310048_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200116

®r Division of Water Resources B 15
Facility Number 3 - �j $ 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation LF
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: - - a { Arrival Time: eparture Time: s'Z l�l County: �, gyp)) j,j Region: I l U
Farm Name: o eK; n the P.f 2 e Il arm LL ( �a r, Owner Email: '__i'�
Owner Name: SAOck�', �j h' � c� (�fe e k' ��,m, LLC� Phone: ? � l O a 9 8 — 372 6
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: r 1'e-- r' LOW n Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
3 38a Layer
Non -Layer
Wean to Finish
560
Other
Other
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv POD.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
r
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 53] N ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
r
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 53] N ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 53] N ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 53] N ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

/(Facility Number: - 4Z�_ Date of inspection:
f Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3�o0tructure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: 5 it 1-4 c, H CAP_�-A EI CP-K--IS
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
19,E 19"s-
-a S �j
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
��
(3
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [32/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes [t_i,/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [1 ]*No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes [(/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Co,rrl Soy FeSCue C-E( d` CJ12- i Yn Z!Y
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes e(o❑ Yes o
[:]Yes [KNo
❑ YesE-do
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes " �Zo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 1 - Date of Inspection: —((ram—oloaC>
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Ez(t ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes F�J�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
[Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[:]Yes [ r o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
dyes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
CC,G L r0'ti A due
L� (2), 4 a
3 a = ep, a 3
4 12.' Cp,31
end 0� adaO
Crop Yield ke,6vrdS—kee? i,n gad, i,,A JUL (
`7 Im arfv� I \+i -FC M S _ �o� e�c�►� � >v.
S,, jvj e n-F j ouL a s
v p�7fl ►—� PA O fog i P P a 'S Svc' &AjN5
C.'eR.Sg ?7 uvnp1N& o o �Frt (P`. St—Plev\ Br-kl 1S-
C3N 9, _Ap()Ll Cp i 1 at`1 C--r—GUP.e-L:2 �)c5 T Na Wt-,2 NPL_I CA 110 0 a"j VW-)
APP f 5ca rr-CTO VIA 1 v 9 PAIN P�1V_ eA K'5K fEezv l eLr_ 1 EM )
Reviewer/Inspector Name: —S. � � ��P-1z `� Phone-0 1y� � I � ��' '11G/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015