20071391 Ver 1_Mitigation Closeout Report_20170526

UT to Uwharrie River Stream Restoration Project
Randolph County, NC
DMS Project No. 847
USACE Action ID# SAW-2007-02854-276
DWR 401 #0713-91
Design -Bid -Build Project
CLOSEOUT REPORT: STREAM
May 2015
Project Setting and Classifications
Meeting XY Coordinates
35°50'40.9"N 80°00'10.6"W
County
Randolph
General Location
SSW of Trinity, NC
Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Carolina Slate Belt
USGS Hydro Unit
03040103050010
NCDWQ Sub -basin
03-07-09
Thermal Regime
Warm
Trout Water
INo
Project Performers
Source Agency
NC DMS
Designer
CALYX Engineers + Consultants
Monitoring Firm
CALYX Engineers + Consultants
General Contractor
Vaughn Contracting, Inc.
Approved for transfer to
Stewardship
Yes
Stewards
INCDEQ Stewardship Program
Project Activities & Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
May 2006
Restoration Plan
July 2007
Permitted - USACE / 404
September 2007
Construction Complete
March 2011
Monitoring Year 1
November 2012
Monitoring Year 2
November 2013
Monitoring Year 3
November 2014
Monitoring Year 4
November 2015
Monitoring Year 5
November 2016
Invasive Treatment
Fall 2015- Spring
2017
Beaver Dam Removal
June 2016
Closeout Submission
May 2017
Note — Monitoring Year Dates reflect mo/yr of data completion

Watershed Planning Summary
The Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Uwharrie River Stream Restoration Site (Site) is located within HUC
03 040103 05 0010, the Upper Uwharrie watershed, which is listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW)
in the 2009 Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) plan. The Site is also
located within the Upper Uwharrie Local Watershed Plan (LWP). The Site is currently the only DMS
project in this TLW. Including this project, there are a total of three DMS projects within the Upper
Uwharrie LWP (Cedar Branch and Uwharrie River Whatley).
The Site's main stem reach eventually flows to the Uwharrie River. The Uwharrie River is designated as
a water supply watershed (WS-III) by the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). This is a
supplemental classification designed to further protect drinking water by requiring new development
density regulations and additional water quality standards.
The 2009 RBRP indicates that the Upper Uwharrie watershed contains a Wildlife Resource Commission
priority area and nearly 100 miles of Water Supply Waters as well as Land Trust for Central North
Carolina land. A large portion of the City of Trinity and a small portion of the City of Archdale are
located within the watershed. Thus, this watershed is likely to experience continued growth over the
coming years. The watershed was targeted as a TLW in order protect aquatic resources from
encroachment by development. Major goals for HUC 03040103 established in the 2009 Lower Yadkin -
Pee Dee RBRP include the continuation of watershed improvement efforts already ongoing within the
watershed, protection of wildlife resources, improved management of stormwater runoff, and mitigation
of impacts resulting from urbanization in the area.
The Upper Uwharrie LWP preliminary findings and recommendations report was completed in August
2005. Since then, completion of the LWP has been placed on hold. Goals recommended in the
preliminary findings report for the Upper Uwharrie watershed include enhancement and restoration of
aquatic habitat, and preservation of high -quality subwatershed drainages.
The goals of the UT to Uwharrie project site are consistent with DMS watershed planning goals. The
project improves aquatic and terrestrial habitat through agricultural BMPs, exclusion of intensive
livestock (cattle) practices, and the establishment of riparian buffers. Improved riparian buffers also
intercept and mitigate stormwater runoff, which improves water quality by reducing sediment and
nutrient inputs. Lastly, the project preserves several functional stream reaches, and preserves and protects
improved reaches and habitat within the project boundaries through a perpetual conservation easement.
Proiect Setting and Background Summa
The project is approximately 5.0 miles southeast of the city of Thomasville and 3.2 miles southwest of the
city of Trinity near the intersection of Morris Road (SR 1557) and Kennedy Road (SR 3106). Topography
associated with the Site consists of gently sloping hills and valleys. Elevations range from a high of 740
feet above mean sea level (msl) at the southwestern project boundary to a low of approximately 640 feet
above msl at the eastern project boundary. The overall drainage area at the Site is about 2 square miles.
This Site was selected because it presented an excellent opportunity to restore natural stream functions,
establish effective riparian buffers, and to protect a segment of stream channel from impending
development. Primary land use within the Site had been open pasture without fencing. The entire cattle
farm encompasses approximately 330 acres and generally contains between 100 cattle in the summer
months to over 350 during other seasons. Cattle had relatively unrestricted access to the creek channel for
water for over a century, resulting in severe impacts to stream channels at the Site.
The year-round livestock access to the streams and general lack of riparian buffer resulted in substantial
erosion along the stream banks, incision of the channels, channel widening, and impaired water quality
through poor water chemistry (low dissolved oxygen, increased levels of fecal coliforms and nutrients).
The majority of the project approaches focused on natural channel design to facilitate improved site water
quality, sediment transport, and channel functionality through an improved floodplain connection.
Benching, planting, and livestock exclusion on enhancement reaches has further helped the Site meet its
goals.

Goals and Objectives (as reported in the 2007 Restoration Plan)
Goals
• Improve the overall water quality by reducing the input of sediment and nutrients into the
aquatic system.
• Improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the riparian zone.
• Improve the overall wildlife habitat across the entire conservation easement.
Objectives
• Create a stable network of stream channels by altering either the dimension, pattern, or
profile of each reach.
• Restore the riparian zone of each reach by reestablishing the appropriate plant community
and eliminating the invasive plant species.
• Eliminate the feedlot run off from entering the stream channels and degrading water quality.
• Protect the completed stream and habitat restoration at the Site through a perpetual
conservation easement.
Success Criteria
Success criteria for stream mitigation sites are based on guidelines established by the USACE, US
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) and the
NCDWQ (USACE et. al, 2003). These guidelines establish criteria for both hydrologic conditions and
vegetation survival.
The monitoring activities evaluated the restored sections of the Site in regard to overall channel stability.
Since streams are considered as "active" or "dynamic" systems, restoration is achieved by allowing the
channel to develop a stable dimension, pattern, and profile such that, over time, the stream features (riffle,
run, pool, and glide) are maintained and the channel does not aggrade or degrade. Minor morphologic
adjustments from the design stream were anticipated based on the correlation of reference reach data,
excessive sediment deposition from upstream sources, and on -going changes in land use within the
watershed.
Success Criteria
Measured Parameter
Criteria Met
Yes, stream cross sections show dimensional
14 cross sections, 30641.f.
stability across the site; observation of restoration
Stream
longitudinal profiling, 3
reaches indicated little or no lateral movement of
Geomorphology
riffle pebble counts, pattern
streams; and bedform features appear stable. A
observation
total of 3,064 feet of stream channel was included
in annual monitoring activities.
Yes, at least 2 bankfull events have been observed
Crest gauge levels and
on separate occasions over the course of the
Stream Hydrology
observed wrack lines
monitoring period. Wrack lines were observed
and crest gauge levels were recorded (See
Summary of Bankfull Events Table).
Yes, the average number of planted stems per acre
following Year 5 monitoring is 350. While 5 out
Riparian
17 permanent vegetation
of 17 plots are 1-2 stems below the 260
Vegetation
plots — CVS Level II
requirement for planted density, only 2 of 17 are
below the required density including volunteers,
and are each only a single stem below.
15 permanent photo
Yes, as evident in annual monitoring photographs
Photo Reference
locations for year to year
vegetation is well -established and channel
Points
conditions remained stable throughout the 5 years
comparison
of monitoring.

EMMitigation
Components
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Riparian
Non -riparian
Stream
Buffer
Nutrient
Nutrient
Wetland
Wetland
Offset
Offset
Type R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
_
Total 1 6590.86
144.4
-
0.18
-
-
Project
Components
RestorationRestored
Existing
App
Project
As Built Stationing/
-or
Credible Feet/
Feet
r
Feet/
Ratio
Credits
Comments
Component
Location
/Acresi
h
Restoration
Acres
Acres
Equivalent
NW -UT
0+00 - 3+38
355
E1
R
338
338
1.5
225.3
SW -UT
0+00 - 2+62
271
E1
R
262
262
1.5
1 174.7
0+00 - 2+71
P
RE
271
271
5
54.2
SW Tributary
1440
2+71 - 15+09
R
R
1238
1218
1
1218
20' wide crossing deduction
0+00 - 2+29
E1
R
229
229
1.5
152.7
Main West
1235
2+29-14+27
R
R
1198
1198
1
1198
Main Center
14+27 - 29+40
1330
R
R
1513
1492
1
1492
21' wide crossing deduction
20' wide crossing deduction (not
SE -UT
-0+36 - 10+70
1020
R
R
1106
1086
1
1086
active)
0+30 - 1+02
E1
R
72
72
1.5
48
N-UT
206
1+02-3+18
R
R
216
216
1
216
29+40-36+56
R
R
716
716
1
716
Main East
1163
36+56 - 41+32
P
RE
476
451
5
90.2
25' wide crossing deduction
Tributary 1
Drains to Main East
129
E2
R
104
104
2.5
41.6
Tributary 2
Drains to Main East
91
E2
R
59
59
2.5
23.6
Wetland A
Top of SW-Trib
0.65
P
RE
0.65
0.65
5
0.13
Wetland B
Adjacent to SW-Trib
0.02
P
RE
0.02
0.02
5
0.004
Wetland C
Adjacent to SE -UT
0.26
P
RE
0.26
0.26
5
0.05
Length and Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear
feet)
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Non-
riparian
Wetland
(acres)
Credited
Buffer
(square
feet)
Riverine
Non-
Riverine
Restoration
5925
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
901
Enhancement 11
163
Creation
Preservation
722
0.93
High Quality
Preservation
Overall Assets
Summar
Asset
Category
Overall
Credits
Stream
6735.26
R Wetland
0.186
NR Wetland
0
Buffer
0
Note - Restoration Plan (2007) indicates 6,967 SMU
'Existing Feet/acres reflect 2007 Restoration Plan (60% design) quantities; field changes during construction resulted in minor changes (overall reductions) to as -built quantities versus Restoration Plan quantities.

;s >,
}
� ,,�� '�� ,•_ �'" � s, � � Beaver dams were found during 2016 spring assessment �".. �•
and removed during the summer of 2016. Invasive, t *`
species were treated intermittenly between Fall 2015 and
e .,r Spring 2017.
,
4
a
"
Yy..'
\w
Beaver dam removed
17
WC
A,
T, Beaver dam removed
f
11
3 N,r
4
M,4
,e
Asset Map .
Restoration Type
El , y
;, WA
Vegetation Plot Condition
Criteria Met
,
Criteria Not Met1611� Alk\,&-.All&
;
� s
PREPARED FOR FIGURE 1 UT TO UWHARRIE CLOSEOUT REPORT LEGEND PREPARED BY
02/24/2017 ASSET AND MONITORING FEATURES MAP �'—
DMS #847 _ Easement Boundary O Crest Gauge
?:^ DRAWN: MLM
PROJECT NUMBER 1 inch = 300 feet ® Wetlands Beaver Dams CALYX
GRAPHIC SCALE —4 ENGINEERS+CONSl1LTANTS
Environmental CALYX:2012057.00 ® 0 150 300 600 ----
- Cross Section ®Cross Section Pin
Quality NCDMS: 847 Feet

'.trl►.j►i,�► \lii
d��.

k
h
11QR i ;
t S St
- ; r
WzE
k r
5 '
l �
6.
01 -+J + ',� h4 �C♦• k :
~ _ -
r.I�vc
K 'r57 r E�
- A.
E S
Ir
I
* S fd16
1
r J.
jr
PrsdomMTit Proect sda _ i .rr fqi 2aa
�MaC-Mtd ks'bl0 foam frxi l9K sky.es} + -"z'' �444
�I
�MeSG-Me�tr6erofctrf pan.a So B%sfopes r'lowaa�e, """:" � f '4 I
�'. e,a-.`.1�tt�erof0 cast pan 80015%sop—.rnc¢erax: "__e_
�. . w+nv a'Io7f ban.Oxi bopcs taYaelri!'pwcc Y.
'__ r-s-'oti6eYu'h'fno-=acr'4�r. 15xi 494 a.p- R
kx a » is% bp-
".+.-'Nins-B+on m^5oexx a xi a%sbpP rnake tfcnxicc
�-ALz-wy-W'k--o rem —pt. 2xi a,,
Ir.u+a...rr n�.r we .*ct w...rawyrrr. Legend
a ara. .._—�-,upsart�aa 1rd 1i4 Tr c+rcl. ih�l -BOA kxt
,Proj_-DtEa�-_rrart PROJECT SITE NR£S SOIL SURVEY MAP
-A- C3D7LE ProjectPwcaL LriTO LWHARRIE RN ERSTREAR RESTORATION
Cl 200
aa'""a.wacaada.ac.btna..r '' am Project Streams RANdOLPHCOUNTY. NC
a..r me.aa.cr,: csa i...a+.rar­ rm Feel

Stream Morphology Data Summary
.2
(Year 5) Cross Section 1 - Riffle (SW-Trib)
Horizontal Distance (ft)
(Year 5) Cross Section 3 - Riffle (SW-Trib) wm.,,:iu�M ^b. - ..', wn.lsw-Tm, ianc Lsw-ran, wme tsw-.gel M ran.�tsw-Tmt
Horizontal Distance (ft)
(Year 5) Cross Section 2 - Pool (SW-Trib)
on®.n
Horizontal Distance (ft)
(Year 5) Cross Section 4 - Pool (Main West)
Horizontal Distance (n)

(Year 5) Cross Section 5 - Pool (Main West)
Horizontal Distance (ft)
(Year 5) Cross Section 7 - Pool (Main Center)
^. r.e.� •ednm'.- ♦ws., s,vo:� On�,l or.2r v(via) op«.+)
Horizontal Distance (ft)
(Year 5) Cross Section 6 - Riffle (Main Center)
Horizontal Distance (ft)
(Year 5) Cross Section 8 - Riffle (Main Center)
o rv...� ♦w,..s — on—q orvd.. Vo .3) ond..,
Horizontal Distance (ft)

(Year 5) Cross Section 9 - Pool (Main Center)
:; nd.�t ♦w�,a,�� or�,t orv��t vn�at ond..l
Hori-ntal Distance (fl)
(Year 5) Cross Section 11 - Pool (Main Center)
:; rd.� •�ab� ♦way, suhace� onn orv��l vrv�.al orvd..l
Horizontal Distance (ft)
(Year 5) Cross Section 10 - Riffle (Main Center)
:; n®rat uaa.a,ui�ne� •w�. s,n�� ,_..nM,tm�=�bsorv�sl anal .e.f orsr.t
Horizontal Distance (ft)
(Year 5) Cross Section 12 - Riffle (SE -UT)
�nd.s .v..�n�,� .wa�s,a�� on,t orv�zt on�al on®re
Horizontal Distance (ft)

(Year 5) Cross Section 13 - Pool (SE -UT)
o ff—y . ff.3r u rr®..r
Horizontal Distance (fl)
(Year 5) Cross Section 14 - Riffle (SE -UT)
ff—. .wager SLrtece Pon¢ c(ver i] ory—xr 7ff.3) off®.al
Horizontal Distance (H)

67
67
57
67
� 673
672
O
w 671
W
67
66
66
667
66
66
66
66
662
1400
(Year 5) Main Center and Main East (STA 14+27 -- 30+15)
m ar m nr cr m
U U V V V V
y C C C C C C
y
IL Ir a_ Of 0-
CO O - ►d y 0 O C C
m
CO
q s O p 4 tp i♦ N �
U U V dP- p Ob0 0 V
suu Y 'Y u7
`m p gu m w y y* a'o-
9 P v � 2gr
a
A�r
TP Ng, -
1— 9r b* 9
u up r r, *4 4 o
Yui
P g `P'!g u ru -rP 19 u
Y r O
Y
g u r
p u r
9 r r
9 P r r u r4 u — --
P up r
gu g 9 u rP g� glr g Iu
P P
1500 16M 1700
• CH v WS * ENT + LB
19W 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2704 2000 2900 J(w 3100
Distance along stream (ft)
4 RB ❑ (Year 1 } Main 0 (Year2} Main a (Year 3) Main 0 Y4 M.a1N
Center and Center and Center CENTER
Hain East Main East

W
(Year 5) Main West - Longitudinal Profile (STA 11 + 92 -- 14+27)
1150 1170 1190 1.210 1230 1250 1270 1290 1310 1330 1350 1370 1390 WO 1430 1450
Distance along stream (ft)
• CH
WS
r BKF
* LB
o RB
a (Year 1} Main West
o (Year2} Main West
v (Year 3} Main West
o Year4(MalnWest)

Monitoring
Data - Dimensional Morpholoy Summary (Cross Sections)
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Cross Section 5 (Pool)
Cross Section 6 (Riffle)
Based on annual surveydataMYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
M71
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) use
688.7
688.7
688.7
668.6
688.6
683.4
683.5
683.3
683.2
683.4
678.7
678.7
678.7
678.8
678.7
678.5
678.4
678.4
678.3
678.6
677.1
677.2
677.2
677.1
677.2
675.7
675.7
675.7
675.5
675.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.68
6.91
6.79
6.67
7.31
6.49
7.22
6.31
6.4
6.27
4.05
2.73
3.56
3.99
4.07
17.58
16.26
15.33
16.16
16.6
23.84
24.05
24.3
24.56
23.23
17.9
17.57
17.98
17.65
18.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
13.0
14.0
14.62
16.41
12.94
14.6
15.0
12.82
12.49
12.85
11.23
9.19
10.85
12.94
11.76
100+
100+
100
100
100
115
115
115
115
115
110
110
110
110
110
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.53
0.48
0.61
0.72
0.64
0.57
0.48
0.53
0.45
0.56
0.39
0.49
0.5
0.54
0.51
1.49
1.68
1.65
1.59
1.57
1.6
1.65
1.57
1.45
1.54
1.76
1.68
1.67
1.59
1.67
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.02
1.13
1.29
1.56
1.08
1.21
1.15
1
1.06
1.05
1.25
0.97
1.13
1.64
1.3
3.43
3.52
3.35
3.37
3.39
3.21
3.27
3.3
3.3
3.22
2.88
2.87
2.9
2.95
3.08
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
3.56
1 3.32
4.15
4.79
1 4.66
3.73
3.45
3.33
2.88
1 3.5
1.59
1.33
1.77
2.15
2.08
26.27
27.3
1 25.24
25.77
26.01
38.18
39.77
38.07
35.48
35.71
31.51
29.51
30.08
28.04
30.47
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratiol12.6
1 14.4
1 11.13
1 9.26
1 11.42
1 11.39
15.04
1 11.91
14.22
1 11.2
10.38
5.57
1 7.12
1 7.39
7.98
11.8
9.68
9.29
10.16
10.57
14.9
14.58
15.48
16.94
15.08
10.17
10.46
10.77
11.1
10.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
1.95
2.02
2.15
2.46
1.77
2.25
2.08
2.03
1.95
2.05
2.77
3.37
3.05
3.24
2.89
5.69
6.15
6.52
6.19
6.03
4.82
4.78
4.73
4.68
4.95
6.15
6.26
6.12
6.23
6.05
�Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
Cross Section 8 (Riffle)
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
Cross Section 11 (Pool)
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
Based on annual survey data
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
675.0
675.0
674.9
675.0
675.0
673.8
673.7
673.7
673.5
673.7
673.0
673.0
673.0
672.9
672.9
671.1
671.1
671.0
671.0
671.2
669.9
669.9
669.8
669.7
669.9
681.7
681.7
681.5
681.5
681.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
20.2
20.43
21.84
22.81
20.74
21.42
21.48
21.5
19.49
19.21
19.2
19.73
21.31
21.27
18.34
17.86
19.78
17.53
19.26
18.87
18.66
19.95
21
18.87
18.75
7.08
7.26
7.6
7.6
8.84
Floodprone Width (ft)
100+
100+
100
100
100
100+
100+
100
100
677.03
100+
100+
100
100
100
100+
100+
100
100
100
100+
100+
100
100
100
16.11
30.83
17.25
17.25
29.78
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2
1.9
1.7
1.64
1.85
1.71
1.66
1.59
1.65
100
1.99
1.88
1.73
1.79
2.11
1.59
1.52
1.54
1.53
1.66
1.54
1.47
1.28
1.52
1.6
0.5
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.67
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
4.23
4.2
4.08
4.25
4.2
3.66
3.71
3.81
3.74
3.36
4.03
4.12
4.03
3.85
3.93
3.05
3.21
3.23
3.31
3.45
3.64
3.87
3.81
4.02
4.05
1.11
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
40.29
39.72
37.19
37.45
38.35
1 36.71
1 35.63
34.14
1 32.25
1 1.69
1 38.25
1 37.13
36.76
38.16
38.79
28.39
30.13
27.02
29.47
31.33
28.75
1 29.23
26.98
28.68
30.07
3.51
4.21
4.39
4.39
5.92
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.1
10.53
12.85
13.91
11.21
12.53
12.94
13.52
11.81
11.37
9.67
10.49
12.32
11.88
8.69
11.23
13.01
11.38
12.59
11.37
12.12
13.57
16.41
12.41
11.72
14.16
12.52
13.1
13.1
13.19
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.95
4.9
4.58
4.38
4.82
4.67
4.66
4.65
5.13
5.21
5.2
5.07
4.69
4.7
5.45
5.6
5.06
5.7
5.19
5.3
5.36
5.01
4.76
5.3
5.33
2.28
4.25
2.27
2.27
3.37
rBankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1 1.00
Cross
Section 13
(Pool)
Cross Section
14
(Riffle)
Based on annual survey data
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
675.6
675.5
675.5
675.5
675.6
672.6
672.6
672.2
672.2
672.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.45
10.22
6.67
6.67
6.26
7.26
7.48
5.72
5.72
5.67
Floodprone Width (ft)
23.18
18.67
21.4
21.4
22.45
24.64
44.35
33.22
33.22
45.74
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.69
0.47
0.7
0.7
0.75
0.51
0.58
0.66
0.66
0.65
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.64
1.2
1.62
1.62
1.55
1.25
1.35
1.36
1.36
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
5.82
4.81
4.68
4.68
4.71
3.71
4.33
1 3.76
1 3.76
1 3.69
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
1 12.25
21.74
9.53
9.53
8.35
14.24
12.9
8.67
8.67
8.72
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
2.74
1 1.83
1 3.21
1 3.21
1 3.59
3.39
5.93
5.81
5.81
8.07
1Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
1 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio (BHR) = low bank height/bankfull maximum depth; the UT to Uwharrie Site was designed fora BHR of 1.0. The site did not experience any significant aggradation/degredation over the 5-year monitoring period that would indicate that the bankfull elevation differed from the low bank elevation at any point during
the monitoring period. BHR for the 5-year monitoring period was not calculated using a static low bank/bankfull elevation. A bankfull/low bank elevation was recorded each year during monitoring activities, resulting in the elevation varying slightly from year to year as indicated by the yearly data shown above. These variations can be
attributed to the human element, but do not change the fact that the low bank elevation remained the bankfull elevation; therefore low bank height/bankfull max depth resulted in a BHR of 1.0 each year.

Parameter
MY-1
Main West Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morpholoy Summary (Longitudinal Profile)
MY-2 MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle ord
in
Mean
Mod Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
.ankfixll Width ft
Flood roneWidth ft
Only pool cross sections exist on
Main West Reach
Onl y pool cross sections exist on
Main West Reach
Only pool cross sections exist on
Main West Reach
Only pool cross sections exist on
Main West Reach
Only pool cross sections exist on
Main West Reach
Bankfixll Mean De th ft
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft�
Width/Dc th Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Bank Hci =ht Ratio
Profile
Riffle Len th ft
2.23
5.47
6.14 726
1.91
5
5.94
8.32
9.64 11.34
2.10
5
5.4
11.25
9.72 21.61
5.53
6
6.10
14.58
14.01 24.20
7.45
4
6.62
13.48
14.39 17.41
4.2
-
Riflle Slope ft/ft
0.0091
0.0225
0.0228 0.0372
0.0128
5
0.00441 0.01943 0.01683 0.04339 0.01446
5
0.00000 0.01320 0.01164 0.03497 0.01223
6
0.00000 0.0073
0.008 0.013
0.0054
4
0.0034
0.0141
0.0141 0.0291
0.0104
-
Pool Lou th ft
8.1
16.58
12.57 35.19
9.94
8
15.13
18.98
17.43 25.93
5.12
4
3.78
9.39
8.51 16.75
6-
4
14.67
20.77
20.87 26.68
5.61
4
10.6
1921
17.42 31.42
8.89
4
Pool Max depth ft
3.18
3.36
329 3.68
0.17
8
3.48
3.61
3.53 3.93
0.19
5
3.50
3.66
3.67 3.80
0.15
4
3.32
3.59
3.66 3.70
0.18
4
337
3.62
3.64 3.84
0.2
4
Pool Spacing ft
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
19.83
29.2
25.97 44.68
FA/1
9.23
7
21.61
37.01
32.96 60.50
CFA/1
17.02
4
15.40
43.02
39.44 77.79
C4/1
26.48
4
18.87
49.23
59.65 69.18
C4/1
26.72
3
37.48
39.94
38.990 43.35
C'4/1
3.05
3
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
235
235
235
235
235
Sinuosity (ft)
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0056
0.00575
0.00532
0.00437
0.00614
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0085 (Pools)
0.00783 (Pools)
0.00964 (Pools)
0.00786(Pools)
0.00851
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G'/o / S%
25.0
20.0
40.0 15.0
O
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
O
26.1
24.8
17.4
21.7
0
26.7
20.0
26.7
26.7
0.0
26.1
26.1
26.1
21-7
O.0
SC% / Sa% / QYo / C% / B% / Be%
9
31
52 8
O
0
7
33
54
6
O
O
3
34
60
3
O
0
4
31
55
1 O
O
O
5
47
37
11
O
O
d 16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
0.19
1.55
10.64 42.4
83.5
0.25
1.67
9.24
1 38.5
1 72.67
F=N=N0.67
1 1.87
1 8.66
1 48.56
1 61.63
1
0.79
1 2.0
1 9.65
1 55.86
1 85.67
0.22
1 123
1 1.91
54.5
83.5
of Reach with Eroding Banks
5%
O%
0%
0%
O"/.
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 ogica o
N/A
N/A
N/A
Main Center and Main Fast Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morpholoy Summary (Longitudinal Profile) -
Parameter
MY-1
MY-2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension a only
Min
Mc-Mcd
Max
Min
Mean
Mcd
Max
Min
Mcan
Mod
Max
Min
Mcan
Mcd
Max
Min
Mcan
Mcd
Max
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.86
19.06
17.9
21.42
2.04
3
17.57
19.61
19.78
21.48
1.96
3
17.53
19.00
17.98
21.50
2.17
3
17.65
18.80
19.26
19.49
1.00
3
18.2
18.71
18.72
19.21
0.51
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
103.33
100
110
5.77
3
100
103.33
100
110
5.77
3
100.0
103.3
100.0
110.0
5.77
3
100.00
103.33
100.00
110.00
5.77
3
100.0
103.330
100.0
110
5.77
3
Bankfu11 Mean Depth (ft)
1.59
1.69
1.71
1.76
0.09
3
1.52
1.62
1.66
1.68
0.09
3
1.54
1.60
1.59
1.67
0.07
3
1.53
1.59
1.59
1.65
0.06
3
1.56
1.64
1.67
1.69
0.07
3
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.88
3.2
3.05
3.66
0.41
3
2.87
3.26
3.21
3.71
0.42
3
2.90
3.31
3.23
3.81
0.46
3
2.95
3.33
3.31
3.74
0.40
3
3.08
3.53
3.36
4.16
0.56
3
Banktu 11 Cross Sectional Area ft2
28.39
32.2
31.51
36.71
4.2
3
29.51
31.76
30.13
35.63
3.37
3
27.02
30.41
30.08
34.14
3.57
3
28.04
29.92
29.47
32.25
2.14
3
29.27
30.73
30.47
32.44
1.6
3
Width/Depth Ratio
10.17
11.31
11.23
12.53
1.18
3
10.46
12.14
12.94
13.01
1.45
3
10.77
11.89
11.38
13.52
1.44
3
11.10
11.83
11.81
12.59
0.75
3
10.9
11.42
1137
12
0.55
3
Entrenchment Ratio
4.67
5.47
5.6
6.15
0.75
3
4.66
5.33
5.06
626
0.83
3
4.65
5.49
5.70
6.12
0.76
3
5.13
5.52
5.19
6.23
0.62
3
521
5.53
5.34
6.05
0.45
3
'Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.00
1.00
1.00
1 100
0.00
3
1.00
1.00
1.00
LOO
0.00
3
1.00
1.00
1.00
1 1.00
1 0.00
3
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
3
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
3
Profile
ft
5.23
12.98
11.86 28.96
6.04
28
3.63
12.91
11.99
26.28
5.99
27
4.94
15.93
13.75
37.05
9.21
26
4.23
14.64
14.23
38.56
8.88
23
6.89
12.29
10.8
18.71
3.49
25
Slope/ft
0.0013
0.0153
0.0113 0.0700
0.0142
28
0.00066
0.01974
0.01320
0.08619
0.02119
27
0.0009
0.0269
0.0126
0.1235
0.0289
26
0.0049
0.0229
0.0161
0.0554
0.0159
22
0.0008
0.0244
0.0184
0.0798
0.0223
25
ft
11.08
24.93
22.79 44.15
10.63
27
8.53
20.59
19.13
51.83
10.70
27
6.67
20.60
17.60
55.97
11.87
27
8.62
15.81
13.39
31.32
6.39
24
9.67
19.94
16.89
43.38
8.54
26
La -de
Pft
3
4.09
4.12 4.91
0.44
27
3.25
4.33
4.34
4.99
0.39
27
3.04
4.05
4.10
4.91
0.43
29
2.73
3.96
3.91
5.06
0.53
24
3.04
4.17
4.22
5.1
0.52
26
(f)
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
20.08
56.26
50.03 108.94
FA
23.02
27
18.05
58.05
54.39
C4
115.72
25.70
26
20.97
54.29
52.66 118.46
C4
20.15
28
16.20
64.61
59.39
C4
117.71
31.40
24
24.45
60.07
52.65 116.340
E5
25.9800
25
Channel Thalwe len th ft
1588
1588
1588
1588
1588
Sinuosit ft
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.28
Water Surface Slope Channel ft/ft
0.00584
0.00597
0.00559
0.00594
0.00594
BF slo a ft/ft
0.00543
0.00544
0.00562
OoOO538
0.00547
Ri % / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
29.17
E:96
28.13
18.75
O
25.0
25.9
25.0
24.1
0
23.9
26.6
23.9
25.6
0.0
27.9
23.3
27.9
20.9
0.0
31.3
18.8
25.9
24.1
00
SC% / Sa % / CP/o / C^/o / B % / Be %
9
31
52
8
O
O
7
33
54
6
O
O
3
34
60
3
O
0
4
31
55
1 O
O
0
5
47
37
11
O
0
d 16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
0.19
1.55
10.64
42.4
83.5
0.25
1.67
9.24
38.5
72.67
0.67
1.87
8.66
48.56
61.63
0.79
2.0
9.65
55.86
85.67
0.22
1.23
1.91
54.5
83.5
s % of Reach with Erodini, Banks
6%
9%
5%
8%
7%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include inforination fromboth the cross-section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion ofmach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey fromvisual assessment table
3 =Riffles, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dipanaxpave, disp--maxsubpave
4=Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3
**Pattern data was not collected since visual, dimensional, and profile data indicated acceptable levels ofndnor variation.

Hydrology Summary Data
Summary of Bankfull Events
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo No.
(If Available)
4/25/2013
Unknown
Crest Gauges Main East and SW-Trib 1
4/25/2013
Unknown
Wrack Lines and Debris on Main Center
Photos 1, 2
11/12/2013
Unknown
Crest Gauges Main East and SW-Trib z
Photo 3
5/21/2014
Unknown
Wrack Lines and Debris on Main West and East
Photos 4, 5
11/11/2014
Unknown
Wrack Lines and Debris on Main Center
Photo 6
11/26/2016
Unknown
Wrack Lines and Crest Gauge Main East)'
1 - Elevations above bankfull were not measure at the crest gauges for this event.
2 - The storm event was measured at 1.4 feet above bankfull elevation on the SW-Trib.
3 - Wrack Lines and Debris was measured at 2.88 inches above bankfull
i
Photo 1
Photo 3
Photo 5
Photo 2
Yi
Photo 4
Photo 6

Vegetation Plot Data
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
MY1 (2012)
MY2 (2013)
MY3 (2014)
MY4 (2015)
MY5 (2016)
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
Aesculus sylvatica
painted buckeye
Shrub
2
2
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
8
8
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
1
1
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
13
11
19
Carya glabra var.
glabra
pignut hickory
Tree
1
Cephalanthus
occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
Cornusamomum
silkydogwood
Shrub
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
2
2
2
5
2
2
2
7
2
7
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
11
9
9
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
4
6
13
Juniperus virginiana
eastern red cedar
Tree
1 2
2
1 2
3
1
1 1
1
1
1
1 1
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
14
12
33
15
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
2
2
Malus angustifolia
southern crabapple
Tree
1
Pinusechinata
shortleaf pine
Tree
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Pinusstrobus
eastern white pine
Tree
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
Pinustaeda
loblollypine
Tree
2
9
2
1 27
2
1 34
2
1 33
2
1 18
Pinus virginiana
Virginia pine
Tree
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
24
27
24
61
24
63
24
48
24
48
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
Quercus alb a
white oak
Tree
33
33
33
33
33
33
29
30
32
33
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
13
13
12
12
9
9
9
9
9
9
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
15
15
15
15
14
14
15
15
15
15
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
10
10
8
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
7
7
6
6
4
4
4
5
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
4
3
8
4
6
Sambucuscanadensis
common elderberry
Shrub
1
1
1
3
10
Ulm usalata
winged elm
Tree
1 22
1 7
1
1 5
1
1 12
Stem count
Size (ares)
Size (acres)
Species count
Stems per acre
162
1 205
157
r 260
147
r 261
145
1 270
147
1 244
17
17
17
17
17
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
19
1 24
19
1 28
18
26
18
24
18
23
385.E
r 488.0
373.7
r 618.9
349.9
r 621.3
1 345.2
r 642.7
349.9
580.8
Stems per plot across all years
MY1(2012)
MY2 (2013)
MY3 (2014)
MY4 (2015)
MY5 (2016)
Plot
Planted
Stems/
ac
Total
Stems/
ac
Planted
Stems/
ac
Total
Stems/
ac
Planted
Stems/
ac
Total
Stems/
ac
Planted
Stems/
ac
Total
Stems/
ac
Planted
Stems/
ac
Total
Stems/ac
1
405
1295
405
728
364
526
405
931
405
1093
2
405
526
283
1538
202
1457
243
445
243
931
3
405
405
364
405
364
405
364
364
364
364
4
202
283
202
283
202
364
202
445
202
405
5
405
405
405
405
405
567
405
445
405
445
6
243
243
243
364
243
364
243
243
243
243
7
688
769
688
1174
688
931
607
1740
647
971
8
486
647
486
567
445
769
486
1174
445
769
9
445
526
445
1416
445
1416
445
1497
445
809
10
405
445
445
445
405
445
405
364
405
405
11
324
324
283
283
243
243
243
243
243
243
12
283
283
283
486
202
405
202
486
202
486
13
364
607
364
486
364
769
243
526
324
607
14
364
364
364
728
364
728
364
728
364
728
15
364
364
364
445
364
445
364
405
324
405
16
364
364
364
364
324
324
324
364
324
364
171
4051
445
364
405
3241
4051
3241
5261
3641
607
AVG 1
385.6 488.01
373.7 618.91
349.9 621.31
345.2 642.71
349.9 580.8

DMS Recommendation and Conclusion
DMS recommends that the UT to Uwharrie River Site be closed out as proposed to generate 6,735.3 Stream Credits
and 0.19 Wetland (Riparian) Credits.
The vegetation survey results indicated an average site density of 350 planted stems per acre (excluding live stakes)
surviving in year five (581 stems/acre including native recruits). Stream visual assessments and morphology data
indicate that the stream is functioning as designed. Beaver activity has been controlled. In addition, multiple
bankfull events were documented throughout the course of the monitoring period.
Contingencies
None.

PHOTOS - Pre -Construction
Rock Wall along Tributary 2
Concrete impoundment walls along Main -East
Main -East substrate Main -East substrate

PHOTOS — During Construction
Main Channel construction and matting
Constructed channels near SW -UT & NW -UT
SE -UT showing illustration where cross vane installed
Wetland seep area near Main -Center right bank
Main channel bank grading
Constructed channel looking up on Main East -Center transition
Main — Center vane arm
Main channel (L) confluence with N-UT (R)
Restoration section along SW -Tributary

PHOTOS — Post Construction
Above — Main Center channel, March 2017
Monitoring Photo Point 12 SE-Trib (MY01)
Monitoring Photo Point 12 SE-Trib (MY04)
Seep area near STA 20+SO (MYO) Seep area near STA 20+SO Mar 2017

Appendix A: Property Ownership Information & Verification of Protection Mechanism
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s), available at the specified
County Register of Deeds office, and is linked to the property portfolio at:
http://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Libra ry/Property/Property%20Portfolio/847 UTtoUwharr
ie PD 2006.pdf
Project Name 11 County 11 Grantor Name IlRecordation Infoll Property Rights
JUT to UwharrielRandolph (Donnie R. SumnerlDB 2255, P 938 (Silage Pit Decommission
JUT to UwharrielRandolph (Donnie R. SumnerlDB 1984, P 2126 (Conservation Easement
Long-term stewardship of this property is managed by the NC DEQ Stewardship Program.

Appendix B. Permits and Jurisdictional Determination
ur to LLO\a ►&�e -A 94-7
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT 41t
Action 1D. SAW 2007 02854 276 County: Randolph USGS quad: Genola
GENERAL PERK UT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION V,,�p,,
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program / Wy tt Brown 1
Address: 1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone No.: 919 715-1972
Size and location of property (water body, road narne/number. town, etc.): Property located off of Morris Road, south
of Trinity, in Randolph County, North Carolina. This site is adjacent to a tributary of the Uwharrie River in the
Yadkin River Basin.
Description of projects area and activity: Proposed stream channel restoration project including the adjacent
rivaurian buffer as described in your construction plans included with vour application of August 15. 2007. to
restore 6,097 and enhance 1,165 linear feet of stream channel and to restore) enhance 0.5 acre of wetlands of the
Jurisdiction al waters of a tributary of the L-wharrie River.
This verification is for the authorization of the proposed work in 'urisdictional waters of the U.S.. it does not
confirm or deny the credit of the successful work for the ipurpose of future mitigation credits.
Per your request of April 19, 2010, this verification is re -issued/ extended to March 18, 2012, as defined by the
plans and conditions of the original project verification Action ID SAW 2007 02854 276.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorisation Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: NW27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittce to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked- All. of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoke prior to March 18, 2012. If, prior
to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain
valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the
natianwidc permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms a-nd ern+ditions of the nationwide pen -nit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are udder
contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve
months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised
on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Wager Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management .
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
Statc or local approvals/perraits.
If there are any questions regarding this v ri zcation, any of e onditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Fngineers regulatory
program, please contact John Thomas [a 954-4884 ext/ 5
Corps Regulatory Official Ll Aa_ --__ OL •�A/ Date: 04/22/2010
Expiration Date of Verifcation� 03/1812012
Page 1 of 2

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit httn;//www,saw.usace,army.miMETLANDS/index.httnl to
complete the survey online.
Determination of Jurisdiction:
❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the CIean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the perinit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Detertninatiou: Property has tributary to Mt. Pleasant Creek which flows to the Deep River and the
Atlantic Ocean.
Appeals Information ('Phis information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.)
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved jurisdictional
determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process
(NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA
form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn:Jcan Manucle, Project Manager,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be recei at the above address by .tune 23, 2008.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA f o e District Office' u do not object to the determination in this correspondence."
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date 04/23/2008
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Page 2 of 2

DWR / 401 Certification
The project was permitted during a period of time when an agreement was made between EEP and
DWQ that any EEP restoration project that did not receive comments from DWQ about any concerns or
issues was automatically deemed permitted, or reflected with a brief email approval (no certificate).
DWR # 0713-91
Internal records indicate the project was deemed approved 9/4/2007 by Cyndi Karoli via email.

APPENDIX C: Debit ledger
Mitigation Project
UT to Uwharrie
DMS ID
847
River Basin
YADKIN
Cataloging Unit
03040103
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
C
'2
N
E
N
E
C
E�m
.m
C
O
mo
C
mE
a
�N
C C
O
c
0 c
C C
T d
C c
A
N C
2
N
oE
N C
A EE
N c
rO
r2mNWO
A
0o
`m.
`
U
,
•o
a;
R N
uo
t0
o.
mN
Lm .1e
N
C
o.a
YN.
0
N
C
0
cv
OCU
c
O
w
O
NNo
Ci
M
M
U
a
W
2 W
Z
Z
W
Z a
Of
U
O
U
O
W
aw
U
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
5,925.00
901.00
163.00
722.00
0.93
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
5,925.00
600.67
65.20
144.40
0.186
NCDOT Pre-DMS Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWR Permit No
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
1999-0321
Laurel Woods Subdivision
882.00
NCDOT TIP I-2511 BB - Widening
1998-0071
of 1-85
155.00
2000-1105
2000-21860
Mountain Valley
300.00
Vulcan Materials East Forsyth
2006-1712
2006-41139-234
Quarry
519.00
2007-0985
2007-01841-234
Salem Stone Quarry
2,872.00
Settineri 2230 Old Union Church
2008-1807
2008-03095
Rd
150.00
2007-0843
2007-01684-229
Kool Pool Outfall Improvements
0.930
2000-1399
2001-20158
W.D. of Thomasville Walmart SC
422.00
901.00
163.00
722.00
2007-1995
2007-03968
Hartley Drive Extension
625.00
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.001
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
1 0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
1
1 0.000
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 05/11/2017