20070423 Ver 1_401 Application_20070307

v McI~VI~'C~EE~
v
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
NCDENR-DWQ
401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
~.i°JC~I~^:~P ~?
., '3V' FYO~
~L „i~~NER.`~
March 5, 2007 Q 7 p 4 2 3
®URTES~Y
CC?P~(
MAR ~ 2007
~Si~1~iFi - YVA1~uR C1~ALITY
71A~lD,~. r: ~D ~ i Qga,~yt+'~({ gRp~It:H
Subject: Authorization Request for Nationwide Permit 12
2005 Annexation Phase V-lA
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
Pertinent Facts:
Location: 7 sewer easements near Bingham Drive, North of the Hope Mills Area,
Cumberland County, North Carolina
USGS 7.5' Quadrangle: Fayetteville
River Basin: Cape Fear River
Nearest Stream: Beaver Creek
Permanent wetland impacts: 0.34 acres (maintenance corridor)
Temporary wetland impacts: 0.90 acres (construction limits)
Temporary stream impacts: 1291inear feet for total of 0.049 acres
Wetland type: Bottomland hardwoods
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed is a Nationwide Permit application for wetland impacts for the Fayetteville
Phase V 1-A Annexation sewer extension. Seven sections of sewer line must cross
wetlands to connect to the existing sewer system. Impacts have been avoided and
minimized to the maximum extent practicable. This permit application is being
submitted on behalf of Joseph E. Glass with the Public Works Commission (PWC) of
Fayetteville. A courtesy copy is being sent to NCDENR-DWQ.
We trust that the enclosed information will be sufficient for you to continue your review
r~ ::~
and approval of this submittal. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Susan M. Howard
.~. ~~

Enclosures:
NWP #12 Permit Application PCN
Vicinity Map
Wetland/Site maps of crossings
Wetland Data Forms
Cumberland County MRCS Soil Survey Map
Additional soil survey maps of crossings obtained from the MRCS Web Soil
Survey
cc: Joseph E Glass (PWC)
v M~~crz~ED

Office Use Only: Form Version Maz h o5
O7 •0423
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing ®uRTE~~
~.®~~
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
~~~~~~~~
II. Applicant Information ~; ?~V~~;
MAR ~ 2007
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Fayetteville Public Works Commission - ~ ~ ~°`^' ~ Q~A~~~
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1089 ti-~-~-r-r3 ~ ~ ~ A,~sr~'~t BRAtJCN
Fayetteville NC 28302
X10 ~e.olti G~11_.o~.m ! J~.; ,1
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Susan M. Howard
Company Affiliation: McKim & Creed PA
Mailing Address: 104 Gillespie Street
Fayetteville NC 28301
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:~910L323-1028
E-mail Address: SHowardna mckimcreed.com
Page 5 of 14

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Annexation Phase 5, Project Area lA
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): multiple properties involved
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town: Fayetteville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):~from Raleigh) Head east
on I-40. Merge onto I-95 S (exit 328A~ Take I-95 Business South towards Fayetteville/Fort
Bra ope AFB (exit 56) Travel 5.6 miles, turn Right on NC-2.4 (Grove Street). Travel 1.4
miles, turn Left at Brae Blvd/Robeson Street. Continue on Robeson Street for 2.6 miles,
turn Left at Raeford road travel 4 miles turn Left on Bingham Drive. For Bingham Drive
Project Area - Within a mile, Turn Left on Tiree Drive and take the first Right on Paisley
Ave. For Greenock, Selkirk, Grampian and Kirby Proiect Areas -continue down
Paisley Ave each crossing is at subsequent streets to the right. For Lochness Project Area -
Continue on Paisley past Kirby Court, Lochness Court is your 3rd street on the ri hg t -
crossing at end of cul-de-sac. For Lawnwood Court Proiect Area -Continue around
Paisley Ave, turn Left on Lawnwood Drive. Travel on Lawnwood Drive, Lawnwood Court
will be on your left.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): Bingham: N35°02'08.1" W78°59'04.7
Greenock: N35°01'41.1" W78°58'54.4" Selkirk: N35°01'38.2" W78°58'52.0"
Grampian: N35°01'35.0" W78°58'51.1" Kirby: N35°01'31.1" W78°58'50.2"
Lochness: N35°01'18.0" W78°58'23.0" Lawnwod: N35°01'43.2" W78°58'21.1"
Page 6 of 14

6. Property size (acres): multiple properties, sewer easements are maximum 40ft wide
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Beaver Creek. UT to Beaver Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Residential
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Typical
earth-moving equipment (trackhoe backhoe bulldozer)
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Installation of sewer line in an existing
neighborhood
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
AT/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the. exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits anticipated
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
Page 7 of 14

permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: All impacts in the project area
are tem orary. Up to a maximum width of 40' of construction corridor will be cleared, sewer
line installed and the site returned to pre-construction grade. All of the construction corridor
through wetlands will be seeded with annual native species of plants suitable for wet
locations. Selkirk, Grampian, Kirby Lochness and Lawnwood will have tree seedlings
planted in all but the 10' wide maintenance corridor as per the request of the local USAGE
representative as a requirement to avoid mitigation. Tree seedlings planted will be species
currently within the wetland and will be planted at a density currently existing in the wetland
X150 trees per acre). Periodic mowing of the maintenance corridor will be done with care to
not alter the hydrology of the wetland.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
Separately list impacts due to heth stn~ct~~re and flnnrlinu
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested
marsh 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) ,
,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no (linear feet)
Temporary -
1 a -Greenock construction limit Bottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0.05
clearing
lb -Greenock Perm- maintenance
corridor gottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0.02
Temporary -
2a -Selkirk construction limit Bottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0.05
clearing
2b -Selkirk Perm- maintenance Bottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0
03
corridor .
Temporary -
3a -Grampian construction limit Bottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0.17
clearing
3b -Grampian Perm- maintenance Bottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0.06
corridor
Temporary -
4a -Kirby construction limit Bottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0.11
clearing
Page 8 of 14

4b -Kirby Perm- maintenance Bottomland Hazdwood Yes 0' 0.04
corridor
Temporary -
Sa - Lochness construction limit Bottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0.20
clearing
Sb - Lochness Perm- maintenance Bottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0.07
corridor
Temporary -
6a - Lawnwood construction limit Bottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0.24
clearing
6b - Lawnwood Perm- maintenance Bottomland Hardwood Yes 0' 0.08
corridor
7a -Bingham Temporary -
constructionlimit Bottomland Hardwood Yes 10'+ 0.08
clearing
7b -Bingham Perm- maintenance gottomland Hazdwood Yes 10'+ 0.04
corridor
Total Wetland Impact (acres)
i.a~
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
Multiple properties, total area of wetlands within easements equals total proposed impacts.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acrea e, multi 1 length X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma Intermittent? Before I act linear feet acres
Temporary -line
1 -Greenock UT to Beaver below stream perennial 21' 20' 0.01
Creek bottom, restored to
grade
2 -Selkirk UT to Beaver Temporary -see perennial 10' 23' 0.005
Creek above note
3 -Grampian ~' to Beaver Temporary -see perennial 8' 24' 0.004
Creek above note
4 -Kirby UT to Beaver Temporary -see perennial 7' 21' 0.003
Creek above note
5 - Lochness Beaver Creek Temporary -see perennial 29' 20' 0.013
above note
6 - Lawnwood Beaver Creek Te b
ee Perennial 30' 21' 0.014
ve note
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 129' .049
~a
Page 9 of 14

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) r
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,

ocean, etc. Area of
Impact

(acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resultin from the ro'ect:
Stream Impact (acres): .049
Wetland Impact (acres): 1.23
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 1.27
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 129
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
Page 10 of 14

were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable Sewer lines will
cross wetlands to tie in with existing sewer lines Where possible sewer lines will tie in with
existing manholes. Sewer line crosses the stream and the adjacent wetland near-perpendicular to
the stream channels.
No joint connections will be made within the stream footprint or within 2' on either side of the
stream. Live concrete will not be poured at any stream crossing or in the wetland area near
Bingham Drive that is adjacent to the lake Silt fence will be installed to protect the lake and the
streams from excess sediment loading Silt fence will be removed after construction Stream
crossings will be lined with North American Green C350 (or en 'ngi eer approved equal or better
The liner will be removed after construction and the stream returned to grade Stream crossings
will be built according to the slope specifications in the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control manual. Anti-seep collars will be installed on the sewer line as directed in WQC #3374
USACE rep Ronnie Smith out of the Wilmington district office visited the site and stated the
USAGE would not require mitigation for any of the wetland crossings if all the construction
corridors were wetland seeded and if all of the impacted wetlands except the 2 urban area
Bingham and Greenock were planted with trees as outlined in section VI question 1 of this
application.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~ide html.
Page 11 of 14

1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):-
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres;
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
Page 12 of 14

and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact ( Required
Zone ~~~.,~ro F e+~ Multiplier *,~:~,~_~,~_
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The site will not increase imperviousness. After
construction the easements will be returned to grade, seeded and allowed to reve~etate. Periodic
mowing of the smaller 10' maintenance corridor will be done with care so that mowing
equipment does not severely alter the wetland characteristics.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Page 13 of 14

and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
XI.
XII.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
3
Zone* I ~~ ImPafte.~ I Multiplier I Required
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss-what
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed)- versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The site will not increase imperviousness. After
construction the easements will be returned to erade, seeded and allowed to revet?etate. Periodic
mowing of the smaller 10' maintenance corridor will be done with care so that mowing
equipment does not severely alter the wetland characteristics.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
~r~
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Enhancement, or Payment into the
appropriate information as identified
Page 13 of 14

Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: This
project- area services an existing older subdivision in which construction is complete and there
are very few vacant lots. New sewer ties in on either side of the subdivision to existin sewer
main servicing the two adjacent neighborhoods.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
-a G-o7
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
s signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14

07 •0423

~•
~
' 1,
_./ r' t
L- ~~'~ ti,
r ~i ~ t `- ~ ~~
l
~
!
j

1' ~ v
~
\ .
~
~
:'~
'
inn ..+-~._ ,: ~ .4' ~ f 1 ~ ~
.~
•.
s
~•
~~ l
.I ~
• t
~ 4 •
`
• _ \
1 '..
.
.'G 1 ~~a~ __
.

' 1 ""
~ ~
~ ,},~~- ~'Ga T . 'C,AN~IMdOQ pNT fA~IO
~r "
A~~ G
~~~~~~o~q"
q ~, 'i
~
~ ~.
.. , , ' ~' auwbiwt,Ealtr asossNO/ ' •' ' ~~ ~ a
1.., .

gar t! I _ ,
~"' ~ =1
~ '` ~ ' ~: ' ;
"` ~•- ~ it ` °: u
~ .,
~, ~ •,~,~ ~~ ~/ ~ ~ ~ Oe11RT CT2059n6 ~
-~-----
j t y-•~.. f d Z ii .S
s t
r"G' , t
c
•
~
.
- ~ "; ~
~ ~ ~
.
~
rzr;=- : _
.
Y ftj
\ ~~. r~
j.,,'~ir
~ I - 1 `n ~ ~ ~ ~'j ~ 1 ti i y~ ,r

,- ,
THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT BEEN LEGEND

REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR :
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND -- PERIMETER BOUNDARY
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. - - PROPOSED SEWER
NOTES: O- PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
1) THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM
RECORDED MAPS, DEEDS, USGS MAPS AND
A PARTIAL GPS FIELD SURVEY. JOB N0. 025320002
2) THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED
FOR WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ONLY. MAP - FAYETTTEVILLE, NC USGS DOQQ
3) THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFIED _ --•
SURVEY AND NO RELIANCE MAY , y"e~ ~'y~~`.f' ~' i~~
~
BE PLACED IN ITS ACCURACY. CUs ~.~4Y
~t~
~
• ~~}:
Z~C7
r PHASE V ANNEXATION
v,M
IQM~CREED MAR 6 PROJECT 1
AR
104 GILLESpIE STREET
FAYETTEVIU.E, NORTH CAROLINA 28301
PH (s1o> 323-3400 ~)~tdR-WAT~ p Fl~~`~h~~(;t~`
A?i~
r
~;
FAX [phone] EA 1-A

WETLAND DELINEATION
~
P~~ ,
.
Internet Site: http://www.mckimcreed.com
SURVEY GPS BY: TJ DATE REVISIONS BY
T 7-pT T D~~~~~rr 7~,~,~-~~ T ~T DATE: 2 21 0
U
PUBLIC WO1~1L7 C~1rurllilSl~lr S
PLAN
PROF
BY: SH
955 OLD WILMINGTON RD DESIGN REVIEW BY: W R ENGR
DEPT
FAYETTEVII
LE
N
C
2~i0 .
.
,
.
.
1 APPROVED BY:
SCALE: HOR: 1"=100' SHT: SH EET DWG

n 7 0 d 2 3
GREENO` K Y~VENUE CROSSING -TOTAL WETLAND AREAS
AREA 1 , - ~{CONSTRUCTION CLEARING LIMIT (TEMP) 0.05 ACRES
AREA 1 ~ - ~~PERMANENT MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR 0.02 ACRES
THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT BEEN
REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
NOTES:
1) THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM
RECORDED MAPS, DEEDS, AND
A PARTIAL GPS FlELD SURVEY.
2) THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED
FOR WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ONLY ~-"~,F'~,;~~3 R ,g7! 1~1
3) THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFlED ~~ ~ ~~'~ ~~-1 ~ E ~p,` ~ ~ ~ I
SURVEY AND NO RELIANCE MAY i7t ~'~"~
BE PLACED IN IT5 ACCURACY. ~~~R ~ 2001
V 1V1`1~C'J ~ E)~~d~t - V4fal ~3i 'yt~:la~:. i -;
V1o4 ONIs"pl. st~..c '+'I~TLANDSR,~~D 5'f~J'~,iVV~',Tl~r; S~~u^It.'r~
Foyettwilla North CarWina 28302
Phonx 910;323 300, Fax: 910;343-1028
Int.rn.t Sfb: http://www.mckknassd.com
LESENL2:
---- -WETLAND BOUNDARY
-PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
® CORRIDOR
® -LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
O -EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE
0 -PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
PHASE V ANNEXATION
PROJECT 1
AREA 1-A
WETLAND DELINEATION
JOB N0. 025320002
SURVEY GPS BY: TJ DATE REVISIONS BY
~~ 2 2, o
PIIJBLIC WORKS CObIlV~SSION uw P
O Ss
Y: sH
R
~ ~~ ~~~ )~ DESIGN REVIEW BY:W R ENGR
DEPT
.
FAYB'ITEVIIi$ IBC. ~ RovED BY:
SCALE: HOR: , "= 40' SHT:

O z n 4 2 3
.~
~g ~y Rq Y 0U
0406 4P 85315' WIDE CONSTRUCTION OMITS
..:.._, ~
s '`
,.
~~ ~~
-~ ,~" ~`
. ~0. ~~°
~~... f ~ ~

~- _
0' WIDE MAINTENANCE CORRIDO
r
~5' WIDE CONSTRUCTION OMITS
IAMED TRIBUTARY TO BEAVER CREEK
LINEAR FEET OF STREAM IMPACT (TEMP)
)5•.ACRES STREAM IMPACT (TEMP)
,,
,, ,,.
,. ,
~ ~, ~ ,,
_` FCCIS N/F
rrF ~ C /0
r} ` FR~ NCeS ~ i f NNSON
SELKIRK PLACE CROSSING - TONAL WETLAND°~ARE'' S o o64S4PG S4jON
2A -CONSTRUCTION CLEARING,.>~' LIMIT (TEMP) 0.05 A RES 'SS3
2B -PERMANENT MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR 0.03 °ACR S
THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT BEEN I FrFNQ,
REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND ---- -WETLAND BOUNDARY
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
NOTES: -PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
1) THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM
RECORDED MAPS, DEEDS, AND
~-~ ~ ~ `~~ ~
~
~
~~ CORRIDOR
A PARTIAL GPS FlELD SURVEY. ~ ~
a ~. -LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
2) THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED
?OaZ
~~'~
XI
TIN
SEWER MANHOLE
FOR WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ONLY. 0
R ~
~ ~ -E
S
G
3) THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFlED -PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
SURVEY AND NO RELIANCE MAY
BE PLACED IN ITS ACCURACY OUAL17y ~'
~rRBRA~~~R'
S ~~
~
. p~~F
,y ~
'J~~
LR ~
,N~,
PHASE V ANNEXATION
~1QNl '~QZ~ PROJECT 1
104 GAlespie strest AREA 1-A
FayettevAl0. Narth Carolina 28302
Phonx (9to;3z3-34o0, Fay ~9,o;3~s-,o2s
WETLAND DELINEATION
Phons: (910 323-3400, Fmc 910 323-1028
Internet Site: http://www.mdcimased.com JOB NO. 025320002
SURVEY GPS BY: TJ DATE REVISIONS BY
uYOUr Br:sH DATE: z z1 0
PUBLIC WORKS COb~ON
PLAN PROF. BY: SH
~ ~ ~~~ ]~ DEPT
DESIGN REVIEW BY: W R ENGR
.
FA NG 2~ PROVED BY:
SCALE: HOR: 1'= 40' SHi:

o7•oa23
0
REALTY INC
ARpB 2134 pG611
4
PB 35 pGT752
p4p6.54.
`~.
5
GRPMp\g~B~T
F,54~.
f °,
_, ;
,:~,w ~
.r ~~ °~,, vPCP'NT FOUND
., ~ ~ ~ ' .... NO PDDR 54S 8436 d-
A ~ ?' ~... 0406,
.r ,r.... , ~.
W
+ '° 10' WIDE
n MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
W ~
W r

UNNAMED TRIB. _
~F~""°--~TO BEAVER CR~lE`~
24 LINEAR FEET OF STEREAM IMPACT"'(TEMP)
0.004 ACRES OF STREAM IMPACT (TEMPS
F pN
N JONHS
EL~1S & Wrfe ON
NS
FR D C 24 54 G 553 •r
0406

40' MAX WIDTH
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
15' MAX WIDTH EITHER
'~ EITHER SIDE OF
MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
hl'CNMI"'IHIV lrVUrC I I.rCVJJIIVV - I V I f-1L YYG~'TL/1IVV ~ r-~r«r1J
3A - CONSTRUCTION CLEARING LIMITS (TEMP) d.17 ACRES
36 -PERMANENT MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR 0.0~ ACRES
THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT BEEN I FrFNn.
REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGEN CY FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND ---- -WETLAND BOUNDARY
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
NOTES: ® -PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
1) THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM CORRIDOR
RECORDED MAPS, DEEDS, AND
A PARTIAL GPS FlELD SURVEY.
~ ~ k ~' ~ ~ t '"=
~'
'`
°~°
`~ ` -LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
2 THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED
) ,
~ I
~
-
0~
~ ~~1 ~
~
FOR WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ONLY.
3) THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFlED ~
~
-
~. O -EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE
SURVEY AND NO RELIANCE MAY ~ ~(}l17 O -PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
~~~
BE PLACED IN ITS ACCURACY.
o~ ~~~~ t~~~~~~aF`a~'jcr, PH
~~~ p~ ASE V ANNEXATION
NFIQNI£~` QZEED ~
~~i:~r: PROJECT 1
`~,o~ cai.pk str«t AREA 1- A
Fayvttsv910. North Carolina za3oz WETLAND DELINEATION
;
;
2
1028
Phonx 910
323-3400, Fa~c 910
3
intem~t Sltc http://www.mdcimcn"d.com JOB N0. 025320002
SURVEY GPS BY: TJ DATE REVISIONS BY
DA7E 2 21 0
~~Iir Tm~ ~vc+ nn~ ~ ~~i 7~T
vl~ur~~l~
va~C wQi
t S
r
~
. PUW PROF
BY: SH
~ ~ ~~~~ R1~ W R ENGR
DEPT
DESIGN REVIEW BY
.
:
FA N G 2830 BY:
scaLE: HoR: 1"=40' sfrT:

®?~r2.3

{ ~ ~

r E ~ ~
f ~ ~~ ~~~

' 1
'
;r

~

d ~
a
#
~ ~ 3
~ ~ I .
r 1 i ~

3 t ?
,~ ~
yt / _
10' WIDE MAINTENANCE
"` ~ CORRIDOR
Y
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO BEAVER CREEK
21 LINEAR FEET OF STEAM IMPACT (TEMP)
0.004 ACRES OF STREAM IMPACT (TEMP) f,
~ i
-...
~-40' WI@E..CONSTRUCTION ,. - R ~4
LIMITS ~.~_~ ._..,~~ -- _~ ..
15' EITHER SIDE OF ~~~~~ ~ ~~~-~~'~
MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
~~
~~
KIRBY COURT CROS'S ,NG -...T TAL WETLAND AREAS
4A - CONSTRUCTIQN CLEARING EMITS (TEMP) 0.11 ACRES
4B - PERMANENT MA;fNTENACE CORRIDa R 0.04 AC RES
~.
THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT BEEN I FrFNj~.
REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND ---- -WETLAND BOUNDARY
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
NOTES: DOR T MAINTENANCE
CORR
1) THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM ® I
RECORDED MAPS, DEEDS, AND
A PARTIAL GPS FlELD SURVEY. ® -LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
2) THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED
FOR WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ONLY. 4~s ? ~ ~s'~ °'~ ` ~,~y~~ ~
~'1
~ ~
~
~
O
-EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE
.
3) THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFlED ~
1.:.~ 6~1
='
~..'
~
" ~
0 _ PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
s
i j
SURVEY AND NO RELIANCE MAY ~
BE PLACED IN ITS ACCURACY. ~~R ~~ ~0C7
PH ASE V ANNEXATION
~IQNI~QZ~D ~~~~ - mar
JZ , ~a.
D~1~TIANDQ A:Pv ~r
~ ~ PROJECT 1
.
~
,o, ~,,.p,. Str„t AREA 1-A
FayettevYl0. North Cardtna 28302
Phon« 9,0;323-300. Fay ~9,o;3z3-,ozs
WETLAND DELINEATION
Phonx 910 323-300, Fax: [phone]
Int~rn~t Stb: http://www.mckkncrud.com JOB N0. 025320002
SURVEY GPS BY: TJ DATE REVISIONS BY
~"T~ 2 2, D
~~c worms coM~orr ~
~FS~
: SH
PR
~ ~ ~~1~ ~ DEPT
DESIGN REVIEW BY: W R ENGR
.
FA NC. 281 PROVED BY:
SCALE: HOR: 1'=40' INSERT NOT T SgCALE

p 7 Q 4 2
`~~:
,#
'°"~
~~s
> ~.'° .
s _~ I °~..
1
1
r '~
+ i
Y
i
W
~` 10' MADE MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
40' MADE CONSTRUCTION OMIT
15' MADE EITHER SIDE OF MAINT. CORR
i
i
y
•
i
BEAVER CREEK
29 LINEAR FEET STREAM IMPACT (TEMP)
x.013 ACRES STREAM IMPACT (TEMP)

I ~~~~~ ~~i~ti~Ati ,6 ,
~~
Q s..:d
~'+
i +
IaENf~ - WATa?~ C.ttsfl,i j `r
WL'TLA.~!De P.,~O STC~4U'~Ai ~r~ BFt~lc:n °'
~~
IV R - ~` V
AREA 5A -CONSTRUCTION .C EARINGr~'LIMI~ (TEMP)
O.~~ACRES
AREA 5B -PERMANENT ,M°AINTEN CE°"CORRIDOR 0 ,0'~ ACRES
f~~.
~' ,~'
THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT BEEN I FC;FNn.
REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND ---- -WETLAND BOUNDARY
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
NOTES: -PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
1) THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM ® CORRIDOR
RECORDED MAPS, DEEDS, AND
A PARTIAL GPS FlELD SURVEY. ® -LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
2) THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED
FOR WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ONLY. O -EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE
3) THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFlED ~ -PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
SURVEY AND NO RELIANCE MAY Q
BE PLACED IN ITS ACCURACY.
PHASE V ANNEXATION
~jQNl '~QZ~ PROJECT 1
104 cm..pi. st.«t AREA 1-A
Faysttsvllla North Carolina 28302
WETLAND DELINEATION
Phon« (91o;3z3-3+o0, F.x ~91o;3z3-loza
Phon« (910 323-3400, Fmc 910 323-1028
Int.m.t Sit« http://www.mdcknen.d.eom JOB N0. 025320002
SURVEY GPS BY: TJ DATE REVISIONS BY
I DAT~: 2 2~ o
S
P
UBLIC WORKS COb~SSION ~ P~
~
: sH
~ ~ ~ ~: DEPT
DESIGN REVIEW BY: W R ENGR
.
FA I~G 281! ROVED BY:
SCALE: HOR: 1 ~$ 50' INSERT NOT T SBCALE

07 0423
- ~ , ~.
....1 =~
NN N I JERNIGAN .. ~ ~ ~
GLE g R t jERNIGAN t ~ ~
JANE CLA 29 Pg 1 ~~ ~ ~h`
_.,.
p406 7 88-217 2 ~n ~ `~.
~ra+*~
'~ ~ . ~~~
~. ~.
i
~ ,f
/ ~~
E
i
LAWNWOOD DRIVE CROSSING -TOTAL WETLAND AREAS
' 6A -CONSTRUCTION CLEARING LIMIT (TEMP) 0.24 ACRES
66 -PERMANENT MAINTENACE CORRIDOR 0.08 ACRES
,.
` 10' MADE MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
` 40' MADE CONSTRUC710N LIMITS
15' ON EITHER SIDE OF MAINT. CORR
e
~`
:AM IMPACT
IfdPACT (TE
N IF V11~-E
CI 0~3 85 845 '

,. .~,~
THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT BEEN L ~I2

REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR :
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND - --- -WETLAND BOUNDARY
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
NOTES: ORNT MAINTENANCE
CORR
1) THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM ® ID
RECORDED MAPS, DEEDS, AND
A PARTIAL GPS FlELD SURVEY. ® -LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
2) THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED
FOR WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION ONLY. O -EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE
3)
N
E ~ a
~
~
SURVEY AND
NO RELIANCE
MAY 1 ~
~ "-~ -~'~ ~ %~ G ~`
~
~~
O
~
-PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
BE PLACED IN ITS ACCURACY. t~
• MAC ~ 2007 PHASE V ANNEXATION
~
NFIQ~/j~QZEED PROJECT 1
`
~
104 caie.Pi. str..t
t
th ,a~r.r~ - ~~rAr~~ ;,a,.ya~ ~ -:
~TU1IND~A
~C F'rr;~~ ~ AREA 1-A
Phorn
x f~;o; z°`
.3-3400"F x ~9 o
aza-,oxe ,
{' ~~ ` WETLAND DELINEATION
;
Phonx [phone], Fmc 910 323-1026
~nt.m~t stta http://www.mdamawd.com JOB N0. 025320002
SURVEY GPS BY: TJ DATE REVISIONS BY
~V'1
A~~
I ~~ 2 21 0
,
P
UBLIC WORKS CON~VIISSION S
PLAN PROF
Br: SH
~ ~ ~~~ 1~ DESIGN REVIEW BY: W R ENGR
DEPT
.
FAYS118VILi$ N~ 28?~ PROVED BY:
SCALE: HOR: 1'=50' INSERT NOT CAL F

07.0423
5' WIDE CONSTRUCTION LIMIT
CONSTRUCTION LIMIT
r
40' WIDE CONSTRUCTION LIMIT
15' EITHER SIDE OF MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
y /
i
~ /
~ ~ /
i
..........
,~ ~ ~~
~4 i
~ ~'~~~ ~ 10' WID~E~IAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
~

I ~~ ~
~ ~
\ /

~.
_~:~. r
n a ~ .~ ? 0 ~? ' '~
a e

~.
`~, ,~ ~_
140$.~I~AISLEY'AVE
X06-47-895'
BINGHAM DRIVE CRO ING - TOTAL V1~E.TLAND~~` R~ 5
T (TE €?,~ x,.08 AGES
AREA 7A -CONSTRUCTION CLEARIN~.a Ll ` !
,
RES
AREA 7B -PERMANENT MAINENANCE CORK DOR O:C~4`~AC
.
~~ ~~
THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT BEEN i FrFNj'~:
REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND ---- -WETLAND BOUNDARY
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
NOTES: PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
1) THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM CORRIDOR
RECORDED MAPS, DEEDS, AND
A PARTIAL GPS FlELD SURVEY. ® - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
2) THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED
FOR WETUWD PERMIT APPLICATION ONLY. ~ -EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE
3) THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFlED
SURVEY AND NO RELIANCE MAY O -PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
BE PLACED iN ITS ACCURACY.
• PHASE V ANNEXATION
~1Y~'1~~~ PROJECT 1
X04 auFSVie s1N~r AREA 1-A
PrAi (rerreH ~N~ CAROLINA 28301 WETLAND DELINEATION
FAX [phone]
Intarnt Sitr. http://www.mdcimcn•d.com JOB N0. 025320002
PWCENCR
SURVEY GPS BY: TJ DV1TE REVISIONS BY
DATE: 2 21 0
~r/~ /~~T
~~~ ~~~ ~
v~vl~ S
' BY: SH
PIAN ROF
~ ~ ~~~ ~: DEPT
DESIGN REVIEW BY
W R ENGR
:
.
FAYSITEVIIi$ NG 28?~ PROVED BY:
SCALE: HOR: 1'=100' SHi: SH EET DWG
10' WIDE MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
15' MADE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
'~ 1219 BINGHAM DR
y 0406-48-7000
y

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
07 •0423
Project/Site: l~G~,yQ Ln ~ S -7 Date: 1• d
Applicant/Own C ~ t, County: Cr ~~
Investigator. ~ ~,.~ c,~.~r State: f,`i G
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Community ID
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Speces Stratum Indicator
1..~jM 1 I G~~C_r(tl'~lA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~i
~ 9.
2. ~ Y ~ 0 ~.~ d rrn ~
~ i7~~'~. IBC 10.
3, M CL~'n o [l ~ ra.na~~~a~= T ~1~-c-fi 11.

S.hC.P.~ Irt,t .h 1r(.t~i~'\ ~ ' /~-' 13.
6. 14. '
7. 15.
8• 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC t-~ •
l
di
FAC
S~~
(exc
u
ng
-).
(
f
Remarks: <~V~-C ~f~~I L C~ ~ cs~1^CfA~~ Ch~~ ~'11~9 ~ ~- P~r~.cTY~ S t/~rG~
/
J
W ~. -- (ctivt. o~, ,,,,,. ~ ~ M~ , ~ -c`
~,C~a-~, vin ~'VI Oc,~.~ ~-e-.
p ~ a~
HYDROLOGY

_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs f Inundated
Other ~/ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
~ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surtace Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: __. _,:._.

SOILS
Map Unit Name ~~ ~~ S~l^
(Series and.Phase):
~
_ Drainage Class:
Taxonom Su rou ~y
y ( ~ P)' = l ,'~A ~ -~'r C Field Observations
~ ~ ~^ ~ r a ~~ Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
~P~ Matrix Color
inches
Horizon ~Munsell Moistl Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
IMunsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure
etc
tl
b ~~ "I ~+ ~ ~ j~ ~~2 ,2, ~ .
.
~}
~
Hydric Soil Indigtors:
- Histosol
_ Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor _ Concretions
_ Hgh Organic Content in Surla ce Layer Sandy Soils
_
~/Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
VListed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions
~Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other E
(xplain in Remarks)
Remar ~ ~
~ a ~ lm ed ~C h Dv~
r W t,17~ h G1 `~ ~'~ c~ri, r ~ el e~ r c S .-
l
~~ ~., y'
, ~ ~t u-cr', ~~ r- e. nQ.esL.t,,r.~ I~a,~reJs ~.~
~
h
h
#-
~
~ ,~
~
s ~. C sue-
~ ~-r.~... .- r
~ N ~ T W A-{,~K, d -~
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
~t ~- ~ h ~ ~ p vJ c1 Q~vv~.
Appfovetl by HQUSACE 3/92

Z
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: rJ~ -Lasc ~' I~ 1 w,r ~ Crv~ rt Date: f .o
Applicant/Owner: ~ County: - b< ~ f
Investigatory otsa,,^ f~b.,-~ c~-~r~ State: ~ ~

Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Community ID
Is the site significanfay disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soeaes Stratum Indicator

2 rr~L~:~. r:h~.MCQF(el,~~ s' L
l~
- ,o.
1ti S r
3. J V U.~V
: t-
f C ms
J t~^
,
~
f rT"~-^ 11.
/!
~
~

5. ~ . N.(1~ \}a-~G61
MA~n4~ ~ t't-i-Lt~ 13.
1
6. at-- I r) u g ~-+"~ l.~ a.~ ~ 1"l~~ 14.
7. 15.
$• 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC I O ~~ ff
(exGuding FAG). ~ -
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other / Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
~No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required}:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAGNeutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
S ~~'`~
~ ~ s~
(Series and Phase):
~ Drainage Class: ~ ~ ~
~~~
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ,j~ _ __ . _ Field Observations
FJ u-~'`'~-- Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ~o
Profile Descriation:
~Pth Matrix Color
inches Horizon IMunsell Moist) Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
IMunsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
~~,~,o cow
Hydric Soil Indicators:
- Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _
H' h
- ~9 Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor
~Aquic Moisture Regime _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
~Cisted on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
,1~
Q, ~-C r 1 C~- tJ ~.(, 1~ c ~ h ~ L h t;~ S k,Y '~c-s.~
~.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circe) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? es: No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92

3
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: S~ S ~ n c Date:
Applicant/Owner. w C County: ~
Investigator:1 k-s w.. ('~ r..rc~? State: O
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Community ID
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Speces Stratum Indicator
J~,

3tt~M tnCw~r AtaGLx7'Cy, ~1~ 11.
~ru..v~n ~ ~
4. ~~.fr 12.
/- ~

Gv._ ~~~ ~C~113
7. IM ~(~ ~.r cl d ~ V~ 15.
/~
8. PQ4.~bW..~ ~A-C~' 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
~~ ~~°
(exGuding FAG).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:'
Aerial Photographs ~ Inundated
Other
N ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
~
Reoorded Data Available ,~_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: rainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secon ary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Rema
k
:
r
fA ~ r/~''~ /~//~) ~~1~ [~
s

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ~ Vl. S ~ ,?
Drainage Class: y
JU,yy~ J
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~'(~ );- Field Observations
~ Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
p"~afi ~ 1211 saw lam
Hydric Soil Indicators: }
_ Histosol Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _
Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
_
_ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils'
,~Aquic Moisture Regime ~.~Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
"Reducing Conditions _ Listed. on National Hydric Soils List
~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)

r ,r ~r
,~ ' j
Remarks: S'6'YYL..Q_ ~ c~~ C~ ~ A...CAN- '~-Cx-~IO ~. ~ ~? ~2
c~ t~.rt ar vs~-Q-t1 ~~ sn ~lt~ ~ c.~.C + '~ ~~- b~ ~'oc~~ ,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~~ No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? ~ No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?lam No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: yJC. ~
"' ,r h ros ng Date: i 1 ~
~
Applicant/Owner: ' County: -r 10.
Investigator: State: ~ C.
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Community ID
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: T_
(If needed, explain on reverse.) "
VEGETATION
Dominant P
lant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Scenes Stratum Indicator
j
2.r.~ Ito c ~:~ ~kl,,~
~ ~ ,o.
''-
416 ° ~ C , n ~ ~. ~_I^7'tZ-' 12.
5.~1I1 L1.S {'~0 ~ R~ ~_ 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
G
di
FA
1 ~ ov
(ex
u
ng
G).
a
.Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other ~~Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
f~Drift Lines
_
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surtace Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water:Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
~
(Series and Phase):
t~ ~ /I S ~ /~ Drainage Class: ~

Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~~~ ~~ L ~ Field Observations
n1~(.~.R-~~" Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
~P~ Matrix Color
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
l~-~ ~ ~a 4 ~`~ t~ `'i2 a i ~~ ~
Hydric Soil Indicators:
- Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
_ Suffidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
t! Aquic Moisture Regime /~ Listed on Local-Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions
/Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
w~~ 1~ le ct~- i ~, ,, hit. oW ~Suv ~c~cs~..r ra~1- Sam ~ s~
~5'raM~-n. 5 W °`.~~ ~^^ pow, s ~- ~~ ~'e- s s-~. s~
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Ye No (Circle) (Circe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~ No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: ~ ~ /1 ~ ~S- Date: D
Applicant/Owner. County:
Investigator: ~~G~--Y ~ State: /~C~

Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? /Y~ No
` Community ID
Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, :explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Speces Stratum Indicator
1.
1. ~t Q U S ~ u. ~ S~ new,
~'7 / '~
-
~'A G
9.
2. ~.o s a m.u.L {, a+r ci. ~ 10.
11.
0..,
4. t +-~-~
1 ~ L 12.
1
5. ~ I Y.~~O~l'~ li~Cra T ~ 13.

7. 15.
g, 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
~ Oy ~`'
(exGuding FAG).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
'Other / Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
~ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ /~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surtace Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name 11 ~1
(Series and Phase): ~J art, vt S~"t3'y1 - Drainage Class; V
Taxonom Su rou Field Observations
Y ( b9 p): ~L~flt ~ n.1 ~ '~' Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon lMunsell Moistl 1Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
b-1S'+ ~- t© ~2 3 i
_sa~~r
Hydric Soil Indicators:
- Histosol Concretions
_, Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface La er Sa
_ Sulfidic Odor y ndy Sotls
_ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
~Aquic Moisture Regime /Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reduang Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils list
z/ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
II Remarks: ~ ~ ~
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No Circe
(Circle) ( )
Wetland Hydrology Present? es No
Hydric Soils Present? ~~ No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~ No
~~ Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: T Ct w u Ca'a i;~- Date:) ~
Applicant/Ow gr: ~J rr %-a.u ~ J~ .l ~ County: rn. r
Investigator. `5b~ ~ ~-. ~, ~~ State: IV L
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Community ID
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No .Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse)
VEGETATION

Dominant Plant S~eaes Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Sr~ecies Stratum Indicator
I1~
-~~''1~1 1 '(~ a fu-N oC (3 l,c-a,
3. 11.
/~
4.. f KkS ~fCX tel. ~^ ~^
~_ 1- 'l~"~- Y
12.
5. Ll Y'~ 0 o~-~-n~vs+n ~ ,n ! ~CN~_~ r~ c' 13.
~~ ~~-hr~,yr~
6.
~ ~ rA-~ 14.
..,,
/
7.L1~G.QrC~S >n~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ 15.
8. `~ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
l
di
FAC
1 (?0
_ (exc
u
ng
-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other ;~ ~Saturated'in Upper 12 Inches
`~No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
- Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: / Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surtaae Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
/ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Rema
rks
:
~ /~
~
"
S 1 W r EGG L V~ W A~4.-L. 11~. ~ `
W~ _ f
CV~n Y~2 S 5~1- ~WJ

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ~ r~ n` $ ~~ ri
Drainage Class: U
C1~~ 1 I ~ uu
Taxonomy (Subgroup): 11u
tti .Field Observations
. Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color
inches Horizon (Munsell Moistl Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
D ~a.D~ /~ G o (L 2 1 ctwo i o
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
- Histic Epipedon _
x High Organic Content in Surfa ce Layer Sandy Soils ^~
_ Sutfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
~/ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
- Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: WlX-'~'Gr '~«.,io LP ~ CC's , KC !u-s
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Circe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? a No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~s No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92

7
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Projec#/Site: rt,¢. Date: ! • "2 0 • Zo 07
Applicant/Owner:
~(f G VI L County; ~'a~n, /xr~ /a,.,~C
~
Investigator: _sicsa.n wwr State: IVY
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~es No Community ID
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ~ Transect ID:
1s the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Q~ Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
~~ 1
2. ~ r~ ~oar~n ~L~.L~,r1~-c~a~
T ~ r+-c. 10.
QQ
4. P~CvSIQ- D ~1rlS S F~4 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
G
di
FAG
/ ~ 0 ~°
(ex
u
ng
)..... ~ ~
LL
Remarks: ~,{ ~ ~~ fi !p m ~ I1'ICc
d~ uLOC
Id~GC. ~`G S~f~%G t ~

.
[,a~~ S}~xoQ- ~ ~a~.,wr-~.~, 9,,,~,, /
,~
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: . _.:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other ~. Saturated iri Upper 121nches
_~,LNo Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surtace Water: (in.) ~ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local.SoifSurvey Data,..,
/FAGNeutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and •Phase): V.a,u uu.S~ ~~ "" ~~ ,,
Drainage Class: W {!l: ~ ~ rG.~.
'
Taxonomy (Subgroup): ~ Field Observations
Confirm Mapped,Type? Yes to
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors
inches Horizon IMunsell Moist) fMunsell Moist) Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
~~
b~ ~ A t ~ ~. a I --
- Sa
d
~ io
K
.
n,
Hydric Soil Indicators: -
- Histosol
- Histic Epipedon - Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _
/Aquic Moisture Regime Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_~Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: n
/h¢~O~c~ .
Sat 1 to rN e~' ~'hrz~
(N~tr /-c vac-~ .,H,. ~ /al~-
,
ti ~ rr~ ll~c~ ~s,~,~ wa.~ ~z-h!~ ~c~. .
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circe) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? ~e No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? 'e No
Remarks:
NO J» ~aY/~ C rb S ~j ~'1 q ~ J ~ c o Cam dw-
/ a-k.-t ~li~ow~- ~'~c! "~.~.~r,.,,/- cff u,,, r,,,,~ ~. S 1S~cc ~~ nv._ .
APpfOV20 Dy YIl.2UJA(:t :i/9Z

35°00'C
~- u K ~ ~( v I.-
ISSUG-~ Dc-TOQ~
S~Ft t E T #~ 1 ~
L u M IS E ~Q, l,I}-lJ j7 f}-nJ ~
198
s
~-t~a Ki/ Co u N Y I F.
NC
This map was compiled by U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Soil Conservation Service and cooperating agencies on
1974 orthophotography obtained from U.S. Department
of the Interior, Geological Survey.
5000 4000 3000
i B

SOIL SURVEY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Greenock Avenue Crossing
Meters Feet
" ,1 0 20 40 80 0 50 100 200 300 400
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Surve 1.1
Conservation Service y 11/29/2006
National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

SOIL SURVEY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
nnAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
_____~_J Soil MapUnks
® cities Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Detailed Counties Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurVey.nres.usda.gov
Q Detailed States
Interstate Highways Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17
Roads Soil Survey Area: Cumberland County, North Carolina
-+-`- Rails Spatial Version of Data: 5
`"rater Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:24000
Hydrography
Oceans
A~A~A~A~ Escarpment, bedrock
vnvnvnv. Escarpment, non•bedrock
~-ti~1ti Gulley
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Levee
---------- Slope i
lJ BIOWOUt
® Borrow Pit
~ Clay Spot
~ Depression, closed
- Eroded Spot
X Gravel PH
Gravelly Spot
'~ Gulley
/~ Lava Flow I
® Landfill Map comprised of aerial images photographed on these dates:
.~ Marsh or Swamp 3/4/1999 i
O Miscellaneous Water
v Rock Outcrop
+ Saline Spot
.. Sandy Spot
~ Slide or Slip
O Sinkhole
pl Sodic Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and
= spoil area digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.
o stony spot As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
O Perennial Water
USDA N.wrlResoarcea `!' Wet Spot Web Soil Survey 1.1 11/29/2006
Consecration Serrice National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Survey of Cumberland County, North Carolina Greenock Avenue Crossing
Map Unit Legend Summary
Cumberland County, North Carolina
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1.1 11/29/2006
Coaservafioo Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
WaB Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 5.0 15.6
percent slopes

SOIL SURVEY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Selkirk Place, Grampain Court, and Kirby Court Crossings
Meters Feet
"~` 0 20 40 80 0 50 100 200 300 400
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1.1 11/29/2006
i~ Conservation Servke National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

SOIL SURVEY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
rK
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
__ j Soil Map Unks
_ ._ .. ..
® cities Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
0 Detailed counties Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Q Detailed States
Interstate Highways Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17
Roads Soil Survey Area: Cumberland County, North Carolina
•-~~ Rails Spatial Version of Data: 5
'mater Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:24000
Hydrography
Oceans
A~A~A~A~ Escarpment, bedrock
v.,..,.vnv. Escarpment, non-bedrock
'"~~^~ Gulley
ununmuu Levee
••••••••-• Slope
v Blowout
® Borrow Pit
~ Clay Spot
~ Depression, closed
Eroded Spot
X Gravel Pit
.. Gravelly Spot
^- Gulley
/~ Lava Flow
® Landfill Map comprised of aerial images photographed on these dates:
~ Marsh or swamp 3/4/1999
O Miscellaneous Water
v Rock Outcrop
+ Saline Spot
.. Sandy Spot
~ Slide or Slip
O Sinkhole
Rj Sodic Spot
~ Spoil Area The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and
digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.
o stony spot As a result, some minor shiftin of ma unit boundaries ma be evident.
O Perennial Water
USDA Natural Rnearces `r Wet Spot Web Soil Survey 1.1 11/29/2006
ComervaHon Santee National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Selkirk Place, Grampain Court, and Kirby
Soil Survey of Cumberland County, North Cazolina Court Crossings
Map Unit Legend Summary
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
e,.ar3 ,~.d:~aor anr~, t zo ts;percens .~ ~l.ts ~~.;~
sl~~es
JT Johnston loam 8.1 14.7
W Water 0.1 0.2
~%~33 ~da~rasa,~ loa~~,~ ~<anr, r~ try ~~ >'4.:' : Y~3
pcarc~nt slon~s.
`vY~is ~Vagram-urban land 3.5 6.3
complex, 0 to 8 percent
slopes
USDA NatutalResources Web Soil Survey 1.1 11/29/2006
Couserv9tion Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

SOIL SURVEY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Lochness Court Crossing
Meters Feet
"~° 0 20 40 80 0 50 100 200 300 400
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1.1 11/29/2006
conservation Serrice National Cooperative Soil Survey Page I of 3

SOIL SURVEY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
____.f Soil Map Units
® cities Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Detailed Counties Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsunrey.nres.usda.gov
C~ Detailed States
Interstate Highways Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17
Roads Soil Survey Area: Cumberland County, North Carolina
-+-+ Rails Spatial Version of Data: 5
® Water Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:24000
Hydrography
Oceans
A~A~A~A~ Escarpment, bedrock
vnv..vnv. Escarpment, non-bedrock
'"~~~ Gulley
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Levee
~••••~~•~• Slope
u Blowout
® Borrow Pit
~ Clsy Spot
• Depression, closed
Eroded Spot
J4 Gravel Ph
• Gravelly Spot
'~ Gulley
/~ Lava Flow
® Landfill Map comprised of aerial images photographed on these dates:
•d. Marsh or Swamp 3/4/1999
O Miscellaneous Water
v Rock Outcrop
+ Saline Spot
.. Sandy Spot
~ Slide or Slip
0 Sinkhole
pl Sodic Spot
~ Spoil Area The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and
o stony spot digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.
-c~=vbro^3torrp'9'ao'
As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
O Perennial Water
USDA Natnnl Resources 'y Vet Spot Web Soil Survey 1.1 11/29/2006
ConsenNios Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Pa e 2 of 3
S

Soil Survey of Cumberland County, North Carolina Lochness Court Crossing
Map Unit Legend Summary
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
WgB Wagram-Urban land complex, 0 0.5 1.8
to 8 percent slopes
USDA Natuca! Resources Web Soil Survey 1.1 11/29/2006
~ Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

SOIL SURVEY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Lawnwood Drive Crosssing
Meters Feet
"~` 0 20 40 80 0 50 100 200 300 400
USDA NafaraiResources Web Soil Survey 1.1 11/29/2006
Consecration Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 Of 3

SOIL SURVEY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
[„_„_.__. _] Soil Map Units
o cities Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
C~ Detailed Counties Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Detailed States
Interstate Highways Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17
Roads Soil Survey Area: Cumberland County, North Carolina
-~-+ Rails Spatial Version of Data: 5
Water Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:24000
Hydrography
Oceans
A~A~A~A~ Escarpment, bedrock
vnvnvnv. Escarpment, non-bedrock
'~-~~~ Gulley
nuuunrrm Levee
•-••••••-- Slope
~ Blowout
® Borrow Pit
~ Clay Spot
• Depression, closed
Eroded Spot
~4 Gravel Pit
• Gravelly Spot
'~ Gulley
/~ Lava Flow
® Landfill Map comprised of aerial images photographed on these dates:
•~• Marsh or swamp 3/4/1999
O Miscellaneous Water
v Rock Outcrop
+ Saline Spot
.. Sandy Spot
3~ Slide or Slip
O Sinkhole
RI Sodic Spot
spoil area The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and
o stony spot digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.

--~~o~er-'~to~i9"9'PO' As a result some minor shiftin of map unit boundaries may be evident
O Perennial Water
U_ SD'~ Nalunl Reaourcea Y' Wet Spot Web Soil Survey L1 11/29/2006
i~ Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

SOIL SURVEY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Bingham Drive Crossing
Meters Feet
`~` 0 20 40 80 0 50 100 200 300 400
~J$~,~ Natural Resources Web Soil Surve 1.1
~"" Y 1 ]/29/2006
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

SOIL SURVEY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MAP t_EGEW~ MAP INFORMATION
,__ __ _ _; Soil Map Units
® cities Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Detailed Counties Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Detailed States
Interstate Highways Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17
Roaas Soil Survey Area: Cumberland County, North Carolina
F-~ Rails Spatial Version of Data: 5
water Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:24000
Hydrography
Oceans
A~A~A~A~ Escarpment, bedrock
vnvnvnv. Escarpment, non-bedrock
'~^~~~- Gulley
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Levee
.......... Slope
v Blowout
® Borrow Pit
~ Clay Spot
~ Depression, closed
Eroded Spot
J4 Gravel Pit
• • Gravelly Spot
'~• Gulley
/~, Lava Flow
® Landfill Map comprised of aerial images photographed on these dates:
.~ Marsh or Swamp 3/4/1999
O Miscellaneous Water
v Rock Outcrop
+ Saline Spot
.. Sandy Spot
;~ Slide or Slip
O Sinkhole
~ Sodic Spot
r Spoil Area The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and
o stony Spot digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.
ca~bro^9•trnro~-3vo"
As a result, some minor shiftin of map unit boundaries may be evident.
O Perennial Water
U$p,~ NmrcatRe.omca '~ Wet Spot Web Soil Surve 1.1
Consmationserrice y 11/29/2006
National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Survey of Cumberland County, North Carolina Bingham Drive Crossing
Map Unit Legend Summary
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
2.ca
VaD Vaucluse loamy sand, 8 to
15 percent slopes
WgB Wagram-Urban land
complex, 0 to 8 percent
slopes
9.6 25.8
12.0 32.3
~~ Nam K`S0Y"~ Web Soil Surve 1.1
i Coacerratioo Service National Coo erative Soil Surve 11/29/2006
P Y Page 3 of 3