20000007 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20000103

R
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
1 • •
A "000-ft=000
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 22, 2000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Doug Huggett, DCM
FROM: John Dorney, D f
RE: Water Quality Comments
Brunswick and Other Adjacent Counties
DWQ Project #: 00007
DWQ has no objections to the project plans to install alternative means of
shoreline stabilization with the two following conditions:
1. DWQ's Wilmington and Washington Regional Offices shall be notified in
advance of any project so a site visit and evaluation can be issued. Separate
authorization of the use of General Certification 3112 (or its replacement) will
be needed from DWQ.
2. An after-the-fact report on success will also be required for these projects.
Please call me at 733-9714 if you have any questions.
cc: Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Washington DWQ Regional Office
00007.dcm
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27669-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An al O ortunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Ili" pp
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: I Steenhuis
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Rick Shiver
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name NC Coastal Federation
Project Number 00 0007
Recvd From DCM
Received Date 113100 Recvd By Region
Project Type shoreline stabilization
Certificates
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream
Type Type Impact Score Index
County MULTI
County2
Region
Stream
Class Acres Feet
Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
Stream Impacts (ft.)
FIN M!"Aillu
CAMA F_- O Y -@N F__F_F__r- F_ I
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? p Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
This office would like to he notified of the sites PRIOR to the construction of the sites. This office is
also concerned about success of the ejects and would like to have a report at the conclusion of the
eject That the projPrt(s) be done in such a manner so as to not cause turbidity outside the
immediate construction area to exceed 25 NTII,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name NC Coastal Federation County MULTI

Project Number 00 0007 Regional Contact: J. Steenhuis
Date: 2/1/2000
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAA
DENR December 28, 1999
JAMES B. HUNT J R.
GOVERNOR NEMOl?? A
???i cu,ai visa
)IVAYN E. Mc D EvI TT
SECRETARY
;A
g.%' DONNA D. MOFFITT
c DIRECTOR

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
co,
TO: Mr. John R. Dorney
Environmental Biological Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
(fin \G. ,''? ?
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC Coastal Federation/NC Sea Grant
Project Location: Various private properties adjacent to estuarine and public trust waters
bodies within the counties of Brunswick, New Hanover, Pender,
Onslow, Carteret, Craven, Hyde, Pamlico, Beaufort, Dare, and
Currituck.
Proposed Project: Proposes a non-traditional authorization for the future development of
30 sites within coastal North Carolina. The development will consist
of various designs and combinations of rock sills, groins, and
breakwaters, with marsh planting, intended to stabilize the adjacent
shoreline.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by January 16, 2000. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
please contact Tere Barrett at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments. MOREHEAD CITY OFFICE
HESTRON PLAZA II 151-B HIGHWAY 24 MOREHEAD CITY NC 28557
SIGNED AN PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
SIGNED AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYL)I&TE RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: NC Coastal Federation, c/o Tracy Skrabal; NC Sea Grant, c/o Spencer Rogers
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Various private properties adjacent to estuarine and public trust water
bodies within the counties of Brunswick, New Hanover, Pender, Onslow, Carteret, Craven, Hyde,
Pamlico, Beaufort, Dare, and Currituck.
Photo Index - 1995: Unknown 1989: Unknown
State Plane Coordinates - X: Unknown Y: Unknown
-lo®
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of site visit - To be determined
Will applicant be present - Yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - December 10, 199 rb l
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - To be determined
Land Classification From LUP - To be determined
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Estuarine Shoreline, Estuarine Waters, Public Trust Areas,'`Coastal Wetlands
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned -None
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Unknown
Planned - Rock Sills, Breakwaters, Groins
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
To be determined
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
To be determined
(C) Other
To be determined
(D) Total Area Disturbed: Unknown
(E) Primary Nursery Area: Unknown
Open: Unknown
(F) Water Classification: Unknown
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The North Carolina Coastal Federation in coordination with the North Carolina
Sea Grant are proposing a non-traditional authorization for the future development of 30 sites within
coastal North Carolina. The proposed development will consist of various designs and combinations of
rock sills, groins, and breakwaters, with marsh planting, intended to stabilize the adjacent shoreline.
1
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
North Carolina Coastal Federation, c% Tracy Skrabal; North Carolina Sea Grant, C/o
Spencer Rogers
Page 2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
The North Carolina Coastal Federation, in coordination with the North Carolina Sea Grant, is
proposing to design and aid in the funding and installation of several shoreline stabilization
projects for private individuals. These projects will be varying combinations of rock sills, groins,
and breakwaters, with marsh planting and some fill placement. The intent is to show the success
of these types of structures in protecting the shoreline from erosion. Long term, the agents
(NCCF and NCSG) hope to monitor the various methods and their individual success rates, and
devise conditions under which the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission would create a
General Permit to authorize these types of projects. There are General Permits currently that
allow for breakwaters and groins, but they do not allow for the type and scope of development
that the agents feel is necessary to effectively retard erosion. The agents are hoping for a General
Permit that would encourage the use of these more passive erosion control measures, and
discourage traditional bulkheads.
This permit is being processed in a non-traditional manner. There are no specific designs
proposed and no specific sites chosen currently. Therefore, there are no site characteristics or
impacts that can be defined. The proposal will be described in very general terms. In the end,
the NCCF and NCSG are hoping to be issued a blanket permit authorizing development of 30
non-specific structures, to be installed in Brunswick, New Hanover, Pender, Onslow, Carteret,
Craven, Hyde, Pamlico, Beaufort, Dare, and Currituck counties. When a specific project is
agreed upon by the agents, along with an individual property owner, who will then become the
responsible applicant, a site specific design will be submitted. At this time, a field visit will be
made, and an abbreviated field report will be circulated to the various review agencies for
expedited scrutiny and comment. Final authorizations for specific projects will be issued from
the DCM Raleigh office. The DCM will retain the authority to disallow a proposal found to be
inconsistent with state guidelines. The agents hope to install the projects in the spring and
summer of 2000.
Included with this application are typical drawings, which show the type of information to be
submitted for each specific proposal. Additionally, there is a descriptive sheet detailing the
characteristics of each site, with regard to water quality, shellfish openings, etc. The current
application should be reviewed with these sheets in mind, as they will be the only site specific
information, submitted for each of the additional 30 sites. If the information is not adequate to
enable the review agencies to conduct an abbreviated review of the proposals, the additional
information should acknowledged at this time, to be added to the above sheets, or to be addressed
in permit conditions. The future authorizations will be in the form of acknowledgment of project
consistency with the permit conditions, and not in the form of 30 modifications to the permit.
As specifically as possible, the proposals will include some forms of the following: Low profile
stone sills are proposed, no more than 1' above the normal high water level, no more than 25'
from the normal high water contour, with a 15' base, sloping to a 3' top width, underlain with
filter cloth. Rock or wooden groins are proposed with an average length of 25', but varying,
typically no more than 2 structures within 75' of shoreline, but varying. Breakwaters are
NCCF & NCSG
Page 3
proposed, with 1" gap per foot, and 5' "drop downs" or openings per 100' of structure. There
may be adjacent bank sloping and planting, there will be marsh planting landward of the
breakwater or sill projects, and there may be fill of this "planting zone" necessary to sustain the
marsh. The agents have committed to including fill waterward of the normal high water contour
on no more than 10 of the proposed sites, with no more than 100 square feet of any type of
wetlands to be filled per site. No excavation is proposed. The following conditions have been
offered by the NCCF and NCSG as permit conditions they feel they can meet with every
proposal:
(A) On shorelines without existing marsh grasses the centerline of breakwaters or sills be shall be
positioned no more than 10 feet waterward of the waterward depth contour of locally growing marsh
grasses or 25 feet waterward of the mean high water or normal water level, whichever is greater. On
shorelines with existing marshes the centerline of the structures shall be positioned no more than 10
feet waterward of the waterward depth contour of locally growing marsh grasses or 10 feet waterward
of the existing marsh at any point along the alignment of the structure, whichever is greater. For
water bodies more narrow than 150 feet, the structures shall not be positioned offshore more than one
sixth (116) the width of the waterbody.
(B) If existing marsh grasses are not present on shoreline, additional grasses will be planted. The
generic permit will only apply to projects that combine marshes with low profile structures.
(C) Construction authorized by this permit will be limited to a maximum length of 500 feet.
(D) Marsh breakwaters and sills shall be porous to allow water circulation through the structure.
Wooden structures shall be constructed with a gap between each sheathing board averaging at least
one inch of open area every linear foot of breakwater. Other vertical structures shall have equivalent
open area for circulation. Stone or riprap structures shall leave open space between the individual
stones for circulation. The sills or breakwaters shall have at least one five-foot drop-down or opening
every 100 feet and maybe staggered and/or overlapped or left open as long as the five foot drop-down
or separation between sections is maintained. Overlapping sections shall not overlap more than 10
feet.
(E) The height of vertical breakwaters or sills shall not exceed six inches above mean high water or
normal water level. The height of sloping stone or riprap structures shall not exceed one foot above
mean high water or normal water level and the width of the structure on the bottom shall be no wider
than 15 feet.
(F) Construction shall be set back 15 feet from the adjoining property line and the riparian access
dividing line unless a written waiver from the adjacent owner is provided. COMMENT.• DCM WILL
MODIFY THIS LANGUAGE TO COMPLY WITH OTHER MAJOR PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
(G) Sills or breakwaters shall be marked at 50 foot intervals with yellow reflectors extending at least
three feet above mean high water level.
(H) No excavation of the shallow water bottom or any wetlands is authorized by this permit.
(I) The breakwater or sill must be constructed of lumber, sheet piles, stone, clean concrete riprap, or
other suitable materials approved by Division personnel.
(J) The permittee will maintain the structure and planted marsh in good condition and in
conformance with the terms and conditions of the permit or structure shall be removed within 90 days
NCCF & NCSG
Page 4
of notification from the Division of Coastal Management.
(K) No more than 30 sites may be included in this generic permit.
(L) No fill will be placed on submerged aquatic vegetation or productive shellfish beds. Prior to
filling, shellfish may be considered for relocation to other sites using methods approved by the
Division of Marine Fisheries and Environmental Health. No more than 100 square feet of existing
wetlands shall be filled per project site.
(M) Filling and grading may be considered above the mean high water line for upland planting if (L)
above are met.
(N) No more than 10 sites may be included in the generic permit which will place clean sand fill
waterward of mean high water to establish proper depths prior to planting marsh grasses. Fill may be
considered where existing shore line slopes do not allow for 20 feet of planted marsh. Seaward of the
mean high water line, the fill shall be sloped to reflect the depth range of locally growing marsh
grasses.
(O) Stone or riprap material will be free of loose sediment or any pollutant. The structures must be of
sufficient size stone, and slope to prevent its movement from the site by wave or current action.
(P) Proposed projects will be initially reviewed and submitted by the NC Coastal Federation or NC Sea
Grant acting as an agent for the property. owner. Each property owner will accept the responsibility to
comply with the permit plans and conditions for that site by signing an individual permit. A 2 -page
project description will be submitted for each site (see attached.).
(Q) Each project constructed under this permit will be monitored with photography before
construction, immediately following construction, quarterly for the first year, and annually for the
duration of the permit or until DCM determines continued monitoring is not required.
(R) Stone or riprap groins may also be included in this generic permit where intended to protect
planted marshes.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
The impacts to be incurred from the 30 proposed projects cannot be defined as yet. It can be
expected that there will be some turbidity increase with each proposal during construction,
certainly more with the projects requiring fill. There will be an incorporation of public trust area,
a loss of shallow bottom habitat, some shellfish impacts, potential impairment to the movement
of organisms, possible alteration in circulation patterns, and a. loss of no more than 1000 square
feet of wetlands. The hoped for positive impacts would be the restoration or creation of coastal
marsh habitat, protection of the adjacent shorelines from erosion, and the creation of a General
Permit to allow for these more passive erosion control structures.
T. Barrett December 23, 1999 Morehead City
Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants).
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT To be determined
a. Landowner: TO BE DETERMINED ON
INDIVIDUAL SITE BASIS
Name
Address
City State
Zip Day Phone
Fax
c. Street address or secondary road number
_ To be determined
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay)
To be determined
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
b. Authorized Agent:
1) NC Sea Gran-( Spencer -D- ers)
Name 2) NC Coastal. Federation (T. Skrabali_
1)7205 Wrightsville Ave. Wilm. 28403
Address2) 720 Market St. Wilm,NC 28401
City Wilmington State NC
1)910-256-2033
Zip Day Phone [phone]
1)910-256-8856
Fax 2) 910-•343-4217
C. Project name (if any)
Blanket permit for marsh enhancement d,
projects
NOTE: Permit will be issued in nanr oflmdmmr(s), mid/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
marsh enhancement/erosion control
stone si or groins woo sref -
waters and marsh plantings up to.
10 with fill)
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? To be determined
Give a brief description of purpose, use,-methods of
construction and -daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. See attached
PROJECT Counties: Brunswick, Pender,
0. Hanover, Onslow, Carteret, Craver:,Hyde,
a. County Pamlico, Beaufort, Dere.Currituck
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER * *TO BE DETERMINED
CHARACTERISTICS ON SITE-BY-SITE
BASIS
a. Size of entire tract
b. Size of individual lot(s)
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
e. Vegetation on tract
f. Man-made features now on tract
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land =e plan.)
Conservation
Developed
Rural
Transitional
Community
Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
J.
Has a professional
done for the tract?
If yes, by whom?.
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? Yes No
Coastal (marsh) Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documntadon, if available-)
archaeological assessment been
Yes No
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy. of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1R" by I1" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number, of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps af
Engineers regarding that agency's use of IarL :r
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
° A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name *To be determined on site-
Address by-site asis.
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
iEE
t
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained ;n the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the day of 2:),ec , 19-.
Print NameTracy Skrabal, NC Coastal
Federatio
Signature
Landowner or riled Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
X DCM MP-4 Structures Information
DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
400 copies of this public document were printed at a total cost of $52.48 or $ .13 per copy.
Revised 03/95
1EC. -0-S' 91) (WED) A iJ
.:.:'.; %i 999 14 Y7
Form DCM. -MP-1
M'i+ iYI:4RI\E SEIEN E TEL-910 250 8F E: 03,
342 1' N(1Cr -- -
_PHGE... 0.
site. hiclvde highway or sowndary road tSR)
cumbers. 14rWraarkc, and the fire.
o A Starmw•ater Certilicoun, if one it nec==-Y.
o A list of the tsame s and omopide addr°e SS46 ear the
&djacent waterfront (riparian) itarubarMram and
signed reeturn receipts as gro'Mr Owt such awns
havo r wood a sop, or the appticadon and plats
by cert1fied instil. Such Itadowsseaz tn11u be advised
that they have 30 days in which w subrait Cottun=tsi
on t2te: proposed project to the Division of Coastal
i4 snagrintat. Upon stiigrifag this km, the oppl"eeaat
fur#mr certifies that such notice has been provided.
Nsune *To Me determined on site-
Y-ei a ass
Address
Fbone ,
Narie
Address
Pbone:
Na.Te
Address
Fborte
s A list of preriotu state or feedlleml pa Wts issued for
wont on the proj= tract. Include permit rumbas,
portnitteae, and issuing dates.
a A cam: for S250 shade payable to the Depactne n, of
Environment, Health, and Natural Racoutces
(DEHNR) to cover the Costs of processing thr,
applicaion.
A signed Altii.C hawd mUm for prajratr in
ocunfront and inlet arm.
o A statearmt or compliance with the N.C.
Eoviroomesttal Policy Att (N.C.G.S. 113A • i to
10) If the project involves the ezpandithre. of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a stauammt
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTMCATION AND PERMISSION
TO Emit ON LA.ND
I undo Md that any parmlt issued in reaspottse to this
sppli=ion wilt allow only the development dMcribad in
the }ppli: ation. 'YT,e project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions coataimW in the permit.
I ramify that is thr. bat of hay knowledge:, the proposed
activity complieta with thv State of North Carolina':,
approved Coastal Mexapmemt Program and will be
conducted in a maunar antsisttat with such program.
I certify that I am aatbariW to grant. mW do is ft a.
$TWA parmi"iDn to representatives of state and fadacsl
re vittw 4190605 to earr on the aforementioned lands in
connectiots with ervalustiag imbrte'satien Folued M this
permit application and follow-cap tnothoring of the
project.
I further ceatify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to thr: but of my knowledge.
This is the clay of S9qq
print rime Spencer Ro e?rs, N Sea Gran:.
.fi i?Batllre ?
Lwwkwwr or A";44 ARmr P
Plane iudicue atrAdhtaratu pouiring to your proposed
pruieat.
_-, DCM )0-2 l acavuioe 4W Fi11 Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
,'X • DCM MP-4 Strunures informttiop
...... DCM M7-5 fridges acrd Curve m
- ACM Mph Maritsa Development
.' OZE Please sign acid date each aaarlu:,mw in rise
spore provided of Ow bmm of each firm,
400 copies of this public 40r,43ment were P&Ied at a total cost of $52 48 or. $ .13 per copy.
Aid 045
Form DCM-MP 2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Length Width De th ?,*h
)
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWI.;
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(excluding
shomline
stabilization)

rr-

?.YF••

L . EXCAVATION N/A
a. Amount of material to be' excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL N/A
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes No
If yes, where?
Revised 03195
Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
b.
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead X Riprap/breakwater
with marsh plantings
b. Length See typical
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
See typical
d. Maximum distance waterw rd of MHW or NWL
See typical
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
To be determined
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material Stone or-
marl
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap To be determined
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material Clean sandy material
i. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes No
If Yes,
(1) Amount.of material to be placed in the
water
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area'
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
The fill will be re acne y tffe---
erosion control measurL= and
stabilized by marsh plantings
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? land-based equipment (ie :
backhoe , excavator, etc.
c. Will wetlands be cr)ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. To be determined
Tracy Skrabal
Nc rnastai Federation (Agent)
APP t or Project a e
t?
Signet=
/.-*Z -?7-
Date
Revised 03/95
C. -0 8' 991'AED! 14 r".
Form DCM-MP-2
0:r SCIENCE
a.%_2 4j41i-
e. Does the disposal arcs inclctdt am7 ooLsW wetlands
(marsh). SAVs or other wetlands?
...... ... Yes NO.
f Dyes the disposal induds any area in the wetter
Yea No
I SHQRELM STABILIZ.47 0,N
nb?
it
b
TEL:91'C 8856 P. ON
If yes,
(1) Amount of material tu- be placed in the
W&W
(2) Ditnetttituu of fill are;
(3) . Purpcsa of fill
b,
Will fill material be pla"W in COBAW wetland:
(Inarsh), SAW or other wsdandr7
? Yes ,- No
13 ,yes,
(1) Dimeoaions of fill axes;
(2) Purpose of fill
Type of Shoreline OrabiIirifion
Hulkhwd -?-x, Ripfepiareaxwater
with marsh plantings
Lmrj; ;ee . seal ..
Average distance water-ward of MHW or NWL
See tr-I Cal.
d. M kimum distance watacward of MHW or NWL.
See typx--al
C. ShorelInt erosioti during pmedirtg 12 rron$s
Ta be determr ned
54wnt of iZlarn?rtonl
f. Type of bujkhe4d or riprap L=et•ial Stone o=?
fiar'i
9. Amount of fill in cubit: yards to be piaeai below
WBtrir leYe;
,"I Riprap To be determined
(?) Bulkhead backfil ` .?-
t:. Type of fill material Clean sandy rr„ate+'rrial
i. Scurcc of fill Matorial
- r
4. DTHER ML ACTIYTTIES
(Excluding Shor4ne Stabilization)
a. Wltl flli rnatariAl be brought to sire?
- Yes No

St GENERAL
it. How will 'excavated or fill material be kept on sit=
and osrosioo pontrolle 7
The till will ?e re a?:: ,
e F stab lize by mars p tan ln7-8
b. ? '?'pe of rOlU ruction equipment wIll be used
(fof exatztple, dragline. backhoe, or hydraulic
dredgo}? land-batted equipmer.t
b ickhas excavator, etc .
c. Will wet2ar:dsi be cr)ssad in trsmporting equipment
to project site? Yea_ No
If yts, explain steps the WWI be, t4an to I Meo
wvimnnlental impms. Deter. i led
r..
Spencer Rogers
NC $ea Grant A drat;
/7i''? ffl, "'17
1
l?>c
X&VUed 03195
CEO. -08' Q9 (WED) 14:16 U-NCW )MARINE iCIFXCE
Form ACM?M _4
STRUCTURES
(CMUtruction within Public 7rwt Artas)
TEL:[phone]
Atracb this form to Joint Application for CAMA ?A }D, C. MDoriq buoys
pc=!t, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to C=Plew all
other actions of the Joiut Application which
relate (1) Commercial ?Catamuai
?' -? Private
,
w
this proposed project. (2) Number
(1) Ducription of buoy
a- Dock(s) arid/or Pier(s)
(Cd1ar. iaascriptioo, aixe, twcbor. etc.)
(1) Commercial _,C.oramunhy_ Private
(2) Numbot
(3) Length
(4) Width (4) Width of water body

,S) Finger Piers Yes No (S) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
shoretino
(i) Number
(ii) Length
{iii) Width f. Moorin ttrutxure
g ? (boatlift, mooring pilings, ac.)
(6) platform
(s) Yes No ?..._ -? (I) Commercial -Community _. Private
(l) Number
6) Number
(ii) Length (3) Length
_
(iii) Width (4) Width
n( Number of slips proposed 8 Other (aw cwMP{srr a r rnan?
(9) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian - stone $il, and marsh plantings
property lines
(9) Width of water body - store ro ns with mars p an i.ng!
-
(It3) Wattr depth at watwward and of pier at wood brerakwaters w t ma
piant+ings
MLW orNWL - o ~naration with marsh
b. Baaihdsse (including covered lift.) Piant?.ags
(1) Commercial _ Private Spenoex Rogers
(2) Lcngtb
(3) Width NC Sea Grant (Agent)
??PPa t or Naaac
C. Grain (e.g. wood, shoetpue, etc j
(?) Nutgber To 'tee det_e,-r:1ined ran site-
(Z) jUgth(b) _Site basis j
i/

d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, cbetxtpile, etc.) Dote
(1) Length *Ta be determined
(Z) Average distance frorb MHW. NWL or
wetlatlds
(3) Maximum distHnCO bayoad MHW, NWL or
wrtlands
R-iced 03/95
Form DCM-MP-4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas) - - -
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major e. Mooring buoys
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
(1) Commercial -Community _ private
other .sections of the Joint Application which relate to (2) Number
this proposed project. (3) Description of buoy
a. Dock(s) and/or Pier(s) (Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
(1) _ Commercial -Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Length
(4) Width (4) Width of water body
(5) Distance buoy(s) to • be placed beyond
(5) Finger Piers Yes No shoreline
(i) Number
(ii) Length f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(iii) Width (1) 'Commercial -community
(6) Platform(s) Yes No (2) Number -=Private
(i) Number (3) Length
(ii) Length (4)' Width
(iii) Width
(7) Number of slips proposed g. Other (Give cor rletc description)
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian - stone sill and marsh plantings
property lines - stone __groins with marsh
p antings
(9) Width of water body - wood breakwaters with mars
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at plantings
MLW orNWL - slope preparation with marsh
plantings
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts)
(1) Commercial Private Tracy Skrabal
(2) Length NC Coastal Federation
(3) Width (Agent)
Applicant Project Name
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.)
-(1) Number *To be determined on site-
'(2) ' Length(s) by-site basis
Date
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.).
(1) Length *To be determined
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands
CAMA APPLICATION (ATTACHMENT 1)
11 ose of the pro posed projects is to construct up to thirty (30) marsh enhancement/
purp
3(d). The
shoreline erosion control projects. The projects mah include th ors a wooden breakwater with
stone (either a stone sill or a stone groin) with mats plantings, have marsh plantings. The details of the typical project design and specifications are the b en pofvided in
the attached drawings- The specifications and conditions or the projects (Spencer Rogers, Tracy
meetings and correspondence between the Agents oo State and Federal environmental
Skrabal) and designated representatives from app priaie typical of shoreline
regulatory and resource agencies. The methods of construction will be erosion control projects involving the use of land ion may construction include bank and/or lope grading,
-based backhoes, etc.). Depending on the site, construc Y and marsh planting (by hand).
la ment of erosion control structures, backfill (if appropriate)
emp ce

TYPICAL DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONE/RIPRAP SILL M i
OWNER:
AGENT/APP:
DATE:
LOCATION:
(f+S ,VEeZ)CD)
DETAIL VIEW
OO-r -To SC A L- I -
VARIES
0 (Mil
' r r , -MHN
rAL
SA?JDFIL.(,IL7ElZ G1.07}{? DiST/4NCE VkQIES ,
SECTION VIEW I? m,4x• 5A5EW,DTH ?5 MAP VIEW
cz -1V7AAC'0fIS7A4
k/ATE.eu//gy
.
rt ?BG/
-------------------------------
. ----
Y
E-O
POT. bu<.C.X a X AtoPasc'a 5 E,
fR /,-r.*
2r$ z 5/cL. 1r
F/' ( 1 1

{
Evtc/YFN
1k LC (uic u
?ROPOS Ea WCTLi1nID,$\
Pc + vn vF •rr r? ?Y APO
R? EX/sr, .?vBCIE ^'?'?/ <gCLL
?+/G S ?f<r[RAJ/r<n?A
(^sac•x 7n sn)
•
CONSi. ACCESS
LAM?? PIW-C ZT% .rvD
s•nfG •e/6 I TbwN OP GONG S cAer/
AREA I PAOPERTy
SITE PLAN VIEW (SAmPL.E-
TYPICAL DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STONEMP RAP GROINS
I. MAR-st4 PLAk)rIK)b-A(?A
r l -- D I S-rA/J c-E V/'!-R_ I ?S
.. _ MHI? \ l
SArv? F'/?L 1
RETAIL VIEW
14 D ISTf{NGC- V4R ! ES
MAX -.Z.5'
rn H W sTOIJE o2
_ ? Cc-f ABU Q? p? ?{.P
S7-0vE C0AYMINme&YT c 20/ W
SECTION VIEW -QoT- rn sC ALE
OWNER:
AGENT/APP:
DATE:
IA)CATION:
MAP VIEW
3F3
Fc.oo?
51111
-ryf', ?1Y ?r !Y
I? S'o'ut sen
UaL??? I., -- - \r??,ges+t ??hl?? ilk A4c*
sro?? C,2oiu? r,aesf I WA-L- noc-A .4
SITE PLAN VIEW ?5,A 1 Pj-
e
TPICAL DESIGN AND SPECIFICATJONS FOR WOOD;_8REAKWATER
OWNER:
APPLICANT: _
DATE:
LOCATION:
t3ap Between Boards
Top View 14-- 4
ZI
BANK
hl ra ????I play)- as
Ama

View Facing Water
2 X 6 Whaler
iv I
%V M/
--- BEACH
i
X
N
2 X 6 Whaler
,6a n k
r- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -t 8vuc n
_ --- ?- -----TOBE -- ,---IV---
• -Q s i 0 . • . f f . • . • • • • • • •
12/20/1999 09:35 9103434217 NCCF PAGE 02
Individual Property Owner and Site Information for Marsh Enhancement/Shoreline
Erosion Control Projects
Property Owner:
Address:
Adjacent Property Owners:
Land Use Pima Classification:
Shellfish Classification:
Water Quality Classification:
Site on National Register of Historic Districts Y Yes . No
Wetlands Area to be filled sq. ft.
Wetlands Description:
Project Description and other Site-Specific Details:
Property Owner Signature
Date
Agent Signature
Date
s