310045_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200122

WDivision of Water Resources
o FaciIity Number, - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 ,Other Agency
Type of Visit: W'Rputine
liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I C> I ©a I Departure Time: County: Pj JOLY1V Region: ()
Farm Name: aM
/ L_ [)JX 1? S J
a ,
Owner Email:
Owner Name: AL
i al A P—) A LPrz f
267i�L'
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: Lop-, 11'*
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone: 4
Integrator: 51'Au i PlIc �L— U%wd.S
Certification Number: � ,? 31; 6 S
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design.Cgrrent� Current 'Design Current; °
$Wine m Capacity' Pop. Wet Poultry . ; . Capacity � Pop. � Cattle' . ;Capacity 'Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
J Feeder to Finish bo �{ D
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Otherr°
Other
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current ` •~
Dry Pnultry Canacihi
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
DischarjZes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
EJ/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
✓ N
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
L To
❑ NA
❑ NE,
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: A-6 F 9 IZ I &TIT
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): o S
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
[dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N3/Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E2,Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (fir r1ly:j."1 6-0
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E]/No , ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑'N ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes ©/No
❑ Yes F9 lac
❑ Yes LJ 1V
❑ Yes [I� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
0 NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Other: .11
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E�/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: _j I jDate of Inspection: oo )�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Y s �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Q' Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ` o ito to
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0 /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ®/No
❑ Yes 24
❑ Yes M/No
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
FN
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
WC'aK— arj ro' V_,5 SPai s a+ i LAc-00j'-J phki wPI-L-
olol7 cs S1 Mco'fcOS CIF ciPpi�;") w, nz)) L'.�s
J7 ti •o
_J y 9
ysQ 5, y a
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatui
Page 3 of 3
Phone: b 10) G 17 —gt C--
Date: 0�
21412015