HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200154 Ver 1_Bio Assessment Memo 5_18_2019 with attachments_20200127
Memorandum
To: Alaina McCurdy, USEPA WIFIA Program
From: Jason Hales, PWS, CDM Smith
Date: May 17, 2019
Subject: Biological Assessment - Brunswick County Northwest Water Treatment Plant (NWTP)
Upgrade and Expansion Project
Introduction
This Biological Assessment (BA), prepared by CDM Smith on behalf of Brunswick County Public
Utilities for the Northwest Water Treatment Plant (NWTP) Upgrade and Expansion Project,
addresses the proposed action in compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973 (Title 16 United States Code [U.S.C.] § 1536 (c)), as amended.
Section 7 of the ESA requires that, through consultation (or conferencing for proposed species)
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), federal actions do not jeopardize the continued
existence of any threatened, endangered, or proposed species or result in the destruction or
adverse modification of critical habitat. Not all threatened and endangered species that occur in
North Carolina are subject to section 7 consultation with the USFWS. Atlantic and shortnose
sturgeon, sea turtles, when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the
National Marine Fisheries Service. This Biological Assessment evaluates the potential effects of the
proposed project on species that are listed under Section 7 of the ESA. A field reconnaissance
survey for federally protected threatened and endangered species was conducted for the proposed
NWTP upgrade and expansion project in Leland, North Carolina (Figure 1).
Project Description
The project study area (PSA) included the water treatment plant (WTP) site, proposed raw water
transmission main corridor from the existing Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority raw
water main to the WTP, and along the proposed concentrate discharge pipeline corridor and outfall
to the Cape Fear River (Figure 2).
Existing Environment
Habitat and land use types within the PSA include paved roadways, maintained right-of-ways,
utility lines and maintained easements, residences, uplands, wetlands, streams and the Cape Fear
River. Forested uplands along the raw water main, at the WTP and along the concentrate discharge
pipeline corridor contain primarily immature stands of loblolly pine, long leaf pine, water oak,
Page 2
sweet gum, red maple and tulip poplar. Most of these areas are in active silviculture production.
Adjacent to the Cape Fear River are stands mature red oak species with a few mature loblolly pines.
Wetlands include areas of high pocosin along the raw water main corridor, Clearwell Drive and on
the northern property; bay forest in the Carolina bays on Mt. Misery Road; coastal plain small
stream swamp adjacent to the stream features crossing Hooper Road and on the northern property;
and emergent wetlands in maintained areas in the road right-of-ways and along the raw water main
corridor. The remaining portion of the alignment is outside of wetlands, and the property consists
of wooded land and residences. The high pocosin has a dense undergrowth of fetter-bush, large
gallberry, ink berry and blueberry with a sparse canopy of loblolly pine, pond pine and laurel bay.
The bay forest contains a sparse understory with thick greenbrier and a dense canopy of young red
maples, loblolly pine and sweet gum. The coastal plain small stream swamp consists of mostly
hardwood trees including black gum, water oaks, red maples, along with some cane, and ferns. The
emergent wetlands contain species of rush and various grasses. The wooded land consists of
planted pine species, ranging from approximately twenty years to forty years in age. Open to
moderately dense understory vegetation consisting of mostly young pine trees and oaks was
observed within the wooded land. Representative photos are included.
Federally Protected Resources
A list of threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final
designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of the proposed project and/or may
be affected by the proposed project was provided for the survey area by the USFWS through the
ECOS-IPaC system on April 4th, 2019 (Attachment A). A field reconnaissance survey for the USFWS
federally protected threatened and endangered species on the list was conducted by CDM Smith
within the project area on January 4th and 17th, 2019 and March 4th and 14th, 2019. Species that are
endangered (E), threatened (T), candidate (C) and/or threatened due to similarity of appearance
(SAT) on the list provided for the survey area is summarized in Table 1 below.
Table 1. USFWS Species List for the NWTP Upgrade and Expansion Project - April 4th, 2019
Group Common Name Scientific Name Status
Mammals West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Threatened
Birds Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened
Red-cockaded
Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Wood Stork Mycteria americana Threatened
Reptiles American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SAT
Page 3
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened
Hawksbill Sea Turtle Eretmochelys imbricata Endangered
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii Endangered
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened
Snails Magnificent Ramshorn Planorbella magnifica Candidate
Flowering
Plants Cooley’s Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi Endangered
Rough-leaved
Loosestrife
Lysimachia
asperulaefolia Endangered
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Threatened
Results
The following outlines the findings from the field reconnaissance.
Mammals
West Indian Manatee
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April 1 to July 31
Species Description: Most adult Manatees are about 10 feet long and weigh 800 to 1,200 pounds,
although some larger than 12 feet and weighing as much as 3,500 pounds have been recorded.
These “gentle giants” have tough, wrinkled brown-to-gray skin that is continuously being sloughed
off. Hair is distributed sparsely over the body. With stiff whiskers around its mouth, the manatee’s
face looks like a walrus without tusks.
Habitat: Manatees move between freshwater, brackish, and saltwater environments. They prefer
large, slow-moving rivers, river mouths, and shallow coastal areas such as coves and bays. The
animals may travel great distances as they migrate between winter and summer grounds. During
the winter, Manatees congregate around warm springs and around power plants that discharge
warm water. During summer months, they have occasionally been seen as far north as Virginia and
Maryland.
Effects: Suitable habitat for the West Indian manatee is not present in the project area. The
proposed project will have no effect on this species.
Page 4
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Birds
Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) – Threatened
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: year-round.
Species Description: The Piping Plover is a small, stocky shorebird resembling a sandpiper. The
adults weigh 1.5 to 2 ounces, have a length of 7 inches, and a wingspread of 15 inches. Both sexes
are similar in size and color; upper parts are pale brownish, underparts are white. A black band
across the forehead over the eye, and a black ring around the base of the neck are distinguishing
marks in adults during the summer that are obscure during the winter.
Habitat Assessment: Piping Plovers nest along the sandy beaches of the Atlantic Coast, the gravelly
shorelines of the Great Lakes, and on river sandbars and alkali wetlands throughout the Great
Plains region. They prefer to nest in sparsely vegetated areas that are slightly raised in elevation
(like a beach berm). Piping Plover breeding territories generally include a feeding area; such as a
dune pond or slough, or near the lakeshore or ocean edge. These birds are primarily coastal during
the winter, preferring areas with expansive sand or mudflats (feeding) in close proximity to a sandy
beach (roosting).
Effects: Suitable habitat for the Piping Plover is not present in the project area. The proposed
project will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa) – Threatened
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: year-round.
Species Description: The Red Knot is 25-28 cm in length. Adults in spring are finely mottled with
grays above, black and light ochre, running into stripes on crown; throat, breast and sides of head
cinnamon-brown; dark gray line through eye; abdomen and undertail coverts white; uppertail
coverts white, barred with black. Adults in winter are pale ashy gray above, from crown to rump,
with feathers on back narrowly edged with white; underparts white, the breast lightly streaked and
speckled, and the flanks narrowly barred with gray. Adults in autumn the underparts of some
individuals show traces of the "red" of spring.
Habitat Assessment: The Red Knot is a large sandpiper characterized by reddish head and breast
during breeding plumage and gray the remaining year. They average 9-10 inches in length with
wingspans of 20-22 inches. They make one of the longest known migrations that extend upwards of
9,300 miles from the Artic to southern South America. They breed in dry tundra areas and are
found along intertidal, marine habitats (i.e. coastal inlets, estuaries, and bays) the remaining time.
Page 5
Effects: Suitable habitat for the Red Knot is not present in the project area. The proposed project
will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) – Endangered
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April 1 to July 31
Species Description: The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) is a small black-and-white woodpecker
with black wings, a black cap, a dull white breast with small black spots, and a barred, black-and-
white back; conspicuous large white cheek patch on each side of the head; red streaks ("cockades")
on either side of the head of adult males barely are visible; small white spots arranged in horizontal
rows along the back convey a "ladder-back" appearance.
Habitat: RCW typically occupy open, mature stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine, for
foraging and nesting/roosting habitat. RCW excavate cavities for nesting and roosting in living pine
trees, aged 60 years or older, and which are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age to
provide foraging habitat. Suitable foraging habitat consists of large mature pines with little or no
mid-story and abundant herbaceous ground cover including native bunchgrasses and forbs. The
historical range of this species included Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi,
North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.
Effects: Suitable foraging habitat is present for RCW in the form of young longleaf pine stands.
However, no suitable nesting habitat was present within the study area or contiguous to the stands
within the study area. Stands within and adjacent to the source line, the treatment plant and along
the discharge corridor are immature and contain a substantial understory component. The
proposed route is primarily with in the roadway right-of-way corridor, with minimal tree clearing.
The proposed project will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) – Threatened
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: June – September
Species Description: Wood storks are large, long-legged wading birds, about 5O inches tall, with a
wingspan of 60 to 65 inches. The plumage is white except for black primaries and secondaries and a
short black tail. The head and neck are largely un-feathered and dark gray in color. The bill is black,
thick at the base, and slightly decurved. Immature birds are dingy gray and have a yellowish bill.
Habitat: Wood storks typically nest in the upper branches of black gum or cypress trees that are in
standing water. Standing water deters mammalian predators and is an essential element of colony
sites. Wood storks require open access to nest trees and are frequently found in trees adjacent to
open water areas. Wood storks frequently feed in large groups in open wetlands where prey
Page 6
species are available and water depths are less than 20 inches. Forested riverine floodplain habitats
are frequently used, but a variety of ponds, ditches and diked marsh impoundments are important
habitats.
Effects: The shoreline of the Cape Fear River could provide foraging habitat for wood storks in the
project area. The Cape Fear River is a relatively high flow system and contains deep water along the
bank in the project area. This habitat is not optimal foraging habitat for wood storks. Potential
impacts to the shoreline of the Cape Fear River would be limited in size and duration for the
discharge pipe installation. Abundant higher quality wood stork foraging habitat is available in the
slower, shallower waters of the smaller tributary streams off the main river channel. The proposed
project will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Reptiles
American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) - Similarity of Appearance (Threatened)
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: year-round (only warm days in winter)
Species Description: The American alligator is a large, semi-aquatic, armored reptile that is related
to crocodiles. Their body alone ranges from 6 - 14 feet long. Almost black in color, it has prominent
eyes and nostrils with coarse scales over the entire body. It has a large, long head with visible upper
teeth along the edge of the jaws. Its front feet have 5 toes, while rear feet have 4 toes that are
webbed.
Habitat Assessment: American alligators inhabit fresh and brackish marshes, ponds, lakes, rivers,
swamps, bayous, canals, and large spring runs. They often bask on partially submerged logs or on
land next to the water. Alligators dig dens in river or lake margins or in marshes; they spend cold
winter and drought periods in the den.
Effects: The American alligator is listed as Threatened due to its similarity in appearance to the
American crocodile, which is extremely rare and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are
not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. The
proposed project will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas) – Threatened
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April – August
Species Description: The green sea turtle grows to a maximum size of about 4 feet and a weight of
440 pounds. It has a heart-shaped shell, small head, and single-clawed flippers. Color is variable.
Hatchlings generally have a black carapace, white plastron, and white margins on the shell and
Page 7
limbs. The adult carapace is smooth, keelless, and light to dark brown with dark mottling; the
plastron is whitish to light yellow. Adult heads are light brown with yellow markings. Identifying
characteristics include four pairs of costal scutes, none of which borders the nuchal scute, and only
one pair of prefrontal scales between the eyes.
Habitat Assessment: Green sea turtles are generally found in fairly shallow waters (except when
migrating) inside reefs, bays, and inlets. The turtles are attracted to lagoons and shoals with an
abundance of marine grass and algae. Open beaches with a sloping platform and minimal
disturbance are required for nesting. Green sea turtles apparently have a strong nesting site fidelity
and often make long distance migrations between feeding grounds and nesting beaches. Hatchlings
have been observed to seek refuge and food in Sargassum rafts.
Effects: Suitable habitat for green sea turtles is not present in the project area. The proposed project
will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Hawksbill Sea Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricate) – Endangered
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April – August
Species Description: The Hawksbill sea turtle is one of seven species of sea turtles found throughout
the world. One of the smaller sea turtles, it has overlapping scutes (plates) that are thicker than
those of other sea turtles. This protects them from being battered against sharp coral and rocks
during storm events. Adults range in size from 30 to 36 inches (0.8-1.0 meters) carapace length and
weigh 100 to 200 pounds (45-90 kilograms). Its carapace (upper shell) is an attractive dark brown
with faint yellow streaks and blotches and a yellow plastron (under shell). The name "hawksbill"
refers to the turtle's prominent hooked beak.
Habitat Assessment: The Hawksbill sea turtle is highly migratory and utilize the waters of more
than one country in their lifetimes. Thus, they share resources among many nations. Hawksbill Sea
Turtles regularly nest on beaches within the U.S. and all depend upon U.S. coastal waters for
foraging and migratory habitat during certain stages of their life history.
Effects: Suitable habitat for Hawksbill sea turtles is not present in the project area. The proposed
project will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle (Lepidochelys kempii) – Endangered
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April – August
Species Description: The Kemp's Ridley turtle is the smallest of the sea turtles, with adults reaching
about 2 feet in length and weighing up to 100 pounds. The adult Kemp's Ridley has an oval carapace
Page 8
that is almost as wide as it is long and is usually olive-gray in color. The carapace has five pairs of
costal scutes. In each bridge adjoining the plastron to the carapace, there are four inframarginal
scutes, each of which is perforated by a pore. The head has two pairs of prefrontal scales. Hatchlings
are black on both sides. The Kemp's Ridley has a triangular-shaped head with a somewhat hooked
beak with large crushing surfaces. This turtle is a shallow water benthic feeder with a diet
consisting primarily of crabs.
Habitat Assessment: Kemp’s Ridley sea turtles occur in the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico.
The females come ashore only to lay eggs.
Effects: Suitable habitat for Kemp’s Ridley sea turtles is not present in the project area. The
proposed project will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) – Endangered
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April – August
Species Description: The Leatherback sea turtle is the largest, deepest diving, and most migratory
and wide ranging of all sea turtles. The adult leatherback sea turtle can reach 4 to 8 feet in length
and 500 to 2000 pounds in weight. Its shell is composed of a mosaic of small bones covered by firm,
rubbery skin with seven longitudinal ridges or keels. The skin is predominantly black with varying
degrees of pale spotting; including a notable pink spot on the dorsal surface of the head in adults. A
toothlike cusp is located on each side of the gray upper jaw; the lower jaw is hooked anteriorly. The
paddle-like clawless limbs are black with white margins and pale spotting.
Habitat Assessment: The Leatherback sea turtle is highly migratory and utilize the waters of more
than one country in their lifetimes. Thus, they share resources among many nations. Leatherback
sea turtles regularly nest on beaches within the U.S. and all depend upon U.S. coastal waters for
foraging and migratory habitat during certain stages of their life history.
Effects: Suitable habitat for Leatherback sea turtles is not present in the project area. The proposed
project will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) – Threatened
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April – August
Species Description: Loggerhead sea turtles were named for their relatively large heads, which
support powerful jaws and enable them to feed on hard-shelled prey, such as whelks and conch.
The carapace (top shell) is slightly heart-shaped and reddish-brown in adults and sub-adults, while
the plastron (bottom shell) is generally a pale yellowish color. The neck and flippers are usually dull
Page 9
brown to reddish brown on top and medium to pale yellow on the sides and bottom. Weight of
adults in the southeastern U.S. is approximately 250 lbs (113 kg).
Habitat Assessment: The Loggerhead sea turtle is highly migratory and utilize the waters of more
than one country in their lifetimes. Thus, they share resources among many nations. Loggerhead
sea turtles regularly nest on beaches within the U.S. and all depend upon U.S. coastal waters for
foraging and migratory habitat during certain stages of their life history.
Effects: Suitable habitat for Loggerhead sea turtles is not present in the project area. The proposed
project will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Snails
Magnificent Ramshorn (Planorbella magnifica) – Candidate
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: year-round.
Species Description: The magnificent ramshorn is a freshwater snail. It has relatively thin brown to
horn colored shell with leopard-like spots and is thin and fragile. The center of the shell is deeply
sunken on each side, with coils having steep slopes which form acute to sub-acute angles on the
outside edges of the coils. The aperture of the shell is somewhat bell-shaped and very wide,
extending beyond the sides of the shell.
Habitat Assessment: The magnificent ramshorn is believed to be a southeastern North Carolina
endemic. Available information indicates that suitable habitat for the species is restricted to
relatively shallow, sheltered portions of still or sluggish, freshwater bodies with an abundance and
diversity of submerged aquatic vegetation. The species is known from only four sites in the lower
Cape Fear River Basin in North Carolina, all ponds with floating aquatic vegetation, Orton Pond,
Greenfield Lake, a millpond on Sand Hill Creek in Brunswick County and possibly a captive, refuge
population created by Dr. Andy Woods UNCW. The last observed living specimen in the wild was in
Orton Pond in 1986.
Effects: Suitable habitat for the Magnificent Ramshorn is not present in the project area. The
proposed project will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Page 10
Plants
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: mid-June through early July
Cooley’s Meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi) – Endangered
Species Description: Cooley's meadowrue is a perennial herb which grows from a rhizome. The
stems are usually 3.3 feet in height, but sometimes grow as high as 6.6 ft on recently burned sites.
Under ideal conditions, in full sun, these stems are erect; however, when shaded they are lax and
may trail along the ground or lean on other plants. The compound green leaves are divided into
three parts and the leaflets are lance-shaped and less than 2 centimeters long. The plant has both
basal and stem leaves. All parts of the plant are glabrous, having virtually no hairs or glands. Each
plant is unisexual, and the male to female ratio is 3 to 1. The flowers have no petals. The sepals on
the male plants are pale yellow to white. There are numerous stamens, and the filaments are pale
lavender. Female plants have green sepals, and their short-stalked, ribbed carpels develop into
narrowly ellipsoidal achenes. Cooley's meadowrue flowers in mid-June to early July. The fruits are
spindle-shaped carpels which develop into 6 millimeter long achenes, maturing in August or
September, and remaining on the plant into October. If the plants grow in partial shade instead of
full sun, flowering may be delayed by as much as two weeks.
Habitat Assessment: Cooley's meadowrue, occurs in circumneutral soils in sunny, moist to wet
grass-sedge bogs, wet-pine savannas over calcareous clays, and savannah-like areas, often at the
ecotones of intermittent drainages or non-riverine swamp forests. This rhizomatous perennial herb
is also found along plowed firebreaks, roadside ditches and rights-of-way, forest clearings
dominated by grass or sedge, and power line or utility rights-of-way. The species requires some
type of disturbance (e.g., mowing, clearing, periodic fire) to maintain its open habitat. The plant
typically occurs on slightly acidic (pH 5.8-6.6) soils that are loamy fine sand, sandy loam, or fine
sandy loam; at least seasonally moist or saturated. Plants often found growing with Cooley’s
meadowrue include tulip poplar bald cypress and Atlantic white cedar. Foreston, Grifton, Muckalee,
Torhunta, and Woodington are some of the soil series in which that the plant occurs.
Effects: Ecotones of intermittent drainages and non-riverine swamp forests, including bay forest
and pocosin; roadside ditches and rights-of-way; and power line or utility rights-of-way are present
in the project area. The ecotone transitions are in mapped upland and wetland fine sandy soils.
Two intermittent drainages with wetlands are located along the source line. The wetlands are
emergent and maintained as a right-of-way. Two similar intermittent drainages are located on
Clearwell Drive. These drainages have emergent wetlands in the right-of-way along Clearwell Drive
and pocosin vegetation beyond the right-of-way. In between Clearwell Drive and Hooper Road, Mt.
Misery Road crosses two bay forests with emergent wetlands in the right-of-way and forested
wetlands to the south. On Hooper Road, there is a perennial drainage with forested bottomland
hardwood wetlands. The northern property has two intermittent drainages with adjacent
bottomland hardwood wetlands. The adjacent bottomland hardwood wetlands grade uphill into
Page 11
pocosin wetlands. These areas are potential habitat for Cooley's meadowrue. No individuals of
Cooley's meadowrue were observed during the species habitat survey conducted in January and
March 2019 for this project. Therefore, the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect this species.
Biological Conclusion: may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect
Rough-leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) – Endangered
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: mid-May through June
Species Description: Rough-leaved loosestrife is a perennial herb that grows 30 - 60 cm tall. The
triangular shaped leaves are often opposite on shorter stems (less than 30 cm tall) and tend to be
arranged in whorls of three or four encircling taller stems. The leaves are widest at the base (0.8 -
2.0 cm wide) and have three prominent veins. Contrary to the common name, the leaf surfaces are
smooth to the touch. The yellow flowers are 1.5 cm across with yellow-orange anthers and occur on
terminal racemes that are 3 - 10 cm long. Flowering occurs from mid-May through June, with fruits
(capsules) present from July through October. Since only a few stems in each population flower in
any given year, surveyors should look for the leaves rather than yellow flowers. Stipitate glands are
usually present on most parts of the plant.
Habitat Assessment: Rough-leaved loosestrife, endemic to the Coastal Plain and Sandhills of North
and South Carolina, generally occurs in the ecotones or edges between longleaf pine uplands and
pond pine pocosins (areas of dense shrub and vine growth usually on a wet, peaty, poorly drained
soil) on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils overlaying sand. Rough-
leaved loosestrife has also been found on deep peat in the low shrub community of large Carolina
bays. The grass-shrub ecotone, where Rough-leaved loosestrife is found, is fire-maintained, as are
the adjacent plant communities (longleaf pine - scrub oak, savanna, flatwoods, and pocosin).
Suppression of naturally-occurring fire in these ecotones results in shrubs increasing in density and
height and expanding to eliminate the open edges required by this plant. Several populations are
known from roadsides and power line rights of way where regular maintenance mimics fire and
maintains vegetation so that herbaceous species are open to sunlight. Blaney, Gilead, Johnston,
Kalmia, Leon, Mandarin, Murville, Torhunta, and Vaucluse are some of the soil series in which the
plant occurs.
Effects: The ecotones habitats in the project area discussed above for rough-leaved loosestrife are
potential habitat for Rough-leaved loosestrife. The upland ridges associated with these areas are
mapped Baymeade soils. Baymeade and other xeric sandy soils are associated with long leaf pine
communities. Though not the dominant species, long leaf pines are present in some upland
communities of the ecotones. No individuals of rough-leaved loosestrife were observed during the
species habitat survey conducted in January and March 2019 for this project. Therefore, the
proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect this species.
Page 12
Biological Conclusion: may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect
Seabeach Amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus) – Threatened
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: July through October
Species Description: Seabeach amaranth is an annual plant found on the dunes of Atlantic Ocean
beaches. The stems are fleshy and pinkish-red or red, with small rounded leaves. The leaves, with
indented veins, are clustered toward the tip of the stem and have a small notch at the rounded tip.
Flowers and fruits are relatively inconspicuous, borne in clusters along the stems. Germination
occurs over a relatively long period of time, generally from April to July. Upon germination, the
species forms a small unbranched sprig, but soon begins to branch profusely into a clump. This
clump often reaches 30 cm in diameter and consists of five to 20 branches. Occasionally, a clump
may get as large as a meter or more across, with 100 or more branches.
Habitat Assessment: Seabeach amaranth occurs on barrier island beaches, where its primary
habitat consists of overwash flats at accreting ends of islands and lower foredunes and upper
strands of non-eroding beaches. It occasionally establishes small temporary populations in other
habitats, including sound-side beaches, blowouts in foredunes, and sand and shell material placed
as beach replenishment or dredge spoil. Seabeach amaranth appears to be intolerant of competition
and does not occur on well-vegetated sites. The species appears to need extensive areas of barrier
island beaches and inlets, functioning in a relatively natural and dynamic manner. These
characteristics allow it to move around in the landscape as a fugitive species, occupying suitable
habitat as it becomes available.
Effects: Suitable habitat for the seabeach amaranth is not present in the project area. The proposed
project will have no effect on this species.
Biological Conclusion: no effect
Critical Habitat
Critical habitat within the boundary of the proposed project area under USFWS jurisdiction were
not listed on April 4th, 2019 letter provided for the survey area by the USFWS.
Conclusions and Determination
Rough-leaved loosestrife and Cooley's meadowrue are the only species which may be affected by
the proposed project. For both species, although no individuals were identified during the survey,
the plants were past their seasonal flowering stage (spring). The proposed project is designed
primarily within the existing road right-of-way and potential impacts to un maintained areas will be
the minimum for the treatment plant upgrade and expansion project. Trenchless construction
methods will also be used to cross stream and wetland areas where practicable. Therefore, the
proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect these species. None of the species
Page 13
on the list provided by the USFWS for the survey area on April 4th, 2019 were seen during the on-
site survey. Based on minimal planned impacts and no observations of the listed species during the
field survey, the proposed action will not adversely affect any threatened or endangered species or
critical habitats currently listed by the USFWS.
Completed by:
5/18/19
Jason Hales, PWS, CDM Smith
Biologist
Date
Attachments: Photographs
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Project Study Area Map
USFWS IPaC Report Letter, April 4th, 2019
Page 14
Photographs
Photo 1: Cape Fear River and upland community in northern portion of the project area.
Photo 2: Small stream and adjacent small stream swamp wetlands in northern portion of the
project area.
Page 15
Photo 3: Forested uplands in northern portion of the project area.
Photo 4: High pocosin in central portion of the project area.
Page 16
Photo 5: Bay forest on Mt. Misery Road in central portion of the project boundary.
Photo 6: Emergent wetlands near the treatment plant.
³Figure 1. Project Vicinity mapNorthwest W TP Expansion SiteBrunswick County, North CarolinaCDM Project No. 23266202468101Miles
Project Location
Leland
³Figure 2. Project Study Area mapNorthwest W TP Expansion SiteBrunswick County, North CarolinaCDM Project No. 232662
0 1,700 3,400850
Feet
Leg en d
NWTP PSA
Discharge Route
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: (919) 856-4520 Fax: (919) 856-4556
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2019-SLI-0736
Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-01664
Project Name: Northwest Water Treatment Plant
Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
April 04, 2019
04/04/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-01664 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at john_ellis@fws.gov.
04/04/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-01664 3
Attachment(s):
▪Official Species List
04/04/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-01664 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
(919) 856-4520
04/04/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-01664 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code:04EN2000-2019-SLI-0736
Event Code:04EN2000-2019-E-01664
Project Name:Northwest Water Treatment Plant
Project Type:WATER SUPPLY / DELIVERY
Project Description:Expansion of the Brunswick County Northwest Water Treatment Plant to
allow greater removal of emerging contaminants (e.g., GenX, Nafion
Byproducts 1 and 2, other perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and
numerous other contaminants) that can be found in the source raw water.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/34.31762438272368N78.08880602792922W
Counties:Brunswick, NC
04/04/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-01664 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 15 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1.NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
This species is also protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and may have additional
consultation requirements.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
Threatened
1
04/04/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-01664 4
Birds
NAME STATUS
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus
Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except
those areas where listed as endangered.
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Threatened
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
Threatened
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
Wood Stork Mycteria americana
Population: AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, SC
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477
Threatened
04/04/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-01664 5
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas
Population: North Atlantic DPS
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Threatened
Hawksbill Sea Turtle Eretmochelys imbricata
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3656
Endangered
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Endangered
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Endangered
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta
Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110
Threatened
Snails
NAME STATUS
Magnificent Ramshorn Planorbella magnifica
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6216
Candidate
04/04/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-01664 6
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281
Endangered
Rough-leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Endangered
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
Threatened
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.