Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191367 Ver 2_USACE PCN 39 1 24 2020 Final_20200124Terracon Consultants Inc. 2401 Brentwood Rd Ste 107 Raleigh, NC 27604-3686 P 919-873-2211 F 919-873-9555 terracon.com January 24, 2020 Ms. Emily Thompson US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street Washington, NC 27889 Re: Pre-Construction Notification State Camp Proposed Telecommunications Site 981 State Camp Road, Vanceboro, Craven County, North Carolina 28586 Terracon Project No. 70197322 Dear Ms. Thompson, On behalf of our client, Terracon is requesting review of a Pre-Construction Notification for Nationwide Permit 39 for the approximately 11.8-acre site located at 981 State Camp Road in Vanceboro, Craven County, North Carolina. A copy of this submittal will be provided to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). If you have any questions regarding the content of this submittal, please contact me at (984) 202- 4065 or via email at Cory.Darnell@terracon.com Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc. Cory Darnell, PWS Andy Ruocco, PWS Department Manager, Natural Resources Environmental Department Manager, APR CC: Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh (NCDEQ - DWR) Attachments: PCN Forms Appendix A - Site Maps Appendix B - Impact Maps Appendix C - March 4, 2011 Jurisdictional Determination Appendix D - NCDEQ Correspondence Page 1 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. _____________ DWQ project no. _______________ Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit 401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. Yes No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. Yes No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: 2b. County: 2c. Nearest municipality / town: 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: State Camp Proposed Telecommunications Site Craven Vanceboro Howard Hill 2837 0340 1346 Streets Ferry Road Vanceboro, NC 28586 (252) 635-8052 Not provided Not provided Page 2 of 10 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Cory Darnell Terracon Consultants Inc. 2401 Brentwood Rd Suite #107 Raleigh, NC 27604 984-202-4065 919-873-9555 cory.darnell@terracon.com Page 3 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: Longitude: 1c. Property size: acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: 2c. River basin: 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? Preliminary Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. The purpose is to develop the site with a proposed telecommunications tower. One access road is proposed along State Camp Road to promote traffic/construction flow for the associated structure. Project will involve construction of gravel entrance drive, clearing and grubbing of uplands to support the building infrastructure. Equipment will in- clude backhoes, bulldozers, skid-steers, and other typical grading and construction equipment. Project area consists of approximately 11.8 acres. The project area is currently undeveloped, wooded land and agricultural fields. State Camp Road is located along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site. Surrounding properties consists of a mixture of single-family residences, agricultural land, and wooded land. Terracon (Will, Darnell) 1-047-003 -77.169243 11.8 Unnamed tributary to Swift Creek C; Sw, NSW Neuse 0 PJD/Stream/Buffer Site Visit with USACE/NCDWR - 11/14/19 35.272496 1,152, LF USACE/NCDWR Field Verified: November 14, 2019 Page 4 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams – tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: Choose one Choose one Yes/No - Yes/No - Yes/No - Yes/No - Yes/No - Yes/No - Culvert Ditch 2 INT Corps 3 40 40 Proposed permanent 40 linear feet of impact to jurisdictional ditch/tributary (Ditch 2). - - - - - - Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose one P - - - - - Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose one - - - - - - - - - - Page 5 of 10 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) O1 O2 O3 O4 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 P2 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Catawba Randleman Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet) B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Choose one Choose Choose one None proposed Yes/No See attached buffer determination letter. No impacts proposed. - - - - Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose Choose Choose Choose one - - - - - - Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No ) Page 6 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Type: Type: Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Site layout was designed to avoid jurisdictional waters on site. The area of disturbance necessary to improve the site has been reduced to the minimal extent possible in order to satisfy the purpose of the telecommunication tower and access road. To gain site access and transportation/ construction needs, one entrance is proposed along the southwestern portion of the site, adjacent to State Camp Road. Additionally, we looked at using an existing access road to the west of the site. However current property owner did not give permission to use the existing road for the proposed crossing. Site construction was planned to avoid jurisdictional waters on site. Construction of gravel entrance drive has been reduced to the minimal extent possible in order to satisfy the purpose of the telecommunication tower and access road. To gain site access and transportation/construction needs, one entrance is proposed along the southwestern portion of the site, adjacent to State Camp road. Choose one Choose one Choose one Choose one Page 7 of 10 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Yes No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply Watershed Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Coastal counties HQW ORW Session Law 2006-246 Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No Project does not include and is not adjacent to protected riparian buffers <5 As the project has a built upon area for this project that is below 24% (including existing built upon area), the project can be developed under the low density option which does not require permanent stormwater controls Town of Vanceboro Page 9 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No 1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Yes No 1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: Yes No 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? Yes No 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No 2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No 3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Project will not generate wastewater. Page 10 of 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? Yes No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Applicant/Agent's Printed Name _______________________________ Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Date Raleigh NCNHP Element Occurrence dataset, USFWS IPAC report The NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper NCSHPO GIS mapping website. FEMA map panel 3720554400J dated 7/2/2004 Cory Darnell PROJECT INFORMATIONTITLE SHEET & T-1PROJECT DESCRIPTIONVICINITY MAPLOCATION MAPSITE NUMBER:SITE NAME:US-NC-5084P. MARSHALL& ASSOCIATESPREPARED FOR:PREPARED BY:CARRIER:1000 HOLCOMB WOODS PKWYSUITE 210ROSWELL, GA 30076678-280-2325DRAWING INDEXPROJECT INFORMATIONSTATE CAMPverizonCALL BEFORE YOU DIG811NORTH CAROLINA ONE-CALLor 1-800-632-4949www.nc811.org········CONSTRUCTION CODES SITE PLANOVERALL Z-1P. MARSHALL& ASSOCIATESWNEMPA&S····· DETAILED SITE PLAN Z-2P. MARSHALL& ASSOCIATESWNEMPA&S TOWER ELEVATION ANDANTENNA ORIENTATION Z-3P. MARSHALL& ASSOCIATESWNEMPA&S FENCE DETAILS Z-4P. MARSHALL& ASSOCIATES EQUIPMENT DETAILS Z-5P. MARSHALL& ASSOCIATES 1/22/2020 IPaC: Resources https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/WMAUVJPGG5H65HGYXGZOY6YMSU/resources 1/10 IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly aected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of eects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specic (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specic (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS oce(s) with jurisdiction in the dened project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. Project information NAME 70197322 - State Camp LOCATION Craven County, North Carolina Local oce Raleigh Ecological Services Field Oce  (919) 856-4520  (919) 856-4556 MAILING ADDRESS Post Oce Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaCInformation for Planning and Consultation 1/22/2020 IPaC: Resources https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/WMAUVJPGG5H65HGYXGZOY6YMSU/resources 2/10 PHYSICAL ADDRESS 551 Pylon Drive, Suite F Raleigh, NC 27606-1487 1/22/2020 IPaC: Resources https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/WMAUVJPGG5H65HGYXGZOY6YMSU/resources 3/10 Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of inuence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly aected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a sh population, even if that sh does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water ow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential eects to species, additional site-specic and project-specic information is often required. Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local oce and a species list which fullls this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an ocial species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local eld oce directly. For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an ocial species list by doing the following: 1. Log in to IPaC. 2. Go to your My Projects list. 3. Click PROJECT HOME for this project. 4. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the sheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ). Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. 2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an oce of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The following species are potentially aected by activities in this location: Mammals 1 2 NAME STATUS Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045 Threatened West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus There is nal critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469 Threatened Marine mammal 1/22/2020 IPaC: Resources https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/WMAUVJPGG5H65HGYXGZOY6YMSU/resources 4/10 Birds Reptiles Amphibians Flowering Plants NAME STATUS Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477 Proposed Threatened Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864 Threatened Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 Endangered NAME STATUS American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 SAT Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas There is nal critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199 Threatened Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea There is nal critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493 Endangered NAME STATUS Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772 Proposed Threatened NAME STATUS 1/22/2020 IPaC: Resources https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/WMAUVJPGG5H65HGYXGZOY6YMSU/resources 5/10 Critical habitats Potential eects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION. Migratory birds The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may nd in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur o the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. Rough-leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747 Endangered Sensitive Joint-vetch Aeschynomene virginica No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/855 Threatened Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act . Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. Additional information can be found using the following links: Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ birds-of-conservation-concern.php Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ conservation-measures.php Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf 1 2 1/22/2020 IPaC: Resources https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/WMAUVJPGG5H65HGYXGZOY6YMSU/resources 6/10 Probability of Presence Summary The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence () Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey eort (see below) can be used to establish a level of condence in the presence score. One can have higher condence in the presence score if the corresponding survey eort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. Breeding Season () Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Eort () Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. To see a bar's survey eort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. No Data () NAME BREEDING SEASON (IF A BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.) Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31 1/22/2020 IPaC: Resources https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/WMAUVJPGG5H65HGYXGZOY6YMSU/resources 7/10  no data survey eort breeding season probability of presence A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas o the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable (This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain types of development or activities.) Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and ltered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identied as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to oshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets . Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specied. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? 1/22/2020 IPaC: Resources https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/WMAUVJPGG5H65HGYXGZOY6YMSU/resources 8/10 Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: 1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacic Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. oshore energy development or longline shing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, eorts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially aected by oshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area o the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also oers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results les underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location”. Please be aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey eort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey eort is the key component. If the survey eort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey eort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to conrm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be conrmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. 1/22/2020 IPaC: Resources https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/WMAUVJPGG5H65HGYXGZOY6YMSU/resources 9/10 Marine mammals Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also protected under the Endangered Species Act and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora . The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears, manatees, and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins, and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list; for additional information on those species please visit the Marine Mammals page of the NOAA Fisheries website. The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take (to harass, hunt, capture, kill, or attempt to harass, hunt, capture or kill) of marine mammals and further coordination may be necessary for project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Oce shown. 1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. 2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is a treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not threaten their survival in the wild. 3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an oce of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The following marine mammals under the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are potentially aected by activities in this location: Facilities National Wildlife Refuge lands Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION. Fish hatcheries THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION. 1 2 3 NAME West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469 1/22/2020 IPaC: Resources https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/WMAUVJPGG5H65HGYXGZOY6YMSU/resources 10/10 Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. This location overlaps the following wetlands: Data limitations The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identied based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the- ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classication established through image analysis. The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verication work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or eld work. There may be occasional dierences in polygon boundaries or classications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site. Data exclusions Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tubercid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. Data precautions Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may dene and describe wetlands in a dierent manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to dene the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specied agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may aect such activities. FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND PFO1C RIVERINE R5UBH A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Local districts & boundaries Local individual resources & centerpoints Local Landmark Local Landmark, Gone Local HD Center Point Surveyed Only individual resources & centerpoints Surveyed Only Surveyed in NRHD Surveyed Only, Gone Surveyed in NRHD, Gone Blockface- Multiple properties 1/22/2020, 8:48:15 AM 0 0.5 10.25 mi 0 0.8 1.60.4 km 1:36,112 North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS | NCSHPO Map