20200102 Ver 1_401 Application_20200116

ao a IM/6A
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑ ! P
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Air Harbor Road 00
7-
�00-
2. Work Type: ✓❑Private ❑institutional ❑Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
See attached. Q
1—
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: See attached. 'm 1
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 - or ORM Consultant 1D Number]:
Bradley S. Luckey/Pilot Environmental, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location- Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B lb]:
36.16312,-79.81389
8. Project Location- Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 7857997218,7857998889 & 7857999565
9. Project Location - County [PCN Form A2b]: Guilford
10. Project Location - Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Greensboro
11. Project Information - Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]:
Richland Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
HCompliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

MO�ot WA
�9QG
o -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification C Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is -this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lie0ee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Air Harbor Road
2b. County:
Guilford
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Greensboro
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Calvary Christian Center, Inc./Marlene, Cato/Signature 31, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
198-29/63-67/8120-53
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
369 Air Harbor Road/358 Air Harbor Road/2618 Battleground Avenue
3e. City, state, zip:
Greensboro, NC 27455/Greensboro, NC 27455/Greensboro, NC 27408
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
r

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Developer
4b. Name:
Mr. Patrick Donnelly
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Byron Development
4d. Street address:
7B Corporate Center Court
4e. City, state, zip:
Greensboro, NC 27408
4f. Telephone no.:
336-282-4217
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Bradley Luckey
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
7857997218, 7857998889 & 7857999565
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.16312 Longitude: - 79.81388
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
15.6 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Richland Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-III, NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains two single family residences and undeveloped wooded land. Residential development and a church are
located within the vicinity of the site.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland=0.043 Ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Streams=151 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a town home development containing 106 units, access roads,
landscaped areas and stormwater devices.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project includes the construction of 106 town home units, associated access roads, landscaped areas and
stormwater devices. In order to provide adequate emergency services/fire turnaround, it will be necessary to construct a
hammerhead turnaround on the southern portion of the site that impacts a stream and wetlands. To facilitate the
construction and development of the site, clearing, and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and
other heavy equipment will be used during grading and constriction of the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ElYes ® No Elunknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Determination not requested
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot'Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Michael Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this application, are not anticipated as a result of the proposed
project.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.02
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.02
2h. Comments: To construct emergency/fire personnel turnaround, it is necessary to permanently impact 0.02 acres of
wetland with fill.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Unnamed
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
3
40
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
El Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
40
3i. Comments: To construct an emergency/fire personel turnaround, it is necessary to permanently impact 40 linear feet of
stream channel with fill.
Page 5of12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Pi
Stormwater
0.36
P2
5f. Total
0.36
5g. Comments: A stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater on
the site.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
0.36
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
14.39
5k. Method of construction:
Constructed in uplands.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ® Other: Jordan Lake
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number-
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required'?
61 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: The applicant is in the process of obtaining a buffer authorization for proposed stream buffer impacts from the
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

local DWR delegated municipality. The applicant requests a conditional 401 approval pending buffer authorization from the
local DWR delegated municipality.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has designed the proposed residential sub -division to avoid other impact to streams and wetlands, specifically
associated with lot/pad fill and stormwater devices. Initial designs included impacting the stream, wetlands and stream buffer
located on the southern -central portion of the site with a stormwater device. However, the applicant re -designed proposed
development of the site to avoid impacts to waters from stormwater devices, following the delineation. The footprint of the
emergency services/fire personnel turnaround has been minimized to the extent that is safe, practical and allowable by the
City of Greensboro. Additionally, grading slopes in the area of impact have been minimized to 3:1.
There are 0.043 acres of wetlands and 151 linear feet of stream channel location on the site. Development has been
designed to avoid 0.02 acres of wetland and 110 linear feet of stream channel.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked. A sediment and erosion control device will be placed in the most down -gradient impact area
of the stream/wetland to prevent sedimentation to down -gradient water bodies.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
El Mitigation bank
ElPayment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments: The applicant does not propose mitigation for impacts to streams and wetlands.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes - [].No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The site has been designed in accordance with City of Greensboro
® Yes ❑ No
stormwater requirements.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
45 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The applicant is in the process of obtaining a.stormwater management plan approval from the City of Greensboro. The
applicant requests conditional 401 WQC pending stormwater management plan approval from the City of Greensboro.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit,
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Greensboro
® Phase 11
3b. Which of the following" locally -implemented stormwater management programs
®NSW
El USMP
apply (check all that apply):
®Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
El Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes, No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered `yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards;
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered 'yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated from the proposed development will be discharged to existing municipal services.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
We consulted the USFWS Website to identify federally protected endangered or threatened species in Guilford County,
NC. The USFWS identify the bald eagle (BGPA), Cape Fear shiner (E), Roanoke logperch (E), Schweinitz's sunflower (E)
and small worled pogonia (T) as protected species that could occur in Guilford County, NC. Suitable habitat for protected
species is not located within the proposed project area. Therefore, we have made a determination of no effect to
federally protected species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the construction of stormwater ponds will prevent sediment from entering down -gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) to identify historic and/or archaeological resources of the site.
The map does not identify listed or eligible for listing properties on or nearby the site. A copy of the map is included as an
attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Map Service Center, National Flood Hazard
Layer (Drawing 4, attached)
a•
k1 Digitally signed by Bradley S. Luckey
!, DN: cn=Bradley S. Luckey, o=Pilot
" Inc., ou,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
Enviromental,
A_-_email=[e-mail],c=US
1.14.20
Date: 2620.01.1414:31:11 -05'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Proposal for Environmental Services
Pilot Proposal5269.1
January 3, 2020
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act .as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of 'Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
351,359,361 & 367
Property Address:
Air Harbor Road
Greensboro, NC 27455
Applicant Information:
Patrick J. Donnelly
Name:
7B Corporate Center Court
Address:
Greensboro, NC 27408
336-3.69-2188
Telephone Number:
336-282-3797
Fax Number:
[e-mail]
E-mail Address:
/
Zo Z�
Sign ure:
Date:
A

rccwo mass '"',
7 —1 --I — — -�- % _ J•Y ��--. Y___ t — \ `\ r`\ LL _ ` �I_ r
I 1 I I 4x Ell
II I I------ --- `' `,` I `'_- r I I ,z
OSLEYIRdAD `O I
---\` -- -_-_ -d' -_ ►�\ I t I to i
YB
T
---------
f '-----------= I III 1 I4 j
.I L1 , I
7R�A I 1 LE
�
I
/
Y r1'
_ _
- PROPosED
POND ry- -ii4
�TREE �, �4 ra---- c II 0 IR 0�11 i 11 \ ' SAVE --
,��,//
1
�_ I . n • �� V � \ wr M.a -_ _ _I .� ..�r�%erl lT _w t ., .. v � .��/
SI TE
P��
0
�
�
z�-
W00
1
LOCATION MAP
1 =2000
IMPACT # 1
OWNER/DEVELOPER
HERB PARKS
7B CORPORATE CENTER CT
GREENSBORO, NC 27408
336-282-4127
— 1 SHEET I OF 2
OVERALL SITE IMPACT MAP
FOR
AIR HARBOR ROAD
/ GUILFORD COUNTY
JANUARY 07.2020
/
' 150 0 75 150 300
1 inch = 150 ft.
4609 Dundas hive
vans Greensboro,
Inc.North Carolina 27407
gineenng, Fax 33"54,8876
—si�tg7a— Phone [phone]
I Engineers Surveyors Planners Firm License No.: C-0168
DWG: H:/DRAVANGS/HERB PARKS/AIR—HARBOR—ROAD/AIR HARBOR Impoct Map-01-07-20.dwg

\ \\
800
\ CRfD NIABa(7011)
5�g � Iz \ \ \ � \ N.G� \\
\ \ \ \ \ �804 \ \ �I
> > 1 I I
0 / WI I� /
I� / / ZONE
I i< INDICATES ZONE 1
BUFFER IMPACT' I BUFFER IMPACTS
= 0.044 ACRES
oco)
I / /ZONE 1I
/ / . ; / BUFFER IMPACT INDICATES ZONE 2
f I BUFFER IMPACTS
/ 0.067 ACRES
/
INDICATES
WETLAND IMPACTS
/ I ��� t s x t f �� t t / i�,. , r j�i✓�y ✓,
`5 0.018 ACRES
PERENNIAL STIR
DiM\ / +'•' '"'`
tV LIMITS OUT AND Z0f4EQ/AG
I I • :•''"`� 4= . ^ CITY 1?MJjS IN AND ZONED R-3 �� 'L EX, STREAM
.rays t• \
52
@51) t:
�a7 :. •.. ; PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
\ ' — \ \ TOTAL IMPACT = 39�4 I
\50 \49 �48 ;: r� \
47 46 .3 I /
COD
_ 4; � � o \ WETLAND / / / SHEET 2 OF 2
-� LU Lu \ / / IMPACT #I MAP
17 O J z \ IMPACT / / / FOR
\ \ \ J o L i \ \ \ \ / / / AIR HARBOR ROAD
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ a 4L) ¢ \ \ \ / GUILFORD COUNTY
CENTER GRQYE TOWNSHIP - SUMMERFIELD NC
JANUARY 07, 2020
40 0 20 40 90
\ _ _
1 I \ \ \ PROPOSED \I\ \ \ 1 inch = 40ft.
STREAM IMPACTS: CONTOURS 4" Dundas Drive
BUFFER IMPACTS: OWNER/DEVELOPER -+ .vans Greensboro,
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 42.8 LF HERB PARKS —---+._. North Carolina 27407
ZONE 2 IMPACT = 1,934 SF 76 CORPORATE CENTER CT + ngineering, Inc. Fax33"54.8876
.
WETLAND IMPACTS: ZONE 1 IMPACT = 2,930 SF —Sfi� 1974— Phone [phone]
TOTAL BUFFER IMPACTS = 4,864 SF GREENSBORO, INC 27408 i Engineers Surveyors Planners Firm License No.: C-0168
TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS = 798 SF 336-282-4127 DWG: H:/DRAWINGS/HERB PARKS/AIR—HARBOR—ROAD/AIR HARBOR Impact Map-01-07-20.dwg
(0.018 AC.)

In . -.-,
® HPOWEB 2.0 Gpnpral Aud on. r
wr
o ,
0
0
0
,yy
�J10. 1
8
•-]9.]93449 36.16]98] DNjrees
i ..`' �► esri

AP- fr
'..��. y. •1 _ l
7-4
1po"I -allow
fw
L �
l• -: � '� err+. __ �1,, le_aj ,`•i'. �= R>.I � ► ;tp
t
�i LEGEND
Site Boundary
• ^ '7i.. „�• ` t ix Freshwater Emergent
.v - . p �yy,, 41 II1� • • p y freshwater Forested/Shrub
• �' sue., �' •..'„ j ' y f II �� Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
f 1 �!r C y-. 1 Estuarine and Marine
i ♦ ' ky• r' •T'-L'• 1 'F� Freshwater Pond
J ,1 Make
- 5• - iRiverine
r� Other
Drawing 3 f . NWI Map
Air Harbor Road
USFWS NWI fF
Approximate 15.6 Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 400' Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
�T� Pilot Project 5269
Wetlands MapperOT •NV I IIONN rNT.I.IMC

FEMA FIRM
Drawing 4
Air Harbor Road
National Flood Hazard Layer
Approximate 15.6 Acre Tract
from FEMA Web Map Service
B' Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
Scale: 1" = 1,000' Iy■■}�PILOT/=%' _ Pilot Project 5269
I! git01 FNvigOx Yf NiN L.iNC

t ;111 �' -a,
I. 7 y
i
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO �—
Site Boundary d
ia
Perennial Stream
WETLAND FLAGS = ® �-•:
STREAM FLAGS= ® Wetland
Wetland Flags = 21 ►Y DP-1 Data Point
Stream Flags = 4 ,
Total Flags= 25 « * WA 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY AND APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE
USACE AND/OR THE NCDEQ-DWR. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
Drawing 5
2018 Aerial Imagery from ESRI
and Pilot GPS Data
Scale: 1" = 200'
Date: 10.30.19
PILOTRO �.
PILOT (NYINONYIM TI1l.IN<
LEGEND
Wetland Map
Air Harbor Road
Approximate 15.6-Acre Tract
Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
Pilot Project 5269

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Air Harbor Road City/County: Guilford/Greensboro Sampling Date: 10.17.19
Applicant/Owner: Byron Development, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.161833 Long:-79.813914 Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Poplar Forest sandy loam (PoC) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology. Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary, Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that aaolv)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (61) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) '- Use scientific names of Dlants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Platanus occidentalis
15
Yes
FACW
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
15
Yes
FACU
3. Liquidambar styraclfiva
15
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
45
=Total Cover
50% of total cover.
23
20% of total cover:
9
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1. Elaeagnus umbellata
5
Yes
UPL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
5
=Total Cover
50% of total cover.
3
20% of total cover:
1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Woodward/a areolata
5
Yes
FACW
2. Campsis radicans
5
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
10
=Total Cover
50% of total cover.
5
20% of total cover:
2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1. Campsis radicans
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
=Total Cover
50% of total cover.
3
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: DPA
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5 (A)
7 (B)
71.4% (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
FACW species
20
x 2 =
40
FAC species
25
x 3 =
75
FACU species
15
x 4 =
60
UPL species
5
x 5 =
25
Column Totals:
65
(A)
200 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.08
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH• and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants,less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains -and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 2.5Y 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-18 10YR 5/1 98 2.5YR 4/6 2 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface, (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122,136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil2:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127,147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#: 0710-xxmr, Exp. Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5.2a)
Project/Site: Air Harbor Road City/County: Guilford/Greensboro Sampling Date: 10.1.7.19
Applicant/Owner: Byron Development, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope Slope (%): 2-3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.161882 Long:-79.813821 Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Poplar Forest sandy loam (PoF) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
- Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X_ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116=4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of Dlants.
Sampling Point: DP-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
15
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Li iodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Aaerrubrum
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Pinus virginiana
15
Yes
UPL
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
5.
Pinus taeda
15
Yes
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 41.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover.
38 20% of total cover:
15
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Fagus grandifolia
5
Yes
FACU
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 45 x 4 = 180
3.
Comus flodda
5
Yes
FACU
UPL species 15 x 5 = 75
4.
Prunus serotina
5
Yes
FACU
Column Totals: 120 (A) 435 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.63
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophyl:ic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g,
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover.
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Polystichum acrostichoides
5
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Campsis radicans
10
Yes
FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
15
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover.
8 20% of total cover:
3
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Campsis radicans
5
Yes
FAC
2.
Lonicera japonica
5'
Yes
FACU
3.
4.
5'
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover.
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-18 7.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
icentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al) _ P
Histic Epipedon (A2) _T
_ Black Histic (A3) _ L
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ L
—Stratified Layers (A5) _ D
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ R
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ D
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) R
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Ir
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ U
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _Pi
Dark Surface (S7) R
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
olyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
hin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
oamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
epleted Matrix (F3)
edox Dark Surface (F6)
epleted Dark Surface (F7)
edox Depressions (F8)
on -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
mbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122,136)
edmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
ed Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland' hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
i
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0