20140090 Ver 7_Mitigation Form U 2579B_20200129

Wanucha, Dave
From:Dagnino, Carla S
Sent:Wednesday, January 22, 2020 3:45 PM
To:Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Euliss, Amy; Wanucha, Dave
Cc:Barrett, William A
Subject:RE: \[External\] RE: U-2579B Permit Modification Application, Forsyth County
Attachments:Mitigation Form U 2579B.docx
Hi Nicholle,

I have not ever filled out one of these forms, so I answered the way I think - except for b.(3) and d.

Please let me know if you need any additional information for this.

Thanks.
Carla

-----Original Message-----
From: Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 3:18 PM
To: Euliss, Amy <[e-mail]>; Dagnino, Carla S <[e-mail]>; Wanucha, Dave
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Barrett, William A <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[External\] RE: U-2579B Permit Modification Application, Forsyth County

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

And then I'm to answer these questions specifically for U 2579B....

It's regarding compensatory mitigation - and I tried looking up information in ORM.. but honestly - I don't see
any mitigation logged in... but I think our logging in impacts and mitigation for DOT has been a work in
progress before and after I got here...

I realize the Corps is answering d. And for now - I think (according to the PN I wrote) -- the Corps is holding off
on additional mitigation until we see what happens w/ the onsite relocations.

Thank you for your help !

If the form doesn't let you check it -- it's in word.. maybe you can use a different colored ink or something..

Thank you !

1

Sincerely,

Nicholle B.

If you answer me in email - our firewall puts everything in plain text and gets rid of all the formatting.. so
perhaps best to modify the word document and send that back.. we'll see..

-----Original Message-----
From: Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 3:08 PM
To: Euliss, Amy <[e-mail]>; Dagnino, Carla S <[e-mail]>; Wanucha, Dave
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Barrett, William A <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: \[External\] RE: U-2579B Permit Modification Application, Forsyth County

Thank you Amy - the next question is "Is the work in compliance" and I am saying YES... so if this is not the
case - let me know.. otherwise - I'm going w/ that...

Sincerely,

Nicholle B.

-----Original Message-----
From: Euliss, Amy \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 3:05 PM
To: Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Dagnino,
Carla S <[e-mail]>; Wanucha, Dave <[e-mail]>
Cc: Barrett, William A <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[Non-DoD Source\] RE: \[External\] RE: U-2579B Permit Modification Application, Forsyth County

Yes, it is under construction.

-----Original Message-----
From: Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 3:04 PM
To: Dagnino, Carla S <[e-mail]>; Euliss, Amy <[e-mail]>; Wanucha, Dave
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Barrett, William A <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[External\] RE: U-2579B Permit Modification Application, Forsyth County

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

2

I'm filling out a memorandum for this mod... it is asking me if U-2579B is under construction? I may know -
but instead of rifling through my green book for compliance - I thought I would just ask - has work started on
U-2579B... I am not sure..

Thank you !

Sincerely,

Nicholle B.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dagnino, Carla S \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 8:46 AM
To: Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>;
Chapman, Amy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Wanucha, Dave <[e-mail]>; Archer Sr, Wright <[e-mail]>; Euliss, Amy
<[e-mail]>; Earley, Jessica S <[e-mail]>; Abernathy, Brett <[e-mail]>;
Moore, Byron G <[e-mail]>; Turchy, Michael A <[e-mail]>; Robinson, Dan
<[e-mail]>; Puckett, Lester L <[e-mail]>; Chambers, Marla J
<[e-mail]>; Ellwanger, Claire <[e-mail]>; Kiser, Marcus K
<[e-mail]>; Matthews, Monte K CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>; Stark, David A <[e-mail]>; Barrett, William A
<[e-mail]>
Subject: \[Non-DoD Source\] U-2579B Permit Modification Application, Forsyth County

The Permit Application for the Modification of the U-2579B Section of the W-S Beltway has been prepared.

The file can be downloaded here:

BlockedBlockedhttps://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/pdea/PermApps
<BlockedBlockedhttps://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/pdea/PermApps>

Named U-2579B Smith Cr Modification October 21 2019

The file is also attached for your review.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this application.

Thank you!

3

Carla Dagnino

Environmental Coordination and Permitting Group Leader

Environmental Analysis Unit

NC Department of Transportation

919 707 6110 office

[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>

1598 Mail Service Center

Raleigh, NC 27699 -1598

1020 Birch Ridge Drive

Raleigh, NC 27610

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the

North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

________________________________

4

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.

________________________________

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.

5

For U 2579B…

a. Compensatory mitigation required in original permit: Yes No

b. Summary of requirements:

(1) Mitigation Bank/ILF Credits Required: No

(2) Permittee-Responsible Mitigation Required: Yes

(3) Site Protection (e.g. Conservation Easement) was required by Corps: Yes No

Explanation:

c. Compensatory mitigation status:

(1) Mitigation bank/ILF credits purchased: N/A Yes No

(2) Permittee responsible mitigation implemented: N/A Yes No

(3) Site Protection finalized and recorded: N/A Yes No

(4) Monitoring reports received: N/A Yes No

(5) Mitigation is in compliance: Yes No

Explanation: Compliance will be determined once the relocation of Smith Creek has
been constructed, monitored and approved by the USACE and NCDWR

(6) Mitigation requires modification: Yes No

Explanation: This will not be determined until the site has been constructed

d. The requested permit modification requires additional mitigation: Yes No