310854_compliance-complaint_20200114

O Division of Water Resources /
Facility Number - ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation v
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: lD'Compliance Inspect' O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine omplaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: (� /�0 ((Q, y Owner Email:
Owner Name: cy�rz �a"C «� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Title:
Latitude:
• t �i Region:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Rlon-Layer ayerI I Ed
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv POD.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field Other: �A C 4, �
a. Was the conveyance man-made?"U?�e�s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) �es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? / 9D
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [2-Y 'es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - y, 9 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
es
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? C?� 171dJZ9,(_
❑ Yes
[ ]�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
®'<
❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
Flo
❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes FU ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require n/ ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �E
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
©-<E
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
©-NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
©CIE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[JNE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
®'1qf
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
Q
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA I✓- E
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA E 1VE
❑ NA Egl<
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: c - Date of Ins ection: d�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA fE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ED-TM
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑E
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA j]-N9
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 8lE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E3<E
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA J:�INE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA &"_
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
54,6, POA
r
.� � � �(��/j !— .(�(� ,� / JVl V � v C.�/ �rvi%/i�� ✓ , `< <-C OW.�`_ �i� lL `7�/T'/a..�%�r.
l f � (/
41AA1 �c �i�f s ��r� �`�-i Maus
40ow ly�5A 0 "
ru 7� �� �c G j /��✓ice �r o�� a c/�'� f c.,� ca P
n/A, ✓tee
v 1�Uv� �<d ✓JU/ CO (Jt-7C� � � �LO''1 �l' O (YG�-J�,9�- Y CLe2lr?dJ�-C.�l
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: 9/0 2q� 7.� 72
Date: ��
Page 3 of 3 21412015