20140189 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2017_20171006

ARRINGTON BRIDGE III WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
YEAR 2 MONITORING REPORT
WAYNE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared For:
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909
Prepared by:
pres
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Project is located on a 57.40 acre site three miles southwest
of Goldsboro in western Wayne County, NC. One unnamed channelized drainage feature that traverses the
site exhibits diminished habitat value as a result of past and on -going agricultural activities. The site was
identified by EBX-Neuse I, LLC as having potential to help meet the compensatory mitigation requirements
for wetland impacts in hydrologic unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Project involves the restoration and enhancement of 41.24
acres of wetlands that had been disturbed by historic mining, agricultural activities, and active cattle
grazing. The project presents 29.37 acres of wetland restoration and 11.87 acres of wetland enhancement,
generating 32.51 Wetland Mitigation Units (WMU's). This mitigation project is the third of three phases.
The Arrington Bridge I & II mitigation sites are located on the north side of Arrington Bridge Road;
Arrington Bridge I is on the east side of John Road, and Arrington Bridge II is on the west side of John
Road. These two buffer and nutrient mitigation sites are hydrologically connected to the Arrington Bridge
III site. The three Arrington Bridge sites complement each other, and, together, confer a greater water
quality benefit to the Neuse River than any one of the sites alone.
The Arrington Bridge III Mitigation Project is located within the southern portion of the HUC and includes
a channelized drainage feature that discharges into the Neuse River. Due to its location and improvements,
the project provides numerous ecological and water quality benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While
many of these benefits are limited to the project area, others, such as pollutant removal and improved
aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching effects.
Land use immediately surrounding the project includes pasture, sand mining, industrial, and forestry. The
total easement area is 57.40 acres. Numerous old borrow pits, spoil, and fill areas adjacent to the restoration
area are evidence of past sand mining operations. A small unnamed tributary enters the project from uplands
to the north (Arrington Bridge I and II), flowing through a wooded buffer along the base of the terrace. The
channel has been dredged and channelized throughout most of the project. Soil investigations show that
much of the low-lying landscape exhibits hydric characteristics and a shallow seasonal high water table.
The site is located on a large inside meander of the Neuse River. There are three community types present
within the project area: pasture, forest, and development. The restoration area was primarily pasture and
forest and the enhancement areas are Cypress -Gum forests with shallow pools and marsh throughout.
The objective for this restoration project is to restore a continuous bottomland wetland system and enhance
the hydrology of existing wetlands. The design is based on reference conditions, USACE guidance
(USACE, 2005), and criteria developed during this project to achieve success. Initial site design included
the construction of three slough habitats to increase surface water storage and include patches of habitat
more typical of reference Cypress -Gum Swamps. Through coordination with the Interagency Review Team
(IRT) and the Seymour Johnson Air Force Base (SJAFB), it was requested that the restoration design
minimize standing water features that attract birds. Therefore, the slough features and Cypress -Gum Swamp
wetlands have been removed from the design and the restoration plan is now exclusively Bottomland
Hardwood Forest. Additional project objectives, such as restoring native vegetation, ensuring hydraulic
stability, and eradicating invasive species, are listed in Section 1.
The Arrington Bridge III Year 2 Monitoring activities were completed in September 2017. All Year 2
monitoring data is presented below and in the appendices. Data presented shows the site is performing as
designed, apart from four underperforming vegetation plots. The site is on track to meeting hydrology
success criteria, while 23 of 27 vegetation plots are on track to meet vegetation success criteria.

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
All 15 wetland hydrology gauges achieved the success criteria by remaining continuously within 12 inches
of the soil surface for at least eight percent of the growing season. Groundwater gauge data indicate the
hydroperiods being very responsive to rainfall events. Approximately 71 % of the total growing season was
monitored during the Year 2 monitoring season.
Year 2 monitoring data documented 23 of the 27 vegetation monitoring plots exceeded the interim success
criteria of 320 stems per acre. The Site's average Year 2 planted stems per acre is 607.

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES........................................................ 3
1.1 Location and Setting...............................................................................................................
3
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives..................................................................................................3
1.3 Project Structure.....................................................................................................................
4
1.3.1 Wetland Restoration Type and Approach......................................................................
4
1.4 Project History, Mitigation Bank Establishment, Contacts and Attribute Data
..................... 5
1.4.1 Project History................................................................................................................
5
1.4.2 Project Watersheds.........................................................................................................5
2 SUCCESS CRITERIA...................................................................................................................
6
2.1 Wetland Success Criteria........................................................................................................6
2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria....................................................................................................6
2.3 Scheduling/Reporting.............................................................................................................6
3 MONITORING PLAN...................................................................................................................
7
3.1 Visual Assessment Monitoring...............................................................................................
7
3.2 Vegetation..............................................................................................................................
7
4 Maintenance and Contingency plan...............................................................................................
8
4.1 Wetlands.................................................................................................................................
8
4.2 Vegetation..............................................................................................................................
8
5 Monitoring Year 2(MY-2).............................................................................................................
8
5.1 Year 2 Data Collection...........................................................................................................
8
5.1.1 Hydrology.......................................................................................................................8
5.1.2 Vegetation.......................................................................................................................9
5.1.3 Photo Documentation.....................................................................................................
9
5.2 Adaptive Management............................................................................................................
9
6 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................
10

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
Appendices
Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Appendix B. Vegetation Data and Site Photos
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species (Species by Plot)
Vegetation Plot Photos
Year 2 General Condition Photos
Appendix C. Hydrology Data
Table 8. Rainfall Summary
Table 9. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Chart 1. 2017 Precipitation Data for Arrington Bridge III Site
Chart 2. 2017 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
11

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Project is located in Wayne County approximately three
miles southwest of Goldsboro, NC. To access the Site from the town of Goldsboro, travel south on NC
HWY 117, and turn left onto Arrington Bridge Road (NC Highway 581). Turn right onto the dirt
entrance road immediately after crossing the railroad tracks (approximately 0.15 miles). Turn left after
0.3 miles. In 0.1 miles, follow the left fork to access the northern end of the Site. Following the path to
the right will lead to the middle and southern portions of the Site.
The site is located in the Neuse River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03020201 (NCDWQ sub -basin 03-
04-12). The project is located within the Neuse River Basin (8-digit USGS HUC 03020201, 14-digit
USGS HUC 03020201200040.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Project provides numerous ecological and water quality
benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While many of these benefits are limited to the project area,
others, such as pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching
effects. Expected improvements to water quality, hydrology, and habitat are outlined below.
Design Goals and Objectives
Benefits Related to Water Quality
Benefit will be achieved through cattle exclusion and direct removal of fecal inputs, filtering of runoff
Nutrient removal
through wetland areas, the conversion of active cattle pastures to forested wetlands, and improved
denitrification and nutrient uptake through wetland zones.
Runoff filtration
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas that will receive and filter runoff,
thereby reducing nutrients and sediment concentrations reaching water bodies downstream.
Benefits to Flood Attenuation
Water storage
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of wetland areas which will infiltrate more water
during precipitation events than under current site conditions.
Improved groundwater
Benefit will be achieved through the increased storage of precipitation in wetland areas, ephemeral
recharge
depressions, and reconnection of existing floodplain. Greater storage of water will lead to improved
infiltration and groundwater recharge.
Benefits Related to Ecological Processes
Restoration of habitats
Benefit will be achieved by restoring riparian wetland habitat to appropriate bottomland hardwood
ecosystem.

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
1.3 Project Structure
Arrington Bridge III Site Project Components — Wetland Mitigation
Mitigation Type
Total Acres
Mitigation Ratio
WMUs
Enhancement
5.80
3:1
1.93
Enhancement Low
6.07
5:1
1.21
Restoration
29.37
1:1
29.37
Non -Wetland Buffer
16.62
N/A
N/A
TOTAL:
57.40
32.51
1.3.1 Wetland Restoration Type and Approach
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation project provides 32.51 wetland mitigation units through
a combination of Wetland Restoration and two levels of Wetland Enhancement. The existing pasture
areas on the Site are treated with Wetland Restoration at a credit ratio of 1:1. Wetland Restoration
activities included: plugging the main channel and side ditches, removing fill, and regrading the area
to reconstruct historical contours. A credit ratio of 3:1 was put in place for higher -uplift wetland
enhancement areas, including a drained area of planted cypress, an excavated pond, and forested areas
along the north side of the main ditch. A ratio of 5:1 was put in place for the lower -uplift wetland
enhancement areas, which are primarily along the north side of the main ditch. Both levels of Wetland
Enhancement were treated by enhancing the hydrology and providing long-term protection. This was
accomplished by filling the ditches across the site to raise the water table and restore a more natural
drainage pattern. Additionally, the pond was backfilled with the adjacent spoil pile and planted with
trees and a permanent seed mix. Although this was restored to a wetland, it receives Enhancement
credits at a ratio of 3:1 because the pond was already a jurisdictional feature.
1.3.1.1 Wetland Restoration Summary
The primary wetland restoration activities included:
• The backfilling and stabilizing of the main channelized drainage feature and existing side ditches;
• The fill material on one of the access roads was removed and stabilized to restore the natural flow
pattern, and the pond was backfilled with the adjacent spoil pile;
• Areas of cut and fill were re -graded to create a continuous bottomland wetland system.
Plugging ditches and main channelized drainage feature
Plugging of the main feature and side ditches was accomplished through a combination of backfilling
and the construction of ditch plugs throughout the easement area. Approximately 8,600 linear feet of
open ditch was backfilled within the easement boundary. Ditches are filled, compacted, and graded to
the adjacent floodplain elevation. Typical ditch plugs are 20 feet wide and extend above the top of the
ditch bank elevation a minimum of 6 inches. Plugs are constructed of compacted fill placed in 12-inch
lifts with the upper 18 inches minimally compacted to allow for plant growth. Plugs are spaced such
that successive plugs are no more than 6 inches in elevation below one another. At the point of departure
from the conservation easement, a headwater -type channel is graded to the existing ditch elevation.
When possible, ditch plugs are constructed using excavated material from the restoration and
construction of wetland pools.
Fill Removal, Pond BaclSll, and regrading ofsite
Disturbed soils underlain by hydric soils (as described in the soils report) were graded to allow for a
more natural hydrologic regime and function. Additionally, the fill material on the access roads was
removed to restore the natural flow pattern of the site. The restoration site is very gently sloping (less
than one percent) but does contain approximately three feet of elevation difference across the site.
Several decades of agricultural management and mining operations has eliminated microtopography

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
across the site. As outlined in the soils report located in the Mitigation Plan, approximately 12.6 acres
of the project area is described as disturbed soils having hydric indicators and lacking wetland
hydrology. These included large areas in a lower landscape position located adjacent to visible borrow
pits. The soils in these areas had variable textures that were exhibiting hydric indicators. All of this area
was in pasture and being grazed by cattle. One excavated pond is backfilled with soil from the adjacent
spoil pile. The filled pond is considered enhancement due to the jurisdictional status of the existing
open water habitat. The entire conservation easement was disked to break up the plow layer, increase
surface roughness, and promote infiltration.
1.3.1.2 Proposed Wetland Hydrology
The Arrington Bridge III Mitigation Site was once a Cypress Gum Swamp wetland subject to prolonged
inundation as indicated by soils mapping, historical aerial photography, and personal communication
with landowners. By 1974, the area was cleared, much of the borrow removed, and conversion of area
to agricultural production was occurring. The ditch system was mostly in place. The restoration plan
for the site consisted of filling and stabilizing ditches, converting active pasture to a bottomland wetland
system, restoring bottomland hardwood forests, and enhancing the hydrology of existing wetlands. The
backfilling and plugging of ditches lengthens wetland hydroperiods by halting artificial subsurface
drainage and preventing rapid surface drainage. Periodic flooding is vital to sustain plants and wildlife
characteristic of riverine wetlands (Ainslie, 2002). The drainage area for the project area is
approximately 0.63 square miles. The restored wetlands have a variable flooding regime due to the
small size of the drainage area
1.4 Project History, Mitigation Bank Establishment, Contacts and Attribute Data
1.4.1 Project History
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site was restored by EBX Neuse I, LLC (EBX). EBX is
an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions LLC (RES). Tables 2, 3, and 4 (Appendix A) provide a
time sequence and information pertaining to the project activities, history, contacts, and baseline
information. EBX, acting as the Bank Sponsor, established a Conservation Easement (CE) and will
monitor the Site for a minimum of seven years. The Mitigation Plan provides detailed information
regarding bank operation, including long term management and annual monitoring activities. The Bank
Sponsor has conveyed the CE to the long-term land steward, the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat
Foundation (NCWHF). The Bank Sponsor will ensure that the conveyed CE will allow for the
implementation of an initial monitoring phase, which will be developed during the design phase and
conducted by the Bank Sponsor. The conveyed CE will allow for yearly monitoring and, if necessary,
maintenance of the Site during the yearly monitoring phases. These activities will be conducted in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Neu -Con Wetland and Stream Umbrella Mitigation
Bank made and entered into by EBX, USACE, and NCDWR.
1.4.2 Project Watersheds
The easement totals 57.40 acres with one unnamed tributary entering the easement and draining into a
channelized wetland ditch, which runs the length of the easement. The total drainage area at the
downstream limits of the project is 403 acres (0.63 mi2). The land use in the project watershed is
approximately 41 percent cultivated cropland, 18 percent pasture, 16 percent forested, eight percent
residential, eight percent commercial, and seven percent managed open space.

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
2 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success criteria for the Arrington Bridge III Site follows accepted and approved success criteria
presented in the North Carolina Wetland Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent agency guidance.
Specific success criteria components are presented below.
2.1 Wetland Success Criteria
2.1.1 Wetland Hydrology Criteria
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has a current WETS table for Wayne County
upon which to base a normal rainfall amount and average growing season. The closest comparable data
station was determined to be WETS station NC713 Goldsboro S Johnson AFB. This station is located
at the Seymour Johnson Air Force Base approximately 1.5 miles east of the proposed mitigation site.
The growing season for Wayne County is 262 days long, extending from March 4 to November 21, and
is based on a daily minimum temperature greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit occurring in five of ten
years.
Because of the surface roughing and shallow depressions, a range of hydroperiods and inundation is
expected. The hydrology success criterion for the site is to restore the water table at the site so that it
will remain continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least eight percent of the growing
season (approximately 21 days) at each groundwater gauge location.
Restoration and enhancement wetland gauge data is compared to reference wetland gauge data in
growing seasons with less than normal rainfall. In periods of low rainfall, if a restoration gauge
hydroperiod exceeds the reference gauge hydroperiod, and both exceed five percent of the growing
season, then the gauge will be deemed successful. If a gauge location fails to meet these success criteria
in the seven year monitoring period, then monitoring may be extended, remedial actions may be
undertaken, or the limits of wetland restoration will be determined.
2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the wetland areas on the site follows
IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size, and cover a minimum
of two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring occurs annually in the fall of each year. The
measures of vegetative success for the site vary based on the planting zones outlined in the mitigation
plan.
The interim measures of vegetative success for the planted areas in the site is the survival of at least
320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3 and 260 five-year old trees per acre at the
end of Year 5. The final vegetative success criteria is the survival of 210 trees per acre at the end of
Year 7 of the monitoring period.
Survival is determined at the plot level, not averaged at the site level. No areas are planted with more
than 50 percent of one species comprising the total composition. In addition, planted vegetation should
show a general trend toward successful establishment of the target communities with vigor and height
growth. Specific height criteria are not specified due to the variability of species and site conditions.
2.3 Scheduling/Reporting
The Bank Sponsor follows the guidance document published by NC DMS, "Monitoring Requirements
and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation" dated November 7, 2011 and the
2003 USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines. Due to the fact that this project is a private mitigation

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
bank and not an NC DMS project, monitoring documents follow DMS guidelines only to the extent
necessary for IRT approval. A monitoring report will be generated by December 31 st of each
monitoring year documenting activities of the site, and submitted to the IRT. The monitoring program
is implemented to document system development and progress toward achieving the success criteria.
The monitoring program will be undertaken for seven years or until the final success criteria are
achieved, whichever is longer.
3 MONITORING PLAN
Annual monitoring data is reported using the IRT monitoring template. The monitoring report provides
a project data chronology that facilitates an understanding of project status and trends, research
purposes, and assists in decision making regarding project close-out. The success criteria for the
Arrington Bridge III site follows current accepted and approved success criteria presented in the North
Carolina Wetland Mitigation Guidelines, and subsequent agency guidance. Specific success criteria
components are presented in the table below. Monitoring reports will be prepared annually and
submitted to the IRT.
Monitoring Requirements
Required
Parameter
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
Yes
Groundwater
Groundwater gauges
Quarterly
Groundwater monitoring gauges
Hydrology
distributed throughout the
with data recording devices will
site
be installed on site; the data will
be installed on site; the data will
be downloaded on a quarterly
basis during the growing season.
Yes
Vegetation
A representative coverage of
Semi-annual
Vegetation will be monitored
planted vegetation area.
using the Carolina Vegetation
Survey CVSprotocols
Yes
Exotic and Nuisance
Semi-annual
Locations of exotic and nuisance
Vegetation
vegetation will be mapped.
Yes
Project Boundary
Semi-annual
Locations of fierce damage,
vegetation damage, boundary
encroachments, etc. will be
mapped
Yes
Wetland Visual
Quarterly
Quarterly visual assessments
3.1 Visual Assessment Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas is conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year by
qualified individuals. The visual assessments include vegetation density, vigor, invasive species, and
easement encroachments. Digital images are taken at fixed representative locations to record each
monitoring event, as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern. Results of visual monitoring
are presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas and digital images.
Photographs are used to subjectively evaluate surface hydrology, success of vegetation, and
effectiveness of erosion control measures. A series of photos over time should indicate successional
maturation of vegetation.
3.2 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring plots will be a minimum of 0.02 acres in size, and cover a minimum of two
percent of the planted area. The following data will be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height,
planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. Monitoring occurs each year during the monitoring
period. Invasive and noxious species are monitored and controlled so that none become dominant or

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
alter the desired community structure of the site. If necessary, RES will develop a species -specific
control plan. Invasive and noxious species are monitored and controlled so that none become dominant
or alter the desired community structure of the site. Table 6 (Appendix B) provides a success summary
for each vegetation monitoring plot.
4 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
All identified problematic areas or areas of concern such as wetland hydrology not meeting success
criteria, erosion/instability, aggradation/degradation, lack of targeted vegetation, and invasive/exotic
species which prevent the site from meeting performance success criteria will be evaluated on a case
by case basis. The USACE will be notified if monitoring or other information indicates that the Bank
Site, or a portion of a Bank Site, is not progressing as anticipated towards meeting the site specific
performance standards as defined in the Mitigation Plan. In such an event the USACE will be provided
with recommendations for adaptive management measures, which may include site modifications,
design changes, revisions to maintenance requirements, and revised monitoring requirements. USACE
approval will be obtained prior to conducting any adaptive management activities.
4.1 Wetlands
Any wetland problem areas which are identified during post construction monitoring activities will be
documented and mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual monitoring
report. Wetland problem areas may include planted vegetation or wetland hydrology not meeting
success criteria. If it is determined through IRT correspondence that remedial action is required to repair
an area, a proposed work plan will be submitted for remediation. No wetland hydrology problems or
concerns were documented during Year 2 monitoring activities.
4.2 Vegetation
Any vegetation problem areas which are identified during post construction monitoring activities will
be documented and mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual stream
monitoring report. Vegetation problem areas or areas of concern may include a vegetation plot not
meeting success criteria, invasive species abundance, sparse vegetation areas, etc. If it is determined
through IRT correspondence that remedial action is required to repair an area, a proposed work plan
will be submitted for remediation. Vegetation problems were documented during Year 2 monitoring
activities and include four vegetation plots (VPs 13, 20, 21, 24) that are not on track to meeting the
vegetation success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre.
5 MONITORING YEAR 2 (MY-2)
The Arrington Bridge III Mitigation Site Year 2 monitoring activities were completed in September
2017. All Year 2 monitoring data is present below and in the appendices. Data presented shows the
site has remained stable throughout Year 2 and is on track to meeting hydrology interim success
criteria, while 23 of 27 vegetation plots are on track to meeting vegetation interim success criteria.
5.1 Year 2 Data Collection
5.1.1 Hydrology
Wetland hydrology is monitored with fifteen automatic recording pressure transducer gauges that have
been installed in representative locations across the wetland restoration areas. Two reference wetland
hydrology gauges were installed in reference wetland areas. An onsite rain gauge is also installed to

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
document rainfall events. Monitoring Year 2 wetland hydrology gauge data is documented in
Appendix B. Year 2 wetland hydrology data show the site is performing as planned and is trending
toward targeted wetland hydroperiods. During Year 2, wetland hydrology was monitored through
September 7th. All wetland hydrology gauges met the hydrology success criteria of remaining
continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least eight percent of the growing season
(approximately 21 days) at each groundwater gauge location during Year 2 monitoring. Recorded
rainfall data shows the site was below or within normal limits except three months out of the sampled
time. During April, May and June, the site recorded above average rainfall.
5.1.2 Vegetation
Based on the Year 2 vegetation monitoring, 23 of the 27 vegetation monitoring plots exceeded the
interim success criteria of 320 stems per acre after year 3 monitoring. The Site's average Year 2 planted
stems per acre is 607. (Table 6, Appendix B). Table 7 (Appendix C) provides a more detailed summary
of stem counts and the type of planted species within each vegetation monitoring plot. The number of
planted stems per acre for the monitoring plots range from 243 stems to 1,214 stems. The average stems
per vegetation plot was 15 planted stems. The minimum planted stems per plot was 6 stems and the
maximum was 30 stems per plot.
5.1.3 Photo Documentation
Permanent photo point locations are established at each vegetation plot by Resource Environmental
Solutions, LLC staff. Any additional problem areas or areas of concern will also be documented with
a digital photograph during monitoring activities. Digital photographs of the site's condition and
vegetation plots can be found in Appendix B.
5.2 Adaptive Management
During Hurricane Matthew, a tree fell and damaged a gate along the southern boundary of the easement.
This gate was fixed in the spring of 2017. Also during this time leftover bald cypresses were planted in
the areas on site with prolonged inundation. Unfortunately, this prolonged inundation has affected tree
survival across the site and we are investigating ways to reduce it and will replant in 2018. Additionally,
in response to a site visit in May 2017 with USACE, the 18-24" deep ponded area on site will be filled
with soil and planted to encourage vegetation growth.

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
6 REFERENCES
Amoroso, J.L., ed. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Conner, W.H. and J. W. Day. (1976) Productivity and Composition of a Baldcypress- Water Tupelo
Site and a Bottomland Hardwood Site in a Louisiana Swamp. American Journal of Botany 63 (10):
1354-1364.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological
Services, FW5/OBS-79131. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
LeGrand, H.E., Jr. and S.P. Hall, eds. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal
Species of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North
Carolina.
Peet, RX, Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63: 262-274.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and F.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC. 2015. Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Bank, Final
Mitigation Plan. WKDickson & Co., Inc.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC. 2016 Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site,
Baseline Monitoring Report
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2002. Regulatory Guidance Letter. RGL No. 02-2, December
24, 2002.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2013. April 2003 NC Wetland Mitigation Guidelines.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS),
1974. Soil Survey of Wayne County, North Carolina.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S.
Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer
Research and Development Center.
10

Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 2 Monitoring Report• Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2017
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS),
Web Soil Survey; http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov (September 2014
11

Appendix A.
General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View

Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Monitoring Report Year 2
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
DWR Project #
USACE Project # SAW-2015-00360
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Ri arian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
N/A
N/A
29.37
3.14
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Project Component -or- Reach
ID
As -Built
Stationing/Location LF
Existing
Footage/Acreage
Approach
PI, PII etc.
Restoration -
or-
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
SMUs with
Buffer
Multiplier
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian
Wetland (Ac.)
Non -riparian
Wetland
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
29.37
Enhancement
5.80
Enhancement II
Enhancement - Low
6.07
Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed
Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Activity and Reporting History
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
DWR Project #
USACE Project # SAW-2015-00360
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
NA
September 2015
Final Design — Construction Plans
August 2015
August 2015
Construction Completed
May 2016
May 2016
Site Planting Completed
May 2016
May 2016
Baseline Monitoring Document Year 0 Monitoring — baseline
June 2016
July 2016
Year 1 Monitoring
December 2016
March 2017
Year 2 Monitoring
September 2017
September 2017
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
Table 3. Project Contacts
Project Contacts Table
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
DWR Project #
USACE Project # SAW-2015-00360
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Frasier Mullen, PE
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthworks
5616 Coble Church Road
Julian, NC 27283
[phone]
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Matt Hitch
Seeding Contractor
KBS Earthworks
5616 Coble Church Road
Julian, NC 27283
[phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbogen, NC Forestry Services Nursery
Bank/Bank SponsorNeu-Con
Wetland and Stream Umbrella Bank
BX Neuse 1, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
[phone]
Project Contact:
Daniel Ingram (din.rg [e-mail] )
Monitoring Performers
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
[phone]
Project Manager:
lRyan Medric (rmedric(&res.us )

Table 4. Project Information
Project Information
Project Name
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
County
Wayne
Project Area acres
57.40
Project Coordinates latitude and longitude)
35.342895°N-78.009907°W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 12-digit
03020201200040
DWQ Sub -basin
03-04-12
Project Drainage Area (acres)
403 Acres

.."4P o
o �
� o
a�
x4Z
o l Goldsboro
° 0
Q
Arrington Bridge III Site
00 �
O
} • G
ar- a a-
- D
�{5 /
Q
Legend
Streams
- ABIII Easement
Waterbody
HUC 03020201200040
n
o\\
Ir�7,
°YaI+q,
12
r=frn Rr -,
fia�ymoL\
JohDsen
/ '0 � ^N1 "-4 \ I
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, i'ncrementIftGorNUse
NRCAN, Esri Japan, METH Esri China (Hong Kong�Es�i (Thailand
e GI TomTom, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and thS
GoMmu n ity
Figure
Resource Project Vicinity Map
Environmental Arrington Bridge III Site
Solutions 4
0 1COUNTYNTS��Miles Scale: NTS

Appendix B.
Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species (Species by Plot)
Vegetation Plot Photos
Year 2 General Conditions Photos

Appendix B. Vegetation Tables
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
Total Stems
Planted
Asimina triloba
Pawpaw
Bare Root
500
Betula nigra
River Birch
Bare Root
2,650
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Common Buttonbush
Bare Root
500
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Bare Root
800
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Bare Root
3,200
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Bare Root
3,000
Nyssa aquatica
Water Tupelo
Bare Root
2,200
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Blackgum Tupelo
Bare Root
5,200
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Bare Root
6,000
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
Bare Root
5,300
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Bare Root
8,500
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Bare Root
6,050
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Bare Root
1,600
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
Bare Root
3,200
Total
48,700
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Stre am/
Wetland
Stems
Volunteers
Total
Survival
Criteria
Met?
Average Tree
Height (cm)*
1
890
0
890
Yes
113
2
971
0
971
Yes
117
3
1 486
0
486
1 Yes
58
4
445
0
445
Yes
63
5
324
0
324
Yes, barely
49
6
567
0
567
Yes
68
7
364
0
405
Yes
58
8
405
0
405
Yes
62
9
1 607
0
607
Yes
92
10
607
0
607
Yes
76
11
567
0
567
Yes
86
12
1012
0
1012
Yes
85
13
243
0
243
No
76
14
850
4047
4897
Yes
160
15
890
1214
2104
Yes
120
16
809
121
931
Yes
119
17
688
0
688
Yes
75
18
688
202
890
Yes
84
19
567
0
567
Yes
66
20
283
2226
2509
No
46
21
283
0
283
No
61
22
1214
2428
3642
Yes
114
23
688
2023
2711
Yes
100
24
243
0
243
No
60
25
364
0
1 364
Yes
57
26
769
2104
2873
Yes
77
27
567
40
607
1 Yes
55
Project Avgj
607
534
1142 j
Yes
JOE-
* Only the tallest eight trees were averaged, as this is the amount that represents 320 stems/acre.

Appendix B. Vegetation Tables
Table 7: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Current Plot Data (MY22017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
00002-01-0001
00002-01-0002
00002-01-0003
00002-01-0004
00002-01-0005
00002-01-0006
00002-01-0007
00002-01-0008
00002-01-0009
00002-01-0010
00002-01-0011
00002-01-0012
00002-01-0013
00002-01-0014
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
1
100
Asiminatriloba
pawpaw
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
3
3
3
Cerciscanadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
Cornusamomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
DONTKNOW: unsure record
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
31
3
3
1
1
1
10
10
10
2
2
2
9
9
9
3
3
3
5
5
5
8
8
8
1
1
1
4
4
4
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssaaquatica
watertupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
10
10
10
3
3
3
4
4
4
Platanusoccidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
31
71
7
71
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
6
6
6
Quercus
oak
Tree
I
I
I
I
1 1
11
1
Quercus I rats
overcup oak
Tree
7
7
7
7
7
7
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
10
10
10
4
4
4
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
ITree
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stem count
221
221
22
241
241
241
121
121
121
Ill
111
11
81
81
8
14
14
14
10
10
10
101
101
101
15
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
25
25
25
6
6
6
21
211
121
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.0d44
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
6
6
6
7
7
7
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
6
7
Stems per ACRE
890.3
890.3
890.3
971.2
971.2
971.2
485.6
485.6
485.6
445.2
445.2
445.2
323.7
323.7
323.7
566.6
566.6
566.6
404.7
404.7
404.7
404.7
404.
4404.7
607
60
6071
6071
6071566.61
566.61
566.61
10121
1012
1012
242.8
242.9
242.8
849.8
849.8
4897
Current Plot Data (MY22017)
Annual Means
00002-01-0015
00002-01-0016
00002-01-0017
00002-01-0018
00002-01-0019
00002-01-0020
00002-01-0021
00002-01-0022
00002-01-0023
00002-01-0024
00002-01-0025
00002-01-0026
00002-01-0027
MY2(2017)
MY1(2016)
MYO(2016)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
30
3
50
60
50
40
333
Asiminatriloba
pawpaw
Tree
2
2
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
8
8
8
1
1
1
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
12
1
28
28
45
34
34
34
36
36
36
Cerciscanadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
Cornusamomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
5
1
1
6
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
4
4
4
DONTKNOW: unsure record
I
I
1 1
1
11
451
45
451
182
182
182
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
8
8
8
1
1
1
6
6
6
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
9
9
9
91
91
91
91
91
91
101
101
101
Liquidambarsty raciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
1
Liriodendrontulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
29
29
29
381
38
38
Nyssaaquatica
watertupelo
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
N ssa biflora
swam to elo
Tree
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
31
2
2
21
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
601
60
60
93
93
93
96
96
96
Platanusoccidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
21
61
6
61
1
1 21
2
21
21
2
21
31
3
3
41
4
4
5
5
5
41
41
41
50
50
50
97
97
97
91
91
91
Quercus
oak
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
2
2
2
29
291
29
12
12
12
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
75
75
75
126
126
126
128
128
128
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
47
47
47
98
98
98
86
861
86
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
13
13
13
111
11
11
Quercus phellos
willowoak
Tree
6
6
6
8
8
8
1
1
1
22
22
22
46
46
46
43
43
43
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
5
51
5
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
251
251
25
28
28
28
24
24
24
Stem count
221
221
52
201
201
231
171
171
17
171
171
22
141
14
141
71
7
62
71
71
7
301
9
91
9
191
191
711
14
14
15
4061
4061
762
737
737
737
849
849
849
size (ares)
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
27
27
27
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.67
0.67
0.67
Species count
Stems per ACRE
5
5
6
6
6
7
4
4
4
5
5
6
7
7
7
4
4
6
5
5
5
7
7
8
6
6
7
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
6
8
3
3
4
13
13
15
16
16
16
13
13
13
890.3
890.3
2104
809.4
809.4
930.81
6881
688
688
688
688
890.3
566.61
566.61
566.61283.31
283.31
25091
283.31
283.31
283.3
12141
12141
3642
688
6881
2711
242.8
242.8
242.8
364.2
364.2
364.2
768.91
768.9
2873
-,rr rl
cirr rl
rn7j
608.51
608.51
1142
11051
110SI
11051
12731
1273
1273
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix B.
Arrington Bridge III Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (9/6/2017)
I
Vegetation Plot 3 (9/6/2017)
Vegetation Plot 5 (9/6/2017)
Vegetation Plot 2 (9/6/2017)
Vegetation Plot 4 (9/6/2017)
Vegetation Plot 6 (12/7/2016)

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 7 (9/6/2017)
Vegetation Plot 9 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 11 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 8 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 10 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 12 (9/7/2017)

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 13 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 15 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 17 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 16 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 18 (9/7/2017)

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 19 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 21 (9/7/2017)
a
Vegetation Plot 23 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 20 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 22 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 24 (9/7/2017)

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 25 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 27 (9/7/2017)
Vegetation Plot 26 (9/7/2017)

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Arrington Bridge III General Conditions Photos
General Conditions Photo (9/6/2017)
General Conditions Photo (9/6/2017)
General Conditions Photo (9/7/2017)
General Conditions Photo (9/6/2017)
General Conditions Photo (9/6/2017)
General Conditions Photo (9/7/2017)

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
General Conditions Photo (9/7/2017)
General Conditions Photo (9/7/2017)
General Conditions Photo (9/7/2017)
General Conditions Photo (9/7/2017)

Appendix C.
Hydrology Data
Table 8. Rainfall Summary
Table 9. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Chart 1. 2017 Precipitation Data for Arrington Bridge III Site
Chart 2. 2017 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs

Table 8. Rainfall Summary
Month
Average
Normal Limits
Station
Precipitation
On -Site Auto
Rain Gaua e
30 Percent
70 Percent
January
4.64
3.56
5.37
3.36
1.73
February
3.67
2.47
4.28
1.04
1.89
March
4.55
3.28
5.53
4.46
3.59
April
3.45
2.15
4.31
7.14
6.76
May
3.87
2.65
4.83
7.17
6.33
June
4.03
2.51
4.94
5.56
---
July
5.34
3.51
6.38
3.36
---
August
5.52
3.49
6.34
4.46
---
September
5.57
2.43
7.40
4.87
---
October
3.10
1.99
4.39
---
---
November
3.01
1.94
3.65
---
---
December
3.44
2.28
4.25
---
---
Total
50.19
32.26
61.67
41.42
20.30
Notes:
Goldsboro CRONOS Database - Cherry Research Station (GOLD)
Table 9. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
2017 Max Hydroperiod (Growing Season 4-Mar through 21-Nov, 262 days)
Well Data for March 4 through September 6
Success Criterion 8% = 21 Consecutive Days
Gauge
Consecutive
Cumulative
Occurrences
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
AWl
27
10
87
33
17
AW2
187
71
187
71
1
AW3
155
59
185
71
2
AW4
1 187
71
187
71
1
AW5
155
59
185
71
2
AW6
155
59
185
71
2
AW7
187
71
187
71
1
AW8
132
50
153
58
7
AW9
187
71
187
71
1
AW10
151
57
181
69
2
AW11
152
58
182
69
2
AW12
187
71
187
71
1
AW13*
47
18
47
18
1
AW14
145
55
167
64
3
AW15
155
59
185
71
2
REFAWI
154
59
184
70
2
IREFAW21
50
1 19
1 114
1 44
1 8
* Well data represents 47 days (-18%) of the total growing season from March 4th to April 19'.

Chart 1. 2017 Precipitation Data for Arrington Bridge III Site
2017 Precipitation Data for Arrington Bridge III Site
10
9
7
.-.
-------------
CD
6
L
U
C
O
---------loll
U
4
d
3
2
1
[[allile
0 L1..1 .............. m ....................................
J F ha A M J J A S O N D
Months
Gddsboro pally Rainfall o Growing Season — On -site Auto Rain Gauge 4 Gddsboro Monthly Rainfall ------- 301IV701h PeRen e

Chart 2. 2017 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW1
20 10,0
Growing Season
9, 0
10
8.0
0
N
7.0
L
U
C
1
o
N
6.0 =
U
— -10
c
>
5.0 O
W
—
-20
p
3
4.0 U
3
O
3.0
0 -30
2.0
-40
1,0
-50
0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
iIIIIIIIIIII�Gdtl�ao Baity Rainfall —ABIII AWI
2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW2
20 100
—
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
0
G/
7.0
L
U
C
N
O
6.0 =
U
— -10
io—
— — — — — — — —
---------------------------------
-----
c
'�.
>
N
5.00
W
-
-20
O
3
4.0 U
c
a
7
O
3.0
0 -30
2.0
-00
1.0
L-50
0.0
J F M A N1 J J A S O N D
Months
�Gddsbao Baity R-fall ABIIIAW2

2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW3
20 10.0
—
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
0
7.0
VNu
C
y
0
6.0 s
0c
— -10
5.0 O
W
—
.y
w 1
.Q
-20
V
4.0
c
a
0
3.0
CD -30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
0.0
J F N1 A M J J A S O N D
Months
�ooaiiy anral Aew Awa
2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW4
20 10,0
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
0
n
N
L
7.0
U
C
N
0
6.0 L
-10
iv--------
—---------
-------------------------
-----
C
>
5.0 O
W
-
'a
-zo
3
4.0 W
a`
0
3.0
(� -30
2.0
-40
1,0
501111AL
ll A J 11JI
11L
ILI0,
0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
�C.Usb—Daly Rainfall—ADIIIAw4

2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW5
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
0
n
N
L
7.0
U
C
N
0
6.0 s
tl
-10
>
5.00
W
a
C
-20
3
4.0
0
3.0
(� -30
2.0
-40
1.0
IL-50
0.0
J F M A M J J A 5 O N 0
Months
C.Msb—Bait' Rainfall —ABI II AW5
2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW6
20 10-0
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
0
N
d
7.0
s
U
C
y
0
6.0 L
U
-10
`.
---------
—
-------------------------------
-----
S
fo
N
5.0 O
W
is
a
-20
4.0
C
`
a
0
3.0
(� -30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
il�c
IL
0.0
J F V A iN J J A S O N 0
Months
�(yJtlsb:.rO Baily Rainfall —ABI II AM

2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW7
20 10.0
—
Growing Season
9.0
10
6.0
0
n
N
s
7.0
u
C
N
=
O
6.0 t
-10
'Z
m
— — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — —
_
>
....
O
5.0 O
W
-20
a
3
4.0 d
r
a`
0
3.0
(� -30
2.0
-40
L
1.0
-50
0.0
J F m A M J J A S O N D
Months
�Gddsb—Daily R-fall ABIII AN7
2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW8
20 10.0
—
Growing Season
9.0
10
6.0
0
v
n
7.0
s
u
C
H
=
O
6.0 L
-10
`
C
_
>
v
c
5.0 O
W
!
O
-20
3
4.0 m
0
a`
0
3.0
(j -30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
ILI
0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
��ilyR .fall—ABIIIAWS

2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW9
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
io
8.0
0
N
7.0
U
U
C
y
O
6.0 t
-10
>
N
---------
---------------------------------
------
5.0 O
W
°'
O.
-20
4.0
c
a
0
C7
3.0
-30
2.0
-40
1,0
-50
L
0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
-iY�Sba'OBaity FEaanfal -ABI AW9
2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW10
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
0
7.0
s
U
C
y
O
U
— -1O
c
>
�
r 5.0 O
W
.y
a
-20
4.0
c
a
3
O
3.0
U' -3O
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
O 0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
�omiiyR nrai ABIIIAWiO

2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW11
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
0
N
N
s
7.0
u
C
N
=
0
6.0 L
-10
'Z
m—
— — — — — — — —
--------------------------------
— — — — —
C
>
�
�-
C
5.0 O
W
16
::
-20
Q
3
4.0 U
a
0
3.0
(� -30
2.0
-40
it
I
1.0
-50
0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
�Gdds %ovally Ralnrall ABIIIAW'11
2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW12
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
0
y
N
s
7.0
u
C
N
=
0
6.0 L
-10
m—
— — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — —
C
.
5.0 CO
W
R
::
-20
Q
3
4.0
a
0
3.0
(� -30
2.0
-40
11I
1.0
-50
11L
0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
�owiry Ranrai ABIIIAW12

2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW13
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
0
7.0
s
u
C
y
6.0 s
O
U
— -10
c
5.0 O
W
.y
-a
-20
V
4.0
c
a
0
3.0
CD -30
2.0
-40
I
I III
1.0
-50
oil
L
I it
0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
�cdoso Wllyeanrai Aew
2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW14
20 10.0
—
Growing Season
9.0
10
6.0
0
v
7.0
v
s
u
C
y
6.0 L
O
-10
io
---------
----------------- — ----------
-----
C
S
>
C
5.0 O
W
-20
L
3
4.0 d
c
d
3
O
3.0
(� -30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
�omiiy anrai Aew Avdia

2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge AW15
20 10.0
—
Growing Season
9.0
10
8.0
0
n
N
s
7.0
u
C
N
=
O
6.0 L
-10
`
co—
— — — — — — — —
------------------ ---— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — —
C
`-'
C
5.0 O
W
—
R
-20
Q
3
4.0
r
a
0
3.0
(� -30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
�Gdds %ovally Ralntall ABIIIAW'15
2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge REFAW1
20 10.0
Growing Season
9.0
10
—
8.0
0
n
N
s
7.0
u
C
N
=
O
6.0 L
-10
m—
— — — — — — — —
------------------ ---— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — —
C
.
C
5.0 O
W
—
R
::
-20
Q
3
4.0
a
0
3.0
(� -30
2.0
-40
11I
1.0
-50
11L
0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
�o Gally RanrAl ABIIIREFAWI

2017 Arrington Bridge III Groundwater Gauge REFAW2
20 10.0
Growing Season
9,0
10
8.0
0
N
W
7,0
L
t)
S
N
0
0
6.0 L
-10
i0---------
--
-- —
—
-----
---------
-----
'._.
W
5,0 O
W
R
-20
Q
D
4.0 `
c
a
0
3.0
(9 -30
2.0
-40
1.0
-50
Ll
0, 0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
�GdrlsboroDally Ralntall ABIIIREF AW2