090036_Inspection_20190614

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - 6 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: C�m oipliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Q Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other . 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: - - Arrival Time: Departure Time: /r County: 0 a. t
Farm Name: ( ��y a� �� f✓ti f (� �+ Owner Email:
Owner Name: FJ'j2ue!!!4 ✓ S YrG Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C7 e_-Ol.o Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: �"e g
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
2-0-60
Feeder to Finish
0 o
b
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region:
Certification Number: 0[6 e G 7
Certification Number:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canneity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts _
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle - Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes LTiv v ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
[] NA ❑ NE
[ vN—A ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [:]No [� NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [, ]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:]Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -36 1 jDate of Inspection: I Ll{
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
®'11A
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[2-157
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
En No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
2'15—o---❑
NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
To
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
F;;�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑, Evidence
of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ct� I 13 -" 6yy &- (7
/ A
13. Soil Type(s): -roar`, Alo . V Q u, � f`�i(ot A Au Foir
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
�
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[i]'l�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E j]�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ef["N*o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - (p Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E;�M ❑ NA ❑ NE
R 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ER.*o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to.properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes EJNe ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �ATTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E2-fl'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
�TQo
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
2 TTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any othercomment§.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
c t 6
(m^ e - �• P 3• � g c(?
�- 4
.� r-r-
�,oP?JAG
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatw
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: j
21412015