20100516 Ver 1_Mitigation Closeout Report_20170526

UT ALTAMAHAW
DMS ID #92837
USACE ACTION ID # SAW2009-02079
DWQ 401# 20100516
CLOSEOUT REPORT: STREAM AND WETLAND
Protect Setting & Classifications
Meeting XY Coordinates:
36.17751,-79.47856
County
Alamance
General Location
Burlington
River Basin:
Cape Fear
Physiographic Region:
Piedmont
Ecoregion:
Southern Outer Piedmont
USGS Hydro Unit:
03030002
NCDWQ Sub -basin:
03-06-02
Wetland Classification
Riparian Non-Riverine
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
N
Project Performers
Source Agency:
DMS
Provider:
N/A
Designer:
Ecological Engineering, LLP
Monitoring Firm
Ecological Engineering, LLP
Spillway Remediation
Riverworks, Inc. &
Backwater Environmental
Plant remediation
Riverworks, Inc. &
Carolina Silvics
Approved for transfer to
Stewardship
Yes
Stewards
NCDEQ
Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
June 2009
Permitted
N/A
Construction Completed
Feb 2011
As -built survey
August 2011
Monitoring Year-1
August 2012
Invasive Plant Control
October 2013
Monitoring Year-2
July 2013
Supplemental Planting
November 2013
Invasive Plant Control
May 2014
Monitoring Year 3
July 2014
Invasive Plant Control
June 2015
Spillway Repair
August 2015
Monitoring Year 4
June 2015
Monitoring Year 5
September 2016
Closeout Submission
May 2017

DMS Planning Context:
The UT Altamahaw stream and wetland project is located within HUC 03030002030010, the Travis/Tickle
Creeks watershed, which is listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2009 Cape Fear River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP). The project is also located in the Little Alamance, Travis and Tickle Local
Watershed Plan (LWP). Currently, DMS has five other projects in this TLW/LWP (UT to Haw River, UT to
Haw (Gwynn), UT to Haw (Beckom), Glen Raven and Aycock Springs Site). UT to Haw River drains to the
Haw approximately 0.5 miles downstream.
The 2009 Cape Fear RBRP indicates that agricultural sources are likely the main source of stressors in the
watershed. The Little Alamance, Travis and Tickle LWP indicates that this watershed suffers from impacts due
to suburban development and agricultural runoff including stream bank erosion, lack of riparian buffer,
livestock access to streams, nutrients and fecal coliform bacteria. The watersheds drain to the Haw River, a
major recreational and cultural asset for the region, and subsequently to Jordan Lake, a drinking water supply
also classified by DWQ as a Nutrient Sensitive Water. Goals of this LWP include: improved riparian
management and protection of stream and wetland resources.
The goals of the UT Altamahaw project are consistent with DMS watershed planning goals. The project
addresses agricultural stressors by eliminating cattle access to the stream, establishing an effective riparian
buffer and improving instream and wetland habitat ultimately reducing nutrient and sediment inputs onsite.
Proiect Setting and Background Summary
The UT Altamahaw Site (Site) is located in Alamance County, approximately 6.1 miles west-northwest of
Burlington and 1.3 miles east-southeast of the Altamahaw community. Historically, land use surrounding the
Site has consisted of agricultural production and cattle grazing. There are two tributaries; UT to Altamahaw
and UT to UT Altamahaw. The tributaries had a narrow buffer of mature trees and cattle had access to the
stream. The stream banks were denuded of vegetation and the majority of the riparian buffer lacked hardwood
trees. Prior to project implementation, an upstream farm pond periodically accessed an unstable overflow
channel during high flow events. The overflow channel outfall discharges to the Site's main tributary, this area
has been removed from stream credit due to single sided easement. There was concentrated flow from the cattle
pasture along the northern side of the Site evidenced by rills, directing sediment and pollutants to the stream.
DMS provided cattle exclusion fencing and alternative water supply, improved the existing culverted crossing
and emergency spillway of the upstream pond by adding erosion control measures, installed a vegetated level
spreader, and planted the 3.7-acre conservation easement.
During the five-year monitoring period, one repair was completed in August 2015 on the overflow channel.
Post -repair observations showed movement of some of the installed rock material but inspections during the
following year indicated the material had stabilized. DMS relocated the spillway rock that had moved towards
the channel in early 2017. There is some erosion along the cattle crossing due to compaction of the roadway.
The compacted roadway allows the water to bypass the level spreader and is entering the stream near the pipe
under the crossing. There was one supplemental planting in November 2013 and all of the vegetation plots are
meeting 260 stems/acre including planted and volunteer stems. There were three invasive species treatments in
2013, 2014, and 2015.

Throughout the five-year monitoring period, a beaver dam was present off -site and created a small backwater
effect onto the Site. A narrow band, four to five feet, of mowing has occurred along the fence line as allowed in
the Letter of Intent and Conservation Easement Agreement (Appendix D).
Post construction, a total of 1,477 linear feet of stream was enhanced through cattle exclusion, planting, and
sediment reduction and 0.026 acres of wetland were enhanced through planting. The conservation easement
totaling 3.75 acres protects streams, wetlands and the riparian buffer in perpetuity.
Goals and Obiectives:
The specific goals and objectives for the UT Altamahaw Site were:
• Reduce nutrient and sediment water quality stressors,
• Provide uplift in water quality functions,
• Improve instream and wetland aquatic habitats, including riparian terrestrial habitats, and
• Provide for greater overall instream and wetland habitat complexity and quality.
Success Criterion
Success Criteria
Measured Parameter
Criteria Met
Yes, all plots are exceeding 260
Vegetation
Stems/Acre need to meet 260
stems/acre when planted and
volunteers stems are counted

Asset Table
Restoration
Pre -Construction
Mitigation
Watershed
As -built
Mitigation
Mitigation
Reach
(acreage/
Approach
Acreage
(acreage/
Ratio
Units
Comments
linear feet)
(s .mi)
linear feet
UT
Less 85' for
Altamahaw
1,347
EII
0.51
1,347-85=1,262
2.5:1
504.8
one sided
buffer
UT to UT
130
EII
0.39
130
2.5:1
52
Altamahaw
Riparian
(Non-
0.026
E
N/A
0.026
2:1
0.013
riverine)
Mitigation Unit Totals
Stream Mitigation
Riparian
Non -Riparian
TotalRiparian
Nutrient Offset
Units (SMU)
Wetland Units
Wetland Units
AMU)
Buffer
556.8
0.013
0
0
0
0

-W41
150
50'
'N-r-A
4*1
Ott,
*7-4
Prepared For: ASSET MAP Map Source:
UT to Altamahaw Site - DIVIS Project No. 92837 2014 Aerial from FIGURE 1
&TI NCOneMap.com
Ewiro menfo; Alamance Co., NC April 2017

y
0 500 1,000
1" = 1,000'
w
(7
U
t�)
700 v
;/4A7 DH
��\0
Ana
Legend
Conservation Easement
.a
- Jx
Prepared For: USGS Topo Map Map Source:
Kc UT to Altamahaw Site - DMS Project No. 92837 2013 USGS Quadrangle FIGURE 2
Lake Burlington
Ewiro ," ra+ Alamance Co., NC April 2017
QualNy
U

3 ; Auxillary spillway repair.
o 75 ,so f Rock has stabilized.
1" = 150' r
S `^
Erosion of road bed
upstream and downstream
of the culvertOA
all
Invasive Treatment -
throughout easement.
ice.; .r
V-Z
Beaver dam off -site
Legend f causing backwater.
• Project Streams • '7.
2013 Replant Areas
Permitted Mowing ~; Ali :x
Wetland Enhancement
Conservation Easement 3.75 acres �{►'' i
Prepared For: REMEDIATION MAP Map Source:
UT to Altamahaw Site - DMS Project No. 92837 FIGURE 4
2014 Aerial from
NCOneMap.com
Ewiro menfa+ Alamance Co., NC February 2016
Quoll+y

Verification of Bankfull Events
UT Altamahaw/ 92837
Date of Data Collectil
November 3 & 4, 2012
Method �ffLhoto
NC State Climate Office
# (if available
n/a"
None
7/31/2013
June 5-13 and June 28-July 14, 2013
NC State Climate Office, Crest Gage & Usual Assessment
None
7/15/2014
Prior to 7/15/2014
Wrack line observations
None
7/15/2014
7/15/2014
Observed rainfall in excess of 3" in less than 12 hours
None
6/5/2015
Prior to 6/5/2015
Crest Gauge
None
*Based on daily rainfall data prior to installation of Crest Gage. Approximately2.4 inches of rain was recorded over a span of two days.
10
8
2
0
UT Altamahaw Site 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfali -Cumulative 2012-2016
Alamance County, INC
2 = co m
ca m n D
� 4
f6 �
7 lL
Month
� MY1 2012
- - MY2 2013
MY3 2014
MY4 2015
MY5 2016
30%
70%
ry `m c`u
� n �
a
p > U
Z ❑

Stem County Each Species per Plot
DMS Project No. 92837
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
6
2
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
2
3
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
3
Carya
hickory
Tree
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
Tree
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
3
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
2
2
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
1
1
Ilex verticillata
common winterberry
Shrub
1
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
3
5
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
6
6
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
1
1
6
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
2
1
1
Ostrya virginiana
hophornbeam
Tree
Oxydendrum arboreum
sourwood
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
11
3
3
1
2
1
9
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus
oak
Tree
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
3
3
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
2
21
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
6
1
1
Rhus
sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
2
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
3
Sambucus nigra
European black elderberry
Shrub
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
Ulmus americana
JAmerican elm
Tree
2
2
1
1
1
7
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
2
Monitoring Year 5 Stem count
Monitoring Year 5 (2016)
Monitoring Year 4 (2015)
Monitoring Year 3 (2014)
Monitoring Year 2 (2013)
Monitoring Year 1 (2012)
16
271
8
18
101
21
13
27
5
35
648
1093
324
728
405
8501
526
1093
202
1416
607
850
283
850
445
809
567
1012
283
1295
688
1052
314
688
445
190
809
1376
202
1335
324
567
405
648
283
324
405
4861
121
728
1001
3501
3001
4501
2501
450
3501
4501
250
1350

DMS Recommendation and Conclusion
The UT Altamahaw Site has completed 5 years of successful monitoring. The planted and volunteer vegetation
is meeting the success criteria, the cattle are excluded from the conservation easement, and the emergency
spillway is stable.
DMS recommends that the Site be closed generating 556.8 SMUs and 0.013 WMUs.
Contingencies
No contingencies.

Baseline & Post Construction Photos:
Baseline 2012
I
Photostation l Vegetation Plot 1
Photostation 17 Vegetation Plot 4
I
Photostation 17 Vegetation Plot 4
Photostation 22 facing upstream UT Altamahaw Creek Photostation 22 facing upstream UT Altamahaw Creek

Appendix A: Property Ownership Information & Verification of Protection Mechanism
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s), available at the specified
County Register of Deeds office, and is linked to the property portfolio at:
http://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Libra ry/Property/Property%20Portfolio/92837 UTtoAlta
mahaw PD 2008.odf
Project Name 11 County 11 Grantor Name 11 Deed Info
mance ICharles S. Hursey Sr, et al TDB 2856, P 900
Property Rights
servation Easement
Long-term stewardship of this property is managed by the NC DEQ Stewardship Program.

haw
Review of Letter of Intent and
Conservation Easement Agreement
Project Tracking System # 92837
SPO File #: 001-P
County: Alamance
Property: Conservation Easement (+/- 4 acres)
Tract PIN# 8858849144
Project: UT to Altamahaw Stream Enhancement Project
Owner(s): Charles S. Hursey Sr. & ETAL
Property owner(s) complete the section below.
Please return this form in the enclosed envelope
I have reviewed the letter of intent and conservation easement document.
fs . I am in agreement with the letter of intent; temporary construction easement and conservation
easement template for future access in reference to the above mentioned property.
I have reviewed the letter of intent and conservation easement and have the following
concerns:
Signed
Date;,3-.-, /�—; ;
Date:

Letter of Intent
Proposed EEP Stream Restoration Project
This document sets forth agreements between the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
and the landowner regarding the proposed EEP restoration project described below. EEP is
proposing a stream enhancement project on an unnamed tributary to Altamahaw Creek located on
a farm owned by Charles Hursey in Alamance County. EEP is hereby providing a letter of intent
regarding proposed responsibilities of EEP as they relate to the "UT to Altamahaw" enhancement
project.
PROJECT NAME: UT to Altamahaw EEP # 92837
EEP intends to enhance, or preserve stream and wetland areas on this site. As part of these efforts,
EEP intends pay for the installation and design of agricultural BMPs (best management practices)
necessary to protect the streams. BMPs will include exclusionary cattle fencing, one alternative
water supply well and one watering station and two gates.
Exclusionary fencing will be installed along, and approximately 1-foot outside of, the easement
boundary as it generally occurs on the tributary which occurs in the current pasture area. A
5-foot grassy clearance zone inside the exclusionary fencing and on the conservation easement
will be allowed to be managed by mowing, or other manual means, to keep this area open and
clear of woody vegetation.
EEP will provide grading and stone for the existing emergency spillway of the farm pond. EEP
will provide stone cover for the existing culvert crossing.
NOTE:
Donations of land or conservation easements may be tax deductible, however, please be aware
that any amenities, such as fencing or bridges, built on your land may have property tax
implications. Please check with your tax attorney regarding the effects of any improvements.
The completion of this project and the items described in this letter are subject to budget and
timing constraints.
Funding is available only for land that is protected by the restrictions described in the attached
permanent conservation easement agreement.
Director of Operations
Ecosysteni Enhancement Program
t,,,,P 12 )nf)R

0 75 150
1" 150'
A".
61
Ile
X
Legend
• Project Streams
2013 Replant Areas
Permitted Mowing
Wetland Enhancement
Conservation Easement 3.75 acres
Prepared For:
REMEDIATION
MAP
Map Source:
1
UT to Altarnahaw Site - DIVIS Project No. 92837
2014 Aerial from
FIGURE 4
NCOneMap.com
Ewiro menfa?
Alamance Co., NC
February 2016

APPENDIX B: Permits & Jurisdictional Determination
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF LNOINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW2009-02079 County: Alamance U.S.G.S. Quad: Lake Burlington
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINAI"ION
Property Owner/Agent: G. Lane Sauls Jr.
Address: Ecological Engineering, I_LP
128 Raleigh Street
Holly Springs, NC 27540
Telephone No.: 919-557-0929
Property description:
Size (acres) -4 acres Nearest Town Altamahaw
Nearest Waterway Altamahaw Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 0303002 Coordinates N-79.47856 W 36.17751
Location description Project area located on the southeast portion of the property at 2884 Altamahaw Union Ridge Road
(SR10021, Green Level, Alamance County, NC.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have this
property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction, To be considered final, a jurisdictional
deternination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR fart 331).
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area delineated. Due to the size of
your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner.
For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered Final, any delineation must be verified by
the Corps.
The waters of the U.S. on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion. this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations. may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
X The waters of die U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on Elie plat signed
by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 9 December 2009. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed live years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine their requirements.

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this determination
and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Steve Kichefski at 919-554- I884 ext. 35.
C. Basis For Determinatioir
There are two perennial streams and one abutting wetland. The two crcnnial streams are unnamed tributaries to
Altamahaw Creek and are relatively permanent waters RPW . The unnamed tributaries now to the named RPW of
Altamahaw Creek. Altamahaw Creek flows to the Haw River, a traditionally navigable water ITNW1, which is a tributary to
the Cape Fear River a navigable water of the United States. The Ordinary High Water Marks OHWMs of the streams were
indicated by the followin It ysical characteristics: Bed and banks clear natural line im pressed on the bank s helvi np, scour.
The wetland meets the hvdro h v tic vegetation, wetland hvd rology, and h dric soil criteria of the 1987 Cyr s of En gineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and is con ti uous with one of the unnamed tributaries on the site .
D. Remarks
Site is to be used for Stream Enhancement (Type 11 by the EEP. Andy Williams and I met Lane Sauls Jr. of Ecological
En uincerin LLP on -site for the Jurisdictional Determination. See attached man for the approximate locations of
Jurisdictional Waters described in this determination. An overflow channel from a yond in the northeast portion of the
pfliect area was inspected and determined to be a non 6urisdictional drainage feature.
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 C1=R part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) Form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed F A form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Steve Kichefski, Regulatory Specialist,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
333E Heritage Trade Drive. Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 C1=R part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by February 8, 2010.
**IL is not necessary to submit an RI -A form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence."
Corps Regulatory Official: YL
Date December 9. 2009 Expiration Date December 9, 2014
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our webs ite at littp;l/reguIatory.usacesurvey.cam/ to coinplele the survey
online.
Copy furnished:
Sue Homewood
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem. NC 27107

N0TIFICATION 01- ADM INIS* RATlV1 AI'll k:AL. OPTIONS ANI.) PROCESS AND
10"QLIES`I' I.OR APPEAL.
Applicant: EEP- Agent: Lane Sauls, l ilc NutilhCr: ti:�w?atr�r-[>?t»�i
Ecological Engineering, LLP
Date: December 9, 2Il(]�)
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/re or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
■ OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. Afler evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the pen -nit document and return it to the district engineer for Final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
■ APPEAL: if you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This fonn must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
■ ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
■ APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Adiiiinistrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to [lie district engineer, This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Andrew Williams, Regulatory Project Manager Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Si nature of appellant or agent-_
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn:Andrew Williams, Project Manager, Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8801

MAHAW
ALTA� f4LiHAMAtiAW- lllll I RIDGE>
ti� Cp SITE
1
VICINITY MAP
(NTS)
NCGS "OSSIPEE"
N = 884,322.400 U.S. SURVEY FEET
E = 1,849,778.376 U.S. SURVEY FEET
NC GRID (NAD83-2001)
WETLAND
DATAFORM
LOCATION.
33 95 Ai
11 .
CORB2 11s4�
• V s J'��111�3
i
st1.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
BOUNDARY OF JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS
DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION
OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE
UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
REGULATORY OFFICIAL 4,-
TITLE
DATE f ✓
USACE ACTION ID vj- 3go - u o -7
CORNER 13 FROM PLAT
CORNER 13 AS LOCATED
/ UPLAND
ERB _ DATAFORM
)R 13 LOCATION
A3 �3 '
25
47n�h,eA
WETLANDS
14 0.026 AC 110
,0
3 112 11 t'4
.�t09
JAMES E WEBSTER s
WILLA JEAN WEBSTER STONE
DB 322, PG 545 COO 11
LEGEND N 630 r
620
• EIP =EXISTING IRON PIPE
• ERB = EXISTING REBAR WITH ALUMINUM CAP
CGF = COMBINED GRID FACTOR
N 89'20'28" W
9234.88' GROUND DIS
9234.68 GRID DISTAP
CGF = 0.9999775
27 28 29
.020 130 L.F.
0%,yr7 -- STREAM 2
12 a f+t9
13 18
ti
14 17
h1 16
3p
NOTES 70'
AREAS ARE BY COORDINATE CALCULATION.
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES
EXPRESSED IN U.S. SURVEY FEET UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
REFERENCES
DEED BOOK 1765, PAGE 523
PLAT BOOK 67. PAGE 207
I, RODNEY E. MORRIS. CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP IS CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND WAS DRAWN
FROM A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON JULY 31,
2009; THAT ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY AT THE TIME OF THE
SURVEY, ARE SHOWN.
,6#6,4
ERB - COR 8 - EL=628.74
N = 884,216.211 U.S. SURVEY FEET
E = 1,859,012.443 U.S. SURVEY FEET
TANCE INC GRID (NAD83-2001)
CHARLES SYLVESTER HURSEY, SR
CHARLES SYLVESTER HURSEY II
CHRISTOPHER ROBERT HURSEY
CAREY ELIZABETH HURSEY
DB 1765, PG 523
PL B 67, PG 207
ERB 114
COR 14
a:
96�
06 1104 L.F. i
STREAM 1
�. • 97
30 g��104
fI 98Q
i2103
0' 33 �101�. ° 36
34
ERB �2 9
COR 20 6a ij1' 1
i
� L-3574-
_ 0
�o' . SURD
E.
10,
3�9
64
91
87
sa : a•�• '`47
PEGGY GOLDEN REGISTER
DB 2174, PG 834
SAMUEL 0 BASHAM/
X JUDI G BASHAW
LIFE ESTATE RESERVED
ERB /
COR 9
�� EIP
COR 1
Dl 243 L.F.
'�
p ^ STREAM o
o9L
STREAM
SEGMENTS
ARE CONNECTED
BY JURISDICIONALI
WATERS
�2\
ERB Q, �
COR 16
CV
s7
ERB
7 49�6 C
72 162
COR 7
/A�'�
ERB
73 i P61
:s0
COR 15
74�69
ERB
75', COR 17
76� �58
'
t`
C9
•'•57
78 56 '
- 54
''�'�¢83b2 8i
55
•
8078
= r-5
51 53
4,'�j ,'�
50
��
1-1s
3
26
1321,7125
ERB
13OR
�! 2
34,F�
123
ERB
COR 5
f�
ERB'
COR 6
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
1. 3.01 AC (BY PLAT) ERB
�g3a 2.92 AC (BY FIELD LOCATION} COR 18
.r �6 EL=625.39
re37 2Fs2 $0 40 $0 160
ERB 6g 5a
COR 19 S SCALE 1 "= 80
WETLANDS POINTS
NC GRID COORDINATES
Al
N
884001.20
E
1858335.02
A2
N
884027.54
E
1858351.41
A3
N
884012.76
E
1858389.13
A4
N
883983.32
E
1858411.21
A5
N
884001.50
E
1858371.24
A6
N
884004.16
E
1858349.01
Im
Lwj
Q
ca
CONSERVATION EASEMENT �!
0.74 AC o
ERB
COR 2
njp
r'J
COR$3 CHARLES SYLVESTER HURSEY, SR
CHARLES SYLVESTER HURSEY If
CHRISTOPHER ROBERT HURSEY
CAREY ELIZABETH HURSEY
DB 1765, PG 523
PL B 67, PG 207
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S
45'40'26"
E
32.50'
L2
N
38'52'52"
W
55.17
L3
S
30' 12'55"
W
90.21
L4
S
46`38'31 "
E
53.51
L5
S
41'29'45"
W
49.37'
L6
S
53'47'01"
W
25.10
L7
N
31'53'07"
E
31.02
L8
S
68"36'09"
E
40.51
L9
S
36'52'48"
E
36.80'
L10
N
65'32'33"
W
43.91
Lll
N
83'14'11"
W
22..38'
L12
S
78'03'33"
W
14.30

STREAM
BANK LOCATION
POINT
NORTHING
EASTING
POINT
NORTHING
EASTING
POINT
NORTHING
EASTING
47
883975.6
1858823.3
93
883969.9
1858714.4
1
883947.4
1858294.2
48
883984.0
1858842.6
94
883962.2
1858704.8
2
883962.1
1858305.1
49
883980.9
1858864.8
95
883957.9
1858696.4
3
883983.9
1858313.2
50
883965.6
1858892.7
96
883944.9
1858689.1
4
883991.8
1858334.4
51
883974.3
1858905.1
97
883911.3
1858693.4
5
883947.9
1858384.3
52
883972.5
1858932.5
98
883882.2
1858689.5
6
883933.8
1858403.2
53
883976.9
1858942.9
99
883872.2
1858678.1
7
883931.2
1858424.4
54
883990.8
1858952.4
100
883857.5
1858667.4
8
883940.5
1858442.7
55
883998.9
1858976.0
101
883842.5
1858626.2
9
883925.3
1858454.4
56
884011.6
1858994.1
102
883858.8
1858590.0
10
883898.6
1858447.2
57
884017.3
1859001.4
103
883873.4
1858584.3
11
883896.7
1858469.7
58
884023.6
1859009.7
104
883901.6
1858605.8
12
883884.7
1858475.5
59
-884047.9
1859003.5
105
883917.1
1858585.9
13
883874.4
1858471.8
60
884061.5
1859000.7
106
883927.0
1858566.6
14
883849.8
1858477.7
61
884075.1
1859007.1
107
883931.9
1858542.3
15
883840.3
1858480.6
62
884080.4
1859013.2
108
883932.2
1858513.0
16
883837.0
1858487.1
63
884090.3
1859018.5
109
883938.9
1858488.8
17
883849.2
1858479.1
64
884099.6
1859016.8
110
883960.0
1858460.7
18
883875.5
1858475.0
65
884109.1
1859009.7
111
883944.7
1858442.7
19
883885.2
1858482.3
66
884114.0
1859010.5
112
883939.9
1858420.7
20
883900.6
1858475.3
67
884118.5
1859006.4
113
883940.6
1858405.7
21
883903.9
1858454.2
68
884106.8
185900.6.4
114
883951.3
1858390.4
22
883925.9
1858460.8
69
884100.6
1859010.7
115
884000.8
1858334.7
23
883944.3
1858449.7
70
884090.0
1859015.6
116
883986.9
1858309.4
24
883953.0
1858458.1
71
884083.6
1859012.6
117
883968.8
1858302.3
25
883955.2
1858463.6
72
884075.2
1858997.1
118
883950.4
1858290.4
26
883934.1
1858486.0
73
884068.3
1858994.0
119
884146.4
1859075.4
27
883925.2
1858512.4
74
884047.6
1859000.5
120
884143.6
1859088.9
28
883925.1
1858541.7
75
884029.7
1859004.4
121
884149.2
1859104.8
29
883922.7
1858563.1
76
884021.8
1858996.6
122
884173.2
1859112.8
30
883910.4
1858581.1
77
884001.7
1858974.6
123
884205.6
1859138.8
31
883902.1
1858603.2
78
883993.5
1858950.5
124
884235.8
1859158.2
32
883874.0
1858580.7
79
883980.8
1858939.9
125
884271.8
1859170.2
33
883856.5
1858588.1
80
883975.0
1858932.1
126
884284.9
1859183.6
34
883839.1
1858626.0
81
883976.8
1858904.3
127
884323.3
1859178.7
35
883854.1
1858670.2
82
883972.7
1858897.4
128
884343.4
1859174.2
36
883870.4
1858680.6
83
883972.8
1858886.1
129
884352.7
1859162.2
37
883879.8
1858693.5
84
883981.9
1858875.8
130
884323.0
1859174.3
38
883910.7
1858698.6
85
883986.0
1858866.9
131
884292.9
1859172.1
39
883945.2
1858695.2
86
883987.2
1858840.1
132
884268.4
1859166.0
40
883951.3
1858701.5
87
883978.0
1858815.4
133
884238.0
1859155.4
41
883964.9
1858728.1
88
883973.9
1858792.5
134
884206.4
1859137.3
42
883963.0
1858736.6
89
883964.6
1858776.3
135
884175.6
1859110.5
43
883947.1
1858755.3
90
883950.6
1858760.1
136
884152.8
1859103.3
44
883947.3
1858761.1
91
883969.5
1858739.2
137
884148.3
1859089.6
45
883958.9
1858782.8
, ► ,
92
883973.6
1858731.5
138
884152.6
1859069.8
46
883969.3
1858794.0
`
\A q R�,�'
WETL�4Np MAP
OF oy9
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY
BOUNDARY OF JURISDICTION
OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
OF SECTION 404
CONSERVATION
EASEMENTS
:y
DETERMINED
BY THE
OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS
• 2 SEAL { :
UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A
SPO
FILE NO
001 '-'P NC EEP PROJECT NO. 258
:
L-3574 =
CHANGE IN
OF SECTION
THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION
404
q�:.
,JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
EXCEED FIVE
UT TO ALTAMANAW
5UR`1� .'
YEARS FROM THIIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE
UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS ffTILANDS DELINEATION MANUAL
MORTON TWP.
r��'•.�� E..•`�t, CAREGULATORY
�12 TITLE �c
I, RODNEY E. MORRIS, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP IS CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND WAS DRAWN
FROM A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON JULY 31,
2009; THAT ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY AT THE TIME OF THE
SURVEY, ARE SHOWN.
DATE
OFFICIAL ` }
USACE ACTION ID S►4W -jU)� - Oa.o7�
153
HOLL
ALAMANCE CO. NORTH CAROLINA
DATE 8/25/09 DRAWN REM JOB NO.
SCALE 1" = 80' SURVEYED REM
ALTAMAHAW--WET SHEET 2 OF 2

APPENDIX C: Debit ledger
Mitigation Project
UT to Altamahaw
DMS ID
92837
River Basin
CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit
03030002
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
C
E o
£ v
E
£
C
m o
A
m `o_
m E
m
C C
m°
C
o
C W
£
C p
m
N C
N
N
N p
m%
m£
m
m
o
a m
d
o c
o m
o
Y m
a
c
Yy m
N O
u
N ry
c
y N
a
rq
Ir
N
Ul
`1
a
C N
o N
zof
O
O U
z
C O
O L
z
C N
O d
za
N N
10 N
oK
N
M U
o
N O
1 L
o
N N
an d
oa
W
W
W
U
U
U W
U
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
1,392.00
0.026
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
556.80
0.013
NCDOT Pre-DMS Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWR Permit No
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
2005-0688
2005-21057-201
East Alamance Quarry
779.67
0.026
NCDOT TIP U-2524BA / BB -
2001-1318
2002-21216
Greensboro Western Loop
557.87
2005-1986
2009-00106
Legend Oaks Lots 3-5
29.30
2014-0059
2014-00268
Green Hope Crossing SD
25.16
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.001
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.001
0.000
Information from DIMS Debit Ledger dated 05/17/2017

APPENDIX D: Additonal Data
Buffer Width Analysis : Areas in red less than 50 feet = 14 % of channel length
wqtt-L.
single sided easement
removedZAA
i
ource. Esri, Digi4aMOD , fta", Earth"ftwmphm, CNE /Airbus Da, U DA, MM,
AeroGRPD, Iw, and the Ma User CUMME t