310239_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200128

0 Division of Water Resources
facility Numbers O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other°Agency
pe of Visit: 0 Co liance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
ason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: cn1 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: nj)p1; h Region: &R6
Farm Name: KQ I N 4 _Cjc_ �'A2 rv► Owner Email:
Owner Name: y-1 , MWIM 1:5E { AC- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: (OE LV 9 1� ? e5 I I C'
Certified Operator: (L�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity, Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
o$
t4 ifc)
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacity Pon.,
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design' Current
CattleCapacity . Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
["No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
E
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Et,j
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of,the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 2,1 - 239 jDate of Inspection: O 0 fi
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? 0 Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: old co � a
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):�
Observed Freeboard (in): 'Xq_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
dj o ❑NA ❑NE
N]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes U4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
04
12. Crop Type(s): `, c�' p 6&A Y) co". � ►.) � �c.� {`a -o.� � ra i l
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes EdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes rNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes �Zo
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �/Nq ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected did the facilityfail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Yes�>No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: _3j Date of inspection: () y Q a (7
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Tf 6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes VNNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes DO'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do bsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
[Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ["No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesE;]/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes,254of ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
E�VN�
❑ NA ❑ NE
-❑❑ NA NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawinEs of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Study Su(ve.l due 1' L"Ca
due 5uYrr-t- lr 'a.4 o o
kn, eon tF* r- d i I St
/M(;H0J%'+y
Reviewer/Inspector Name: :, S jd jj h$n,ye
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: di o)
Date: O1- oL8-aoad
Page 3 of 3 21412015