20110821 Ver 1_Mitigation Closeout Report_20170526

LYLE CREEK MITIGATION SITE
DMS ID (CRM#94643)
FDP CONTRACT #003241
USACE ACTION ID #2010-02102
DWQ 401 #11-0821
CLOSEOUT REPORT: STREAM & WETLAND
Project Setting & Classifications
Meeting Location Coordinates: 35142'32.14" N 8105'3.53"
County
Catawba
General Location
Catawba
River Basin:
Catawba
Ph sio ra hic Region:
Piedmont
Ecore ion:
Northern Inner Piedmont
USGS Hydro Unit:
03050101 (submitted for
03050103 extended service area
NCDWQ Sub -basin:
03-08-32
Wetland Classification
Riparian
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Project Performers
Source Agency:
DMS
Provider:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Designer:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Monitoring Firm
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Channel Remediation
RiverWorks
Plant remediation
RiverWorks
Approved for transfer to
Stewardship
Yes
Stewards
NCDEQ
Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
July 2010
Permitted
November 2011
Construction Completed
Aril 2012
Planting Completed
April 2012
As -built survey
July 2012
Invasive Plant Control
August 2012
Monitoring Year 1 Data Collected
September — October 2012
Monitoring Year 1 Final Report
January 2013
Supplemental Planting
December 2012
Invasive Plant Control
Aril and October 2013
Monitoring Year 2 Data Collected
May -October 2013
Monitoring Year 2 Final Report
December 2013
Supplemental Planting
Aril 2014
Monitoring Year 3 Data Collected
May — June 2014
Monitoring Year 3 Final Report
January 2015
Additional CE Posts
March — April 2015
Monitoring Year 4 Data Collected
May — June 2015
Monitoring Year 4 Final Report
March 2016
Invasive Plant Control
December 2016
Monitoring Year 5 Data Collected
February — November 2016
Monitoring Year 5 Final Report
December 2016
Additional CE Posts
November — December 2016
Supplemental Planting
February 2017
Closeout Submission
Aril 2017

DMS Planning Context:
The Lyle Creek restoration project is located in within Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03050101140010, the Lyle Creek
watershed, which is listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2007 Catawba River Basin Restoration Priorities
(RBRP) plan. Currently, DMS has one other project (Wike Property) in this TLW.
The project restores and protects several unnamed tributaries to Lyle creek, which is classified as a Water Supply
Watershed (WSW) by the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR). Lyle Creek is classified as WS-IV, which indicates
waters used for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes, generally located within moderately to highly developed
watersheds.
The 2007 RBRP indicates that the Lyle Creek watershed contains 24% developed land and 39% agricultural land; 34% of
streams are without adequate forested riparian buffers. Goals established in the 2007 RBRP for HUC 03050101 include
protection for WSWs and their immediate riparian zones, and improved management of stormwater runoff.
The goals of the Lyle Creek project are consistent with DMS watershed planning goals. The project protects WSWs
through establishment of conservation easements and restoration of riparian buffers, as well as decreased sediment
input. The project also reconnects streams with their floodplains and adjacent riparian wetlands, which attenuates peak
streamflows, increases hydrologic transfer, and creates opportunities for storage of surface stormwater runoff.
Project Setting and Background Summar
The Lyle Creek Mitigation Site is located in the Catawba River Basin (HUC) 03050101140010, which is a North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) Targeted Local Watershed
and qualifies as a service area for the adjacent Catawba River Basin HUC 03050103. The project stream reaches consist
of UT1, UT1A, UT113 (stream restoration) and UT1C and UT1D (stream enhancement level II). The project wetland areas
consist of RW1 and RW2 (wetland restoration and creation). Mitigation work within the site included restoring and
enhancing 6,795 LF of perennial and intermittent stream channel and restoring and creating 9.5 ac of riparian wetland.
The project is located on an active tree farm. Prior to construction activities, the project streams were regularly modified
and maintained and therefore lacked bedform diversity, habitat, and riparian buffer. The lack of bedform diversity
combined with continued anthropogenic disturbance resulted in degraded aquatic habitat, altered hydrology, and water
quality concerns such as lowered dissolved oxygen levels. The primary goals of the project were to provide ecological
and water quality enhancements to the Catawba River Basin while creating a functional riparian corridor at the site level,
providing wetland habitat and ecological function, and restoring a Piedmont Bottomland Forest as described by Schafale
and Weakley (1990).
Overall, the project streams, vegetation, and wetlands proposed for credit are stable and functioning as intended. All
project streams have met the required success criteria of exhibiting two overbank events in separate monitoring years.
The streams within the site are stable and meeting the final MY5 success criteria with the exception of a portion of
UT1A. This section along UT1A has aggraded due to a large influx of sediment from upstream, off -site of the project
limits. The average stem density of 419 stems/acre is greater than the final MY5 vegetative success criteria of 260
stems/acre. Supplemental plantings in 2012 and 2014 were performed within vegetation plots and surrounding areas
that were underperforming and not meeting success criteria. The additional stems resulting in all plots meeting criteria
in subsequent monitoring years (Years 4 and 5). Additional plantings that occurred in early 2017 were to replace areas
near the easement perimeter that had been scalloped. The 2017 plantings were not factored into Year 5 average stem
densities. All the groundwater gages (GWG) within areas proposed for credit have met the hydrologic success criteria
(7% hydroperiod within the growing season) approved in the mitigation plan during a majority of post -construction
monitoring (at least 3 out of 5 years). In addition, these gages would also meet the 2016 IRT recommended
hydroperiods associated with their mapped soil series (Chewacla or Wehadkee) during the majority of post -construction
monitoring. There are two gages (GWG 6 and 9) that did not meet hydrologic success criteria during a majority of post -
construction monitoring. These gages are located in the wetland areas no longer proposed for mitigation credit, thereby
no longer part of the project success criteria.
Based on the performance of project components through MY5, credit is not proposed for 394 LF of stream restoration
(394 SMU's) along UT1A that has aggraded due to offsite sediment sources. Credit is not proposed for 0.6 acres of
wetland creation (0.2 WMU's) in RW1 where groundwater gages (GWG 6 and 9) within the right floodplain of UT1 Reach
1 have not met hydrologic success criteria during the majority of monitoring years. Based on these modifications to
proposed credits the project is anticipated to generate 5,571 SMU's and 7.1 WMU's.

Goals and Objectives:
The following project goals/benefits and objectives were established in the Lyle Creek Mitigation Plan:
Goal/Benefit
Objectives
• Wetland areas disked to increase surface roughness and better capture rainfall which
Improve hydrologic
to improve connection with the water table for groundwater recharge.
connectivity
. Adjacent streams stabilized and established with a floodplain elevation to promote
hydrologic transfer between wetland and stream.
c
• A channel with riffle -pool sequences and some rock structures created in the steeper project
c7
reaches and a channel with run -pool sequences and woody debris structures created in the
v
Create appropriate in-
low sloped project reaches for macroinvertebrate and fish habitat.
o
stream habitat
. Introduction of wood including brush toe, root wads, and woody 'riffles' along with native
a
stream bank vegetation substantially increase habitat value.
c
• Gravel areas added as appropriate to further diversify available habitats.
Y
r_
0
a
Decrease sediment
. Sediment input from eroding stream banks reduced by installing bioengineering and in -
input
stream structures while creating a stable channel form using geomorphic design principles.
Create appropriate
• Adjacent buffer areas restored by removing invasive vegetation and planting native
terrestrial habitat
vegetation. These areas receive more regular and inundating flows.
• Riparian wetland areas restore and enhance to provide wetland habitat.
• Restored riffle/step-pool sequences on the upper reach of UT1a, where distinct points of re -
aeration can occur, allow for oxygen levels to be maintained in the perennial reaches. Small
Decrease water
log steps on the upstream portion of UT1b and UT1 Reach 1 Upper also provide re -aeration
temperature and
points.
increase dissolved
• Creation of deep pool zones lower temperature, helping to maintain dissolved oxygen
oxygen concentrations
concentrations. Pools form below drops on the steeper project reaches and around areas of
woody debris on the low -sloped project reaches.
a
• Establishment and maintenance of riparian buffers create long-term shading of the channel
O-,
flow to minimize thermal heating.
U
v
a
0
• Chemical fertilizer and pesticide levels are decreased by filtering runoff from adjacent tree
0.
-0
farm operations through restored native buffer zones and wetlands.
a,
Decrease nutrient and
Offsite nutrient input is absorbed onsite by filtering flood flows through restored floodplain
Xadverse
chemical
areas and wetlands, where flood flows can disperse through native vegetation and be
W
levels
captured in vernal pools.
• Increased surface water residency time provides contact treatment time and groundwater
recharge potential.
Decrease sediment
. Sediment from offsite sources is captured during bankfull or greater flows by deposition on
input
restored floodplain areas where native vegetation slow overland flow velocities.

Success Criterion:
Success Criteria
Measured Parameter
Criteria Met
Stream Dimension:
• Riffle/run cross -sections on the
Yes
restoration reaches should be stable;
• Riffle/run cross -sections surveyed
however due to sand/silt nature of the
along the restoration reaches appear
substrate through the project reaches,
stable and show little to no change in
temporary fluctuations of plus or
the bankfull area, maximum depth
minus 6 inches are expected.
13 cross sections:
ratio, or width -to -depth ratio during
• Riffle/run cross -sectional ratios
• 7 Riffle/run & 6 pools
the monitoring period.
(width -to -depth, depth ratio, and bank
• Surveyed riffle cross-section
height ratio) should fall within the
dimensions fell within the parameters
parameters defined for channels of
defined for channels of the
the appropriate Rosgen stream type.
appropriate Rosgen stream type.
• Changes in the channel that indicate a
• UT1A cross -sections (XS9, 10, & 13)
movement toward stability or
have filled in as a result of
enhanced habitat include a decrease
aggradation from off -site sources.
in the width -to -depth ratio in
This portion of UT1A has been
meandering channels in meandering
removed from proposed credit.
channels or an increase in pool depth.
Stream Pattern & Profile:
Yes
• Longitudinal profile data for the
The annual surveyed longitudinal
stream restoration reaches should
profile data for the stream restoration
show that the bedform features are
reaches illustrates that the bedform
remaining stable. The riffles should be
features are maintaining lateral and
steeper and shallower than the pools,
vertical stability. Exceptions include
while the pools should be deep with
aggradation on UT1A and to a lesser
flat water surface slopes.
4,460 linear feet (LF) of longitudinal
degree UT1B.
• The relative percentage of riffles and
profile:
• Aggradation from off -site sources has
pools should not change significantly
. 3,000 LF on UT1
filled in 394 LF of UT1A (Stations
from the design parameters.
. 615 LF on UT1A
300+36 to 304+30). This section of
• Adjustments in length and slope of run
. g45 LF on UT1B
UT1A has been removed from
and glide features are expected and
proposed credit.
are not considered a sign of instability.
•The riffles are remaining steeper and
• The longitudinal profiles should show
shallower than the pools.
that the bank height ratios remain
•The longitudinal profiles show that
very near to 1.0 for all of the
the bank height ratios remain very
restoration reaches.
near to 1.0 for all of the restoration
reaches.
Stream Hydrology:
3 crest gages:
Yes
• At the end of monitoring year five, two
. UT1 Reach 1
• Bankfull events were documented on
or more bankfull events must occur in
. UT1A
each reach in at least 3 separate
separate years within the restored
reaches.
. UT1B
monitoring years.
Yes
Wetland Hydrology:
• 9 of 11 gages exceeded the required
• Free groundwater surface within 12
7% hydrology in at least 3 of 5
inches of the ground surface for 7% of
11 groundwater gages
monitoring years. Gages 6 and 9 failed
the growing season, which is
to meet the success criteria in 3 of 5
measured on consecutive days under
monitoring years. The acreage
typical precipitation conditions.
surrounding Gages 6 and 9 is no
longer sought for wetland for credit.
Vegetation:
Yes
• The final vegetative success criteria is
• All 35 vegetation plots meet or
the survival of 260 planted trees per
35 vegetation plots
exceed 260 stems per acre.
acre at the end of the five year
• The average planted stem density for
monitoring period.
monitoring year five was 419 stems
per acre.

Asset Table:
Pre-
Restored
Creditable
Wetland
Approach
Reach ID
Position and
Construction
As -Built
Length (LF)
Length (LF)
Restoration
Priority
Mitigation
Mitigation
Notes/Comments
Length (LF) or
Stationing
or Acreage
or Acreage
Level
Ratio
Credits
Hydro Type
Level
Acreage (Ac)
(Ac)
(Ac)
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Invasive Control, Conservation
100+00-
Easement, Creditable length excludes 179 LF in crossings (farm road and
UT1
N/A
4,071
3,951
3,951
Restoration
Priority 1/2
1:1
3,951
overhead power line) and includes length from station 125+42 to 125+60
141+30
where left bank buffer width ranges from 48.5 ft to 50 ft and the right bank
buffer width exceeds 100 ft.
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Invasive Control, Conservation
300+00-
Easement, As -Built stationing, and creditable length ends at the start of the
UT1a
N/A
1,141
615
221
Restoration
Priority 1
1:1
221
anastomosed wetland complex. Creditable length also excludes length from
306+15
station 300+36 to 304+30 which has filled as a result of sedimentation from
off -site sources.
201+52-
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Invasive Control, Conservation
UT1b
N/A
890
845
845
Restoration
Priority 1/2
1:1
845
Easement, As -Built stationing, and creditable length ends at the start of the
209+97
anastomosed wetland complex.
in -stream
Planted Buffer, Invasive Control, Conservation Easement, Creditable length
UT1c
N/A
695
400+00
677
677
Enhancement II
structures
2.5:1
271
includes length from station 4+48 to 6+11 where left bank buffer width ranges
406+77
grading,
from 28.7 ft to 50ft and the right bank buffer width ranges from 65.5 ft to
planting
102.6 ft.
in -stream
UT1d
N/A
760
500+00-
707
707
Enhancement II
structures,
2.5:1
283
Planted Buffer, Invasive Control, Conservation Easement.
507+07
grading,
planting
Planting, ripping, excavation/grading, braided channels. Creditable area
RW1
RR
N/A
N/A
5.6
5.6
Restoration
grading,
1:1
5.6
excludes stream footprint proposed for credit within wetland area. Area of
planting
aggradation along UT1a no longer sought out for stream credit is now included
as wetland credit.
Planting, ripping, excavation/grading, braided channels. Creditable area
RW1
RR
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
Creation
grading,
3:1
0.3
excludes stream footprint proposed for credit within wetland area. Area of
planting
aggradation along UT1a no longer sought out for stream credit is now included
as wetland credit.
RW2
RR
N/A
N/A
0.8
0.8
Restoration
grading,
1:1
0.8
Planting and excavation/grading. Creditable area excludes stream footprint
planting
within wetland area.
Planting and excavation/grading, berm added along stream. Creditable area
RW2
RR
N/A
N/A
1.8
1.2
Creation
grading,
3:1
0.4
excludes stream footprint within wetland area and excludes 0.6 AC of wetland
planting
creation in RW2 where groundwater gages 6 and 9 haven't met success
criteria in a majority of monitoring years.

Length and Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
5,017
6.4
-
Enhancement
-
-
Enhancement I
-
Enhancement 11
1,384
Creation
2.2
-
Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category
Overall Credits
Stream
5,571
RP Wetland
7.1

Figure 1. Asset and Monitoring Features Map
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site
WILD LANDS DMS Project Number 94643
\& ENGINEERING rk�
0 25o Soo ft Closeout Report
I I I
Catawba County, NC

j Conservation Easement
OProject Watershed
- Project Streams
--_ 4060
�ON WILDLANDS
W& ENGINEERING rk�
Itc-
i
'k
r
1
' 1' ♦,`a', ,� �I III 1 ,��
/ • • � ' �� J�
_ _ • - �� 11
19
rep
O •
atawb
1 - _NIP-
i
• 3U&I*
minute topog pbic' ranfle
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project Number 94643
0 500 1,000 2,000 ft Closeout Report
I I I I I
Catawba County, NC

Figure 3. Soils Map
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site
WILDLANDS , DMS Project Number 94643
ENGINEERING o 25o Soo ft
I t
Closeout Report
Catawba County, NC

Conservation Easement
—Project Streams
Non Project Streams
Severe Aggradation Stream (Credit no longer proposed)
� Wetland Restoration
Wetland Creation
Wetland Creation (Credit no longer proposed)
December 2012: Supplemental Planting (1,200 bare root trees)�-
�__
r�
® April 2014: Supplemental Planting (200 1-gal container trees)
February 2017: Supplemental Planting (58 ball and burlap trees)
_r
sr ,
"^-.a•..e_'.�':..:aaY'u"'.�'1i7';1�t?_:.�4
F 1E
.�.::...=_1
t
�;::. a...,.. . iLa.2Y�L.� t �
� �Hf ��►itR sal,
E%•� 4 r l
f4-1
a
�� ENGINEERWILDLANDS k
\�/ ING
4
0 250 500 ft
I I I
4
T
111 N
it
it
a
x
}
► _ L: t 1�
Figure 4. Remediation Map
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site
P DMS Project Number 94643
Closeout Report
Catawba County, NC

Stream Morphology Data: Cross Sections
Cross Section 1 Riffle — UT1 Reach 1 Upper
774
773
4 77I
771
770
0 10 20 30 40 s0 60 70 80
Width{ft)
+MYo(V2012} .-MYS(10/2012)—MY215�2013j +MY3 15/20141
—MY4 [5120151 MYS(512016)—Bankfull—Fbodpr n Nea
Cross Section 4 Pool — UT1 Reach 1 Lower
766
765
—
C
764
low
Q
7W
761
0 10 20 30 40 50 fiO 70 80 90
Width{tt)
�MYO(472012) —MY1(1012012)—MY2(V2013) —MY3(512014) �MY4(572015) �MVI:W:-Q—Bdnklull
Cross Section 2 Pool — UT1 Reach 1 Upper
773
772
771
_ 770
s`
769 .
768
767
766
0 10 20 30 40 s0 6D 70 80 90 100
W Idlh Ifl]
7— MYO($12012j �MYl(10/2017) —MY21Y20131 —MY3(512(n4)—MY415/20151 �MY5(572D16)—Bankfull
Cross Section 5 Pool — UT1 Reach 1 Lower
T65
764
-2
W
762
762
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7u
width(fl]
+MYO(472012}—MY1(WI20121 �MY2(5/2013) +MY3(5120141 +MY4(512015) tMYS(572016)—Ba,+k:ull
Cross Section 3 Riffle — UT1 Reach 1 Lower
767
766
765
4
S 764
763
]62
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (t1j
—MYoI 2012j —LkAY2 2013]—MY3I572014J
+MY4 2015 �MYS 2016—OankPnll —Fkwd . Nea
Cross Section 6 Riffle — UT1 Reach 1 Lower
i65
i64
—
.
163
i62
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
width M
�MYO (472D12j �MY1 (10�i012) MY2 (572o13) +MY3 (572014)
�MY4 2015 �MYS 2016—Bankfull —Flood one Area

Cross Section 7 Riffle — UT1 Reach 2
Cross Section 8 Pool — UT1 Reach 2
Cross Section 9 Riffle — UT1A (Not Proposed for Credit)
762
762
768
761
76D
v
s 759
759
757
761
76D
-
-
767
.g 765
764
Ira
s` 759
$,
7%
-
0{
0 10 21 30 40 50 EO 70
Width 1ft1
0 10 20 30 40 s0 fiD 70 BD 90
W idlh (R)
0 5 10 1s 20 25 30 35
Width (}1)
-MYO 2112] �MYl Il 2012} —MY2 2013} —MY3(201-0
�MY9 2D14 tMYs 201—0ankfull —F W7a
+MYO (4/N112} •-MYl [10/2112} +MY2 (5/2ri3} �MY3 (5/2i114} �MY4 [Sj20151 tMYS [6f20161—Banklull
�MYO(4/2012) �MYI(10r2012) - MY2{5/2013} �MY3(S/2014) �MY4(11/MM) �MY519/20161—Banklull
Cross Section 10 Pool — UT1A (Not Proposed for Credit)
Cross Section 11 Riffle — UT16
Cross Section 12 Pool — UT1B
205 + 30 riffle
766
769
766
767
766
—
765
S 767
762
-
2
762
�5
765
764
763
L ^�
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width{}t)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Widtl+(R1
0 10 20 30 4D 5D 6D 70 q0
width(R)
t MY014/20121—MYi[10/2022] +MY2(5/2D13] �MY315/2D141 �INY4111/2015} �MYS(9/2016]—B�nk[ull
tMYO(4/2012} tMYl [30/2012] +MY2(s/2013) tMY3{5/20141
�MY4 5/2015 �MYs [O6/2016—Bankfull —F load one Brea
�MYO (7/20121 �MYl (10/20121 �k1Y2 {Sj20131 �MY3 (5/2014) +MY4 (5/2015) +MYS (6/2016) —BankEull
*Bankfull elevation adjusted in MY3 due to channel and floodplain aggradation

Cross Section 13 Riffle — UT1A (Not Proposed for Credit)
772
2770 —
4
5 769
Y
769
767
0 10 7o 30 40 50 60 70
Width IRJ
�MY31V20141 PAN {11/2015l �MYS(9�1016)—8anklull
Stream Morphology Data: Longitudinal Profiles
UT1 Reach 1 Upper
116
—
a
■
■
774
ra
■
■
770
■
7b8
■
764
7G2
760
103M
10100
10200 103W 10400 10500 10600 10700
Statlon (two
rn pAm.nouV
- rn pprl-1W1aul — m p u-bf2u a1 +11N {M�3-]n0161 t 11i/ IMY6-'un015]
iW pAT33�i0161
••••••• WSIM1'S-4I>•416} ■ WFJt 0 k V W
UT1 Reach 1 Lower
770
768
71
764
7S2
Wr
760
7ss
756
754
10700
10900
11100
11300 11500
11700 11500 12110
Station 11eet1
� YW [Mmvo 1017j
♦ TW ]MY1.1011011}
� TW ]MY1-W2013)
� lW {MY3.5l2014] �1W 1A1Y4.vwj51
� TW jMYSfijM161
....... WS(MYSW20M,
■ BKFI7OB
■ 1AG4ANE
■

UT1 Reach 2
753
762
■
UT1B
774
1f116 encer5 prolett area
772
770
768
766
764
762
750
759
20000 20100 20200 203M 20400 20600 206M 20700 20800 20KO 21000
Station 11m)
�TW {Mr0-/120121 SSW )Mrl-10/10121 �S+M (M1`]-512U131 �Tw (MT3i1201a) �iW IMT6-Sj2015}-7W Iµy6-5/701Bj-•••--• WS{MrSWMF6j ■ &?R
at Station
■
2o1+s2
■
■
■
■
A
■
UT1A
774
at Station
■
2o1+s2
■
■
■
■
A
■
UT1A
774
UT1A
774
772
■
■
770
7[$
■
766
W
764
■
■ ■
762
76O
758
30008
3O100 30200 30300 311400 30500 3O6p7
5[a[lan [fret}
�Tw (MinV+Os 1[ rw [Mn•sW2o s?I �iW {MI'f •y/)61 ij - TW IMI`S-j/tnl�} �-rw [wr+strzps59
� 1xr(Mn wms6t ....... W5IMn172w4} eanaelMn•9rj4:b} a locwun7stu

Stream Morphology: Morphology Table
Cross -Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 2 (Pool)
Cross -Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 4 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY1 I MY2 MY3 I MY4 MY5
Base MY1 I MY2 MY3 I MY4 LMY5
Base MY1 MY2 I MY3 I MY4 MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.6
5.8
6.1
5.1
9.7
6.5
13.6
10.8
10.3
10.6
8.9
9.9
19.1
13.7
18.2
15.5
15.6
13.4
21.6
15.3
17.4
16.4
17.3
16.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
66.7
65.4
65.4
65.4
66.8
67.0
---
---
---
---
---
62.6
63.4
55.7
55.7
63.4
63.4
---
---
---
---
---
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.3
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.9
2.4
1.9
1.8
1.1
1.4
1.3
1.6
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.5
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
2.7
2.7
2.3
1.7
2.1
2.1
14.2
9.8
8.1
5.1
5.0
4.9
13.1
9.0
10.8
8.1
9.5
8.9
22.0
16.1
17.9
17.0
17.3
17.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.7
12.8
16.0
15.2
43.8
20.1
13.0
12.0
13.0
22.2
15.9
19.7
27.7
20.9
30.7
29.6
25.6
20.1
21.1
14.6
16.9
15.8
17.5
14.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cross -Section 5 (Pool)
Cross -Section 6 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 7 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 8 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.6
14.4
18.0
15.9
14.4
15.1
11.9
12.4
13.5
13.4
12.6
12.8
11.8
8.7
14.7
12.1
13.1
11.0
23.6
16.9
22.7
21.0
20.5
22.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
79.6
80.3
76.9
76.9
79.7
79.7
69.7
70.8
65.9
65.9
71.8
71.7
---
---
---
---
---
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
1.0
1.1
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.2
1.3
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.4
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.3
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.6
3.0
2.1
2.7
2.9
2.3
2.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
16.4
13.7
14.8
13.8
11.8
12.9
8.1
8.5
8.8
7.6
7.4
8.3
11.7
9.4
11.8
10.9
11.4
9.3
27.4
21.3
24.4
20.9
19.6
18.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.9
15.1
21.9
18.3
17.6
17.7
17.3
1 18.0
20.8
23.6
21.7
19.7
11.8
8.0
18.3
13.5
15.1
12.9
20.3
13.4
21.0
21.1
21.4
27.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cross -Section 9 (Riffle)'
Cross -Section 10 (Pool)'
Cross -Section 11 (Riffle)Z
Cross -Section 12 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base MY1 MY2 I MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY MY2 I MY3 MY47 MY5
Base I MY1 I MY2 MY3 I MY4 MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.6
1.9
2.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.9
---
2.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.5
3.1
4.8
3.5
5.2
5.2
6.0
6.4
8.5
4.7
6.7
4.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.5
31.4
27.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
---
---
---
---
---
---
67.3
66.5
64.2
53.8
45.4
67.8
---
---
---
---
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
---
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
0.4
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
---
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.9
1.2
1.0
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
2.1
0.6
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.3
---
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
1.0
2.3
1.7
2.1
2.0
4.5
3.9
3.1
1.3
1.5
1.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
6.2
5.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.7
---
8.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.7
9.8
10.0
6.9
12.7
13.3
8.0
10.6
23.4
17.9
29.7
18.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
2.2+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cross
-Section
13 (Riffle)'
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
5.7
0.0
0.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
---
54.9
---
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
0.4
0.0
0.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
---
---
---
1.0
0.0
0.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
---
---
---
2.0
0.0
1 0.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
---
---
---
16.3
0.0
0.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
---
---
---
2.2+
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
---
-
---
1.0
N/A
N/A
'Cross -sections 9, 10 and 13 are located in the section of UT1A that is no longer proposed for credit.
*In MY1(2012) sediment deposition occurred within cross-section 10filling in the majority of the channel. Storm flows have flushed out the sediment flows and the channel dimensions appearto be adjusting back toward the as -built channel dimensions.
*In MY3 (2014) sediment deposition occurred within cross-section 9 and 10filling in the channel and part of the surronding floodplain.
*Cross Section 13 on UT1A was installed during MY3 and filled in with sediment during MY4.
2Bankfull elevation was adjusted in MY3 due to sediment aggradation in the channel and on the floodplain.

Hydrology Data:
Verification of Bankfull Events Table
Reach
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
MY of
Occurrence
Method
5/11/2012
U
1
Crest Gage
UT1
10/31/2013
U
2
Crest Gage
6/17/2016
U
5
Crest Gage
7/10/2012
U
1
Crest Gage
UT1A
3/7/2013
U
2
Crest Gage
6/30/2014
5/15/2014
3
Crest Gage
7/10/2012
U
1
Crest Gage
3/7/2013
U
2
Crest Gage
UT113
6/30/2014
5/15/2014
3
Crest Gage
11/4/2015
U
4
Crest Gage
U: Unknown
Summary of Groundwater Gage Results for Year 1 through 5
Wetlands RW1 and RW2
Summary of Groundwater Gage Results
Success Criteria
Gage
Year 1(2012)
Year 2 (2013)
Year 3 (2014)
Year 4 (2015)
Year 5 (2016)
2017*
No/5 Days
Yes/49 Days
Yes/47 Days
Yes/59 Days
Yes/42 Days
Yes/31.5 Days
1
(2.5%)
(24.0%)
(23.0%)
(25.4%)
(18.1%)
(15.8%)
No/0 Days
Yes/93 Days
Yes/113.5 Days
Yes/99.5 Days
Yes/108 Days
Should Meet/11
2
(0.0%)
(46.0%)
(56.0%)
(42.9%)
(46.6%)
Days (5.4%)**
Yes/29 Days
Yes/49 Days
Yes/52.5 Days
Yes/101.5 Days
Yes/84 Days
Yes/31.5 Days
3
(14.0%)
(24.0%)
26.0%)
(43.8%)
(36.2%)
(15.8%)
Yes/27 Days
Yes/54.5 Days
Yes/47 Days
Yes/65.5 Days
Yes/48 Days
Yes/31.5 Days
4
(13.0%)
(27.0%)
(23.0%)
(28.2%)
(20.7%)
(15.8%)
No/11 Days
Yes/41.5 Days
Yes/52.5 Days
Yes/75.5 Days
Yes/233 Days
Yes/31.5 Days
5
(5.0%)
(20.3%)
(26.0%)
(32.5%)
(100.0%)
(15.8%)
6***
No/5 Days
Yes/16 Days
No/10 Days
Yes/35.5 Days
No/9 Days (3.9%)
Yes/31.5 Days
(2.5%)
(7.8%)
(5.0%)
(15.3%)
(15.8%)
Yes/22 Days
Yes/179 Days
Yes/49.5 Days
Yes/79.5 Days
Yes/43 Days
Yes/31.5 Days
7
(11.0%)
(88.0%)
(25.0%)
(34.3%)
(18.5%)
(15.8%)
No/12 Days
Yes/53 Days
Yes/44.5 Days
Yes/63 Days
Yes/42 Days
Yes/31 Days
8
(6.0%)
(26.0%)
(22.0%)
(27.2%)
(18.1%)
(15.3%)
9***
N/A
N/A
A
Yes/17 Days
No/9 Days (3.9%)
Yes/31.5 Days
(7.3%)
(15.8%)
Yes/180 Days
Yes/45.5 Days
Yes/85 Days
Yes/45 Days
Yes/31.5 Days
10
N/A
(88.0%)
(23.0%)
(36.6%)
(19.4%)
(15.8%)
11
N/A
Yes/80 Days
Yes/50.5 Days
Yes/73.5 Days
Yes/84 Days
Yes/31.5 Days
(39.0%)
(25.0%)
(31.7%)
(36.2%)
(15.8%)
Reference
Yes/74.5 Days
Yes/204 Days
Yes/35 Days
Yes/52.5 Days
No/13 Days
N/A
(36.5%)
(100%)
(17.3%)
(22.6%)
(5.4%)
* 2017 data runs through 5/8/17 except for Gage 2.
"Gage 2 data was pulled for repairs on 4/18/17. Groundwater levels at Gage 2 were within 12 inches of the surface for
the entire captured portion of the 2017growing season. The unit has been redeployed and is expected to meet success criteria in 2017.
***Gages 6 and 9 did not meet hydroperiod success criteria in a majority of monitoring years and credit associated with these gages has
been removed.
Hydro period performance standard is 7% of the growing season. NRCS WETS defined growing season is 202 days (April 8thto October 27tn)
NRCS WETS data was used to determine the growing season for monitoring years 1-3 and 2017. On -site soil temperature probe data was
used to determine the beginning of the growing season for monitoring years 4-5.
N/A: Gages 10and 11were installed during MY2. Gage 9was installed during MY4. Reference data not yet available in 2017.

Monthly Rainfall Data
Lyle Creek 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall in 2012-2016
13
12
11
10
9
8
'^ 7
a
s
u
S6
5
4
3-
2 —
1 — —
0
January February March April May June July August September October November December
Month
2012 Rainfall Data 2013 Rainfall Data 2014 Rainfall Data 2015 Rainfall Data
2016 Rainfall Data 30th Percentile 70th Percentile
1 USGS station 354616081085145 rainfall used when on -site gage malfunctioned.
Z 30th and 70th percentile rainfall data collected from weather station Catawba 3 NNW, NC1579 (USDA, 2002)

Vegetation Data:
Summary of Planted Vegetation Plot Results
Plot Number
Planted Stems/Acre Counting Towards Success Criteria
Year 0
(2012)
Year 1
(2012)
Year 2
(2013)
Year 3
(2014)
Year 4
(2015)
Year 5
(2016)
1
526
405
405
405
405
364
2
567
364
405
364
364
283
3
486
486
445
445
445
445
4
405
121
283
364
364
364
5
486
202
324
445
445
445
6
607
364
283
324
364
364
7
445
283
364
364
405
405
8
445
324
405
405
405
405
9
486
405
405
364
283
283
10
445
283
324
324
324
324
11
526
445
486
405
405
364
12
486
283
324
243
324
324
13
607
567
607
607
607
607
14
445
445
445
445
486
486
15
567
526
486
486
486
486
16
526
486
567
526
607
567
17
607
405
364
364
364
364
18
486
324
405
283
324
283
19
486
40
243
283
364
364
20
567
486
486
526
526
526
21
648
243
405
405
405
405
22
567
405
445
405
445
445
23
445
324
405
364
364
364
24
567
445
526
486
567
607
25
648
445
445
445
445
445
26
607
445
405
364
445
445
27
607
526
567
567
526
567
28
648
526
526
445
486
486
29
486
283
283
283
324
324
30
729
121
324
283
364
364
31
486
405
405
405
405
405
32
445
405
445
364
445
324
33
405
324
405
364
405
405
34
486
364
445
486
486
486
35
607
526
526
526
567
526
Average of All
Plots
(1-35 )
532
372
416
406
428
419

Vegetation Data:
Planted and Total Stem Counts
Annual Summary
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
MY5 (2016)
MY4 (2015)
MY3 (2014)
MY2 (2013)
MY1 (2012)
MYO (2012)
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Acerfloridonum
southern sugar maple
Tree
2
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
10
10
12
11
11
13
10
10
11
11
11
12
14
14
14
24
24
24
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
12
4
A In us serrulo to
hazel alder
Shrub
34
34
34
34
34
34
33
33
33
33
33
33
13
13
13
25
25
25
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
53
53
54
52
52
53
51
51
55
52
52
55
52
52
52
71
71
71
Collicarpa americans
American beautyberry
Shrub
15
Carpinuscaroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
17
17
17
Celtisloevigata
sugarberry
Tree
9
9
9
14
14
14
11
11
11
13
13
13
13
13
13
15
15
15
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
34
50
35
22
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
Cornusamomum
siIkydogwood
Shrub
3
3
13
3
3
11
Cornusflorida
floweri ng dogwood
Tree
1
1
2
Diospyros virginiano
common persimmon
Tree
9
9
13
9
9
9
8
8
8
8
8
9
8
8
8
10
10
10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
80
80
97
82
82
95
74
74
84
77
77
88
63
63
63
69
69
69
Hibiscus
rosemal low
Shrub
1
Juglans nigra
bl ack wa I nut
Tree
1
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
2
10
2
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
15
15
17
16
16
19
17
17
19
20
20
21
20
20
20
52
52
52
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
39
39
41
40
40
40
38
38
38
40
40
40
38
38
38
48
48
48
Pin us rigida
pitch pine
Tree
2
Pinus taedo
loblolly pine
Tree
6
Platanusoccidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
66
66
93
65
65
113
66
66
97
68
68
97
66
66
66
88
88
88
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
14
29
10
7
Pru n u s sero tin a
blackcherry
Tree
1
3
Quercus michouxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
12
12
12
12
12
12
14
14
14
Quercus phellos
wi I I ow oa k
Tree
23
23
25
23
23
24
23
23
24
22
22
22
21
21
21
27
27
27
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
Rosa palustris
swamp rose
Shrub
36
12
32
Salix bebbiono
Bebb wi I I ow
Tree
1
1
2
1
1
1
Salix nigra
black wiI low
Tree
17
72
1
Salix sericea
s i I ky wi I I ow
Shrub
55
40
13
36
Sombucuscanadensis
common elderberry
Shrub
1
1
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
1
5
Ulmusamericana
American elm
Tree
5
Ulmus rubra
slippery el m
Tree
4
Stem count
362
362
577
370
370
698
351
351
479
360
360
527
322
322
322
460
460
460
size (ares)
35
35
35
35
35
35
size (acres)
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.86
Species count
15
15
26
15
15
27
14
14
21
12
12
22
12
12
12
12
12
12
Stems per Acre
419
419
667
428
428
807
406
406
1 554
416
416
609
372
372
372
532
532
532
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: NumberofPIanted stems excluding Iivestakes
P-all: Numberofplanted stems including Iivestakes
T: Total Stems

Pre & Post Construction Photos:
;WA
'yam.. --:i°`
-: �
;�5 ���'�}
➢'r �
x h
!R
39 Via.,
do y tl t.
R ' 7
�11
UT1 Reach 1 (Upper) — Existing Conditions (02/2010)
UT1 Reach 1 (Upper) — Monitoring Year 5 (07/2016)
.7�y�
� '
J.
y _Il
ram...
t
sk-
i
UT1 Reach 1 (Lower) — Existing Conditions (8/2010)
UT1 Reach 1 (Lower) — Monitoring Year 5 (07/2016)
1 _
r�
5A�y11.
UT1 Reach 2 — Existing Conditions (8/2010)
UT1 Reach 2 — Monitoring Year 5 (07/2016)

UT1D — Existing Conditions (8/2010) 1 UT1D — Monitoring Year 5 (07/2016) 1
RW1— Existing Conditions (8/2010) 1 RW1— Monitoring Year 5 (06/2016) 1
RW2 — Existing Conditions (8/2010) 1RW2 — Monitoring Year 5 (06/2016) I

DMS Recommendation and Conclusion:
Overall, the project streams, vegetation, and wetlands proposed for credit are stable and functioning as intended. All
project streams have met the required success criteria of exhibiting two overbank events in separate monitoring years.
The streams within the site are stable and meeting the final MY5 success criteria with the exception of a portion of
UT1A. The average stem density of 419 stems/acre is greater than the final MY5 vegetative success criteria of 260
stems/acre. All the groundwater gages (GWG) within areas proposed for credit have met the hydrologic success criteria
(7% hydroperiod within the growing season) approved in the mitigation plan during a majority of post -construction
monitoring (at least 3 out of 5 years). In addition, these gages would also meet the 2016 IRT recommended
hydroperiods associated with their mapped soil series (Chewacla or Wehadkee) during the majority of post -construction
monitoring.
Based on the performance of project components through MY5, credit is not proposed for 394 LF of stream restoration
(394 SMU's) along UT1A that has aggraded due to offsite sediment sources. Credit is not proposed for 0.6 acres of
wetland creation (0.2 WMU's) in RW1 where groundwater gages (GWG 6 and 9) have not met hydrologic success criteria
during the majority of monitoring years. The site is generally free of invasive vegetation and there are not beaver
impoundments.
The project has met the overall goals and DMS recommends close out of the project based on the above
modifications to proposed credits requested 5,571 SMU's and 7.1 WMU's.
Contingencies:
None.

Appendix A: Property Ownership Information & Verification of Protection Mechanism
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s), available at the specified
County Register of Deeds office, and is linked to the property portfolio at:
http://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Libra ry/Property/Property%20Portfolio/94643 LyleCreek
MitigationSite PD 2010.pdf
Project Name I County I Grantor Name I Deed Info II Property Rights
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site Catawba Joseph S. Garmon and Kathy T. Garmon IDB 3057, P 1320IConservation Easement
Long-term stewardship of this property is managed by the NC DEQ Stewardship Program.

APPENDIX B: Permits and Jurisdictional Determination
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action 1D. SAW-2010-02102 County: Catawba USGS Quad: Catawba
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Owner/Applicant: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Matt Jenkins
Address: 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Telephone No.. [phone]
Authorized Agent: North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Attn: Mr. Guy Pearce
Address: 1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Telephone No.: [phone]
Size and location of property (waterbody, road name/number, town, etc.): The project (Lyle Creek Mitigation Site) is
located west of North Carolina Highway 10, south of Lyle Creek, in Catawba County, North Carolina.
Site Coordinates: 35.7117 °N-81.0815 °W Waterway: Lyle Creek River Basin: Catawba
Description of project area and activity: This permit authorizes stream channel relocation, excavation, mechanized
land clearing, the placement of fill material (including the installation of in -stream structures, coir fiber rolls, log
and rock vanes, root wads, brush mattresses, vegetated geolifts, etc.) associated with the construction of Lyle Creek
Stream and Wetland Restoration Project. Authorized impacts to waters of the U.S. are identified on the table on
page 2 of this authorization.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Nationwide or Regional General Permit Number(s): 27
SEE ATTACHED NATIONWIDE CONDITIONS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS ON PAGE 2 OF THIS FORM
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated September 1, 2011. Any violation of the attached
conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or
appropriate legal action.
• This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 19, 2012. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will
issue a public notice when the N WPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity
before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the
modification or revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
• Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification.
You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
• For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
• This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
• If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Todd Tugwell at telephone [phone].
Corps Regulatory Official
Date: November 21, 2011
Digitally signed by
TUGWELL.TODD.JASON.1048429293
Date: 2011.11.22 10:44:22-05'00'
Expiration Date of Nationwide Permit Verification: March 18, 2012
Pagel of 3

Summary of Authorized Impacts and Reauired Mitieation
Open Water ac
Wetland ac
Unimportant Steam 1
Important Stream t
NWP / GP #
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
27
0
0
1.43
1.3
0
0
3785
0
Impact Totals
0
0
1.43
1.3
0
0
3785
0
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. ac 1.3
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. I 0
Required Wetland Miti ation(ac) 1 0
Required Stream Mitigation (If) 1 0
Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions:
This verification is the second NWP 27 issued for this project, and was issued for work necessary to repair
degraded portions of the project. The following special conditions apply:
1. This Nationwide Permit verification does not imply approval of the suitability of this property for compensatory
wetland mitigation for any particular project. The use of any portion of this site as compensatory mitigation for a
particular project will be determined during our public interest review and 404 (b) (1) Guidelines analysis during
the permit review process for that project.
2. Work associated with this authorization is based on the Mitigation Plan dated August 2011.
3. Groundwater monitoring wells shall be installed to document site hydrology in all wetland areas (creation and
enhancement).
4. Within wetland areas, planted vegetation shall average 4 feet in height at year 3, and 8 feet in hieght at year 5.
5. The performance standard for wetland vegetation in the mitigation plan shall be modified to 210 living planted
stems per acre at year 7.
Copy Furnished:
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey
h"://regulatorv.usacesurvev.com/ to complete the survey online.
the public. To help us ensure we
located at our website at
Page 2 of 3

Determination of Jurisdiction
A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there
is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ❑ There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the
date of this notification.
D. ® The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference the jurisdictional determination issued on April 6, 2011 (Action ID: SAW 2010-02102).
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants: This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of
Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are
USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland
determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B and C above): This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described
site. If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR
Part 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA)
form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete; that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the
NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by . It is not necessary
to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.
Corps Regulatory
Date: November 21, 2011
Digitally signed by
TUG W ELL.TODDJASON.104842
9293
Date: 2011.11.22 10:44:53-05'00'
Expiration Date of Jurisdictional Determination: April 6, 2016
Page 3 of 3

WILMINGTON DISTRICT
POST -CONSTRUCTION COMPLIANCE FORM
Action ID Number: SAW-2010-02102
Permittee: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Date Permit Issued: November 21, 2011
Project Manager: Todd Tugwell
County: Catawba
Attn: Matt Jenkins
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the address of the Regulatory Field Office indicated below:
® Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
❑ Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
❑ Washington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
❑ Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Matt Jenkins
Wildland Engineering
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Subject: Lyle Creek Stream Restoration
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
October 7, 2011
DWQ# 11-0821
Catawba County
You have our approval, in accordance with the general certification and those conditions listed below,
to impact 2.73 acre of wetland and 3,785 linear feet (If) of unnamed tributaries to Lyle Creek in order to
complete the restoration project Catawba County, as described in your application received by the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) on September 7, 2011. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this
project is covered by Water Quality General Certification Number 3689, which can be viewed on our web site
at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ws/401. The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit
Number 27 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any
other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not
limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described
in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send
us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas
has commenced.
2. The plan proposes: 5,410 If of stream restoration, 1,337 If of stream enhancement, 6.6 acres of wetland
restoration, and 2.9 acres of wetland creation.
3. An aquatic survey (macro benthos, crayfish, etc.) shall be taken for each reach of the existing channels
prior to the initiation of the project. A follow up survey shall be conducted following the second year of
construction and annually thereafter upon close out of the project. This information shall be included in the
annual monitoring report.
Mooresville Regional Office One
Location: 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Noft lCarolina
Phone: [phone]\Fax: [phone]\ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 /
Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq Xatumllff
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

4. The existing strew bed material/substrate shall be excavated, stored, and placed in the newly
constructed stream channel as indicated in the application.
5. The buffer shall be properly marked and protected to prevent encroachment by machinery at the site.
Fencing, or at minimum "cable/rope", shall be utilized to delineate the boundary.
6. Signage for notifying the power company within their easement of the project shall be tall enough within the
buffer to be observed.
7. Wetland monitoring shall be clarified with the Army Corp of Engineers.
8. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC DWQ.
9. Continuing Compliance. The applicant (Wildland Engineering) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as
not to contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with section
303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ
determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or
achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure
compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure
compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before
codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public
notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be
provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of DWQ under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Karen
Higgins in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-807-6360.
Sincerely,
1
forColeen H. Sullins
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit

ALTEOWA
ija
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
November 30, 2011
DWQ# 11-0821
Catawba County
Mr. Matt Jenkins
Wildland Engineering
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Subject: Modification Additional Condition #5, Lyle Creek Stream Restoration
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
This letter is notification that Additional Condition #5 in the approval letter issued on October 7, 2011
has been modified. The original condition stated "The buffer shall be properly marked and protected to prevent
encroachment by machinery at the site. Fencing, or at minimum "cable/rope", shall be utilized to delineate the
boundary". The new condition shall read: The buffer shall be properly/adequately identified to protect the
easement from encroachment and harm. DWQ reserves the right to require a more stringent protection
should the buffer found not to be adequately protected. All other conditions of the previously issued 401
Certification shall remain in effect.
If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-
663-1699 or Ms. Karen Higgins in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-807-6360.
Sincerely,
,y-)
for Coleen H. Sullins
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone]\Fax: [phone]\ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq
NorthCarolina
naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Action I.D.: SAW 2010-02102 County: Catawba U.S.G.S. Quad: NC Catawba
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: Matt Jenkins; Wildlands Engineering Inc.
Address: 1430 South Mint Street,
Suite 104 Charlotte, NC 28203
Telephone No.: 704-332-7754
Property description:
Size (acres): 4045 LF of stream and 1.85 acres
Nearest Waterway: Lyle Creek
Coordinates: 35.711674 N/-81.081496 W
Location Description:
Nearest Town: Catawba
River Basin: Catawba
Hydrologic Unit Code: 03050101
Based on preliminary information, there may be waters on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
m
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are waters on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the waters on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The waters on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years.
The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory
Official identified below on Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may
be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

Action Id.: 2010-01009
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of COE's Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Tyler Crumbley at 828-271-7980.
C. Basis For Determination
The site contains wetlands as determined by the USACE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and they directly abut stream
channels located on the property that exhibit indicators of ordinary high water marks. The stream channel on the property is an
unnamed tributary to Lyle Creek which flows into the Catawba River which is Section 10 Navigable at the Mountain Island
Lake dam on the Mecklenburg/Gaston county line in NC.
D. Remarks
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved
jurisdictional determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification
of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must
submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Program
Attn: Tyler Crumbley, Project Manager
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address within 60 of the issue date.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: _Tyler Crumbley
Issue Date: 6 April, 2011 Expiration Date: 6 April, 2016
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at hM://per2.nmT.usace.gM.mil/survgy.html
to complete the survey online.
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF:
2

¢,...'.
Applicant: Matt Jenkins; Wildlands Engineering Inc. File Number: 2010-02102
Date: 6 April, 2011
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
X
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
�TO�
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
I: fI�1i it rbt d� unla-e
Adt iif tle fIld fit:
y�����g tis Il 3'CR
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
® ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
® OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that
the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer.
Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right
to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a)
modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify
the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
® ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the pennit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this
form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the
date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process
by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received
by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL, DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an
approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an
initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons
or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However,
you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
.19

If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
process you may contact: also contact:
Tyler Crumbley, Project Manager Jason Steele
USACE, Asheville Regulatory Field Office Administrative Appeals Review Officer
151 Patton Ave 60 Forsyth Street, SW (Room 9M10)
RM 208 Atlanta, GA 30303-8801
Asheville. NC 28806 404-562-5137
828-271-7980
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.

Figure 3
Jurisdictional
Delineation
Lyle Creek
Mitigation Site
Catawba River Basin
(03050101)
Catawba County, NC
Perennial Stream
Jurisdictional Wetlands
• SCP1 - Stream Data Point
• DP1 - Wetland Data Point
—; Project Area
Property Boundary
0 100 200 ft
I I I I
W1LDL�ANDS
l�t-I
r.
Ito
f' f
* f
•
- ' - iL- Ilk
40
• A ONO
�• • � � s at' 1 -� rl• s .s � � �'�• s` +err 't � f ..
eq
:�rt.a` ! +� ..`A Ji•- i. rr" .1' =*sr :�., 5 +� r si .�! {'
r Wetland UTld .� 1
4q.
♦. (755 LF) q,IF
+ r r
• �• �s i
- rr
Y
it t
WL-F 7 �•. . —.—.
/--1,
SCP1.I - —•.; sir � 1
j ' P ■ # 1 DP2,1�
SCP3\
91
..I:. / DP9 I I 1
WL-40.06 Acre
•�:�� I I a' 1
j r 4
• t� 1
•' , '� I
%- Wetland UT1c 401 '
- ` (735 LF)
41 ',
0.15 Acre
• 1
Wetland UT1
1 (1,033 LF) DP4
UT1b (966 LF)
�•—'Perennial RPW
•oo "--
■OF
•� t' a r i
k
•
rr
� •� r
1
� • SCP4 � � � �r�*y'. J
_ • n l
r'
DP5
1}
1..
WL-2
0.43 Acre
DP3 �
1`
DP6 ,
Wetland UT1a
(1,141 LF)
a .I
Aerial Photography

APPENDIX C: Debit ledger
Mitigation Project Lyle Creek Mitigation Site
DMS ID 94643
River Basin CATAWBA
Cataloging Unit 03050103
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
y
oN
N
Of
E
E
LNc
(
c
E
y d
C
E
L
y
a
m
.
UC
m
U
_c
2m
O
w
M
_Q m
m
2' d
a.
0
a
O N
z
C
o C1
z
EY
V
C
m
O
z w
a m
0"0
z a
s
m W
o W
U
.o
m
O
cU
m EE
c
e
m
m L
o c
cU W
rO
m
cUw C�dN
O aw
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
5,017.00
13384.00
1 6.400
2.200
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
5,017.00
553.60
6.400
0.730
NCDOT Pre-DMS Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWR Permit No
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
2002-1430
2002-31320
Villages of Seven Eagles
189.00
1999-0337
1999-30776
NCDOT TIP R-2248AC / AD / BA -
Charlotte Outer Loop
4,071.40
2007-1334
2007-03999-360
Piedmont Town Center
725.00
2008-0081
2008-00196-360
Franklin Water Treatment Plant
Expansion
1.270
2006-1849
2006-41599-390
Bromley
300.00
2006-1085
2006-41185-390
Union County Public School "G"
Site
284.00
2000-0165
2000-30383 / 2000
30528
Weddington Chase
1
520.00
1998-1125
1998-31046
Landen Town Center
1.000
2007-1442
2007-02826
Fred D Alexander Blvd.
0.980
2000-1195
2009-03090
Wilkinson Blvd Parking Decks
3.155
0.067
2008-0790
2008-01510
Wilora Lake Rehabilitation Project
0.394
2009-0544
2009-00940
Silverlanding
172.60
1.133
2007-1673
2007-02551-360
Providence Road West
Commercial Development
1
10.123
2010-0467
2008-03268
Matthews Gateway
139.00
2005-30193
Ballantyne Country Club Golf
Course
0.478
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.00
0.001
0.000
0.000
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.001
1 0.001
10.00010.0001
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 05/11/2017