E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
�A
A
Mature forest
B
B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
�C
C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
�D
D
Maintained shrubs
E
E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB
RB
LB RB LB RB
[�A
A
A A A A Row crops
[�B
B
B B B B Maintained turf
[ �C
C
C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
[ �D
D
D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem
Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider
for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB
RB
�A
A
Medium to high stem density
�B
B
Low stem density
�C
C
No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)

Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
[ �A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
[;C [;C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
[ �A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B [+'� B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
[�C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. [,Yes F,No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. [;No Water [Other:
251b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
[,A <46 [;B 46to<67 [;C 67to<79 [,D 79to<230 [;E ? 230

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name U-5108
Stream Category Pb2
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Summary
Date of Evaluation 02/02/2017
Assessor Name/Organization Chris Tinklenberg /
Kimley Horn
NO
NO
YES
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography NA
(3) Stream Stability LOW
(4) Channel Stability MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat MEDIUM
(2) In -stream Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow HIGH
(3) Substrate LOW
(3) Stream Stability MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Stream -side Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall MEDIUM

APPROVED CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
Type III Categorical Exclusion Action Classification Form
STIP Project No.
WBS Element
U-5108
42370.1.1
Federal Project No. TBA
A. Project Description:
Project U-5108 proposes to extend Northcross Drive on new location from N.C. 73
(Sam Furr Road) in Huntersville to Westmoreland Road in Cornelius, Mecklenburg
County. The project is primarily located on new location (approximately 1 mile). The
remaining proposed alignment utilizes existing Northcross Drive on the south end of the
project (0.5 miles) and existing Eagleridge Way Lane (0.2 miles) on the north end of the
project. (See Figures 2A-2F) The new location portion of the project includes a 110-
foot bridge over McDowell Creek which will require a realignment of the existing
McDowell Creek Greenway (See Figure 2B). A single -lane roundabout is proposed at
the intersection of Eagleridge Way Lane and Westmoreland Road as part of this project
(See Figure 2A).
The proposed typical section (see Figures 3A-3B) on the new location portion of the
project is a two-lane roadway with 11-foot lanes which widen to 14.5-foot lanes at the
existing Eagleridge Way Lane. A 10-foot wide multi -use path is proposed between
Westmoreland Road and the Westmoreland Athletic Park entrance on Eagleridge Way
Lane. A 5-foot sidewalk, two 11-foot travel lanes, and a 10 to 11-foot wide center left -
turn lane are proposed on the existing Northcross Drive between NorthPointe
Executive Park Drive and the beginning of the new location portion of Northcross Drive.
The remaining portion of Northcross drive will be re -surfaced.
The estimated project costs, based on 2017 prices for the preliminary designs, are $1.5
million for right of way and $11 million for construction, totaling $12.5 million for project.
B. Description of Need and Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to improve the roadway connectivity within the
surrounding area by providing an alternate north -south route for local traffic parallel to
Interstate 77, U.S. 21 (Statesville Road), N.C. 115 (Old Statesville Road), and West
Catawba Avenue (S.R. 5544). Existing north -south routes that run through the Town of
Cornelius and Town of Huntersville are congested and used primarily by through traffic
and commuters to Charlotte and Statesville.
C. Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: Type III
D. Proposed Improvements: Not applicable
NCDOT STIP Project No. U-5108 1 May 2019

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
E. SDecial Proiect Information:
Alternatives Analysis: Two alternative alignments were initially studied in addition to the
preferred alignment. The two eliminated alternatives differed from the preferred
alternative in how they crossed through the undeveloped property (Cooke property)
adjacent to 1-77. The eliminated alternatives crossed through the property further to the
west, and would have resulted in additional division of the property. Several residents
in Stratford Forest also expressed concern about potential noise impacts of the
alternatives that crossed further to the west that were closer to the neighborhood.
Based on the costs, impacts, and input from the community and Town of Cornelius,
NCDOT recommended the alternative that is closest to 1-77 and further from the
Stratford Forest neighborhood.
Jurisdictional Resources: Four streams (SA, SB, SC, and SD), one wetland (WA), and
one pond (PA) were identified in the Final Natural Resources Technical Report (March
2018). An additional two streams (Caldwell Station Creek and SD-1-5715), one wetland
(WE), and two ponds (PA 1-5715 and PD) were identified within the U-5108 study area
in the Natural Resources Technical Report (May 2016) for STIP Project No. 1-5715
which overlapped with the U-5108 study area. A Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
23 and Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) are anticipated based on the
level of anticipated impacts to jurisdictional resources.
Impacts to jurisdictional resources were calculated using a 25-foot buffer of the
proposed slope stakes. Impacts to stream SA (McDowell Creek) are anticipated to be
less than 50 feet since the design proposes a bridge crossing at this location. A new
60-inch reinforced concrete pipe is proposed for stream SB where it crosses under the
proposed roadway. Approximately 250 feet of impacts to stream SB are anticipated
with the construction of this pipe. Stream SD currently travels under the existing
McDowell Creek Greenway; approximately 80 feet of impacts are anticipated at this
location due to the realignment of the existing greenway underneath the proposed
roadway bridge.
The wetlands and ponds identified within the study area (shown on Figures 2A through
2F) are all located at least 100-foot outside of the proposed slope stakes, and therefore
are not expected to be directly impacted by construction of the proposed project.
Threatened and Endangered Species: There are six federally protected species listed
by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for Mecklenburg County
(Updated June 27, 2018): Michaux's sumac, Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth
coneflower, Carolina heelsplitter, rusty -patched bumblebee (RPBB), and Northern
long-eared bat (NLEB). Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac, Schweinitz's sunflower,
and smooth coneflower were found within the study area. Due to a lack of recorded
occurrences and a lack of observed individuals in the project study area, it has been
determined that the proposed project will have "No Effect" on these species. A "No
Effect" determination was made for the Carolina heelsplitter since suitable habitat is not
present within the study area. A biological conclusion is not required for the RPBB
because the USFWS does not and will not require surveys for RPBB in North Carolina
since the USFWS assumes the state is unoccupied by RPBB.
NCDOT STIP Project No. U-5108 2 May 2019

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
There is suitable roosting habitat for the NLEB within the study area; however, there
are no known hibernacula or roosting sites within Mecklenburg county. In addition,
Mecklenburg County is not identified by the USFWS Asheville Field Office as a county
where incidental take may be a special consideration for NLEB. A review of the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) records updated February 2018, indicates
no known roosting sites or hibernacula within 1.0 mile of the study area. Based upon
the presence of potentially suitable habitat but the lack of known occurrences,
hibernacula, or roosting sites, the biological conclusion of "May Affect, Not Likely to
Adversely Affect" has been rendered for NLEB for this project.
In accordance with the Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act, a desktop-GIS
assessment and field survey of the project study area, as well as the area within a
1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits, was performed in February
2017. One water body (Lake Norman) large enough or sufficiently open to be
considered a potential feeding source was identified. No known occurrences within 1.0
miles of the study area were documented and no nests or individuals were observed.
Due to the lack of known occurrences, and the lack of observed individuals or nests, it
has been determined that the proposed project will not affect this species.
Local Transit: The Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) operates two bus routes,
Route 97 and Route 77X, which use N.C. 73 and/or Northcross Drive as well as the
Huntersville-Northcross Park and Ride facility along the project corridor. During
construction, lanes on the existing section of Northcross Drive will remain open and all
properties will be accessible, but travel time could be affected temporarily. Buses must
be provided adequate room for turning around on Northcross Drive and Eagleridge
Way during construction.
Public Involvement: Two public meetings were held for the subject project on February
13, 2017 and December 7, 2017 with approximately 75 and 33 people in attendance,
respectively. The February public meeting presented three alternative alignments.
Citizens generally preferred the alignment that has now been selected as the preferred
alignment by the NCDOT. The second public meeting presented a more detailed
design of the preferred alternative. Comments received from the public at this meeting
were positive in nature.
Several members of the Alexander Chase neighborhood expressed concern about
increased cut -through traffic and other impacts. During the public meeting and two
additional neighborhood meetings in March and December 2017, residents provided
specific suggestions for the design of Eagleridge Way Lane, such as restricting access
through the neighborhood, creating a buffer between the roadway and the
neighborhood, and a pedestrian crossing at Westmoreland. Since those meetings, the
design has been modified to add a single -lane roundabout with pedestrian crossing at
Westmoreland Road, as well as a 200-foot long median on Eagleridge Way Lane which
will convert Arrowhead Place Lane to right -in right -out access.
NCDOT STIP Project No. U-5108 3 May 2019

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
F. Proiect Impact Criteria Checklists:
Type III Actions
Yes
No
1
Does the project involve potential effects on species listed with the US Fish
❑X
❑
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries (NMFS)?
2
Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and
❑
Golden Eagle Protection Act BGPA ?
3
Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any
❑
❑X
reason, following appropriate ublic involvement?
4
Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to
❑
low-income and/or minority populations?
5
Does the project involve substantial residential or commercial displacements
❑
or right of way acquisition?
6
Does the project include a determination under Section 4(f)?
❑X
❑
7
Is a project -level analysis fordirect, indirect, or cumulative effects required
❑
based on the NCDOT community studies screening tool?
8
Is a project level air quality Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSAT) analysis
❑
required?
9
Is the project located in anadromous fish spawning waters?
❑
❑X
Does the project impact waters classified as Outstanding Resource Water
10
(ORW), High Quality Water (HQW), Water Supply Watershed Critical
❑
Areas, 303(d) listed impaired water bodies, buffer rules, or Submerged
Aquatic Vegetation (SAV)?
11
Does the project impact waters of the United States in any of the designated
❑
mountain trout streams?
12
Does the project require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual
❑
Section 404 Permit?
13
Will the project require an easement from a Federal Energy Regulatory
❑
Commission FERC licensed facility?
Does the project include Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
14
(NHPA) effects determination other than a no effect, including archaeological
❑
0
remains? Are there project commitments identified?
15
Does the project involve hazardous materials and/or landfills?
❑
0
Does the project require work encroaching and adversely effecting a
16
regulatory floodway or work affecting the base floodplain (100-year flood)
❑
elevations of a water course or lake, pursuantto Executive Order 11988 and
23 CFR 650 subpart A?
Is the project in a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) county and
17
substantially affects the coastal zone and/or any Area of Environmental
❑
0
Concern (AEC)?
18
Does the project require a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) permit?
❑
0
19
Does the project involve construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a
❑
designated Wild and Scenic River present within the project area?
20
Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) resources?
❑
0
NCDOT STIP Project No. U-5108 4 May 2019

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
Type III Actions (continued)
Yes
No
21
Does the project impact federal lands (e.g. USFS, USFWS, etc.) or Tribal
❑
Lands?
22
Does the project involve any changes in access control?
❑
❑X
23
Does the project have a permanent adverse effect on local traffic patterns or
❑
community cohesiveness?
24
Will maintenance of traffic cause substantial disruption?
❑
0
Is the project inconsistent with the STIP or the Metropolitan Planning
25
Organization's (MPO's) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) (where
❑
0
applicable)?
Does the project require the acquisition of lands underthe protection of
Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act, the Federal Aid in Fish
26
Restoration Act, the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, Tennessee Valley
❑
Authority (TVA), Tribal Lands, or other unique areas or special lands that were
acquired in fee or easement with public -use money and have deed restrictions
or covenants on the property?
27
Does the project involve Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
❑
buyout properties underthe Hazard Mitigation Grant Program HMGP ?
28
Is the project considered a Type I under the NCDOT's Noise Policy?
❑X
❑
29
Is there prime or important farmland soil impacted by this project as defined by
❑
❑X
the Farmland Protection Policy Act FPPA ?
30
Are there other issues that arose during the project development process that
❑
effected the project decision?
G. Additional Documentation as Required from Section F
1. There is suitable roosting habitat for the NLEB within the study area; however, there
are no known hibernacula or roosting sites within Mecklenburg county. In addition,
Mecklenburg County is not identified by the USFWS Asheville Field Office as a county
where incidental take may be a special consideration for NLEB. A review of the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) records updated February 2018, indicates
no known roosting sites or hibernacula within 1.0 mile of the study area. Based upon
the presence of potentially suitable habitat but the lack of known occurrences,
hibernacula, or roosting sites, the biological conclusion of "may affect, not likely to
adversely affect" has been rendered for NLEB for this project.
6. Right-of-way and temporary construction easements are required within the Robbins
Park/Westmoreland Regional Park, a potential Section 4(f) resource. The proposed
road alignment through the park is consistent with previously approved plans. NCDOT
has coordinated with the Town of Cornelius and Mecklenburg County officials to
determine that the proposed construction will not adversely affect the park's activities,
features, and attributes that qualify it for protection under Section 4(f). This agreement
provided basis for a de minimis impact conclusion.
NCDOT STIP Project No. U-5108 5 May 2019

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
The project also may require temporary use of the McDowell Creek Greenway, a
potential Section 4(f) resource, during construction, and may require that the greenway
is briefly closed for bridge construction. NCDOT will coordinate with Mecklenburg
County to designate and sign a temporary detour route for the McDowell Creek
Greenway during construction of the realigned portion of the greenway, using existing
trail and sidewalk facilities.
7. The project is anticipated to alter travel patterns through this area and reduce travel
times for north -south traffic. It will improve access to the undeveloped Cooke property,
which is bounded by 1-77 on the east, McDowell Creek on the west, and development
to the north and south. The Cooke property is the only remaining undeveloped property
along or near to the corridor. By providing access to the Cooke property, this project
may affect the timing or type of development on that property. The Cooke property is
identified as "Corporate Office" in the Cornelius Land Use Plan, though no specific
development has been proposed.
The other properties adjacent to the Cooke property and along the proposed corridor
include commercial development to the south, residential development to the north,
and a park to the west. These properties are all built out and unlikely to redevelop. A
separate qualitative Indirect and Cumulative Effects (ICE) report will be prepared prior
to submittal of the permit application to provide additional information on the Cooke
property as part of the permit application.
8. The project is in Mecklenburg County, which is within the Charlotte maintenance
area for the prior 1997 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) as
defined by the EPA. This area was designated moderate nonattainment under the
1997 ozone NAAQS on June 15, 2004 and due to improved air quality in the region
was re -designated maintenance on January 2, 2014. The Charlotte area was
designated for the 2008 ozone NAAQS resulting in the 1997 ozone NAAQS being
revoked on April 6, 2015. On February 16, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit in South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. District v. EPA
("South Coast ll," 882 F.3d 1138) held that transportation applies for the revoked 1997
ozone NAAQS areas. Transportation conformity for plans and TIPs for the 1997 Ozone
NAAQS can be demonstrated without a regional emissions analysis pursuant to 40
CFR 93.109(c).
The project is in Mecklenburg County, which is within the Charlotte maintenance area
for the 2008 ozone NAAQS as defined by the EPA. The Charlotte area was
designated marginal nonattainment under the 2008 ozone NAAQS on July 20, 2012
and due to improved air quality in the region was re -designated maintenance on August
27, 2015. Section 176(c) of the CAAA requires that transportation plans, programs,
and projects conform to the intent of the state air quality implementation plan (SIP).
The current SIP does not contain any transportation control measures for Mecklenburg
County. The Charlotte Region Transportation Planning Organization 2045 Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP) and the 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) conform to the intent of the SIP. The USDOT made a conformity determination
on the MTP on December 3, 2018 and the TIP on December 3, 2018. The current
conformity determination is consistent with the final conformity rule found in 40 CFR
Parts 51and 93. There are no significant changes in the project's design concept or
scope, as used in the conformity analyses.
NCDOT STIP Project No. U-5108 6 May 2019

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
16. This project is not anticipated to increase the level or extent of upstream flood
potential for insurable structures. The NCDOT project team has coordinated with the
NCDOT Hydraulics group to follow the Memorandum of Agreement between the
NCDOT Hydraulics group and the NC Floodplain Mapping Program. It is anticipated
that this project will result in a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR).
28. The U-5108 Traffic Noise Report (October 2018) identified one noise barrier which
meets the preliminary feasible and reasonable criteria found in the NCDOT Traffic
Noise Abatement Policy. Noise barriers found to be feasible and reasonable during the
preliminary noise analysis may not be found to be feasible and reasonable during the
final design noise analysis due to changes in proposed project alignment and other
design considerations, surrounding land use development, or utility conflicts, among
other factors. Conversely, noise barriers that were not considered feasible and
reasonable may meet the established criteria and be recommended for construction.
NCDOT STIP Project No. U-5108 7 May 2019

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4045F585-1 FDB-41 DA-84A8-9ED 1 Al B67A47
H. Proiect Commitments
Mecklenburg County
Extension of Northcross Drive on New Location from N.C. 73 (Sam Furr Road) in
Huntersville To Westmoreland Road in Cornelius
Federal Project No. TBA
WBS No. 42340.1.1
TIP No. U-5108
Division 10 Construction
NCDOT will coordinate with Mecklenburg County to designate and sign a temporary
detour route for the McDowell Creek Greenway during construction of the realigned
portion of the greenway, using existing trail and sidewalk facilities.
Community Studies Group
NCDOT will prepare an Indirect and Cumulative Effects study prior to submittal of the
permit application.
NCDOT STIP Project No. U-5108 8 May 2019

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
Categorical Exclusion Approval
STIP Project No.
WBS Element
Federal Project No.
Prepared By:
5/23/2019
Date
U-5108
42370.1.1
TBA
—DocuSigned by:
_�ro�nnrte en nr
Teresa Gresham, PE
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Prepared For: NCDOT Division 10
Reviewed By:
5/23/2019
Date
—DocuSigned by:
'I umrsm
—nnA7AoFn1rrFncs
Larry Thompson, PWS, LSS, Division Environmental Officer
Highway Division 10
North Carolina Department of Transportation
NCDOT certifies that the proposed action qualifies as a Type III Categorical
Exclusion.
5/27/2019
Date
FHWA Approval:
5/29/2019
—DocuSigned by:
fimef(u, k boI,A.I, J
Scott Cole, PE, Division Engineer
Highway Division 10
North Carolina Department of Transportation
by:
Date Loretta Barren, Planning & Environment Specialist
NCDOT Highway Divisions 10-12
Federal Highway Administration
NCDOT STIP Project No. U-5108 9 May 2019

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
q
f�
/j
r_
J R
Q
3
R
U
w
G2Roy
Pi
Lake Norman
L
r %
J
Q
X
Preferred Alignment Town of Cornelius
— Streams Town of Huntersville
0 Lakes and Ponds Mecklenburg County
Parks
0.5
Miles 1 V I S'
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
NCDOT Project No. U-5108
Northcross Drive Extension
Mecklenburg County

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
ana'Rd C
F a 2A
z'
Figure F
d
2 ' -
2E, ,
WIW -
"I
M
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Preferred Alignment Lakes and Ponds Figure 2
Proposed Sidewalk and Multi -use Trail Town of Cornelius Design Map
NCDOT Project No. U-5108
- - Existing McDowell Creek Greenway Town of Huntersville Northcross Drive Extension
Streams Park Mecklenburg County

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
Amberwood Gleri Driv
Alexander Chase Ambers de Road
�' I ® 1 I: ' °��a:��� h. -•. `� 41F.y .JCS. �� — �-
a
T4 \ r>
F
_ II
Ll_
!C • �: - �r , -� - oaf
p
i r
� - '" `•�- ' � - - Fag'/er/dge w
III 4W
• ,•;:_��=._:.,. � Lahr N �
._! JJ� m
I � �
Westmoreland Athletic Park
1
� 1
1 1
1 ;
1 ,
1 � ,
1 V �
1 � {
1
1 L
0 '
r
Feet
0 200 400
o� %oRry aR — Proposed Sidewalk and Multi -use Trail Delineated Ponds Figure 2A
— Proposed Island Delineated Wetlands Detailed Design Map
x Proposed Edge of Travel Floodway
b - - - Slope Stakes 100-Year Floodplain NCDOT Project No. U-5108
Northcross Drive Extension
-Existing McDowell Creek Greenway Park
F, Mecklenburg County
r of to*`' Delineated Streams

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
x
Cooke Property
✓ III_. _ _ ':'>. 4/. -. -... � r'.. • j f M1 y� - --'� ;
INA
Al
01Air
N Feet
0 200 400
o� %oRry cR — Proposed Sidewalk and Multi -use Trail Delineated' Wetlands Figure 2D
Proposed Edge of Travel Floodway Detailed Design Map
x - - -Slope Stakes 100-Year Floodplain NCDOT Project No. U-5108
b - - Existing McDowell Creek Greenway
y�A Delineated Streams
Northcross Drive Extension "t -
FH Mecklenburg County
�' of ts+a°' Delineated Ponds

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
4
A,Vm-, —..Ai.%L
0
Va�,AM Stratford Forest
�c A6alar'Ridge Court
x e
t' ' a9ure 20
Figure 4„ V.
a 2E
NeJar� ��
Nea�tr
v
PA4-5745
L PBS'
CATS Park and Ride
a r The Landings Apartments
i 11 A
�eoutiv P rk Drive Or
[' a
NorthPointe �;_ Zi � � 'w �p .�.. � 6 •
2 t Executive Park 4
ve
�. ! See Figure 21= `.
R.' Feet
See Figure 2F 0 200 400
o� %oRry cR — Proposed Sidewalk and Multi -use Trail Delineated Wetlands Figure 2E
Proposed Edge of Travel Floodway Detailed Design Map
x - - - Slope Stakes 100-Year Floodplain NCDOT Project No. U-5108
b - - Existing McDowell Creek Greenway
Northcross Drive Extension
Delineated Streams
Mecklenburg County
OF to*`' Delineated Ponds

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4045F585-1 FDB-41 DA-84AMED 1 Al B67A47
T qIRMIRM
NorthPointe
Executive Park
� 1
i
P
r lw`
t
!Figurej2E,.
i
e Fiaurer2E
0
_ rt
f7o
P EFF 1FE e4-
T
.z
Landings U!
Apartments
0
e: X
Proposed Edge of Travel 100-Year Floodplain
— — Existing McDowell Creek Greenway Park
—Delineated Streams
Delineated Ponds
Delineated Wetlands
Floodway
5 �.
or"
Feet
200 400
Figure 2F
Detailed Design Map
NCDOT Project No. U-5108
Northcross Drive Extension
Mecklenburg County

DocuSian Envelope ID: 4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
Eagleridge Way Lane
-Ll- EAGLERIDGE WAY LANE
I!'�6 33"-0'
I
I
IO -O 14' -6' 14- 6"
MULTI -USE
PATH
EXISTING GROUND
0.02 � MATCH EXISTING MATCH EXISTING EXISTING GROUND
r-
L — I —
S U� !CI -i~ CI v1
Northcross Drive Extension - New Location
-L- NORTHCROSS DRIVE
I
I
I
W
2
U
F�
GRADE EXISTING GROUND
POINT
OD2 © EXISTING GROUND
4:1
�cl
EXfSTING_GROUND I
CI DI E! VARIABLE
' r SLOPE
EXISTING_GRQV VARIABLE
SLOPE
o� Kanry c�q$ Figure 3A
' Typical Sections
NCDOT Project No. U-5108
Northcross Drive Extension
Mecklenburg County
Of ,�*

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
Northcross Drive
(Northpointe Executive Park Drive to Forest Shadow Circle)
13'-0' � -L- NORTNCROSS DRIVE
VARIES-6'
PLANTING
5•-U STRIP Y!'�7 IQ� 7 !'-0 8'-0'
SW
8'-0'
VAR.
EX75TYNG GROUND
GR EXISTING GROUND
POIN - EX -
Ong OD2 a D0B EXISTING GROUND
- 4 ---
21 S T E! R! C! G! D! E! T VARIABLE
EXISTING GROUND
Northcross Drive
Forest Shadow Circle to Northcross Drive New Location Roadway
7•-6' � -L- NORTHCROSS DRIVE
i
i
�'�rr rr-cr ro+� x'� a•-Lr
SW
4'-0'
2'�cr
EXISTING GROUND
� GR EXISTING GROUND
POW- ---
ad12 0.02 � OQg� EXlST1NG GROUND
EXISTING
j Gl D! EI ABLE
6' J V LOPE
Figure 313
Typical Sections
NCDOT Project No. U-5108
Northcross Drive Extension
Mecklenburg County

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-lFDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
August 25, 2017
Mr. Troy Fitzsimmons
Director, Parks, Arts, Recreation, & Culture
Town of Cornelius
21445 Catawba Avenue
Cornelius, NC 28031
TAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
RE: NCDOT STIP Project U-5108: Section 4(f) Coordination for Westmoreland Regional Park
Dear Mr. Fitzsimmons,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to construct the Northcross Drive
Extension in Cornelius. The Northcross Drive Extension will construct a new Iocation roadway
between NC 73 and Westmoreland Road by connecting existing Northcross Drive and Eagle Ridge
Way through Westmoreland Regional Park.
In order to construct the proposed project, NCDOT will need to acquire property from
Westmoreland Regional Park, which is owned by Mecklenburg County Park & Recreation
Department, leased to the Town of Cornelius, and subject to Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of
Transportation Act of 1966. Preliminary design indicates that the right-of-way needed will likely
be 62-63 feet wide within the project limits. The project will include amenities such as bike lanes
and a multi -use path. The project is not anticipated to impact amenities within the park. Attached is
a figure detailing the approximate path of the alignment through the park and the proposed
approximate right-of-way required through the park property. Temporary Construction Easement,
Permanent Utility Easement (PUE), and Permanent or Temporary Drainage Easement (PDE/TDE)
outside the proposed right-of-way will likely be necessary as well for relocating existing utilities
and roadside ditches/drainage features. The approximate locations of the easements have not been
finalized at this stage of preliminary design. NCDOT and FHWA believe that the proposed project
will have no adverse effect on the activities, features, and attributes that qualify Westmoreland
Regional Park for protection under Section 4(f). With your agreement, we would deem the impacts
from the proposed project to be de minimis. NCDOT right-of-way agents will be in contact with
Mecklenburg County Park & Recreation Department and the Town of Cornelius to appraise the
right-of-way to be purchased for the project in late 2018 based on the current schedule.
If you concur that the proposed impacts to Westmoreland Regional Park, as described above and
shown on the attached figures, will not adversely affect the park's access and use, NCDOT is
requesting that you sign and date this letter in the spaces provided below, keep a copy for your
files, and return a signed original to the address noted below. We will keep a copy of the letter in
the project files.
Mailing Address: Telephone: (704)983A400 Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] WEST MAIN STREET
716 WEST MAIN STREET ALBEMARLE, NC 28001
ALBEMARLE, NC 28001
Website: www.ncdot.gov

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
As the Director of Parks, Art, Recreation, & Culture for The Town of Cornelius, and the official
with jurisdiction over the Westmoreland Regional Park, I concur with the determination that the
proposed project U-5108 as described in this letter and shown on the accompanying attachments
will not adversely affect the activities, features, and attributes that quay Westmoreland Regional
Park for protection under Section 469 of the Department of Transportation Act as amended. I have
been informed that, based on my concurrence, the FHWA intends to make a de minimis finding
regarding impacts to Westmoreland Regional Park, thus satisfying the requirements of Section
40 /`
Signed:
Troy Fitzsimmons, Director, Parks,
Town of Cornelius
Cornelius, North Carolina
Date; - 7
& Culture
Upon signing and dating this letter, please return it to me within two weeks of the date of the
letter by email at s[basharn =,ncdot,gov and return a signed original to the following address:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Attn: Stuart Basham
12033 East Independence Boulevard
Matthews, NC 28105
NCDOT greatly appreciates your cooperation in making the U-5108 Northcross Drive Extension
project possible. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 704-845-1151.
Sincerely,
Stuart L. Basham
Division 10 Planning Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
SLB/
Attachments

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4045F585-1 FDB-41 DA-84A8-9ED1A1 B67A47
Frosch, Colin
From:
Troy Fitzsimmons <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Monday, September 24, 2018 11:14 AM
To:
Frosch, Colin; [e-mail]; Andrew Grant;
[e-mail]
Cc:
Gresham, Teresa; Gibilaro, Carl; Epperson, Sean M; Spacek, Tony
Subject:
RE: NCDOT Project U-5108 Section 4(f) Coordination
Categories: External
Yes, on behalf of Town of Cornelius
From: Frosch, Colin [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 9:55 AM
To: [e-mail]; Troy Fitzsimmons <[e-mail]>; Andrew Grant
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Cc: Gresham, Teresa <[e-mail]>; Gibilaro, Carl <[e-mail]>; Epperson, Sean M
<[e-mail]>; Spacek, Tony <[e-mail]>
Subject: NCDOT Project U-5108 Section 4(f) Coordination
Hello all,
On behalf of the Project team for NCDOT STIP Project U-5108, Proposed Extension of Northcross Drive on New Location
from N.C. 73 (Sam Furr Road) in Huntersville to Westmoreland Road in Cornelius, I would like to provide you an update
on proposed impacts to the Robbins Park/Westmoreland Regional Park which is a Section 4(f) resource. As you may
already know, the previous design of the project (shown in attached "U-5108 Old Design" PDF) proposed a roundabout
within the Future Robbins Park. After coordinating with local officials and stakeholders, the design in this section has
been revised to instead construct a new roundabout at the intersection of Eagleridge Way Lane and Westmoreland
Road, and maintain a curve without interruptions through the park (shown in attached "U-5108 New Design 09-20-
2018" PDF).
We appreciate your past coordination with us on these proposed impacts to Robbins Park/Westmoreland Regional Park
and have on file, and attached here, your concurrence that the proposed impacts to Robbins Park/Westmoreland
Regional Park will not adversely affect the park's access and use. With the proposed change in design, we want to
confirm with you that your previous concurrence still stands. A simple yes email response would be sufficient, an
additional signature is not required.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
Thank you!
Colin Frosch, E.I. (WV) I Transportation Analyst
Kimley-Horn 1 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
Direct: 919-677-2184 1 Mobile: [phone]
Connect with us: Twitter I Linkedln I Facebook I Instagram I Kimley-Horn.com
Celebrating 11 years as one of FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-lFDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
,5CATE,y
?� B
v,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
March 13, 2018
Ms. Dena R. Diorio
County Manager — Mecklenburg County
600 East 4" St.
Charlotte, NC 28202-2835
.LAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
RE: NCDOT STIP Project U-5108: Section 4(f) Coordination for Robbins Park/Westmoreland
Regional Park
Dear Ms. Diorio,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to construct the Northcross Drive
Extension in Cornelius. The Northcross Drive Extension will construct a new location roadway
between NC 73 and Westmoreland Road by connecting existing Northcross Drive and Eagle Ridge
Way through Robbins Park/Westmoreland Regional Park.
In order to construct the proposed project, NCDOT will need to acquire property from Robbins
Park/Westmoreland Regional Park, which is owned by Mecklenburg County Park & Recreation
Department and subject to Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966.
Preliminary design indicates that the right-of-way needed will likely be 62-63 feet wide within the
project limits. The project will include amenities such as bike lanes and a multi -use path. The
project is not anticipated to impact amenities within the park. Attached is a figure detailing the
approximate path of the alignment through the park and the proposed approximate right-of-way
required through the park property. Temporary Construction Easement, Permanent Utility
Easement (PUE), and Permanent or Temporary Drainage Easement (PDE/TDE) outside the
proposed right-of-way will likely be necessary as well for relocating existing utilities and roadside
ditches/drainage features. The approximate locations of the easements have not been finalized at
this stage of preliminary design. NCDOT and FHWA believe that the proposed project will have
no adverse effect on the activities, features, and attributes that qualify Robbins Park/Westmoreland
Regional Park for protection under Section 4(f). With your agreement, we would deem the impacts
from the proposed project to be de minimis. NCDOT right-of-way agents will be in contact with
Mecklenburg County Park & Recreation Department to appraise the right-of-way to be purchased
for the project in late 2018 based on the current schedule.
If you concur that the proposed impacts to Robbins Park/Westmoreland Regional Park, as
described above and shown on the attached figures, will not adversely affect the park's access and
use, NCDOT is requesting that you sign and date this letter in the spaces provided below, keep a
copy for your files, and return a signed original to the address noted below. We will keep a copy of
the letter in the project files.
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] INDEPENDENCE TRANSPORTATION PARK
12033 EAST INDEPENDENCE BLVD, STE F Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 12033 EAST INDEPENDENCE BLVD, STE F
MA'r'I'HEWs, NC 28105 MATTHEWS, NC 28105
Website; www.ncdot.gov

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
As the Manager of Mecklenburg County with jurisdiction over the Robbins ParklWestmoreland
Regional Park, I concur with the determination that the proposed project U-5108 as described in
this letter and shown on the accompanying attachments will not adversely affect the activities,
features, and attributes that qualify Robbins Park/Westmoreland Regional Park for protection
under Section 4(of the Department of Transportation Act as amended. I have been informed that,
based on my concurrence, the FHWA intends to make a de minimis finding regarding impacts to
Robbins Park/Westmoreland Regional Park, thus satisfying the requirements of Section 4(f).
Signed: aV a f '—"0
Dena R. Diorio
County Manager
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Date: :,;,, 1 I -� I ( o
Upon signing and dating this letter, please return it to me within two weeks of the date of the
letter by email at slbashamAnedot. og_v and return a signed original to the following address:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Attn: Stuart Basham
12033 East Independence Boulevard
Matthews, NC 28105
NCDOT greatly appreciates your cooperation in making the U-5108 Northcross Drive Extension
project possible. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 704-845-1151.
Sincerely,
Stuart L. Basham
Division 10 Planning Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
SLB/
Attachments

DocuSign Envelope ID:4045F585-1FDB-41DA-84A8-9ED1A1B67A47
Frosch, Colin
From: Johnson, Leslie <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 2:48 PM
To: Frosch, Colin
Cc: Jones, Lee; McNeil, Jacqueline; Gresham, Teresa; Gibilaro, Carl; Epperson, Sean M; Spacek, Tony
Subject: FW: [External]FW: NCDOT Project U-5108 Section 4(f) Coordination
Categories: External
Good Afternoon Colin,
Again, thanks for providing the County opportunity to comment on the revised design of NCDOT Project U-5108.
Below please find comments from Park and Recreation.
Enjoy the rest of your day and have a blessed week.
M
Leslie Johnson
Assistant County Manager
Mecklenburg County Manager's Office
600 East Fourth Street - 1 lth Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
[phone] voice NEW
Leslie.JohnsongMecklenbur Cg ountC.gov
From: McNeil, Jacqueline
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 10:27 AM
To: Johnson, Leslie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jones, Lee <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External]FW: NCDOT Project U-5108 Section 4(f) Coordination
Hi Leslie,
Park and Recreation is disappointed that the bulk of the multi -use path along Northcross Drive Extension has
been eliminated in the new design but is pleased that the roundabout has been removed. Apart from this, the
department finds the impact of the new design to be de minimis. Reinstating the multi -use path from the main
trail of McDowell to where it picks up on Eagleridge Way Lane in the new design is welcomed by the
department.
Jacqueline McNeil, AICP
Real Estate Manager
Asset and Facility Management
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 101
Charlotte, NC 28208

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4045F585-1 FDB-41 DA-84A8-9ED1A1 B67A47
980.314.2511 (Phone)
[e-mail]
www.Mecklenbur Cg ountgov
From: Johnson, Leslie
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 12:00 PM
To: McNeil, Jacqueline <Jacqueline.McNeil@ mecklenburgcountync.gov>
Subject: FW: [External]FW: NCDOT Project U-5108 Section 4(f) Coordination
Hi Jacqueline,
As discussed, can you loop back with the team to see if there are any impacts with the revised design. Ideally, the
consultant would like our comments in a couple weeks if at all possible.
Thanks and enjoy the rest of your day.
Fi3
Leslie Johnson
Assistant County Manager
Mecklenburg County Manager's Office
600 East Fourth Street - 1 lth Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
[phone] voice NEW
Leslie.JohnsongMecklenbur Cg oun . NC. _ ov
From: Frosch, Colin <Colin.Frosch @kimlev-horn.com>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 11:51 AM
To: Johnson, Leslie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Gresham, Teresa <[e-mail]>; Gibilaro, Carl <[e-mail]>; Epperson, Sean M
<[e-mail]>; Spacek, Tony <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External]FW: NCDOT Project U-5108 Section 4(f) Coordination
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good morning Leslie,
Thank you for speaking with me on the phone regarding the U-5108 project which proposes the extension of Northcross
Drive in Mecklenburg County. Please see the below email and the attached files as references for what we discussed
today.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Have a great day!
Colin Frosch, E.I. (WV) I Transportation Analyst
Kimley-Horn 1 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4045F585-1 FDB-41 DA-84A8-9ED1A1 B67A47
Direct: 919-677-2184 1 Mobile: [phone]
Connect with us: Twitter I Linkedln I Facebook I Instagram I Kimley-Horn.com
Celebrating 11 years as one of FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For
From: Frosch, Colin
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 5:38 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: Gresham, Teresa <[e-mail]>; Gibilaro, Carl <[e-mail]>; Epperson, Sean M
<[e-mail]>; Spacek, Tony <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: NCDOT Project U-5108 Section 4(f) Coordination
Good afternoon Lee and Dena,
I wanted to touch base with you regarding the NCDOT STIP Project No. U-5108, Proposed Extension of Northcross Drive
in Huntersville and Cornelius, and the anticipated impacts to Section 4(f) resources as described in the previous email.
When you get an opportunity, could you please review the attached figures of the old and new designs for the northern
most portion of the project which includes impacts to Robbins Park/Westmoreland Regional Park, a Section 4(f)
resource? We had previously received the attached letter from you confirming that the impacts to the park would be
considered de minimis. With the proposed change in design, we want to confirm with you that your previous
concurrence still stands. A simple yes email response would be sufficient, an additional signature is not required.
We also would like to coordinate with you in regards to proposed construction activity which will occur along the
McDowell Creek Greenway. The project proposes to re -align a portion of the greenway which will pass underneath the
proposed bridge along the Northcross Drive Extension. Unfortunately the project team anticipates that the McDowell
Creek Greenway will need to be closed at this location during construction of the bridge for approximately six months.
For purposes of including a commitment in the environmental document, we would like your input on how you would
prefer we proceed. We believe committing to communicate to the public the closure of a portion of the greenway and
the timeline associated with it, will be the most effective. We could also designate an alternative route if you would
prefer.
Please let us know if you have any questions.
Thanks and have a great rest of the week!
Colin Frosch, E.I. (WV) I Transportation Analyst
Kimley-Horn 1 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
Direct: 919-677-2184 1 Mobile: [phone]
Connect with us: Twitter I Linkedln I Facebook I Instagram I Kimley-Horn.com
Celebrating 11 years as one of FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For
From: Frosch, Colin
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 9:55 AM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Cc: Gresham, Teresa <[e-mail]>; Gibilaro, Carl <[e-mail]>; Epperson, Sean M
<[e-mail]>; Spacek, Tony <[e-mail]>
Subject: NCDOT Project U-5108 Section 4(f) Coordination
Hello all,

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4045F585-1 FDB-41 DA-84A8-9ED1A1 B67A47
On behalf of the Project team for NCDOT STIP Project U-5108, Proposed Extension of Northcross Drive on New Location
from N.C. 73 (Sam Furr Road) in Huntersville to Westmoreland Road in Cornelius, I would like to provide you an update
on proposed impacts to the Robbins Park/Westmoreland Regional Park which is a Section 4(f) resource. As you may
already know, the previous design of the project (shown in attached "U-5108 Old Design" PDF) proposed a roundabout
within the Future Robbins Park. After coordinating with local officials and stakeholders, the design in this section has
been revised to instead construct a new roundabout at the intersection of Eagleridge Way Lane and Westmoreland
Road, and maintain a curve without interruptions through the park (shown in attached "U-5108 New Design 09-20-
2018" PDF).
We appreciate your past coordination with us on these proposed impacts to Robbins Park/Westmoreland Regional Park
and have on file, and attached here, your concurrence that the proposed impacts to Robbins Park/Westmoreland
Regional Park will not adversely affect the park's access and use. With the proposed change in design, we want to
confirm with you that your previous concurrence still stands. A simple yes email response would be sufficient, an
additional signature is not required.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
Thank you!
Colin Frosch, E.I. (WV) I Transportation Analyst
Kimley-Horn 1 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
Direct: 919-677-2184 1 Mobile: [phone]
Connect with us: Twitter I Linkedln I Facebook I Instagram I Kimley-Horn.com
Celebrating 11 years as one of FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For

PERMIT DRAWINGS

Highway North Carolina Department of Transportation
-torrYtwater
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2.
(Version 2.07; Released October 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 42370.1.1 TIP No.: U-5108 County(ies): Mecklenburg Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element:
42370.1.1 ITIP Number: U-5108 Project Type: New Location Date: 11/12/2019
NCDOT Contact:
Randy Bowers
Contractor / Designer:
Kimley-Horn & Associates
Address:
716 West Main Street
Address:
200 South Tryon St, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28202
Albemarle, NC 28001
Phone:
704-983-4400
Phone:
704-319-5683
Email:
rwbowersl(a)ncdot.gov
Email:
lason.lawing(a�kimley horn.com
City/Town:
Cornelius/Huntersville
County(ies):
Mecklenburg
River Basin(s):
Catawba
CAMA County?
No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
No
Project Description
Project Length fin. miles or feet):
1.757 miles Surrounding Land Use: Urban and undeveloped woods
Proposed Project
Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area (ac.)
10.2 ac.
5.1 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
-L- Sta 11+88 to 43+50 - 3 Lane, C & G on LT, mix of C & G and shoulder on RT with grass shoulders. -L-
Sta 43+50 to 73+46 new location - 2 lane shoulder section. -L- Sta 74+56 to 94+55 new location - 2 lane C &
G section with 4' grassed shoulders
Existing Northcross Drive - 3 lane, C & G on LT, mix of C & G and shoulder on RT
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: 16800 Year: 2040
Existing: 9,900 Year: 2022
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
• New bridge on proposed Northcross Drive Extension. Proposed 1 @ 110', 63" bulb tee bridge with 4' end bent caps and 1.5:1 spill through abutments
• Bridge to span McDowell Creek to avoid impacts
• No deck drains (Direct discharge) over McDowell Creek
• Minimized directly connected impervious surfaces where possible. Runoff from road in shoulder section will drain through grassed ditches prior to outfall connection
Grassed shoulder typical section utilized as much as possible throughout the project to encourage sheet flow off of the roadway
• Located new location roadway in areas to minimize/avoid stream and wetland impacts
• Burying circular cross pipe at jurisdictional streams
• Maintaining existing drainage patterns to best extent practical
• Avoiding direct discharges where practical
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): McDowell Creek
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
11-115-(1.5)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Water Supply IV (WS-IV)
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
Yes
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A
Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
INo
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)

SEE SHEET IA FOR INDEX OF SHEETS (FUTURE)
SEE SHEET iB FOR CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
i1mrin
i
I,
m
O . \
1 �iI TO
TOW
35
PRO ECT
VICINITY MAP
f
D
x
SAM FURR ROA
BEGIN TIP PROJECT U-5108
-L- Sta. 11+88.00
S`ll'A'd'lE OF 17TtOR°I['1H[ CARialLdNA
IDdVdSdOlaT cfl1F HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 8
sTATe
sz"� PRO eCT RRFe"eN°e N°.
T s"1
N.C.
U-5108
-A- m..—.
R.A.PR°L
De6CRIP'fION
42370.1.1
PE
42370.2.2
STBGDA-1001(078)
RAW & UTIL.
42370.3.3
STBGDM7001(078)
CONST.
LOCATION: NORTHCROSS DRIVE EXTENSION FROM END OF NORTHCROSS
DRIVE TO WESTMORELAND ROAD
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURES
WETLAND AND S U RFAC E
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
WATER IMPACTS PERMIT-Y6- Sta. 10 + 00.00
END TIP PROJECT U-5108
-Ll- Sta. 20+10.59
-L- Sta. 94+55 LB =
-Ll- Sta. 10+00 LA
SITE 4 —
END BRIDGE
-L- Sta. 74 + 56.00
SITE 2
SITE 3 —
S 7 q
Q
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
I
WESTMORELAND ROAD
00 SITE I
END CONSTRUCTION
NCDOT CONTACT: BEGIN BRIDGE -Y6- Sta. 25+59.95
SEAN EPPERSON, P.E. 6 —L— Sta. 73+46.00
NCDOT —DIVISION 10
716 W. MAIN STREET
ALBEMARLE, NC 28001 CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIM TS ESTABLISHED BY NCDOT METHOD III
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF CORNELIUS AND HUNTERSVILLE
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
m
Kiley *Hor
PLANS PREPARED FOR )� n
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT U-5108 = 1.736 MILES
THE NCDOT BY.• ""
50 25 0 50 100
ADT 2022 = 9900 VPD
ADT 2040 = 16800 VPD
K = 10%
D = 70%
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT U-5108 = 0.021 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT U-5108 = 1.757 MILES
� N .a.«�oj
P.E.
g��� NOR?���
7
2019 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
T 4%*
V = 25 — 40 MPH
FUNCTIONAL URBAN MAJOR
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
DUNE 19,2019
TONY SPACEK, P.E.
A
cxarr.
ADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
ROADWAY
OA
PROJECT ENGINEER
BItANDON MURR,EIT
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
CLASSIFICATION: COLLECTOR
* 1% TTST 3% DUAL
REGIONAL TIER
LETTING DATE:
JUNE 16, 2020
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
P.E.
sICNATc xE:

z
>O
W
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
RETAIN EX.36"PVjS N- VEY Kimley)))Horn U-5/OS 9
KW SHEET NO.
DES
NC LICENSE #F-0102 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
Imo\ AVM MECKLENBURG COUNTY 2 200 SOUTH TRYON,SUITE 200 ENGINEER ENGINEER
\ CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28202
\ —
RIPRAPEMBANKMENTPROTECTION I��\�r\��,\� --- -=e111 \� �\ _ 4 STAND "V"DITCH
CLASS II RIP RAP \, \ SEEP AIL 12, SHEET 2D-1
EST 8 TONS `/,' \ \ \ SLORE k 0.5%—
EST 12 SY A'DJ•'-// �5 CY,_-'-
SEE DETAIL 9, SHEET 2D-1 `!� \ \ 1 I 9 OU LE7 TR ECT76
0��
CL SS B�,RIP RjjP
d _ tSS 2rTON5
RIP RAP EMBANKMENT PROTECTION V \ \ 3'�'\A' /EST 7
CLASS II RIP RAP _ A,\h T 1 \
EST 12 TONS—
',1
EST 17 SY GFD k
SEE DETAIL 9, SHEET 2D-1 /' ',, '-- \' 1 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
'�11'�' UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
STANDARD 2' BASE DITCH
W/CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
EsnS TONS ', 1 ',15"r P'Iv,', PERMIT DRAWING
EST 30 SY GFD '��`i 'i I 1 1 —�1 I, /
SEE DETAIL58, SHEET 2D—E ,,i�l'�\\�,d'�,\/ I /
30 CY \� IIATEI6II,12 "DITCH SHEET 2 OF 8
O / I "\,��i 9EE DE)AILH, ECTIO2p-f \
O4'1&AE S 'B"RIP ON
�`I�'� Eu$S 'B' RIP R/P
I'p�r' � 1'i I � ST 2'TONS/ / -
:1� EST 7/SY GFD
r
iilii UR TAr /
i
15" CSP
SITE 2 -------_
�� z0
W/ELBOW$
,/Irllll��ll'll�l� �111 � �....\\\\ / "'
LATERAL 2' BASE DUCH, I MECKLENBURG COUNTY
W/CLASS_ B RIP RAP E PD n � i i, po l l o i l i'
EST'55 TONS, -
EST"2, SX c D r ,, h"/ _ ,, / 1 pie" csR' wreLBo+%s
EST ? `CY �DD� I f' 1 I — LF 1 \ ..6eL
n \SE DETAIL 6, S14E 3¢I - - -
y I PbE r° 1 �' r FALSE SUMP /
C) �iSEE DETAIL 13,1
SHEET 2D,1 'fi /
15" RITP-IV
5 B
21,. / 1
1" 1 F_r V 1
' JB2Gl ' ' �, der•. / ' , r 1 r r 1 `1
15",RgP-rIV rTB2G 1 CB 1, lT — -- '/, r' ' ',� �/r �`� ,I
8 ���rFlr
/ 3 �c / PQB/ dS5 1 Y,k `
rn F1
rERgt'v 'Ir H' / PDE �� /a ' 1
RIP � � � r !� _I�, 2� � 1 r I11 ' ,
E67 60 Td S r ' / r rt' V ( _?� ' / ' I 1 I EIJ� SPILLrCUR&'
r Si 11� SYi GP r I T , 1 I 1 / ,'L�-,STA y8+9 43 LT
ES}} 9 Y pp,
, t l �I . \ I II ', / ' I ' I `i T `, C \ S�E,CI�L LATERAL 'V�DITCH
SEE DETAIL 5,5Hf 2D-0 ' / r SEfi-DETAIL'I,SHEET 2D-1
FTANDARD, 'V' D1TCH
`EST 20 SY CFI}' h
WLkSS B'.RIP RAP
,EST 10 TON$
EST 8 CY DDE,; CB
2,�T=.�^k"
SEE DETAIL 7, SHEET,:"
RIP RAP EPRO' T V `
CLA
SS IEST _TONS r ' ,rol,\ \ 1 �17 SY GFDr"r'/'I``�i`�`\`,✓/SPECIAL LATERAL 'V'DITCH
SEE DETA, SHEET 2D-1 �L� I ' ��i 11 m `1 r �, \ / \ ` ` / SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 2D-1
„( 1i / I�ul„ %+�, ice
�Uo�Ip ���� r; t5BCP�IAF R
c�]y5"C \� \
CLASS II RIP PAT V �p7i8 E �;/hr�
(STRUCTURES PA I
'Ir ;''I;;
CRESCENT � r \
ro'
ELECTRIC ' 1 � I - MEMBERSHIP TIFARMS, - - - - - - _COOKE -
-
cF
INCORPORATED
15" V ,
SPECIA LATERAL 'V'DITCH
L 1, ,
� SEE DE�AISHEET.2D 1
i ___
15�RCPd`L- 'SPECIAL -LATERAL 'V'DITC+Lp�
TAIL
I MECKLENBURG COUNTY \ L C - _ _-_-- - � _g _ - ---` _ _ _SEEp------ 15' 1=0 `-- - 1/ -yam
a
15`RCP-4V--
----------------
m \ 1\` \ _ -- -
I m / 15" CS WiEIEOWS 1 - ` _
\ i
CLASS TONS
RAP % �I� `�',\•. _____-,
EST 2 TONS
EST 7 SY GFD \ \ �-` = -- - _ - _f =�F� l?5�,�' _ --_ _'
I - ==_- - ____ _ ---
2_,
50' 0' S0' 100' 150, / \ / \ - -
I / / — QTITLET-PR(7-5'( A-
GRAPHIC SCALE EST 3 TONS, -EST TO-SY GEM
LEGEND I - -
®DENOTES IMPACTS IN ES�ET'1vP>7R71RY-
SURFACE WATER ® IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

z
O
ti
K
U
O
a
0
h
0
0
z
0
m
0
0
cz
m cz
o Q-
N J
N U
Y
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
-5108
Kimley»)Horn URW SHEET NO. 0
NC LICENSE #F-0102 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
200 SOUTH TRYON, SUITE 200 ENGINEER ENGINEER
/ CHARWOTTE, N.C. 28202
now —
NC GRID
I
/ 1 I ND 83 NA 2011
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
i T F R I TOWN 0 CO NEL US
PS EI TD OF
ALEXANDER CHASE
HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION. INC,
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
ALEXANDER CHASE
HOMEOWNERS
,
1' ti
I - _
ASSOCIATION. INC. A ,
--------- ---____=_=_--_-____= i\LEXANDE CHASE
_ ----- -
)OE.�it;
��' �� -6H0OCIA
v'S` �A �.��[r ..�.,FEAIN DICDE U5BRIT RAP ��� 'I "
��" J .'�f.' P - 'GF - _- ADJUSTCB'S
EST 65 TONS 1 / \ _ -
EST 140'SY GF
. r
10,F
514EET,20.1 I / 11 i � � � 11/ / A.� k
,I� I a
_i RCP s0
1 1 o i 1 0
IRNE 24'
¢Jusry V' A
�F ��r AIN 15" NTO R918.,
,
AV --.z� N� � " 4 ERF / MovE ly
� I. i _ R A„
I �' 1'`�`� I OP tsvo6 r R nfN CB
wv is6.az'�, �V '
�Ts I I I
FeP3:�p319'�� NV-75'5'0.
iNv=Tso.ie- N ce's
P�� PD _ �6q, _'� �V ANDER CHASE
r +� '\ TOP=755.56' RETAIN 15"
}erg. j71' 1 ' ALEXANDER CHASE R TAIN C8 HOMEOWNERS
N 25 AssoclAno INCI
�I�� ASSOCIATION.R NC-�
',10,, hA'� I �I�' 'I�' 1 A
� � `RAY S. ARMI%I
/ v "I° �'IA
\ , I l ' \� 11' 1� 1' _ _ CLASS 9' R P ,RAP`\ , `\ BRITTANY S, CROTE AU
OUTLET PR(�TEC�I INV=746.7I'
(BANKS 6NL 1 / ALEXANDER CHASE
�1 , I \` ` `, , ` �' \ / TOP=756.88'J
14
/ C 1\'1 �' 1��`1, `b\ ES715�70NS �. \ \ HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, IN
EST zs
' 1 _ ALEXANDER CHASE
`�.;.\��.����\'�,�,; - HOMEOWNERS
\ ; \ ` ASSOCIATION. INC.
MECKLE .H G���bl'11`liY; \�\:TS
', -
/
SPECIAL LATE 'Y'DITC,
SEE DETAIL 1 S EET
PD
/ ; t5"',RCP- DORIS MENDIOLA
1 DOMINICK S. MENDIOLA
1 \ 86+5� "v
T
1A
I
so' o'
so'
loo' 150,
GRAPHIC SCALE
\
LEGEND
\
®DENOTES IMPACTS
IN
®
DENOTES TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

z
O
K
z
'o
N
DETAIL 1
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
( Nor to Scale)
Nalural � h.1 °0t Fill
croand 7•) F\a� slope
D
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 30+00 TO STA. 30+25 -L- (RT)
FROM STA. 39+50 TO STA. 45+66 -L- (RT)
FROM STA. 45+66 TO STA. 48+50 -L- (RT)
FROM STA. 55+00 TO STA. 56+50 -L- (RT)
FROM STA. 61+00 TO STA. 63+50 -L- (LT)
FROM STA. 76+50 TO STA. 80+50 -L- (LT)
FROM STA. 81+00 TO STA. 82+70 -L- LT)
FROM STA. 82+70 TO STA. 83+50 -L- (LT)
FROM STA. 83+50 TO STA. 85+16 -L- (LT)
FROM STA. 85+16 TO STA. 90+00 -L- (LT)
FROM STA. 18+00 TO STA. 19+12 -Ll- (RT)
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 15+50 -Y6- (LT)
DETAIL 5
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
( No to Style)
�f b�
Natural
Ground 1.) D M11 7 ift.
Fill
Slope
Min. D=
2.0 Ft.
Max. d=
2.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class BRip-Rap B= 5.0
Ft.
FROM STA. 71+50 TO STA. 73+46 -L- (RT)
DETAIL 11
LATERAL 'V' DITCH
(Not to Scale)
II^b I�
Natural Fill
croand ?,.) D ? lifi. Slope
Min. D= 2.0 Ft.
b= 5.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 75+00 TO STA. 75+50 -L- (LT)
DETAIL 2
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Nor to Scale)
t
atuml h1 �g< Ditch
Ground p)� D F\O Slope
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 26+27 TO STA. 28+00 -L- (RT)
FROM STA. 56+50 TO STA. 58+50 -L- (RT)
FROM STA. 67+50 TO STA. 71+50 -L- (RT)
FROM STA. 59+50 TO STA. 61+00 -L- (LT)
FROM STA. 63+50 TO STA. 66+00 -L- (LT)
DETAIL 6
LATERAL BASE DITCH
(Not to Scale)
Naural
Ground �') D 1 Fill
d ( slap.
GEGTEXTILE B Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
Max. d= 1.0 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
Type of Line —Class B Rip -Rap 6= 5 Ft.
FROM STA. 71+65 TO STA. 73+46 -L- (L
FROM STA. 15+50 TO STA. 15+86-Y6-(LT)
DETAIL 12
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
(Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground ?,) ,L.\ Gound
D
Min. D= 2.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 74+50 TO STA. 75+00 -L- (L
FROM STA. 15+50 TO STA. 15+85 -Y6- (L
DETAIL 3
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural .� of Fill
Ground ?•) D E\oget Slope
LBB Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
FROM STA. 66+00 TO STA. 70+00 -L- (LT)
DETAIL 7
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
( Not b Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground ?,) ,1.1 Ground
D
Min. D- 2.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class B Rip -Rap Max. d= 2.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 73+46 TO STA. 73+75 -L- (RT)
DETAIL 13
FALSE SUMP
(Nat to Scale)
Outside Ditch �2.0•�
Traffic FIoW 10, 20:1
GI
—S—
S = Ditch Slope 4 Proposed Ditch
STA. 76+37 -L- (LT)
DETAIL 4
SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH
(Not to Scale)
Natural Front
?.) D R.'��yel Dtkh Ground
� E\ slope
L, Ei . Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
FROM STA. 70+00 TO STA. 71+65 -L- (LT)
DETAIL 8
STANDARD BASE DITCH
( Natto Scale)
Nalural Nalural
Ground .1� Ground
d D
Georextile B Min. D= 3.0 Ft.
Max. d= 3.0 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
of Liner= Claw B
FROM STA. 73+46 TO STA. 73+90 -L- (LT)
Kimley )) Horn
NC LICENSE #F-0102
200 SOUTH TRYON, SUITE 200
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28202
DETAIL 9
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
(Notto Scale)
10,min.
Ditch 1.0'minJ
Grade (. 2.0
GEOTEXTILE
Type of Liner= Claw II Rip -tap
STA. 73+81 -L- (RT)
STA. 73+93 -L- (LT)
STA. 74+16 -L- LT)
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
11
-5108 21)-1
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 7 OF 8
DETAIL 10
TOE PROTECTION
(Nat to Scale)
O�g<
Natural 1�F� S oQa
Ground b
d = 2.0 R.
b= 2.0 Ft. Geotextile
Type of Liner- Class B Rip -Rap
FROM STA. 90+00 TO STA. 91+50 -L- (LT)

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
73+81/73+95 -L- (RT)
Embankment Protection
< 0.01
< 0.01
10
20
2
73+93/74+09 -L- (LT)
Embankment Protection
< 0.01
< 0.01
16
20
3
73+97/74+11 -L- (LT)
Embankment Protection
< 0.01
< 0.01
12
20
4
90+60/91+85 -L- (RT/LT)
60" RCP & Fill
0.02
< 0.01
225
20
TOTALS*:
1
0.03
1 0.01
1 263
1 80
1 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2018 02 26