20200136 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20200123

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20200136
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Troy Stone
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Lauren Norris -Heflin
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
1 /23/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Kenneth Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.567942-78.822722
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
* Nationwide Permit (NWP)
* Regional General Permit (RGP)
7 Standard (IP)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
V

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
18 - Minor Discharges
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. lathe project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Micke Douglas -Martinez & Eduardo Martinez-Cortes
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB 017080 PG 01739
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
7505 Troy Stone Drive
Address Line 2
aty
Fuquay-Varina
Postal / Zip Code
27526
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
4a. Name:
Lauren Norris -Heflin

4b. Business Name:
Timmons Group
4c.Address
Street Address
5410 Trinity Rd
Address Lim 2
Suite 102
City
State / Province / Flagion
Raleigh
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27607
USA
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
06_8.27.2019_SIGNED Agent Authorization Form.pdf 243.1 KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Fuquay-Varina
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size:
0656219661 4.5
2c. Project Address
Street Address
7505 Troy Stone Drive
Address Lim 2
Cfty
State / Province / FLgion
Fuquay-Varina
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27526
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Kenneth Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040501
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*

The subject site encompasses approximately 4.5-acres of land and is located at 7505 Troy Stone Drive, within the Town of Fuquay-Varina, in Wake County, North Carolina. The project
site is currently occupied by residential and commercial land uses associated with a small business and small farm operations. The property is currently undergoing approval with
Fuquay-Varina for listing as a bona -fide farm, allowing commercial use of the property as the headquarters of a small business. The site is bound to the north by residential land, and to
the southeast and southwest by residential and forested land.
This PCN is an after the fact permit request for a perpendicular stream crossing constructed for access to the structures located on -site in the winter of 2018/2019. The property
formerly utilized a shared driveway crossing on an adjoining property to the north for site access. The new crossing was required due to: instability, frequent flooding resulting in the
inability to ingress/egress the property, durability required for vehicles associated with the small business operated on -site (including commercial 3500 trucks with service bodies, quad
dump -trucks, a Bobcat T590, a Bobcat Excavator, commercial delivery vehicles, and trailers for transporting livestock), and a hostile neighbor. The hostile neighbor utilizes the
aforementioned shared driveway as their only access, and opposed any changes or use to allowfor the aforementioned necessary improvements.
No records pertaining to permitting or construction of the aforementioned former crossing (on the adjoining property) could be obtained. However, it first appears in available aerial
imagery in 1998 (nearest imagery prior dated 1993).
The original project included grading part of the southwestern portion of the property near the existing crossing, which impacted wetlands later delineated on -site. However, these areas
are to be restored through removal of all fill material and planting of native wetland species.
Per review of the USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Map for the area, an unnamed tributary of Kenneth Creek flows from north to east-southeast through the property
Timmons Group completed a delineation of Waters of the U.S. on the project site in August of 2019, during which the aforementioned stream was delineated as a perennial stream. Two
emergent wetland systems were delineated along the stream. Additionally, a non -jurisdictional ephemeral stream and man-made ditch were identified. Confirmation of the delineated
boundaries was received from James Lastinger of the USACE during a site visit on September 27, 2019. No Action ID was assigned.
The project site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin (12-digit HUC 030300040501), and drains to the east-southeast into an unnamed tributary of Kenneth Creek which flows
southeasterly into Kenneth Creek, which is classified as a Class C Water. According to FEMA FIRM #3720065600J (effective date May 2, 2006), the southern portion of the Site
surrounding the aforementioned unnamed perennial stream is located within the FEMA designated floodway and 100-year floodplain (Zone AE) according to FEMA FIRM Map. The 100-
year floodplain base flood elevation ranges from 348 ft to 353 ft within the site. Flood easements and permitting are being obtained concurrently to this PCN.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
F Yes G No F Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fig1-VIC.pdf
896.58KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Figs-NRCS.pdf 754.86KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.078-acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
971
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
This project consists of a perpendicular stream crossing for access to structures on -site due to the inadequate nature of a former shared crossing located on an adjoining property.
This crossing is necessary to provide safe and reliable ingress and egress to the site, which includes access for large vehicles for the existing concrete business office and proposed
small farm.
The development was first noted by Fuquay-Varina as out of compliance in early 2019. Fuquay-Varina passed the matter on to Wake County, who is required a FEMA flood study as
well as 401/404 permitting. Wake County has requested the 401/404 permitting be expedited and completed prior to finalization of flood study related work.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
This is an after the fact permit request for a property associated with a single family residence and operation of a commercial business. In order to obtain compliance, the landowner
proposes to restore portions of the originally disturbed area.
The original construction consisted of the installation of a stream crossing and land clearing. Impacts included the installation of a 21-ft x 48" corrugated plastic pipe, construction of
concrete headwalls to either side of the crossing to enable safe vehicle passage (outside of jurisdictional areas), riprap placement along stream banks and within the stream for
stabilization, and vegetation clearing/land grading along the southern side of the stream which included fill placement within two wetlands.
Work was completed using traditional equipment, including front-end loaders, bulldozers, paving equipment, graders, and earth movers.
Impact totals resulting from the above construction were: 0.78-acres of wetland impact, 188-ft of stream impact, and 26.8-acres of cubic yards of fill within the stream bed. Please see
attached As -Built Plan and Impact Exhibit for a depiction of the original impacts.
The proposed future project work will modify the project impacts by removing riprap along a 50-ft section of stream (-3.9-cubic yards), restoring the two wetlands on -site through
removal of fill material and planting of wetland species, and restoring a 30-ft Wake County buffer area around the stream.
Riprap to be removed will be removed by hand to minimize further impact to the stream. Fill material within the wetland area vdll be removed through use of a small excavator,
proceeding from edge of stream bank outward with efforts to reduce compaction. Appropriate sediment and erosion control methods will be used.
Following the proposed site restoration, impacts resulting from the project will be as follows:
Permanent Impact: 138-ft and 22.9-cubic yards of stream impact
Temporary Impact: 50-ft and 3.9-cubic yards of stream impact, 0.78-acres of wetland impact
Please see the attached Restoration Plan and Impact Exhibit for additional details.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Troy Stone_RESTORATION PLAN.pdf
Troy Stone_ Impact Exhibit 01.22.20.pdf
Troy Stone As -Built Plan_01.07.20.pdf
1.71 MB
618.08KB
919.44KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations

5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
Delineation by Timmons Group 08/20/19
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
No AID assigned
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Lauren Norris -Heflin
Agency/Consultant Company: Timmons Group
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
Timmons Group completed an on -site reviewwas completed with James Lastinger of the USACE and Erin Deck of DWR on September 27, 2019. Mr. Lastinger provided an informal
confirmation of the delineation during this visit.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Fig4-WTDM.pdf 2.49MB
Troy Stone PJD Package-signed.pdf 18.1 MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are anyother NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
This is a single and complete project for an existing residence.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries ❑ Buffers
f— Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
1
2a1 Reason (?)
fill material for grading
2b. Impact type * (')
T
2c. Type of W.
Headwater Forest
2d. W. name *
Feature D
2e. Forested *
�No
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
Both
2g. Impact
area*
0.033
(acres)
Wetland Impact
2
�aterlal for grading
T
Headwater Forest
_��]
Feature E
Both
0.045
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.078 0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.078
2h. Comments:
The two wetland features on -site were permanently impacted during earth moving activities to grade the southern portion of the property for the
purposes of creating a parking area. Per request from the USACE (wetlands) and Wake County (30-ft stream buffer), the wetland areas and a 30-ft
buffer off of the adjacent stream will be restored to pre -construction conditions. This will include the removal of all fill material placed within these areas
and planting of native wetland species. Please refer to the restoration plan included in this submittal.
3. Stream Impacts

S2
Road Crossing & stream
stabilization
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
unnamed tributary of
Kenneth Creek
Perennial
Both
3
Average(feet)
117
(linearfeet)
S3
Road Crossing & stream
stabilization
Temporary
Rip Rap Fill
unnamed tributary of
Kenneth Creek
Perennial
Both
3
Average (fee)
50
(li ea fcet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
138
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
188
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
50
3j. Comments:
Original stream impacts totaled 21-linear feet for the culvert installation and 167-ft for riprap installation.
Riprap is proposed to be removed by hand along a 50-ft segment of stream, resulting in 117-ft of permanent impact from riprap installation and 50-ft
of temporary impact. Please refer to the Impact Exhibit. Portions of the stream banks where riprap is to be removed will be seeded with riparian seed
mix, a thin layer of straw placed, and then matted with a C-700 coconut fiber matting.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts to jurisdictional features were minimized through the design of the crossing as a perpendicular crossing through a relatively straight and
narrow segment of stream. Additionally, 50-ft of riprap is to be removed by hand, and previously impacted wetland areas on -site and a 30-ft non -state
mandated buffer off of the stream will be restored through removal of fill material and replanting of native vegetation.
Providing the aforementioned removal/restoration Mile leaving the remaining impacts in place reduces the additional impacts to the area, avoiding the
need for stream impact for removal of the existing crossing and installation of an additional crossing.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during the wetland and stream buffer restoration on -site in accordance with the
requirements of the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources: Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual (May 2013)
and local codes. Work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from non -jurisdictional uplands and stable ground. Temporary
seeding and permanent seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas.
Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris, and other pollutants from entering the adjacent jurisdictional features. Excess excavated fill
materials we be placed and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into adjacent jurisdictional features.
Therefore, stockpiling of excavated material within jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will be strictly prohibited as part of the construction of this project. All
project construction activities initiated within wetlands on -site will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of
disturbance within the jurisdictional areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Stream and wetland impacts are below the mitigation requirement thresholds for Nationwide Permit use.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Project is within the Cape Fear River Basin which does not have NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules. Wake County is requiring a county stream buffer of 30-ft (see Restoration Plan).
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
This project consists of a single road crossing for an existing property registered as a bona fide farm. The existing structures on -site are part of a residential development constructed in
1999. Due to the minimal size and nature of the project (a single perpendicular road crossing), no storrnwater management plan is warranted.
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
2b Provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Existing crossing was constructed without prior DWR and USACE review and approval. Therefore, this after the fact application is being submitted.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is a single and complete project within an existing subdivision to provide access to existing on -site structures.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor NIA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r' Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Species information was obtained through the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) website and NC Natural
Heritage Program Data Explorer. The species listed as potentially occurring in the vicinity of the project area included: red -cockaded woodpecker,
cape fear shiner, Michawes sumac, and Atlantic pigtoe.
it is the opinion of Timmons Group that this project Will have no effect on the red -cockaded woodpecker, Cape Fear shiner, and Atlantic pigtoe, and
may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect Michames sumac.
Timmons Group submitted these determinations through a Self -Certification Letter to the USFWS Raleigh Field Office on September 9, 2019.
Confirmation of project receipt was received from the USFWS. No additional comments were received.
Consultation Documentation Upload
Troy Stone TE Package.pdf 10.76MB
09.09.19_FWS to SLL_Confirmation of Project Receipt_Troy Stone Drive - Online Project Review Certification
119.76KB
Letter.pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*

r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA's Essential Fish Habitat Mapper - https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/application/efhmapper/indexhtml
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Timmons Group personnel conducted a desktop review of historic resources within one -mile of the project area, including review of the NC State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS Web Service and review of site files at the NC Office of State Archaeology (OSA).
Per this review, the project will not likely affect historic resources due to the absence of listed resources within the project area and the absence of
alteration to the existing site setting and land use.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Troy Stone - Cultural Resources Report.pdf 89.87KB
Troy Stone - SHPO Map.pdf 100.73KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The proposed project meets the minimum impact requirements of Nationwide Permit 18.
Consultation is on -going with Wake County Sediment and Erosion Control Section, Water Quality Division, for obtainment of a flood permit.
Additionally, the obtainment of flood easements for up -stream properties is in -progress. Wake County has requested 401/404 certification as part of
their review process.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA FIRM #3720065600J (effective date May 2, 2006)
Miscellaneous
Comments
U
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Fig2-HUC.pdf 5.25MB
Fig3-EIM.pdf 4.6MB
Fig6-Parcel.pdf 4.41 MB
F_
Signature U
*
P By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Lauren Norris -Heflin
Signature
Date
1/23/2020

�wwoo*
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROU..-- OURS.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks to be Filled in by Current Landowner
The Department of the Army NCDENR - Division of Water Resources
US Army Corps of Engineers 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Wilmington District 1650 Mail Service Center
PO Box t890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This the ZS day of AV q 015 2019,
(number) onth) (Year)
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: Troy Stone Drive Location: Fu4uay-Varina, NC
Property Owner's Name (Print): EZ
Property Owner's Signature:
Property Owner's Mailing Address: Y I V E
Property Owner's Telephone: -Lr 9-2,�j5'%22-/ Fax No. A.) M
Property Owner's Email Address: m, r C k n c • ish rn
r
y
C
0
u�
M
rM
ko
v-,
is
Lr1
W
a�
r-I
O�
l!'S
m
M
rn
J
W
F
E
0
u
c
0
E
E
.y
i

0l 64 L*.*We1:1•

F ra nkIin,ille
Ramseur --- - - - �--- - - a.i- -`'s�,.---.------ pex �`' -. N'i
Slier City ---- _ _�P ¢ w
- - Fitt �ro _ �� � E c
.
w ✓E03040103 arnrr
w
QI /YO. ww dN 0
Coll cteev, oily Springs g ' . / Cla Eton -0 rn O
t
(, z a m u H
North eeN 1, • _ / --?� O x H d
carol na I ea�G laJ V a o — U
_ obg gal B , N, ,cure
r,Par k Bear Creek /- �� / -- W c W W
/ F eN 0
Go Hston .rP� _ lillov; Spring/ ';uilso o W ro N
Fuqua, Ina PAIII, w
/ T 5 w
r _
Bennett—
_, 03020201 O c (irG Seagrove
eP 03030003
--- --1--- -I -- -- _ naootee --- --- _ Angier
i
w
., v Raren ' B1a Creek w 0
- S, -� d / > Rock - ■ p
%Fo k ;: Broad way sl Park - ? y DATE
Four yaks i 'w 08/29/2019
Robbins f a' RAWN BY
L.DCARSON
! on44 tMo rill, l- Hwy- �, DESIGNED BY
oa1, e \Nan tree L. CARSON
lar m° ° LdlinJton o4 �,
CHECKED BY
Benson S. LAW
or SCALE
1 "- 6 Miles
'! Cameron / 169 ff -- Env r/
Bunnlesel
-- - Dunn �
Eag k Springs =:r/ �
\\I Crrer
03040104 Seven -
p. Whispering /
Pines - brass 03030004
Gr - Coharie Sdtsa
/ W
/ O
L—Le Sdtsa E t, 0 0
1 !
Jackson RNEiS /
' Springs
Falcon
- - Piriehurst Southern /� - creeks h .1 \,.. r+'" W (.i z
Norman' - \ Resort Pines,/ Z
State ev
Pow Army Spring Like Park F - ! 5 ��ie�,
fz e. Cre - / Airteld �. 'a'v ad. /, O U
JaF L ,n
Fort Bragg ! - 1? 'sc�e Ct ee z 0
- Aterdee Mlitary f F. rl Bragg
t Reservation ,C
,I
i 1 > o
°
Pi �nlur
03030006 � � z o
G r l
/ l . nnie Dc�o ne 0
I+1
c
erbe
Drowwng Cree/r I -. �_ ^I Y N
040203 x J.Uj
Fayetteville eg ?
Legend O
CemplOfeckafl t\t yville lid--- _ � !� 9
Military
Reservation `` < - - F`! Stedman c Sa lemburg
LL
Site Marker
�'''t - - t Autryville
Jrr
r\ `
■ ■ ■ ■ + Raeford
■ ■ UpperCape Fear (Cape Fear River Basin) Rockfish reek Hoke Ikidls
p � p , Hydrologic Unit Code
03040204 NOTES
0 3 6 12 �f%, - 03030005 Site marker is approximate. 06 ;26
MBER
/ / < Rart sw "sy / HUC from USGS. 444
Miles ° �h
/ a sva,'ram .o / \ Topographic basema from Esri Online.
P SH NO.
1 OF1

Upper Cape Fear Soils
Mapunit Symbol
Mapunit Name
AgB2
Appling gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded
AgC
Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
AgC2
Appling gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
ApB2
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded
ApC2
Appling sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
ApD
Appling sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
MeA
Mantachie sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
WaC
Wagram loamy sand, 6 to 10 percent slopes
WgA
Wagram-Troup sands, 0 to 4 percent slopes
WkE
Wake-Wateree complex, 10 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky
WmE
Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
WoA
lWehadkee and Bibb soils. 0 to 2 percent slopes. freauentiv flooded
•S
Legend
Project Limits - 5.1 Acres
..... -- National Hydrography Dataset
National Wetlands Inventory
- Zone A: 1 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Hydric Soil Rating
Hydric
Non-Hydric
0 80 160
r
L '': • rir
320
■ Feet
f..
MeA,
u
r
I
N u 9
N y
W
O E
C
W E w o
awl _
1 wU m
K LL o 6
W W d O
a a y O Z
o
Z0 U H
a QQ
U
N N
` w
= D o �N Z Z
m�2o
O W y N
w
5 �
C c
a
N
W
v
o�
€ >o
� o
S y DATE
gw 08/29/2019
DRAWN BY
L. CARSON
DESIGNED BY
® L. CARSON
CHECKED BY
i S. LAW
SCALE
1 „ = 80 '
��,1lY✓n..� �d
a
a
O
O
�
z
z
J
-
w
z
W
Z
J
F-
~
~
Z
W
z
O
F-
o
>
Z
Y
LU
ApB �'
a
M
oLU
LL
NOTES:
Project Limits are approximate.
NVN from US Fish and Wildlife Service.
BER
Soils data from SSURGO.
r44244
National Hydrography Dataset from USGS.Aerial
No.1
imagery from NC OneMap.

\ �,'�1�-�11` 1r�_i\� 1-�`i�\\\\\ , \\` ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ / 1, I %'/}I j 1 / _�_',. -' ,,. /, , / / /,///
\ _ \,, . \ �� � _� � \ ` 1 I / 1 / J \ 1 ♦ \ \ 1 *N L I 1 1 / 1 5 + - y _ / ' , ♦ � l ' '/'/' 1 ` )
-\\ \.\,; �`;\♦ \\ 1'I1 111 111♦\\ /-`L `-_ `♦ + ` I\ \ r 1 i I � � 1, 1 11` \\ ,'I �/�'.--.' ,ii i' /1'/.
`\ \ /ail It.' \1 I , 1 \`♦.\+11k \-^) 1- 1♦ � ♦\ \ , 1 I + / I 1 +1 \ \ \ \ � '/ �� ' /, �„ /, , ,//
, / \ ♦ \ ) 1 1 / 1 I1 '\ \ � � \ 1 I , 1 5 1 \ \ � r \I , / I\ �s _ � � � - , ,r , ,,, //,' _ n, / ! ,'
\ '♦ `1 1 ,IQ�fI l 'LII t\I\♦,(\ , , \ _ � , 1 1 1 1 11 1 , \ t \ \ - �_� �_ �_ - - � ,/, ///1 ♦ ,/ l,i
, \ .t \ 'R f F1�•' / / \ \ \�( �\ l 4 \ , t \ 1 � 1 1 , 1 \ � \ �-- 1 - ',' ' , / /r J I , / / /i
tj
♦ 1 1 \1 \ \ I1 11` 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 \ ♦ �..� - _ _ }' f� _ ' � �_ ', r' /,///
1 I 1 I , \ 1 \ \ \ ♦ 1 , M I 1 \ \ , + 1 1 1 , 1 1 \ - - - - - � - - ' J � � - , ' • � , , I , /, � , / , 1
♦ \\ ♦ 1\ \ \ \ I + \ \ 1/ I 1 I1. Jyf41+.' `1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 / 1 1 \ r
`♦♦ ♦ ♦ \, `\\\♦,/1I 11J;i �� 1 1 1 \t 1, 5 +1 L\ ♦=;\ ^�� --�- -_/_' -- r'''' - �-- ,'/'�1// f%�%�%' 11//'/
♦ `\`\ \♦1\ \ \\ \1,111 ,/ I� „1( 1 1 1 1 + ( 1 \ \ 1 `'-^_J ~ \`---\ - _^�'''_, �- _ii -'' -_ , •\, ,�����' , /%,/'
- \ \. \\+\\ 1+♦\1l`\ 1 \1111� `I , \ 1 \ \ , \ , ll- 'C ���` _ ', ' __ '♦\/r' /f /�T'iii__I '///
Iligr�i \� �\\�1\ 1 r+,ll;�ll ll�// ir��l 1. L \\ \,^1 x•\\ \ x\ 1� -r •1 i;,ir; I_ `♦1 ^ ,' /jii��y' _ \5151;\\\1\`
'mo
^ � "_\\♦\\-\ ,+� /1I Ir.)' -_ \ \�\L 4`♦ .. .t ) /��' _�.� _ __--, ,, ^-1`'11 M1'/ j/f'�'r 11+\1
` / \ ♦\\)\h\ 1 - , 11 ,� % \ \ \ 7 \ �♦ \♦ � -'. ^ _- �- _ ♦. , .,. /,r/ //.� /, 1, 11 it ) � \
\
1 ;, ,ll♦ t`; :�;'II '1`\Ilrl lil l\\ / ••Cili+llFCJ \ l \\ \\♦`\ `\- �` `\\♦i`%.. --=�i 1 rlr/'�
`\ \ \ 1/. I I I \ ` \ - `\ \ \ ♦ ` ' / _ Illy-' - '--- //,'/, ! �///,1 11111 - \ ,
/' / \ \•U1 t/ II 11 1 1 ` \ \' \♦ ♦ \ \ � , / f /I - -� _' /t1! / / ' /// / I 1 1r' /' 1
r / / •f t ' � , �, I I 1 1 + 1 I � ( \ \' � i , r 'i}i _ _ r /// _ '/ ' - r , / r I I1 ) I I
/ , `_;;�' ,;'., 'r, /I1, . I . 1 \ ♦ `\ ` Jar ♦'`�`'/ ' -�= L� "3s% - i l,•// // // //: /'/':/I '/. J„-'-
/,�i'/,� ��/ ,`,, l,, l 1 \ 1 ' ♦l�,�.I77��r��1,��I,yy : \ \--�_�\\ -"','' ' ,' r'�r '' ' ' l' /r'/ I I /•i11 / i/�J/ - ,, �� �' I`,1,/// Jr/,'I / / \\ 'r''
%!/1/, i.,' I , r1, 1. , \ \ 1 I ` D ♦\ \ -Z- tiY , ' , r{ /rr r_ �' ../ D ::/
40
I I I1r1, // I I \ ♦\ \1\ \ \\`♦ �\ ♦ r♦, .y# / , J� // lJ//' / I///�'/i//,i�i i' I--\_ ---�-- `\_�- ---
t\1C C 1 �\ \ `- � .♦ -- `\ D \ _ \ \\� ♦`` �� 11 ' I l 1N(i/�'/i J//i/j/ ` �I )l-y//r_---,//rl•=�-` �'-��♦•
♦ `1\ \ \ \ \ \ / � 1 \ `` \ \ '.' -w` \ \ \ I - - - \ _ ` �1y'y� , r ' D D ' / i //l'//f,,/ /, /,,�,/,( I 1 , , - , ��; , / r
+ Yt \ \ \ \ \ \ L _ ' _ - \ _ I l� }. ♦ \\ ♦ `++/ \ e _: Ug'JU ' / I i 1' //„ /S/,�'/
I '\ \ \ \ ♦ � - - -\ ` ` ` \ ` - \ n Cc:li.YRSII \ r - - - -_^ -_-_ - - - - /7'4 /i i,/i/ , r "/ ' �/ � \ - - . - - - - - -
1 \ \ \ \ \ \ ♦� - 1 ♦ \ \ + \ \ ♦ \ / Cl.:LnYSiTJ� � � "- - '4 / / / /'/ 1 / � '_ _ � ' - - - ' � q ` I� - .1
-'I/ \'''/
\ \ \ `\ \ ` I \ 1\ 1 1 \ \ .1 \ \� / / / -' �''' -_ q''/ /' l �' '' /r ,''' "' /'-'Alm' ") ` \ ♦ \
If
, 1
I \ ` 1 ''/ ` \ \ \ \\ + 1 +1 11 J' , ' , ' ^ - ` \ \`I.. � 1 ' 1 , r / � _ - " 'i - - _/,' 1 // � r / / / _ _ � I , ' , / 1 !��Y' � � � _ + I , ♦ I \ \
\_t. \ \\`♦ \\ \` \I \III`\\11111 ="Yr, '' \♦+, \ j, /, l 'I � /�/ //`\ ',' r' ___ ', _�' ',,' /, It /!r ___- \iJ' /.♦.
` \♦ \ \ 1 1 ,1 ,1, fll ( / ter' , I 1 / a�,/,- // _ '' /r _ /�' / / , I /!
--`�` - \+ 1 \\\ 11111 /I,`I \ _---' 'rl♦•` ''� /r //, /, , ,' _ - / 1 / r/ I 1 1�
1 -♦ \ ♦ 1\1 \ \ I,1I1I \ \ \ � , __ \ l,;ir / I r ".'/' '_ J ,' / / , \ I "/I ' � / '/ I I i F,1
.♦\\ 1 \t� 1j 11,11 t 1 1 ,' '- ` ,/, ,/, _I I ' •"�"-'/ I y. ,' r, `� � ,t, r� I I 1
�♦ 1 +1 +111; \\\\ \11,11 1 1 ll Il ,' r' ,' �/':�) '// , 1'1 " '' '' /r' ' / / L n/-' r /^,/. .I 1 1 \ 1

Path: Y:\805\44264 - Troy Stone\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\44264-NRCS.mxd
v
W- `✓-7S
s
- Ic
N F
ACV
r
II
■
■
AvC;-
u
WA ,
W9gA 0
ir -0.
Site limits are approximate. Legend
Soils from NRCS.
' ' ■ Project Limits - 5.1 Acres
0 300 600 900 1,200
Feet
WAKE CTROTY, NORTH TOICAROLINA TIMMONS GROUP
FIGURE 5: NRCS SOILS MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. •
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 44264 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): FUQUAY-VARINA
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 5.1 ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE: 35'343.361 N WATERSHED(S): UPPER CAPE FEAR (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE: 78049'20.337"W HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03030004
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: Y:\805\44264 - Troy Stone\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\44264-Parcel.mxd
/
-:
Wc��E
-. - g
{
N`
r a !'- f
f n� �� • �'' _ f
0656219661 i,l Fp
i MARTINEZ-CORTES, EDUARDO r,I
-- 6' DOUGLAS-MARTINEZ, MICKE
,,.
III. A
31
ft
a fr
9' s• � dF
^� � � ,.•� � .�r •�� Legend
�..
Sit
e Parcels limits re sfrom Wak■ •
e County.. Project Limits - 5.1 Acres
Aerial imagery from NC OneMap. f
o soo 600 900 1,200
Wake County Tax Parcels
Feet,
WAKE CTROTY, NORTH TOICAROLINA TIMMONS GROUP
FIGURE 6: TAX PARCEL MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. •
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 44264 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): FUQUAY-VARINA
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 5.1 ACRES DATE(S): 2016
LATITUDE: 35o343.361'N WATERSHED(S): UPPER CAPE FEAR (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE: 78o49'20.337"W HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03030004
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in partand shall not be used For any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

HEALING IN
1, Locate a healing -in site in a shady,
wellprotected area,
2, Excavate a flat bottom trench
12' deep and provide drainage,
Y7
3, Backfill the trench with 2' well
rotted sawdust, Place a 2' layer of
well rotted sawdust at a sloping
angle at one end of the trench,
4, Place a single layer of plants
against the sloping end so that
the root collar is at ground level,
5, Place a 2' layer of well rotted
sawdust over the roots
maintaining a sloping angle,
6. Repeat layers of plants and sawdust
as necessary and water thoroughly,
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
USING THE KBC PLANTING BAR
1, Insert planting bar
as shown and pull
hnnrAlP tnwnrcA nlnntPr
4, Pull handle of bar
toward planter,
firming soil at
bottom.
PLANTING NOTES:
PLANTING BAG
During planting,
seedlings shall be
kept in a moist
2, Remove planting bar 3, Insert planting bar
and place seedling 2' toward planter
at correct depth, from �seedling,
5, Push handle forward 6, Leave compaction
firming soil at top, hole open, Water
thoroughly,
KBC PLANTING BAR
Planting bar shall have
a blade with a triangular
cross section, and shall
be 12' long, 4' wide and
1' thick at center,
�I� I
R❑❑T PRUNING
All seedlings shall be root
pruned, if necessary, so that
no roots extend more than
10 inches (10') below the
root collar,
REFORESTATION DETAIL
IMPACTED WETLAND AREA SOIL REMOVAL NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR TO USE SMALL EXCAVATOR FOR SOIL REMOVAL
TO MINIMIZE FURTHER IMPACTS TO WETLAND AREAS.
2. SOIL REMOVAL OPERATIONS TO PROCEED FROM EDGE OF
STREAM BANK OUTWARD. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE
EQUIPMENT MOVEMENT IN THE WETLAND AREA TO REDUCE
COMPACTION.
3. ONCE SOIL REMOVAL IS COMPLETE, RAKE AREA TO A DEPTH OF
3 INCHES, LEAVING SURFACE ROUGH.
4. SEE PLANTING NOTES
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
POST PROJECT
\ \ i \ �•\ 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
4 -EXISTING 30"CULVERTS (20LF) \ \
UPSTREAM OF 7505 TROY STONE DR. \ \ , ^ EXISTING ^ ^ ^ ^.. ^ ^ING CONDITIONNS7 \
PLANTING NOTES:
WETLAND PLANTING LIST A:
SCIENTIFIC NAME:
COMMON NAME:
1.
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES AND UNDERGROUND IMPEDIMENTS PRIOR TO
BEGINNING PLANTING.
ANDROPOGON GLOMERATUS
BUSHY BEARDGRASS
2.
ALL WEEDS, NON-NATIVE INVASIVE SPECIES, AND EXOTIC SPECIES LOCATED WITHIN THE WETLAND LIMITS
ASCLEPIAS INCARNATA
SWAMP MILKWEED
SHALL BE ELIMINATED PRIOR TO PLANTING BED CREATION, PLANTING, AND SEEDING OPERATIONS.
CAREX STRICTA
UPRIGHT SEDGE
3.
PLANTS ARE TO BE PURCHASED BY SCIENTIFIC NAMES, THEY SHALL BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THEIR
CAREX VULPINOIDEA
FOX SEDGE
SPECIES AND SHALL BE IN VIGOROUS GROWING CONDITION MEETING ANSI STANDARD Z60.
EUPATORIADELPHUS FISTULOSUS
HOLLOW STEMMED JOE PYE
4.
ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF ALL PESTS, DISEASES, AND CANKERS, IN HEALTHY CONDITION,
AND FREE OF MECHANICAL DAMAGE AT THE TIME OF PLANTING.
EUTROCHIUM MACULATUM
SPOTTED JOE PYE WEED
5.
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING AND INSTALLING ALL PLANTS SHOWN ON PLANS
EUPATORIUM PERFOLIATUM
BONESET
6.
ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO OR EXCEED THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK
HELIANTHUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS
SWAMP SUNFLOWER
(LATEST EDITION) AS PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN.
HIBISCUS COCCINEUS
SCARLET ROSEMALLOW
7.
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE A HEALTHY AND VIABLE PLANT AND THE
HIBISCUS LAEVIS
HALBERLEAF ROSEMALLOW
PLANT SHALL BE REJECTED IF DEEMED UNHEALTHY OR UNFIT AT ANY TIME DURING THE CONTRACT OR
WARRANTY DURATION.
HIBISCUS MOSCHEUTOS
MARSH HIBISCUS
8.
IF ANY PLANT/MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS ARE REQUESTED BY CONTRACTOR, SUGGESTED ACCEPTABLE
JUNCUS TENUIS
PATH RUSH
REPLACEMENTS SHALL ALSO BE PRESENTED AT THE TIME FOR FULL AND COMPLETE REVIEW BY
LEERSIA ORYZOIDES
RICE CUTGRASS
DESIGNER.
LOBELIA CARDINALIS
CARDINAL FLOWER
9.
CONTRACTOR PLANT LIST AND QUANTITIES TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE DESIGNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR
LOBELIA SIPHILITICA
BIG BLUE LOBELIA
TO ORDERING AND INSTALLATION.
10.
RIPARIAN SEED MIX ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS PIEDMONT RIPARIAN SEED MIX OR APPROVED EQUAL
MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS
PURPLE MUHLY
BY DESIGNER. APPLICATION RATE 25 LBS/AC.
PANICUM ANCEPS
BEAKED PANICUM
11.
TEMPORARY SEED TO BE PLACED WITH PERMANENT SEED.
PANICUM VIRGATUM
SWITCHGRASS
12.
PLANTING SHOULD OCCUR IMMEDIATELY AFTER FILL SOIL REMOVAL IN WETLAND AREAS TO STABILIZE
SACCHARUM BREVIBARBE
NARROW PLUME GRASS
BARE SOIL.
SACCHARUM GIGANTEUM
SUGAR CANE PLUMEGRASS
13.
ALL WETLAND PLUGS SHALL BE A MIN. 6.8 CUBIC INCHES AND TAPERED IN SHAPED. PLUGS SHALL BE
SCIRPUS ATROVIRENS
GREEN BULRUSH
PLANTED AT A RATE OF ONE (1) PLUG PER TWO (2) SF AND A MIN. OF EIGHT (8) DIFFERENT SPECIES FROM
THE WETLAND PLANTING LIST A SHALL BE USED WITHIN EACH IMPACTED WETLAND AREA.
VERBENA HASTATA
SWAMP VERBENA
APPROXIMATELY 855 PLANTS TOTAL.
ACORUS AMERICANUS
SWEET FLAG
14.
WETLAND SPECIES SHALL BE PLANTED AFTER LAST FROST IN SPRING AND 6 WEEKS PRIOR TO FIRST
IRIS VIRGINICA
SOUTHERN BLUE FLAG IRIS
FROST IN FALL.
JUNCUS EFFUSUS
SOFT RUSH
15.
WOODY SPECIES TO BE PLANTED IN THE BUFFER RESTORATION AREAS WITH A COMBINATION OF THE
SCIRPUS CYPERINUS
WOOL GRASS
SMALL TREE/SHRUBS: ROOTED PLANT PLUGS/TUBELINGS - 12"-18" IN HEIGHT.SPECIES
BUFFER RESTORATION PLANTING
LIST B:
SUBSTITUTIONS REQUIRE PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE DESIGNER. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT PLANT
SCIENTIFIC NAME:
COMMON NAME:
QUANTITIES BY SPECIES FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLANTING.PLANT 3' O.C. THROUGHOUT PLANTING
AREA. TOTAL PLANTS=1,425. SEE BUFFER RESTORATION PLANT LIST B.
AMELANCHIER ARBOREA
SERVICE BERRY
16.
BUFFER PLANTING OPTIMAL LATE FALL THROUGH MARCH 15TH.
LINDERA BENZOIN
SPICEBUSH
17.
FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY WITH ON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS:
ILEX VERTICILLATA
WINTERBERRY
CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS
BUTTONBUSH
LIME'h TON/AC
CALYCANTHUS FLORIDUS
SWEET SHRUB
PHOSPHATE 20-40 LBS/AC
CORNUS AMOMUM
SILKY DOGWOOD
POTASH 50-70 LBS/AC
PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS
NINEBARK
WATERING REQUIREMENTS ONCE/WEEK IF NO RAIN
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA
GREEN ASH
18. LIVE STAKES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR PLUGS IN WET BUFFER AREAS UPON APPROVAL FROM
THE DESIGNER.
19. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED DECEMBER - APRIL DEPENDING ON DORMANCY AND AVAILABILITY
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
SEEDING MIXTURE RATE (LB/ACRE) SEEDING DATES
RYE GRAIN 120 15-AUG TO 1-MAY
GERMAN MILLET 40 1-MAY TO 15-AUG
MULCH:
APPLY 4,000 LB/ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW WITH NETTING OR A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL.
MAINTENANCE:
REPAIR AND REFERTILIZE DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATLEY. RESEED AND
MULCH IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE.
LEGEND
-345—
NC FLOODMAPS CONTOURS
-345- - -
SURVEYED CONTOURS
-•••-•••-•••-•••- -
STREAM CENTERLINE
--------
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
SURVEYED TOP OF BANK
- - - - - - - -
WAKE COUNTY 30' BUFFER ZONE
-----------------
HIGH WATER MARK
IMPACTED WETLAND AREA
BUFFER RESTORATION AREA
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
- - - - - - -
(POST 48-INCH PIPE CROSSING)
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
(PRE 48-INCH PIPE CROSSING)
fON,`�'�/,
13344•
rs e•�
0
U
o �
� o
N E
2 z IN
W of
a LL 0' a,
Z
Corn a,
a2'-I0o U
W M
a
M
C�
JU) x O
(n
w
0
o U
C)� _4
Ln ,
Z
Q) L
_ 'E o
•L � z
H
U)
o
I --I
w
� rn
�
LnM
J
w
U)
0
_
0
0
w
> w
w
= Q
z
0
to DATE
0 1-3-2020
DRAWN BY
VANDERGRIFF
DESIGNED BY
B. WARD P.E.
CHECKED BY
B. WARD P.E.
SCALE
1 "=20'
Uj
N
Ln
�
oC
N
a
0
z
a
LU
U
zwe
<�
pia
z
O
Q
�
0
W
LL
30B NO.
44717
SHEET NO.
1

\
\
\� 7503 TROYSTONE DR.
WAKE COUNTY—
/\ _ 30' BUFFER = 1,200 SF.
\�
EXISTING 6" WOOD FENCEAND BLOCK PILLARS
\ (TO BE REMOVED)
7595 LROY STONE DR.
_ _
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
/1 1
/ / J
oo,
_350
lox
_349— EXISTTNGtAWN—
TO REMAIN \�— _ -sas5+�
_ / i /
pPN EXISTING — ��a RIPRAPPROPOSED — — _ / /
1 \ PREP SURVEYED RIPRAP — _ _ — `�ti TO
\I\\\� \ NOSE Pp+1T TOP OF BANK / / ^ —CO— — _ — —� / / �/� 5 / • ' // / / K `EXISTING \ �\ P� / ���� —> _ _ / / / f?0,
R RAP . I / — -1il H WATER MARK
\ II
\ \� \ (�\ i� EXISTRIG — 348 / s���\�
48 INGFi CP
48 I CH CPP � r � ♦ �J PQ' / _ / /// r . • ' �j`i /.
G�� \ ✓ /// l�j
yam\ SURV YED r * /✓/ /
\1 p / \ \�X — �'� TOE F BANK
\ \ J �, �, • y y y y 0 ROCKY FORD /
BRANCH CREEK / \\\
EXIS NG 1 y •/ 345•\\ �, �\ — CENTERLINE
RI RAP\ � � ���.. A � / y y y y y \ •. O / � _ \ � o / /
735)1` J 47 / 0
y y y y \ +8-
WAKE COUNTY /
�l �3, y
48 y �I �I �I �1��I y �I �I �I �I \I : ��``` �; \ \ / - • i` �� \ `\ \ 11� I /
30' BUFFER = 4,454 SF. /
\/ \ -,.351 . /
L 3CLBUF'FER=�9,242�SF. \ \'. ' . ' 0 \ `� — Ft� • �I �I �I �I �1.\\ , / /
NG
\ \ \ 'C. \ . \ . ' \ - .. — 350 — — — — — URVEYED
\ \ \ \ . \48 1 CH'tWPP TO�OE;BANK y y y y
.. �.
-IN. V: UT=3,45'1 I. FT.
,may
I \:.:. �.. :\ .. .. \. \. .. ..
V.
IMPACTED:WETLANb
. .1'..EXI�STING RAVEL Df21t(E '. �. ' .\AREA=.1,437 SF:. =.0,03 AC, \ I LEGEND /
\. \ f.. 1.. .�. .. I.. .. .� `.� .. \ �.\' \ .'. �. .'. .' 1
'. \ .. .. .. \ .. \ NC FLOODMAPS CONTOURS
\..\.. 1.1. 1 1. L..L....{..... ----
\., .', .. \ \ — SURVEYED CONTOURS
- 1 \
WAKE CO NTY �' U
�.' ..'
I.. .1....1 .. i .. (. .'..'( .' \ — --- _--- _...— STREAM CENTERLINE
y I ( ( 30''BUFFER SE:
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
—SURVEYED TOP OF BANK
\
RIPRAP PROPOSE � � -� \ I SURVEYED TOE OF BANK
7------------ --------- — — — — — — — _— — — — — — — — \
— — _ — — TO BE REM _ — _ _ \ HIGH WATER MARK
D / // I ---------- — — — —_ — _ — — — — —
-�- — � WAKEC�JNTY
IMPACTED WE_TLAND — — — — —WAKE COUNTY 30' BUFFER ZONE
30' BUFFER = 622 SF.
AREA = 1,981 SF. = 0.05 AC.
0 ' \ / i \ \ \ \ \ WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW IMPACTED WETLAND AREA
1 ( \ \ \
y I 75 �OYSTONE DR. / / \ \ \ WAKE COUNTY
\ \ \ BUFFER RESTORATION AREA
SCALE 1 "=30
_200 TUSTIN CT. \
Y
Y \ \ \ \
\ / \ \ \ ` 0 30' 60'
\ \
J
Imapact Summary
Type of Impact
LF
AC
CY
Remarks
Approximated 12" topsoil
0.033
53.2
removal
Wetland Impact
Approximated 12" topsoil
0.045
73.4
removal
Station 0+77 to 2+48 and 0+360
Stream Impact
188
to 0+377
Stream Impact
(Riprap placed below
0.011
26.8
Riprap Class I
high water mark)
30' Wake County Buffer Area
to be replanted
0.280
Station at 0+77 to 2+15
Stream Impact
138
After proposed romoveal
Stream Impact
(Riprap placed below
0.009
22.9
Riprap Class I
After proposed removal
high water mark)
• DESIGNED BY
• B. WARD P.E.
• CHECKED BY
B. WARD P.E.
• • SCALE
• 1"=30'
•
•
•
CL
D
O N
U I/ -I ^ m
z
w X 0 LU
z W o
w W U
J z3a
z Oz�
J U-)
a
Q� � r LL
U 0 LL
a
m
0zZ
JGB NO.
44717
SHEET NO.
1

SCALE 1 "=10'
NOR
0 10' 20'
ROADWAY PROFILE
SCALE 1 "=10' HORIZONTAL
1 "=5' VERTICAL
365
360
355
350
345
340
33�+80
SURVEY DATA BY:
TIMMONS GROUP, INC. 10-25-2019
REVISED 12-10-2019
-2,-, SURVEYED CONTOURS
—•••—•••—•••—•••— — SURVEYED STREAM CENTERLINE
-------- PROPERTY BOUNDARY
— — — — — — — — BUFFER ZONE LIMITS
BANK PROTECTION
CHANNEL BED RIPRAP
LL
cq
•
r
r
u')
M
J
J
J
�
Q
�
Q
�Q
=
a
Lu
o =
O
o
+0
�r0
cQ
Q�
X;0
LJ
CO
EXISTING
GRAVEL ROAD
EXISTING
GROUNDtxisrmG
0
LL
w
r
i
u
Z
0+90 1+00 1+10 1+20
CULVERT PROFILE
SCALE 1 "=10' HORIZONTAL
1 "=5' VERTICAL
365
360
355
350
345
340
1 + 3035
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 "=10'
0 10' 20'
,,,Neeeo��es®or
`SEAL
1334V-V
OeNE�e:.
LYNVAS, %
;_
O
U
n Uj
O O
� O
n E
N
Lu IN
Ln
Q 3 U
Lu z� N �
dL00
-
LL N Ln
Lu M
Lu O O M W
_ '--I Co U
U�)C)��
Z J M C
x o
� lx rya
.- q U
TL
_ 'E o
c
I.0 z
o
� rn
L rn
J
Lu
U)
O
2
0
2
r)
Lu
Lu
U
Q
z
0
O
0
z
O_
a
U
U)
Lu
0
z
0
U)
Lu
w
Lu
Q
0
DATE
w.i.1/lrXII&
DRAWN BY
VANDERGRIFT
DESIGNED BY
B. WARD P.E.
CHECKED BY
SCALE
1 "=20'
w
J
LL
0
JOB NO.
44717
SHEET NO.
1

CULTURAL RESOURCES BACKGROUND STUDY — 7505 TROY STONE DRIVE,
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Timmons Group, Inc. has prepared a cultural resources background study for the property
at 7505 Troy Stone Drive (Parcel Number 656219661), Fuquay-Varina, Wake County, North
Carolina (Figure 1). The purpose of this study is to provide information about known cultural
resources in the vicinity of the property. This information will be used as supplement to the US
Army Corps of Engineers in the issuance of a permit for a crossing at a small unnamed creek that
crosses the property. Alterations to the creek include the construction of a residential driveway
over the creek, the installation of a culvert, and rip -rap along stream banks.
The parcel measures approximately five (5) acres and currently includes both wooded and
cleared areas. Improvements include a single-family residence, swimming pool and outbuildings.
The parcel was developed between 2004 and 2005. Prior to that it was mostly wooded owing to
natural topography and the hydric nature of the soils. This property is located within the southern
edge of Wake County, North Carolina, approximately 1.50 miles southwest of downtown Fuquay-
Varina (Figure 1). The region is dominated by agricultural fields and recently developed residential
neighborhoods.
A Timmons Group Secretary of the Interior qualified archaeologist conducted a review of
the cultural resources database at the North Carolina Office of State Archeology (OSA) on August
8, 2019. The proposed project area of potential effects (APE) extended one mile from the proj ect's
area of direct effects. The database review at the OSA revealed that no previous archaeological
studies have been conducted within a one -mile radius of the APE. Eight previously identified
archaeological sites have been recorded within one mile of the project area (Table 1), the nearest
of which is approximately 0.23 mile to the northwest. Aerial photographs (NETR and Google
Earth, accessed 8/9/2019) indicate that the project area has experienced moderately intensive
development as former agricultural land has been converted to single-family residential
neighborhoods. The current project area has never been surveyed for the presence of cultural
resources.
The USGS Web Soil Survey (accessed 08/9/2019) defines most of soils in the APE as
naturally sloped, hydric, or frequently flooded. These types of soil are unlikely to preserve intact
archaeological deposits.

Eight prehistoric sites have been recorded by avocational archaeologists within one mile
of the Troy Stone Drive study area. The nearest of these is almost one -quarter mile away, situated
on a level upland ridge with freshwater creeks flowing along the base of both sides of the landform.
The other known prehistoric sites are similarly situated on ridges or level upland areas near
streams. The current study area does not fit the local profile for settlement patterns. Given the level
of recent disturbances to the current proj ect area through development, as well as the physiographic
setting that seems to preclude the presence of prehistoric settlement, intact archaeological deposits
are very unlikely to be present within the APE as it is currently defined. It is not anticipated that
the project will have an adverse effect on archaeological resources.
Table 1. Archaeological resources located within a one -mile radius of the APE.
Site No.
Site Type
Status
WA1831
Prehistoric
Not evaluated
WA1834
Prehistoric
Not evaluated
WA1837
Prehistoric
Not evaluated
WA1877
Prehistoric
Not evaluated
WA1878
Prehistoric
Not evaluated
WA1887
Prehistoric
Not evaluated
WA1923
Prehistoric
Not evaluated
WA1924
Prehistoric
Not evaluated
Based on a review of the NCHPOWEB Online Mapper, there are no previously recorded
historical resources within the property. There are 17 previously recorded historical structures
within a 1-mile radius of the project area (Table 2). The nearest of these is WA530, a mid -
nineteenth century farmhouse located 0.40 mile to the northeast. One (1) resource, WA6542 (New
Deal Warehouse) is identified as potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. However, this
resource is located approximately 0.98-miles east of the proposed project area and is not visible
due to topography, vegetation, and existing development. The remaining 16 resources are surveyed
only and are therefore not listed or eligible for listing on the NRHP. Therefore, due to the absence
of historic resources in the immediate vicinity of the project area and the minimal visual impacts

associated with the project, it is unlikely to have an adverse effect on aboveground historic
resources.
Table 2. Historical resources located within a one -mile radius of the APE.
Site No.
Name/Type
Description
Status
C. 1900 1 1/2-story Triple -A frame
WA0528
Jones Farm (Gone)
house w/ many outbuildings
Destroyed
WA0529
House (Gone)
1900-1915
Destroyed
WA0530
Curran -Snipes House
c. 1880 I -house
Surveyed Only
WA0531
Powell House
c. 1900 I -house
Surveyed Only
WA0532
Howard House
1840-1860(?) I -house
Surveyed Only
WA0533
Mason House
1900-1910
Surveyed Only
WA0534
Dale -Beck Farm
c. 1931 Colonial Revival
Surveyed Only
1900-1910 1-story hip roof frame
WA0535
Robert Allen House
19th-20th c. traditional/vernacular
Surveyed Only
house
c. 1935 1-story hip roof frame 19th-
WA4785
Farm
20th c. traditional/vernacular
Surveyed Only
building
WA6538
House
c. 1961 1-story brick L-plan Ranch
Surveyed Only
WA6539
House
c. 1962 1-story side gable brick
Surveyed Only
linear Ranch
c. 1961 1-story side gable brick
WA6540
House
linear Ranch w/ carport
Surveyed Only
c. 1959 1-story side gable brick
WA6541
House
Surveyed Only
linear Ranch w/ carport
WA7557
House
c. 1958 1-story side gable brick
Surveyed Only
linear Ranch w/ carport
WA6543
House
c. 1961 1-story side gable painted
Surveyed Only
brick linear Ranch w/ carport

Site No.
Name/Type
Description
Status
WA7557
New Deal Warehouse
c. 1961 1-story front gable
potentially Eligible
commercial brick building
WA7596
House (Gone)
1930s Bungalow
Destroyed

PhCgPs-WestRq
y St •
—i �
cp
t,
(J
•
e
C
3urf f
WAU533 Meson H ors e
r
WA058B ti
tt
com House '
WA0532 k •---:;e
a F6 S
L C)O WA0531 Pow' N House ✓'o
"
Fleming
• apkwy
f WA0530 Curran -Snipes S
e
House
-
rlh
P. r
5`
.a
J
Q
o
■
gWA0535 Robert Allen
WagstatiR6
7.7
o House
tk.
r��fRa
o''p
a
WA4785
�
Fum
�
,
2
_ `na
►y �'
WA0537 John
Smith House 4
f f���

Lauren Norris -Heflin
From: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 2:37 PM
To: Sydni Law
Subject: Confirmation of Project Receipt Re: [EXTERNAL] Troy Stone Drive - Online Project Review
Certification Letter
Thank you for submitting your online project package. We will review your package within 30 days of receipt. If
you have submitted an online project review request letter, expect our response within 30 days. If you have
submitted an online project review certification letter, you will typically not receive a response from us since
the certification letter is our official response. However, if we have additional questions or we do not concur
with your determinations, we will contact you during the review period.