20031128 Ver 1_Complete File_20030909

CFA
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
January 8, 2004
DWQ# 03-1128
Guilford County
Mr. Scott Wallace
Keystone Group, Inc.
5710-K-203 High Point Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Wallace:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in 145 linear feet of
perennial stream and 0.03 acre of wetlands for a road crossing and in 0.075 acre of wetlands for roadbed and
slope fill in order to construct the Meadow Oaks Subdivision in Guilford County, as described in your application
received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on September 9, 2003 and in additional correspondence
received on October 10, 2003 and November 14, 2003. After reviewing your application, we have determined
that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3404 which can be viewed on our web site
at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 14
when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should secure any other federal, state or
local permits before you proceed with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval will expire when
the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as well as
the additional conditions listed below:
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and
protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These
mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact
under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be
downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
2. The culvert required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profile is not
altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing stream
dimensions (including the pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and below the location of the
culvert. The culvert shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent
head cutting of the stream. If the culvert becomes perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-
established or, if the culvert is installed in a perched manner, the culvert shall be removed and re-installed
correctly.
NC
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
The Applicant must submit a plan and receive written approval from this Office to address any head cutting
that will occur as a result of this project (e.g., use of cross vanes downstream of the culvert).
Native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where practicable
instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary in the streambed, it shall be limited
to the minimum amount required (as shown by engineering calculations) to protect the culvert from scouring.
3. No impacts to the stream channel, to include temporary or permanent placement of riprap, culverts, fill
material, or mechanized land clearing, are authorized for the proposed stream crossing at the site
designated W-1. This crossing is depicted in the site plan as utilizing a bottomless arch culvert.
4. Upon finishing the project, the Applicant shall fill out and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion" to
notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed. This certificate
should be returned to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality at the address listed.
Along with the Certificate of Completion, please send photographs upstream and downstream of each
culvert site to document correct installation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which
conforms to Chapter 1506 of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless
you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-771-
4600 or Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AW K/cdl
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
Wendel Overby, Soil & Environmental Consultants, P. A., 236 LePhillip Court, Suite C, Concord, NC 28025
Facility Name Meadow Oaks County Guilford
Project Number 03 1128 Regional Contact: Daryl Lamb
Date: 12/31/2003
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: DaWl Lamb
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: S.teVe Tedder
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Meadow Oaks County Guilford
Project Number 03, 1128 County2
Recvd From APP Region 'Winston-Salem
Received Date 9/9/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type road crossing for 76 lot s/d
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
F-14F-9 ? F O Y O N F 16 1 -114-2 I NSW 30,602. 0. t 1 14
F 145.00
F RR Buffers 0 Y ?O N ?70707 r r
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? OQ Y O N Did you request more info? O Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? OQ Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 360011
Comments:
Longitude (ddmmss) 794851
Site visit made on 12/19/2003. Site is 28 .72 acres and consists of abandoned agricultural fields and
forested areas. Surrounding area is sing le family residential. Prop osed site development consists of
74 single family homes and a 5 acre site for multi-family dwellings (number to be determined by final
site layout), Applicant is aware that an a pproved stormwater mana ge
ment plan will be required rp for
to construction if the total impervious are a of the multi-family site e s
xceeds 30%, or if the impervious
area of the entire development at build-o ut exceeds 30%. Current estimate of total eject
impervious area is 25%. Total im acp is t o jurisdictional waters con sist of 145 If of stream channel
and 4744 sq. ft. of headwater wetlands. These impacts will result from the construction of Meadow
Oaks Drive which will be the main acces s road into the subdivision . Much of the jurisdictional waters
on site are subject to a 50' no-build buffe r mandated by the Ci of Greensboro. Applicant has done
an acceptable job of avoiding and minim iAnag impacts. Original pr oposal consisted of 436 If of
channel impact and 15,411 sn ft. of
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Daryl Lamb
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Steve Tedder
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Meadow Oaks County Guilford
Project Number ,03 1128
Recvd From
Received Date
Project Type
Certificates
Permit Wetland
Type- Type
APP
9/9/03 Recvd By Region
road crossing for 76 lot s/d
Stream
Wetland Wetland Stream Class
Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin
County2
Region Winston-Salem
Acres Feet
Req. Req.
rnial - Int er-
mittent
1-14-? 77--?S- 30.602 . 0.11 14>.00 145.00 F_
F14 M- 'F 0 ti ON' F 16 11-14277-7-7-71-
w
RK BuffersO ? O N F__F_F_F_30.602. I r I I -
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: O Issue 0 Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 360011 Longitude (ddmmss) 794851
Comments:
Site visit made on 12/19/2003. Site is 28 .72 acres and consists of abandoned agricultural fields and
forested areas. Surrounding area is sing le family residential. Prop osed site development consists of
74 single family homes and a 5 acre site for multi-family dwellings (number to be determined by fi
nal
site lay)ut). Applicant is aware that an a pproved stormwater man r
agement plan will be required pr for
to construction if the total impervious are a of the multi-family site e xceeds 30%, or if the impervious
area of the entire development at build-o ut exceeds 30%. Current estimate of total project
impervious area is 25%. Total im acp is t o jurisdictional waters con sist of 145 If of stream channel
and 4744 sq. ft. of headwater wetlands. These impacts will result from the construction of Meadow
Oaks Drive which will be the main acces s road into the subdivision . Much of the jurisdictional waters
on site are subject to a 50' no-build buffe r mandated by the City of Greensboro. Applicant has done
an acce tp able job of avoiding and minim izing impacts. Original pr oposal consisted of 436 If of
channel impact an115,411 sq. ft, of
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Meadow Oaks County Guilford

Project Number 03 1128 Regional Contact: Daryl Lamb
Date: 12/31/2003
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
I
Triage Check List
Date. Protect Name: C?A vi AL
DWQ#: C? - I Iz?
County: ?% i j
To:
11
ARO
FRO
MRO
RRO
Mike Parker
?- WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
A WSRO Daryl Lamb
From:
Ken Averitte
Alan Johnson
Steve Mitchell
Telephone : (919)
Me attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? h inimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments:
W-I

?Ue`-)
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
?y A ember 13, 2003
? 8' 11 EC #5-1218W0
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Todd Tugwell
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Action ID #200321277
Dear Mr. Tugwell and Ms. Mueller:
NC DENR-DWQ
Wetlands Unit
Attn: Amanda Mueller
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
DWQ#3-1128
WETIAND,3140' GROUP
Np V 14 2093
W ATEh? QU4Crty SEC,
r/0N
The attached pre-construction notification (PCN) reflects a third submittal requesting impacts to
`Waters of the US' for the proposed Meadow Oaks Subdivision near Greensboro, NC. The initial
PCN was submitted September 5, 2003. The attached PCN addresses questions raised by the NC
DWQ from earlier submittals. The applicant, Keystone Group, requests the use of Nationwide
Permit 14 for impacts to `Waters' related to road construction. The subject property is located
east of Rehobeth Church Road approximately 1.3 miles south of Interstate 85. The site is shown
on the attached USGS Topo Quad vicinity map. Surface waters on the property flow to Ryan
Creek.
Site plans for the proposed development include construction of 74 single-family homes and 5
acres dedicated for construction of multi-family dwellings. At this time plans for the multi-
family site have not been completed. The project engineer is aware that level spreaders will be
conditioned to the construction of the multi-family area if final plans result in impervious
percents greater than 30.
Total impacts to jurisdictional features involve 145 linear feet of channel and 0.1 acres of
wetlands. Proposed impacts W-1, W-2, and S-1 occur via pipe placement, rip rap dissipater and
fill slopes associated with road construction. The proposed road will be maintained by the City of
Greensboro DOT and will connect Rehobeth Church Road and Blazingwood Drive. Spanning of
the stream at impact S-1 would be difficult due to extensive channel sinuosity.
The mitigation plan for the project involves preservation of undisturbed streams and wetlands,
avoidance and minimization of permanent impacts and establishment of mandated 50' City of
Greensboro stream and wetland buffers. The project engineer has incorporated retaining walls
and an arch culvert to avoid impacts to wetlands and perennial streams. A previously proposed
wetland impact, W-3, and perennial stream impact near station 8+00 have been avoided through .
the use of retaining walls. Large-scale maps of the arch culvert and retaining wall at station 8+00
are included with this submittal.
Minimization of impacts can be demonstrated from initial site plans that proposed impacts of 436
If of perennial channel and 15,411 fe of wetlands to final plans with 145 if and 4744 f C,
respectively. Approximately 94% (74,982 sq ft) of the jurisdictional wetlands and 93% (1973
linear feet) of stream channel will not be disturbed upon construction of the project. The majority
Greensboro Office: Hickory Area Office: Raleigh Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive 710 Boston Road 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681 Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
of the streams and wetlands on the property will require 50'no-build buffers required by the City
of Greensboro. Stream and wetland buffers are shown on the revised overall site plan.
In response to questions raised by the USACE for the earlier submittal: the mitigation plan was
outlined in the earlier in which previous impact W-3 has been eliminated by the use of retaining
walls, the culvert design does not require riprap or temporary crossings and the clearing limits for
lots 10 and 11 are enclosed. The project engineer does not know whether any review agency will
require the use of riprap for the proposed arch culvert. A temporary crossing in the location of
the proposed arch culvert will not be necessary according to the developer and their engineer.
In response to questions raised by the NC DWQ in their 9/22 and 10/20 response letters a more
detailed site plan with topo, jurisdictional features, impacted areas, etc has been provided. Large-
scale drawings of the impact areas are included with the PCN. A typical cross-section view of the
proposed arch culvert is enclosed for review. A revised plan view of the arch culvert is also
enclosed. Please note that no column ever existed in the middle of the culvert. Previous wetland
impact W-3 has been avoided via retaining walls. Wetland impacts W-4, 5 and 6 from an earlier
site plan were never requested by the applicant but shown initially to S&EC. At our
recommendation these along with stream impacts will not occur. The questionable hatch area on
a previous drawing mentioned in the 9/22/03 DWQ response letter is not wetland. The project
engineer states the road low-point has designed to coincide near the stream location to minimize
fill while providing the most direct route to proposed outlets. The project engineer's
computations for use of the standard riprap outfall are enclosed with this notification.
Attached please find: 1) A completed Pre-construction Notification 2) signed Agent
Authorization Form, 3) USGS topo quad vicinity map, 4) Guilford County Soil Survey Map, 5)
Construction Plans, 6) Cross section view of proposed arch culvert, 7) Clearing Limits for Lots
10 and 11, 8) Engineer's RipRap Calculations, 9) Earlier Site Plans and 10) Wetland Data Forms.
A 401 processing fee of $200 was provided in an earlier PCN submittal.
Sincerely,
Wendell Overby
NC Licensed Soil Scientist
NC Registered Forester
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?.
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Keystone Group, Inc. Attn: Scott Wallace)
Mailing Address: 5710-K 203 High Point Road
Greensboro NC 27407
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Wendell Overby
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing Address: 236 LePhillip Ct.
Concord NC 28025
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: woverb @sandec.com
Page 5 of 12
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Meadow Oaks
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN ):ACL6-342-672N-10.ACL6-689N3&45
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: Greensboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Meadow Oaks
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I85/40 in Greensboro take exit
122C-Rehobeth Church Road approximately 1.3 miles Site on E. side of Rehobeth Ch. Rd
See attached vicinity mgp.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 36000'10.8"N, 79°48' 50.7"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 28.72
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Ryan Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mVs/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Abandon tobacco farm and forested areas.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:Road
construction and site preparation for construction of subdivision. Bulldozers, loaders, and
backhoes will be used for site work/clearing.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction of Meadow Oaks Subdivision
(76 lots proposed). Construction of roads will result in impacts to `Waters'. Meadow Oaks
Drive will connect Rehobeth Church Road to Blazingwood Drive. Proposed roads will
provide access for the subdivision.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Unknown
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 7 of 12
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Two vegetated wetland areas and 1
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100 year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
W-1 Fill .075 No 0 Headwater
W-2 Fill .03 No 0 Headwater

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://vA"v.fema.ag .
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.83 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.1 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
S-1 Pipe 145 UT to Ryan Creek 3 Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.2ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.lopozone.com,
www.mgpguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 145
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Page 8 of 12
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts mciude, but are not nmttea to: nn, excavanon, ureuging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A . Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Applicant proposes 55' low arch span of one perennial stream to avoid impacts. Crossing will be
perpendicular. Meadow Oaks Rd has been re-aligned to avoid impacts. Retain walls will be
installed to avoid stream impacts west of W-1 and former W-3 impact. S-1 cannot be spanned
due to channel sinuosity. Initial site plan called for 4361f of perennial ch impact and 15,411 sf of
wetland impact
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
Page 9 of 12
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htt]p://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Majority of remaining jurisdictional streams and wetlands on site are subject to City of
Greensboro 50' no-build buffers Buffered areas will require recordation by the City.
Applicants have avoided and minimized impacts to `Waters'. Applicants will pay for arch
culvert and use of retaining walls to avoid impacts Roads will be maintained by City of
Greensboro and not NC DOT Significant amounts of open space proposed for the project
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify)?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers. act Zone* (s uare feet) Multiplier Mitig t n

1 3 N/A
2 1.5 N/A
Total 1 -1
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Page 11 of 12
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or. 0260.
XI.
XH.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Engineer estimates 25% impervious for project Temporary sediment traps will be constructed
along with following local sediment and erosion control measures.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary sewer lines exist on the property Wastewater will be discharged to the sanitary sewer.
XHL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Ageno Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
' Q • E Atolmental 'Consultants, PA
i z n;p Court, W4 c • Cam. North Uvi. zsozs t?+? traces Fu (?04} nasao;
? . .,,?smd5cca+n
A? kUTHMZAUON FW .. .
All Blanks T Filled In The Curren own9
1C?s roIJ65- 67F-C C.
N=%
;7,0_,-.2. 03
Address:
ProfectNamejDescriptiorv PFr ?r3E7rr CHWcK
Date: ?'1 a - 0 3
The DepartrncWt'Of the Araty
US. Army Corps of rm&eers, Wnmmgban District
P.O. Box 1880
w;?mkigtor? NC 2MM
Atn Id T
I l:iald Office:
Ke: Wetlands Related Consulang and Pe=tting
-rc Wham It May C.orurertt:
L the a=erct 192iEx o . Imthy designate and authariz.e Scdl ' 4 ; Caitsultarlts. PA W
%ct in my behalf as my ag nt in the process g of permit applications, to far *OL upoz1:T*eA
supplemental atbr=tion in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The ?y Of
F66?o Zoos
This sodfication s iperaedes say previous cozr+esponde= concerning the agent for Otis project.
NOnCE-. This iuthorirat m foieRabir4 dad professional comtesp-m- as-aiir b vaii &V :fat .
VVtr arnt of CL* to eater the property whoa ai =Ompaaied by S&RC staff. Yeut}ioul iill-6&EC
tC UM O a aftt trieet Wg prior to v g the site.
- L
s?ro?sc C-,??P• ? bVr
W-Sco{{ WeLtk&ct
Pri7.lt Property Ownces Flame
c W J011h 17wrzrey
NCDENR -- TWO
2321 Crabtree' Boulevard
iAeigh, NC 27604
»?t.ue?6o:a?aoe
ct_ i
?aeesboro OHSct: tricum Area OM
381 Y-S Uwndetc Dd- 710 Roston Road 11010 lta A.idBe Read
Gceensbom NC 27655 Tkylotsvillt. NC 28681 lt&leigt, NC 21614
Phone; ;3361 540-823A Phone: (E28) 635.5920 none (919) SO.5900
2V ILf Vf,v VvuIII I, Ivvr\ I I-I I.r%nvLI 1\4 /A - 3n LLI INVIVIL "I% .?.?
(Joins sheet 2
IrB r
tv,
MuB
x 4- Mu6 - t} ox }p, '? i ;? t •i,. \"h .,u?
k? is /? •`
c ? -
-Aa
lamp- -
.c Y
Ir
".-i•t p, tl f V ?a4'?Y'hly 4'. a?' T f ?I -IT.- ._ ! ? ..' t ?{?,..
EuF
• . , a < V 1 rt. , ./fir" ? t ? ? ?,4?1?4 ,?
yy ? ? f
_.t.;{Y' I4, ..'i.t •Y ?? , c .:its.
,: ErtC`p
.: of +dr Yy , t Ch
JYW 1 'S 'IG. lc"L v7` ,a?5, y?r `r ',46?y ,? i.ws I 1 _ ' ?y"?i ,z ?'Ay Mt36 x _a, -r• ,r'?"'
i t
i
?r
? u .ate ,
`?
3 M@B ,????? r ? ,j,,:I? r? ? '? ? r E •dr v . • ?y - i s y
"?' t?` r ?, *y? 1NU '?? e, y "? .e.- ACM" C..m„a. 1k °?. .(?.
a,
`?`,: } EuB v: '1I`r} e t a, +r +? ?• '. 'C2 MuB? , .
,n _ -'` iF:_ a ?['+??t'- r "1 s'• >wir x ,?' svx -- EnB
Sf T"IF +YS t 1 r.??t$/'?ZiF i.1.1?
En , En B '? « a
EnGr? . n t "'
vl I ? t?l 1. _ i4 N't ? 1?
.
I'? a1 I h??, .?, Ic?c EnB
s
,
II
Ery ?°?++e B2 '' 4 a,
c F y
Mh
' En6 W x `,S ,?, a EnB;v ?• ? - ? r?` y? r "? n
Eo62 ; 4 c y j F h to `'
n6
z
-- -- Joins shee
/" ? :?. ? ?, .?-G , { lei ! ;• ! li ?_J/ ? / ? , ?; ;:?? ?`? 1?? +
- IN
l/??°. ??
\ 49 01 dBJ t , Z
W T1102 •5C997I --- 3 .Lb.IL,lO N (dB of dW
\ .ecv¢ j M-4
. \ 9HL9•LLE9YN '$f dYH 7fY1 ! r.. ® O " ] w . 4
"YAW #
cwvmm •*2 °„ , I
\ \ ----- ,? - -
------ Qr O J -??
\ ] 09-98
n \ \ 9E -U.9-c*e-q-1w :m dt" XYl I ]
O 1
a" COYNO91 1,L magarki
- ------------- \ 4NHMGR 7037N1!°ff X Q
_' - - - - - - - - - -
rw ]
?? F O I
\ <??? -? ? II 1 ] it
"zrj
\ /? S Q 1 j] ]j 4
d ? w ta_
{? d In
9!? Al
F '?3'. j' ] j] +' z d
LE, a
I o 1,. .? y\ n f' j ]' we z
o
- ] I
If,
I
m
s; ? I ] II I +
1
I
i / p?.{d• '/ ;° ? ii I ?1'Il ] ] Sri,!! ? ?,
i f ? r, ? i l, I I r j' I
I
1 ,
??_s? ] li\x J? Itl \? I ?_?\ J `?-v"?? [xu, ?? ???? ] I ] ] ] ] lrjfr ]1 % !
aI ;J
r
Meadow Oaks
Rehobeth Church Road, Greensboro, NC
Existing Wetlands Impacted
`Number Impacted Area, Sq. Ft.
W-1
W-2 3270
1474
Total
Existing Streams Impacted
Number Impacted Length, L.F.
S-1 145
Total = 145
'"?"""
E T G WETL D5 TO BE -,
MPAGTE B ROAD C Og5TRU( LION
wri I I
3270 S.F. 1
_?
Vli ?

EXISTINCG STREAM TO
REMAIN UNDISTURBED
808
810--_
PROP. 12 x 6 BOTTOM-
- LEA LVERT
1
00 NIT G (TYP., BOTH 51 E5)
C-(bob ?

I
STREAM /
? I
DETAIL,-- BOTTOML _ GULVt =RT ROAD GR0551 .\? I /

s\
006-- - --)
0 0 \\?
? o v
zz ?
X w
i
I \ \ \ /
-Ilz
?t
I ° J

m
Qz
t
t
I

0
CC)

V
Q
z?
M
/ \I
I
CL/
CENTERLINE STREAM
(OTHER SIDE 51MILAR)
GONGRETE
UND15TURBED
ARCH/SPAN CULVERT FOOTING DETAIL
SCALE: 31S" = 1'-0'
REV. 10/28/03
V-DET
v?
,
CA
z
CD r-- 9:

cV
b
-
00
NP
? o
c?
c
a -?

s
Z LIN
H
f-1
0
o
z
a
N I r -- C rj
p )i . P N
N ?° O m

53 p p o p - - cn
W
d Q a

0
p
u
'
`
<
a m
cn
0/ ` " o Q

p
ut p
? O
`/} °
°? L?
d

00
p

c C-)

? o

7

\J3 00
° 1 M
D
O
? p v z
• ? 0 n. -P ?
- D
r
O G r
a c G 0 m c
m M
0
23,
z n ?
V' o o ° a o '? o o +i c 'v z 'O

69 to 08
?
V Z C
`
sp Ir °° \jj 00 c/\ -? °a 00 n D

U
l
F
r
s m
O

t `?' a't ? ? ?l3
c

11
C
m
r
?
o

(v
N? ?,
N CXJ.
:
P
._.
_
.:.
.. . .

a
CA)
o O
?v d Z ?
o r
? a z
C/)
o ? O
n
L
t:o
A Fb
o ?
0
?.
m
--t
r
O
C7
a
0
z
7
0 03 -0 -a

m O 0-

m m

z z
r- O
>
I I m
n
Z
iF-
G
0
A D =
i -I m.
m m m
1
0
O
n
I?

v

?J r
N o
J CD c
c -
E7. It
- q7\ N
00 n i -- --
"d'?n v - - _-- _-
V? ?_ -
O ? :.. t... a9a. I
E7
-W-
9-8T-3

.? v; DTs I t+; ?-.
J i
1
I

= -- r --4 m
-
_ , •'' 4 D Vf

-n
m
0
0

:....
r 14 M
}
_
__. _ _ i... O ?... It, ry rr -i

.y ID O rr
-
o ti rl-
ci c?
--I

•
0?
-t- 3 trI ? (D A rJ

O
Ln

o
t
n

? b
=
I I d O
i
_

-7 co
I I I ' }
?1 O? r N w A
a M
V+ Median Stone Diameter, d50, in feet
t?
1
?Q O V??
6T algrl

L ? ? r?

_
t
C
n p r
p
0 n
0
C" ` ! y o C O° J ono
h
, z
C
O O
n
l9 0 _ O o _ cn

Ca d ? m

9 a P P 9 0
C*) m

07 c

rr
m
n
c
t
z

G O

r C
.
Oo :; K. i? t` ?`; ?^ tom ?? ?+ iJr1 •f - m

N
?s -ts- cc -n

C
f C
- cn
o C

F U

C/)
T
y m
II
rn 10
r w

m

m
A

C')
p
c
1" t'1
0
O
n
m
' mm
M .
' Z
A
o
Io
C)
C
m
n
--I
O
C7
n
--t
0
Z
W
o O
o
N a ? d
a ? CA
X to
N O N
J
v,
n 0 ?.
"o Cn
4? )V
O
C) C3 -u -u
m O 0-
m m n
m z z
O K
m
C
0 p (n
-ii -yi m
m m m
`V N
w o
I-
Table 20
C
°C

`%

C
_
\1 _

•1-..
_- .. ? ? 1 ?- , i . bap. ? 1 ? t ? ?• •G
' I I i i ? - _ •i - - 1r
71
tn CL
(U 4 w
o ?c s ?w - ° l/
;N
I- n i It ., v I -
00
Lo 3:
LAJ
-, m r Y
0 o a .,. .+ - o -
v ¢ v" o „7
LL. It
.?_.. C > n . . . .
c ¢ a o.) m cn
F-18-7

? w.w ? ? i . s ? r ?• rr ? r r i
aaa3 vi 'OSp •zaaQwvTG avozs ueTpow
f'1 N .•?
LIt=A
-A ftLi e t ?H PACC rs.
57 Avot bjk*j4ne?
Meadow Oaks
Rehobeth Church Road, Greensboro, NC
July 25, 2003
Existing Wetlands Impacted
Number Impacted Area, Sq. Ft.
W-1 5744
W-2 1474
W-3 2254
W-4 5300
W-5 300
W-6 339
Total = 15411
Existing Streams Impacted
Number Impacted Length, L.F.
S-1
S-2
S-3 131
145
160
Total = ( 436
Wetland Delineation Performed By Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone] [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: I4'C c?Y3 e 7H CJgaAet0 xy Date: 017/.Y
Applicant/Owner: ,f!?YS7aaa°? /xhvle County: 6WI-~
Investigator: 0,10"K v /c A-4 rrus State: 1414
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: M6fowlt7ig W/1
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ?No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? -Yes A No Plot ID: euc ?i. b
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. tla)ui 4woft 9.
2. UltNc?S 1"6CItIll-A T Pr7CW 10.
3. ,L'a. AO-,,rn ),;+c 11.
4. WPINV5 eWh4Z011'V1'*--4 floe 12.
5. Lwjv1cex4 Jf9-Pe;v ,c.4 I*C- 13.
6. 4 bus rr?v.? s?• r• se rfG??3 F4-G 14.
7. Jvafu"s E?Fus?s ??/Lx4 J5vtc w 15.
8.2vI54 AAawZaS f1Eiz,6 cv 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are O BL, FACW,or FAC
8,11
(excluding FAC- :
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
-Other TSaturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
X No Recorded Data Available -
-Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
A Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) 'K Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Free Water in Pit: j,
(in.) -Local Soil Survey Data
x FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 236 LePhillip CL, Suite C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone] [phone]
Project/Site: RCNu6F1,q Cliur,"f Plot ID: °E emo
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: 1LWJ?'4y
(Series and Phase): ?co?Na9 n ker Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): 1,11V U6W1 0V#z?VWJr Confirm Mapped Type? Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches Hori on (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-11 lort 51; 5?t
L
2t /0YX -4 C
,?
Lea
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol -Concretions
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime T Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X _Reducing Conditions X Listed on National Hydric Soils List
)Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes _No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes _No
Remarks:
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Yes No

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone] [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: cRageye Date:
Applicant/Owner: XIAVIAye 6W le County: 4
Investigator. /11 "0W . ?? State: r?C
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. / V11 1#11Ihsr 190 /W-V 9.
2. rcvvp.9 'J%i rt- /-Xt 10.
3. 11,eio ®cwap 7oG /ridmtA Tits' )53G 11.
4. ®06-Y571C1Y & t ?nvr?? cy?:,?[ 3 NG r? 12.
5. a-,VL-2cus' 47154 9'rLa2a P-Tc"" 13.
6. A60r- rxv4rt.? -Z c r7fr; 14.
7. JVAh'Re-nc/j 11W1-1 'Ar4 -mi-v e FKv r 15.
8.04, y,4 7°"'e7v-rvSP ?'? Flfe?/ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are O BL, FACW,or FAC ,?
(excluding FAC-):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-,Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs Inundated
-Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches

NNo Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
/
1 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: Itr
A (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test

Depth to Saturated Soil: A
(in
) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
.
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: IMY066%,.t /W Plot ID:
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: 4_i6LG
(Series and Phase): 1 5.U04 Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): 0471H 111?71?1 C-" Confirm Mapped Type? Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Hori on (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
O -S /aY/T S4 SL
_
_'2- 2,sy sf./ sL
fz-aaf f?Ye f%8 C
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? _Yes _No
Wetland Hydrology Present? _Yes x No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
_Yes )C No
Remarks:
? r
O ^C
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Keystone Group, Inc.
Attn: Scott Wallace
5710-K 203 High Point Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
Michael F. Easley, Gov
William G. Ross Jr., Secre
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resour
Alan Klimek, P.E., Directo
Division of Water Quali
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
October 20, 2003
DWQ # 03-1128
Guilford County
Subject Property: Meadow Oak subdivision Greensboro, NC
Dear Mr. Wallace:
On September 9, 2003 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)` was notified by receipt of your application
and October 10, 2003 receipt of more information regarding your plan to fill wetlands or waters for the
purpose of constructing a road crossing in Guilford County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb
these areas. Please provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in
your reply. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to
determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
1. Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the
site plan. Please indicate the proposed disposition of S1 & S3 (131 & 160 feet of impact
respecting) from the original impact map dated 7/25/03.
2. Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan. Please indicate plans for
W4 (5,300 square feet), W6 (339 square feet) and W5 (300 square feet) from original impact
map.
3. Please provide details for the stormwater management practices as required by GC 3404
condition # 6 for Nutrient Sensitive Waters.
4. Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
5. It is not clear that there will be no stream impacts as station 8+00. Please revise plans or account
for the impacts.
6. The proposed bottomless culvert crossing appears to show that actual impa;,ts to the stream will
occur. Please revise plans to show that there will be no impacts or account for the impacts.
Please telephone Todd St. John at 919-733-9584 if you have any questions or would require copies of
our rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (bttp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
or j VT October 20, 2003
Page 2
received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by fax at [phone] within three (3) weeks we
will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
? ICU
'. n R. Dorney
1 Water Quality C ation Program
JRD/bs
cc: Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Wendell Overby, S&EC, 236 LePhillip Court, Suite C; Concord, NC 28025
s®il & Environmental
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C • Concord, North Carolina 28025
www.SandEC.com
October 8, 2003
S&EC #5-1218W0
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Todd Tugwell
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Action ID #200321277
OCT 1 0 2003
Dear Mr. Tugwell and Ms. Mueller:
WATER QUAL17 Y SECTION
The attached pre-construction notification is a modification to an earlier submittal dated
September 5, 2003. We are resubmitting an application based on requests by the USACE and NC
DWQ for more information regarding the proposed development. The purpose of this submittal
is to request the use of Nationwide Permit 14 for the proposed Meadow Oaks Subdivision in
Greensboro, NC. The subject property is located east of Rehobeth Church Road approximately
1.3 miles south of Interstate 85. The site is shown on the attached USGS Topo Quad vicinity
map. Surface waters on the property flow to Ryan Creek.
The applicant proposes to impact 145 linear feet of channel for construction of Meadow Oaks
Road. The proposed road will be maintained by the City of Greensboro DOT and will connect
Rehobeth Church Road and Blazingwood Drive. Proposed impacts occur via pipe placement, rip
rap dissipater and fill slopes associated with road construction. Revised impact totals for the
project are: 0.1 acres of vegetated wetland and 145 linear feet of channel (impact S-1). Spanning
of the stream at impact S-1 would be difficult due to extensive channel sinuosity.
The mitigation plan for the development involves preservation of remaining streams and
wetlands, avoidance and minimization of permanent impacts and establishment of mandated 50'
City of Greensboro stream and wetland buffers. The project engineer will incorporate retaining
walls and an arch culvert to avoid impacts to wetlands and perennial streams. A previously
proposed wetland impact, W-3, has been avoided along with perennial stream impacts through
incorporation of retaining walls. Minimization of impacts can be demonstrated from initial site
plans with proposed impacts of 43 61f of perennial channel and 15,411 ft2 of wetlands to 145 if
and 4744 ft2, respectively. Approximately 94% (74,982 sq ft) of the jurisdictional wetlands and
93% (1973 linear feet) of stream channel will not be disturbed by the development. The majority
of the streams and wetlands on the property will require 50'no-build buffers required by the City
of Greensboro. A map of the buffers is attached in this PCN.
In response to questions raised by the USACE for the earlier submittal: the mitigation plan was
outlined in the earlier paragraph, previous impact W-3 has been eliminated by the use of retaining
walls, the culvert design does not require riprap or temporary crossings and the clearing limits for
lots 10 and 11 are enclosed. The project engineer does not know whether any review agency will
require the use of riprap for the proposed arch culvert. A temporary crossing in the location of
the proposed arch culvert will not be necessary according to the developer.
NC DENR-DWQ
Wetlands Unit
Attn: Amanda Mueller
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Sui 250
Raleigh, NC 27604 MLANDS / 401 GROUP
DWQ#3-1128
Consultants, A
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hickorv Area Office:
710 Boston Road
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Raleigh Office:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]
In response to questions raised by the NC DWQ for the earlier submittal: details for the arch
culvert are enclosed with this submittal, impact W-3 has been avoided, the questionable hatch
area on the drawing is not a wetland, and the project engineer states the road low-point has
designed to coincide near the stream location to minimize fill while providing the most direct
route to proposed outlets. The project engineer's computations for use of the standard riprap
outfall are enclosed with this notification.
Attached please find: 1) A completed Pre-construction Notification 2) signed Agent
Authorization Form, 3) USGS topo quad vicinity map, 4) Guilford County Soil Survey Map, 5)
Construction Plans, 6) City of Greensboro Riparian Buffer Map, 7) Cross section view of
proposed arch culvert, 8) Engineer's RipRap Calculations, 9) Earlier Site Plans and 10) Wetland
Data Forms.
Sincerely,
A6ft4ff
Wendell Overby
NC Licensed Soil Scientist
NC Registered Forester
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or 'N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Keystone Group. Inc. Attn: Scott Wallace)
Mailing Address: 5710-K 203 High Point Road
Greensboro NC 27407
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Wendell Overby
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing Address: 236 LePhillip Ct.
Concord NC 28025
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:_ [phone]
E-mail Address:_ woverbynasandec.com
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Meadow Oaks
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):ACL6-342-672N-10,ACL6-689N3&45
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: Greensboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Meadow Oaks
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I85/40 in Greensboro take exit
122C-Rehobeth Church Road approximately 1.3 miles. Site on E. side of Rehobeth Ch. Rd
See attached vicinity map.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 36"00'10.8'N, 79°48' 50.7"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 28.72
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Ryan Creek
8. River Basin: C Ve Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Abandon tobacco farm and forested areas.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:Road
construction and site preparation for construction of subdivision. Bulldozers, loaders, and
backhoes will be used for site work/clearing.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction of Meadow Oaks Subdivision
(76 lots proposed). Construction of roads will result in impacts to `Waters'. Meadow Oaks
Drive will connect Rehobeth Church Road to Blazing-wood Drive. Proposed roads will
provide access for the subdivision.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Unknown
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 7 of 12
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Two vegetated wetland areas and 1
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
W-1 Fill .075 No 0 Headwater
W-2 Fill .03 No 0 Headwater

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at bnp:/Iwww.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.83 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.1 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
S-1 Pipe 145 UT to Ryan Creek 3 Perennial

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www,usas.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 145
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U. S.) below:
Page 8 of 12
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

i i i i i
* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NIA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Applicant proposes 55' lone arch span of one perennial stream to avoid impacts. Crossing will be
perpendicular. Meadow Oaks Rd has been re-aligned to avoid impacts. Retaining walls will be
installed to avoid stream impacts west of W-1 and former W-3 impact. S-1 cannot be spanned
due to channel sinuosity. Initial site plan called for 436 if of perennial ch impact and 15,411 sf of
wetland impact.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
Page 9 of 12
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmp,ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Maj jority of remaining- jurisdictional streams and wetlands on site are subject to City of
Greensboro 50' no-build buffers. Buffered areas will require recordation by the City.
Applicants have avoided and minimized impacts to `Waters'. Applicants will pay for arch
culvert and use of retaining walls to avoid impacts. Roads will be maintained by City of
Greensboro and not NC DOT. Significant amounts of open space proposed for the project.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.ua/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 10 of 12
IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify)?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* hnpact Multiplier Required feet) Mitigation
1 3 N/A
2 1.5 N/A
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Page 11 of 12
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Engineer estimates 25% impervious for project. Temporary sediment traps will be constructed
along with following local sediment and erosion control measures.
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary sewer lines exist on the property. Wastewater will be discharged to the sanitary sewer.
XM. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agen&:t Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
Consul us .
Soil & Environmental
!ZO 9404
430 t.cAiitlt Casa Suva C 9 Or40 1. NQ, `u ago= no Ras (?) M440 ? ? v%)
? wwN.SsIIt4iC ewn
kcENT AUTHORIZATION >=C3RM
Blanks To ]?S Med In B The Curren own
.
Naatei X 6-les ra,J?" r2o v IN C
sq.o ,?. ?e 3 Nrg ?, ?? Ram , CRr sRorr? ,J C- Zy qc 7
Address:

Project Name/Description, EF"0130-24 22224
gate:-1a-v3
The Departx,=t*of the Army
US. A=y Corps of Engineers, WilMtOM District
P.O. Box IM
Wi'lmlr, gtor , NC 2841}2
Attm- Tgdd Tttgwe?1
l:ield Office:
,Re: We&zI& Related Consuiting and Peravtdng
To Whom It May C.oroem'
L the Current p!2= ow=, hereby- desiigrate and authorize Soil Cxritaultastls, PA to
act in my behalf as, my agunt in the processing of permit applications, to famish upctsrxegciegt'
suppkmental hdo=lion in support of applications; etc. from this day forward. the day dl!
F66V-0A<A-%. Zoos
Tlw md6 ation mpersedw any previous correspailde= corticm*% the agent for flt3s Ptolect,.
NanCE: This iii'thori?t-M. fox naliiTity and professional cctutcs?r ie?sa64 is Valiid:v#t?y=poi .
gnvernsncnt Officials to. eater the prdp!atp *hett accompanied by 8&EC staff. Yostsh6&iiU-S&EC
to arratto a gift meeting PrWr to visitutg the site.
WISCO+t W4t,oLcC - Fe";
Print Pmpetty Ownees Ka.=
o~ Mr: john DoMey
NCDENR-- DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
FAeigh, NC 27644

Q p9sbom Offke:
3817.1~ UWAdaic WTz
Cieeasbato. NC 27455
Phoscl: 1,33613404234
Nickorv Area 0
710 Boston toad
hylocdvtlk. NC 28681
pfmc: (EZE) 6)5.5820
t 1010Ra? badge lG?ad
Roldgt, NC 27614
P'Soatc (414) E46•S4cq
OMS

Meadow Oaks
Rehobeth Church Road, Greensboro, NC
Existing Wetlands Impacted
Number Impacted Area, Sq. Ft.
W-1
W-2 3270
1474
Total
Existing Streams Impacted
Number Impacted Length, L.F.
S-1 145
Total = 145
-_,.
\`_
V
?? r \
?- ?--' -
O?
D O

w ?

SaL.

J
1 0
-.-A
U7
n-
W
W
W.
Q
rr,
Q
n
CK
C1
Q
m
(/)
W
W
CD
II
O
U
?.v
ERLINE STREAM
ER SIDE SIMILAR)
CONCRETE
UNDISTURBED
ARCH SPAN CULVERT FOOTING DETAIL
SCALE: 3/8" = l'-0"

I
D
zi.-I
LL.
O
d
Lli 1
W
W IW-
Q
U) o 0

O
F-
z
S2
W
0
w
O
Z Z,
f- I- O
w L U
O O W
lL CL m U
o
a.a cn ?
H ? Z r
U5 8
L/]
1
Cl? E/) W
'Q a o
I
P•.
A ?„ Q N
?W3
o
R; w Q a
O_
F-
0
J
c--l
0
F---
•d
Q
0
W
F-
a
0
v

J
tr
? J
W
II
a
?
_

t1
C/j

? Q
J
a
-SL
Cn '? La
r1li
t

1 C-5 v?
L1.
it cd 00 - f-,

= ad
- ? KY cn ADO <} cJ ?°
LU
LA

Z D ? , ?. ° O 0. O D D O

:
C7 ? 1
U
LU O
.?.?
~ ~ .?

z -cc

w
o

aS
?
¢ ? Q D?

0 L?i_ -
Lu U Q
DO
ov pl
Or1 V,
?O
v
?D
v o ,p 10
O
0

o
D
? I/^\
r
1?
fi J
Oq
C13
LU
=
F- 1 Q
.01
1

c/3 0 0 p 0 Pf

N
'
i N O
~v N \v
?j \j
of o N T Q ?.

q
Table 19 d3
,aa3 uz ,OSp •aazaumTc auo:?S uQtpaW
on
-45
- - _ f- - _ _ - ice' 3
13
C_ A
41
r+ O N
.1 N7
U w d w
,a rj
cv v s y s= -? _? _- -__
N a _ - -- ----- :. - o y
t- o v a c0
(-j 41 N
L'i
O _ O ?'^ r-' t- •.. °, - - i i . i-? 'fit i ' ti 06
JI,
F-18-6 3
O M
i
lJ
N
w w w
S
N 0

3

w
Z Z
W W ? Y
O
a O
d w
U
co
O
W O U i
H Z M
N
U
0 V)
110
to w w
d
A
o
A V] ¢ N
r??o
'z Q a
Z
O
Q
v
o_
v
w
O
e
°.
O
H
Z
C?
W
0
Fw-
Q
D
CIO
Y

Q

w
m
w

c- CA cf` V
J
w?
Iv
`
_
O _I
w

c
w r
2- -
a cn

7 Cl3
S f y
V

Q
cv Cl?
00

UO

"C?

In

R? _
- a C-,) ON c?tj - O (1 1/' - cu cal
W p0 OQ

J

V ?
o Q 1 , O
U
w m
o

z

z .
()
`?
,
71

O tt:
°? 4 6

F4- o
0 • J1- ?
? lir
?
-mot
- f
!3 }
?
C/D
U

O O O O r N
Q

0 0 VA
f= ?- v
Q
C-')
CD
ki

CD
t?
i 1
?,?
µ -
ti
Z

f
m
0
w
O
O
U
Table 20

t
OS
?aa3 UT
p ,zzaaWVTQ auOIS UVTpaW

I'T

Fi
.

_ - - - - - __ - - r __ - - - 9 -
I I I l .I V
7- 7
tny? C,
_ 1.- -. -- -- -- - ---
N N-
to n a o o--- - j ----- __ 3
X
c 3 -O. •p .. ?__- - - - -- - - -
4J :7,
n o w A >r o =
y 0 0 R7 tU 4 "t .} t
1-- n I It - ._.. t ... 00
LAJ :4j
_ t\
J :p . •fa O •? : cc
C) C)
LL-
O 4 .r O 2I yJ. I ?_7
12) ell
C? sS ?? G. 7 RS 1 "d h y Gil t •L
F-18-7
w

GD
Meadow Oaks
Rehobeth Church Road, Greensboro, NC
July 25, 2003
Existing Wetlands Impacted
Number Impacted Area, Sq. Ft.
W-1 5744
W-2 1474
W-3 2254
W-4 5300
W-5 300
W-6 339
Total = 15411
Existing Streams Impacted
Number Impacted Length, L.F.
S-1
S-2
S-3 131
145
160
Total = 436
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone] [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: /:!! rVo e7r/ CRS' xe Date: 9/7A5
Applicant/Owner: 45"7rsale' AWAVII County: 46:01-159W
Investigator: 0,417"y /? GerNS State: Ale-
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X -Yes No Community ID: /7Q?rrzit
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ?No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? -Yes A No Plot ID: e ?? D
If needed, ex lain on reverse.) I
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.liowrJ4n S CAF ?/I ??G2r -/- 9.
2. Lf OWS' A-76cfe4-4 Mein 10.
3. th'54 2 41,3jC-rn fi+c 11.
4- eVp,,4vs ?/t/ ti.?f 9 ?2c f?`G 12.
5. P,1w14-&.04 J,,W,-w t CA V, -49- mac. 13.
6. Lt 6?s rr?c? . 9? r?s? !rAll vs$ ,il-G 14.
7. JatJ"-S Fvs s 14G-n-4 r-'tc- +^/ 15.
8. ,2v.4YS Avcl- r; N?izl3 co 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are O BL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC-):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
-Other KSaturated in upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
)C No Recorded Data Available -
-Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
,K Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: / (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves

®~ ?/ -Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) T FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone] [phone]
Project/Site: RQ1v,5 9ef CA'ur"W Plot ID: &lg? 7c,f7-o
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): J?U e-80 D i Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): yy tt?11c -ra 0ht?VWr Confirm Mapped Type? Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches Hori on (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0*1 ?k. 5d,
fU?i s ? a"L

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol -Concretions
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sutfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
x Aquic moisture Regime X_Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
'X Reducing Conditions X Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X_Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
L_
I
Wt 1 LANUS Ut I tKMI
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes No
X Yes No
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Remarks:
'6vs71 ntC- ?u ?-x Lf v? J/j
.)( , Yes No
OF We- -r'-1WA2j'.
XYes No
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone] [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Ae'q'9' oiag 'yy Date:. °917! -0-y'
Applicant/Owner: A-ySAVtr e-"w County: e--4114/540
Investigator. 1711el-IN . & S State: ,?c-

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
_
1. 11111411& V1 liy: / 71 -AF40 fizo 9.
2. e6lrsv; PUVO/I ?, e M-c U 10.
3. ?NrvF1G?/Ni' -rowl./pt7e.4 T? 1696
" 11.
4. jvOL-Ys7icH,,, &A0J'71 c -0C-S f1G?Q 0'
Ac- 12.
5. Qu??rcvs 4215A 7ticrtx JW,v 13.
6. ?? Avda-14- ?a a r? 14.
7. Jvevr oe-;IivS 116m.-I A -.?- r F4cfl 15.
8. copy/' 7 mmLav?v.> F,$ G4/ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are O BL, FACW,or FAC 3,7
(excluding FAG-):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
-Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches

No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
k
k Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: Ar
Ar
(in.) Water-Stained Leaves
/
' Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: /? (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: ? A (in
) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
.
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: AeHOlb&ZAt Of 0941-1 R® Plot ID: fJ/r?,9ry
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): , fOrl Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): W-71 N GIi i?fezG Confirm Mapped Type? X Yes - No
Profile Description.
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Hor 'Won (Munsell Mpist)
s? (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
©-S /d y
s 5L
S-j2 y
7.5/
S'L
!z- 20f 6 Jo ye -' 8 C
Hydric Soil Indicators:
istosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Condit ions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? _Yes _No
Wetland Hydrology Present? _Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? _Yes X No
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
_Yes )C No
Remarks:
©? VWq AT ??QG
E
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
September 22, 2003
DWQ # 03-1128
Guilford County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Keystone Group, Inc.
Attn: Scott Wallace
5710-K 203 High Point Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
Subject Property: Meadow Oak subdivision Greensboro, NC
Dear Mr. Wallace:
On September 9, 2003 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your application regarding your plan
to fill wetlands or waters for the purpose of constructing a road crossing in Guilford County. Approval from DWQ is
required to disturb these areas. Please provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in
your reply. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100' feet) so we can begin to determine your
projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500.
1. Please provide details for the arch culvert including a plan view that shows the exact location of the stream
banks and culvert footing and a typical cross section slowing, the minimum distance form each footer to each
stream bank.
2. Please discuss impact minimization and/or avoidance for wetland impact W-3. Provide information showing
why this impact is necessary.
3. A hatched area (possibly wetland) is depicted in the roadway (2+00) on the blow-up map (1"=40') showing
impacts to wetland w-3. Please provide information concerning whether this is a wetland area, and if so, whit is
the area of the impacted site?
4. Provide information showing that run-off discharged directly into wetlands adjacent to impacts W1 and W-2/S-
1 will be non-erosive. Discuss why discharge outlets cannot be moved away from the streams so that discharge
could have longer residence time in the wetlands to improve water quality.
Please telephone Amanda Mueller at 919-715-3475 if you have any questions or would require copies of our rules or
procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The
processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by
fax at [phone] within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it
withdrawn.
Sincerely,
JRD/bs
V11_" 11
1 R. r y
Water Quality Ce fic tion Program
cc: Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Wendell Overby, S&EC, 236 LePhillip Court, Suite C, Concord, NC 28025
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748

www.SandEC.com
US Army Corps of Engineers ? 77'7tItr a 5 7 ? N)C-M
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Wd'land 'Gnit
Attn: Todd Tugwell Attn: John Dorney
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604
Dear Mr. Tugwell and Mr. Dorney:
The purpose of this letter is to request the use of Nationwi'de' Permit 14 for the proposed Meadow
Oaks Subdivision in Greensboro, NC. The subject property is located east of Rehobeth Church
Road approximately 1.3 miles south of Interstate 85. The site is shown on the attached USGS
Topo Quad vicinity map. Surface waters on the property flow to Ryan Creek.
The applicant proposes to impact linear feet of channel for construction of Meadow Oaks Road.
Upon construction the road will connect Rehobeth Church Road and Blazingwood Drive. The
City of Greensboro DOT will maintain the proposed roads. Impacts will occur via pipe
placement, rip rap dissipater and fill slopes associated with road construction. Other proposed
impacts will total 0.16 acres of vegetated wetland associated with road construction.
The project engineer will incorporate a retaining wall and the use of an arched culvert
(bottomless) span to avoid impacts to perennial streams. Spanning of the stream at impact S-1
would be difficult due to extensive channel sinuosity. According to the project engineer road
alignment for Meadow Oaks Road near Rehobeth Church Road was limited due to a NC DOT
controlled-access line (no alternative). From S&EC's initial involvement with the project
proposed impacts to perennial streams have lessened from 436 if to 145 if and wetland impacts
from 15,411 W to 6998 W. Undisturbed streams and wetlands are subject to the City of
Greensboro buffers that will be recorded on the final plan. The final site plan incorporates a
significant amount of open space.
Attached please find: 1) A completed Preconstruction Notification 2) signed Agent Authorization
Form, 3) USGS topo quad vicinity map, 4) Guilford County Soil Survey map, 5) Site Plans 6)
Wetland data forms 7) A check for $200 to cover 401 fees and 8) Earlier Site Plans.
Sincerely,
Wendell Overby
NC Licensed Soil ientist
NC Registered Forester
Environmental
Consultants,
Phone: [phone] • Fax: (704)
ou
y u ? ).-'a'
RON
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hickorv Area Office:
710 Boston Road
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Raleigh Office:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]
September 5, 2003
SEP ° 9 2003 S&EC #5-1218W0
Office Use Only Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for finther'details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Keystone Group Inc. (Attn: Scott Wallace)
Mailing Address: 5710-K 203 High Point Road
Greensboro NC 27407
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Wendell Overby
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing Address: 236 LePhi& Ct
Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: woverby@sandec com
Fax Number: [phone]
Page 5 of 12
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Meadow Oaks
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):ACL6-342-672N-10.ACL6-689N3&45
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: Greensboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Meadow Oaks
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I85/40 in Greensboro take exit
122C-Rehobeth Church Road approximately 1.3 miles. Site on E. side of Rehobeth Ch. Rd
See attached vicinity map.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 36°00' 10.8"N 79°48' 50.7"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 28.72
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Ryan Creek
8. River Basin: Cage Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's, seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Abandon tobacco farm and forested areas.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:Road
construction and site preparation for construction of subdivision. Bulldozers, loaders, and
backhoes will be used for site work/clearing.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction of Meadow Oaks Subdivision
(76 lots proposed). Construction of roads will result in impacts to `Waters'. Meadow Oaks
Drive will connect Rehobeth Church Road to Blazingwood Drive. Proposed roads will
provide access for the subdivision.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 7 of 12
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Three vegetated wetland areas and 1
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100 year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
W-1 Fill .075 No 0 Headwater
W-2 Fill .03 No 0 Headwater
W-3 Fill .05 No 0 Headwater

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized cleating, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.83 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.16 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
S-1 Pipe 145 UT to Ryan Creek 3 Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
* * Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.ggov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.maQauest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 145
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Annlicant nromoses 55'. long arch span of one verennial stream to avoid impacts. Crossing will be
perpendicular. Road alignment resulting- in W-3 impact due to NCDOT controlled-access line
(no alternatives). Meadow Oaks Rd has been re-aligned to avoid impacts. Retaining wall will be
installed to avoid stream impacts west of W-l. S-1 cannot be spanned due to channel sinuosity.
Initial site plan called for 436 if of perennial ch impact and 15,411 sf of wetland impact.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strtngide.htnil.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Remaining jurisdictional streams and wetlands on site are subject to City of Greensboro
buffers. Buffered areas will require recordation by the City. Mplicants have avoided and
minimized impacts to `Waters'. Applicants will pay for arched culvert for perennial stream
crossing. Roads will be maintained by City of Greensboro and not NC DOT. Significant
amounts of open space proposed for the project.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/)yM/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify)?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (square act feet) Multiplier Required
1 3 N/A
2 1.5 N/A
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of. 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration ! Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XL
XH.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Engineer estimates 25% impervious for project. TgmporM sediment traps will be constructed
along with following; local sediment and erosion control measures.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary sewer lines exist on the property. Wastewater will be discharged to the sanitary sewer.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Sign r Date
(Agent's signature is valid only iuthorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
• v , o rental CO.MultanU, Phi. Cowt. Suite c cam. r rte. zsozs • M) ?10 w • Fm c od) r1 mi
2e s,c?t? .,,.,v.5sa?c.?+
AGEM. k iORIZATION FORM ..
Filled In B The Curren an OWM
Be-
All Blanks Tv
?,.
Name: JC e-7-'s ro tJ65- C RC o r C
S?,a-?.. ?o•? ?-,y?, R?,:?¢ Ram, ??t?:sRo?? ,??. z??v7.
Address:
33? -36 Z, 7-
PYtos7e:
Project Name[Descdp6on:. " fAeO'3ETrr
Project
Date:
The Departirmt'of the Army
US. Army Corp of Bn&eors, Wi' Mtrxt
P.O. Box IM
WBmiigtar? NC 28402
Atn Todd T
I:iQld office: R-4 ,
Re: Wedar4s Related Consulting acid Petavtting
To Whom it may concem,
I, the current M=t owner, hesebv des Cate and auftriae Soil 6r Eird tuiient "Cvitsultturts, 'A to
act in my behalf as my agent in the prods g of permit applsoatl=, to Nthish upon'regaegt
me doi'
nwlemental frdb=tI= in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The
Fig uo asp-..? z.o ? 3 .
IW3 no6kadon s seder any previous cnrrespondenee cox coring the agent for this project,.
go evtntesp ceasofLy. is vaii<1"b=fDt" .
AIO'ITCE: This aftthoriali?i, fox h??biTity znd professional
vrrament of€'icials to eater the pragertp whet: wi Ompanied by S &K staff. You tiould cell S&EC
to amip a she weeting prier to visilsng the site. S
C-1 P-0 0?.? b11-
W'ScAt
Pemt Property Ownees Name Property Ownef s sw%alure
c Mr. john limey cG Mr. WvAell CKerby
NCDENR -- DWO So91 k EmArwmx421 Caasu ante, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Rafe gh, NC 27604 blaaka selaaEi?EoYO+d
a afimgm oft e: 111142a Area or_res: luulphottr?
3817.B Uwndalc Dri s 710 Haft h Goad l 1010 Ram d84 Read
Goeensbom NC 27455 I?Ylocsvllle. NC 28681 1tQelgts, NC 27614
Phoda: ,3361 503234 Pipe (a'28) 635.5820 E'ftonc {919) 646.5900
'OuI '4083tleW 16M (o)34D!Aa'J
S6ZL-9 Iasi OOOZ slenba youi y :aleoS
sewoH euojsA9>j :uo4deO £OOZQUz :9Iea
M .Z09 RV °6LO N X'OL .00 P9£0 :uo4e00- OHOBSN332iJ :aweN
..Al
M o9
r ?I f % r
r E
1, °'? _ ' ? ,. ??? •; (t.umn??.?r
?JJ , r ` \, ?'`, r 'v'iii. y:u} `? L1-.h C•t f-•;%~ _ ,
X17? J _ o c g
-77
/_
296 . rl ! - ?-
. ' ? { iMQL!_ (1 . - ;"-r J r.. 6t f } ?,_. ? r--?--????J o?r?gnuu? S 1 [ [• «• ?..- , .
??/ , -? "pp - r'" - ???? _ A - [ __..- l -: 7 jam.- c " ' • r -
,. i4.-.r?????.-..r, ? F??? .?r p ?? p_ol?•" Q ha ? <-r??r 4, ?'7? ? ? _ ?•? I. I_
?
I IC a
1 i r
r'? ?? ,^ ??,? i ????e„?"?,? !?,(. Y S? ? i ? ?i J?r?4 J ^k...„_ 1 •...` Sig , ?._..??_
I ! r ?J$$1 t
I-j
:"?7 n l 1 ! ? C? .? (..r t...lt/• ,Y ??'w c. ?? ti?,/? ?-,. ??\t ? ??Q58? ? 4???t? ? ?
N
64,
- lt?r `? , ??C - s ? IE l` .. / ?. i ?? Lwsw '--? w? ` ?`r Dom„ ?p4 ,.r l'. ?' ?? ? 7 1 J
T '+
M _
%
7 ? T
?3 1
i ? 't• ? r•? -M,n' > ? ??" % ? Irk' r' t ? ? (• ?I :' +l1 ? ?? ?? » .
?' iJ..? I V lam.-..-;%? / ??,,,(?.,??' / r,?- •4?.°?5.. 0? t 7
-ri
aays swot)
01 1 8U3 eta 8u3•
..°•? .se ;:,: ,,
u3 i k M ;gU3 fir. a
u kr Y f z *$ 3
t 4
' gu3;' r? ??? i?: ?"^? ,? ? .?., ,? ?, 4'• ? ? `
Q,
,?' .tom Z84 r-
, a
k gu3
, P4
43
? F
?4s 'r gnW M fry (/ x ?' a ' ?a a. gn3
gn3
y;. 'a / ?_ n3? `?"r ? ?t 'c?a".. .a:. ? : s:7`,gnW s ., •t?$ o? k; 3 y3?..
w
?
*B
X'Y"'a n q ,'.r2, r, r ?,?'r? ;T"' s? +?z I$ • ? 4' 1 ..? '?',w rr k,? i?' 3 _
?'fgx 8n3 ?m Sa r` ,?$ z ,r: x. r „ ?, f
Rte.,,-r• ? v?? L ''° ?s v.. 3 F ,?nt4„ ?? r? „a ?. ???»~ „ti`,?r. t '?.
4• g a w l " g'h W "'r s-?:. vnr r T~ ?!; y'.c r ?' }}
R
r ?t
,, ? lea ? ? •.s ?lu"`t'w .? . } ???. ?: /,/ ' ? ,-'r r. ,.gu3 , , c? ;a ?s?s *t e? ? .? ?
• w
n
., 14
{
.3n3
?+va-
pY
'A •• } •,?i3t ?° OC ,.x-_ g13
.n
}? IL Y?y?s - rr I. >. i 4 ns?W d ? .wA? Drev{,
.J^S ?iy '• j . ' f? ?? r' f '3" lr f ?y y t8!''.+1'r@ .
may? , ? .A??,;, ? ,? ? • \, ' si. . ? ,te+. ,J ?r & ?azsy.?}`y ,?d a ,
a
.a
1T?
10
t 2 f i% lA r°?s rzbR+? }a1
.' ' `?a
gnA
° gnW 4.
gnW ?7s. , ' y r r
Ile"
;aays suaof) gel
Meadow Oaks
Rehobeth Church Road, Greensboro, NC
August 08, 2003
Existing Wetlands Impacted
Number Impacted Area, Sq. Ft.
W-1
W-2
W-3 3270
1474
2254
Total = 6998
Existing Streams Impacted
Number Impacted Length, L.F.
S-1 145
Total = 145

v -
fl
C> '"gee RFH?
C eET
CID
s
4k
?o
Ap
7
0 a?
9s co
C a?
co
r o ?
a
0 0
O ?qKS
4
o
0
o
Q c ?
V ?
O
O k ?
O
O
O p
O
0 0 ? ?
O is
O _ Wall Z
k ? L
4 N
/ k
d
® ®Y. ?1E011
KAY LEMM CYtAYr T/C
D81881/, ?PG 710
® TAX YAP FU t r-6-342-M- M
® O UM?t t1 ?
D
O O DONALD W UV=
d YARY A.
O ® TAX YAP A1•T7JCS-742-071-16
bYe o7 (NO TO OP) N 0121'47' E- IJW-I 1166.25' TOTAL p 23S.W
m (OP 70 OP)
C
Z
0
??
'?'
_ ??

?-
___.?
i\
1 \\
,''??
? ? `.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone] [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: A4' Voa.6 9H CROftew /lam Date: 0/7/0
Applicant/Owner: klx'YSZ?de 1'XV41.e County: 6Wy w
Investigator. l ilnf_15 y y Rla-11 1'rAis State: M4
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: i7E?avw?rT?ii ivt
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? -Yes No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.1'0v;44mB4-4 s`1y114C1A4&,q _-Miar 9.
2.Wofv5 /l?r1?i?tl?t.?A leV' fife V/ 10.
3.AeW Xu.00_z"vn X+c 11.
4. PnVVS c'/ti'?xovrRr t ?ic?s ??t? 12.
5. Lw;vrcea 4 j4f'k'w r c A" V11-497 0?9c 13.
6.4?r?s?.??,r Sr ,tiS ?t.L?l3 fit" 14.
7. Jvv? ds E ?rws` 5 'r;JCP1 15.
8.,2v13'j Alz6wds N izb t?s 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC-):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs X Inundated
-Other 'ZSaturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
x No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
.C Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
K Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: C7- % (in.) 'c Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test

®°° ?'? Other (Explain in Remarks)
-
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone] [phone]
I Project/Site: RE-JYU6 -Jti C"ulf-C1' Plot ID: luc`7c4;,Jo
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): (V 040 Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): V /. 6t7')-ytC, i D+?i9?7??lf,'/ Confirm Mapped Type? Y- Yes- No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches Hon on (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
?°lYl 0/i ?&- 5,1,
5 /2' "L
Q_ft ,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol -Concretions
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions 'x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
)_(Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y Yes _No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes _No
Remarks:
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
'Yes No
.Aw4-7e_ ztvo /.v OF
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
11010 Raven Ridge Road 236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone] [phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: d3?z's' C%tvYle Date: a171,05'
Applicant/Owner: County: Diu/4 /--o x 0
Investigator: IN16MY ,?+ S State: /'re
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? x Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? _Yes J? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes x No Plot ID: (/J?/r?
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. V1J 1'y1 f7J 19W /*Xv 9.
2. 10.
3. L1?e?vt?G/>A'a? 7?rad/?A Tyt2?' ERG 11.
4. ?OyY57KN b n ,? /zus7?Grns pG? NC?? ?' 12.
5. Qyc7zeas 13.
6. Acorn ,??.?. 5-- 14.
7. ,1v,us,pGnvj Ur,i.vilt -, r?v? 15.
8.6;lpy4 7new-re,3 A ?g gfea 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are O BL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAG):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
-Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
-Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
No Recorded Data Available Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
/ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: ?/? (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) FAC-Neutral Test

Depth to Saturated Soil:
+v (in
) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
.
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
236 LePhillip Ct., Suite C
Concord, North Carolina 28025
[phone]
Project/Site: 1 HO1316 7}I 4yoleeN Rn Plot ID: 01 -tea
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: &*f,6
(Series and Phase): /JUG Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup r H Utamer r Confirm Mapped Type? Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Hori
in (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
T
O--S lbtiR 51q SL
z .2, s y s?? .??
_
Hydric Soil Indicators:
istosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_GIeyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? _Yes _No
Weiland Hydrology Present? _Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
_Yes X No
Remarks:
Meadow Oaks
Rehobeth Church Road, Greensboro, NC
July 25, 2003
Existing Wetlands Impacted
Number Impacted Area, Sq. Ft.
W-1 5744
W-2 1474
W-3 2254
W-4 5300
W-5 300
W-6 339
Total = 15411
Existing Streams Impacted
Number Impacted Length, L.F.
S-1
S-2
S-3 131
145
160
Total = 436
DWQ# Z
Plan DetaiVocomplete
Date Who Reviewed: _ 75-eW
? Please provide a location map, for the project. /? f31 L1/o0
7 ? 5? ?nd?ca+? Pro?aSer.? diseasi?iorl v f?- ef-^
[? fJ Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on th site plan. S ?'1?
Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan. `i ,r?a? t'n't Pac} ltil4?
j ?1a.5/a3
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. ?` oL.0.S& L {(1 Q ` (Q?a-per
) ??a?s ?o? w? (5,3o?s??
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. csr 5F oM orr3;?q) ,.,,A r
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan. " "^?
Lc ?1??3aas?)
Fh Please locate all isolated Q9av64igti" wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC , - /
r s V"
0 Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC O40 . n / t O h 6 A.
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormw r can be discharged through the buffer.
X14 deeW rJIF?&lG4r1 ! GlS 1l'
Other
6ation ?e. '??? c9El The licfee was insu ficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation
? of compensatory - mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H.0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
cutwi cro",?Y
1K fl(,?J qdwx IPA Will 0&_UA,,
1. SY/if /iP ICU?r?- U?MOAD /""1/ "I/ L010 r?Lt? or 'fCCa 16'11L L
DWQ# 63 112g
Plan Detail Incomplete
Date
? Please provide a location map for the project.
Who Reviewed:
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or of the pro?lose impacts already bgen cT
ducted. n 0 l?n v'r
Pi^o?tr.? a,,fro
??w5Z c
l c? ????
Avoi ante and/or Minimization Not Provided e L / kx f/A5 40 C'Ce??,? ? [•
Kai & ?o It2 0/e K?/
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. lease eliminate the or provide additional /
information as to why it is necessary for this project. G
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to they
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
Q?
C-1
R
_?
3
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.

Pease. ? - - - ?/? ago-?.oCaM.cQ ? u?e?:?„zo/ v?,r yacf ti?- 3,
A axaz, (possibly wetland) ?a¢OVL g "- 6 ,7s yo.
i/npa,4s -to wetland W-3. Nems, e s i ?a
4Aao,,- ao-uj Vur, &Ac?""Salue- 4==?6 4A
97 P" Wqlcrn? JOZA " IV&417?
GA' Discuss wl?y di'scha?e
aut?efs Cc?nnof 6e /»ov+ away From ?/ie wrearns so f?iQf Ac% e
27
c u C,o J.O( ? l y n /ZO.o ca(oat cst t.?mv riy, tO ` `.r / ° .
Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
ftem 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. .
Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
11 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Keystone Group, Inc.
5710-K 203 High Point Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
DWQ# 03-1128 - Guilford
a. Article Number
?ranter ft M servige fat
orm 811; August
L Signature
Date of Deliver
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address.below: ? No
3. Service Type
0 Certified Mail ? Express Mail
? Registered q Return Receipt for Merchandis
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
nazurn new1pL
2588
;102595.0'
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print. your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box'
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401. Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
. ?117i1?ff{+{?It-if'fJtJtti?{?.{?1Jt?f?ilFf?ti?l?il?[?it'1.liti 11?1'