20030567 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030508

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 24, 2004
Ms. Sally Browning
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734

MAR . 2 2004
'A' Eli UUAI. iTY SECTION
Subject: Additional Information Request #2
Upgrade Silvermine Take-Out #3
DWQ Project Number 03-0567
Status: On-Hold
Swain County
Dear Ms. Browning:
The Asheville Regional Office of the N.C. Division of Water Quality is in receipt of your response dated
January 20, 2003. This office is unable to process your application as submitted. The following must be
addressed prior to any further review of this project:
• The project, as described in the application does not agree with the project described during the onsite
meeting on July 30, 2003. The project description must be update to reflect what is actually going to be
constructed. This must include acreages of stream channel filled buy this project.
• As this project will impact greater than 3 00 feet of stream channel, mitigation must be performed as part
of this project. The mitigation must meet the requirements stated in
http://www.saw.usace.gmy.mil/wetlands/1\4itigation/stream mitigation.html
• As this project proposes to impact greater than 300 feet of stream, an individual permit maybe required.
As the final impacts are planned, contact with this office and with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers is
appropriate to determine if an individual permit is required.
• Bank erosion was listed as one of the reasons for this project, yet the stream banks were fairly stable
during the site visit. You must re-evaluate the purposes of this project and modify your application.
• In the section of the application regarding Impact Justification, you propose some sediment and erosion
control measures to protect the adjacent aquatic resources. There is no discussion in regards to
temporary diversions, or channel dewatering. You must include a discussion of all temporary impacts
so that they may be included in any fixture Water Quality Certification.
• Under the section titled Stormwater, there is no discussion in regards to outlet structures, nor discharge
points for collected stormwater. A discussion of stormwater management must be included as part of
the application.

59 Woodfin Place Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Additional Information Request #2
February 24, 2004
Page 2.
• The resource agency comments from the State Clearing House review appear to not be current. The
Division of Water Quality comments are dated February 14, 1994. The Wildlife Resources
Commission comments are dated November 18, 1991. The Department of Cultural Resources
comments are Dated January 24, 1997. As none of these comments were given during the past five (5)
years, current comments must be requested and submitted, in order to address "current" agency
directives and missions.
As this application is not complete enough for review, this project will remain of hold. All requested
information must be submitted within 30 calendar days of receipt of this document. Should the requested
information not be received within the above mentioned 30 calendar days, this project will be returned as
incomplete.
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at kevin.barnettra,ncmail.net or at
828-251-6205.
Sincerely,
Kevin H. Barnett
Environmental Chemist
cc: David Baker, US Army Corps of Engineers
Cyndi Karoli, DWQ 401 Unit
Denise Moldenhauer, US F&WS
David McHenry, NC WRC
__Y
59 Woodfin Place Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] Fax[phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
? wA Michael F. Easley, Governor
O
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
F
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
--
a c Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
June 8, 2004
DWQ Project # 030567
Swain County
Page 1 of 3
Ms. Sally Browning
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC, 28734
Subject Property: Upgrade Silvermine Take-out #3
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Ms. Browning:

You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
replace an existing seawall and to construct an additional wall and ramp along 224 linear feet of
the Nantahala River and Silvermine Creek for the purpose of upgrading the Silvermine Take-out
#3 in Swain County, as described within your revised application dated March 23, 2004 and
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Central Office on June 7, 2004. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number(s) 3376, 3402 and 3399 (GC3376, 3402 and 3399). The
Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 3, 18 and 13 when issued by the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with
any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and local regulations. Also,
this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in- your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 211.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands)
11-4-r.?• c.,...o.... u. 4_Q'77_G09_C7A0
Applicant:
Page 2 of 3
Date:
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementatiodmust comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
- wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored
within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the
project.
4. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Applicant:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in
Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville Regional Office at 828-296-
4500.
AWKlcbk
Enclosures: GC 3402, 3399, 3376
Certificate of Completion
cc: USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
DWQ. Asheville Regional Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sincerely,
I I/
X14
Al ?W. Klimek, P.E.
Filename: 030567
06-07-`04 14:56 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043
TO:
FAX #:
T-593 P01l16 U-645
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
2090 U.S. HIGHWAY 70
SWANNANOA, NORTH CAROLINA 28778
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

AV
NCDENR
FROM: =?1 At 6
DATE: fi) 71b I
# OF PACES INCLUDING THIS COVER: A-13t-wLL" f
MESSAGE: If questions. please call 8281296-4500 „ .

JUN-7-2084 MON 13:36 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 1
.06-07-'04 14:56 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043 T-593 P02115 U-645
United States Forest Wayah Ranger District 90 Sloan Road
Department of Service Franklin, NC 281734
Agriculture Phone: [phone]
File Code: 2350
. Date: March 23, 2004
Kevin Barnett
NCDWQ
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
Dear Kevin,
We appreciate you and Forest Westall visiting our Silvermine Take-out project site. There is our
revised permit and drawings with the changes that we discussed on site.
Sincerely,
i
MICHAEL L. 'Ul ILKINS
District Ranger
CIO. David Baker, USAGE
David McHenry, NCWRC
Caring for the L"d and Serving People
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:36 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS
Printed on Recyded Paper
P. 2
.06-07-'04 14:56 FROCK-NCPENR ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043
T-593 P03/16 L1-645
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action 1D No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
© Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Revised
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWp #3 - 96 feet -
replacement of existing structure, NW? # 18 - 33 feet - fill in washed out areas (7.32 cubic
muds). The remaining 95 feet of wall and :ramp will be above the high water mark and will
be NWP # 13 - bank stabilization.
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4, If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCW RP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section V111 and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: 0
11. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: USDA Forest Service Contact: Sally Browning
Mailing Address:Wayah Ranger District, 90 Sloan Road, Franklin, NC
28734
Telephone Number: 828/524-6441 Fax Number: 828/369-6592
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2, Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant,)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation: _
Mailing Address:
'telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 10
JUN-7-2084 MON 13:36 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 3
.06-07-'04 14;56 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043
III. Project Information
T-593 P04/16 U-645
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USCS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Upgrade Silvermine Take-out #3 - Revised permit 3/23/2004. The
original permit was completed in MU of 2003.
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A National Forest Lands
4. Location
County: Swain Nearest Town: Wesser - Community
Subdivision, name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Bryson City travel south on
US 19. The project lies between the old bridge crossing the Nantahala River at Wesser and
Silvermine Creek (just downstream from NOC's store).
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35 19.89, 83 35.56
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):.24 acres
7. Nearest body of water (streamlriver/sound/ocean/lake): Nantahala River - 700' before it
flows into Fontana Lake
8. River Basin: Little Tennessee River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The proposed area is currently being used as a river take-out.
The area had a very detailed site survey completed to make the design work for the take-out
as accurate as possible. Over 50,000 people get out of the river on this spot each year. The
take-out has a gravel surface that is eroding along with the river bank. A large portion of the
take-out is located on old road fill material. The river bank closest to Silvennine Creek is
Page 2 of 10
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:37 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 4
.06-07-'04 14:56 FROM-NCDENE ASHEVILLE BO 8282997043
IV.
T-593 P05/16 U-645
shored up with. 8" x 8" treated timbers for 96 feet. We would replace the existing timbers
with a concrete wall. There will be two sections of fill. The first fill will be for
approximately 21 X 3 feet (4.66 cubic yards). This will be from the corner of the existing
steps for 21 feet on the downstream side of the existing steps. An additional fill area will be
located in the middle of the project for 12 X 3 feet (2.66 cubic yards). This area is below an
unauthorized set of steps that boaters have placed on the side of the bank. The Forest Service
removes the steps and boaters put them back in a different place causing more bank erosion.
The total cubic yards of fill will be 7.32 yards. The new wall and ramp will extend for 128
feet. This includes the 33 feet of fill area and 95 feet of wall placed above the normal high
water mark. This area is below an unauthorized set of steps that boaters have placed on the
side of the bank.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The take-
out will be upgraded for public use and safety by constructing a wall above the high water
mark with a set of concrete steps on the upstream side and a ramp in the,middle of the
project. The wall and ramp will begin at the water's edge and taper to 14 feet above the
water. The new wall and ramp will extend for an additional 128 feet. A track hoe will be
used to dig out some large boulders and old waste material. This material will be placed
away from any live streams. Silt fence will be used. Silt fence will also be installed at the
top of the existing bank to filter and slow water velocity from the drainage off US 19.
Portable concrete barriers and sandbags covered with plastic will be used below the project
area to keep eater away from the construction site and to prevent any concrete from entering
the river. The contract will require the monitoring of all erosion control practices after any
storm event. The contract will also require that any damage to the erosion control measures
will be repaired immediately. The concrete pouring will be completed when the Nantahala
River is turned off at the powerhouse. At the Suggestion of the NCDWQ the surface water
leaving the take-out will be channeled through rock layers underneath tree planters before it
enters the Nantahala River. The stream temperature of the Nantahala River is approximately
52-57 degrees year round because the water comes out of the bottom of Nantahala Lake. We
will place large rip-rap or boulders adjacent to the retaining wall downstream of the ramp.
This part of the project was a suggestion from the NCWRC biologist, Dave McHenry, to
improve aquatic habitat in the area of the proposed project.
11.
12. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the work is to provide for better
public safely and use while preventing further bank erosion and sedimentation of the
Nantahala River.
Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action 1D Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.U. project, along with
construction schedules.
Page 3 of 10
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:37 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 5
-06-07-'04 14.57 FROM-NCDENH ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043 T-593 P06,r16 U-645
The original permit was mailed to the USAGE, NC Division of Water Quality, and the NC
Wildlife Resources Commission on May 6 2003. The Division of Water Quality has assigned
the Proiect number 03-0567 The site was reviewed in the field in August of 2003 by Sally
Browning - USFS, Owen Anderson - NCWRC Kevin Barnett - NCDWQ mid David Balker -
USACE. The site was reviewed again on March 17, 2004 by: Forest Westall - NCDWQ
Kevin Barnett - NCDWQ Dave McHM - NCW RC, Mike Wilkins - USFS, Sally Browning -
USFS,
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A This project will complete the take-out upgrade
V1. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VIZ below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. ''Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VTTT below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 4 of 10
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:37 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 6
06-07-'04 14:57 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043
T-593 P07/16 U-645
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The concrete retaining wall and steps
will take the place of an existing timbered wall for 96 feet. A concrete ramp and wall will
be constructed along natural stream bank and road fill material for 128 feet. The existing
take-out that will be improved is located on old road fill material (Udorthent soils). These
Udorthent soils are not classified as wetland or hydric soils,
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-yearFloodpiain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* Gist each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts includes, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For darns, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
* * 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rato Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the 1113MA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at ht1n://www.fema.e61r.
*'* List a wetland type that best describes wetlatid to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
Udoorthent soils dominate the existing take-out. The take-out (old road shoulder) and US 19
were constructed on man made soils (Udorthents). The area adjacent to the river was filled
to construct US 19 many years ago. This space is the only place that the road and take-out
can be between the base of the mountain and the river. The river bank along the 320 foot
section for a few feet is Rosman soil. It is classified as a moderately well drained soil.
Neither soil is classified as a wetland or hydric soil. The N'antahala River flogs into Fontana
Lake approximately 700 feet below the take-out area.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name" Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please Secify)
There should be 202 Nantahala River 25 perennial
No impacts w/ 22 Silvertnine Creek 6 perennial
Proper erosion
Control
measures

e List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain).
Page 5 of 10
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:37 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 7
-06-07-'04 14:57 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043
T-593 P08/16 U-645
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
?w Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps- If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616. or online at
www.usgs gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of UStaS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www:n1aD(1uest.Co1151 etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 224' of stream bank
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impaet* Area of
impact
(acres
Name Wate) Type of W'aterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to; fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Silt fence will be placed below the area where the 320 feet of retaining wall, steps and ramp will be placed. The retaining wall construction
will take place when the Na ntahala power house is not generating water and the water levels in the Nantahala River are low.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream, impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream [l wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond:- Expected pond surface area:
V11. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
We will Droverly place silt fence below the retainine wall construction area. We will place
portable concrete barriers covered with plastic and sandbags below the construction site to
wevent any concrete spillage into the Nantahala River. We will plant trees back in large planters
along the retaining wall. 'W'ater from the project site will be filtered through rock lavers under the
planters before it enters the Nantahala River. The retaining wall construction will take place
Page 6 of 10
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:38 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 8
.06-07-'04 14;57 FROM-NCDENB ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043
T-593 F09/1b U-b4b
when the power house is not ggnerating-water and the water levels are low. The level of Fontana
Lake will also be low at this time. The project is agproximately 700 feet above where the
Nant-&ala River flows into Fontana Lake.
VIII. Mitigation
DW Q - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource fumetions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/newetlands/s=igide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan ,view,
preservation mechanism .(e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A - there will only 128 feet of new cleared bank.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
page 7 of 10
JUN-7-8884 MON 13:38 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 9
• 06-07-'04 14,58 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043
T-593 P10/1b U-b45
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at httn://li2a.enr.state.nc.w/wra/index.htz , if use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ? National Forest lands - federal - Nantahala National Forest. The
funds for the project have been collected by recreation users of the Nantahala Gorge under the
Fee Demonstration Project.
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes N No [] NEPA document completed by USDA. Forest Service
A Cultural resource/archeological inventory was completed for the project as part of the
Nantahala River Corridor Environmental Assessment. No significant sites were found. The
final report was sent to the State of North Carolina for SHPQ approval. It received SHPO
approval. A biological evaluation was completed for the project. This included informal
consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No N N/A The state clearinghouse gave imput to the EA. A final
approval letter is not required on a USDA project. In this case the decision maker was the
district ranger.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable an the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 9of10
JUN-7-2884 MON 13:38 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 13
06-07-'04 14:58 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043
T-593 P11/16 U-645
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify. V
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* ltnpact
(Square feet Multiplier Requited
lv--goon
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; "Lone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge ofZont 1.
X1.
X J1,
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within I SA NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
N/A
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
None now - currently gavel surface washes away due to slope of US 19
24 acres of ISavement - pipes and sloping will control the water. The storm water will be
channeled through gravel la rers underneath the tree planters before it enters the N'antahala River.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
X111. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
X1V. Other Circumstances (Optional):
Page 9 of 10
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:38 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 11
. 06-07-'04 14:58 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043
T-593 F12/16 U-645
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lak=es, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The retaining walls for this project will be mostly completed when the Nantahala River Po?yer
louse is down for maintenance. The Nantahala River flows at a low level during _this time. Any
additional work on the take-out wall will take place during periods of water being turned off.
This proiects lies 700' from where the Nantahala River drops into Fontana Lace. Fontana Lake
12" /?
Applint/Age.' ignature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
JUN-7-2884 MON 13:38 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 12
.176-07-'04 14;58 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043
T-593 P13I16 U-545
&MI& NolEtg
RIYER Cx?)NTRACTOR Iq L ?
CORTROL 5EpIMENT?OM THE GON5TRUGT ON 5 TE.
f,ORTABLE GON M-rE BARRIO USEV FOR WATER I,>IVE1 5ION SHALL. MEET
Tm RLwiR NT5 DF NGDOT 5TANDARD WeGIFIGATION lOgd, 2042
EDITION.
L ARC 5oULi7l;.5 EWOUNTERj?D DURING ORAVINe ORATIONS 514Ai-L l
PLAaw mLON1 WALL. 5M-i TO cAmATE F150 HABITAT.
EXI5TIN& GONGRETE
E30X CULVERT
GRATE TO PRA1N E
CA AkPM12 #1
ni aAMTirQ ik']
U.S. HWY. i Y

r?,es* C1 LJ.5.P.A. FORE5T 5ERVIGE NANTAHALA NATIONAL FOE
ION WAYAH RANGER O I STi
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:39 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 13
qb I^T - REPLACE
EXI5TIN& 5TRUGTuRe
CON6RETE BARRIO 4 5Ai
FOR YJATER VINE-RSIflN PU
. 06-07-'04 14.58 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE BO 8282997043
T-593 P14/16 U-645
IAN T'IA,HALA RIVER
a
128' NEN WmTmZTIom
(33 L_INEA<R FT - FILL)
? A&GRESATE --- -
4 (RAW ONLY) NEYV STORM MAhWQ(..E
4 W Ckip
?o ¢d 40 O ?O O v 6 d d
o D '.
O o J ° C7' O O O.° p0 o pO O • ... ,? D ?' D v D
K1 D.
o b o
WALL 514-4.
I I° O D •?
D I b . a
V D
/ .v ° a.. .
ax.-15" GMP w
f I I ° 5fDEVI44L.K
b
D II
tf
II
NEW A5PHALT I I
RETE MOUNTABLE PAVING ?
\N - '75' L ON& t
II
14
II
1
II
If
II
II
I?
-)I`C•TE PLAN
20'
F'ROJF-GT:
T
11 VFRMINF- TAKE-OUT
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:39 TEL:[phone]
PERMIT ITE PLAN
NAME:DWO-WETLANDS
/ i
P. 14
EX. 5TEf'S
06-07-'04 14;59 FROM-NCDENR ASHEVILLE HO 8282997043
T-593 P15i16 U-545
United States Forest Wayah Ranger District 90 Sloan Road
Department of Service Franklin, NC 281734
Agriculture Pholne: 828-524-6441
File Code: 2100
Date: April 8, 2004
Kevin H. Barnett, Environmental Chemist
NC NENR, Division of Water Quality
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
Dear Kevin:
On April 7, 2004 our design engineer, Lynn Difiore, went out to the Silvermine Take-out area in
order to see if we could design anything to filter out NCDOT's storm water. She looked at both
sides of the road. I regret to say that there is no feasible alternative for the discharge of
NCDOT's storm water. If you have any further questions, please advise,
MICHAEL L. WILK.INS
District Ranger
i? APR 19
, 99
i
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILf.? (3ECi10?VAL OFFIC:;
Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed On RHcyded Pa""' Co
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:39 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 15
JUN-7-2004 MON 13:39 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 16
. P16-07-'04 14;59 FROM-NCDENH ASHEVILLE RO 8282997043 T-593 P16/16 U-645
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Barnett, Kevin
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Eorrest Westall
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Upgrade Silvermine Take-out # 3 County Swain
Project Number 03 0567 County2
Recvd From APP
Received Date 5/8/03
Recvd By Region
Project Type streambank stabilization w/ concrete wall
Region Asheville
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland WetlandWetland Stream Class Acres Feet ME
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. supp. Basin Req. Req. F13 Stream PT O N F- 2-57-(22.5) B TR 40,403. F 320.00 320.00 F -
w
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres " Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y OQ N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 351989 Longitude (ddmmss) -833556
Comments:
This project should be considered additions to 97-0547 and 00-1288.
There is little or no discussion of need on this application.
If you are familiar with the river, this is already being used as a take
out b appears to be questionable as a safe take out. There is no active
erosion but a portion of the bank alono Silvermine Creek and the Nantahala
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Upgrade Silvermine Take-out # 3 County Swain
Project Number 03 0567 Regional Contact: Barnett, Kevin
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
04/20/04 - Issue as requested and detailed in ammended application dated 03/23/04 and received on
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
0? WAT?,p Michael F. Easley, Governor
?
Q
0 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina De
artment
f E
i
d
`
r
= p
o
nv
ronment an
Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P: E. Director
-? Division of Water Quality
Cfl 'C Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 12, 2004
Ms. Sally Browning
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734

Subject: Failure to Respond to Additional Information Letter
Upgrade Silvermine Take-Out #3
DWQ Project Number 03-0567
Status: On-Hold
Swain County
Dear Ms. Browning:
The Asheville Regional Office of the N.C. Division of Water Quality sent to your attention an additional
information letter dated August 27, 2003 requesting additional information in regards to this project. In order
to address back logged projects, we are setting deadlines for responses to our requests. You must provide a
written response, addressing the issues stated in the August 27, 2003 letter, by no later than January 26, 2003
in order for this project to proceed. Should no written response be received by January 26, 2003, this office
will have no recourse other than to return the package as incomplete.
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at kevin.barnettgncmail.net or at
828-251-6205.
Sincerely,
Kevin H. Barnett
Environmental Chemist
cc: David Baker, US Army Corps of Engineers
Cyndi Karoli, DWQ 401 Unit

59 Woodfin Place Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.; Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Fax Tot
Company:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:
Date: l LI a
?a y
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
'-v \") '9), ,V' C ±?t Fax #:
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands

WLODS/401
MAY 2 0
USDA Forest S?e
ALITV
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
To: C' Y/1 //i
vu?gprIGEn
NA-Igp
Land of the Noonday Sun
b Uv ?) lviKo /P_al-
From:
0,3-65(7
Number of-Pages
(Including this sheet) -- 6
.. .. ................................................................................... .... ........:.......... ................ ...... ...............-
Additional Information: Wer zZre. 7//t4e- A?-S
(2/
C4?Nl?'7GL?`' GL
CL) 2
11?211
Contact PPfone: [phone] FAX NumG828) 369-6592
r/nnnq in. All VAY ---
t
VJ/tU/GV VU tV v a<aa

xc?k TX REPORT mx??k
??kskxe?k?e?:k??k?k?&?k?k?kxe?k?xe??k
TRANSMISSION OK
TX/RX NO 1338
CONNECTION TEL [phone]
SUBADDRESS
CONNECTION ID
ST. TIME 05/15 10:47
USAGE T 01'13
PGS. SENT 6
RESULT OK
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
To: C4(hd "
From:
Number of-Pages "
(Including this sheet)
................
..,??..?? ............................ ................. ...,....................... _...... ............................. ...................................... .,,................................. ...... ...........
Additional Information:
Land of the Noonday Sun
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 13, 2003
Swain County
DWQ Project No. 03-0567
CERTIFIED MAIL: Return Receipt Requested
Ms. Sally Browning
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC, 28734
Dear Ms. Browning:
Reference is made to your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification to construct a retaining wall along 320 linear feet of
the Nantahala River in Swain County. In your application, you noted that the State Clearinghouse gave input to the EA. Although an
approval of a FONSI by the State Clearinghouse is not required for US Department of Agriculture projects, correspondence
documenting coordination with the State Clearinghouse will be necessary before we can proceed with review of your application.
Please note that DWQ cannot issue a 401 Certification until the project has received documentation of your coordination with the State
Clearinghouse in accordance with NCAC 15A:01 C .0402. We have been unable to find documentation of this project under the names
of Nantahala River Corridor, Fontana Lake, Upgrade Silvermine Take-out #3, or otherwise in Swain County. If you have
documentation of your coordination with the State Clearinghouse, please provide us a copy of their recommendation. Please be sure
to include the State Clearinghouse Project Number in your correspondence so that we can track this project.
Please note that you have three days from the date of this correspondence to provide a response. If you do not provide a
response within three days, we will assume you no longer wish to pursue this project and will consider the application withdrawn.
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Cyndi Karoly in our Central Office in Raleigh at (919)
733-9721.
Sincerely,
John Dorney
JRD/cbk
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Asheville DWQ Regional Office
Melba McGee
File Copy
Central Files
030567
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
Service
7748
u s.
Customer
1 800 623-
State of North Caijlina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nann B. Guthrie, Regional Manager
Affl"FAAA
AM#
.V-
Asheville Regional Office WATER QUALITY SECTION _ L;-
February 14, 1994
Mr. Michael L. Wilkins, District Ranger
Wayah Ranger District
8 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
Subject: Nantahala River Project
Environmental Assessment
Macon/Swain Counties
Dear Mr. Wilkins:
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Environmental
Assessment of the Nantahala River Project. We have concerns about the
extremely high usage of the Nantahala River and the potential degradation
of water quality which may result.
The Nantahala River is classified as B Trout ORW from its source to
Roaring Fork. From Roaring Fork to Fontana Lake, the classification is B
Trout. Currently, this section is under study by the Water Quality
Section for consideration for reclassification to ORW. This designation
would prevent new point source discharges and require more stringent
stormwater controls on other development. Preliminary results indicate,
however, that the section below the hydroelectric plant may not meet the
minimum requirements of biological diversity for this designation.
Flush toilets pose a greater threat to water quality due to the
potential for excessive water consumption because of overuse or leakage,
leading to failure of subsurface disposal systems. It is recommended
that non-flush or very low volume flush facilities be used in lieu of
conventional flush toilets.
Other concerns include loss of vegetation and canopy beside streams
and the resulting temperature, erosion, and habitat impacts. It is
recognized that the project will result in minimization of many of these
adverse impacts. It is recommended that tree and vegetation removal be
minimized, especially within the stream bank zone. Natural vegetation
should be used to stabilize stream banks.
Concerning sedimentation in the launching pools, it is anticipated
that maintenance will continue to be necessary. Some means of access for
periodic removal should be considered, since it is not feasible to avoid
sediment in quiescent areas without controlling upstream sources.
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
.An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Michael L. Wilkins
February 14, 1994
Page Two
Stormwater from impervious areas should be diverted away from a
direct discharge into the river. Vegetated buffer areas should be used
as much as possible to filter runoff from these areas.
We will be glad to offer specific comments and recommendations as
plans for individual projects are developed. If you have any questions,
you may call me at 704-251-6208.
Sincerely,
Paul R. White, P. E.
Environmental Engineer
copy: Richard Burns
a l
i
trk'? _ 1t[Y ?' t-y '
01 North Carolina Wildlife sources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
November 18, 1991
Mr. Michael L. Wilkins
District Ranger
Wayah Ranger District
U.S. Forest Service
8 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
SUBJECT: Proposed improvements within the Nantahala River Gorge, Swain and
Macon Counties.
Dear Mr. Wilkins:
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has completed its
review of the proposed improvements within the Nantahala Gorge, and a field staff
biologist conducted a site visit on September 20, 1991. These comments are provided in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d.) and the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S.
113A-1 through 113A-10; 1 NCAC 25).
The U.S. Forest Service is proposing improvements within the Nantahala River
Gorge to eliminate safety hazards, eliminate on-going resource damage and to provide
needed and improved facilities for the increased use of the Nantahala River by the general
public. We are pleased that erosion problems near the lower end of the Nantahala River
are being addressed, which will lessen adverse impacts to trout from sedimentation.
The NCWRC has no objection to the project as planned and no further comments
at this time. We request that the draft Environmental Assessment and all supporting
documents be provided to the NCWRC for review and comments. Thank you for the
opportunity to provide input during the early stages of this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please advise.
Sincerely,
6111?_ / 9"?p
Dennis L. Stewart, Manager
Habitat Conservation Program
cc: Ms. Stephanie Goudreau, Mt. Region Habitat Biologist
Mr. Micky Clemmons, District 9 Fisheries Biologist
Mr. Joffrey Brooks, District 9 Wildlife Biologist

y w SATC
1 M
1 C?
x?
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Division of Archives and History
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
January 24, 1997
Paul Schuller, Director
Fire, Forest, and Heritage Resources
National Forests in North Carolina
P.O. Box 2750
Asheville, NC 28802
Re: Nantahala Gorge improvements project, Macon and
Swain Counties, ER 97-8071 - --
Dear Mr. Schuller:
Thank you for your letter of December 20, 1996, transmitting the archaeological
survey report by David Dyson concerning the above project.
During the course of the survey no sites were located within the project area. Mr.
Dyson has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted
in connection with this project. We concur with this recommendation since this
project will not involve significant archaeological resources.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
X6
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw

109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 ???9
t

FILE COPY
Office Use U, Fn,yersion May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1.
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 13
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), cW&AWA01 GROUP
Applicant Information
MAY 0 8 ?0(j3
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: USDA Forest Service Contact: Sally Browning MATER QUALITY sF('.T1 N
Mailing Address:Wayah Ranger District, 90 Sloan Road, Franklin, NC 28734
Telephone Number: 828/524-6441 Fax Number: 828/369-6592
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
5
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Upgrade Silvermine Take-out #3
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A National Forest Lands
4. Location
County: Swain Nearest Town: Wesser - Community
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Bryson City travel south on
US 19. The project lies between the old bridge crossing the Nantahala River at Wesser and
Silvermine Creek (just downstream from NOC's store).
Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35 19.89, 83 35.56
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):.24 acres,
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Nantahala River - 700' before it
flows into Fontana Lake
8. River Basin: Little Tennessee River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The proposed area is currently being used as a river take-out.
Over 50,000 people get oout of the river on this spot each year. The take-out has a gravel
surface that is eroding along with the river bank. A large portion of the take-out is located on
Page 6 of 13
old road fill material. The river bank closest to Silvermine Creek is shored up with 8" x 8"
treated timbers. We would replace the existing timbers with a concrete wall.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The take-
out will be upgraded for public use and safety by constructing a 10-16' wall above the high
water mark with a set of concrete steps on the upstream side and a ramp with steps in the
middle of the project. The wall with steps and ramp will extend for 230 feet. A track how
will be used to dig out some large boulders and old waste material. This material will be
placed away from any live streams .
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the work is to provide for better
public safely and use while preventing further bank erosion and sedimentation of the
Nantahala River.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A This project will complete the take-out upgrade
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The 230' concrete retaining wall will
take the place of a timbered wall and natural stream bank. The existing take-out that will be
improved is located on old road fill material (Udorthent soils)
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htto://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
Udoorthent soils dominate the existing take-out. The take-out (old road shoulder) and US 19
were constructed on man made soils (Udorthents). The area adjacent to the river was filled
to construct US 19 many years ago. This space is the only place that the road and take-out
can be between the base of the mountain and the river. The river bank along the 320 foot
section for a few feet is Rosman soil. It is classified as a moderately well drained soil.
Neither soil is classified as a wetland or hydric soil. The Nantahala River flows into Fontana
Lake approximately 700 feet below the take-out area.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Imp act Perennial or
Intermittent?
( leasespecify)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
Page 8 of 13
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 320' of stream bank
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
y (if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Silt fence will be placed below the area where the 320 feet of retaining wall, steps and ramp will be placed. The retaining wall construction
will take place when the Nantahala power house is not generating water and the water levels in the Nantahala River are low.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
We will nronerly place silt fence below the retaining wall construction area. We will plant trees
back in large planters along the retaining wall. The retaining wall construction will take place
Page 9 of 13
when the power house is not generating water and the water levels are low. The level of Fontana
Lake will also be low at this time. The project is approximately 700 feet above where the
Nantahala River flows into Fontana Lake.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr. state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmp,ide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 10 of 13
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wro/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ? National Forest lands -federal Nantahala National Forest
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ? NEPA document completed by USDA Forest Service
A cultural resource/archeological inventory was completed for the project as part of the
Nantahala River Corridor Environmental Assessment. No significant sites were found. The
final report was sent to the State of North Carolina for SHPO approval. It received SHPO
approval. A biological evaluation was completed for the project. This included informal
consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ® N/A The state clearinghouse gave imput to the EA. A final
approval letter is not required on a USDA project. In this case the decision maker was the
district ranger.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Page 11 of 13
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
XI.
XII.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
N/A
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
None now - currentlv gravel surface washes away due to slope of US 19
24 acres of pavement - pipes and sloping will control the water
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 12 of 13
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The retaining walls for this project will be mostly completed when the Nantahala River Power
House is down for maintenance. The Nantahala River flows at a low level during this time. Any
additional work on the take-out wall will take place during periods of water being turned off.
This projects lies 700' from where the Nantahala River drops into Fontana Lake. Fontana Lake
is drawn down during the period that we plan to do the construction work.
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
Ta{'
Silvermine Take-out L
Take-out #3
s
? 1 I? ?-?? li???1?1? f -? fir; ', ?? ?? ? - ?, ? ?`?`'Y ? ??!_,{?_
j? 1 \
VA,
c i' I, ?? i Pik r

J0C????n x»? ? `? 171 fl
?
? ? ??l iff rl ? ap ''4j. S). ? i? ? t ) ?,? _-i? l - •f (i 1????1
Ip?r
®r, 1 c
Project Location
T?
?',? Z,
rf UU ?,ti ?. / J Ij : A l ?? J f 1 C
?r
p
i
° 'F
er bless Quadrangle
=1 mile
Scale 264"
r
r
v ( J
i ?
??.1 ? 1 )r? a` ? O C?
Welch Ridge p ° ( ?e
SMOK MOUNTAINS 1?
NATIO
?1d?e j aPP Ridgy m ?o
VICINITY MAP w
8? Silvermine Take-out Upgrade
Wayah Ranger District g
Nantaha1 `?-
a National Forest
t Robbinsville 1
3147E - 1
?-C ?-' ? - Z,J \? ?l
Tuskeegee TSALI
??,?/1 Gu ter Cem ?yl _ 1236
f Chestnut , S?? , SowYe i f _ j
i- ??.ogGap ?LreekCe Q?
?? ? Brock ? ? r. -
Rood t?,owii,Ce
p ?? as
U
?..? -,? f ? ? "tom. > tj? ? Co1dS rin s,,,
UN L-__. - Ed. ords Cable Gap rY a p7 a P 9 p
Cabtc?Cem < o ) a', 1 [ Ct -l
(< -* NS 5 ,tlo e P J- ?? Lauada•
Knob
Hidet wn
l j' sowm(n
L i ?j - i le k ns Ce?n, Almond
-t Hill Ch i ' Dovis Cem
I It ?Stecoah ? _J?
'V
Stecoah', ti0 ?. a14 1 ,? / [NoNO Sch
iJ{ ?j<< ?p =ate h ?Bt (` -? i Cho White 0.k So
? yZ
w J r- ?+o
1 0 [,-
eet?'
y,?.
C-4 f t
3 1 otY' ?, jRPVI, uchulla Cem
Cheoah 'Grassy
?2. ( Swim Sal Gap J Ledb-dSrer Ce Hogback Gap
n Sassafras Gap Wes?-
` i
'Holloway ?? Locust ove Ga, AF,vA ?. - Project Location
S S ti\
Cheoa'h, 1r, erush creek
W ROAN,
c 1
en a cem
Bard/'
T+ a. W-esselC -em Mica
> --
//? Knob
Breedlove Cem i Q Tobor
y _ tz l? O r G? Truitt Ce CM
m
1 T
A,
y _ _IO >? p `•
?
?? e°' 1 ? E?IewiYf: _ 1 Gronr ?/^ t ? / I Brush CreekJ
tp o? r ?{ ?` 1) A w' ? ?,? ?- Com C7 ? ,tom 1 f `oA I, ?. .LfT7,?E+ School
?eyt F£RE81 Ei Pin acle
MEMORIAL 7?1? ( % ?7 7.•> Knob
iYCE2 gum
1;Nk0
/CO ?De Hart
Nantahal8 ?r s .. C+ ndACON Bald ?
1?1 y?wessER' ~??Pinnacle
1rKo
^ I Cb
T
.BALD BCe
3
5 11,1p prtrid9c 1tLO__ Morgon Cemi
Bear Tellico 1365
/Creek -NANFA AL"A177V&7-_I Stiles
f / LAUNnNtrF l ?l , r\ r . Tei..• 1 l
•Tulala
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
FOREST SERVICE
a
?Q__
'T
?.ZY
C
NANTAHALA NATIONAL FOREST
NORTH CAROLINA 3
39
Scale 1:126,720 1387 F.
1 X2 o 1 2 3 4 6 Miles
7 r
i 1 14 0 1 2 3 4 6 Kilometers Ike S
- ?y r
Rocky ?71 r Knob ?I,. RID1G
?Id yX f TRtMOr1T? ??rr ?a?? y
r ( W yah? C(1 _ l s y/ M1 l
ap N?N7iA1A°1 1 wine
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Upgrade Silvermine Take-out # 3
Project Number 03 0567
County Swain
County2
Recvd From APP
Received Date 5/8/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type streambank stabilization w/ concrete wall

Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream -Class Acres
Type Type Impact Score Index- Prim. Supp. Basin` Req.
Region Asheville
Stream Impacts (ft.)
Feet - -
Req.
13 Stream 77 O N ? ~7-(22.51 I ° TR 40,403. ?? 320.00 320.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue Q Issue/fond pQ Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 351989 Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
-833556
If you are familiar with the river, this is already being used as a take
out but appears to be questionable as a safe take out. There is no active
erosion but a portion of the bank along Silvermine Creek and the Nantahala
L__ ?:.Y b. _.._ __ _a_L.:1:__t:_.- 11 _..... _i..__... :_ .._.._t_a__I ...711- _. .__.Y____ __?
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
Facility Name Upgrade Silvermine Take-out # 3 County Swain
Project Number 03 0567 Regional Contact: Barnett, Kevin
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
o Division of Water Quality
she,01?00gional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION SFP
ANWQ11 TId
Ms. Sally Browning August 27, 2003 '
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
Subject: Regional Office Comments
Upgrade Silvermine Take-Out #3
DWQ Project Number 03-0567
Swain County
Dear Ms. Browning:
The Division of Water Quality has carefully reviewed the submitted application and determined that, as
submitted, a 401 Water Quality Certification cannot be issued. The Asheville Regional Office believes that
the subject activity would be regulated as a "filling" activity. As such, The Asheville Regional Office feels that
alternatives to this project should be evaluated. The Division offers the following as one such alternative:
Expansion of the existing, upstream, commercial take-out to handle the additional load of paddlers and
to serve the two additional commercial rafting interests. This extension should be of the existing
concrete apron and parking area in the upstream direction. As mitigation for this filling activity, the
Silvermine Take-Out #3 would be removed and the stream bank restored to a natural state.
The Division of Water Quality believes that this would be a more complete solution to the previously submitted
package. Should the U.S. Forest Service be unable, or unwilling, to consider this alternative, then the submitted
package should be rewritten to address the filling activities associated with the previously applied for
Silvermine Take-Out #3, and include mitigation for these impacts.
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-251-6205 or at
kevin. b arnettnncmail. net.
Sincerely,
i
Kevin H. Barnett
Environmental Chemist
Cc: Todd St. John, DENR 401 Unit
Owen Anderson, NC WRC
David Baker, US Army Corps of Engineers

Woodfin Place Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
F 1NATF
Q R Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
7 Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q `C Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
11
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Michael Wilkins
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
Subject:
Dear Mr. Wilkins:
August 12, 2003
Upgrade Silvermine Take-out #3
DWQ Project No. 030567
Swain County
Per our discussion that you referenced in your August 4, 2003 correspondence the information below must still be
provided in regards to your request to harden 320 feet of the bank (and bottom) of the Nantahala River and Silvermine
Creek:
1) The exact impacts to jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands are not clearly delineated on the site plan provided. Please
clearly indicate all impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands on the site plans. It is recommended that full size
plans be submitted that clearly show the normal high water with the project overlay.
2) As long as the site plan described above in item no. 1 does not show any impacts below the normal high water or
encroachment into the river, mitigation will not be required. However, if impacts are proposed to the river itself, then
mitigation may be required. Previously conducted stream restoration or enhancement projects could be considered for
mitigation credit as long as they fulfilled the Division's criteria for stream mitigation credit.
3) The project will result in .24 acres. of impervious area immediately adjacent to the stream. The stormwater
management proposed will only direct stormwater directly into the stream. Stormwater treatment prior to discharge will
be required for the runoff from the new impervious area. As we discussed, bioretention areas (in lieu of the planters)
may prove to be a good treatment option. Please include conceptual stormwater management plans as part of the
submittal for item no. 1 above.
This information is needed by the Division in order for us to decide whether this project is approvable.
Please call Todd St. John at 919-733-9584 if you have any questions. Until this information is received, I will place this
project on hold due to incomplete information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(a)).
i
h R. Dorney
a er Quality Ce ificatio Program
cc: Asheville DWQ Regional Office
Asheville Regional USACE Office
Todd St. John
File
Central Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslncwetlands/
WNArF.Q Michael F. Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
y Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested
Ms, Sally Browning
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
Dear Ms. Browning:
July 2, 2003
Subject: Upgrade Silvermine Take-out #3
DWQ Project No. 030567
Swain County
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal to harden 320 feet of the bank and bottom of the Nantahala
River and Silvermine Creek. After a site review by DWQ's Asheville Regional Office it has been determined that your
application was not complete for the following reasons:
1) Please provide a signed copy of the application.
2) The exact impacts to jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands are not clearly delineated on the site plan provided. Please
clearly indicate all impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands.
3) The proposed impacts will result in a loss of near bank aquatic habitat and the proposed planters are not considered
sufficient to replace this loss. As such, 320 feet of compensatory mitigation is required. A mitigation plan must be
provided to replaced the lost habitat.
4) The project will result in .24 acres of impervious area immediately adjacent to the stream. The stormwater
management proposed will only direct stormwater directly into the stream. Stormwater treatment prior to discharge
shall be required for the runoff from the new impervious area. Bioretention areas (in lieu of the planters) may prove to
be a good treatment option.
This information is needed by the Division in order for us to decide whether this project is approvable.
Please call Todd St. John at 919-733-9584 if you have any questions. Until this information is received, I will place this
project on hold due to incomplete. information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(a)).
Program
cc: Asheville DWQ Regional Office
Asheville Regional USACE Office
Todd St. John
File
Central Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.no.us/ncwetlands/
05/15/2003 11:06 FAX
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franldin, NC 2.8734
To:
lA 001
C, Y/1 "y;' -?? In 4 L
? C7 17t [LANDS I401GROUP
15 2003
AWSWLITY SECTION
From--Ilia
Number o Wages
(Including this sheet)
..................................................................................................................................................................
0
....... ... /
Additional Information: `'-fiO/X, -74& cl? o r, r (?,
.T tv v ou;?- d f' 7 a q).t
cl.?C d r.,c
cowl,oxkr 7?.
A w ate _Z
Contact P one: [phone]
FAX Num r: [phone]
Land of the Noonday Sun
05/15/2003 11:07 FAX wi ooZ

A Michael F. Easley, Governor
L4
Qt William G_ ROSS Jr., Secretary
North Carolina DQpanmerlt of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality

Q ?
May 19, 2003
Swain County
DWQ Project No. 03-0567
CERTIFIED MAIL: Returrt Racft#_Reauested
Ms. Sally Browning
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NO, 28734
Dear Ms. Browning:
Reference is made to your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification to construct a retaining wall along 320 linear feet of
the Nantahala River in Swain County_ In your application, you noted that the State Clearinghouse gave input to the F`cA. Although an
approval of a FONSI by the State Clearinghouse is not required for US Department of Agriculture projects, correspondence
documenting coordination with the State Clearinghouse will be necessary before we can proceed with review of your application.
Please note that DWQ cannot issue a 441 Certification until the project has received documentation of your coordination with the State
Clearinghouse in accordance with NCAC 15A:01 C .0402. We have been unable to find documentation of this project under the names
of Nantahala River Corridor, Fontana Lake, Upgrade Silverrnine Take-out #3, or otherwise in Swain County. If you have
documentation of your coordination with the State Clearinghouse, please provide us a copy of their recommendation. Please be sure
to include the State Clearinghouse Project Number in your correspondence so that we can track this project
Please note that you have three days from the date of this correspondence to provide a response. If you do not provide a
response within three days, we will assume you no longer wish to pursue this project and will consider the application withdrawn.
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Cyndi Karoly in our Central Office In Raleigh at (919)
733-9721.
Sincerely,
John Domey
JRDlcbk
cc- Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field (Office
Asheville DWQ Regional Office
Melba McGee
File Copy
Central Files
030587
---``' 1
X11
N. C_ Division of Water Quality 1$17 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer
Service
1 800 623-
7748
05/15/2003 11:07 FAX
State of North Calulina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nann B. Guthrie, Regional Manager
Asheville Regional Office WATER QUALITY
WJ uu3
i?•
IJr--=?
SECTION
February 14, 1994
Mr. Michael L. Wilkins, District Ranger
Wayah Ranger District
8 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
,'? r -.p ,lei!? FOF.?:...r?._.,-. • + _ _. ?-
SLEET,.,... __- fd..'
4k
Subject; Nantahala River Project
Environmental Assessment
Macon/Swain Counties
Dear Mr. Wilkins:
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Environmental
Assessment of the Nantahala River Project. we have concerns about the
extremely high usage of the Nantahala River and the potential degradation
of water quality which may result.
The Nantahala River is classified as B Trout ORW from its source to
Roaring Fork. From Roaring Fork to Fontana Lake, the classification is B
Trout. Currently, this section is under study by the Water Quality
Section for consideration for reclassification to ORW. This designation
would prevent new point source discharges and require more stringent
stormwa.ter controls on other development. Preliminary results indicate,
however, that the section below the hydkoelectric plant may not meet the
minimum requirements of biological diversity for this designation.-
Flush toilets pose a greater threat to water quality due to the
potential for excessive water consumption because of overuse or leakage,
leading to failure of subsurface disposal systems. It is recommended
that non-flush or vety low yol u?rLe flush. facilities be used in lieu of
conventional flush toilets.
Other concerns include loss of vegetation and canopy beside streams
and the resulting temperature, erosion, and habitat impacts. It is
recognized that the project will result in minimization of many of these
adverse impacts. It is recommended that tree and vegetation removal be
minimized, especially within the stream bank zone, Natural vegetation
should be used to stabilize stream banks.
Concerning sedimentation, in the launching pools, it is anticipated
that maintenance will continue to be necessary. Some means of access for
periodic removal should be considered, since it is not feasible to avoid
sediment in quiescent areas without controlling upstream sources.
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville. N.C. 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60% reeyelad/ 10% post-eonwmer paper
05/15/2003 11:07 FAX
Michael L. Wilkins
February 14, 1994
Page Two
10 004
Stormwater from impervious areas should be diverted away from a
direct discharge into the river. Vegetated buffer areas should be used
as much as possible to filter runoff from these areas,
We will be glad to offer specific comments and recommendations as
plans for individual projects are developed. If you have any questions,
you may call me at 704-251-6208.
Sincerely,
- P-c-L-kc,
Paul R. White, P. E.
Environmental Engineer
copy: Richard Burns
05/15/2003 11:07 FAX
4 005
'-7-"'TTortCar()life sources Commission 9
512 N. Salisbury Street, Meigh, North Carolina 27604-1188,9.19-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
November 18, 1991
Mr. Michael L. Wilkins
District Ranger
Wayah Ranger District
U.S. Forest Service
8 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
SUBJECT: Proposed improvements within the Nantahala River Gorge, Swain and
Macon Counties.
Dear Mr. Wilkins:
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has completed its
review of the proposed improvements within the Nantahala Gorge, and a field staff
biologist conducted a site visit on September 20, 1991. These comments are provided in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d.) and the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S.
113.A,-1 through 113A.-10; 1 NCA.C 25).
The U.S. Forest Service is proposing improvements within, the Nantahala River
Gorge to eliminate safety hazards, ellmmate on-going resource damage and to provide
needed and improved facilities for the increased use of the Nantahala Raver by the general
public. We are pleased that erosion problems mear the lower end of the Nantahala Riven
are being addressed, which will lessen adverse impacts to trout from sedimentation.
The NCWRC has no objection to the project as planned and no further comments
at this time. We request that the draft Environmental Assessment and all supporting
documents be provided to the NCWRC for review and comments. Thank you for the
opportunity to provide input during the early stages of this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please advise.
Sincerely,
Dennis L. Stewart, Manager
Habitat Conservation Program
CC* Ms. Stephanie Goudreau, Mt. Region Habitat Biologist
Mr. Micky Clemmons, District 9 Fisheries tiologist
Mr. Joffrey Brooks, District 9 Wildlife Biologist
05/15/2003 11:07 FAX
t?
y?$rATF„
19006
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Division of Archives and History
13etty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
January 24, 1997
Paul Schuller, Director
Fire, Forest, and Heritage Resources
National Forests in North Carolina
P.O,. Box 2754
Asheville, NC 28802
Re: Nantahala Gorge improvements project, Macon and
Swain Counties, ER 97-8071
Dear Mr. Schuller:
Thank you for your letter of December 20, 1996, transmitting the archaeological
survey report by David Dyson concerning the above project-
During the course of the survey no sites were located within the project area. Mr.
Dyson has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted
in connection with this project. We concur with this recommendation since this
project will not involve significant archaeological resources.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration- if you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Giedhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4753.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27401-2807
uoj?

05/15/2003 10:48 FAX
State of North Caiulina
Department of Environment.
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nann B. Guthrie, Regional Manager
ig 403
_JWK V_
4•i
i, ' j.,.?iVL?.....
Asheville Regional Office WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 14, 1994
Mr. Michael L. Wilkins, District Range'
Wayah Ranger District
BSloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734

!ti a 17
}BEGET
FILE
7
3k
;
Subject: Nantahala River Project
Environmental Assessment
Macon/Swain Counties
Dear Mr. Wilkins:
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Environmental
Assessment of the Nantahala River Project. We have concerns about the
extremely high usage of the Nantahala River and the potential degradation
of water quality which may result.
The Nantahala River is classified as B Trout ORW from its source to
Roaring Fork. From Roaring Fork to Fontana Lake, the classification is B
Trout. Currently, this section is under study by the Water Quality
Section for consideration for reclassification to ORW. This designation
would prevent new point source discharges and require more stringent
stormwater controls on other development. Preliminary results indicate,
however, that the section below the hydroelectric plant may not meet the
minimum requirements of biological diversity for this designation.-
Flush toilets pose a greater threat to water quality due to,the
potential for excessive water consumption because of overuse or leakage,
leading to failure of subsurface disposal systems. It is recommended
that non-flush or vcry low lush facilities be used in lieu of
conventional flush toilets.
Other concerns include loss of vegetation and canopy beside streams
and the resulting temperature, erosion, and habitat impacts. It is
recognized that the project will result in minimization: of many of these
adverse impacts. It is recommended that tree and vegetation removal be
minimized, especially within the stream bank zone. Natural vegetation
should be used to stabilize stream banks.
Concerning sedimentation in the launching pools, it is anticipated
that maintenance will continue to be necessary. Some means of access for
periodic removal should be considered, since it is not feasible to avoid
sediment in quiescent areas without controlling upstream sources.
Interchange Building, 59 WoodAn Pime, Asheville, N.C. 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5096 recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
05/15/2003 10:48 FAX
Michael L. Wilkins
February 14, 1994
Page Two
10004
Stormwater from impervious areas should be diverted away from a
direct discharge into the river. Vegetated buffer areas should be used
as much as possible to filter runoff from these areas.
We will be glad to offer specific comments and recommendations as
plans for individual projects are developed. If you have any questions,
you may call me at 704-251-6208.
Sincerely,
?._X GC.J
Paul R. White, P. E.
Environmental Engineer
copy: Richard Burns
05/15/2003 10:48 FAY
10005
" North Carolina Wikdlife Resources Commission 0
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188,919-733-3391
Cbarles R. FullwoW, Executive Director
November 18, 1991
Mr. Michael L. Wilkins
District Ranger
Wayah Ranger District
U.S. Forrest Service
8 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
SUBJECT: Proposed improvements within the Nantahala River Gorge, Swain, and
Macon Counties.
Dear Mr. Willdus:
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has completed its
review of the proposed improvements within the Nantahala Gorge, and a field staff
biologist conducted a site visit on September 20, 1991. These comments are provided in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d.) and the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S.
113A-1 through 113A-10; 1 NCAC 25).
The U.S. Forest Service is proposing improvements within, the Nantabala River
Gorge to eliminate safety hazards, eliminate on-going resource damage and to provide
heeded and improved facilities for the increased use of the Nantahala River by the general
public. We are pleased that erosion problems near the lower end of the Nantabala River
are being addressed, which will lessen adverse impacts to trout from sedimentation.
The NCWRC has no objection to the project as planned and no further comments
at this time. We :request that the draft Environmeintal.Assessment and all supporting
documents be provided to the NCWRC for review and comments. Thank you for the
opportunity to provide input during the early stages of this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please advise.
Sincerely,
V- X
Dennis L. Stewart, Manager
Habitat Conservation Program
cc: Ms. Stephanie Goudreau, Mt. Reg?'on Habitat Biologist CL% 0
Mr. Micky Clemmons, District 9 fisheries Biologist
Mr. Joffrey Brooks, District 9 Wildlife Biologist
05/15/2003 10:48 FAX
9r
LO 006
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Division of Archives and History
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
January 24, 1997
Paul Schuller, Director
Fire, Forest, and Heritage Resources
National Forests in North Carolina
P.Q. Box 2750
Asheville, NC 28802
Re: Nantahala Gorge Improvements project, Macon and
Swain Counties, ER 97-8071
Dear Mr. Schuller:
Thank you for your letter of December 20, 1996, transmitting the archaeological
survey report by David Dyson concerning the above project.
During the course of the survey no sites were located within the project area. Mr.
Dyson has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted
in connection with this project. We concur with this recommendation since this
project will not involve significant archaeological resources.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
?Y -
zw?
David Brook ,
Deputy,State Historic Preservation Officer ..
log East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 g?
05/15/2003 10:47 FAX
'USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
To: C. t(/, //i-
v
From
es
Numbeloa
g
(Including this sheet)
IQ 001
Additional Information: Wev-e- ?e 7'Z/Le- 18-116-&--y
?rflm. 7?lc.e- ?? ?? ou, awe ie9uca..?r2? .
-7- c?a? Duf o f ?u?.?.. ?cla!?afwee. bum
COIW/Oa?kr M4Uq 6417
?`? 6 w rZia? cou/Q? 24 - J--X/ 11
Contact Ptfone: [phone] FAX NumL828) 369-6592
Land of the Noonday Sun
05/15/2003 10:48 FAX IQ.IUUz
wA Michael F. Easley, Governor
Qf ? Wellam 0. Ross Jr-, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
• Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
r Division of Water Quality
>. y
May 13, 2003
Swain County
DWQ Project No. 03-0567
rIERTIFIED MAIL- Return Rwelat Requested
Ms. Sally Browning
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger Dlstrlct
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NO, 28734
Dear Ms. Browning:
Reference is made to your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification to construct a retaining wall along 320 linear fast of
the Nantahals River in Swain County. In your application, you noted that the State Clearinghouse gave input to the EA. Although an
approval of a FONSI by the State Clearinghouse is not required for US Department of Agriculture projects, correspondence
documenting coordination with the State Clearinghouse will be necessary beiore we can proceed with review of your application.
Please note that DWC cannot issue a 401 Certification until the project has received documentation of your coordination with the State
Clearinghouse in accordance with NCAC 15A:01 C .0402. We have been unable to find documentation of this project under the names
of Nantahala River Corridor, Fontana Lake, Upgrade Silvermine Take-out #3, or otherwise in Swain County. If you have
documentation of your coordination with the State Clearinghouse, please provide us a copy of their recommendation. Please be sure
to Include the State Clearinghouse Project Number in your correspondence so that we can track this project.
Please note that you have three days from the date of this correspondence to provide a response. If you do not provide a
response within three days, we will assume you no longer wish to pursue this project and will consider the application withdrawn.
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Cyndi Karoiy in our Central Office In Raleigh at (919)
733-9721.
sincerely,
John Domey
JRDlcbk
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Feld Office
Asheville DWQ Regional Office
Melba McGee
File Copy
Central Files 030667
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer
Service
1 800 623-
7746
Re: hold letter
Subject: Re: hold letter
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:30:33 -0400
From: "Sally Browning" <sbrowningC fs.fed.us>
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
I have faxed these letters to your office today. I have also sent a hard
copy in the US Mail. I do not have these letters on the computer to attach
to this message. Sally Browning
Sally Browning, Resource Assistant
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
ph: 828-524-6441
FAX: [phone]
Cyndi Karoly
<cyndi.karoly@nc To: [e-mail]
mail.net> cc:
Subject: hold letter
05/13/2003 11:25
AM
Sally - please note the 3-day turnaround time in this hold letter. This
is not our choice. We have been directed to require this. Please
provide any written response - even by e-mail noting that you're working
on a reply - so it won't get withdrawn.
(See attached file: 030567.doc)
Name: 030567.doc
M030567.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
Encoding: base64
Download Status: Not downloaded with messaize
1 of 1 5/20/03 9:56 AM
0? WArFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`? QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
y Division of Water Quality
o ?
May 13, 2003
Swain County
DWQ Project No. 03-0567
CERTIFIED MAIL: Return Receipt Requested
Ms. Sally Browning
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC, 28734
Dear Ms. Browning:
Reference is made to your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification to construct a retaining wall along 320 linear feet of
the Nantahala River in Swain County. In your application, you noted that the State Clearinghouse gave input to the EA. Although an
approval of a FONSI by the State Clearinghouse is not required for US Department of Agriculture projects, correspondence
documenting coordination with the State Clearinghouse will be necessary before we can proceed with review of your application.
Please note that DWQ cannot issue a 401 Certification until the project has received documentation of your coordination with the State
Clearinghouse in accordance with NCAC 15A:01C .0402. We have been unable to find documentation of this project under the names
of Nantahala River Corridor, Fontana Lake, Upgrade Silvermine Take-out #3, or otherwise in Swain County. If you have
documentation. of your coordination with the State Clearinghouse, please provide us a copy of their recommendation. Please be sure
to include the State Clearinghouse Project Number in your correspondence so that we can track this project.
Please note that you have three days from the date of this correspondence to provide a response. If you do not provide a
response within three days, we will assume you no longer wish to pursue this project and will consider the application withdrawn.
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Cyndi Karoly in our Central Office in Raleigh at (919)
733-9721.
Sincerely,
John Dorney
JRD/cbk
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Asheville DWQ Regional Office
Melba McGee
File Copy
Central Files
030567
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
Service
Customer
1 800 623-
7748
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
To: (? ?4 n
pany: V!
.ber of pages including cover .sheet:
s or special instructions:
-V--'Y),
d-o - A
Fax #: 9)-o'
Date: IkO-3
;ion of Water
Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
ree Blvd., Raleigh,.NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1786 (phone). 919-733-6893 (fax). (httDJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.tWncwetiands
s40 %
05/08/2003 15:50 FAX
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 25734
To:
Frorn : r-\fal-1,a 4,i-da-milto
Number of Pa s
(Including this sheet)
Additional Information :
a 001
VVLANDS1401 p r
MAY 0 8
TERQUALITY,
.qE
Tt
Contact Phone: [phone] FAX Number: [phone]
Land of the Noonday Sun
Triage Check List
Date: 0 ? Project Name: e-All ,e
DWQ#: 03 - O SCQ?
County: J y?
To: X ARO Mike Parker
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson
? RRO Steve Mitchell
? WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Cyndi Karoly (Central Office)
From: Ml ?? 0
Telephone : (919) 73
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
JEkmmimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios `` I",
? Ditching V
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
CE3-elieck drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments (_A&? ?? ?
+-b tp& - ato Ae ??
V
F-E-oU
United States Forest Wayah Ranger District 90 Sloan Road
Department of Service Franklin, NC 28i734
Agriculture Phone: [phone]
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Dear Sir or Madam:
File Code: 2520/2350
Date: May 6, 2003
0'q 0Q
Here are seven copies of a permit for 401 certification. Also enclosed is our $475.
Sincerely, r
MICHAEL L. WILKINS
District Ranger
cc: NCWRC,
USACE
WETLANDS /401 GROUP
MAY 0 S 2003
"MATER QUALITY SECTION
We mac.a- 1tu1;4t?,-11 1, ?,,L.
Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paperi#
N ( j-- A i El
,.,.err
m.»>r
Q"aW*. SYapob
$0
a/
- ! 1
1730:
NFAU Lim of Ponlrn?t --?- Nwr Ed§e of Anwne
N"O tie
Csnts Lim ! k -
.ma+.xP pus t SMw Li 7 ,

°enahma. k is Chiseled Squcrs on Corner of
Conc. et£ headwolt at Noithwes. Comer of Oridys
Ftavoticn (as ta*cn om N.C.O.O.F. pr'ons for
near b das) 1742.52 Ft !531.12 Alei[rsj
oan ewa? = fro'
bwt Qmam - fmAr
m
Inca
TOPOCRAPHIC SL
?T
AdWknd Re>:rwwa -
MWAvft AW Set h AlogaeGe AW Sbt h
Cm"IN Needed Located Cavcrele Neoe/aY
5 25--57-15 w Amos, Assamed GbaraFate+ ..
Axamed Q Illief ! • N MR.20 ft
N = 4=56 ft E = MOM FL
E = 44=w ft Ehrattm - 1726.50 fL
56mum - 113252 F'L
? Lsklavsem `)
_ 7dgeMa?e ANNa/_//

r

t

1715-----?^--
50 O 50
SCAL 1
MARCH 21, 200'
171620 172ti . L??f.
a
ir8" heeled K6ad / .? i
O
Q
1 1 Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
QG
L , .,?
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested
Ms= Sally Browning
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
Dear Ms. Browning:
Subject:
Upgrade Silverm'
DWQ Project N r SECTO
Swain County
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed. your submittal to harden 320 feet of the bank and bottom of the Nantahala
River and Silvermine Creek. After a site review by DWQ's Asheville Regional Office it has been determined that your
application was not complete for the following reasons:
1) Please provide a signed copy of the application.
2) The exact impacts to jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands are not clearly delineated on the site plan provided. Please
clearly indicate all impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands
3) The proposed impacts will result in a loss of near bank aquatic habitat and the proposed planters are not considered
sufficient to replace this loss. As such, 320 feet of compensatory mitigation is required. A mitigation plan must be
provided to replaced the lost habitat.
4) The project will result in .24 acres of impervious area immediately adjacent to the stream. The stormwater
management proposed will only direct stormwater directly into the stream. Stormwater treatment prior to discharge
shall be required for the runoff from the new impervious area. Bioretention areas (in lieu of the planters) may prove to
be a good treatment option.
This information is needed by the Division in order for us to decide whether this project is approvable.
Please call Todd St. John at 919-733-9584 if you have any questions. Until this information is received, I will place this
project on hold due to incomplete information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(a)).
Sincerely,
rter ti Program
cc: Asheville DWQ Regional Office
Asheville Regional USACE Office
Todd St. John
File
Central Files We
60 -
fn 11
July 2, 2003
VVErLANDSl41011 GAOU1:
JUL ? i Iiit; j
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiAnds/
United States Forest Wayah Ranger District 90 Sloan Road
ti c Department of Service Franklin, NC 28i734
Agriculture Phone: [phone]
File Code: 2520/2350
Date: May 6, 2003
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Dear Sir or Madam:
Here are seven copies of a permit for 401 certification. Also enclosed is our $475.
Sincerely, c
MICHAEL L. WILKINS
District Ranger
cc: NCWRC,
USACE
We- .mod a- .<u a f ?: >1:1 </ ?
_ Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper

4'
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 13
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: USDA Forest Service Contact: Sally Browning
Mailing Address:Wayah Ranger District, 90 Sloan Road, Franklin, NC 28734
Telephone Number: 828/524-6441
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number: 828/369-6592
Fax Number:
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to. be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Upgrade Silvermine Take-out #3
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A National Forest Lands
4. Location
County: Swain Nearest Town: Wesser - Community
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Bryson City travel south on
US 19. The project lies between the old bridge crossing the Nantahala River at Wesser and
Silvermine Creek (just downstream from NOC's store).
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35 19.89, 83 35.56
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):.24 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Nantahala River - 700' before it
flows into Fontana Lake
8. River Basin: Little Tennessee River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The proposed area is currently being used as a river take-out.
Over 50,000 people get oout of the river on this spot each year. The take-out has a gravel
surface that is eroding along with the river bank. A large portion of the take-out is located on
Page 6 of 13
old road fill material. The river bank closest to Silvermine Creek is shored up with 8" x 8"
treated timbers. We would replace the existing timbers with a concrete wall.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The take-
out will be upgraded for public use and safety by constructing a 10-16' wall above the high
water mark with a set of concrete steps on the upstream side and a ramp with steps in the
middle of the project. The wall with steps and ramp will extend for 230 feet. A track how
will be used to dig out some large boulders and old waste material. This material will be
placed away from any live streams .
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the work is to provide for better
public safely and use while preventing further bank erosion and sedimentation of the
Nantahala River.
IV. . Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A This project will complete the take-out upgrade
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The 230' concrete retaining wall will
take the place of a timbered wall and natural stream bank. The existing take-out that will be
improved is located on old road fill material (Udorthent soils)
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htty://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
Udoorthent soils dominate the existing take-out. The take-out (old road shoulder) and US 19
were constructed on man made soils (Udorthents). The area adjacent. to the river was filled
to construct US 19 many years ago. This space is the only place that the road and take-out
can be between the base of the mountain and the river. The river bank along the 320 foot
section for a few feet is Rosman soil. It is classified as a moderately well drained soil.
Neither soil is classified as a wetland or hydric soil. The Nantahala River flows into Fontana
Lake approximately 700 feet below the take-out area.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(lease specify)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
Page 8 of 13
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 320' of stream bank
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

(acres)
(if Name p Waterbody
applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Silt fence will be placed below the area where the 320 feet of retaining wall, steps and ramp will be placed. The retaining wall construction
will take place when the Nantahala power house is not generating water and the water levels in the Nantahala River are low.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): D uplands D stream D wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
We will properly place silt fence below the retaining wall construction area We will plant trees
back in lame planters along the retaining wall. The retaining wall construction will take place
Page 9 of 13
when the power house is not generating water and the water levels are low. The level of Fontana
Lake will also be low at this time. The proiect is approximately 700 feet above where the
Nantahala River flows into Fontana Lake.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NOV" concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
hLtp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmizide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin,.type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 10 of 13
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http:l/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes Z No ? National Forest lands -federal Nantahala National Forest
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ? NEPA document completed by USDA Forest Service
A cultural resource/archeological inventory was completed for the project as part of the
Nantahala River Corridor Environmental Assessment. No significant sites were found. The
final report was sent to the State of North Carolina for SHPO approval. It received SHPO
approval. A biological evaluation was completed for the project. This included informal
consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ® N/A The state clearinghouse gave imput to the EA. A final
approval letter is not required on a USDA project. In this case the decision maker was the
district ranger.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Page 11 of 13
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
XI.
XII.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
N/A
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
None now - currently gravel surface washes away due to slope of US 19
.24 acres of pavement =pipes and sloping will control the water
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 12 of 13

z.
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The retaining walls for this proiect will be mostly completed when the Nantahala River Power
House is down for maintenance. The Nantahala River flows at a low level during this time Any
additional work on the take-out wall will take place during_peri ods of water being turned off.
This projects lies 700' from where the Nantahala River drops into Fontana Lake Fontana Lake
is drawn down during the period that we plan to do the construction work
Applicaiit/Agent's ature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
r l
r i `r ! r r 1 G1'r ? ??L ?? ?1
Silvermine Take-out L`}
? , ? _ Lurch,
Take-out #3
i t s _ ? 1 /? d1 ? it r
qME Ul'?
14
17
r ? ??VTIkT 1.. 5, r ` f'fl ??}`?' i'? '? `, ??\i l? ?, 4e;r?i ?: ?. °?-'?"? i I ? '? ? r
'•ir'
1
>-. ? `t i ? (JI /??'??, ?? i `? ` ,.`• ? -+l'i t /? II ? 1 1 ? 1I ?Il ? ??'?V }1- I f t`?
V
A, 0
?. ."? ! r ? l? ` Al"if ? °fl '"' ?/??' i •/7i I r : L ?<< ` I ? ? ?`,. it { ,?4? f' , ? , l
?yr -F7 - 1 ?- 1 rCS?'.I ^,r V,17
?a ?flerZ I f F.?C ?I r f r
Cove , ! ` T-J ri )
r Pro ect Location
T, 11
?, Wesser Quadrangle
?JJ / I
Scale: 2.64" -1 mile
??f4 t i l G ' II : 1'. I
?` United States Forest Wayah Ranger District 90 Sloan Road
Department of Service Franklin, NC 28i734
Agriculture Phone: [phone]
File Code: 2300
Date: August 4, 2003
Mr. Todd St. John UV 6ru GAoU
North Carolina Division of Water Quality ?U °! LUi)3
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center _ NATEn QUALITYSOON
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 ?0 11
3
Dear Todd:
Reference our discussion of the improvements to Take-out #3 adjacent to Silvermine Creek. Our
retaining wall will replace the natural bank at water's edge. It will not move horizontally into the
stream. It will go down vertically slightly below the river bed to prevent scouring and
undercutting of the structure over time.
It will be similar to Take-out #1 and #2 which have been reconstructed in recent years. The
Wayah Ranger District manages over 1000 miles of streams and rivers in a natural state. The
aquatic habitat in Take-out #3 to be reconstructed has long since disappeared with the use of the
site by the public. Construction of the take-out will eliminate a sediment and erosion problem
and improve safety for the recreating public. For these reasons, I request that you review the
need for mitigation befor aking your final determination.
MICHA
District Ranger
Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed an Reoyaea Paper??
s
Here's the ARO staff report - for some reason it won't all show on filemaker but will copy and paste:
This project should be considered additions to 97-0547 and 00-1288.
There is little or no discussion of need on this application. J
NCWRC Comments:
The USFS is requesting more hardening the riverbank at and downstream of
Silvermine Creek on the Nantahala River. I have visited this site and have
a number of concerns with more hardening of the riverbank especially at
this site. At this time I am leaning toward recommending to supervisors
that we deny this permit.
If you are familiar with the river, this is already being used as a take
out but appears to be questionable as a safe take out. There is no active
erosion but a portion of the bank along Silvermine Creek and the Nantahala
has timbers as stabilization. Downstream is vegetated with sycamores and
there is a floodplain bench along part of the area where they are
requesting to but a concrete wall. Since this is near the mouth of
Silvermine Creek, there are more issues here than on the previous sites
upstreams. Since this is more of the same stabilization work that is
already been permitted will mitigation be required for impacts to the
habitat and riparian area. The two or three planters they have put in is
not adequate in my opinion.
This is already a very congested area and this will only exacerbate the
congestion near the NOC store and the Slivermine Road intersection with US
19/74.
I concur with these observations.
? Mitigation required as this seems a continuation of previous projects?
--khb
?v
v,
I??

d

MgMORANDUM

TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Upgrade Silvermine Take-out # 3 County Swain
Project Number 03 0567` County2
Recvd From APP Region Asheville
Received Date 5/8/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type streambank stabilization w/ concrete wall
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet ` - - Oman
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
13 Stream FT-@)N F__2-57-(22.5)FB TR 40,403. F 320.0 320.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y (0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y * N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y * N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 351989 Longitude (ddmmss) -833556
Comments:
If you are familiar with the river, this is already being used as a take
out but appears to be questionable as a safe take out. There is no active
erosion but a portion of the bank along Silvermine Creek and the Nantahala
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Upgrade Silvermine Take-out # 3 County Swain
Project Number 03 0567 Regional Contact: Barnett, Kevin
Cate:
Comments (continued from page 1):

cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
Re: Nantahala River Project
Subject: Re: Nantahala River Project
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:33:32 -0400
From: Melba McGee <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
That's good enough for me. The number you gave me is a clearinghouse
number. Plus the ER before the number tells me that it was an environmental
report which the feds consider a EA/FONSI. Fold what you can in the 401 and
go with it. :--)
Cyndi Karoly wrote:
> Melba - if you'll recall our phone conversation on 5113103, I was trying
> to track down past evidence of SEPA coordination by the USDA Forest
> Service for the "Nantahala River Project." Other names might be
> Nantahala River Corridor, Fontana Lake, or Upgrade Silvermine Take-out
> #3. The USDA has provided letters from Paul White of the Water Quality
> Section dated 2114194, from Dennis Stewart of the NCWRC dated 11/18/91,
> and from David Brook of SHPO dated 1124197. The latter two are
> basically "no comment" responses. White's letter has some broad
> recommendations we might be able to fold into the 401. The only
> tracking number I can find is "ER 97-8071." it may also help to note
> that the letters show this project as Macon and Swain Counties. When
> you and I had talked it was just Swain County.
> is this any help in tracking the project? Are we ok to proceed with
> reviewing the 401? Do they need further SEPA clearance?
> Thanks as always for your gracious help. Call me at 733-9721 if you
> need more details or a memory jogger.
(JJ ?
C V,
` 1=Ji
1 of 1 5/21/03 9:19 AM
Triage Check List
te: Project Name: '
DWQ#: _r_5 3 r 0- ? 7
County: ?&fzc.e-?-,
To: ILd" ARO Mike Parker
? WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Cyndi Karoly (Central Office)
? RRO Steve Mitchell
rom: ??? Telephone : (919
)
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
Stream length impacted r;
0 Stream determination
? and determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
I?Iinir?,i? tion/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman).
? Pond fill
? M, tigation Ratios
? Ditching _
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy ;
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
nments:
r

w W ] `C Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
~ Division of Water Quality
f
May 8, 2003
UO 6.
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
Subject: Receipt of Fee paid to DWQ 401 Wetlands Unit
To Whom It May Concern::
This letter of receipt is in regards to the fee of $475.00 that was paid by Sara Browning for the listed project.
The check number is 197. The fee was received on Thursday, May 08, 2003.
1. DWQ# 03-0567 Upgrade Silvermine Take-out #3
Please call me at 919-733-3574 or visit our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands if you have
any questions regarding this fee.
Sincerely,
Michael Horan
cc: Central Files
File Copy
INMENK
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

SARA BROWNING
NF S IN N CAROLINA For Official Use Only 19?j
` 'US CTovernme tTax Exempt
ASHEVILLE NC 28802
.
DATE 68-1/610

PAY TO
- ` M
9F? OF r r^ g ' ez ." 111A
DwAR58 ?.. °••?re•
-
:.t .-
USDATaxED/471600000 NationsBa*oi ^^ Vah More Than $2,500.00
Dover De ,
NationsBank

FOR _ ar

?'05? db'[ . i DC -Q232
ill 0
.

t:
j .

- _ -L .

¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete .
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired:
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
. so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
DWQ# 03-0567 - Swain
2. Article Number
.(Transfer fmm sen4ce.la
mA 381"1`, Augi si
&.Signahue _
X R ? Agent
? Addresse
B. Received by (Printed N e C. Date o Deliver
D. Is delivery address d' rent from item 1? Yes
If YES, enter delivery ress below: ? No
3. Type
® Certified Mail ?3 press Mail
0 Registered eReturn Receipt for Merchandis
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
7002 2410 0003 0275 1895
i bornestic`Re irm Receipt ? i 102W-I
UNITED; STATES POSTAL SERVI. ?.?- E iy lrsl? ss
w 0 ? ? ees
bis.taex?"°
• Senaer: Please pdn t? e, address,..and-7F4
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Iddiltiitiit illittiikifiiiiit-IlIMiltIHtAlitii lltliii
UNITED: STATES POSTAL `SERn\,k--E
ees
CMD
Sender: Please prin . e, address,,-aad,7HP+*im4WzJaeje-
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
1 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
I111MIIAt1hIiI11'11IIII-11 lt{it!IHI11A11I iltlit-it111M
Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete .
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ 'Print your name and address on the reverse
so thatwe can.return the card to you.
¦ Attachsthis card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
USDA Forest Service
Wayah Ranger District
90 Sloan Road
Franklin, NC 28734
DWQ# 03-0567 - Swain
2. Article Number
,(lransferfium service,l
ann..

A. Signature
X R ? Agent
? Addresse
B. Received by (Printed N C. Date o Deliver
r ,Q2
D. Is delivery address diit, from Item 1? Yes
If YES, enter delivery3 ress below: ? No
i
3. Se ce Type
E3 rtfied Mail ? press Mail
? Registered $ Return Receipt for Merchandis
? Insured Mail C] C.O.D:
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
7002 2410 0003 0275 1895
z T te•a {l. t: 't t ort o 3, t.t i t t t s s n+ t a s
Dcmestic'Returl Receipt' 102595x