20170537 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report Comments_20200107

Strickland, Bev
From: Davis, Erin B
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 8:55 AM
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Hannah Bridge MY1 Report - DWR Comments
Good morning,
So... if you haven't sent comments to RES yet, please disregard/delete my first bullet under Requests. Randomly I was
going back through the report and did find the maintenance actions within the narrative - my mistake.
Thanks!
Erin B. Davis, PWS
Stream & Wetland Mitigation Specialist
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-3684 office
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) [mailto:[e-mail]1]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 8:31 AM
To: Davis, Erin B <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Hannah Bridge MY1 Report - DWR Comments
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Thank you for taking a look at this, Erin!!
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 22
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Davis, Erin B [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 4:35 PM
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
1

Cc: Haupt, Mac <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Hannah Bridge MY1 Report - DWR Comments
Hi Sam,
The Hannah Bridge site appears to have a few issues, as Ryan summarizes in the cover letter. We would consider both
TH3 with zero flow and wetlands with 1-3% hydroperiods to be "at -risk" areas in need of close monitoring/evaluation
next year.
Requests:
* Include planned maintenance actions noted in the cover letter (supplemental planting and invasive treatment)
within the actual monitoring report.
* Include stream and vegetation survey dates in Table 2.
* Include photo location points on Figure 2.
* Include a visual assessment statement regarding easement boundary condition. Ideally, also add photos of
crossings.
Super nitpicky corrections:
* Page 9 second paragraph states 12 automatic pressure transducer gauges, but should be 13.
* GW6 graph legend is labelled "GW1".
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Many thanks,
Erin
Fil