20070404 Ver 1_401 Application_20070307

6Zuible ~ - fl~ ~
6~uible & Associates, P.C. P.o. Drawer 870
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTALSCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING ~f7 1 ~41# t- Rjj
SINCE 1959 RFCE~VE~
John Dorney
NC Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
March 5, 2007
RE: Peter and Julie Wiley Lot Access
Ocracoke, Hyde County, NC
Mr. Dorney:
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lassiter, C.E.P.
Eduardo J. Valdivieso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C. Marchello, P.L.S.
Enclosed is a Nationwide 14 and 401 Water Quality Certification submission for a project referred to as
"Peter and Julie Wiley Lot Access" in Beachside Extension Subdivision in Ocracoke, Hyde County, North
Carolina. There are two buildable lots (81 and 83) that have received Nationwide 18 Permits and 401
Water Quality Certifications for house footprint construction, however, those lots require vehicular access.
The proposed work involves extension of a recently permitted access road in the path of least Section
404 wetland impact. The impacts proposed herein are for 0.07 acres of freshwater Section 404 wetland.
The coastal wetland line is depicted on the plat and the area to be impacted is not considered coastal
wetland.
Enclosed are seven copies of the following:
• $200 processing fee check
• Site Plan
• PCN Application
• Agent Authorization Letter
• USGS Vicinity Map
• USACE Jurisdictional Determination
• EEP Acceptance for Mitigation
• Diffuse Flow Calculations
Please review and process this permit request. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please contact me at [phone].
Respectfully Submitted,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
-~~ ~'2-'`_--
Brian Rubino
CC: Kyle Barnes, DWQ
Tom Steffens, USACE
r, x ,5~~
1.{ ;
~. ,. :.1~1k9~yf1

6~uible
Quible & Associates, P.C. P.O. Drawer 870
K'rfty Hawk, NC 27949
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTALSCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING Phone: [phone]
SINCE 1959 Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lassiter, C.E.P.
Thomas Steffens Eduardo J. Valdivleso, P.E.
US Army Corps of Engineers AssoclATEs
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
P.O. BOX 1000 Katherine C. Marchello, P.L.S.
Washington, NC 27889
March 1, 2007
RE: Peter and Julie Wiley Lot Access
Ocracoke, Hyde County, NC
Mr. Steffens:
Enclosed is a Nationwide 14 and 401 Water Quality Certification submission for a project referred to as
"Peter and Julie Wiley Lot Access" in Beachside Extension Subdivision in Ocracoke, Hyde County, North
Carolina. As we have discussed, there are two buildable lots (81 and 83) that have received Nationwide
18 Permits for house footprint construction, however, they require vehicular access. The proposed work
involves extension of a recently permitted access road in the path of least Section 404 wetland impact.
The Wiley's provided a letter of support for the prior issued permit since it was realized that an extension
of that road would be the route of least impact. The impacts proposed herein are for 0.07 acres of
freshwater Section 404 wetland. The coastal wetland line is depicted on the plat and the area to be
impacted is not considered coastal wetland.
Enclosed is the following:
• Site Plan
<,
• PCN Application
• Agent Authorization Letter
• USGS Vicinity Map
• USACE Jurisdictional Determination
• EEP Acceptance Application
• Diffuse Flow Calculations
Please review and process this permit request. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please contact me at [phone].
Respectfully Submitted,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
Brian Rubino
CC: John Dorney, DWQ
Kyle Barnes, DWQ

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~1 ' O
iu _ --'
~_= u.=y Ya.~=~u~a= ,«_„ ,~ ~=v~ appii~avie ~u uus pro~ecr, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing ~f'-Y~~ ~ ~ T
RECEIVED
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide#14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further tA~~17!~~l ~
II. Applicant Information ,,~ _.
h~~a~ ~~ Liliil
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: 'Sk~v~a ~.~~ ~~ ~ ~~<,~ ;~~~
Peter and Julie Wiley ~T~ah3r3~ n ~~, ~~,~:~~~, ~~,, ~~ ~~~+~~~~
Mailing Address: 105 Glade Street
Chapel Hill NC 27516
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Brian Rubino
Company Affiliation: Ouible & Associates, P.C.
Mailing Address: P.O. Drawer 870
Kittv Hawk NC 27949
Telephone Number: 252-261-3300 Fax Number: 252-261-1260
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Peter and Julie Wiley Lot Access
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): PC C, SL 79E
4. Location
County: Hyde Nearest Town: Ocracoke
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Lot 81 and 83 Beachside Extension
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Hatteras to Ocracoke
ferry terminal take NC 12 to the village of Ocracoke• take first right after Howard's Pub and
another right onto Central Drive• then take a left onto Lake Drive- follow to end
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.107777 °N 75.96916 °W
6. Property size (acres):. 0.74 ac Total (Wiley Lots 81-83 and adjacent designated Access
Drive); Access Drive only: 0.15 ac.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: The Pamlico Sound is approximately 2 400 linear
feet from the proposed driveway work described herein
8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mapsl.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:. Undeveloped grassy with sparse trees and shrub-scrub tyke
vegetation; total non-wetland (0.31 ac)• Section 404 wetland (0 43 ac) On the north (back)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 13

side of the property there are areas of coastal wetlands The Section 404 wetlands line has
been confirmed on March 13 2003 by William Walker USACE The coastal wetlands line
has been delineated in August 2006 b~Terry Moore and Steve Trowell of NC Division of
Coastal Management. There have been recent road improvements in the subdivision
however, the improvements do not allow access all of the way to Lot 81 and 83 where the
Wiley's intend to construct cottages. This general vicinity of Ocracoke is comprised of
residentially developed and undeveloped residential lots There has been no construction on
the subiect lot to date, but Nationwide #18 and associated 401 Water Quality Certifications
have been obtained for the house footprint areas on Lots 81 and 83 The Wiled lan to
beam construction in 2007.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The protect involves placement of sand and gravel material through a portion of Section 404
freshwater (non-coastal) wetlands. The proposed wetlands impacts from fill include a 16 ft
wide corridor that will connect existing uplands (the existing access road) to uplands at Lot
83. A maximum of 12 inches of material will be placed alon this alignment There will be
side-bv-side 12 inch diameter traffic rated culverts to maintain adequate hydrologic
connections of Section 404 wetland areas durin exceptional storm events (see culvert
location on site plan). Sand will be transported to the site via dump truck and will be s rp ead
and compacted with a bulldozer within the surveyed road alignment This material will be
compacted and covered with gravel or similar material During the fill process the ed es of
the road will be lined with silt fence.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:_ The purpose of the project is to rovide
vehicular access to Lots 81 and 83 which are buildable lots that have received Nationwide
#18 and 401 Water Quality Cert. Permits It is necessary to have vehicular access to proceed
to the construction stage.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. A USACE iurisdictional determination has been issued on 3-13-03
For Lot 81: A Nationwide #18 (November 14 2005- Action ID#200610117) and 401 Water
Quality Cert. (October 11 2005- DWQ#20051835) Permits have been issued for residential
house construction.
For Lot 83: A Nationwide #18 (November 14 2005- Action ID#200610118) and 401 Water
Quality Cert. (October 11, 2005- DWQ#20051834) Permits have been issued for residential
house construction.
There has been a Nationwide #14 (December 4 2006 Action ID#2006-41141-148) and a 401
Water Quality Cert. (January 17 2007 DWQ#02-1157v 2) issued for access road improvements
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13

in the subdivision, but this did not extend to the Wiley Lot since the permits were not ap lied for
by the Wiley's. However the prior access road permit application addressed the Wiley property
and the minimization efforts that would be achieved by using one discrete access road
throughout this portion of Beachside Extension Subdivision The prior access road permits were
for a total of 0.1 acres of wetland disturbance and a combination of the two applications does
not come near the maximum allowable under a nationwide #14.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There will future building permit requests to Hyde County There have been septic system
improvement permits issued for lots 81 and 83 There are no additional access road ermit
requests anticipated since the road extension as proposed will effectively provide access to all
buildable lots.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:- Impacts include a jurisdictional
Section 404 wetland impact of 0.07 acres This area is proposed to be filled for a vehicular
access drive that connects existing uplands to existing_uplands The proposed alignment is
within a designated 30 ft right-of-way that was established for Beachside Extension lot
access.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
SeDaratElV 11St imnaCtc r1nP to tenth etrnrtnra and finnrl;,,..
Wetland Im act
p
Site Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact

-
Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Flood lain
p
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream

(linear feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)

Shaded on plat Fill, Grading Herbaceous, scrub-shrub yes 2'4~ ~ YO
Pamlico Sound 0.07

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 13

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.07
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.43 ac. (lots
and designated access road adjacent to lots)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included- To calculate acres ae mnltinl~~ lan oth Y .:,;.lth *t,o„ ,~:..;ao t,.. n~ ccn ~r/A
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width

Before Im act Impact
Len th
g
(linear feet) Area of
Im act
p
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation- dredgin~_ flnnrlin¢ rlrainaae hnikhaarlc Pty N/A
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map) v ..
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) v
T e of Im act
yp P Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact

(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the Ii ~ recnltino frnm tha ,~.,-.,;A.~t•

Stream Impact (acres): J-"
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.07 ac.
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13

Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The wetland impacts have been
minimized to the fullest extent possible by limiting the driveway width (toe to toe of fill) to 16 ft
and by utlllzma the existing designated roadway for this portion of Beachside Extension This
alignment achieves the goal of providing access to Lots 81 and 83 to be built on in the near
future. The access road fill does not require fill within an Area of Environmental Concern
(AEC) including estuarine AEC and coastal wetlands The access road improvement work is not
within Tar-Pamlico Buffer Zones. This is the shorted possible route to the subject lots and will
be an extension of the already permitted drive Diffuse flow will be achieved though ve etative
infiltration (exactly the same construction methodology as the prior permitted access road) and
side-bv-side culverts will be installed in the location indicated on the plat to maintain surficial
hydrolo~lc connections from heavy precipitation events
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13

necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Proposed mitigation includes payment into the NC EEP at a 2.1 mitigation to fill ratio (See
acceptance letter from EEP)
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state nc us/wrp/index htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.25 acres (2:1 miti ation
to fill ratio)
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page i i of 13

1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^ N/A
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^ N/A
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers. N/A
Im act
Zone* P ~(` Multipplier Required
/CT1Al'P TPP}~ Y 11 .T747._,. ~,_~
l 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. 5tormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 13

the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. No existing impervious coverage•
Proposed impervious coverage at build-out: gravel-topped driveway (current permit request) and
the residential construction on lots 81 and 83 (already permitted)• (13 5 percent)
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
An on-site septic treatment system will be constructed and has been permitted b ty he H dti e Co
Health Dept. for lots 81 and 83. This was addressed in prior Nat 18 and 401 permits No
additional sewage disposal.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The proposed wetland crossing work is the shortest possible distance to access Lot 81 and Lot 83
from the existinc access road and is an extension of the already permitted road The driveway
impact is limited to 16 ft wide. This will provide a 10 ft wide drive aisle with compacted
vegetated side slopes. Fill material while not calculated as pervious cover herein will allow
Infiltration and will not be paved. There will be no additional access road permits needed since
all buildable lots will now have vehicular access.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional): N/A
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~4.~i~. ~~' r-- - ~,~ ~ ,c...i

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13

OZ%Z1/2007 17:aa FAX [phone] GPA PLLC
02-21-2007 04:40pm From-QUIBLE&ASSOCIATES
~I Uoa
E6E2611Z60 T-568 P.00~ F-598
February 21, 2007
ItE: Lots 81 strict S3, B~:acbSxUe Excsnsln>n, ocxacolce, NC
Attn: Pertinent Ragulator~, .Agencies
I, P'ercr wiicy, authorize t!uiblo & Associates, P.C, to stet as agent an my behalf far the qurpose of
environmental permitc~ng 'or the access toad oxlension for the above referenced lots. Permits to be
applied far inclu6e a U5 ~.rmy Corps ofF~gineers Nationwide la Permits For Section 404 wet]ands
impacts and NC Division ~>f after Quality 40] Water Quality CerCiFicaaon_
l~~ ~i(f~
~tzr wary
Received OZ-21-2007 06:lTpm From-919945155A To-QU16LE&ASSOCIATES Page OOZ

Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc
07-fl~~~

stem ~.
PROGRAM
March 1, 2007
Peter Wiley
105 Glade Street
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
Project: Wiley Lot Access County: Dare

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Pragram (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. l[f we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 CertiEcation/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. I[ is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and ----
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
Tar-Pamlico
03020105 Stream (feet} Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Wazm Ri azian Non-Ri avian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 0 0 0.07 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 0 0 0.14 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
(/ `'.~ .
~lliam D Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Kazoiy, Wetlandsl401 Unit
Tam Steffens, USACE-Washington
Kyle Barnes, DWQ-Washington
Doug Huggett, NCDCM-Morehead City
Brian Rubino. agent
File
R~'~DYGK~... ~h~?.A.~L!,Gy(~... PYDt~~ OtzY ftr~..te~
~CD~IRr
North Caroiina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 ! 919-715-04761 www.nceep.net

Diffuse Flow Provision Calculations:
Applicable to the Pete and Julie Wiley Lot Access
401 Water Quality Certification Request
The proposed work for the Peter and Julie Wiley Lot Access is an extension of the recently permitted
Warner Lot Access (DWQ#02-1157v.2) to be constructed in the same manner. Extension of the road
(~1901inear feet) is necessary for vehicular access for the Wiley lots 81 and 83 and there will be no further
extension, as these are the last two buildable lots without access. The vegetated filter strips and low profile
driveway is designed to effectively accept, treat and diffuse runoff created from the proposed driveway
extension.

SPNCE 1959
. ~uible & Associates, P.C,
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
8 Juniper Trail • P.O, Drawer 870 • Kitty Nawk, NC 27949
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] • E-Mail: [e-mail]
JOB
SHEET NO. ~ ~
OF '
CALCULATED BY > ~~..~ ~ DATE >~>,~~
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE j
"`
,.
.... ..... .
....
:...

~' ' SINCE 1959
~.~ ~uible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
8 Juniper Trail • P.O. Drawer 870 • sctty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] • E-Mall: quibleCearthlink,net
JOB ~~~&~ ~~ 2.~C.?i~~~-tea ~ ~'~°f ~..~~~~ ,
SHEET NO. ~!_- ~ OF ~
-/ r
CALCULATED BY ~~J DATE 1~.~~ ~~ s
CHECKED BY,
SCALE ~~~
DATE
~~ A~;

- ~l
~, ,

SINCE 1959
~~~ Qlaible ~C Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SHEET NO. OF
CALCULATED BY DATE ~~

SdNt'E' 1959
Q~iible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
8 Juniper Trail • P.O. Drawer 870 • Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] • E-Mail: [e-mail]
SHEET NO. OF
CALCULATED BY ~ DATE ~~~ ~',
r
CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE

SINCE 1959
~uible & Associates, P,C,
E~7GINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
8 Juniper Trail • P,O. Drawer 870 • Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] • E-Mail; [e-mail]
JOB
SHEET NO. _ OF
~. ~ , ~,
CALCULATED BY ~~ ~ DATE #~
CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
. ~

~xa~~ir
Land Use
Lawns:
Sandy soil, flat, 2%
Sandy soil, ave., 2-7%
Sandy soil, steep, 7%
Heavy soil, flat, 2%
Heavy soil, ave., 2-7%
Heavy soil, steep, 7%
Agricultural land:
Bare packed soil
Smooth
Rough
Cultivated rows
Heavy soil no crop
Heavy soil with crop
Sandy soil no crop
Sandy soil with crop
Pasture
Heavy soil
Sandy soil
Woodlands

C
--
0.05-0.10
0.10-0.15
0.15-0.20
0.13-0.17
0.18-0.22
0.25-0.35
0.30-0.60
0.20-0.50
0.30-0.60
0.20-0.50
0.20-0.40
0.10-0.25
0.15-0.45
0.05-0.25
0.05-0.25
NOTE: The designer must use judgment to select the a ro riate C value
within the range for the appropriate land use. GenerallyPlargeraress with
permeable soils, flat slopes, and dense vegetation should have lowest C
values. Smaller areas with slowly permeable soils, steep slopes, and
sparse vegetation should be assigned highest C values.
Source: American Society of Civil Engineers
The overland flow portion of flow time may be determined from Figure 8.03a.
The flow time (in minutes) in the channel can be estimated by calculating the
average velocity in feet per minute and dividing the length (in feet) by the
average velocity.
Step 4. Determine the rainfall intensity, frequency, and duration
through 8.03g-source: North Cazolina State Highway Commission;8 an
1973). Select the chart far the locality closest to your location. Enter the
"duration" axis of the chazt with the calculated time of concentration, TC. Move
vertically until you intersect the curve of the appropriate design storm, then
move horizontally to read the rainfall intensity factor, i, in inches per hour.
Step 5. Determine peak discharge, O (ft3/seC), by multiplying the previously
determined factors using the rational formula (Sample Problem 8.03a).
8.03.2
D
Land Us® C
Business:
Downtown areas 0.70-0.95
Neighborhood areas 0.50-0.70
Table B.03a
Value of Runoff Coeffit;ient
(C) for Rational Porrrtula
Residential:
Single-family areas 0.30-0.50
Multi units
detached
,
Multi units, attached 0.40-0.60
0.60-0
75
Suburban .
0.25-0.40
Industrial:
Light areas
Heavy areas 0.50-0.80
0.60-0.90
Parks, cemeteries 0.10-0.25
Playgrounds 0.20-0.35
Railroad yard areas 0.20-0.40
Unimproved areas 0.10-0.30
Streets:
Asphalt
Concrete 0.70-0.95 -

Brick 0.80-0.95

D 0.70-0.85
rives and walks 0.75-0.85
Roofs 0.75-0.85
~'
L
L
i -
t
b~~

Figure 8.03b Rainfall intensity duration curves-Wilrnington.
/0,5
Duration
~..r
~,~
Figure 8.03c Rainfall intensity duration curves-Hatteras.
i T
~ppendaces
x.03.5
~ ~~
ivnnuies Hours
~~~~~ iu~es Hours
Duration

' t+g I T
Table 8.05a "
IUlaxirrturn All®wable ®esign Vel®cities~
f®r Vegetated Channels -
Typical Soii a Grass Lining
Channel Slope Characteristics Permissible Velocity3

Application for Established Grass
Ltning (ft/sec)
0-5% Easily Erodible Bermudagrass
Non-plastic Tall fescue 5.0

(Sands & Silts) Bahiagrass 4.5
4.5
Kentucky bluegrass 4.5
Grass-legume mixture 3.5
Erosion Resistant Bermudagrass
Plastic 6.0
Tall fescue
(Clay mixes) ,Bahiagrass 5.5
5.5
Kentucky bluegrass 5.5
Grass-legume mixture 4.5
5-10% Easily Erodible Bermudagrass
Non-plastic Tall fescue 4.5

(Sands & Silts) Bahiagrass 4.0
4.0
Kentucky bluegrass 4.0
Grass-legume mixture 3.0
Erosion Resistant Bermudagrass
Plastic 5.5
Tall fescue
(Clay Mixes) Bahiagrass 5.0
5.0
Kentucky bluegrass 5.0
N
Grass-legume mixture 3.5 ,
>10% Easily Erodible Bermudagrass
Non-plastic Tall fescue 3.5

(Sands & Silts) Bahiagrass 2.5
2.5
Kentucky bluegrass 2.5
Erosion Resistant Bermudagrass
Plastic 4.5
Tall fescue
(Clay Mixes) Bahiagrass 3.5
3.5
Kentucky bluegrass 3.5
Source: USDA-SCS Modified
NOTE: Permissible Velocity based on 10-yr storm peak runoff
2Soil e
dibili
b
ro
ty
ased on resistance to soil movement from concentrated flowing water.
3Bef
ore grass is established, permissible velocity is determined by the type of temporary liner used.
S e I e cti n g C h an n e I To calculate the required size of an open channel, assume the design flow is
uniform and does not vary with time. Since actual flow conditions change
Cross-Section
throughout the length of a channel, subdivide the channel into design reaches
,
Geometry and design each reach to carry the appropriate capacity.
The three most commonly used channel cross-sections are "V"-shaped, par-
abolic, and trapezoidal. Figure 8.OSb gives mathematical formulas for the area,
hydraulic radius and top width of each of these shapes.
5.05.4 ~ ~~

THE COASTAL WETLANDS LINE DEPICTED HAS BEEN DELINEATED BY
DCM IN AUGUST 2006 AND LOCATED BY MESA SURVEYING, INC
NOTE:
THE SECTION 404 WETLANDS LINE WAS CONFIRMED
BY USACE ON 3-13-03
II,I ~ ~ \ - '•~-
~l
`\\ /,~~
~ ~,
~'~.
~_ 11_ ~ v ,~• ,,~es••`
~`- b
o
I ~ ~ I LOT ~;
80 M
~~. ~`- O
~I_ ~ ~ i O
~`__ ~ p
I I ~~ ~
z
~ ~~
I UPLAND
~- ~
®® ~
/I

i

30 0
~_
~~
~ ~
~~~0 / ~ \
.~ / .c
.~
~ . ' ~ ~_
•~`" ~
f E1,
UPLAND
. ~~ t~ I I
~, i \ 1
~,.~ I ~ _ ~ -, _ J
w~
`~ `• I ~-
/~ i
' ® •~ ZONE 1 E'
Lor
ZONE Z _
i
LOT ~-
~- 82
P (NOT BUILDABLE,) O,
,.~._ l1
~I
~ I .,~.
I SIDE OB ~SSIDE I
~ 12° CUILVERTS
/ ~ I I .~I~ I ~`_
T 1~'
'~~`- EXISTING 30' 31 }R4T ,
i
i
~ EXISTING ROAD END/ BEGINNING OF WILEY DRIVEWAY
EXTENSION; TOTAL DRIVEWAY EXTENSION THROUGH SECTION 404
FRESHWATER WETLANDS = 190 LF/ 3,040 SQ.FT. (0.07 AC.)
GRAPHIC SCALE
eo
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 30 ft~
/ :13.61 2
i ~ C1
/ '
~~
~ .~~ ~ ~i
.t1~_
LOT ~~~ ~ ~,~:/" /
83 ,~ Er% NPS MONUMENT
~' ^tij~' O~ ~E 2' / WP-1
.~_ ~ /
•, /
b O ~ ~Q. /
~~f ~
UPLAN~~ p ~ ~J /
~ ~_ ~~/ Q
~~ / \~ Q •/
~_ ~~ / / I
' -~ r
~~ ~•, Al ~ °W/~ SET Q
'/,(V NB~.~~,35~~ CONTROL IRON
/ ~
~ ",~ Qe~~ LEGEND
~ ~'
"2' ~ e
~~a ~ i ~0~ ~_ WETLAND AREA
~ i ?e
~ PRIOR PERMITTED FlLL (NAT 16)
t2o NOTE:
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR ACCESS ROAD EXTENSION ONLY
TO PROVIDE VEHICLUAR ACCESS TO LOTS 81 AND 83;
LOT IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN PERMITTED SEPARATELY
PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD EXTENSION
FlLL (0.07 AC.)
PROP05ED GRAVEL SURfAgNG
(0.05 AC.)

_

z

~ n
0
i
rn
I
N
k'

j

v ~
~~~
~
Q
J
d W
U ~
~
01 ~ ~
Q Z 2 ya
~
Ul p~ O '
~~
}W U ~a~
1 ~ ~ ~ F
W
~ =
W
3
~- L,,I D 2 0 ~
~ ~N
~_ a ~x~
~~
W U W °
0.
ZLa U ~ ~ ~ ~
Z m ~'
"
A
O ~ ~ ~ ~
Z W ~ C~' ~ ~'

ci ,°
a III
~ J
Q
V1
~~
c~

~~~ ~ `~~
`\ ~ \`~~\
~\~
Z
Q
W
~~ O
• ~~
~~~\~~ Z
~~ ~~~ ~
\~~\ ~a
:~ ~\~ .
~ S,, ~,
\r' ..
~~
a~
oZ
2~
i
I

_ 2~i
Q~ ;~
Q~ ~ "~°
~ i
~ ~ ~
~
J

I

t ~
I
W
a
0
•
ru
.a

~
' O
Q'
ru

V
a o ._
ui ~ ~
w ~ ~, ~
F-Nn
Q N
N N
V=U
O
~ a Z .a
N n ~ `~ rn
mow= ~ ~

3

~ O

._
J Q Y ~
a ~
~ U ~
~
~0 ~
s
i. ~ ~ ,
l 2 o
~~ o
i o
~

I

LL

~ n

v
~ k
W ~
~I=-Q
~ l
a~o ~