310183_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200122

& Division of Water Resources `
Facility Nu><ritber ... ?� $ r O Division of:Soit and Water Conservation
�.-��
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: a 7Routine
pliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: ; dQ County: %1)c �(� r Region: KI i Po
Farm Name:
Gja
AmrliF, )Z�
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
M 1 j.;
L. U
An a KK
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: M I k-le U Ath 6&Z5
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: ha rroh lj&r44�
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
-Design' Cuirrent� ° ° = Design 'Current:
Swine ..' ° y ° "Capacity Pop. ; Wet Poultry ° ° Copaclty�° •`Pop. ,
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish E; R&O ozi
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other'
Other
Layer
Non -Layer
Design - Current
Dry Poultry Capacity, Pon.,
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design Currenit
CattXe ,Capacity Pop. ,
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 2N0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: ',')I Date of Inspection: p - j D
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):_1 S
Observed Freeboard (in): —119 3(C7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ERfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes D/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � Cam,Sc il -F, `7 &d
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[D"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
�/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
E3 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
gNNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
`
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[:]Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes '1/ N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes VNoNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: ')S jDate of inspection: 6
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes dNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [3" o
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes t No
❑ Yes [2*'1'4o
[:]Yes YNO
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
S;yh I rr 's
L-1
;.Qa o
Nc WcAl CaV@r_
La S I udle Ll,
-7
"ee kty SI'C_1<; O) Ah
e,,-fn l 'f-/;b r u0,42le
Reviewer/Inspector Name: -:I;, �j tj :TC nit/ Phone: (1 6 j7—
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015