NC0036196_Renewal (Application)_20200203

t:` .Srr4➢' 4.-
ROY COOPER fi V! =;
c®vrrr�or� "�. �,
t7 : )
MICHAEL S.REGAN ..,rotr . .,
Secretory
`Q b1h5 A�
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
February 03, 2020
City of Newton
Attn: Eric Jones, WWTP Supt.
PO Box 550
Newton, NC 28658
•
Subject: Permit Renewal
Application No. NC0036196
Clark Creek WWTP
Catawba County
Dear Applicant:
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges the January 29, 2020 receipt of your permit renewal application and
supporting documentation. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the Section's NPDES WW permitting
branch. Per G.S. 150B-3 your current permit does not expire until permit decision on the application is made.
Continuation of the current permit is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit.The
permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to complete your permit renewal. Please respond in a
timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to allow a complete review of the application and renewal
of the permit.
Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental
Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at:
https://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/permit-guidance/environmental-application-tracker
If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the
links available within the Application Tracker.
Sin erely Va
Wren Thedford ,
Administrative Assistant
Water Quality Permitting Section
ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application
r
11 , North.Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I DoiDiViSbit of Water Resources
MooreslAFa ReVonal Office 1 610 East°enter Avenue,Srrste 301 I Mooreswee,North Carolina 28115

NoRry c
O;M ` a NEWTON
,.. $ NORTH CAROLINA
1855
01/27/2020 RECEIVED
JAN 2 9 2020
NCDENR/DWQ
NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES
ATTN: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: City of Newton
Clark Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit NC0036196 Renewal
To Whom It May Concern:
The City of Newton requests the renewal of permit NC0036196 based on the enclosed application.
Included in this application is the WWTP topographic map, WWTP flow schematic,testing data results,
bio-solids management plan and the toxicity testing summary.The City of Newton request that the
permit be issued with the 5.0 and 7.5 MGD limits as contained in the present permit. If you have any
questions or concerns please contact me at 828-695-4370 or 828-217-4457.
Sincerely,
0 Eric Jones
City of Newton
WWTP Superintendent

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
FORM
2A NPDES FORM 2A APPLICATION OVERVIEW
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow>_0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C(Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D(Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program(or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E(Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program(or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users(SIUs)or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F(Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations(CFR)403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works(with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G(Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
1
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WVVTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name Clark Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Mailing Address PO Box 550
Newton NC 28658
Contact Person Eric Jones
Title Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent
Telephone Number [phone]
Facility Address 1407 McKay Road
(not P.O.Box) Newton NC 28658
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above,provide the following:
Applicant Name City of Newton North Carolina
Mailing Address PO Box 550
Newton NC 28658
Contact Person E.Todd Clark
Title City Manager
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator(or both)of the treatment works?
owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
® facility ❑ applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state-issued permits).
NPDES NC0036196 PSD
UIC Other 03197R06-Air
RCRA Other W00003902—Land Application
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and,if known,provide information on the type of collection system(combined vs.separate)and its ownership(municipal,private,etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
City of Newton NC 13000 Sanitary Sewer Municipal
City of Conover NC 8300 _ Sanitary Sewer Municipal
Total population served 21300
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from(and eventually flows
through)Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant(i.e.,the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12th month of"this year"occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 5.0 mgd
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily flow rate 1.76 MGD 2.11 MGD 2.32 MGD
c. Maximum daily flow rate 15.06 MGD 12.05 MGD 16.5 MGD
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s)of collection system(s)used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution(by miles)of each.
• Separate sanitary sewer 100 ok
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer ok
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes,list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent 1
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows(prior to the headworks)
v. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins,ponds,or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes,provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s) mgd
Is discharge ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land-apply treated wastewater? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes,provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site: mgd
Is land application ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works? ❑ Yes ® No
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
If yes,describe the mean(s)by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g.,tank truck,pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant,provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number (
For each treatment works that receives this discharge,provide the following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number (
If known,provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility. mgd
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8.through A.8.d above(e.g.,underground percolation,well injection): ❑ Yes ® No
If yes,provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method(including location and size of site(s)if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

Bio-solids Management Summary
City of Newton NC
Clark Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit#NC0036196
The City of Newton disposes of generated residuals from the Clark Creek WWTP
generally by its Land Application Program with a small portion being transported to the
Regional Composting Facility via the City of Conover.
The City of Conover discharges wastewater to the Clark Creek WWTP and is a vested
owner in the Regional Compost Consortium. Presently Conover is transporting
approximately 14% of the bio-solids produced at Clark Creek to the Compost Facility for
treatment and disposal.
The remainder of the bio-solids is land applied in accordance with the City of Newton
Land Application Permit.
Primary clarifier sludge and waste biological solids are pumped to an in-process gravity
thickener. Telescoping valves are utilized to decant water from the surface of the
thickener as solids settle.
If sludge is to be hauled to the Regional Compost Facility by the City of Conover, the
solids are segregated to a separate thickener and gravity thickened only.
Solids for land application are gravity thickened with the addition of lime slurry to the in-
process thickener. Thickened sludge is transferred to one of two holding thickeners
where the pH of the sludge is raised to 12.0 or greater. In two hours, the pH is again
tested to verify a pH of 12.0 or greater. After 22 more hours, a pH is again taken to
confirm a pH of 11.5 or greater to meet the requirements pathogen reduction and vector
attraction elimination. The sludge is then land applied.
Periodic, routine analyses of the bio-solids are performed as required by the Land
Application Permit.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered"Yes"to question A.8.a,complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall(including bypass points)through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered"No"to question
A.8.a,go to Part B,"Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location Newton 28658
(City or town,if applicable) (Zip Code)
Catawba NC
(County) (State)
35.626111 -81.231944
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore(if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface(if applicable) ft.
e. Average daily flow rate mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes ® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes,provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge: mgd
Months in which discharge occurs: -_
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes ❑ No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Clark Creek
b. Name of watershed(if known) Catawba _
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code(if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin(if known):South Fork Catawba(03-1)
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code(if known): 03050102
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream(if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow(if applicable): mg/I of CaCO3
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek VWVfP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary EI Secondary
Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates(as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 95
Design SS removal 95
Design P removal
Design N removal %
Other
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season,please describe:
Chlorine
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? EI Yes 0 No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ® Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition,this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum,effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
PARAMETER
Value Units Value Units Number of Samples
pH(Minimum) . s.u.
8 �A
pH(Maximum) .9 s.u.
Flow Rate 16.5 MGD 2.32 MGD 1613
Temperature(Winter) 20 Degrees C 13.1 Degrees C 439
Temperature(Summer) 27 Degrees C 22.1 Degrees C 659
For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value _
MAXIMUM DAILY AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT METHOD ML/MDL
Conc. Units Conc. Units Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN BOD5 26.4 Mg/L 4.31 Mg/L 1102 SM5210B 2.0 mg/L
DEMAND(Report one) CBOD5
FECALCOLIFORM 60000 #/100mL 28 #/100m 1102 SM9222D 1/100mL
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS(TSS) 830 Mg/L 2.9 Mg/L , 1102 SM2540D 2.5 mg/L
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD(100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate>_0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C(Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
I&I is dependent upon local rainfall. Efforts are periodically ongoing(via testing)to identify and alleviate I&I. The City has
applied for grants for further work on I&I.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant,including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping,if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells,springs,other surface water bodies,and drinking water wells that are: 1)within Y,mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works,and 2)listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored,treated,or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)by truck,rail,
or special pipe,show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated,stored,and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant,including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units,including disinfection(e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects(related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality)of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes,list the name,address,telephone number,and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities(attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: ( )
Responsibilities of Contractor:
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment,effluent quality,or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements,submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none,go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number(assigned in question A.9)for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local,State,or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ❑ No
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

s
-t'7_-.__)......:.L...\..„,.)
iF i
rTh 5 tali ^ f ♦ V ,* 1 -ki.- , ‘ , ., . _ s. •. t-i'),\\V to-i..o...-.(......."
j -cam /
,, ,,, \\ 4,k% ,,fit,,..r 3 , ,, i ` t, ,` „, 1,r,
.,C,• Park � ,. • J io
. ..",a:-.:::_•\, ..-‘.-7.--,--4'44 , ''..- ..'-:_r_V/„....) po. . •36 -N11)4
---,,, . , ,.., ,.. '),...,c- ----\ --1.. .,,,,,,,,r..,-.-- 1 Y4f,jr-..i4=--- e
,/ ,,,- _..., c
„'' r. a • it - s
,...-k.„... , • , .. '.4 .SEGICS007* '4 0''.00 V' \ '''''' .-.
'' �k f • " �- .AAA 4 c.-,..• ` -• - 'J4 k.?-2 - \/ ``i
° •-, azw`• \\o ff 1 � ,� ��� 0: ��"
s;.6-5:1
" gar t �r ,_
„.:
t,_
,, 95 -----4. Niii-.4.„,,,,,,''' •--:,..,', ' ' .r.-t\ 'ti.-w 1,1 I'Vr I I, -r i." ,j ,I,,----..(il,, \\2.0.,'' c''
•
• OA,
\'� 1 �,, �. =a" dI \tea'_ c ra, Armory■ \
:'� • 5 s'b�-�.. e�"''w s \:•.., ...... e_.>(
- aS?.1 \ fc.. oi,,,
n •"-n7" h'k�cl s ,J��. \McKay Road\ - .1;,-,Y•:(: -• tk: n/- c-= ,A` , . � ° (c
, •
.......
C y j II
�<,ti� �y.� �k li '� Approximate \_��
;
•\`� ��` �y^, _`, (I , Facility Location , HZ f> ,
r..,..
® `,%9"' ` _ ,rJ n/lea t,'; d1b.rsn:z,�' y v wx:s� e 14 —
I 7;. �r , Yr• K p'�fil I. Outfall001 _ - :�,
6sseee ;n� ram— - ..- . ,.n
`,..�r -_� _r,p '' /. ` I 4". �,a;-'=�' lY i ,g �.7J,+,', � iJ00.
1 °_ 7J� .-� � ' A, , ,.tea may. �i-� `�'`, + +3 4 ,.1-
w.
F 6. e c_i ' 4 v t sr.g.,:-u ��6 F erg iEr
-\ ii• ''''Ir.,.''.._1. \
'e4ma{:/ l 44�, �l ° `i t I'� , 4 4 , ,/ 9 3 [\ ,)
,11
Ems''' V, o� -- ._ P t 'f •, . ,��'l' ` -ew gem �F
/a s kt' / � �w3� ( .
� Disp a�� P/'tai
i'`"`
• ••;•--_," ii ,,(,,,lk 1:7;:-,,.--'-; i I 4 I:if-. 0 ill P,,RI 4,,,,... ,,,. /) Alpo_ ., 6_,,,,•,..„1 , u3n .. N
•
" ?„v il
xr"'sue" 7= i 9 �� "'Cam•q
,,,,. -4„ ,-...,-#4,, ...-.,-4:4•,.; #- ,t'L___. No...,,,_,-.4:-:_)?
4,, ,f,i4,4,,14- - ---- J,'-- ....•,.,„. . . if,t + .."(litts",
\ , . \
•
,,,D , , ----' \
• , \To a , • n� , in 9 • tmi • .,
,. 1
1211'7\
` y/4a 4 ▪ \� 4k %'.. ti
City of Newton N !,.►1a wevas peas
Clark Creek!�lWTP 1��A+mAn ��'��rf�i '�
NPDES Permit NC0036196 A ,r,����r�e'.11, vAi��I► �� ,��
Facility •Location �ikeOl er�Y
Stream Segment:11-129-5-(0.3) Stream Class:C ���
scale not shown
River Basin:Catawba Sub-Basin#:03-08-35 gal
County:Catawba HUC:0305010203 SCALE 35.626111°, -81.231944°
Receiving Stream:Clark Creek 1:24,000 USGS Quad:Newton

s
INFLUENT
INF MGD INFLUENT PUMP STATION
a^ AND BAR SCREEN
ri
k
I
Y
AERATED GRIT CHAMBERS
4
- LIME ADDITION
REACTOR CLARIFIERS
t
AERATION BASINS
lij 1 I
I
1 1
(.--L\
SECONDARY
CLARIFIERS
\
y\\___
L \——1—— _ \.,_ BIOLOGICAL
H
SLUDGE RECYCLE PUMP STATION
L
I I l
L I
DUAL MEDIA I 1 l
FILTERS
I
+ i
THICKENERS:--.--0—
j 0--T
I I I �
1 f CENTRIFUGES I
AND PUMP STATION
CHLORINE CONTACT I PUMP STATION
BASINS AND I
DECHLORINATION I 11-111
I I
TO REGIONAL
DISCHARGE TO COMPOST FACILITY
CLARK CREEK 001 OR LAND APPLICATION
•
CITY OF NEWTON
JANUARY 2005
WINS ENGINEERS
CLARK CREEK WWTP
•
FLOW SCHEMATIC N0 949.037
SCALE 1

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
c. If the answer to B.5.b is"Yes,"briefly describe,including new maximum daily inflow rate(if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below,as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local,State,or Federal agencies,indicate planned or actual completion dates,as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
-Begin Construction / / / /
-End Construction / / / /
-Begin Discharge / / / /
-Attain Operational Level / / / /
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? El Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly:
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA(GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition,this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on-half years old.
Outfall Number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT METHOD ML/MDL
Conc. Units Conc. Units Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA(as N) 6.9 Mg/L 0.18 Mg/L 1102 SM4500NH3D 0.1 mg/L
CHLORINE(TOTAL 73 pg/L 9.9 pg/L 1102 SM4500CLG 10 pg/L
RESIDUAL,TRC)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN 12.3 Mg/L 9.1 Mg/L 1102 SM450006 0.1 mg/L
TOTAL KJELDAHL 5.64 Mg/L 0.32 Mg/L 52 EPA351.1 0.2 mg/L
NITROGEN(TKN)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE 38.5 Mg/L 21.8 Mg/L 52 EPA353.2 0.1 mg/L
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE 6.0 Mg/L 2.0 Mg/L 3 EPA1664A 5 mg/L
PHOSPHORUS(Total) 1.72 Mg/L 0.83 Mg/L 52 EPA200.7 0.02 mg/L
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS 436 Mg/L 381 Mg/L 3 SM2540C 10 mg/L
(TDS)
OTHER
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A,as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement,applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
El Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
El Part D(Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
El Part E(Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
EI Part F(Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G(Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,the information is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,
accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title Eri dnes, P Superintendent
Signature
Telephone number (828)695-4 7
Date signed 1 )a? / 2 o
Upon request of the permitting authority,you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT Number ANALYTICAL ML/MDL
Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass Units of METHOD
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN <50 pg/L <50 pg/L 3 EPA624 50 pg/L
ACRYLONITRILE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA624 10 pg/L
BENZENE <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
BROMOFORM <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
CARBON <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
CHLORODIBROMO- <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE <5 pg/L <5 pg/L 3 EPA624 5 pg/L
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL <5 pg/L <5 pg/L 3 EPA624 5 pg/L
ETHER
CHLOROFORM 3.44 pg/L 2.1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
DICHLOROBROMO- 2.18 pg/L 1.58 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO- <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO- <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
1,3-DICHLORO- <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
METHYL BROMIDE <5 pg/L <5 pg/L 3 EPA624 5 pg/L
METHYL CHLORIDE <5 pg/L <5 pg/L 3 EPA624 5 pg/L
METHYLENE CHLORIDE <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
1,1,2,2-TETRA- <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO- <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE 1.47 pg/L 0.49 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has(or is required
to have)a pretreatment program,or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data,then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition,these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum,effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT Number ANALYTICAL ML/MDL
Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass Units of METHOD
Samples
METALS(TOTAL RECOVERABLE),CYANIDE,PHENOLS,AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY <25 pg/L <25 pg/L 3 EPA200.7 25 pg/L
ARSENIC <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 18 EPA200.7 10 pg/L
BERYLLIUM <5 pg/L <5 pg/L 3 EPA200.7 5 pg/L
CADMIUM <2 pg/L <2 pg/L 21 EPA200.7 2 pg/L
CHROMIUM <5 pg/L <5 pg/L 21 EPA200.7 5 pg/L
COPPER 13 pg/L 7.85 pg/L 21 EPA200.7 2 pg/L
LEAD <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 21 EPA200.7 10 pg/L
MERCURY 19.9 ng/L 3.03 ng/L 16 EPA1631 1 ng/L
NICKEL 16 pg/L 2.04 pg/L 21 EPA200.7 10 pg/L
SELENIUM <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 21 EPA200.7 10 pg/L
SILVER <5 pg/L <5 pg/L 21 EPA200.7 5 pg/L
THALLIUM - pg/L - pg/L 0 EPA200.7 5 pg/L
ZINC 68 pg/L 35.4 pg/L 21 EPA200.7 10 pg/L
CYANIDE <5 pg/L <5 pg/L 21 EPA335.4 5 pg/L
TOTAL PHENOLIC 27 pg/L 9 pg/L 3 EPA420.1 10 pg/L
COMPOUNDS
HARDNESS(as CaCO3) 176 Mg/L 150 Mg/L 18 EPA2340C 1 mg/L
Use this space(or a separate sheet)to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT Number ANALYTICAL ML/MDL
Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass Units of METHOD
Samples
1,1,1- <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1,2- <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE <1 pg/L <1 pg/L 3 EPA624 1 pg/L
VINYL CHLORIDE <5 pg/L <5 pg/L 3 EPA624 5 pg/L
Use this space(or a separate sheet)to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID-EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL - pg/L - pg/L 0 EPA625 10 pg/L
2-CHLOROPHENOL <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
4,6-DINITRO-O-CRESOL - pg/L - pg/L 0 EPA625 50 pg/L
2,4-DINITROPHENOL <50 pg/L <50 pg/L 3 EPA625 50 pg/L
2-NITROPHENOL <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
4-NITROPHENOL <50 pg/L <50 pg/L 3 EPA625 50 pg/L
PENTACHLOROPHENOL <50 pg/L <50 pg/L 3 EPA625 50 pg/L
PHENOL <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
2,4,6- <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
TRICHLOROPHENOL
Use this space(or a separate sheet)to provide information on other acid-extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE-NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
ACENAPHTHYLENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
ANTHRACENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
BENZIDINE <50 pg/L <50 pg/L 3 EPA625 50 pg/L
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
BENZO(A)PYRENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT Number ANALYTICAL ML/MDL
Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass Units of METHOD
Samples
3,4 BENZO- - pg/L - pg/L 0 EPA625 10 pg/L
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
BENZO(K) <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
FLUORANTHENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
METHANE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)- <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
ETHER
BIS(2-CHLOROISO- <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
PROPYL)ETHER
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
PHENYL ETHER
BUTYL BENZYL - pg/L -
pg/L 0 EPA625 10 pg/L
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO- <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
PHENYL ETHER
CHRYSENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
DIBENZO(A,H) <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
3,3-DICHLORO- <50 pg/L <50 pg/L 3 EPA625 50 pg/L
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
1,2-DIPHENYL- <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
HYDRAZINE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT Number ANALYTICAL ML/MDL
Conc. Units Mass Units Conc. Units Mass Units of METHOD
Samples
FLUORANTHENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
FLUORENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
HEXACHLOROBENZENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
HEXACHLORO- <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO- <50 pg/L <50 pg/L 3 EPA625 50 pg/L
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
INDENO(1,2,3-CD) <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
NAPHTHALENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
NITROBENZENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
N-NITROSODI-N- <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI- <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI- <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
PYRENE <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
1,2,4 <10 pg/L <10 pg/L 3 EPA625 10 pg/L
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space(or a separate sheet)to provide information on other base-neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space(or a separate sheet)to provide information on other pollutants(e.g.,pesticides)requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
Be advised that the maximum mercury result was due to the contract lab's double
preservation of the sample.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1)POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd;2)POTWs with a pretreatment program(or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403);or 3)POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum,these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species(minimum of two
species),or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application,provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity,and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity,depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition,this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition,submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity,provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation,if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E,you need not submit it again. Rather,provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used,report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below,they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required,do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
El chronic 0 acute Summary Attached: 4 Fathead Minnow,Multi-concentration. 18 Ceriodaphnia,Chronic PASS/FAIL
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test(where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number: Test number: Test number:
a. Test information.
Test Species&test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s)used. For multiple grab samples,indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WVVfP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test,include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity,acute toxicity,or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static-renewal
Flow-through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water,specify type;if receiving water,specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water,specify"natural"or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100% %
effluent
LC50
95%C.I.
Control percent survival
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

Other(describe)
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek V V TP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
Chronic:
NOEC
IC25 % %
Control percent survival
Other(describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run(MM/DD/YYYY)?
Other(describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes,describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information,or information regarding the
cause of toxicity,within the past four and one-half years,provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

Toxicity Summary
Method 1: North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic PASS/FAIL Reproduction Toxicity Test
w/56%
Method 2: Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi-concentration Test
Week of: Results: PASS/FAIL/% Method
9/14/2015 PASS 1
12/7/2015 PASS 1
2/29/2016 PASS 1
6/13/2016 PASS 1
9/12/2016 PASS _ 1
12/5/2016 PASS 1
3/18/2017 PASS 1
6/17/2017 PASS 1
9/11/2017 PASS 1
12/11/2017 PASS 1
3/12/2018 PASS 1
6/11/2018 PASS 1
9/10/2018 PASS 1
12/3/2018 PASS 1
3/18/2019 L PASS 1
3/18/2019 >100 __ 2
6/17/2019 PASS 1
6/17/2019 >100 2
9/9/2019 PASS 1
9/9/2019 >100 2
12/9/2019 PASS 1
12/9/2019 >100 2

C-k A\C Toy,
> 4 9I2015 - I2.12.alel
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 09/24/15
Facility: CITY OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Laborat y Pe forming Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
Comments:
X
Signature o Operator in Responsible Charge
X 9---; P%4-?L144Z-_
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor SSr,D; _-0.91% Reduction *
Water Sciences Section -Aquatic mmilmim
Work Order: Toxicology Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Division of Water Resources
1623 Mail Service Center 621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Raleigh.N.C. 27699-1623
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.285
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = -0.91
1 I % Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 25 27 28 26 27 27 25 31 27 28 30 29
I 0.00 27.50
I Control Control _�
1 Adult (L)ive (D)ead IL L L iL L L L L L L L L
I 0.00 27.75 j
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
6.669% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 129 32 28130124 30 25 25 28 29 27126 % control orgs 1 -7]
1 I producing 3rd
li brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead ILLILLILLILLLLLLIII 100% I i -I
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For: Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 09/16/15
Control 7.78 7.82 7.86 7.99 7.99 8.01 Collection (Start) Date '
Sample 1: 09/14/15 Sample 2: 09/16/15
Treatment 2 17.90 8.021 8.02 8.23 8.05I.9 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 23 .9 hrs L A A
✓ d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample i
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 42
Control 7.85 7.67 7.88 7.88 8.02 8.00
Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 144 574 602
Treatment 2 7.99 7.71 7.92 7.76 7.95 7.94
Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 1.2 0.9
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) I
Note: Please
o . o a o 0 0
% % % % % % %6 %o % Concentration Complete This
Section Also
% % % Mortality
o % o % % % % % % 0
start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average _ Probit
% -- % Spearman Karber _ Other High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 12/,16/15
1Facility: CITY OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC00361.96 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
ILaborato erfo 'rig Test: R a A LABORATORIES, INC. ----
Comments: Final Effluent
Signa 12e -f rator in Responsible Charge 12683-01
X 4V
Si, :at re of oratory Supervisor �_- i� * PASSED: 1.09b Reduction * 1
Rork Order: 12481-01 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
• - 1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
north Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated tt = 0.435
Tabular t = 2 .508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 1.09
- Mortality Avg.Reprod�
# Young Produced 22123I21 25I21I23I24I25 22123 22124I H
i
-- 0,00 ' 22.92 i
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead ILLLLIJIL ILLLLL L
' 0.00 22.67
Effluent 56t
Treatment 2 I Treatment 2
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1.1 12 Control CV
l 6.017* PASS FAIL
I # Young Produced 121 25 24 23 25 2212122 23122 23122 % control orgs XI
f I producing 3rd I
Adult (L)ive (D)ead it L I L LL Ir ,. F?rood Check 021e
J L IL L L I L.LL 10 0$ -
1:t sample 1st sample 2nd sample In - Complete This For Either- Test
pH , Test Start Date: 12/09/15 •
Control 6.96I7.05 6.95 7.04 6.94 7.021 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/07/15 Sample 2: 12/09/15
Treatment 2 6.96 7.041 6.92 7.01 6.91 7.001 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t s t e -- I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hre L A A
✓ d r d r d - U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hre T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
)-O. Hardness(mg/1) 48
Control 8 .6 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4 •
Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 191 496 550
:reatment 2 8 .6 8.4 8 .6 , 8.3.1 8.6 8.4 •
—I Chlorine(mg/1) .......... 0.02 0.02
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 1.6 13 .0
;Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) 1
Note: ,please_,.
% % r % ' .V. . t % k - ki % Concentration Complete This
- - Section Also .
% k k * k k t t t If Mortality —
start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination Contro].
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average Probit --
t -- % Spearman Kerber -- Other - High
--- Coac. -
pH D.O.
..—
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA. ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 03/14/16
Facility: CITY OF IjEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Laboratory erform' g Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
Comments:
X
ISignatur _ Op a r i�Respor_sible Charge
Ix
Signature of La oratory Supervisor * ,PASSED: -0.62% Reduction *
Water Sciences Section -Aquatic mimml
Work Order: Toxicology Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Division of Water Resources
1621 Mail Service Center L621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Ral ieh.N.C.27699-1621
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.153
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = -0.62
1 I I I I I I % Mortality I Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 125131 26 27125 28 27 26 26 23 30 26
( 0.00 I 26.67
I I I
i Control ' Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead IL IL IL IL IL L L IL IL L L IL
0.00 i 26.83
ITreatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56% I i
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
8.205% PASS FAIL
[ # Young Produced I24129 30 29 25 25 24 30 21 27 31 27 % control orgs
II I I producing 3rd '
' brood Check One
Adult Wive (D)ead IHL IL IL IL IL IL IL L L L IL IL II 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH - Test Start Date: 03/02/16
Control 7.96 8.04 8.16 7.99 8.09 7.87 Collection (Start) Date;
Sample 1: 02/29/16 Sample 2: 03/02/16
Treatment 2 7.92 8.20 7.90I8.12I 7.96 8.16 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
I 1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24.0 hrs L A A
✓ d r d r d I U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24.0 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. I , , Hardness(mg/1) I 48 1
Control 17.8018.11 7.76 7.92 8.12 7.92
JJ Spec. Cond. (pn hos) 202 451 522
Treatment 2 8.45 7.98 8.46 7.94 8.48 7.81
Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 1 0.6 10.4
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) 1
Note: Please
% % % % % % % % % % Concentration Complete This
, Section Also
% % % % % Mortality
0 o a % % % % 0 0 0
start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average _ Probit
% -- % Spearman Karber Other High
- - Cone.
pH D.O.
IOrganism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) : I
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

•
•
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 06/22/16
Facility: CITY 0 NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Laboraox`vf Performing Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
X. • Comments: Final Effluent
X d
Sign .-. .tor in Responsible Charge 20615-01
E-
X
Si a e o d'aboratory Supervisor * PASSED: 2. 19% Reduction *
No
Work Order: 20501-01 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t m 0.883
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 2 .19
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 22 23 21 25 21 23 24 22 24 22 24 23 - -
0.00 22 .83
Adult (L) ive (D)ead ILLLLLLLLLLLL Control Control
-
0 .00 22 .33
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56% ,- _
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
- 5 .550% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 23 22 24 21 21 25 24 22 21 23 20 22 % control orge X
producing 3rd
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L brood100% -Check One
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
PH Test Start Date: 06/15/16
Control 6.95 7. 03 6.94 7.03 6.94 7.02 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/13/16 Sample 2: 06/15/16
)'reatment 2 7.30 7.38 7.05 7.09 7.06 7.15 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st :P/F
8 s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S ' 5
a n a n a n Sample ], X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d u M M
t t t Sample 2 X 23 .8 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
).O. - Hardness (mg/1) 48
Control 8 .6 8 .4 8 .6 8 .3 8.6 8 .4
Spec. Cond. (pnihos) 189 539 509
'reatment 2 6.6 8.4 8 . 6 8.3 8.6 8 .4 -
- Chlorine(mg/1) 0.03 0,03
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 2.3 2.3
Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) 1 .
Note: Please
$ %
3 3 % 3 3 Concentration Complete This
3 3 3 3 t 3 3 3 3 3 Mortality -
section Also
- start/end start/end
LC50 n t Method of Determination Control
95%r Confidence Limits Moving Average Probit
3 -- 3 Spearman Karber = Other High '
Conc. -
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
l'opied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4 .32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 09/21/16
Facility: TY OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Labora ry Perfo ing Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
Comments: Final Effluent
X
Sig ture rator in Responsible Charge 24590-01
X
S gna u e Laboratory Supervisor * PASSED: 0.00% Reduction *
Work Order: 24350-01 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction=
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 21 22 24 25 23 23 21 25 23 22 24 22
0.00 22.92
Control Control
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 22.92
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
6.017% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 23 24 25 23 26 21 21 23 22 22 23 22 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 09/14/16
Control 6.97 7.05 6.96 7.05 6.94 7.02 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/12/16 Sample 2: 09/14/16
Treatment 2 7.28 7.36 7.36 7.44 7.34 7.42 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. D9,ration D
t e t e t e I S i S
a n a n a n Sample 1 '. X 24 hrs L A A
✓ d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 48
Control 8.6 8.4 8.6 8 .3 8.6 8.4
Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 187 536 582
Treatment 2 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
Chlorine(mg/1) 0.02 0.04
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 2.1 2.3
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
Note: Please
% % % % % Concentration Complete This
% % % %
Section Also
%0 % % % % Mortality
% % % % %
start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average Probit
% -- % Spearman Karber - Other - High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 12/14/16
Facility: CITY OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Laboratory Performing Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
Comments: Final Effluent
X
Sign ur a for in Responsible Charge 28206-01
X ':
Si a e aboratory Supervisor t PASSED: 0.72* Reduction *
Work Order: 27981-01 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of ERNR
1621-•Mail Service Ctr•-
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.290
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 t Reduction = 0.72
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 22 21 23 24 22 25 21 22 25 24 24 23 -
0.00 23 .00
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
- 0.00 22.83
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control. CV
- 6.149% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 23 21 22 22 25 23 22 24 22 24 21 25 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample let sample 2nd sample Complete-This For Either 'Test
pH Test Start Date: 12/07/16
Control 6.95 7.04 6.94 7.03 6.93 7.02 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/05/16 Sample 2: 12/07/16
Creatment 2 7.17 7.25 7.05 7 .14 7.04 7.13 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s a s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
✓ d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24.2 hrs T P P
1st sample lst sample 2nd sample
-
).0. Hardness (mg/1). 48
Control 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.3 8 .6 8.4
- Spec. Cond. (p.mhos) 193 524 481
:'reatment 2 8.5 8.3 8.5 8.2 8.5 8 .3
Chlorine(mg/1) 0.03 0.03
r T
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 2.3 3 .1
;Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) I
Note: Please
% % % , $ ., ?s g_._... % % % . .Concentration Complete This
- Section Also
v V v t % % % V V Mortality
start/end start/end
LC50 µ % Method of Determination Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average Probit _
-
% -- % Spearman Kerber Other High
- Conc. -
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 03/27/19
Facility: CITY OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
Comments:
X
Signature of 0 erator in Responsible Charge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor * PASSED: 11.91% Reduction *
Work Order: Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
• Raleigh, North Carolina 27699--1621
Vorth Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 2.180
Tabular t = 2.508
"ONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 11.91
-
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 25 21 22 18 18 20 16 14 17 22 20 22
, - 0.00 19.58
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 17.25
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
affluent %: 56%
'REATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
15.770% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 17 18 18 18 17 18 12 20 15 19 18 17 % control orgs X
producing 3rd -
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
- I
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
II Test Start Date: 03/20/19
Control 8.18 8.29 8.04 8.05 7.97 8.04 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/18/19 Sample 2: 03/20/19
reatment 2 8.13 8.40 8.00 8.46 8.19 8.43 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 23.8 hrs L A A
✓ d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 23 .8 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
.0. Hardness(mg/1) 42
Control 8.05 7.54 7.64 7.43 7.90 7.46
- Spec. Cond. (punhos) 148 467 562
reatment 2 8.30 7.80 7.86 7.52 7.66 7.48
-
Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 1.5 1.2
Kortality expressed as %, combining replicates) I
Note: Please
% % % % % % % % % Concentration Complete This
Section Also
% % % % % % % % % % Mortality
start/end start/end
1,C50 = % Method of Determination Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average - Probit
% -- % Spearman Karber ` Other High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
p
'_opied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41) 99

•
' Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 06/26/19 itt.
Facility: CITY OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
Comments:
X
Sigaas of Operat in Responsible Charge
i-,
x 1 eac.,Signature ofborat ry Supervisor * PASSED: 12.07% Reduction *
Work Order: Environmental Sciences Branch ! _
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 2.604
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 12.07
Mortality Avg.Reprod. )
# Young Produced 29 29 29 28 33 24 24 29 25 23 27 23 0.00 26.92 S
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 23.67
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
- 11.583% PASS FAIL
If Young Produced 21 19 21 27 25 23 23 29 25 23 27 21 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 06/19/19
Control 8.09 8.24 8 .22 8.16 8.16 7.96 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/17/19 Sample 2: 06/19/19
Treatment 2 8.00 8.30 7.97 8.19 7.99 8.00 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
lst P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 23.8 hrs L A A
✓ d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 23.9 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 48
Control 7.49 7.50 7.52 7.66 7.77 7.62
Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 155 529 575
Treatment 2 7.50 7.48 7.66 7.62 7.74 7.59
Chlorine(mg/1) c c
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 23.8 23.9
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) I
Note: Please
% % 0 o a % o o % Concentration Complete This
a %
Section Also
% % % % % % % % % % Mortality
start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination Control tt(
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average _ Probit
% -- % Spearman Karber _ Other High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

-/'--- '
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 09/22/17
Facility: CITY OF NEWTON NPDES#: N00036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Laboratory erf min est: MERITECH LABS, INC.
Comments:
X
Signature of 0 rator in Responsible Charge
x
Signatu e o Laboratory Supervisor * PASSED: -4.25% Reduction *
Work Order: Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.943
Tabular t = '2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = -4.25
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 16 21 17 20 15 19 19 15 17 17 18 18
0.00 17.67
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 18.42
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 - 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
10:612% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 19 18 19 14 19 21 18 18 17 17 19 22 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 09/13/17
Control 8.13 8.08 8.32 8.17 8.02 8.14 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/11/17 Sample 2: 09/13/17
Treatment 2 8.01 8.19 8.13 8.19 8.10 8.25 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s 'Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24.0 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 21 X 24.0 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. I- Hardness(mg/1) 46
Control 17.89 7.81 17.70 7.47 7.89 7.59
Spec: Cond. (umhos) 160 596 446
Treatment 2 8.09 7.84I 18.33 .7.51 8.24 7.58
Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
LC50 Acute Toxicity -••••Test est Sample temp. at receipt(°C) "- 2.6 2.6
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) 1 1
I % %I %' % WI %I ,I I Note: Please
0 o e o % 0 % % 0 Concentration Complete This
Section Also ,
% % %1 % % % %I % % % Mortality
1 I start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination 1 I Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average Probit
-- % Spearman Karber Other - High
Conc.
pH D.O.
1
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

•
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 12/20/17
Facility: CITY OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
�J
Labora Ty P rformi Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
Comments:
• Sign urofyerat in Responsible Charge
/13141 -
• Signature of Laboratory Supervisor * PASSED: 15.83% Reduction
Work Order: Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 4.578
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 15.83
Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 21 23 24 23 25 25 21 21 22 24 24 25
- 0.00 23.17
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 19.50
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
6.846% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 18 18 24 18 18 18 '22 16 21 21 21 19 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L .L L L L L L IL L L L 100%
I 1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 12/13/17
Control 8.09 8.14 8.05 8.11 8.10 8.16 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/11/17 Sample 2: 12/13/17
Treatment 2 7.93 8.28 7.94 8.30 7.94 8.13 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration' D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
✓ d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 49
Control 17.87 7.93 7.50 7.80 7.6417.55 -
Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 165 645 699
Treatment 2 I8.51 8.10 8.43 7.86 I8.30 7.68
l ' i Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test 'Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 1.8 11.6
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) 1
Note: Please
oI oI ,iI
0 o % % o % cI c % oI Concentration Complete This
I Section Also
% % % % % % % % of % Mortality
start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination 1 Control I
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average Probit _
% --- % , Spearman Karber _ OtherL '- High
Conc. L 'L.
-� -J
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 03/21/18
Facility: CITY 'F NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Laborator erfo. m ing Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC. Comments: Final Effluent
X -
Sig ture f ,- ator in Responsible Charge 47934-01
X * PASSED: 1.45% Reduction
S na u o Laboratory Supervisor
Work Order: 47748-01 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Test Results
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Calculated t = 0.518
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 1.45
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 25 23 22 24 22 21 23 25 21 24 25 21 0.00 23.00
Control' Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 0
,00 22.67
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control93 % CV6. PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 21 25 21 23 24 21 24 22 23 22 25 21 p control ro s X
ducing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 03/14/18 "
Control 6.95 7.03 16.93 7.02 6.93 7.01 CollecSamplet1: 03/12/18Dateion (Start) Sample 2: 03/14/18
Treatment 2 7.18 7.25 7.01 7.10 7.01 7.10 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 23.9 hrs U M M
r d r d r d
t t t Sample 2 X 23.9 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample D.O. tt Hardness(mg/1) 48
Control 8.6 18.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4 Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 188 525 522
Treatment 2 8.5 8.3 I8.5 8.2 8.5 8.3
1 Chlorine(mg/1) 0.03 0.03
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 3.1 3.2 1
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) i I Note: Please
% % % % % %1 % % % % Concentration Complete This
Section Also
% %{ %1 %1 %1 %{ % % % %I Mortality
start/end start/end
=-
5::(;-5-0 = % Method of Determination Control' 1
195% Confidence+Limits Moving Average - Probit r
1 % Spearman Karber Other I High
Conc.
PH D.O.
LOrganism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 06/20/18
Facility: CITY OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Laborat y Per orming Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
Comments: Final Effluent
X
Sig ure rator in Responsible Charge 52060-01
X 44
Si ati a Laboratory Supervisor * PASSED: 1.09t Reduction *
Work Order: 51896-01 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.440
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 1,09
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 24 21 25 22 23 22 21 23 24 23 21 25 .
0.00 22.83
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 22.58
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent t: 56t
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
- _ 6.424t PASS tttFAIL
# Young Produced 22 21 24 22 23 21 23 24 22 25 21 23 t control orgs X 1
producing 3rd I
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L ii L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 06/13/10
Control 6.96 7.04 6.95 7.03 6.94 7.02 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 06/11/18 Sample 2: 06/13/18
Treatment 2 7.08 7.16 7.01 7.10 7.00 7.09 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp, Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 48
Control 8.6 18.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
Spec. Cond. (p.mhos) 192 538 716
Treatment 2 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
Chlorine(mg/1) 1 0.03 0.03
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) ...•.•. 2.6 3.0
(Mortality expressed as t, combining replicates) I
Note: Please
' t! t° %I t t� t' % % % % Concentration Complete This
I Section Also
% % %I ti %I t ti W. % t Mortality
start/end start/end
`LC50 = % 1 Method of Determination L Control' I i
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average Prcbit
t -- % Spearman Kerber Other i 1 High f i 11
f_- Conc.
PH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DEEM form AT (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 09/19/18
[Facility: C-TY OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036156 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Labora ,ry Pe orming Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
Comments: Final Effluent
`-
Signdt e of\opera or in Responsible Charge i 56058-01
X i 1
Sig u ,o 42,.....----"
ratory Supervisor * PASSED: 1.090 Reduction * J J
Work Order: 55899-01 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.519
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 1.09
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 23 22 24 23 25 21 22 23 23 21 25 22
0.00• 22.83
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 22.58
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
5.856% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 24 23 22 23 22 21 23 23 24 22 23 21 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For-Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 09/12/18
Control 7.00 7.07 6.95 7.04 6.93 7.02 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/10/18 Sample 2: 09/12/18
Treatment 2 7.04 7.12 7.07 7.15 7.05 7.13 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 23.8 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 23.8 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 48
Control 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 192 527 247
Treatment 2 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
Chlorine(mg/l) 0.01 0.04
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 2.3 3.2
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) (
Note: Please
% % % % % % % % % % Concentration Complete This
Section Also
% % % I I I % I % % Mortality
start/end start/end
LC50 = t Method of Determination Control •
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average _ Probit _
I -- % Spearman Karber Other High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 12/12/18
Facility: C ;Y OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Labor ory P:rforming Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
1 Comments: Final Effluent
X 1�
Sig tur ; .perator in Responsible Charge 60097-01
X ' PASSED: 1.10% Reduction
S'gna ure of Laboratory Supervisor * _
Work Order: 59928-01 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia ronic Test Results
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test CCChroiced t = e. 45
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 1.10
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 21 24 25 21 23 22 21 25 23 24 21 22 0.00 22.67
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 22.42
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV 6.869% PASS FAIL
or
# Young Produced 22 23 22 24 21 24 21 23 21 22 24 22 % controlg 3rds X
prbrood Check One
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 12/05/18
Control 6.96.7.04 6.95 7.03 6.94 7.02 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/03/18 Sample 2: 12/05/18
Treatment 2 6.92 7.00 7.08 7.16 7.07 7.15, Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n an an Sample 1 X 23 .8 hrs L A A
✓ d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 23.8 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Hardness(mg/1) 48
D.O. i I
Control 18.6 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 191 452 537
Treatment 2 18.6 8.4 I 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
L Chlorine(mg/1) I 0.03 0.02
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 2.8 2.1
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) 1
Note: Please
% %1 % %1 % % % Concentration Complete This
°� % % Section Also
% % % % % % % % % % Mortality
1 start/end start/end
LC50 =
Method of Determination Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average Probit _
% -- % Spearman Karber _ Other High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) : 1
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 03/27/19
Facility: CT OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Labor- ory forming Test: R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
Comments: Final Effluent
X
Sig tur erator in Response le Charge 64468-01
X
S na r La oratory Supervisor * PASSED: 0.00% Reduction
Work Order. 64326-01 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction =
Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 22 21 25 23 21 22 21 24 25 23 22 23
0.00 22.67
Control' Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead. L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 22.67
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56W
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
6.333% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 22 23 24 25 21 23 22 21 23 24 21 23 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D) ead IL L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample lst sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 03/20/19
Control 6.95 7.02 6.94 7.03 6.92 7.01 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 03/18/19 Sample 2: 03/20/19
Treatment 2 7.13 7.20 7.11 7.20 7.10 7.18 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 23.8 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 23.8 hrs T P P
1st sample lst sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 48 �o;i;o..o. g::::a„a
Control 8.6 8,4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
Spec, Cond, (pmhos) 190 498 572
Treatment 2 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
Chlorine(mg/1) „oo.,o„0 0.01 0.03
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) oo,,,o„o, 3.0 2.6
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) I- Note: Please
%. % % % % % % % % t Concentration Complete This
Section Also
% % % % % % % % % a Mortality
start/end start/end
-
LC50 = t Method of Determination Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average Probit _
g -- t Spearman Kerber , Other High
- Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 06/26/19
Facility: CITY O NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
y
Laborat y Perio ring Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
Comments:
X
Si na ure er t in esponsi le Charge
X �/. 2 - - * PASSED: 12.07% Reduction
Signature of aborat ry Supervisor
Work Order: Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia ronic Test Results
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test CCChroaced t = e.604
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 12.07
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 29 29 29 28 33 24 24 29 25 23 27 23 0.00 26.92
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 0.00 23 .67
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV 11.583% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 21 19 21 27 25 23 23 29 25 23 27 21 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 06/19/19
Control 8.09 8.24 8.22 8.16 8.16 7.96 Samption (Start) Date
1: 06/17/19
leSample 2: 06/19/19
Treatment 2 8.00 8.30 7.97 8.19 7.99 8.00 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 23 .8 hrs L MA A
M
r d r d r d
t t t Sample 2 X 23.9 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Hardness(mg/1) 48
D.O.
Control 7.49 7.50 7.52 7.66 7.77 7.62 Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 155 529 575
Treatment 2 7.50 7.48 7.66 7.62 7.74 7.59 Chlorine(mg/1) c c
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 23 .8 23 .9
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) Note: Please
% % % % % % % % % % Concentration Complete This
0
Section Also
% % % % % % % % Mortality
%
start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average Probit _ High
% -- % Spearman Karber _ Other g
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 09/19/19
Facility: CITY ^F NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Labor ory Peri11
iming Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
Comments:
X
Sig aturei pe�tor-in Responsible Charge
X /r/Y�/ �`
Signature .f aborabory Supervisor * PASSED: 2.96% Reduction *
Work Order: Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.669
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 2.96
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 18 16 17 18 16 19 21 17 14 14 17 16
0.00 16.92
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 16.42
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
11.676% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 18 18 15 17 15 14 16 19 14 17 16 18 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 09/11/19
Control 7.99 8.01 8.00 7.94 8.05 7.97 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 09/09/19 Sample 2: 09/11/19
Treatment 2 7.79 8.09 7.90 8.17 7.88 8.09 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 23 .8 hrs L A A
✓ d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24.0 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 48
Control 7.97 7.51 7.85 7.35 7.81 7.35
Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 152 725 700
Treatment 2 8.18 7.62 7.96 7.58 7.72 7.40
Chlorine(mg/1) <0.1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 2.1 2.4
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates) 1
Note: Please
% % % % % % % % % % Concentration Complete This
Section Also
% % % % % % % % % % Mortality
start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average _ Probit _ ,
% -- % Spearman Karber _ Other High
Conc. '
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 12/18/19
Facility: CITY OF NEWTON NPDES#: NC0036196 Pipe#: 001 County: CATAWBA
Laborat r Performing T se t•R & A LABORATORIES, INC.
re Comments: Final Effluent
X
Sign r/. +,c-rator in Responsible Charge 75998-01
X 49(
S' na u. ,.`f Laboratory Supervisor * PASSED: 5.28% Reduction *
Work Order: 75859-01 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
1621 Mail Service Ctr
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 2.839
Tabular t = 2.508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 5.28
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 23 25 23 23 24 23 25 23 24 23 25 23
0.00 23.67
Control Control
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 22.42
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 56%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
3.751% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 25 23 22 22 21 23 24 21 22 23 21 22 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 12/11/19
Control 7.34 7.42 7.37 7.44 7.36 7.43 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 12/09/19 Sample 2: 12/11/19
Treatment 2 7.43 7.51 7.20 7.28 7.19 7.27 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 23.8 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 23.8 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 97
Control 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 398 701 626
Treatment 2 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.4
Chlorine(mg/1) 0.03 0.04
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(°C) 3.4 3.3
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
Note: Please
% % % % % % % % % Concentration Complete This
Section Also
% % % % % % % % % % Mortality
start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination Control
95% Confidence Limits Moving Average _ Probit
% -- % Spearman Karber _ Other High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)

.,.. TOK
IZOi2.h7JD '\
Effluent Toxicity Report Form-Chro • Minnow Multi-Concentration Test Date:3/27/20
Facility: City of Newton NPDES#NC00 36196 Pipe#: 001 County: Catawba
Labor: /1•ritech, Inc. Comments I
x r -
Signature of Oper.l.r in Respons b�e Charge
x 2 1
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Water Sciences Section
Aquatic Toxicology Branch
Division of Water Resources
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,N.C.27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time 3/19/2019 5:05 PM Avg Wt/Surv.Control 0.586 Test Organisms
%Eff. Repl. 1 2 3 4 r Cultured In-House
Control Surviving# 10 9 10 10 %Survival 97.5 FT Outside Supplier
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.580 0.516 0.598 0.592 Avg Wt(mg) 0.572 Hatch Date: 3/18/19
28 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0 Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.484 0.636 0.591 0.617 Avg Wt(mg) 0.582
42 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.591 0.547 0.611 0.578 Avg Wt(mg) 0.582
56 Surviving# 10 9 10 10 %Survival 97.5
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.575 0.531 0.637 0.461 Avg Wt(mg) 0.551
75 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.550 0.671 0.498 0.543 Avg Wt(mg) 0.566
100 Surviving# ' 6 10 10 10 %Survival 90.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.350 0.605 0.574 0.626 Avg Wt(mg) 0.539
Water Quality Data Day
Control 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH(SU)Init/Fin 7.96 / 7.92 8.08 / 8.07 8.06 / 7.79 8.09 / 8.02 8.21 / 7.99 8.23 / 8.02 8.28 / 7.95
DO(mg/L) Init/Fin 7.68 / 7.49 7.91 / 7.59 7.58 / 6.86 7.73 / 7.58 8.02 / 7.57 8.25 / 7.26 7.84 / 6.42
Temp(C)Init/Fin 24.7 / 24.3 24.5 / 24.5 25.2 / 25.0 24.7 / 24.4 24.1 / 24.9 24.8 / 24.3 24.7 / 24.6
High Concentration o 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH(SU)!nit/Fin 7.96 / 8.28 8.05 / 8.40 7.96 / 8.31 7.93 / 8.36 7.94 / 8.39 8.33 / 8.42 8.19 / 8.84
DO(mg/L) Init/Fin 8.48 / 7.56 8.27 / 7.59 8.41 / 7.05 8.50 / 7.34 8.49 / 7.48 8.29 / 7.71 8.07 / 9.48
Temp(C)Init/Fin 25.7 / 24.1 24.8 / 24.5 25.8 / 24.9 25.6 / 24.6 24.1 / 24.8 24.8 / 24.5 25.1 / 24.5
Sample 1 2 3 Survival Growth Overall Result
Collection Start Date 3/18/2019 3/20/2019 3/21/2019 Normal r1. Fl ChV >100
Grab Flom.Var. ra Fl
Composite(Duration) 23.8 23.8 24.2 NOEC 100 100
Hardness(mg/L) 156 178 170 LOEC >100 >100
Alkalinity(mg/L) 141 177 147 ChV >100 >100
Conductivity(umhos/cm) 476 569 584 Method Steel's Dunnett's
Chlorine(mg/L) <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Temp.at Receipt(°C) 1.5 1.2 1.5 Stats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
Dilution H2O Batch# 1377 1378 1379 28 10 20 2.41 -0.1972
Hardness(mg/L) 44 46 46 42 10 20 2.41 -0.1925
Alkalinity(mg/L) 55 56 53 56 10 18 2.41 0.3851
Conductivity(umhos/cm) 197 204 207 75 10 20 2.41 0.1127
100 10 17.5 2.41 0.6151

Effluent Toxicity Report Form-Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi-Concentration Test Date:6/26/2019
Facility: City of Newto NPDES#NC00 36196 Pipe#: 001 County: Catawba •
Labor ry: Mat c ,Inc. Comments I
x {i
Signature of Operato ' e ponsibl •harge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Water Sciences Section
Aquatic Toxicology Branch
Division of Water Resources
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,N.C.27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time 6/18/2019 2:53 PM Avg Wt/Surv.Control 0.591 Test Organisms
%Eff. Repl. 1 2 3 4 r Cultured In-House
Control Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0 17 Outside Supplier
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.644 0.600 0.546 0.574 Avg Wt(mg) 0.591 Hatch Date: 6/17/19
28 Surviving# 10 10 9 10 %Survival 97.5 Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
Original# 10 10 - 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.609 0.688 0.585 0.567 Avg Wt(mg) 0.612
42 Surviving# 10 9 10 10 %Survival 97.5
Original# 10 10 10 , 10 •
Wt/original(mg) 0.651 0.484 0.601 0.610 Avg Wt(mg) 0.587
56 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.495 0.694 0.705 0.632 Avg Wt(mg) 0.632
75 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.683 0.631 0.632 0.670 Avg Wt(mg)[ 0.654
100 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.617 0.669 0.596 0.730 Avg Wt(mg) 0.653
Water Quality Data Day
Control 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH(SU)!nit/Fin 8.05 / 8.00 8.22 / 7.97 8.20 / 8.01 8.09 / 8.09 8.19 / 7.89 8.19 / 8.04 8.20 / 7.83
DO(mg/L) Init/Fin 8.02 / 7.09 7.42 / 7.55 7.63 / 7.09 7.53 / 7.51 7.88 / 7.02 7.91 / 7.50 7.73 / 7.09
Temp(C)Init/Fin 24.4 / 24.3 24.1 / 24.3 25.0 / 24.1 25.0 / 24.0 24.2 / 24.3 24.4 / 24.4 24.6 / 25.3
High Concentration 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH(SU)Init/Fin 7.67 / 7.97 7.74 / 8.00 7.63 / 7.93 7.74 / 8.05 7.61 / 7.78 7.80 / 8.01 7.70 / 7.71
DO(mg/L) Init/Fin 8.39 / 6.94 7.52 / 7.43 7.79 / 6.82 7.65 / 7.41 8.36 / 6.47 8.08 / 7.34 7.94 / 6.79
Temp(C)Init/Fin 24.5 / 24.1 24.2 / 24.8 25.2 / 24.1 24.9 124.4 25.3 / 24.5 24.8 / 25.3 25.1 / 25.6
Sample 1 2 3 Survival Growth Overall Result
Collection Start Date ' 6/17/2019 6/19/2019 6/20/2019 Normal F) Fl ChV >100
Grab Horn.Var. ri iji_
Composite(Duration) 23.8 23.9 23.8 NOEC 100 • 100
Hardness(mg/L) 132 144 145 LOEC >100 >100
Alkalinity(mg/L) 75 72 65 ChV >100 >100
Conductivity(umhos/cm) 505 574 583 Method Steel's Dunnett's
Chlorine(mg/L) <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Temp.at Receipt(°C) 1.2 1.8 0.8 Stats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
Dilution H2O Batch# 1410 1411 1412 _ 28 10 16 2.41 -0.4821
Hardness(mg/L) 46 44 46 42 10 16 2.41 0.1021
Alkalinity(mg/L) 56 54 64 56 10 18 2.41 -0.9188
Conductivity(umhos/cm) 195 200 213 ; 75 10 18 2.41 -1.4292
100 10 18 2.41 -1.4065

•
Effluent Toxicity Report Form-Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi-Concentration Test Date:9/19/2019
Facility: City of Ne n NPDES#NC00 36196 Pipe#: 001 County: Catawba
Lab toppry:'Mer ch, Inc. Comments'
x 4/4 /1,--4''
Signature of Operato n Reesspoonsiblee barge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Water Sciences Section
Aquatic Toxicology Branch
Division of Water Resources
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,N.C.27699-1621
Test Initiation DatefTime 9/10/2019 3:40 PM Avg Wt/Surv.Control 0.573 Test Organisms
%Eff. Repl. 1 2 3 4 ( Cultured In-House
Control Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 102.6 (+ Outside Supplier
Original# 10 9 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.625 0.549 0.535 0.638 Avg Wt(mg) 0.587 Hatch Date: 9/9/19
28 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0 Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.597 0.671 0.495 0.672 Avg Wt(mg) 0.609
_ 42 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.608 0.564 0.507 0.606 Avg Wt(mg) 0.571
56 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.650 0.656 0.571 0.691 Avg Wt(mg) 0.642
_ 75 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.507 0.627 0.660 0.700 Avg Wt(mg) 0.624
100 Surviving# 10 9 10 9 %Survival 95.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) r 0.525 0.543 0.648 0.601 Avg Wt(mg) 0.579
Water Quality Data Day
Control 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH(SU)Init/Fin 7.80 / 7.66 7.92 / 7.55 7.90 / 7.72 7.94 / 7.73 8.09 / 7.94 7.99 / 7.61 7.98 / 7.59
DO(mg/L) Init/Fin 7.79 / 7.46 7.76 / 6.96 7.60 / 7.12 7.84 / 7.73 7.95 / 7.73 7.89 / 6.91 7.70 / 6.72
Temp(C)'nit/Fin 24.7 / 24.8 24.5 / 24.2 24.6 / 24.0 24.3 / 24.1 24.2 / 24.7 24.9 / 25.5 24.0 / 24.9
High Concentration 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH(SU)Init/Fin 7.53 / 7.97 7.74 / 7.92 7.60 / 7.96 7.78 / 8.08 7.99 / 8.16 8.03 / 7.83 7.70 / 7.82
DO(mg/L) Init/Fin 8.48 / 7.31 8.37 / 6.94 8.26 / 7.09 8.49 / 7.82 8.02 / 7.60 7.73 / 6.80 8.10 / 6.75
Temp(C)'nit/Fin 25.1 / 24.9 24.1 / 24.6 24.8 / 25.0 24.7 / 24.0 24.8 / 24.7 24.6 / 24.6 24.7 / 25.4
Sample 1 2 3 Survival Growth Overall Result
Collection Start Date 9/9/2019 9/11/2019 9/12/2019 Normal ') Fl ChV >100
Grab Hom.Var. rl Fl
Composite(Duration) 23.8 24.0 23.8 NOEC 100 100
Hardness(mg/L) 188 186 182 LOEC >100 >100
Alkalinity(mg/L) 84 81 73 ChV >100 >100
Conductivity(umhos/cm) 688 694 685 Method Steel's Dunnett's
Chlorine(mg/L) <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Temp.at Receipt(°C) 2.1 2.4 1.7 Stats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
Dilution H2O Batch# 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 28 10 20 2.41 -0.4859
Hardness(mg/L) 47 50 48 46 46 42 10 20 2.41 0.3423
Alkalinity(mg/L) 31 34 32 30 30 56 10 20 2.41 -1.2202
Conductivity(umhos/cm) 153 169 161 167 ' 169 75 10 20 2.41 -0.8116
100 10 16 2.41 0.1656

•
Effluent Toxicity Report Form-Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi-Concentration Test
Date:12/19/2019
Facility: City of Newton NPDES#NCOO 36196 Pipe#: 001 County: Catawba
Laborato . eritech, nc. Comments)
x r-I.A.---e/'"--`-
Signature of Operator in sponsi Char e,
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Water Sciences Section
Aquatic Toxicology Branch
Division of Water Resources
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,N.C.27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time 12/10/2019 3:30 PM Avg Wt/Surv.Control) 0.514 I Test Organisms
%Eff. Repl. 1 2 3 4 r Cultured In-House
Control Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0 7 Outside Supplier
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.607 0.519 0.461 0.469 Avg Wt(mg)I 0.514 I Hatch Date: 12/9/19
I 28 I Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0 Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.557 0.515 0.460 0.517 Avg Wt(mg) 0.512
42 I Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.522 0.585 0.583 0.697 Avg Wt(mg) 0.597
56 Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.511 0.486 0.537 0.547 Avg Wt(mg) 0.520
I 75 I Surviving# 10 10 10 10 %Survival 100.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.496 0.568 0.475 0.570 Avg Wt(mg) 0.527
I 100 I Surviving# 10 10 8 10 %Survival 95.0
Original# 10 10 10 10
Wt/original(mg) 0.469 0.560 0.489 0.539 Avg Wt(mg) 0.514
Water Quality Data Day
Control 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH(SU)Init/Fin 7.80 / 7.73 8.02 / 7.70 7.84 / 7.63 7.95 / 7.90 8.02 / 7.83 8.05 / 7.69 7.88 / 7.49
DO(mg/L) !nit/Fin 7.82 / 7.61 7.99 / 7.61 8.03 / 7.46 7.94 / 7.54 7.83 / 7.70 7.94 / 7.72 7.96 / 6.86
Temp(C)Init/Fin 24.7 / 24.8 24.3 / 24.6 24.7 / 24.7 24.2 / 24.3 24.1 / 25.5 24.8 / 24.0 24.0 / 25.4
High Concentration 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH(SU)!nit/Fin 7.76 18.16 7.88 / 8.10 7.69 / 8.16 7.92 / 8.17 8.09 18.27 8.22 / 8.90 7.93 / 7.92
DO(mg/L) !nit/Fin 8.38 / 7.63 8.32 / 7.54 8.30 / 7.64 8.28 / 7.53 7.76 / 7.82 7.90 / 7.56 8.15 / 6.74
Temp(C)Init/Fin 24.5 / 25.4 24.9 / 25.1 24.6 / 25.3 24.8 / 25.0 24.6 / 25.2 25.1 / 25.2 24.3 / 25.3
Sample 1 2 3 Survival Growth Overall Result
Collection Start Date 12/9/2019 12/11/2019 12/12/2019 Normal
F) rl''' ChV >100
Grab Horn.Var. ri F1`.
Composite(Duration) 23.8 23.8 23.8 NOEC 100 100
Hardness(mg/L) 154 200 164 LOEC >100 >100
Alkalinity(mg/L) 99 94 88 ChV >100 >100
Conductivity(umhos/cm) 563 604 578 Method Steel's Dunnett's
Chlorine(mg/L) <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Temp.at Receipt(°C) 1.8 2.3 1.8 Stats Survival Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
Dilution H2O Batch# 1456 1457 1458 28 10 18 2.41 0.0474
Hardness(mg/L) 44 44 42 42 10 18 2.41 -2.2412
Alkalinity(mg/L) 31 31 30 56 10 18 2.41 -0.1693
Conductivity(umhos/cm) 165 173 149 75 10 18 2.41 -0.3589
100 10 16 2.41 -0.0068

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek VWVfP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have,or is subject ot,an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users(SIUs)and Categorical Industrial Users(CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non-categorical Sills. 0
b. Number of CIUs. 4
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works,copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Technibilt,Ltd.
Mailing Address: PO Box 310,700 East P Street
Newton NC 28658
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Powder coating,shopping cart,and material handling equipment
F.5. Principal Product(s)and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Shopping carts and material handling equipment
Raw material(s): Steel in wire,tube,and flat form
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day(gpd)and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
30,493 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
b. Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day(gpd)and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards,which category and subcategory?
433.17
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek VWVfP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems(e.g.,
upsets,interference)at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes,describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck,rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No(go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received(check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount(volume or mass,specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA(SUPERFUND)WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently(or has it been notified that it will)receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes(complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates(or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received(or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration,if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated(or will be treated)prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes,describe the treatment(provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge(or will the discharge be)continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent,describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have,or is subject ot,an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users(SIUs)and Categorical Industrial Users(CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
c. Number of non-categorical Sills. 0
d. Number of CIUs. 4
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works,copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Special Metals Welding Products
Mailing Address: 1401 Burris Rd
Newton NC 28658
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Production of high nickel content and stainless steel welding products
F.5. Principal Product(s)and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Nickel/nickel alloy coated electrodes,stainless steel welding wire,and fluxes
Raw material(s): Nickel,nickel alloy,stainless steel,compounds associated with production of welding fluxes
F.6. Flow Rate.
c. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day(gpd)and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
2980 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
d. Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day(gpd)and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits El Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards,which category and subcategory?
471.35
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems(e.g.,
upsets,interference)at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes,describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck,rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No(go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received(check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount(volume or mass,specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA(SUPERFUND)WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently(or has it been notified that it will)receive waste from remedial activities?
0 Yes(complete F.13 through F.15.) (0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates(or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received(or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration,if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a.Is this waste treated(or will be treated)prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes,describe the treatment(provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge(or will the discharge be)continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent,describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have,or is subject ot,an approved pretreatment program?
El Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users(SIUs)and Categorical Industrial Users(CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
e. Number of non-categorical SlUs. 0
f. Number of ClUs. 4
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works,copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Hickory Spring Mfg Co/Wire Technology Plant
Mailing Address: 1115 Farrington St
Conover NC 28613
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Bedding manufacturing/furniture spring
F.5. Principal Product(s)and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Coil springs
Raw material(s): Metal alloy round wire
F.6. Flow Rate.
e. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day(gpd)and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
1000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
f. Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day(gpd)and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits 0 Yes ® No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards,which category and subcategory?
433.17
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems(e.g.,
upsets,interference)at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes,describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck,rail or dedicated pipe?
O Yes ® No(go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received(check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount(volume or mass,specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA(SUPERFUND)WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently(or has it been notified that it will)receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes(complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates(or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received(or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration,if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
c.Is this waste treated(or will be treated)prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes,describe the treatment(provide information about the removal efficiency):
d. Is the discharge(or will the discharge be)continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent,describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek V V TP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have,or is subject ot,an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users(SIUs)and Categorical Industrial Users(CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
g. Number of non-categorical SIUs. 0
h. Number of ClUs. 4
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works,copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Engineered Controls
Mailing Address: 911 Industrial Dr
Conover NC 28613
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Assembly of LP gas regulators
F.5. Principal Product(s)and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): LP gas regulators
Raw material(s): Pre-fabricated,machined regulators
F.6. Flow Rate.
g. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day(gpd)and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
3100 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
h. Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day(gpd)and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ❑ Yes ® No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards,which category and subcategory?
433.17
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Clark Creek WWTP, NC0036196 Renewal Catawba
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems(e.g.,
upsets,interference)at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes,describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL,OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck,rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No(go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received(check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount(volume or mass,specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA(SUPERFUND)WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER,AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently(or has it been notified that it will)receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes(complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates(or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received(or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration,if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
e.Is this waste treated(or will be treated)prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes,describe the treatment(provide information about the removal efficiency):
f. Is the discharge(or will the discharge be)continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent,describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information