Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19990255 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19991005 DWQ Project No.: 990255 County Applicant: Gary Singleton Wake 41 Project Name: Streambank Stabilization Crabtree Creek 121 W. Drewry Lane Raleigh, NC 27609 Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: October 7, 1999 Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1621. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these. Applicant's Certification hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such.that the.construction..was..observed :to be-built ,within.substantial .. compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, 'the, approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Agent's Certification Date: I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materiais. Signature: Date: Engineer's Certification Partial XX Final 1, Charles Douglas Jewell, II , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, g(xXI:kkN)e.) the construction of the project,for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 ,s, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Water Quality Certificatiop-*d Buffer Rule Signature Registration No. 11934 Date May 18 , 2001 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director Gary Singleton 121 West Drewry Lane Raleigh, NC 27609 Dear Mr. Singleton: ,Tk?WA WON NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES September 11, 2000 Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act, and the Neuse River Buffer Rules Proposed shoreline stabilization project WQC Project #990255 COE # 19920600 Wake County Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No.3248 issued to Gary Singleton dated September 11, 2000. This Certification amends one issued to you on October 7, 1999. If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us. Attachments Sincerely, Stevens cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office Raleigh DWQ Regional Office Doug Jewell; Jewell Engineering Consultants Heath Beard; Neuse River Foundation Victor D' Amanto; Capital Group Sierra Club Danny Murphy File Copy Central Files Division of Water Quality • Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center • Raleigh NC 27669-1621 • Telephone 919-733-1786 • FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper 2 NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 and 15A NCAC 2B .0233. It is issued to Gary Singleton resulting wetland impact in Wake County pursuant to an application filed on the 15`° day of September, 1999 to stabilize the shoreline of Crabtree Creek at 121 Drewry Lane Raleigh. The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters of Crebtree Creek in conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application, as described in the Public Notice. If you change your project, you must notify us and send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre or total perennial stream impact exceeds 150 feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations. Condition(s) of Certification: 1. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the most recent version of two manuals, either the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices). The control practices shall be utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakes and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters); 2. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the project; 3. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened; 4. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands or other waters, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities; Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit. If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding. This the 11th day of September 2000 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY Stev s WQC# 3248 @ .+-* 4 DWQ Project No.: Applicant: Project Name: Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and anv subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1621. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant,.the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these. Applicant's Certification I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Agent's Certification Date: I, hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications. and other supporting materials. Signature: Date: Engineer's Certification Partial Final I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project,for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature Registration No. Date County: JEWELL _? - 1qP ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, RC August 30,2000 John R. DorneY? C NC DENR DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit F P I 200 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 RE: Gary?F. Singleton, Streambank Stabilization, Crabtree Creek WQC Project # 990255,.COE # 199920600, Certification #.3248 JEC Project No. 97-026-024 Dear John: Following up from our telephone conversation this morning, I have reviewed the 401 Water Quality Certification for the referenced proj ect.dated October 7, 1999, and, do not find any reference to approval for compliance with the Neuse River Basin Buffer Rule. I understand that such approval should have been included with this certificate: Please issue a letter documenting compliance with the Neuse Buffer Rules. We anticipate starting construction on this projecton or about October 2-, 2000. Thanks for`your prompt response to this request. Sincerely yours; JEWELL Engineering Consultants, PC C. Douglas Jewell, PE President C Gary F. Singleton Post Office Box 2294, Kernersville, NC 27285-2294 ¦ 1145 Union Cross Road, Kemersville, NC 27284 (336) 996-9974 ¦ Fax(336)996-9976 ¦ E-mail jec@ols.net V t *State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director 11krJ9hV1FA 4 ?•r Ilk 1 NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES October 7, 1999 Gary Singleton 121 West Drewry Lane Raleigh NC 27609 Dear Mr. Singleton: Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act, Proposed shoreline stabilization project WQC Project # 990255 COE # 199920600 Wake County Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3248 issued to Gary Singleton dated October 7, 1999. If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us. Attachments 990255.wgc cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office Raleigh DWQ Regional Office File Copy Central Files Doug Jewell; Jewell Engineering Consultants Heath Beard; Neuse River Foundation Victor D' Amato; Capitol Group Sierra Club Danny Murphy ?ty, Steven Ar Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 Telephone 919-733-1786 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B.«Hunt, Jr., Govemor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director z moo, NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES October 7, 1999 Gary Singleton 121 West Drewry Lane Raleigh NC 27609 Dear Mr. Singleton: Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act, Proposed shoreline stabilization project WQC Project # 990255 COE # 199920600 Wake County Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3248 issued to Gary Singleton dated October 7, 1999. If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us. Attachments 990255.wgc cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office Raleigh DWQ Regional Office File Copy Central Files Doug Jewell; Jewell Engineering Consultants Heath Beard; Neuse River Foundation Victor D' Amato; Capitol Group Sierra Club Danny Murphy n er ly, A err . Steven n Aw Division of Water Quality - Non-Discharge Branch Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 Telephone 919-733-1786 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper I? ` NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500. It is issued to Gary Singleton resulting wetland impact in Wake County pursuant to the revised application filed on the 15'' day of September 1999 and the original plan described in the Public Notice from the Corps of Engineers dated March 12, 1999 to stabilize the shoreline of Crabtree Creek at 121 Drewry Lane Raleigh. The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters of Crabtree Creek in conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application, as described in the Public Notice. If you change your project, you must notify us and send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations. Condition(s) of Certification: 1. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the most recent version of two manuals. Either the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices). The control practices shall be utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakgs and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters); 2. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the project; 3. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened; Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit. If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding. This the 7t° day of October 1999 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PtT e vens WQC # 3248 r ??A NCDENR DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY September 27, 1999 Memorandum To: John Dorney From: Todd St. John Subject: Gary Singleton Wake County DWQ# 990255 Please find the attached submittal for the subject project. The current structure of hardened concrete bags will be removed and replaced with the hard stabilization techniques in the attached plans dated September 14, 1999. The cross section will have approximately the same area between the pre-impact conditions and the proposed conditions. Also, the transition from the hard armoring to natural bank will be smooth (to avoid eddy currents). Rock vanes are proposed to help force the thalweg away from Mr. Singleton's property. It is not clear if these structures will be effective at moving the thalweg as desired , but the engineer believes that their presence will do little damage to the stream banks. In any event, the proposed bank-hardening plans seem reasonable considering all of the circumstances discussed by the engineer in his letter dated September 15, 1999. jEWELL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, PC September 15, 1999, John R. Dorney: y1A?ER Wetlands Unit Supervisor NCDENR Division of Water Quality 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh NC 27607 RE: G. F. Singleton Property, at 121 W. Drewry Lane, Raleigh, NC USACE Action ID 199920600 NCDENR DWQ# 990255 JEC Project No. 97-026-024 Dear Mr. Dorney JEWELL Engineering Consultants; PC is pleased to respond to the issues raised in your letter dated June 28, 1999. In order to provide an overview of the impacts of the proposed project, we have prepared cross section information which shows the following: I . Historical channel dimensions as contained in the official Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood analysis published in 1989. 2, Current channel dimensions°as measured on August 14,. 1999. 3. 'Proposed channel dimensions that will result from implementation of the proposed bank stabilization project: Data and graphs of these cross sections are provided on the attached spreadsheet plots and hand sketch: 'Flow areas have been calculated with a ,water surface at the right top of bank. On the left side of the channel, the water. edge, point has beeninterpolated from existing slopes. The following parameters are gleaned from this data and these plots. FEMA Cross Section Right Bank: Average side slope: 2.4H:IV. Bank height: 11.9 FT Left Bank: Average side slope: 0.9H:1 V Bank height: 11.5 F Flow area: Top width: 91: FT Maximum channel depth: 1T' Post Office; Box 2294; Kernersville, NC 27285-2294 ¦ 1145 Union Cross Road, Kemersville, NC 27284 (336) 996-9974 ¦ Fax (336) 996-9976 ¦ E-mail jec@016n6t John R. Dorney September 15, 1999, Page 2 of 4 Existing Cross Section Right Bank: Average side slope: I :9H:1 V Bank height: 14.5 FT Left Bank: Average side slope: 1.2H:1 V Bank height: 1T' Flow area: SF Top width: T Maximum channel depth: lli?w Proposed Cross Section with Bank Stabilization Right Bank: Average side slope: 1.9H:1 V Bank height: 1 f Left Bank: Average side slope: 0.8H- IV Bank height: 13.1 FT Flow area: - 1056, SF Top width: 87 FT ,. Maximum channel depth: 1$:8 ET We know that the Crabtree, Creek watershed is a dynamic one that is still. seeing development pressures and that has not yet reached a stable :condition. In,response, the stream channel continues to change because of this dynamic hydrologic regime and we_anticipate that many years will tie required for.the stream to become stable. Historical records on other streams indicate that 20 to 50 or more years may be required for a stream to stabilize in response to an altered hydrologic regime. A comparison of historical dimensions ;from the FEMA cross section to dimensions from the current existing cross section indicates that one way the channel is responding to the hydrologic changes is by becoming more incised. The banks are higher and the maximum depth isdeeper. The overall flow area as measured at top of the right bank has increased by over 6 percent from 990 SF to 1054 SF. Stream incision is atypical reaction to watershed development and loss of historical floodplain. Incision is generally followed by a period of bank erosion so that the channel may reestablish a floodplain at a lower, level. We atliat if left to its own etevicsrahts eCreek.wl:.contito eat° a=attoe of Mr., Singleton's bank, thus causing_pro sad ,. laughs:that Will,.resul i fail l nks, increa?ou .4ream,sediment,loadsrloss f? ot.sn-srdewtr.=&,and ve.getdamageto the sa *tary„se,w line and continued.damage_to Mr_ Singleton's property:, As you are aware, the 'Stream 's'root problems result from.-the many individual home4nd property owners` upstream who insist on sealing the land surface, eliminating floodplain storage and altering the natural drainage system, Unfortunately; Mr. Singleton is forced to spend large sums of money to mitigate the continuing damage that he did not cause: SWELL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS,hC John R.'Dorney September 15, 1999 Page 3 of 4 You raise the question about the proposed project's impact on upstream and downstream erosion. As described above, the entire stream system is in, a continual state of flux and erosion is quite evident all along the stream, especially at the outside of meander bends such as at this project , site. We can be quite sure that if nothing is done here, there will be continued erosion of the bank. The proposedprojectwill mitigate erosive effects. along Mr. Singleton's property and we are incorporating features to minimize impacts up and downstream These features iinclude smooth blending of'tl ,, s wing terial into the, natural;bapks;o,the?up..and,downstream endpoints. Smooth transitions will minimize_ddy, currents a.Feadtui?ttlence. Also,. we are using deflector weirs to direct the dominant erosive. currenrts` mto?;rthe center of the channel where... these-currents wi11-do little damage to streambanks: and .wherethe y create and maintain thatweg: p,661§- r}hich *ill °impr-ove flo,w characteristics aiid.aquatic .habitat As the attached cross sections show, the flow area after the project will be slightly' larger than the existing flow area. We recognize that the deflector weirs may be, viewed. by some as restricting flow, however experience and researd) show that the resulting;improvements toIhe thalvveg conditions from introduction of the weirs will offset, their, minor; restnetions to the. flow area,;. We cannot, guarantee that no erosion will result from this,work, however I am quite confident of, the following: 1), erosion will continue up- and downstream, and 2) erosion will continue in the project site if nothing is done. I do, not anticipate that this work will significantly improve the conditions up and.downstream of the project and we are taking appropriate actions to avoid making matters worse: You stated that ewe have not provided calculations.on the possible upstream and downstream channel impacts. I am aware of only one approach to analyzing such conditions and that is using finite element analysis procedures to model two and three dimensional flows. These analyses require copious amounts of data, cost thousands of dollars to perform, and are of questionable value since so many boundary, conditions must be estimated or assumed. Itis inappropriate to take this approach for a project of such limited scope. This project provides the following benefits: 1. Erosion of the bank in the project area will be significantly reduced. 2. Sediment production from the project area will be'significantly reduced. 3. Existing trees in the project area will be preserved and protected as much as, possible. 4. New vegetation (trees ;-shrubs and.:other plantings) will be'introduced alongthe bank within the'proiect area: 5. Thalweg flow conditions will be improved by the development of scour pools. 6. Aquatic, environment conditions will be improved through` increased habitat diversity. The negative aspects of the project are relatively short-lived. The stream will be temporarily disrupted during construction, but this will quickly pass once construction is complete. Some people consider the stark nature of the, riprap and gabions to be aesthetically offensive. Our experience is that in a relatively short time, the riprap will silt in and plants will begin to grow between the rocks. Trees, shrubs and vines will be planted among the, gabions to provide , additional habitat and, screen the "engineered" look. In'summary, we feel the benefits of doing this work in the manner proposed far outweigh the real, potential or imagined negatives. We are committed to an effective project that stabilizes EWELL ENGINEE.RINO 00NSULTANTS,pC __ Cross Section Comparison G. F. Singleton 121 W. Drewry Ln. Raleigh, NC '- Prepared: 9/14/99 J C ro'. No. 97-026-024 EAstin. Cro ss Section Station Elevation Flow Comments Area (SF) 127 98.1 TOB (R) 108 88.9 87 Bench (R) Back 105 88.6 28 Bench (R) Front 104 87.4 10 Slope (R) 100 83.6 50 Water Edge (R) 94 82.3 91 Thalweg 73 83.6 318 Sandbar 62 83.5 160 Base of Wail (L) 50 83.4 176 Extrapolated point 46 87.2 51 Toe of Slope (L) 35 96.5 69 TOB (L) 19 98.1 13 WSEL intercepts slope 0 100 Benchmark Area Sum: 1054 Existi Cross Section with Bank Protection Station Elevation Flow Comments Area (SF) 127 98.1 TOB (R) 108 88.9 87 Bench (R) Back 105 88.6 28 Bench (R) Front 104 87.4 10 Slope (R) 100 83.6 50 Water Edge (R) 94 82.3 91 Thalweg 73 83.6 318 Sandbar 62 83.5 160 Base of Wall (L) 50 83.4 176 Extrapolated point, toe of riprap 42 87.4 102 Top of riprap 42 90.4 0 Gabion 41 90.4 8 Gabion 41 93.4 0 Gabion 40 93.4 5 Gabion 40 96.5 0 Gabion 35 96.5 8 TOB (L) 19 98.1 13 WSEL intercepts slope 0 100 Benchmark Existing Cross Section 100:0 -, 1 95.0 F 1 _ I +y 90.0 - j. - ' I L _ W 85.0 ' fi ll ? 80:0 ?? 11 0 20 40 60 80 100 Station I j- ? - 120 140 Existing Cross Section w1 Bank Protection F I 100.0-h-r r, r... 95.0.. -- 90.0 - - 1 I -Li - W 85.0 - 1 - I 80.0 - -'- -? i 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Station Inrea oum:I -iuooi FEMA Cross Section G.F. Singleton 121 w. Drewry Lane Raleigh, NC Crabtree Creek Bank Stabilization Project JEC Project No. 97-026-024-001 Cross section in meander bend from FEMA HEC-2 analysis dated 1989 at Station 49500 Station Elevation Flow Comments (FT) (FT) Area (SF) 1000 210 1006.4 204.2 interpolated cross section 1007 203.7 0 1020 201.8 19 left top of bank 1030 190.3 81 1052 189.8 311 1068 190.4 226 1082 192.3 180 1111 204.2 173 right top of bank JArea Sum: 9901 Flow area calculated assuming water surface is at top of right bank. FEMA Cross Section of Crabtree Creek at Sta. 49500 H 220 r . _ ._ - - -- - - --- - c 210 ^- 200 - -- - - ca 190 + -_ -_- m 180 ±- -- --- _ - W 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 Station (FT) CO 011 v C r m co m O z m r1f -n+ I -C) 4 0 N m r) b ? n CRI N 7q al i n ? g x AI 1 n _ a r m z G7 Z m m 33 z 0 Z C D Z co el" I 0 0 0 Z z m 0 m m cn D C n m cr x z ?. m m 0 0 C yy=- m 0 0 m m m r 0 (c :a 3Lr? waud?a?s3a ?us o w wa z f0 > U > zQ _ ; m Q W ?- a. w F- _ ?• Nr W W 41 iv a 00 N P- U W W Lij '= z 0 a J a r C) W w Z m Ix m _N c x Q O N V O cn ? = U Z w 946"66 (9f£) W.4 99LLS FNr)OWO KWN IT SN3NM +L66-966 MT) "U X06 30L4.40 1SOd YNrK)UVO HINON 1.10 ? 4 I ? S1NV1-1nuN OO ONI»?aBNONE-3 ,-ih ???s? Q Ntfld NOLL`dZl'118d1S ?IIVt/9 YV?/3liL? ?? ? ? ? 4 r "- )8-%0 33HAVU0 NO hl ld N013 -KM I ! tt J d U O O Z -H co e+i? cr- zm j W O W 1 o w ? N a ? , Y II = a ?a. U CO YZ_ W pN N m O d (n O m O X 00 O = LLJ O 00 w > 0.. EL d ? Z w O J Q lL LL ?a O w Y CO z wQ < 00 ?- 3.. 0- u j a U0 O N CO W CO II ib fV -- - --7 - ---?-? -- - ?- - LO w - I w I I W Q i i C9 i? ;N ... O Z J d 0 X "?! N ? U X - -''' -f -N - --- a (n W p in to i w t --f O d ?'t r U _k- m i U Q zmo rn 0 `o 00 i o NOUVA3-13 x w `t p Z o O w z Q a Ln Z ?-1 O v W Q a a Z O.. CL w N Z 3 a z Vi m z w = a w v i m o 2 m vi Z W W U D Z. t m W w X C z W Y a Q' Q w Z} mm W ? w co Q W co Oa Z O U a z z Z w 4- w >- \ c~n J Q w CO ?_ o t z pZ to cn ¢< 3 ? m N 'O o z v a r 5 , o X z < d J = 0 p a z Wo a? Q f n. m4 wW w (n Z w (n w co U) z ? m zo mo V) ?w m --? 0 a U- O (=n X (n (1) O o: O Z z w w a &i Ljj W PC) O O w c> w w 2 z0 a? I-- W O Q Q m i w au O ?< a ?- c? cD a z .: (V ?7 4 ui 6 f? co Y Z d co LL 0 M O t- t- LLU QUO CL O LU JQZ 23W Q O 3N;1 AibEdOdd N -H Aa? ?gia4srra?ya aG ?e e h 67 !r P G 6 V W J H z w Q o (n Lk- U O 0 O0 Q QO Q ^ O Q U (n (n w Q z U (? TV/5 z z = xxxx 0=0 o w aaaa a Q U U U (o to (n (n !n } a a Q N Q a W C? a Q n O = (n o a Z m } W a m dN CO cn 0 3 O a J a m w w (n V) W U W CL V t^ Q? d'. } O O 3 O V) C9 D V) O LAJ L9 f - Z J 7--G J LL (I) J V ._F t- W O V) m -j-- ?' 1 O > < o 4 ? =F- `J n - `v ,89 O( - N (1. cn t o oQ d <? CL LAJ :2 :2 it CL Uw Of m I- (n - ? T? ff?? I LL 0 d W J 7 00LLJ LLI _- Y W W (Y C) W -H } LJ W Zz t- f m I d O U ll- _-_4 F N W? W ? p 3A-ino dhO s EAY U O Of Q3WH lY :3WX M-d35 3LW M" :A9 431187 M09iLP-66\w sl7?, n?ahawJ 0 N II r LLt d U In X 0 w tl a a T13"' AS State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director e?? NCDENR DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY June 28, 1999 Mr. C. Douglas Jewell, PE Jewell Engineering Consultants PO Box 2294 Kernersville, NC 27285-2294 Subject: Gary Singleton Stream Bank Stabilization Wake County, NC DWQ# 990255 Dear Mr. Jewell: This Office is in receipt of your plans dated June 16, 1999. Your submission did not contain information to show that the proposed placement of rip rap and/or gabions in the "pre- impact limits of the stream channel will not cause accelerated erosion upstream or downstream of the proposed project. This Office is concerned that the constriction and redirection of the steam channel may exacerbate upstream and down stream bank instability. Please provide any plans, showing entire channel cross-section(s), and calculations to provide information on the possible upstream and downstream channel impacts. Also, it is not clear what effect the proposed placement of the rock weir deflectors will have on the current conditions in the stream. Please provide a copy of Section view "B-B" describing weir deflector detail and an explanation of the anticipated effects of the deflectors. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Todd St. John at (919) 733-1786. , 'Ire, RDorney nds Unit Su sor cc: Todd St. John, Wetlands Unit Raleigh Regional Office Ken Jolly, ACOE Raleigh Office Eric Fleek, Wetlands Unit 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone 919-733-1896 FAX 919-733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper 91.68-M (Sir) -cr.4 WUZ VNnOVVD NLWW 13TwASUMM nee-988 (9££) "= )008 301W isod . . M rK)WVO F LMON 'iV!! SiNbCL` naNoo E) lWaPNIoNa, ?? Nv-1d 1aou -MIS )Kvfe nyaws Ai 3110 ?IOUdlgs30 SNOISN7il .. ? ? I 8 1 a m ?z 8 w C- m < U > z N I - Z N X r r i j co i - -- --- -A r- rn rn ? NOIlVA313 I-- z < W m < ? W $ m. 0- < OO zz z 10- m gs < p z a a I-- 04 on S V Oz 0[< V) V) - ?a 30 ?z W"?+W+ a O m> F- ce N ? / O Y Q ?< ?z z C' Ix O j m Z mZ mN O N >.. m a?ZQ LLJ -i \_ o cTTiw ww -? m V) m C) L.Li z CL o (W 00 0 m C)m 0w IL 30 d Z - N vi 4: Sri cd H 10 o¢w W _o 0 oD 0) o: v ; ww co p a w Yw z •- z w i; {I 0 z U w w ? w z }' mm 4. O m 1 9 z J ° w 09 -ai: Ual: Q '4 U- o4 M NZ Z O U p 6 8 Q O QZ m CL ( m ao 0w c ?wm zm w o v? Q ?o ~ zz zz N oa o? ZII O F- U W V) of o? 3NI-1 ki83dO?l {3 W 0 ,L9 ,89 0 00 w '- ii Q W J J U- N J V 0 1.°n m Cil Q c? N ' N< ?Q U? W .?. 1\ < 1.n U w zw Q o < ? lU V) _j z <? ?Z( a aS.?a `. Z Z U vNi vi 5 Z v) ?iZ2 J" O _ < XXXX = ??... crr yak a_3 a _3 =a _3 2 p l? m #ac<nm w W to m 3 own LA. ,Ile O? _ co to, Y W W N a ? 0- O o ui > o Q C) V) 7 F- w CL o w w a a Q O m Q U r }? 1a3n3nO dNQ ,9 u 0 v ? 3 V O aim sv TM7` 66-" mve UW UY 03189 avq Y/L0-6e\w?iio\ ausx?+oJ &nwo.*.a -nwR to _j 0 CO Zm x3380 -9 N N +( < o w z Q J W V) :) W ? o 3 N L.Li .)1 Z oM Ir oN O ' oo U w U Li z W Y U (if LL O 3.1 L1J V u w co N F?ol DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 IN REPLY REFER TO March 12, 1999 Regulatory Division SUBJECT: Action ID. 199920600 Mr. John Dorney Q 51' Division of Water Quality t h'am' North Carolina Department of Environment and 1AND$GSCTION,.., Natural Resources ?pjER UF?1? 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607 Dear Mr. Dorney: Enclosed is the modified application of Gary F. Singleton, for a Department of the Army permit and a State Water Quality Certification for the proposed discharge of fill material (clean earth backfill, and riprap) in waters of the United States, at his residence at 121 W. Drewry Lane, on the north side of Crabtree Creek, in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. The work involves bank stabilization and the replacement of bank material lost during hurricane Fran in September, 1996, and will involve total impacts to approximately 1,390 square feet (0.03 acre) of creek bottom below ordinary high water. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations. We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality certification may be required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification has been obtained or waived. Please note that, because of the relatively small change in the impacted resource between the original and the modified application, we will not be issuing a public notice for the modification. In accordance with our administrative regulations, 60 days after receipt of a request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request by May 10, 1999, the+ District Engineer will deem that waiver has occurred. Please address questions or comments to me at (919) 876-8441, extension 23. Sincerely, Eric C. Alsmeyer Regulatory Project Manager Enclosure Copy Furnished (without enclosure): Mr. John Parker Division of Coastal Management North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Mr. C. Douglas Jewell, P.E. President Jewell Engineering Consultants Post Office Box 2294 Kernersville, North Carolina 27285-2294 2 APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003 (33 CFR 3251 Expires October 1996 Public reporting burden for this collection of Information Is sstimtrted.to.average 5 hours per response, including. the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing.data sources.-gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and`reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of InformationOperations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204;'Adington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,'Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503._ Please DO NO RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed. applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over. the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Authority: 33 USC 401. Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued. One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned. a ^ •-r r -- 1. APPLICATION NO. lq(gq- , 106b 4 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLET; 5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE /en agent Is not revuiredl Gary F. Singleton C. Douglas Jewell, P.E. 6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS 121 W. Drewry Lane PO Box 2294 Raleigh, NC 27609 Kernersville, NC 27285-2294 7. APPLICANT'S PHONE . W AR A CODE 1 NT' H N NOS. W R A CODE a.. Residence 919 420-Q370 a. Residence 336-788-9168 b: Business Business 336-996=9974 -'STATEMENT OF. AUTHORIZATION I hereby authorize, C `Douglas Jewell to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and t furnish upon request,•supple entai information in support of this permit application: 13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN iN.pnae ek1 Crabtree Creek 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT Wake NC COUNTY STATE 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, fsee/nsrructions) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (#&PP eeble; 121 W. Drewry Lane Raleigh, NC 27609 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE Take I-440 to Six Forks Road Exit(by North Hills,Hall). Go south on Six Forks Road, right on Coleridge.Rd, left.on Milton Rd, right on Drewry. Lane. No. 121 is on the left. r,'-?'??'?;b"`. S.ey?alS'ai1'^Oy?Ci.rrL ?"-i,Cdt'A`-?,`tA 3'tSx'?t`".X-.t?e.r: +`t?td}:c tii?.x3 h' - _.•:Sr ?ivf}?tT4Gs EN FORM 4345, Feb 4 EDITION OF EP 91 I 089OLETE. (Proponent: ly. NaU/tC JI AC(IVIIy (OrsCripl,nn u t prajecl. include al/lexturesl See attached sheet 19. Project Purpose tOoscribe the reeson or purpose-of the project, see /nstructlonsl The purposes of this project are 1) to restore the creek bank eroded by Hurricane Fran and 2) to stabilize the creek bank to control future erosion to protect the home, property, and sanitary sewer line. USE BLOCKS 20-221F DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 20. Reason(s) for Discharge 1) To replace bank material lost during Hurricane Fran, September 1996. 2) To stabilze the creek bank thus protecting property, home and sanitary sewer line. 21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards 180 cy class 2 riprap 86 cy class 1 riprap approx 245 cy backfill with soil 22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled rsee/nstructionsl Approximately 142 linear feet of creek bank will be affected. 23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes X No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK Approximately 2/3 of the backfill has been placed and concrete bags which were placed previously must be removed. 24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list). 1) David S. Reardon 2)., Vi:rgilia..Moore 119 W. Drewry Ln. 207 W. Drewry Ln. Raleigh, NC 27609 Raleigh, NC 27609 (919)571-8321 (919)881-9615 25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from .other Federal, State or_Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application. AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL` IDENTIEICA'1!O9NUMBER 'DATE APPLIED' DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED none *Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits 26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work-described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is comp) to and accurate. I further certify that 1 possess the authority to u dertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly au ized agen of the applica t. / rm /9, iffy del- A ;." 1---? I y -f r 4? OT F SIG U 4E OF AP P_t CANT DATE SIGNAT`RIEtAf/hqENT DATE ?? NN ?] pp,,,, h The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed a}L`?tt4?`{aR:?attT9??lt?may be signed by a duly v authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed. ? ? ??Ot E SS%q 9 . 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner Within the juris knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals; or covers up eny triokr scheme, or di: any Se? an Apr ag6ncy of the United States net 1" c or nipkes'ny false, fictitious or Y Wt- RnLaI. any false, fictitious or M -4 LLS.OP0:1994.520-478/8201e ,?r??^11+rJ11111Cj1??? Block 18 of Application for the Department of the Army Permit Singleton Property, 121 W. Drewry Lane, Raleigh, NC February 1999 Nature of Activity: This project is intended to stabilize the outside of a meander bend on Crabtree Creek at 121 W. Drewry Lane, which eroded significantly during Hurricane Fran in September 1996. A previous attempt to stabilize the bank with concrete bags has been stopped. Over many years, this outside bend has experienced erosion that is typical of most bends in creeks having this size and geomorphology. A review of historical records (HEC-2 analysis from FEMA study in 1989) shows that the bank near the point of interest had a slope of 2.7H to IV. The proposed stabilization plan calls for a 2H:1 V slope from the top of the existing bank to the creek bed. A trench 2 ft deep and 2 ft wide will extend along the toe of the proposed slope for a length of approximately 142 ft (not to exceed 150 ft). Geotextile filter fabric will line the trench and the 2H:1 V earthen bank slope. Class 2 riprap will be placed from the bottom of the trench to 8 ft above the existing elevation of the stream channel. Class 1 riprap will be placed from the top edge of the class 2 riprap to the top of the existing bank at a maximum thickness of 1.5 ft. Native woody species will be planted through the class 1 riprap and filter fabric to further stabilize the bank. Previously placed concrete bags will be removed. Two rock deflector weirs will be constructed from class 2 riprap. These devices will also be trenched below the invert of the stream channel. They will be flush with the channel invert at the centerline of the stream channel and will rise to a height of 4 ft by the time they intersect the riprap-faced embankment. The deflector weirs will be pointed upstream in order to deflect the flow in the outside of the meander back to the center of the stream. The weirs will be placed at an angle between 30 and 45 degrees from the bank (angle to be determined in the field depending on direction of flow toward bank.) Pagel .of 2 Z- 50 W m N J 0 W O Z LLI m J 0C) w Z z Q co LL) = O M U) O Z Z 0 Q ? J O a(x O Z Q? a- ?Lj CL Y C- VW i (? U-) Z U O Y Z Q m w O CL C<L T 00 Z 00 a U _ Z w m N U LL V) Q O N w U Z w N?' H O ?r N W' ?? _ 00 ( l M M N W o > N Z O C) O ? Lo O 0 0 °o LO 0 O rn orn co m z NOIIVA313 x w W cn O 3NII .1183dOb ,L9 W U W ? ?- m J ao V m ry W O0 U w J LL W Y z O N LL- 0 O 0 _W Z O W cn Z ? Z ono N N OoR O ~ O Y N 0 Q U a ma. o`r'o ONY tn Nto M z to W a 1 . m 10 z o: o i O ? f-, d Z \ J Q r- II Q 0- ?. CL 4_ CL o! m a. a- W ? CC N D: ? Q CN N '- ? YV)(nz Nn ((n m J Ua i U X c ) L O tY a Q O II Y - z a m? LL) J O w Y Q U J w w ui (n = U I~ X O O z O M w Z O LLJ Q a Q Z < w? w LLJ O N 0- O w m x to 9 o F- J 3 C) -j z w cn ZO O Q ?j D 0- x w F293A-Ino dwO ,9 Q W Of 0 ,89 O p O w mj II ~ U) > Qw i W ?? J Z w N Q o ?, w U ww Z O ? O ' O N m C)f 9a z v a ! Q Q n Q -im z to V) J QQ«..Z U Z Z = xxxx m aV)NN Q V I N O li Q J Q O = ? U O U w W O _ W Q J r w w C-n O O m O Q.Nm w M O ?. p ?O W LAJ J w U) m 3 OO .\ 0 o vc 8 -O Q 0 0 p vF? co - t 8 O O u? o 0 4 u W OZ? " ?QO ? N 0 WWZ z T (5o z ... y v 2 W.. Q Y w W U ? X ? W > to (i Q J ? W w m U l c Li U w N Z Q J a (n w Y Z Q m LLO 0 N W !Y ^ O? U v W J Lj- Of W p W Y U O Q 0 N I I i J I Q U V) X O Of d a_ Q w-Im --ALA MA : v mum *Ngrolm-"N o\ GVAWWWo w^.«0w3 7rAq- r The upstream end of the riprap section will be tapered smoothly into the existing bank at the outlet of a corrugated metal pipe (CMP) which discharges into Crabtree Creek. The CMP carries tributary streamflow under an existing sanitary sewer outfall and is owned by the Raleigh water and sewer system. Severe corrosion of this CMP will ultimately lead to its failure unless remediation of the pipe is implemented. The downstream end of the riprap section will be tapered smoothly into the existing bank to form a hydraulically efficient transition to natural bank material and to minimize erosive eddy currents in that area. Project work will require the use of heavy equipment and hand labor to construct. Heavy equipment will be required to dig trenches and shape the bank and to lift and place the riprap. We envision that the project will be constructed during the summer months when flows are typically lower and access can be gained to the channel bed. Care will be taken to minimize disruption of the channel and aquatic flora and fauna. The proposed project will have the following beneficial effects: • Woody vegetation planted in the riprap will provide shade and habitat for aquatic and terrestrial animals. • The rock deflector weirs will provide aquatic habitat diversity and will minimize erosive flows against the downstream outside of the stream meander. • The riprap will attract and accrete sediment which will provide soil substrate for plant growth. • The protected bank will produce less sediment. Existing trees and vegetation at the top of the slope will be preserved. Page 2 of 2 Subj: Re: Stream Stabilization Date: 99-02.22 11:56:28 EST From: ° GSngNC To: djewelljec@ols.net Thanks Doug, Will forward application when recieved. HOWEVER, please add an update the the parties involved to the effect that the City of Raleigh will be invited to be a party to this action considering the corrosive condition of the metal culvert adjacent to the planned project. Gary... 2 ,Z3, ff dG '04 cX T: d - CA-? k 7 ?aaw i CiC etl r i k e 4 w e i Je ?v W f /?I ? 7? P 3f 4aT r'ew-o'o - ed 4z, F-m m J 't4,e4.4 4La na'lic?"Ue kes sre-Ad b? V .74 Monday February 22, 1999 America Online: GSngNC Page: 1 98-0678 Subject: 98-0678 Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 14:50:37 EST From: "Steven R. Mitchell" <Steve_Mitchell@rro.enr.state. nc.us> Organization: DENR - Raleigh Regional Office To: todd_stjohn@l12o.enr.state.nc.us Issue. Plans include proEection of existing veg and new trees on slope. No riprap in active channel 1 of 1 5/5/99 4:12 PM State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director Gary Singleton 121 Drewry Lane Raleigh, NC 27609 Dear Mr. Singleton: Subject: DWQ # 990255 Wake County • 461 NC ENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES March 17, 1999 On March 15, 1999, your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification for backfill and riprap in Wake County was received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality. The Division will begin to review the project for eventual decision. However, please be aware that beginning January 1, 1999 that the N.C. General Assembly passed legislation requiring payment of a fee of $200.00 for this project. The 401 Certification cannot be issued until this fee is paid. Until that time, your application will remain on hold as incomplete. Please call Cyndi Bell at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions. gin R. D o y cc: Central Files Raleigh DWQ Regional Office Raleigh Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers Cyndi Bell John Dorney Wetlands/401 Unit 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 Telephone 919-733-1786 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post consumer paper DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 IN REPLY REFER TO March 12, 1999 Regulatory Branch Action ID. 199920600 Mr. Owen Anderson North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 1142 I-85 Service Road Creedmoor, North Carolina 27522 Mr. David S. Reardon 119 W. Drewry Lane Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Mr. Virgilia Moore 207 W. Drewry Lane Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Mr. Denny M. Murphy c/o O'Brien Atkins Associates, PA Post Office Box 12037 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 City of Raleigh Department of Parks and Recreation Post Office Box 590 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-0590 Dear Sirs: .. A'Wo Reference the public notice dated July 16, 1998, describing the request by Mr. Gary F. Singleton for an after-the-fact Department of the Army permit for the completed and proposed discharge of fill material in waters of the United States. The project location is at his residence at 121 W. Drewry Lane, on the north side of Crabtree Creek, in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. The purpose of the work is bank stabilization and the replacement of eroded bank material. ti A.Y By application dated February 22, 1999, Mr. Singleton has revised his proposal. We are requesting that you review the enclosed materials from the application and provide your comments and/or recommendations to us on or before April 5, 1999. Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer at telephone (919) 876-8441, extension 23. Sincerely, cz:?i . a"-e-6 S. Kenneth Jolly Manager, Raleigh Field Office Enclosure Copies Furnished (without Mr. John Dorney l North Carolina Department and Natural Resources Water Quality Division 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina enclosure): of Environment 27607 Mr. C. Douglas Jewell, P.E. President Jewell Engineering Consultants Post Office Box 2294 Kernersville, North Carolina 27285-2294 Regulatory 2 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director 1 ? • NC ENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES May 28, 1999 DWQ Project #990255 COE# 19920600 CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Gary Singleton 121 Drewry Lane Raleigh, N.C. 27609 Dear Mr. Singleton: The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill material into 0.03 acres of streams and/or wetlands located at your lot in Wake County for Streambank Stabilization. Insufficient evidence is present in our files to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below, we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(el. and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information, we are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers place your project on administrative hold. Please provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must be constructed as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing fill in these waters and/or wetlands. Specifically can you development without placing material in the active channel? We have not been able to reach your consultant. Please have him call Todd St. John of my staff at (919) 733-1786. Any documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to address alternative designs for your project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending d copy of this information to me and one copy to Mr. Steve Mitchell Raleigh Regional Office at 3800 Barrett Drive, PO Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27609. If we do not hear from you in three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. I can be reached at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions. Jo R. Dome cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office J Wilmington Office Corps of Engineers Central Files John Dorney Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers Todd St. John Doug Jewell; Jewell Engineering Consultants 9900255.nty Wetlands/401 Unit 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 Telephone 919-733-1786 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director 1•? NC ENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES May 28, 1999 DWQ Project #990255 COE# 19920600 CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Gary Singleton 121 Drewry Lane Raleigh, N.C. 27609 Dear Mr. Singleton: The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill material into 0.03 acres of streams and/or wetlands located at your lot in Wake County for Streambank Stabilization. Insufficient evidence is present in our files to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance with 15A NCAC 211 .0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below, we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0507(e) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information, we are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers place your project on administrative hold. Please provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must be constructed as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to placing fill in these waters and/or wetlands. Specifically can you development without placing material in the active channel? We have not been able to reach your consultant. Please have him call Todd St. John of my staff at (919) 733-1786. Any documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to address alternative designs for your project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending d copy of this information to me and one copy to Mr. Steve Mitchell Raleigh Regional Office at 3800 Barrett Drive, PO Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27609. If we do not hear from you in three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. I can be reached at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions. c Jo R. Dorney r-, cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office J Wilmington Office Corps of Engineers Central Files John Dorney Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers Todd St. John Doug Jewell; Jewell Engineering Consultants 9900255.nty Wetlands/401 Unit 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 Telephone 919-733-1786 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper MEMORANDUM TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Ken Schuster Date: SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Facility Name Gary Singleton Project Number 98 0678 Recvd From COE Received Date 3/23/99 Recvd By Region Project Type bank stabilization County Wake County2 Region Raleigh Certificates Stream Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ip Stream O Y O N 27-33 (lO) NSW 30,402. 0.03 Mitigation Wetland MitigationType Type Acres Feet Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y ON Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/fond O Deny Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss) Comments: AS long as stabilization materials are not placed in the active channel_ Project has plans to protect exi i gyegetation and reestablish woodyyegetation on the riprapslQpe, cc: Regional Office Page Number 1 Central Office