Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0002284_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20191209ROY COOPER cmernor MICHAEL S. REGAN serrefm y LINDA CULPEPPER ninYtor Certified Mail # 7018 1830 0000 9509 8850 Return Receipt Requested Ray E Hollowell, Jr Outer Banks/Kinnakeet Associates, LLC PO Box 34 Connelly Spring, NC 28612 NORTH CAROLINA EnvironmenfalQuallry January 29, 2020 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION & INTENT TO ASSESS CIVIL PENALTY Tracking Number: NOV-2020-PC-0055 Permit No. WQ0002284 Kinnakeet Shores WWTP Dare County Dear Mr. Hollowell: The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Kinnakeet Shores WWTP on December 9, 2019. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with the conditions and limitations specified in Non -discharge Permit No. WQ0002284. A summary of the findings and comments noted during the inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection report. The Compliance Sampling inspection was conducted by Division of Water Resources staff from the Washington Regional Office. The following violation(s) were noted during the inspection: Inspection Area Description of Violation Record Keeping Numerous months of NDMRs and NDARs are missing, Data needs to be revised on a few of the NDMRs. Refer to the summary page of the Inspection Report for more detail. Treatment Flow Flow meter did not appear to be able to record Flow. Measurement -Effluent Wells Monitoring wells are not installed Treatment Filters The traveling bridge filter is in disrepair. The travelling bridge would not traverse the filter during the backwash cycle. The system is not operating as designed. � � Norm Grobne OeDenmentof Enwoomeeter Qualty I Divsonof Weter Resources Wnhin(ton Regonei 0ffoe 1943 Wnh,gton square Moll I Wnhnston, North Gfolos 27889 ...��:i*' ...� 252546.6461 Inspection Area Description of Violation Treatment The facility is non -compliant because several needed treatment units are either not functional or close to not functional. Two 3000 CFM blowers are broken, one 175,000 gallon clarifier is broken, and the 348 square foot traveling bridge filter is in need of repair. End Use -Infiltration The infiltration pond has algae during the summer months. Samples were taken to evaluate the condition of the infiltration pond. Samples indicated that the water did not meet reclaimed standards. Refer to summary page of the Inspection Report for more detail. Treatment Disinfection The liquid chlorine system is operating, however we do not have an engineers certification for the system which is required in the permit. Also, pulled samples during inspection. The fecal coliform came back at 200 colonies per 100ml. There has also been several fecal limit violations. End Use -Reuse The reclaimed irrigation system does not work. The operator has not used the system for some time. A complete rehab of the system would have to take place prior to operation. The wells for the infiltration/storage pond have not been installed. The turbidity meter does not appear to be functional. Turbidity samples came back at 10 NTU and the meter was reading 4 NTU. End Use -Reuse Turbidity meter down and water is not being transferred to 5 day pond when wastewater does not meet reclaimed standards. Collection System The main lift station at Dory Lane is not functioning as designed and has been reworked to keep running during low flows. Both pumps in the station are broken. Also, the duplex pumps have been replaced with single/trash pumps that move the wastewater from the grinder pump station to the next pump station. A Notice of Violation/Intent to Issue Civil Penalty is being issued for the noted violation of North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1 and the facility's Non -discharge Permit. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000,00) may be assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1. If you wish to provide additional information regarding the noted violation, request technical assistance, or discuss overall compliance please respond in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of this Notice. A review of your response will be considered along with any additional information provided. You will then be notified of any civil penalties that may be assessed regarding the violations. If no response is received in this Office within the 10-day period, a civil penalty assessment may be prepared. North CamLna Depart"ntof Enyroamenta: Quertp I Divson of Water Resources IED Wash,ngton Regoaai OfFce 1943 W"h.ngton Square MO I Washsgton, North GtoSne 27889 252e48-64g1 Remedial actions should have already been taken to correct this problem and prevent further occurrences in the future. The Division of Water Resources may pursue enforcement action for this and any additional violations of State law. If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. Reminder: Pursuant to Permit Condition 14 in Section IV, the Permittee is required to verbally notify the Regional Office as soon as possible, not to exceed 24 hours, from first knowledge of any non-compliance at the facility including limit violations, bypasses of, or failure of a treatment unit. A written report may be required within 5 days if directed by Division staff. Prior notice should be given for anticipated or potential problems due to planned maintenance activities, taking units off-line, etc. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Sarah Toppen with the Water Quality Regional Operations Section in the Washington Regional Office at 252-946-6481. Sincerely, ROW T".lw►r[ Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Washington Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ ATTACHMENTS Cc: Ray Hollowell (ravehollowell(cbvahoo.com) Laserfiche Z. North Gro6ns Deps rtment of EnveonmentN Quo] ay I Diws000f Wster R*s tmrl 4cdw-o—" J/A WsshmSton Re{�on6r0ffae 1943 Wssh,naton Spusre Msri I WsshaYton, North Grolms 27889 252848.6481 Compliance Inspection Report Permit: WO0002284 Effective: 08/17/18 Expiration: 02/28/23 Owner: Outer Banks/Kinnakeet Associates LLC -- — - SOC:— — — — - Effective: Expiration: Facility:- Kinnakeet Shores WWTP -- County: Dare 41105 Big Kinnakeet Dr Region: Washington Avon NC 27915 Contact Person: Ray E Hollowell Title: Manager Phone: Directions to Facility: On the outer banks, take NC Hwy 12 south of Rodanthe to Avon and take a right onto Big Kinnakeet Drive and follow to the gated end of drive System Classifications: SI, WW2, Primary ORC: David Pharr Certification: 21101 Phone: 252473-3461 Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 12/09/2019 Entry Time: 10:30AM Primary Inspector: Sarah A Toppen Secondary Inspector(s): Robert B Tankard Paul M Mays Robert E Bullock Reason for Inspection: Routine Permit Inspection Type: Reclaimed Water Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Question Areas: Exit Time: 01:OOPM Phone: 252-946-6481 Phone:252-946-6481 Ext.233 Inspection Type: Compliance Sampling Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent Miscellaneous Questions Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Treatment Treatment Barscreen Use Records Treatment Filters Record Keeping Treatment Activated Sludge Treatment Clarifiers Treatment Disinfection End Use -Infiltration Treatment Flow Measurement End Use -Reuse Wells (See attachment summary) Page 1 of 9 Permit: W00002284 Owner-Facility:Outer Banks/Kinnakeet Associates LLC Inspection Date: 12/09/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Sampling Reason for Visit Routine Inspection Summary: A compliance sampling inspection was completed on December 9, 2019 Our records indicate that the ORC is David Pharr but we do not have a current BORC listed. The operator desgination form needs to be updated. We have verbally been informed that Michelle Pharr is the BORC. Our records indicate that we haven't received all the monthly NDMRs and NDARs for 2019.It appears that we have only received February, March, and August 2019 monthly reports. We need these reports completed accurately and signed properly. We are suppose to receive each monthly report before the end of the next month. No sludge removal records are present because facility hasn't removed sludge from the plant in several years. A spot check was conducted on the NDMR forms for August 2018 . There was a lab report dated 8/9/2018 but was entered on the NDMR on 8/13/2018. Another spat check was conducted for July 2019. The lab reports showed a July 25, 2019 sampling event but it was not entered on the NDMR. The results for the sampling are listed below: Fecal Coliform: >6000 BOD: 3 Nitrite: <0.02 TSS: 3.5 The bench sheets were not on -site for pH. The pH on the NDMR could not be confirmed based on the ORCs records. September 2019 spot check was looking at 9/9/2019. The parameters for that date were located under 9/19/2019. The above NDMRs should be revised and resent. Also, we reviewed the maintenance book for the facilty. There was a few days that had been completed. No operation and maintenance book was available. Pond 1 and the 5-day upset pond should have staff gauges so that the freeboard of each pond can be read weekly and shall not be less than two feet at any time. Ground water monitoring via three groundwater wells are in the newest permit but they have not been constructed yet. There is also groundwater sampling that hasn't started due to the wells not being installed. Please refer back to 11. 12, and 13 under section IV. Monitoring and Reporting. In the permit, Section IV. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements 6.Freeboard (i.e., reclaimed water level to the lowest embankment elevation) in the 3.057MG lined 5-day upset pond and the 5.1 MG storage/infiltration pond shall be measured to the nearest inch or tenth of a foot, and recorded weekly. Weekly freeboard records shall be maintained at the facility for a period of no less than five years, and shall be made available to the Division upon request. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(c)] 8. A maintenance log shall be maintained at this facility. The log shall be maintained at the facility for a period of no less than five years, and shall be made available to the Division upon request. At a minimum, this log shall include: a. Visual observations of treatment plant and plant site; b. Date of calibration of flow measurement device(s); c. Date of calibration of turbidimeter; d. Date and results of power interrution testing on alternate power supply; e. Record of preventative maintenance (e.g., changing/adjusting of equipment, pump and valve maintenance, cross conncetion contrl, testing, inspections and cleanings, etc.; and Page 2 of 9 Permit: W00002284 Owner - Facility: Outer Banks/Kinnakeet Associates LLC Inspection Date: 12/09/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine f. Record of all unpermitted releases of reclaimed water to surface water or land surface including date of occurrence, estimated volume of release, cause, and corrective action taken. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)(1)] 9. Three copies of all effluent monitoring data and reclaimed water distribution data (as specified in Conditions IV.3. and IV .4.) shall be submitted on Form NDMR for each PPI listed in Attachment A. Reporting forms shall be sumbitted on or before the last day of the following month. If no reclaimed water distribution activities occurred during the monitoring month, monitoring reports documenting the absence of the activity are still required to be submitted. All effluent monitoring data shall be submitted to the following address: Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. [15A NCAC 02T .0105(1)] There was a compliance sampling event that was conducted during the inspection. The results from the Fecal Coliform sampling is below: Groundwater lowering ditch: 2000 Colonies/100ml- Effluent: 200 Colonies/100ml- Infiltration Pond: 420 Colonies/100ml- Recreational Pond (outside of fence): 1100 Colonies/100ml- Dare County Environmental Health was contacted by our office due to the results of the Fecal Coliform levels at the Recreational Pond (children splashing around pond and kayakers have been observed in and around pond). In turn they contacted Kinnakeet HOA to inform them. Sampled for BOD, Turbidity, NH3, NO2+NO3 as N, Total Phosphorus, Total Kjeldahl N as N (TKN), and Residue Suspended (TSS) were sampled at several different locations. Below you will find the location and the results for these parameters: Effluent BOD: 2.1 mg/L Turbidity: 10 NTU NH3 as N: 0.02 mg/L NO2+NO3 as N: 0.04 mg/L Total Phosphorus: 0.03 mg/L TKN: 0.40 mg/L TSS: 12 U mg/L Fecal Coliform, Turbidity and TSS all exceed the limits for PPI 001 Effluent. Also, there is no composite sampler used at the facility. There are nine parameters on PPI 001 of the permit that are required to use a composite sampler. The facility is using a small trash bin inside a small dorm refrigerator. Infiltration Basin: BOD: 23 mg/L NH3 as N: 14 mg/L NO2+NO3 as N: 3.3 mg/L Total Phosphorus: 2.7 mg/L TKN: 16 mg/L TSS: 16 U mg/L Groundwater Lowering Ditch BOD: 12 mg/L NH3 as N: 0.90 mg/L NO2+NO3 as N: 1.4 mg/L Page 3 of 9 Permit: W00002284 Owner - Facility: Outer Banks/Kinnakeet Associates LLC Inspection Date: 12/09/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine Total Phosphorus: 2.7 mg/L TKN: 4.9 mg/L TSS: 26 U mg/L Recreational Pond: BOO: 3.2 mg/L NH3 as N: 0.02 mg/L NO2+NO3 as N: 0.02 mg/L Total Phosphorus: 0.13 mg/L TKN: 0.99 mg/L TSS: 6.2 U mg/L The inspection of the plant showed several equipment failures. The two 3000 CFM blowers were not operable. The operator had maintained and fixed the third blower so it would work. One treatment train (which included one of the clarifiers) was down so that the maximum treatable capacity of the plant is 175,000 gallons per day. The 348 square fool traveling bridge filter rated at 0.70GPM/ft2 was also not funtional. The operator stated that they manually backwashed the filter on a weekly schedule. The traveling bridge would not travel. The turbidity meter was also non functional. Unsure whether the 5 day upset valves would transfer non reclaim wastewater to the pond. Nothing with the reclaimed system would work. All wastewater was going to the high rate system with no expectations of using the water for reclaimed irrigation. The high rate system is designed for 162,261 gallons per day and the reclaimed irrigation system is designed for 202,417 gallons per day. The limiting capacity of the treatment and diposal system is 162,261 gpd. Also, inspected the main lift station at Dory Lane. Both pumps in the station were broken. The operator had rigged a pump to take low flows to the plant. The system will not accomodate high flows during the summer months. Pictures are included behind this inspection report. The collection system is suppose to have duplex pumps but they have been replaced with single/trash pumps that move the waste water from the grinder pump station to next. We can not determine the number of pumps that are missing and how many need to be replaced to become compliant. Page 4 of 9 Permit: w00002284 Owner - Facility:Outer Banks/Kinnekeet Associates LLC Inspection Date: 12/09/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine Type Yes No NA NE Reuse (Quality) ❑ Recycle/Reuse Activated Sludge Spray, LR Activated Sludge Drip, LR ❑ Activated Sludge Spray, HR ❑ Single Family Drip ❑ Single Family Spray, LR Lagoon Spray, LR Infiltration System Treatment Yes No NA NE Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Do all treatment units appear to be operational? (if no, note below.) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Comment. The facility is non -compliant because several needed treatment units are either not functional or close to not functional The two 3000 CFM blowers are broken one 175,000 gallon clairfler is broken and the 348 square foot traveling bridge filter is in need of repair. Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent Yes No NA NE Is flowmeter calibrated annually? El ❑ ❑ Is flowmeter operating properly? ❑ El M ❑ Does flowmeter monitor continuously? ❑ El M ❑ Does flowmeter record flow? ❑ ❑ ❑ Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? ❑ 1:10 ❑ Comment Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Use Records Yes No NA NE Is water use metered? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are the daily average values properly calculated? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent Yes No NA NE Is flowmeter calibrated annually? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is flowmeter operating properly? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Does flowmeter monitor continuously? 0❑ ❑ ❑ Does flowmeter record flow? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Flowmeter did not appear to be able to record flow Page 5 of 9 permit: W00002284 Owner -Facility: Outer Banks/Kinnakeet Associates LLC Inspection Dale: 12/09/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine Treatment Barscreen Is it free of excessive debris? Is disposal of screenings in compliance? Are the bars spaced properly? Is the unit in good condition? Comment: Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E ■❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Treatment Activated Sludge Yes No NA NE Is the aeration mechanism operable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the aeration basin thoroughly mixed? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the aeration equipment easily accessed? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is Dissolved Oxygen adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are Settleometer results acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ E Is activated sludge an acceptable color? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The two 3000 CFM blowers are broken Only one train was running. It is not known whether the second train will operate. Treatment Clarifiers Yes No NA NE Are the weirs level? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the weirs free of solids and algae? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the scum removal system operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the scum removal system accessible? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the sludge blanket at an acceptable level? ❑ ❑ ❑ M Is the effluent from the clarifier free of excessive solids? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: One of the 31,050 gallon clarifiers is broken Treatment Filters Yes No NA NE Is the filter media present? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the filter media the correct size and type? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the air scour operational? ❑ E ❑ ❑ Is the scouring acceptable? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Is the clear well free of excessive solids? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the mud well free of excessive solids and filter media? ❑ ❑ ❑ Does backwashing frequency appear adequate? ❑ M ❑ ❑ Comment: Operator stated filter is backwashed once a week manually. However, the traveling bridge would not function correctly (would not travel the entire length of the filter). Therefore the system is not operating as designed. Treatment Disinfection Yes No NA NE Is the system working? ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 6 of 9 Permit: WQ0002284 Owner - Facility: Outer Banks/Kinnakeet Associates LLC Inspection Date: 12/09/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine Do the fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection? Is there adequate detention time (>=30 minutes)? Is the system properly maintained? If gas, does the cylinder storage appear safe? Is the fan in the chlorine feed room and storage area operable? Is the chlorinator accessible? If tablets, are tablets present? Are the tablets the proper size and type? Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids, and growth? If UV, are extra UV bulbs available? If UV, is the UV intensity adequate? # Is it a dual feed system? Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)? If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site? If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000 ___) If yes, then when was the RMP last updated? Comment: The liquid chlorine system is operating however we do not have a enqineers certification for the system which is required in the permit Also Dulled samples during inspection The fecal coliform came back at 200 colonies per 100m1 There has also been several fecal limit violations. Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Is a copy of current permit available? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are monitoring reports present: NDMR? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ NDAR? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Are application rates adhered to? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Are there any 2L GW quality violations? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW7 ❑ ❑ ❑ Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are annual soil reports available? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ # Are PAN records required? ❑ ❑ E ❑ # Did last soil report indicate a need for lime? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ If so, has it been applied? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Page 7 of 9 Permit: W00002284 Owner-Facility:Outer Banks/Kinnakeel Associates LLC Inspection Date: 12/09/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine Are operational logs present? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are lab sheets available for review? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Are Operational and Maintenance records present? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Were Operational and Maintenance records complete? ❑ E ❑ ❑ Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is a copy of the SOC readily available? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ No treatment units bypassed since last inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment End Use -Infiltration Yes No NA NE # Is the application High Rate or Low Rate? High Rate Are buffers maintained? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Are any supply wells within the CB? ❑ N ❑ ❑ Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB? ❑ E ❑ ❑ Is municipal water available in the area? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are GW monitoring wells required? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Are GW monitoring wells located properly wl respect to RB and CB? ❑ N ❑ ❑ Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval? ❑ E ❑ ❑ Is a usable green area maintained? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the disposal site acceptable? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the distribution equipment acceptable? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the disposal site free of ponding? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is the disposal site free of breakout? N ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the disposal sites free of solids, algae, etc.? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Do the records show that the fields are properly maintained? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are the disposal sites free of vegetation? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Do any surface water features appear to be adversely impacted by GW discharge? ❑ ❑ ❑ No chemicals or rototiller used to eliminate vegetation, solids, algae, etc.? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: The infiltration pond has alqae durinq the summer months Samples were taken to evaluate the condition of the infiltration pond No monitoring wells have been installed to monitor if groundwater has been impacted. End Ilse -Reuse Yes No NA NE Is the acreage in the permit being utilized? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Does the acreage specified in the permit correspond to the measured acreage at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all essential units provided in duplicate? ❑■❑❑ Page 8 of 9 Permit: WQ0002284 Owner - ramify: Outer Banks/Kinnakeet Associates LLC Inspection Date: 12/09/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine Is an automatically activated standby power source available? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the equalization capacity adequate? 0❑ ❑ ❑ Is aerated flow equalization present? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the turbidity meter been calibrated in the last 12 months? ❑ 0 ❑ Does the turbidity meter have recording capabilities? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Is all flow diverted at the appropriate times? El ❑ ❑ M Is all upset wastewater diverted from reuse storage unit? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is all upset wastewater treated, retreated, or disposed of acceptably? ❑ El ❑ Is upset wastewater treated prior to discharge to irrigation storage? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is public access restricted from irrigation area during active site use? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ If golf course, is a sign posted in plain sight on the club house? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is the cover crop acceptable? ❑ ❑ Are buffers adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Is the site free of ponding/runoff? ❑ ❑ ■ Is the acreage in the permit being utilized? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the application equipment acceptable? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Is the application area free of limiting slopes? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 How close is the closest water supply well? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Are any supply wells within the CB? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is municipal water available in the area? 0❑ ❑ ❑ Are GW monitoring wells required? ME100 Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB and CB? ❑ 0 El ❑ Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval? D 0 ❑ ❑ Comment. The reclaimed system does not work. The operator has not used the system in some time A Complete rehab of the system would have to take place prior to operation The wells for the infiltration/storage pond have not been installed The turbidity meter does not appear to be functional. The meter was reading 4 NTUs and the effluent sample pulled was 10 NTUs Page 9 of 9 sw� < 1 ""�SRJJM� \ � � d� \�� . / ` \�° ®> , , : � < - �. .� � � �«� -� ... . _ x\�� .\�� � {� � � � � :�:/\ % . \a, �� ��� �� � � � �� : ! aft t�. , vA