20000856 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20000627

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
The City of Rocky Mount
Attn: Mr. Stephen W. Raper
One Government Plaza
Rocky Mount, NC 27802-1180
Cc: Peirson & Whitman
Attn: Mr. Clark L. Thomas, P.E.
5510 Munford Road
Raleigh, NC 27622-0398
1 o • A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
November 28, 2000
DWQ # 00-0856
Nash County
Page 1 of 2
RE: Lucas Street Redevelopment Project; P&W Project No. 1547
UT to Stony Creek [03-03-02.28-68, C NSW]
APPROVAL of Tar-Pamlico River Riparian Buffer Protection Rules AUTHORIZATION
CERTIFICATE and MINOR VARIANCE [15A NCAC 2B.0259(9)(b)] with ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Thomas,
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, to impact ± 2,020 ft' of Zone
2 of the protected riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing the proposed road, Lucas Street
Redevelopment Project. This letter shall act as your Minor Variance approval as described within 15A NC AC
213 .0259(9)(b) and Authorization Certificate. In addition, you should get any other required federal. state or
iocal permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) 404/401 Wetlands
Certification and Sediment and Erosion Control Permits.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in revisions dated 11/3/00
to the Minor Variance Request dated 10/4/00 except as modified below. If you change your project, you must
notify us and you may be required to send us a new request for approval. If the property is sold, the new
owner must be given a copy of this approval and is thereby responsible for complying with'all conditions. For
this approval to be valid, you trust follow the conditions listed below.
No impacts shall occur to Zone 1 of the protected riparian buffers. This office recommends
that tree protection fencing be placed along the boundary of Zone 1 near the construction
area to ensure that no impacts to Zone 1 occur.
Diffuse Flow of all stormwater run-off must be provided at non-erosive velocities prior to
entering all retained portions of the protected stream buffers as identified within 15A NCAC
2B .0259(5). Any additional stormwater located on the remainder of the property shall be
directed to sheet-flow at non-erosive velocities prior to entering the protected riparian
buffers. No new ditching or piping of stormwater through the protected buffers is allowed.
Non-Discharge Branch Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27669-1 62 1
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post consumer paper
r ' Page 2 of 2
3. Riparian Buffer Mitigation must be provided per 15A NCAC 2B .0260 prior to construction
as a condition of this Minor Variance and as required under 15A NCAC 2B .0260(6) for
road impacts other than perpendicular crossinss. This mitigation will require a ratio of 1.5:1
for impacts to Zone 2. Therefore, the required area of mitigation will be ± 3,030 ft`. One
option to provide this mitigation is to make a payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund at a cost of 50.96/ft2.
If you decide to choose this option in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0260(7).
this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC
2B .0250(10). Until the Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check (made
payable to: DENR - Wetlands Restoration Program), buffer impacts shall not occur. Mr.
Ron Ferrell should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning the
Wetland Restoration Program. You have one month from the date of this Certification to
make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes payment into
the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to compensate for 3,030 ftZ of required riparian
buffer, mitigation for impacts to 2,020 ft2 of Zone 2 of the protected riparian buffers:
03-03-02 river and subbasin.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for and adjudicator
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing. send a
written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes.to the Office of
Administrative Hearings. PO Box 27447, Raleigh. N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are
final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under the Neuse River Riparian
Buffer Protection Rules [ 15A NCAC 2B .0233(9)(b)]. Please call Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726 if you have
any questions or require copies of our rules or procedural materials.
Sinceyely,
I (?
Stevens
Cc: Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Non-Discharge Branch Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27669-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/] 0% post consumer paper
sa
7;IP6r
PEIRSON
WHITMAN
ARCHITECTS
AND
ENGINEERS,
PA.
ESTABLISHED 1938
5510
MUNFORD ROAD
P.O. BOX
30398
PHONE
919/782-8300
FAX
919/783-7642
RALEIGH
N.C.
27622-0398
i I't! I?
November 3, 2000
NN 3 W
Mr. Bob Zarzecki
Division of Water Quality +aetn x
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Revision to Minor Variance Request
Lucas Street Redevelopment Project
City of Rocky Mount, North Carolina
DWQ Project No. 00-0856
P&W Project No. 1547
Dear Mr. Zarzecki:
Per our conversation today, November 2, 2000, the fill slope for the proposed
roadway has been increased from 4:1 to 3:1. This modification will insure that
land is not disturb d_?n 1. I have included the revised drawing and the
storm water calculation for the level spreader. A minor variance request was
submitted October 4, 2000 due to storm water discharge from the proposed
road into Zone 2. This impact could not be avoided and the total Zone 2
impact is 2020 square feet.
The topography is flat in this region, and it is impossible to place the storm
water outlet outside of the buffer zone. Steve Mitchell and I discussed this
storm water outlet within buffer zone and deduced that a minor variance would
be required.
We appreciate DWQ's technical assistance on this project. Please review these
plans with revisions at your earliest convenience and if you have any
questions, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
PEIRSON & WHITMAN ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, P.A.
C/' Ja //
Clark L. Thomas, P.E.
Project Engineer
Enclosures
cc: Project File
U.S.A.
i Rocx, M OJN <1I?? 54561/l SE 247
1 I 50' 145 246 (DRAKE) [
• 243 I DORTCHES 1.2 M1 °
21 ; ' CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT
V:. 1613 - ?``\ \ \> ?? 1535 '? •( 77 )
LUCAS ST. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Cem
.\\v?? ,-
fi-
/
,-s P&W PROJECT # 1 547 7
Al,
_ rove r
`Cem h
/47 • ? 1649 / /44 /29 A
S ag,ktr - - 618: 48
:o / _ ?? °o \ ^ I • • 1 ?? -PrIgC-(a %? \ lfillj St Semeju.
r :8
??J' \1619 genvenue x •ir'
I ,/• 7
/)( Joe Country ClubO : 16;6 r= \nvenu? i
J?envenue
iddle Seh
?? (?'`? ?? r?? i •?,••'• `?''•• ? 1615
-? iO.?. ti`1¦?? John /'r ..r, •?'I,-_- -.... ">\'. i0b
S 11? p o
o :; •\ - ` -._ J ,
JAS \ ??I)))llah r, i'.i%: 1 f • _ 16
??Genera? ?,, / \ ^
1. ? i?
°\11DO \ BM 140 Ch :i.'
?l • \ 1<?? \ ur 1634.
', ? ?• ,, J i_.•,o / 1 - s
PROJECT SITE
•? ' c- 11 II
\? 1 .21 // (:.. I ... Ir I .O I ?-- •' ,4? • • • all
J ? III • I) ? rr° ? • ? •_?_?
00
1613 • / 4' /?• _
/)6 16
(:`'I J L•J uns t Avenue ?? -- !' I •. r° •??J i
* 5,'
C • pj Ch , I estvieCh . ??' - 10 tPNe[
• + SUNSET' If ? •AVE•• ?1' f 1770 - ?(WE / ?r
Englew•ood
I a /jl
ogle ood ¦ 99 V I ; / .. ) I \
° J • I Engie; / t, J..
-,
-? `? - if
boa Woo D
/33 ROAD ??`? 111 o -
?00?? _ - =
41
[' \\ \ -- ? o/NSTEAD ? ? ROAD \ ? ?: 4? / .r? ' ? o ?.h\ • :w
• COAST En mood
I n _ '?. hnso :.? ?Ch %V ? . • ? /-_____ --?°-c o??,• Y sei
Mus U
ubsta an tmen ,3?
: iii-° ( ?\\ ? ?. 'p,• B ? ? . ??? kesi msg. - +
1'. t
r
M R? ?? ,, [O0. z}? o-?y. •O
-it
'
', ? ' ? _ ?.? / / (1 q,`C?caOe[RY y ?_ •O n ` - / 0 x y?,3 .?y ,? `
iT r? ?r?#
uj- IS.
Lv ups ?T
X70
7-0
/- r D. '95-
3 o F 3 0 z? / 3a
320 +
Q = ?rA

? °?"? ? ? a tax
W / ?r

h

X13 t?
?•p?3

6-9
r y / ? - - i ? \ ?_ `mil ,y<?,- `' ? \ • ? ;
r ,t r i ?- eX ? \ \
00,
ILIJ
LLI
E==:j
ct)
U GUARDRAIL SEE DRWG 154701DT2
J
it v r ? - - ' ? 7f ! \ `
i I r k
/ \ J ff 1 \ i.n
If r ' \RE?MOVE 42" RCP AND
('! rat/ f No LANO? SHALL BE DISTURBED
nlll err I(\T TALL' GUARDRAIL AFTER WITHIN 00' OF STREA? BANK, - -
_NE ROAD. IS ACCEPTED - I 1 \ _ - -
BY INFERS AND OWNER HATCHED AREA IS BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTE
l A%A IMPXCTED IS 2020 S.F.
PLAN
f
' SCALE' 1 " \50'
a - ` LEVEL SPREADER '
\ 3: 1 SLbeE \ \ \ ? ;
START DITCH` QLEANING
\ \\\
OIL` ? \ \ `• '\ ,\ ? t ? , , ,' ? _ i ilii
\ \ p \ \ \ 15' FES tRV. OUT 131!1?01 f ` ?, • --
3 ,_}\ = --2-4' FROM CBS ki ?-
?F `• i, its\t\\ ? ?>?- ? -???
1 t ?'i \
PI 1STA, 7+,50.00
8139P 1. 02
\\` ` (E) 4344904',77
Inalnn a A• ao \ \ \ +
R: 15?,
tc"
'' \ i Ili ?` fx 001 no* y 1 p `?
{-- / 0 ! I \
/W r;! ' - ?y6 tr !t \ \
yI It -,-? ? i11 \
VCn
U GUARDRAIL SEE DRWG 154701DT2
I t - / 3 I `•
it ?RE?'IOVE 42" RCP AND ' !! N? LANO' SHALL BE DISTURBED
It4S?TALL GUARDRAIL AFTER WITHIN GO- OF STAEA BANK--
-NN, ROAD. IS ACCEPTED - I 1 -1 . - -
BY Tit INFERS AND OWNER HATCHED AREA IS BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTE
;, t ' ? - ^ ! A%A IMPNCTED IS 2020 S.F.
PLAN
SCALE' 1 " ?? 50'
LEVEL \qPREADER '
` i \ \? _
'START DITCf-I` CLEANING } \ / ? ' ? ^ { {,
? ? \ ?.• ? 'i/ \`? \ ? `\ ?!! // ? iii ?l11 {
1 "4'
` l ' \\ 15' FES IRV. OUT 13V! 0'\
k\ r=\ -2-4' FROM CS#1 3 s+ (1\ ?_ i'
! \ ` \\ \ ?-- 1 11611
j \ \ ! 1 ? ? \ \ ? , 1 1
! / ?\ \ r?? ,\ -PI VISTA; 7+50.00
8!13901 1.02
\\` ` (E) 2344904,77
\ 1, ? ' ' f
/nD/nn 4 A• QO \ \ \ 1
SR;
1544--
14 Tit ? I ?Jtl i??,`
It io
??
3it(_-' - - ii It 1 \
i \
------------
t-) GUARDRAIL SEE DRWG 154701DT2
it
I L!
' \REMOVE 42" RCP AND
No LANO,' SHALL BE DISTURBED
N,':?TALL -GUARDRAIL AFTER ;r
XROAD IS ACCEPTED WITHIN (30' OF STREA? BANK--
HATCHED BY INFERS AND OWNER AREA IS BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTE
Y A%A IMPXCTED IS 2020 S.F.
I
PLAN
\
SCALE: 1 " \50'
i - - \' - LEVEL ?S.PREADER
?? If 3: 1 SLbPE \ \ 130 \' \ ` \
`TART DITCH` CLEANING
'' ` \ \ p \ ? \\\ \ ` 15' FES TN( V. OUT 134. 01 r .. .
3 -24\ FROM CB-lei 1-
\
PI ISTA 7+;50.00
k 8113901.02
\ (E) X344904:77
/np/nn 4d• 40
SR. 1544 - -
00,
t
i J ' r \ 1
-LLJ 1)
ft i y \ 1 ' ' ' ,
I'
I t ? _ , ? - - rr1 r \
v GUARDRAIL SEE DRWG 154701DT2
\RE'_ VE 42" RCP AND
No LANOi SHALL BE DISTURBED
II4STALL -GUARDRAIL AFTER WITHIN I30' OF STREAM BANK_ -
Jui rl'` 1?E1!!? ROAD. IS ACCEPTED
_ BY 1'i' INEERS AND OWNER t HATCHED AREA IS BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTE
1 ,; I AR?A IMPXCTED IS 2020 S.F.
PLAN
SCALE: 1 50'
' A
r - - - \ \ LEVEL SPREADER '
/ 3: 1 SLbeE \ \ \ \ 3 \ ;
'gTART DITCH` CLEANING / - - - '' -'
FP \ \. 15" FES if (V . OUT 131 ! 0'
3 = \ c? ?. ` ;?\ 1 ' -2q' FROM CBS 1
y I
\ \/ \ \ PI 'STA,, 7+50.00
?? ?a \ (M) 81139P 1. ¢2
\\\ ' (E) 344904 ! 77
, \ ? I IPg
Sp1 1544--
lie
co _ Rom
!It\ ?S`
!1 t \?\\ \\ F,,?!
0
'W ' ( 1?6 1! !1
4 ? i4 I1 \ \
uU) 11 t (_ --------
c) ?? \ \'? \ \
GUARDRAIL SEE DRWG 154701DT2
Irk
1 rrj r // ! 1
' J ?i ' REMOVE 42" RCP AND
/ No LAN SHALL BE DISTURBED
?Ai?l? {!r l i \ II?TTAL'GUARDRAIL AFTER
JNElK ROAD IS ACCEPTED WITHIN 00' OF STREA? BANK- -
r 111 ?,? 1 ' _
BY INFERS AND OWNER HATCHED AREA IS SUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
r ; AREA IMPXCTED IS 2020 S.F.
I, ? 1
I
PLAN
r;k _ SCALE: 1 50'
LEVEL SPREADER '
I? 11 3:1 SLbPE Sao \ \
3
\ !- ? °\ 'gTART DITCH` PLEANING
`t +OIL? ? ? \ \ \ '? .,\ 1 ( r , ? s ? _ i 11(1.
V \ '
fill
i
F \ i. 15 FES IN,V. OUT 13V! O\
-24\ FROM CB'ki l\ `\ \`' -' ?' J
-kit
" PI 1STA,' 7+:50.00
8'13901.02
(E) 344904: 77
MP/nn 4 A• a4 \? ?\ \ \
- - 44-
4
itt ? ? ?X ? ?` \ \
00•
! I Rah Q
0
i ?
If / If
i ( i \ \
/w ! t / ^3? It jI \ t ?
0
<, JI
U - ' " GUARDRAIL SEE DRWG 154701DT2 i f
1' 1 1
REMOVE 42" RCP AND
/+t, I;II/ It?TALL -GUARDRAIL AFTER No LAND; SHALL BE DISTURBED
WITHIN 130' OF STREA BANK,
iA-
ll ( r' L NN, ROAD. IS ACCEPTED t
_ BY INFERS AND OWNER HATCHED AREA IS BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTE
AREA IMPX,CTED IS 2020 S.F.
if
! ?! Z \
PLAN
SCALE' 1 " \50'
I - - - \ \ LEVEL SPREADER
\ 1 3:1 SLbeE \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \,
t t \ s \ \\ >'!qTART DITCFr QLEANING - - - ' - \
\\\
1%1 i
1
pp \ 15" FESP(V . OUT 13v vi
- > -- `?
--2-4- FROM CB- k1
? / i \ ` \ ?? ?3 t t \' \CClljj\ t t 1t11,, - i ? ! I i
! \ PI ISTA 7+:50.00
81396 1.02
(E) 2344904':77
t
/n9/nn 4 A• ao \` \. \ t
- - - r
SR. 154' 00
0' t 1 t Go
\ 0 R
if
i! \ >
J
j ! ? ? / !f 1 1 1 i ` ? \ ?
VCn I r ---- ?!4 \
Q tl\ __?? 111 i 1,
cj -' GUARDRAIL SEE DRWG 15470IDT2 r rri/ ` `
Jj ?tl , rr r 1 \
- r
\ t ! ? ? - 1 r , rr i \
!it/ \ ` r r rr ! \
1 \
I l f \ ?--- r r \
' ( f REMOVE 42" RCP AND ' r r I i
+II ltrlr I14ST-ALL- -GUARDRAIL AFTER NY LANO? SHALL BE DISTURBED
u! !'1 r WITHIN (30 OF STREA? BANK. -
-SEX ROAD. IS ACCEPTED r I + \ _ -
HATCHED AREA IS BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTE
- --BY T* INEERS AND OWNER A%A IMPXCTED IS 2020 S.F.
? 111 \\:.??, ?,\ ?
I'11_ ?, . ?,,, ?, • \ PLAN
SCALE' 1 \50'
1 \ f?
! t{r?1 LEVEL SPREADER
\ 3:1 SLbeE \ \ '' ' ` \
\ - \ \ \\\ 'START DITCH` PLEANING
, \ ? \\ / r r ? ? /itt;,: lift
U OIC` - \ \ \ \\\ i \ l \ /
^ ??- \ \ p \\ \. 15' FES Vt V. OUT 13V! 0''\''_
3 \ \ \ r \ -24' FROM CBS iti t\ t \ - , '
\ ` PI 'STA,' 7+50.00
i
r\?\\ \\ ?) $`139`1.2
\ \ ?\ \ \
\\ (CI-) 2344904'":77
t
/n)/nn 4A- ao x
7 D
PEIRSON
WHITMAN
ARCHITECTS
AND
ENGINEERS,
PA.
ESTABLISHED 1938
5510
MUNFORD ROAD
P.O. BOX
30398
PHONE
919/782-8300
FAX
919/783-7642
RALEIGH
N.C.
27622-0398
October 4, 2000
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Minor Variance Request
Lucas Street Redevelopment Project
City of Rocky Mount, NC
P&W Project No. 1547
Dear Mr. Dorney:
OCT 4 2n
r=n _,
WE1LAOS GRPtIP
te'ATFX
Please find enclosed seven(7) copies of the "Variance Request Form- for Mnor
Variances". In your letter dated August 11, 2000 the Division of Water Quality has
placed this project (DWQ Project No. 00-0856) on hold until design revisions are
made. I have worked closely with the Division of Water Quality to minimize buffer
zone impacts. The topography is very flat in this region and it is impossible to place
the storm water outlet outside of the buffer zone. Steve Mitchell and myself
discussed this storm water outlet within buffer zone and deduced that a minor
variance would be required.
I just want to reiterate this project's purpose: to upgrade public facilities (paved
road, water and sewer services) to a small, low income, rural community with
federal monies. Currently the residents of this neighborhood are on wells and septic
tanks. Most houses do not meet the current building code for well and septic tank
11
separation distances. Wellsepiic` tank separation.` distances not up to code in
conjunction with high water tables makes this project a serious public health issue.
Please review these plans at your earliest convenience and if you have any
questions, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
PEIRSON & WHITMAN ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, P.A.
&J; - 1^,?
Clark L. Thomas, P.E.
Project Engineer
cc: Jerry Pierce, P.E. City of Rocky Mount
Project File
Enclosures
U.S.A.

OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Request # _
OCT
Variance Request Form - fo"?P
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rules
NOTE. This form may be photocopied for use as an original.
9'c-
Y-^^ g3l;
R e?
1 <'?y

Please identify which Riparian Area Protection Rule applies.
? Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A NCAC.0233)
/1 Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A
NCAC .0259)
Part 1: General Information
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Applicant's name (the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the property):
The City of Rocky Mount
2. Print Owner/Signing Official (person legally responsible for the property and its compliance)
Name: Mr. Stephen W. Raper
Title:_ City Manager
Street address: One Government Plaza
City, State, Zip: Rocky Mount, NC, 27802-1180
Telephone: L252) 972-1111
Fax: ( 252 ) 972-1232
3. Contact person who can answer questions about the proposed project:
Name: Jerrry Pierce
Telephone: X252 ) 972-1120
Fax: ( 252) 972-1232
Email: pierce] c[?r ci.rocky-mount.nc.us
4. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name - consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Lucas Street Redevelopment Proiect
5. Project Location:
Street address: SR 1544. Hunter Hills Road
City, State, Zip: Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27802
County: Nash County
Latitude/longitude: N 35°58.9' W 77° 50.1'
?sfe.
t?
e?
i?

Version 1: February 2000
6. Directions to site from nearest major intersection (Also, attach an 8 %2 x 11 copy of the USGS
topographic map indicating the location of the site):
Heading east on Highway 64 to Rocky Mount exit on SR 1613(turn left) and head north to
the four-way intersection with SR 1544 (Hunter Hills Rd.) and head east (turn right) on Hunter
Hills Rd. The project is located 1200 feet east of this intersection on the south side of Hunter
Hills Rd.
7. Stream to be impacted by the proposed activity:
Stream name (for unnamed streams label as "UT" to the nearest named stream):
UT of Stony Creek
Stream classification [as identified within the Schedule of Classifications 15A NCAC 2B .0315
(Neuse) or.0316 (Tar-Pamlico)]: C-NSW
8. Which of the following permits/approvals will be required or have been received already for
this project?
Required: Received: Date received: Permit Type:
CAMA Major
CAMA Minor
401 Certification/404 Permit
On-site Wastewater Permit
NPDES Permit (including stormwater)
3-9-2000 Non-discharge Permit
Water Supply Watershed Variance
8_29-2000 Others (specify) 404 Permit_
Part 2: Proposed Activity
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Description of proposed activity [Also, please attach a map of sufficient detail (such as a plat
map or site plan) to accurately delineate the boundaries of the land to be utilized in carrying
out the activity, the location and dimension of any disturbance in the riparian buffers
associated with the activity, and the extent of riparian buffers on the land. Include the area
of buffer impact in ft'.]: The project provides a road, water and sanitary sewer to a low
income communes. The roadway construction will impact 2800 SF of riparian buffer.
2. State reasons why this plan for the proposed activity cannot be practically accomplished,
reduced or reconfigured to better minimize or eliminate disturbance to the riparian buffers:
The project involves the installation of a paved road, water and sewer lines. The proposed
road alignment follows the existing dirt drive. The road could not be placed anywhere else
due to the density of housing and the minimum set back distances from the houses to the
road. The proposed storm water sewer that collects the road runoff requires a minimum of
1.5 feet of cover to handle truck loads. The topography of the area is flat, therefore the storm
water outlet must discharge in the direction of the natural drainage area. The storm water
outlet discharges into zone 2 of the Buffer area.
3. Description of any best management practices to be used to control impacts associated with
the proposed activity (i.e., control of runoff from impervious surfaces to provide diffuse flow,
re-planting vegetation or enhancement of existing vegetation, etc.):
The storm water outlet discharges into a level spreader in zone 2 of the riparian buffer
Variance Request Form, page 2
Version 1: February 2000
4. Please provide an explanation of the following:
(1) The practical difficulties or hardships that would result from the strict application of this
Rule.
It would be impossible to not discharge storm water into zone 2 given current conditions. The
topography. is flat. and the road winds between the houses. The quantity of storm water
could be reduced by discharging at several points upstream but this would require
discharging and maintaining several stormwater outlets that discharge into residents front
..Yards
(2) How these difficulties or hardships result from conditions that are unique to the property
involved.
In addition to Statement 4.1, this project protects the public health and provides water
and sewer services to a low income community that does not have the NC State required set
back distances between their well and septic tanks
(3) If economic hardship is the major consideration, then include a specific explanation of the
economic hardships and the proportion of the hardship to the entire value of the project.
Not Applicable
Part 3: Deed Restrictions
By your signature in Part 5 of this application, you certify that all structural stormwater best
management practices required by this variance shall be located in recorded stormwater
easements, that the easements will run with the land, that the easements cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that the easements will be recorded prior to the
sale of any lot.
Part 4: Agent Authorization
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (individual or firm):
Mailing address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
Part 5: Applicant's Certification
13I e(kEn (-j' &OW (print or type name of person
listed in Part I, Item 2), certify that the' information included on this permit application form is
correct, that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the
deed restrictions in accordance with Part 5 of this form will be recorded with all required permit
conditions.
Signature:
Date:
Title:
Variance Request Form, page 3
Version 1: February 2000
SRI 1544--
f, 178 \ ? I 1 ,.: ? ??
80-
I I I tl f?1-.,? ow
? 1 1 \
10 tl I t \ ? ? K
'(_(J 11 ?' ' I ?6 (I It \ 1 \\ \
(jj I 1 - ?J tl Ir 1 - 1 _w
cr'?I 1 ti ! t \ 1 y? ?? S
tk ? \ \
U) ------- -\ 1 \
U GUARDRAIL SEE DRWG 154701DT2
r r \ ^ _ _ I / / \ T \
I / tl l/ \ \ _ - - / / II 1 \ ? \
I \
`MOVE 42" RCP AND
t;r INSAT-ALL -GUARDRAIL AFTER III i \
tII _ _WK ROAD IS ACCEPTED ' HATCHED AREA IS BUFFER ZONE IMPACTED` \
BY ENGINEERS AND OWNER
tlll ?? ? ??? ?? I I
Ilia - ` , \ \ I PLA'?I
, -
t' SCALE: 1 50'
t T \ ` \ 0,
3
t - \ \ \ \ \ \ , ' ??, LEVEL 'gPREADER \ \ ' - !!
t ) \ \ \ SAO ? ? ? , \ \ \ \ ? \ !
T #3
r- `\ \\ \ \?\\ \\ `START DITCH` CLEANING
?IOIL?? \ \ ?i `?\ ' ?/ t, I,??,
l `Irrt I I r-
\\ I I / r 1 1
r "- \ \ \ Fp \ \\' 15" FES IRV, OUT 131 : 01
`_ --2-4- FROM CB\ #1 (\ •` \ _ - , ? \
\ \\ ` \\ _ , \ ? ? ?. _? \11 Illl\ _1 1 / !? -' .ice/
' RD CL 1 t ; I' r _\ ,? Ism _ • ! \ \ I I
I \ I 1 ?-- 1 \\ ? r r r
1 ! I
? ? \ \ \ \ i 1 l ? ? _' ? i \ ?\ ' \ ti30 I 11 (1 r!
' PI ISTA 7+50.00 r
?o r \ \
W) 8113901.02
I\
fl (E) 344904':77
\ 1 ?1 l
)0 14:07 \ \ \

NASH GENERAL
HOSPITAL
SR PROJECT SITE
16aa
SR 1618
?' s9
5P 16 0 \\?f js94
HUNTER HILL qo
SH 1614
R I6rS
ro oo?,Nro? 301
64 N 9?CkY
MpUN?
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
i
50' 145 146 (DRAKE) 4 / t [
... . ?' .-
r i DORTCNES 1.2 Mr. "-
243 7
CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT ' VV J /?'_'_$ (?( ?I
1613 ?? ` U 1531 _ `' ?r
p 1 /-
' LUCAS ST. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT tom,/ f
! -- --. `:Cem ROCKY MOUNT QUAD SHEET B 0
11 17911 P&W PROJECT # 1 547
r)` u•" 1\ ??1?) ?? !?`-__ =="f-°I i^ i -- /i/? \Q?, r.? /33 / •\ \ 'ice -_
r, Grove
Q -D
lp 147
T9 f 129
r6r % ==p <? .. _ S nr?, .ee -- - 1618 O
Semenu
v'- ' I??? l\\ ••\ sO \ n / 'I'' ••r•••'•-,• " 3 .-^` - w? t\ I 1611j •' ..
n ?- o\ ? ii t635 t!j JJ
1oe \?• I j _? ?l ' _ •° • i.- C Benvenue
untry CtubO , !bib' r=?3envenugg
J i ?? ; _ \ i ' _ envertoe
? ?? •, ` ?? ? i? / •• _ 1 .??._•? •. •` 1615 -_ ?
ItGeneral os N.1 / ? %?
BM 140 `Ch
?• ?\ ?\-- -==-=111=/// o }}} l?."? ',?`??' i,9 _ ?.
c
// ' 1634 ^1 /` !
PROJECT SITE
V, all
Q• `
..?''I ` 11 '; r- ? ? .?-.??`7 i ??J .? s•.l (.a :l"? ?? ?? _rf?
' _ i - \?• ,ooh' o?•.
I r 1613
ti j. _ _ \ 106.. ,? ?---- , ii ,, - '• • • e• • ?•?
?'
Lj uns t Avenue ?? •1 ' i '
r=Ch •I estvie •i! - ?I • l _- _ 10 dWerS,?• `o\?;
SUNSET' 11 • t 11;0 ` , ?a i • `.._i .,
1??`??JJ En le\coocl •AVE • ` J 'a _
' ° n Englew / ogle ood • 99 `)) 1/ 1 j J
I q ? 1, \.-
' (n n µ ?I \
_ W0=A11
?????? O a r "'4 ;
1 /3J "ROAD
RD , < r? WiyST O ROAD 'Q? ?' • o h ° :?':
y ? • ! et ' Y Via, :. ' T.
CpAST
;C En e\c
I? c''_ °o .37? ?h " y--/ca=:?_._.,•?i oSOnSO rt
mus
tmen
V- t6 cem
° 1 ! , ll r ! r 5 itocky^?'^b?l?????r,,R,,I?r` • ' ?? a}
.,.
OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Request #
OCT
Variance Request Form =-..,fo-A
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas
?

Marian
NOTE. This form may be photocopied for use as an original.
Please identify which Riparian Area Protection Rule applies.
C?
s?
?b
?, CTa
r g
? Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A NCAC .0233)
X Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A
NCAC.0259)
Part 1: General Information
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Applicant's name (the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the property):
The City of Rocky Mount
2. Print Owner/Signing Official (person legally responsible for the property and its compliance)
Name: Mr. Stephen W. Raper
Title:_ City Manager
Street address: One Government Plaza
City, State, Zip: Rocky Mount, NC, 27802-1180
Telephone: X252 } 972-1111
Fax: ( 252 ) 972-1232
3. Contact person who can answer questions about the proposed project:
Name: Jerrry Pierce
Telephone: (252 ) 972-1120
Fax: { 252) 972-1232
Email: pierceiaci.rocky-mount.nc.us
4. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name - consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Lucas Street Redevelopment Project
5. Project Location:
Street address: SR 1544, Hunter Hills Road
City, State, Zip: Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27802
County: Nash County
Latitude/longitude: N 35°58.9' W 77° 50.1'
Version 1: February 2000
Rules

6. Directions to site from nearest major intersection (Also, attach an 8 %z x 11 copy of the USGS
topographic map indicating the location of the site):
Headin_q east on Highway 64 to Rocky Mount exit on SR 1613(turn left and head north to
the four-way intersection with SR 1544 (Hunter Hills Rd.) and head east (turn right) on Hunter
Hilis Rd. The project is located 1200 feet east of this intersection on the south side of Hunter
Hills Rd.
7. Stream to be impacted by the proposed activity:
Stream name (for unnamed streams label as "UT" to the nearest named stream):
UT of Stony Creek
Stream classification [as identified within the Schedule of Classifications 15A NCAC 2B .0315
(Neuse) or.0316 (Tar-Pamlico)]: C-NSW
8. Which of the following permits/approvals will be required or have been received already for
this project?
Required: Received: Date received: Permit Type:
CAMA Major
CAMA Minor
401 Certification/404 Permit
On-site Wastewater Permit
NPDES Permit (including stormwater)
3-9-2000 Non-discharge Permit
Water Supply Watershed Variance
8-29-2000 Others (specify) 404 Permit
Part 2: Proposed Activity
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Description of proposed activity [Also, please attach a map of sufficient detail (such as a plat
map or site plan) to accurately delineate the boundaries of the land to be utilized in carrying
out the activity, the location and dimension of any disturbance in the riparian buffers
associated with the activity, and the extent of riparian buffers on the land. Include the area
of buffer impact in ftz.]: The roiect provides a road water and sanita sewer to a low
income community. The roadway construction will impact 2800 SF of riparian buffer.
2. State reasons why this plan for the proposed activity cannot be practically accomplished,
reduced or reconfigured to better minimize or eliminate disturbance to the riparian buffers:
The project involves the installation of a paved road water and sewer lines. The proposed
road alignment follows the existing dirt drive. The road could not be laced anywhere else
due to the density of housing and the minimum set back distances from the houses to the
road. The proposed storm water sewer that collects the road runoff re uires a minimum of
1.5 feet of cover to handle truck loads. The topography of the area is flat therefore the storm
water outlet must discharge in the direction of the natural drainage area. The storm water
outlet discharges into zone 2 of the Buffer area.
3. Description of any best management practices to be used to control impacts associated with
the proposed activity (i.e., control of runoff from impervious surfaces to provide diffuse flow,
re-planting vegetation or enhancement of existing vegetation, etc.):
The storm water outlet discharges into a levels reader in zone 2 of the riparian buffer
Variance Request Form, page 2
Version 1: February 2000
4. Please provide an explanation of the following:
(1) The practical difficulties or hardships that would result from the strict application of this
Rule.
It would be impossible to not discharge storm water into zone 2 given current conditions. The
to_„tc rah is flat and the road winds between the houses. The uantit of storm water
could be reduced by discharging at several points upstream but this would require
dischar in and maintaining several stormwater outlets that discharge into residents front
yards
(2) How these difficulties or hardships result from conditions that are unique to the property
involved.
In addition to Statement 4.1, this project protects the public health and provides water
and sewer services to a low income community that does not have the NC State required set
back distances between their well and septic tanks
(3) If economic hardship is the major consideration, then include a specific explanation of the
economic hardships and the proportion of the hardship to the entire value of the project.
Not Applicable
Part 3: Deed Restrictions
By your signature in Part 5 of this application, you certify that all structural stormwater best
management practices required by this variance shall be located in recorded stormwater
easements, that the easements will run with the land, that the easements cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that the easements will be recorded prior to the
sale of any lot.
Part 4: Agent Authorization
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (individual or firm):
Mailing address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
Part 5: Applicant's Certification
I, ?.1?E,(Jr*Xl W . &VO?' (print or type name of person
listed in Part I, Item 2), certify that the information included on this permit application form is
correct, that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the
deed restrictions in accordance with Part 5 of this form will be recorded with all required permit
conditions.
Signature:
Date:
Title:
Variance Request Form, page 3
Version 1: February 2000
_ -I SRS 1544--
hs? '_"?I ?. ,,,_? "'^.`\ ?`- ? ^` ?.? ? / ( ?\? A\p Dili
I I l \ \ 0 I jl ? \ now ` p s \
II `? \ III +1 \ ?? ?'? K
/ 36 II ii `? 1 \ '??
11.1 Irll1 .r- 0 f fI II ? V ,\??? 1` ?\ t
ft 11 \ \
GUARDRAIL SEE ORWG 15470 i DT2
/;? II I I /' REMOVE 42" RCP AND
+y ; 1 IN'VALL -GUARDRAIL AFTER I \
I! ` _ / - -NtW\ ROAD IS ACCEPTED
BY Tl-ENGINEERS AND OWNER HATCHED AREA IS BUFFER ZONE IMPACTED
\ / / I
III ????^ ?` ? I I `
PLAN
SCALE: 150'
1 ' \ 0 LEVEL \SPREADER
y 11 \ \ TST t3 \ `\ r \\ \\ 133 \ i A \ \ /
` \\\ \ \EjTART DITCH` CLEANING
fp \ \\` 15" FES INV. OUT 131 !Q0(
-2-4' FROM CB\
! c ? rte/ \ ` ? ?? `?\ /
-1 3L
)FP` RD CL
' I \ g PI ISTA,' 7+50.00 /
\ \ \ ` / (N) 8139 1. ?2 I\
\ (E) 344904177
A100 I A- n7
I z
NASH GENERAL
HOSPITAL
-•ti
S'1644
4 ?
=614
S
\61S
PROJECT SITE
SR 1618
S,9
1Sy
4
DER HILL RD.
ro
opy,Hrok'N
64 R?CkY
MovMr
1
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE

s"
5456 111 St 1
S0' 245 146 (DRAKE) 147 t c
143 I DORTCHES 1.2 M7.!
CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT
1613 1535 ^\,
' LUCAS ST. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Cem f ROCKY MOUNT QUAD SHEET
? p 1 ' L•y
J \l/ \n it •^u? -
\ In ?? I
178 -
P& W PROJECT # 1547 \ r °
it It
133
it' _j
to Grove L- / r% tCr?\o.===-• ) ,(j
Cem h < r !! i
i`•.j;? /i' \\ ill/ i?? '•' •_J i•`ri { ,`jV'?' (\?O n h ,
?' Sri ? j0 ?? 16?./<7 •? ?' i« % ' ` - rag -t
s It.
?" ??? °o\ \ n J ?: J • 1 ?-, ?` ?? \, 1611j Sencejm.
3 J 1635• = Ig envenue ` •
)i Joe - rc, // \, r C Ugtry CIUbO \nvenug •
47
-71 `\?: \? / 13>?, l X1615 iddleSch.
\?General os dal p`\?1 i l ` /' '" j'???
\ ? `\ \ `?? ?VJ C t ..: ??Park\cood • ? , . I ? ... ,,;:' ey _ -.
??. \ }?DO n\ BM 140 ?A w`Ch ? i/ - G // -..
? O %19v r v -
'/ ?\?.?- u? „ 1.1634 a •? :J "? //1 1`
%
PROJECT SITE J ?' • ?/ 1 ,. $
:' Qil' .. / ?... ('`„r i L'•oyo --' ! i'ce'/ -?',^? ? "
r? 'I. ` .! ,i ?_.) ?`7 I \ S•'? i? ; •/\ ?? '? y f? ye; 72$
,.`' /j ? 1613 ?-J O• ?100
of ` r? II ?r ?' ' / •j• 'CJp?
a uns t Avenue II '.I vie •i' t 1 •_?i i .'
• r Ch , I est Ch * ?I ' L _ _ - towers,' o -
(WE
a'? + SUNSET' IlEnle\_ood •AVE {ITJ° d? • Q'`"/.-`.???
?? n` g Ch fi r r b'r om/ a: .9 / i h r '1
f J ' n Englew ?/? ngle ood 99 ??.!
. dr •s. ' ? ?? .
aoo .. , x
.
• ` ? ?a WOOD AWN n 4 ? r .. x ., a
/33 ?`?
!
r a.;;s• .
1011,
t4l P00
n \ ? .? AST hns° ? ?Ch e\cou ? _° _;: =.-- i:•? ! Sei ,?Yti-??rF? 't::k:
AL3
b4ld
?Substa . 3 tme ter, b>,,
22
"'I ) I .-!1i - - tier f
"o ) • I° l' ` /r,. ? Ott M N'? 00, ° ? ? , ? ;

OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received
Request #
.?? 1,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
OCT 20
Division of Water Quality
Wi it fiNC)„? GR(t?1p
.?k WATE ^ T:
Variance Request Form - or 7 IrVarian
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rules
NOTE. This form may be photocopied for use as an original.
Please identify which Riparian Area Protection Rule applies.
A C??
t3 ?
M
0
vos?1
a Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A NCAC .0233)
/1 Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A
NCAC.0259)

Part 1: General Information
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Applicant's name (the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the property):
The City of Rocky Mount
2. Print Owner/Signing Official (person legally responsible for the property and its compliance)
Name: Mr. Stephen W. Raper
Title:_ City Manager
Street address: One Government Plaza
City, State, Zip: Rocky Mount, NC, 27802-1180
Telephone: X252) 972-1111
Fax: { 252) 972-1232
3. Contact person who can answer questions about the proposed project:
Name: Jerrry Pierce
Telephone: (252 ) 972-1120
Fax: ( 252) 972-1232
Email: pierce] ti, .ci.rocky-mount.nc.us
4. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name - consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Lucas Street Redevelopment Project
5. Project Location:
Street address: SR 1544. Hunter Hills Road
City, State, Zip: Rocky Mount, North Carolina. 27802
County: Nash County
Latitude/longitude: N 35°58.9' W 77° 50.1'
Version 1: February 2000
r
6. Directions to site from nearest major intersection (Also, attach an 8 %2 x 11 copy of the USGS
topographic map indicating the location of the site):
Heading east on Highway 64 to Rocky Mount exit on SR 1613(turn left) and head north to
the four-way intersection with SR 1544 (Hunter Hills Rd.) and head east (turn right) on Hunter
Hills Rd. The project is located 1200 feet east of this intersection on the south side of Hunter
Hills Rd.
7. Stream to be impacted by the proposed activity:
Stream name (for unnamed streams label as "UT" to the nearest named stream):
UT of Stony Creek
Stream classification [as identified within the Schedule of Classifications 15A NCAC 2B .0315
(Neuse) or.0316 (Tar-Pamlico)]: C-NSW
8. Which of the following permits/approvals will be required or have been received already for
this project?
Required: Received: Date received: Permit Type:
CAMA Major
CAMA Minor
401 Certification/404 Permit
On-site Wastewater Permit
NPDES Permit (including stormwater)
3-9-20€10 Non-discharge Permit
Water Supply Watershed Variance
_ 8829-2000 Others (specify) 404 Permit
Part 2: Proposed Activity
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Description of proposed activity [Also, please attach a map of sufficient detail (such as a plat
map or site plan) to accurately delineate the boundaries of the land to be utilized in carrying
out the activity, the location and dimension of any disturbance in the riparian buffers
associated with the activity, and the extent of riparian buffers on the land. Include the area
of buffer impact in ft2.]: The project provides a road, water and sanitary sewer to a low
income community. The roadway construction will impact 2800 SF of riparian buffer.
2. State reasons why this plan for the proposed activity cannot be practically accomplished,
reduced or reconfigured to better minimize or eliminate disturbance to the riparian buffers:
The proiect involves the installation of a paved road, water and sewer lines. The proposed
road alignment follows the existing dirt drive. The road could not be placed anywhere else
due to the density of housing and the minimum set back distances from the houses to the
road. The proposed storm water sewer that collects the road runoff requires a minimum of
1.5 feet of cover to handle truck loads. The topography of the area is flat, therefore the storm
water outlet must discharge in the direction of the natural drainage area. The storm water
outlet discharges into zone 2 of the Buffer area.
3. Description of any best management practices to be used to control impacts associated with
the proposed activity (i.e., control of runoff from impervious surfaces to provide diffuse flow,
re-planting vegetation or enhancement of existing vegetation, etc.):
The storm water outlet discharges into a level spreader in zone 2 of the riparian buffer
Variance Request Form, page 2
Version 1: February 2000
4. Please provide an explanation of the following:
(1) The practical difficulties or hardships that would result from the strict application of this
Rule.
It would be impossible to not discharge storm water into zone 2 given current conditions. The
topography is flat, and the road winds between the houses. The quantity of storm water
could be reduced by discharging at several points upstream but this would require
discharging and maintaining several stormwater outlets that discharge into residents front
yards
(2) How these difficulties or hardships result from conditions that are unique to the property
involved.
In addition to Statement 4. 1, thisprromect protects the public health and provides water
and sewer services to a low income community that does not have the NC State required set
back distances between their well and septic tanks
(3) If economic hardship is the major consideration, then include a specific explanation of the
economic hardships and the proportion of the hardship to the entire value of the project.
Not Applicable
Part 3: Deed Restrictions
By your signature in Part 5 of this application, you certify that all structural stormwater best
management practices required by this variance shall be located in recorded stormwater
easements, that the easements will run with the land, that the easements cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that the easements will be recorded prior to the
sale of any lot.
Part 4: Agent Authorization
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (individual or firm):
Mailing address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
Part 5: Applicant's Certification
I, 151e-( ken W, &-mr (print or type name of person
listed in Part I, Item 2), certify that the' information included on this permit application form is
correct, that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the
deed restrictions in accordance with Part 5 of this form will be recorded with all required permit
conditions. X11--N
Signature:
Date:
Title:
2
Variance Request Form, page 3
Version 1: February 2000
_' SRI 1544 _ ___
1 I
I \ I I I! ! so• 0
I I t \ \\ t I If \\~ \? ??
U,J II III II \ )S
LLJ ^ I 1 - t II !r 1 1 l
VY' I 1 (- ? ? ? - - f1 \I \ \
pQ I
K( if
?- - - i1? \ Ill \? ?3\
U GUARDRAIL SEE_ DRWG 1547OiDT2
1 1 \ t , /1 1 \ ? \
f t' MOVE 42" RCP AND ,' + 1
Ilftl IOSATALL -GUARDRAIL AFTER ?? I \\
.N/E'W\ ROAD IS ACCEPTED
BY 1'1 ENGINEERS AND OWNER HATCHED AREA IS BUFFER ZONE IMPACTED
\ ?, / r I \
PLAN ?
\\
' It SCALD' 1 " =\50'
LEVEL \qPREADER
ST #3
\ \\ \ \ TART DITCH` CLEANING _ \ / / -T = ` ; ^;;111
FP \ \\ 15" FES INV. OUT 1311Q0' .
- -2-4 \ FROM CB\ #1
t' \ 1 ? ? L 111 1 1
/ / \ ? ? I-`'-+L, \ ? 1 f\ 1111111\??i-1 I ?? ?? \ I
)FF' RD CL \ l I \ / I _\ Q1 ` II? ° - / \ \ I I
? ? \\ \ I 1 1 ?\ ?J; \ ( \\: \ 130 ? !! /! /r
PI /STA } 7-50.00 /
(N) 8,139oi1. ¢2 f\
\\ \ (E) x`344904\77
A100 ld- 07

NASH GENERAL
HOSPITAL
"' 1!i44
1 4 1
®,\? 3q 1615
PROJECT SITE
SR 1618
S,q
ISy
4
DER HILL Ro.
TO
O0krIv ?N
gr ROCkY
MOOMl
1
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE

545611,Jc
w 245 246 (DRAKE) 741 r
743 I DORTCHES 1.2 MLA 50 ° ` 1 ( • \' '
i27CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT
• `5??\. \? ?; 1613 ?S// \??? 1531 \• J.
LUCAS ST. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - "
2m - -_ ) Cem
' v
\))`:Cem r= ROCKY MOUNT: QUAD SHEET 6 0 -'
"ei` P& W PROJECT. # 1 547
133
7 J _ Grope ??.___- 0
-Cem
?.. o
r IW ,/ , . -
1 14 /44
/ • • _ 618
ll\\`\.,.? 'sues •,?••.,.• it 3 1617}
}` ?.? _ 8enc u
Wi' ??VV ..J 2•. \ ?l6i8
n ••-
f J t- y 0 ° %-? 3 ?/ d 1635 lfi? envenue -- ?'
Il, J / ?•??-T ?\ ?/' i.' C l1try CIubO . 1 r=-Benvenug i
Joe ?? T a 6;6' ?.. Sc •`? B
?\?? ij rv'%% _ ,' 33envenue
Sch
-? `: /l? _ •1 ??? ??. •• _ ? i ??.,•, ? •%:1615 V i J e
?^J1,'?`??0 ?)/1'.1l'J?l??-?° John .1,' .\ ... 1'?,1 ?/• -`? '?'`\ /? _
05 1
5;? Genera
arkwoo?l
I' `?DO ` •,? { em 140 Ch .,??•- I'/9' G vim' •? i -..
1 ` N ??..? ,L +? ?? TT ? 1634 ` ? •? ° _' 11 ? . ?? ? ^v' ' /
1544
PROJECT ?. ?• .. :? ?; , ., ? l : ;?..'
SITE
?'? ' / ( ? 1613 I . _- • ?-U ?? ?,%\ /oo ; `?\_ /'
_O'.';! ?? u ??? I{ l \\ J06 .. rT ? \ \? 16 + i?''r °y?` - •'•• ?• • ?-: ?IJ..I?
, ~{ :I .:? _'??? I j j?• ?? ? V iii ? =?•• '•'••,••? f ???
I.''I J j? uns t Avenue ?I ''I - •.' ?. _ ?^
>7• Ch { I estvieCh
•cl t ¦ ` 1110 - - (WE
?' ?• + SUNSET A
IIEn lewood VE ` -Q`? • ' M
I \-~? ''1% Englew? /'? • ogle .oat • 99 '? f? ?? 3. - q `??.. ^ r-....?. -'I `? <
1 n _I t ? .
.?
all
oao?
woo AWN
M
' 133 ROgp
ROAU
• \ OAST tEn eaou n ° ?__ ? ! iea? Y3r,,,
n _ hnso fCh Se § '3
?`?^ _ i `:\` ?° i .L. _ __ _ v •--?-EM-=q& ??Ch?df MU?Uy,.???'_
1 /NE . eft ' tmen n
;D .0
122
0 1
_G\ ns ' S l Cem \' , .? 1.
° ( \ 112i' 1 ?Stgckpy Mtl• ?1/? /?o ' was Zit $ °
aON,
.P?
• June 26, 2000
PEIRSON
7C
WHITMAN
ARCHITECTS
AND
ENGINEERS,
PA.
ESTABLISHED 1938
5510
MUNFORD ROAD
P.O. BOX
30398
PHONE
919/782-8300
FAX
919/783-7642
RALEIGH
N.C.
27622-0398
U.S.A.
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
Mr. John Domey
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
.F
JUN 2 7 2000
WETLANDS ORUUP
„- t°lATER UAUTY SEC; i"
Re: 401 Certification & Riparian Buffer Impacts
Lucas Street Redevelopment Project
City of Rocky Mount, NC
P&W Project No. 1547
Dear Mr. Domey:
000858
The City of Rocky Mount has acquired a grant from the Federal Housing Administration
to upgrade public facilities to a small, low income, rural community. The following
services will be provided: a paved road (27' from back of curb to back of curb), public
water for domestic use and fire protection, and sanitary sewer. Currently, the residents
of this neighborhood are on wells and septic tanks. Most houses do not meet the current
building code for well and septic tank separation distances. This fact makes this project
a serious public health issue. After the Owner (City of Rocky Mount) and the Engineers
(Peirson & Whitman) accept this work, all septic tanks and some of the wells will be
abandoned per State code.
We have submitted this project to the Division of Land Quality, and they have rejected
the plan due to the Tar-Pamlico riparian buffer rules. We have worked closely with
Steve Mitchell, Todd St. John and Bob Zarzecki to minimize impact to the riparian
buffer. We have changed the design to incorporate all of DWQ's suggestions which are;
move the proposed road, move the proposed sanitary sewer into the proposed road,
change the concentrated storm water flow into sheet flow and add some trees on the
stream bank.
Please find enclosed seven (7) copies of the Pre-Construction Notification Application,
review these plans at your earliest convenience, and send us a copy of your approval
letter for our files. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please
do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
PEIRSON & WHITMAN ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, P.A.

Clark L. Thomas, P.E.
Project Engineer
Enclosures
cc: Jerry Pierce, P.E., City of Rocky Mount
Steve Scruggs, P.E. Peirson & Whitman
Project File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 11, 2000
Nash County
DWQ Project No. 00-0856
Stephen Raper
City of Rocky Mount
P.O. Box 1180
Rocky. Mount, NC, 27802-1180
Dear Mr. Raper:
On June 27, 2000, the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application for a 401 Water Quality
Certification and Neuse Buffer Rule Approval to impact streams and wetlands in order to construct the Lucas Street
Redevelopment Project in Nash County. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0506, a thorough inspection of the site has
been conducted by staff of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. Mr. Steve Mitchell of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
has informed us that the plan revisions he requested have not been fully incorporated into the design of this project; rather,
the plans still show stormwater outlets within the buffer. Based on this review, we have determined that significant uses
would be removed or degraded by this project. Insufficient evidence is provided in your application to conclude that your
project must be built as planned in buffers associated with Stony Creek. Therefore, unless the requested modifications of
the proposal are made, we will move toward denial of the 401 Certification as required in 15A NCAC 2H.0507(e).
Until all the requested modifications are.made on the redevelopment plan, I will request (by copy of this letter) that
the Corps of Engineers place this project on hold. Also, this project will be placed on hold for our processing due to
incomplete information (15A NCAC 2H.0507(h)).
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone] or Steve Mitchell at
[phone].
cc:
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office /
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office ?/
File Copy
Central Files
Clark Thomas, 5510 Munford Road, Raleigh, NC, 27622-0398
FILE,-
000856
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
401 /Wetlands Unit, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name City of Rocky Mount : Lucas Street Redevelopment
Project Number 00 0856
Recvd From APP
Received Date 6/27/00 Recvd By Region
Project Type utilities & pave road
County Nash
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
12 5THO Y O N F_- 28-68 F -c NSW 30,302. 0.2o F
F__ F_ OY ON F_ F__ F_F__ F__ F_ F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N
Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/COnd 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 355854 Longitude (ddmmss) 775010
Comments:
Stormwater outfalls are in the creek therfore not compliant with NBR_ Did not get new plans at
RRO_
Hold til we talk
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name City of Rocky Mount : Lucas Street Redevelopment County Nash
Project Number 00 0856 Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
PAYMENT
0 0 8 5 6 RECEIVED
0
DEM ID: CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #):
12 & 13
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION 7 20
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEVEN
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM40 THVI ' ROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
(SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS' NAME: City of Rocky Mount
2. MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 1180
SUBDIVISION NAME
CITY Rocky Mount STATE:
NC
ZIP CODE: 27802-1180
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): Hunter Hill Road (SR 1544)
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME): WORK: [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
Mr. Stephen Raper, City Manager
P.O. Box 1180, Rocky Mount, NC 27802-1180 [phone]
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Nash NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Rocky Mount
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD
NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.: I The project is located off SR 1544 in Nash County. The
site is 1200 feet east from the intersection of SR 1544 and SR 1613 heading toward SR 1618.
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: I Stonv Creek
RIVER BASIN: TAR
7a. IS PROJECTED LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER
SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II? YES I I NO I X IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT AREA LOCATED WITH A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES I I I NO I X
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES I X1 NO IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION:
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? I I YES I X1 NO IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: 11
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
2
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 0.07 acres EXCAVATION: 0.125 acres
FLOODING OTHER:
DRAINAGE TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0.195
1Ob. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION:
LENGTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):: FT
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE FT AFTER: FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL: X
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: X CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER:
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? N/A
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 1/2" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): The installation of 1100' of paved road with curb and gutter. The installation of 1200' of
8" waterline and 3,460' of 8" sewer.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: This project is funded by CDBG to provide a road,
fire protection and water and sewer services.
3
14 STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): All sewer and road crossings have been installed as close to 90° as possible, and the number of
crossings have been minimized. The stream needs to be cleaned out to eliminate flooding a structure and
potentially washing out a driveway.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR
PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT
IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE
CONTACTED: May 16, 2000 (ATTACH RESPONSES
FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: May 16, 2000
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES I X I NO I I IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
YES I I NO I X
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARING HOUSE?
YES I I NO I X
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26,
29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT ON THE PROPERTY
MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR
1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED
C. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? The site is located in a rural
setting, with 2-acre residential lots on two (2) sides, pasture land on the front and undeveloped woodland
in back.
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
Gravitv Sewer.
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF EITHER A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.

OWNER'S/AGENT'S/SI(rNATURE DATE
(AGENT'S SIGN URE VALID ONLY IF
AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM THE
OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
1 5056 N SE
.1 50' 245 '46 (DRAKE) 247 r
243 I DORTCHES 1.2 Ml.? o r? ?? +
r,-
?7) CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT
13
- -? G o
LUCAS ST. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Cem
====11 '.Cem \v Il/ o \.\~ t? / -
" :gym ROCKY MOUNT: QUAD SHEET 6 04 •;:
11 J
.1 P& W PROJECT. # 1 547
l n 1 I O +? /33 \.
it it
j ;j
t? j - `.J`a (? ,c ; _ ?a? cam, ' '? • :"U .
•`Cem .}.? It
l29 (
`` ??_ --==11 \ Sri a 618: ?O .
^?\ I
-?`>.? ?`fO o k \ ^ ?''• I `` / ._ 1617j. Se 8enerju-
/'
l . tS 8envenue ' -- 9•
i .\ ll-,r?i. `1 3 / • t/ 1635
? Joe J q l? j' :' i.' 1 ?Ci]U(ttfy CIUbO -penvenug
. 5 7
i ?? Q ?? •?-? \ v ;Benvenue
iddle Sch
(f? 1 /
.1 `?? % - 1 .:••• '•• 1615
_General_']tal / lbi= \? / V, ;1^ l
\-"-Park\%00d •? ? /^ :;.
BM 140• Ch ? ,ir G j.•?
1/9
` 7? .,1 ` `?` r '? 1?, \ ate? \ t ?. /\• V : 15440V? l
PROJECT SITE
all-i ,,. •\-,•
?•. _
.1 it
100 zz
ALL
Oj I , ?? II i 1613 '°? / •' , ' '?
rob
... ? i' // • o / ? III •.? `? ? ? ¢' ? y ? ? t.• -
I:''I •LL??I fins t Avenue II •I °, -
1 ri Ch 1J I estvieCh ?? . _ tovae(s,
C.
SUNSET' II• •AVF .; 1770? o a • 0 `..?%??,
tXnglety°od{ b rfOn. 9 /a?. f? .?-, _ •' /
n Ch j r0?? ` . ` \\
I o Engle nugle oCohd 99 ?r;??, / ?? i-- •.? -..i .?
aao 11 ,.:
'? s • ar s '.? •.
1 ?a
& 7-f
I _ W000 AWN?? O Q _
/)Oqp I /7 O • o f ?c
1 133
oNSTFAO ?ROA ? ?? ; ,-?'? • ovh - ,?:ti
E. e-00(
I II \.\ C AS hn5? ?Ch ... __. __,_c.- •? ?sC _ (i•,:
ti ? /NE Fi- ? - ?_---- M-9b' ?••Chddr _--. r,;'=`' :,; ?'tr;:
_' Substa?
-A It
116
_( ?,. ?• ?I . 311-#'f?) . /. / (? focl.?'Yr?
NASH GENERAL
HOSPITAL
PROJECT SITE
SR 1544
SR 1618
1 \i
ti6y? \ S9
5Q c ?....i 1544
HUNTER HILL R0.
a
Sq 1614 to
Sq 1615
ro oo?,Nro? 301
64 N Ra?kY
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE

N cD
Lo +

cu .cn
rn 150

a

0) w

T 140
1 130

120

C-u

- 0 110

z
N
'\\''11X26 0
FINAL DI
i IU(1T DIN [ncrn rn?
f
DITCH CLEANING SEE DRWG 154701002
REMOVE 18" PIPE 6 DISPOSE OF OFF SITE
\ 1

1
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT

INSTALL SIX 3" DIAMETER
RIVER BIRCH TREES ON DRIVE
SIDE OF CLEANED DITCH
+-25
+ t
t
t
t

i !
a
w
t t
a _
' -
t

m o

o

(Nn
0 r

L) O t
?
}
ul t

lt7
Q

- Ld
F- f

t
CO --C
O W
'
t
3 N O U)
Ui
z 2 O O t

m
O
a ' t

?e
w
W 0 if Cu
CE
O D m

t
t
U '
W
N
H
H
t
m
a
n
t

k
W
F?
t 1
1 i t

\ t 1
t

\ m
m
t

l

/ 95
. \ \ \
z
W
W
Q
W
z
w
z
a
t2
tL!
0-
0
m
? I! U
=
a Q
z,
a'
J
0-
z
W
LL)
U)
Q '
t1!
z
O
H
F-
u
Z)
Q
H
U)
z
O
U
0
m
O
LO
Ik
w
J
a
U
1 1 I
• f ( t 1 r
1 H
a
f `a
M
1 w
t t3)
N 1 ? F- i
z J /
Q W / U
C!) .72:
t ?• o U QQ v /
' H J
Q W a ,I o ?
1 o t z H ilk !
Cc ' O
O
:D U)
J
J Cr 1 O o o / o
Ljj U It rU ?? { O t
w z os? ' OU =
_? a t V !
¢ °
o l
O? .mil D R
± m r ? * sL? r?i p- I
if W a W .,t
- cr ( { I
o { rr
1 ` _r (T'
t - to /
g I
J ro
I 00{1 t
o a ,
1 _ o
{ U-
L) t
_ i
• {
V> --?- ?--? r
(n V 1- 1
/f (T)
co
O H
r-e F-- o / O r
u / O
t 00 IV)
0 rn O
a- z
_ a Q
f W Cu o Q ta.> • w
f m Cc W? Z V ~
LL < N 0)
?- ED
° OU) - Q(Y) r
Co CF) CO Cu
LL 0 (y) rr)
0 LO
`O rr) r
0 I
? d? m ru /
i LD Q ??w
I ? ~11
t co