20191666 Ver 1_Updated 401 Application with drawings_20200110

Strickland, Bev
From: Mark Bissell <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 9:01 AM
To: Pullinger, Robert C
Cc: 'Marcie'
Subject: RE: [External] 401 Application for The Fost Tract
Attachments: 401 Application.pdf
• 1 External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Please see the attachment
Mark S. Bissell, PE
OEM
*12 Aiialic.,
Celebrating Innovative Services Since 1985!
3512 N. Croatan Hwy. * PO Box 1068 * Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
0: [phone] F: [phone] C: [phone]
Firm License # C-0956
www.bissellDrofessionadLyrouD.com
Fend6%or
Facebook "Like" Bissell Professional Group
From: Pullinger, Robert C [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 2:06 PM
To: Marcie
Cc: 'Mark Bissell'
Subject: RE: [External] 401 Application for The Fost Tract
Ms. Respass (Marcie),
Looking at our tracking database, it appears that the application was stamped as received in Raleigh on December 06,
2019, and then forwarded to me here for review at the Regional Office on December 12, 2019, so with the 60-day
statutory review time we're allowed, the project is on day 14 (which also means the drop dead date would be February
04, 2020, if after reviewing the project, I don't need to request additional information). I haven't had a chance to take a
hard look at the application yet, but after a preliminary "triage" type of look today, I noticed that there appeared to be
no plan drawing showing where the culverts are to be placed/where the roads would be going, or where the
jurisdictional areas appear to be. That said I would/will probably be putting the project on hold to request that
additional information at a minimum, but I'll need to look at the application/project a little harder (which my plan right
now is to do when I return to the office after the holidays either on Monday, December 301"), to make sure there isn't
other additional information I'd need, but if you can send me a drawing showing where the impacts are proposed to be,
that'll definitely help, and when I get a chance to look at the application more fully on that next -following Monday, then
it'll definitely keep things moving and if I don't see anything else I'd need, then obviously I wouldn't have to put the
project on -hold and could move forward. Sorry for the long-winded explanation, and if there's anything else I find on
the 301" that I need, I'll make sure to e-mail you, to give you the heads-up/opportunity to provide it before starting that

on -hold process. Thanks for your patience with the process, and if you've got any more questions, please let know, and
have a Merry Christmas!
Chris Pullinger
Environmental Specialist II
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Regional Operations
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252 948 3918 office
chris.pullingera-ncdenr.gov
From: Marcie<[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 8:24 AM
To: Pullinger, Robert C <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Mark Bissell' <mark@ bissellprofessionalgroup.com>
Subject: [External] 401 Application for The Fost Tract
Ores, r External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
ort.s am nc. ov
Good morning Chris. Can you give me a status and/or time frame on the application submitted for the project in
Moyock, NC called The Fost Tract? I appreciate any help you can give and if there is anything further I will need to
provide, please feel free to contact me at anytime. Thank you and I hope you have a very Merry Christmas.
Respectfully Submitted,
Marcie Respass
Engineering Coordinator
FOUR
rkc ,,,o W10
Celebrating Innovative Services Since 1985!
3512 N. Croatan Hwy. * PO Box 1068 * Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
0: [phone] F: [phone]
Fern License # C-0956
www.bisseUDrofessionalvrouD.com
com
M= "Like" Bissell Professional Group

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. 2018-00838
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
ED 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank ❑x Yes ❑ No
or in -lieu fee program.
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h x❑ Yes ❑ No
below.
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Fost Tract LLC
2b. County:
Currituck
2c.
Nearest municipality / town: Moyock
2d.
Subdivision name: The Fost Tract PD-R
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Sandra Fost
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB 1391 Pg 861
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
Bissell Professional Group
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3512 North Croatan Highway / Post Office Box 1068
3e.
City, state, zip:
Kitty Hawk, North Carolina 27949
3f.
Telephone no.:
757-816-2006 (LLC)
3g.
Fax no..
3h.
Email address:
Pagel of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Fost Tract LLC
4d.
Street address:
417-D Caratoke Highway
4e.
City, state, zip:
Moyock North Carolina 27958
4f.
Telephone no.:
757-816-2006
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
5a.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
Name: Mark Bissell
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Bissell Proffessional Group
5c.
Street address:
3512 North Croatan Highway / Post Office Box 1068
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kitty Hawk North Carolina 27949
5e.
Telephone no.:
252-261-3266
5f.
Fax no.:
252-261-1760
5g.
Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8031-80-3559
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 36.491912 Longitude:-76.15037
1 c.
Property size:
228.8 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Roland Creek Canal
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Roland Creek
Albemarle-Chowan 03010205
2c.
River basin:
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site consists of agricultural fields and cutover woodsland. Residential development and agricultural uses border all sides of project site.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 17
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Install culverts and construct roadway crossings at 3 separate locations to provide access for residential development.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Install culverts and construct roadway crossings at 3 separate locations. Excavator, dump trucks, and bull dozers will be used for the work.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments:
project (includingall prior phases) in the past?
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑X Preliminary Final
❑
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): RG-W Staff, Washington NC
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
March 22, 2018. See attached documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for TO Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
USACE issued a NWP 18 to install culverts to cross a jurisdictional Waters of the US only. Total impacts were 1,200 sq ft.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project? ❑X Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Initial development will occur in the open field areas with later phases to take place in the cutover woodsland area.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries
❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then
complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c.
2d. 2e.
2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact
Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Tem ora . T
W1 P Culvert
Pine Flat No Corps
0.16
W2 P
Culvert
Pine Flat
No
Corps
0.06
W3 P
Culvert
Pine Flat
No
Corps
0.04
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 Choose one
Choose one Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.26
2h. Comments:
Jurisdictional areas to be impacted includes 3 small fingers of
the subject wetland area. No other wetland impacts will take place associated with this
project.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts
(including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c.
3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream
name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 - Choose one
S2 - Choose one
S3 - Choose one
S4 Choose one
-
S5
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID number
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
purpose of pond
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation. then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact
Reason for impact
Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Tem ora T)
feet)
feet
B 1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6 Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5of10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Culvert roadway crossings will be installed at 3 separate locations to allow road access to proposed single-family residential development. The
crossings were designed at the narrowest areas to minimize impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. The road widths have also been minimized to meet
county and local codes and within the smallest allowable foot print. There will be no other impacts to wetlands associated with this project.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fences, hay bales, and grass mat seeding will be utilized to prevent any off site sedimentation. Fill will be discharged into the authorized fill area via
dump truck and spread with rubber tire equipment. An excavator will also be used to spread fill material and shape the area without having to actually
be in the fill foot print.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
❑X Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. ComDlete if Usina a Mitioation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank LLC / Timberlake Farm
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
3c. Comments:
Type: Non -riparian wetland
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
aaEle upon permit issuance. re i
4. ComDlete if Makinu a Pavment to In -lieu Fee Pr(
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)_
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
4h. Comments:
ram
❑ Yes
linear feet
Choose one
_1 square feet
acres
acres
acres
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Quantity: 0.53 acre
Quantity:
Quantity:
rchased imme is e y upon
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes X❑ No
buffer mitigation? I El
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Stormwater Management Plan is currently in late stages of development and in consultation with NCDEQ
requirements.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan. then provide a brief. narrative
description of the plan:
Plan in development and awaiting initial submission to NCDEQ.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local.government's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Currituck County
0 Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review _
OCoastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
❑X No
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility.
Property owner currently working with Currituck County for waste disposal related needs.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or _.__..
habitat? ® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act (@ Yes ❑ No
impacts?
�5c— yes
� indicate the USFWS Field Oyou have contacted,�
. if es, fflce Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Web -based Heritage Data
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes © No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corp Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g.. National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina hislory and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Web based Heritage Data
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Ba. Wilt this project occur in a FEMA-designated IOD-year floodplain? — �❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain taw project meets FEMA requirements:
80. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
ApplicantlAgent's Printed Name
Applioantl-� Date
(Agents t, is valid only It an authorization
r from the a ocanl is provided.y
Page 10 of 10

GENERAL NOTES:
1. PROJECT NAME: FOST TRACT
2. APPLICANT: FOST TRACT, LLC
417—D CARATOKE HIGHWAY
MOYOCK, NC 27958
3. OWNER: SANDRA DAVIS FOST & IRIS ANN O'CONNER
121 SOUNDSHORE DRIVE
CURRITUCK, NC 27929
4. PROPERTY DATA:
PARCEL ID#: 0009-000-0006-0000
PRIMARY ADDRESS: 209 CARATOKE HIGHWAY, MOYOCK, NC
RECORDED REFERENCES: P.C. 0, SL 157; D.B. 1391, PG. 861; P.C. 0, SL:
156; D.B. 1391, PG. 856;
PROPERTY ZONING: C—MXR — MIXED RESIDENTIAL
5. F.I.R.M. DATA:
ZONES X & SHADED X F.E.M.A. F.I.R.M. MAP# 3721802200 J, CID 370078,
EFFECTIVE DATE DECEMBER 16, 2005. USE OF LAND WITHIN A FLOODWAY OR
FLOOD PLAIN IS SUBSTANTIALLY RESTRICTED BY CHAPTER 7 OF THE
CURRITUCK COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE.
6. THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS "404' JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS AS CONFIRMED
BY USACOE ACTION ID# SAW 2014-00023, DATED 2-29-2016 AND SHOWN
ON A PLAT TITLED "PARRISH ESTATES C/O JENNIFER CAHOON 404 WETLAND
SURVEY" DATED 2-24-16, PREPARED BY BPG. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTAL
ACTIVITIES MAY REQUIRE U.S. CORP OF ENGINEERS APPROVAL PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
7. EXISTING CONDITION INFORMATION BASED ON A COMBINATION OF THE
FOLLOWING:
• 2015-2017 FIELD SURVEY DATA OBTAINED BY BISSELL PROFESSIONAL
GROUP
• 2012-2016 AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM NCONEMAP.COM
• ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 1988 VERTICAL DATUM.
c* \ / /
O qi� Opp
B q
9e
y
doe•
pip
O,P
e BFr� 1
0c pRh�r
3sRFR
Sheet
Number
1
2
Sheet Title
FOST TRACT FUTURE WETLANDS CROSSINGS EXHIBIT
FOST TRACT WETLANDS CROSSINGS DETAILS
LEGEND
ROADWAY CENTERLINE
—
RIGHT-OF-WAY
— —
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING DITCH CENTERLINE
PROPOSED SWALE
y
y y
EXISTING WETLANDS
- - - - - - - 6 - - - - - --
EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR
FEMA FEMA
FEMA BOUNDARY LINE
C
EXISTING CULVERT
PROPOSED CULVERT
!
\ I
L21
Al
IV
IV
I y \\\
y y
I I y,
I y y y y\\ \ ��\
\ V A
\\ \ IV IV A
\ -
I �— y y \ ; \ !fit\ \ \ \ /�
y \ \\\\ \\�
IVIV
\ J
I I \ ly
IV
IV 4A
IV
IV
I I / FUTURE WETLANDSIN
CRO
(SEE SSHT. 2) ^/ \// \ \\\\\\���\ ��///01
41
IIV
IVIVI \ `\\ \ / / `,w�v�\ \ /i / \
IV
IV IV
�N' IV�
IV
ZONE - I
IV
y
IV
If
1IV/
IV\ / v \ / \s \\ \
\.
lo V IV IV
IV V
IV v IV
IV
IV r
/ y\ IV
,V
IV J
IV
\ \ \ y \ - ' FUTURE WETLANDS
/ \ 1 CROSSING #2-
_ (SEE SHT. 2)
\12,01
?gv`N
\ V „ �// \ / / I\ — / ti oe �k op s2 o c
_ I O
y lI( \\ l� \—' ''\�! I \� / '/ pey✓cop 0c �AFs�9p�y
FUTURE WETLANDS / �y \ \ / / / — \\ I /— , \ / I / ' ^ ' / do �� s9�yF�p�y '� i? F
CROSSING 3 ,' ,'
SEE SHT. 2 _ _ I y s� c���`y
IV IV 6
IV
IV
IVi ( I _ / �gLFO �OpaC,i,2 yc S F?`r I
IV
y q e R pR
y I / / o', p 0.
FRAY I II \,ot40AO
A Ois+0"
YI IV p °eOsFZF RS sI
ap
4 °a a"c� �(�,
O0'1q�pH
- 9P
A� ,6 ✓F��
6 s oc q�r/QZl-
R 2365
R
q ,r
+oh
OePjS,/O,Q� .c G� pq0 Gsq �
o07R
F
s
s SCAc�Oyo�} /
srs <Tg
FOO�F Np4,
< Asli9p
99 GZ�I
is �9 PP9y
Ali sR3 CCs yh�p�} Rs �� I I
S'<AS2','Y/q I II
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I II
1
FOO�F Np4,
< Asli9p
99 GZ�I
is �9 PP9y
Ali sR3 CCs yh�p�} Rs �� I I
S'<AS2','Y/q I II
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I II
1
o
gF4,Rp
A "-rp; p'P,t�,
cs�?A?(g�(y
y
1 I
I
I
I
I
17
I
\
I
\ Ill
i ✓ /
�'�i
T
'
I
1
1
I
Of
1
\\\
l \
I
I
I
I
jI
I\
150 0 75 150 300
1 "=150'
GRAPHIC SCALE
n-off
a
0
>. N
O
3 0
L c
� O
rn c 0
I o r
L
ON(p
0 D
N V z M N
c«�_
- U 0 x O� 0
N
j z Do 2 N
(n N Z'Nv
����.-Loa
pj LzMaY�U-
• CA N
Eml
. � N
O
.)
W
)
�a
c
� N
`
C
in
• C c'N
E
d O
I�
0
_
w
'o, v
�i
W C,
O
o�
GAG
�xaz
'T.
w
w
Lj�C7C)
W Z,
w
AEU
aoxzz
��oo�
wU �z
wo
U2a
0
�oa
o
tY.l
� U
off°
a
�¢oWa
�
O�
wzHwa
hoUxU
FUAAa�
WH�ha
::D C)
�7
a
Q
z_
J
O
�
Q
U
I-
^/ O
z
ll
I--1
�(
z
^Q
z
—J O
w
j
~
W
�
v 1
OU
M'W a
M+�
Z
z
Y
U
a
Occ
U G
w
0
a
�
m
3
Y
U)
Z
o
F-
z
w
0
o_
0
A
(� J
L
0
0
W
a
LU
olf
w
�
Q
�
�
N
o
z
pRF4/
All M�V4 R
�Rp RF��F
OSFS
0
N4 !
DATE:
SCALE:
10/30/19
1" = 150'
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
BPG
MSB
DRAWN:
APPROVED:
KFW
BPG
SHEET:
1
2
OF
CAD FILE:
46510000E1
PROJECT NO:
4651

FUTURE WETLANDS CROSSING #1 PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
3
i
� FUTURE CONCRETE
SIDEWALK (TYP.)
24" RCP CULVERT
- - - - - - _ _ AREA OF WETLAND , \
\ FILL: 2,697 S.F. �j \
\ Q
\ � I
d) , I
I
CJ4p
i oQ" i I
� I
I
------
--- - - - - --
�J � I
FUTURE WETLANDS CROSSING #2 PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
5'-0" 4'-6"
2'-0" 2'-0"
2'-6"
1 /4"/F . I
i`iAi \Vw�AA\A
\2\ ASPHALT SURFACE,
Y�yvwvv�\v��,
40' R\W
li-
13'-6" FROM CENTERLINE 13'-6" FROM CENTERLINE
TO BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB
22' WIDE ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION
f 1 /4"/FT.
24" RCP CULVERT
1 /4"/FT. —�
TYPICAL WETLAND CROSSING SECTION VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
4'-6" 5'-0"
2'-0"
I f-1/4"/FT.
J
C�
v � /
� I
I �
O � I
� I
24" RCP CULVERT\
- - AREA OF WETLAND
\ FILL: 1,902 S.F.
1 FUTURE CONCRETE
SIDEWALK (TYP.)
FUTURE WETLANDS CROSSING #2 PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 30'
3
m
a m
0
L >. N
(� O
3 0
L c_
O, O
rn c U
I o r
L
o N V Z 04 M N
c«�_
2 O x O� n
N
i Z m 2 N
U) N Z'N�v
fA ��O"''
Q] [z to L`L�WQ
• N N
. � N
> O
V�
W
V)_U
a
� N
O
C
• C N
O
FLO
I&M
0
_
C W
�i
M U
C,
Wo
o°zoo
w
Q
z�Wzx
UzEC_5
a. p cG z c
G
U
wo
ww�Q�z
O
a W m
w
�
aHozo
0 U
a¢ww
w zfj
hoo�z
HUCa�c�
zI
wH�a
�D C)
Ii)
g3o�oa
a
Q
z_
J
O
�
Q
U
�
z
ll
a
nI
z
o
W
~
I+I
r
OU
z
Z
h--I
Y
U
O
a
Occ
U G
!Li
O
a
m
y
N
Q
ILL]
�/'�
V)
Z
O
w
Q
0
1.—
o_
o
CIO
_
Q
W
3
w
W
F
°
I
Q
M
�
I
o
Z
pRF�/
FoR M�Nq R
�Rp RF��F
OSFS �/V1'
0
N`
DATE:
SCALE:
10/30/19
N/A
DESIGNED:
CHECKED:
BPG
MSB
DRAWN:
APPROVED:
KFW
BPG
SHEET:
2
2
OF
CAD FILE:
46510000E1
PROJECT NO:
4651

Vie Great 2 r'sma(S vam_p Restora.t onDark, LLC
P. 0. Box 6186
Chesapeake, VA 23323
November 19, 2019
Project: Justin Old
417 D Caratoke Hwy
Moyock, NC 27958
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
The following price quote is given in reply to your request for the purchase 0.53 Non -Riparian wetland
mitigation credits (HUC Code 03010205) from The Great Dismal Swamp Restoration Bank Timberlake
Farm. These credits are currently available from our Timberlake mitigation bank.
The cost will be Twenty -Four Thousand, Nine Hundred, Ten Dollars ($ 24,910.00). This quote will expire
on January 31, 2020. You will need to submit to the USCOE the necessary application for said
mitigation, and receive USCOE permission to furnish said required credits from our Timberlake bank.
To complete this transaction, we will require payment in full. Once payment is received, the credit sale
will be reported to the US Army Corps of Engineers. Please provide and/or confirm the following
information:
Corps Project #:
Waterway:
Permittee Name:
Locality of Impact:
Permit action (i.e., IP, NWP-39, enforcement, etc.) Non Riparian
Impacts (acres/linear feet): 0.265
Impacts Hydrologic Unit Code: 03010205
Mitigation Bank, Permittee, and Consultant agree not to discuss with any other party the details and/or
pricing of this agreement, unless necessary for regulatory matters. Information contained herein shall be
held in the strictest confidence.
Thank you for allowing us to quote this project. We look forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
V�
Beverly M. hite
Manager,— accounting / Sales
GDSRB
CC: File

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2018-00838 County: Currituck U.S.G.S. Quad: Lambs Corner NE
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: Sandra D. Fost
Address: 121 Soundshore Drive
Currituck, North Carolina 27929
Telephone Number: 252-232-3005
Size (acres) 228.8 acres
Nearest Waterway Roland Creek
USGS RUC 03010205
Nearest Town Snowden
River Basin Albemarle-Chowan
Coordinates Latitude: 36.491912 N
Longitude:-76.150370 W
Location description: Property is an approximate 228.8-acre tract located off US Highway 168 and Survey Road, adjacent to
Roland Creek and the Northwest River, near Snowden, in Currituck County, North Carolina. The project area consists of an
approximate 102-acre wooded area immediately adjacent to the existing agricultural fields on the property. Currituck County
PARID: 001500000860000. TAXID: 130052. NC PIN 8031-80-3559.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described property that maybe subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all
waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
Page 1 of 5

SAW-2018-00838 Fost Farm
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon
completion. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA
jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on Date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
v (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Elizabeth City, NC at 252-264-3901 to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Raleigh W. Bland.
PWS at [phone] or Raleieh.w.blandnusace.armv.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: The delineated wetlands on this site meets the wetland criteria as described in the
1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement to the 1987
Wetland Delineation Manual. The wetlands are a part of a broad continium of wetlands connected to Roland Creek
and the Northwest River.
D. Remarks: Department of the Army authorization is required to work within any jurisdictional waters
and or wetlands on the property.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by March 30, 2017.
Page 2 of 5

SAW-2018-00838 Fost Farm
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Div' ion Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: -u-.-
Date_ April 30, 2018 Expiration Date: N/A for PJD
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://coMsma,pu.usace.aM.mil/cm a ex/f? 136:4:0.
Copy Furnished: CESAW/RG-WBland
Page 3 of 5

SAW-2018-00838 Fost Farm
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Fost Farm File Number: SAW 2018-00838 April 30, 2018
Attached is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
C
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
❑
®
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at htt.://www.usace.artn-.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/ReTulatoi' !ProyramandPermits.as x or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Pen -nit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terns and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
Page 4 of 5

SAW-2018-00838 Fost Farm
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION 11- REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Raleigh W. Bland, PWS
CESAD-PDO
2407 West 51" Street
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Washington, North Carolina 27889
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
910-252-4558
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Raleigh W. Bland, PWS, 2407 West 511 Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
Page 5 of 5

Ll
i.
I
_s
- o-
km
r
ti
mom
� .. Nationai Map 3D Elevation Program (3DEP). Data refresh
. _ .g � , .

4
.- � / __. \�
W-901
The National Map: National Boundaries Dates et, 3DEP El(

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Fost Tract City/County: Moyock / Currituck Sampling Date: March 23, 2018
ApplicantlOwner: Sandra Fost 121 Soundshore Drive Cunituck 27929 State: NC Sampling Point: N-1
Investigator(s): Bland USACE RG-W -Section, Township, Range: Moyock / Snowden / Lambs Comer NE
Landform (hiflslope, terrace, etc.): Marine Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): USDA LRR-T Lat: 35.491912 N Long:-76.150370 W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Mapped as No - Nimmo loamy sand . _ —NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers. in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _M No �nr--I
Hydric Soil Present? Yes M No —mil
Hydrology Present? Yes _M No
Remarks:
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes _� No —❑
All 3 required wetland parameters are satisfied per the Corps of Engineers 1987 Manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement and this
area is adjacent to a Waters of the US connected to the Northwest River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
n Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
I�
Ipl Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Water Marks (131)
® Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
(] Drainage Paftems (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (132)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No _Jpt Depth (inches): None
Water Table Present? Yes No ❑ Depth (inches): <12 in -1
Saturation Present? Yes No _� Depth (inches): <6 in Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ M No f
_.I -t
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Aerial photography on Google Earth.
This area of the property exhibits lower topography than the rest of the tract
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species?
1. Pinus taeda 50 % Yes
2. Acer rubrum _ _ _ 10 % Yes
3. Quercus phellos ' _ 5% No
4. Persea borbonia 5% No
5.
6
7
8.
Indicator
Status
FAC
FAC
FACW
FACW
"-
Sampling Point: N-1
Dominance Testworksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100 %
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35%
20% of total cover: 14%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
FACW species x 2 =
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
°
15 /o
Yes
FACW
2. Gordonia lasianthus
10 %
Yes
FACW
FAC species x 3 =
3. Ilex glabra
10 %
Yes
FACW
FACU species x 4 =
4' -
5.
UPL species x 5 =
6.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
7.
8,
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
35 % = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5% 20% of total cover. 7%
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Arundinaria gigantea
25%
Yes
FAC
n 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2.3: Andropogon alomeratus.
5%
No
FACW
_ _
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5•
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
7.
_
8.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
9.
I
10.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
11.
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
12.
height.
30 %
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
50% of total cover: 12.5%
20% of total cover: 5%
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft _) _
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
I. Smilax laurifolia
5%
No
FACW
2. Toxicodendron radicans
5%
No
FAC
Woody vine - All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
3.
height.
4.
-
10 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 5%
20% of total cover: 2%
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
This area has been recently clear cut
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No _Q
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: N-1
Profile Description: (Describe
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' L062
Texture Remarks
0-7
10 YR 411
100
loam muck
7-14
10 YR 611
90
10 YR 5/6 10 C M
loam
14-25
10 YR 611
90
10 YR 4/6 10 C M
loam
25-36+ 10 YR 5/2 80 10 YR 5/6 20 C M Sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
II Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
II Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
II 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
II Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P. T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
II Red Parent Material (TF2)
�] 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
II Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (178)
II Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
II Marl (F10) (LRR U)
II Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al1)
II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
EJ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Q Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Q Delta Ocfiric (F17) (MLRA 151)
II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A,150B)
II Sandy Redox (S5)
II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
II Stripped Matrix (86)
II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,1530)
II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P. S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes �� No
Matches USDA-NCSS Soil Web Network Link Profile Mapping for Nimmo loamy sand.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Fost Tract
Applicant/Owner: Sandra Fost 121 Soundshore Drive Currituck 27929
City/County: Moyock / Currituck Sampling Date: March 23, 2018
State: NC Sampling Point: CF-1
Investigator(s): Bland USACE RG-W Section, Township, Range: Moyock / Snowden / Lambs Corner NE
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Marine Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): USDA LRR-T Lat: 35.491912 N Long:-76.150370 W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Mapped as Ca — Cape Fear loam NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No _u
I�1 t--I Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _ILC7_1I within a Wetland? Yes _n
J0 No
Hydrology Present? Yes �_ No
Remarks:
All 3 required wetland parameters are not satisfied per the Corps of Engineers 1987 Manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Water (All)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes n No ^ M Depth (inches): None
Water Table Present? Yes _Z No n Depth (inches): >36 in
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required}
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ FAC Neutral Test (05)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
I-1 I R
Saturation Present? Yes M _1,s No Depth (inches): 25 in Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No _R
Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections),
on Google Earth.
Remarks:
This area of the property is influenced by several drainage ditches and a network of agricultural field ditches in the immediate vicinity.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute
Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft i
% Cover
Species?
1. Pinus taeda
60 %
Yes
2. Acer rubrum _
10 %
Yes
_
3. Quercus alba _
10 %
Yes
4. Liquidambar styraciflua
5%
No
-
5.
6.
T
- -
7.
8.
85 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 42.5%
20% of total cover 17%
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:. 30 ft 1
1. Ilex opaca
40 %
Yes
2. Cornus florida
10 %
Yes
3. Ilex coricea
5%
No
4. Phytolaca americans
5%
No
5.
6.
7.
8.
60 %
= Total Cover
60% of total cover: 30%
20% of total cover: 12%
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft _
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2. Euthamia spp.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
20.%
- - 5%
Indicator
Status
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species 66 %
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
CPA
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
FAC
FAC
FACU
FAC
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FACW
FAC species
FACU species
x 3 =
x 4 =
FACU
FAC
FACU
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = _
_Yes FAC
No FAC
12.
25 % = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12.5% 20% of total cover: 5%
Woody Vine Stratum_ Plot size: 30 ft i
1. Smilax glauca 5% No FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia 5% No FAC
3.
4.
10 % = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5% 20% of total cover: 2%
Remarks: (If observed, list morpholog
This area has been recently clear cut
Hydrophytic vegetation indicators:
n 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3- Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes _� No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-15 10 YR 211 100 loam
15-22 10 YR 4/1 90 10 YR 312 10 C M Clay loam
Point:
22-36+ 10 YR 5/1 90 10 YR 312 10 C M clay Pass ribbon and bounce test
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
`Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
II Histosol (Al)
II Poiyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
II Histic Epipedon (A2)
n Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
D 2 cm Muck (Al0) (LRR S)
II Black Histic (A3)
II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Q Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
II Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
II Redox Depressions (F8)
II Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
II Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
II iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
Coast Prairie Redox A16 MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
( II
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
II Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
II Sandy Redox (35)
II Piedmont Floodplain'Soiis (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T. U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Matches USDA-NCSS Soil Web Network Link Profile Mapping for Cape Fear loam.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ M No _,Q
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Fast Tract
Applicant/Owner: Sandra Fast 121 Soundshore Drive Currituck 27929
Investigator(s): Bland USACE RG-W
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Flat
City/County: Moyock / Currituck Sampling Date: March 23, 2018
State: NC Sampling Point: WS-1
Section, Township, Range: Moyock / Snowden / Lambs Corner NE
Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): USDA LRR-T Lat: 35.491912 N Long:-76.150370 W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Mapped as Ws - WaSda muck _ NW1 classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. —(
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No _L_i
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _® No —❑ within a wetland? Yes n No
Hydrology Present? _ Yes No
Remarks:
All 3 required wetland parameters are not satisfied per the Corps of Engineers 1987 Manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators [minimum of one is required: check all that a
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (131)
Secondary Indicators [minimum of two required]
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
L] Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
,❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
f __1 Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ❑Sphagnum moss {D8) (LRR T, III
Field Observations: ICI
Surface Water Present? Yes IDI No _Doll Depth (inches): None
Water Table Pressent? Yes _Jpt Nd L-_-Il Depth (inches): >36 in
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 26 in Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capiilary_frin4e)_
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Aerial photography on Google Earth.
Remarks:
This area of the property is influenced by several drainage ditches on and adjacent to the property.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute
Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft . _ -__}
%'Cover
Species?
1. Pinus taeda
60 %
Yes
2. Acer rubrurti
10 %
Yes
3. Quercus Alba
10 %
Yes
4. Liquidambar stvraciflua
5%
No
5.
6.
7.
-
8 --
W -
85 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 42.5%
20°% of total cover 17%
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft :
1. Ilex opaca
40 %
Yes
2. Corms florida
10 %
Yes
3. Ilex concea
5 %
No
4. Phytolaca Americana
5%
No
5.
7.
8.
60 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30%
20% of total cover: 12%
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2. Euthamia spp.
3.�
4.
5.
6.
7.
10.
11.
Sampling Point:
WS-1
Indicator
Status
Dominance Testworksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species 66 %
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
(13}
(A/B)
FAC
FAC
FACU
FAC
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FACW
FACU
FAC species
j FACU species
x 3 =
x 4 =
FAC
FACU
1 UPL species
x 5 =
-Column
Totals:
(A) (B)
20% _Yes FAC
5% No FAC
25 % = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12.6% 20°% of total cover: 5°%
Woody Vine Stratum {Plot size: 30 It
1. Smilax g lauca _ 5%u No FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia_ 5% No FAC
3.
4.
5. - -
10 % = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5, "L 20% of total cover: 2%
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
This area has been recently clear cut
Prevalence Index = B/A = _
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is _Q-0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetations (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger, in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplingfShrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
Hydrophytir
Vegetation
Present? Yes No _Q
U$ Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL _ _ Sampling Point: WS-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators,)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10 YR 211 muck
6-14 SYR 212
14-20 10 YR 412 loam
20-36+ 10YR 512 90 10YR 411 10 C M mottles
Type: C=Concentration, D--Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Q Histosol (Al)
Poiyvaiue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
l� Histic Epipedon (A2)
II Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S; T, U)
II 2 cm Muds {Al 0) (LRR S)
II Black Histic (A3)
0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
0 Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 160A,B)
II hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
II Stratified Layers (A5)
R Depleted Matrix (F3)
II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
n Redox Dark Surface (176)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
F1 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
II Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
II Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Mari (F10) (LRR U)
II Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al1)
II Depleted Ochdc (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P T U)
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) C] Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A,1SOB)
II Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
n Stripped Matrix (S6) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149X 153C, 153D)
n Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S. T, U)
Type: --
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present?
Matches USDA-NCSS Soil Web Network Link Profile Mapping for Wasda muck.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0