20200142 Ver 1_B-4484 Individual CAMA Craven September 30 2019_20200127

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
September 30, 2019
Mr. Torn Steffens
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
Mr. Stephen Lane
N.C. Dept. of Environmental Quality
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Subject: Application for CAMA Major Development Permit, Section 404 and Section 10
Individual Permit, Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and Neuse River Buffer
Authorization for the Proposed Replacement of Bridges 138 and 139 over the Neuse
River on SR 14770 (Maple Cypress Road) in Craven County, North Carolina. TIP B-
4484. Debit Permit Fees from WBS No. 33723.1.2
Dear Sirs:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing bridges 138
and 139 over the Neuse River in Craven County with a parallel bridges to the northwest. The purpose of
this letter is to request approval under a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major Development
Permit, Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Individual Permit, a CWA Section 401 Water Quality
Certification, Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) Section 10, and Neuse River Buffer Authorization. In
addition to this cover letter, ENGE Form 4345 and CAMA MP 1, 2, and 5 Forms, this application
package includes the following: adjacent landowner list, CAMA adjacent riparian landowner
notifications, stormwater management plan, permit impact drawings (including utility relocation plans),
and half size roadway plans. The US Coast Guard has issued an exemption for this project, which is
attached. In addition, a request has been submitted to the National Marine Fisheries Service for
concurrence that the project will not affect the Atlantic Sturgeon.
1.0 Purpose and Need
As identified in the October 2017 Environmental Assessment / Finding of No Significant Impact
(EA/FONSI), the need for the proposed action is to replace two structurally deficient, functionally
obsolete bridges. The purpose of the proposed action is to improve bridge structural safety and
functionality for vehicular traffic.
NCDOT Structures Management Unit records (Bridge Inspection Report, March 29, 2019; Bridge
Inspection Report, June 7, 2019) indicate Bridge No. 138 and 139 have sufficiency ratings of 7.98 and
71.42, respectively, out of a possible 100 for a new structure. Bridge No. 138 is considered structurally
deficient due to superstructure and substructure ratings of four or less and has two years of estimated
MallingAddress: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DFPARTMLNI' OF TRANSPORTATION Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 2815 ROUSE ROAD Ex ENsloN
MaiwAY DIVISION 2 KINSTON, NC 28504
2815Rom RoADExTENSIDN 6Yebsire: www.Rcdot.gov
KwsroN, NC 28504

TIP B-4484 CAMA Major and Individual Permit Application
September 30, 2019
remaining life left. Bridge No. 139 has an estimated twelve years of estimated remaining life. NCDOT
has completed recent repairs to both structures.
2.0 Project Description
The proposed project is located in northeastern Craven County, approximately midway between Kinston
and Vanceboro. The land surrounding the bridge is predominantly rural and includes marshes, wooded
areas, large tracts of agricultural crops, and low -density single family homes.
SR 1470 (Maple Cypress Road) is a two-lane roadway with a statutory speed limit of 55 miles per hour
(mph). It is classified as a major collector road according to NCDOT Functional Classification maps. The
estimated (2012) annual average daily traffic (AADT) along SR 1470 (Maple Cypress Road) is 1,800
vehicles per day (vpd). There are no signalized intersections within the project study area. Craven County
school buses make two total trips per day across the bridges.
Known utilities in the project study area include a water line, power, and telecommunications
cable.
3.0 Summary of Impacts
Construction of the project would result in 2.5 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.4 acre of temporary
wetland impacts, <0.01 acre of permanent surface water impacts, and 0.13 acre of temporary surface
water impacts.
See Section 7.3 for wetland and surface water impact summary tables.
4.0 Summary of Mitigation
The proposed construction of B-4484 will permanently impact 2.5 acres of jurisdictional wetlands.
NCDOT has investigated potential on -site wetland mitigation opportunities, but no practical mitigation
sites were available. The existing roadway embankments that will be graded as part of the project were
evaluated for potential mitigation credit. However, due to the presence of overhead utility lines and the
relocated water line, access and clearing would be required in these areas. Therefore no mitigation credit
opportunity was practical.
Therefore, mitigation will be provided by North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality —
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). In accordance with the "Memorandum of Agreement Among the
North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District" (MOA), July 22, 2003, the DMS will be requested to provide off -site mitigation to satisfy the
federal CWA compensatory mitigation requirements for this project.
5.0 Project Schedule
B-4484 is scheduled to be let in April 2020. Mobilization will begin upon let followed by upland staging
and construction, and relocation of utilities in uplands or via directional bore. In -water construction will
start in October 2020. Due to the in -water work moratorium of February 15-September 30, proposed
completion of the new bridge is 2023 and demolition of existing bridges is scheduled for 2024.
2

TIP B-4484 CAMA Major and Individual Permit Application
September 30, 2019
6.0 NEPA Document Status
An Environmental Assessment / Finding of No Significant Impact was signed on October 2, 2017 and is
attached.
7.0 Resource Status
The project is located in the Neuse River Basin and lies within the USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020202.
The project crosses the Neuse River (NCDEQ Index No. 27-(85) which is classified as C;Sw;NSW.
7.l Wetland Delineations
Wetland delineations were performed using the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland
Delineation Manual and the USACE 2010 Regional Supplement for the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain
Region. Results of the wetland delineation were reported in the April 2014 Natural Resources Technical
Report (NRTR). While updated delineations were performed in 2017, inundation of the Neuse River
floodplain prevented verification of this delineation, which had reduced wetland sizes in several locations.
Therefore the impacts provided in this application are based on the 2014 delineation. The 2017
delineation data was used to extend the wetland boundary parallel and adjacent to the existing boat ramp
driveway only. This line was field inspected on September 12, 2019 and deemed accurate. The final
design avoids and minimizes wetland impacts to the maximum extent practical.
7.2 Characterization of Jurisdictional Sites
The project area bridges the Neuse River on Maple Cypress Road in Craven County. Seven wetlands
were mapped within the project footprint, including riverine swamp forest and bottomland hardwood
forest. All wetlands are subject only to Section 404 regulations. No CAMA coastal wetlands are present
on the site.
The Neuse River has not been designated an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW), High Quality Water
(HQW) or water supply watershed (WS-I or WS-II) within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area.
Per the above NSW designation, NCDOT's Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be
implemented for the project.

TIP B-4484
September 30, 2019
7.3 Impacts to Jurisdictional Resources
CAMA Major and Individual Permit Application
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands as well as surface waters for 13-4484 are summarized below in Tables I
and 2.
Table 1: Wetland Impacts
Permit
Wetland Biotic Communities
Permanent
Temporary
Drawing
(Z014 NRTR}
Wetland Type
Impacts
Impacts
Site Number
ac.
ac.
1
Riverine Swamp Forest /
404
0.74
-
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
2
Riverine Swamp Forest 1
404
1.76
0.4
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Total:
2.5
0.4
- Permanent Impacts represent permanent excavation, fill, and mechanized clearing
- Temporary Impacts represent temporary fill (work platform) and construction access (hand clearing)
- Totals represent the cumulative area of each site (not rounded per site) so differ slightly from individual site impacts
Table 2: Surface Water Impacts
Permit Drawing
Permanent
Temporary
Mitigation
Site Number
Waterbody
ac.
ac.
Required
1
Neuse River
<0.01
0.13
No
Total:
<0.01
0.13
- Totals represent the cumulative area of each site (not rounded per site) so differ slightly from individual site impacts
Table 3: Riparian Buffer Impacts
Permit Drawing
Waterbody
Zone 1
Zone 2
Mitigation
Site Number
s.f.
s.f.
Required
1
Neuse River
7,479
4,364
No
Total:
7,479
4,364
Permanent Impacts: Proposed permanent impacts include fill for roadway embanlanent in 1.09 acres of
404 jurisdictional wetlands at Sites 1 and 2. Permanent excavation impacts to 404 riparian wetlands
consist of 0.09 acre for relocation of an existing channel at impact site 2. There will be 1.2 acres of
mechanized clearing at both sites I and 2 in wetlands for construction access (0.58 ac) and maintenance
(0.62 ac). Proposed permanent impacts to surface waters are <0.01 acre (141 sq. ft), which includes the
proposed bridge piles (Sites 1 and 2).
Temporary Impacts: There will be 0.27 acre of temporary wetland impacts for dewatering and
construction access associated with the channel relocation within the Neuse River floodplain at Site 2,
which will also require 0.09 acre of excavation in wetlands to construct. A total of 0.11 acre of
excavation will also be required to allow the grading of the causeway areas downstream of the new bridge
139 to be tied into adjacent wetland elevation. There will be 0.13 acre of temporary surface water
impacts to the Neuse River due to the work platforms, bridge construction, and existing bridge
demolition. Of the 1.2 acres of mechanized clearing, 0.58 acre will be allowed to revegetate after project
completion.
Utility Relocation: Overhead power lines and aerial and subsurface water lines will require relocation to
allow construction of the proposed project. The overhead power line relocation will involve one pole
moved within an upland location near bridge 139 at the Wildlife Resources Commission boat ramp access
al

TIP B-4484 CAMA Major and Individual Permit Application
September 30, 2019
drive. The existing water line is both aerial and subsurface throughout the project. The new line will be
installed from upland roadside bore pits using directional drill methods.
Bridge Demolition
Both bridges will be demolished using top -down methods. Temporary impacts associated with the
removal of the existing piles at each bridge total 0.07 acre of surface water for bridge 138, and 0.03 acre
of wetland for bridge 139. The superstructure of each bridge will be cut and removed with measures in
place to prevent materials from entering jurisdictional waters. Once a segment of bridge is removed, the
existing piles will be pulled. Full removal of piles will be accomplished unless they break off during
removal. In that case, the piles will be cut at or below the river bed (bridge 138) or wetland elevation
(bridge 139) to avoid increased disturbance to completely remove the piles. NCDOT's Best Management
Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be implemented for the bridge demolition. A
Bridge Demolition Plan will be prepared by the selected contractor, submitted to NCDOT for approval,
and shared with permitting agencies.
Individual impact site descriptions are provided below:
7.3.1 Site 1 (Permit Drawings 4-5)
Site 1 is the replacement of bridge 138 over the Neuse River. The bridge approaches will be constructed
with retaining walls to reduce encroachment into adjacent wetlands. Fill slopes above the retaining wall
have been steepened as much as practical to 2:1 due to load limits on the retaining wall and
constructability and safety considerations adjacent to the sheet pile walls. Rock plating, while not
required, will be applied to the slopes for added protection and stability. Mechanized clearing will be
performed adjacent to the retaining walls for construction access and under the bridge for maintenance
access. A work platform will be used to construct the new bridge from both sides of the Neuse River,
with a span left open to maintain boat passage. Three minor impacts (fill and mechanized clearing) are
also proposed to allow for non -erosive discharge of stormwater from the bridge into the adjacent
wetlands, rather than direct discharge into the river.
7.3.2 Site 2 (Permit Drawings 6--9)
Site 2 is the construction of the new bridge over the Neuse River overflow and associated approaches.
The roadway fill approaching this bridge will be constructed with 1.5:1 side slopes protected with rock
plating. A retaining wall was evaluated for this area but deemed not practical due to design and
constructability considerations. Construction of the wall at this location would require tie -backs that
would result in moving the wall further out into the wetland in order to maintain traffic on the existing
road. This would have caused additional impacts to wetlands as compared to the proposed 1.5:1 slopes
without retaining walls. Mechanized clearing will be performed adjacent to the fill slope and for the
bridge and work platform to allow for construction access and pile installation. The existing road
embankment will be abandoned upon completion of the construction and graded down to drain via sheet
flow into the adjacent wetlands. A temporary construction area has been established around the channel
relocation to allow for sheet piling or other dewatering method to be implemented so the culvert extension
can be constructed in the dry.

TIP B-4484
September 30, 2019
8.0 Protected Species
CAMA Major and Individual Permit Application
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
list 16 federally protected species for Craven County as of the September 20, 2019 listing (Table 3).
Table 3. Federally Protected Species in Craven Conn
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Biological
Conclusion
Alli ator mississi iensis
American alligator
T S/A
Yes
N/A
Chelonia m das
Green sea turtle
T
No
No Effect
Dermochel s cortacea
Leatherback sea turtle
E
No
No Effect
M otis se tentrionalis
Northern long-eared bat
T
Yes
MALAA
Necturus lewisi
Neuse River waterdog
PT
Yes
N/A
Noturus fitriosus
Carolina madtom
PE
Yes
N/A
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded woodpecker
E
No
No Effect
Calidris canutus ru a
Red knot
T
No
No Effect
Aci eraser oxyrinchus
Atlantic Sturgeon
E
Yes
MANLAA
Trichechus manatus
West Indian manatee
E
Yes
MANLAA
L simachia as erulae olia
Rough -leaved loosestrife
E
No
No Effect
Aeschynomene vir inica
Sensitive joint -vetch
T
No
No Effect
E = Endangered, T = Threatened, T(S/A) = Threatened(Simdarity of Appearance), T = Threatened, P=Proposed; MANLAA= May Affect, Not
Likely to Adversely Affect, MALAA = May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect, N/A = Not Applicable.
NCDOT has determined that the project will not affect listed species, with the exception of Northern
long-eared bat, Atlantic sturgeon, and West Indian manatee. Biological conclusions from the 2014 NRTR
are provided in Table 3. A request has been submitted to the NMFS for concurrence that the project is
not likely to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.
American alligator
Biological Conclusion: Not Applicable
The American alligator remains on the protected species Iist due to its similarity in appearance to
the Endangered American crocodile and no biological conclusion is required.
Green sea turtle
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
This project will not affect the beaches or coastal waters of North Carolina, therefore no habitat
for green sea turtles exists within the study area. A review of NCNHP records, accessed
September 24, 2019, indicates no known green sea turtle occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study
area.
Leatherback sea turtle
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
This project will not affect the beaches or coastal waters of North Carolina, therefore no habitat
for leatherback sea turtles exists within the study area. A review of NCNHP records, updated
May 1, 2009, indicates no known leatherback sea turtle occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study
area.
6

TIP B-4484 CAMA Major and Individual Permit Application
September 30, 2019
Northern long-eared bat
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect
The USFWS has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the
Federal Highway Administration, the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDOT for the northern
long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the
entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities. The
programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to
Adversely Affect." The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure
compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects
with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Craven County.
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the red cockaded woodpecker does not exist in the study area. Forests in the
study area are comprised of a closed hardwood canopy and subcanopy. Where pine trees occur in
maintained or disturbed areas, they are not of sufficient age or density to provide suitable nesting
or foraging habitat. A review of NCNHP records, accessed September 25, 2019, indicates no
known RCW occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Red knot
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the red knot does not exist in the study area. The study area consists of
forested, riparian areas in a freshwater system. It lacks coastal foraging and roosting areas
preferred by the red knot. A review of NCNHP records, accessed September 25, 2019, indicates
no known red knot occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Atlantic Sturgeon
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
The Neuse River at this location is designated as critical habitat for the Atlantic sturgeon. A
review of NCNHP records, access September 25, 2019, indicates there are no known Atlantic
sturgeon occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
West Indian manatee
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Suitable habitat for the West Indian manatee does exist in the study area. A review of NCNHP
records, accessed September 25, 2019, revealed a 1994 manatee occurrence within the study area
(EO ID: 5451). NCDOT will utilize the "Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian
Manatee: precautionary Measures for Construction Activities in North Carolina's Waters" during
construction of the bridge.
Rough -leaved loosestrife
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for rough -leaved loosestrife does not exist in the study area. The canopy in the
wetland areas that are not regularly flooded is too dense to allow rough -leaved loosestrife to
grow. A review of NCNHP records, accessed September 25, 2019, indicates no known rough -
leaved loosestrife occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area.
7

TIP B-4484 CAMA Major and Individual Permit Application
September 30, 2019
Sensitive joint -vetch
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for sensitive joint -vetch does not exist in the study area. The wetland areas and
roadside ditches are not brackish or tidally influenced and therefore do not provide the necessary
conditions for this vetch. A review of NCNHP records, accessed September 25, 2019, indicates
no known sensitive joint -vetch occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Two other species, the Neuse River waterdog and the Carolina madtom are proposed for listing under the
Endangered Species Act. Surveys were performed at the site in Spring 2019 and none were found.
8.1 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register (72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and
removed (de -listed) from the Federal List of Tbreatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took
effect August 8, 2007. After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C.
668-668d) became the primary law protecting bald eagles.
The Neuse River is a water body of sufficient size to be considered potential feeding habitat. Also, there
are trees near the project large enough to support the nesting of bald eagles. While a bald eagle was seen
on the July 6, 2009 site visit, no nest trees were visible within 660 feet of the study area. A review of
NCNHP records, accessed September 26, 2019, indicates no known bald eagle occurrence within 1.0 mile
of the study area. The NCDOT will survey the project area again for bald eagle nests prior to
construction.
8.2 Protection Measures
Protection measures for several species have been recommended for B-4484. The Neuse River within the
project area is designated as critical habitat for the Atlantic sturgeon. In order to minimize potential
effects to these resources, NCDOT has committed to the following nondiscretionary measures for the
construction of this project:
In -Water Work Moratorium:
An in -water work moratorium will be implemented during the construction of B-4484. Construction
activity at or below the mean high water elevation within the Neuse River, including its floodplain when
inundated, will not be allowed from February 15 to September 30. Work in upland areas, on the bridge
superstructure, and within exclusion devices around individual bents or other work areas (installed prior
to the start of the moratorium) will be allowed to continue.
West Indian Manatee:
All conditions outlined in Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee: Precautionary
Measures for Construction Activities in North Carolina Waters (USFWS, 2003) will be adhered to.
9.0 Cultural Resources
No sites eligible for the National Register of Historic Places are within the project area. NC State
Historic Preservation Office concurrence is included in the attached EA.
8

TIP 13-4484 CAMA Major and Individual Permit Application
September 30, 2019
10.0 FEMA Compliance
The project has been coordinated with appropriate state and local officials and the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) to assure compliance with FEMA, state, and local floodway regulations.
11.0 Mitigation Options
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and
minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining,
unavoidable jurisdictional impacts.
11.1 Avoidance & Minimization
All jurisdictional features were delineated, field verified and surveyed within the corridor for B-4484 as
described above. Using these surveyed features, preliminary designs were adjusted to avoid and/or
minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas. NCDOT employs many strategies to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional areas in all of its designs. Many of these strategies have been incorporated into
BMP documents that have been reviewed and approved by the resource agencies and which will be
followed throughout construction. All wetland areas and environmental sensitive areas (ESA) not
affected by the project will be protected from unnecessary encroachment. Individual avoidance and
minimization measures include the following:
11.1.1 Design Measures
• Bridge 138 over the Neuse River has been lengthened to span riparian buffers and the river banks.
• Retaining walls have been utilized to reduce wetland impacts on the approaches to bridge 138.
• There will be no deck drains or direct discharge of stormwater off the bridges. All stormwater will be
discharged at the ends of the bridges at non -erosive velocity.
Riprap has been eliminated along the base of sheet pile walls.
Granite, not marl, will be specified for riprap protection areas.
* Fill slopes have been steepened to the maximum extent practical considering erosive velocities and
geotechnical considerations.
• 2:1 slopes arc used above retaining walls for load, constructability, and safety considerations
• 1.5:1 slopes are used where retaining walls were not practical (see Impact Site 2 discussion)
11.1.2 General Construction Measures
• Refer to Section 8.2 for protected species measures
• No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands.
• Temporary work platforms are proposed to access the new bridge alignments except one span to
allow boat passage along the river where a barge may be used.
• Sediment and erosion control measures shall adhere to the Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds
during construction of the project.
• Special Sediment Control Fence and Environmentally -Sensitive Area fencing will be used where
applicable.
• Bridge piles will be driven, and no jetting will be used.
• Pile driving will be accomplished using pile cushions and will be ramped up to minimize the effects
of in -water noise.
• No dredging is proposed.
• Turbidity curtains will be considered in areas of adequate shallow depth and lower velocity.
Turbidity will be monitored during in -water work to ensure compliance with state water quality
standards.
9

TIP B-4484
September 30, 2019
CAMA Major and Individual Permit Application
• Water line relocation will be accomplished using directional subsurface methods to avoid wetland and
surface water impacts.
• To ensure that all borrow and waste activities occur on high ground, except as authorized by permit,
the NCDOT shall require its contractors to identify all areas to be used to borrow material, or to
dispose of dredged, fill or waste material. Documentation of the location and characteristics of all
borrow and disposal sites associated with the project will be available on request.
11.1.3 Demolition Measures
• NCDOT will adhere to Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities.
• Demolition will be accomplished through top -down and/or barge access.
• Non -shattering methods will be implemented (no explosives) for bridge removal.
• No bridge deck or substructure components will be dropped in the water.
• Existing bridge piles will be removed completely, unless not practicable.
• If a pile snaps off at a depth below the stream bed or wetland elevation it will be left in place rather
than disturb additional area to remove.
• A demolition plan will be finalized by the selected contractor. The final demolition plan will also be
approved by NCDOT and provided to permitting agencies for review prior to implementation.
11.2 Compensation
The NCDOT has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent possible
as described above. Unavoidable jurisdictional wetland impacts will be offset by in -lieu fee payment to
the NCDMS.
12.0 Indirect and Cumulative Effects
The project is a replacement of existing infrastructure; therefore, additional development is not likely to
occur as a result of the project. The replacement will neither influence nearby land use or stimulate
growth as no new travel lanes are proposed.
13.0 Regulatory Approvals
NCDOT requests that the proposed work be authorized under:
- A Coastal Area Management Act Major Development Permit. The Certified Mail records for
each adjacent riparian landowner are provided with this permit application. The return receipts
will be forwarded once they have been received. Authorization to debit the $475 Permit
Application Fee from WBS 33723.1.2 is hereby given.
A Clean Water Act Section 404 Individual Permit and Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Permit.
- A Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification and Neuse Buffer Authorization. Authorization to
debit the $540 Application Fee from WBS 33723.1.2 is hereby given.
A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT website at:
h=://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/pdea/Perm&12s/.
10

TIP B-4484
September 30, 2019
CAMA Major and Individual Permit Application
If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at [phone] or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
40"
Casey itley, PE PLS
Division 2
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
Garcy Ward, NCDWR
Jay Johnson, NCDOT Division 2
Jennifer Farino, P.E., RS&H
Phil May, Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Attachments:
- ENG 4345 Form
DCM MP-1 Form: Application for Major Development Permit
DCM MP-2 Form: Excavation and Fill
- DCM MP-5 Form: Bridges and Culverts
USACE Landowner List
CAMA Landowner List & Notification Receipts
- EA/FONSI
- Vicinity Map
USGS Map
Stormwater Management Plan
- Permit Impact Drawings
Impact Summary Table
- Buffer Drawings
Roadway Drawings
Utility Drawings
11

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARRAY PERMIT
OMB APPROVAL N0. 0710-0003
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARY 2013
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW CO-R.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344: Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS f THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED 0YAPPLICAN7)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Casey Middle - Last - Whitley
First - Middle - Last -
Company - NCDOT Highway Division 2
Company -
E-mail [e-mail]
E-mail Address -
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS:
9. AGENTS ADDRESS:
Address- 1037 W.H. Smith Blvd
Address -
City - Greenville State - NC Zip - 27835 Country -USA
City - State - Zip - Country -
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. WAREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
[phone] [phone]
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. t hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12, PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
B-4484
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Neuse River
Address Maple Cypress Road
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: ^N 35.3132 Longitude: ^W-77.3006
City - Dover State- NC Zip- 28526
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID Municipality Dover
Section - Township - Range -
ENG FORM 4346, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From Washington, take US-17 Business to Vanceboro. Turn right onto NC-118 WBailey Ln/Dawson Ln and continue for approximately
threemiles. Turn left onto Nelson Road, and in six miles, tam left onto Maple Cypress Road. Project will be located in approximately 0.5
le crossing the Neuse River and ifs overflow channel.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
Bridge No. 138 is 22 feet wide accommodating a two-lane roadway and is 580.5 feet in length. Bridge No. 139 is 29 feet wide
accommodating a two-lane roadway and is 180 feet in length. Bridge No. 138 is proposed to be 600 feet in length, and Bridge No. 139 is
proposed to be 375 feet in length. Bridge 138 will be 34.5 feet wide (30-foot clear roadway width) accommodating two 11-foot lanes and
four -foot shoulders and will be constructed on the northwest side of the existing bridge. Bridge 139 will accommodate two 11-foot lanes
and one three-foot should, and one six-foot shoulder. Traffic will use the existing bridges during construction, with temporary pavement
widening and one -lane, two-way flagger operations.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The purpose of this project is to improve bridge safety and functionality. The need for the project is to replace the structurally deficient
bridges.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL. MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Proposed impacts are required as a result of a new alignment for the roadway and bridges, as well as shoulders and lengthening/replacing
existing hydraulic structures within the project corridor.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yams Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
See attached cover letter.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres See attached cover letter.
or
Linear Feet See attached cover letter.
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
See attached cover letter.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes NNo IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- See attached Property Owners List.
City - State - Zip -
b. Address -
City - State - Zip -
c. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State - Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL" IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant
a
w/l
GNATURE OF A LI ANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block i 1 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3

MW1
WFuUnoNfor
major merNoNro■t Permit
(last revised 12127106)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
Ncdot Division 2
B-4484 Replace Bridges No. 138 & 139 over the Neuse Rivi
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Casey
K
Whitley
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
NIA
NIA
NIA
if additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
1037 W H Smith Blvd
1587
Greenville
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
27835
USA
I
252 - 439 - 2811 ext.
NIA - -
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA -
Email
[e-mail]
2, AgentContractor Information
Business Name
NIA
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
NIA
NIA
NIA
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
NIA
NIA
NIA
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
NIA
NIA - -
ext.
NIA - - ext.
FAX No.
Contractor#
NIA
NIA
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State ZIP
NIA
NIA
NIA NIA -
Email
NIA
<Form continues on backs
k!4'll 1606 .- +.-e86-4RC$A$T wv►w.-.-4ik:teF�nsnat0anisni.n e

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple) Street Address
State Rd. #
Craven Maple Cypress Road
1470
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
N/A
Dover
NC
28526 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
N/A - - ext.
NIA, ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Neuse
Neuse River
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Neuse River
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ®No
work fails within.
NIA
4. Site Descilptfon
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
154 feet
504,700 sq.ft.
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(if many lot sizes, please affach additional page with a list)
20' ❑NHW or ®NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Primarily maintained roadside grasses and herbs, mixed pine and oak forest, and riverine swamp forest.
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Man-made features include existing bridges and roadway, as well as subsurface and aerial utilities. Uses include
transportation and recreational fishing and boating.
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Primarily undeveloped land, open water, and institutional (boat ramp and public river access).
h. How does local government zone the tract?
I. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
Craven County has not zoned this area.
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
[]Yes []No ®NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? []Yes ®No
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, by wham? NCDOT
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
aFolYn continues on next pages
1i2-{} A•-iR�dF� •i-f)Wtt-e4A OAST .. YiIY T.rF��:n+�.s airn.r,.�r�e,en�e�t.nar

Form DCM MPA (Page 3 of,4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (I) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(tt) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(itt) If yes to either (i) or (tt) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ❑No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
NIA
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
NIA
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
Existing roadway stormwater either sheet flows to existing roadside ditches or drains directly from the bridges into the Neuse
River or it's overflow.
S. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use?
❑Commercial ®Public(Govemment
❑ Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
See cover letter.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
See cover letter.
d. List all development activities you propose.
See cover letter.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both?
Both - construction of replacement
bridges on new location and existing
roadway.
f. What % the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project?
3.8 acres ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area
®Yes ONO ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
See cover letter and attached permit impact drawings.
t. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland?
®Yes ❑No DNA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed?
®Yes ❑No DNA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
.. 1-a8#-4KC0A51- ,. wrw+ .ar;t;�:tx#rt+nar aywA+er.l.nal

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
<Fonm continues on back>
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
B. Additionallnformatfon
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items Wow, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
pacKage to be complete Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major davalonment application Please consult the appkabon
instruction boNdet on how to properly prepare the required items below
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between wont completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name See attached landowner list Phone No
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permiltee, and issuing dates.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, If applicable.
1. Wetiand delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
T. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that t e information provided in this application lids truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date �0/1 a©�� Print Name OLsel04- 1el
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP-5 Iridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information

Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given In feet.
Access
Other
Channel
(NLW or
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
Breakwater
(excluding
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization
Length
170'
Width
201
Avg. Existing
Depth
NA
NA
1.5'
Final Project
Depth
NA
NA
1.5'
9. EXCAVATION El This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards. Soil
NIA
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WQ? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
JOWL 3.924 []None
(it) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Channel relocation within the floodplain at Site 2.
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ❑This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
To be determined by contractor at an approved location. Undetermined
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ONO ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
Contractor will be required to dispose of material in upland areas
only.
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
®Yes []No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, when:?
Undetermined
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
[]Yes ONO ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?

Fcwm 1)- ' I MP-2 -~4YSi;iCM and Fi'lf, Pane 2 al' 3)
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ® This secf►on not applicable
(►f development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length:
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other: Width:
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
L Source of fill material.
f. (1) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
[]Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of All material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will All material be brought to the site? ❑Yes []No ❑NA b. (1) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CWf_
If yes,
@) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of All
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Fill material will be contained behind a retaining wall, or protected Standard construction equipment including excavator, backhoe,
with rock plating. dump truck etc. No dredge or dragline proposed.
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
[]Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
d (1) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
Access to project will be via existing roadways
09/23/2019
Da — Casey Whitley
B-4484 Maple Cypress Road Bridge Replacement
Project Name
Applicant Name
..°J'2-tl l�• 1�;'l a '9-4458-ZRCOASI 1! w%Y�I.lF�Y.Q�it��MtI�IK$�fYMl7i�1�,

Form E -`I WRP=,2 watmi n mfiid P'isl, Page 3 of �k
Applicant Signat
232406-2"1::7-itbS�Itt;i;lA:�T::i�rW,_iyi_„_�_.�c�sa.�r.i�a���#Iwmr-nti'.Atl rm.;satL 12i2WO$

FOM ON MP-5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
!. BRIDGES ❑This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge:
[]Commercial ®PublirJGovemmerri ❑Private/Community
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
Prestressed concrete
e. (t) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 580.5' & 180'
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 22' & '
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 28.0' Q
Bridae 138: 10.2' @ Bridge 139
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) Both Bridge 138 and 139 will be removed in
their entirety.
g. Length of proposed bridge: 600' & 400'
t. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? []Yes ®No
If yes, explain: NIA
b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
Neuse River
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
4' @ Bridge 138; 2' @ Bridge 139
f. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert: NIA
(iii) Width of existing culvert: NIA
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL. NIA
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain) N/A
Width of proposed bridge: 30' & 31'
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducin or
increasing the existing navigable opening? or
❑No
If yes, explain: Proposed low chord is approximately 0.5'
higher than existing @ Bridge 138 amd 1.3' higher @
Bridge 139.
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 28.5' & 11.5" I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ®Yes []No
If yes, explain: USCG has issued an exemption for this
project.
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: 12-18'
waters? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: Bridge 139 will be constructed at 8.3' (11.5'
from NWS elevation).
2. CULVERTS ® This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
,- ;:I�, ReB # 99• RCL ti,S'i n n c rifna �ndi�+�r,+n�+t..nf.t.

Form OCM SIP=S (Mrtdges ease Calve , _ � ! of 4,
49 Form continues on back>
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
OYes ONO
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance undemeath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? []Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
[]Yes ❑No
If yes,
(R) Length of existing culvert(s):
(it!) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
g. Width of proposed culvert:
I. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
If yes, explain:
❑Yes ❑No
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ❑ This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No excavation within coastal wetlandstmarsh (CW), submerged
If yes, aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
A �)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
(ii) vg• length 9 of area to be excavated: feet affected.
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: ❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
(lv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: ❑WL ®None
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
NIA.
,. _-...,rz•FkA7' www,nc�oa6#Ini�nau+sr�oect.�a[ ._.i

Form DCM NIP-5 (60-0_ _ e:. -- _ A" -, c
c. (1) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 87.5'
(lii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 75'
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: C
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 7.090
cu. vd.
If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Undetermined
(!I) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: Undetermined
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? []Yes ®No (If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ®Yes (:]No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑WL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. Undetermined
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? []Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. Undetermined
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes [--]No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 12 so ft
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 12 sa ft
(iv) Purpose of fill: Pilings for the two proposed bridges.
g. (1) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 25' & 1 V
(ill) Avg. width of area to be filled: 95' & 61'
(iv) Purpose of fill: Roadway construction
4. GENERAL
(1) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlandalmarsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(AIL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL 103.708 ❑None
(if) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Retaining wall construction, rip rap outlets, and
proposed roadway for bridges 138 and 139.
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
utility lines? ®Yes []No detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain: Overhead electric and aeriallsubsurafce If yes, explain:
water. (see cover letter).
c. nvi��rdr #Olaiu

If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
< Form continues on backs
c Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
[]Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MPR-2. NCDOT standard practices (i.e. sift fence & check dams)
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Standard construction equipment including cranes, pile
drivers, backhoes, excavators, barges, boats, & dump
trucks
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert re uire anj�II
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, complete form MP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
9/23/2019
Date
B-4484 Maple Cypress Road Bndge Replacement
Project Name
Casey Whitley
Applicant Na e
Applicant Sign
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
5Y-EOt1-284 .. 5-489- RCOA= .. revivad; 1OUGM

SMTE„ .
o 2.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
September 26, 2019
Dear Landowner:
JAMEs H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is planning to replace bridges 138 and 139 on SR 1470
(Maple Cypress Road) over the Neuse River. The proposed project will replace the aging existing
structures over the Neuse River and its overflow channel. A full permit application detailing the bridge
replacement will be provided to you in the Fall of 2019. NCDOT is currently proposing to relocate
utilities (overhead power lines and underground water) out of the future construction area.
This bridge relocation crosses an Area of Environmental Concern, as defined by the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management (DCM), and must be approved by the DCM under provisions of the
Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA). One of the prerequisites to this approval is that adjacent riparian
landowners be given an opportunity to comment on the proposal.
The attached form is submitted to ensure that you have an opportunity to comment on the proposal. If you
have no objections to the proposal, please return the form with your response within 30 days to this
office. If you do have objections to the project, please forward your comments to:
Mr. Stephen Lane
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Casey Whitley, P.E.
NCDOT Division 2
cc: Stephen Lane, NCDCM
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 1037 W.H. SMITH BLVD
HIGHWAY DIVISION 2 GREENVILLE, NC 27835
1037 W.H. SMITH BLVD
Website: www.ncdot.¢ov
GREENVILLE, NC 27835

ADJACENT RIPARIAN LANDOWNER STATEMENT
(Craven County: Replace Bridge Nos. 138 and 139 over the Neuse River)
NCDOT TIP B-4484
General Statutes and Division of Coastal Management Major Permit approval procedures require
that riparian landowners with property adjoining a proposed development in an Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC) be given thirty (30) days in which to comment on the proposed
development. This form allows the adjacent riparian landowner to express either: (1) that he/she
objects to the project; or, (2) that he/she does not object and desires to waive his/her right to the 30-
day period so that the processing of the application can progress more rapidly. Of course, the
adjacent riparian landowner need not sign this form at all if he/she so chooses.
I, , am an adjacent riparian property owner and am aware of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation's plans for relocating utilities associated with the
future replacement of bridges 138 and 139 over the Neuse River in Craven County, North Carolina.
I am further aware that this work will occur in one or more Areas of Environmental Concern and
therefore will require authorization from the Division of Coastal Management in accordance with the
Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA).
I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and hereby waive that right of
objection as provided in General Statute 113-229.
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and my comments are attached.
Signature of Adjacent Riparian Landowner Date
Phone Number with Area Code

TIP B-4484 Landowner Notification List September 2019
Parcel
Owner Name
Mailing Address
1
Frances T. Kilpatrick
9201 NC Highway 55 West, Dover, NC 28526
2
Sandra N. White
428 White Columns Way, Wilmington, NC 28411
3
William E. Daniels
202 7th Street, New Bern, NC 28560
4
Coastal Forest Resources Company
PO Box 709, Buckhannon, WV 26201
5
Vonnie Heath
138 Castle Ct, Washington, NC 27889
6
Ray Heath
165 Maple Cypress Road, Grifton, NC 28530
7
Tonya H Byrd & Margaret Hargett & Dallas
Delabruere & Austin A Hargett
116 Pinenut Lane, Bogart, GA 30622
8
Tonya H Byrd & Margaret Hargett & Dallas
Delabruere & Austin A Hargett
116 Pinenut Lane, Bogart, GA 30622
Add.
I Heath Family Farms, LLC
1650 Biddle Road, Dover, NC 28526

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE No.138 AND 139
CARRYING SR 1470 (MAPLE CYPREss ROAD)
OVER THE NEUSE RIVER
CRAVEN COUNTY9 NORTH CAROLINA
WBS No. 33723.1.1
STIP PROJECT No. B-4484
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT /
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS — DIVISION 2
Submitted pursuant to the North Carolina State Environmental Policy Act
APPROVED:
10/2/2017
1p
Docu�Syigned by: �}
2Pi7�0�4tH'Iil P/L
5433AB4391.E8E9415...
Date R. Preston Hunter, PE, Division Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation — Division 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
10/2/2017
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGES No.138 AND 139
CARRYING SR 1470 (MAPLE CYPRESS ROAD
OVER THE NEUSE RIVER
CRAVEN COUNTY9 NORTH CAROLINA
WBS No. 33723.1.1
STIP PROJECT No. B-4484
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT /
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
October 2017
Prepared by RS&H Architects -Engineers -Planners, Inc.
For the North Carolina Department of Transportation
Docu Sig'�nee�ddy by,
0 6614D00576564D8...
Date Meredith H. Van Duyn, PE, Project Manager
RS&H Architects -Engineers -Planners, Inc.
10/2/2017
Date
Docu Signed by:
Nt , �l
1EF3D8610D6847E...
Hon F. Yeung, PE, Project Manager
North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 2
1.
PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT...............................................................................................2
11.
EXISTING CONDITIONS...................................................................................................................3
I11.
ALTERNATIVES................................................................................................................................4
A.
Description of the Build Alternative.................................................................................................
4
B.
Alternatives Eliminated from Further Study.....................................................................................
4
IV.
ESTIMATED COSTS..........................................................................................................................
5
V.
OTHER HIGHWAY PROJECTS IN THE AREA...............................................................................
6
VI.
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT.............................................................................................................
6
A.
Methodology.....................................................................................................................................
6
B.
Physiography and Soils.....................................................................................................................
6
C.
Water Resources...............................................................................................................................
6
D.
Biotic Resources...............................................................................................................................
7
1. Terrestrial Communities............................................................................................................... 7
2. Terrestrial Wildlife........................................................................................................................ 8
3. Aquatic Communities...................................................................................................................
9
4. Invasive Species............................................................................................................................9
E.
Jurisdictional Issues.......................................................................................................................... 9
1. Clean Water Act Waters of the United States...............................................................................
9
2. Clean Water Act Permits.............................................................................................................10
3. Construction Moratoria...............................................................................................................11
4. North Carolina River Basin Buffer Rules...................................................................................11
5. Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters...............................................................11
6. Wetland and Stream Mitigation..................................................................................................11
F.
Federally Protected Species............................................................................................................11
VII.
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT...............................................................................................................16
A.
Section 106 Compliance.................................................................................................................16
B.
Community Impacts........................................................................................................................16
C.
Noise and Air Quality.....................................................................................................................17
VIII.
GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.....................................................................................17
IX.
COORDINATION AND AGENCY COMMENTS...........................................................................18
X.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT................................................................................................................18
XI.
BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT................................................................18

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGES No. 138 AND 139
CARRYING SR 1470 (MAPLE CYPREss ROAD)
OVER THE NEUSE RIVER
CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WBS No. 33723.1.1
STIP PROJECT No. B-4484
NCDOT Division 2
NCDOT will adhere to Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee:
Precautionary Measures for Construction Activities in North Carolina Waters for this project.
The Neuse River is identified by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)
as anadromous fish habitat and an inland primary nursery area. As a result, an in -water
construction moratorium will be in effect from February 15 to September 30.
The project study area contains suitable habitat for bald eagles, which are protected under the
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Bald eagles were observed during site visits in 2009 and
2017. NCDOT will conduct surveys for bald eagle nests prior to construction.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGES No. 138 AND 139
CARRYING SR 1470 (MAPLE CYPREss ROAD)
OVER THE NEUSE RIVER
CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WBS No. 33723.1.1
STIP PROJECT No. B-4484
INTRODUCTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridges No. 138
and 139 carrying SR 1470 (Maple Cypress Road) over the Neuse River and overflow in Craven
County. Currently, Bridge No. 138 is 22 feet wide accommodating a two-lane roadway and is
580.5 feet in length. Bridge No. 139 is 29 feet wide accommodating a two-lane roadway and is
180 feet in length. Bridge No. 138 is proposed to be 600 feet in length, and Bridge No. 139 is
proposed to be 375 feet in length. Both bridges will be 34.5 feet wide (30-foot clear roadway
width) accommodating two 11-foot lanes and four -foot shoulders and will be constructed on the
west side of the existing bridges. Traffic will use the existing bridges during construction, with
temporary pavement widening and one -lane, two-way flagger operations.
This project is included in the NCDOT State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) as
Project No. B-4484. Right-of-way acquisition is scheduled in the summer of 2018, and
construction is scheduled to begin in the summer of 2019. The project is subject to compliance
with the North Carolina (State) Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). No substantial environmental
impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. This action is classified as State
Environmental Assessment / Finding of No Significant Impact.
I. PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
The purpose of this project is to improve bridge safety and functionality. The need for the project
is to replace the structurally deficient bridges. The project location is shown in Figures 1, 2, and
3. Photos of the project area are included in Figure 4.
NCDOT Structures Management Unit records (Bridge Inspection Report - 240138, July 14, 2017;
Bridge Inspection Report - 240139, December 07, 2016) indicate Bridge No. 138 and 139 have
sufficiency ratings of 26.2 and 52.93, respectively, out of a possible 100 for a new structure.
Bridge No. 138 is considered structurally deficient due to superstructure and substructure ratings
of four or less and has two years of estimated remaining life left. Bridge No. 139 has an estimated
twelve years of estimated remaining life. NCDOT has completed recent repairs to both structures.
Bridge No. 138 was built in 1952 and has a steel girder floor beam system with a reinforced
concrete deck, as well as timber pile substructure. The posted weight limit on the bridge at the time
of the Bridge Inspection Report (July 2017) was 34 tons for single vehicles and 37 tons for truck -
tractor semi -trailers. The posted weight limit during a site visit in August 2017 was 22 tons for
single vehicles and 26 tons for truck -tractor semi -trailers. A change to the posted weight limit
listed on the Bridge Inspection Report (July 2017) was requested to match the 22 tons for single
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
vehicles and 26 tons for truck -tractor semi -trailers currently posted at the bridge and seen on the
August 2017 site visit.
Bridge No. 139 was built in 1972 and has a steel substructure (floor and pile), a steel girder floor
beam system with a prestressed concrete deck. No weight limits are posted.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The proposed project is located in northeastern Craven County, approximately midway between
Kinston and Vanceboro. The land surrounding the bridge is predominantly rural and includes
marshes, wooded areas, large tracts of agricultural crops, and low -density single family homes.
SR 1470 (Maple Cypress Road) is a two-lane roadway with a statutory speed limit of 55 miles per
hour (mph). It is classified as a major collector road according to NCDOT Functional
Classification maps. The estimated (2012) annual average daily traffic (AADT) along SR 1470
(Maple Cypress Road) is 1,800 vehicles per day (vpd). There are no signalized intersections within
the project study area. Craven County school buses make two total trips per day across the bridge.
Known utilities in the project study area include a water line, power, and telecommunications
cable.
There were four crashes reported to have occurred in the immediate project vicinity during the ten-
year period of October 1, 1998 through September 30, 2008. There were no fatal collisions
reported. Crash data is summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
Total crash rates for the segment in Table 1 is lower than the North Carolina statewide average
(2012-2014) for a two-lane rural secondary route undivided (average 649.92 crashes per 100
million vehicle miles traveled (100MVMT)). The critical crash rate based on the North Carolina
statewide average for a similar facility and a 95% confidence interval is 248.47.
Two of the collisions on the roadway segment of Maple Cypress Road on both sides of Bridge
No. 138 during the ten year analysis period were fixed -object collisions, and two were rear -end
collisions.
Table 1. Crash Summary: Totals and Severity
Roadway Segment
Total
Crash Rate*
Crash Severity**
Non-
Type
Type
Type
EPDO
Crashes
Total
Fatal
Fatal
A
B
C
PDO
Severity
Injury
Injury
Injury
Injury
Index***
Maple Cypress Road 500
feet on both sides of Bridge
4
208.57
52.14
0
0
0
1
3
2.85
No. 138
* Rate = Crashes per 100 Million Vehicles Miles; 2003-2013 (10 years)
** Crash severity is rated Fatal, Class A to C (highest to lowest), or PDO (property damage only)
*** EPDO severity index of 8.4 is the threshold for locations that have more serious crashes. (Chapter 14 of
NCDOT TEAAS Training Material)
B-4484 State EA/FONSI

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Table 2. Roadway Segment Crash Type Summar : 10/01/1998 to 09/30/2008 (10 years)
Roadway Segment
Fixed Object
Rear End
Total
Maple Cypress Road — 500 feet on both
2
2
4
sides of Bridge No. 138
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Description of the Build Alternative
The proposed Build Alternative involves replacement of the structure along the existing roadway
alignment, to its immediate west side. Improvements to the approach roadways will be required
for a distance of approximately 510 feet to the south(west) of Bridge No. 138 and 870 feet to the
north(east) of Bridge No. 139 to tie in the proposed pavement improvements to the existing
roadway. This alternate will be designed using Sub Regional Tier guidelines with a design speed
of 60 miles per hour. The driveway to the public boat ramp will be realigned slightly to avoid a
sight distance issue. Traffic will not be detoured offsite during the construction period. The boat
ramp access will remain open during construction.
Typical sections and the preliminary roadway design for Alternative 1 are included in Figures 5
and 6.
B. Alternatives Eliminated from Further Study
No Build
The No Build Alternative serves as a basis of comparison between not replacing the bridge and
the associated impacts with the Build alternative. The No Build Alternative would result in no new
construction costs; no impacts to streams, wetlands, or other natural or cultural resources; and no
residential or business relocations. However, this alternative would result in increased maintenance
cost for a period of a few years prior to complete bridge closure. The eventual closure would result
in travel delays. The No Build Alternative would not meet the purpose of and need for the proposed
project to improve bridge safety. This alternative was dropped from consideration.
Offsite Detour
The Craven County Emergency Services Director has expressed concern about the potential
impacts of an off -site detour on emergency response times. Craven County is divided by the Neuse
River and closing the bridge would impact response times for EMS, fire, and law enforcement
services. The nearest detour on either side of the bridge is 32 miles (approximately 40 minutes
driving time). Traffic will use the existing bridges during construction, with temporary pavement
widening and one -lane operations. An off -site detour will not be used.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Alternative 2
Build Alternative 2 proposed replacement of Bridges No. 138 and 139 on the east side,
immediately adjacent to the existing structures and roadway. Alternative 2 was eliminated in 2017
due to its higher potential wetland impacts, with no other measurable benefits above Alternative 1.
A comparison of Alternatives 1 and 2 was completed in February 2017 for the field meeting with
permitting/regulatory agency representatives and is included in Table 3 and in the meeting minutes
in the Appendix.
Table 3. Build Alternative Comparison
Category
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Project Length
3,700 ft.
4,000 ft.
Overhead Utility Relocations
(power and telecommunications)
10 poles
10 poles
Riparian Wetland Impacts
3.68 ac.
4.63 ac.
Surface Water Impacts
0.01 ac.
0.02 ac.
Stream Impacts
2401f.
230 If.
Neuse River Buffer Impacts
4,303 sq. ft.
3,926 sq. ft.
Water line relocation
(underground and above -ground)
approx. 3,900 If.
approx. 1,600 if.
Construction Cost Estimate (as of Feb. 2017)
$10.5 Million
$11.1 Million
A combination of Alternative 1 and 2 was briefly discussed but eliminated due to sight distance
concerns. This design would not have met NCDOT or AASHTO design standards.
IV. ESTIMATED COSTS
The estimated costs for the Build Alternative, based on 2017 prices are as follows:
Table 4. Estimated Project Costs (Alternative 1)
Item
Build Alternative
Right -of -Way 1
$66,000
Utility Relocation z
$1,786,000
Construction 3
$11,548,000
TOTAL
$13,400,000
'From NCDOT R/W Cost Estimate completed on 8/2/17.
2 Includes power pole relocation cost ($87,600) from NCDOT Utility Estimate completed on 8/8/17,
and water line construction/relocation utility cost ($1,536,000) from NCDOT Preliminary Estimate
completed on 7/12/17, as well as a 10% contingency.
3 Includes roadway, drainage, and structure costs ($8,718,000) from NCDOT Preliminary Estimate
completed on 7/12/17, as well as miscellaneous, mobilization, engineering, and construction
contingencies.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
V. OTHER HIGHWAY PROJECTS IN THE AREA
The New Bern Area Metropolitan Planning Organization's (NBAMPO) 2016-2025 Metropolitan
Transportation Improvement Plan, adopted in July 23, 2015, Amendment No. 1, adopted
September 24, 2015, and Amendment No. 2, adopted January 28, 2016, do not include any projects
in the vicinity of B-4484. There are no nearby projects listed in the 2018-2027 STIR
VI. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
A. Methodology
All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Natural Environment Section standard
operating procedures and July 2012 Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) template.
Fieldwork was conducted on July 6, 2009, February 26, 2014, March 11, 2014, March 26, 2014,
and September 11, 2017. The 2014 B-4484 NRTR and 2017 wetland survey updates are
summarized here and incorporated by reference.
B. Physiography and Soils
The study area lies in the southern outer coastal plain physiographic region of North Carolina.
Topography in the project vicinity is generally flat. Elevations in the study area range from 4 to 8
feet above sea level. Land use in the project vicinity consists primarily of forestland and
agriculture.
The Craven County Soil Survey identifies four soil types within the study area. The characteristics
of the soils in this area are provided in Table 5.
Table 5. Soils in the Study Area
Soil Series
Mapping Unit
Drainage Class
H dric Status
Conetoe loamy sand
CnB
Well Drained
Non-h dric
Masontown mucky fine
Poorly
sandy loam & Muckalee
MM
Drained/Very
Hydric
sandy loam
Poorly Drained
Somewhat
Tarboro sand
TaB
Excessively
Non-hydric
Drained
Seabrook loamy sand
Se
Moderately Well
Hydric *
Drained
*Soils which are predominantly non-hydric, but which contain hydric inclusions
C. Water Resources
Water resources in the study area are part of the Neuse River Basin (U.S. Geological Survey
[USGS] Hydrologic Unit 03020204). One stream, the Neuse River, was identified in the study
area (Table 6). The physical characteristics of this stream are provided in Table 7. An unnamed
tributary of the Neuse River was identified just outside of the study area at the northwest corner of
the project.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Table 6. Water Resources in the Studv Area
DWQ Stream
Best Usage
Stream Name
Map ID
Index Number
Classification
Neuse River
Neuse River
27- 85
C;Sw;NSW
Table 7. Phvsical Characteristics of Water Resources in the Studv Area
Bank
Bankfull
Water
Channel
Map ID
Height
Width
Depth
Substrate
Velocity
Clarity
(ft)
ft
(in)
Neuse River
15
320
48-120
Sand
Medium
Turbid
The Neuse River is not designated an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW), High Quality Water
(HQW) or water supply watershed (WS-I or WS-II) within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area.
The Neuse River was not on the North Carolina 2014 Final 303(d) list of impaired waters due to
sedimentation or turbidity, nor does it drain into any Section 303(d) waters within 1.0 mile of the
study area, that are listed for sedimentation or turbidity.
This portion of the Neuse River is designated as an inland primary nursery by the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC). There are no benthic samples taken within one mile
of Bridge No. 138. Craven County is not designated by the NCWRC as containing Mountain
Trout Waters, and no streams within the project study area are designated as Trout Waters.
D. Biotic Resources
This section describes the existing vegetation and associated wildlife that occur within the project
study area. Potential impacts affecting these resources are also discussed.
1. Terrestrial Communities
Five terrestrial communities were identified in the study area: maintained/disturbed, riverine
swamp forest, bottomland hardwood forest, mixed pine hardwoods, and clearcut/cutover areas.
The NRTR includes detailed mapping showing the location and extent of these terrestrial
communities in the study area. A brief description of each community type follows.
Maintained/Disturbed
Maintained/disturbed areas in the study area are in places where the vegetation is periodically
mowed, such as roadside shoulders, agricultural fields, and residences. The vegetation in this
community is comprised of low growing grasses and herbs, including fescue, clover, wild onion,
broomsedge, kudzu, and henbit.
Riverine Swamp Forest
The riverine swamp forest community occurs in each quadrant of the study area near the river and
its overflow areas. The vegetation in this community includes bald cypress, red maple, swamp
cottonwood, black willow, overcup oak, green ash, American elm, lizard's tail, trumpet creeper,
and various sedges.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Bottomland hardwood forest community exists in several locations in the study area. Species in
this community include willow oak, laurel oak, blackgum, water hickory, box elder, sycamore,
ironwood, sweetgum, Chinese privet, and deciduous holly in the overstory and understory.
Greenbrier, wild grape, trumpet creeper, poison ivy, Japanese honeysuckle, and various sedges
area also in the understory.
Mixed Pine Hardwood Forest
The extreme northeast portion of the study area includes small areas of mixed pine and hardwood
forest, on slopes rising from the Neuse River floodplain. These areas are dominated by loblolly
pine.
Clearcut/Cutover
The 2009 NRTR identified a recent clearcut northwest of the Neuse River bridge. This area has
grown into a dense stand of saplings. Most of this area was inundated during the February -March
2014 field visits. South of the roadway, an area mapped by the 2009 NRTR as riverine swamp
forest, bottomland hardwood, and pine plantation has now also recently been cut.
Terrestrial Community Impacts
Terrestrial communities in the study area may be impacted by project construction as a result of
grading and paving of portions of the study area. Community data of each type within the study
area and potential impacts from Alternative 1 are shown in Table 8.
Table 8. Coverage of Terrestrial Communities in the Study Area
Community
Coverage (ac.)
Impacts (ac.
Maintained/Disturbed
7.36
3.28
Riverine Swamp Forest
14.63
1.61
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
3.98
0.33
Clearcut/Cutover
5.89
0.68
Mixed Pine Hardwood
1.64
0.03
Total
33.50
5.93
2. Terrestrial Wildlife
Terrestrial communities in the study area are comprised of both natural and disturbed habitats that
may support a diversity of wildlife species (those species actually observed are indicated with an
asterisk *). Mammal species that commonly exploit forested habitats and stream corridors found
within the study area include species such as marsh rabbit*, raccoon, Virginia opossum*, gray
squirrel, and white-tailed deer*. Birds that commonly use forest and forest edge habitats include
the American goldfinch*, American robin*, Carolina wren*, Acadian flycatcher*, great crested
flycatcher*, blue -gray gnatcatcher*, prairie warbler*, killdeer*, northern cardinal*, northern
parula warbler*, northern flicker*, red -bellied woodpecker* yellow throated vireo*, indigo
bunting* barred owl*, and red -shouldered hawk. Birds that may use the open habitat or water
bodies within the study area include belted kingfisher, great blue heron, yellow crowned night
heron*, bald eagle*, and turkey vulture*. Reptile and amphibian species that may use terrestrial
communities located in the study area include the king snake*, eastern box turtle*, Cope's gray
treefrog*, eastern fence lizard, and five -lined skink.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
3. Aquatic Communities
Aquatic communities in the study area consist of a perennial coastal plain river and its overflow
tributaries. The Neuse River can support these fish species: hickory shad, alewife, gizzard shad,
silvery minnow, golden shiner, comely shiner, satinfin shiner, dusky shiner, whitefin shiner,
channel catfish, pirate perch, warmouth, redbreast sunfish, bluegill, pumpkinseed, largemouth
bass, white crappie, black crappie, scalyhead darter, and southern flounder. The Neuse River can
also support beaver, stinkpot, southern dusky salamander, crayfish, and various benthic
macroinvertebrates.
Aquatic organisms are acutely sensitive to changes in their environment, and environmental
impacts from construction activities may result in long term or irreversible effects. Impacts usually
associated with in -stream activities include alterations to the substrate and impacts to the adjacent
streamside vegetation. Such disturbances within the substrate lead to increased siltation, which can
clog the gills and/or feeding mechanisms of benthic organisms, fish, and amphibian species.
Siltation may cover benthic macroinvertebrates with excessive amounts of sediment that inhibit
their ability to obtain oxygen.
The removal of streamside vegetation and placement of fill material during construction enhances
erosion and possible sedimentation. Quick revegetation of these areas helps to reduce the impacts
by supporting the underlying soils. Erosion and sedimentation may carry soils, toxic compounds,
trash, and other materials into the aquatic communities at the construction site. As a result, bars
may form downstream of the site. Increased light from the removal of streamside vegetation may
increase water temperatures. Warmer water contains less oxygen, thus reducing aquatic life that
depends on high oxygen concentrations.
4. Invasive Species
Three species from the NCDOT Invasive Exotic Plant List for North Carolina were found to occur
in the study area. The species identified were Chinese privet (Threat level 1), kudzu (Threat level
1), and Japanese honeysuckle (Threat level 2). NCDOT will manage invasive plant species as
appropriate.
E. Jurisdictional Issues
1. Clean Water Act Waters of the United States
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act requires regulation of discharges into Waters of the United
States. The USACE has the responsibility for implementation, permitting, and enforcement of the
provisions of the Act. The USACE regulatory program is defined in 33 CFR 320-330.
One jurisdictional stream, the Neuse River, was identified in the study area (Table 10). The
location of this stream is shown on Figure 1. The physical characteristics and water quality
designations of the Neuse River are detailed in Section VI.C. This stream has been designated as
a warm water stream for the purposes of stream mitigation.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 9

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Table 10. Jurisdictional Characteristics of Water Resources in the Studv Area
Compensatory
River Basin
Buffer
Map ID
Length (ft)
Classification
Mitigation
Buffers
Impacts
Required
(sq ft
Neuse River
200
Perennial
Yes
Subject
3,185*
* Includes 50 foot offset from the top of bank delineation
Wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.
Much of the project study area was inundated during the February -March 2014 site visits, which
complicated the process of delineating the jurisdictional boundaries and mapping with the excess
water. These wetland boundaries were reviewed in August and September 2017 when normal
hydrologic conditions existed on the site. The updated delineation shows a reduced wetland area.
Eight jurisdictional wetlands were identified within the study area (Figure 5). Wetland
classification data are presented in Table 11. All wetlands in the study area are within the Neuse
River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020204).
Table 11. Jurisdictional Characteristics of Wetlands in the Studv Area
Map
ID
Hydrologic
Classification
Area (ac)
Potential
Impacts (ac)l
WA
Riparian
1.24
0
WB
Riparian
0.952
0
WC
Riparian
1.22
0
WD
Riparian
11.193
1.59
WE
Riparian
0.06
0
WF
Riparian
0.03
0.02
WG
Riparian
0.14
0
WAA
Riparian
0.20
0
Total
15.03
1.61
' Potential impacts include a 25-foot offset from preliminary construction limits.
2 WB area approximated per aerial imagery and wetland delineation.
3 WD area only includes wetlands within study area.
2. Clean Water Act Permits
The proposed project has been designated as a State EA/FONSI for the purposes of SEPA
documentation. The USACE stated in the February 2017 field meeting with other agency
representatives that an Individual Permit will be required.
In addition to the Section 404 permit, other required authorizations include the corresponding
Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) from the NCDWR. A NCDWR Section 401 Water
Quality General certification may be required prior to the issuance of a Section 404 Permit. Other
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 10

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
required 401 certifications may include a GC 3688 for temporary construction access and
dewatering.
3. Construction Moratoria
The Neuse River has been identified by the NCWRC as anadromous fish habitat and an inland
primary nursery area. As a result, a construction moratorium has been requested from February 15
to September 30.
4. North Carolina River Basin Buffer Rules
Streamside riparian zones within the study area are protected under provisions of the Neuse River
Buffer Rules as administered by NCDWR. Table 10 indicates which streams in the study area are
subject to the buffer rule protection. The unnamed tributary at the northwest corner of the project
lies outside of the study area, but its buffers may lie inside it. Due to floodplain inundation, it was
not possible to locate the top of bank during the February -March site visits. Potential impacts to
protected stream buffers will be determined once a final alignment and design have been
determined.
5. Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters
The Neuse River has been designated by the USACE as a Navigable Water under Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act.
6. Wetland and Stream Mitigation
Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts
The NCDOT has attempted to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands to the greatest
extent practicable in choosing Alternative 1 as the preferred alternative. Due to buffer rules, Design
Standards for Sensitive Watersheds will be followed. Further minimization of impacts will be
determined during final design.
Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts
The NCDOT will investigate potential on -site stream and wetland mitigation opportunities. If on -
site mitigation is not feasible, mitigation will be provided by North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality — Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). In accordance with the
"Memorandum of Agreement Among the North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District" (MOA), July 22, 2003, the DMS will be
requested to provide off -site mitigation to satisfy the federal Clean Water Act compensatory
mitigation requirements for this project.
F. Federally Protected Species
Federal law under the provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as
amended, requires that any action likely to adversely affect a federally protected species be subject
to review by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS). Other species may warrant protection under separate state laws.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 11

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed
Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under Section 7 and Section 9 of
the ESA.
As of May 23, 2017 (verified August 30, 2017), the USFWS and NMFS list eight federally
protected species for Craven County (Table 12). A brief description of each species' habitat
requirements follows, along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results.
Table 12. Federally Protected Species Listed for Craven Countv
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
M otis se tentrionalis
Northern long-eared bat
T
Yes
MA/LAA
Calidris canutus ru a
Rufa red knot
T
No
No Effect
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded woodpecker
E
No
No Effect
Trichechus manatus
West Indian manatee
E
Yes
MA/NLAA
Dermochel s coriacea
Leatherback sea turtle
E
No
No Effect
Aesch nomene vir inica*
Sensitive joint -vetch
T
No
No Effect
Lysimachia
as erulae olia
Rough -leaved loosestrife
E
No
No Effect
Aci enser ox rinchus
Atlantic sturgeon
E
Yes
MA/NLAA
E = Endangered; T = Threatened; MA/NLTAA = May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect; MA/LAA = May
Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect
* Historic record (the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago)
Northern long-eared bat
The USFWS has developed a programmatic biological opinion in conjunction with the Federal
Highway Administration, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and NCDOT for the northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The programmatic biological opinion
covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities.
The programmatic determination for the northern long-eared bat for the NCDOT program is "May
Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect." The programmatic biological opinion provides incidental
take coverage for northern long-eared bat and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-
8, which includes Craven County.
Rufa red knot
The rufa red knot is a medium sized shorebird about 9 to 11 inches in length. Red knots are a
specialized molluscivore, eating hard -shelled mollusks, sometimes supplemented with easily
accessed softer invertebrate prey. The red knot migrates annually between its breeding ground in
the Canadian arctic and several wintering regions, including the Southeast United States from
Florida to North Carolina. During both the northbound (spring) and southbound (fall) migrations,
red knots use key staging and stopover areas to rest and feed. This species typically makes long
flights between stops. The birds migrate in large flocks northward through the contiguous United
States mainly March — early June, southward July — August. Arrival in breeding areas occurs in
late May or early June; most have departed breeding areas by mid -August. Red knots are restricted
to the ocean coasts during winter and occur primarily along the coast during migration. Habitats
used by red knots in migration and wintering areas are similar in character, generally coastal
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 12

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
marine and estuarine habitats with large areas of exposed intertidal sediments. In North America,
red knots are commonly found along sandy, gravel, or cobble beaches, tidal mudflats, salt marshes,
shallow coastal impoundments, lagoons, and peat banks.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the red knot does not exist in the study area. The study area consist of forested,
riparian areas in a freshwater system. It lacks coastal foraging and roosting areas preferred by the
red knot. A review of NCNHP records, updated August 18, 2017, indicates no known red knot
occurrences within one mile of the study area.
Red -cockaded woodpecker
The red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) typically occupies open, mature stands of southern pines,
particularly longleaf pine, for foraging and nesting/roosting habitat. The RCW excavates cavities
for nesting and roosting in living pine trees, aged 60 years or older, and which are contiguous with
pine stands of at least 30 years of age to provide foraging habitat. The foraging range of the RCW
is normally no more than 0.5 mile.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the red -cockaded woodpecker does not exist in the study area. Forests in the
study area are comprised of a closed hardwood canopy and sub -canopy. Where pine trees occur
in maintained or disturbed areas, they are not of sufficient age or density to provide suitable nesting
or foraging habitat. A review of NCNHP records, updated August 18, 2017, indicates no known
RCW occurrences within one mile of the study area.
West Indian Manatee
USFWS optimal survey window: year round
Habitat Description: West Indian manatees have been observed in all the N.C. coastal counties.
West Indian manatees are found in canals, sluggish rivers, estuarine habitats, salt water bays, and
as far off shore as 3.7 miles. They utilize freshwater and marine habitats at shallow depths of 5 to
20 feet. In the winter, between October and April, manatees concentrate in areas with warm water.
During other times of the year, habitats appropriate for the West Indian manatee are those with
sufficient water depth, an adequate food supply, and in proximity to freshwater. West Indian
manatees require a source of freshwater to drink. West Indian manatees are primarily herbivores,
feeding on any aquatic vegetation present, but they may occasionally feed on fish.
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Suitable habitat for West Indian manatee does exist in the study area. A review of NCNHP records,
updated May 1, 2009, revealed a 1990 manatee occurrence approximately 1100 feet downstream
of the study area. NCDOT will utilize the Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian
Manatee: Precautionary Measures for Construction Activities in North Carolina Waters during
construction of the bridge.
Leatherback sea turtle
Leatherbacks are distributed worldwide in tropical waters of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian
Oceans. They are generally open -ocean species, and may be common off the North Carolina coast
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
during certain times of the year. However, in northern waters, leatherbacks are reported to enter
into bays, estuaries, and other inland bodies of water. Major nesting areas occur mainly in tropical
regions. In the United States, primary nesting areas are in Florida; however, nests are known from
Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina as well. Nesting occurs from April to August.
Leatherbacks need sandy beaches backed with vegetation in the proximity of deep water and
generally with rough seas. Beaches with a relatively steep slope are usually preferred.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
This project will not affect the beaches or coastal waters of North Carolina. Therefore, no habitat
for leatherback sea turtles exists within the study area. A review of NCNHP records, updated
August 18, 2017, indicates no known leatherback sea turtle occurrences within one mile of the
study area.
Sensitive joint -vetch
Sensitive joint -vetch grows in the mildly brackish intertidal zone where plants are flooded twice
daily. This annual legume prefers the marsh edge at an elevation near the upper limit of tidal
fluctuation but can also be found in swamps and on river banks. Sensitive joint -vetch normally
occurs in areas with high plant diversity where annual species predominate and can grow in sand,
mud, gravel, or peat substrates. Bare to sparsely vegetated substrates appear to be a microhabitat
feature of critical importance to this plant. Such microhabitats may include accreting point bars
that have not yet been colonized by perennial species, areas scoured out by ice, low swales within
marshes, muskrat "eat outs" where this rodent removes all of the vegetation within a small portion
of the marsh, storm damaged areas, and the saturated organic sediments of some interior marshes
that have local nutrient deficiencies. In North Carolina, stable populations have been found in the
estuarine meander zone of tidal rivers where sediments transported from upriver settle out, and
extensive marshes are formed. Additional North Carolina occurrences are also found in moist to
wet roadside ditches and moist fields, but these are not considered stable populations.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for sensitive joint -vetch does not exist in the study area. The wetland areas and
roadside ditches are not brackish or tidally influenced, and therefore do not provide the necessary
conditions for this vetch. A review of NCNHP records, updated August 18, 2017, indicates no
known sensitive joint -vetch occurrence within one mile of the study area.
Rough -leaved loosestrife
Rough -leaved loosestrife, endemic to the Coastal Plain and Sandhills of North and South Carolina,
generally occurs in the ecotones or edges between longleaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins
in dense shrub and vine growth on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils
overlaying sand (spodosolic soils). Occurrences are found in such disturbed habitats as roadside
depressions, maintained power and utility line rights -of -way, firebreaks, and trails. The species
prefers full sunlight, is shade intolerant, and requires areas of disturbance (e.g., clearing, mowing,
and periodic burning) where overstory is minimal. It can, however, persist vegetatively for many
years in overgrown, fire -suppressed areas. Blaney, Gilead, Johnston, Kalmia, Leon, Mandarin,
Murville, Torhunta, and Vaucluse some of the soil series that occurrences have been found on.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 14

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for rough -leaved loosestrife does not exist in the study area. The canopy in the
wetland areas that are not regularly flooded is too dense to allow rough -leaved loosestrife to grow.
A review of NCNHP records, updated August 18, 2017, indicates no known rough -leaved
loosestrife occurrence within one mile of the study area.
Atlantic sturgeon
Habitat Description: Atlantic sturgeon spawn in freshwater in the spring and migrate to the
estuarine waters where they spend most of their lives. Spawning occurs in moderately flowing
waters in the deep parts of large rivers between the salt front and fall line of large rivers. Eggs are
deposited on the bottom, usually attaching to hard substrates. They occur in most major river
systems along the eastern seaboard of the United States. The species prefers the near shore marine,
estuarine and riverine habitat of large river systems. Subadults and adults live in coastal waters
and estuaries when not spawning, generally in nearshore areas dominated by gravel and sand
substrates. Long distance migrations away from spawning rivers are common. Large freshwater
rivers that are unobstructed by dams or pollutants are imperative to successful reproduction.
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Correspondence with Fritz Rohde (NMFS) indicated that habitat for the Atlantic sturgeon is
present in the study area. A review of NCNHP records, updated August 18, 2017, indicates there
are no known Atlantic sturgeon occurrences within one mile of the study area.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
The bald eagle was removed from the USFWS's list of Threatened and Endangered Species
(effective August 8, 2007), but it is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.
Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests in proximity to large bodies of open
water for foraging. Large, dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within one mile
of open water.
Suitable habitat for bald eagle exists in the project study area, as it is within one mile of suitable
habitat (Meuse River). Bald eagles were observed during field work in 2009 and 2017. NCDOT
will conduct surveys for nests prior to construction and coordinate with the USFWS if needed.
Endangered Species Act Candidate Species
As of May 23, 2017 (verified August 30, 2017), the USFWS lists no Candidate species for Craven
County.
Coastal Zone Issues
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Areas of Environmental Concern
CAMA Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC) were identified in the project study area. The
Neuse River is a Public Trust Water. A CAMA Major Development Permit from the North
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 15

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) will be required for all impacts to designated
AECs within the project study area.
Essential Fish Habitat
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has identified the Neuse River as an Essential Fish
Habitat (EFH).
The proposed project will require that the existing structure over the Neuse River be removed and
a new structure built in its place or in proximity. The new bridge structure will likely require
footings to be placed within the Neuse River. However, the existing bridge footings will be
removed. Therefore, the proposed project will likely result in a negligible net effect on available
Essential Fish Habitat.
VII. HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
A. Section 106 Compliance
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires
Federal agencies to take into account the effect of their undertakings (federally -funded, licensed,
or permitted) on properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places and to afford the Advisory Council a reasonable opportunity to comment on such
undertakings.
The State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) reviewed the subject project and is not aware of any
historic resources which would be affected by the project. HPO has no comment on the project as
proposed. (November 18, 2008 response is included in the Appendix).
B. Community Impacts
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right-of-way acquisition will be
limited. One abandoned house is anticipated to be impacted by the proposed realignment of the
driveway to the boat ramp. No relocatees are expected with implementation of the proposed
alternative.
No adverse effects on public facilities or services is expected. While two bus trips are made daily
through the study area, the Craven County Schools Transportation Information Management
Systems (TIMS) Coordinator expects bridge closure during construction to have an overall low
impact on school transportation services. The project is not expected to adversely affect social,
economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
Access to the public boat ramp, operated by NCWRC, will remain open throughout construction.
Craven County Emergency Services Director has expressed concern about the potential impacts
of an off -site detour on emergency response times. Craven County is divided by the Neuse River
and closing the bridge would impact response times for EMS, fire, and law enforcement services.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 16

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Traffic will use the existing bridges during construction, with temporary pavement widening and
one -lane operations. An off -site detour will not be used.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No change in
land use is expected to result from the construction of the project. The Farmland Protection Policy
Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives to consider the potential impact to prime
farmland of all land acquisition and construction projects. FPPA eligible soils are present within
all quadrants of the Direct Bridge Impact Area (DBIA). A preliminary screening of farmland
conversion impacts in the project was completed (MRCS Form AD-1006, Part VI only) and a total
score of 51 out of 160 points was calculated. Due to this score, this land is not covered by the act.
The project will not have a disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental
effect on any minority or low-income population.
Three access driveways are located within the DBIA providing access to single family homes and
a cell tower. Access to properties will be maintained during construction.
C. Noise and Air Quality
The project is located in Craven County, which has been determined to comply with the National
Air Quality Standards. The proposed project is located in an attainment area; therefore, 40 CFR
Parts 51 and 93 are not applicable. This project is not anticipated to create any adverse effects on
the air quality of this attainment area. This project will not result in any meaningful changes in
traffic volume, vehicle mix, location of the existing facility, or any other factor that would cause
an increase in emissions impacts relative to the no -build alternative. As such, FHWA has
determined that this project will generate minimal air quality impacts for Clean Air Act criteria
pollutants and has not been linked with any special MSAT concerns. Consequently this effort is
exempt from analysis for MSAT's.
Noise levels may increase during project construction; however, these impacts are not expected to
be substantial considering the relatively short-term nature of construction noise and the limitation
of construction to daytime hours. The transmission loss characteristics of nearby natural elements
and man-made structures are believed to be sufficient to moderate the effects of intrusive
construction noise.
This project has been determined to be a Type III Noise Project and therefore, no traffic noise
analysis is required to meet the requirements of 23 CFR 772.
VIII. GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
This action is classified as a State Environmental Assessment / Finding of No Significant Impact.
The proposed project is not expected to have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or
natural environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is anticipated. The project is not expected to
adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area. There are no anticipated
impacts from this project to publicly owned public facilities, wildlife or waterfowl refuges, or sites
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 17

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
of national, state, or local importance. It is recommended to coordinate with Craven County
Emergency Services to minimize emergency response impacts during construction.
The project's impact on noise and air will not be substantial. Noise levels could increase during
construction but will be temporary.
Anticipated impacts to utilities include water and telephone cable lines. Coordination with utility
companies for relocation plans will be complete before construction begins.
IX. COORDINATION AND AGENCY COMMENTS
A scoping letter was mailed to the following agencies on November 4, 2008 asking for input
regarding anticipated permits or other known potential issues. Responses were received from
agencies marked in bold with an asterisk (*). A field meeting with agency representatives was
held in February 2017 to discuss alternatives. Letters and additional agency comments are
included in the Appendix.
Federal Highway Administration
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
US Environmental Protection Agency
US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
*NC Department of Cultural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
• Division of Marine Fisheries
• Division of Water Resources (NCDWR)
NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)
*Craven County
• *Office of Planning and Community Development
• *Board of Commissioners
• *Craven County Schools — Transportation Department
X. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
A mailing list of approximately 126 citizens and property owners; federal, state, and local
environmental regulatory/resource agencies; local elected officials and governmental agencies;
and interested persons was developed and continuously updated throughout the project
development process. To date, NCDOT has mailed one newsletter and received no comments.
XI. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon a study of the proposed project documented in this assessment and upon comments
received from federal, state, and local agencies, and the public, it is the finding of the NCDOT that
this project would not have a significant adverse impact upon the human or natural environment.
The proposed project is consistent with local plans and would not disrupt communities. Per this
evaluation, a Finding of No Significant Impact is applicable for this project. Therefore, no further
environmental analysis will be required.
B-4484 State EA/FONSI 18

ID:C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
FIGURES

DocuSign
Legend
Project Study
Area
IDState Owned
Land
Water Body
Property Limits
s�i1►�1���rul �1tir.,rr
• C � � : �Figure:

6E3-B79657127B72
7
Proposed Bridge No. 139
Proposed0NCWRC~
Boat Ramp Driveway
41
Proposed Bridge No. 138 j a
i 1
41
d`a i
�• �'��a,� .r,r '• .: tlE..:)-,�•e Ili:.7- 11 :! "' , is -� ��
0 500 1,000

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
�e
� r
f c
118 ' I
UD
r 4,
NCWRC Boat Ramp
Bridge No. 138
Bridge No00
. g
IA
p �a = - -�-
p a c -' F- - ---
Fon BarnweR
SR 1473 (Carr Rd)
sm
0 3,000 ` 6,000MONEENEZZZZM
Feet Copyright:© 2013, National GeographicfSociety, i-cubed
lt2 Replacement of Bridge No. 138 and 139 TIP No: B-4484 Figure: 3
$ RSW
on SR 1470 (Maple Cypress Road) Topographic
., =Craven County over the Neuse River Division: 2 Map

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Bridge 139 approach facing NW direction
toward SR 1450 (Nelson Rd)
East side of Bridge
Neuse River West of Bridge 139
Bridge 139 approach facing SE
direction toward Biddle Rd
West side of Bridge
Neuse River East of Bridge 139
D"M and No. 139 on SR 1470
MOff-40"FIFIN 1 -1 ­ r - Al (Maple Cypress Road) over the Project
WCravenCountv— Vr" m Neuse River rea otos

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Bridge 138 approach facing NE direction
toward SR 1450 (Nelson Rd)
West side of Bridge 138
from Boat Launch site
Neuse River West of Bridge 138
Bridge 138 approach facing SW
direction toward Biddle Rd
East side of Bridge 138
Neuse River East of Boat Launch
WE%! Replacement of Bridge Pto. 138 Figure: 4b
(M and No. 139 on SR 1470 Project
aple Cypress Road) over the
M Craven Co'untv 11 1 M Neuse River 9 0 Area Photos

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Maple Cypress Boat Launch
northwest of Bridge 138
Parking Lot for Launch
Maple Cypress Boat Launch
northwest of Bridge 138
vr:rr`.
Parking Lot for Launch
Abandoned House northeast of Bridge 138 Abandoned Shack northeast of Bridge 138
(south of abandoned house)
���-• Replacement of Bridge No. 138
and No. 139 on SR 1470 TIP No: B-4484 Figure: 4c
3 H (Maple Cypress Road) over the Project
m WCraven County Neuse River Division: 2 Area Photos

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Legend
Riparian Wetland Impacts
Temporary Riparian Wetland Impacts
Permanent Stream Water Impacts
Wetland Boundary
Roadway Footprint (Slope Stakes)
Total Riparian Wetland Impacts = 1.75 acres
Total Stream Water Impacts = 209 LF
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
150' 0' 150' 300'
75' SCALE

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Roadway Typical Section
*6' full depth paved shoulder proposed in areas with guardrail only
**Rock plating proposed for all slopes steeper than 3:1
Al -
q n,
Bridge Typical Section
***4' shoulder required for sight distance
Note: The cross slope of 0.02 to the west is for Bridge No. 139.
Bridge No. 138 would have a cross slope 0.04 in an easterly direction.
Replacement of Bridge No�� Figure: 6
• No. 139 on 1 Typical
(Maple Cypress Road)
Co:

ID:C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
-V 5fA7@ 4
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Adauritm-ator
I ficl-mel F. Easley, Governor office of Archiv s end Ilisteq
Lishcdi C. Evans, Secretary Divisinn of i-iistoricl Resoueccs
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brooi-, Dneuor
November 18, 2008
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tracy Walter
Project Development and Environmental AnalStsis Branch
NCDOT Bridge Unit
FROM: Peter Sandbeck1711
K/125�-
SUBJECT: Bridge 138 on SR 1470 over the Neuse River, B-4484, Craven County, ER 08-2754
Thank you for }Tour Ietter of November 4, 2008, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review -of the proposed undertalctng and are aware of no historic resources which would
be affected by the project. 'Ilierefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisor), Council on Historic Preseuvation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Rence Gledhill Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT
Matt Wilkerson, NCDO`I'
Location; 109 Uast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address; 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephune/Fax: [phone]-6599

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Board of Commissioners
Jason R. Jones, Chairman
Theron McCabe, Vice Chairman
Lee Kyle Allen
Perry L. Morris
Johnnie Sampson, Jr.
M. Renee Sisk
Steve Tyson
Administrative Staff
Harold Blizzard, County Manager
Ray H. Moser, Assistant Manager
Gwendolyn M. Bryan, Clerk to the Board
Rick Hemphill, Finance Officer
Joan Harrell, Human Resources Director
Craben Countp
Tracy Walter
NC Department of Transportation
1551 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1551
Dear Tracy Walter:
February 11, 2009
Administration Building
406 Craven Street
New Bern, NC 28560
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
Commissioners 252-636-6601
Manager 252-636-6600
Finance 252-636-6603
Human Resources 252-636-6602
RE: Tip Project N. B-4484: Replacement
of Bridge No. 13 8 on SR 1470 over
the Neuse River in Craven County
As a Commissioner of Craven County, I received notice that Bridge #138 on State Road
1470 was due to be replaced. Having traveled over, as well as under this bridge for
several years, I will agree the bridge is in need of replacement and has served western
Craven County well over its life span.
At the time B-138 was constructed this section of the Neuse River was used by larger
boats, mainly in the operation of moving timber down the river to saw mill operations in
New Bern. Under the river's current condition of year-round shallow water, along with
other forms of moving time, a replacement bridge with current water clearance in today's
market place cannot be justified. The bridges on either side, even though miles away, do
not allow for such clearance.
The second, and main issue of my concern, is the hardship it will cause on the residents
of Craven County if B-138 is removed prior to the opening of B-4484. As you are aware,
western Craven County is divided by the Neuse River with only two points to cross
which are 14.8 miles apart by water. There are roads on each side of the river that run
parallel to it, but with only two crossings the removal of B-138 will cause a tremendous
hardship on everyone from school students to emergency services.
Living in a rural area, most emergency services operations are run by volunteers and
often mutual aid is requested and must travel B-138 in order to save a life. With removal
of B-138 mutual aid time will be increased by a minimum of twenty minutes if the next
unit is staffed and ready to roll.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CO8E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
�t`A�1Ett (�Ottttl�
1 IT erefore, I strongly recommend building B-4484 parallel to B-138 and removing B-138
only after B-4484 is open to traffic. There is land available for this project to be built in
this manner and would be a well accepted D.O.T. project in western Craven County.
Again, I support the replacement of B-138, but feel it very important that traffic not be
disrupted during the construction phase.
If I may be of further help to you, please do not hesitate to contact me at 252-514-1733.
Sincerely,
Commissioner Perry Morris
Craven County
PLMlaj n

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Board of Commissioners
Jason R. Jones, Chairman
Theron McCabe, Vice Chairman
Lee Kyle Allen
Perry L. Morris
Johnnie Sampson, Jr.
M. Renee Sisk
Steve Tyson
Administrative Staff
Harold Blizzard, County Manager
Ray H. Moser, Assistant Manager
Gwendolyn M. Bryan, Clerk to the Board
Rick Hemphill, Finance Officer
Joan Harrell, Human Resources Director
Tracy Walter
NC Dept. Of Transportation
1551 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1551
Dear Tracey Walter:
graben �ountp
January 26, 2009
Administration Building
406 Craven Street
New Bern, NC 28560
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
Commissioners 252-636-6601
Manager 252-636-6600
Finance 252-636-6603
Human Resources 252-636-6602
SUBJECT: Tip Project No. B-4484: Replacement of Bridge No. 138 on SR 1470 over the
Neuse River in Craven County
Craven County government was notified by you on November 4, 2008 that the Project
Development and Environmental Analysis Branch was starting development,
environment and engineering studies for the replacement of the above referenced bridge.
As a county commissioner representing the western end of Craven County that adjoins
the Neuse River I am concerned about the closing of bridge no. 138 for an extended
period of time. Western Craven County is an agricultural area where many farmers tend
land on both sides of the Neuse River. Also, there are local businesses that depend on
trade from both sides of the Neuse River. Maple Cypress Road is traveled by many
citizens in western Craven County as a primary route to their work in Grifton, Vanceboro,
Greenville, Ayden and other surrounding towns. To prohibit travel across the Neuse
River on bridge no. 138 would cause a financial struggle on the above mentioned.
Alternative routes would add at least 10 — 15 miles of travel to access farm land,
businesses, and work for western Craven County citizens.
It is my recommendation that the NC Department of Transportation build the new bridge
project no. B-4484 beside the existing bridge no. 138 and after completion of the new
bridge project no, B-4484 the existing bridge no. 138 then be demolished,
I ask that the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch consider this
recommendation before proceeding with this project. I do support the construction of a
new bridge across the Neuse River but I feel there are appropriate ways to proceed with
this without hurting the local economy.

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Graben Countp
t,
1712
If you desire additional information, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jason R. Jones, Chairman
Craven County Board of Commissioners

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
SCHOOL BUS GARAGE
1816 Hazel Avenue
New Bern, NC 28560
[phone]
FAX [phone]
NC Department Of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Davis Moore,
This letter is in response to - TIP project Number: B-4484.
Subject: Bridge No. 138 on SR 1470, over Neuse River, Craven County
As of December 2003, there is one school bus routed over this bridge each day.
However, the bridge replacement would not create an unworkable school bus routing
situation. The single requirement for safe school bus routing is a safe turn around near
the last student passenger's residence before the section of road closed near the bridge.
When construction begins, if NC DOT could assist with development of a suitable turn
around, then any bus routing inconvenience would be minimal. Our local NC DOT has
always been very helpful in assisting with road maintenance at existing school bus turn
around areas; therefore, I do not foresee any significant problem,
Sincerely,
Becton Broughton

r I J!J e-f I I "- ,
DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
r
1� .6
�• F
Office of Planning
and
Community Development
Danakd R. 6aumgardrler, Director
R. Chad Stra n, Assistant director
Shalton P Toler, Chief StAdinz Codes Insoectur
C:d Eatmon
Divi lion Construction Engineer
NCDOT Division Two
105 Pactolus H . M 33)
€ O Box 1587
Greenville, NC 2783
Human Services Annek
2628 Meuse Boulevard
New Berri, North Carolina 28562
' Planning & CEO [phone]
712 �` Fax (25 ) 636-519D
1pspecdQns [phone]
Fax [phone]
Febmary 10, 2009
Re; ProjectNao B-4494 of Bridge No. 139 in Crmien County
Dear Mr, Eater on.
This letter is in regards to the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 138 uver the
Meuse liver I t Maple Cypress in Craven County. Craven County would like xc express a
ftw concerns about the replacement of this bridge as welt as rccor~ mend that an on5ile
detour be provided during the coris"iu lion process. The concerns are as 1 allows;
I ) Fire and Reseue Response =Tort Barnre11 Fire and Rescue, Vanceboro Fire
and Rescue, and New Bern — Craven fescue all rely on each other for mutual
aid its times of need. I#' Bridge No. 138 would be impassable witbout an on-
siie detour, the response time would increase substantially during emergenr'y
situations. (Map Attached)
2) 'Vest ICralren Middle and ]High Schaal Traffic Flow — if an on -site detour
were to not be provided during the construction process. the traffic patterns of
West Craven Middle and 14igh School would be diverted through the Spring
Garden Community to Hwy 43 to River Rd. This urnuld be an inconvenience
and add submantial transportation cost and require sludents to he picked tip
earlier. Also, this would cause a m -or delay in traffic at the Spring Garden
stop light and River Rd stop light. (Map Attached)
3) Large Farm Equipment — This area of the count} has a high number of
agriculture farmers that store their equipment on one side of the river, but
tends land on the other side of tine river. it would he �r ry benefleial to have
are on -site detour to allow for the transfer of large fann equipment.
% e have determined that an off site detoLrr for this location wemld result in more
than 20 minute delay for the traveling public: and the delay would be for a period of 24

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
months or more to replace a bridge of this rnngniWde. With this being determined, we
have referred to the NCDOT guidelines for evaluation of detours for bridge mplacement
projects. According to the "Acceptable Delay" table with 20 A mutes detour dclay For the
traveling public for a period of 24 months. it would be an unacceptable delay to not have
an onsite detour during this period. Therefore, we respectfully reques[ an ors -site detour
bridge remain in place during the construct ion of the new bridge.
sincerely,
Dan 8aumg rdr er. �Ctur
Planning and ir;spectiorls
Craven county
cc, COMIQIissinner Jason Jones
Commissioner Perry Morris
Harold Blizzard, Craven Counm Manager
Gene Coati, Secretary of Transportation
Neil Lassiter, NCDDT Division Two Hngineer
Johnny Metcalfe, NCDOT Resident Engineer (Cmven)
Reed Smith. NCDOT District Two Engineer

winmin f;',,press Bridge
DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Relative t
EMS Districts
Maplc C}press Bndgc
VAN CEBORO RESUE
FORT BAR NWELL RESCUE j` LL • , -
'OO
CITY RESC E
�~ NEW BERN CRAVEN RESCUE
Iv
Legend
r
EM Distri t
BRIDGETON RESCUE
CARTERET COUNTY HOSPITALAWR,tk1
,F--1 CHERRY POINT
COVE rITY RESCUE
FORT BARNWELL RESCUE
0 HAVELOCK RESCUE
I
HOSPITAL AMBULANCE SERVICE
JONES COUNT'
u NEW BERN CRAVEN RESCUE
..-,,.., TOWN HIP 7 RESCUE
UNKNOWN
�! VANCESDRO RESUE
Reads
I
I
CRIME` ON RESCUE
5
P7
�1
HAVEL CX RESCUE '

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72 Fp Bridge
Relative t
School Districts & Schools
Sc 1 'ct(s)''
r �ment,
ancib - e �e
map]r cypress H ', r
- .- 4 �-.y_-'- 'V`�{ftebaa'�fafrn l.lfe Elerrtuntary
Jr r`
t J� { s av- SrHWEllemen
School I istr� ick e'
James � . m►ith L' L6h�f]% 1f4Yoh MiddIF.
West Craven N iddle.
We t liven ITgh . '
Legend
� sGhaal6
sohool attendance districts
James VV. Smillb Elementary, vvezt Craven Middle, West Craven High
— - Vancebafo-Farm Life Elementary. West Craven Middle, Wesl Craven
Roads
1` 7
�1

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
DEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVEPNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
February 28, 2009
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. William T. Goodwin, PE.,
Project Development -Bridge Unit
FROM: D. R. Henderson, P.E. �
State Hydraulics Engineer
EuGENE A. CONTi, JR.
SECMARY
SUBJECT: Preliminary Hydraulic Information for the Proposed
Replacement of Bridge No. 138 on SR 1470 over Neuse
River, Craven Co., WBS No. 33723.1.1, TIP No. B-4484
Hydraulic Structure Recommendations:
The recommended replacement structure for Bridge No. 138 is a 595 ft. bridge. The
bridge should be built at approximately the same elevation as that of the existing bridge
with a minimum 0.3% gradient to facilitate deck drainage. The off -site detour length is
31.9 mi. long, therefore an on -site detour is recommended, utilizing the existing bridge.
The new bridge should be constructed downstream, (east) of the existing bridge to
minimize utility conflicts.
Existing structure: .
The existing structure is a 582 ft. fourteen span bridge, with concrete deck, caps, and
vertical' abutine' nts. Built ur 1952,' it consists of steel- girders, r' o' and wooden piles, and'
concrete rails. The bridge deck is situated approximately 36.5 feet above the creek bed,
and the normal depth of water is approximately 5 ft_ The river channel base width is
approximately 310 ft. The banks are approximately 6 ft. high, with a channel top width
of approximately 350 ft.
Floodplain Management:
Craven County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by
the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)_ The effective FEMA floodplain
mapping indicates that the subject crossing is located within a flood hazard zone
designated as Zone AE, where 100-year base flood elevations have been established in a
"Detailed Study". It is anticipated that a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
and a subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) will be required for the project_
Environmental Considerations:
This crossing of Neuse River is located within the Neuse River Basin and has a drainage
area of approximately 3900 sq. mi. The current land use in the watershed is'
predominantly rural and wooded with low density agricultural and residential

DocuSign Envelope ID: CO8E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
development. The project is not located within a water supply watershed protected area.
This stream location carries a best usage classification of SA, HQW, & NSW by NC
Division of Water Quality. NCDOT's Best Management Practices far Protection of
Surface Waters (March 1997) will be followed throughout the design and construction of
the project. It is anticipated that there will be a State Stormwater Permit (SSP) required
for this project.
DRH/RCH/wsh
Cc: Mr. Art McMillan, P.E. (Highway Design Branch)
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E. (Roadway Design Unit)
Mr. Philip Halms Ill, P.E. (PDEA., Natural Environment Unit)
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E. (Structure Design Unit)
Mr. Njorge W. Wainaina, P.E. (Geotechnical Engineering Unit)
Mr. Keith Johnston, P.E, P.L.S. (Photogrammetry Unit)
Mr. Charles W. Brown, RE, P.L.S. (Location and Surveys Unit)
Mr. Eddie Bunn, P.E. (Area Bridge Construction Engineer)
Mr. C.E.(Neil) Lassiter Jr. P.E. (Division Engineer)

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
RECEIVED
° " '' ()f Highways
•,; �. FEB 1 ' 20D9
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Pmjet,1 t)evelopment and
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ViTOn Uta1 Anaiysjs Srat1c�
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
FEBRUARY 9, 2009
Greg Thorpe
PDEA Director
Charlie Brown, PE, PLS
State Location and Surveys Engineer
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
Scoping Comments for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 138 on
SR 1470 over Neuse River in Craven County. TIP No. B-4484
I have reviewed this project and offer the following observations:
UTILITIES
Direct buried telephone cable is evident outside of the project limits north of the bridge but, no evidence of telephone
cable could be found south of the Neuse River.
A water pipe line is along the west shoulder of SR 1470 throughout the project limits. The owner of the water line is
unknown.
There is no evidence of existing power, cable TV, sanitary sewer or gas utilities at or near the project. 1 would rate the
utility conflict low.
GENERAL COMMENTS
Bridge No. 138 is located along SR 1470, Maple Cypress Road over the Neuse River. The existing structure is 14
spans at 582 ft. in length and 22 ft wide. Built in 1952, it consists of a timber superstructure with reinforced concrete
caps, steel girders and reinforced concrete deck. It is currently posted at 24 tons for single axial and legal gross weight
for semi axial vehicles. This bridge is one of only a few bridges that provide a way to cross the Neuse River west of
New Bern and east of Kinston. Therefore, an on -site detour is recommended.
The existing right of way appears to be 60 ft. (30 ft. each side). The horizontal alignment of SR 1470 is tangent with a
slight grade on both approaches. There are no site distance concerns. The posted speed limit for SR 1470 is 55
mph.
North Carolina Geodetic Survey vertical control monument "CR-8 1971" will be destroyed as a result of this project
and a USGS monitoring station is attached to the upstream side of the bridge,
If I can be of further assistance, please advise.
KEH/keh
Cc: Art McMillan, PE — Highway Design Engineer
Jay Bennett, PE — Roadway Design Engineer
Dave Henderson, PE — Hydraulics Design Engineer
Njorge Wainaina, PE — Geotechnical Design Engineer
Robert Memory— State Utilities Agent
Roger Worthington, PE — Utilities Section Engineer
File
MAIL: 1588 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, 27699-1588
[phone] FAX: [phone] Courier: 51-31-00

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
Meeting Notes RS&H
Memorandum
Meeting Date: February 13, 2017
Subject: B-4484 Maple Cypress Bridge Replacements
Agency Field Meeting
Location: Project Site, Maple Cypress Road, Grifton, NC — Bridge No. 138 and 139
Attendees: NCDOT AGENCIES RS&H
Maria Rogerson, Division 2 Tom Steffens, USACE Edith Peters
Bill Kincannon, Division 2 Garcy Ward, NCDWR Drew Morrow
Jay Johnson, Division 2 Travis Wilson, NCWRC Samantha Schober
Gary Jordan, USFWS
Stephan Lane, NCDCM
The purpose of this meeting was to meet with the environmental agency stakeholders for the B-4484
Maple Cypress Bridge Replacements Project to provide an update on the project status, information on
alternatives being considered, and to determine a selected alternative.
➢ General Notes
o Construction moratorium will apply to Neuse River, overflow, and culvert. Consider
constructability meeting in the future and look at potential staging areas.
o Maintain access to the boat ramp during construction. NCWRC is ok with the proposed
driveway location for both alternatives.
o Distinguish in water line impacts how much are above vs. underground.
o Coordinate with Utilities unit to see why estimates are the same for both alternatives.
o Manatee guidelines will apply for this project.
o USACE Individual Permit is anticipated.
o Any existing causeway that is unused needs to be brought back to wetland height and
tied in with surrounding wetlands.
o Consider steepening and armoring slopes to reduce wetland impacts.
o NCDWR requested Neuse River Buffer Impacts be provided prior to selection of the
alternative (see attached maps and table below).
o Storm water will need to be collected — deck drains would have to be outside of buffer.
o Look at adding EQ pipes/culverts on northern end (3 or more would be helpful in storm
events).
o CAMA Major Permit is anticipated.
o NCDOT will provide preliminary design on selected alterative to agencies before
permitting.
o Be sure to include a write up of previously considered alternatives and why they were
eliminated. This includes looking at the option of Alt 1 and 2 combined but sight
distance issues would make it below design standards.
o USACE, NCWRC, NCDCM, and USFWS prefer Alternative 1. NCDWR needs Neuse River
Buffer Impacts to make decision on preferred alternative.

DocuSign Envelope ID: C08E4F67-4C57-4F30-96E3-B79657127B72
➢ Follow-up Coordination
o RS&H provided the Neuse River Buffer Impacts to NCDWR on 2/16/17. Additional
coordination and guidance was provided to RS&H and buffer impacts were updated on
2/20/17. On 3/9/17, NCDWR approved the buffer calculations and agreed on
Alternative 1 as the preferred alternative.
Category
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Project Length
3,700 ft.
4,000 ft.
Overhead Utility Relocations
(power and telecommunications)
10 poles
10 poles
Riparian Wetland Impacts
3.68 ac.
4.63 ac.
Surface Water Impacts
0.01 ac.
0.02 ac.
Stream Impacts
240 If.
230 If.
Neuse River Buffer Impacts
4,303 sq. ft.
3,926 sq. ft.
Water line relocation
(underground and above -ground)
approx. 3,900 If.
approx. 1,600 If.
Construction Cost Estimate
$10.5 Million
$11.1 Million
➢ Next Steps
o Alternative 1 has been selected as the Preferred Alternative.
o RS&H and NCDOT will carry forward with preliminary design for Alternative 1.
If any recipient of the meeting notes would like to add comments or feels a comment is erroneous or
needs to be expanded, please feel free to contact Samantha Schober by email at
[e-mail].
Attachments:
Meeting Handout
Neuse River Buffer Impact Figures 3 and 4
Copies to:
Meeting Attendees
Page 2 of 2

CjQ. 001 swamp
x 'f
! Grifton p /
CZ �118j C4
Nt y+9hway
ti
Jacks Slough
P1& /
_- N�se�iver �o
9 a
OC
P
p
n
Snake 'z'Oje BrQ� h
a�
`CIO
�Yacey S,�a>ny *os jev Creek
- GZ
Lat: 35.3125 / Long:-77.3021
Craven County
f NOPT
N
OFTPP O
September 2019
O Miles
1 2
,$1,0104
011
a
c
k
0
covecity F
Project Location
�i USGS Named Streams
Creeping Swamp 1
i
RAc/Y.
�y4
. D
i
c
0
O1tl VS-7p Beaverda Q
m gr-an�h
TIP B-4484
Replace Bridges No.138 & 139
Craven County, NC
Figure 1: Vicinity Map

i
zs
Maplecypress z.'
25
IA
..cS, - �.\ n � �-�- ru; • �-tip — c�� �.:r � -- }1 �, J` � _/ l'} \
QS 2s
-
-
25
}
tih1 _ ice.�\ \4\ yam\ �
��,`'
�.-' �� '. i �\ � tip] � \ � _ ",� ' � �-��- / ��� � (,� "1m"." - �� � � �—"'•:.
�AP�OF NOPTX cI O TIP B-4484
` N Replace Bridges No.138 & 139
Feet Craven County, NC
GFTPPN 0 1,000 2,000
September 2019 Figure 2: USGS Map
P Fort Barnwell (2016) USGS 1:24,000 Quadrangle Map

Hi North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program .r�.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.06; Released June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS im
WBS Element: 33723.1.2 TIP No.: B-4484 County(ies): Craven Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element:
33723.1.2 ITIP Number: B-4484 Project Type: Bridge replacement Date: 8/7/2019
NCDOT Contact:
Hon Yeun , PE
Contractor / Desi ner:
Richard Bollinger, PE
Address:
1037 W.H. Smith Blvd.
Greenville, NC 27835
Address:
8521 Six Forks Rd. Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone:
252 439-2827
Phone:
919 926-4105
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
City/Town:
Ft. Barnwell
Coun(ies :
Craven
River Basin(s):
Neuse
ICAMA County?
I Yes
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Yes
Project Description
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
0.701 miles Surrounding Land Use: lWoods, Farmland, Residential
Project Built -Upon Area ac.
Proposed Project
4.0 ac.
Existing Site
3.0 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
Bridge 138: Two 11' lanes with 8' total shoulder width
Bridge 139: Two 11' lanes with 9' total shoulder width
Bridge 138: Two 12' lanes with 1.5' shoulders
Bridge 139: Two 12' lanes with 3' shoulders
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: 2279 Year: 2039
Existing: 1863 Year: 2019
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
This is a bridge replacement project. The existing Bridge 138 over the Neuse River is 1 @40'3"; 5@40'; 1 @60'; 6@40; 1 @40.3" RC floor in I -beams. The proposed bridge will
go upstream from existing crossing. Proposed Bridge 138 is a 6@100' 54" girder bridge with 4' caps. The bridge will have 2 drop inlets at the end of the approach slab to collect
deck drainage with a single outlet to the side of the bridge. Rip rap pads will be used at all ditch outlets to reduce flows into wetlands.
The existing Bridge 139 over the Neuse River overflow is a 4@45' prestressed concrete cored slab bridge. The proposed bridge will go upstream from existing crossing.
Proposed Bridge 139 is a 4@100' 54" girder bridge with 4' caps. The bridge will have 2 drop inlets at the end of the approach slab to collect deck drainage with a single outlet to
the side of the bridge. Rip rap pads will be used at all ditch outlets to reduce flows into wetlands.
Retaining walls are being used along the upstream side of the project where practicable to minimize wetland impacts.
NCDOT will attempt to avoid and minimize impacts to streams to the greatest extent practicable during project design.
OwWaterbody Information
Surface Water Body 1): Neuse River
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
27-(85)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Class C
Supplemental Classification:
Swamp Waters Sw
(NSW)
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Neuse River
Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
Yes
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? INo
Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? INo
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
No
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)

STATE OF NORTH CAROI ILA
HHEET E
TEATLS
YlAI1 QIAT8PROIR REPRRRN(BN0. ND
Dkd B-4484 �
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
LPq�`RIPI'ION
1460 / las.
—' 1459
�1'A11 PROlYiO. F.A.PROI.NP
33723.1.2 WA PE
33723.2.1 WA ROW, UTIL
�� Riversi e \ - 146z
I 1459
141465ail
CRAVEN C 0 UNTY
EpwoLth
00
, ,
00
OBI ' 1468`
1456 1457 1454
LOCATION: REPLACE BRIDGES NO.138 & 139 OVER NEUSE
1
M
PROJECT LOCATION
- � �-
�,
RIVER AND NEUSE RIVER OVERFLOW ON
PERMIT DRAWING
'"`I
1450
' 1474 � .,.,.. - 1470 1454
S
SR 1470 (MAPLE CYPRESS ROAD)
OF 15 ,
SHEET 11472
1470 ' 11450
N
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, RETAINING WALLS,
V
14714°°°
AND STRUCTURES
o
147
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
VICINITY MAP N.T.S.
N0
SITE 1
7
�
SITE 2
4 6
END TIP PROJECT B -4484
-Ll - POC Sta. 54+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
I - I- POT STA14+50.00
NEUSE RIVER
; END BRIDGE END BRIDGE
- -___
-LI- POT Sta.28+06.00 -LI- POT Sto. 3+ 5.00
..
TO BIDDLE RD -__-- --- ---
Ci NEUSE RIVER
I 34 OVERFLOW
10
' - - --
_
I O�
I � tiF
__ _
_
DGE
Bill PX Sta.22+06A0
417
SR I470 �L4PLE CYPRESS ROgp - --- - - - ------
fEXI5f.8R.139
------- -----
I
BEGIN BRIDGE
END CONSTRUCTION
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4484
-; _- -LI- POT St0.39+ 5.Oo
-
-Ll- POC StO.54+50.00
-Ll - POC Sto.17+00.00
IN(IOMPLETE PLAN$
DO NOT USE FOR R/ W ACQUISITION
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
DOCUMENr NOT CONSIDERED FIN AL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
V
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
PREPARED /N THE OFFICE OF:
1520 SOUTH BOULEVARD, SUITE 200
HYDRA ULICS ENGINEER
ADT 2019 = 1863
RSWCHARLOTTE, NC 28203
50
25 0 50 100
,
ADT 2039 = 2,279
K 12 %
LENGTH
ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4484 = 0.512 MILE
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
®� NOR N
�0
PLANS
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
D = 60 %
—
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4484 - 0.189 MILE
P.E.
50
25 0 50 100
0 *
T = 10 /o
TOTAL
LENGTH
TIP PROJECT B-4484 0.701 MILE
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
JENNIFER FARING, PE
SIGNATURE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
V = 60 MPH
-
MARCH 7, 2019
DREW MORROW, PE
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
a
�
PROFILE HORIZONTAL
(HORIZONTAL)
*(TTST=3°/a + DUAL=7%)
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
LQ
10
5 0 10 20
FUNC CLASS = MAJOR
LETTING DATE:
HON YEUNG, PENCDOT
THK
COLLECTOR
APRIL 21, 2020
PESIGNATURE:
CONTACTPROFILE
(VERTICAL) lk
SUB -REGIONAL TIER

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. I SHEET NO.
a— o
t
RETAIN EXISTING
OVERFLOW BRIDGE
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4484
-Ll- POC STA.17 + 00.00
In
SITE 1
WOODS
iu•A/, ATE Llfy—�—V
NE-S--1VER==R-
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 15
o`
Z
�P° O
FRANCES T. KILPATRICK
x x INSET B N
� 'FOODS �
TIE TO EXIST. � � ,
GARDRAAPPRO�Y. 1 END PROP. RET. WALL #1REMOVE
50 LF OF EXIST.
-Ll- STA. 19+50.00 / BEGIN PROP. RET. WALL #1
I i
GLYARDPAIL FRgM 1 -Ll- VA.2-+00.9
1Ll- 0.A00 TO „� WOODS
17E+52 }T +/,k Sk N
BEGIN HDD OF
.k 4v i 12" HDPE WATF,RLIIQE ' SEE IN BE * * k *
' EASR /N VA C R / .� PUE N iE5 i �1 Qd � PUE PUE �
a
GV
SBG
5" RCP -III
MH �.
* � � REMOVE EXISTING � M— � _
TIE TO EXIST. GUARDRAIL la CMP * W ` I
k REMOVE APP`ROX. 150 LF OF Ex'snoto * Sk � � OW F
EXIST. GUARDRAIL FR ,� .� Es \
,FLI- STA. 17+00.00 TO
k 19 tt50 RT +/-
WOODS * * k \
Sk
* * MECHANIZED CLEARING *SEE WSET*A ,
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
GRADE gEXISTIN EMf'�I( AMFROM SNTkDOWN. T01
2$+31 FROM 41 b LAYBS A121ACK +87 t OENT 22++28.1
AT A
W * * 1l
* SBG FROM -Ll- STA. 19+34 TO STA. T1+95 LT
_ SANDRA N. #BITE
SeG FROM -L1- STA 2&+49 PD STA�,211+95 RT
TEMPORARY WORK
PLATFORM
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
* DENOTES MECHANIZE[
" CLEARING
50' 0' 50' 100' 150'
INSET A
N
- PUE
'tf
ROADWAY DESIGN I HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RS01
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
I O
O
N
Ii
1_
W
O
2
N

BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4484
—LI— POC STA.17 + 00.00
SITE I
r y s x INSET B N
1yooD5 � � � � � � TI TO EXIST.
- REMOVE APPRO�C. 1 END ROP, RET. WALL 11
STA.19+50.00 i
RE E EXIST. I i
.. G&RDRAIL FR
R AIN
� BEG1. OF � i
SE
NEU
WOODS
TEMPORARY
P LAT F O Rh
F F DENOTES FIL
WETLAND
DENOTES MEI
CLEARI
50' 0' 50' 100' 150'
��RR\EE �
-
k �E REMOVE EXISTING
t TIE TO EXIST. GUARD IL 124. CMP
t REMOVE APMOX. 850 LF R/R Y
EXIST. GUARDRAIL FROM A,
fLl- S 00.00 TO
eI 19-0 Rl
MECHANIZED CLEARING E WSE �A ,1
t y w ELEV. 13' F,BA
Ll- $NTI, 2 1,
22
GRADE
T�-
2X+46,#lD LAY BACK EMBANKMENT T A,
3:1 FROM1- STA 1+7 PTO 22 28.
SAIpRA It *FIITE SrG FRO�A -Lt-�S A. 1 +34 16 TA.
SBG FROM -Ll \, ST .2 +
I1n'�
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 3 OF 15 '
Xlb
'1
�P� O
FRA4CES T. KILPATRICK Ja.
INSET A
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
B-4484
4
R,W SHEET NO.
:OADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RSUf
NC FIRM LICENSE N.- F-0493
0
2

N
�a
z
0
0
N
Q
H
z —�
wPUE PUE
N
I
W
W
11
C I SiRU E iS E i CHED
N
7-r—Imus IltrASreLry'.LSiA1E uA
BRIDGE #138
OQuCH
it
,.I
U
J R..
E EXISTINV
.ELOIDG
O�SBY-
0
rc
zz STATE OF NORTH CAROUNA
�o
' 1 I
*SEE NOT
NfAD
" MP%
E
v
f8DE 9, EX ST G N E T O
!'277\- EL R T 42 J9gµJ
3:1 R M-Ll_BAA 8 9 T 2 ++3 ` NW
i \
SB 'FROM -Ll- TA. 8+ T© W
1J = ST . Fj4 11 LT A
S G ' FROM -1.1- A. 28 19 TO
S A.29+74 RY
* DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
TEMPORARY WORK
PLATFORM*
50' 0' 50' 100' 150'
&• m
N
SITE I
O
WILLIAM E. DANIELS
N 'W.L S.S. FOR" IMPACT
V,, REGARIINNG THRv
VORK PLATFORM
+
� I �
ME F T � � � < )
l B GIN PROP. RE7 ALL
PUE� -L - S A. 33+35.00
U
E y \
f f z yr. V PUE
wi + P
f 6 1
PUE -
i —15"
I - i
1 t & I
t I
1* / r
I&
I I �
i
MECHANIZED CLEARING
\ O
COASTAL LUVBER COOANY
i
i
i
POND
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
I SHEET NO.
B-4484
1 5
REV SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
.�
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
OD
�O
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RSUf
NC FIRM LICENSE N.- F-0493
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 5 OF 15
n
O
15" RCP II
Un
F ni
_
ol
_ 12" HDPE WATERLINE
N
T`
F D
LJT
SI E7
I of
1 1
I �
1 1
FALLOW
1
1 HEATH AMIL
FARMS,` LC
1
1
1
1\
\ 1
_
1 \
FOR -Ll- PROF/LE. SEE SHEET 8 I

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
a"D'�NJfCs B- 6
RAY SHEET NO.
\ ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
\ \B ENGINEER ENGINEER
\ WOODS I \ O
\ �P
\\ \
DETAIL A
\ \ \ \ q S SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
END CO STRUCTIO \ UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
f \ Nmur°I '!' Fill
—DWI— POT ST I +3700 Fo,O 5 \
D SITE 2
\\ \ \ \ \ Min.D= 1.011. RS&H
FROM -LI- STA. 35+20 TO STA. 35+50 LT
^ \ \ FROM -Ll- STA. 36+50 TO STA. 37+21 LT \ NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
I STANDARD 'V' DITCH
mO WOODS \ \ I SEE DETAIL C DETAIL B DETAIL C
m3
41 } SPECIAL
N°rCr°USwlD.,ITCH STANDARD DITCH
NaS. From PERMIT D RAW I N G
d .�,
Ddd,
H I J: i' SI"pe Nmu,ul NoNml d'be69, SHEET 6 OF 15
� D F
FOODS Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
101 \ \ \\ \
I18\' RCP IV FROM -DWI- STA. 10+26 TO STA. 14+40 LT -DWI- STA. 14+00 RT
\ A A FROM -DWI- STA. 10+29 TO STA. 13+90 RT O
f ECIAL CUT DITCH ooIn
SEE DETAIL B \ \ J: A P HAROLD HARGETT JR 6 TONYA H. BYRD
END PHALTPA ENT \\ \,\\\\� CAROL u.NEATN \
DWl- 10+ .79
ROL u HEAT N \ \ BEGI ROCK PLATI G
boos � � � � � � /LT
— �l— POT S3+57�+/—LT� ti SBG FROM -L1- STA. 43JCYPRESS
SBG FROM -LI- STA. 38+89 TO 39+34 LT C]�SEECIAL CUT DETAIL B DITCH W U�t1 J< t >tiOlot 0
W\ CYPRESS SWAMPt t t 3< J'�
/ 11 O BEGI - GRADE E �""\ E E E E E� t E E E \� t -D I Por Sr /o+I
PECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH \ �°' & C / R SEE DETAIL A WOODS Tjl r w w w w iE w wr w w i4'1E w war w% atw w w w alEw w war w w w w w w w w EZ15TiNG R/'H I <C—-5RCP-IIIt- 1111111111,
©/ � SBG.
W ©' '
62GI
15" RCP IIIWAIV
_ C{
\`=__-� O 10'PLAS. (NI�CRAwE 1Y=D)— - \ ._.-.
EIP _� 1
xlsn c R F I . F
I \
PU
\ \ PUE
BEGIN HDD OF s\
12" HOPE WATERLINE \\
DENOTES MECHANIZED \ It
CLEARING \ \
F F DENOTES FILL IN \\\\\
WETLAND \ \
DENOTES EXCAVATION \ \
IN WETLAND \ \
\ \
TEMPORARY WORK \ \
PLATFORM \\ \
50' 0' 50' 100' 150'
\ 9•
w#wwwwwwwwwwwww
www wwwwwwwww w
IF.................
ii
.J1
w wwww ww warww www ww www www ww www wwww w - - �
ww w ww www wwwww wwIMITSw wwwwwwww w
w.w w w w w LLJ
i>1dMr
Lu
. — — — — F
�—---_r----�_ I SR 1470 MAPLE CYPRESS RD 22' BST -- -- lo" wL —
NE E RIVER OVE .. .. .. O
5 EXCAVATION .. W. wL & � , , .. .. .. .. * .. 21,
. PUE.. .. .. �.. EIJO HDD'E OF U
PUE PUE � � 12" HDPE WATERLINE Nk
J< t RL*OVE ?XISTIN� t CYPRESS SWAMP
BRIDGE \ }
RRhAA1 ,,Dp
E� ENl�V. 7Ely(ETLAN6 ELEVV'VA NI fROMN L1�Nk
\ SYA. 39+73 TO 40+47 AND 42+21 �TaO CYPRESS SWAMP :k
\ \\ \\ FROM 32. FROM TA. 3 +41LAY BACK NKMENT AT JO2 TO 3 9f 73 Al l
\ J! }
sk
21,
Nk
21,
� ,,II
RAY M.HEATH
FOR -D*I- PROFILE. SEE SHEET /0
,\ FOR -Ll- PROFILE. SEE SHEET 9

W'
\ DAAil
\ \ } A Nk x
\ \ 1
\ OD 1
1
\ 4 a
IDooS \ \� �, I S1
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
B-4484
1 6
RAY SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
✓r�0
<vp 0
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RS&H
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
1 I SPECIAL CUT DITCH STANDARD V DITCH
N°..° Swl., N. Se°1el PERMIT D RAW I N G
\ ondr
H � �' Ne ro sl° N°,°r Ne,uml e SHEET 7 OF 15
IA \ e Ground 3,.� D Ground �� D ,�.\ Ground E 9 S.
\ \ W D Min. D= 1.0 H.
Min. D= 1.0 Ff.
1 CP FROM -DWI- STA. 10+26 TO STA. 14+40 LT -DWI- STA. 14+00 RT
FROM -DWI- STA. 10+29 TO STA. 13+90 RT
\ / Ln O
Via\ t t /< HAROLD HARGETT JR 6 TONYA H.BYRD
C \\ \ CAROL U.HEATH \
t t t
U.' A BEGI ROCK PLATI G
\ \\. -Ll- POT ST 3+57 +/- LT
\ t t
J< SBG FROM -Ll- STA.43+56 TO 43+72 LT
1 I SBG FROM -LI- STA. 38+89 TO 39+34 LT
) t
\ t � CYPRESS SWAMP
r-15EECDETAAL IL T DITCH + E \ � Jc t >ti & t 7!
J r1D4� ...� i O�
W w ��
i \ CYPRESS AMP �\ t
00
/- PO'GIN GRD , /0 / E s\ E III E �, E IF Ct
PECIAL LATERAL V' DITC \`. Q
EE DETAIL A DS� \ JF iE dE 71r .R. JE iF iE xJE JE dE�E JE JE i4 JE iE iE�f ik ii Jk9E JP iF iE i1kiE iE iEE dE JE iE JE JE JE JE iE EzisnNc R/'H
\ iE dE iE iF iF iE iE •F dE JE iE JE JE JP JF dF JE JE dE JF JF JE iE JF JF d! # iE iE K +r. ,.
5" CAAP F
F� SBG. dF dF dE JE iF dE # JF dt iF dF JF dF iF dF JF F F F F F F F F
� * dE JF dr dE dE dE dE Jt dr dF dF � * � dE de � �r � dE � dF dE dE dE dE �E �E dr dE dE dt dE X dE I
I \
I \ \
BEGIN HD OF
12" HDPE WATER NE 1
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
F F DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
TEMPORARY WORK
PLATFORM
1 01 50'11 1
DETAIL A \
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
I N°��o Scale)
N°tur°I si
2
Ground Fo'1 SII°pe
al D TE
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
FROM -1-1- STA. 35+20 TO STA. 35+50 LT \
FROM -1-1- STA. 36+50 TO STA. 37+21 LT
'V' DITCH
DETAIL B DETAIL C
PUE
-
*�4E
' #,9E 3E 3E 3E Jk IiE .J1IMITS.R.Lu
W
s— -
` ---- — — —
- -..�- - — — — — — S7• B-----�_
- - I SR 1470 MAPLE CYPRESS RD 22- - _ Ln
--
EXCAVATION :k
� PUE � EN® HDD3.OF U
�
PUE PUE ������""" 12" HDPE WATERLINE
R OVq kISTIN� t CYPRESS SWAMP
1TI
GE
k t :k t
G E EXI I G MBA E. 0\1' O Nk t t
V. T ( ET N tE ION) FROM -Ll-
A. 39+73 40+47 AND 42+21 TO CY R SS AMP J< :k sk3:
\ +32. Y ACK EMBANKMENT AT A i� J:
\ OM -L TA. 39+41 O 39�E 73 is
F M 43EF 32 TO 43+38. t
l
\\ \\ 1 Jia
---------,
Ak
RAY (�, HEATH
�\ FOR -D*I- PROF/LE. SEE SHEET l0
FOR -Ll- PROF/LE. SEE SHEET 9

0
0
DD
N
a
F
DETAIL D
CHANNEL CHANGE
( Not to Scale)
b Not ral
�a Proposed Groan=�
�itOan� `— Fill Slope
d q,y D A'� 1'%Ft.
GEOTEXtILE B �Exiat. Channel
Min. D—
Max. d= 1.5 Ft.
8= 8.0 Ft.
Type of Liner=Class "I" Granite Rip Rap b= 5.0 to 12.0 Ft.
FROM —Ll— STA. 48+80 TO STA. 50+50 LT
EST. CLASS "I" GRANITE RIP RAP — 106 TONS
EST. GEOTEXTILE — 234 Sy
EST. DDE = 120 CY
LINDA B.VCKEEL.ET AL
INSET A
0 \
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H. BYRD OLn
\
\ EAIQ-ROCK PLATI G
-Ll- P0C ST 53+00 +/- LT/I
CYPRESS SWAMP �\ \
t 1< `\
FILL LYX SCOUR HOL CHANNEL CHANGE �
WITH APPROX. 22 TONS OF SEE DETAIL D }} t „1
CLASS "I' GR�4NITE IIP RAPS �pR0P6SED Cf1ANNEt SLOPE=0.70% / v_wOO
DS
SEE APPROVED CSR DATED
COLLAR AND EXTEND FOR MORE DF�TAILS, *� : CRESS 4WAMP
DUAL 84" iMP
T.,. /
w _-SEE INSETLu
A
F 1z
_ —_ --
N — 0—
—*La— — — — — �— — .� — — JE — .. .. .. ..
--- - TO kB— —E SE
O
E � �T� �
~ N:k Nk I
CYPRESS SWAMP 11
CYPRESS SWAMP 9e )
RETAIN DUAL .4" CMS t �k 1(
-L GlN ROCK P0g ST P 0*50 */- RT
* * * • DENOTES MECHANIZED
* * * CLEARING
O
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H.BYRO
WOODS
SITE 2
0
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H,BYRD
END TIP PROJECT B-4484
U I -Ll- POC STA. 54 + 00.00
END CONSTRUCTION B-4484
-Ll- POC STA. 54 + 50.00
04R 1 / / �(( 'WOODS
/
SR 1470 MAPLE CYPRESS RD 22' @T___�---
JUDY K,HEATH
Y \ \ \
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
50' 0'
50' 100' 150'
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO,
B-4484
7
RW SHEET NO,
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
n 01
YO
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RS01
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 8 OF 15
y'L
\ �ti4 ayo
S 32'51'25"
77.87'
FOR -LI - PROFILE. SEE SHEET 9 I

INSET A
0
0
00
J -
10
I--
LLJ
LLJ
Cn
0
F--
U
H-
Q
F4
DETAIL D
CHANNEL CHANGE
( Not to &ale)
b Na al
Proposed G_d
�tar� .r- Fill Slope
oun d .y D p.� 1"iFt.
GEOTMLE B .Channel
Min. D= 1.5 1.5 Ft. Ft
Max. d= 1.5 Ft.
B= 8.0 Ft.
Type of Liner=Class "I" Granite Rip Rap b= 5.0 to 12.0 Ft.
FROM Al- STA. 48+80 TO STA. 50+50 LT
EST. CLASS "I" GRANITE RIP RAP = 106 TONS
EST. GEOTEVILE 234 SY
EST. DDE = 120 CY
/n0701
� J V
SITE Z
LINDA B.VCKEEL.ET AL
0
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H.BYRD
END TIP PROJECT B-4484
-LI- POC STA. 54 + 00.00
PROJECT�REFERENCE
�NO.
B 4 8
KW SHEET N(
OADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RSUf
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 9 OF 15
z
rnm
00
5 32'51'25"
77.87'
Jul 1�hjll
FOR -Ll- PROFILE. SEE SHEET 9 I

:::::::::: UMMU:::: UMMUMN
"""""�IIIIIIII�

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
-1-1- 17+85 RT
Exist. 12" CMP Removal
< 0.01
1
-1-1- 19+41 LT
Rip Rap Outlets
< 0.01
< 0.01
1
-1-1- 20+50 RT
Rip Rap Outlet
< 0.01
< 0.01
1
-1-1- 20+62 to 22+28 LT
Ret Wall / Fill / Work Platform
0.07
0.19
1
-1-1- 27+85 to 32+70 LT
Ret Wall / Fill / Work Platform
0.36
0.10
1
-1-1- 29+73 RT
Rip Rap Outlet
< 0.01
2
-1-1- 39+17 LT
Roadway Fill Slope
0.03
2
-1-1- 39+62 RT
Roadway Cut Slope
< 0.01
2
-1-1- 39+71 to 40+45 RT
Roadway Cut Slope
0.04
2
-1-1- 39+00 to 43+32
Proposed Bridge / Work Platform
0.82
2
-1-1- 42+26 to 43+32 RT
Roadway Cut Slope
0.07
2
-1-1- 43+32 to 51+32 LT
Proposed Roadway/Fill Slope
0.61
0.08
2
-1-1- 48+60 to 50+66 LT
Channel Relocation
< 0.01
0.27
0.09
2
-1-1- 53+00 LT
Roadway Fill Slope
< 0.01
2
-1-1- 52+97 RT
Roadway Fill Slope
< 0.01
TOTALS*:
1 1.09
0.27
0.20
1.20
0
0
0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Total permanent Wetland Impacts due to proposed piles = 38 sq.ft.
Total permanent SW Impacts due to proposed piles = 141 sq.ft.
Temp Work Platform
Based on 20' or shorter spans, with pile rows 2' long and the full width of the platform (both conservative):
Temporary Fill in Wetlands = 4,567 sq.ft and Temporary Surface Water Impacts = 2,905 sq.ft
Revised 2016 09 09

STATE O F NORTH CARD ILA
QHEET E
TEATLS
YlAI1 QIAT8PROIR REPRRRN(BN0. ND
Did B-4484 �
DIVISION O F HIGHWAYS
LPq�`RIPI'ION
1460 / las.
—'
jk1'A11 PROlYiO. F.A.PROI.NP
33723.1.2 WA PE
1459
33723.2.1 WA ROW, UTIL
�� Riversi e \ - 146z
I 1459 147-
rw
1465—�J
VEN
CRAC 0 UNTY
00
Epwo h 'Z
J-
OBI ' 1468` , 1456 1457
iaoo
1454 Qr
LOCATION: REPLACE BRIDGES NO.138 & 139 OVER NEUSE
1
M
PROJECT LOCATION ' \ -
A
RIVER AND NEUSE RIVER OVERFLOW ON
BUFFER DRAWING
1474 I - \ 1470 1450 1454
SR 1470 (MAPLE CYPRESS ROAD)
SHEET 1 OF 5
1472 _ 1470 ' . 1450
_
ti 1 \
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, RETAINING WALLS,
V
7f
1471
AND STRUCTURES
o
'147
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
VICINITY MAP N.T.S.
N0
SITE 1
7
4
END TIP PROJECT B -4484
—Ll — POC StO. 54+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION
I - I- POT STA14+50.00
NEUSE RIVER
END BRIDGE END BRIDGE
-LI- POT Sto.28+06.00 -LI- POT Sto. 5+ 5.00
TO BIDDLE RD ------
---
---
C+ NEUSE RIVER
I 3 a OVERFLOW
l EXIST. BR. 138ISO
SR 147p
-Ll-PX DGE
Sta.22+06A0
�L4PLE CYPRESS 139
OAD------- — ------ ---
J I
BEGIN BRIDGE
END CONSTRUCTION
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B -4484
--' -LI- POT Sta.39+ 5.00
-Ll- POC Sto.54+50.00
-Ll - POC Sta.17+00.00
IN(IOMPLETE PLAN$
DO NOT USE FOR R/ W ACQUISITION
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
DOCUMENTN.OT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
V
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
PREPARED /N THE OFFICE OF:
7520 SOUTH BOULEVARD, SUITE 200
HYDRA ULICS ENGINEER
ADT 2019 = 1863
RSWCHARLOTTE, NC 28203
50
25 0 50 100
,
ADT 2039 = 2,279
K 12 %
LENGTH
ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4484 = 0.512 MILE
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
®� NOR N
�0
PLANS
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
D = 60 %
—
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4484 - 0.189 MILE
P.E.50
25 0 50 100
D *
T = 10 /o
TOTAL LENGTH
TIP PROJECT B-4484 0.701 MILE
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
JENNIFER FARING, PE
SIGNATURE:
M
PROJECT ENcrNEER
V = 60 MPH
-
MARCH 7, 2019
DREW MORROW, PE
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
a
PROFILE HORIZONTAL
(HORIZONTAL)
*(TTST=3% + DUAL=7%)
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
�0
10
5 0 10 20
FUNC CLASS = MAJOR
LETTING DATE:
HON YEUNG, PE
1HaN�
LQt!i
COLLECTOR
APRIL 21, 2020
PESIGNATURE:
NCDOT CONTACT
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
SUB -REGIONAL TIER

RETAIN EXISTING
// OVERFLOW BRIDGE
7
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4484
—Ll— POC STA.17 + 00.00
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 5
O
SITE 1 PRANCES T. KILPATRICK
N
Y Y �
Y /
.t Y WOODS
k lk /
WOODS TIE TO EXIST. /
GUi4RDRAdL END PROP. RET. WALL #1
REMOVE APPRO(. -Ll- STA. 19+50.00 / / /fi
50 LF OF EXIST. e BEGIN PROP. RET. WALL #1
t /
G1ARDRAIL FRgM ��' -Ll- STA. 22+00.V0 1
.. .. t -LI- STA. t / /
.. � ' � � � t WOODS
17+00.00 TO / ..
— 17E+52 IT +/,k
n
R
IO i 47E
LME �gR iq� / BEGI _HDulOF t
EXISTING RR=S 12",Vr_WATERLINE / / 4 P E PUE PUE PIE m
" s---------- - -*,B- - �i 1 ,z w� E FI
24
NE=S=-1-R OVERFLOW BRIDGE —j �O'�' Gv_W-
—�EeI��_ l— [� t� N
F
_
vc
REMOVE EXISTINGs ts- ,^ \ MFI 15" CAA
e TIE TO EXIST. GUARDRAIL t 121 CMP m
RElk MOVE
REME APPIROX. 250 LF OF 6xlsn— % Y O� \ F C
EXIST. GUARDRAIL FI*OM
,FLl- STA. 17+00.00 TO
1
t y W y GRADE IX�TI3GFROMARx(KM SNTkDOWI TOI
/ w ` 2k+3.1 ALO LAY BACK EMBANKMENT78,TO22288A''T .
3:1 FROM LAY
SCK 22 AT A
� t 1 SA► DRA 4. *14TE * * 1
EXISTING J
TRANSPORTATION
FACILITY
TEMPORARY WORK
PLATFORM i
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
50' 0'
50' 100' 150'
io+
z�
a�
r
- PUE
m
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
B-4484
R,W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RS&�I
NC FIRM LICENSE N. F-0493
I O
O
d
N
fi

N
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
8-4484 5
\ RNJ SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
1 O
lb
i
zi STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA {FOODS
SITE I
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
of 4y� UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
U 1 _
RS&H
/ NC FIRM LICENSE N. F-0493
O
#ILL1AV E. DA41ELS BUFFER D RAW I N G
SHEET 3 OF 5
�
Iz
�I
�
u�
m
H
I
04
Q
�z wPUE
PUE�''�
I—
,z
N
a
I
Lu
W
W
N01E, ISEFARAiF
Ii0R1 G 157RU E 15 RE 7i DIED i0 THE
A D 7HE
I S1RUCiURE.
—
HEAD
--I—_
L.
u
REMOVE EXISTING RELOCATE TO
--
BRIDGE
PROPOSED BRIDGE
BY OTHERS
GRADE EXISTING EMBANKMENT DOWN TO
ELEV. ll' FROM —Ll— STA. 27+42 TO
27+89, AND LAY BACK EMBANKMENT AT A ��'7
3:1 FROM —Ll— STA. 27+89 TO 28+39. N1 \
11
W SBG FROM —Ll— STA. 28+10 TO roc
= STA. 34+11 LT
A^ SBG FROM —Ll— STA. 28+19 TO
—
�v — STA. 29+74 RT
2
-Ll- STA. 28+10.00
—wPUE— PUE
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
TEMPORARY WORK
PLATFORM
50' 0' 50' 100' 150'
R
FIAAD*
1�
' PtE
PUE 'F ,T '� BEGIN PROP. RET. N
�. PUE�\ -Ll- STA. 33+35.00
4fE END Hbp OF
lTS" R y� PUE 12�HDPE WAEEAI.�NE
RCP -III '� SBG w pug 'F1 ,i UE
SB
TB2GI
TB2G1-- —� ��
—W— IO' PLAS.
�� — CRAVEN I ., .. ..
15" RCP —III
SR 1470 MAPLE CYPRESS RD T
WOODS
O
COASTAL LUVOER COVPAHY
n
15" RCP —III O
Ln
F
m
G17— p Cn
GV
I
F F F D
1 �
114 O
1 I
I
�1
I of
WOODS 1 1
1 I
1 1
1 I
1
1 HEATH
1
1
1
1
1
� 1 1
POND \ \\
� 11 11
FALLOW
Y FARVS. LLC
FOR -LI - PROFILE. SEE SHEET 8 I

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACTS
BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
Site Station Structure ROAD PARALLEL
No. (From/To) Size / Type BRIDGE ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
CROSSING IMPACT (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1
-1-1- 22+15 to 22+78
Prop Bridge
X
1468
443
1911
1
-1-1- 22+15 to 22+78
Temp Work Platform
X
1746
1147
2893
1
-1-1- 22+45 RT
Ex Road/Bridge Removal
X
434
167
601
1
-1-1- 26+16 to 27+00
Prop Bridge / Temp Platform
X
2889
1976
4865
1
-1-1- 27+00 RT
Ex Bridge Removal
X
942
631
1573
TOTALS*:
7479
4364
11843
0
0
0
0
0
NOTES:
sed 2018 Feb

WETLANDS IN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLANDS IN
BUFFERS
SITE ZONE 1 ZONE 2
NO. STATION (FROM/TO) (ft) (ft)
1 -L1- 22+15 to 22+78 1 54" Girder Bridge 812 1 219
1 -L1- 22+15 to 22+78 1 Tema Work Bridae 1732 1 1147
ITOTAL: I 2544 I 1366 I
wised 2018 Feb
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
9/19/2019
Craven County
B-4484
33723.1.2
SHEET 5 OF 5
Rev.Jan 2009

rft
•
-J
U
O
U
See
Sheet
I A
For
Index of Sheets
See
Sheet
1 B
For
Conventional Symbols
1460
' 145
1459 -
Riversi e 1462
--'/1459 1463 _ 1458
\ 1457 . \ _ 1465
Epwo h
r
1469
�,• 0 1468 •�GO� G 1456 1457 1454
1400
�' PROJECT LOCATION �
1474— �____-� 1470 1450 1454
1472
1, ( 1470 1450
/ 1400
/ / ) 1471
- .� . • 1472„
J
VICINITY MAP N. T. S.
CRA VEN
COUNTY
LOCATION.- REPLACE BRIDGES 11t0.138 & 139 OVER 1VEUSE
RIVER AND 11lEUSE RIVER OVERFLOW ON
SR 1470 (MAPLE CYPRESS ROAD)
TYPE OF WORD: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING RETAINING WALLS,
AND STRUCTURES
,QTATE
STATE PROJECT UFEREN(E NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
NOCO
B-4484
I
$TATE PR0,6 Na
F A, PROLNa
DE$('RJPTION
33723.1.2
WA
PE
33723.2.1
WA
ROW, UTIL
33723.3.1
WA
CONST
C�
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF : I-IYDRAULICS ENGINEER
,�O `�"�"CAR01 �,
1520 SOUTH BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 ,.. • • i ,�'
ADT 2019 = 1 863 CHARLOTTE, NC 28203 -�`��.oFFSSioN99
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493 ` SEAL
50 25 0 50 100 RS&HADT 2039 = 2,279 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4484 = 0.512 MILE y; 018442 00V NOoG�p� o
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 'L9�' . FNG E Bo
K = 12 % 2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ON��,,, a
PLANS p = 60 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4484 = 0.189 MILE P.E. o a
50 25 0 50 100 = JENNIFER FARINO, PE SIGNATURE:
T 10 % TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4484 = 0.701 MILE RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
V = 60 MPH MARCH 7 2 O19 PROJECT ENGINEER a
ROADWAY DESIGN
DREW MORROW PE ENGINEER .��: •Fs's, • :�9'.,
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) *(TTST = 3% + DUAL = 7%) PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER SEAL
10 5 0 10 20 F U N C CLASS = MAJOR LETTING DATE: 030952
HON YEUNG, PE=,:FtiG,NE��'�°,•'
COLLECTOR APRIL 21 2020 "%F FP��,''
' NCDOT CONTACT 'i,,
PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER P.E.
SIGNATURE:

BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.-
State Line
County Line
Township Line
----- -----
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
O
Computed Property Corner
Property Monument
EC
Parcel/Sequence Number
@
Existing Fence Line
-X x X-
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
Proposed Chain Link Fence
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary
- - - -WLB- - - -
Proposed Wetland Boundary
WLB
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
EAB
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
EPB
Existing Historic Property Boundary
HPB
Known Contamination Area: Soil
s S
Potential Contamination Area: Soil
Known Contamination Area: Water
--"'--`"-
Potential Contamination Area: Water
- W �t W
Contaminated Site: Known or Potential:*c
��
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
O
Sign
S
Well
WW
Small Mine
Foundation
0
Area Outline
Cemetery
fi
Building
School
Church
Dam
HYDROLOGY.-
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
IF—
Jurisdictional Stream
—is
Buffer Zone 1
Bz I
Buffer Zone 2
Bz 2
Flow Arrow
< -- ---
Disappearing Stream
Spring
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
FLOW
False Sump
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge -
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
STATE or NORTH c-_RoLdNA,DdVIsloN OF HIGHWAYS
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
Note: Not to Scale 'S. UE = Subsurface Utility Engineering
CSX THANSPOHTATION
0
MILEPOST 55
0
SWITCH
RIGHT OF WAY & PROJECT CONTROL:
Secondary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Primary Horiz Control Point 0
Primary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Exist Permanent Easment Pin and Cap 0
New Permanent Easement Pin and Cap 0
Vertical Benchmark
Existing Right of Way Marker 0
Existing Right of Way Line
New Right of Way Line w
New Right of Way Line with Pin and Cap —
New Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite R1W Marker
New Control of Access Line with
Concrete C/A Marker
Existing Control of Access
New Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
New Temporary Construction Easement
New Temporary Drainage Easement
New Permanent Drainage Easement
New Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement
New Permanent Utility Easement
New Temporary Utility Easement
New Aerial Utility Easement
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb —
•� v
ins 0
.�. v
/c\
'\A/'
n
-E-
-E—
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
- - - C - -
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
- - - F - -
Proposed Curb Ramp(CD
Existing Metal Guardrail
T T
Proposed Guardrail
T T T
Existing Cable Guiderail
Proposed Cable Guiderail
Equality Symbol
Pavement Removal
VEGETATION -
Single Tree
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
Orchard
Vineyard
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall -
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES:
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand
Hole
H-Frame Pole
U/G Power Line LOS B
(S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS C
(S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS D
(S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
Proposed Telephone Pole
Telephone Manhole
Telephone Pedestal
Telephone Cell Tower
U/G Telephone Cable Hand
Hole
U/G Telephone Cable LOS B
(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Cable LOS C
(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Cable LOS D (S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS
B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS
C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS
D (S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS
B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS
C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS
D (S.U.E.*)
Vineyard
coNc
) CONC WW
/ CONC HW \
Ll CB
O
S
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
o
Water Valve
0
Water Hydrant
.0
U/G Water Line LOS
B (S.U.E*)
- - - -�- - - -
U/G Water Line LOS
C (S.U.E*)
- -W- -
U/G Water Line LOS
D (S.U.E*)
Above Ground Water
Line
A/G Water
TV:
TV
Pedestal
ILI
TV
Tower
0
U/G
TV Cable Hand Hole
Iq
U/G
TV Cable LOS B
(S.U.E.*)
- - - -TV- - - -
U/G
TV Cable LOS C
(S.U.E.*)
- —TV— -
U/G
TV Cable LOS D
(S.U.E.*)
TV
U/G
Fiber Optic Cable
LOS B (S.U.E.*)
- - - -TV FO- - -
U/G
Fiber Optic Cable
LOS C (S.U.E.*)
- -TV FO-
U/G
Fiber Optic Cable
LOS D (S.U.E.*)
TV FD
GAS :
i
Gas Valve
0
Gas Meter
U/G Gas Line
LOS
B (S.U.E.*)
- - - -°- - - -
U/G Gas Line
LOS
C (S.U.E.*)
- -°- -
U/G Gas Line
LOS
D (S.U.E.*)
°
Above Ground
Gas
Line
A/C Gas
- T - - -
- T -
T
----TC----
-TC- -
TC
-T FO- - -
-T FO- -
T FO
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
SS Forced Main Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U/G Test Hole LOS A (S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
O
ss
A/C Sanitary Sewer
- - - -FSS- - - -
FSS -
FSS

P A V E M E N T S C H E D U L E PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
(FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN) —LI—
B -4484 2A -1
I
ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
C1 PROP. APPROX. 11/2" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B, 8' *61 11' 11' *61 1111111fry,1 1111111fry,1
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 165 LBS. PER SQ. YD. 9' W/GR 9' W/GR O�O��N CARp����,, O�O��N CARO���,��
to
PROP. APPROX. 21/2" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.513,AT AN = SEAL = = SEAL =
C2 AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE PLACED IN 1 030952 022896
LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1" IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 1%2" IN DEPTH. �N ��•; �, ��•::�
�',``ti • I NE • ��.�� '�, lq'••�G I NE
GRADE
C3 PROP. APPROX. 3 ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.513, C3 POINT C3
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 165 LBS. PER SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.513,AT AN
ORIGINAL 0.08 ,0.02 1 0.02, 0.08 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL C4 AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE PLACED IN UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
—
LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1" IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 1 %2" IN DEPTH. GROUND ,j: 7 4.1 k4ff S1616
xs,S
T 7.5„ T � �.s. 7 c
E1 PROP. APPROX. 41/2" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.00, ORIGINAL
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 513 LBS. PER SQ. YD. E1 E1 J —
RS&H
GRADE TO THIS LINE GROUND NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.00,
E2 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER " YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 4" IN DEPTH OR GREATER
THAN 5%2" IN DEPTH.
J 1 PROP. 6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE. —L1— STA. 17 + 00.00 TO —L1— STA. 19 + 50.00
—L1— STA. 43 + 45.00 (END BRIDGE) TO —L1— STA. 51 + 89.00
J2 PROP. 8" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE. *VARIABLE WIDTH FULL DEPTH PAVED SHOULDER PROPOSED IN AREAS WITH GUARDRAIL ONLY — SEE PLANS
**ROCK PLATING PROPOSED FOR ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
P I PRIME COAT
R1 I PROP. SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
T I EARTH MATERIAL.
PROPOSED
RETAINING
WALL**
U I EXISTING PAVEMENT.
W I WEDGING (SEE WEDGING DETAIL SHEET 2A-1)
NOTE: ALL PAVEMENT SLOPES 1:1 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
SEE PLANS FOR ALL WEDGING LOCATIONS
Detail Showing Method of Wedging
50, _ 1 _ WEDGING
VARIABLE MILLING
C1
-----------------
r
1Y2 /' „ �/ 1y2„
Detail of Incidental Milling at Pavement Tie-ins
Use Detail
-L1- STA. 54 + 00.00 TO STA. 54 + 50.00
W
P
CONC.
DITCH**
VARIES
25' TO 27'
tiv1*
VARIES
4' TO 6'
FDPS
R1
C3
,0.02
E1 7.5:
11'
I
I
I
I
j GRADE
POINT C3
0.02,
E1
GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
VARIES
7' TO 9'
VARI ES
4' TO 6'
FDPS
w
VAR' SDT
FF
—L1— STA. 19 + 50.00 TO STA. 22 + 06.00 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
*ROCK PLATING PROPOSED FOR ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
** SEE SHEET W-1 FOR RETAINING WALL AND CONC. DITCH DETAILS
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
—Ll— STA. 22+06.00 (BEGIN BRIDGE) TO
—Ll— STA. 28+06.00 (END BRIDGE)
***4' SHOULDER REQUIRED FOR SIGHT DISTANCE
ORIGINAL
GROUND
THIS LINE
SHOULDER BERM GUTTER DETAIL
-L1-
STA.
19 + 34.00
TO
-Ll -
STA.
21 + 95.00
LT
-Ll-
STA.
20 + 49.00
TO
-Ll-
STA.
21 + 95.00
RT
-L1-
STA.
2 8 + 15.00
TO
-L1-
STA.
34 + 11.00
LT
-L1-
STA.
2 8 + 19.00
TO
-Ll -
STA.
2 9 + 74.00
RT
-Ll-
STA.
38 + 90.00
TO
-Ll-
STA.
39 + 34.00
LT
-Ll-
STA.
43 + 56.00
TO
-Ll-
STA.
43 + 72.00
LT

17
I-
c
6
C
n
Cr
Q

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-4484 2C-2
o z
m
o� oU)
C� HQ
z Q��
DHD�p HNC=U
r0��� LL —jOH
Hz�=D 00CL
00m wQzLL=
_ z D STEEL LINE � 0 0
_ Cn O 0 POSTS Q H
0r7171 =~zLu
00H C/)~LL0J
n= x z o 6'-3" 6'-3" T-1%2„ 3,-11/2,� O O�<
ADD
0 w 0
z /F o _� o c#� c� ;I, 0
I � i
lz
BUFFERED END SECTION
PLAN
I
BUTTON HEAD
PAY LIMITS BOLT (10" LONG)
BUTTON HEAD BOLT (10" THRU RAIL AND
LONG) THRU RAIL AND POST WITH NUT
POST WITH NUT AND AND STD. WASHER
STD. WASHER ��W�� BEAM
RAILIF
I Z
.i QMD.i
I z J
_ \ SHORT WOOD BREAKAWAY POST \ T = W-BEAM MIDSPAN I H
C,� (SEE SHEET 6 OF 8) - cj No PANEL SPLICE J
STD. LINE POST w Q Q
M Co _ _ I J
r - GROUND 0
D LEVEL o N
Z r o
H
Lo
w J
D
C STEEL TUBE
C Q
r H 3/4 "x7%2" BOLTS
r z WITH 2 WASHERS STEEL LINE
^ QTY. 2 POSTS Q
I --I ....... . ..........Q Q
O O
O r
Z ELEVATION 0
TRAILING END UNIT ASSEMBLY
AmTo =1 SYSTEM
SHEET OF SHEET OF
C A R pj �o�,
CONTRACTS STANDARDS
• SEAL
022966 AND DEVELOPMENT UNIT
0� FNG NE��•r: Of f is e 919 - 707 - 6950 FAX 919 - 250 - 41 19
•' �O
AmTo =1 SYSTEM
ORIGINAL BY: DATE:
MODIFIED BY: DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL CHECKED BY: DATE:
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED FILE SPEC.:

O
(D�
0 6'
LO
� N
Oi
� O
Lam,
CL)
�9 O
��Q
ocn
_+1
O
�ccc:
��°
CL
W0�
L) 3
/ 0
'00N HDI3�Vd
300I88 NO IIVU 01 1N31NHOV1IV d03
r,
M
SAVMHOIH 30 NOISIAIG
NOIl`d1dOdSNVdl 30 ' ld3a
III 3dAi `lI Nn HOHONV � IVdauvno
VNI�OHVO H1dON
S1INn HOHONV 3uni3nuis
w
IN
30 31ViS
d03 ON IMVdG -1IV13G AVMGVOH
m
00
cn
N
CD
z
I —I
U
Q
c-
U)
M
U
0
H
U)
U) W
H 0
z Q
-----------'H m
LL (D
r\
MT�y� lf
cy)
T
N
Z
Q
0
------------- m
cc IL
z
z:)
O
U Lu
H
m
C 0
I --I
W 00
-J U
U)
---------- 0
m
m
It
c/)
X
W
-
----------= 00 U)
i
W
I.
w = co ______________
H z ,.
O �o
H z
J � Q Lc)� �_--------------
m
QW Q
W D H U)
cc W
Q U) I. _
H C7-------------1 Q U
J Io W O
Q ~' N cr
J CL
W Q JCL
m m I. Q
W W r �'------------- W
Z-------------
OHC O i
0
i � J
r J
I Q
W
I I
U) F-
LU
LL U
Z
O
I �
m
Q
J
co
U
f— O
z m
W 0-
W Q
m
li z
Q
00
• z
m
W U)
W H Z
z W
H J U
C0 J Q
z Q -)
Lu U Q
= Q
H m 0
z
>- W
Go H U)
W H
Occ
W U H
Z H
W OU ZD
Ir
I-1 W m
0 H O
LL.I = U
Q W
CC T LL
W 1-1
= W c�
o m 3 m
0 O O
(/) J =
W O m
J = U) m
z U) H W
m
o � co
O O m
cy) E U Lu
Q U) H
= m J O
LL ; U)
U)
U) W
W = X W
J H U
Q Ir LL co LL
00 m
W c=i)
O z 1-1
Ln F-I M
T J 1--1 Z
J W
Z m U
Q W W Q
2 H 2 7
~ w ~ Q O
m U O J
W H LL W
Q 0 O U O
W W IL 1--1
m J J O LL ZD
('3 H J LL m
U) Cc W Cc
W U) 2 H
J W Z r
CD (D H LL
Q� W O O z
� m LL 0 cr m O�-q
W H ♦-
Y W U) H H U
U) O ZD = U LL.I
m 0 W U)
m 0 h-1 m
O z m W H
LL W W = 0 U)
0 m H J W 0-
Lu 0 H =
cc cc 0 < m
I --I LL m 0
�0zLL
O W m m H
iJ U Lu Q co
cczmz:)cf)
m 0 z w
O U) W W 1-1 W
z H O m 0=
0 J =) 7 (/)
c/) W O Q CL W
• 0 = = W Q W
W 0 U) m J U)
* -IC I 1 I I
0
Z
Y
U
O
J
m
W
U)
W
LL
r\
T
c)
� -
Z .
CL
w:
Q
m : COO
r
Co:; m
/J^
LL
T
m ; U
Lu
cy)
W
m
0: W
=
s
J : H
f—
::)• J
U
p.
J
W
U
U)'
Q
U)
CL
X
W
W
Co
00
U)
U)
W
U
Q
coL
c
u
00
................................
CC)
co
z
O
1--1
H
U
ui
m
J �
Q
m
0
Cc
Q
0
co
J
U)
U
0
IY
CL
EL
Q
�
T
�s
T
-
------------,-
................................
----
--------
O
z
m
Q U)
o
O
> T
O
0
T
O z
r
�;
T WEL
'
_
X
W
cf)
Y
Z
U
Lu
Lu
m ^
0
J
0
Lu
z
H
Cc
0
m
W
0
�o
0
Lu
Q
0
0
cr
U
H
m
W Z
m
H
= Q
m
m
cn
m
W z
H O Q
Q = J
W
LLi
0 W
zm
W
m U
0 =)
W m
U)
z
H W
O W
11 U)
STATE OF
ROADWAY DETAIL DRAWING FOR
M
NORTH CAROLINA
STRUCTURE ANCHOR UNITS
00
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
GUARDRAIL ANCHOR UNIT, TYPE III
INDIVISION
OF HIGHWAYS
FOR ATTACHMENT TO RAIL ON BRIDGE
WCo
RALEIGH, N.C.
ui m
co
' 0' N H0I3�Vd
d3Il �VNOI038 ons - 30aId8 NO �IVH
LL
Mp
SJlVMHOIH 30 NOISIAIG
NOIl`d1dOdSNVdl 30 ' 1d3G
01 1N3WHOV1IV UOd III 3dAi `lINn HOHONV �IVdauvn!q
0
VN I �OdVO H1dON
S1I Nn �IOHON�d 3�If110f1�I1S
w
N
30 31V1S
HOd JN IMVd0 -1IV13G AVMGVOU
=
00
cn
cy)
r
T
c)
2
1�-1 0
z Q
-----------'F-I m
LL 0
T
N
U)
z
m J Z
m 0- O
F-I
U LL.I
m a
11 = >
'-' ~ W
0
J U J
= W
m
�cn
X
W
Z Lu
00 U)
I'
� I
W -- ,
m I.
~ W = '
0 ,o
J Z
HJ-1 Q
Q m W I-- ------------ J
0 0 ------ U)
cr
Q z ' _ W =
0~' M----------- U Q
_ Q
J I" W 0
QH N ' J EL
W Q J IL
m m ! �-' Q
W LL
L
Luz r ____________
cc O '
, I J
r � J
I
W Q
r t t I I 0 Y
Q U
_ m
116
W
I I I U)
I I I Hcc W
' 'z-' U
LL z
I I I O
I I U
I I
� I I
� I I
� I I
� I I
I �
� I I
I I
� I I
� I I
� I I
� I I
I �
m
Q
J
U)
2
U
O
z Ir
W IZ
W Q
m
CL z
Q
00
• z
m
W cf) H
W H z
Z W
0 J Q
Z a
7
Lu U Q
= Q
H m O
z
>- W
m U)
W 1--1
Ocr
W U H
Z H
U 0 z
Lu 0
H LL m
0 H 0
Lu = U
U) N z m
I --I r\ Q W
T
I—
m T LL ♦-
W H
= W 0
m o � m
0 O 0
U) J =
W O m
J = U) m
Z U) H W
0�0m
o O = m
cy) wULu
0
Z CL J
Q U) H =)
2 m J O
1--1 =
LL _ U)
U) t
U) Lu
W 2 X W
J U
m LL 00 LQL
O 0 m
W c=n
o z 1-1
LO H M f-
T J H Z
J W
z m U
Q W W Q
~ Lu ~ Q 0
W U LL LL
Q D O U O
W W d H
m J J O LL z:)
0 H J LL m
U) m H W m H
W U) = f-
J W Z H T
Z 0 H 0 U)
Q �-1 W 0 z
m m m z 0
W m i- LL OH H
Y LL U) H H U
U)0L) Lu
m 0 W U)
m 0 H m
0ZccLU
LL W W = 0 U)
0 m H J W 11
W O H =
mm0< cr
H LL m O
0 Z LL
O W m m 1-1
Lu U Lu Q c)
mzm=)cn
m 0 z w
O U) W W 1-1 W
z1-10m0=
0 J � U)
c~ W O Q 0- W
• 0 = = W Q W
W m H U) m J w
0 x
Z
(5
z
I--1
U
Q
CL
U)
1
(.0
0
U)
T Z.
� H ;
�O ;
CL.
W:
m; CO
CC
r m 1 CC
T
m; U
co W '
0: CL
J; H
= J
U) 0 , 'ZW ='
U U);
X
U)
co 00
nCJ
z
Q
J
W
J
Q
m
0
m
Q
C'3
Q
W
m
70J
Z
<
o
U
W
U)
m
m
Q
Q J
U)
Lu F-1
m QLO
=
m
U
Lu 0
Q
1-1 m
O
mQ
0
a
Q
co
N
T
..
Lu
0
• co
=
Z
m (0
Q U)
o
O
> T
O
0
T
O Z
'
r W
W
w
U)
0
Z
CL
W
�
0
=
LLZ
Q
Q W
m w
Q
O
Q
U H
W
Z m
Q m
U)
W Z
O= J
Q
U) CL
W
Z
0 W
Q
z m
J
W z:)
C
m U
J
O z:)
Q
LL m
U
H
H
U)
�z
m
H W
W
0 W
>
11 U)
Y
U
W
J
p
H
0
0
W
H
o
m
m
m
n
H
H
w W
> a
Q r
J
CL
i
P�A
i
Tr
STATE OF
ROADWAY DETAIL DRAWING FOR
I-,
M
NORTH CAROLINA
STRUCTURE ANCHOR UNITS
0
o
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
GUARDRAIL ANCHOR UNIT, TYPE III FOR ATTACHMENT TO
N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RAIL ON BRIDGE - SUB REGIONAL TIER
W
CD
RALEIGH, N.C.
00
CARol
jii
SEAL -
022966
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

0
om
H
�
C
H
Z
D
rn
H
0n��
0
H�=D
Z
=0�nrn
V
�
z>
_
cf)
O
0
ZHOrTI
n=�z
H
c/)
H
0
z
6"
2 rr 41/4 rr 41/4 rr
I F7
r_11/nrr
W-BEAM MIDSPAN
PANEL SPLICE
2%2rr X 11/8n (TYP.
SPLICE BOLT SLOTS
25r-Orr
r_11/nrr
3/4 rr X 21/2 rr ( TYP . )
POST BOLT SLOTS
r_11/nrr
STANDARD W-BEAM GUARDRAIL
8 ►► 6,►
STANDARD
LINE POST
HEET 6 OF 8
862DO2
WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
(FOR WOOD POSTS)
� �-) I "l--
2�2►►X3/ ►►
SLOT
100
7 %2 it
±1/8
SHORT WOOD
BREAKAWAY POST
8 ►►
1"
/$►► DIA
CENTERED
ON 6" SIDE
r------- ----- ,
I T
I
/8►► DIA.
3►► i 3►►.
I
SOIL PLATE
3/4" DIA.
I
r-----------------
I
O
I
I
I
I
I
LO
co
T
STEEL TUBE
TS 6 itx8 xO.1875
SYSTEM PARTS
IDE
r_11/nrr
1 i "IA 1 A rr 2 rr
i
1 113 ►►+ ►►
16 16
r
I
_
+�
23/ ►►+
16rr
r\
_
I
0 it
PLAN
I
2 1611 +
1/8 ►►
_
0 ►►
I
FRONT
-
ROUTED
OFFSET BLOCK
R
LO
co
411
116�� DIA.
I I
HOLES
%6" DIA.
HOLES
IDE
"W6" STEEL POST
CAR
p1'
s.
SEAL
022966
„HOW, *,O-*
O
uuu
z
O
cn
H
H
Q
Q
WJ�~Z
00cn=
W
W
=
Q
Q
U
=
O
Q
=~zW
H
c
W
O
-1
0
c/)
z
,H
�
H
�
W
0
SHEET 6 OF 8
862-D02

COMPUTED BY: ANK
CHECKED BY: DDM
DATE: 8/15/19
DATE: 8/15/19
STATE I'A" I' E OF \ OR ` I' I'"II CA R O I [ 4 -
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B -4484 1 315-/
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
E
m
m
m
i
�o
CL
m�
Oro
CV 3
m r6
wo
cnm
L�o0
oc__
S UMMAR Y OF EARTHWORK
STATION
STATION
UNCL.
EXCAV.
EMBANK.
+ %
BORROW
WASTE
PHASE I AND II
-L1- 17+00.00
-L1- 22+05.00
162
6,349
6,187
0
-L1- 28+10.00
-L1- 39+44.00
34
30,237
30,203
0
-L1- 43 + 46.00
-L1- 54 + 00.00
153
13,335
13,182
0
-EL- 49+50.00
-EL- 54+50.00
36
636
600
0
-DW1- 10+11.00
-DW1- 14+37.00
1,097
21
0
1,076
SUBTOTALS:
1,482
50,578
50,172
1,076
PHASE III
-L1- 17+00.00
-L1- 21+50.00
68
155
87
0
-L1- 48+00.00
-11_11- 54+00.00
51
384
333
0
SUBTOTALS:
119
539
420
0
EROSION CONTROL
-L1- 21+00.00
-11_11- 22+06.00
394
21
0
373
-L1- 27+50.00
-11_1- 40+00.00
2,578
3,666
1,088
0
-L1- 42+50.00
-11_11- 47+50.00
2,170
520
0
1,650
SUBTOTALS:
5,142
4,207
1,088
2,023
TOTALS:
6,743
55,324
51,680
3,099
WASTE IN LIEU OF BORROW
-3,099
-3,099
PROJECT TOTALS:
6,743
55,324
48,581
0
EST. 5% TO REPLACE SOIL IN BORROW PIT
2,429
GRAND TOTALS:
6,743
55,324
51,010
0
SAY:
7,090
53,570
Earthwork quantities are calculated by the Roadway Design Unit.
These earthwork quantities are based in part on subsurface data
provided by the Geotechnical Engineering Unit.
EST DDE (FROM HYDRO TBD)
EST UNDERCUT EXCAVATION (FROM GEOTECH TBD)
EST SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL (FROM GEOTECH TBD)
EST GEOTEXTILE FOR SOIL STABILIZATION (FROM GEOTECH TBD)
ROW AREA DATA S UMMAR Y
PARCEL
NO.
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES
PROP.
ROW
PERM.
UTILITY
EASE.
PERM.
DRAIN
EASE.
PERM.
DRAINAGE
UTILITY EASE.
CONST.
EASE.
1
FRANCES T. KILPATRICK
15,493.49 S.F.
11,732.96 S.F.
2
SANDRA N. WHITE
558.04 S.F.
1,840.03 S.F.
3
WILLIAM E. DANIELS
65,099.98 S.F.
19,208.65 S.F.
4
COASTAL LUMBER COMPANY
541.79 S.F.
4,009.94 S.F.
5
CAROL U. HEATH
64,196.66 S.F.
2,679.74 S.F.
969.12 S.F.
18,884.11 S.F.
6
RAY M. HEATH
15,848.44 S.F.
2,206.45 S.F.
7
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H. BYRD
3,526.15 S.F.
8
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H. BYRD
2,980.53 S.F.
2,721.57 S.F.
10,454.05 S.F.
SHOULDER BERM GUTTER S UMMAR Y
SURVEY
LINE
STATION
STATION
LENGTH
(LF)
-L1- LT
19+34.03
21 +95.13
261.10
-11_11- RT
20+48.75
21 +95.04
146.29
-L1- LT
28+15.08
34+10.85
595.77
-L1- RT
28+18.95
29+74.49
155.54
-Ll- LT
38 + 89.50
39 + 33.83
44.33
-Ll- LT
43 + 56.17
43 + 72.17
16.00
TOTAL:
1,219.03
SAY:
1,220
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
LINE
STATION
STATION
LOCATION
AREA
SQUARE
YARDS
-L1-
17 + 00
22 + 08
RT
14,582.65
1,620.29
-L1-
27+95
40+43
RT
28,940.96
3,215.66
-L1-
42 +22
49 + 87
RT
21,800.08
2,422.23
-L1-
49 +14
54 + 60
RT
4,328.65
480.96
TOTAL:
7,739.15
SAY:
7,740
"N" - DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF LANE TO FACE OF GUARDRAIL.
TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH - DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE TO SHOULDER BREAK POINT.
FLARE LENGTH = DISTANCE FROM LAST SECTION OF PARALLEL GUARDRAIL TO END OF GUARDRAIL.
W = TOTAL WIDTH OF FLARE FROM BEGINNING OF TAPER TO END OF GUARDRAIL. GUARDRAIL S UMMAR Y
G = GATING IMPACT ATTENUATOR TYPE 350
NG = NON -GATING IMPACT ATTENUATOR TYPE 350
LENGTH
WARRANT POINT
"N"
LENGTH
W
ANCHORS
IMPACT
REMOVE
REMOVE
SURVEY
D I ST.
TOTAL
TOTAL
ATTENUATOR
SINGLE
EXISTING
AND
LINE
BEG. STA.
END STA.
LOCATION
FROM
SHOUL.
TYPE 350
FACED
GUARDRAIL
STOCKPILE
REMARKS
SHOP
DOUBLE
APPROACH
TRAILING
E.O.L.
WIDTH
APPROACH
TRAILING
APPROACH
TRAILING
GREU
TYPE III
AT-1
GUARDRAIL
(LF )
EXISTING
STRAIGHT
CURVED
FACED
END
END
END
END
END
END
TL-3
EA
G
NG
GUARDRAIL
-Ll-
17+00.00
17+50.00
LT
50.00
3'
9'
50
1
1
75
REMOVE AND REPLACE EXIST. GR., USE GR TRANSITION SECTION
-Ll-
17+00.00
22+06.00 (BR)
RT
487.50
6'
9'
1
250
TIE TO EXIST. GR AT BEGIN PROJECT, REMOVE EXIST. GR., USE GR. TRANSITION SECTION
-Ll-
18+25.00
22+06.00 (BR)
LT
381.25
22+06.00 (BR)
6'
9'
50
1
1
1
-Ll-/ DWl-
28+06.00 (BR)
10+52.84
LT
737.50
50.00
34+00.00
6'
9'
1
1
-L1-
28+06.00 (BR)
29+87.50
RT
181.25
28+90.00
6'
9'
100
2
1
1
-DW1-/ Ll-
10+69.45
39+45.00 (BR)
LT
300.00
75.00
39+45.00 (BR)
6'
9'
1
1
-Ll-
38+63.75
39+45.00 (BR)
RT
81.25
39+45.00 (BR)
3'
9'
50
1
1
1
ANCHOR DEDUCTION
GREU TL-3: 8 @ 50' = 400'
TYPE 111: 8 @ 18.75' = 150'
AT-1: 2 @ 6.25' = 12.5'
-Ll-
43+45.00 (BR)
54+25.00
LT
1081.25
53+00.00
6'
9'
50
1
1
1
-L1-
43+45.00 (BR)
44+26.25
RT
81.25
43+45.00 (BR)
3'
9'
50
1
1
1
-L1-
49 + 25.00
54 + 25.00
RT
500.00
50 + 50.00
53 + 00.00
6'
9'
50
50
1
1
2
SUBTOTALS
3881.25
125.00
GRAND TOTAL = 562.5'
ANCHOR DEDUCTION
562.50
0.00
ADDITIONAL GUARDRAIL POSTS = 5
TOTAL
3318.75
125.00
SAY
3337.50
137.50

E
D
m
COMPUTED BY:
ANK
DATE: 227A9
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
CHECKED BY:
ARV
DATE: 227A9
STATE OF NORTH
C ROLIN
B-4484 3D-1
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
LIST
OF
PIPES, END WALLS, ETC.
(FOR PIPES 48" &
UNDER)
O
fV
Lq
ENDWALLS
Q U m
00
aw '
N W m O
N
00
Z J v
2
6
0
ABBREVIATIONS
2 X
00
N
STATION
O
Z
DRAINAGE PIPE
C.A.A. PIPE
CLASS III R.C. PIPE
CLASS IV R.C. PIPE
STD. 838.01
STD. 838.11
Z V ii
(n CO
Q = J _
} r
0
H
w
"'
Ln
C.B. CATCH BASIN
V
j
(RCP, CSP, CARP, HDPE, or PVC)
(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
OR
O O N
FRAME, GRATES
Nt
N.D.I. NARROW DROP INLET
STD. 838.80
LL
O Z +
AND HOOD
W
O
u
(UNLESS
~ D Q
STANDARD 840.03
D. 1. DROP INLET
O
O
NOTED
O
N
0Ln
G.D.I. GRATED DROP INLET
N
z
p
a
Q
u
OTHERWISE)
00
p
0
Z
w
>
G.D.I. (N.S.) GRATED DROP INLET
Q
w
w
w
o
Q
O
(NARROW SLOT)
z
O
W
J
w
J
w
V
o
*FT
FT.
N
_
`n
U
J.B. JUNCTION BOX
A
B
SIZE
Q
"'
u
w
Lu
12"
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
48"
12"
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
48"
12"
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
48"
12"
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
48"
w
w
w
CU. YDS.
`n
w
~
3
Z
V
a
>
>
O
a
CL
d
D
O
LO
w
Q
M.H. MANHOLE
Lu
>
O
O
Z
Z
H
_
Lu
Mo
JO
w
�
T.B.D.I. TRAFFIC BEARING DROP INLET
z
z
Z
o
O
o
00
_
THICKNESS
o
o
a
o
Z
T.B.J.B. TRAFFIC BEARING JUNCTION BOX
OR GAUGE
Nt
v
o•
of
o,
o,
a
a
=
p
00
TYPE OF GRATE
cii
w
Q
w
O
10
o
10
0
10
0
10
0
N
0
N
0
0
0
�u
0
w
0
0
�j
d
vi
CJ
Q
=
Q
0
?
N
N
`n
Ln
00
w
0
00
0
m
Q
mw
REMARKS
E
F
G
c�
a
V
H
ow-
-Ll- 21 + 86
15RT
0401
31.59
1
1
1
0401
0402
28.84
26.00
128
-Ll- 20+54
17RT
0402
28.65
1
1
1
0402
0403
24.65
22.45
24
-Ll- 20+55
39RT
0403
26.00
1
1
1
0403
0404
21.00
10.00
28
2
-Ll- 19+40
17LT
0405
24.75
1
1
1
REMOVE 32 LF OF EXIST 12" CMP
0405
0406
22.00
7.00
40
2
-Ll- 28+28
15RT
0501
32.70
1
1
1
0501
0502
29.95
27.05
140
-Ll- 29+69
15RT
0502
29.80
1
1
1
0502
0503
26.30
21.45
52
-Ll- 29+71
67RT
0503
25.00
1
1
1
0503
0504
21.35
10.00
32
2
-Ll- 34 + 05
17 LT
0506
17.00
1
1
1
0506
0507
14.25
12.50
16
-Ll- 39+25
17LT
0601
18.10
1
1
1
0601
0602
13.50
13.00
36
-Ll- 38+95
17LT
0602
17.50
1
0.3
1
1
0602
0603
12.20
12.00
36
-Ll- 43+65
17LT
0604
20.10
1
3.1
1
1
0604
0605
12.00
9.00
24
2
0606
8.60
8.40
44
1
CROSS PIPE WITH HEADWALL
TOTALS
124
428
44
1
11
4.4
9
9
2
2
8

STATE I'A" I' E OF \ OR ` I' I'"II CA R O I [ 4 -
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
co
�m
o./
O ro
3
mc,
OD
CV +'
I �
c� cm
PARCEL INDEX SHEET
PARCEL No.
SHEET No.
PROPERTY OWNER NAME
1
4
FRANCES T. KILPATRICK
2
4
SANDRA N. WHITE
3
5,6
WI LLIAM E. DANIELS
4
5
COASTAL LUMBER COMPANY
5
6
CAROL U. HEATH
6
6
RAY M . HEATH
7
67
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H. BYRD
8
67
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H. BYRD
PARCEL No. SHEET No. PROPERTY OWNER NAME
Q�
I /

0-
03
Cc
�0'
LLL
LL>
sLL
orr
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4484
-LI- POC STA. 17 + 00*00
In
-Ll - PC Sto. 14+57.76
DETAIL E
STANDARD BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground S
TD
?BM*i�
Ground
d
Geotextile n. D= 1.0 Ft.
Max. d = 1.0 Ft.
*When B is < 6.0' B= 1.0 Ft.
Type of Liner- Class "B" Rip -Rap
1
FRANCES T. KILPATRICK
DB 1457 PG 210
W IPG 2
-Ll - PRC Sto. 20+27.10
-Ll- STA. 19+47 LT
EST. 6 TONS CLASS "B" RIP RAP
EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE
N
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
B -4484
W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
53.•• • •.,
� •�� SEAL
= 030952 =
•,��F�ti • G I NE • •\�0,�.
-Ll - PCC Sto. 17+72.05
m
Y
1' .Ak STANDARD BASE DITCH
WOODS SEE DETAIL E
Woods TIE TO EXIST. Z
A- � GUARDRAJL END PROP. RET. WALL #1 �/ '� m sz
REMOVE APPRO&. / e rr -Ll- +65.38 y,�
50 LF OF EXIST. /
-LI- STA. 19 + 50.00 55.00' LT - ' ' ' / BEGIN PROP. RET. WALL #1 W
GLIARDRAIL FRAM / _ - - - / -Ll- TA. 2+00.�0 03
-L1- STA. ;s^� , WOODS �� a_Z
17 + 00.00 TO EST 1/ON L RAP 20,
. 17k+ 52 IT +/- Y GEOTEXTILE 30'
/ � N
EST 1 TON CL B RIP RAP / ' �g
RETAI '� -Ll- A7.10 -Ll- +00.00 00 /
� / EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE , - � �
10" LINE EXISTING VV / 1-�+27.10 55.00' LT 55,00' LT
_ ATE R`^'r -Ll- + 65.00 -Ll-/+ 00.00
S� f -_- - � / 65.26' LT, 85.00' LT P 85.00' LTCyp 50.00' LT I
/ ' , - PUE PUE ~I
MAPLE RESS Rp ° %iNG R W VARIES >
_ - - PdE
16
E --- _ v ------ -��s- 00 J_ E I
�y r) -A 15" P
NEUSE RIVER N + �'� 13 °'' MAX PIPE SLOPE - 0406 m UE -
OVERFLp GE 1�_ _ R W GRID T �1C TL E3 ABC 20 + �° OUTLET = 1%a _ m
� GREUC 6' FDPSELBOWS 'A, DI
_ r _ TL-3 + 75.40 r r
� - �I 7 - TO BIDD vv)) 14.8' - - SBC� F WOODS
�(� 2 VEN WSD)
_ _ LE RD.
_ _ LA3
- w 12.6 0 oM O
RETAIN EXISTING �T�A�N - - - - - - - - 8. N 0 N
OVERFLOW BRIDGE -� = - -elM- - - - - F M _ - 50:1 p p 0
k � - -a�rv) - 10,00 INC II _ �BG T GI
+ 15" RCP -III S ��
PUE
LOW
SHEET NO.
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
/041'*%
SEAL -9!,
018442
'�i O•!' FNG I NF��'' Cj`���
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0403 T; _
L R j�ySMNc - _ ei _ �° o .'lNC- MH �� 040 I - �_ l(i
REMOVE EXISTING M _ `LM ^ + (TYP.) 15" CAAP _SE T_ m
� TIE TO EXIST. GUARDRAIL 12- CMP -�' ` + - 43.02 =4' I ��
ku
REMOVE APPIROX. �50 LF OF ExsnN-ages ELBOWS 33� -Ll- +63.15
EXIST. GUARDRAIL FROM � �49.92 RT
�LI- STA. 17 + 00.00 TO
-Ll- + 38.17 -Ll + 58.32
19 �50 R_� +/- N C D O T G P S � 74.49RT 77.82' RT- _Ll- + 75.00
WOODS � B 4 4 4 -1 ) EST 1 TON CL B RIP RAP A- 64.70' RT / Uj
_ _ � EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE �e �� O
MAX PIPE SLOPE
@ OUTLET = 1% cN
A -B�
- 2 a
V
'L -Ll- + 00.00 100.00' RT
-Ll- + 50.00
� � � .� � � � 1 .00' RTC 1 Q
J PROPOSED GRADING 1 73.11' RT m
(SEIE EC YLANS1 1 r,
J.
J_ 1 m
S_
BEGIN BRIDGE
o -LI - POC ST A. 22 +06.00
N
6' SHLD 4' SHLD
+ 87.33
+ 87.33
0 o N
TYPE -III
30' CLR RDW r
-Ll -
CURVE DATA
CN o N
0 0 N
PI Sto 16+14.94
PI Sto 18+99.59
PI Sto 23+80.19
p =
2° 51' 30.1" (LT)
p =
1* 48' 46.9" (LT)
A =
11° 41' 14.5" (RT )
~
D =
0° 54' 34,0"
D =
0' 42' 39.1"
D =
1° 39' 38.7"
o a
YPE-III
L =
314.29'
L =
255.05'
L =
703.74'
o
T =
157.18"
T =
127.53"
T =
353.10'
R =
6,300.00'
R =
8,060.00'
R =
3,450.00"
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
SE
= 03
SE
= 02
SE
= 04
-Ll - POC ST A. 2I +95.00
RO
= 81'
RO
= 54'
RO
= l08'
DETAIL SHOWING PAVEMENT - BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP (NOT TO SCALE)
S®aG FROM -Ll- STA. 19 + 34 TO STA. 21 + 95 LT
SANDRA N. WHITE 1
DB 2834 PG 537 SBG FROM -Ll- STA. 2&+49 Tab STA. 211+95 RT
W2PIG 103
N
N
0o
WOODS
N
ca
Of
w
c�
Z o'
oLn
D
Lnw
ZZ
D�
wO
ww
zz
J J
Fr- ry
W
wI-
as
03:
c�
m
r
Q
N
Q
RS&H
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
I FOR -Ll- PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 8
r/ BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
PAVEMENT REMOVAL
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-37
FOR RETAINING WALL PLANS, SEE SHEETS W-1 THRU W-5

CD
w
m,
0
w
w
U�L
o�

0-
03
c9
0
*/4 /AM
PC N 320 pG�llE� S
St0pc 154-N
WOODS
n ° -DWI- +55.82
2 8.56' RT
WOODS
m 3 -DWI- + 37.68 b C
30.09' LT
I
HY
I
101
S
ECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL B
S
m
0
U)
N
Cn
N .
CV)-Dwlo
+ 75.0
30.00' L
CURVED
GR
AT_
"O-
J
a
1 F
°
C'
v , N
o
W
i
O PKO
F
2 --
EIP
POT Sto.l4+g0.20
��� �o N 77° 40' 23.6" W
V, END CONSTRUCTION
-DVV l - POT ST A. I4 +37.00
-DWI- +20.00
30.00' RT
PT StG.14+33.13
END BRIDGE
�n
-Ll- POT STA. 43+45.00
CL
�o
0 51' CLR RDWY
TYPE -III
-L/
�
N
O
O
8:1
TYPE -III 0 GREU TL-3
M
U_
END APPROACH SLAB
-Ll- POT STA. 43+56.17
DETAIL SHOWING PAVEMENT
- BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP (NOT TO SCALE)
DETAIL C
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground 3 Ground
D
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
-DWI- STA. 14 + 00 RT
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
B -4484
W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
CARO����,,i
SS00
/p�.'9
.�� SEAL 91.
�Q' 030952
�.. F4,
,,,I1j,
u �� �a u►►`� ``,.
SHEET NO.
6
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
t1H.11CA R 0� Ilk-
�� SS /p��.9
.�� SEAL -9l.
;n 018442
��i O•!'c�IG I NFF�'
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RS&H
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493
7
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H.BYRD
/ D 2677
G3 781 P699 DBG
-DWI- 24.22 C / ' // 5
00' LT 3
END � PHALT PAV ENT / CAROL U. HEATH
DWI- 10+ .79 DB 3134 PG 72
PC I SLIDE 15-A
BEGIN ROCK PLAT lNG
AROL U. HEATH EST 1 TON CL B RIP RAP DB 781 PG 695 -LI - POT ST A. 43+57 +/ - LT
/ / C
DB 3134 PIS 72 o PC I SLIDE 15-Q W000s
EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE
/ �
c DB 781PIS 695
/ -DWI- + 24.22 -Ll- + 38.39
30.00' RT I 131.85' LTA SBG FROM -Ll- STA. 43 + 56 TO 43 + 72 LT � -Ll- 27.07 SBG FROM -Ll- STA. 38+89 TO 39+34 LT
/ PRC Sto. 12+24.22 1 .10' LT � EST 1 TON CL B RIP RAP
3 -Ll- +97.24 r� -L1- ` 4.61 _ � m EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE -k Nk,
124.37' LT 118. LT �c
� � � � � � Jz CYPRESS SWAMP
/ Wl- +75.00 SPECIAL CUT DITCH QVE -Ll- + ` .58
30.00' RT SEE DETAIL B 1 \ 8 LT e� -L 70.04
0 PC . 10+60.96 10.4 �� \ � � � 80.00' LT Q
° ' 'I w �� 50.0 T PIPE SLOPE 56.48' LT
` 44 38 40.1 w a +
` MAX���J� CYPRESS SWAMP @ OUTLET = 0.6/0 �c 00
' ROE BEGIN GRADE �s N
-DWI- POT STA.10 ��,\ E E E E E1- +38. 6 E 060 E E M 27'
06 _
p SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH 50.20' LT N rn + (TYP.) �o Q
0 5 ' R SEE DETAIL A ODS �� TB GI CL EXISTING R/W � INC 00 A/ o- ~
�,FLBOW ;0 + (TYP.) " N
o, -L1- +50.00 -L1- +96.12 - _ ) 01 W
Ail- - -C 50.00' LT 50.00' LT - E F
15" RCP -III � � �, 5 CAABG J
F _ - _ SBG . ` I
m
060 32G1 ` M �� TB2G1 _ c�1 O r cal �"� M
37 20 26.3E c o604 L/- o 0 0
' -
' O o 15"RCP III \..�.. o -- _ - -- �CN
M---
r BC - M -8:
- o W
ExisTING a 0� R 20' -�'_/ _ _ - +22.99 10" Vr ~
R lQ \ TB
10°PEAS, (NW W +_z�w - R 20'I�LB�' W LU
��- _CRA�EN WSD) INC i ---- -SEAT=13.99c'� I=�=
EAT_13.99' __ -, 22' BST F I
- (TYP- - -- ` -T SR 1470 MAPLE CYPRESS RD - - - - N
-L1- + 79.17 2' ASPHALT I I - - - -
96.26' RT 12' 1 PROPOSED GRADING I PROPOSED GRADING / F - --
APRON � I _ _-
_ _ (SEE EC PLANS) NEUE RIVER OVERFLOW BRIDGE139 (SEE EC PLANS) O
_=-------13.99' - -- EXISTING wLB - -k-- SEAT=13.97' SEAT= - - - - - - _ - -
�' 106- �
- -�
ExisnNG R/W -LI- +80.24 -F -T-t- F - ---- F 10.5 ` --_ -
116.42' RT Ln I �. �..a U
-Ll- POC Sto.35+85.25 - I Pu PUE -Ll- +51.87 �_
.66
-DWI- POT Sta.10+00.00 PUE \ PUE -Ll- +4 U83 RE10VEicISTING 110.0' RT 2 RT -Ll 76.0718' RT - B L - 5
1- +80.87
- 1- 18.23 \ CYPRESS SWAMP
-BL- 4 19do,.5 ' RT _Ll- +10.00 120.7 RT BRIDGE e��l � -Ll- +00.00
130.00' RT ° 110.00' RT
-Ll- + 98.30 \ o \ E �\ 8100' RT j
115.44' RT `� ` LI- +00.00 \ - \ CYPRESS SWAMP re -Ll- PC Sto. 46+05.62
-Ll- +134.75' RT 97.92-L1135-\. ' 17.92RT\` 116.52' RT \ \ \ -L1155 00' ROT _k A/ ` � 8
\ \
CULTIVATED FIELD
0606 -DWI- +10.00 FROM -L1- STA. 35+20 TO STA. 35+50 LT
45.00' RT FROM -Ll- STA. 36+50 TO STA. 37+21 LT
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL C DETAIL B
EST 3 TON CL B RIP RAP SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Q EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE Fron
/ Ditcl
EST 2 TON CL B RIP RAP Natural 3Slop
EST 7 SY GEOTEXTILE Ground .7 D
WOODS Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
-DWI- + 8000
.55.00' RT -Ll- PT Sta 37+96.12 FROM -DWI- STA. 10+26 TO STA. 14+40 LT
18 RCP IV FROM -DWI- STA. 10+29 TO STA. 13+90 RT
/ -DWI- +70.00
30.00' RT
DETAIL SHOWING PAVEMENT - BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP (NOT TO SCALE)
130.00' RT
I
\ Im
\ \ 155.00 RT
v�6 FOR -DWI- PROFILE, SEE SHEET NO. 10
RAY DB 3134. HEATH PG 65 -DWI- CURVE DATA -Ll- CURVE DATA FOR -LI- PROFILE SEE SHEET NO. 9
PC I SLIDE 15-A PI StG 11+47.45 PI Sto 13+49.63 Pl Sto 47+08.74
L = 46° 46' 08.1" (RT) L = 79° 47' 51.6" (LT) L = 128' 28.7" (RT)
D = 28° 38' 52.4' D = 38° ll' 49.9,, D = 1° 41' 06.6" BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
L = 163.25' L = 208.9IL = 206.19"
T = 86.48' T = 125.41' T = 103.IT PAVEMENT REMOVAL
R = 200.00' R = 150.00' R = 3,400.00'
1101, SE = NC SE = NC SE = 04
RO = NIA RO = NIA RO = 108' FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-31

PROJECT REFERENCE NO
B -4484
SHEET NO.
7
F—
Uj
W
N
U
F-
2
m
�U
,L L LL
—LLB
sLL
cr
_n o�
DETAIL D
CHANNEL CHANGE
( Not to Scale)
b
Natural E-
GrouncTd 4•� TD
GEOTEXTILE
Type of Liner=Class "I" Granite Rip Rap
Proposed Natural
Fill Slope Ground
Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
Max. d = 1.5 Ft.
B = 8.0 Ft.
b = 5.0 to 12.0 Ft.
FROM -Ll- STA. 48 + 80 TO STA. 50 + 50 LT
EST. CLASS "I" GRANITE RIP RAP = 106 TONS
EST. GEOTEXTILE = 234 SY
EST. DDE = 120 CY
LINDA B. MCKEEL, ET AL
DB 303 PG 280
Exist. Channel
(:7)
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H.BYRD
DB 2677 PG 283
END TIP PROJECT B-4484
-LI- POC STA. 54 + 00., 00
CONSTRUCTION
STA. 54 + 50.00
110
S \ S�
\ ns
-Ll- +37.07 \ \
\ _ GR.
JUDY K. HEATH
DB 3134 PG 59
APO
Stn_ 'iR+4/_RI
nO�
V
W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
tN1CARO,��.,,.
1CARO���...
FESS/0 •9'1
FESS/0 •*
• !••
.`
SEAL
A SEAL
' 030952
Z. 018442
.,��,'0 B j%
a u►►`� ``,.
N 0;
I
J
O
CP �
0
W N
L32°51'25" W
77.87'
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
RS&H
NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-0493

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
6'
9'
co
LID
F
I
00
7T
m
/
0
L
/
F7
E
L
m
T
roE
N D)
E
— Iw
o�
N
m�
w+
LL-�
rl_--�
N cl�
r \ �'
1460 /
145
1459
Riversi e ' 1462
1459 -1458
/ 1463- . _ 1457' , 1465
Epwo th
_L=C-
�N,�0 1469
0�
�,• 1468 1456 1457 1454
1400
PROJECT L0CATION '\ ,
1474 /, - - _ . -'- - 1470 1450 1454
11472 1470 �� \1450
J
1471
1400
/ / I "/ . \
1472�
J
VICINITY MAP N. T. S.
GRAPHIC SCALES --)�
50 25 0 50 100
10000 m
PLANS
50 2,5 0 50100
iFuuuu�
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
uuuuu� �
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
RT H
STATIE'i OF NOCAROLINA
DIVISION OF H11""HWAYS
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION PLANS
IT
z CRA VEN C 0 UNTY
0*4
,7 LOCATION: REPLACE BRIDGES N0.138 & 139 OVER 11tEUSE
RIVER AND NEUSE RIVER OVERFLOW 0111
SR 1470 (MAPLE CYPRESS ROAD)
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.: DESCRIPTION:
UC-1
UC-2
UC-3
UC-3A TO UC-3E
UC-4 TO UC-7
UC-8 TO UC-9
TYPE OF WORD: WATER LINE RELOCATION
TITLE SHEET
UTILITY SYMBOLOGY
NOTES
DETAILS
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHEET
PR OFILE SHEET
WATER AND SEWER OWNERS 011i PROJECT
(A) CRAVEN COUNTY WATER
SEAL
• SEAL
C� o3138Wb,:
9/4/2019
,TiLPi Na
C�
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF
RS&H
ITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS, INC.
8521 SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 400
RALEIGH, NC 27615
RICHARD BOLLINGER. PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
ALEX VINSON, El
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
HON YEUNG. PE
NCDOT CONTACT
SH&Ur NQ

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B —4484 U C - 2
LO
TE NORTH � LI
DIVISION OHRG'HWAYS
UTILITIES PLAN
SHEET SYMBOLS
PROPOSED WATER
SYMBOLS
PROPOSED MISCELLANOUS UTILITIES SYMBOLS
Water Line (Sized as Shown) ---------------------------
12"WL
Power Pole------------------------------------------------------------------
b
Thrust Block -------------------------------------------------------------
1 11/4 Degree Bend ----------------------------------------------------
+.+
Telephone Pole ---------------------------------------------------------
-0-
Air Release Valve ---------------------------------------------------
AR
22%2 Degree Bend ----------------------------------------------------
+k
Joint Use Pole ---------------------------------------------------------
-
Utility Vault----------------------------------------------------------
v
45 Degree Bend ---------------------------------------------------------
+.�
Telephone Pedestal ------------------------------------------------
TEOED
Concrete Pier------------------------------------------------------------
N
90 Degree Bend ---------------------------------------------------------
+t
Utility Line by Others ---------------------------------------
(Type as Shown)
-PROP O/H POW LINES
Steel Pier--------------------------------------------------------------
SP
❑
Plug-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trenchless Installation -------------------------------------
-12" TL INSTALL_
Plan Note -------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE
Tee----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+t+
Encasement by Open Cut -------------------------------------
24"ENCAS BYOC
Pay Item Note -----------------------------------------------------------
PAY ITEM
Cross------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Encasement ------------------------------------------------------------------
24" ENCASEMENT
Reducer-------------------------------------------------------------------------
►.
GV
EXISTING UTILITIES
SYMBOLS
Gate Valve-------------------------------------------------------------------
//
-----------------------------------------------------
Butterfly Valve
BV
//
Power Pole -------------------------------------------------------------------
l
*
Underground Power Line ----------------------------------------
P
Tapping Valve-----------------------------------------------------------
TGV
H
Telephone Pole----------------------------------------------------------
+
*Underground Telephone Cable ----------------------------
T
Line Stop
LS
Joint Use Pole----------------------------------------------------------
4-
* Underground Telephone Conduit------------------------
Tc
Line Stop with Bypass ------------------------------------------
LS/BP
Utility Pole--------------------------------------------------------------
•
*
Underground Fiber Optics Telephone Cable
T FO
Blow Off-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bo
■
Utility Pole with Base ---------------------------------------
o
Underground TV Cable --------------------------------------------
TV
Fire Hydrant--------------------------------------------------------------
*
H-Frame Pole--------------------------------------------------------------
*Underground Fiber Optics TV Cable ---------------
TV FO
Relocate Fire Hydrant ------------------------------------------
R4"
Power Transmission Line Tower ------------------------
❑
*Underground Gas Pipeline -----------------------------------
Remove Fire Hydrant-----------------------------------------------
REM FH
.
Water Manhole------------------------------------------------------------
®
Aboveground Gas Pipeline -----------------------------------
A/G Gas
Water Meter----------------------------------------------------------------
PIM
Power Manhole-----------------------------------------------------------
©
*Underground Water Line ----------------------------------------
w
Relocate Water Meter --------------------------------------------
RWM
I
Telephone Manhole --------------------------------------------------
o
Aboveground Water Line ----------------------------------------
A/C Water
Remove Water Meter-------------------------------------------------
REM WM
Sanitary Sewer Manhole ---------------------------------------
*Underground Gravity Sanitary Sewer Line--
SS
Water Pump Station ------------------------------------------------
p
PS(W,
Hand Hole for Cable ----------------------------------------------
H„
Aboveground Gravity Sanitary Sewer Line--
A/G Sanitary Sewer
�
77
RPZ Backflow Preventer---------------------------------------
PRPZ
X
Power Transformer---------------------------------------------------
H
Underground SS Forced Main Line--------------------
FSS
00
DCV Backflow P rev e n t e r---------------------------------------
PBFP
X
Telephone Pedestal ------------------------------------------------
a
Underground Unknown Utility Line -----------------
?0TL
Relocate RPZ Backflow Preventer
RRPZ
X
CATV Pedestal------------------------------------------------------------
©
SUE Test Hole------------------------------------------------------------
A
00
Relocate DCV Backflow Preventer--------------------
RBFP
X
Gas Valve---------------------------------------------------------------------
o
Water Meter----------------------------------------------------------------
o
m
0
GasMeter---------------------------------------------------------------------
4
Water Valve----------------------------------------------------------------
�
PROPOSED SEWER
SYMBOLS
�
Located Miscellaneous Utility
Object -------- o
Fire Hydrant--------------------------------------------------------------
�
Gravity Sewer Line
(Sized as Shown)
12' SS
Abandoned According to Utility
Records --- AATUR
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout-------------------------------------
o
L
0
0
Force Main Sewer Line -----------------------------------------
(Sized as Shown)
12" FSS
End of Information
E.O.I.
l�o_61�
Manhole
ELLI
(Sized per Note)
For Existing Utilities
UQ
0 0�
Sewer Pump Station------------------------------------------------PS(SS,
Utility Line Drawn from Record
N+U�
---------------------
( Type as Shown)
W
<+
Designated Utility Line
(Type as Shown)
o�
N (Y
REV: 2/1/2012

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
9'
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B -4484 U C - 3
DESIGNED BY: R`/
,01n1nnrgi
DRAWN BY: ARV
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
.����-,, ---ACR°�/°--.
CHECKED BY: RLB �,,, �0
��``�J•/(541,
::� 9�:
APPROVED B Y . DoeuS�r��:
18,44?"
REVISED:
�z'.`,
NORTH CAROLINA .�
'
DEPARTMENT OF '�(EON..gp�,,
TRANSPORTATION 9/4/21W9j1111100
GENERAL NOTES:
PROJECT SPECIFIC NOTES:
UTILITIES ENGINEERING SEC.
PHONE:[phone] UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
FAX: [phone] PLANS ONLY
1. THE PROPOSED UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
6. THE PLANS DEPICT THE BEST AVAILABLE
1. ALL PROPOSED WATER LINE SHALL BE
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS
INFORMATION FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE, AND
D.I.R.J. (DUCTILE IRON RESTRAINED
OF THE NC DEPARTMENT OF
TYPE OF MATERIAL FOR ALL EXISTING
JOINT) PIPE FOR TRENCHED INSTALLATION
TRANSPORTATION'S "STANDARD
UTILITIES. MAKE INVESTIGATIONS FOR
AND HDPE FOR TRENCHLESS.
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND
DETERMINING THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE,
STRUCTURES" DATED JANUARY 2018.
AND TYPE MATERIAL OF THE EXISTING
2. THE EXISTING ABOVE GROUND WATER LINE
FACILITIES AS NECESSARY FOR THE
IS TO BE REMOVED AND/OR THE EXISTING
2. THE EXISTING UTILITIES BELONG TO
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED UTILITIES
UNDER GROUND WATER LINE IS TO BE
CRAVEN COUNTY WATER.
AND FOR AVOIDING DAMAGE TO EXISTING
ABANDONED OR REMOVED WHERE RELOCATIONS
FACILITIES. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE INCURRED
ARE PROPOSED.
TO EXISTING FACILITIES TO THE ORIGINAL
3. ALL WATER LINES TO BE INSTALLED
OR BETTER CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL
WITHIN COMPLIANCE OF THE RULES AND
COST TO THE DEPARTMENT.
3. CONTRACTOR'S ATTENTION IS DIRECTED
TO SECTIONS 102, 107, AND 1550 OF THE
REGULATIONS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS CONCERNING
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,
7. MAKE FINAL CONNECTIONS OF THE NEW
TRENCHLESS INSTALLATION. IT IS
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES,
WORK TO THE EXISTING SYSTEM WHERE
CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO HAVE
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SECTION. ALL SEWER
INDICATED ON THE PLANS, AS REQUIRED TO
BORE DESIGNED AND SEALED BY A LICENSED
LINES TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN COMPLIANCE
FIT THE ACTUAL CONDITIONS, OR AS
NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.
OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE
DIRECTED.
NO DAMAGE IS ALLOWED TO RIVER,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
WETLANDS, OR BUFFER ZONES.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, DIVISION OF
WATER RESOURCES, WATER QUALITY SECTION.
8. MAKE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN EXISTING
PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
AND PROPOSED UTILITIES AT TIMES MOST
APPLICABLE PLUMBING CODES.
CONVENIENT TO THE PUBLIC, WITHOUT
LIST OF STANDARD DRAWINGS
ENDANGERING THE UTILITY SERVICE, AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY OWNER'S
1515.01 WATER METER
4. THE UTILITY OWNER OWNS THE EXISTING
REQUIREMENTS. MAKE CONNECTIONS ON
UTILITY FACILITIES AND WILL OWN THE NEW
WEEKENDS, AT NIGHT, AND ON HOLIDAYS IF
UTILITY FACILITIES AFTER ACCEPTANCE BY
NECESSARY.
THE DEPARTMENT. THE DEPARTMENT OWNS THE
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND HAS
9. ALL UTILITY MATERIALS SHALL BE
ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY.
APPROVED PRIOR TO DELIVERY TO THE
COMMUNICATIONS AND DECISIONS BETWEEN
PROJECT. SEE 1500-7, " SUBMITTALS AND
THE CONTRACTOR AND UTILITY OWNER ARE
RECORDS" IN SECTION 1500 OF THE
NOT BINDING UPON THE DEPARTMENT OR THIS
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
CONTRACT UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE
ENGINEER. AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE
UTILITY OWNER AND CONTRACTOR FOR THE
WORK THAT IS NOT PART OF THIS CONTRACT
OR IS SECONDARY TO THIS CONTRACT ARE
ALLOWED, BUT ARE NOT BINDING UPON THE
DEPARTMENT.
°
5. PROVIDE ACCESS FOR THE DEPARTMENT
°
PERSONNEL AND THE OWNER'S
REPRESENTATIVES TO ALL PHASES OF
CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY DEPARTMENT
00
PERSONNEL AND THE UTILITY OWNER TWO
m
WEEKS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK
°
AND ONE WEEK PRIOR TO SERVICE
INTERRUPTION. KEEP UTILITY OWNERS'
REPRESENTATIVES INFORMED OF WORK
°
PROGRESS AND PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY FOR
L
INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING.
0
00
�Q
�z
N+W
U+�
I o �}

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
PROJECT REFERENCE
NO. SHEET NO.
B -4484
U C - 3A
DESIGNED BY: ARV
PROJECT TYPICAI
DETAII R
DRAWN BY: ARV
...CA Rol..... . Ilk
CHECKED BY: RLB°ti9�"'s
�Docu9LY 9�••
APPROVED BY:
=
REVISED:
NORTH CAROL I NA
DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
UTILITIES ENGINEERING SEC.
9/4/2019
PHONE:[phone]
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
FAX: [phone]
PLANS ONLY
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
TRENCH DETAIL
BACKFILL
CLASS "C"
TYPE 113 ►►
(BEDDING FOR P.V.C. PIPE)
(BEDDING FOR D.I. PIPE)
N PIPE
�i
0000000000000000000000000000000000000 BEDDING
O� ��������� -0�. FOUNDATION
0 000000 0000000 00000
o W J 00000 00000000000000
oJ 0000000000 0000000000000000000000000 CONDITIONING
0 H W 00000 0000000000000
0 a m 00000 000000000000000000000000000 FABRIC AS
00 0000000 00000000000000
000 00 000000000000000 REQUIRED
o0000000000000000000000000000000 0
P_ o Pp Pp Pp Pp Pp Pp FOUNDATION
N
CONDITIONING
AS REQUIRED
KI
PLACE FOUNDATION CONDITIONING MATERIAL BELOW
BEDDING IF REQUIRED, AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.
PIPE BEDDED IN SELECT MATERIAL, CLASS II (TYPE 1)
% .
R CLASS III TRENCH BACKFILLED IN LOOSE
—vim e
LAYERS COMPACTED TO TOP OF TRENCH USING LOCAL
EXCAVATED MATERIAL IF APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER,
\77—�i�=
��
OR SELECT MATERIAL. ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE
OF ROCKS, FOREIGN MATERIAL, AND FROZEN EARTH.
COMPACTION SHALL BE TO APPROXIMATELY 95% DENSITY
- -
IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO T-99 AS MODIFIED BY THE
PIPE BEDDED IN LOOSE MATERIAL, LIGHTLY TAMPED WITH
PIPE BEDDED IN 4" MINIMUM LOOSE SOIL. TRENCH
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
A MINIMUM OF 6" UNDER PIPE. TRENCH BACKFILLED IN
BACKFILLED IN LOOSE 6" LAYERS COMPACTED TO
LOOSE 6" LAYERS COMPACTED TO TOP OF TRENCH
TOP OF TRENCH USING LOCAL EXCAVATED MATERIAL,
USING LOCAL EXCAVATED MATERIAL, IF APPROVED BY
IF APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, OR SELECT MATERIAL.
THE ENGINEER, OR SELECT MATERIAL. ALL MATERIAL
ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, FOREIGN
SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, FOREIGN MATERIAL, AND
MATERIAL, AND FROZEN EARTH. COMPACTION SHALL
FROZEN EARTH. COMPACTION SHALL BE TO APPROX.
BE TO APPROX. 95% DENSITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH
95% DENSITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO T-99
AASHTO T-99 AS MODIFIED BY THE DEPARTMENT
AS MODIFIED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
OF TRANSPORTATION.
GENERAL TRENCH DETAL
NOT TO SCAB
NOTES:
1. CONSIDERATION OR THE PIPE
—ZONE EMBEDMENT
CONDITIONS INCLUDED IN THIS
FIGURE MAY BE INFLUENCED
BY FACTORS OTHER
THAN PIPE STRENGTH, FOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
PIPE BEDDING AND
BACKFILL, SEE ANSI/AWWA
C600.
MAXIMUM TRENCH WIDTH
AT TOP OF PIPE
STANDARD RPE
BEDDNG
DETALS
NOMINAL NOMINAL
4-
NOT
TO SCALE
PIPE SIZE TRENCH WIDTH PIPE SIZE TRENCH WIDTH
(INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES)
4 28 20 44
6 30 24 48
00
8 32 30 54
10 34 36 60
i
12 36 42 66
0
14 38 48 72
16 40 54 78
B
18 42
0
i
L
0
0-69-
ooL -69-
uo
w I
00 CQ
0 0�
N + W
�+o
a�-64
m�-69-
Neff}

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
L(�
C
O
c�
00
m
O
L
w
U
w
C
L
O
N�
L
00
C7
/Q
00 CO
o°-w
N+W
_ (n
C�+ka
_64
o4}
-69-
FOR ALL BEND FITTINGS �� T FOR TEE FITTING
��ti
T
ANCHOR IFOR�:QUIRED
SECTION A -A
NOTES:
1.
CONCRETE BLOCKING IS TO
BE FORMED TO
ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO FITTINGS AND POURED AGAINST
UNDISTURBED EARTH.
2.
ALL FITTINGS SHALL BE WRAPPED
IN POLYETHYLENE
TO PREVENT CONCRETE FROM CONTACTING
FITTINGS, BOLTS, OR ENDS
OF MECHANICAL
JOINT BENDS.
3.
CONCRETE TO BE MINIMUM
3,000 PSI @ 28
DAYS.
4.
WHEN SACKRETE IS TO BE
USED, IT SHALL
BE PROPERLY MIXED PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS.
5.
FOR REQUIRED DIMENSIONS,
SEE WS_TB2
THRUST BLOCKAG
NOT TO SCALE
TEST PRESSURE = 1S0 PSI
PIPE
SIZE
TYPE
FITTING
DIMENSI❑NS (FT)
VOLUME
CONCRETE
CU, YE,
„L„
„H„
„T„
11 1/4°
<4
22 1/2'
1.00
1.00
1,50
0.06
INCHES
45'
1.00
1.00
1.50
0.06
90°
1.00
1.00
2.50
0.09
TEE
1.00
1.00
2,00
0.07
11 1/4'
1.00
1.00
2.50
0.09
4
22 1/2°
1,00
1.00
2.50
0,09
INCHES
45'
1.00
1.00
2.50
0.09
90,
1,50
1.50
2.50
0.15
TEE
L50
1,50
2,00
0.12
11 1/4'
1.50
1.50
2.50
0.15
6
22 1/2'
1,50
1.50
2.50
0.15
INCHES
45°
1.50
L50
2,50
0,15
90,
2,00
2.00
3,00
0.28
TEE
2,00
2,00
2.50
0,23
11 1/4°
2,00
2.00
2,50
0,23
8
22 1/2'
2,00
2.00
2,50
0.23
INCHES
45°
2,00
2,00
2.75
0,25
90°
3,00
2.00
3,00
0.39
TEE
3,00
2.00
2.50
0.32
11 1/4'
2,00
2.00
3,00
0,28
12
22 1/2,
2 00
2.00
3 00
0.28
INCHES
45°
3,00
2.50
3,00
0,47
90,
4.50
3.00
3.50
0.94
TEE
4.50
3.00
3,00
0.81
11 1/4'
2,00
2.00
3,00
028
16
22 1/2'
3,00
2.00
3,00
0.39
INCHES
45°
4 00
3.00
3,50
0.84
90,
6.50
3.50
3.50
1.54
TEE
6.50
3,50
3,00
1.32
CHART NOTES:
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
TEST PRESSURE - 200 PSI
PIPE
SIZE
TYPE
FITTING
DIMENSI❑NS (FT)
VOLUME
CONCRETE
CU. YD,
„L„
„H„
„T„
11 1/4°
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.04
<4
22 1/2°
1.00
1.00
1.50
0.06
INCHES
45°
1.00
1.00
1.50
0.06
90°
1.50
150
2,50
0,15
TEE
1.50
150
2,00
0,12
11 1/4°
1.00
1.00
2.50
0.09
4
22 1/2°
1.00
1.00
2,50
0,09
INCHES
45°
1,50
150
2.50
0.15
90,
Lt5o
150
2,50
0.15
TEE
1.50
150
2,00
0,12
11 1/4°
1,50
150
2.50
0.15
6
22 1/2°
1.50
150
2,50
0,15
INCHES
45°
1.50
150
2,50
0,15
90,
2,50
2.00
3.00
0.33
TEE
2.50
2.00
2.50
0.28
11 1/4°
2,00
2.00
2,50
0.23
8
22 1/2'
2.00
2.00
2.50
0.23
INCHES
45'
2.00
2.00
2.75
0.23
90,
4.00
2.00
3,00
0.50
TEE
4.00
2.00
2.50
0.42
11 1/4'
2,00
2.00
3,00
0.28
12
22 1/2°
3,00
2.00
3,00
0.39
INCHES
45°
4.00
2,50
3.00
0.61
90°
5.50
3.00
3.50
1.13
TEE
5.50
3.00
3.00
0.97
11 1/4°
2.00
2.00
3.00
0.28
16
22 1/2°
4.00
2.00
3,00
0,50
INCHES
45°
5.50
3.00
3.50
1.13
90,
7.50
4.00
3.50
2.01
TEE
7,50
4.00
3,00
1.72
1. IE BLOCKING EXCAVATION IS IN LIGHTLY COMPACTED FILL AREAS, OR IN AREAS WHERE BOULDERS OR STUMPS HAVE
BEEN REMOVED, BLOCKING SIZE MUST BE RE -SIZED FOR THE SPECIFIC LOCATION/CIRCUMSTANCE BY A NC LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.
2. BLOCKING SIZES SHOWN IN THESE TABLES ASSUME THE FOLLOWING:
a. BLOCKING IS CONSTRUCTED IN RESIDUAL SOILS AS SHOWN IN DETAIL
b. SOIL BEARING PRESSURE = 2000 PSF
c. VELOCITY OF FLOW = 15 FPS
3. THIS DETAIL NOT APPLICABLE TO REDUCING BENDS.
4. NEITHER THE WEIGHT DE THE CONCRETE BLOCKING NOR FRICTION BETWEEN CONCRETE BLOCKING AND SOIL WAS ADDED
INTO BLOCKING SIZES COMPUTATION. THEREFORE, BLOCKING SIZE IS CONSERVATIVE.
THRUST BLOCK NS
NOT TO SCALE

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
L(�
THRUST COLLAR
(SEE DETAIL)
5' MIN.
6", TYP
RESTRAINT
GLANDS (TYP,)
BLOCKING CROSS SECTION
NO SCALE
n
TOP OF GROUND
z_
m
N_�m
ANCHOR
STRAP
CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK
ANCHOR
STRAP
BOTTOM OF TRENCH
UNDISTURBED EARTH
4
ADD RESTRAINT GLANDS
THROUGHOUT ASSEMBLY.
ROD REQUIREMENTS
SIZE OF BEND
STATIC THRUST IN POUNDS
N0. OF RODS REQUIRED
6"
4,328
4
8"
7,694
4
12"
17,312
4
16"
30,779
8
24"
69,252
8
3/4" THREADED
STEEL RODS
d - d
EL,
a
a
4
Od. d
�d
da
U—
O d d
a
5' MIN.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL FITTINGS SHALL BE WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE TO PREVENT CONCRETE FROM CONTACTING
FITTINGS, BOLTS, OR ENDS OF MECHANICAL JOINT BENDS.
2, EACH FITTING SHALL BE SECURED BY TWO FORMS OF RESTRAINT. RESTRAINING GLANDS AND
CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING ARE PREFERRED. WEDGE —ACTION RESTRAINT GLANDS (I.E. MEGALUGS)
ARE APPROVED ONLY FOR USE ON DUCTILE IRON PIPE. FULLCIRCUMFERENTIAL PIPE RESTRAINT
GLANDS (I.E. GRIP RINGS) MAY BE USED ON PVC OR DUCTILE IRON PIPE. ALL RESTRAINT GLANDS
SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR USE ON THE TYPE OF PIPE FOR WHICH THEY ARE BEING
INSTALLED. OTHER FORMS OF RESTRAINT SUCH AS THREADED ROD, BELL RESTRAINT HARNESSES,
ETC. MAY BE APPROVED BY ONWASA ON A CASE —BY —CASE BASIS.
3, IF APPROVED FOR USE BY ONWASA, STEEL RODS AND BOLTS SHALL BE 3/4" HOT DIPPED
GALVANIZED.
4. MUST USE DUCTILE IRON EYE BOLTS WHERE NECESSARY.
THRUST BCCR NC DES CN QUANT TY TABLE
NOT TO SCALE
3" MIN.
CLEARANCE
RESTRAINT GLAND
UNDISTURBED SOIL
00
o °o p 0 0 000 o O°
00
� I 0°
0
d d
4
a.
4 d.
- d a
/OO d0' O
0 0
o
1
REINFORCING REQUIREMENTS
3" MIN.
CLEARANCE
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
I.D. PIPE
REBAR SIZE
"X" BAR LENGTH
"X" BAR WEIGHT
"Y$' BAR LENGTH
"Y" BAR WEIGHT
NO. REQUIRED
6" — 36"
#5
2'-2"+ O.D. PIPE
1.043 LBS/FT
1'-1"
1.1 LBS. EACH
X-24, Y-12
48" & greater
#6
3'-0"+ O.D. PIPE
1,502 LBS/FT
1'-3"
1.9 LBS. EACH
X-24, Y-12
THRUST COLLAR, AND THRUST SCHEDULE
I.D. PIPE
'$A"
"B"
11
C—C-16", 20"-24", 30"-36", 48"
6" — 36"
1'-411
1'-7„
2„ 3„ 4„
48" & greater
1'-8"
1'-9"
6"
NOTES:
1. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 PSI AND TRANSIT MIXED,
2. REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE DEFORMED AND TIED TOGETHER,
3. TRENCH BOTTOM WIDTH IN VICINITY OF THRUST BLOCK INSTALLATION SHALL BE THE MINIMUM WIDTH
AS SHOWN ON STANDARD EMBEDMENT DETAIL.
4. BACKFILL TAMPED IN 6" LILTS PER STANDARD EMBEDMENT DETAIL.
THRUST COLLAR DES GN QUANT TY TABLE
NOT TO SCALE

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
PROJECT REFERENCE
NO. SHEET NO.
B —4484
U C- 3 D
DESIGNED BY: ARV
PROJECT TYPICAI
DETAII RDRAWN
BY : ARV
,����n�nnrgi
�*, '\ ....... �
CHECKED BY: RLB
:',��°.�oF�ss��°ti�9�"'s
APPROVED BY:
REVISED:
89nea �Y'
F�•.;��
NORTH CAROL I NA
�.
DEPARTMENT OF110
.��'.'�
��ig0���,`,�
UTILITIES ENGINEERING SEC.
9/4/2019
LTRANSPORTATION
PHONE:[phone]
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
FAX:[phone]
PLANS ONLY
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
NOTE: CONCRETE
VALVE COLLAR
REQUIRED ON ALL
VALVES,
APPROVED METHOD FOR
EXTENSION OF VALVE BOX
COVER =
D .o
° WATER
o �'
' d
4 V
STANDARD CONCRETE VALVE COLLAR
(IF NOT IN ASPHALT)
(IF IN ASPHALT, VALVE BOX TO
MATCH ASPHALT GRADE)
0
DOMESTIC
o
CASTING
FINISHED GRADE
PAVEMENT
9
VALVE BOX
VALVE
BOX
COVER
Aga COVER
\\
\/\
VALVE
TAMPED
CAST IRON VALVE BOX
BOX
QO o BACKFILE
5 3„
4 TAMPED-,'
",
,O U
BACKFILE
CAST IRON GATE VALVE
STANDARD MJ GLANDS
0 NOTE: RESTRAINT GLANDS
STANDARD VALVE BOX
MAY BE USED AS OPTION
BOTTOM SECTION
IF NEEDED
VALVE
WATER 0 0
TAMPED
�
MAIN
BACKFILE
° °
CONCRETE
,
SUPPORT
TAMPED
BACKFILE ° ° °
CONCRETE
SUPPORT
TYP CAE
N D N E VALVE DETA E
NOT TO SCALE
C
VALVE BOX DETA L
NOT TO SCALE
O
T)
u
�I
00
m
O
L
0-
u
C
L
Q�
C
oC
� W �
/ Q
CO
00
o°0cc
N + W
u ka
o 4�4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
PROJECT REFERENCE
NO. SHEET NO.
B -4484
U C- 3 E
DESIGNED BY:
Ln
PROJECT TYPICA1 DETAII
,qR`/
BY: ARV
CAROl�,,o
-qDRAWN
CHECKED BY: RLB
��..01,
.
:�',��•oF�SS'/0N9�-,.
;• 9
APPROVED BY:
= SEAL '
REVISED:
:70 DoQuQi T : �i
�v
NORTH CAROL I NA
m•''�.',
DEPARTMENT OF�ip;"g0���
TRANSPORTATION
UTILITIES ENGINEERING SEC.
9/4/2019
PHONE: [phone]
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
FAX: [phone]
PLANS ONLY
UTILITY
CONSTRUCTION
PIPF�I
CAUTION
0 c4L I
NOTES
:
�����
1.
A PROFILE AND PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ENTRY TO EXIT FOR EACH
DIRECTIONAL BORE SECTION BY THE DIRECTIONAL BORE CONTRACTOR.
40 LF RESTRAINED JOINT DIP
(2 PIPE JOINTS TYP.)
2.
ALL BORE SECTIONS SHAD BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED, PER SPECIFICATIONS
UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO CONNECTION TO THE MAIN
WATER LINE.
RESTRAINED JOINT MECHANICAL COUPLING
OR FITTING AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
3.
LENGTH OF CROSSING, LOCATION OF INSPECTION/OBSERVATION EXCAVATION,
NUMBER OF P.E. PIPE JOINTS, LOCATION OF BORE MACHINE, AUGER ENTRANCE
a
LOCATION, AND TIE-IN POINTS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY CRAVEN COUNTY WATER
o w
PRIOR TO ANY START OF WORK OR ORDERING MATERIALS.
HDPE DR9 FITTING DIP
PER PLANS A As SIZE AS REQUIRED
SPECS REQUIRED PER PLANS
v
4.
CONCRETE MARKERS SHALL BE PLACED AT THE BOTH THE ENTRY AND EXIT
W
POINT OF ALL DIRECTIONAL BORES, REFERENCING THE TYPE OF UTILITY
Q
UNDERGROUND.
5.
THE BORE DEVELOPED FOR THE LEAD-IN END OF THE PIPE SHALL BE KEPT AT
BUTT FUSION JOINT
A MINIMUM DIAMETER FOR THE PIPE INSTALLATION. THE LEAD-IN END SHALL BE
HDPE MJ ADAPTER
PULLED THROUGH WITHOUT THE M.J. FLANGE ATTACHED FOR LARGER THAN 6"
COMPACT MJ / BF
PIPE INSTALLATION. THE M.J. FLANGE FOR SAID LEAD-IN END SHALL BE
W / SST SLEEVE -ANSI/AWWA STANDARD MJ
INSTALLED AFTER THE PIPE INSTALLATION WITH THE USE OF A SPLIT M.J.
INSERTS GLAND AND GASKETS W/
FLANGE.
EXTENDED BOL TS PER MJ
�C
FITTING MANUFACTURER
6.
IF BURIED OBSTRUCTIONS ARE LOCATED IN THE LENGTH OF THE DIRECTIONAL
BORE, DIRECTIONAL BORE CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID CONFLICT WITH THESE
OBSTRUCTIONS BY GOING UNDER A MINIMUM OF 12" WITH PROPOSED PIPE
DID TO HDPE TRANSITION CTYP.)
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED OR IDENTIFIED N GENERAL NOTES ON SHEET, OR
CONCRETE MARKER
IN SPECIFICATIONS.
NOT TO SCALE
CROSS SECTION
CONCRETE MARKER AT
SEE NOTE 3, "L" - VARIES (SEE PLANS)
EACH END OF BORE
P.E.
PIPE TO BE
INSTALLED WITH A MIN. DE CROSSING OF ROAD, CREEK AND SENSITIVE
10'
HORIZONTAL
RUN. INSPECTION HOLE ONLY AREAS AS NOTED ON PLANS
APPROXIMATE GRADE
ALLOWED
THIS LOCATION.
OF ROAD
GATE VALVE
SHOULDER
(TYP.)
10' MAX SPACING
111110.
FOR DEPTH
MEASUREMENT
I�
>
Q
� C
w
w
LLI
DIP
DIP
E:l
v�
w
u tj
40' MIN SPACING
� o o
40' MIN SPACING
z z
N
SELF -RESTRAINED PE/MJ ADAPTERS, NSF
w w
LLI LWj
r�
APPROVED FOR POTABLE WATER WITH
SST SLEEVE INSERTS. ADAPTERS TO BE
+
HDPE DR-9 (TYP. BOTH ENDS.) ADAPTER
O
SHALL BE PE/MJ TRANSITION.
7D
u
CXD
HDPE DR-9 PER SPECIFICATION
m
(ALL PIPE SIZES MAY VARY),
O
L
HOR ZONTAE D RECT ONAE DR EE PROE EE
(TYP.)
�
NOT TO SCALE
C
L
0
N-69-
C
oC
/Q
CO
CO
o°0cc
N+W
u+{f}
o 4�4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
6PROJECI
HLFERENCE NO. SHLL.
B —4484 UC-4
l�
co
DESIGNED BY: ARV
�01nnm►"
DRAWN B Y : ARC/ �4O�H ...... ,���
CHECKED BY: RLB
APPROVED BY: SEAL
Doc
• Is�i ::
REVISED: `z 7
9•J�3�k4' �'.`�
NORTH AROL I A i
DEPARTMENT OF
i
TRANSPORTATION
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4484
9/4/2019
LITIES ENGINEERING SEC.
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
rFX:[phone]
ONE:[phone]
PLANS ONLY
-Ll- POC STA. 17 00, 00
OPEN TRENCH
TRENCHLESS
UTILITY
CONSTRUCTION
10" DI PIPE
12 HDPE PIPE
FRANCES T. KILPATRICK
DB�B5PGG22i0
—Ll— PC Sto. 14+57.76
N
-Ll- PRC Sta.
20+27.10
-Ll- PCC Sto.17+72.05
,
WOODS ' '
-
'
i
N
WOODS
'
.'
W
.'
PROP
12" DPE
.. ..
-'
'
WOODS
i
.. .. .. ..
-
�
i
N
RE—
�0* /G
ATE Ll E-�REXISTIO
�
-'
N m
m
ABANDON EXISTING
O
N
0 �� _—
�'� CrPRESS RD
r
G ��� a
--
/--- PUE
Ex TING R -' . - �G PUE
VARIES
10 WATER LINE
O
w
- �22 BST
�� �
������II v
- � � PUE
PROP 10" DIP T` _ / Q
P
O
--- N
lit
12" wL
12„ L UE
NEUSE RIVER
`�
,' o�.'
UE
IV.
= VERFLp GE
V� BR►D
-L
-�t�
Gv ' ia' 040 R
� w
C I
m PUE
nl
�►I'�
�. — — — � � i � / F �y00DS
9
��� �RAVEIy
Sp,
Q
_
-- U
--��
0 -
R
Ilr
RETAIN EXISTING
i
W
OVERFLOW BRIDGE
C
��
I
T
IN 0 » -/
x►�S ► G %�-r 3
to
10" GATE VALVE ( NEW)
E EXIST
S T_
34
12" MP
Ex►gn NCR
/I'I� VARIES C
-r•.."""`.---. �
__
� �
ui
T
_
i
ODDS
EXITING
TIE TO
040
-4
ui
ADDSTHRUSTOCOLDLAR
TION LIMI
0
22.50 10" DIP BEND
m
U
ADD THRUST BLOCKING
TRANSITION FITTING
N
m
TIE
12" PROP HDPE TO 10" DIP WATER LINE
PROPOSED DOWNSTREAM
ADD THRUST COLLAR
EXCAVATION TO ELEV.13'
r
SANDRA N. WHITE
0
D�2834 PG 537
aN
B2PG103
iz
iW
N F
W
ONO WQ
WOODS
ODS o;
a�
i
m
r
.
r
N
to
m
NOTE:
NOTE: PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK ON ANY TRENCHLESS INSTALLATION
THERE ARE DEFINABLE DITCHES
VEGETATED, BOUT MAINTAINED. OVERALLLTO THE EA WI HC
ON THIS PROJECT,
PROVIDE A DESIGN FOR THE TRENCHLESS INSTALLATION
SOME THE138 HAVE
SOME SSIIGNS OFOODEN SCOUR ALONG THEPILES ONRIDGE RIVER BANKS. BR
CERTIFIED BY AN
ENGINEER LICENSED BY THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
MANY OF THE WOODEN PILES HAVE BEEN ENCASED
AS REQUIRED BY SUBARTICLE 1550-3(B) OF THE
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
BEHIND THE WINGWALLS. THE 84" CMPs ARE IN FAIR 1
STREAM BOUNDARIES ARE DIFFICULT TO DISCERN. THI
CONSTRUCTED OF OR REINFORCED WITH SANDBAGS
FOR -*L - PROFILE. SEE SHEET 8
AT THE DATE OF THE FIELD VISIT.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
�
yob
-
/
\
\
JLUI HLFERENCE NO. SHLLI
B -4484 UC-5
l�
/
� e\
DESIGNED BY: ARV
\
DRAWN BY: ARV ��.���H CA011� O�
CHECKED BY: RLB ;`o��ss Doti9�"':
EIP
�.
APPROVED BY • ••�Doca8lg, 89.by:
REVISED: = '( ����
oz�
�'
NORTHCAROLINA ��
DEPARTENT OF �''� IFON
ay
TRANSPORTATION ����� uu►'`�
9/4/201�
NW STATE
>�
OF NORTH CAROLINA
DO 2391 PG 212
UTILITIES ENGINEERING SEC.
UTILIPLANSNOONLYCTION
PC E SLIDE 382
FAxNE919)250-4151
W
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
�%
a=
%. 3p3.
i
TRENCHLESS
3
OPEN TRENCH
12 HDPE PIPE
10 DI PIPE `
N o*ILLIAV
E. DANIELS
-
N
DO 3207 PG I
a
PC H SLIDE 154-H
k
N
W
Z
:W
TRANSITION FITTING
W
TIE 12" PROP HDPE TO 10" DIP WATER LINE
-
N
ADD THRUST COLLAR
N
ABANDON EXISTING
W
PROP 12" HDPE
10" WATER LINE
N
W
O
END PROP. RET. WALL #2
450 10" DIP BEND
-Ll- STA. 28+10.00
ADD THRUST BLOCKING
N
•
u E
Y
-LI - PC Sta. 3 +8b j1
H
12„ wL
mmmmmumI 12" WL
PUEW6
N
d
12' WL PUE
EST 1 TON CL B RIP RAP
PUE
EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE
I
12" w� PUE
BEGIN PR P. RE r. WALLP#02P 10" DIP
—�— —
PUE
-Ll- STA. 3 + 3 .00
— W" DI cN* CRAVEN
UE
F
15'
D
/C 12„ wL PUE
r,
RCP -III
PUE
O
W
C
"
050 15" RCP-1 I I
-
W----.--_..�._
..............._.......
R N
_._—— ,
— —
--
[�_.._....__._.
0501
— — — —
--- _�—
L
— TB2G1
050 _ _
TB2G1
—L—L
TB2G�— —
°f — —
1�— — 10' PLAS. IN CR AVEN SD)
V
REMOVE EXISTING
-'----
RELOCATE TO
—
---..._' _ BL _
o
_
—
BRID
HIGH PT.
PROPOSED BRIDGE
"V
C F- — _ _
- ---_-
_
---• �.X SR 14 70
...3r
— — — —— —�-
STA.25+35.22 -L1-
BY OTHERS
—L�— PT $t0. 2%f3OA`t
EXC V TION I
--- _ __ _ MH
l
Ex�sn -'
N_�-
�.. APLE CYPRESS
„ESS Rp
22'
EMITS .. .. ..
3.43% 3.49%
— _
15"CARP o-
-
CL-050 • •• •• •• .. •, •.
__ -
-_--- ..
PROPOSED DOWNSTREAM
r„
.. • • • •
EXCAVATION TO ELEV.11'
1
PROPOSED GRADING
EST 1 TON CL B RIP RAP
0;
-�-
(SEE EC PLANS
W
7
1
7
0�1`O
EST 5 SY GEOTEXTILE
20" STEEL ENCASING
PIPE GATF
O
1
W
Z
r
450 10" DIP BEND
�iA
ADD THRUST BLOCKING
m
1
o
li
TIE TO EXISTING 10" PLAS. WATER LINE i
ADD THRUST COLLAR ,10" GATE VALVE (NEW)
1
N
: 1 1
L1
W
N
L61
T- 01
d' 1
Z 1
1
HEA FAMILY FARMS. LLC
OB 1800 PG 832
1 B1016PIG 952
COASTAL LUMBER COMPANY
DB 700 PG 109
'
PC H SLIDE 154-H
1
NOTE: PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK ON
ANY TRENCHLESS INSTALLATION
ON THIS PROJECT, PROVIDE A DESIGN FOR
THE TRENCHLESS INSTALLATION
CERTIFIED BY AN ENGINEER LICENSED BY
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
AS REQUIRED BY SUBARTICLE 1550-3(B) OF
THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
FOR -*L - PROFILE. SEE SHEET 8

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
04
B —4484
UC-6
cc)scipr
PC 320r P�/f�S
C
` 154•0
j
DESIGNED BY: ARV
DRAWN BY: ARC
�,,,,,1I111111,,.
o�•°���'CARo�Iti".
�Q�°F�SS�o,�919 -,
CHECKED BY: RLB
`%
APPROVED
`�
'.
BY:
REVISED:
NORTH AROL I A
CAM,
D°SUhLd by:
�' �84 •
��� ''••.....•
%
%` WOODS
` W
\
ARTENOF
�•••
�, O �� �.
`
'EON ,gO`�
,TRANSPORTATION
`, �%
UTILITIES ENGINEERING SEC.
PHONE: [phone]
9/4/26Y�
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
`� `�
'`, 'c_; 77'4a 23.s•
UTILITY
FAX: (919 ) 250-4151
CONSTRUCTION
PLANS ONLY
E D CONSTRUCT/0
` —DWI— POT ST l +37.00
N
�
n4.
n3
` ` 060
`
WOODS` STANDARD 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL C
I
H
S9 9S.
WOODS
101
v
18" RCP IV
ECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL B /
HAROLD
HARGETT JR & TONYA H.BYRD
DB 2677 PG 283
S
/
DB 781PG 699
C
END�5PHALT PAV ENT
CAROL U. HEATH
DW1-
10+
DB 3134 PG 72
.79
PC I SLIDE 15-A
BEGIN
ROCK PLATI G
Z
/ ROL U• HEATH
OB 3134 p
DB 781PG 695
REMOVE EXISTING
—Ll —
POT ST 3+57 +/ — LT
c
' 0 7 I SLIDE 5 A 0
10" A/G WATER LINE
' B 781 PG 695 WOODS
Lu
O
•
3
ABANDON
10"
EXISTING
WATER LINE
CYPRESS SWOP
(�
m ro
SPECIAL CUT DITCH vE
OSEE DETAIL B i
oy
`
O
(�
m
CUROD ` ��
/X
GIR AT-1 ''
104 r
% y
�` Af �38,40.1• 5 w �'
1
/C BEG/ GRADE s�
MAX PIPE SLOPE
r OUTLET = °
CYPRESS S�yA1�P @ OU 0 6 /o
`
+
00
l
R E E
AT -DWI- POT ST l0+/ 0, 060
E
E E o h o E
E
F
1
C7 0 B
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
' R SEE DETAIL A WOODS oN TB2GI R
—
_r" EXISTING R
Q
N
_ _ _J
� 1
•
'L_ � � _ • F
' ► 01
E
ELBO
F
O — �C
- F — ` `
—�8` 7
5" CAAP
F i-
J
O
T T T T T T T
LLIA[YI1111,44,1111, ]milli
W
uj
,
,
«� 060 B2G1 , `�
��
C 060 TB2G1
0 0 0
0 0 0
r-
' '
' p NMI* o 0 0 0 0 �.
`. �.. ..
-�—�
,
Ex►sriNc R��, ` TB
10' PL �.—___ `
EXCAVATION LIMITS
ji
o
10'
�
W
W
`
F
g S. R (N C_....._......_.__ __._.._..._.._... ...� L�_._.__.. __
— -- -._
_ `
----r--
1
,0 " WL
V
_
- _
EIP DING
— — — �E C PLANS)
_
I I
NEU4 RIVER OVERFLOW BRIDGE 139
_�___ -----
DING
PROPOSED GRA —
PLANS F
(SEE EC „ �,
' ° WL
EXISTING R/
-���
__.._.._._._.__.._.._.._. -'-��-����"'
N
0
`
F `1 q5
_.__.......... _........._._..__
_._._ �C� Q �' 1 6
�
-'-' �
EXCAVATION LIMIT"
., 12" WL
•
PROP 10"
DIP
12"
e
( ,
TRANSITION FITTING U 12 iL PUE
TIE 12" PROP HDPE TO 10" PLAS. WATER LINE ��` ��, LIE
ADD THRUST COLLAR
PUE PUE W
REMOVE EXISTING TB
\��
TRANSITION FITTING
CYPRESS S A P
iY M
,J
BRIDGE
re
TIE 12 PROP HDPE TO
10 DIP WATER LINE
45°E12" H �E
450 12" HDPE BEND ADD THRUST BLOCKING
BEND
PROPOSED DOWNSTREAM
EXCAVATION TO ELEV.7'
PROPOSED DOWNSTREAM CYPRESS SWAMP re
ADD THRUST COLLAR
ADD THRUST BLOCKING
EXCAVATION TO ELEV.7' V
CULTIVATED FIELD
RAY �. HEATH ``
6 DB 3134 PG 65 % .
TRENCHLESS
12" HDPE PIPE
OPEN TRENCH
10" DI PIPE
m,
PC I SLIDE 15-A
` .
m
I
` �
RAY �. HEATH
` �%
`
DB 3134 PG 65
PC I SLIDE 15-A
`
NOTE: PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK
ON THIS PROJECT, PROVIDE A DESIGN
ON ANY TRENCHLESS
FOR THE TRENCHLESS
INSTALLATION
INSTALLATION
'
CERTIFIED BY AN ENGINEER LICENSED
BY THE STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA,
AS REQUIRED BY SUBARTICLE 1550-3(B)
OF THE STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS.
FOR —WL — PROF/LE.
SEE SHEET 9
Fcc�
OFF

DocuSign Envelope ID: 15B043AA-9DB8-4E72-979C-8E9C39893439
6PROJECI
HLFERENCE
NO. SHLL.
l�
B-4484
UC -7
co
DESIGNED BY: ARV
�01nnm►"
DRAWN BY: ARC/
CHECKED BY: RLB
��O`��H•CARpj��,���
APPROVED BY:
REVISED:
= SEAL
•;y c•�
NORTH AROLI A
DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
UTILITIES ENGINEERING SEC.
FON g0 ��`�
�w���,u►►��
9/4/2019
PHONE:[phone]
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
FAX:[phone]
PLANS ONLY
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
LINDA B. I CKEEL. ET AL
OB 303 PG 280
4
HAROLD HARGETT JR & TONYA H.BYRD
DB 2677 PG 283
END TIP PROJECT B-4484
4
LO
-LI- POC STA. 54 + 00, 00
HAROLD
HARGETT JR & TONYA H.BYRD O
DB 2677 PG 283 LO
END ROCK PLAT l G
-Ll - POC ST 53+00 +/ - LT /RT
-LI - PC Sta. 52+10.53
N
Z
o
-Ll- PT Sto. 51+85.53
THE CRAVEN COUNTY WATER DEPARTMENT HAS VERIFIED
j
w
THAT THE 6" WATERLINE SHOWN IN THE FINAL SURVEY
IS NO LONGER IN THAT LOCATION. IT IS 48' SOUTH OF —Ll- POT
THE FIRE HYDRANT ON NELSON ROAD AND IS NO LONGER
Sto.58+41.81
A CONCERN FOR THIS RELOCATION.
sto. 56+53.53
CYPRESS
SWAMP
\
0
ABANDON EXISTING 10
WOODS
O
WATER LINE
WOODS
+
00
TRANSITION FITTING
12" HDPE TO 10" DIP
/ CYPRESS SWAMP
CAP EXISTING
10" WATER LINE
ADD THRUST COLLAR -
I
to
/
r
070�
F H
1 1 1
/ R
F
1411 1
[4,4 rz kf4&jc2%a=r
../
IIIo
F
GR
«� O
E CYPRESS RD 22' BST — — —
SR 1470 MA LE — — — -
ui -
/ �XISTING
R/
o
-� _
N
o Mo p o 0 o
F
04—
\ 110
W
— —
WIL
1107
v
qs` �ASo Y K. HEATH
DB 304 PG 59
O
. E E
cWo•
E E_ E
TRANSITION FITTING
12" HDPE TO 10" DIP
E
�y00D
F
TH
2.72
/(
ADD THRUST COLLAR
2, AS.
1�ATER \ �S,
�+ IQ
V
Y
CYPRESS SWAIyIP
N 34` 3r 02.5' E
►NE \ _ _ _
1
20, - - seKo
\ ,�F GR,_,, ,
CYPRESS SWOP
RETAIN DU kL 84" CMP
F+ems
BEGIN ROCK PLATING
END CONSTRUCTION
B-4484
-Ll - POC ST 0+50
+/ RT
-LI - POC S TA. 55 + 00. 00
°�
�, �
S 32'S,'25"
77.87
LI- PRC Sta.
48+1181
HAROLD HARGETT JR & ToNYA H. BYRD
DB 2677 PG 283
DIP BEND
4THRUST
ADD THRUUST BLOCKING
TIE 10" DIP TO
EXISTING 10" PLAS.
`�•
WATER LINE
ADD THRUST COLLAR \
NOTE: PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK ON ANY TRENCHLESS
INSTALLATION
TRENCHLESS
OPEN TRENCH
ON THIS PROJECT
PROVIDE A DESIGN FOR THE TRENCHLESS
INSTALLATION
12" HDPE PIPE
10" DI PIPE
CERTIFIED BY AN
ENGINEER LICENSED BY THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
AS REQUIRED BY SUBARTICLE 1550-3(B) OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
OPEN TRENCH
10" DI PIPE
FOR -WL - PROFILE. SEE SHEET 9