20011690 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090609 (2)

' Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table,
NC Division ofkWater Quality
;
Date of Office Review: g' - ,(7q r.. b? b /I;At kk
Evaluator's h}ame s
Date of Report: It/1sfof (recCl)1pcw+WY 4 121a : -11 Z-24 05 M=+ rni4-.
Date of Field Review: LA - 9 -o q Evaluator's Name(s): _? l ( () P
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: - 8 j29 f 02
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: Where Killian Rd (SR1008) crosses P tt°Zre k;in Lincoln Co. Site on S side of Pott Creek, W of Killian Rd.,?
creek flows E thru the site into S. Forleo Catawba R; site located N of Reepsville Rd (SR1113) E of Wyatt Rd

(.Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20011690 "Project History '

Project Name: Pott Creek
Event Event Date
County(ies): Lincoln
Basin & subbasin: Catawba 03050102 Construction Compl ted 2/1/2002
Planting - Supplemental 2/1/2003
Nearest Stream: Pott Creek Monitoring Completed 12/31/2007 j
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: WS-IV
Mitigator Type: Mitigation Bank
DOT Status: DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland:

acres
(OP
Stream:
'
linear f
t
V
g32
1
ee
%
Q
Buffer:
Nutr. Offset: 7
?
v
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes &
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No J
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20011690-1 ljk)Tlinear feet Stream Restoration
20011690-2 0.76 acres Wetland Enhancement
'20011690-3 0.36 acres Wetland Preservation 13) I
5.?F5
20011690-4 9 acres Wetland Restoration
20011690-5 31.32 CC, LAJ1- CA-4,+0
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful' partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Stream Mitigation Component Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 1806 linear feet Stream Restorati Component ID: 20011690-1
Description: shallow C4, -10' wide (per plan E5 er response to agency comments
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:
STREAMBANK STABILITY - Approved Success Criteria:
Are streambanks stable? Yes No
If no, provide description and notes regarding stability issues:
STRUCTURES - Approved Success Criteria:
List all types of structures present on site:
Are the structures installed correctly? Yes No
Are the structures made of acceptable material? Yes No
(Unacceptable materials include: railroad ties, concrete with rebar, etc.
Are the structures located approximately where shown on the plan? Yes No
Are the structures stable (e.g. erosion, deposition, etc.)? Yes No
Provide description and notes regarding problematic structures:
FEATURES - Approved Success Criteria:
Are riffles and pools in approximately the correct locations Yes No
Is the final sinuosity and gradient designed approximately to plan specifications? Yes No
Any evidence of vegetation growing on the stream bed or in the thalweg Yes No
Percentage of the restoration reach that has: Flowing water Ponded areas
Describe any stream features that provide evidence of unstable stream reaches (e.g. mid-channel bars,
downstream meander migration, chute cutoff formation, etc.):
AQUATIC BIOTA - Approved Success Criteria:
Is aquatic life present in the channel? Yes No
Description of taxa observed, incl. quantities of individuals and general distribution of biota. Include a brief
description of the sampling methodology.
List any remaining aquatic biota issues to address (e.g. erosion, discharges or toxicants, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Stream Mitigation Component Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
na
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per rep ort):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPAP/ cover
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas (e.g. buffer width, overall health of vegetation,
etc.):
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
.t o c?Ce?? t o L0. v?
I?? G LoWt .A- C ?-eruetA cir%- CXOxLn-e.1 +- C4
' . LV r?.nO oloS,(u CCL lpq In rfbac-co s joy,, . rw
A itiona?l comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
IYLt.inSL S?a:?t?,S D Std Glt?Se ptkA" YDCC:SS .
I
Use the definitions in the joint state/federal stream mitigation guidelines to determine the correct type of
mitigation used for this component.
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and/or important stream features.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2