20000406 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20000328

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 25, 2000 -
200
Mary Beth Nickolich
P.O. Box 1391
New Bern, NC 28563-1391

Subject: Neuse and Tar/Pam Buffer Strategy
2/24/00 Site visits
Beaufort and Craven County
Dear Mary Beth:
000406
On February 24, 2000, Paula Moon-Butzin and I conducted field surveys to determine
compliance with the Neuse and Tar/Pam Buffer Rules. We visited ten (10) different sites and
made stream determinations. The following is a brief summary of each site with associated maps
and pictures:
Tributary of Chocowinity Creek - two features examined. The feature within the
thinning practice was determined to be exempt, where as the downstream feature
outside the tract, above the railroad track, was determined to be subject.
2. Tributary of Chocowinity Creek - two features examined. The feature on the east
side of the tract was determined to be subject, however the feature on the west
side of the tract was exempt.
Tributary to Cyndi Edwards Branch - one feature examined. The feature was
determined to be exempt, except for the downstream portion, which empties into
Cyndi Edwards Branch. The line for the necessary buffer was five (5) chains (330
feet) upstream of Cyndi Edwards Branch.
4. Tributary to Chocowinity Creek - two features examined. Both of the mapped
features were not found on the ground, therefore exempt.
5. Tributary to Blounts Creek - two features examined. Both of the mapped features
were not found on the ground, therefore exempt.
6. Tributary to Little Swift Creek - one feature examined. The feature was
determined to be a historical canal dug for drainage, therefore not subject to the
buffer rules.

C?
all
7. Tributary to Little Swift Creek - one feature examined. The feature was
determined to be a historical canal dug for drainage, therefore not subject to the
buffer rules.
8. Tributary to Little Swift Creek - one feature examined. The feature was visible on
the soil maps but not the USGS. There was a tributary on the ground but it
eventually fanned out into the tract and did not connect to any downstream surface
waters. This feature was determined to be exempt from the buffer rules. There was
a system found within the tract, which had stream characteristics, but did not show
up on any map.
9. Tributary to Morgan Swamp - one feature examined. The feature in question was
rated and found not have the necessary components to be classified a stream. (11.5
points) The system was found to be exempt.
10. Tributary to Beaverdam Swamp - one feature examined. The feature was found
not to have the necessary components to be a classified stream. The system was
found to be exempt.
All of the tracts examined were part of Weyerhaeuser's timberlands management strategy.
The sites are scheduled to have first and second thinnings in the 2000 calendar year.
If you have any comments or questions please call me at 252-946-6481.
Sincerely,
&? 144,
Brad Shaver
Environmental Specialist II
cc: WaRO
401 Wetlands Group
943 Washington `square Mall. Washington. North Carolina 27889
1 elephone (252) 946-648! FAX-I'2152)946-9215
An Fgtual Or)pnrtumty Atfirrative Actievt Emp!o%er 0°„ recccled I Q";. post-consumer pater

Jk1E ? ?
'VhYC +W4 .W? -
-4F e
I
AF.+?'alt il?.Yc ? .WLc ye,y? ? ?
?F'fi •'IF Y
\ ?Y
OF
I

rte ? Eby` .
1
I?
I

K

K ?RF

t

`d
s
Field G?? `
l?
I ?
istThin --1_99_9_1_999_____ ___
I MGT Unit: 310140 Acs:71 Thin acs: 71 Priority: 2 - Per _ _ ,
Birthyear:1981 SI: 77 AvgD:9.60 Avg H: 61 BA/ac: 240 TPA: 482 Map: J - 1 12 - 7
Exam type: 4 year: 94 Prescription: 5throw -Chip-LSG Target: 135 TPA Comp: Beau 60
Seas_ 2 Sens: No Sensitivity Coded - - - Sens. Area Plan: N GRD: 1999 L - - - - - J
I I I District: Neuse ?

. i
•
O

f_ X33
Ruins .
,y.
1
X 170

?? (1125)
?r •
?i
ri
tti X31
Site #2
f ? fI • R
IV
q
.30
?'rv y 34
Ile
! r
Name: HACKNEY Location: 035' 28'44.7" N 077' 03'48.7" W
Date: 2/25/100 Caption: Beaufort County
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Site #2 U ! 4 ?
Exemption Request v! v
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc