Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200111 Ver 1_PJD Draft_20200117Shaping Communities Together December 17, 2019 Ms. Samantha Dailey US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 W ake Forest, North Carolina 27587 RE: Johnston County Detention Center Project Jurisdictional Determination Johnston County, North Carolina Dear Ms. Dailey: This letter is to request confirmation of Jurisdictional Determination on the referenced site. The request is based on data, site observations, and a site visit on March 07, 2019. Specifically, we are requesting confirmation of the jurisdictional limit of Wetland A and Wetland B on the subject property. The location of the wetlands is shown and labeled on the attached Delineation Map. Included in this letter are the following: •JD Request Forms •Agent Authorization Form •Topographic Location Map •Soils Map •Delineation Map •Photo Sheets •Wetland Data Sheets Please include McGill Associates on the copy list of all correspondence for this project. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at 828-386-1920. Sincerely, MCGILL ASSOCIATES, PA JON SWAIM Project Manager / Environmental Services P:\2019\19.01906-MoseleyArc-Johnston Co PSC MCGILL ASSOCIATES 1013 STATE FARM ROAD, BOONE, NC 28607 / 828.386.1920 / MCGILLASSOCIATES.COM Shapin�, Coininunitios �u��clh�i I FA mci I I AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM PROJECT NAME: Johnston County Detention Center Protect PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DB:05272 PG:0536 PARCELID. 15L11011 STREET ADDRESS: Off US-70 Bus Smithfield NC 27577 Please Print Property Owner/Representative: Johnston County (If Representative) Title: Jimmy Boykin The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize Jon Swaim of McGill Associates P.A. (Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm) to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached. Property Owner's/Representative's Address (if different than property above): P.O. Box 1187 Smithfield, North Carolina 27577 Telephone: 919-422-2962 We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. 1��- Aut zed ignature Authorized Signature Date: m I ^ a 7— 2G 26 Date: 1013 STATE FARM ROAD, BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA 28607 1 828.386.1920 www.mcgillassociates.com Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received): Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM 1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: 2. Work Type: Private Institutional Government Commercial 3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]: 4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: 5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]: 6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: 7. Project Location – Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]: 8. Project Location – Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 9. Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]: 10. Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: 11. Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: 12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 and 404 Regulatory Action Type: Standard Permit Pre-Application Request Nationwide Permit # Unauthorized Activity Regional General Permit # Compliance Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required Revised 20150602 Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: County/parish/borough: City: Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: Long.: Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination. Date(s): TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE” SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION. Site number Latitude (decimal degrees) Longitude (decimal degrees) Estimated amount of aquatic resource in review area (acreage and linear feet, if applicable) Type of aquatic resource (i.e., wetland vs. non-wetland waters) Geographic authority to which the aquatic resource “may be” subject (i.e., Section 404 or Section 10/404) 1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate. 2)In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre- construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be” navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items: Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Map: ___________________________________________________. Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ___________________. Data sheets prepared by the Corps: _______________________________________________. Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________________________________________________. U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ___________________________________________. USGS NHD data. USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _______________________________. Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ___________________________. National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ______________________________________. State/local wetland inventory map(s): _______________________________________________. FEMA/FIRM maps: ____________________________________________________________. 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ________________.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ___________________________________________. or Other (Name & Date): ____________________________________________. Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________________________. Other information (please specify): _________________________________________________. IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Signature and date of Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable)1 1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action. Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 1 This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by assigned counties can be found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx, by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager. ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number: (828) 271-7980 Fax Number: (828) 281-8120 RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 General Number: (919) 554-4884 Fax Number: (919) 562-0421 WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street Washington, North Carolina 27889 General Number: (910) 251-4610 Fax Number: (252) 975-1399 WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 General Number: 910-251-4633 Fax Number: (910) 251-4025 INSTRUCTIONS: All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G. NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H. NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s) authorized agent to be considered a complete request. NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols. NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 2 A. PARCEL INFORMATION Street Address: _______________________________________________ Cit y, State: _______________________________________________ County: Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): B.REQUESTOR INFORMATION Name: Mailing Address: _________________________________________ Telephone Number: _________________________________________ Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________ Select one: I am the current property owner. I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant1 Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase Other, please explain. ________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ C.PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2 Name: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter. 2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record). Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 3 D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4 By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on- site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Print Name Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5 Date Signature E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable) I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all aquatic resources. I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority. I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting process. I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application and the JD is to be used in the permitting process. I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization. I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel. I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land. Other:___________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ 3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E. 4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a continuation sheet. 5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s). Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 4 F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One) I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property. PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is “preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do not expire. I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years (subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05- 02). I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision. G. ALL REQUESTS Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the review area. Size of Property or Review Area acres. The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site. Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 5 H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________ Longitude: ______________________ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area. Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been reviewed and approved).6  North Arrow  Graphical Scale  Boundary of Review Area  Date  Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary assessment reach. For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:  Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.  Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries, impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary, open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear length of each of these features as appropriate.  Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non- jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e. “Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage or linear length of these features as appropriate. For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:  Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404, Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and linear length of these features as appropriate. Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region (at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type) ____________________________________________________________________________ 6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit- Program/Jurisdiction/ Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 6 Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form • PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the Aquatic Resource Table • AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form8 Vicinity Map Aerial Photograph USGS Topographic Map Soil Survey Map Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps) Landscape Photos (if taken) NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms Other Assessment Forms _____________________________________________________________________________ 7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf 8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/ Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USAGE website. Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued. 200 0 100 200 400 200DIVISION VALUE = FEETGRAPHIC SCALE WETLAND DELINEATION MAP 1 FIGURE1/7/20 19.01906 DATE PROJECT # JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA JOHNSTON COUNTY JOHNSTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER PROJECT MC AL OFFICE MANAGER DESIGNER CS JS PROJECT MANAGER REVIEWER P:\2019\19.01906-MOSELEYARC-JOHNSTON CO PSC\DESIGN\PERMITS\JD\JD FIGURES AND WETLAND DELINEATION MAP.DWG PLOT DATE 1/7/2020 4:40 PM ALEX LOWDERMILK1013 State Farm Road Boone, NC 28607 828.386.1920 NC Firm License # C-0459 mcgillassociates.com Legend Wetland Limits Property Line/Study Limits Data Points Wetland Table Wetland A 0.58 Acres Wetland B 0.89 Acres Potential Wetland Waters of the US - Wetland B US 7 0 B U SYELVERTON GROVE RDProperty Line/Study Limits Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Potential Habitat Trees WB-OUT WB-IN WA-IN WA-OUT Potential Wetland Waters of the US - Wetland A DIVISION VALUE = FEETGRAPHIC SCALE 1000 0 500 1000 2000 1000 USGS MAP 2 FIGURE12/17/19 19.01906 DATE PROJECT # JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA JOHNSTON COUNTY JOHNSTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER PROJECT BR AL OFFICE MANAGER DESIGNER CS JS PROJECT MANAGER REVIEWER C:\USERS\ALEX.LOWDERMILK\DESKTOP\JD FIGURES AND WETLAND DELINEATION MAP.DWG PLOT DATE 12/17/2019 12:26 PM ALEX LOWDERMILK1013 State Farm Road Boone, NC 28607 828.386.1920 NC Firm License # C-0459 mcgillassociates.com Property Line/Study Limits © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 HERE DIVISION VALUE = FEETGRAPHIC SCALE 1000 0 500 1000 2000 1000 LOCATION MAP 3 FIGURE12/17/19 19.01906 DATE PROJECT # JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA JOHNSTON COUNTY JOHNSTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER PROJECT BR AL OFFICE MANAGER DESIGNER CS JS PROJECT MANAGER REVIEWER C:\USERS\ALEX.LOWDERMILK\DESKTOP\JD FIGURES AND WETLAND DELINEATION MAP.DWG PLOT DATE 12/17/2019 12:32 PM ALEX LOWDERMILK1013 State Farm Road Boone, NC 28607 828.386.1920 NC Firm License # C-0459 mcgillassociates.com Property Line/Study Limits PHOTO SHEET 1 4 FIGURE12/17/19 DATE 19.01906 PROJECT # CS PROJECT MANAGER C:\USERS\ALEX.LOWDERMILK\DESKTOP\JD FIGURES AND WETLAND DELINEATION MAP.DWG PLOT DATE 12/17/2019 1:54 PM ALEX LOWDERMILK1013 State Farm Road Boone, NC 28607 828.386.1920 NC Firm License # C-0459 mcgillassociates.com Photo One: View looking northeast at agricultural field and Wetland B. Photo Two: View looking north at agricultural field and Wetland B. Photo Three: View looking north at Wetland B. Photo Four: View looking south at agricultural field and Wetland A. JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA JOHNSTON COUNTY JOHNSTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER PROJECT PHOTO SHEET 2 5 FIGURE12/17/19 DATE 19.01906 PROJECT # CS PROJECT MANAGER C:\USERS\ALEX.LOWDERMILK\DESKTOP\JD FIGURES AND WETLAND DELINEATION MAP.DWG PLOT DATE 12/17/2019 1:58 PM ALEX LOWDERMILK1013 State Farm Road Boone, NC 28607 828.386.1920 NC Firm License # C-0459 mcgillassociates.com Photo Five: View looking south at Wetland A.Photo Six: View looking south at Wetland A. Photo Seven: View looking west at Wetland B. Photo Eight: View looking west at Wetland A. JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA JOHNSTON COUNTY JOHNSTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER PROJECT Soil Map—Johnston County, North Carolina Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/17/2019 Page 1 of 339315003931600393170039318003931900393200039321003932200393230039316003931700393180039319003932000393210039322003932300744100744200744300744400744500744600 744100 744200 744300 744400 744500 744600 35° 30' 15'' N 78° 18' 34'' W35° 30' 15'' N78° 18' 9'' W35° 29' 49'' N 78° 18' 34'' W35° 29' 49'' N 78° 18' 9'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 Meters Map Scale: 1:3,960 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Johnston County, North Carolina Survey Area Data: Version 23, Sep 16, 2019 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 29, 2014—Dec 9, 2017 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Johnston County, North Carolina Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/17/2019 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI GoA Goldsboro sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1.5 8.7% Gr Grantham silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0.0 0.1% NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 14.5 83.2% Ra Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1.4 8.0% Totals for Area of Interest 17.5 100.0% Soil Map—Johnston County, North Carolina Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 12/17/2019 Page 3 of 3 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long: Soil Map Unit Name: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. X No X No X X No X X X Yes X Yes X Yes X X U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Wetland Hydrology Present? Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) NoYes 2 No No Water Table Present? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: True Aquatic Plants (B14) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) HYDROLOGY Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (B5) City/County:Johnston County Detention Center Project Smithfield WA-IN 3/7/19 Johnston County NC No Section, Township, Range:Jon Swaim 2concave Datum:WGS84-78.30620635.500052LRR P, MLRA 136 N/ANWI classification:Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none): Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.) significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Remarks: Is the Sampled AreaYes Yes Yes Hydric Soil Present? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Nowithin a Wetland?Yes Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Remarks: Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 0 0 Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): No Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Surface Water Present? Field Observations: ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 = 1.x 3 = 2.x 4 = 3.x 5 = 4.Column Totals:(B) 5. 6. 7. 8.X 9. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X25 =Total Cover50 Smilax rotundifolia 25 Yes Yes FACU Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) )5 =Total Cover 10 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants. 35 14 10 0 10 No FACU Yes Yes FAC FAC 285 0 280 Multiply by: 0 3.42Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: FAC Total % Cover of: 95 70 (A) (B) (A) 923 15 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? FAC =Total Cover Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 5 ) Lonicera japonica 35 Acer rubrum 45 Ligustrum sinense Tree Stratum ) =Total Cover Liquidambar styraciflua Acer rubrum Quercus phellos Celtis occidentalis 30 ) 70 Indicator Status 30 20 No Dominant Species? Yes 10 FACU OBL species FACW species FAC species 25 Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Absolute % Cover 66.7% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) No WA-IN 4 6 FACU species UPL species Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 565 0 165 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 X X Depth (inches):X Sampling Point: Yes Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Type: Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Loc2 Sandy75 Color (moist) Matrix 2.5YR 3/1 2.5YR 5/10-12 WA-INSOIL Type1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist)Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. % Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Redox (S5) %Texture 25 Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136) Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) No Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Redox Depressions (F8) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long: Soil Map Unit Name: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. X No X No X X No X X Yes X Yes X Yes X X Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Remarks: Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 8 3 Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): No Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Surface Water Present? Field Observations: Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.) significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Remarks: Is the Sampled AreaYes Yes Yes Hydric Soil Present? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Nowithin a Wetland?Yes City/County:Johnston County Detention Center Project Smithfield WB-IN 3/7/19 Johnston County NC No Section, Township, Range:Jon Swaim 3concave Datum:WGS84-78.30492235.501511LRR P, MLRA 136 N/ANWI classification:Goldsboro sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none): Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: True Aquatic Plants (B14) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) HYDROLOGY Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (B5) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Wetland Hydrology Present? Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) NoYes No No Water Table Present? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 = 1.x 3 = 2.x 4 = 3.x 5 = 4.Column Totals:(B) 5. 6. 7. 8.X 9. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) No WB-IN 6 9 FACU species UPL species Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 125 810 25 245 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: FACU OBL species FACW species FAC species 25 Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Absolute % Cover 66.7% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60 Ligustrum sinense Tree Stratum ) =Total Cover Acer rubrum Pinus taeda Pinus echinata Liquidambar styraciflua 30 ) 105 Indicator Status 25 25 Yes Dominant Species? Yes 20 40 Acer rubrum Arundinaria gigantea 40 15 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? FACU =Total Cover Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 5 ) Smilax rotundifolia 40 8 1230 20 Prevalence Index worksheet: UPL Total % Cover of: 115 65 (A) (B) (A) 345 0 260 Multiply by: 80 3.31Prevalence Index = B/A = 40 Yes FAC 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants. 53 21 25 0 30 Yes FAC Yes Yes FAC FAC Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) )5 =Total Cover FACWYes 820 =Total Cover40 Lonicera japonica 15 Yes Yes FAC ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 X Depth (inches):X Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) No Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Redox Depressions (F8) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Redox (S5) %Texture 25 WB-INSOIL Type1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist)Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. % Matrix 2.5YR 5/1 2.5YR 4/10-12 Loc2 Sandy75 Color (moist) Sampling Point: Yes Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Type: Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long: Soil Map Unit Name: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. No X No X X No X Yes X Yes X Yes X X Soy bean field, historic disturbed soils and vegetation Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Remarks: Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): No Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Surface Water Present? Field Observations: Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.) significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Remarks: Is the Sampled AreaYes Yes Yes Hydric Soil Present? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Nowithin a Wetland?Yes City/County:Johnston County Detention Center Project Smithfield WA/B-OUT 3/7/19 Johnston County No Section, Township, Range:Jon Swaim 2none Datum:WGS84-78.306039, -78.30546235.500244, 35.501627LRR P, MLRA 136 NWI classification:Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none): Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: True Aquatic Plants (B14) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) HYDROLOGY Geomorphic Position (D2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Iron Deposits (B5) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Microtopographic Relief (D4) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Wetland Hydrology Present? Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) NoYes No No Water Table Present? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Crayfish Burrows (C8) ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 = 1.x 3 = 2.x 4 = 3.x 5 = 4.Column Totals:(B) 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) No WA/B-OUT 0 4 FACU species UPL species Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 300 595 60 140 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: FACU OBL species FACW species FAC species Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Absolute % Cover 0.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 30 Ligustrum sinense Tree Stratum ) =Total Cover 30 ) Indicator Status Dominant Species? Yes Allium ascalonicum Yes Yes 25 30 Geranium carolinianum 35Glycine max UPL Festuca paradoxa 15 15 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? =Total Cover Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. ligy ) Lonicera japonica 85 FACNo 17 615 43 10 Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: 25 55 (A) (B) (A) 75 0 220 Multiply by: 0 4.25Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants. 0 Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) )5 =Total Cover FAC UPL No 513 =Total Cover25 25 Yes FACU ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 Depth (inches):X Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) No Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Redox Depressions (F8) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Redox (S5) % Tilled- Historic Agricultural Field Texture WA/B-OUTSOIL Type1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist)Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. % Matrix 2.5YR 4/30-12 Loc2 Sandy100 Color (moist) Sampling Point: Yes Restrictive Layer (if observed): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Type: Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0