20200142 Ver 1_SAW-2017-00829-PN_20200127

M
US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: November 8, 2019
Comment Deadline: December 9, 2019
Corps Action ID# SAW-2017-00829
TIP Project No. B-4484
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application from the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) seeking Department of the Army
authorization to impact 3.68 acres of wetlands, 240 linear feet of stream, and 0.01 acre of
surface water impact associated the proposed replacement of Bridges 138 and 139 over the
Neuse River on SR 14770 (Maple Cypress Road) in Craven County, North Carolina, TIP
B- 4484.
Specific location information is described below and shown on the attached plans. This
Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site
at
https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Program/Public-Notices/
"Viewing the on-line version will better display color and grant the ability to view
exploded views.
Applicant: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Ms. Heather Lane, Project Development Engineer
105 Pactolus Hwy 33,
Greenville, NC 27834.
Authori
The Corps will evaluate this application and decide whether to issue, conditionally issue, or
deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory
Authorities:
® Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)
® Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403)
❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33
U.S.C.1413)
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is lead federal agency. The United States
Coast Guard (USCG) has determined that the existing bridges and their replacement are
exempt for the purposes of compliance with Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.

Location
The proposed project is located on SR 1470 (Maple Cypress Road) in northeastern Craven
County, approximately midway between Kinston and Vanceboro. The land surrounding the
bridge is predominantly rural and includes marshes, wooded areas, large tracts of
agricultural crops, and low -density single family homes. The project is more specifically
located around Latitude 35.313613 N and Longitude 77.299543. Figures 1 and 2 depict
vicinity and aerial views.
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
DpeuSign Envelope ID C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3.-D796S7127B72 -
/ 6 r 8
?
NCWRC Boat Ramp
E a
Bridge Na. 138L�
Bridge No. 13rill
5�
44-
g
0 3, 000 b', 000 AI -
Feat L pyhghtCG2013, Vational= hi o—t e ograp y, I-cubetl
Replacement of Bridge No. 138 and 139 TIP No: �4484 Figure: 3
on SR 1470 (Maple Cypress Road) Topographic
Qb,H
s � over the Neuse River Division: 2 Map

Figure 2. Aerial View
Doqusign

Existing Site Conditions
The proposed project is located in the Southeastern Plains and Middle Atlantic Coastal
Plain physiographic regions of the state and straddles to the Craven and Pitt County lines.
The project is located in the Neuse River Basin and lies within the USGS Hydrologic Unit
03020202. The project crosses the Neuse River (NCDEQ Index No. 27-(85) which is
classified as C; Sw; NSW.
The proposed project is located in northeastern Craven County, approximately midway
between Kinston and Vanceboro. The land surrounding the bridge is predominantly rural
and includes marshes, wooded areas, large tracts of agricultural crops, and low -density
single family homes. The project area bridges the Neuse River on Maple Cypress Road (SR
1470) in Craven County. Seven wetlands were mapped within the project footprint,
including riverine swamp forest and bottomland hardwood forest. All wetlands are subject
only to Section 404 regulations. No CAMA coastal wetlands are present on the site.
SR 1470 (Maple Cypress Road) is a two-lane roadway with a statutory speed limit of 55
miles per hour (mph). It is classified as a major collector road according to NCDOT
Functional Classification maps. The estimated (2012) annual average daily traffic (AADT)
along SR 1470 (Maple Cypress Road) is 1,800 vehicles per day (vpd). There are no
signalized intersections within the project study area. Craven County school buses make
two total trips per day across the bridges. Known utilities in the project study area include a
water line, power, and telecommunications cable.
The Neuse River has not been designated an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW), High
Quality Water (HQW) or water supply watershed (WS-1 or WS-II) within 1.0 mile
downstream of the study area.
This area of the Neuse River contain Anadromous Fish Spawning Areas, Inland Primary
Nursery Area designation and is considered by the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) as Critical Habitat for the Atlantic Sturgeon.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The purpose of the proposed action is to replace two structurally deficient, functionally
obsolete bridges. The purpose of the proposed action is to improve bridge structural safety
and functionality for vehicular traffic
Project Description
In order to meet the stated purpose and need of the project, the existing bridge is proposed
for replacement on the upstream side of the Neuse River. An upgrade to the existing
facility was not considered because it is structurally deficient and functionally obsolete.
The applicant's proposal is depicted on Figure 3, and additional information is shown on
Table 1.

Figure 3. Proposed Project
is
:. ,
TOTAL PE-0,1T 1-5 Ll
Legend
Riparian WeOand Impacts
Temporary Riparian Wetland Impacts
Total Riparian Wetland Impacts .= 3,08 acres
Altemative 1
Permanent Surface Water Impacts
Total Surface Water Impacts = 0.01 acres
Affected Natural Environment
Permanent Stream Water Impacts
Total Stream Water Impacts =240 LF
L.^i RCt•H
v
Temporary Stream Water Impacts
—_
Wetland Boundary
Q>7;I:LI 1I11T.iI{'g' I°L.1N5
1$0' O' 1$0' 300 Maple Cypress Rd. 6ridg.
krrrr` J Replacements PrOed
Figure t
-- Roadway Footprint (Slope Stakes)
75' SCALE e.�ase xa r�a.�auo��os ow m.xouw w.o, �o
.
EJ
Table 1: B-4484 Impacts from the Proposal
Category
Preferred Alt.
Project Length
3,700 feet
Overhead Utility Relocations (power and
telecommunications)
1 pole
Riparian Wetland Impacts
3.68 acres
Surface Water Impacts
0.01 acres
Stream Impacts
240 LF
Water line relocation (underground and above-
ground)
approx. 1,000 LF
Construction Cost Estimate
$10.5 Million
Background Information (see Figure 3):
o Existing Bridge No. 138 over the Neuse River: 580 feet long, 20 feet wide
o Existing Bridge No. 139 over the Neuse River Overflow: 250 feet long, 20
feet wide
o Unacceptable off -site detour route (36 minutes/31 miles to the east; 41
minutes/35 miles to the west).
o NCWRC owns and maintains a nearby boat ramp and parking lot.

Proposed Project Description (see Figure 3):
o Applicant's Preferred Alternative — two bridges, northwest side of existing:
■ Bridge No. 138 over the Neuse River: 600 feet long, 12-foot lanes,
3-foot paved shoulders
■ Bridge No. 139 over the Neuse River Overflow: 375 feet long, 12-
foot lanes, 3-foot paved shoulders
Bridge Construction and Demolition
Individual impact site descriptions are provided below:
Site 1 (Permit Drawings 4-5)
Site I is the replacement of Bridge 138 over the Neuse River. The bridge approaches will
be constructed with retaining walls to reduce encroachment into adjacent wetlands. Fill
slopes above the retaining wall have been steepened as much as practical to 2:1 due to load
limits on the retaining wall and constructability and safety considerations adjacent to the
sheet pile walls. Rock plating, while not required, will be applied to the slopes for added
protection and stability. Mechanized clearing will be performed adjacent to the retaining
walls for construction access and under the bridge for maintenance access. A work
platform will be used to construct the new bridge from both sides of the Neuse River, with
a span left open to maintain boat passage. Three minor impacts (fill and mechanized
clearing) are also proposed to allow for non -erosive discharge of stormwater from the
bridge into the adjacent wetlands, rather than direct discharge into the river.
Site 2 (Permit Drawings 6-9)
Site 2 is the construction of the new Bridge 139 over the Neuse River overflow and
associated approaches. The roadway fill approaching this bridge will be constructed with
1.5:1 side slopes protected with rock plating. A retaining wall was evaluated for this area
but deemed not practical due to design and constructability considerations. Construction of
the wall at this location would require tie -backs that would result in moving the wall further
out into the wetland in order to maintain traffic on the existing road. This would have
caused additional impacts to wetlands as compared to the proposed 1.5:1 slopes without
retaining walls. Mechanized clearing will be performed adjacent to the fill slope and for the
bridge and work platform to allow for construction access and pile installation. The
existing road embankment will be abandoned upon completion of the construction and
graded down to drain via sheet flow into the adjacent wetlands. A temporary construction
area has been established around the channel relocation to allow for sheet piling or other
dewatering method to be implemented so the culvert extension can be constructed in the
dry.
Both bridges will be demolished using top -down methods. Temporary impacts associated
with the removal of the existing piles at each bridge total 0.07 acre of surface water for
Bridge 138, and 0.03 acre of wetland for Bridge 139. The superstructure of each bridge will
be cut and removed with measures in place to prevent materials from entering jurisdictional

waters. Once a segment of bridge is removed, the existing piles will be pulled. Full removal
of piles will be accomplished unless they break off during removal. In that case, the piles
will be cut at or below the river bed (Bridge 138) or wetland elevation (Bridge 139) to
avoid increased disturbance to completely remove the piles. NCDOT's Best Management
Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be implemented for the bridge
demolition. A Bridge Demolition Plan will be prepared by the selected contractor,
submitted to NCDOT for approval, and shared with permitting agencies.
Federally Threatened and Endangered Species
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) list 16 federally protected species for Craven County as of the September
20, 2019 listing (Table 2).
Table 2. Federally Protected Species in Craven County
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Biological
Conclusion
Alligator
mississinniensis
American alligator
T(S/A)
Yes
IVIA
Chelonia mvdas
Green sea turtle
T
No
No Effect
ermochelvs coriacea
Leatherback sea turtle
E
No
No Effect
votis septentrionalis
Northern long eared bat
T
Yes
MALAA
ecturus lewisi
Neuse River waterdog
PT
Yes
IA
oturus furiosus
Carolina Madtom
PE
Yes
IVIA
icoides borealis
Red -cockaded
woodpecker
E
No
No Effect
Calidris canutus rufa
Red knot
T
No
No Effect
cipenser oxyrinchus
Atlantic Sturgeon
E
Yes
MANLAA
Trichechus manatus
West Indian manatee
E
Yes
MANLAA
vsimachia
asoerulaefolia
Rough -leaved loosestrife
E
No
No Effect
eschvnomene virginica
Sensitive joint -vetch
T
No
No Effect

E = Endangered, T = Threatened, T(S/A) = Threatened (Similarity of Appearance), T
Threatened, P=Proposed; MANLAA= May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect,
MALAA = May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect, NIA= Not Applicable.
FHWA and NCDOT have determined that the project will not affect listed species, with the
exception of Northern long-eared bat, Atlantic sturgeon, and West Indian manatee.
Biological conclusions from the 2014 NRTR are provided in Table 3. A request has been
submitted to the NMFS for concurrence that the project is not likely to adversely affect the
Atlantic sturgeon.
American alligator
Biological Conclusion: Not Applicable .The American alligator remains on the protected
species list due to its similarity in appearance to the Endangered American crocodile and
no biological conclusion is required.
Green sea turtle
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. This project will not affect the beaches or coastal waters
of North Carolina, therefore no habitat for green sea turtles exists within the study area. A
review of NCNHP records, accessed September 24, 2019, indicates no known green sea
turtle occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Leatherback sea turtle
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. This project will not affect the beaches or coastal waters
of North Carolina, therefore no habitat for leatherback sea turtles exists within the study
area A review of NCNHP records, updated May 1, 2009, indicates no known leatherback
sea turtle occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Northern long-eared bat
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect. The USFWS has
developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal
Highway Administration, the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDOT for the northern
long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers
the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities.
The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is "May Affect,
Likely to Adversely Affect." The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and
will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all
NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Craven County.
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Suitable habitat for the red cockaded woodpecker does
not exist in the study area. Forests in the study area are comprised of a closed hardwood
canopy and sub canopy. Where pine trees occur in maintained or disturbed areas, they are
not of sufficient age or density to provide suitable nesting or foraging habitat. A review of

NCNHP records, accessed September 25, 2019, indicates no known RCW occurrences
within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Red knot
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Suitable habitat for the red knot does not exist in the
study area. The study area consists of forested, riparian areas in a freshwater system. It
lacks coastal foraging and roosting areas preferred by the red knot. A review of NCNHP
records, accessed September 25, 2019, indicates no known red knot occurrences within 1.0
mile of the study area.
Atlantic Sturgeon
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect. The Neuse River at
this location is designated as critical habitat for the Atlantic sturgeon. A review of NCNHP
records, access September 25, 2019, indicates there are no known Atlantic sturgeon
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
West Indian manatee
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect. Suitable habitat for
the West Indian manatee does exist in the study area. A review of NCNHP records,
accessed September 25, 2019, revealed a 1994 manatee occurrence within the study area
(EO ID: 5451). NCDOT will utilize the "Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West
Indian Manatee: precautionary Measures for Construction Activities in North Carolina's
Waters" during construction of the bridge.
Rough -leaved loosestrife
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Suitable habitat for rough -leaved loosestrife does not
exist in the study area. The canopy in the wetland areas that are not regularly flooded is too
dense to allow rough -leaved loosestrife to grow. A review of NCNHP records, accessed
September 25, 2019, indicates no known rough- leaved loosestrife occurrence within 1.0
mile of the study area.
Sensitive joint -vetch
Biological Conclusion: No Effect. Suitable habitat for sensitive joint -vetch does not exist in
the study area. The wetland areas and roadside ditches are not brackish or tidally influenced
and therefore do not provide the necessary conditions for this vetch. A review of NCNHP
records, accessed September 25, 2019, indicates no known sensitive joint -vetch occurrence
within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Two other species, the Neuse River waterdog and the Carolina Madtom are proposed for
listing under the Endangered Species Act. Surveys were performed at the site in spring of
2019 - none were found.

Anadromous Species
Suitable habitat is present for the Atlantic sturgeon, an anadromous fish, within the entirety
of the Neuse River in the study area. The Neuse River within Lenoir and Craven counties is
listed as one of the Atlantic sturgeon critical habitat rivers in the Southeast US.
Additionally, the Neuse River and most of its associated tributaries are also designated as
anadromous fish spawning areas for other species such as Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis)
and Blueback Herring (Alosa spp).
Cultural Resources
No sites eligible for the National Register of Historic Places are within the project area. NC
State Historic Preservation Office concurred via letter to the applicant dated November 18,
2008.
Mitigation Evaluation
Mitigation has been defined in the NEPA regulations to include efforts that: a) avoid; b)
minimize; c) rectify; d) reduce or eliminate; or e) compensate for adverse impacts to the
environment [40 CFR 1508.20 (a-e)]. Practicable alternative analysis must be fully
evaluated before compensatory mitigation can be discussed.
Avoidance and Minimization
All jurisdictional features were delineated, field verified and surveyed within the corridor
for B-4484 as described above. Using these surveyed features, preliminary designs were
adjusted to avoid and/or minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas. NCDOT employs many
strategies to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas in all of its designs. Many
of these strategies have been incorporated into BMP documents that have been reviewed
and approved by the resource agencies and which will be followed throughout construction.
All wetland areas and environmental sensitive areas (ESA) not affected by the project will
be protected from unnecessary encroachment. Individual avoidance and minimization
measures include the following:
Design Measures
• Bridge 138 over the Neuse River has been lengthened to span riparian buffers and the
river banks.
• Retaining walls have been utilized to reduce wetland impacts on the approaches to
bridge 138.
• There will be no deck drains or direct discharge of stormwater off the bridges. All
stormwater will be discharged at the ends of the bridges at non -erosive velocity.
• Riprap has been eliminated along the base of sheet pile walls.
• Granite, not marl, will be specified for riprap protection areas.
• Fill slopes have been steepened to the maximum extent practical considering erosive
velocities and geotechnical considerations.
• 2:I slopes are used above retaining walls for load, constructability, and safety
considerations

• 1.5:1 slopes are used where retaining walls were not practical (see Impact Site 2
discussion)
General Construction Measures
• Refer to Section 8.2 for protected species measures
• No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be
allowed in wetlands.
• Temporary work platforms are proposed to access the new bridge alignments except
one span to allow boat passage along the river where a barge may be used.
• Sediment and erosion control measures shall adhere to the Design Standards in
Sensitive Watersheds during construction of the project.
• Special Sediment Control Fence and Environmentally -Sensitive Area fencing will be
used where applicable.
• Bridge piles will be driven, and no jetting will be used.
• Pile driving will be accomplished using pile cushions and will be ramped up to
minimize the effects of in -water noise.
• No dredging is proposed.
• Water line relocation will be accomplished using directional subsurface
methods to avoid wetland and surface water impacts.
• To ensure that all borrow and waste activities occur on high ground, except as
authorized by permit, the NCDOT shall require its contractors to identify all
areas to be used to borrow material, or to dispose of dredged, fill or waste
material. Documentation of the location and characteristics of all borrow and
disposal sites associated with the project will be available on request.
Turbidity curtains will be considered in areas of adequate shallow depth and
lower velocity. Turbidity will be monitored during in -water work to ensure
compliance with state water quality standards.
Demolition Measures
• NCDOT will adhere to Best Management Practices for Construction and
Maintenance Activities.
• Demolition will be accomplished through top -down and/or barge access.
• Non -shattering methods will be implemented (no explosives) for bridge
removal.
• No bridge deck or substructure components will be dropped in the water.
• Existing bridge piles will be removed completely, unless not practicable.
• If a pile snaps off at a depth below the stream bed or wetland elevation it will
be left in place rather than disturb additional area to remove.
A demolition plan will be finalized by the selected contractor. The final
demolition plan will also be approved by NCDOT and provided to permitting
agencies for review prior to implementation.

Compensatory Mitigation
The NCDOT will investigate potential on -site stream and wetland mitigation opportunities
once all possible measures to avoid and minimize impacts to the aquatic environment have
been explored. Offsite mitigation needed to satisfy the federal Clean Water Act
requirements for this project will be provided by the North Carolina Department of
Environment Quality, Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) in accordance with their
current In -Lieu Fee Mitigation Instrument.
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate
State agencies for review.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not
make a final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state
Certification as required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt
of the application and this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at
the NCDWR Central Office in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a 401
Certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this request
for certification within sixty days of receipt of a complete application. Additional
information regarding the 401 Certification may be reviewed at the NCDWR Central
Office, Transportation Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for
a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by December 9, 2019 to:
NCDWR Central Office
Attention: Ms. Amy Chapman, Transportation Permitting Unit
(USPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Or,
(physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):
The applicant has requested approval for the proposed project under a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) Major Development Permit and that the proposed work
complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved North
Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2 (b)(2) the Corps
is, by this notice, forwarding this information to the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (NCDCM) and requesting its concurrence or objection. Generally, the Corps
will not issue a DA permit until the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the
applicant's consistency certification or issues the CAMA Major Development Permit.

Section 408
Interested parties are hereby notified that an application has been received for Department
of the Army Section 408 (Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899; 33 U.S.C.
408) approval to conduct this bridge replacement over the federally authorized Neuse River
Navigation Channel as described above and shown on the attached maps. Written
comments are being solicited from anyone having an interest in the requested alteration.
Comments received will become part of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
administrative record and will be considered in determining whether to approve the request.
Comments supporting, opposing, or identifying concerns that should be considered by the
USACE in its decision process are welcome. Comments providing substantive information
and/or a rationale for the commenter's position are the most helpful.
This public notice is not a paid advertisement and is for public information only. Issuance
of this notice does not imply USACE endorsement of the project as described.
The decision whether to grant the requested permission for federal project modification
under Section 408 will be based on several factors and will reflect the national concern for
both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may
be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably
foreseeable detriments. Review of the request for modification will be reviewed by a
USACE technical review team and will consider, but not necessarily be limited to, the
following factors:
1. Impair the Usefulness of the Project Determination. The review team will determine
if the proposed alteration would limit the ability of the project to function as
authorized, or would compromise or change any authorized project conditions,
purposes, or outputs. The decision whether to approve a request for modification
would be based on a determination of no impairments.
2. Injurious to the Public Interest Determination. Proposed alterations will be reviewed
to determine the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, on the public
interest. Evaluation of the probable public interest impacts of the proposed alteration
to the USACE requires a careful weighing of all relevant factors in each particular
case. Factors that may be relevant to the public interest depend upon the type of
USACE project being altered and may include, but are not limited to, conservation,
economic development, historic properties/cultural resources, environmental impacts,
water supply, water quality, flood hazards, floodplains, residual risk, induced
damages, navigation, shore erosion or accretion, and recreation. The decision whether
or not to approve an alteration to a federal project will be determined by the
consideration of whether benefits are commensurate with risks. If the potential
detriments are found to outweigh the potential benefits, then it may be determined
that the proposed alteration is injurious to the public interest.

3. Environmental Compliance. A decision on a Section 408 request is a federal action,
and therefore subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other
environmental compliance requirements. While ensuring compliance is the
responsibility of the USACE, the requester provides all information necessary to
satisfy applicable federal laws, executive orders, regulations, policies, ordinances, and
any other environmental requirements. The NEPA and other analyses completed to
comply with environmental statutes, such as the Endangered Species Act, should be
commensurate with the scale and potential effects of the activity that would alter the
federal project. The scope of analyses for the NEPA and environmental compliance
evaluations pursuant to Section 408 are limited to the area of alteration and adjacent
areas that may be directly or indirectly affected by the alteration. A preliminary
determination has been made that an environmental impact statement is not required
for the proposed action.
4. Technical Analysis. The USACE will ensure that the requester provides all technical
plans, maps, drawings, and specifications to facilitate a thorough review of the
proposal. A USACE-led Agency Technical Review (ATR) is being conducted to
determine any potential adverse impacts to the federal project.
Any comments received will be considered by the USACE in determining whether to issue,
modify, condition or deny a permission for this proposal if received before the comment
period expiration date. To make its decision, the USACE will review comments received to
supplement and inform its assessment of impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and other public interest factors
listed above. Comments will be taken into consideration in the preparation of an
appropriate document pursuant to the NEPA (e.g. Environmental Assessment). Comments
will also be used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine overall public
interest in the proposed action.
It should be noted that materials submitted as part of Section 408 requests become
part of the public record and will be available to the general public under the
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Individuals may submit a
written request to obtain materials under the FOIA or make an appointment to view
the project file at the USACE Wilmington District's Office of Counsel.
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That
decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important
resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal
must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be
relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof, among
those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands,
historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in
accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and

accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety,
food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in
general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the discharge of
dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the impact of the
activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental Protection
Agency's 404@(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials, including any consolidate state viewpoint or written position of the
Governor; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the
impacts of this proposed activity. To make this decision, comments are used to assess
impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental
effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the
preparation of a Corp environmental assessment and permit decision. Comments are also
used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest
of the proposed activity.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received
by the US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, December 9, 2019.
Comments should be submitted to Mr. Thomas Steffens, Washington Regulatory Field
Office, 2407 West 51h Street, Washington, North Carolina, 27889 or to
[e-mail].

ti
I�
t
0
L
a
T
m
c
.3
O
L
0
c
F-
E
C
O
w
w
0
U
01
00
N L
wT
0
1460 /
1459 1458 ' '
rr\((11"**
/♦ Riversi e \ - 1462 0011
1459 1463 1458
� ' 145T , 1465
- E wo h
{ 1469
1468 ' 1454
� V � 1456 1457
"yi0aa� - 1400
PROJECT LOCATION
1470 1450
1454
1470 , 1450 - I
�
1471 1400
'147 A
VICINITY MAP N. T. S.
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
1
DESIGN
DATA
ADT 2019 =
1,863
ADT 2039 =
2,279
K =
12 D/D
D =
60 %
T =
10 %
V =
60 MPH
*(TTST=3% +
DUAL =7%)
FUNC CLASS
= MAJOR
COLLECTOR
SUB -REGIONAL TIER
STATE OF NORTH CAROLIN
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CRAVEN COUNTY
LOCATION: REPLACE BRIDGES NO.138 & 139 OVER NEUSE
RIVER AND NEUSE RIVER OVERFLOW ON
SR 1470 (MAPLE CYPRESS ROAD)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, RETAINING WALLS,
AND STRUCTURES
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4484 = 0.512 MILE
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4484 = 0.189 MILE
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4484 = 0.701 MILE
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF.•
152 UTH BOULEVARD, SUITE
RS01 LICENSE
NCOIRM No8F--0 93200
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
JENNIFER FARINO, PE
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
MARCH 7, 2019
DREW MORROW, PE
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
LETTING DATE:
APRIL 21, 2020
HON YEUNG, PE
NCDOT CONTACT
RTATS
"A'B PRO)Dgr REFERENa NO.
N.
B-4484
I
"A-PRq.WA
F. A.PRDI.NG
RRR6RIPTON
33723.1.2
WA
PE
33723.2.1
WA
ROW, UTIL
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 15
BYDRAULICS ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
IN('OMPLETE PLAN$
DO NOT USE FOR ROW ACOI�ISTTION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

RETAIN EXISTING
OVERFLOW BRIDGE
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4484
—Ll— POC STA.17 + 00.00
SITE I
� e s
y r r
t �
WOODS
t
t
RETAIN ..
ATE �
LINE
NE.USE -IVER OVE= FLOW BRIDGE'—_—��'
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 75
�yo
�P° O
FRAWS T. KILPATRICK
x INSET B /
o
WOODS
TIE TO EXIST.GRDRL
REMOVES APPRC& END PROP. RET. WALL #1 / 0
50 LF OF EXIST. I -Ll- STA. 19+50.00 / / BEGIN PROP. RET. WALL #1
G14ARDRAIL FR9M I -L1- TA. 2i+00.Q0
-Ll- STA. 17+00.00 TO WOODS t
17E+52 ;T +/-, �f�^iT`r i /. �.. .. 'I` * �k
BEGIN HDD OF
4v i 12" HDPE WATF,RLINE ' SEE INS E�
� ' EXISTING R VA IESPUE t
P
T` yl � � PUE (�E 'E
/ / E
-
GV �
!io,
\ I. I —W SBG�
U
�RETAW= f
n
REMOVE EXISTING 4! M- � _ _ _ MH15" CAA
s TIE TO EXIST. GUARDRAIL 121k CMP
i REMOVE APPIROX. 250 LF OF EX'snN--�'F ty� � p
EXIST. GUARDRAIL FI*OM Es
Ll- STA. 17+00.00 TO
,t 'E 19+k50 RT', +/-
W000s � * � ,� �
* * -*SEE INSET�A �
MECHANIZED CLEARING 1
* * * �k *1
1
GRADE E EV EXISTING
ISTIN EM A-LI1- ENSTUDOW1 TOI
W / 28+46, MID LAY BACK EMBANKMENT AT AI
\'/-F/1 3:1 FROM 4- STA,,21+7 PTO 22+28.
� � 1l
S9G FROM -L1- STA. 19+34 TO STA. T +95 LT
SANDRA N. WHITE * 1
SBG FROM -LI- STA. 2�+49 TO STA�,211+95 RT
PLATFORM
F F DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES MECHANIZE[
CLEARING
50' 0' 50' 100' 150'
INSET A
- PUE
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
B-4484
4
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RSaf
NC FIRM LICENSE N. F-0493
Ii
uj
W
O
U
N

BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4484
—Ll— POC STA.17 + 00.00
IQ
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 3 OF 15
Ks,
/0,-Q O
FRANCES T. K&PATRICK
SITE I
2 j y x x INSET B N
r
o
.� TI TO EXIST. -
yooDs t RDRAIL END PROP. RET. WALL #1
REMOVEPPROt. i
-Ll- STA. 19+50.00 iBEGIN PROP. RET. WALL
- t 50 LF OF EXIST. I -
'E G1ARDRAIL FIR ii -Ll- TA. 22+OO.QO
.. .. -Ll- STA. �y ' �k 'MOODS
.. 17+00.00 T
RETAIN - / i
BEGIN OF
II
IO' / 4TE EJN 1 DPE WATWIME SEE INS
PUE PUE �
zresr •• �- _ - T�PdE
E.
RIVER')VCRFLOyy 8RjGC--GV
I _
RETAIN EXISTING
_71LOW BRIDGE
7 �//7`/' -� 5" RCP -III
k �E �/ REMOVE EXISTING-= - 15
TIE TO EXIST. GUARD IL � 124 CMP
t REMOVE APPMtOX. WO LF RiW
EXIST. GUARDRAIL FIfOM
,ELl- STA. 17+00.00 TO '� t
19 -00 RTt �
+/-
{MOODS 'E .k � � � � � * *
L / -* �*
* � SEE WSE
MECHANIZED CLEARING
1
W t t zk GRADE EXISTING EMBA MENPYDOW TO
W ELEV. 1L FROM Ll- AN 22+2 TOk
2 2t+46, A�JD AY BACK EMBANKMENT T Al
3:1 FROM 4- 5TA�A.
+78.T0 �22 28.
� � 1
S9G FR0�11 -L1- 19+34 TO STA. 95 LT
SANORA N �HITE *SBG FROM -Ll-. 2+49 T+0 STA,y2A+9 RT t
TEMPORARY WORK
PLATFORM
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
* + * DENOTES MECHANIZE[
CLEARING
50' 0' 50' 100' 150'
INSET A
N
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
B-4484
4
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDEROED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RS&H
NC FIRM LICENSE N. F-0493

\ \E
\E\ \\
n
a /ii STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ao
SITE I
O
#ILLIAV E. DANIELS
N �•
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
B-4484
5
RV SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
,�
DO
7 /-F
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RSS�I
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 4 OF 15
*SEE NOTE ON W.I.S.S. FOR IMPACT
INFORMATION REGARDING THE
TEMPORARY WORK PLATFORM
0
0
yZ
END PROP. RET. WALL #2 Flgtl"Loyl
�$
-Ll- STA. 28+10.00
N
W
POE
POE
w`
POE
N
POE, PUE
w
I
POE
��
1 1
l BEGIN PROP. RET. WALL #2
�
—d—
PUE
\ -Ll- STA. 33+35.00
()
——I�,_01 fNW CRA 4EN W, F, iF
,E
�UE
yc \
F
POE
�
F—
" F e
Pt�
O
LLJ
C
F F
'F 4
�- POE
15" RCP -III
W
Nff
IiORI C S
E iS E ii ED i IRE BRI GE
..
-
R
F
Ln
S UCIU E.
\
F F
F rn
O
Q pf 38
C cx G R
F F
mi
'
T62 GT---_
F
TB2GI CT
--A—
10•PLAS. .
U
REMOVE EXISTING
BRIDGE
RELOCATE TO—�
15=' RCP=1U--------===
OV
PROPOSED BRIDGE
BY OTHERS
\ —F.
C MH
I
�— —
SR Lo—CYPRESS
r
--R--- J
EXC TION
y\� ensnNG R/W
RD ZEST
END HDD OF I
ITS .. .. .. ..
12" HOPE WATERLINE
+15" AAA
��\
. .. ..
F F F
t 'k .ELJO�WS
E 1 �-
r----- ��t �
4
t 1
GRADE
EXISTING EMBANKMENT DOWN TO
s
I
I I
I W
IUl
27+ AND STA.ELEV.1LAYR ACK OM LEMBANKMENT AT A
I t
I
I I
I I +
:1
3:1 FROM -Ll- STA.27+89 TO 28+39.
N= \
�I
I
I 0
i
\�
� r/
1 4>� 0
w
W.�6.� \
\\
III
W FROMSTA. 28+10
z
TO }
t
I
SSBG TA. 34 LT
SBG FROM -Ll- STA. 28+19
TO 19-1
_
STA. 29+74 RT
WOODS
t
*
DENOTES MECHANIZED
I
I t FALLOW
CLEARING
I WOODS
MECHANIZED CLEARING '
t
I HEATH AIMLY FARIIIS, LLC
DENOTES FILL IN
I
O
Ii
WETLAND
t
COASTAL LUMBER C01�PANY
1
TEMPORARY WORK
®
PLATFORM*
50' 0'
50' 100' 150'
I POND
\ 1
FOR —Ll— PROFILE, SEE SHEET 8 I

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
\ \ \7�i/,dM/ E•.04`2 B-4484 SHEET NO. 6
\ SRV
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
\ \B ENGINEER ENGINEER
\ \ �'000s 1 p,Q
\ 1�
\\ \ 1
DETAIL A
\ /111v
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
E CO STRUCTIO °° 3.\ F,II UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
— I— POT ST l +3700 G,° nd ,o',° 51 \
\ \ \SITE 2
RS&H\ \ FROM -Ll- STA. 35+20 TO STA. 35+50 LT
\ \ FROM -Ll- STA. 36+50 TO STA. 37+21 LT \ NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0993
\ \
\� \\ I � STANDARD 'V' DITCH
WOODS
3 \ I SEE DETAIL C DETAIL B DETAIL C
�1 SPECIAL CUT DITCH STANDARD 'V' DITCH
�° 5oo1ej PERMIT D RAW I N G
y
oam
I
H � 5i°� °,°, , .ul e SHEET 6 OF 15 , \� Ground 3.� D Ground :� 3.\ Ground 69v S.
F
\ 101 WOODS
\
I \
\ 18\' RCP IV FROM -DWI- STA. 10+26 TO STA. 14+40 LT -DWI- STA. 14+00 RT O
& FROM -DWI- STA. 10+29 TO STA. 73+90 RT
ECIAL CUT DITCH \ O
SEE DETAIL B
\ / t HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H.BYRD
s \
\
c \ \ O
END PHALTPAV ENT \\ \,\\\\� CAROL U.HEATH \
DWI- 10+ .79
BEGIN ROCK PLATING
U.NEATFE \ \ \\ —LI— POT ST 3+57 +/— LT
O
c \
�� \
} t SBG FROM -Ll- STA. 43/LT
\t J<
SBG FROM -L1- STA. 38+89 TO 39+34 LT t
CYPRESS SWAMP
� SPECIAL CUT DITCH VE � � } A: � � } t
(+') Z.c N EE DETAIL B P \ t � 4
`cr+ 0 �� `
CYPRESS SWAMP
I GE
/ 100 BpGT— POST lO+l E z�\ E TEy E) E E E
►3 PEEECIAL LATERAL 'V DITCH m
l P C l R SDETAIL A WOODS ** iF - EziSTiNG R/W
/N/
m/ � � aF + .. dF d� * * * dF * dF d� r dF dr + dr * dF dt * * * ar dr + * *�..l.* �• W x--x-� ��F �
O C 15" RCP -III iF iE iF dF if iF iE iF iF_iF % i!-% #: F:i: :•R #- 3!'-'1L3F-d(�iF-K-k'it^lF"'i! #�a['-3F3FiL it iF S' CRAP F
- / SBG. lE dF — dF # dF dF dF iF dF dF M dF iF iF dF d! # iE dE -IF dF dF F f F F F F F F F F F F
dF # dF dF dE # dF dF aE 1F d! iF. iF dF iE iF # dF dF iE dk i} dk dF dF df iE iE dF dF dF dF _ dF iF dE
� O / I - a1•x aF-aF
((/ 32GI F F F F F F F
15" RCP III
dF _
O � � II � ENISIINC R y,` � \
PKO 10. PLAS. ( RA
NE tsi), 1
xsn g - F ''05
I 1
PU
\ \ PUE
BEGIN HOD OF
12" HDPE WATERLINE \\
• * DENOTES MECHANIZED \ \\
* CLEARING \ \
F DENOTES FILL IN \\\\\
WETLAND \ \
DENOTES EXCAVATION \ \
IN WETLAND ` \
TEMPORARY WORK
PLATFORM \
50' 0' 50' 100' 150' \ \
I
O
O
00
V)
N
rig
iF dF dF iF iF dF dE iF iF df dF iF dF df dE dF #• !F iE iF dF iF dE dF # iF dF dF iF
iF iF iF dE iE iF iF iF iF ii}}��9F��}}jjLL��FF t iF iF iF M iF iF # iF iE —
1F dE iE iE dF dP 4F�1i��P"`R111FMtMITSiF.K. dh dF iF iE IO' 11
Lu
Ui
--_ -1 -_ --- SR 1470 MAPLE CYPRESS RD 22' BST 'o — — — F
e. w N
-------� _ ____--
PUE.. OF V
PUE PUE } t e e 2" HDPEENib DWAATERLINE } t CYPRESS SWAMP
3: REMOVE EXISTING7. t
�X(MM BRIDGE \\J�e� � �
Ewa GRADE EXISTING
I`11lEf AGNB ELEVN7ETIONI fROMN LI� �\ �
39+73 TO 40+47 AND 42+21 TO CYPRESS SWAMP i >a i<
` \ FROM .-�LIY STA. 3 BACK EMBANKMENT AT 73 AI.1 � � � �
\ \ A FROM 4* 32 TO 43+ B.
t
\\ \ I \ �k
RAY III, FEATH
FOR —L*I— PROFILE. SEE SHEET 10
FOR —Ll— PROFILE. SEE SHEET 9

N
31
PROJECT ETCT REFERENCE NO. SHENO.
\ \ �I7LL14w f off [ B-4484 6
\ s
RSV SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
\ \� ENGINEER ENGINEER
\ \ Q
Woods 1 p,
\\ \
DETAIL A
`-. SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
\ m \ E D CO STRUCTlO
f\ \ ry Hn� n � ,�.. r;�� UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
\\ \ \\ \ A -DWI- POT ST I +3700 Ground Fo D
\ \• SITE 2
FROM -L1- STA. 35+20 TO STA. 35+50 LT RS&H
\ \ FROM -L7- STA. 36+50 TO STA. 37+21 LT \ NC FIRM LICENSE N. F-0493
\ \ \ 1
W0005 \ STANDARD� � 'V' DITCH
\ \ I SEE DETAIL c DETAIL B DETAIL C
± } SPECIAL CUT DITCH STANDARD 'V' DITCH
�orro Soule, IN m 5 ..I PERMIT D RAW I N G
\ d DI m
H �nr rn oPe �e,ere L Nmu,ul I SHEET 7 OF 15
18\, CP IV I \ Ground 3.� D, Ground 3.� ,�.1 Ground SyS•
D F
\ WOODS' Min.D= 1.0 Ft.
701 \
I\ FROM -DWI- STA. 10+2TO STA. 14+0 LT -DWI- STA. 14+00 RT O
- RCFROM -DWI- STA. 10-29 TO STA. 13+90 RT
ECIAL CUT DITCH \ O Ln
- SEE DETAIL B x \ 7 h mil'
HAROLD HARGETT JR E TOIrYA H.BYRD
G I l .�� O
ALT PAV ENT ' CAROL U. HEATH \
W1-10+ .79 � 5 \ BEGI ROCK PLATI G
L U. HEATH \ \
� �� c Q \ \ \ � � � -LS l- POT ST 3+57�+/-ELT
gboos
o
t SBG FROM -LI- STA. 43+56 TO 43+72 LT L
SBG FROM -L1- STA. 38+89 TO 39+34 L7�Nk
SPECIAL CUT DITCH03 lk Nk I X* CYPRESS SWAMPthSEE DETAIL 8C ,04s - C
7 \ \ 4 • � � is � is � CYPRESS AMBEGI GRADE \ Vo - l- POT ST lO+l ��E� E' E* E ESPECIAL LATERAL'V' DITCHSEE DETAL A WO DS\NcF 15RCP-III dF iF iFyaF F {F^ Y'"�I....iF3:�•iF-IF-IF-lt'xa! #aF3f�FiF. N' 3F 5„ CAAPF� SBG _ w9t #iF7F' ii iF iF dF iF it it IF 1F iF if iF iF i! it iE dF itk* F F F F F F F F FF —'1
EXIS PNG R
9KO - - 10.PLAS INI CRA vE
N501
EIP.
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
• .' . " + CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
TEMPORARY WORK
PLATFORM
15"RCP J dr dF .r xaF i+}}... ��+lF���. �+tFF +Fw w.w+t +r �Fxw w w• � x- -
iF iF !E iEIf iF dF iF 1FLit^4F�iE .Rl #—
\ \ iF dE dE dE dF dP MITS.X, dt iF iE iE i0• W
Uj
'r \ CYPRESS RD 22' BST
-- SR 1470 MAPLE C
EXCAVATION
PUE - END HDD*OF u
PU PUE PUE 12" HDPE WATERLINE 3<
\ \ PUE 3r RIIEAOVE &ISTING - CYPRESS SWAMP
BEGIN HDD OF �\ BRIDGE �j3: t St
12" HDPE WATERLINE \\,\u,+ GRADE EXISTING EMBANKKMMENT,pOW1JT021,
\EIAV. T (`WETLANB ELEV7iTI EN) FROM &T� STA. 39+73 TO 40+47 AND 42+21 TO CYPRESS SWAMP t
�\ \ 43+32. LAY BACK EMBANKMENT AT A 1 } A }
\ \ FROM -Ll- STA. 39+41�7O 39¢¢73 AI t 8
t FROM 434432 Tb 4315B.
\ \ \ RAY V. HEATH
\ \ ` FOR —DWI- PROFILE. SEE SHEET 10
P s \I FOR -Ll - PROFILE. SEE SHEET 9

SHEET NO.
0
0
00
�t
FQ-
N
a
F
DETAIL D
CHANNEL CHANGE
(Not to Sc lel
b NvNml
PrvPvsad G,—d
u „oV ^„I —_ FiIl Slope
d
GEOTEXtILE B Exist. Channel
Min. D= 7.5 Ft.
Max. d= 1.5 Ft.
B= 8.0 Ft.
Type of Liner=Class "I" Granite Rip Rap 6= 5.0 to 12.0 Ft.
FROM —Ll— STA. 48+80 TO STA. 504-50 LT
EST. CLASS "I" GRANITE RIP RAP = 106 TONS
EST. GEOTEXTILE 234 SY
EST. DDE = 720 CY
LINDA B. VCKEEL. ET AL
INSET A
0 \
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H. BYRD O \
E D ROCK PLATING
—Ll— POC 5T 53+00 +/— LT/7
J
Nk
CYPRESS SWAMPsk NX / \
t � FILL SCOfl1R HOL� CHANNEL CHANGE / \�
WITH APPROX. 22 TONS OF
CLASS "I" G NITE IP RAP SEE DETAIL D } 'k /= t i
Je *PROP(JSED AANNE SLOPE-0.70% v__WO0
D5
SEE APPROVED CSR DATED 9MO18 / �.
COLLAR AND EXTEND FOR MORE DF�TAILS, 'k *� CRESS ilWAMP
DUAL 84"MP J< / /
T A
T /
sk
w
INSET A
---
_—SEE
o^ w
r
L
AL
-�-
O
.. ..�..
NIA
_ _E y
E �
\
Jc CYPRESS SWAMP 1I
u
�I
i 6
CYPRESS SWAMP �
�
� � Jc �
I
. RETAIN DUAL ±4" CMk Jc �
' BEGI ROCK PLATI G * II
Z/±
—Ll* Pw ST 50*50 */— RT - ± * ± - - � J, III
y J: Je t Js t �k t J< * t
* * * * DENOTES MECHANIZED
* ' CLEARING
O
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H.BYRD
WOODS
SITE 2
0
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H. BYRD
END TIP PROJECT B-4484
I -Ll- POC STA. 54 + 00.00
END CONSTRUCTION B-4484
—Ll— POC STA. 54 + 50.00
ek�k / �I 'WOODS
SR 1470 MAPLE CYPRESS RD 22' BST_
JUDY K. HEATH
40
ISSKD
9
S
� o \
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
50' 0'
50' 100' 150'
/7e
✓ n�
APO � .
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
B-4484
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RSaf
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 8 OF 15
z
N
f
5 32S125 `R
77.87'
y'L a
\ ti tia>a°
V�
FOR —Ll— PROFILE. SEE SHEET 9 I

0
0
00
I'—
N
a
10
1- -
Lu
W
CYPRESS SWAMP
t t
t
t :k All
* *
F
INSET A
0
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H. BYRD OLn \
\ E)VROCK PLATING
—Ll--PVC ST 53+00 +/— LT/RT
CYPRESS SWAMP } Tc /k \�p
t �k FILL ex SC06R HOLI �
CHANNEL CHANGE
WITH APPROX. 22 TONS OF ,(j- --A - -
CLASS "I" G NITE IP RAP SEE DETAIL D } /i j
�PROPCiSED CIANNE�SLOPE=0.70% _ -WOODS
SEE APPROVED CSR DATED 9i52018
COLLAR AND EXTEND FOR MORE DFTTAILS �/ A! CYPRESS *WAMP
DUAL 84" iMP t A! t
T /
T � /
DETAIL D
CHANNEL CHANGE
( Not to Sc le)
b NvNml
PraPvud Grvun=�
FiIl Slope
d q.7 D
GEOTEXtILE B Exist. Channel
Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
Max. d= 1.5 Ft.
B= 8.0 Ft.
Type of Line —Class "I" Granite Rip Rap 6= 5.0 to 12.0 Ft.
FROM -Ll- STA. 48+80 TO STA. 501-50 LT
EST. CLASS "I" GRANITE RIP RAP = 106 TONS
EST. GEOTEXTILE = 234 SY
EST. DDE = 720 CY
LINDA B. VCKEEL. ET AL
E
E E
E
do CYPRESS SWAMP \
RETAIN DUAL 84" CMS t
i
BEGIN ROCK PLATI G
—LI; POf ST 50*50 */— RT
* * * * DENOTES MECHANIZED
* ' CLEARING
O
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H.BYRD
SI
HAROLD HARGETT
END TIP
Lo
LI POC
!'E 2
0
JR & TONYA H. BYRD
PROJECT B-4484
STA. 54 + 00.00
END 'CONSTRUCTION B-4484
L7=—I4�C STA. 54 + 50.00
DS
SR 1470 MAPLE CYPRESS RD 22_T -
1 U E \�\ '>\\ JUDY K. HEATH
7,11
J \
WOODS
z s. _
i S d• _ � � 150K0
20' GR. _ 1
a9
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
50' 0'
50' 100' 150'
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-4484 7
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RSaf
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 9 OF 15
U
a' m
00
S 32'S1'25" `W
77.87
\ \ 4ti�tiatl �
V�
FOR —Ll— PROFILE. SEE SHEET 9

N
C
��
.j
U
E
�,
C
0
+�
C
N
E
C
O
1
C
W
H
�H
�+»
W {A
mdy
'/W
� �E
UQ
m
O
N �W
Z 1�
��
�=M
ti��
N �fR

C
6i
C1
E
Q
S
V
V
0]
L31
C
N
O
N
+�
C
N
E
C
0
C
w
�K�
�*n
ww
Ana n
Piw
� U�
..Q
6i r.Z
� '�W
N��
Z
�_
� /+Pr
..43
N �Hf

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
-1-1- 17+85 RT
Exist. 12" CMP Removal
< 0.01
1
-1-1- 19+41 LT
Rip Rap Outlets
< 0.01
< 0.01
1
-1-1- 20+50 RT
Rip Rap Outlet
< 0.01
< 0.01
1
-1-1- 20+62 to 22+28 LT
Ret Wall / Fill / Work Platform
0.07
0.19
1
-1-1- 27+85 to 32+70 LT
Ret Wall / Fill / Work Platform
0.36
0.10
1
-1-1- 29+73 RT
Rip Rap Outlet
< 0.01
2
-1-1- 39+17 LT
Roadway Fill Slope
0.03
2
-1-1- 39+62 RT
Roadway Cut Slope
< 0.01
2
-1-1- 39+71 to 40+45 RT
Roadway Cut Slope
0.04
2
-1-1- 39+00 to 43+32
Proposed Bridge / Work Platform
0.82
2
-1-1- 42+26 to 43+32 RT
Roadway Cut Slope
0.07
2
-1-1- 43+32 to 51+32 LT
Proposed Roadway/Fill Slope
0.61
0.08
2
-1-1- 48+60 to 50+66 LT
Channel Relocation
< 0.01
0.27
0.09
2
-1-1- 53+00 LT
Roadway Fill Slope
< 0.01
2
-1-1- 52+97 RT
Roadway Fill Slope
< 0.01
TOTALS*:
1.09
0.27
0.20
1.20
0
0
0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Total permanent Wetland Impacts due to proposed piles = 38 sq.ft.
Total permanent SW Impacts due to proposed piles = 141 sq.ft.
Temp Work Platform
Based on 20' or shorter spans, with pile rows 2' long and the full width of the platform (both conservative):
Temporary Fill in Wetlands = 4,567 sq.ft and Temporary Surface Water Impacts = 2,905 sq.ft
Revised 2016 09 09