310870_Complete File - Historical_20170101

�0� W a r�Rpco 7
Q `C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
March 27, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 0810 0004 4464 6156
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Reginald S. Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
P.O. Box 472
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Notice of Violation
Case # NOV-2007-PC-0189
Reginald inald Kea Farm
Duplin County —
Dear Mr. Kenan:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
This is to notify you of violations to Swine Waste Management System General NPDES Permit
NCA200000 issued on August 22, 2005 under Certificate of Coverage NCA231870.
On March 2, 2007, Mr. John Farnell and Mr. Chester Cobb from the Wilmington Regional Office
inspected one of the sprayfields at the Reginald Kenan Farm. The inspection was conducted in
response to an aerial photo sent to the Wilmington Regional Office on March 1, 2007. The
photo showed animal waste ponding and running towards a ditch while an application event
was occurring. Mr. Farnell and Mr. Cobb were able to identify the sprayfield from which the
photo was taken. At the time of inspection, no waste was found ponded or in the ditch due to
heavy rainfall that night. The operator, Mr. Perry Vann, said that he did pump from about 10:00
am to 1:00 pm and that he turned off the pump when he noticed waste ponding on the field.
From the inspection, the following violations were noted:
1. Hydraulic Overload
The aerial photo taken on February 28, 2007, showed animal waste running towards a
ditch. Also, the operator mentioned that he saw waste ponding.
The ponding and runoff of animal waste is in violation of Condition No. II. 4. of NPDES
Permit NCA200000 that states, "Land application rates shall be in accordance with the
CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen
rate for the receiving crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive
ponding or any runoff during any given application event."
Nne
of Carolina
Ntura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Kenam r
Page 2 of 2
March 27, 2007
2. Failure to Notify
The operator mentioned that he noticed animal waste ponding. The Wilmington
Regional Office received no notification of the hydraulic overload.
This is in violation of Condition No. III. 11. of NPDES Permit NCA200000 that states in
part, "The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following
first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events: (f) Overapplying waste
either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or where runoff enters surface
waters or wetlands."
In response to these violations, this office must receive the following information within
fifteen (15) working days of the receipt of this notice:
a. A written explanation of the violations.
b. A written description of the actions taken or to be taken to bring the violations back
into compliance and to prevent their recurrence.
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County
Extension office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any
assistance they may be able to provide.
Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in these matters including
assessment of civil penalties, injunctive relief, and permit revocation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call MAURkgLejIllp
C6b'b 910-796-7327. Also, please find enclosed a copy of the inspection report.
Yours ery trl
,
0Ju.
Charles F. Stehman, Ph.D., P.G.
Environmental Regional Supervisor II
Enclosure: (3) Addressee only
cc: Billy Houston, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
John College, DSWC-WiRO
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC
APS Central Files
1DWQaWxil ingtonAnimal-Files_31_=8.7_0 ,
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\DUPLIN\2007\31-870 NOV

Certified Mail Provides: ■ A mailing receipt (esjanea)zoozeunr'ooee-odS,
■ A unique identifier for your mailplecd
■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
mportant Reminders:
■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Mail,
■ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fc
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
■ For an additional fee, a Retum Receipt may be requested to provide proof o
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Retun
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover thi
fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver foi
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt i;
required.
■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee a
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mallpiece with th,
endorsement "Restricted -Delivery".
■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti
cie at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Ma
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
Internet access to delivery information is not available on mail
addressed to APOs and FPOs.

■ Complete iterhs 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addresse
A. jig6ature ,
X ❑ Agent
U 1 0 �
�y , �Lvii> `p`' ' ddre
q. receiveld by (Pin ed Name) Da �l'
D. Is delivery address different i: item 1 '❑'Yes
If YES, enter delivery adds} s ib No
us�
3. S rvice Type
ertified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7006 0 810 0004 4464 615 6
(Transfer from service label
oc kc iJ : '!1Qi i l c a ..l : ! nnnn I I i 1 I

I
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. GAP
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NCDENR
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wihnington, NC 28405
Attn: Kathy Rivera
ri, 1C-1 111111111111111111If11IfIIIIfIIII11"It11111t111I11i1111111111

04/25/2007 16:53 9102937437 S.REGINALD KENAN PAGE 01/02
S. REGINALD HENAN
ATTORNEY AT•LAW
115. WEST HILL STREET
P. O. BOX 472
WARSAW, N. C.28398
[phone]
FAX (910)' 293-7437
April 25, 2007
Mr. Charles F. Stehman. '
North Carolina Division -or Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, N.C. 28405
Dear Mr. Stehman:
I'mt writing this letter :in response to your notice of violation dated March 7, 2007.
Firstly, I would like to say that I have tried very hard to abide by all the rules and
regulations required by your office and other state and federal agencies. This is the first
time I have ever had to response to any notice of violation. I take great pride 1n my hog
operation and I am very proud of it.
I do not agree that I have violated the NPDES permit. I understand "ponding" to
mean water standing on top of the ground for more than four hours. The facts of this case
indicate that the operator, Mr. Perry Lee Vann on February 28, 2007 irrigated for
approximately three hours. ending at 1:00 P.M. A. photo was taken by your personnel on
February 28, 2007 at 12:45 p.m. The operator ended irrigation event due to required
inspection of the system showing that some ponding was beginning to occur in this field.
The permit allows four hours of ponding. There are no additional photos or evidence
which show that the ponding exceeded your hours; therefore no ponding.violation
occurred.
The photo and nov letter state indicate the animal waste discharged into the ditch
on the edge of the field but the review of the photo provided does not show clearly any
runoff occurring.' The area in question has some erosion due to rainfall during the winter
and the white areas shown indicate areas where said has "washed"' not waste water. Even
your visit on Mary 7, 2007 found no ponding/runoff or evidence of it having occurred.
The failure to notify violation assumes that ponding exceeded four hours or runoff
occurred. Agana there is no evidence of either or is there any evidence that the operator
knew of -such. If it did not occur, the operator would have no requirement to notify since
there was no ponditug violation or runoff. Notification failure could only occur if the
operator was aware of a violation.

04/25/2007 16:53 9102937437
S.REGINALD KENAN
PAGE 02/02
In order to prevent any farther misunderstanding, the area of erosion evident in
the photo are being repaired to avoid further confusion.
I sincerely appreciate your consideration i6 understanding my position and concur
with me that there is no evidence of any violations. Again, I want to continue to have a
reputable hog farm without any blemish.
Thanks for your time and consideration.
Si erely,
a
Attorney',At Law
'IZISJsAac

S. REGINALD KENAN
ATTORNEY AT LAW
115 WEST HILL STREET
P. O. BOX 472
WARSAW, N. C. 28398
[phone]
FAX [phone]
April 25, 2007
Mr. Charles F. Stehman
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, N.C. 28405
Dear Mr. Stehman:
APR 3 0 2001
WILMINGi4N REGIONAL OFFICE
I'm writing this letter in response to your notice of violation dated March 7, 2007.
Firstly, I would like to say that I have tried very hard to abide by all the rules and
regulations required by your office, other state and federal agencies. This is the first time
I have ever had to response to any notice of violation. I take great pride in my hog
operation and I am very proud of it.
I do not agree that I have violated the NPDES permit. I understand "ponding" to
mean water standing on top of the ground for more than four hours. The facts of this case
indicate that the operator, Mr: Perry Lee Vann on February 28, 2007 irrigated for
approximately three hours ending at 1:00 p.m. A photo was taken by your personnel on
February 28, 2007 at 12:45 p.m. The operator ended irrigation event due to required
inspection of the system showing that some ponding was beginning to occur in this field.
The permit allows four hours of ponding. There are no additional photos or evidence
which show that the ponding exceeded hour hours; therefore no ponding violation
occurred.
The photo and nov letter state the animal waste discharged into the ditch on the
edge of the field but the review of the photo provided does not show clearly any runoff
occurring. The area in question has some erosion due to rainfall during the winter and
the white areas shown indicate areas where sand has "washed", not waste water. Even
your visit on Mary 7, 2007 found no ponding/runoff or evidence of it having occurred.
The failure to notify violation assumes that ponding exceeded four hours or runoff
occurred. Again there is no evidence of either or is there any evidence that the operator
knew of such. If it did not occur, the operator would have no requirement to notify since
there was no ponding violation or runoff. Notification failure could only occur if the
operator was aware of a violation.

In order to prevent any further misunderstanding, the area of erosion evident in
the photo are being repaired to avoid further confusion.
I sincerely appreciate your consideration in understanding my position and concur
with me that there is no evidence of any violations. Again, I want to continue to have a
reputable hog farm without any blemish.
Thanks for your time and consideration.
jSinrelyklen�
Attorney At Law
Pi:7R

�70
�`�^;M �.� -+N« <-'�:..^.*r�„e...--,�,„:n;..�.x.•;-'"-''M,i."z'"-�`'"=5cfi`�.�r""��`'�ss:.tw°�.`^x-"-'xyF"'�'^,.?�A`:."M"`�x„T;�":;.<s,-.�a:>�W?5r�.r,',y'
�•^ eu - .x;Y `�:+%' ,�� �5"` "��ro ,,,;;f'" „-:t;. r 3,.;. ":�'_ .a...�a ;, `. �'; `�.:._.,_�&: ray,, <.�;:..; ,r "a.,..; ,;r..{,*,,�u<
--t,''"^��i�"`i ..r , «>:i`=�•.''(" �;tY,,s�; ,�;" �ss, zF�".��'�`<+.. 7'E'"s«�,..b r . , �:_ ;; o/-. ..� r _..,.,.,.._ .....;. �: �.. ,;'� s`,�% .. :.,�
PRODUCER: Reginald Kenan
LOCATION: HWY 903
Magnolia, NC
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder - Finish
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 7344
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the, waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information o propel ,sampl ng ,
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysi��'
JUN 0 5 2009
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. By:
Page 1 RECEIVED / DENR / DWQ
Aquifer Protection Section
JUN 0 2 2009

.., e�r^��e-�- �"�;-�^'.--'�'S- :.'i^`mia`�'e"x'..°':-,`w�w'�""�,'^..;n^::5:-. —'m xL,.'S`e:�,<�'.f°.�e;C*.7 ;,>., _y�:�` •1.+E��� ,': a"'.4°�r,.-.,�-e;sa: �"'., '`"` r1?zrt'y"-0:ii".M;�::»- ,�3:;
yq ^�,„u r.4i�,",,.z• �. �,y f'� �n.r �.4`,��`K:?e.`'x'.^ .x:,.a es,�::t ;;;Ns�� yg�
i^a.'i .�•a.�.. .:� . �, �e,..�:;.e ';`�aa ,..�:°�„atL: ;%R ^ `c�°z.T,='.sn� �.., -m �• .s.i". �' . �4'..�"-<w,'s:�.:::�'s.�.x.'",�»".:�.:m.:3"t:;x�,ar:..�...:,.,:.w"a.:Ns»M:.a�.'�±..�,...:.n.uw n'.�L M.x�.:a�a. �"t
ta�iY�?.':xw, .....^..r.4r9. .�.^:r.�y✓ .....-_., ._..rot€�a,.t.o,..S,w,...aa..¢.'�i.�,s�'ea��',1t�a.�......�w.au,..,.,_:....`,a.�.+v�.....w�':.�`cz»3z+�..,...»e'.4.^,..�.a.......,.�»wz,..zxs....'. +.w"Ci,.t
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft, tons, etc.)
7344 animals X 1_9 (tons) waste/animal/year = 13,953.6 (tons) waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
7344 animals X 2_3 lbs. PAN/animal/year = 16,891.2 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Guide Std. 633) Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
R Mn TvnP Per Acre Utilized ADDlication
T865
2
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
12.57
3205.35
March - Sept.
T865
3
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
12.91
3292.05
March - Sept.
T865
4
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
7.70
1963.5
March - Sept.
T865
5
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
0.75
191.25
March - Sept.
T865
6
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
2.30
586.5
March - Sept.
T865
7..
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
1.25
318.75
March - Sept..
T865
8.
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
1.50
382.5
March - Sept.
T865
11
AuB
Bermuda(G)
235
4.77
1120.95
March - Sept.
1-9
FoA
Small Grain(G)
50
43.75
1949
Sept. -April
imal 1 4.5.131 IS,UUW.60 I
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

-: x' .-c.;.ar.s^:;.--y-,-xr, r,'^°;,�..,— r.•"'S`.i; ..,•..."�T"�;s`?"�,- a�:"br^aw^ez-,.?h`'�i'.o-`i,c^ "'. Eap,, rya'•;'.;
P"�»air"r«.,-«-.,,A»s'"'z'"'7'2y;...; i'' ,.,,,r2.".� "'+'_.`-'"7"'."'^'"'-'_3z .,t:s
�a. g n ,;� .:A ,a
s,�
_'i r. #•m
Zs E, ii,a
L
`�a� ;�`�� p�`� '1'I �-IZAT=1z0`N2` P A
: � . , � n,�;��nz ,�� r, ,�, �. �r' ,"�UI%A2STE . U�
„•'•..., x'3 ''.z=.'[�, .,�> .�:`..un ,,...r$i..: +"a -,«.a• aRw e, nr.4�<..: xl
,
k ,., x xm.
5 + .�,
¢r
'aw`1�^'.�.�,.�'"`.�''•;''"s>,..i...��.ax..-._..:.:,.�:e.r
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land [see
Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Tvne Per Acre* Utilized Application
T8162
9
Wo
Corn
115
13.83
1590
March - Aug:
T8162
9
Wo
Wheat
96
13.83
1328
Sept. - April
T8162
9
Wo
Soybeans
140
13.83
1936
June - Sept.
T8162
10
Ln
Corn
90
8.51
766
March - Aug.
T8162
10
Ln
Wheat
75
8.51
638
Sept. - April
T8162
10
Ln
Soybeans
75
8.51
638
June - Sept.
1
Fo
Corn
135
8.25
1114
March - Aug.
1
Fo
Wheat
120
8.25
990
Sept. - April
1
Fo
Soybeans
140
8.25
1155
June - Sept.
10,155
*2 years so
*
divide by 2
* See footnote for Table 1
Total
Totals from above Tables
I 3U.591 5,U76.UU I
Acres
Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
F 43.75
13,009.85
Table 2
1 30.59
5078
Total
F777KR
18,087.85
Amount of N Produced
16,891.20
Surplus or Deficit
(1,196.65)
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

a �� :,.-
3t 1•`.±..a :.,, ,,r. ,, ,..cy:fiF„„ aa: . :,, s �.cw ,, � _ ',,,b;,.r "3<9 `�.� q ro fi A3"K. i���>N�V
��ILIZATIONP�. a
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Maximum
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
Nn. Rate (In/Hr) Amount (In.)
2-8
FoA
Bermuda
0.5
1
9
Wo/Au
Row Crops
0.46
1
10
Ln/Wo
Row Crops
0.45
1
1
FoA
Row Crops
0.45
1
11
AuB
Bermuda
0.6
1
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation *see lagoon design.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
Narrative of operation:
Acres shown are irrigated acres. Grower uses a combination of solid set and hard hose
travellers.
Field 11 has been added to the plan 8/18/2005. SB515 setbacks apply to this field.
Field # Pull #'s
Field # Pull #
2 4-8
8 solid set
3 9,10,11,15,16
9 1,2,3,4
4 12,13,14
10 5,6,7
5 Solid set
11 1,2,3,4
6 Solid set
1 1,2,3
7 Solid set
Page 4

'�°"—r—�>rr»;r5:.;.�r:.�s,»„Ya--*. »,M— �...>�,y�a^, �.• _ .��... ?`,a-;,s'��,"""„%`_':';"":'S'„';`;''�?1^,?„¢.-,'-;$ ';'.., ,"'r :orw✓ >*:4^,�f--.! ,..zs; ";s-".: de ., v''`:� '`3 ��>, ::;tom �:" 6F"p,,3 � .��, Y.1r �%x," '�.z3=:,
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

-.-,..�.-_.-"�5�.�-.r^;-•;- s.,,-.,w;�,�..-.'�;.�,'^ c,.";;-.�-..,...o.,�;;,�..,r-,^.�„a ors x--.'y"c`g�;;m'x-;" %"'�'> 'si
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
18 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
19 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
20 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
21 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
22 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

fF F =Z5.3 � ;,,• ,sis_
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Kenan Farm
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Reginald Kenan
(Please print)
Signature:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: ( Please print)
Affiliation: Murphy Family Farms
Address (Agency):
Signature:
Date: .
Date:
Kraig A. Westerbeek
a-dcS

Sheet1
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Reginald Kenan
Address: HWY 903
Magnolia, NC
Telephone: [phone]
Table 1 - Field Specifications
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
Field of Field
County: Duplin
Date: 8/15/2005
Maximum
Maximum Application
Application per Irrigation
Rate Cycle
Number (acres) Soil Type Slope % Crop(s) (In/hr) (inches) Comments
11
4.77
AuB
<5
Bermuda
0.6
.5-1
Pulls 1-4

Sheet2
TABLE 2 -Travelling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: Ag Rain 2.5' Traveller
Field No. Travel Application TRAVEL LANE Wetted Nozzle Operating Operating
and Speed Rate Effective Effective Diameter Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
/:_,L_ . IA 1:_nt-1.4 " I , --4-k fr+N i+oo+� (Inrh=cN at ri in(ncil nt rPPI(nci) Pattarn Cnmments - Acres Der pull
F1YU1 Of IL 111U.
F11, H1
1iui i[u 11
2.3
0.37
11.k,1.1
187.5
'Z:.......
282
%• -1
250
0.895
50
95
330
1.83
F11,H2
F11,H3
2.3
2.76
0.37
0.51
187.5
168
0
142
250
250
0.895
0.895
50
50
95
95
330
220
0.62
0.97
F11,H4
2.3
0.37
178.5
178
250
0.895
50
95
330
1.35

Sheet4
TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Solid Set
Irrigation Gun
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
129
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
103.2
Design Precipitation Rate (in/hr)
0.31
Hose Length (feet)
850
xxxxxxXX
Type of Speed Compensation
Mechanical
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Engine
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
14.1
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications
THRUST BLOCK
LOCATION
AREA (sq. ft.)
90 degree bend
4.94
Dead End
3.5
Tee
2.45
Gate Valve
3.5
45 degree bend
2.66
Page 1

Sheet5
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: Kraig Westerbeek
Company: Murphy - Brown
Address: P.O. Box 759 Rose Hill, NC 28458
Phone: [phone]
Required Documentation
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
1. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, pipelines, thrust block locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS standard for IRRIGATION WATER CONVEYANCE.
8. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and
address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip of 25' or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all
perennial streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.
}

Sheet6
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Acres shown are effective wetted acres for this new field. SB515 setbacks are shown on the design
drawing and should be adhered to.
Producer is familiar with the operation and maintenance requirements of the equipment used as they
are the same as those used with the existing system.

Sheet?
CALCULATIONS
Sprinkler Specifications
Sprinkler Type: Nelson 100
Nozzle Size:
0.895 inches
Sprinkler Pressure:
50 psi
Flowrate(GPM):
129 gpm
Wetted Diameter:
250 feet
Lane Spacings
Desired Spacing (%):
70 %
Design Spacing(feet):
175 "PVC irrigation pipe normally comes in 20' pieces,
so round to the nearest multiple of 20.
Actual Spacing (feet):
180 feet
Actual Spacing (%):
72 %
Application Rate
Application Rate =(96.3xFlowrate)/(3.1415x(.9xradius)squared)
Design App. Rate =
0.31 in/hr
300 degree arc =
0.37 in/hr
220 degree arc =
0.51 in/hr
180 degree arc =
0.62 in/hr
Traveller Speed
Travel speed = 1.605 x Flowrate / Desired application amount x Lane Spacing
Desired app. (in.) =
0.5 inches
300 degree arc =
2.30 ft/min
220 degree arc =
2.76 ft/min
180 degree arc =
4.60 ft/min
Mainline Velocity
Velocity = .408 x Flowrate / pipe diameter squared feet/sec.**
**For buried pipelines,
velocity should be below 5 feet per second
Pipe size:
6 inches
Velocity=
1.46 ft/sec.
Page 1

Sheet7
Maximum Mainline Friction Loss
Most distant hydrant: 4
Total distance: 1920 feet
Friction Loss is figured using Hazen/William's Equation
Friction Loss= 0.13 feet/100 feet
Max. Mainline Loss = 2.5 feet or 1.1 psi
Total Dvnamic Head
Sprinkler Pressure:
50 psi
Loss through traveller:
45 psi
Elevation head:
0 psi
Mainline loss:
1.1 psi
Suction head and lift:
2.2 psi
5% fitting loss:
4.9 psi
TOTAL(TDH) =
103.2 psi or
Horsepower Required
Horsepower = Flowrate x TDH(feet) / 3960 / Pump effeciency
Pump Description: Berkeley B3J
Pump Efficiency: 55 %
Horsepower Required: 14.1 Hp
Thrust Blocking
Thrust Block Area = Thrust / Soil Bearing Strength
Thrust:
4200 feet
Soil Bearing Strength:
1200 feet
End Cap:
3.5 ft2
90 degree elbow:
4.9 ft2
Tee:
2.5 ft2
45 degree elbow:
2.7 ft2
Pipe Pressure Rating Check
Pressure Rating of Pipe to be Used: 200 psi
Max. Pressure on system when running: 103.2 psi
70% of Pressure Rating: 140 psi
238.3 feet
If Max. Pressure on system is less than 70% of Pressure Rating, OK
Net Positive Suction Head Check
Page 2

Sheet7
NPSHA: 21.7
NPSHR: 7 *from pump curve
If NPSHA>NPSHR OK
Page 3

%
Acreage calculations
Pull No.
Width
Length Start
Stop
Total Acres
1
187.5
282
0.34
0.28
1.83
2
187.5
0
0.34
0.28
0.62
3
168
142
0.28
0.14
0.97
4
178.5
178
0.34
0.28
1.35
Field 11 =
4.77

y ti
Reggie Kenan
Kenan Hog Farms
Scale: 1 "=300'
Wej- W / i vu vilo—
C," Cls'S AGO 'PJL
CI-

O� WA' Michael F. Easley, Governor
O� QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
CO
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
p Division of Water Quality
March 28, 2005
MEMORANDUM
.1-
To: J[ ohn Parnell^
From: Duane Leith! ' O
Subject: Additional Information
Permit Application NCA231870
Reginald Kenan Farm
Duplin County'•
Type of Permit: Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage nd Application System
John,
Attached is the field map and lease agreement received March 14, 2005 for the Reginald Kenan Farm.
Duane
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone]
Customer Service 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, NC 27604 Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
One
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us No Carolina
atura!!y
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
a

miohaei P, Easley. Governor
William G. Roae Jr., Secretary
r North C9rolina Departmcn rf Environment and Natural Resources
Eli ' Y Alan W. Klimck, P.E., Director
Division of water Quality
March 1., 2005
MR, REGINA.LD KENAN
MOINALD KENAN FARM
PO BOX 472
WARSAW, NORTH CAR®LINA 28398
Subject: Application. No. N'CA23 370
Additional Information F .quest
Reginald Kcnan Farm
Swine Waste Collection, freatmnent, Storage and
Application System
Duplin County
Bear J�fr. Ircr n:
The .Animal Feeding and Operations Permitting and Compliance Unit b S Conducted a preliminary
review of the subject permit application package. Additionalumformatior is .required before we may
continue our .review. Please address time following items no later than March i i, 2005.
1. Thank you for submitting your Animal Waste Management I an Certification and Waste
U1ilimtion Plan (WUP). Please provide copies of the agreement or cases on the 30.59 acres of
land identified in the WUP to which wastes are to be applied under, agreement or lease.
2. Please provide a xliap showing the boundaries of the fields to vhich wastes are to be
applied and the field .identifwation numbers. Please be sure these a ree with the tract and field
numbers shown in the WUP.
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set fort in North Carolina. rules
and regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject apr lication package are still
the responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any onussions made in resM.. ling to time above items may
result in future requests for additional information,
Please reference the subject application number (NCA231, 870) when providit ; the requested
infemution. Two copies of all revised and/or, additional documentation shoo i be signed, sealed, dated,
and submitted to my attention at the address as the bottom of the cover page c this letter. Please note
that ;Failure to provide this additional info i-nation on or before the abovr; requ ;led date may result in
your application being returned as incomplete.
C3
�c.3
i.R.rt�., �
e�t--
MCC
lai0-
>
cis • � �Carolina
�
c�
r" f C)Aquifer Protection Section 1635 MAil Serv9Go Csnler Raleigh, NC 27699-l636 Phone )19) 733-3221 Cusloghcr Service
4 lntemet: http!1/h2o.etrr.4t3tc.ns.us 2729 Capital 13oulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 fax )19) 715.0588 1.577-623-(,748
An Equal 4pportunitylAiflartative Anion Employar _ 60% Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper raft )19) 715.6048

If you have any questioiis regarding this requeqt, a
, ploase do not hesitate to co tact me t
[e-mail][phone], You may also check the future! atus of this project online at
b-tti).-//h2o.cnr.sote.nc.us/bims/,Rmorts/roDorisPermits.htm), Thankyou for otv cooperation.
Sincerely,
Duane Lcith
APS-Animal Unix
Cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section,
APS-LAPCU Central File NCA231870

n+n-w-aw4 TU:ZVAM FAPd- -A3s v.00t. F�SOa
• �eK 12►t3 0356
Dratted by. Aecilneld Konen, Narsaw, North Carolina
NORTH CAROLIHA
HEMORANMW OF ACf OMM AND $A8&kM
DUPLIN COUNTY r
r DOMIS BRA6R,6'Y PARM9, I.LC, a north Caroiinn limftad liabAlity
onsigpny of. Duplin County, North Carolina, hereby grant. to 9. itBGnmv 1RbT"
w,/
Of buplin county, Vorah carcuna. ror a term coma+agcing n the ,,3�ay of
19901 and terminating on the 31st +ley of Deodblber, g De, at,uhioh time
the parties will renegotiate for f4rther eutenalon, the rig t and +sasawnt to
eoett#r amd atheXV19® disnewinate swine aowage, Impure e 1 effluent in en
agriculturally ¢agnd uenner upon a portion 4f the erople 9 located on the
hereinafter desorlbad tract of land togethar with the rigt . and easem+nt of
ingreas, egress and regress over and upon said mot of la, 1 for the purpose
Of scattering and otherwise di.eacstinetinq ouch sWLni se aqa, manure and
e;fluent, said nand bsinq more particularly desaritx+d as f :lloer:
going eyproximately 40 aerea of land situatad in A gnolia To�snahjp,
Duplin county, North Carolina, and being a Pattlan of the and met forth in
dead. reoordad in look 4o3d Page S`51$ , and book _Lay_, pa ! j' g , oe the
Duplin County nogifitry.
The proviniona are rat for�thh in a written Agrem ►nt and va-eftent
bstgrann the parties dated —1 ,+,yam
1998, and hereby Incorporated by
reference in thie Hemorandom.
IN TSeTIKMV Uh uor, said bmas agAsM rAlni,R LLC hap caucad
tJ+Sa ihaCrunent to be executed in its Wane by its Has:aq®r this the Ails
day of , 1990,
OEM S LSY FAM10, 1
8Y: (SRAL)
D EDI a Y, „
NORTH CAROLZRA
DUPLIV COVN?X'
+°?R. OIl 7QS .? 1[�9. � , A Notary ?nklic eZ eeifl
4;. ,
COuRtk +adiQ''d 9 A, do hereby osrtify that DBMNIS MUM, H roger of vennie
geaa�dy FB IIC poreonally appeared before me thin day :d aClntovrIadgod
ttia, tie/BXgbt} of the rorepoinq instrument.
":pp:A►i ®ss my hated and notarial semi, thin the -day of 74v-h
1998_
Ny Coromiseian Expiros:

MAR-10.2005 10.211AM FF.CM-
inn 12113 ME357
T-1 6 F-002 F-5590
µflRF16CAROLiMA.wyNedonryT� +1`/' ..�,1(ad.•••M"_7.'�..' ... ......... ..• ..5........ -,
7lrtan�Mn�eedtayKlrxm V..�.�..... ...«.-.«..... ....-.- ., ....,..,..n..."......
�.....w. •,..,�...-... ..�•�.1..�.....'...�_...—.... .��....u.��..w....+•-.+. ........
-.1� �etadll,AMM
.........r..............w...m••• ..._. •• ..._dt..
ra; •,a...an � TIeet�pe 't. �..........
By,
�area�.aW.eAMa•n�ai,r.ela.�. p,�%/,r,d,�y�.rJD. r
IftimDEXED

I inch equals 600.000000 feet Kenan Hog Farm

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM MAR U 3 -4)
Date: March 1, 2005 13Y
To: ❑ Landon Davidson, ARO-APS ❑ David May, WaRO-APS
❑ Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS ® Charlie Stehman, WiRO-APS
❑ Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS ❑ Sherri Knight, WSRO-APS
❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: Duane Leith, AFO Permitting and Compliance Unit
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
E-Mail. duane.leith(o),ncmail.net
A. Permit Number: NCA231870
B. Owner: Reginald Kenan
C. Facility/Operation: Reginald Kenan Farm 31-870
❑ Proposed ® Existing ❑ Facility ® Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Type: ® Animal ❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
❑ Recycle ❑ I/E Lagoon ❑ GW Remediation (ND)
❑ UIC - (5QW) closed loop water only geothermal
For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ❑ D&M ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 El503 Exempt ❑Animal
2. Project Type: ® New ❑ Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. ❑ Renewal ❑ Renewal w/ Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: ❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
Trying to bring it under the general permit at this time. AU concerns? Thanks.
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within 30 calendar days, please take the following actions:
® Return a Completed Form APSSRR.
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO*.
* Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits, reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer:
Date:
FORM: APSARR 09/04 Page 1 of 1

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
March 1, 2005
MR. REGINALD KENAN
REGINALD KENAN FARM
PO BOX 472
WARSAW, NORTH CAROLINA 28398
Subject: Application No.NCA231870
Additional Information Request
Reginald Kenan Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kenan:
The Animal Feeding and Operations Permitting and Compliance Unit has conducted a preliminary
review of the subject permit application package. Additional information is required before we may
continue our review. Please address the following items no later than March 31, 2005.
1. Thank you for submitting your Animal Waste Management Plan Certification and Waste
Utilization Plan (WUP). Please provide copies of the agreement or leases on the 30.59 acres of
land identified in the WUP to which wastes are to be applied under agreement or lease.
2. Please provide a map showing the boundaries of the fields to which wastes are to be
applied and the field identification numbers. Please be sure these agree with the tract and field
numbers shown in the WUP.
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules
and regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still
the responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items may
result in future requests for additional information.
Please reference the subject application number (NCA231870) when providing the requested
information. Two copies of all revised and/or additional documentation should be signed, sealed, dated,
and submitted to my attention at the address at the bottom of the cover page of this letter. Please note
that failure to provide this additional information on or before the above requested date may result in
your application being returned as incomplete.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
NoorthCarolina
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[e-mail] or [phone]. You may also check the future status of this project online at
hltp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/rpportsPermits.html. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Duane Leith
APS-Animal Unit
Cc: Wilmington.Regional_OfficeAquifer ProtectionSection —;
APS-LAPCU Central File NCA231870

Animal Waste 1Iariagement Plan Certification
(Please tvoe or Irinc all infcxrnation drat does not reuuire a sign 1tUre)
nr Expanded.'': (pleah_se circle ones
F�istinR or..: -�leh�(please - -
General Information: 1
Name of Farm: 1d e� r Facility tip:
Owner(s) dame: �� r\a�a �ha Phone o:�916) a93`` 61
Mailinz Address: Po. NG T33N
Farm Location: County Farm is located in:
o l �o' 1 tit
Latitude and Longitude: 34� ./ � %6 N Inie�rrator:MAV_ �► y ASS
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specittc: road
names, direections. milepost. i �a�P' LAS111 ko A'C'A ig
JZLA"o � +-L," � e on AL O K S
ho '�'e_f m 1l0'hC e_ o � C'i `vj
Oneration Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
=) W'ean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish `73
_1 Farrow to Wean —
:a Farrow to Feeder
.I Farrow to Finish
Z! Gilts
Boars
Type of Poultr
_1 Laver
_.t Pullets
No. of _animals Th pe of Cattle V`o. of anintals
D Dairy
D Beef
Other Type of Livestock: ,Munber ofAnimals:
*,Pv � Se � Ce'4F cokt a h Jf�r b a b r
0e!S
aisdzrsa-�• O :� �:::
;....::.:. :
....... ............::.:.:.:.....:.:.::-:.:.:.••. .• :: .,:.::;.:-.:•:. :,fir:.:::.•'.::
. ..:.;.::..; • :I'otai:De.sr, . C�Dac�i&v:°•��-:.:•:::..
�reciotis--Desr2n:::CaDacrn° ���•:;;:;'.::•::,..:,..::,,.>:.;:;��{ddttronaf Dest2n. C:tt7acr� ... .. ...:
�14.5H Required Acreage: �
Acreage Available for AQpiication:
—v
Number of Lazoons / Storage Ponds : I Total Capacity: � � � Cubic Feet (ft3) j -Ask)
IV CD CD
Are subsurfac_ drains present on the farm: i`ES or r0 (please circle one) =
Jr, Cn
If 'YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOOV or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one) w C';
iircxi�i�ii lax xi,[�ic ie is six i�ia xia is ra isxa!�xia Mftn is yt it ia,iit is ri is isle is as i�ia it i,,t i�it ai ie is �k ieixaxia rt aaKicitae is is is icx i�ititititit it is is �k it 3,a is is ie is ie
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand die operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste mana;emenc plan tar die farm named above and % ill
implement these procedures. I (we) :now that anv expansion to the existing design caeacicv of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental -N•lanagement before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be ao disclharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of tie state either directly through a man-made
convevance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-y ear. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand iliac run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the ;`Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that anv modifhcaton
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 daysAt a tide i sfer.�
Name of Lard Owner : �''r`q CIL nO` `'-�
Signature:
Name of titan
Signature:
different from owner):
Date: 1/a a / -7g
Date:
AWC -- .august 1, 1997 1
M00202071074

Technical Specialist Certircation
. . Y, As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
dards and specifications of the Division of Environmental anth
management plan that meets or exceeds stan
e North Ca olma
specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS)
Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following
elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each
certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC,I) the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storage Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
() Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
AA New expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoonslaB4lp9g4FIIfj
have
'been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications. %`%00AR9Z
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) j "rOCV4—=gj
'T
Affiliation: Mvpp*i Vr*ml W rAPY'AS
Date Work Completed? 5 /41; 4 S 13 0
Phone No:�j��_�IIJJ54,0
F
Address(Agency),po.nx ?59(�s•E F11U- �-►L �1� 'j• 4/VX -,ut& Date: 1744
Signature:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separation (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 4�161
A)esgeni
Mv� �l Fgp�yA5
cy): Q.D. 0 7 ,,E F-�il,L II�G
S
C) terior LotsChpriate box
wthout exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not'contain any exterior lots.
Date Work Completed:
Date:
No: mc/a)W-V)I
() Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have bean designed. in accordance
with technical standards developed by NRCS. ,01111111f+ill., �
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): J ,� t�L'�u , �. FESS
Date Work CompEpt SEAL 9� "
Affiliation:
Address(Agency):8 Phone No.:
E 1 a, gyc 7
Signature: 4,0I Date:IZl,%q7 ��''�. RI` -n% %%`�•
.J. _ .
M00202071075.!
AWC — August 1, 1997
2

D) Appncation and Handling Equipment
Check the Appropriate box
() Existing or expanding facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in accordance
with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management
plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the
specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of application has been established; required buffers
can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan).
New, expanded or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at
rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of applications has
been established; -required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan)
() New,ex anded or existin facilitywithout existin waste a lication ui ment for land s readin not usin s ra
irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed gpplication equipment can cover the area required by the plan at
rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applicaions has
been established: required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: MIH Date Work Completed:
Address(Agency): ,D, Phone No:C91D) r 411
7 ZS
Q;onar„re Date: f 7
E) Odor Coh o nsect ntrol lvior[aur. iviaua Cauca., ". an Insect Control
--- -
The agement plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist,
Ch klist, a Mortaility Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have
b n evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management
Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality
Manangement Plan and the EmergencyAction Plan are complete and can be implemented by `1'a f�
•1"',
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) : J W'L_
�—Q E „ �sS! • '
Date Work•Com het =:
Affiliation: Mu �,�,v�n��,•l �ptprvl5 p=
Address (Agency):Qa_ 13t,�,_-7S9gow l .JC Z04601- Phone No.
�nn' Date: �Zl • a k�y��' E:'�.'°
Signature: _ '�•
ten Notice of New or rxpanuill —1— =-e••••
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expandedA9(p • I(we)
certify that I(we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice
was in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners
notified is attached.
Name of Land Owner: V,8&
Signature:
Name of Manager
Signature:
l ` Date:
-rent ntt from owner) :
Date:
z, Sr
AWC -- August 1, 1997
M00202071076

III: Certification of Installation
A) Collection Storae Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): j. arc t,� I- � P �- �" LESS/o r'v
M
Da
Affiliation:te Work Computed I idol �
: Phone No .
Address(Agency): P D- cF-- 7 S5 c 2�rg (A le) �6"9'
/ n -{ Date: ,�'�,
Signature: : /` •C.�X -G/ , Z�q ri 7 ''l.;
runn++
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
() The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
( Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system as
specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to established the
vegetation as specified in the plan by 1/14 11,1 (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for
compliance with the waste utilization plan.
() Also check this box if appropriate
` if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within .30 days of
this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): 9
Affiliation:
This
V.
Date Work Completed:
Phone No.
Date:
block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in 1H.B above has been checked.
I (we) certify at I (we) ve committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and if
appropriate t at
th interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within IS calendar days following the date specifed in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action
from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: TLC„sq.L;t;;, 14�
Signature: G--- Date:
Name of Manger (' � different from owner):
Signature: Date:
M00202071077 ;
AWC — August 1, 1997 4

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in
the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
FSj
f Technical Specialist (Please Print):
ion: Date Work Completed:
s(Agency). Phone No.:
re: Date:
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or n
Check the appropriate block
() Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration and
adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
() Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the contract
agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained, calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
(J� Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been purchased
and will be on site and installed by 4/I4 141
(month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with cropping
system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: M v f-S Date Work Completed:
Address A encY)� 14ILL �C- Ta45g> Phone No.:�gw) Zyq_�►► l
( g Q�a•$ox
Signature: Date:
The following ignature ock is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in ffi D above has been checker
I (we) certify t I (we) ha committed to purchase the animal waste application and in equipment as specified in my
(our) waste agement plan d will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist
within 15 cale dar days follow g the date specified in -the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this
verification i a violation of the aste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:, V ��v,q,J
Signature:
Date: r ��
Name of Manage (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control Insect Control anortatity Management (SD SI WUP.RC or
Methods to control odors and insects as specified to the Plan have been installed and are operational.`
management s stem as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): J .;.1. G;�� -r,)e • t, le:---------------
.
Affiliation: Date Work Completed:
v t
Address (Agency)
Phone No.:� ��
�� D . god '7 E ► t ( �ICZ ¢
Signature: Date:
AW C -- Augu 1, 1997 5
1 �
M
7 r
v Glt��••�E` �:
'fflf flltl6l��5``
M00202071078

1
Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the
following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste Management Plan to the
local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in your files with your Animal Waste Management
Plan.
M00202071079
AWC — August 1, 1997

O
O
N
O
N
O
v
F-�
O
OD
O
50
T

c' a
/Vtoi Pic, r, - '1) 17 10c) - c9 9 q — 3 (o 014
C. ' fias '- 4��' �'�'ey+�x ��i,���x'X,%+m wLY -• N���'3 .� "...it. ,}'�1.-a4�. i'mo' �'rYi"�'p�+-p :`
a
PRODUCER: Reginald Kenan
LOCATION:
HWY 903
0
Magnolia, NC
TELEPHONE:
[phone]
N
TYPE OPERATION:
Feeder - Finish
NUMBER OF ANIMALS:
7344
N
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will " find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
C3
rnn,
=o
C
rn
r)
Page 1

00
...c.-
ZM4 animals X 1„Q (tons) waste/animal/year = 13,953.6 (tons) waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
73A4 animals X 2,3 lbs. PAN/animal/year = 16,891.2 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Guide Std. 633) Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. TVDe Per Acre Utilized Annlicatinn
T865
2
FoA
Bermuda G
255
12.57
3205.35
March - Sept.
T865
3
FoA
Bermuda G
255
12.91
3292.05
March - Sept.
T865
4
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
7.70
1963.5
March - Sept.
T865
5
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
0.75
191.25
March - Sept.
T865
6
FoA
Bermuda G
255
2.30
586.5
March - Sept.
T865
7
FoA
Bermuda G
255
1.25
318.75
March - Sept.
T865
8
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
1.50
382.5
March - Sept.
1-8
FoA
Small Grain(G)
50
38.98
1949
Sept. - April
i vial I 3ts.val 99,tsat3.yu I
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation
NOTE. The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
CI
RAW
I1f
14160,If. 15111»
v�
12k,,� ly
n
Page 2

Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land [see
Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres
# No. Twe Per Acre*
Lbs. N Month of
Utilized Application
1590 March - Au
T8162
9
Wo
Corn
115
13.83
T8162
9
Wo
Wheat
96
13.83
1328
Sept. - April
T8162
9
Wo
Soybeans
140
13.83
1936
June - Sept.
T8162
10
Ln
Corn
90
8.51
766
March - Aug.
T8162
10
Ln
Wheat
75
8.51
638
Sept. - April
T8162
10
Ln
Soybeans
75
8.51
638
June - Sept.
lib2
1
Fo
Corn
135
8.25
1114
March -Aug.
T 1 b ?
1
Fo
Wheat
120
8.25
990
Sept. - A ril
Ttlua
1
Fo
Soybeans
140
8.25
1155
,tune - Sept.
10,155
*2 years so
*
divide by 2
* See footnote for Table 1.
i orai
Totals from above Tables
I 30.591 o,u7t$.00 I
Acres
Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
11,888.90
Table 2
216,966.90
5078
Total
Amount of N Produced
16,891.20
Surplus or Deficit
75.70)
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
%t 10_;."
%i►aJ-5
Page 3

See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
.Application of Waste by Irrigation
Maximum
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate (In/Hr) Amount (In.)
2-8
FoA
Bermuda
0.5
1
9
Wo/Au
Row Crops
0.45
1
10
Ln/Wo
Row Crops
0.45
1
1
FoA
Row Crops
0.45
1
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for M days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every fi MONTHS. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure. exceed Elevation *see lagoon desion.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
Narrative of operation:
Acres shown are irrigated acres. Grower uses a combination of solid set and hard hose
travellers.
Page 4

See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Maximum
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate (In/Hr) Ammint (in 1
1-8
FoA
Bermuda
0.5
1
9
Wo/Au
Row Crops
0.45
1
10
Ln/Wo
Row Crops
0.45
1
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for IM days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every IG MONTHS. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation *see lagoon design.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
Narrative of operation:
Acres shown are irrigated acres. Grower uses a combination of solid set and hard hose
travellers.
Page 4

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any -discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during_ rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

S*� `w .�. E'r..e+u'�r � h ✓.f? � �.. � �_. �- q ��'�i �'—����.�{�.Y,_3-e� � � r���' �#...c��"'i� �S
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a 'closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
18 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
19 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
20 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
21 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
22 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

s �4i ...v. ... __..-,.t—__.._..1.�_ _i. �_.. �.� ....�= �.•�._. .. _..�...-.___.. .A ._'-�5..__C^. ...n-. x_.__{:W_.. :4-`"...e___-r.... ._l-x�.'_see.�•L.:.r<�
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Kenan Farm
Owner/ Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Reginald Kenan
(Please print)
Signature:ti^Y, Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) Kraig A. Westerbeek
A
21
9

?.7.7770M.,
4M
V. Y, tc
77.
MR'
7

�F W ATF� Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
No Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007
S. Reginald Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
P. O. Box 472
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310870
Reginald Kenan Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Duplin County
Dear S. Reginald Kenan:
In accordance with your application received on January 4, 2007 we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to S. Reginald Kenan, authorizing the. operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Reginald Kenan Farm, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 7344 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 111.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for 'collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record kepping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwateraualit .ororg Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a -period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-796-7215. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS310870

�III�Q •
^'�*`,�s:>::'�ia+• r;,,;:. �,�razj^:."�':;�;�rz:�-,n�;:�--�",�Tt-���a�"`j`T"�e�`��.� ``�""�„'�= `^ �.:�..."�..'__"`�,�.,�Y
PRODUCER: Reginald Kenan
LOCATION: HWY 903
Magnolia, NC
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder o Finish
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 7344.
(Design Capacity)
C ID
.lo N 1 0 2007
v.
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1

' 1.,1L.ma?fi�'..'+°k=,.`�.,T<`�"�c,3 �:at
"IH a :: ` _1 SsT , 11TfLt ..° i' SNP — 4 .
raass:3,.�rw.;t.e `_"4r��,�:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons. ft, tons, etc.)
7344 animals X 1.2 (tons) waste/animal/year = 13,953.6 (tons) waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
7344 animals X 2. lbs. PAN/animal/year = 16,891.2 Ibs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Guide Std. 633) Tech
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
fi Nn- Tvne Per Acre Utilized Aoolication
T865
2
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
- 12.57
3205.35
March -Sept.
T865
3
FoA
Bermuda G
" 255
12.91
3292.05
March - Sept.
T865
4
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
7.70
1963.5
March - Sept.
T865
5
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
0.75
191.25
March - Sept.
T865
6
FoA
Bermuda G
255
2.301
586.5
March - Sept.
T865
7
FoA
Bermuda G
255
1.25
318.75
March - Se t.
T865
8
FoA
Bermuda G
255
1.50
382.5
March -Sept.
1-8
FoA
Small Grain(G)
50
38.98
1949
Sept. - April
i otai I su.aul 'I'I,tsuu.au I
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

V _ 4 i � <..' � 'ici���nt'+��3�jw� ��.1—i . • � a4�cr-�V w3 �>'.w y�`.
10
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land [see .
Required Specification 2]) -
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N
# No_ Tvne Per Acre*
13.83 1590 March -Aug.
Acres Lbs. N Month of
Utilized Application ��� ►� (�,
T8162
9
Wo
Corn
115
* See footnote for Table 1.
I otal l su.oyl 5,uits.uu l
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 38.98 11,888.90
Table 2 30.59 5078
Total 69.57 16,966.90
Amount of N Produced 16,891.20
Surplus or Deficit 75.70)
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
V%4to .-I
®�alz
Page 3

I
^.•sbMIA
-s`- :e^i '."?r-'P°s _ = 5r^.—m"-=.t; ';.5-'�.F —atei:;,.+c?S?:i=ntiv..`,.,�'."�'z�`-ax< ae•-'`=+'-'c:'"=:,�=9`�c:'.',-5;:':'.-^-n"""�r't'�"��^..1-%`.::�'
fir( _
�...�.... "ts»�..,,
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Maximum
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
nice Rsta (In/Hrl Amount (in.)
2-8
FoA
Bermuda
0.5
1
9
Wo/Au
Row Crops '
0.45
1
10
Ln/Wo
Row Crops
0.45
1
1
FoA
Row Crops
0.45
1
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for M days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every a MONTHS. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation *see lagoon design.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly. Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
Narrative of operation:
Acres shown are irrigated acres. Grower uses a combination of solid set and hard hose
travellers.
Page 4

4
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Maximum
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
KIn- Rate (ln/Hr) Amount (In.)
1-8
FoA
Bermuda
0.5
1
9
Wo/Au
Row Crops
0.45
1
10
Ln/Wo
Row Crops
0.45
1
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for M days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every S MONTHS. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation *see lagoon design.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
Narrative of operation:
Acres shown are irrigated acres. Grower uses a combination of solid set and hard hose
travellers.
Page 4

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any -discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which. does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
Page 5

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that -the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
.discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist'.
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
16 ' Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 6

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
^17 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is "
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
18 Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
19 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre plant with no further applications animal waste
during the crop season.
20 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
21 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste appiication records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
22 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

t.
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Kenan farm
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the
new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event. less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Reginald Kenan
(Please print)
Signature: 1:�;; 1 i1_i^:� Date: -7
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) Kraig A. Westerbeek
Affiliation: Murphy Family Farms
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 759
Rose Hill, NC
Page 8

/��r�!(
rNk,DA A ronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Ralei h NC 276 465
q 07-G [phone] Report No W01259 W
Grower. McGill Environmental Systems Copies To. -County Extension Director
D
1100 Herring Rd. USDA-NRCS-Sampson
Rose Hill, NC 28458
WN
• Waste na ysis effort Farm: Delway
v--+5
8/16/00 Sampson County��,�`
Sample Info, Laborato Results (parts per mil[ion untess otherwise noted)
Sample ID: N P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn CU B Mo CI C
01 Total 4607 1885 1955 44362 933 17153 885 86.2 63.7 36.7 3.99 155649
IN -N
Waste Code: -NH4
FCW -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH Ss C.•N DM% CCE96 ALE tons
Description: OR-N 1140 9.58 4.34 6.62 3.01 540 33.79 57.90
Com osted Waste - Other Urea
Recommendations:=; `. ,.- ;:.. Nutr� n v ; .
e is A ailabie for First Cro Ibs/tor .(wet 6asis): Other ELerrients . Ibsltori (wet lia`sisj:
Application Method N Pz05 K20 Ca Nig S Fe M, Zn CU B . ':_ Mo CI' Na =.Ni ... Cd Pb Al
Soil Incorp 2 7 3.8 2.4 38.5 0.81 149 0:77 . 007 „ 0:06 0:03 T 13 ..0`01.. 0.01 0.01
Elie waste product contains a`large amount of carbon in relation to nitrogen: (higli:C N ratio) To enhance composting, blend with a:material contalnmg.a low O N ratio to obtain an ideal ratio of 20=30..
loluble salt level js;Very high,;:The.,compostconnot be used as a landsca esoil or, otti: mediawvithout blendin other P. P .. ng g o er materials toaower soluble salts to;an aeceptaple<level. Very high solublesalts likel indicate.Ve
sigh nutrient -availability. Fake a-mateli ng soil sample to further evaluate�pHand.nutnent�availabl11
Y y ...
e pH ©f the:compost is we(I be ow' desired range for plant:pioduction. if the matenaf will bet' sed as: a6landsca p e or potting soil,'blend.othor amendirie �
p P 9 nts.or.add lime to increase pH to the desired range Submit a
Hatching soil sarnple forgujoonce on, lime rate required to increase pH to the desired, ran e
9
j�P�r°� 7� �S loads Cllenon F�um

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh., NC 27607-6465 919 733-2655
Re -port No: V709273 W
Grower: McGill Environmental Systems Copies To: County Extension Director
1100 Herring Rd. USDA-NRCS-Sampson
Rose Hill, NC 28458
.
aste na ysis e�®rt Farm: Dehvay
ll
6/ 9/00
Sampson County
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca MA; S Fe Mn Zn. Cu. B
Mo CI C
42800
Total 16701 L
10629 8610 30581 3564 5076 3555 356 289 103 36.5
264788
Waste Code:
IN -N
-N&
L Al M L Al Al L L Al M
PCP
Descriptio7z:
Composted Poultry Waste
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li PH SS CN
DAM CCE% ALE (1o?is)
3235 6.47 410.00 15.85
M
52.23
Recommendations:
Apphcatio77 Metbod
Soil Incorp
Nutrients Available for First Crop lbsjton (wet. basis)
N P205 X 20 Ca Mg S Fe M11 Z11 Cu B Mo Cl
8.7. 19.1 9.7 24.0 2.8 4.0 2.8 0.28 0.23 0.08 0.03
Other Elements
Na N;
3.4
lbs/ton (wet basis
Cd A Al Se Li
Nitrogen is very high in relation to carbon (Low C:N Ratio). if the waste product is to be used as a rawmalerial in composting, blend it with another material with a high C:N ratio.
ideal composting conditions.
The C:N ratio should be 20-30 for
Soluble salt level is very high. The compost cannot be used as a landscape soil or potting media without blending other materials to lower soluble salts to an acceptable level. Very
high nutrient availability. Take a matching soil sample to further evaluate pH and nutrient availability.
high soluble salts likely indicate very
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
N
P X Ca M S
Fe Mn
Z77
Cu B
Mo Cl C
50200
Waste Code:
PLO
Description:
Ind. Poult. (Other)
Total 16516
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
6145 1852 10853 1098 2205
2090 156
220
89.9 - 32.1
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Sc Li PH SS C.N
DA1% CCE% ALE(1017S)
5380 35.5 1.66 0.00 6.06
31.20
Recommendations:
ice,
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/ton (wet basis)
Other Elements
lbs/ton (wet basis)
Application Method
Soil Incorp
N P205 X20
3.1 6.6 1.3
Ca Aig S Fe A177 Zr7. CU
5.1 0.51 1.0 0.98 0.07 0.10 0.04
B Ago
0.02
Cl
Na Ni Cd
3.4 0.02 T
Pb Al Se Li
0.00

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W00782W
7/27/00
Grower: McGill Environmenta
1100 Herring Rd.
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Waste A na ysis R effort Farm: Delway
Sampson County
ins Copies To: County Extension Director
USDA-NRCS-Sampson
Sam le Info.
Ilaborato :_Results :( arts _er million uril'ess otherwise noted)
Sample 1D:
N
P K Ca Mg S
Fe Mn Zn
CU
B
Mo CI C
MCI
Total 14553
7682 3791 24392 2494 2209
4118 286 207
92.3
0.00
306858
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
FCP
-NO3
Na Ni Cd Pb Al
Se Li pH
SS
C:N
DM% CCE% ALE tons
Description:
OR-N
1533
6.38
89
21.09
55.23
Composted Poultry Waste
Urea
Recommendations:
.::.:, _ ::: _ ;'::
Nutrients: Available=for.-"First Cro `-- ..,:
Ibs/ton Ow t,basis);a;'.' = ;.Oth'e'r
(. )
Elements:
Ibs/fon wefi;basis
(.
Appliication-�tilethod:
: =-N Pz03: �K20.
Ca, A S u�Fe; �' ` -:: Mn : Zn Cu
�8 - �Md :'Cl.._
Na
INi Cd
Pb :Al:
Soil lncbr ;:: �.'
P,
�:.8,0;. ~� 4:6 4:5
20.22118 =3;4� rfl24.017 0:08
0.00
'j.7
:6.4 :.:11.7: 4.0
16.2 1. 1.5 2;;7:. `:0:19 -0:14 0:06
0: 0
1.7
i ne wastaproauspas:an ideai t :iy: ratio of U u.tor optimum composting. No additional .blending is: necessary.
soluble salt level;is h► `h. ;The foots of: lants rowin directly in the com ' ost.ma be lama 'ed articular) under d soil condi ions. ..The corgi ost should,be. len ed 6U-le t 50:50 with another r f i ui I
_g...: P.::...9 .9 Y P...... y.. 9<: ;R.., _ „=. , y.. dry t o s e :., : P.,.:.. ,....b d, as t othe mate ial. o , o.:er,sa t . .
evel. High:solublesalts l kely indicate,h3gh.nutrieratavailability. Take -a matching soil sample to:further evaluate pH and nutrient availability ..: .
orator::: e'sults : arts -:,et naillton unless=otherwise noted
-
:,. .
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca og S
Fe Mn Zn
CU
B
Mo CI C
MC2
Total
16726
9770 7422 32839 3607 3629
5050 381 268
113
0.00
282786
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
FCP
-NO3
Na Ni Cd Pb Al
Se Li pH
SS
C:N
DM% CCE% ALE(tons).
Description:
OR-N
2805
6.24
268
16.91
58.03
Composted Poultry Waste
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Qroo
lbs/ton (wet basis)
Other Elements
Ibs/ton (we't,:basis)
Application Method
N-
F205 K20
Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu
B Mo Cl
Na
Ni Cd
Pb Al Se Li
Soillncorp
9.7
19.5 9.3
28.6 3.1 3.2 4.4 0.33 0.23 0.10
0.00
3.3
Broadcast
7.8
15.6 8.3
22.9 2.5 2.5 3.5 0.27 0.19 0.08
0.00
3.3
rogen is very nigh in relation to carbon (Low C:N Ratio). If the waste.produc ;t is to be used as a raw material in composting, blend it with another material with a high C:N ratio. The C:N ratio should be 20-30 for ideal
:ornposting conditions.
>oluble salt level isvery high. The compost cannot be used as a landscape soil or potting media without blending other materials to lower soluble salts to an acceptable level. Very high soluble salts likely indicate very
sigh nutrient availability. Take a matching soil sample to further evaluate pH and nutrient availability.

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 919 733-2655 Grower: McGill Environmental S Tste Report No: W09094 P9 3
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
N
P h Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu G Alo 611 C
41000
Total 13501 L
8470 7877 28478 3490 2470 3676 371 263 96.3 30.6 248504
IN -N
L M M L L M L L Al Al
Waste Code:
-NI14
PCP
-NO3
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH SS C.N DM/ CCE% ALE(tons)
Descz1ptiozz:
OR -A'
2739 33.4 1.82 16.9 6.73 400.00 18.41 49.30
Composted Poultry Waste
Urea
M
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs/ton wet basis
Other Elements lbs/ton wet basis
Application Metbod N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Soillncorp 6.7 14.3 8.4 21.1 2.6 1.8 2.7 0.27 0.19 0.07 0.02
2.7 0.03 T 0.02
itrogen is very high in relation to carbon (Lo)v C:N Ratio)• if the waste product is to be used as a raw material in composting, blend it with another material with a high C:N ratio. The C:N ratio should be 20-30 for
ideal composting conditions.
Soluble salt level is very high. The compost cannot -be used as a landscape soil or potting media without blending other materials to lower soluble salts to an acceptable level. Very high soluble salts likely indicate very
high nutrient availability. Take a matching soil sample to further evaluate pH and nutrient availability.
Compost pH is higher than ideal for plant production. If the compost will be used.as a landscape or potting soil, blend other materials or add elemental sulfur to decrease pH to the desired range. As a general rule, add
0.25 lb. of elemental sulfur per cu. yd. of soil to lower pH 0.5-1.0 unit, One month after treatment, take a soil sample to determine if pH is within the desired range.

>+1CDs�i ouomic,Divisi®n,
4300,Reed ,Creek.Road : Ralei h, NC.-2,7607=6465 � >919 ' 7=33=2' 55;; _ .Grower: VCGHLEnv ron'm6tal S ste . Re ort,No: W03856 Pg 2
—oratory
Sample Info.
LA Results arts per million unless otherwise.no'ted
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Z)Z Cu B MO Cl C
AG0001
Total 16260
4646 3635 25825 1607 8592 2579 172 181 116 22.4 312618
IN -N
Waste Code:
NH4
MCS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li pH SS C.-N DM% CCE% ALE(tom)
Description:
OR-N
2924 24.4 2.11 12.7 5.80 174.00 19.23 48.61
Composted Sludge
Urea
ke6n6mendatioris: 'NuIt`rients Availahle for W 4`Cro .: ;:. ;: `::` :..r;; . _" `;'k =:`lbsLton;' uiet.bdsis ;:'; ;, :
Other Elements = lbslton ioet-basis
.;
Applicatioia-Method' N . ; P205 ; ''Kz0' Ca ° ' ,.Mg : 5..- ;'Fe =' �`Mn'Zn Cit_�`� B Mo Cl,
.
Na Ni:: �Cd Rb Al Se Li
Soil;Incorp.'..:' 6:3.7:8 3.818.8. 1;2. 6 3; 1:9: °�: `�0:13� .0:13'= . �.0:08��'., ��; 0:02. ..
2,8 0:02' T. 0.01.
ifr" 'n''{'" - -
e is v o e hig
h �r m ea' tion�'t � ' 1 o carbon• Low. C:N�Ra i >„g rY. g.. � t o). • If the waste product. is to: be �used'a's;a raw'maferial�iri`com�"ostn` ; ailerd�it'wifli an''other material with'a hi h,C:N ratio. T he C:N: ratio should -be 20-30 for
p g g
; ,. .
deal _coinposting.conditions.
olublesalt leyel'is,.high. The roots:of'plants growing directly,in,the wra ost ma be darn: ege articularl'uadec d" soil,co diti k. >>, 1,..... P
> . ..- .Y, g P; ., .,; .,. Y...,_ ry, n ons,-,The compost slioiild.be.lilended at Ieast,:50:50,�yith another rriaterial of lower salt
,
evel; °Higlisolulile salts;likelY indicate higli'nu'fr`ieni availabiliry..'Take `a matching.soil sanipleao.further evaluale,pH and`niitrient avail'abihty
Sam` IeInfo: ,r,`;`; °'•' ;
`Laborator :Resu is t :•' 1 ar s ei:iiiilhon�il ss.othera�is�noted
Sam IeID:
p .. _
N P K Ca M S Fe Mn ~ Zn Cu B MO Cl C
AG0002n
Total 12375
4114 3087 29883 1363 9650 2072 147 154 84.4 20.6 269329
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
MCS -
-NO3.
Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li pH SS C.N DM% CCE% ALE(Ions)
Description:
OR-N
2732 22.1 2.17 11.1 5.52 304.00 21.76 46.86
Composted Sludge
Urea
Recommendations: ' „ x . 'r, ; ;,;. ,., • Nutrients Available: for. First'.Cro `r=.'. _ .: - .. -,w .,';.;;';.1'6s%ton. iwet`. 4sis "-;` _ :::
Other tBk ents •. ;. , lbs ton .wet basis
Application Method. = - '=7V = ` 'P205,` K'z0 =' Ca `. = Mg ' :�5''. "Fe' `.;: - iYln ��Zn Cu_',� = B : >'iY1o` �. - Cl. - :'"
=' °:Na ` :.., Ni ' Cd� Pb ' Ali Se Li
`_'Soil Ineom : - 4.6 . '6:G 3.:1: 21.0. , 0:96 -6.8 L: ;0:10:-.� . ,�0.1�1 6:06 ' �0€0"1' `
:.
2:� . 0:02 T 001
e.avaste odticfhasanideah'
C.Nratioof20=30.for.o tiiriumcomostin . No
P. P g g-
-.
,.`
oluble salt-leve J� yer' `ii li: The`co `Wit
g p _ „cannot te-used as,a;landsca a soil or potting media Wi " "
y, most , p witliout�blendingothermateno', lowei-..soluble salts,to,an acceptaule level.Very, ,high soluble salts likel indicateve'
Y. ry
, .
iigli nutrient availability::Take a matcliing soil sample to-furthdi`�evaluate pH and nufrieability
nt`avail--,
_,

Re: 31-870 Kenan Permit Question
o..
Subject: Re: 31-870 Kenan Permit Question
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:56:02 -0500
From: Sue Homewood <[e-mail]>
Organization: DWQ
To: Dennis Ramsey <[e-mail]>
CC: Dean Hunkele <[e-mail]>,
Stonewall Mathis <Stonewall. Mathis@ncmail. net>,
Rick Shiver <[e-mail]>, Kim Colson <[e-mail]>
Dennis,
Please see Dean's email. The last time I tried to track this one down, it
was in your office. I agree with Dean's statement.
Sue
Dean Hunkele wrote:
> Sue,
> Since it has been over 2 years since this permit was reviewed and sent
> up for further review/signatures, doesn't it have the General Permit by
> default at this point based on NC Statute? If this is the case, then
> shouldn't the GP be issued? We are very limited in actions we can take
> against this facility since it is officially only certified.
> Dean
1 of 1 1/29/2001 11:25 AM

3 1-870 Kenan Permit Question
Subject: 31-870 Kenan Permit Question
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 08:53:38 -0500
From: Dean Hunkele <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC Division of Water Quality
To: Sue Homewood <[e-mail]>
CC: Stonewall Mathis <[e-mail]>,
Rick Shiver <[e-mail]>
Sue,
Since it has been over 2 years since this permit was reviewed and sent
up for further review/signatures, doesn't it have the General Permit by
default at this point based on NC Statute? If this is the case, then
shouldn't the GP be issued? We are very limited in actions we can take
against this facility since it is officially only certified.
Dean
................. _....... .... .- . .... ._..... ............. ....... _.. . ... .. .. .............. _....... -......_`_................_...................._.
Dean Hunkele <[e-mail]> j
Environmental Specialist i
NC Division of Water Quality
DENR -- Wilmington Regional Office
1 of 1 1/22/2001 11:02 AM

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
August 5, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
S. Reginald Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
PO Box 472
Warsaw NC 28398
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Application for National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit
Facility Number 31 - 870
Dear S. Reginald Kenan:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) has been required by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) to develop a NPDES permit program for animal waste management systems. The
Division has developed a general NPDES permit similar to the state Non -Discharge General Permit that
this facility is currently permitted under. Coverage under the General NPDES permit will be required by
all facilities that are at, or above, the federal threshold numbers of animals listed below, as well as any
facilities that have had a discharge to waters of the state since January 1, 2001.
Federal Threshold Animal Numbers:
2500 Swine greater than 55 pounds in weight
10,000 Swine less than 55 pounds in weight
700 Mature (milking cows or any cows that have calved) Dairy Cattle
1000 Beef Cattle in confinement
30,000 Poultry with a liquid waste management system
55,000 Turkeys
125,000 Chickens other than a liquid waste management system
82,000 Laying Hens other than a liquid waste management system
According to our records this facility meets the federal threshold for a NPDES permit. If you are
currently operating at a population above the threshold numbers please sign and submit the enclosed
NPDES Short Form B — Existing Facility. Please carefully follow the instructions on the form.
If you are currently operating this facility at a population below the federal threshold you may choose to
submit the enclosed "NPDES Short Form B — Existing Facility" for the design capacity of the system as
it is currently permitted. You may also choose to request a new Certificate of Coverage under the State
Non -Discharge Permit at a population below the federal threshold. Should you choose this option,
please submit the enclosed "Request for Modification to Existing Certificate of Coverage for State Non -
Discharge Permit" application and updated WUP reflecting the population change. Please note that if
you are issued a modified Certificate of Coverage for a lesser population, any future increases in
population would require a new permit from the Division prior to increasing the animal population.
IIta_ 1)EN.R
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http://h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Please submit one of the enclosed applications within 60 days from receipt of this letter. If you choose
to submit the 'Request for Modification to Existing Certificate of Coverage for State Non -Discharge
Permit" application you must include an updated WUP. If you are unable to obtain an updated WUP
you should submit the "NPDES Short Form B — Existing Facility" for your current permitted population
and request a permit modification at a later date when you have obtained a new WUP. Failure to
submit the application as required may subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement
actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
If you have any questions about the NDPES permit, the enclosed applications, or any related matter
please feel free to contact Duane Leith at 919-733-5083 extension 370.
Sincerely,
M. Paul Sherman, P.E.
Cc: Duplin Soil and Water Conservation District
Wilmington Regional Office, Division of Water Quality
Permit File NCA231870
Permit Application File NCA231870

Type of Visit 9F Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit QO'Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 6 une:
Facility Number
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted 0 Certified 1/Conditionally Certifiieed 0 Registered Date•Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....._._......_._._.
Farm Name: .... (f.�.. 1.Q�C.lr..����d��.._ �..t/......_....._.__...._._ County:... VKc�G!".f't..................._.........».».»..._.
OwnerName: ........... _...................................... ..... _......... »............................... _....... ........ ... * Phone No:
MailingAddress: ...... ....................... ...................................................................... _-_._.._.__.._.».__._........_._...._._.......... _.............. _...... _...... _........
Facility Contact: ... _... _..... .......... __._..... _Title:..__..._._._._. ._ _. _» _._....» .. Phone No: _...__........ _...._.._ _ .__ _..
7
Onsite Representative: rf.P.. �....�C!f it....._........_...._........»... _.. Integrator: I70
'
Certified Operator:._......._......._ ............................ .._..__.... »........... __....... _.... ............ _... Operator Certification Num ......
Location of Farm:
i
Igr
[]Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude " Longitude "
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �` o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes allo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ,3No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [I Spillway
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _._ . I_ ._ .. ...._.._._...».__._.:..__ .___........__....... __.»___.._....___».» ....._._._...._........... _...._._._._.....__._._...
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are. there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding [IPAN [IHydraulic Overload ElFrozen Ground
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Copper and/or Zinc
❑ Yes Q'No
❑ Yes TWO
❑ Yes 0-No
❑ Yes .•0'No
❑ Yes _ 3'No
❑ Yes ZrNo
❑ Yes ,M'No
aste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes .©'No
❑ Yes [D lqo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes .,B'No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? [:]Yes Bfio
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Z NN o
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes Z'No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes/ MNo
Air Quality representative immediately.
Ciiiiaiiaeiits;"refer to ` ueshosi;# lz laun yin aniswers gi= any ecommendatioas-®r any other'commentss
"[Tse twangs of faciiity to Be ier explain situations."{we aiitiitiieAal pages; necessary} ` ` ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
�.
lle/ � � Gee
Reviewer/Inspector Name 121"' ,,",'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
!l/Il/UJ a.viuucuau

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 1, � O S�
/ r
Required Reco; ds & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ®'No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Z�No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[2rNo
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
VNo
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ff No
28. Does facility require afollow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
©'No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
'E`No
NTPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
JA
dditcoz�al:..Cctmsl?ensaaad/ar:Dravi»gs"
Z-6iy1ck-
3 -76 lz�2eelllln 17Z 46/1
Y66c6W,
ree'10, 15 - 5
per-nlAj
/�
�� ������ �c Al � r
12112103 ,0�1% 5'

WAT t
� � � \� �', /. ,� `� Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
CO
r-1 Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
(p Division of Water Quality
February 22, 2005
MR. S. REGINALD KENAN RE��I��'�
REGINALD KENAN FARM F E,B 2 3 Luu�
PO BOX 472
WARSAW, NORTH CAROLINA 28398
$� e
Subject: Application No. NCA231870
Additional Information Request
Reginald Kenan Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kenan:
The Animal Feeding and Operations Permitting and Compliance Unit has conducted a preliminary
review of the subject permit application package. Additional information is required before we may
continue our review. Please address the following items no later than March 23, 2005.
We have received your application for the NPDES General Permit for animal Waste
Management Systems. Please provide a Waste Utilization Plan and Waste Management Plan
Certification for the number of animals to be permitted.
Two copies of all revised and/or additional documentation should be dated, signed and submitted to my
attention at the address at the bottom of the cover page of this letter. Please note that failure to provide
this additional information on or before the above requested date could result in your application being
returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[e-mail] or [phone]. You may also check the future status of this project online at
hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/rgportsPermits.html. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Duane Leith
APS-Animal Unit
Cc: ;WilmingtonRegionl-0ffice�--Aquifer-Protecti6n;Section
APS-LAPCU Central File NCA231870
NorthCarolina
Naturally
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

W A TF9Q
Michael F. Easley, Governor
��F
�i
��
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
-�
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. S. Reginald Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
PO Box 472
Warsaw, North Carolina 28398
Subject:
to*
Dear Mr. Kenan:
August 22, 2005
TTI
� AUG;- 2 4
�UUS
Certificate of Coverage No. NCA231870
Reginald Kenan Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
In accordance with your application received on September 7, 2004 we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to S. Reginald Kenan, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES
General Permit NCA200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Reginald Kenan Farm, located in Duplin County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 7344 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please. carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitorinR conditions in this permit. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be
completed and returned to the Division of Water Quality by no later than March 1 st of each year.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. None Carolina
AdAMallY
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit.
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the, expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to, expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at (919) 7.15-6186.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
EWilmington_Regional-Office,_�quifer_1?rgtection Section'
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA231870
APS Central Files

I
0
0
N
O
N
O
v
O
00
O

'Av

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1 hUl UG/ 1.G
�i►ieO-IhPs
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certificate of Coverage
Facility Currently Covered by an.Expiring NPDES General Permit
:1, 2007, the North Carolina NPDES General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will expiire. As required by
pe Tarts, facilities that have been. issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these NPDES General Permits must apply. for
lewst 180. days prior to their expiration date. Therefore all applications must be received by the Division of W at6r Quality
:1= January 2, 2007.
_ .;tie- k st do not discharge animal waste to the surface waters or do not propose to have a discharge have the option to request
y. --z-age under either an appropriate NPDES General Permit (that will be issued with an effective date of July 1, 2007 and will expire
2012) or to request coverage under an appropriate existing State Non -Discharge General Permit (that was issued on
a��td wluch will expire on September 30, 2009).
n...orm is to be used regardless of the type of General Permit under which coverage is requested. Wherefore please
cirvie your requested type of permit below and then. complete all the information on the application form.
do
rzo2 leave any question unanswered. Please make any necessajy corrections to D
I.A N 8 2007
A
I :t^ t 'aaeral Permit Type: NPDES PERMIT or ❑ STAT NON -DISC RMIT
z :';t- �-- rxbar; 31087 and Certificate of Coverage Number: NCA231870 AQUIFER pitOTECTION SFC71Uh!
:,Za: zc; B e¢ix ald Ken7tn P JAN 0 1 2001
as othe Wzt Plan): SRogina]d e�
'Mran
Mailing address: PQ Box 472 a
«arsaw. NC Zip: 2, 8398 `C'l
_ J1[-
j ,:� ep)jcne Number (include
p, bysical address:
`City/State; - _&%\�
code): 21QZ237891 E-mail; Vult,
..0 +�
cn, where facility ij; located: Duvlin
name (If different than the Landowner): Perry, Vann
cr's telephone number (include area code): 910293780.1
Zip;S
name (if there is not an integrator write "None"): Murphy FanOy Farms
(if here is not a lessee write "None"):
operation type and number;
Dry Poultry
'i eaa to Finish
Dairy Calf
Non Laying Chickens
Wean to Feeder
Dairy Heifer
Laying Chickens
Fa.+ ow to Finish
Mille Cow
Turkeys
re-,ier to Finish 7344
Dry Cow
Other
Beef Stocker Calf
Pulicts
Beef Feeder
Turkey Poults
;O-T; ad
Beef Brood Cow
hilts
Other
C�er
Wet Poalt�
Horses
Sheep - Sheep
Non Laying Pullets
Horses - Other
Sheep - Other
Layers
R NEWAL-NPDES-11/06

C,2? 15:38 9102937437 S.REGINALD KENAN PAGE 03/12
--- ,-Fo !1'I copies of the inost•recent Waste Utilization Plan for this facility with this application. The Waste Utilization
')y the owner and alechnical specialist. If a copy -of the fac tv's most recent Certified Animal Waste
�< Tart;f��FTi�a�l has not reviouely been submitted to the NC l)iyisL of Water analitV two (21 copies of the
2;-=3� c� he stlb 'tied as part of this spolication.
^'r sf s piication has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge, X understand that, if
r. It ed pacts o£ this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attacb=ts are not included,
,,is application, package will be returned to me as incompletc. Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-
'.5.6, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application may be subject to
a iap to $25,000 peer violation- (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a ire of not mote than $10,000 or
--. -- c ;got more than 5 years, or both for a similar offense.)
of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign, J,f Landowner is a corporation,
7�,c ajd be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
_ r�
�v Title:
Date:
Title:
Date:
Title:
Date:
THE COMPLETED .AXpLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
PICDENR - DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
Fax dumber: [phone]
;ti:;r %7sTN'EWAL-NFDES-11/06

15:38 9102537437 S.REGINALD KENAN
60
PRODUCER: Reginald Kenan
HWY 903 RECEIVED
Magnolia, NC AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
Fj014iE. .(91.0) 293.7801
JAN ® 2 2007
-rr sCN: Feeder - Finish
1 ? y�qi5E.R OF ANIMALS: 7344
i,De ign capacity)
PAGE 04/12
Y waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rateto prevent pollution
and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
Fmcunt of commercial fertilizer required for the crops In the fields where the waste is
'"h is v4aa`ste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient Waste should be
cle. Annual soil ;ae ore each application
for realistic ells of the crop to be grown.sts are strongly encouraged so that all
r �? utflents can be balanced Y
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that itis the applied o In anro environmentally and thnutrient.
r r;�;nner. Always apply waste based on the needs of p grown
of the, waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than
crop can utilize. Soli types are
4,;,;st a5 they hava different infiltration rates, leaching, potentials, cation exchange
d7 cities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
at greater than ,5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
1 : land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
-may rult in runoff to
lning, or when the surface is frozen. Either afulations.these coW'ndnconditionsshould also be
;,: ,auu waters which is not allowed under DEM reg
r s�•� to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. ,To maximize the value of nutrients for
production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
�c ing crop or applied'to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. injecting the
,rt ce or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
erti,:¢ated acres needed to apply the animal waste is.based on typical nutrient -content for
facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
�t rr;�inagc�ment facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab, for analysis.
-r1l", weste utilization plan, if carried out, .meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2T: 02' 7 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1

-• f _.'4.�_ 15:38 9102937437
S.REGINALD KENAN
PAGE 05/12
112
M�_!4 animals X I& (tons) waste/anlmallyear = 13,953,6. (tons) waste/year_
caT -Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
animals X 2. lbs. PAN/animal/year 16,891.2 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N.C.
Q ud Std. C33) Tech.
Applying the. above amaunt Of waste is a . big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
a ' ,�t"ien! to apply the waste in a timely manner
• r-%I,!VA4ng acreage will be needed for waste application based on. the crop to be grown and
application:
Table I. ACRES OWNED 13Y PRODUCER
'Prat
Field
Soil
Crop
Lbs. N
Acres
Lhs. N Month of
No.
Type
Per Acre
Utilized Application
2
FoA
Bermuda(G)
255
12.57
$205.36
March - seet.
'T
3
FoA
Bermuda G
- 255
12.91
3292.05
March - Sept.
-1 4011 i• t
'.
Q
FoA
Bermuda G
255
7.70
1963.5
March -Set
s�FS is#
5
FoA
Sermudn G
255
0,75
191.25
March
6
FoA
Bermuda G
255
2.30
586.5
March - Se t
5
7
PoA
Bermuda G
255
l ,25
318.75
March - Sept.
'7; !I;w l:
8
FoA
Bermuda G
255
1.50
2.5 38
March-Se t.
1-8
38.981 19491sept -
^- Taut 38.901, I a,tststsmu
r'= tam animal• waste only if nutrients from other sources such as G*mmOmlal fertlilzer are
must he accounted for. "' 4t bn as=�., •,"':naneifc yl�ld-�X��# to lon�
7,1O, applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
°T,� rin,7nenis.' Beginning in i986 the Coastal Zone, Management Act will require farmers in some
-ourtties of North Caroline to have a nutrlent management plan that addresses all nutrients.
i aefs plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

32 —007 16: 38 '
9102937437 S. REGINALD KENAAN
PAGE
06/12
Table 2:
ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator dons not own adequate land [see
Required Specificatlon 21)
;r;p*,
F[�'d
5�i1
Crop Lbs. N Acres
Lbs. N Month of
��
NO.-
Type
Per Acre*
Utilized Application
t
-f
Wo
Cam
115
13.83•
1590
March -Au .
1bak*)+d•
Wo
Wheat
96
13.83
1328
Sept. - rll
g
Wo
Soybeans
140
13-83
im
June - Se t.
143
4n
Cam
90
$.51
768
March - Au
� tad
10
Ln
Wheat
75.
63$
rll
8 l i3
10
Ln
Ln
Soybeans
• 75
8.51
8.26
638
1114
June Se t.
March - Aug.
�
,b
^:
1
1
Fo
CoCorn135
Wheat
120
8.25
990
Sept. - April
Fo
Soybeans
140
$.25
.
1155
.Tune - sept
10,155
*2 years so
"
divide by 2
-- ,----`
Total 30.59
5,078.00
Yy •;Qotnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utlllzed
Table 1
38.98
11,$88.90
Table 2
30.59
5078
Total
69.57
18,966.90
Amount of N Produced
18;891.20
surplus or. Deficit 75.70
no waste U.UffkatTon Plan must contain provisions for periodic land appileatlon of sludge• at
aic-7-a om.1c rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

007 15:38 9102937431 S.REGINALD KENAN
PAGE 07112
:� 3.Sy�!;, ERA'•`' .f
,rsrrao showing the fields to be used 'for the utlilzatlon of waste water.
Application of Waste by irrigation
Maximum
Application 'Application
iS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOW EVER A SIMILAR TABLE
ls'i w,'1 OR SLURRY.N!i B SD•FOR DRY LITTER
Your •Face ty is designed for days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
IMu 'be removed on the average of once every E MONTHS. In no instance should the volume
ta•, %," ste, being stored in your structure exceed Elevation *Se agoon.siesiga•
.;K ;ti ¢ Aural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Sail Conservation Service) or
a7i'. and Water Conservation District office after you ,receive the waste analysis report for
in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper appilra#ion rate prior to
y%Rig,r-ative dfoperatlon:
Page 4

16:38
9102937437 S.REGINALD KENAN
PAGE 08/12
: raj �: , . I,- `map showing the t7e/ds to be used for the uttlizatich of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Maximum
�ea _QtsII Tvnp Crco Application Application
IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE iS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION; HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE
DE NEEDED FOP, DRY L T19R OR SLURRY. '
'=cii;ty is designed for im days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
-. � t 6e removed on the average of once every . fx MONTHS. In no instance should the volume
�.y ^s a'sng stored In your structure exceed EIevatlan see �g000dn.
9: the 1eaal Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or.
and fttef Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
� s mce in determining the amount per acre to apply and -the proper application rate prior to
t1e7ng- tzr, waste.
of operation.
i- GrFlr shw9 n are irrigated acres. Grower uses a combination of solid set and hard hose
Page 4

/L'212LIV 1b:38 9102937437 S.REGINALD KENAN PAGE 09/12
lam• �
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1 Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the, state by runoff, drift, manmade
conyeyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any -discharge of waste which reaches surface -water is prohibited.
2' There., roust be documentation- in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to .properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not awn adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
sn agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
toss of the land for waste application. 'It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utillzation Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
waste small be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
itUtfient$.
Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard SO - Filter Strip).
odors can be reduced by Injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
4^lhen animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
or, convenfmnally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
e w ste may be broadcast provided -the application does not occur during a season
prone to -flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
T Ligvid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such'that runoff
does not occur offsIte or to surface waters and in a method which. does not -cause AM
•from the site during application. . No ponding should occur in order to control odor or Ries.
Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen- .
Page 5

IS:35 9102937437 S.REGINALD KENAN
PAGE 10/12
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(coritlnued)
9 'Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
net dovered with waste to a depth that would Inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
f1rom animal waste should also be considered.
i© Waste nutrients shall -not be applied in fall or -minter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
i as; rltit be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
Jor � s,ancy.
1 ; Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the'following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 90 feet from any residential property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste: other than swine waste from faacilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
;? Animal waste shall not he applied closer than 140 feet to wells.
animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
oavned by the landowner.
r:- V%!aste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right -of --ways.
1. Animell waste shall not be discharged Into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over�spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
p, ovided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall De applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that courses no runoff or drift from the site.
pia Domestic and industrial waste from washdowri facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Page 60

38 9102937437 S. REGINALD KENAN PAGE 11/12
RQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing •a' "closure plan" which will 'eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution .and. erosion_
Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
humeri consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
Consumption it should only be applied pre plant with no further applications animal waste,
during the crop season.
20 Highly visible markers shall be installed• to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds,
�Naste shall be'tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied_ Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels., pH shall be adjusted for
i ;r.!mi ; rop, production and. maintained: , Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
Qr five years. Pouftry dry waste application retards shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
{. Redd anirnals will be -disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
Page 7

Ib:38 9102937437
. rr
S.REGINALD KENAN
,, - of Farm-, Kenan 1=arm .
owner l Manager Agreement
(ave) understand and will 'follow and implement the spectficattons and the operation and
rnainteriance procedures 'estanlished, In the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I. (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new•
certlficatton to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management.(DEM) before the'
new animals are stocked. t (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system fq surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm.' The approved .plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil ' and Water Conservation District and. will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name Of Factiity Owner:' Reginald Kenan
(Please print)
I ; ,.d Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Date:
Signature:
's\iam6 of technical Specialist: (Please print)
Kraig A. Wasterbeek +
Affiliation;
Address (Agency):
PAGE 12/12

JUH-09-00 11:41'AM
e
1 ■
Murphy (Family
Farms
P.01
Land & Nutrient Management - ft®i�ter Office
®,®.;C 759, apse 9fif% North Carolina 910-289-2111
..eXozl.,0V
To:
Phonc;
Fax phone: �i 10).3 5,0 ob I-'
CC:
Date: 66 / -' /0 Cy
Number of pages including cover sheet:
From:
L - e 'ster Of% e
Local Phone; 910-289-6439
Phone: [phone]
Fax phone; 910-289.6442
REMARKS: ❑ Urgent [;I-Ifor,your review ® Reply ASAP ❑ Please comment

JUN-09-00 11:41 AM
P.02
O .. • - _ • • _ • _ - _ • -I RUN 1 a e
7-14-4 animals X 1_9 (tons) waste/animal/year = 13,953.6 (tons) waste/year,
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
7-M animals X ZI lbs. PAN/animal/year = 16,891.2 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN trom N.C.
Guide Std. 633) Tech
Applying the above amount of waste Is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application.,
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lba. N Acres Lbs. IN Month of
"This Nis from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertlllzer are
applied, they must be accounted for, N must b® based on rea/ls !c yield wQectallon
NOTE: The applicator Is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning In 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers In some
eastern counties of North Caroline to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2

JUM-09-00 11:42 AM
P. 03
Table 2:
ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only If operator does not own adequate land [see
Required Specification 21)
Tract
#
Field
Soil
Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
T8162
No.
9
Type
Wo
Per Acre Utillzed AppIlcgitllon
Corn
T8162
9
Wo
125 13.831 1729 March -Aug,
Wheat 96
T8152 1
T8162
9
Wo
13.83 1328 Se t. - , ril
So beans 100 13.83 1383 June - Sept.
T8162
10
10
Ln
Ln
Corn 90 8.51 766 March - Aug.
Wheat
T8162
10
Ln
75 8.51 838 Se t. - April
ISoybeans 1 751 8.511 638 Juno - Soot.
See footnote for Table 1.
Total 1 22-341 3.241.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 47.23 14,405,15
Table 2 22.34 324'
Total 69.57 17 646.15
Amount of N Produced 16,891.20
Surplus or Deficit
2
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrient or other elements.
Page 3

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landuhncr/Ope"for Na = � a 1 A �e n J ;•�
Address: {NECl O 3
Counly; .l.a•• , ;
nalic^ C
Tekpl,: 9 3 yo i Dad:
TWO: I - ReM Specifications
'RcCcr to H C. krigsliou Guide, Ficll Olrice Teltulical Guide, Section R G. Anauol application must nob excoed du: a
t a®raic talcs for
dle soil end crop used.
EXUrf D-1
MRCS. NC
Jam, 1996

-i- q o ?"� C� 1 1 �� a '"► fo i Q 9 S f c)
Landowner/Operator Name:
Address:
relephmte:
TABLE I - Field Specifications
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
-
W 9b ca®dtr �;
uww 39 7Y01 Data 3p
---...-.- —..a,w „„claw FcgUtrt,d buiTer oreas.
3Refer to N. C. Irrigation halide, Field Office Teclurical Guide, SeCtioir 110. Annual application muss uol exceed the agronomic
gr omic [ales for the soil and crop used.
EXf®IT D-I
MRCS, NC

TABLE 2 - ` r4ycli4g Irrigalia[ Gun Selliligs
Atake, RfQdcl and Type of E4uipmwl:
FieWNol
No
Travel
Application
TRAVELLANE
WGlell
Nozzle
EQUIPMENTSMINGS
IlydnnrNo�
SP-d
(Armin)
Raw
(Wv)
Efrodive
WidtG(0)
EIcaivc
u�
Dianlelu
DiameW
Opel
Piesswq$
Plessu�e
ppernting
F(CU re
.
l
3
� ��
!, n
O
61 0
(reoI)
5 �i
(inrJmsi
15
coo fi)
Ral )
Arc
PNIem
_
Y
0
6
S o
.
. ?95
o
9
O
�-o
G
ao
0
50
. g95
q�
o
_5
a
�Drl
b
a5o
.9.
sry
o
D.3
tY
aoc�
ISb
90o
&lop
So
�50
. &95
0
46
'-7
a-9
.7.3
,y1
o
,875
�-
s
3-Ot
:5�
Itob3o
aa..
895
5O
3-[O
�.3
, 4 [
r
a00
Oc
3-i l
y
,mil
� p
�5v
asp
Sc>
9r
0
4-1
"l3
f
9
so
50
, �o
)-3
`f
�f
!�dooO
F.
kq,51
5o
qG
3
l'
!
c,
a
50
1
-a.3.
�a
300G
�
!See attached imp. 1 —
2Shova separate enhics far eacii hydrant locution is each field.
3Use the Wowalg abbreviations firr various arc palterns: 1% (full circle), TQ (three qumurs), TT (two thirds), li (half circle), T (am third a
may also use degrees of arc_
). Q ( ne quarter)_
Comnrnts
3•3 � p
a.3coq
?O_jAA
3 A
I
4
.0
I
0
%D
EXIOBFf D-2 m
m
N
—� 3
v
m
m
Wes, NC
RINE. 1996

E7CHIBCf D.2
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Set(irlgs
Milk. Model and TYPO Of .Equipmenl; p r
c Isp n j IO
Field tJol Travel A➢pliealion TRAVEL LANE EQUIPMENT SETrINGs
and Speed Rafe Effective Effective Wened Nozzle Operaling Operaling
lI d Not (Nmin) (idly) Widlll R Dian da Diameter Preswre Premre
Am
a) �r(a) 15 d (inches) Gun ( ri) Red ( i) Pal m3 Comments
�.41 RO TOO a5O
:l �S 6 .30A�re
BOO 50 ,�6 S �70� 3.30A�r�s
156' d$p j jS S� %�' a 76 a 3130ACIC
S f 3 i1'S 9�50r Ac ie S
lac / So .74 �ACrC
a _ 89S y6 aOD� �O .Z.(o J3 A�.c89s S6 Lft3Ge
1S©e tutadied insp.
2311owseparate cjilries for each Ilydrmrt location ill each ftcld. 3Usc the Cullowillg Abbreviations
for Wow arc
patterns; Ir (Cull circick "fQ (Ulrce rters), 'd'C (faro rds), l i (llnlfcilcle , T one th'
May also use degrees of ere. qua_ thirds). ) ( urlj, Q (ane quarter).
NRCS, NC
JUNE. 1996

TAW 3 - SoIN Set Irriplioll Gun Settings
hf ake, Model and Type of Equipment;
Field Nei
Welled
and
1.11ke N07
Number o/
Dfwsncler
U dimnls
(Ccel
L 1
!�
IIydrwot
Sparlog (ft)
Appllrolioo
OPERATWG P4RA111ETIRS
Nozzle Operullog O
Along
f Dcpac
Iktween
i'i cJfncs
Role
Dlxmeter
Pressure
crwllo
P 8
'Time
(idhr)
(lacbcs
11 drwiq
CnGunsl
�.
�'•.�
;'�;'
is/_
d
'
9
�976
5o
1
IS" a91anrd impf.
?Sh" scpars6e cwiries for each p1palm with hydrews in each fwd.
EXMIT D-3
MRCS, NC
.l MEN 1996

aN
4 j ,5-7 pvVcS
SCALE V-370•
t,0
av
��
- (,0 G (a► s s �Gd
.� re o� k I sa s ✓� sG l
�<COE�96
.
A-, e vc �.-�-
0
`.0
S0'd
wrs Ems: i i 90—so—Hnr

II JUN-14-00 02:44 PM
�
1
P.01
X urphy Tamify Land csZ Nutrient Management - Tsgister Owe
Tarms P.O. Box 759, apse Viff North carofina 9.10-289-2111
*4wxe04t4wv -
To:
Phone:
Fax phone:
CC:
Date: L a L( /G O
Number of pages including cover sheet: Z
From:
LNM - Re 'ster Of e
�•S �f' fL E
Local Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Fax phone: [phone]

' , .� - :: L.1''. •ems-�:i., -� �t - _ .• - �.r'
•( ��'� .,ram (�` ` , �_-, ' _ , 7 "�) �..
mom ab
AD
rl
r?:,\,' ; � � - � . •:,; �-_ - c - , ..i ;to-;: �...
IN f jl • 1 ✓ ,
ne
•r•'i- ii,r Ire, .. _ •'4•,,�rT •ti.' '.. � �.i4tr.+,�} ,_'t �yf
�., :r>j , a rr ' f.�,�`'R T r R'�f � i.I z � .•1� _ '•' ti.,�
• - ' - K' / • fir, . I' L '
'f T
.f:.. ! � ^k �Gy 'may t -/l/ �, 7 :! •t_
•' t, - r •',�iJ •iS. .it*`'�x1�L '� 'LC-f r ��r'� = FL•`r: � � •
-Ike r t-:j T b'•'.: ` -� '•t= } ,'mot'
•' f EJ• t' /j GS ... _• r .:1' � �' •_ •f t t ��. r � � t _ faf -
�, s

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of'Water.Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 7, 2000
CERTIFIED ��?�9 8.4
RETURN RECEI ZR k � � E' --
Mr. S. Reginald Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
PO Box 472
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Notice of Violation
Reginald Kenan Farm
Facility Number: 3 1 -870
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kenan:
This is to notify, lvfr. Pt gbiald it ;'.an, vdho m-.;ris the Regl,"' ld ltenan li'rili rlLr_ll is
deerned permitted to have a nondischarge permit for an animal waste disposal system pursuant to
15A NCAC 2H .0217 and North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, of violations of your 2H
.0217 Permit and your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
On May 23. 2000 and June 9, 2000, Nh% Stone«,alj Mathis of the Wil_rning-ton Regional
ti_1 ce of the Division of `4'arer Quality (6.Q.1 1nSpe`:ted your am- imal operation and Elie animal
waste management system serving this operation. These inspections resulted in the following:
May 23, 2000 inspection: (1) It was observed that a new waste analysis is needed.
The most recent waste analysis is dated December 3, 1999. The CAWMP
requires that a waste analysis be performed at least within 60 days of waste
application. This is a violation of the 2H .0217 Permit and the CAWMP as there
is no waste analysis sufficiently dated for applications made between February 2,
2000 and the date of your new waste analysis (once received) less 60 days. It is
required that a schedule be established for having waste samples analyzed which
will ensure that there is always a waste analysis dated sufficiently to cover
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 An Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Reginald Kenan
July 7, 2000
Page Two
Field
1
1,
Y
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
6
7
8
any application events. (2) It was observed that a soil analysis of the application
fields is needed. The most recent soil analysis is dated August 25, 1998. This is a
violation of the 2H .0217 Permit and the CAWMP which requires that soil test be
performed at least annually. (3) It was observed that you are in violation of the
2H .0217 Permit and the CAWMP by grazing fields that are designated for hay
production in -the CAWMP. (4) It was observed that some of the fields need
improvement. There are low wet areas, bare areas, and non berinuda grasses that
need to be addressed. (5) It was observed that the acreage in the waste plan and
the irrigation design that are on site do not agree. A copy of the waste plan and
irrigation design (including maps) that agree on acreage should be obtained and
kept with the records. (6) It was observed that the irrigation records had not been
updated since October 1999. Irrigation records should be kept up to date.
• June 9, 2000 inspection: (1) The following overapplications of animal waste Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) were observed:
Amount Amount
Allowed Applied Percent
Hydrant Crop (lbs PAN/acre) (lbs PAN/acre) Overapplication
2
1999/2000 Small Grain
3
1999/2000 Small Grain
4
1999/2000 Small Grain
5
1999/2000 Small Grain
6
1999/2000 Small Grain
7A
1999/2 ^.00 Small. (]cain-
7B
1999/2000 Small Grain
8
1999/2000 Small Grain
9
1999/2000 Small Grain
10
1999/2000 Small Grain
71eira_
i2
1>99/2000 Small Grain
13
1999/2000 Small Grain
14
1999/2000 Small Grain
1999/2000 Small Grain
1999/2000 Small Grain
1999/2000 Small Grain
1999/2000 Small Grain
50.
79
58
50
97
84
50
81
62
50
56
12
50
66
32
50
79
58
50
75
50
50
98
96
50
84
68
50
85
70
50
50
99
_ 98
50
89
78
50
86
72
50
-'99
98
50
97
94
50
97
94
50
91
82
These eighteen (18) overapplications of animal waste PAN are violations of the
2H .0217 Permit and the CAWMP. (2) It was observed that the IRR-2 forms for
the 1999/2000 small grain crop show the beginning PAN allowance as 100
lbs/acre while the CAWMP allows 50 lbs PAN/acre to be applied to the small
grain. The IRR-2 forms should be corrected such that they agree with the
CAWMP. (3) It was observed that there is a recent waste plan which it appears

Mr. Reginald Kenan
July 7, 2000
Page Three
is intended to be the waste plan in use at the facility. However, this waste plan
had not been signed and dated by you at "the time of the inspection. If it is your
intention to operate the facility under this waste plan, then it should be signed and
dated by you. (4) It was observed that IRR-2 forms for the 2000 bermuda crop
show the beginning PAN allowance as 3001bs/acre while the unsigned/undated
waste plan allows 255 lbs PAN/acre to be applied. Upon implementing the "new"
waste plan, the IRR-2 forms should be modified. (5) It was observed that field 1,
which is designated in the waste plan as bermuda, is actually planted in both corn
and bermuda. This is a violation of the 211.0217 Permit and the CAWMP.
Modifications should be made such that the waste plan and the field practice
agree. (6) It was observed that the 1999 bermuda crop records were not available
at the time of inspection. Records of waste application are required to be
maintained for a period of five years and should be readily available for
inspection.
Please submit a Plan of Action which addresses the violations and items noted above.
The Plan of Action should include:
1) A list of any and all actions taken to correct the noted violations and items. Please
include any mitigation efforts.
2) A list of any and all modifications that have been and will be implemented to prevent
future occurrences along with a timetable for completion of the modifications.
The written Plan of Action must be submitted to this office within ten days of receipt of this
notice. .. ,
Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may take further enforcement actions in
these matters including assessment of civil penalties, injunctive relief, and permit revocation.
If you have any questions conceming thismatter, please do n�i_l� s t ie t u�;ll _�J�:, .,...:
Stot evWllllatl isa OTl)-395-3900 ext. 203. .
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Harold Jones, Duplin County Soil and Water Conservatoin
Star Maready, Duplin County Cooperative Extension
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy Farms
Romlie Kennedy, Duplin County Health Department
Central Files
Wilmington Files
s:\wqs\animals\duplin\2000\31-970nov

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Al, ,. ✓A-d )8e,✓4 J
U AX Y7�.
A.
C.
X
by (Please Print Clearly) I B.
❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
D. Is dgvery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
9-2¢r(ffied Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service labeg
. .; it ! I1ti1 tt i1 -,I ' t ! t it
t it it ik!% 61111d6diy' d6. 3i c7`Vi gtit ;�6t�tt �
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952

i
,, STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
State of North Carolina
DENR
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405 (Attn: Bev)
ff-70
�: + �4£1?�{!£iti�1£�f�!!!11£13lllilit?itl�!!t£ll��Sii11{tilll�l£!I

2J
-Gt
jsaa
esB $o ,;
®o0?
(pai�nbea WewesJopu3),
rr
ead tieni�ep peloi�lsey,
.
1/�PH
y{I y wlsod
S ��
P 3)
ead l beo 3A ujnlg o u
eej ldleoed wnley
o"L Y
99=1 peliltJeo

Certified Mail Provides:
■ A mailing receipt
■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece
e A signature upon delivery
■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
Important Reminders:
■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail or Priority Mail.
■ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. Fo
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
■ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof o
delivery:'To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Returr
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover thr
fee. Endorse mailpiece 'Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver fo
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is
required.
■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the- addressee o
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with thf
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired,' lease present the art!
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified' Mal
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.,
IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry..
PS Form 3800, July 1999 (Reverse) 102595-99-M-208'

Lom'.10�
j
FAMILY FARMS
NCDEHNR
Wilmington Regional Office
Attn. Rick Shiver
127 N. Cardinal Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Mr. Shiver,
LBY""
21 2000
I am writing on behalf of Mr. Reginald Kenan, owner of the Reginald Kenan Farm,
facility no.jj-ij8 , in Duplin Co. This letter is in response to the July 7, 2000 Notice of
Violation issued by your office against this farm. In an effort to reply in an orderly
fashion to the deficiencies noted in your letter, I will reply to each point in the order that
they are identified in your correspondence.
May 23, 2000 inspection:
(1&2) Grower has implemented a calendar program reminding him of the correct
sampling frequencies. A new lagoon sample was received by the farm on June 28, 2000;
and a new soil sample was received on June 22, 2000.
(3) A grazing plan, written on 5/25/00, was not on the farm at the time of this inspection.
A copy of this plan has been placed in the filebox at the farm.
(4) Grower has hauled dirt to fill in low areas. Lime has been applied to all fields.
(5) Grower had a copy of an old irrigation design in the filebox. The as built version has
been placed in the farm records.
(6) The farm currently uses a third party to keep records. This system is being worked
on to insure that updated records are placed in the filebox weekly.
June 9, 2000 inspection:
(1) The grower understood that he was signed up for DWQ emergency BMP's allowing
1001bs of application to small grain. Unfortunately, no record of this could be
found. If one looks at the amount applied to each pull, it is apparent that the grower
made an effort to evenly apply his effluent in a responsible manner.
(2) Once again, Mr. Kenan was under the impression that he could apply 100 lbs.
through the emergency BMP's. This misunderstanding is understandable given the
confusion involving the implementation of these BMP's.
(3) The current waste plan has been signed and dated by the owner.
(4) All IRR2 forms have been updated to the current WUP rates.
(5) I have modified the WUP to account for the corn in field 1.
(6) Records are kept on computer. Crop end reports will be kept as specified in the
future.
Post Office Box 759, Rose Hill, North Carolina 28458, [phone], FAX [phone]

Mr. Kenan is committed to operating his farm in compliance with all applicable
regulations. The corrective actions outlined in this letter are intended to alleviate any and
all concerns noted in the inspection. If there are any questions, or further concerns,
please call me at [phone] ext. 4556.
e ,
We terbeek
iv F rms
7/17/00

Re: Reginald Kenan Permit Inquiry
Subject: Re: Reginald Kenan Permit Inquiry
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 09:10:57 -0400
From: Sue Homewood <[e-mail]>
Organization: DWQ
To: Stonewall Mathis <[e-mail]>
CC: Kim Colson <[e-mail]>, Dennis Ramsey <[e-mail]>
Stoney,
that permit was sent up for signature prior to 12/98. It needed to go
through Kim Colson, Dennis, Coleen, then Tommy for signature. I've not
seen it since, i've asked. Sorry, i have no idea if or when it will be
signed.
Sue
Stonewall Mathis wrote:
> Sue,
> What is the status of the permit for Reginald Kenan's Farm facility
> number 31-870? I have already looked in the database and saw where the
> last add info request was responded to on 8121198.
> Thanks,
> Stoney
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
919-733-5083 extension 502
fax: [phone]
Mailto:[e-mail]
1 of 1 07/13/2000 4:55 PM

Revised April 20. 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number f' - 87�
Farm Name:_ /Se!j : k4ld I, c,1g11 Fa e,,j
On -Site Representative:Th�N��'�66y�t,
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: S, "�°►¢�i� S
Date of site visit: (9 1 /00
Date of most recent WUP: 57/ZS/M
Annual farm PAN deficit: 2. qs pounds
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
/Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
y Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption El' E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hZaneonstep�i%5.
d-eler' 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
s ationary sprinkler system wlperstationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART i. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Par I exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation , desi nincluding 9 9 map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D�D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, 'including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Iil. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational. table in Par Ili).
PART 11.75% Rule -Eligibility Checklist and .Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination .required -because-operation fails :one of the .eliglbili y
requirements listed.below:
_ F1 Lack -of mc.reagezwhichTesultedin:over-m')Pfication:of--wastewater:(PAN) omsprily.
fields) :accorddnaiofarm'sdastiwoyeaEsmf�rrigaiion7ecords:
F2 Unclear,Jllegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious -field -limitations -(numerous:ditches;-:fai"iure:to:dedUCtTequired:-..
buff'erlsetback:acreage;-or25%:offotaf acreaoeddentdfieddn-LAWMi?.::includes _ .
small ;-irregulady-shaped -fields = fields:lessfhan-5acres :foriravelers-or.less�han
2 acres for. -stationary -sprinklers).
F^ WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage -in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Par Ill.

Facility Number. 3) - 8 70
Revised April 20, 1999
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination
of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination >'
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER1,2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
I
I
I
FIr=r n NI Ieer;r=P1
- hwrir ,+ n 11-�
--- -- • —� - • v �• •ti l+�+a emu, �z, u' .NUII i► I lu, uuers may ne useo in place of Held numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; -otherwis_e operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER2 - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' -back-up fields with CAWMP acreage_exceeding75% of its total--acres-and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm'sprevious-two years' (1997 & 1998) of inicationTecords,--cannot serve -as -the
.sole basis for requiring a WA Determination:hack-upfields-must-be-noted inthe-commentzectionand mustbe accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations -
P 1 Plan :lacks _following information:
P2 Plan revision may_satisiy-7.5% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit -and by
adjusting -all fiield-acre2ge�o below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ie/in process of installing new irrigation system):

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment _
and Natural Resources F-,-C4 -F�
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
S. Reginald Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
PO Box 472
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear S. Reginald Kenan:
FEB 03 2
:DENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 24, 2000
Subject: Conditional Approval
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-870
Duplin County,
Our records indicate that your facility was conditionally certified in order to fulfill the requirements
of completion of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan Certification. This letter is to inform you
of your unresolved conditional approval status. Any facility receiving a conditional approval must notify
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) in writing within 15 days after the date that the work needed to resolve the
conditional certification has been completed. Any failure to notify DWQ as required, subjects the owner to
an enforcement action. As of December 6, 1999, we have no record of any information from you, advising
us of the status of your conditional approval. Therefore, please fill out the attached form and have your
technical specialist and landowner sign the form in the appropriate areas.
The completed form must be submitted to this office on or before 45 days of receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability
for failure to provide DWQ with proper notification of your conditional certification status or possible failure
to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by
December 31, 1997.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
extension 571.
Sincerely,
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
S. Reginald Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
PO Box 472
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear S. Reginald Kenan:
ILTI?WAA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 31-870
Duplin County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Division of Soil And Water:eonsei aiion'- Operation.ReA6 ,
• ° _ . ®Division of Soil and.Wafec Co�iservation- Compliance Tnspectio>i�, ,
r' : ,® Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection,
® Other Agency' :Opera 'fa'onl Revaew
lie Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection I I Z G 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[3 Permitted ® Certified '® Conditionally Certified ® Registered 13 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
P
Farm Name: 1:.tia I (A J<e vt�v. .!"........................................ County: ,V�4,..i%1
.................... ...............................................................................
9e ;�idl kengt,.
OwnerName: ........................�................................................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ....................................................................... .............. ..........................
Onsite Representative: � l'1✓1 !�f e�l��.'.'l.0.................................................. Integrator: M ✓f�L2 �?!1.�. ��t.^.. ......
......y....... y............
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =•=` " Longitude ' 4 49
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
JZFeeder to Finish
7344
�O®
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts ,
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
JEl Layer ❑Dairy
EI Non -Layer I JE] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
1Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area TO Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from.any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EfNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 93 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes R No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min9 ki /,q
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes JZ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 5Q No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Z Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: d
Freeboard(inches):.........1..83....................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®,No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 3Date of inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure. plan? ❑ Yes Xf No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? X• Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? K Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Aoolication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Ej No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
Jj No
12.
1t
Crop type �ey� w+ t/GLGt uoi y Jrwur �' (71^C{� ✓� , Co /'> ' LlG'aT , .sot/ % CA 14$
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
IN No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Z No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
0 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
8 No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
§gYes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes VJ No
❑ Yes M No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Yes SM ❑ Yes 9 No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Yes*No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? El Yes � No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes X No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ' ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
�: Nd -' iWat Loris tor• di f deric&e -*6re potted• diiring •fhistvisit.' • Ytoi� wil1 •reeeiye Rio further
corres• 6iidence'AO' U' .th'' it. : : : : : :::•:•:•.•.•.•:.....:•.•:•:•.•:•.•:•.•.
Comments (refer to question #)�: Explain any YES answers. and/or any recommendations;or•anv other,cominents.-' .
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
;n y rav e. 0.rcc5S COVCI- oPI / aa1OOPN d;ke
015
j yc,( recv P 1' c ov e..'_' pkt; j 445 OGC-V ✓'_Cd% tr.1 101i•` 5
� i� let �- 0 OI i n MLT 12. T CA 2 ( �L T A d l 2 a /�cLC CS
% G+ /• ro%Mi�i►T9'�t IOL. GS�d tti � C� ✓'Ct�'!T
of �/ °l 1 al�jnP 20)-735 godleie-rc 41 J'32�
I.E.1Areiwi' L-6 cX O.'%S'q.Gre! ate 8/--? S/ q of 31)2oo 45-14cre
1--3- L-5 otl S/ZSl et'g o•r 30� S.Z Z 1 el�s�ctG�
1-;Efe.7 ova. 10%rSJ�� �'.29�952gg1s/que
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;....., .S• o t/lel/yti� l } ,l .E �) D
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: — 9 Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number: Date of .Inspection
Odor Issues
4 •
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes M No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
A9 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
El Yes
R1 No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
19 No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes D§ No
Additional Comments an or Drawings:
8&001v)
- F;,-, (A 8 Lrl - Lq 4 28) 0810,9411r-tGr e oh 10l
�.�draJ�ic ove,rload�' res �l�s LObtcn Morc +Ltan
lon,ya4ioh eve"tl. Tk;r ePee,se3
surd 4o kie4 h yA.-etull,'c-41 y &I/C Pca.
l'.1-yeave C��./°JtMJ.U��{ f �gj�il e lq�p�l� IiwlC �GGOe^C/liV�
4,, he(r i-yV- a Ve �iQlpl. r
The r'ecorAed - 6-LcS'por -PLJII qA�b qO Z<ket" be a"AjLAs4ec( 4-
01Ce,0/lot161 � 1,,f toC 4V"Ve f A 'P401 64-CL .
l�bi LJ� she a��e�,�s -$o be fon Acd ;n sort q rce s o
4o arpl� was-�e sve�®t -��tzl tic ry oFF
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources C ��'7
Division of Water Quality
7JUL 16 1998
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary BY -
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 9, 1998
Reginald Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
PO Box 472
Warsaw, NC 28398
• •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. 31-0870
Additional Information Request
.Reginald Kenan Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Duplin County
Dear Reginald Kenan:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. The following
information was missing from your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Please
address the following by August 10, 1998.
The Clean Water Responsibility Act, signed August 27, 1997, set a two-year moratorium on all -
new and expanding swine operations. Reginald Kenan Farm's facility design was certified prior to
January 1, 1997 and, therefore, you were not required to apply for a General Permit prior to constructing
your operation. However, your facility did not acquire deemed permitted status prior to August 27,
1997. A complete Animal Waste Management Plan Certification form was received by the Division of
Water Quality dated April 22, 1998. Since your facility was not completely certified prior to August 27,
1997, you are required to provide documentation that your facility meets one of the exceptions to the
moratorium before it can be issued coverage under the General Permit. Please reference the attached
documentation for the list of the seven (7) exceptions for new and expanding hog operations in the Clean
Water Responsibility Act.
Additionally, please provide two copies of the irrigation design for Reginald Kenan Farm. The
certification form referenced above shows a certification date for the irrigation design on December 5,
1997. An irrigation design is a required part of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan if it was
completed after September 30, 1996. If you have documentation showing the irrigation design was
completed before September 30, 1996, please submit it for review. If the design was completed on
December 5, 1997 as certified or any date after September 30, 1996, please provide two copies of the
design for review.
The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) for this facility indicates the dominant soil type for tract
8162, field 10 to be "Ln". The "Ln" abbreviation is used to represent Leon soils in Duplin County.
The Realistic Yield Expectations (R.Y.E.) for the crops listed in your WUP does not correspond with the
crop yields listed in your WUP for Leon soil. Please clarify the dominant soil type for field 10 and / or
adjust the application rates to meet R.Y.E.s for each crop by soil type.
The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists soybeans, corn and wheat in a two-year rotation as
available crops for waste application. Residual nitrogen left over from the soybean crop in the two-year
rotation must be accounted for. Nitrogen application rates to the following crop are required to be
reduced by 15-30 lb. (dependent on soil type) to account for the residual nitrogen left by the preceding
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 31-0870
Reginald Kenan
Page 2
soybean crop. Please revise your WUP to properly list all application rates with residual nitrogen
incorporated into your cropping scheme.
The Site Evaluation, dated May 16, 1995, indicates a wetland determination was required. This
information was not provided as part of your CAWMP. Please provide this documentation and if
applicable, include a map showing where wetlands were delineated on site.
All revisions / amendments are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the
Technical Specialist before they are submitted for review. Please reference the subject permit
application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed and
submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter,
must be submitted on or before August 10, 1998 or the Division will return your application as
incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be
operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the
enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
533. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension
Sincerely,
, ;Mlii6ulu�' 4elo_*
Katharine Keaton
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Di
Reginald Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
PO Box 472
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Reginald Kenan:
AUG 11 Igga
II
BY:
NCDENR
ector -_
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 7, 1998
Subject: Application No.31-0870
Additional Information Request
Reginald Kenan Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Duplin County .
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a review of the subject application additional
information that was received on August 5, 1998. Information requested by this office in a letter dated
July 9, 1998 was not received in the package submitted. Please submit the following by September 7,
1998.
The Clean Water Responsibility Act, signed August 27, 1997, set a two-year moratorium on all
new and expanding swine operations. Reginald Kenan Farm's facility design was certified prior to
January 1, 1997 and, therefore, you were not required to apply for a General Permit prior to constructing
your operation. However, your facility did not acquire deemed permitted status prior to August 27,
1997. A complete Animal Waste Management Plan Certification form was received by the Division of
Water Quality dated April 22, 1998. Since your facility was not completely certified prior to August 27,
1997, you are required to provide documentation that your facility meets one of the exceptions to the
moratorium before it can be. issued coverage under the General Permit. Please reference the attached
documentation for the list of the seven (7) exceptions for new and expanding hog operations in the Clean
Water Responsibility Act.
The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists soybeans, corn and wheat in a two-year rotation as
available crops for waste application. Residual nitrogen left over from the soybean crop in the two-year
rotation must be accounted for. Nitrogen application rates to the following crop are required to be
reduced by 15-30 lb. (dependent on soil type) to account for the residual nitrogen left by the preceding
soybean crop. Though the WUP was revised to reflect the nitrogen residual in application per acre,
application rates were not reduced throughout your plan. Please revise your WUP to properly list all
application rates with residual nitrogen incorporated throughout your entire cropping scheme.
All revisions / amendments are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the
Technical Specialist before they are submitted for review. Please reference the subject permit
application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed and
submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter
must be submitted on or before September 7, 1998 or the Division will return your application as
incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be
operating without a permit.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 31-0870
Reginald Keaan
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the
enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
533. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension
Sincerely,
Katharine Keaton
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

Facility Number
® Registered Certified Applied for Permit 13 Permitted
FarmName:.........t�tY e.11l....lrx...... F�........................................
Owner Name: :............ 5:..l�r1.lZta� v,-.................................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:........
Mailing Address:... .. .....�-.Qx .........I ...................
Onsite Representative:......... UM,&kjl .........
CertifiedOperator:..............................................................
Location of Farm:
Date of Inspection (,
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Not Operational . Date Last Operated :..........................
County:...... ��"...............................................................
PhoneNo:... `�10. �1.3'..(b.................................................
PhoneNo: ....................................................
ar. }.......9s!.......................................... . rA. 3.
...... Integrator: ..... W1.41 ...............................................................
..... Operator Certification Number; .........................................
F..........iWVAl
.9p .. ?�aa.,...�...nai..... �ou..f1�—..was
........................................... ................................................. ......
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified, operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes M No .
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
[N No
❑ Yes
(� No
❑ Yes
P No
fp Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
MNo
Structures (Lagoons,I1olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................
Freeboard (ft): ...................................................................................................... .................................... ....................................
....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
[, No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity.of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
IUrNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
EJJ Yes
[ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, orrunoffentering waters of the State, notify DW`Q)
15. Crop type........`rmut�bs........sv�....................c0.>�........lnlhf��.......��t��?�G�.—.........................................
.......................
J
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
ENo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
M.No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
J Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
q9 No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
No
0 No.violations or. deficiencies. were noted during this. visit.' You 4ill receive no ftirther
...... . ...... . ...... ........ . ...... . ...... . ...
correspondence Aoitt this. visit
Comments..(refer to question #):- Explain any YES answers and/or any -recommendations:or.any.othe'r comments;
Ilse drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use 'additional pages as necessary):
SW,,:-k GkOUWono f_ arU "Cross ,.„, `� a 7,e uv OJej J5e of S P
I Z- rtV4 k-�.a
6,V_ g ot- 4, yc� d C1(L wa([, pu,,, � r evoS, oO- i DM o u�, di i k
,crn.0 k uy-o 3`noA be- (►v\ p ovf O ,
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Named. J,l�ltfliaL
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��hc _�� �Jj Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor j�,�.
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary illy
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 17, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
S. Reginald Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
PO Box 472
Warsaw NC 28398
Farm Number: 31- 870
Dear S. Reginald Kenan:
so
�d
You are hereby notified that Reginald Kenan Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has six (60
days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of
1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an
application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system
after the specified date. Your application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter.
Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other
enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste
Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please
make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The signed original
application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application package. The completed
package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Mike Lewandowski at [phone]
extension 362 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environi
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governo
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
S. Reginald Kenan
Reginald Kenan Farm
PO Box 472
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Mr. Kenan:
nt
DEC 3 1 W7
gLTI.9;TA
E N R
Subject: Classification of Animal Waste Management Systems
Facility: Reginald Kenan Farm
Facility ID #: 31-870
County: Duplin
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge (OIC) by January 1, 1997, for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more
horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management
system. Our records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets
the requirements for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is available for animal waste management system operators. For
information on the training programs please contact your local Cooperative Extension Agent. Operator
certifications are issued by the Water Pollution Control Systems Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). For information on the certification process, please contact the Technical Assistance and
Certification Unit at [phone]. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each
system is based on the nature of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat
the animal waste. There are two types of animal waste management systems, type A and type B. Type A
animal waste management systems are generally used to treat waste generated by monogastric animals
which produce a low -fiber waste. Type B animal waste management systems are generally used to treat
waste generated by ruminants and other animals which produce a high -fiber waste. The type of training and
certification an operator receives should correspond with the type of system(s) they intend to operate. For
more information on the classification of your system please contact the Technical Assistance and
Certification Unit.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not
intend to operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or
engage a contract operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge,
whether yourself or another person, must possess a currently valid certificate of the appropriate type.
nSincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cd/AW OIC Designation
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper