20030056 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20070831

D3-?aS,G
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
a? sTgTFS REGION 4
A Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 - 8960
Colonel Charles R. Alexander, Jr.
District Engineer
ATTN: Mr. Todd Tugwell
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
SUBJ: Ronald Wilson
Action ID No. 200320436
Dear Colonel Alexander:
AIL 0;3
WET DS/401 OROV
JUL 0 7 2003
TERQUALITYSECT
l%
oq
This is in response to the above referenced public notice, dated June 12, 2003, concerning
the proposed fill within 0.198 acre of wetland and 2,072 linear feet of stream for the construction
of six road crossings in a planned subdivision. According to the public notice, the project is
located in and adjacent to unnamed tributaries of Reedy Fork, in Greensboro, Guilford County,
North Carolina. Mitigation is proposed in the form of 1,825 linear feet of stream restoration
along an unnamed. tributary to Reedy Fork, located on the project site. The applicant also
proposes to restore approximately 1,430 linear feet of stream channel and up to 4,000 linear feet
of riparian buffer in the vicinity of the project, and preserve over 10 acres of wetland and an
undetermined length of stream channel on-site. Mitigation plans are not complete.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 4 Wetlands Regulatory
Section has reviewed the public notice and recommends that the authorization not be issued until
a final mitigation plan is reviewed and approved. Thank you for the opportunity to review this
public notice. Should you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact Kathy
Matthews at 706-355-8780.
Sincerely,
Ronald J.ikulak, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section
cc: USFWS, Raleigh
DWQ/NCDENR, Raleigh
NCWRC, Raleigh
r
wArF9pC,

March 12, 2004
Mr. Ronald Wilson
P.O. Box 10349
Greensboro, NC, 27409
Re: The Villages at Reedy,Fork Subdivision, Phase I I, Guilford County
DWQ #03-0056; USACE Action ID. No. 200320436
Dear Mr. Wilson:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3443 issued to Mr. Ronald Wilson, dated October 16, 2003.
In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Solid Waste, Sediment and Erosion Control, Stormwater, Dam Safety, Non-discharge and
Water Supply Watershed regulations. This Certification replaces the ones issued on October 20, 2003 and
February 2, 2004.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E,
AW K/cbk
Attachments
cc: Todd Tugwell, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Daryl Lamb, DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Denise Poulos, 6909 International Drive, Suite 103, Greensboro, NC, 27409
030056rev2
em"
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260-(Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Ronald Wilson
March 12, 2004
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public.Laws 92-500 and 95-
217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC
2H, Section .0500 to Ronald Wilson to place fill in 889 linear feet of perennial streams and 0.198 acre of wetlands
and to shade 331 linear feet of perennial streams associated with the construction of a residential development at
the Villages at Reedy Fork Subidivision, Phase 11, in Guilford County, North Carolina, pursuant to an application filed
on the 12th day of June of 2003 and in additional correspondence received by the Division on October 7, 2003. This
Certification replaces the one issued on October 20, 2003.
The application and supporting documentation provides adequate assurance that the proposed work will not
result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North
Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL
92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the. application, the supporting documentation, and
conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design submitted in the application materials and as described
in the Public Notice. If the project is changed, prior to notification a new application for a new Certification is
required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions of this Certification. Any new owner must notify the Division
and request the Certification be issued in their name. Should wetland or stream fill be requested in the future,
additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). If any
plan revisions from the approved site plan result in a change in stream or wetland impact or an increase in
impervious surfaces, the DWQ shall be notified in writing and a new application for 401 Certification. may be
required. For,this approval to be valid, compliance with the conditions listed below is required -
Conditions of Certification:
Sediment and Erosion Control.,
1. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the
proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall
be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil).projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
2. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401 Permit Application. All construction activities, including
the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management
Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur;
3. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
1)

Mr. Ronald Wilson
March 12, 2004
Continuing Compliance:
4. Ronald L. Wilson, shall conduct construction activities in a manner consistent with State water quality
standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean
Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of State law and federal law. If the Division
determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a
designated or achieved use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions
are necessary to assure compliance, the Division may reevaluate and modify this Certification to
include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before modifying the Certification, the Division shall notify
Dockside Adventures, LLC and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H.0503 and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC
2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to Dockside Adventures, LLC in writing,
shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any Permit issued
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit
for the project;
Mitigation
5. Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We understand
that you wish to make a payment to a fund administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (formerly Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP)) to meet this mitigation requirement. This
has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. This
contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements. Until the EEP receives and clears
your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no impacts
specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at (919)
733-5208 if you have any.questions concerning payment into the EEP. You have one month from
the date of approval of the 404. Permit to. make this payment. For accounting purposes; this
Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program to
..meet the following compensatory, mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation
Required River and Subbasin Number
Stream 420 feet
Wetlands N/A acres
Waters N/A acres
Buffers N/A (square feet
The remaining stream impact was mitigated as part of the Habitat Assessment and Restoration
Program, Inc. (HARP) stream mitigation plan (Restoration of a Channelized Tributary to Reedy
Fork Creek, Haw River Watershed, Cape Fear Basin, Greensboro area - Guilford County, NC) for
The Villages at Reedy Fork, Phase I (DWQ Project No. 01-0382), as described in the Certification
issued October 17, 2001.
Road Crossings:
6. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the
elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement
of culverts including open bottom or bottomless arch culverts and other structures including temporary
erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in aggradation,
degradation or significant changes in hydrology of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or
upstream and down stream of the above structures. Additionally, when roadways, causeways or other
fill projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or wetlands, openings such as
culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain the natural hydrology of the system as well as
prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant changes
in hydrology of streams or wetlands;
3
Mr. Ronald Wilson
March 12, 2004
Utility Lines:
7. The edge of the construction corridor shall not be installed parallel to and closer than 10 feet (3
meters) to a stream and 25 feet in waters classified as HQW. Utility lines shall not cross a stream
channel at other than a near-perpendicular direction (i.e., stream channel crossings shall not be at an
angle of less than 75 degrees or more than 105 degrees to the stream bank);
8. Any wastewater line that crosses any stream shown on the most recent version of the 1:24,000
USGS topographic map or NRCS (SCS) County Soil Survey as permanent or intermittent shall be
installed with no joints connected within the footprint of a stream channel or within 2 feet of the stream
banks;
9. Placement of rip rap is restricted to the stream bottom and banks directly impacted by the placement
of the utility line. Rip rap may only be used below the normal high water level. The stream cross
section must be restored to its original grade and elevation. Placement of rip rap or other materials
shall not result in de-stabilization of the stream bed or banks upstream of downstream of the crossing;
10. An anti-seep collar shall be placed at the downstream (utility line gradient) wetland boundary and
every 150 feet (45.7 meters) up the gradient until the utility exits the wetland for buried utility lines.
Anti-seep collars may be constructed with class B concrete, compacted clay,. PVC pipe, or metal
collars. Wetland crossings that are directionally drilled, and perpendicular wetland crossings that are
open cut and less than 150 feet (45.7 meters) long do.not require anti-seep collars. The compacted
clay shall have a specific discharge of 1 X 10- 5 cm/sec or less. A section and plan view diagram is
attached for the anti-seep collars;
Stormwater:
11. The following condition shall apply unless it is demonstrated in writing to the satisfaction of"this Office
that the.impervious area of the entire, built-out project shall be less than 30% and that there are no
areas of concentrated impervious area over 30% within the project such as, but not limited #o;
commercial areas, multi-family, clubhouses, maintenance areas, etc.
An additional condition is that a final, written stormwater management plan (including a signed and
notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement) shall be approved in writing by this Office before
the impacts specified in this Certification occur per Condition No. 4 in GC No. 3402. The stormwater
management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater management facilities that are
appropriate for surface waters classified as Class C and designed to remove 85% TSS according to
the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. These
facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly
approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the
subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the
stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The structural
stormwater practices as approved by this.Off ice as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in
perpetuity..No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
A State Stormwater Permit (15 A NCAC 2H .1000) can be considered to meet this condition.
Other conditions:
12. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters of the
state until the concrete has hardened;
13. Waste or borrow sites shall not be located in streams or wetlands;
14. The use of pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers and cleaners near or over open waters shall be avoided
to the extent practical;
Id
Mr. Ronald Wilson
March 12, 2004
15. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters
and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact.
These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers
approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed
notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands.
16. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained
to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids and other toxic
materials;
17. Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed
"Certificate of Completion" form to notify the Division when all work included in the §401
Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form
and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon
completion of the project. Photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site
must be included to document correct installation along with the Certificate of Completion
form;
18. Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties;
19. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit:
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within-
sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written petition: 1
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mai[ Service Center, Raleigh, 'N.C..27699-6714. If modifications are made to an origin, Al
Certification you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request'within sixty `, .
(60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shallber.final and
binding.
This the 12th day of March 2004
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
3443
AW K/cbk
5
NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, Mr. Ronald Wilson has permission as outlined below to place fill in
889 linear feet of perennial streams and to shade 331 linear feet of perennial streams associated with-the
construction of a residential development at the Villages at Reedy Fork Subdivision, Phase II, in Guilford County,
North Carolina. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed
in the attached certification. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT
WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM
LOCATION: Villages at Reedy Fork Subdivision, Phase II
COUNTY: Guilford
BASIN/SUBBASIN Cape Fear (03-03-00-02)
Impacts:
Shading of 331 linear feet of perennial streams
placement of fill into 889 linear feet of streams
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands as
outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Mitigation:
420 linear feet of streams by NCEEP required for the 401 Water Quality Certification. In correspondence dated
July 25, 2003, the. NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP)) .
indicated that up to 2000 linear feet of stream mitigation will be conducted by EEP if necessary for the 404 Permit
The remaining stream impact was mitigated as part of the Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program, Inc.
(HARP) stream mitigation plan (Restoration of a Channelized Tributary to Reedy Fork Creek, Haw River
Watershed, Cape Fear Basin, Greensboro area - Guilford County, NC) for The Villages at Reedy Fork, Phase I
(DWQ Project No. 01-0382), as described in the Certification issued October 17, 2001.
Note: Linear foot requirements proposed to be mitigated through the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
must be rounded to the nearest foot and acreage requirements must be rounded to one-quarter acre
increments according to 15 2r.0503(b).
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the
payment of a fee to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program Fund per NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option,
please sign this form and mail it to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program at the address listed below. An invoice
for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE
IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN
PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM.
Signature Date
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
4
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmeptal
March 10, 2004
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
2321• Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
Reference: Revision to 401 Water Quality Certification VVET LAV DS l4-01 GROU
The villages at Reedy Fork
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina MARY 2 2004
DWQ #03-0056
USACE Action ID No. 200320436 ?!???r tTa
?iEcT ,)N
Dear Ms. Karoly:
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality issued Certification No. 3443 to Mr. Ronald Wilson on
October 16, 2003 (revised February 2, 2004). The Certification authorizes impacts to 862 linear-feet of
stream channel and 0.198 acres of wetlands and requires compensatory mitigation for 393 linear feet of
stream channel.
An error was made in calculating the linear feet of stream impact and was presented to both the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality and the U.S. Army.Corps of Engineers as 862 linear feet. The actual
impact to streams will be 889 linear feet. This will increase the compensatory mitigation requirement to
420 linear feet. The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has agreed to accept
payment for stream and wetland impacts associated with this project. The NCEEP will accept payment
for up to 786 linear feet of stream impact. Therefore, we propose payment. to the NCEEP for 420 linear
feet of stream impact. There are no other additional impacts as shown in the following table.
impacts Streams Wetlands Waters Buffers
Ori ' 1 862 if 0.198 acres NA NA
Revised 8891f 0.198 acres NA
As always, Cyndi, I appreciate your assistance. I regret this error and any inconvenience it has caused
you. Please contact me at 336-856-7150 if you have questions or if you require additional information.
Sincerely,
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Denise M. Poulos, LSS
Principal Scientist
Attachments: February 5, 2004 NCEEP Acceptance Letter
6909 International Drive, Suite,103 • "Greensboro, NC 27409 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen, MD • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore; MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, IL • Cornelia, GA • Dallas, TX
Danville, VA • Frederick, MD Fredericksburg, VA • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC Norfolk, VA • Orlando, FL • Raleigh, NC
Richmond, VA,- Roanoke, VA San Antonio, TX • Williamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC • Winchester, VA
02-06-2004 16:01 From-ENGINEERING CONSULTING SRVS LTD [phone]
NCDENR
T-565 P-003/004 F-335
North Carolina Department of Environment and. Natural Resources
Michael F. Easlev, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
February 5, 2004
Denise K Poulos, LLS
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd.
6909 iQteru*onal Drive, Suite 103.
Greeusbaro, NC 27409
Subject: Paymem to Ecosystem EnhanceFbO
Villages at Reedy Pork s3 ; ;
Guilford County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Car6Hha Ecosystem Bnharccernenl Program (NCEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and wetlim&- qx&cts; associated *ft_b>r'snl jtgetpM=L' :Please mote that tbeJecision by the
NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assmre that this payment will be approved by the
U_S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Wafter Quality Wetlands/.401. Unit. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is
appropriate_
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Pirmit/401 Certifika:tiom within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Vaisi ed dh the -information supplied by you iu 44ener dated February 3, 2004, the stream and wetlands restoration that is
&cesm` to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept ford its project is also indicated in this table.
Strear6 -'' 11,;
linear feet `'?:" Wetlands Riparian
actrs ` l Wedands Non-
? acres Riparian Buffer
s . i?.
Impact 393 0.198
kii ' anon Max 786 *See Below - 17. .._ „ ?.
Tlrie Mc . '
rno=dum of Agreement with'thd;U.S. Army Corps 4 thgjr eery that 2?IoSNs` aj?uieYrts to the Ecosystem
Lhfianc ant Fund, requires that the compensatory mitigado'npetformed by tht'NCEEP be acquired and designed within
one year. from date of payment. NCEEP has studied this-cataloging unit very exieks Iely and has found limited
opgortuk?ities for traditional wetlands restoration. *Tlterefore the,NCEEP is up-A a to accept p?taemt fox the
compensatory mitigadon requirements associated with the proposed wetla: as impact unless the U.S. Army Corps
Q,T Engglheers' (USACE) willaccept compensatory mitt lion pic?jecls other dm traditional wedand restoration,
r °r= ,..
----- ?,as.p?res'ervation,dwedands,, gpari "rei r&torat!* urban BMPs, or combinations of these 'Upas of
FI'ojec to offset the loss of wetlaiRd functions associated 11v the suW!ct project. Please note that unless the
??AC "permits exptieitly stal?s'iin'the canr?i ieital of the patron *at mitiption other than traditional wetland
't?> gat>>toa is acceptable the NC] E>??wi?tlnotF accept respoo . k14 y for, the mitigation requirements.
NC ©-E-N-R Ecosystem Enhancement-Pro m
?.1 9 Mail Service Cenfier Raleigh, 1Vort C roll T t: %e, Caro
Ffione:` 919-733-5208. FAX. [phone] tntemet: h2o.bnrFt '!e;nc.Usfwrp/ jtr?r'allt/
02-06-Z p04 16:01 From-ENGINEERING CONSULTING SRVS LTD [phone] T-565 P.004/004 F-335
Denise M. Poulos, LLS
Page 2
February 5, 2004
The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401,Warer Qualm' Cerdfication and/or Section 404 Permit for
irwacts associated witb the subject project, in Cataloging Unir 03030002 of the Cape Fear River Basin. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the •Memorandmn of Uriderstatiding between the N.C. Dgmtm mt of Environment
and Natural Resources and the US. - Army-Carps.bf Engineeis'dats NoveTnber4,1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
` Sincerely= 1
Dl Ronald E. Faired, .
Director of Oporations
r
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACOE-Raleigh
.; f
":Steve Mitchell, Raleigh DENR-Reoonsl Office =
? File
t,, ,gin .1. '.. •
. r.
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
March 10, 2004
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC.Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
Reference: Revision to 401 Water Quality Certification
The Villages at Reedy Fork
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina MAR 12 2004
DWQ #03-0056
USACE Action ID No. 200320436 VY i E Q ALI1 Y SECTION
Dear Ms. Karoly:
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality issued Certification No. 3443 to Mr. Ronald Wilson on
October 16, 2003 (revised February 2, 2004). The Certification authorizes impacts to 862 linear feet of
stream channel and 0.198 acres of wetlands and requires compensatory mitigation for 393 linear feet of
stream channel.
An error was made in calculating the linear feet of stream impact and was presented to-both the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as 862 linear feet. The actual
impact to streams will be 889 linear feet. This will increase the compensatory mitigation requirement to
420 linear feet. The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement. Program (NCEEP) has agreed to accept
payment for stream and wetland impacts associated with this project. The NCEEP will accept payment
for up to 786 linear feet of stream impact. Therefore, we propose payment to the NCEEP for 420 linear
feet of stream impact. There are no other additional impacts as shown in the following table.
Impacts Streams Wetlands Waters Buffers
Original 862 if 0.198 acres NA NA
Revised 889 if 0.198 acres NA NA
As always, Cyndi, I appreciate your assistance. I regret this error and any inconvenience it has caused
you. Please contact me at 336-856-7150 if you have questions or if you require additional information.
Sincerely,
E EKING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Denise M. Poulos, S
Principal Scientist
Attachments: February 5, 2004 NCEEP Acceptance Letter
6909 International Drive, Suite 103 Greensboro, NC 27409 • [phone] Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen, MD • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, IL • Cornelia, GA • Dallas, TX
Danville, VA • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Orlando, FL • Raleigh, NC
Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA • San Antonio, TX • Williamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC • Winchester, VA
02-06-2004 -16:01 From-ENGINEERING CONSULTING SRVS LTD [phone] T-565 P.003/004 F-335
NCDER.R
North Carolina Department of Environment and. Natural Resources
Michael F. Easfev: Govemor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
February 5, 2004
Denise 'K Poulo6, LLS
Engineering Consult mg Services, Ltd.
69091nteriWicmal. Drive, Suite 103.
Greensboro, NC 2740.9
Subject: Payment to Ecosystem EnhatteemWFU41'
Villages at Reedy Fork
Cranford County L
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carohna Ecosystem Bnbancement Program (NCB is willing to
accept payment for stream and wedands3#Vcts associated it}r thrr st j t prc?jezt.' Please Dote that the:deeision by the
NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assmca that this paymentrwill be approved by the
U..S- Amy Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wotlands1401. Unit. Y is the respoosibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project i$
appropriate_
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
AirmW401 Certificacdon within this time frame, this acceptance will expim
eased €h the-information supplied by you in 44ener dated February 3, 201A the stream and wetlands restoration that is
&cessaiy to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for.th}s project is also indicated in this table.
Streaiit -`'
linear feet Weidmids Riparian :
acres ' ' Wetlands Non-
-Ri acres Riparian Buffer
s ft.
1m act 393 0.198
;NTi ' anon Max 786 " *See Below - - ?-"
T><ie Nicmorandum of Agreement withthe tl.S. Army Corps dfBa,g eers, that agldW aj?Q ehts to the Ecosystem
ahanc enc '
Fund, requires that the compensatory mitigatioli'pctformed by the- NCF.EP be acquired and designed within
one year from date of payment. NCE]ai has studied ddi-cataloging unit very extensively and has found limited
opporwhities for traditional, 'wetlands restoration. *Therefore the,NCEEP is tgaable to accept payment for the
compensatory mi?lgadon requirements associated wits= rite proposed wetlands impact unless the US. Army Corps
gfYngtiiieers (USAGE) wiq accept vompegsatory mititiori prq?ects other than traditional wedaud restoration,
-----?`?;as?p?te9er?vatfon ? wetlands,-r?gat?an-area r?storatioii; urban $MP??, ot• eo?m6iastionso?hes??ypr ?'
glrojectFfo offset the loss of wetland tfwnetiotis associated with the sai?ject project. Please oobe that unless the
ACE ;permits explicitly stapes in. the cgn?i 'o?ai of fire unit that mitigation other thaw traditional wetland
'R gad" is acceptable the N`CI EI¢?wi?lL40F__?c?gt tespozs¢}b*ty.for the mitigation requiremmemts.
NC D1NR Ecosystem Enhancement Program e
ly'o"l Carolina
1.1_??9 lyAil ServJce Center, Raleigh, Nort?.C?rolina??699 1619
919-733-5208 ; FAX: 919-'?33-53271 Internet: h2o.erirKsi?te,ric.us%wrp/ -• -
atr?rall?
02-06-2004 '16:01 From-ENGINEERING CONSULTING SRVS LTD [phone] T-565 P-004/004 F-335
UW4 ir%orrni -- ---
Denise M. Poulos, LLS
Page 2
February 5, 2004
The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the}401Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404 Permit for
impacts associated with the subject project. is Cataloging Unit 03030002 of the Cape Fear River Basin. The nni,t*ion
will be performed in accordance with the •Memorandua, of XIiiderstaading between the N.C. Department of Euvironmant
and Natural Resources and the U,S_•Army-t orps.bf Engincers'&W Novernber,4, 1998.
If you.have any questions or need additional infatmation, please contact Casot Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely; . ,
90? _2c
D, Ronald E. Feireii.
Director of Operations
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, US,ACOE-Raleigh F
,
:::Steve Mitchell, Raleigh DENR-Reooni? Office'
.. ;; 'File , - .>?•? -??.
'A -L
w A ??. Michael F. Easley, Governor
O
O? QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
\
C!j Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
? .,C Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
February 2, 2004
Mr. Ronald Wilson
P.O. Box 10349
Greensboro, NC, 27409
Re: The Villages at Reedy Fork Subdivision, Phase II , Guilford County
DWQ #03-0056; USACE Action ID. No. 200320436
Dear Mr. Wilson:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3443 issued to Mr. Ronald Wilson, dated October 16, 2003.
In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Solid Waste, Sediment and Erosion Control, Stormwater, Dam Safety, Non-discharge and
Water Supply Watershed regulations. This Certification replaces the one issued on October 20, 2003.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
(?? 1,4' ra_4
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AW K/cbk
Attachments
cc: Todd Tugwell, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Daryl Lamb, DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Denise Poulos, 6909 International Drive, Suite 103, Greensboro, NC, 27409
030056
0%
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httu://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Cnctnmer Cervire #• 1 _R77_(,'J4_R7dR
Mr. Ronald Wilson
February 2, 2004
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-
217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC
2H, Section .0500 to Ronald Wilson to place fill in 862 linear feet of perennial streams and 0.198 acre of wetlands
and to shade 331 linear feet of perennial streams associated with the construction of a residential development at
the Villages at Reedy Fork Subidivision, Phase II, in Guilford County, North Carolina, pursuant to an application filed
on the 12th day of June of 2003 and in additional correspondence received by the Division on October 7, 2003. This
Certification replaces the one issued on October 20, 2003.
The application and supporting documentation provides adequate assurance that the proposed work will not
result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North
Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL
92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application, the supporting documentation, and
conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design submitted in the application materials and as described
in the Public Notice. If the project is changed, prior to notification a new application for a new Certification is
required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions of this Certification. Any new owner must notify the Division
and request the Certification be issued in their name. Should wetland or stream fill be requested in the future,
additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). If any
plan revisions from the approved site plan result in a change in stream or wetland impact or an increase in
impervious surfaces, the DWQ shall be notified in writing and a new application for 401 Certification may be
required. For this approval to be valid, compliance with the conditions listed below is required
Conditions of Certification:
Sediment and Erosion Control:
1. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the
proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall
be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
2. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401 Permit Application. All construction activities, including
the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management
Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur;
3. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
2
Mr. Ronald Wilson
February 2, 2004
Continuinq Compliance:
4. Ronald L. Wilson, shall conduct construction activities in a manner consistent with State water quality
standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean
Water. Act) and any other appropriate requirements of State law and federal law. If the Division
determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a
designated or achieved use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions
are necessary to assure compliance, the Division may reevaluate and modify this Certification to
include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before modifying the Certification, the Division shall notify
Dockside Adventures, LLC and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H.0503 and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC
2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to Dockside Adventures, LLC in writing,
shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any Permit issued
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit
for the project;
Mitigation:
5. Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We understand
that you wish to make a payment to a fund administered by the NC Wetlands Restoration Program
(WRP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable
method to meet the mitigation requirement. This contribution will satisfy our compensatory.mitigation
requirements. Until the WRP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Wetlands
Restoration Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. Mr.
Ron Ferrell should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment
into the WRP. You have one month from the date of approval of the 404 Permit to make this
payment. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation
Required River and Subbasin Number
Stream 393 feet
Wetlands N/A acres
Waters N/A acres
Buffers N/A (square feet
The remaining stream impact was mitigated as part of the Habitat Assessment and Restoration
Program, Inc. (HARP) stream mitigation plan (Restoration ofa Channelized Tributary to Reedy
Fork Creek, Haw River Watershed, Cape Fear Basin, Greensboro area - Guilford County, NC) for
The Villages at Reedy Fork, Phase I (DWQ Project No. 01-0382), as described in the Certification
issued October 17, 2001.
Road Crossings:
6. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the
elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement
of culverts including open bottom or bottomless arch culverts and other structures including temporary
erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in aggradation,
degradation or significant changes in hydrology of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or
upstream and down stream of the above structures. Additionally, when roadways, causeways or other
fill projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or wetlands, openings such as
culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain the natural hydrology of the system as well as
prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant changes
in hydrology of streams or wetlands;
3
Mr. Ronald Wilson
February 2, 2004
Utility Lines:
7. The edge of the construction corridor shall not be installed parallel to and closer than 10 feet (3
meters) to a stream and 25 feet in waters classified as HQW. Utility lines shall not cross a stream
channel at other than a near-perpendicular direction (i.e., stream channel crossings shall not be at an
angle of less than 75 degrees or more than 105 degrees to the stream bank);
8. Any wastewater line that crosses any stream shown on the most recent version of the 1:24,000
USGS topographic map or NRCS (SCS) County Soil Survey as permanent or intermittent shall be
installed with no joints connected within the footprint of a stream channel or within 2 feet of the stream
banks;
9. Placement of rip rap is restricted to the stream bottom and banks directly impacted by the placement
of the utility line. Rip rap may only be used below the normal high water level. The stream cross
section must be restored to its original grade and elevation. Placement of rip rap or other materials
shall not result in de-stabilization of the stream bed or banks upstream of downstream of the crossing;
10. An anti-seep collar shall be placed at the downstream (utility line gradient) wetland boundary and
every 150 feet (45.7 meters) up the gradient until the utility exits the wetland for buried utility lines.
Anti-seep collars may be constructed with class B concrete, compacted clay, PVC pipe, or metal
collars. Wetland crossings that are directionally drilled, and perpendicular wetland crossings that are
open cut and less than 150 feet (45.7 meters) long do not require anti-seep collars. The compacted
clay shall have a specific discharge of 1 X 10- 5 cm/sec or less. A section and plan view diagram is
attached for the anti-seep collars;
Stormwater:
11. The following condition shall apply unless it is demonstrated in writing to the satisfaction of this Office
that the impervious area of the entire, built-out project shall be less than 30% and that there are no
areas of concentrated impervious area over 30% within the project such as, but not limited to,
commercial areas, multi-family, clubhouses, maintenance areas, etc.
An additional condition is that a final, written stormwater management plan (including a signed and
notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement) shall be approved in writing by this Office before
the impacts specified in this Certification occur per Condition No. 4 in GC No. 3402. The stormwater
management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater management facilities that are
appropriate for surface waters classified as Class C and designed to remove 85% TSS according to
the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. These
facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly
approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the
subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the
stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The structural
stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in
perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
A State Stormwater Permit (15 A NCAC 2H .1000) can be considered to meet this condition.
Other conditions:
12. Measures shall betaken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters of the
state until the concrete has hardened;
13. Waste or borrow sites shall not be located in streams or wetlands;
14. The use of pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers and cleaners near or over open waters shall be avoided
to the extent practical;
4
Mr. Ronald Wilson
February 2, 2004
15. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters
and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact.
These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers
approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed
notification can be downloaded from the 401IMetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
16. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained
to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids and other toxic
materials;
17. Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed
"Certificate of Completion" form to notify the Division when all work included in the §401
Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form
and return it to the 401 /Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon
completion of the project. Photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site
must be included to document correct installation along with the Certificate of Completion
form;
18. Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties;
19. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within
sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written petition
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. If modifications are made to an original
Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty
(60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and
binding.
This the 20th day of October 2003
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ti"
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
3443
AW K/cbk
NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, Mr. Ronald Wilson has permission as outlined below to place fill in
862 linear feet of perennial streams and to shade 331 linear feet of perennial streams associated with the
construction of a residential development at the Villages at Reedy Fork Subidivision, Phase II, in Guilford County,
North Carolina. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed
in the attached certification. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT
WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
Villages at Reedy Fork Subidivision, Phase II
Guilford
BASIN/SUBBASIN Cape Fear (03-03-00-02)
Impacts:
Shading of 331 linear feet of perennial streams
placement of fill into 862 linear feet of streams
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands as
outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Mitigation:
393 linear feet of streams by WRP required for the 401 Water Quality Certification. In correspondence dated July
25, 2003, the WRP indicated that up to 2000 linear feet of stream mitigation will be conducted by WRP if
necessary for the 404. Permit. The remaining stream impact was mitigated as part of the Habitat Assessment and
Restoration Program, Inc. (HARP) stream mitigation plan (Restoration of a Channelized Tributary to Reedy Fork
Creek, Haw River Watershed, Cape Fear Basin, Greensboro area - Guilford County, NC) for. The Villages at
Reedy Fork, Phase I (DWQ Project No. 01-0382), as described in the Certification issued October 17, 2001.
Note: Linear foot requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Program must be
rounded to the nearest foot and acreage requirements must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments
according to 15 2r.0503(b).
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the
payment of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option, please sign
this form and mail it to the Wetlands Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate
amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE
NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED
BY THE WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Signature
Date
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
A
n
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
-? Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality

a
October 20, 2003
Mr. Ronald Wilson
P.O. Box 10349
Greensboro, NC, 27409
Re: The Villages at Reedy Fork Subdivision, Phase II , Guilford County
DWQ #03-0056; USACE Action ID. No. 200320436
Dear Mr. Wilson:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3443 issued to Mr. Ronald Wilson, dated October 16, 2003.
In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your,project including
(but not limited to) Solid Waste, Sediment and Erosion Control, Stormwater, Dam Safety, Non-discharge and
Water Supply Watershed regulations.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact Ms.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P. .
AW K/cbk
Attachments
cc: Todd Tugwell, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Daryl Lamb, DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Denise Poulos, 6909 International Drive, Suite 103, Greensboro, NC, 27409
030056
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (htlp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)

r'
Mr. Ronald Wilson
October 20, 2003
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-
217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC
2H, Section .0500 to Ronald Wilson to place fill in 862 linear feet of perennial streams and to shade 331 linear feet of
perennial streams associated with the construction of a residential development at the Villages at Reedy Fork
Subidivision, Phase II, in Guilford County, North Carolina, pursuant to an application filed on the 12th day of June of
2003 and in additional correspondence received by the Division on October 7, 2003.
The application and supporting documentation provides adequate assurance that the proposed work will not
result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North
Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL
92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application, the supporting documentation, and
conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design submitted in the application materials and as described
in the Public Notice. If the project is changed, prior to notification a new application for a new Certification is
required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions of this Certification. Any new owner must notify the Division
and request the Certification be issued in their name. Should wetland or stream fill be requested in the future,
additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). If any
plan revisions from the approved site plan result in a change in stream or wetland impact or an increase in
impervious surfaces, the DWQ shall be notified in writing and a new application for 401 Certification may be
required. For this approval to be valid, compliance with the conditions fisted below is required.
Conditions of Certification:
Sediment and Erosion Control:
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the
proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall
be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
2. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401 Permit Application. All construction activities, including
the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management
Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur;
3. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
N
Mr. Ronald Wilson
October 20, 2003
Continuing Compliance:
4. Ronald L. Wilson, shall conduct construction activities in a manner consistent with State water quality
standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean
Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of State law and federal law. If the Division
determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a
designated or achieved use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions
are necessary to assure compliance, the Division may reevaluate and modify this Certification to
include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before modifying the Certification, the Division shall notify
Dockside Adventures, LLC and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H.0503 and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC
2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to Dockside Adventures, LLC in writing,
shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any Permit issued
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit
for the project;
Mitigation
5. Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We understand
that you wish to make a payment to a fund administered by the NC Wetlands Restoration Program
(WRP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable
method to meet the mitigation requirement. This contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation
requirements. Until the WRP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Wetlands
Restoration Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. Mr.
Ron Ferrell should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment
into the WRP. You have one month from the date of approval of the 404 Permit to make this
payment. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation
Required River and Subbasin Number
Stream 393 feet
Wetlands N/A acres
Waters N/A acres
Buffers N/A (square feet
The remaining stream impact was mitigated as part of the Habitat Assessment and Restoration
Program, Inc. (HARP) stream mitigation plan (Restoration of a Channelized Tributary to Reedy
Fork Creek, Haw River Watershed, Cape Fear Basin, Greensboro area - Guilford County, NC) for
The Villages at Reedy Fork, Phase I (DWQ Project No. 01-0382), as described in the Certification
issued October 17, 2001.
Road Crossings:
6. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the
elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement
of culverts including open bottom or bottomless arch culverts and other structures including temporary
erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in aggradation,
degradation or significant changes in hydrology of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or
upstream and down stream of the above structures. Additionally, when roadways, causeways or other
fill projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or wetlands, openings such as
culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain the natural hydrology of the system as well as
prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant changes
in hydrology of streams or wetlands;
Mr. Ronald Wilson
October 20, 2003
Utility Lines:
7. The edge of the construction corridor shall not be installed parallel to and closer than 10 feet (3
meters) to a stream and 25 feet in waters classified as HOW. Utility lines shall not cross astream
channel at other than a near-perpendicular direction (i.e., stream channel crossings shall not be at an
angle of less than 75 degrees or more than 105 degrees to the stream bank);
8. Any wastewater line that crosses any stream shown on the most recent version of the 1:24,000
USGS topographic map or NRCS (SCS) County Soil Survey as permanent or intermittent shall be
installed with no joints connected within the footprint of a stream channel or within 2 feet of the stream
banks;
9. Placement of rip rap is restricted to the stream bottom and banks directly impacted by the placement
of the utility line. Rip rap may only be used below the normal high water level. The stream cross
section must be restored to its original grade and elevation. Placement of rip rap or other materials
shall not result in de-stabilization of the stream bed or banks upstream of downstream of the crossing;
10. An anti-seep collar shall be placed at the downstream (utility line gradient) wetland boundary and
every 150 feet (45.7 meters) up the gradient until the utility exits the wetland for buried utility lines.
Anti-seep collars may be constructed with class B concrete, compacted clay, PVC pipe, or metal
collars. Wetland crossings that are directionally drilled, and perpendicular wetland crossings that are
open cut and less than 150 feet (45.7 meters) long do not require anti-seep collars. The compacted
clay shall have a specific discharge of 1 X 10- 5 cm/sec or less. A section and plan view diagram is
attached for the anti-seep collars;
Stormwater:
11. The following condition shall apply unless it is demonstrated in writing to the satisfaction of this Office
that the impervious area of the entire, built-out project shall be less than 30% and that there are no
areas of concentrated impervious area over 30% within the project such as, but not limited to,
commercial areas, multi-family, clubhouses, maintenance areas, etc.
An additional condition is that a final, written stormwater management plan (including a signed and
notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement) shall be approved in writing by this Office before
the impacts specified in this Certification occur per Condition No. 4 in GC No. 3402. The stormwater
management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater management facilities that are
appropriate for surface waters classified as Class C and designed to remove 85% TSS according to
the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. These
facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless otherwise explicitly
approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the
subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the
stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The structural
stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in
perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
A State Stormwater Permit (15 A NCAC 2H .1000) can be considered to meet this condition.
Other conditions:
12. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters of the
state until the concrete has hardened;
13. Waste or borrow sites shall not be located in streams or wetlands;
14. The use of pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers and cleaners near or over open waters shall be avoided
to the extent practical;

Mr. Ronald Wilson
October 20, 2003
15. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters
and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact.
These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers
approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed
notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
16. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained
to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids and other toxic
materials;
17. Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed
"Certificate of Completion" form to notify the Division when all work included in the §401
Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form
and return it to the 401 /Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon
completion of the project. Photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site
must be included to document correct installation along with the Certificate of Completion
form;
18. Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties;
1
19. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within
sixty (6.0) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written petition
conforming to Chapter 1506 of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. If modifications are made to an original
Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty
(60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and
binding.
This the 20th day of October 2003
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Z?r 3443

AW K/cbk

NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, Mr. Ronald Wilson has permission as outlined below to place fill in
862 linear feet of perennial streams and to shade 331 linear feet of perennial streams associated with the
construction of a residential development at the Villages at Reedy Fork Subidivision, Phase II, in Guilford County,
North Carolina. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed
in the attached certification. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT
WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
BASIN/SUBBASIN
Impacts:
Shading of 331 linear feet of perennial streams
placement of fill into 862 linear feet of streams
Villages at Reedy Fork Subidivision, Phase II
Guilford
Cape Fear (03-03-00-02)
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands as
outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Mitigation:
393 linear feet of streams by WRP required for the 401 Water Quality Certification. In. correspondence dated July
25, 2003, the WRP indicated that up to 2000 linear feet of stream mitigation will be conducted by WRP if
necessary for the 404 Permit. The remaining stream impact was mitigated as part of the Habitat Assessment and
Restoration Program, Inc. (HARP) stream mitigation plan (Restoration of a Channelized Tributary to Reedy Fork
Creek, Haw River Watershed, Cape Fear Basin, Greensboro area - Guilford County, NC) for The Villages at
Reedy Fork, Phase I (DWQ Project No. 01-0382), as described in the Certification issued October 17, 2001.
Note: Linear foot requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Program must be
rounded to the nearest foot and acreage requirements must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments
according to 15 2r.0503(b).
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the
payment of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option, please sign
this form and mail it to the Wetlands Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate
amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE
NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED
BY THE WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Signature
Date
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
A
10-17-2003 06:25 From-ENGINEERING CONSULTING SRVS LTD [phone] T-741 P.001/002 F-555
17 -
ENGINEERING CONSVLTYNG SERVICES, LTD.
6909 International Drive, Suite 103, Greensboro NC 27409 Tel. [phone] / Fax.[phone]
Fax
To: t From. t C`?
Fax: Pages:
Phone: Date,
Re: cc:
0 Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment ? Please Reply 0 Please. Distribute

10-17-2003 06:25 From-ENGINEERING CONSULTING SRVS LTD [phone] T-741 P.002/002 F-555
orth Carolina
cpartmctit of Environment and Natural Resources t +
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
July 25, 2003
Denise M. Poulos, LLS
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd.
6909 International Drive, Suite 103
Greensboro, NC 27409
Subject. Project. Villages at Reedy Fork
County: Guilford
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Prograrn (NCWRP) is
willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by
the NCWRP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be
approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit, It is
the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCWRP for impacts
associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued
404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Eased on the information supplied by you in a letter dated July 10, 2003 the stream restoration that is necessary to
satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of miti ation that the NCWRP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream Wetlands Riparian Riparian Buffer
lam- 1000
Miti ation Maximum 2000
The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404
Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03030002 of the Cape Fear River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4,
1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
ztlx 4u zl_zt?
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd TugwelI, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DENR Regional Office-Raleigh
file
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
[phone] Fax: [phone]
A k
of
S TA R M O U N -I-
C O M P A N Y
October 6, 2003
Ms. Cindi Karoly
NC Division of water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Re: DWQ Project No. 03-0056
Dear Ms. Karoly:
VJ17 s @ f?(eeJ
6 L/ AG "'-w
NETLANDS1401 GROUP
OCT - 7 2003
&TERQURKM
I write to follow up on our permit application and my letter of September 2, 2003 requesting
revision of the mitigation footage.
Todd Tugwell was, I think, surprised by our ability to achieve the 42% reduction (1,193 if
revised vs 2072 If original requested, a 8791f and 42% reduction and asked for further
information to determine that the impact measurement is all inclusive. I asked our engineers to
provide colored copies reflecting:
o Streams impacted by disturbance 862 if
o Streams impacted by shading 331 if
o Total Phase II impact 1,193 if total
o Phase I impact 1,025 if
Grand Total 2,2181
f
Less credit for approved mitigation 1,8251
f
Additional mitigation required at 1:1 393 if
Your approval of a revised permit with reduction in the mitigation requirement to the 393 foot
number is respectfully requested.
Please see the attached drawings which are the same as previously submitted but color shaded.
We are very near needing to begin construction and I solicit your understanding and early
approval.
Sincerely,
Ronald L. Wilso
Development Manager
Reedy Fork East LLC
Sr. Vice President
Starmount Company
Cc: Ms Denise Poulos, ECS
P.O. Box 10349 . Greensboro, NC 27404-0349 600 Green Valley Road . Suite 300 . Greensboro, NC 27408-7722
Business Phone [phone] . Fax Numbers 336-299-1905 or 336-632-4955
Reedy Fork Ranch - Stream Impacts
The following is a summary of the change in stream impacts for Crossings #4 - 10. The reduction in stream
impacts were a result in changing most of the crossings from cast-in place box culverts to precast arch culverts.
The change in the basic culvert design was a result of the modification of the policies of the City of Greensboro
with regard to construction within the future City right-of-way and contributions toward that construction. In
addition, the City of Greensboro worked with us, wherever possible, on modifying the road section over the
proposed crossings. Those with other design revisions have resulted in the significant reductions indicated
below:
Crossing #
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total
Original Impact-(Lf)
513
120
135
0
673
242
389
2,072
Current Impact-(Lf)
341 =
120 =
135 =
0 =
307 =
61 =
256 =
1,193 =
Streams Covered
But Not Disturbed
0
0
0
147
61
123
331
Stream Portion That
Was Moved/Distur ed
+ 34
+ 120
+ 135
+ 0
+ 160
+ 0
+ 133
+ 862
As indicated in the Chart above, of the currently proposed Stream Impacts of 1,193 L.F. only, 862 L.F. will be
the result of actual impact to the stream bed. The balance of 331 L.F. will be channels covered by the proposed
culvert spans, but will not be disturbed during the construction. The culverts have been realigned to minimize
the channel impact and maximize the lengths of the retained existing channels.
Y r? \ \
00
p a.g °
° O O •O Y i i ?OpO0 i
0 0
°?
°
? o
?o
00
Y0
?.3 0
? 1 d
5•CPQ`S % pp b i t
"0 00
° i 10
o
c
S O
1 O
QQ?''C???p III ? o
i\
/ l
41,
i

00 -
\ I

/ -Illy
e C ?-
%°°p / ??-
0
o / Sgt / f1-
o j
° o o Z
ID°00 )00,0 O pa00 OpO 1I \ i ?
0 0 Ise
0 a:
00 .,
0 ° l?' I I U ,
00 i (L J
?'
0-0 N
0001
l - ;
N
qca o
W r? ?
C\2
o •Q N co
0.? ?co t,
?Nco co
oa??o i co
0 Q4 Q? "t I
?viQv00 ko
?00
-?
z2 co
W CO
Wry q?
q- C)
W
W W Q4
L?
J
?I M
A ?
? U
V Q
ti
w
cr
W 4-
O
J
U
Q
0
O
O
w
Q N
00
A ?
OJ
Z
V J
o
O
w ``Im
Q
Q
W0
0
i
l
/ ?< a w cr-
LL w LL. -5
\? 1 1
W
s"'m ?? I 1
ox / I h-?
w b
?/ / / 1 F - j i C(J `
LLJ
1

J(JIj,i
i
j
w,
i
/ w
o
I ?
/

o0
_ x
Lo
/ 14`1 Z
#°
a
/ J
Q
LULi
O w1 co
co
?o" ?Nco CC)
C) ap?l 00
iu qQb
00 c
W? co
ABQ,
Ww ZoO?
coti 20.
wW Q4
E
A
V
0.
t?t^
vl
O
N
i
U
Q
a
Q
W
o.
U-
J
CJ
Q
O
O
0
?o
z -j
J
-j LL
°
Q
o
o
qa0
?LL,?
Qa
CL
?
0
q co o

-? /
\ \?
, Nq Z,,
0. 0.
w co
\
` E,: OD co
Q4 64 "t I

/ Vwh
CO

/
i
2 w ? ? o
co 0)
lb
y
i r;r4
a/ _
t
? O O
W O
/
// rz;

Lij

//ofO

W r ? J
\ ? 1i
7- q i
7
j Ems, U
w

i ?
_
i3 U-

i

`
/
LLJ
/
\ .-.
\ cc?
\
?
0
LLJ
O
r^

,
1!;'`\ E., Z
L?
Q
_
W Lai
J
? 0
C) gWO0
/

l \

J U
r14 I a.
Oa.

r
--z LLI
LLI
?,\ x
41
V) li -k- - 11 00
1% W U O
-w z o? w v `mac
Of LLI
of
N
- W
Z`\
I
13= 0
12 00
/ / \ \ \ Y w
i ' ?/ \ \ ?\ W vvi
q? o
4 C4 'It
to
?Nco co
Vt??p I
04 C4 W
ti
ulVco ko
Q4 00
q?M
04 ??4M
?
to
C'4 w mop
Cq:-:q
Q? W
ww ?
J J
O r?
tD 00 J W
II J
¢mrn?
co 00 , I
r- F- a m
00 CO U-
D Z)
a U
UwWO
Of
J mmEncn II
J
O ?
Wo Le
W Q
w ui
oo
009-1
:2 LU ?
Y WWL`O O
V) !n J
J
LL- L?
00
J J
CU
Q
O
0
vi
O
n
I
Cl
ZJ
J V-
?~.1 O
3 Q
O
O?
wCr
c?
Q?
J U
02

i

1
l
1
1 z
O ?
U ?
o`
i
t?
t--
-? P
w
/ j

i ?

Q
LLJ
U
-J LJ
O
O 0 X

t
0
rr / /

I
/?
' j
z ?
i
U
Q
LJ}.. i
W
a? co
?co co
I co
C9??Vcoc
co
04 C,)
c4
? ?Q4 >
0 °
ww
WW ?
J
q U J
? w u
0. ? J
?a
00
F
? a
w w
ai ?
t"I U-
O
L?
J
U
Q
O
O
M
O
(O
0
Z J
J
Lo
wQ
?O
O?
fr?
Q F
?
0
r- / ---- `?° / -- Z
W i
LLJ/
\ W\ \\ /?
o
z
z
?j /W ?-
1Aq
LLJ
/
n
J
J/ W
a: o
ICE
' % W
J/ ??.? ! CC
0.? co
co co
Q)c' a° 1 00
ti? qU? b
csw co ?°
Co
?Z Sao, C,3
W? cry
W A? ?
0.
W
w?Zo ooQ
WW ?
C5
J
M
N U-
IJ
?M
w M
Ei
>I
UW J
U m? N
Q
oil
U
00 0
w <m
Q
W
E? R? o
01,
O
J
U
Q
0
V
0.
co
O
M
tD
I
0
Z _J
J
F-
?Q
0
O?
QO
a?
F-
aQ
F- a
02
b
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
Mr. Todd Tugwell
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
COPY
April 13, 2003
R,.?..
lAY i 2u03

Reference: Individual Permit Application
The Villages at Reedy Fork
Greensboro, Guilford County; North Carolina
ECS Project G-1001
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
9g?
/401„ "go
This is in response, to your February. I% 2002 letter concerning the. Villages at. Reedy Forlc°i,dual
Permit application.
Item A - These revised plans were submitted to you by e-mail on March 17, 2003. Copies of these
revised plans are attached.
Item B - Attached to this letter is a Stream Crossing Justification prepared by Evans Engineering that
describes the steps taken to reduce wetland/stream impacts at each road crossing. In the future there may
be additional temporary impacts to waters of the U.S. associated with utility construction. The locations
of these impacts are not known at this time. .
Item C - We propose to mitigate for the planned impacts as follows:
• A restoration plan for 1,825 linear feet of stream channel has been prepared by HARP and approved
by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. You have stated that all of this restoration can be
applied to the proposed impacts associated with Crossings 4-10 (2,072 linear feet).
• Approximately 1,430 linear feet of potentially restorable stream channels have been identified
southwest of the project site by HARP. The memorandum describing this area is included for your
review. We will visit this area on May 22, 2003 to determine if it is suitable for mitigation.
• Several stretches of Reedy Fork do not have vegetated buffers. We propose restoring 50 foot wooded
buffers along these sections of stream. An aerial photograph is included that depicts these areas. The
banks in some areas have been eroded. These areas will be identified and stabilized with the use of
bioent?' ;ueering techniques. There are approximately 2,000-4,000 feet of stream channel that would
benefit from buffer restoration/stabilization.
6909 International Drive, Suite 103 • Greensboro, NC 27409 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen, MD - Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, IL • Cornelia, GA • Dallas, TX
Danville, VA • Frederick, MD - Fredericksburg, VA • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Orlando, FL • Raleigh, NC
Richmond, VA • Roanoke. VA - San Antonia. TX • Williamsburg, VA - Wilmington, NC • Winchester, VA
I

STREAM CROSSING JUSTIFICATION
CROSSING #4
- The vertical alignment was maximized to reduce the cover over the culverts.
Parapet Headwalls and Wingwalls allow the pipe length to be reduced.
The street section was modified to allow fora 2:1 side slope to minimize impacts.
Culvert rotated to minimize impact.
CROSSING #5
a - Headwalls allow the pipe length to be reduced.
v- The street section was modified to allow for a 2: I side slope to mmim!1-ze impacts.
Culvert matches existing channel to reduce impact..
CROSSING #6. .
Headwalls allow the.pipe.length ,to. be reduced... ± .
The street section was modif ed to allow for a 2:1 side slope to minimize impacts.
Culvertmatches existing channel to reduce impact.
CROSSING #8
Multiple boxes used to a11ow for the street to be lowered to reduce length of impact
Parapet Headwalls and Wingwalls allow the pipe length to be reduced.
The street section was modified to allow for a 2:1 side slope to minimize impacts.
Culvert field located to reduce'irimpacts
CROSSING #9
- Parapet Headwalls and Wingwalls allow the pipe length to be reduced.
- The street section was modified to allow for a 2:1 side slope to minimize impacts.
- Culvert matches existing channel to reduce impact.
CROSSING #10
The vertical alignment was maximized to reduce the cover over the culverts.
Parapet Headwalls and Wingwalls allow the pipe length to be reduced.
- The street section was modified to allow for a 2:1 side slope to minimize impacts.
- a- Culvert matches existing channel to reduce impact.
ri
,Crossing #4 can not be shifted due.to the distance from Reedy Fork Creek to the adjacent property.
Crossings 8-10 each cross streams that begin'outside of'the property and extend to Reedy ork Creek. Also
this horizontal alignment was established to create a future extension of Turner-Smith Roe to a new
interchange on RTE. 29.

I
? ..a
Qo
4, (?4 W Z co
114, - co cc
Co Ir
i ! 1 zw
w r Q. \ I \ 1 \ ?? jQ,-,???
loW?- ? Iw I\\? \ \ rw?NrJ
Lncnm ?i /? I I,I \ i0.rn
If ) 64 ??
! I / z l I , \ w 44
Lid
LIJ
LLJ
Q
I /' I I i Q
o
-- 00.'
LIJ
-71
J / It Q
0
LL:
00.\ W
o
a
Q W r W 11°
Q U
7
i j
1 -7Z
"
---- --- -----
_`- w
W
l\ X W U
-- W J W / ?
--- - - Z ~0 0000
co00 00000
00000000
onoOJOUO.. OC
??--- ?_ ? oao00o0a- 0000
_ "000-
W U
J
W
? O _
/ d
0
o V)
00 Q
)00?
o' Z \\
o Q
J
Lti
W7.

r ; - Q 00

#1-
o.,
Iz
,.?
W 71,
/. o W
!i/ / ' \ \ Q V 1 V1
W
w

Cc') I,-
4? wpm ?c
>
Wn q? CO
G
ww d-oo
? W
El M
Q
q ?
a
W N
0.10
r?r O
"f J
U
Q
v
0
0
vi
h n_
q i
E? Z _JJ
C? J LL
Q W
3 00
~0?
uj Of
Q ?
Q Q
O,m
Q fn n
co OC
Cl)
The mitigation factors are very preliminary field-based estimates of the extent to which the NC
mitigation criteria would apply to each of the segments identified in figure 1. There are a
number of assumptions that come into play with these estimates. First, the unnamed
contributing channel, labeled Segment B. which drains upland pasture along both sides of
Summit Ave. just west of Hwy. 29, may not have seasonal flow, and thus be determined as
non jurisdictional waters. Those segments with original geometry (planform, cross section, and
longitudinal profile) would likely only qualify for mitigation credit for conservation buffer,
habitat, and bank stability enhancement, which at this time is estimated at 10:1. Segment C,
has several sections which are severely degraded, and would likely qualify for significant
restoration.
Overall, on the positive side, there may be an additional 20% that could be achieved over the
1430' listed above depending on how a detail inventory and mitigation plan were to be
developed. Any final mitigation value would also depend on the value-based assessment to be
made by the NCDWQ staff. A factor which would speak in favor.of mitigation in this
watershed is the fact that a reach is under restoration immediately down stream on this-
tributary; efforts made here would improve conditions for that restoration. On the down side,
Segment B may not be jurisdictional waters, and the other segments that have shared riparian
landowners may not be available for restoration or enhancement. If both of these conditions
were to. be true, only Segments A and C would be available for restoration, limiting mitigation
potential to less than 600'.
To conclude the mitigation potential in this reach ranges from a low of approximately 600' to a
maximum of 1716'.
r

k
}t{wu?p1t5^••?ti't .. ,,r ,44Y
to >
I iih'li.}l'•?'r
ah
1.
I. ` • • ?.l - ,. :?,,. II?1 •? Y'/QT.OSIMFry;iy`I ?.
ji"
Panorama photos (top & bottom) of unstable meander bend to unnamed tributary to Reedy Fork, meander
banks cut down for cattle access. stream fenced offto limit cattle Pares-, (serymnt M

v N
i
a

P
HARP Vlhges at Peedy Fork Stream Mitigation Feasibility Assessment 11 /09/02
Unnamed Tributary to Reedy Fork
?? ?
IJ
,4N TL US i 401 GROUP
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 200320436
PUBLIC NOTICE
JUN 1 6 2003
M 'ON
June 12, 2003
Mr. Ronald Wilson, Post Office Box 10349, Greensboro, North Carolina, 27409, has
applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO PLACE FILL MATERIAL INTO 0.198
ACRE OF WETLAND AND 2,072 LINEAR FEET OF UNNAMED TRIBUTARIES TO
REEDY FORK, IN THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, ASSOCIATED WITH THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SIX ROAD CROSSINGS REQUIRED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE VILLAGES AT REEDY FORK SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN GREENSBORO,
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant and
from observations made during a site visit by a representative of the Corps of Engineers. Plans
submitted with the application show the proposed construction of the The Villages at Reedy Fork
Subdivision on 1,735 acres of land located on the east side of NC 29, north of Eckerson Road, in
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina. Development of the site will result in the
placement of culverts and fill material into tributaries of Reedy Fork, for the construction of six
road crossings needed to access high ground on the property.
Construction of the road crossings will require mechanized clearing of vegetation from the
banks of the streams, excavation within the stream to provide the proper grade, followed by
installation of the culverts, and the placement of the fill material and road surfaces. Riprap will
be placed at the inlet and outlet of the culverts to prevent erosion. Following road construction,
the site will be cleared and graded in preparation for the construction of the subdivision.
Construction of a bridge across Reedy Fork is also proposed (shown on the attached plans as Site
#7), however this crossing will not result in the placement of fill material into streams or
wetlands. Three road crossings located in the southern portion of the tract (identified in the
attached plans as Sites 1, 2, and 3) were previously authorized by nationwide permit.
The applicant proposes to mitigate for impacts to stream channels and wetlands associated
with this application with the restoration of 1,825 linear feet of a tributary to Reedy Fork located
on the project site (see attached plans). Additional mitigation plans, including the restoration of
approximately 1,430 feet of stream channel in the vicinity of the project, and up to 4,000 feet of
riparian buffer restoration, are currently in development. In addition, the applicant proposes the
preservation of 367 acres of common space within the subdivision. The proposed preservation
area includes more than 10 acres of wetland and an undetermined length of stream channel. The
purpose of the work is to provide for development of the site as a mixed-use residential and
commercial subdivision. Plans showing the work are included with this public notice.

The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the
applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No Department of the Army (DA) permit
will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and
reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as
required by PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the
notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of
Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being
eligible for inclusion therein. Based on the best available evidence, it.has been determined that
no sites within the vicinity of the project are registered or listed as being eligible for inclusion in
the Register. Examination of the National Register of Historic Places constitutes the extent of
cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the
presence of other such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or
historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed
activity will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public
interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts that the proposed activity may have on the public
interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors, which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be
balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a
proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore
determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the
national concern for both protection and-utilization of important resources. AV factors that may
be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among
those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural
values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with
Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water
supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral
needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people.
2
For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States,
a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not
comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the
preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless
the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate
the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of
Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal.
To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed
above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine
the overall public. interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army (DA) permit
modification will not be made until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
issues, denies, or waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The
NCDWQ considers whether or, not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302,
306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the Department
of the Army (DA) permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the
offices of the Wetlands /401 Unit, North Carolina DENR, Division of Water Quality, 2321
Crabtree Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished to any
person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act
certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ), Wetlands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-
1650, on or before July 5, 2003, Attention: Mr. John Dorney.
Writt comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in
this office, Attention: Mr. Todd Tugwell, until 4:15 p.m., July 12, 2003, or telephone (919) 876-
8441, extension 26.
3
SOURCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP,
BROWNS SUMNflT, NC
QUADRANGLE, DATED 1951 AND
REVISED 1994
SCALE: I"= 4,000'
Ecs"D
ENGINEERING
CONSULTING
9ERVICES,LTD
Sheet 1 of 12
SITE LOCATION MAP
THE VILLAGES AT REEDY FORK
GREENSBORO, NC
ECS PROJECT G-1001
BRYAN PARK I
ANO COCF
COURSE
Q L

AREA CF/NfZUENCE iQR
P07EN77AL fWVRE /N7FROUNCE
o
0
OR.
SITE MO. rElo
SITE #5
E#9
SITE #8
• r
C:) t
0 A
?D
sITE #s
V SITE #7, bridge crossing
OE
COYPNIY
... ?S {? ?g ~ i?o SITE #4
P
A'DOV ? =, N? ? ?/IIy WWW
wrZa'a
a SITE #2
:O.0
SITE #1 * SITE #3
*Impacts previously authorized
Sheet 2 of 12
REEDY FORK RANCH
STREAM CROSSINGS
KEY MAP
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1`1600'

?o<
?-+h
D D ,,
r
A m <
O D e
O
O
D m
-
F D
z ti
r ?
O
O
Ln
O
O
O
D
O
r C/1
o
(J) 9
Cf)
CD -?
m m
co
o b
N y
tz,
I
w
r
m
q)
:Dj
bC ?U
to
,-
co q,)
'ji
CC) Q) q o
CC) Ct)??
CY)
oa
v
4
-u 0
Cf)
C) m
y (P z
S
00
13
jo,
? x
to ?. I I I / / a 1 ; J I
,
s m
CD 1 ? ?? ?/
llxo
0 0/
?b I
t ? i r
p \ 1 \ \ \ ;I G? / /
p6 ?? 1 1 \ I U1
Cp r 1 , t \ I I I -4
CO cn Ul i
?W?1 ?? \ \ \ ??`? I I m> --qI
Q) Co.
?o?7j
Co Ct)
ON) Lo -To
C, b
?E0
-u
TI ?
;u m?
oDb
o
D
>?b
z y
0
0
0
N
0
0
0
D
(7
b
r
m
O
V)
(D 70
(D m
CIl ?
O
N D
n
i
cN
r
m
ti
n
y
b
S?
ti
c) -N t"i
?p? ?6
W ?
a' co yb ??
co
co
rn ?? ?o
NO ?a
o c/ b
v
Y
r
O
-n
N
O
r
D
Z7 fTl
0 D b
?o?
omb
-? a
? D n
rZO y
I b
a
o a

o
0
A
n
n VJ \\ \ \,\ \\ I jj//'
r \ i
0 00 D
r
Z
\r

y
0 00
00000 Q00
0000 00000 000
000000 0 0C .O 0
00
'
000000000 O
0000000000 000
00000000000 0000
0000000000 000000
_
\ u0e000000 0000000
\ 000000000 00000000
00000
00 00 0
\\ a Q 00 0 00000
O
0000
mm nm x
=a f
Cf)
(D
fD ti \I\ -------
y --
CY)
,
cS 1-0
-rj
U) CD ?,j
CY) CO
CY)
4- u em
Co I
lair"
? ?(???? / i
,CC?
CC) -rj
D D y
nr h
TI ?
onb
0
o?
Dmb
o
F D
F
z y
r 0
O
0
w
N
'T1
O
O
D
(7

O
Cl)
N
C
(D m
(D D
J
O E
N D
n
N
A
N '
r
ti
n
b
too ?6
rn W?
cb`-?bt,,J
Cl) OD .C') b
A Ch
Cb o
co ??t??
y
o C/)b

C7 r
o m d
?o
D r, )
°?b
F z y
r C,
O)
(A
O
00
N
q
O
A
D
(7

O ?u
m
Cf)
7' m
CD
h D n
C-) y
i b
W ]i
00
r
m
G?
?7 ?7 t=j
W -? O b?j
co i o?C/)o
co C ?
°' NI ? o
v
o c/ b
4
? -ns S
O
C Cr pi
C O \p
r t (?
n, in
O Z 0)
3 n?
(D
(D
CL
71
r
01
LD
(D (D
CD
O Q
N• -n
`V cr
(D
0
3 1
(D
-+0
77
f
O
Tf
` S k ?? til? !Matz i {r? 3
t;tif + ary$bir` sXT
t.1 ?' rl?zl
tt r
-I A.

•? i ,¢t 7 t?? at`>t ! I x r3?¢F1` 4r y4 \ \N
t J, Q3µ.
rr + 'rt`\ ; v rwY ti' r j ,.?'? s? KJt-../ .A 1 t ? t, 1\ ? ?? S -1 o ?'•
t ' . -; , --' fit, c*?r.? ( f y ?r s' y rc r 1 : 4 +i d I-
4
i • ? ? i, .. '? t rl ?C:W'rrbi? ?t?'EY? 4 .,, T r I? a t'?l??r rl`L+1 ? . 1 '\. ' y yy ?,.! (D 8 .
t :t 1! , a,d y' \ i 02
, ;'i? ?^ fff r rev d ti : to 4
'# •? s 31a fV ;,? l* r•to?-;_.\? ^c"y " ? r?? ?"e 'wl»; ? .? ?, ?'
?......,??,?,? i ?
I . >E f 6. ! r ?r 4 I Si •o r??'? J3r: 'n a ?+ti 'K ? ? ?w ' '" ... ? '}
f ? ? / ? . ? f eX ?,-? ? 4 ?? a. ? l'r ? `ia} y 1,?•? rfr ? ? ? y?j'IZ+r` f ' 'i v y '? ` ?`'. ? ?°" •....'K ? ? ?? ? 'C - ? ae : `'S
f f ? _? 1 '?` ? 1 rt `I ' ?t'?it'? ? y . ? i Y ° i•'r f? ? 1; ` .ti i y;4Yr?+?'?r r ?? (L,? ? h' ? N . \ ? .
.'? ? ?rrr Z .M ? '•1? .{yy /- r r. ?+ t "T ''+ 14 '\? •?r Mi ?..-
t' fr{?IIF { ?fa t -?_/i _.iC?' ? ?7?•c?{+rs",?917•. tlc t k, yYi3 ; ?rr i t 4x ?•»,?' a ? R ..\? ? '4• _ L
R,' ? (:? )f ? ^ 41.'11 I j Y'i? f,? i ?`? j>'••r? E ? t'J?'C`3??Y j 1 ? `i+ .: '4+. ? y ; r? ? ,t . ; • ' 'E
?. . ? ?lher (,J a ,d 1 ur?` w' T" J ?t .Y
,{ f5 ?' t `' .1t lyi $? ?L•?'F'r r i {r ? rl r' t : 2.' ? ?i _
t t t rrS ` 4.??'- f ? -. '1• . k.: ? y..• ? '1 -... -
;J,y/t` [ja \ F''r}• •X'iaJy?Jtri
'1 '' J f t., tij `? C I?Jrr 1' z \ 't` {'???? L1j t } t n/I +; A L ?. r f ti jC
•SL
` y! ? - k e 1ate` a r_ k:, .
•S ? l?t? t ? a i ? r 3. F tnfi? ly^l,A \ !GtI.GCjY? .z;. ?i?,D . h ? at, ` , ?, a t t J i 1 4 1r 4 • - q7 ?
??'?j?ir'?-i ''r vA fy 1? r ? ?L ?Jt C><•t+>,,? ,. ?^ n ? .tl t} -? , Yi i -'Y `?.
:1 > "F,? ?1 L a` 7Irt,o?, r.hj - !1r y c. S ( f r
-• ? „Ibt ?'w.?,?( y{'F%' ? ?,}! 94?? ?t'1+ ? Y; 7 ..! ?' 1Jrr 1 r My?+ tru 4l'MI *? •??c
,/' ,? 1 t r ?t +' , t ' h 1/ 6 ( I rfr ?- Ixyl?r $'/ ? y ? I ! ?
S ..:? ? `4, '-•- rr 1; y'y Fi ? (F ? i 3 ?1 ? s °" dt rl yn.rap„ { ' r its t, , t 11 S 1 ? ? .
•S 1<?'?M- i Ir•?1_- r a'?? .? F 4 a t. tY{.F,,.,,tts
y Y°? K .Ilr r W"rTi?itZt ?? i .y°? r C ?} r } i
Jr.
.y y?.;,,,• r.?. - °n,4ta?.n ti1,.. 3 \ 2 fd??! '•G St}?l 1 , \ ' ?- ..
,? ,rte, Ft f,,??yry?rx
r t? (y' ? ,,-i/"e?4+• `,•:. ?if'}? .';?s(r?lr ?a{-//•ri ll?e"'I ?•?? t ?+ t4.1 r 1 ,. i 1 f + ?(D{ q.. . ..
'?. - ?,? .!o•r. M'°..Ys w. ~'X '.•St?•rlyj ?i21-j?Yy,!<+r .+tl f y.>?? r ?. Fri ?. '. j.: .Z ..
v
S it .? z
try 1
'A .
''• M ? ? V J ?' 7 9.ayJ.' f? l fl.i 1
i
;m +r
QJ (D
0 (D
LD.
cl-
.1.,=Ij',? ??,l.:'i^.t? ' ?r ?` =.?:?:Yr?r•;?:+I. ?' ? 73 v1 n n
' S • ? ,aFO ". r fir. C. ? ? d < O :.
IC'ti ?t?•'N?? ?i'?C?I Lcil:t?y? ? _ fD ? '7p? ..
Stt?ri,.tl'l?.a.? '?tY?/'? t `?f r, C ?.. _.' ?' ? ? • ? ?D ? O 3
SO, 7q, 0)
(D :3
?;; Its F?,v.. /s (D tD
ff 7,at1^,?dt•`4fj t''1R.}' 1`t?t ri ttty''? O 7r
n
t
I ' ? r
r4 t S { . 1 + a ! f 3r
t r! f P' r' 7y, t
i
!'rs?y?( e c •r Ati,
`jrtf Ira x ?} r I ??, S !,

(D
S TA R
O U N T
AA
M
October 6, 2003 C O M P A N Y
Mr. Todd Tugwell
Regulatory Project Manager
Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Re: Action ID No. 200320436 r?
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
VVE LW/401 GIB
OCT - 7 2003
MATER QUALI 1 i SECTION
I write to follow up on our permit application and in response to your questions regarding our calculations
for stream disturbance and impact.
As I advised, I was and am assured that, despite the decreased impact requested (1,193 if revised vs 2072 if
original requested, a 8791f and 42% reduction), the impact measurement is all inclusive. I asked our
engineers to provide colored copies reflecting:
o Streams impacted by disturbance 862 if
o Streams impacted by shading 331 if
o Total Phase II impact 1,193 if total
o Phase I impact
Grand Total
1,025 if
22181f
Less credit for approved mitigation 1,825 if
Additional mitigation required at 1:1 393 if
Your approval of the permit, concurrence in stream mitigation and approval for our use of the WRP
payment alternative as approved by NCDENR and WRP is respectfully requested. I believe the increased
cost required to minimize the disturbed area to be sufficient to justify the 1:1 ratio. NCDENR has approved
the 1:1 formula and is being asked to consider the revised impact numbers now.
Use of a 2:1 ratio for the 862 feet actually disturbed would increase our additional mitigation requirement
to 1,255 if and our cost by $250,000. This is also roughly equal to our cost of minimizing impacts.
Please see the attached drawings which are the same as previously submitted but color shaded. We are
very near needing to begin construction and I solicit your understanding and early approval.
Sincerely,
Zo ald L. llso
Development Manager
Reedy Fork East LLC
Sr. Vice President
Starmount Company
Cc: Ms Denise Poulos, ECS
,-Ms. Cyndi Karoly, NC Division of Water Qualtity
P.O. Box 10349 . Greensboro, NC 27404-0349 600 Green Valley Road . Suite 300 . Greensboro, NC 27408-7722
Business Phone [phone] . Fax Numbers 336-299-1905 or 336-632-4955
V)c
9. a) dS ns ra t + j;
r•1 v ,?VVf1 c(? •b
ED M
i
L • ?t'i 4 Y. J : i t q .rjt' ? .
t wr
r \
f R \ 1 '`

j{rC N ?
h r }i4Cjt??
? r f4 Y -le L f
\ G/ ?\

?
'fbi •. ? Y? L ?
s?w. y1??,,?
'
~ •
?? / U T
a
?
1
?
,.X .? e
, ::..,

S 4
F ' ti . .t -'

p
• 1 ? 1 Z ' r t
'
s
.

?
m g ?

M q M

?. a

.
CL
F o
N 0
N

fill FT
# ; c 0

0 0

?

N of N

N
6?
0
M o
M

? 7 N ? t0 ? N

\ ?
1

46
?. r'? .1 ?• ? , ? r ?. 1.x..1' ??F?3?..+•`",•."1„?1?w.:.
A% J,
r r h
4 j
`yY. .
? d,u ? F"F t y {: y
(D
o LL
nCE
c
(Tj co
EE C:
O
C: +--
O U
CZ U)
O co
CO -
r.a. F-
cZ a
.Q (n
L
aj
L
O
LL (V
O
O
a)
L
FJ1
CCm
O, ?
W
? I
N C
{L Q.
V
rip Z O
O 4-J
=
-no
>=E
L j
F-Vv?i

lrR'• ?' yix. It
c•
' ? '? ? SIG ? •I ? { `-??„! "? yr '' n
N
rr c"` r-P+r
rly ) Y J J•rh - !I
-.=5t ?y, t? ? A fj` ?''?tt ?•. ?.r ??s.;S Yx4JY<'Pi ,y?.lr?- 7.
Y
ti :.' 4 ?, ,• +t } 4 +?' J s• t , 1!1 s >,+".. ru eri) r q r
? ? -•?• rt 1, 1r : ?ur??r y?•?1 dS'i•+ rjt?,la?, ly,i.'?l. r
• '? : 4,• ? ?^ti ? ?1 _} i... ?Y?}k^i? Jy?? 7`??1y/, r t ,rte ?'?'tiri :?.
ti ,•?, 1. '?` . r+: `? _?: ti ' nP ,r? ? +,? ti?,?
N t 'q, . ti• 1 r??r? ??
8 v Y;' 9; "y r f
1' ?{ y t1
'x. ` - rti S' t vI' 4 1 . '
16
? r=

c?
c?
2
c CE5
O
(0 CL
"0 if
+-
? CLS
O
1-0
?-1- . N
-? o
T
L
Q?
Qt
C?
G
L QJ
O Cl
LL r
cu
v a
C U
ro z O
O yJ
O C
;lu •V
. {...! :3
?n O
C
Gl v
L ?
v N
v
o L°
C Z u
0
Q) t .. r' J All .1.'•:
of o 00
a ? 00
C€A
(D
M c
OO O' C co
C? O d? O L

?.
a) V
1
it
.
Lo
N a a) Lo z.

` of
O
$ N L° of L o LL
v CL axi to
f0 o (Do
'o > ?A 1
U

J .
4r• T ?
S is l ?iSI 7l+j) ry?ti?jZy? ??tS??t°r?IS
4 "{ wh}; J'' 'rare 1 ! `"dr ? '? ?)t??+?
Z?,?9_ y.. JibKJJ
• \ 1t ? ?, ;'I!V ti T. f s DTs 1 ) r
?;=Sts •? 'L'+ "1
r
i °1 ? h ? u.{4Yr?ky°a15. ?
?(( \''
•r
'?}It ?t''!•?-%;="?.77??;Y?'???r.':;1?6ri*"ilyL"t ?....:.; _
>r?? r r I
> C c.q/,F?t Kr
i `x1 l° k ^ r Y( ?.
i,?sll?N a:?(Ilyr,-1't.tAr'?G'`""-!c!*Y°,??,. rt I I
,jI' ? t t?r• !j
S
vur
{? ti, yj J1. r? f rv s
co O
1.. <a 4,
?.
8
} r ?, `* J
c .). t \
1?a?t ti N
{"r'#>i L ?. "• ?'` ? ,.;:,,, +K dr'a'w`" ? ?
ti.
KVN,
Jzo
t -c"ti {r r v v
aS: r \ °?j ?iy4?ti r C??if?,L'L+?tkrt? I
Y ?t 'r
Reedy Fork Ranch - Stream Impacts
The following is a summary of the change in stream impacts for Crossings #4 -10. The reduction in stream
impacts were a result in changing most of the crossings from cast-in place box culverts to precast arch culverts.
The change in the basic culvert design was a result of the modification of the policies of the City of Greensboro
with regard to construction within the future City right-of-way and contributions toward that construction. In
addition, the City of Greensboro worked with us, wherever possible, on modifying the road section over the
proposed crossings. Those with other design revisions have resulted in the significant reductions indicated
below:
Crossing #
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total
Original Impact-(Lf)
513
120
135
`0
673
242
389
2,072
Current Impact-(Lf)
341 =
120 =
135 =
0 =
307 =
61 =
256
1,193 =
Streams Covered
But Not Disturbed
0
0
0
147
61
123
331
Stream Portion That
Was Moved/Distur ed
+ 3T_
+ 120
+ 135
+ 0
+ 160
+ 0
+ 133
+ 862
As indicated in the Chart above, of the currently proposed Stream Impacts of 1,193 L.F. only, 862 L.F. will be
the result of actual impact to the stream bed. The balance of 331 L.F. will be channels covered by the proposed
culvert spans, but will not be disturbed during the construction. The culverts have been realigned to minimize
the channel impact and maximize the lengths of the retained existing channels.
`\1\,sI i I \, ? ?? .
\ 1 \u
° b
o ° ?t
° °
pO'oo
O o c
cp
0
0
o i o0
°
\ ??P d 0
0
.e °o ,
o,o
°iSP 66
1o k
b4
O
I 0)"X
'C p
W /
5 /
z
o°
x
bk )

\I

co i?--

W? ?
oy `C? co
Q4 co 00
co
??co
CS44
ti ? c E C,3
W'A2??
vim; oow •.
WW
?j
x
6h )
0

o°1
o
00
00
o?
00
zk\;
IV)
i
??? kyh
Z ?r
LLJ
i
CO
% W
i CC
J
?I M
A '
F
E., c)
U a
a
w
Q N
r o
C1, J
U
a
0
0
0
L?
N
o
o
q ?
ZZ
V J V
?F-
o
a
0
o
qao
}wX
QQP
?1 o a

LO In m / ,/ Iw
cl?

Lf)
LLJ
L

-00 LJ
1 a
LLI
I; I 1

?
I

00 , j
a

LLJ

LLJ
J
j 0
i O
ate? L
I cr- o
Ne ? 11
a:
,I \
-? w
/
\WAW Q
?N
j cc
r ?
N
WIC14,
0.? co ?
co CC)
I co
qucok
c4 c,) ?co
C)
C,) W? ?O`-cry
Z?ppW
0.
<r
o o
W
N
qx w
WW ?
qO
vQ
0.?
?L
o.
E'l
J
17
CU
Q
O
p
0
Li
vi
EE °
o
E,, Z J
V J Li
Q
o?
q<
Eti J v
W~a
boa
Q-
w
r
I ! I 00 L4
/ 79+00J
I j
Z ` ,l \
LLJ
LL)
/s a
q? o
o co
Tyco co
o v? -• o co
V
??cj ?k
00
04 Q4 co '60,
? Zo
?rroo?
ww qx w
ww
h LO
? M
q i
E? v
V Q
Q
w
04 O
J
v
Q
0
0
0
U)
o
? o
q ?
0
Z J_
V J ?
awQ
?o
U- Of
0:2
?Q?
o

?? ``\ •'` ? l \ '` I? / / \\ / / t
Tr^
0.O (Vy`I co
C) co
c
j/ u
o to
CC)
10

0
:5

Al

Al
C5
(D 00

_ /J M ?\ sZ \ \ ¢mCM
(0
co 00

-Z w
---- --- -- ---? ??\ \? _ - _ ?? 00 00 w
c.) v w w o
_ -X- ?/-
W ( \ M M II

J
(? L L' o o
/
> U F-
>
W
. , ey ram
cr- Z 0 0
Q Q? D
O-

a*
Mf
?- w W L,

w
0 O
o
C
O W ..
LLI
J W
-? --'XL' Z f- w~ c.?
U /] fn v) J J
o 0
J
o -J ? ""rte
_ IL ??P'Fc' I O O
C)f U- L,
J J
- (n \
F---
L
CD lk
z Q

\. _ _ `?. \ \\\? vi

? U
• \ ? j ? A I
_ E-4 Z J
01
C 0c) <

LL- \ \ J
?\ j j. /, ??? \ \\\ W c¢i
U) 0 :2
A ¢ o
LLJ (r
¢
boa.
-
F-

\` 1
i ?
1
/ i
l /
O \ /J i
-J LLJ
F- U)
?:) o
?e \ off. X
LLJ
n
i y \
? i

?
-
z

z

i

/o ?
J
-\ ` <
cr-
w cn
??-
cr_
WC4 ?
r-4 Co
-4 NCo CO
Q) Q) co
U
?04 ?uco to
v J -?
co
E, W? ?o?M
WaA? ?
?o C4
r14 (Z)
w A?W
Ww
J
co
e =U-
q U J
E-4 M
u ° u
?Q
o0
m
a
?w
?N
?L,
0
J
U
Q
O
O
L?
M
q i
0
E, Z J
U?LL
aLLJ
Q
0
0
u?
QH
w?a
?o?

77 --

t

z ? \
1 \ 1
V

I
0

\ \ I

W

1
Gil)

II
l ?

\ U
\ w

o w

L-Li
1

U
Q
? r o
WQ

?
w
U)
VJ
/
W

\\
?LLJ ? \ Q
\ w?
C If
X,
6171- LLJ
f- i /!A?q
w v
i Q J
i
?4 co co
) Q4 CO NI
Vcc)0
Z? q?M C04 1,03
Tz? ?C4
iw ?O::7y Q) -N
J
M
N ?
IJ
? M
jM
q Z)MLL
Uw J
mN N
a o° I.
W? J
C>
UU
O O
w <LJ
Q
W
`o
(n LL
J
0
J
U
Q
a
N
co
O
M
t0
I
Z _J
w°
3Q
O
?Cr
O:2
QO
wM
of
Q?
?d
O?
Mr. Ronald Wilson
Page 2 of 2
September 25, 2003
Based upon the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0500 and the policies outlined in the Stream
Mitigation Guidelines, your request for a waiver of stream mitigation requirements does not meet any of
our criteria for flexible mitigation. This project is a private development and no evidence has been
provided that the public good would be better served by flexible mitigation or a waiver of mitigation
requirements. The waiver proposal includes no provisions for demonstrable stream improvements.
Therefore, we cannot approve of your request for a waiver of the stream mitigation requirements for this
project. Since you have reduced the Phase II proposed stream impacts to 1,193 feet, the cumulative
project total impact is now 2,218 linear feet. Subtracting the 1,825 linear feet to be mitigated as
described in the HARP plan, the balance of 393 linear feet will need to be mitigated in the form of WRP
credits or development of another stream restoration/creation plan as discussed in our July 31, 2003
correspondence.
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Daryl Lamb in the DWQ
Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-771-4600 or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at [phone]. Questions
regarding the Wetland Restoration Program may be directed to Ron Ferrell at [phone].
Sincerely,
AW K/cbk
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Ron Ferrell, WRP
File Copy
Central Files
Ron Linville, WRC
Denise Poulos, 6909 International Drive, Suite 103, Greensboro, NC, 27409
030056agn
2
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
September 25, 2003
Guilford County
DWQ Project No. 03-0056
The Villages at Reedy Fork Phase II
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ronald Wilson
Starmount Company
P.O. Box 10349
Greensboro, NC, 27409
Dear Mr. Wilson:
On June 16, 2003, the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers' Public Notice of your application for an Individual 401 Water Quality Certification to impact
2,072 linear feet of streams and 0.198 acre of wetlands in order to construct The Villages at Reedy Fork
Phase II subdivision in Guilford County. As we noted in our correspondence to you dated July 31, 2003,
compensatory stream mitigation is required in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). Specifically,
mitigation in the form of WRP credits or development of a detailed restoration plan for 1,272 linear feet of
streams would be required, based upon prior project impacts associated with Phase I of The Villages at
Reedy Fork and the existing mitigation plan. These stream mitigation requirements are based upon our
mitigation policy as applied to all applicants. We are in receipt of your request of September 2, 2003 to
waive the stream mitigation requirements altogether for Phase II of this project since you are now
proposing measures such as bottomless culverts and other measures to reduce stream impacts to 1,193
linear feet.
Please note that in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h)(6), mitigation shall be provided at a 1:1
ratio through restoration or creation prior to utilizing preservation or enhancement, unless the Director
determines that the public good would be better served by other types of mitigation. 15A NCAC 2H
.0506(h)(5) says that "Restoration is the preferred method of wetlands mitigation. The other methods
may be utilized if the applicant can demonstrate that restoration is not practical or that the proposed
alternative is the most ecologically viable method of replacing the lost functions and values." The W RP
has agreed to meet the portion of your mitigation needs that cannot be met onsite, so restoration is
practical. Furthermore, avoidance and minimization are inherent to the sequencing process, with
mitigation replacing lost functions and values associated with the impacted streams.
Furthermore, the Stream Mitigation Guidelines published jointly by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, US Environmental Protection Agency, NC Wildlife Resources Commission and Division of
Water Quality (April 2003) describes cases where flexible mitigation could be appropriate. In the
rural/suburban setting where the Villages at Reedy Creek development occurs, such cases could
include "other actions that result in demonstrable stream improvements, beyond those measures
required by regulations and should be part of a local watershed restoration plan." In considering flexible
mitigation options, DWQ is required to ensure that aquatic life uses are being replaced, and that
monitoring that will demonstrate the water quality and aquatic life benefits of the project.
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (ht!p://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748

ST A R M 0 U NT
C O M P A N Y
September 2, 2003
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1650
Re: DWQ Project No. 03-0056
*TM/a mF
SEP) o
"M9ECTION
Dear Ms. Karoly:
In furtherance of the referenced application and your letter of July 31, 2003 (copy
attached), I am enclosing revised drawings and calculations. I am pleased to advise that,
with a the cooperation of the City of Greensboro, we have been able to reduce the
proposed impact from 2072 if to 11931f, a reduction of over 42 percent.
You required in your July 31, 2003 letter 1,272 of additional mitigation credits. This 10 z
requirement resulted from combining Phase I impacts (1,0251f) with the proposed Phase 013
II impacts (2,072 feet) for a total of 3,097 less credit for 1,8251f from a previously --
approved mitigation plan. a-?L f I3
-- )
As a result of approval by the City of Greensboro for the use of Conspan and _--
minimization of stream armoring, the revised additional requirement would be 393 if
(Phase 11,025 + Phase II 1,193 = 2,2181f reduced by 1,825 if = 393). WRP has agreed to
accept payment.
I do, however, feel that there are circumstances which justify your waiver of any
additional mitigation credits and request your consideration of the following points:
o The nature of impact resulting from use of bottomless culverts is much less per
foot that a box culvert or pipe and
o These culverts and the other measures employed to minimize impact are very
costly to install and to maintain.
I request that, if yo» find it appropriate, a revised letter be issued and that no mitigation
credit beyond the 1,825 be required. If you feel, despite the significant costs incurred,
that additional mitigation credits are necessary, I request that the amount be reduced to
393 linear feet with continuation of the WRP payment alternative
P.O. Box 10349 . Greensboro, NC 27404-0349 600 Green Valley Road . Suite 300 . Greensboro, NC 27408-7722
Business Phone [phone] . Fax Numbers 336-299-1905 or 336-632-4955
I would be happy to discuss this with you. To assure delivery, please correct my zip code
to 27404.
Sincerely,
Ronald L. Wilson
Development Manager
Reedy fork East LLC
Sr. Vice President
Starmount Company
Cc: Mr. Todd Tugwell
Ms. Denise Poulos
Attachments
Reedy Fork Ranch - Stream Impacts
The following is a summary of the change in stream impacts for Crossings #4 -10. The
reduction in stream impacts were a result in changing most of the crossings from cast-in
place box culverts to precast arch culverts. The change in the basic culvert design was a
result of the modification of the policies of the City of Greensboro with regard to
construction within the future City right-of-way and contributions toward that
construction. In addition, the City of Greensboro worked with us, wherever possible, on
modifying the road section over the proposed crossings. Those with other design
revisions have resulted in the significant reductions indicated below:
Crossing # Original Impact-(Lf) Current Impact-(Lf)
4 513 341
5 120 120
6 135 135
7 0 0
8 673 307
9 242 61
10 389 256
Total 2,072 1,193

a• _
o D
op 0 .
0000 j
00
°de 0
°o
00 '000
Ox °b°
`i
\ g?P 60
° c
0
RQ ' I p0 0
5? ?o }o
° c
,OQ
py
Z? ? O I
Q???P O
yQP
GO _
5?P

bkx /

4
6yx ?
O

/?
-Alb

GQ
ryx0?, G?\\Z?? G ??O 6,15 \
aka of z`? ?? \\ \
j
p ----
/?5Q ky5
x
000 ° O
?p 0 /
O pp
! i1\ aa° _ a: W
1 1 1 1! 1 p?0 I'\ W
! ! i 0 p Q
LT
pp\ I I U /
i
III 1 0;
pp d 11 '; S V/ cn
0
o CJ'I W
0
CO Lu
1
A t? o
v ? ?. (0
atY ?w ?
C4: ?Nco co
C) co 1 0i
~ ? A u co Lo
00
2Q4 Co cr)
a `-
??oow ..
ww co
W
c"I
2
W r? ?
L?
J
?I M
A I
H
(ti U
V a
a
W
H
Q N
W W
O
J
U
Q
O
O
O
W
N
' O
' O
j I
O J
Z
J W
?i O
O?
<0
LL,
Q l?
H
l- a-
0:2
0
00
0
00
O C

00

o r

m
00
o
00
0
00 0
--4
o
00 m
C)
0
00
o
O
00 Z
0
00
0
Z

rn
rn

N
N CO
O

O

r
m
_
N
U)
?I
Cl) OD
>X r CY) 0
C
00
-
rn0
Z Ui -l
< (7
C Zo
r
p
O -I
O
00
000
00
000
00
000
00
?[7

D

Z
r m
x
m Cn

? Z
C) m
O D
z m ?-N+(o m
N>
A m

(n v
0
-4
0
z Z
m n z m
D' D Z O
r

nN??s T
111
CO
0 > > 0) ;A;

-1
M D
to
m o (n M
I C) D
II
P 0
o =
CROSSING #4
The previously submitted drawings had indicated 513 linear feet of stream impact, the
revisions listed below have reduced the total stream impact to 341 linear feet.
REVISIONS:
- We changed the basic culvert design from a multi barreled cast in place box
culvert (with a bottom elevation 1-ft below the existing stream channel) to a
pre-cast concrete arch culvert that is bottomless. This will allow us to utilize
the exiting stream channel to the entrance and from the exit of the proposed
culvert. The portion of the stream that is relocated through the culvert will
have a "cobble" bottom to help minimize the impact of the velocity of the
flow.
- Revised the location of the culvert to utilize as much of the existing channel as
possible.
- We increased the width of the structure, which allows for a greater cross
sectional area that will further reduce flow velocities.
- The proposed riprap was removed from the existing stream channel on the
upstream and downstream ends of the culvert.
- Added another pipe to direct a tributary into the culvert instead of redirecting
the existing stream channel
- We worked with the City of Greensboro to reduce the road width from 36-ft to
30-ft over the crossing to minimize the length of the stream impact. The City
had previously agreed to allow the use of 2-to-1 slopes in the crossing areas to
aid in the reduction of the stream impact.
- We increased the height of the end walls to the maximum of 15-ft to reduce
the length of the culvert. The end wall will function as a retaining wall for the
street fill over the culvert.
- The approach and departure slopes were maximized to reduce the fill over the
culvert.
- The horizontal alignment could not be adjusted due to the proximity of the
adjacent property line and Reedy Fork Creek.

w
C
\Z

cz) co

c
U
o Lo
j LL
I C4 co
?
-
/
LL- Lj
y LL- j
Q )M
W
/ LO U) M I I ?\ `? ti
M

LLJ

FF-

N
I Ems. U
---- - - % a
CL
w

=? I ?V'
Illy-

?? ?? OXO
/.
/ P
LLLI
fr

LLI

/ l O /
II \ -- \ o
Li
/ oo

Z °
a:
W

! \ \ N L'i w

W Q
a
I Q

O

O
m
J
W
Z
Z
Q
U
U Z
O
0 F-
Z U
1=
ui LLJ
I-

X O
W
d
0 O F-
0000 °O J
z
000
000
0 O
Q
0
0000
0 ?
00 0-
0000
0 ?
p
0
Op
Opp
°00
0
0
°00
000
000

M O
Oppp
Q 0
0O
O 0
rr
L- (N
O pr) U M
r-
?
IZ O

0 0
F- rl_

00 U?
00
(D

0
04
L1._
O >
Z
00

? >
Z
M

000
000
Opp
pop
Op
100, O
o Z
O
O 0O 1-
U
p0
°00 H
°OO
Op O

Q
op
p
°po
a

U °o
°p F-
J
Z
a 3 c9 \;II ^II
Y Z + 0
?[ a 0 0 a J
Q
W Y U O N
H
oQZ?J a I
? ?^

U5
LLJ PP o Z C)
Q
} O H
LLI
N
W N°>
A

CROSSING #5
The following items were incorporated into the design to minimize the impact on the
stream.
- The addition of headwalls at both ends of the pipe allows the pipe length to be
reduced by utilizing the headwall extensions above the pipe as retaining walls for the
road fill over the pipe.
- The street section was modified to allow for a 2:1 side slope to minimize impacts.
However, due to the proximity of intersecting roads, the roadway width could not be
reduced in this area.
- The horizontal alignment could not be adjusted due to design constraints of a minor
thoroughfare and the location of Reedy Fork Creek and the adjacent property line.
- Culvert matches the path of the existing channel as much as possible to reduce
impacts.
- The riprap at the entrance and exit of the pipe has been reduced as much as possible.

WCg "t*
E,(:)
t, C?o
z ca CO
co 6

----- - --------- 00 LO
co co
04 Q4 CO 10
"0
'14
\ \ ` `
I I \
-
- -?
c c
i
>, M4

r?2 ?a
n? w

!
-----------
i
- w

LLJ

as

/ -?--!
-
i
-79+00 004-Z/

Cot) J

? i I I
- - - -

w
\ \ \ ..
a

-,
w

\

\
\

o
F- \
_

icy

cc
LLJ
J
0

/ ??V
\ \ N
CO qa0
w
l i \
W ~
-j U
f
O m

O
F-
O
m
J
W
Z
Z
Q
=
U
Z
O
0 ?
Z U

(n W
~
X O
W
W
O O
0
0
J
000 0 Z
000
000 a-
0
0 Q
Op°0 Q?
0
0 a-
00
00()
000
000
000
°00
000
000
000
O
°00
Q 00 O
O
r
OO
O U
O

n r-
OCY) O
LO 0)
LL-
O ]
?
I?
co

Z
N -
0
000
000
00
000
Op
O Z
o O O
_
Oo ~
000 W
000 H
°oO
-
00
C of
000
°00

=
b OO
°00 W

Z ? J

Q 3
Y z + -
O
Q 0 J W
O Q -?
a
N
?
I.L 0
O Q :2 -j
?J
Z H Q I

'^
uJ
}
° ?
? O Z ?

W a r,4
LLJ
W?NO>
W _

CROSSING #6
The following items were incorporated into the design to minimize the impact on the
stream.
- The addition of headwalls at both ends of the pipe allows the pipe length to be
reduced by utilizing the headwall extensions above the pipe as retaining walls for the
road fill over the pipe.
- The street section was modified to allow for a 2:1 side slope to minimize impacts.
However, due to the proximity of intersecting roads, the roadway width could not be
reduced in this area.
- The horizontal alignment could not be adjusted due to design constraints of a minor
thoroughfare and the location of Reedy Fork Creek and the adjacent property line.
- Culvert matches the path of the existing channel as much as possible to reduce
impacts.
- The riprap at the entrance and exit of the pipe has been reduced as much as possible.
A? o
it

I i / ;S:?' C'4
/ w N
co Cp

/J
1 :3.: co co
0 't
C) Lo
Co kx)
C4 CC)
CO

I ?o
w?o?
?
w
2
Zoo 0,- 2 >c

Cl)
/ ww 44

O/V / X3

J

r r , R', _

LLJ
`
W o
ESP AN t
BR\D
C )v
P PR '
FORK
'
i E0?
?
I

'
o

i ! w
' U q
1 ? i
Z
o p
[ti Z J
U w
YII
af W- 3O
0
L'j
LL
%
i i _rU l
to
?? 1 Qo
w
?Qw
i i W ?a-i C)
a

cr- W ?- a-
0 :2

CROSSING #7
Crossing # 7 will be a bridge over Reedy Fork Creek, the will not be any impact to Reedy
Fork Creek nor any wetlands. The bridge will be designed to completely span the creek
area. The horizontal alignment has been adjusted to cross the creek as perpendicular as
possible to further reduce the chance of impacting the creek.
CROSSING #8
The previously submitted drawings had indicated 673 linear feet of stream impact, the
revisions listed below have reduced the total stream impact to 307 linear feet.
REVISIONS:
- We changed the basic culvert design from a multi barreled cast in place box
culvert (with a bottom elevation 1-ft below the existing stream channel) to
multiple pre-cast concrete arch culverts that are bottomless. This will allow
us to utilize the exiting stream channels to the entrance and from the exit of
the proposed culvert. The portions of the existing stream channels that have
been relocated are minimize as much as possible.
- Revised the location of the culvert to utilize as much of the existing channel as
possible.
- We increased the width of the structure, which allows for a greater cross
sectional area that will further reduce flow velocities.
- The proposed riprap was removed from the existing stream channel on the
upstream and downstream ends of the culvert.
- Added the additional culvert to avoid diverting a significantly larger portion
of the existing stream.
- We worked with the City of Greensboro to reduce the road width from 36-ft to
30-ft over the crossing to minimize the length of the stream impact. The City
had previously agreed to allow the use of 2-to-1 slopes in the crossing areas to
aid in the reduction of the stream impact.
- We maximized the height of the end walls to reduce the length of the culvert.
The end wall will function as a retaining wall for the street fill over the
culvert.
- We have modified the approach and departure slopes were optimized to
reduce the fill over the culvert.
- The horizontal alignment could not be adjusted due to the proximity of the
adjacent property line to the north. Moving the crossing further south would
increase the potential impact on streams and wetlands.

co t,
CZ) co
00
Co
c
u
o to
to-
?-

-
co ?o
?4 C)
44
i .
--

44

W CID
¢mrn?
0000 1
.../ m Of
LL, >
_ ..................._ \ -- C.
Ldl -- _-_

\ ------ -
U U ¢
W W O

V r r o_ U) Co M ?- U)
,; -
---

....... W W W W ¢
F-

U
\
? F-
O
O
0
? U
U 0
i
U( ?
?1 _ MM
Z wof 0 O
F- F- O
W U
O W
F- F- N V) L?

J
W _
-0 W U ,.. C
I---J Lj •
C 00
F-
-' /
O
Z) 0
0 Of J J
CL V) \
\
i
(n
Z
-
-------------
,.

.
-- - ----------
\

vi

z _,j
( ti
/ / / / /
\ \ vN
?11? O
J
-
/ / // r \ \
? \ Q
/ W
¢
\ W rn
/ % / ' !? O :

i
z
O
F-
U
W
H
O
[if
m
F-
W
J
_Z

Q

m

00
000
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
O
00
O
O
Q W F--
Q J O
m

LL. U
O -t _ > Z

O U Z
Q 3--
0(1() U
LL: U)
J x J Z
L
O N Q QO U)
F-
F-
OOP X
W
O
co O

Z
0
00
o
00 Z
O
O
00
O U
00 W
°a b oo O
U ° o
00
a-

Q
z +? )0(
00
r-
M
W N o J W
oa O
0 W
? Q
Q N N N 00

W
12
z 2 -<J _j
W

00 O
=wOF
~?FpF o
00 W
Q

W vJ LLJ
N N > )0(
p
?-
W o O
(3=
O
i
z
? 0

U
w
0

W
J
Z

Q

a-

A
O

0
0
0
O
0
0
-
D
0
(
0

of 00
O
>
p p
00 O
m

LL. D
U
w
O = >
Z Z
a. N
O O U - Z
Q

U
00
N
Ii
i x W U
Z
_
N 0
?p

r- F-

(n
00 0 O) X
LiJ
O co
m >
Z
O
00
o
00 z
O
00
1-

00 W
°
0
? oo
)0(
00 O
Z
m
Q i
d
'
oo
H
F- z+
M
? W v? w
(f) to < Q o
O 00 w
-1
w?pvvi v Oo D
N
Z Q
Z
F-
U
w O
00

O O

CL
0
-Z
F 00

w n w?o w
>
j N0 00

W _ O
OO
w 0
CROSSING #9
The previously submitted drawings had indicated 242 linear feet of stream impact, the
revisions listed below have reduced the total stream impact to 61 linear feet.
REVISIONS:
- We changed the basic culvert design from a cast in place box culvert (with a
bottom elevation 1-ft below the existing stream channel) to a pre-cast concrete
arch culverts that are bottomless. This will allow us to utilize the existing
stream channel.
- We adjusted the location and rotation of the culvert to eliminate direct impact
on the stream channel.
- We increased the width of the structure, which allows for a greater cross
sectional area that will further reduce flow velocities.
- The proposed riprap was removed from the existing stream channel on the
upstream and downstream ends of the culvert.
- We worked with the City of Greensboro to reduce the road width from 36-ft to
30-ft over the crossing to minimize the length of the stream impact. The City
had previously agreed to allow the use of 2-to-1 slopes in the crossing areas to
aid in the reduction of the stream impact.
- We maximized the height of the end walls to reduce the length of the culvert.
The end wall will function as a retaining wall for the street fill over the
culvert.
- We have modified the approach and departure slopes were optimized to
reduce the fill over the culvert.
- The horizontal alignment could not be further adjusted due to the design
constraints for the minor thoroughfare.

/ y W U
-1 W I-

W

o

/ i

N ^

W
_

- - -------- ------ --

/-- W ?. -

i -------_ ,

;
\ \

i

r~a ?
C\Z
a r? co N
Oc co
??AVco Lo
ai u _ co
2?? 10
CO
a `-
r-4
ww
wW ?
J
E? J
J
[? m cp
uj II
Il, ? J
?-
0 O
?o
Li
J
U
Q
O
O
l?
i O
i I
a
Z J
I J ?-
Lj Q
I Ly ?
0
Of 0-1
Q I-
-1 0
O ?
i
z
O

U
w
I O

?
I
w
J
I z

a
l

00
000
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
00
0
?
Q w
> O O
Ln
Q
O J ~
O O
[ O 0) m
O cfl _ > w
N U Z
Z
w (c)
O -
Q _
Z
Q
O
tL-
N S
U
(
J X w
J
0
N_ :
O co O Z
O

~
O X
O w
m co

Z
O
00 Z
00 O
O F-
00 U
0 w
00
I-
o O
0
a o 00
O [If
d
U o 00
11

Z+
` )0(
00
o
w
w
-
V)o
a ? o
o
O

W N
U eq N U 00

LYL

? t,? J

Z
'r z 00
a

Q
?
^ O
W O
U
of -
00
w NNE > O

W D O
F- z 00
O
I
W0
1-4

' / / g \\ U7 Vt ?apop1 00
\
cj co
-tij

c (z Q

- W
CK
------------

z?
W
F- M

cQ<
Q w?
04
V)
LLJ
00
000

? Ljj
~
w a ; ----?
--- W o
i X
?q O
i i
A
P
W

W (n
L-Li

o
\
` W
00
` --_ Cti cMo
Z J

3- 0
Of
r ?LWLLJ L,
O
¢
cn 0
C
Q
F-
J U
- __ \ / ~ a

08-14-2003 11:01 From-ENGINEERING CONSULTING SRVS LTD [phone] T-597 P.002/003 F-389
V\1 A I ;9
aG
^i
- `C
Alan W. Klimok, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality

CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ronald Wilson
Starmount Company
P.O. Box 10349
Greensboro, NC, 27409
Dear Mr. Wilson:
NETADS/401 CftP
William U, Koss it., ziecrerary
Nash Carolina Deparmenr of Environment and Natural Resources

AIAfTERQUAl.ITYSM
July 31, 2003
Guilford County
DWQ Project No. 03-0056
On June 16, 2003, the NO Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Public Notice of your
application for an Individual 401 Water Quality Certification to impact 2,072 linear feet of streams and 0.198 acre of wetlands in order to
construct The Villages at Reedy Fork Phase II subdivision in Guilford County. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506, a thorough
inspection of the site has been conducted by Ms. Cyndi Karoly of the DWQ Central Office. DWQ has determined that significant uses
Would bb removed or degraded by this project. Since the perennial stream impacts associated with this project exceed 150 linear feet,
compensatory stream mitigation Is required in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). You have the following options for satisfying the
stream mitigation requirement associated with this project-
1 . Payment into the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (WRP), if the WRP will accept the responsibility for conducting this
mitigation work, or
2. Preparing and Implementing a stream mitigation plan with a minimum of a 1:1 restoration component for all impacts associated with
Phases I and II of The Villages at Reedy Fork subdivision. Cumulative impacts for Phases I and II now stand at 1,025 feet and 2,072
feet of streams, respectively, for a total of 3,097. The existing mitigation plan prepared by HARP may be applied to cover 1:1
restoration for 1,825 linear feet of streams. Additional mitigation in the form of WRP credits or development of a detailed restoration
plan for 1,272 linear feet of streams will be required.
If you decide to pursue use of the Wetland Restoration Program in lieu of developing your own stream mitigation plan, you will
need to contact Mr. Rots Ferrell with the WRP at [phone] to see if they will accept the project. You should note that mitigation
requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Program must be rounded to the nearest linear foot Increme, it
according to 15 2r.0503(b).
Until the information requested in this letter is provided, I will request (by copy of this letter) that the Corps of Engineers place this
project on hold. Also, this project will be placed on hold for our processing due to incomplete Information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(h)).
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Offieo at
336-771-4600 or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at [phone]. Questions, regarding the Wetland Restoration Program may be directed to
Ron Ferrell at [phone].
ely,
SiLrey
John cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Ron Ferrell, WRP
File Copy
Central Files
Ron Linville, WRC
Denise Poulos, 6909 International Drive, Suite 103, Greensboro, NO, 27409
030056
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh. NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6393 (fax), (_hIIp'Uh2o cncla e.nc us n werlaTi
Customer Service f, 1-877-623-6748
1
08-14=2003 11:02 From-ENGINEERING CONSULTING SRVS LTD
north Carolina
Department of. En..vlronment and Natural Resources
Michael IF. Basler, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Denise M. Poulos, LLS
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd.
6909 International Drive, Suite 103
Greensboro, NC 27409
Subject, Project: Villages at Reedy Fork
County: Guilford.
[phone] T-597 P-003/003 F-389
ern
NCDENR
July 25, 2003
The purpose of this letter is to notify Y9u that the North Carolina Wetlands, Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by
the NCWRP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be
approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetbmds/401 Unit. It is
the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if ,ayment to the NCWRP for impacts
associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid, for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued
404 Permit/401 CertSf9cation within this time frame, this accepter wtU expire.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated July 10, 2003 the stream restoration that is necessary to
satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCWRP will accot for this vroied is also indicated in this table.
Stream
linear feet Wetlands Riparian
acres Riparian Suffer
ft2
Impacts 1000
Mir' on .Maximum 2000
The stream mitigation will be provide4 as specified in. the?401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404
Permit for impacts associated with the'subject project in Cataloging Unit 03030002 of the Cape Fear River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance: with the Memorandum of Vriderstanding between the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Capps of Engineers dated November 4,
if you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
cct Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACO&Ralosh
Steve Mitchell, DENR Regional Office-Raleigh
file
r'atC ?.
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center
[phone]
Raleiih, NC 27699-1619
Fax: [phone]
WA fi Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q 9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`O? QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
17 Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
.? Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
July 31, 2003
Guilford County
DWQ Project No. 03-0056
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ronald Wilson
Starmount Company
P.O. Box 10349
Greensboro, NC, 27409
Dear Mr. Wilson:
On June 16, 2003, the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Public Notice of your
application for an Individual 401 Water Quality Certification to impact 2,072 linear feet of streams and 0.198 acre of wetlands in order to
construct The Villages at Reedy Fork Phase II subdivision in Guilford County. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506, a thorough
inspection of the site has been conducted by Ms. Cyndi Karoly of the DWQ Central Office. DWQ has determined that significant uses
would be removed or degraded by this project. Since the perennial stream impacts associated with this project exceed 150 linear feet,
compensatory stream mitigation is required in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). You have the following options for satisfying the
stream mitigation requirement associated with this project:
1. Payment into the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (WRP), if the WRP will accept the responsibility for conducting this
mitigation work, or
2. Preparing and implementing a stream mitigation plan with a minimum of a 1:1 restoration component for all impacts associated with
Phases I and II of The Villages at Reedy Fork subdivision. Cumulative impacts for Phases I and II now stand at 1,025 feet and 2,072
feet of streams, respectively, for a total of 3,097. The existing mitigation plan prepared by HARP may be applied to cover 1:1
restoration for 1,825 linear feet of streams. Additional mitigation in the form of WRP credits or development of a detailed restoration
plan for 1,272 linear feet of streams will be required.
If you decide to pursue use of the Wetland Restoration Program in lieu of developing your own stream mitigation plan, you will
need to contact Mr. Ron Ferrell with the WRP at [phone] to see if they will accept the project. You should note that mitigation
requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Program must be rounded to the nearest linear foot increment
according to 15 2r.0503(b).
Until the information requested in this letter is provided, I will request (by copy of this letter) that the Corps of Engineers place this
project on hold. Also, this project will be placed on hold for our processing due to incomplete information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(h)).
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at
336-771-4600 or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at [phone]. Questions regarding the Wetland Restoration Program may be directed to
Ron Ferrell at [phone].
Sincerely,
John orney
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Ron Ferrell, WRP
File Copy
Central Files
Ron Linville, W RC
Denise Poulos, 6909 International Drive, Suite 103, Greensboro, NC, 27409
030056
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (htW://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
Triage Check List
/4jc"''- Date: 6?? Project Name:
DwQ#: oSG o
County: 1121297,0'(
To: ? ARO Mike Parker
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson
? RRO Steve Mitchell
From:
? WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
_1kWSR0 Cyndi Karoly (Central Office)
Telephone : (919) a
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy.
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
(p ??(
Comments:
-?P
WNW

n'1
S0A lYN SvRl1eY??,?

C
?o

S

V /

b
OJ

V l
F

o ?i - t •3 ?:" r?? i --? -r 1 _ ? i?.??.? ?'Y Jfnl rl iC?7?1r? O 1?i -??
?1?: ??C ? rv 'j? I ? _1 li r R "?._. ? .. 0 ,.'. 1Snn4cully rr? ??? ?F ?. ??? } i ?/- 1 q••, w ? ?. %?.
? ,-? ? i t, ; • Mme. t i t' r /? I ?_: n , ' n` ? 1 r + ,
`-i..! i I •9Z •i ; ,L T? i? - - ?.r1 J 1 r? f'•'%r} /L'%?•?• Il ? ?( \r ,•)
C,,u -. •ti. r a W -i- l?v tn,1 T (? 1 I / (. l ti
?'! t\. ° .4 + , ?) r \ t? y ??? . _ 1> }lrt.w b? I r `? r?
4-i?.•. '1f/_ ?( 41
( r` 1 r
? / .?•14i1?? Le ? \ f ? i ? 1 l.'. _ l ?'?I •'1 ! _ 7 ` ?\ 1\ \ 1 ? ? ' I
! - e t ?
l ? / ' . ? l{ C I N ? t I t 1 1 3 JI / 1 _ / t'?.? l( 1 ? 1 i _ ? 1?? II ? I
?e)• .].. ? xV !)? ? nr•I? ? ?'? ? ` ??N{?,??? a ,-jF,' ? SAY
- ` t;
}r.! .?-. ` (• !; j ` \ ? ? ? _ I ; ("T,?e `mot I `? t ?
csi
)-
S?r .
41
I ?fl lI ? ?\ - Y 4 I f ?\ ) I ? ? ?` l'r??! `Slrr ( rL ?'.\;?
3- l h ? n I
? 1 . ll ! .a_ ? J j'f V t Jq ?:
r
t t - r' "'? 1 t r ' l (/ ^r,?a r \ I { } l ?. ( rf 1, _ J? i
Iz'
-''??. \ I•' c ??.' -? ?' 1 _ r ,11111 41.. .?
Vr,
r f ? ??tr_r? ?? ?. ? ti ?} ? ?..r(? c 'fie r 5',?+?rt"r? •?.?e .ti\ '-_ ; / ?'l} ?` \f 'i L ?' i) ?.i • t
? /? / r ice' ?f; ?''?? .-? r (?•?? I?` r??.L, ? r?. i,'e ? ,.,Il?
f1 ? •' ??? ? ? ? 1 r?( I`. 4??lv ror?? { ? I.. )..ti rl i},' ?ti'? ? V? ?.; n ?'??
i ?N?f
3 Hato o.h H+ ??(l?tl f {L? I?? ??i i? J,v .
_ ( t l \.- F (ya
a .ill it ?- '•tf?ll c•`...-=,-_1??.?' aw ??.t-r-;? \1.1:.:1. N..?-.?_l.._. _ c??. \1..__. ...... ?.4,.,?.? t ,w,: ,1,'??-G?ii?J(i1.?. 1....It r??'•rl4.c.1L i 6
M - ?
SOURCE: FIGURE i
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, SLTD SITE LOCATION MAP
BROWNS SUMMIT, NC THE VILLAGES AT REEDY FORK
QUADRANGLE, DATED 1951 AND - --- -- = -' GREENSBORO, NC
REVISED 1994 ENGINEERING
SCALE: I"= 4,000' CONSULTING ECS PROJECT G-1001
SERVICES,LTD
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD. 4
`;?
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
January 15, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
d?d
Division of Water Quality
Wetland/401 Unit!' f2
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 #
A `.
Subject: Copy. of Individual Permit Application
The Villages at Reedy Fork TUN05 G`, UU?
Greensboro, Guilford. County, North Carolina ! ?Y SECrU?
ECS Project G-1001
Dear Mr..Dorney:
Enclosed please find two copies of the application submitted to the, -U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for
proposed impacts associated with The Villages at Reedy Fork. Attached to this letter is a check for
$475.00 for the Water Quality Certification Fee.
`Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please contact me at [phone] if you have
questions or require additional information..
Sincerely,
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
erase M. Ws.,Le?
Principal Scientist )
1
5
a j- &t4 t7 t, -_A
i &?`t
6909 International Drive, Suite 103 • Greensboro, NC 27409 • [phone] Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen, MD • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD - Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, IL • Cornelia, GA • Dallas, TX
Danville, VA Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Raleigh, NC - Richmond, VA
Roanoke; VA • San Antonio, TX • Williamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC • Winchester; VA
5
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
January. 15, 2003
Mr. John Thomas
U.S.. Army Corps of Engineers +F .
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 56
6508 Falls of the Neuse. Road, Suite 120 -
1.
Raleigh, NC 27615 ; i
ali
Reference: Individual Permit Application ??03
The Villages at Reedy Fork t1 .
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
ECS Project G-1001 NIETLANDS GROt1P
ifi;r 1 ? lULiTY SECTION__
5
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Enclosed please find two copies of the application prepared for The Villages at Reedy Fork.. The
application is for authorization to impact approximately 2,072 linear, feet of stream channel and
approximately 0.19 acres of wetlands associated with road construction. The roads will provide access to
the site. -
.'The site is approximately 1,735 acres in area and is located on Highway 29 in Greensboro (Figure .1).
The site is'being. developed with The Villages at Reedy Fork. - Reedy Fork and its tributaries cross the
site. As shown on the Environmental Preservation and Impacts Analysis.Plan and the Stream Crossings
Key-Map, several roadways must be constructed in order to develop the site. The site will be developed
in phases over a.period of time. At this time; we are. applying for a Department of the Army Permit to.
impact 2,072 linear feet of stream channel and 8,651square feet (0.198 acres) of wetlands. The proposed
impacts' are illustrated on the attached exhibits for Site 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10. Please note, a bridge across
Reedy Fork is planned for:Site 7.. We do not anticipate that streams or wetlands will be impacted by this
crossing. -
Approximately 367 acres of the site willbe set aside as preservation area/common elements. Includedin
that area are at least ten acres of wetlands and several miles of stream channel. A Stream Mitigation &
Restoration Plan dated July 20, 2001 was prepared for the site by HARP in order to mitigate for impacts
to streams associated with Site 1, 2, and 3. These impacts were permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of
-.Engineers (Action ID 200120410 and 200120660) and by the. NCDWQ (#010382). When complete,
approximately 1,825 linear feet of, stream channel. will be restored. We are requesting that this
restoration, along with preservation of undisturbed sections of stream channels and wetlands in other
areas, be considered adequate mitigation for this project.
6909 International Drive, Suite 103 • Greensboro, NC 27409.• [phone] Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen,.MD • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, IL • Cornelia, GA • Dallas, TX
Danville, VA • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC - Norfolk, VA • Raleigh, NC • Richmond, VA
Roanoke, VA • San Antonio, TX • Williamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC Winchester, VA
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should
require 5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway,, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdic-
tion over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Pr a n, Research, and.
Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided, the.permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and.character of the proposed.activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
_ activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANTS NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
5119 / ,Lf ,). ?F ISM o Lo
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS
C/o 1)11L 9. AGENTS ADDRESS

-55
'
p p, ./.SOX /03 107
U•?
r?t7T ?Py?i loNf}? .E
s o3
S
G e??n bo,2 o ti o -0 3 y 5' ea ti L a o
Pti
7. APPLICANTS PHONE UMBERS WITH AREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NU BERS WITH AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence

Busines (p ' p?. / 71
b. Business 3 (O ' to •- 7/S
?/
STATEMENT OF AU ATION
11.
I hereby authorize "F-N t S l - I COS
?_C_'4 to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request; sup ental if ti in suppo 6th permit application.

AP CA S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
TH-F- 1114Z,-1'66_5 AL Foe &
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if appli ble) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRES r(" p1!" ale
RzEa/tt r-bQk ,?-N? I ?g t
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT 2 2UU3 a..
5
Nom. ?.
COUNTY STATE WETLANDS GROUP
Ail Eif UTY SECTION
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
o-7 9 p i
yl `/q• `/S
1 53'I A"'
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE FR041 G e r`? !S o e O 11(6dW 19-1 a.q / 0i277A 7`0 7-A 5
SUrn?'??IT i9-U.EA) VE jFxl7-. %NE Sire ?5 Goc/rF- rte 7/y
/UOP-7"h )ff/tSr gj),f'Z)A-4IL/7" of 7_11e _ti07?eeSr-c1?aN OF ,EGA °so
ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF SEP 94 IS OBSOLETE (Proponent: CECW-OR)
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project include all features) T11E- S-1 TE- ?V E-Z-49 rEb 017 -H
TAE [JSua}G Es /t)'"Ez j' ,0 2,t Zoj?)s G.? . ,8 E Goys. c r? z- v
c>,eD?,e To lhcc ss T/t? i if C moss -7-e -l 8uTi9R/.MS
OF z'Er-?11 Fo2?, -7-AL R0v92> 000Ds7'eue77-10.J
rr.¢c%' A ,E,v 7Z
Pr P es >D- ?9 P -N70 -7-1V
>?02 7 S /9-r A19CH Loc?r?cP.J,
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project see instructions)
'7'HF S ? rE .ts ? ?ti G ? U oO ? z v ?H?ts S 60,0T11 7-#
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED l
20. Reason(s) for Discharge 7jy/_ l SGH? ?G /92 ?T? 7Z? CaNSTQU C770
vcoP 7-r}? s?T?
SEC Essl92/ 7C)
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Y No IF Yes DESCRIBE THE CMP ETED WORK
?ecur.o a:; -TV]?,/I?GT3. /9-SSf>c!< ?c? h f??T ZG ?t STa?c ?'? 1? wG2C
f}v o2i ?/ ?Gc? tl y? NW 39 9:71A a ; pti=.s Aee-
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a
supplemental list).
_ S f=? /S?TT/tftf/YI t?N TS
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application
"Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application
is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized
agent of the applicant
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT ATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized
agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, knowingly
and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or
representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall
be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
Block 24 - Adjoining Property Owners
Lot # Name and address
30 Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
Monroe and Madison Township P.O. Box 30013
Ma # 193 Raleigh NC 27622-0013
28 Wysong & Miles Co.
Monroe Township U.S. 29 North
Map # 193 P.O. Box 21168
Greensboro, NC 27420-1168
02 Wysong & Miles Co.
Monroe Township U.S. 29 North
Map # 193 P.O. Box 21168
Greensboro, NC 27420-1 1 68
06 Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
Madison Township P.O. Box 30013
Ma # 601 Ralei h NC 27622-0013
05 North Jefferson Inc.
Madison Township C/O O.W. Hines
Map # 601 107 Birch Creek Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9205
16 Timothy T. Mericka
Madison Township Sandra R. Mericka
Map # 603 6941 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville NC 27301
13 Carolyn Sharpe Williard
Madison Township 6950 McLeansville Rd.
Ma # 603 McLeansville, NC 27301
OS Joel E. Gibson

Madison Township Ronda
S. Gibson
Map # 603 6806 Poplar Grove Trail
Greensboro, NC 27410-8621
10 George Haywood Williams
.
Madison Township Connie S. Williams
Map # 603 6958 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
01 Frank N. Stevenson
Madison Township Faith H. Stevenson
Map # 603 6964 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
09 Dennis L Roberson
Madison Township Vickie Roberson
Map # 603 6977 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
11 Dennis L Roberson
Madison Township Vickie Roberson
Map # 603 6977 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
12 Wayne Falls
Madison Township Pamela Falls
Map # 603 6981 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
Block 24 - Adjoining Property Owners (continued)
Lot # Name and address
07 Terry Lee Busick
Madison Township Patricia S. Busick
Map # 603 7011 McLeansville Rd.
Browns Summit NC 27214-9716
06 James D. Smith
Madison Township Sandra P. Smith
Map # 603 7002 McLeansville Rd.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9716
12 Herbert William Kennedy Jr.

Madison Township C/O Chu Swaney

Map # 603 3136 Battleground Ave.
Greensboro, NC 27408
05 William G. Rudd Jr.
Madison Township 108 Wilson St.
Ma # 603 Eden, NC 27288-5231
14 Burton, Herbert W. Heirs

Madison Township C/O Mrs. Herbert W. Burton

# 603
Map 5115 Long Island Dr.
, Atlanta, GA 30327-4907
Burton, Rhetta N. L/J
03 Wiliam F. Burton III
Madison Township Loretta B. Wenger T/C
Map # 603 1304 Norman Dr.
- Eden, NC 2728/8
13
Herbert William Kennedy Jr.
Madison Township C/O Chu Swaney
Map # 603 3136 Battleground Ave.
Greensboro, NC 27408
William M. Mericka
11 Mary J. Mericka
Monroe Township 5963 Summit Ave.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9704
03 John M. Jenkins
Monroe Township P.O. Box 346
Browns Summit, NC 27214
02 Susan Finley McCanless

Monroe Township 5939 Summit Ave.
Browns Summit, NC 27214
Reedy Fork Associates LLC
13 C/O Starmount Company
Monroe Township 600 Green Valley Rd. Suite 300
Greensboro, NC 27408
03 Greentree Inc.
Monroe Township 5925 Summit Ave.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9704
%40,?Ilopy
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200220551 County: Guilford
GENERAL PERMIT REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE VERIFICATION
Property. Authorized
owner: Starmont Company Agent: ECS
c/o Ronald Wilson Denise M. Poulos
Address: P.O. Box 10349 Address: 6909 International Drive, Suite 103
Greensboro, NC 27409-0349 Greensboro, NC 27409
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone]
Size and Location of Property (Waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): Starmont
Company's proposed the Villages of Reedy Fork subdivision property, located off of US29, adjacent
to unnamed tributaries of Reedy Fork Creek, north of Greensboro, in Guilford County, North
Carolina.
Description of Activity: Proposed sanitary sewer line outfall project resulting in approximately 0.02
acre of temporary impacts to the jurisdictional waters of an unnamed tributaries of Reedy Fork
Creek.
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
X Nationwide Permit Number NWP 12
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may
subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and or appropriate. legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General / Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact John Thomas at telephone numbe (919) 876- 441, exte on 25.
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date February 14, 2002 Expiration March 18, 2002
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200120410 (NW 14), 200120660 (NW 39) County: Guilford )001.
GENERAL PERMIT REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE VERIFICATION
Property Authorized
owner: Starmount Company Agent: ECS
c/o Ronald Wilson C/o Denise M. Poulos
Address: P.O. Box 10349 Address: 6909 International Drive, Suite 103
Greensboro, NC 27404-0349 Greensboro, NC 27409
Telephone : [phone] Telephone: [phone]
Size and Location of Property (Waterbody , Hithway name/number, town, etc.): Starmount
Company's proposed the Villages at Reedy Fork subdivision property located off of-US 29, adjacent
to unnamed tributaries of Reedy Fork . Creek, north of Greensboro, in Guilford County, North
Carolina.
Description of Activity: Proposed construction of subdivision development resulting in impacts to
approximately 0.16 acre of jurisdictional waters associated with road access construction (NW 14)
and approximately 0.003 acre of jurisdictional waters associated with lot fill. (Total of
approximately 0.163 acre of impacts to the jurisdictional waters of unnamed tributaries of Reedy
Fork Creek.)
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
X Nationwide Permit Number NW 14 & NW 39
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may
subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General / Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regarding he Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact John Thomas at telephone number 919 876-8441, ext sion Z
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date March 19, 2001 Expiration February 11, 2002
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF:
Stream/Wetland Impact Summa
Crossing #4
This crossing is located in an area where several tributaries to Reedy. Fork converge. The crossing was
located at the point where the impact to the tributaries would be minimized. Moving the crossing north or
south of the proposed location would result in greater stream impacts..
In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on both
ends of the culverts. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culverts
will be placed approximately 12 inches. below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic
organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 513 linear feet of stream channel.
Crossing #5
This crossing is located on a tributary to Reedy Fork. In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, the
road alignment has been re-graded to maximize slopes and minimize the amount of fill over the stream
channel. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom'of the culvert will be placed
approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 120 linear feet of stream channel.
Crossing #6
This crossing is located on a tributary to Reedy Fork. In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, the
road alignment has been re-graded to maximize slopes and minimize the amount of fill over the stream
channel. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culvert will be placed
approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 135 linear feet of stream channel.
Crossing #8
This crossing is located in an area where several tributaries to Reedy Fork converge. The crossing was
located at the point where the impact to the largest tributary would be minimized. Moving the crossing
north or south of the proposed location would result in greater stream impacts,
In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on both
ends of the culverts. The vertical alignment of the road has been adjusted to minimize fill in the stream
channel.- In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culverts will be
placed approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 673 linear feet of stream channel and 1,740 square feet of
wetland.
The Villages at Reedy Fork
Stream/Wedand Impact Summary
p2
Crossing _#9
The tributary to Reedy Fork at this crossing is very sinuous. The crossing has been located on the portion
of the stream that will result in the least amount of impact. The fill over the pipe was minimized by
following the natural terrain to the extent practical. Parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on
both ends of the culvert. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the
culvert will be placed approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of
aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 242 linear feet of stream channel and 603 square feet of wetland.
Crossing #10
The tributary to Reedy Fork at this crossing is very sinuous. The crossing has been located on the portion
of the stream that will result in the least amount of impact. The fill over the pipe was minimized by
following the natural terrain to the extent practical. Parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on
both ends of the culvert. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the
culvert will be placed approximately 12 inches below the. channel bottom to facilitate movement of
aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 389 linear feet of stream channel and 6,308 square feet of
wetland.
Summary of Impacts
Stream Impacts: 2,072 Linear Feet
Wetland Impacts: 8,651 Square Feet
gk2
lea- NORFOLK SOU7XERN
0 0
d
XP?
5
O c
e
EC.i'E ? ROgp - \
co
® 0

x rn
? =0

N rn

a m
v
r ..?
F O 07
D

A
f

?

O
O Z
Z

11`/
J ^
=
7
f,
(
bwowvS %T ROAD
a vi .v
o
a
L•
0

o ?
0
e OVO?J 377NSNd37?W
io e

a o
o°
00 °o
00°° 0 0 00p00
o
0 / .
000 0 0 0 000
p-000 0 00 /
00 0 _ °° 000 0
° °°°
x?
xy9 \\
i
°00o \?'
). 0
0 ?c
y m
no p ENS co 0 \ \ \ J
>0 -Ru C&
-1 p \ \ \\
O
O
O
D

D

Z m
r x
m to

z

? G7
O
C)
4 =
n D

O
m
z r
W
O
-I

IO
FR
??
v'
a-
?o
?m rn0
{
n Z
aZk.o

r
N? o x
C, +
rn
rn m o N
;
Z
psi
{

0
l \\
U L
I V
N / - / 14
o_ _ \ \\ In .
o En- 0 D 0 rr^^
?1o O V, _
N r Z>?O
D ?`A O A'? rn \ ` xx
?moW >
CDj,> it I o,D w• / I /
i
r
10
x
rr,
LY;
rri
?m? ??

-? I

D
-0
O
c
r
H
M
--i

0
0
O O
000
--j
M 0
00
°O
::j 0°0
0
° 0
°
z 00
°
o
00
00
000,
000
J

Z W
<
rn
00
W
Z
<
0
00 0)

v
W 70
C)
-
0

O
000
0p0
00
000
°00
°00
000
000
000
000
0
X 00
-D 0 0
Z7 °00
0000
°
0
0
°
0000
0°

m o
00
°
1 O
m m
x
O
m
n z

O
z n
=
D
z
Z
m
r

O

- 0

O O
O -
W O
O
D
0

FR
0 m 177
=1 4 v) rn
CA S

r.
r DZ
0
V) ,4 M
r D 0
7) D
m
O(
N
m
?
"

0
'! o W\
o
*? N m 1'11
4 (n Tlo o O ? CD
y r Z O \
rn ? / ?-
Rul
z rn\n + ;0 -
°??o?? #
-0 + z
o 1 I?> O
\ m
77 \ M
I / 00+
oo I cZ ? ?j
I
r /
m?
o
/ ??m'

'O I

D
-0
O
C
r
M o0
o
°

-o 00°

O o0
0
000
n °o
-_-I 000C
°
O
°
z 00
°
o
00
00
00
000

Z N
< -TI
O
W _
Z O
n
CO
v
00 (n
O
o
L4 ?
n
-
o

00°
0
000
00
_ FR
r?* 2 t N m m
?ZE?°
> -1 ZO >M
P r
N N?c;Ku
+
p
> m
r m D
0
o vv)) D J`
A
C _
000
000
000
000
000
000
000

;u 0
0 0
°O
0°a 0
0
D op
on
00°
_
Z O
0000

m 000
000
-i o
rrt
x
O
rn

n z
? o
o
z
_
D
z
z
m
r
W
O

0

(00
v-0
O
OO
0
O
D
0
q F04 go m
C4
o OZo\
?1yZD? ? \ \
r?fN?r??'m 111 \ ?_
n+ S,? \ \
\
ZDrpV)I
D D C \ ?-?
m 000
? 0,000
_

j
°0°0°00 0 0°0°0° o°o°o°o°°0 0 0 0 U -??
000
0 00000000
00000000 ,p
0000000 O -

I
H C-) M x
C O N
O z
m
D

. I
O
ICJ 0 0
? O
0
o
D 00
O

O 0
C 00
O
0
m
-1 00
° I
_o 0
0
0
O 0
0
)OC
I
M
0
00

O
0 I
Z 00
O
00
O

Z

rn
m -,J
X

-? w
Z
0
1 n
2
D
I z Z
Z
rn
i r 0)
co OD
O

I
p OD

O
00
O
00
0 0
0 O
0 0
r
00
0 0
00
0 0
00 0
00

1
(0 0
N ?
0 ?
00
O
D
0
D
z
can/
I
0 0
oc
0
0 0?
0000
i oo c
00
o.
m 0
x
cn _0
000
0
/ 0
o l
k ? \
0

i

i
0
00
0
0
0

70 O

O
D o I
0 00

0 00

C
O 1
? 0

m q0

-+
o I
00

OO

O
o I
rn 0
0
c? 00
o
1
p 00
Z 0
00
0

z
i <

N R Ill
= oE5 co
?
n ZO m
DZKZ
+o ?
Y
M
n
N
m ??
m V)
+zll
m
o >
O
J -1
O
rn O
O
D
0
00
00
oo.l
00
00
00
0o
000
00
x
c
o w?? OD OD
x
0-? , ") . mz
z ::'.,
> Z?Z Z
D C'+?;rn$rn o
Gr. D O 0N T /
m N /
D D Its M /
00/.P.. p 0
FT?
/ Cn /
u ?
o
- o X o?
o I ? /
/rn
i
O
00
;u )o
-O 010
M O
D o°
0 OOI
O ool
C O
--{ O O
r- )OC
m OO

-I
O I
OO
)OC
°
°
O o I
m O
C) 00
::j o
O o0
Z O
00
O
o
00
O
00
001
00
00I
o0
00
00
010
0010
00
O
N O
T)
X
O
D
D
2
0, L:j
v>A
Ny
m
- cl)
?
c
i?p
r DZ?;u
Z
V, 'A M
D D N (n
?F0??
F
Z
O
0
0 0 _
J
i
r,
?7 ,{ J• K
.t v-y - 7i".^ r? 7 .r '-x-:, t,^ - s
., -,i 3 - t•R ° f '; 1, ,# t.VX' r fc-* y 4 i : t
."?f '? t t ' }.'_ f ty fi_i? ,p , :r' r z t ?°•?.- ,d; i s i?2 l `Jr s .,rr a -
q.. r +i 4 t\ 7 ""?? .( ?i 'if. }+p 1 i yr il` _ _
N }. ? ?. F •'* .+v I ! 1-i.' 'Pfi 131,1 f -$' iY ,sT ':N - _ j
I ?' , 1 / >'s t 7 j y[)k -. I 1 ??1p 1 :" -,! ) (? .,C, 1 " ,1 Riffle Zones
( ns t r r 'r: yr 1...?, .e tai. e'n I., r - ' s 'N', ,? I ! t 7 { N i/„•
V
.0
t final grade
f ,.d i t 2, 'x ,y ? Y r J ., 'r h. ?? 4 i
t ; ;
r s}ss # i '• 'J r W -x: 4 ,? . r a b s
t(( r!
j 14 r 4 armored with cobbles
ft ' ?.'w 1 t ,, tr ' 1 l _ .f yiy?V - r" 4 ^ji t
.k. ??1 f > bstrate
D84 su
,r r t $ ,1 • , t
- k
1 j t r , 'c4 )'f '? ISO( ?
i T' r ~ s 1 i? , ki ? U `.E 1
G 1 r 7 _. 1 Y
- I . '.' T ":.-;-- -."-'-'?_:'%-. '- Z ; .- t .' , ' ? - : -'?? ? ?.' -, -, , ; _* '. - , ' , - , ' - -"-???:-?' ?-'.- - -. - _' ", . ? _.- ?' - ?' . ! , , " ? I - - - - ' -
i n e?.?' 0 50 100 150R} iv?:R{'''
n9 ! t- j4
a ; . r ?1 v scale ^.. ?? iJ • y , uS ? ! ; v . ; r ' ' . .x
t? - t t • t t xT '
1 :g Y } w K.,
ii 7
.,?. ;tr ,r ar '+-. r. --r L. i ?:. Y1 - .'- . _' , .' i,..•?. t .flex ?.(, I
..t, r 4 ' ?.
,.
,,, . L 1 r k
,+,, .:?Ii; y?.Ls },v, "? t 'n ?f ° i-. ?y, 7 f 1UVU L ?! W ?4.•'+a;,"t 71 , 1'•i t.
r- . ? ?< f ?. Pool Zones
{; . ai F) >! 'Y, , '?"' i^'Y,z"'.? ..n' 4 -.w ' J: s i r 4 1 t?'. . 'S ,54 I R. ''i 1 .1 1; f J.3•I- tit x7 a ,t;+-a., rJ. ^ e?: .!
. t ,
? - S - J i ?,,. t e r *1 :?
r ? ? K ' x? r ?;- ,?; - %.;.::1'-v". , water slope <.003
! fs 3rz ' ?' 1 .!: ,.r+' 5 ^', "Yv^ .! r f , 1 ? ?` t.'.'1.?1 . '•
d +tii??t 7
? - g, e u,. , x ,r•:_-_'.',f.}r,- ?Y. - r f r } S Sj A' Y ..? X. t '• j .-7 - ,v 00/
;., Yb R.--I Yg "? 3 .°t r H .s: 1 r{F'.'`1 %"' .?' k't \' ..lr ,.. r N t'j ?7+i ". '4.' 17. l . r k', i bed grade
.; 3 j :x - . C z - ).. t i W,w .g s r
g '> ' ,,1 r 3:
1' r .:).., ';? ryF - : x, -11-11"'_k' a I r ,++:, t-?+ ? ?.. 1.:. t 'i Y' . Y '' :4
r
;` x? _ t .:?, (valley grade) pool
::.'r:.•? >'r scc .a. ,?.. rt ?.. r t'' _r,1 i ' 'Yi .' _ '.?' .e 1 4.,,.:,'J }? N /!
6:?,: CYO >,•'r o ,u- -t i L r? 7; .1 - '' }Nv• ?`.w-. x st i ?,} 7 ' t'-' Y F i
?._'t E? , .:.? p m t =, n t __ .t depths 6 12
1! _•.?c m*'r ''tY'^'i +,S } _ 1 i1.-'. ?x ?.;'r'i.r.r?.,, + • ?f r 'ui;, T;i-
.
>.
, t ! #i' .y .O., '*4 is I 'D r . 1 • • a t
?. _^. r * ?i' .,- -
{e T' ' J - tx ys r t?, i L' ,y? '?5?' S Y ._'' Fl k r 1 . y,? I ?'', ,15• FN,,•, p g ;; 11
11 . - / J s •r r?? :'. ,p?y; ,l°7 r ?V c' i r _•if?"rt' iW .:? if J•t
c. ;
{ 33' a Y at j't
xt r ! e', . t „ •Y
t : ti -_ ? t `i- 3 ,! , y v ` r _ a f ... y ? 7W _ ? '1 I. x 1. Y L
- 500 , , t Y
0 ?1 ' 1.r 1 t4f ,.: t r 1 .. r : L i !r t ,
r 7? l+ iF.^' '}.r,; fit `t 1
- - ?-' - , , N
hr r` ,. r 'i :! t ti 1. i n.!' i _: :y„?a v?.'t uI .".;-: i? t.S. {t ?} ' r
a
ry r x .,drf y} ?...'t{. ,J F -i! a 4 t ,,A , t ,.tft Yy+ Ilri i t "Z'
3/ f4 } L Y X ti'- f 1 1. LC ,b C -; 1
*{ Y' i :?5 r
}•
r- J lr R •1 t r?• i•"
_ ._ - -
684 - - r
"' i `,;
;. ... 1 r t
680I
L. I .
so j 12 5:1 vertical exaO eration
.. ,
1
i
676
<'
672
- - - - -- - ------ ------ -- -- --- --- --- -- ------ -- ---; --- --- - ---- -----
0 500 1000 1500 1800
HARP The Villages at Reedy Fork, Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan 7/15/01
Greensboro, NC R.D. Forsythe
Starmount Company - Dev. Manager Sheet 4: Longitudinal Profile
Figure 13d. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan, Sheet 3, Longitudinal Profile
3 Z
i Tott SW AMC TM ACM
2CanmanRLrtartldf?rtHatAmc ib&71aw
(!F A'
Y, ,,,rA ) r f, ?'`',1, ATtkdWnGkdNfC6riW4 f'A«bAaO
,
1 ..y ... 4,,roWUWrfA*o?fio*oft -itm.AiTi.E
,\ f r r tf~'Yl ``.• V .,,'lf +.,, J,.w....^ ': r 'v t ToWAiw{ogofft -Vw"iooE tARC01.f.
i /
I r?? F? ' '' r?? .1:? - Yoa&tlwefieeof9krmatuNetarr+etartiaw^ t P,TOOtF.
Y/ ?..,. Ott 12'
r•",
r nt 11? " t t S + ? ` ..
4 + r - - ? ?f j: t, ??, ?^ r r ?, t", MlwiirtlfspiwtbncuYErabkrRrpsc>x4MgaSRd?t
?''« ''?( vtalh?h?bdene?r?nlw?onyroArtnery
,.?. t,.jr .max, L, •,rC1':. ""r..ti uf
?,,q !?•? ?, A,,;::? '?i p i'V'? ? ::}? A, , ' ? S r t ..1 `• , : ? ?,,, bfaAU9nAw rose ndr'ranaww
??? ?j ?`?r? r 1 ` ?? ?nr;S?,l." :i'1ti}?. ;?1?..? t i t! ??"p? ,?stV •`k r ?E t?
•,??? ?? r,? T 1 s \??, t<} ? ' 'I?? a_ •?i Y'S".? ? ? i tt? 1??. •` / •( (+ "t ? ? l ? 1,? ,, ; }=t t. ? -
;"T?A1'ty; ?,ti"+ 7 t I i' or -
BRYAN
S t 4 Y' \ } t.: ' i 't i \' '" •' / '/ j 1 ` ; t t t I { ,rv.'«
77
PARK 4 v tr? i ?r } dt v • ?, I
rr'?" ?.., t , ,? } :5 e? J f
AND GOLF ? ?? r lT; : I ? 4. ?
COURSE Qi4 \ ` ?. A! 1 1 , \ i I T, S aV /(!, 1 i ;j?
r% ?;..? ?? ? , 0 1 ,t'•, . ? a'tiT ?' ? ? ? i ;rr ?t, .: t ? ;1 t ? ?. ? '?? ,,,'t't?+? r , ; j? ? ? 1? %v
4 1 ..t al t r tai t 4 ,.i, 4t `,;? \, r ti.:'• 4 ?4 rti? S i"t VY?",
!wt
r'1 ..?' a ,u t <
tY / ? ?"""`._ ? i, 1':?;;Ki'?? .r r1 }> ? .. ?? it f h rE?:?. ft?{ r \ ••?` +t? 1 t ? h ¢, r r r t? ,i:.
?•,'?? ?V'r?' .,; ?, r ?l ? ...? ? i;, r.. ,. ? .. ? r ?+}? ?.rV ?,?,1 t 'ii?;? ,? } .i?,?"? ; f t? '' veti err ? rj ? 1 t cwt ,
C.
y ? Vim, 'l' 0 s f j i Z tt. ""? ? y,ah J t? ?r '.o?Yl. t ?, ,t i f l?' ?.,V } ?,? r,
l .l"?•. ? . A `" , r: ?? t ( { t?f ? ` i 1 '. + ? ?? ,/a? 'x ° \.?C ^1' r ?'?.( ? \ , 1 ,?i; ? ,ti ( ?,? (,'.. ? ? I ' '``???.^ ?' ?'t
)t ?' ? a? ' ? ? ( ? 1Y? '?' .?L k? f 'L. ( tv.. '1v,?.. 1 ''v. \
71}
11j zy . . ?yl?l? l j?f. ?^,r''i try Jtr ?sf ,,' ?j'tfii?i??,r ? t?t? ?,r r? fr tiA a .???:? ? li;{'' ??' r?7'
'?{ t, ? t- ?., l ?!f. r'?. t` rr '? ! i t ?"' ( +'>' ? ?', r , ?, \ s1 ? i ? a
1. ? ??•7\ t,t''f ? , ?,.'"`, } r ? t ,r A' ?'. „ ?,.? ?Y?r,,r l,?r ? r?,? ` ,' t11 ...1J.. .?, t ,5
?.,, )` '?`}t ,\l',,f t! t..t; }?? Vim' - \`, '+: 1?},.t Il X(r,"?/ \v rat"•• :.\t +.' ?U,....,` ti f, t?, 1 Y''.?? , ..'ft it'll
%
'It sli
o
„Tl? ? ?'?' `'? ?'. '1j:.til ??. ?,1. ;:r ' 7, t? ',A? ?P.? ??: i ?..:? ? ,fi', '?., .`w..i.. ?,,,...5 , v. ?wt
ti
?,}y)t,? ?Ttt',? F' r,,?,???,,?? l?.t,C,t f A1.54 t s ?r?'?I? ?, ...??, ?,
1, N
t {....1 iN /rJ??.... .• ? ? .7'? r' ? `: ??? :r. t ?1 ',,.A? ? }?... . r. ?, t .. ((r ..? V`?^', Q. ?.*1.? ?-
I
?/ aRti 'L`? ?l+' fir.\k\? 1 may'`" t%,lt?trt r!?r 1.
.(?
l Jr..nv P t t vV???t\\. b ???
X1
i t st ` ?T ?ISy a fi{
PROCTOR & GAMBLE MORRI
?/A ?'? tir - d F >^` qY ?< ?b.w«".. f'Z5. fit i S °f f
n '4 f 1 r J f 1 ' k V'4 J tt {{•
!4t1..\\1t i1?...'
-'? t ff 1 ,."'.. r' t'.` .?! : ii' l`J i '1 + \5 }' d 7 y r ,lrF, '.? 1?Y1
?J1{' t?[1 ,{?.J r' $ r,,. : r ;- ,. . ? \ t f 1l `1 t ? y { M Q
? ..'{+? iy/y?'ry;?Y ? .+?`f`^y ?} ..5. A \: !I 7 ?! ? y.'L 5y)',',\d I + ?'k} ! 11 ?>!? ??\y\ 1 I Y? ..+w..
??.??`,-»"...f?t'?,`???? ?'...' ? 1?1+J ?' ?i f+,r:/P'1?. ? ? f???t?,ti?t?til jl y. ??S t ??itltf??.??( a ??,r,'? ..?.?tr???-^,?\
,?+ c„::: 1t" »• t d" , " ;.." r r _ ??• t 1 r ?t? s t ii "'? !fit I
r 1„?•,? a•, ,
'?.! ° _?'tit
t ..+•^ f. t ', 7 ...,? ^, «' ? 'wf ;' r' r , , ( .,: r _ AS r 1 ,n*'"` ? +?,t} i' t 4r« 1. t'0.
"Environmental Preservation and Impacts Analysis Plan"
't r i %'Y r r ?'
The Villages at Reedy Fork
.?
aPl
LEGEND: Greensboro North Carolina
PROP('nY $uIRwxmt (omen - Developmm manatgar
rr i r ",.a ?, ' v w ?i .!. °h ?'1,. .? ...ti, •S w ? "+ '? f J%> ,fliJ? ? t rv ? tra r 1? :((rf,. ?, t ' r; r :? j :a%rs+", yN? _ ..r.
SEI ON BOUNDARY plo??m ? EnpI'nwwing Engineers
G
°^' 'k t, l? "4 ff ?' J ` ' j ? t {:r +? y, { _: 0. \ " ' r,+,^! . Q dof f ') EDAM V E,nfirimwdrig ConBOffing Services, U&- Environ nente[ Scientist -
1. Y r r u 47a ?f+ ,' t t o ..3 „."_ PRESERVAAON AREA
3 r33 : .°',v aa4r IN International,- Planwalandscapa Arsitacfs
K ?, ? r? ?, '; ' .? ?. •???. r ?1d/ ®WA'I'ERWAY 8n> .P?ra, Mstendan Hu
_ f r?h
,
OE>WMG UTILITY EASEMENT ?y & Leonard-
•'?•"" .'? .p #;?"s, '?' ? ?!lJJ;?t''- ?g° d ,1;? t f? ",:„,'?•r.,?f ? tfrl?"'?`?t " ERVkotvrlenuiCaG9UfbBnt6nd Attorney
wig DENTIREO WETLANDS
Sak P oa d
z ??? a LFOR C (i ', r ail ,ti. 0 s" REA is CROSSING
a.
t d? rrx 'y, T ?.,
+'r' ,? a r t a f a ., #{,'},+ }y ,. 0 IW J90 - AWAMY 90,2= Not*
..'\.i}ixt ,,,,,..,,fir ..,,,v ;ys?* m, r'?il• ?c6
ti.

1 fqt RMdiX.
2, hh6rrybpg47yq w

kar
Irrk
I`
L
1-1
' 7
1
j? ? a Y
+ k
' , t4??
t
?
r r n,
? F
3
-
-: !
S?
':? q:
-dl``
- •
?
r
pr
1
? a
? _

1
_
.? y
,
I
`
11
?y
•
1
,
_
, __ - - - -
,
? ? , ? : .-!-
,
a
.-
y 1 1 - " L d, ' } >
"," , _ _
x 1 3
, ,
. ? ,
?
.
s
.,
{
11 E

-'+?
? .
.
.
`
Y„,y. yy?h? Lid. /?•? `3 ' ".
- fQ /!,'?1i?7 1IIf
d i?1 { x?
!
r s
r a y
??'
_
"
?.
Iv'? ,
P
?
?' + I ,r . , -
r , - - ? - _. I
_1 -
.
'. ) T?'{w"n' i'`(????r}? a j??[?, }'? /? T ' ]{?G ?^??''?,.•?.. . r :. , x r" ?, y
,rrr ^-. '? it 1,i LN7 KR" d(Lis-b ??GYMlS'iu? t 5 - ir`,, 1
!" ?•:! .lair , L ?-o ?' i ,\ ±- s r --
. . ?, . , P j ., ? 111; --' - .!?, ; , .? .% -.,? ., . . c. , --,, -,,Z?? , , - . -, . I, .? . - .
K t 1 $k A .YY b `7 4iP r 3Sa s r ` + +. _ - / - f , m L
i t P $4 t ,p. -, - ., - 4 ,a, r ,
r ?'" "I •i yP 'C -a' -; - ?V? s '+ tia L i
. e.4 F 0 50 100 150 ft ' `, + t ; vF i. a \ _ „ /? s Z'- a t
?! t rR t ,- \r1 ? , ??? -- ?-/ r = r.
scale , 2
J ti? +f k?,. I \, t '' 4.,
5 ) - a+ t?'f-.?r f ar of a y? i -?a r y -
1
' -:3 P s *p ` is a // C i- C
.j,Y. r r )/a r:.a s• ` as 77_- '/ t , ,''?' .s-``- ' .+ s
y + a c. S Y + I V ary.? v
C ,A, '? ri 5f - I t \ k
I .-. i;kF {' . y .? ti r - 1 .i ! ti / it ' ``'> :, } ; _f 5...
f C a'{._/y ;I yt ,? f it to ."?'"?. i .l •,, K kF.• ., t'- A:R a
ti 1}}' .W f r ?< , d yr , ?'' / - -%. / - / \ f :7 ,^ -:2?• +r { ?+ , Yid , • , 4+ h L
j , tir r+s4't"r a yf ` .!: y„:r ;y' - 'I ?^, e'. 1 S i f
7 { -f Y , 4 i 5 +:' Artificial Nickpoint
e -i
'?y f{ , -- _ P for grade control
'1 c., v f,1 t ?, v t ??_- ..1 0' r r+ f 1 I +. yr p ?j ?I ?p ?/?/?
i tA.',? 7 - ?. z j f:, F t?si 1 s rv"f-.i r 1 ;?' i' (e.g. tfUnJYet Jb IVi.k
!, ra._ + 1- r, ;f,?k, y,w i I + r, L w t , r ,
r F Y ? ' ?L weir extending laterally
-r s r[, { t !t i 4 i,..
?? r{ N 4 i,4 , . , _? + ,, f. +F, to top of bank), not -1. 1
, / : ,? r
{?
needed if bedrock
rea?aea ,?
4 t ? - _ " y ,7 f t , +, ? a y ` encountered In new
-,? j'? ^•?f, ;1 ; , : ; = d ' $- ; , x', allignment
, ? ? - - . - \ I-'. -_.,.,?, . . . ? ? ?. ??;- ?, ?,.- ?: - %.- I-- - - t-, ? _'.,.??%, -i '. .- _? "' ...? t r t ,•' f .? 1 , . _. f 'C'. v,% °i *1 .F? i-. 4 F , ?t ?-4+ t
t R
.`` r 4 y 'r
. I- I 11 1:= 1 ?`?
f
?./ i
-1 Z
r It'
, g
7
163: ft r
r $at?1G11 h
m
3 Y
', t , /
?; riw ..,. S+ Y, nk Al +'sae,* + ,4 ;` , t fi'
} ,
I
7 ; t .:
Y' `x> . . W
rp< ba Ga cw) F3 y_ 'iN , Pi Y* f w
4a 'FS'4 btc .r l.;•+s, n 44 y.. *t i`?i:'• I :, t 7 .Wk`s ,?•?
y
'?:;`.,,?Ft F.-.ca,.-,`k. *"1 ':'l., y: , It ;qA` ?' y 7 , 1?/.
y
Mt 5 3? 1I _+ i , a I !. J3 '?-[ n S j, r.F
I i , tr xr / 'r i f?, it -'?
A Ap', t` Ctc'v '+f :! 1w t` ` wl„ r:.P 1P
a R°'' ;• F t ."t 4' t 3 r Mr t.+r t ?, t i Irl _r } r r' a,, 47 ? 'r?.
,. t Yr }? ;
1 a ?f s,
?_.. 4 ... s, p ?, r sr'...s + : r a 1, ?4 fir . `!' !, < < ,
.tp +1 ,• a d 3 '. ?r r? A x
t o .F i t "K : r ..
,a..AE'`.r... .,.rir » ,.i.t:_,_`:.? .'4..- ?, + b 3C ,t! +
The Villages at Reedy Fork, Reed Fork Tributary Restoration Plan
Greensboro, NC Y 7,15,01
L_ HARP I Starmount Company - Dev. Manager Sheet 1: Channel Re-alignment & Planform R.D. Forsythe
Figure 13a. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan, Sheet 1, Stream Re-alignment Planform .
aq
... ,,., .. .:1 .. .?. '... .i?: 1 .'r. ?..r.,,.
i' 9' kT .. 9 ?'.'" 'Y' {?}. 1 1 ??i+ %. J JY1"? tM ' µ?'n
Materials
A 40
,.' kY' ?k `'rt #?' ' ?
J* -A
y i }.pqr 1 vtit 1 fl Af;
1,1re „+ 1~ r T??P ,,y. Yoh.+? g x y 11.5 top soli if existing
.?'. G tt" A? .} '? 7,x ,? ?F ?dK etA'.ff?M. Y9 ?'??i• 1V??' Yt,?}? /i :Ir+f, ?.Y.... + j?
A" # a ?.? i.+>; ,{??t 1 x i ® substrate not loam
V ,•Y.t sh cv v?„et` N&
M a 1' ti ?• 'A r'
,HF": k y."C" ter s y ":N'-' •.r,',.'
f a, u , 11 Channel sand & gravel
1 I s <? t k substrate
6" layer of Rlftle armor
?,? • 1 ??? '?t?? T ,r+,1
yf''> Point Bar --Gravel
+c?1s + ` r Mpg yy+ " ' . p^ ? jp` + t , _? ?` . staked in coir fiber log for outer
'./
$ f '.?A' t 4 P ?.c i 't V T Xefir ' t.,x? a +t i;
h M +?, i:? l Ii L"'Ln?, hq?F 1 W 1 ?) t'a{eF, i G wYrIN We prOton
bend We
'g
rx? ?x ^? ? .: ?.: nt •,?'t " 1 ??i /1? ?''y"b r?'y ? / f1? 2"' 'S'am
?"• ?
scale F k
> yf h ?? biodegradable erosion control
IAJI+•'?S'1i, T.,? dA ^ ,[ Lao- i t t s+f Y1?,1,.y??: may, xw :: r + .;k YS?e ,.'.fr3: +r?r
' L 1rET• ...: f" ?f' i y". N seY Y H t1 Y£F ?., ?p " .. /y l A '??.?,V Irl k { ter. A4 1" i I+r M
#?' .,i '' { ay x+..'r`' w - yt+'FC^'? •+a:!' i<•.. n. V 4,, ?+G ?'? /`? k y,.{.. ': > h,17 ..,E matting
,
r'
-A+?r 'K1,11P aP : Y !k y „"? i "Y rd` .. r. ". +?i;•, ?' M x `.
I l i live staked with riparian
' ## : 7 tt' x F ?e 'w'b, .Va ??"y?1 aL' ?„v' 4tt? ! a; xT?l c l.e ,p, species
li'.'?M.4f r : Y 11r .A " + ?:+;LA?r•''"' v1li M1 b1 "`` <tk ti.L?r.. d. .a V Y i '•r""k* i / r .' Ss ?. c g + li/ b i?Ydno? A ,? + i+r<`<n1 r e 4 a 5 3' s M'4+,<VK w' 6 x .6F?'tv:..:. yq, r:1y+ 4'.'' , 5 j „ry,.
v staked hardw o
v x.
'1?F Ue Staked with hardW0d
i "iirr r r•.MC y _. 4 ?d ? „ 1ytf?. ,i?a dr e$e rv 3+5?" F..r1?? ?,F?? s F ?F r >^
ss? ? y
'? t ?} 1 ?',:! ?,e ye??'si'.??'t?Y'7• ?, '? ; . `l,F<`^ ?s?51'w :"n ?v? y'.»?'i?'?k'gk. >Fy? f? ^ ? t, "r'e '
.
. ? ,.3^` ,s y 4's3r"+?aTt`fSa^ ? $1a ' n .. .? P'"? ,,.,. v q:.. • ? d + ?' ? 'e • ? ? r ???
?':> ? +K +r •a'' .''.,,na Y'?. K .e... 4 s .«4,??4??,L. eR3;•,.ztx'_ , +? vb• ? '?i„lf.w, ? .. A ? M N?"' T r y >.y.L`u '.' > ' : ?t` "jY' ,r?+1 W`t
{
AT
A?V y t:.
<, y
rz Illllllllllillilllllllll"....r 1....rr.lulllllllllillllll!
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(.....r........?11111111111111Nllllillll?::r.2....lllil_ Illlll.,...",111111
a? ?y
s? ,?':?>r w j r*-arv v 4*a'y ? r>'{ ?''? #r:y+A???*
3:1 bank slopes n
20
u_h.psisiEY4 .n x4< t ,,,1?,' Y ;j
M>tt RA.?'+5. 'rt! 1' k in ti _
Frr4 t +t. I'nA? '"^?" r, uP* s'"y .:SA ry j - ?k +'r ' f
M e ' BFI sa4h ?, "ens ° i1" +Ery M°r;? ' / w 4
1 1r,' i ,`Lw}c' 7 ¢ 'C y?i I'? ?t G Mb:?V"f i 4 LF } y'a"?.: p,
IF.
41
a% .rA+: ? .. it?i?Yb 7a'^4 i.>..:. ` / nwYlh?? .i ?.'I,.A"?v"?'• .?' ?' ...VY,e .r v? .

10
d i .F'`'"' r .+°z , n1n* A+>H xM •,"t1' v` '?'? s.A.} y,''?
10
40
4 a;:w}^ii3 .a s%:) 3P .y,, lafpJ'11?.C,,+,,?.+?^d ' 4 YYFF{ tt1??L...?H3vlt,A Y Ssr.Q`*5 ?`?v??rrY? ?? 4," 3b
20
2.1 bank slopes A 20
? 1? f1? t..ls #AF " - W1" v'? `« ?? .C?` k?' ? .,????f 1 ( y? •? 'z?/tq?r' ? ? ?-?1
y,
r 1N, 8 1
FF,
I- 4.v
1.4
2 Bedrock saproNte "
5 5
40 An 20 10
i 20 /
t ` . ? flood?a? al?nlfal soil
Oft 10
The Villages at Reedy Fork, Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan
HARP Greensboro, NC Starmount Company - Dev. Manager Sheet 2: Banks and Typical .Sections
Figure 13b. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan, Sheet 2, Banks and Typical Cross Sections
20 30 40 1
7/15101
R.D. Forsythe
3o
VM9 3yyi a ',` �,tr ! t„ N 1r ..•;p... �6((�
)1 �''
^!F ? rtiAY;rr.rc.Y< >t ,+.`'
s. 'r,{,� •/:N.'T'` Y' tiw�" ivi.'„ y a�n a.i` p ,• s'�. p t,'{ _
..o
T1, ,y^k� T• :s,. �^ �'- n..... ,tY• s k :`r .t. ti•T'
Cu P+0. ��aa Y'FL• � A � r
... ,•. K.. {{� 1 2:;�'q �"w%.,'.a}�" �'"
�
ill
J yy
1 aT? ,��i gee µ
rn�+, n•� ��.-,,". ,' 'rort � . ;
'1. �
ids. ^, f[ a� rt• _ a z .Z: a...
L.•�
..'`^�� g� r��l .•, �, �'" is � � ' I 1 ,- z, u f=# 'o rd�� �z 4� s' �T
a 4t4`�.FF:!'s�_5`.r ", a.!:''•' r w: t�t'`-�� �� :...�:r.": -�+.' f�#�i�
I
o-1+ �9 �'2i.._'=... .' ,r�r:-�pa4�`�'i #' �
' �t:^,".� {S;d':"',f;< '< ��-.- �«.'`��4"`-'R�+L�<'°�u''°'�tw�y'y'<,.�+��� *E`��' . .�.,rQy-s.�,���L° Y v *a �-r.t.'=�'�yr_�5•�.s:-:..-r:.iligT��c4tei"tamY;;•T#.i �.✓.�_:��;.-'. ,{.Fy�° 5 S','n�.4,":r2'Ar,f� iy♦ {4:�' ;7/^1�`''.� I��"I1/ r-7,„r� t� i Y,_!n. rt.:..;.:.i.. a Y '`'b�is:1.''s.x: t, ru¢
.�A5'Xq_�r
'•r1K. }``'1H1t i
QrYut-i;xa'r-rJY�
Y
yF
r-..� -:: '7'-q:t'_#�J' r_.. �"' a. "y .' C.z 1 Fr.;y.'v�•t%hr•'r �' x r' 1 R- y t`
ISO - - .,i+�{.ku;r.. y.• _`C Jr�HIiT -�" - "S.#?., .`ft i y:• .xyr+�efirw 6"yv4:ti;.a< hi
P+r .'. - �""sn ct°'.` ••�-�'`?' g,�.. px'a�i:>ti '' , >�`+J �y`*�' L r s : � �.1� �/J//] -V � r^�
'f
:. .- �. '�",>-'�''4'�r..�•- ,:a���h'
t
T �v7g
d_
+a•.
T-
.: -' . _ „. ..-' '. £ L �. �3F.'�n."ik.� .�' �R� ,�,�-. ;F.,.a„"Q`�'i'�Fn � e'i r.. �_..: ' ;R_t ,yr�x:r* �:.,, --•� yf ��l`' y .�.c _ ��7
2".. x .1�'b• n_4 3i `dA* S _ b ���h� r �g•^. M G . s mar is 'ta.rC^^yy,,.:°F �I . �' j < 1Y t
- •R-�',3<'atT?FK x.,. i^9;.� ,.
�
G...e^--Y '.io i. t •.1,�1 _� .'i1..• � Y+xS-> .wt ,y.•
k : ✓�2:k ia%' .3P .�{$rti a �. t ,;'i:, r
_< rb r > mss. wtib
t ds.ay..,ssr-�` �.3r, .5' ..k 3-e i-
+:.n�•..'d.:.y w.a "_"k.. �.n � t£
. " +��. 'O M1 ..
7.-
yd:: .�°§c�., ;f'a•r s-c: .�v. .�Enr•✓. a 'i 3 i �'' ia;'-``st -F"" + r-v.;. -.t - - r
� a✓�.-L'z5”'
�'�'t :�.nw •d'e�-a. �: *� _.-�4w..4.?�-3aa .: 3 #"` � 1. ,..y. t._ar' �i�. r i� F� .�•,, ,r $ � t 1�,, i s
..... .. ,. ��` � � - � Ks . `�'fr. � _ z:. 4:F: r�' °< hy,.��.jyh = `- .'+ y. ~'6 r �e ':''�S-�. # ,fi• J• `°'+roy'ts%: a,�. +
:.'.f. .� ... - �# .:.•i_�',3. .a.�T�'.I. ,�` .. Y.-.�'h,�.0 W.•� __=4.:..,, F,a +. ty., /� �.•fi . t 1 .4.�:t
��.. , �'•,_ �r �'�..,.,`"q.. , i�r4., r 'r3 Y,,t. ,.ir": ,..K' t 6; ,.•a . W � moi": „� .?� •gym : -;� t' "`4 s' .q...'s . 3.,
teS,-.c.ti". v s ..P�z .:t'.,^ _ ..ti' .s•""P..a*•rt _T„r ' Y :.:�.r _ Y ,yr 3t r,:,^. t_ : .1
{ � 1 •` a ! , .,.ai. - ,�' ..n an.,:, i'-� g.r 4 4.. v ..l"-.�.•. ':r•;
r.
n
aY y.• ;)_'"-*;.c�-^�.�"' `^rte
°.
• e z t
.- •.; 7i ...r." !Y�.!-�!". 5� r h �'h'Inh�:� ,y - ,T o.[ . y
. �
, r
Y
'2•�
:: <r ., _:w; - >.:.-,.c. ,, ,:,k ,; yi '9,t .'ab..:a :y, : I i': --�'. >'t'. "i•: - a ,•.� a
Z^' - �.,a k:F ,;� c;..-5. e' w.,t�1-a' .t3'"'` �..-'z �v ix.�o:ti. - ,�- '+s •r.-_ # i. � -! , �
- - �.•„c:'„ zti rr
>. �-*�` +u".aa'«F' ;�•`_F .'i, Y �,.'.a'E-t �'+ ,. ,.Y#�: „'y� rr-.,M<. ."C ¢';� �' n F -.::r. -c.
:s. - �•' S'� rs•�,,' "�,�-�" �` a; ^'� _- 'r:X,. g.::T iL�� / � x `,`K -< F ' . F� Y�? ;-"� x r
' .:. :.-.,s ,f, ' �S , y°,x y.; E'`rt �•2 -.:- r'�'--� "i .s•�.: .::.. T+,a•5'• - . �.�p••?�'f� y :^"'' 'ti' > s lir.
- ' a: y,..'rk':,`rr �• .�`i°;=k:ry w;'.. w :6`-# ' ., � J ." � �,t'-. ' �� 7- :
' .,.� `' �" . ,,•.Y d r„�,a�, a-,�g -t _;'n 3.'x:� K ' " :�;`.- _ :`'w a.:.x,9 �="*-, S.- s .. � y.. �,�,
' ..,. :. .-tk�yLi' - �':'�1*,• "v`.r s-.i'S'�F 'nl a ,�,,dy 4 �'
'et 'h,.,b 'C�.. �}' v-`1 r .•Y.'cz+..:- { r., ,t, a• yr:-..b"3•-= '( - 4[i �:: '+- a
-,Y . .*rr� ?�^`5-rfr. �' ✓.�cir�yY � 3..�. r,, r � _ .4 b � ' �-t S ` ? +� i 1' � �'�'-•. r,�y-, .r:. ` , V. �;
i Cs ?v r rrt� .i v ate+ �fe 9,
rd a•, .y:.lSy'C• L; c?.,t .,,,��c`-.+ g,.`" s, ty. `s `-::x�_. rSr"; N W�.,..�.:. `o. -`'rte <".L.'.`��;.'` a,a, �: y,
�c�' -^w 9•?a 5{ �`rY'At•F x. � �t < :-i. � d �;d,�:b.'. � �/ ` w moi^+ � .w•,'#, �a3aF-.,.,. r c a
P � r.9::3 a.�r�xa�"y5 _.. -. 32• � ::a ...,'i:.` z b�'-, �✓ :s;`'Fn� �k „�`i 3" .fit.. iL :.. F � i 'i.
»„ '*+ z3 R 7'sE t a .q a wis. .�...�x,„..:,.kt"'`"C •`'> _ °' f. c' -t x:'
KaKt -
- ..,c: is .,t�.'
i n .a^ +.v- tr 9-Fa4: '
yn.. x �3- -yr. t i - P•' - All --S«r k. - »', •+.. -�
aN' :
- ' : _ ; ,..: •r ' a •.- .-,....:.. 7 ' - : - ,.. ;, .:s^ .::.'` r � ,Y-.''G:`a�?� °y �'.:�>z�S9.y-Y.��w^•, tg � x.. �Y� u' •' e• *.r i-' ''_.� '� -" d
.J• �. .:� .: L.�"�'' may' ..�":�-a-, y'sar:d; •_,-'.!:-�.;::- :-,.: .::.;.,� r.._ "� � th �- - r,"-tr'`i, 9"., 'Y!' ,'"' i:,
w
.. _ .� K•'�. 3 '�.:�$ �z �'.y ..: Y : ;i_ "':r'. 3- �S;.y"'i�"' �i» . �,y.:•�-1 :-�"�a:. yi9 ��.aa.. { ,:4" - _..6
Yy^r�., e,{ -,�•� r3A,,. Ht'. � .sr^ - ��-#moi.+ , r: ..=t �� �s;F '�`"� -c.. „ r �„� -_ ;,},. R :�� - �` �-':.e' � ; '::.-•-
„�•� sa, - s,. e a.c ..; x' y .:::z^_i .�.,,� `'" '-0 3� C�•,'7".;: tl. .'v`"' - 7.. ;.,.t
:..'i'r �k; .-r-.;., a_g -•T .. ,.�: ..0 ,Y �a ,-? 4e'Gc��,�a-'.ra.,; tq.a.,„°r�.ffi.{ "3", �•9 _
�:.: �C�t 'x•.. � �.i+ �..:'�.�. _ a � �<S ,k^_": - - h'. '� ".�".�`"'. �"'^•¢na. iM"4y'�+ '_ � .?'- -.. a,n--. _ '` t � i,.
x?
'h"ro F a :6r .sem' ,+^ :Y;u r ,�• ''�g.F.3`'':a<'t -r,_-"'3. ,;'`1:. ;d _
,aV.
te ,�' }ek"^T3fir� � .c? � :,�x�_r `
18 ri
ffles
d- j�v''t t?f -;. - v �"`'�S'•:�' °w.+.�,f'``. • totaling, I
e� v k - >. # s�ie • pools 1 / 1 of i�f'X 1`
50 ft
'S.x- �m. 1 • • '�'z ?i-a"''�'FJ•ii};.z;,t�Fv.3b;
/1 y tib r L EY3
rs 53
J,'' average I0 ft
conservation
e pool size 61 ft ii.
averag
50 ft buffer to ; x
< 3 �' R69`w
totalling
36
,,��rQ.�.q}y..,a �,,_,�ti.�. �",.` t"y:haNrr1.i'_c��':d'wv ;,�r`.��•'`�:r,''•. ,yY``# -,k-+\y+-w".'�'•7'4irr',}}.T.,'*l3i�7:-..g'`-..-h'>,„,�."'.4y":'. fsa ''v"k�~-"N•-�C%�G�-i� S- -^a:.•:�`V....-,`'F matn.i��'eititiy.Y''::..'y.`:)'..'g..✓'.s'�'.k"i;'<'��;- 'o�''XC."a�'fda''.":.,+ r:�:r••:+,. �'�. w �4�P,' SJ,'3S%C,3.Fr"f,^+a..Rr.:t'�."Etl•._^+3w.Y",-'�y..+Pi;1.z,t°�.k/:l0rx<:t%�.+Y2� i<i,.,.`�..Y`icEV.E'aSg:s? Sm .i�a:;..,.i i4f�t j"°::�i,-j.y'.,..:ti,"•:7z"�.,'.-4�3„3ye;.4,%''k, s"y.+>-”,w!,?-._�-sa.ksa,:�.inky.".�` ,fa.ma,.a'.°3,'"Y"�kY?��7'"...I'enK"�fi'�'nr,. '1'�.' : "•-5''`Lihs.ir'W.a--ry'y-.tst,KiS'r.m��ayxi�`,�,.,--.,. p. �..�•�L� Z.er^;•��'niI.";r':i#4ay,.d':'�§3"Yas:{G-u..,�at"�'"o4 �4�+j•�L0a- ,-�>+�'v.Kw_T:, :.s.P�,. ssda. ;Wk -:„c.
stream, "`z
4.!,- •including
1 1channelarea).
�'
rwr d7g
-:4,.r S.vr*d..�_A._ , _.2�:�fi,y<nf,y.�{�.r,i . ry•c..1.R'' 3:1':.i��`. _ [.,�-.,.z;a5,uv,-r.�.'.,rf . �2r Y,�f,,¢. Fa�.
The V! I lages at
�
ee_'l.4
.yF
X:z
L
"yr �,' = "., '?`��<"Sk`a t'fYF`"" •'a x t: e' _lt7v r,? i J x 4... �,•'LKrxra,,,,aCy.
4
_ Y
Reedy/ •
f" -•• • Reedy
_ Tributary Restoration • r

-3
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200320436
June 11, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetland/401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Dear Mr. Dorney:

Enclosed is the application submitted by the Starmount Company, for Department of the
Army authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to authorize the proposed placement
of fill material into 0.198 acre of wetland and 2,072 linear feet of tributaries to Reedy Fork, in
the Cape Fear River Basin, associated with the construction of six road crossings required for the
development of The Villages at Reedy Fork Subdivision, located in Greensboro, Guilford
County, North Carolina.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality certification is required under the
provisions of Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted
until the certification has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, in most cases, 60 days after receipt of a
request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on
the request, or asked for an extension of time, by August 11, 2003, the District Engineer will
deem that waiver has occurred.

Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please don't hesitate to
contact me at [phone], extension 26.
Sincerely,
"??J I\ i---111
Todd J. Tugwell
Regulatory Project Manager,
Raleigh Field Office
Enclosure

t
«itl
RECEIVED
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD_ JAN 2 1 2003
Geotechnical - Construction Materials - Environmental
RALEiGH'.ZEGILATOR? EELD OFFICE
January 15, 2003
Mr. John Thomas
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers YYCrT P ° ao
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 0UP
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 Jui.v '003
Raleigh, NC 27615 t?
Reference: Individual Permit Application ?M T
? NJ ??+
The Villages at Reedy Fork CTIO?y?
I
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
ECS Project G-1001
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Enclosed please find two copies of the application prepared for The Villages at Reedy Fork. The
application is for authorization to impact approximately 2,072 linear feet of stream channel and
approximately 0.19 acres of wetlands associated with road construction. The roads will provide access to
the site.
The site is approximately 1,735 acres in area and is located on Highway 29 in Greensboro (Figure 1).
The site is being developed with The Villages at Reedy Fork. Reedy Fork and its tributaries cross the
site. As shown on the Environmental Preservation and Impacts Analysis Plan and the Stream Crossings
Key Map, several roadways must be constructed in order to develop the site. The site will be developed
in phases over a period of time. At this time, we are applying for a Department of the Army Permit to
impact 2,072 linear feet of stream channel and 8,651 square feet (0.198 acres) of wetlands. The proposed
impacts are illustrated on the attached exhibits for Site 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10. Please note, a bridge across
Reedy Fork is planned for Site 7. We do not anticipate that streams or wetlands will be impacted by this
crossing.
Approximately 367 acres of the site will be set aside as preservation area/common elements. Included in
that area are at least ten acres of wetlands and several miles of stream channel. A Stream Mitigation &
Restoration Plan dated July 20, 2001 was prepared for the site by HARP in order to mitigate for impacts
to streams associated with Site 1, 2, and 3. These impacts were permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Action ID 200120410 and 20011:4)60) and by the.NCDWQ (#010382). When complete,
approximately 1,825 linear feet of stream channel will be restored. We are requesting that this
restoration, along with preservation of undisturbed sections of stream channels and wetlands in other
areas, be considered adequate mitigation for this project.
wou
W rrAaJr ' t? Z.. 6O.c? C
J
6909 International Drive, Suite 103 - Greensboro, NC 27409 - [phone] - Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen, MD • Atlanta, GA - Austin, TX - Baltimore, MD - Chantilly, VA - Charlotte, NC - Chicago, IL - Cornelia, GA - Dallas, TX
Danville, VA - Frederick, MD - Fredericksburg, VA - Greensboro, NC - Greenville, SC - Norfolk, VA - Raleigh, NC - Richmond, VA
Roanoke, VA - San Antonio, TX - Williamsburg, VA - Wilmington, NC - Winchester, VA
The Villages at Reedy Fork
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
ECSProject G-1001
January 15, 2003
I appreciate your assistance with this matter. Please contact me at [phone] if you have questions
or require additional information. .
Sincerely,
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
r
Denise M. Poulos, LSS
Principal Scientist
2
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT I OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should
require 5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdic-
tion over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 4D4, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and.
Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provlded,.the.permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed-activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 12. FIELD OFFICE CODE I 3. DATE RECEIVED I4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
2_0C)
5. APPLICANTS NAME
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS /
C1 p M,e . P_OIV 9-4 j GJ ??s opt)
P p, .aox /a3 Y ?
G er?,Ais 6o,e o
7. APPLICANTS PHONE
c n? 7 yOq -0 3
:RS WITH AREA CODE
a. Residence
8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
-AFNISE /YI , /'0040-
9. AGENTS ADDRESS
?C-5 LTA
Sar•T 6 /0,3
'7--"00.I U•€
?P tis?ae0 NL 6/L7yo9
10. AGENTS PHONE NUMBERS WITH AREA CODE
a. Residence
"'Z-15 (' o--f 7 ' oL 96Y I Z ousiness_) __3 3& - 1-5 S<o - / S D
11. STATEMENT OF AU ATION
I hereby authorize A> t s = 0o to actin my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, sup ental t f ti in suppo th' permit application.
lo-3
AP CA S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (rt appli ble) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (it applicable)
RF- Eat/
T?'1 UT 21x_5' ?? t
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
rluA C -
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) p
j9PPeox,nw9r??/ D3G 83 "N? o 9 L11 y9. ys 0
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE FkO?YI (? e??JU S 0 eQ ; f ((,(?(?/?'? a9 /vORTA TO 7-A5
SUrn m r T !/ EiV U c FA/7. T NE SiTc t S LoTF-?7710 7/7`
1V0;?-7-A)E1 :r1- 4?Uf'bZA1U7- cF 7-#e TNTE/!S/.=?T?oN QF
ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF SEP 94 IS OBSOLETE (Proponent: CECW-OR)
i 18. Nature of Activity (Description of project include all features) T/tE- S/rt`
T1t? vs ? Es 1517- ??ta/ Fo--14.
oeD6?2 To ItCCmss T/t? Ssi-E. i/f ?o??s G? C,toss 7?,8uTi9ie/?.S
/.? Fo2/?, TAf 7Zo? D C'o?osrev?rlo.J W/GL -r?N[/OGu? ? G/ic?
OF
prPEs zP- ? P ?ti 70 -7&,f Es ; /1 T71fC11 A F,v 7-S
FOZ 7? Sc?/?T?r?NS OF .ST?t?9/?'l. ,tM /??TS /?T igC/`/ LOCi9T/O.t7,
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project see instructions)
THE S / rE IS /N (? ?? v tco??? S.v ?1ti95 wi TN 7W E
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED l
20. Reason(s) for Discharge 711E ?/ sGHi9 ?G E,S l9? F - f}Tc 7`0 o?g j, ?aN S>-E? U C7?C)
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
SSE /tTT/jcf/ n?I .Eti?-S
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Y?T;t?O No IF Y DESCRIBE THE CAMP ED ORK
?p?ur.olLS .Z G73"/9v !VGA? tiW NO )a; Go?Jtc.s 4;2c VAEa ,
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a
supplemental list).
S ??. /gl'Tif?'lJ/rl fN TS
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
'Would include but is not restricted to zonino. buildino and flood plain Dermits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application
is complete and accurate. I further certify that I .possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized
agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT ATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or It may be signed by a duly authorized
agent If the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, knowingly
and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false fictitious or fraudulent statements or
representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall
be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
Block 24 - Adjoining Property Owners
Lot # Name and address
30 Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
Monroe and Madison Township P.O. Box 30013
Ma # 193 Raleigh NC 27622-0013
28 Wysong & Miles Co.

Monroe Township .__..--
U.S. 29 North
- -
Map # 193 P.O. Box 21168.------
Greensboro, NC 27420-1 1 68
02 Wysong & Miles Co.
Monroe Township U.S. 29 North
Map # 193 P.O. Box 21168
Greensboro, NC 27420-1 1 68
06 Martin Marietta Materials Inc,, _._- -- -
Madison Township P.O. Box 300
Ma # 601 R C 27622-0013
05 North Jefferson Inc.
Madison Township C/O O.W. Hines
Map # 601 107 Birch Creek Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9205
16 Timothy T. Mericka
Madison Township Sandra R. Mericka
Map # 603 6941 McLeansville Rd. -
McLeansville NC 27301
13 Carolyn Sharpe Williard
Madison Township 6950 McLeansville Rd.
Ma # 603 McLeansville NC 27301
05 Joel E. Gibson
Madison Township Ronda S. Gibson
Map # 603 6806 Poplar Grove Trail
Greensboro, NC 27410-8621
10 George Haywood Williams
Madison Township Connie S. Williams
Map # 603 6958 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
01 Frank N. Stevenson
Madison Township Faith H. Stevenson
Map # 603 6964 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
09 Dennis L Roberson
Madison Township Vickie Roberson
Map # 603 6977 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
11 Dennis L Roberson
Madison Township Vickie Roberson
Map # 603 6977 ville Rd.
C sville, NC 27301-9730
12 Wayne Falls
Madison Township Pamela Falls
Map # 603 6981 McLeansville Rd.
McL.eansville, NC 27301-9730
Block 24 - Adjoining Property Owners (continued)
Lot # Name and address
07 Terry Lee Busick

Madison Township Patricia S. Busick

Map # 603 7011 McLeansville Rd.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9716
06 James D. Smith
Madison Township Sandra P. Smith

Map # 603 7002 McLeansville Rd.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9716
12 Herbert William Kennedy Jr.
Madison Township C/O Chu Swaney

Map # 603 3136 Battleground Ave.
Greensboro, NC 27408
05 William G. Rudd Jr.
Madison Township 108 Wilson St.
Ma # 603 Eden NC 27288-5231
14 Burton, Herbert W. Heirs
Madison Township C/O Mrs. Herbert W. Burton
Map # 603 5115 Long Island Dr.
Atlanta, GA 303274907
Burton, Rhetta N. L/J
03 Wiliam F. Burton III
Madison Township Loretta B. Wenger T/C
Map # 603 1304 Norman Dr.
Eden, NC 2728/8
13 Herbert William Kennedy Jr.
Madison Township C/O Chu Swane
Map # 603 3136 eground Ave.
Greensboro, NC 27408
William M. Mericka
11 Mary J. Mericka
Monroe Township 5963 Summit Ave.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9704
03 John M. Jenkins
Monroe Township P.O. Box 346
Browns Summit, NC 27214
02 Susan Finley McCanless
Monroe Township 5939 Summit Ave.
Browns Summit, NC 27214
Reedy Fork Associates LLC
13 C/O Starmount Company
Monroe Township 600 Green Valley Rd. Suite 300
Greensboro NC 27408
03 Greentree Inc.
Monroe Township 5925 Summit Ave.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9704

40,?Ilopy
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS %lap
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200220551
County: Guilford
GENERAL PERMIT REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE VERIFICATION
Property Authorized
owner: Starmont Company Agent: ECS
c/o Ronald Wilson Denise M. Poulos
Address: P.O. Box 10349 Address: 6909 International Drive, Suite 103
Greensboro, NC 274090349. . Greensboro, NC 27409
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone]
Size and Location of Property (Waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): Starmont
Company's proposed the Villages of Reedy Fork subdivision property, located off of US29, adjacent
to unnamed tributaries of Reedy Fork Creek, north of Greensboro, in Guilford County, North
Carolina.
Description of Activity: Proposed sanitary sewer line outfall project resulting in approximately 0.02
acre of temporary impacts to the jurisdictional waters of an unnamed tributaries of Reedy Fork
Creek.
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
X Nationwide Permit Number NWP 12
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may
subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General / Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of E meers regulatory program,
please contact John Thomas at telephone numbe (919) 876- 441, exte ion 25.
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date February 14, 2002 Expiration March 18, 2002
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID:
200120410 (NW 14), 200120660 (NW 391 County: Guilford )00.
GENERAL PERMIT REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE VERIFICATION
Property Authorized
owner: Starmount Company Agent: ECS
c/o Ronald Wilson C/o Denise M. Poulos
Address: P.O. Box 10349 Address: 6909 International Drive, Suite 103
Greensboro, NC 27404-0349 Greensboro, NC 27409
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
Size and Location of Property (Waterbody, Hi2hway name/number, town, etc.): Starmount
Company's proposed the Villages at Reedy Fork subdivision property located off of-US 29, adjacent
to unnamed tributaries of Reedy Fork. Creek, north of Greensboro, in Guilford County, North
Carolina.
Description of Activity: Proposed construction of subdivision development resulting in impacts to
approximately 0.16 acre of jurisdictional waters associated with road access construction (NW 14)
and approximately 0.003 acre of jurisdictional waters associated with lot fill. (Total of
approximately 0.163 acre of impacts to the jurisdictional waters of unnamed tributaries of Reedy
Fork Creek.)
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
X Nationwide Permit Number NW 14 & NW 39
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may
subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and or appropriate legal action..
This Department of the Army Regional General / Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regarding he Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact John Thomas at telephone number 919 876.84 ext sion 2
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date Mazcb 19, 2001 Expiration February 11, 2002 U
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF: .
Stream/Wetland Impact Summary
Crossing #4
This crossing is located in an area where several tributaries to Reedy. Fork converge. The crossing was
located at the point where the impact to the tributaries would be minimized. Moving the crossing north or
south of the proposed location would result in greater stream impacts..
In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on both
ends of the culverts. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culverts
will be placed approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic
organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 513 linear feet of stream channel.
Crossing #5
This crossing is located on a tributary to Reedy Fork. In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, the
road alignment has been re-graded to maximize slopes and minimize the amount of fill over the stream
channel. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culvert will be placed
approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 120 linear feet of stream channel.
Crossing #6
This crossing is located on a tributary to Reedy Fork. In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, the
road alignment has been re-graded to maximize slopes and minimize the amount of fill over the stream
channel. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culvert will be placed
approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic organisms.
This crossing will.impact approximately 135 linear feet of stream channel.
Crossing #8
This crossing is located in an area where several tributaries to Reedy Fork converge. The crossing was
located at the point where the impact to the largest tributary would be minimized. Moving the crossing
north or south of the proposed location would result in greater stream impacts.
In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on both
ends of the culverts. The vertical alignment of the road has been adjusted to minimize fill in the stream
channel. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culverts will be
placed approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 673 linear feet of stream channel and 1,740 square feet of
wetland.
The Villages at Reedy Fork
Stream/Wetland Impact Summary
p• 2
Crossing #9
The tributary to Reedy Fork at this crossing is very sinuous. The crossing has been located on the portion
of the stream that will result in the least amount of impact. The fill over the pipe was minimized by
following the natural terrain to the extent practical. Parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on
both ends of the culvert. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the
culvert will be placed approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of
aquatic organisms.
This. crossing will impact approximately 242 linear feet of stream channel and 603 square feet of wetland.
Crossing #10
The tributary to Reedy Fork at this crossing is very sinuous. The crossing has been located on the portion
of the stream that will result in the least amount of impact. The fill over the pipe was minimized by
following the natural terrain to the extent practical. Parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on
both ends of the culvert. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the
culvert will be placed approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of
aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 389 linear feet of stream channel and 6,308 square feet of
wetland.
Summary of Impacts
Stream Impacts: .2,072 Linear Feet
Wetland Impacts: 8,651 Square Feet D (q ??
} . o fOA Q ,w
o ( ?N
w0
114
u W
pC CO
o
o ??Qp
00000 o All
rwr
u
F96 to
W? ? cuo, ? of l?? 1
?? ll 11
o ?
f 1 owe
De snor"
OYO? 1//YIY/!S SIINIOl1B ? ? "?
w.?.?ss av
j r`h?b
0
? OYpd, ?
0
3• ? L O
0
OYOd 7/Yd ,Y7016ON "0 0
?a<
V
m

Iv,
? + w z
\ \ \ W v vvi ?,a 0 LL.
/ \ \ w to F... N l 0
p M N
\ G O
o /
oo
I /
?A? ?.
\ --
6,fix
'
1 .. 'o!
\\ / p O° °
p OO
. ? 0 o
° _-
\ 00 o p0000
\\ / / o° 0 0 00 00 101
• 0°
°0 0 0 0 000
\ \ 0000 00 / G.Z.
o °0 0 0o
G I /
1
1 ?
?o
• 01
0
•t -
Qz+ N
Y z +
o o
co Q -j
a.a
a
.
U U
Y U
N
W co
J (f)
02 -j
Z

n
La-
C<
z
W F~
N F
W ?
Q V,
W F
LLI
NQ

C
Q
c
a
LL
c
a-
c
` l
O
1-
O
m
J Z
w O
Z
Q W
2 ?
U O
U ?
Z a
H ?
(n W
X J
W z
W
Q
d
I?z
LLI
of
i /w
?-/ ?Q7 ?! ILA
+ 0 00 LL
?l , ---
TI
w
F-
LLJ
I 3c?\ as
G J \ oQZ.
Fo= Z- 10L
\ co W(?/1l<-t4
\ W N
O M,N
Q
O
0-1
LL.
O
00
dri
O

O
H
H
O
co
J
W
Z
Z
Q
=
U Z
O
U H
Z U
1=
V) W
F-
O
X
W n
d
O
O0
p H
J
0 OO
p ..
O 0 Z
Opp
p0
O d
Q
0 00
Opp
n
00 0
0
OOp
000
Opp
000
000
000
000
Op
Opp
9,00
U O
0
w
LO
rn
0 Z
O - ?
LL- >
Z
N
0
eN M
(C) z
3 z \
aaoa
U U
W Cl)
?
J
o
~

CO
z
WF
F
5
4 0:
W (A;
L
w C/) lz
ix 0

000
Op
O 0
O 0
00
00C Z
000 O
0 OO F-
0
O W
00 O H
0o O
000
00 Q
000 {-
00 J
F-
D
O
O_
Q
I 0-
Of

w
N o , o
W U _ W
W J L
Z 0 0000000
w 0 0°00°0°0°0°0° ° o 0 CL
CL 00000000 00000000
0000000 000000000
000000 0000000000
0000 00000000coo N
02 O 00 0000000
000
\ 0 0 0°0°0°0° Q
00 000000
0000°i?°. 000 J
000 H
LLJ
\ J/ / ? ? Z
o< 0
An N 0J QOZ
O 0 C'n g
? U N .?
? F
N N?1
z LL.
\ W O Z O W
LLJ 1 N ~ N N
? VO
/ \ lL 1?
I
' US \
/ LL.
/ D W
(nm
/ zl
i ? W Z
FOO=
L
a \ \
o i ? I
? U
00.
o
i/ W
W-
?/? i
0
?uZZ .-gym
QNO ? ?-
\\ der W Z
/ W 0: °
1 \ \ / _? LdNN?
OOw
m C4
L-71 I
\ /

D
O
Of
LL- N
O ro
a- O
?O ?
0
•r -
3c?+ N
(a ?
0-
0
a
0: TO
?UnN VI
J
?QZ? Q
W {d J W N
R "'
cn
ix 0

O
O
m
J
w
Z
Z
Q
=
U
Z
O
U H
Z U
F- Ld

W O
O
CL
° O
0 F-
.
O 0
O00o J
Z
000
000
Opp
O d
Q
O0
000 Of
CL
00 °
° (K
0
00
000
000
000
000
000
000
00
0O0
°
0
O
0
a
U
?

00 00
to 0
0

O
Z
0
-
(0
LL- >

M Z
-

000
00
004
00
00
O
00 p
0 oO
° H-
U
O°
°oo
F--
000
"00, O
cr
o° °
0 d
00
0o ~
w
I-

O
a
CL
I CL

CE
Z
O
U
W
H
O
w
n
i-
w
F--
O
Q-
Q
cr-
n
i
i
O
Iz
LLJ
I?
O
i?
J
Z
Iw
Q
I?
CL
rt,
\ / o
LLJ
ry v?
x
1
l
o
o /
0
z o00 /
o ?

ZZ
i
*a j

z
O
U
w
O
fy
la
w
z
IJ
n
la
,w
5wc 7-
00 O
o p
00 U
O w
O
O ?-
I o p
00
O
00
O ?-
0O w
O J
00
I-
O
00 O
O
, a
1 0 Q
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0 E
5
I/
/ S
Al
? ? z
w
c ? x
w
w , / z
/
w °
O
w
x/00
/
N
a. a-
R
N O s < QZ
Ix + W N .00 N
W
z / z
1
W o z o L.
O
/ J F l3
V
Ix (n
00 400 -
iM M
Z
O
H
C)
W
F-
O
cr-
d
w
J
Z
CL
Q
Cr
CL
Cr
z
Q
H
C)
W
F-
O
Cr
a_
I-
w
J
H
O
CL
Q
Cr
CL
Cr
SOURCE:
FIGURE 1
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, LTp SITE LOCATION MAP
BROWNS SUM
MIT, NC THE VILLAGES AT REEDY FORK
QUADRANGLE
DATED 1951 AND G
, r5 REENSBORO, NC

REVISED 1994 NGINEERING
SCALE: 1 " = 4,000' ING ECS PROJECT G-1001
.I.TD
tTaa :Wte Mtc <T, dA,
?.p??iAV :ih.r•:.. ,,////??''? •? 5Tow, W.Mw4dYM114,• tOMAp
7j/, T :?5 1/! ) ?' ?I??? :?1 ? r: 1''•j. `?'?ti ti•./"`.'" t Q ti/ 1 v{i ?WFt totc Lbw. fft* &f6rwn t65,947 1f.
repot .
?; ," ,frffrl/et r,i11P{r 1 5 ?.. A:n ?? {?(y rawer r«cn5u.., Vww?ak
Sl. ::r ?.t '-•" .b? '??j ,1'?`^si V DA N t ' 9, jttj7 YaLliWrfieed9tnrn MUWlnrortastiae` k2T7Dtf,
`'11?15•?rys9Y' ? ? t ?5 ?r??? ?r f'Jjr ? ? r? t'" , i+ ' t`"? J? I'.' N..``? r ?,
'.•`e?.^-?"Y'w,•]j? t \ ' ;J ?1rr f j 1 r'11 .1' ?, g + 7 , ,•- •f 1 •,..\.
41?}} ?lt?l I l c ;!! a 1'F?' Ar4 ?? f
ti? ' 9 ? '1t?rl r C. , t ` r } .....,;;;,r.'/ . ? i U ! .,..,,, r ^. { r, „ watt.r+dnrwwasa?faraanbk'?Lwnom.Mbcizna
, {;) 1_T ` y f t r r Y-, ^`(: L ..• •? ! { t.? :?. .-1•` r `ty ?- 5 ,ppmaruu\w'1'wca.-tnswrbnYw on preit+wy ',.
:?'.'yJ: :'At ;,?ff((1 r .? ?'+'". \''•....,,,. t ?j' } '?[ `y,. t .'h ."` TOW
k .t t =
y.f? t/iii tr; /! /r (I' i. !` i 'lrt?" \•, f. f ?Yh.?t'ry! tit' .?,?+ 1, \?, il'` +e.C ti ?? ti 7.1; 1 `j 1 ;,- w wwthlb fm4m Ain Syfww r wsm d QLIUi• ""M
V
M,m t 044b.tuW Nwt.
?.: ?,. b' ? h1 ?? /S/ J 'I,f I\1`\\'u?_ \,l?IJ?i ?A ;i •'? .,,r ? 7';``?',t..1t\`,.4.:,> r ? S'? `,t ?, ?'F?1 s. ., '?' •r?;:... \e[' r,, t\?'
? ,, ?.. ,???. !.e ', y `t`.t\ / .,r i 'y.t ? +.iF'_ „7..., ? !{I, t \\ I ' ( I ?'\ \11? ?.'•'rf ».. r
t L? \' ti: '; ? r..i \ jrr?. I?".•?.,) ;??. ?JI`: ? I t t \?:?1 ,??\... r ? F '-`?^.... ,.
? 4. ,?,?. lL.,• `?,,, ,r ?,,. t ?.. r r i f. w. : , ?.... 's? : , i ? ?<< `I? ;r+ ti`F?" ? \ .: , ? ? l ?',;?it ? , l . ?l \. I t .,, ? ? .
i ?, r ?`r. r r r t r a t' t A .., v it `? \ t ?? t t 1
BRYAN ! ` , , ` ' ' . \t \? , \ w
PARK 4? \ r ,1 f 1 s L l \ s rr t \ ` .t', , , '+? '
'1 \ ,? 1?? )a,ylt ?' It t t r I f r `t ,`??,.ri ?, 1'.•" ?5, S S? }1 \?`,..,. ?; ,? tf„ t f
? R
AND GOLF
COURSE
t An V 1?., l,,,t, 1 v,v ! i r 1? ?. ? I '1•? 1v; tt v? ,? 11s ,vY1n I t'i
vv v v:` 111 t ! ; r•-,. ?5. J ""YI {? , v e'i..? + a I
tt ?«;..' y1?x..yJ?t`r':;- ?,.t ? jti}( r ,.'?.??,???, Ii ? ?!. 5...• ?'?! ??`?i?;..?,a ,:?r?f'trr t ??1?.?.:. /J?rr if? t,??
t??y( \\y\}.« A a'?i%`- '?;' It ' ?i Q ? lc f"??.? ? I?Mit.•. ? t ????'";4' ? r?Y' t','?il rr.jl ? ? r`??' '?
r
?!}?! !l ??r:'r?`•? ' r ?u_?'? ??;{j f ,.^? ? 1 ?, ?? ? .?;t ?,,.,"' `'???'; 1 x }' ,`?,.-, ;t ?? ,,?,'r?;;,'J•?:
1 fi
r T (1 Fw t
.' ?, r ?. ? , t?' ».° ? 1:11 t r.+a r =r! +,,," ? ' ? ?? 1 S t,i;t:, ?? .1 ,+"M f ; f {l ?'?r,?;("' .... 'l
W ';?/" ` \ , l;i'>' r ?, I ! i'+"/ ? 1 t 1? A,,• ?' .c1 t v,, ? !"" Y ?' ? ;F ? f ?,,.t ? , ?1i.. mss;;, AS,IC,r ' ?, 1 ?ijrjiil?/ '? ,•, A ; trr t...• ? S , ,
f
? rr ?, ^ (r r i ?.; r/ r {+',C J 1 ) ? r .e? i. ! '? ` f '\1\ ?; «.z , v1?,4 . ?.. i `.. • ? ??
""e? ? . , ? 1 ?t.. ,. I ? r t + , ,: N -' ?1 . 1? ' ,..+.. ? 1v » ?`5 v t•` v \ r F.. ?A / :.. v ? v,,, 1
2 ' f`" ?y ? ? ? ii' '1 r?? '??: t t.?,.++? ,? i •? rr'r^viit t `\ ? .,,,,;? ,?+"„ ?.ti.;
t l t t r 5, f ? ? 11.5 t t y, ?•..,.. r.,:»_ '?. j
;. 1 r???'f( X11 l
1 J t 1 ? _ v, t o `I ,, v ?, ?t ! 1
X71
v.?t
?SS?tlt: 5:: ---^? I ?1?`,'h '?r ?r r , ?... ,r ti ?.,, d ?. ? ?? (' ??'•y? ? ?? ?? ?', tl? 1?7 ? ''r' r ?ri (S v ? t ??,. E , i ?tl ???r
,11i! V ,, vF v?,1-. ?' ?? i ??:1•J r',/; ?r +.rr??,; fti
.,±1
rttf' ,A "v ..rt: t„. ? ?` r'tt t ? \ gr'.t i 1G S.AI ` , ?¢•„ ,'4'V' ? '.FI.
/r}t'?, f' ?,1 1;•,'r t, y-`4.?.. 1y ?J??., ?+,?'?1`. „???, ?,? iF.- e f??' \• ,A ? ,t: n. i?p{y
lJ . ."`F w 1? r r / it
V. ';1? .?. -? v1. I(tAt"? w •? h ?:
,,? .'+,ti„.?. ? ?1 pr\VJ, 1 rx ?'V,1i?. '?: ?ht 1 ?. ??'A Pi ? ? ??''?',?f.??15 •, v?:' ?,;t? ??t1.?11? 1,-• ?? ?.,4^'"-.?? "7 tk
J /,+? tb `'?'?N9 ??I>Y?? .ti.•"„_ LA`,t1? ?1,?•,?;`?`?• ,'??? '!l ` ?.t ?l ? ?w?..1;1 `?+^'i'V? r??,» rrry r? / _ ??`?` ???"i?i
f ?? ??J c,.`„'r^a >r. r yyf rr ? + +` tt ? ``" ,` ?r? f. t ?, ?//?! i i .d? ? °r?""' ?1, `.,,,r, '`7? l _ ? ?.`..? rri?? ? tr, ?•. ? ?.^?.?.\
a ??r \? } ? u:I?! 1 r ? ? v it7.t ? {?. ;? 'C ?? ?;• t. 3, A ?'?_: .," ''"^:;r;?^,. ,..n rt`` 'Jl?' l
?? ?? 4• 'i a ?t 'ref y 51! 1 ?:4 "7 I;':` ?f X? ? ?' r,, v' a tt'J
+?•iY';??'" 'r'"'?i tf ?s, i?t ?... b ''?. •y?iS,?? I? A? i J?»?rr ? ,..? ??5,? ,^' ?t?? y < I j? J''4,r ? R" - ?'r ?" Aft. ?1' ? ?\\*
/r-»?.? i ?..ll)}t;?y ? ?? f? .,'M'/A . ?..-".:?:::'?,l? ??. ?\4?? S.y??Str`r'n15[Ia?i???"`^,^,;.,??j ;"?'.,,?'• ,.?'7,
r
yA
l r \
PROCTOR & GAMBLE _ 4? 4 t '1 t'
MORRIS ..,•,.z.,.; ? ?? +,?r{ ???+( ? ? ?"? ? ? ??; ? ? f ? '^?,..? ? ?r:.? ' v?1? ?{ ? t .,?.. rJ
P r?
!? !,•? I ?y?.4?' ?\. v..? 11! ??j' % ?r'? S' - ?` ? ? 3 („?.` ?? ,, 5 ? j ? ? } t lrj?ffr
'? y }'` r: ti. 'til! l?`•i ?} ?1%'r ^:..••. ; 7 ' i h ? ,.?' ?.G'' i?: V t l f llt
rr?tt? ??? ? ".? ? ?f'? ??rJ/rf?,. p r t?l?r?ll?l(y?° ??? ? r?-',,.rr.^ ?+r
.. ?'? ?ti A ? s'' 7 i. ? . ? ,-?,? • % ? r?k ? 111fff / ? 1 ? ? t??.y?, ? lj (?' ? ti
r 'r , t .t.- th4 ;"e•4•n, I I . ?.: ?,'?_:.,?1
?`'Oi???'???,??????'? W ( ?' ?1 ???• ? ?+? ? ?f?,?t? .If1?J??. •? ?tSj G:.?f (' ?' i'' /'?-ter.. ? v v
?1(, .1
j/•, ({ + ?»..
J '••?.,~.o-,?•'j! .? ,,•"•J')\?r'w..???,N •"," ?,." J ? .S ?I? ,.'1..??/}{?yr ;?????r: ?.15r ll/ ??.Ir ??/`L:,,?,,.h ??1?1,?f?1.?'.."'y`a •'^.•'µ.``•`. ?^
,- ? w1,?i1, ??'1..• ? v.?f? ?f/f ??,? i??-•:,r?J??? ?l'?/? ?;? ,I r? `'.'.,.a,
t `t ?F '' `"f/ +w.?;frf w wff!! f `? "Environmental Preservation and Impacts Analysis Plan"
!? The Villages at Reedy Fork
?... "'1• h .k1l, ,? '..Ifs, !'•..,,. r \{ 1
LEGEND: Greensboro N
i+.. , ",^ ? s 1f+li4?4S e. t ai;S . r.t 1,i... ` b. ) 1 f1,r`ff( .ff c ?/lr ,"lJ w;;, i;'?r+:: Orth C8t0lln$
PROPERTY
Starmou1t Company- Development Manager
rr r ! 1 ` tly fu` ?/J ?i ' /rr ?lr?r.. r ' ? G rr - SECTION BOUNDARY
} ! r ll
f !'• ? , r Evens Engineering- Engineers
` ,?' ?. ? ? / 1 •^t } r' i };.'r??. .v,:t t r ./,,.•I r ... a.? w .a? .?r?
t %? Y+t? +L j? ?'rrr `A V? rl % r l \ r COMMON ElEMOW
: N \ r ; r J 11, - ..._ © PRESERVATION AREA EngnQ Consulting 5aM0es Ltd.- Environments! Scientist
I f v f y i }l , f y?' tP`i`, V 1 ?r
LDR IManrationa4- P1annweelandscape Architects
r-71
i \ se ' ty1 ,/ r t WATERWAY
t '" t / 1 v ( I L{ f ' ?\ f , JJ ' ? ?1\ Brookes. Niema, Mclendon, & Leonwd
plo
?, ;v;` S : % { , t/! •" -. , ! >'?, Y.+?., i ?DUT1NG UMM EASEMENT
Consultant and A"ney
t ??\ ;. I • ,Ni'} ?t + 1'? . h f Emken
/'? IDENTIFIED WE IANO$ Soots; 7
L O STREAM CROSSING n
FOR 7L.77
s zoo 400 roc J n.na0,wM
r
1.1+r. et
k IaFfiNk {IICBV.
2 ?rratwnn A e x

I i gure 13a. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan,
Sheet 1, Stream Re-alignment Planform
2q
r
.
ep ?.. d ''wa
-8 At
t4t? i , , s Materials

?Ki
1.1.5 top soil If existing

a° s , substrate not loam
"c ; 1` Channel sand & gravel
-
z substrate
f 6° l
f Riffl
L
b e armor
ayer o
og
er
I(r fi

! {
L Point Bar - Gravel

staked In coir fiber log for outer

-? 1 bend toe protection
biodegradable erosion control

Ri ry? {}i

matting
a*
L / x°t ,y F Y1 Live. staked with riparian
species

Yz live staked with hardwood
1•
* ?
?
5
?
* ?
;
1 4ui t

t ?5F ,?
' ? r
:.?
;, pr ri y# .A
i 4 :enc. 5h yr? ';

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllf:::::r ? ?::::II .
.
?
l11111111111811i111 ,... ..
.
?? 111llllililllllllll1111 C:::: r ?::::::111111111111111111
r
2 °..1
? I11
11111........ IIIIIL 2
..r
,.....,.III III
B =A,quadc tone= B
20
-- 1
V
I
8 ?a

er 7.7 1
floodplalri alltivlal sock;
6

ft
4
2 Bedrock / saprolite
40 30 20 10 0 ft 10 20 30 40
I 20 20 I

8 11
-?,
,
r-
firoodplak alkmal w1s
6
ft
4-
2- Bedrock saprolite
40 30 20 10 Oft 10 20 30 40
HARP The Villages at Reedy Fork.. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan 7/15/01
Greensboro, NC Sheet 2: Banks and Typical Sections R.D. Forsythe
Starmount Company - Dev. Manager
30
Figure 13b. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan, Sheet 2, Banks and Typical Cross Sections

k?_ ?3 K !eb' Jg J?r1+M `A'.e,r.,"r ?a?" ?,r r i;;•.ae?. n 5, • .1':
?"., f
:? , # ? _.. .3, ?.. ? ?.>+ #?M1 ?a,y'?'c?`?(,?T? ?' ' A _aa?,?' lr?'??R?,?:?? ?el? ° + '?''? `? 1?5 ?? 'L?Y?"i??tit'+... • R? ?n ?°"._s ? ?y.J,
?' ?.?` ^eye f°' .', :.?f '+,.5 '. G '?.f ,?J'L 1. 71i J5? `„f 1? „l#.f ?+°".r?'4M1` ? ????? 'Y •..'y' "'K.
-`. "` ?•d',:,.,' iR? ,g? #` "..NP' ,,? ,W,r.,1?'e ??,p{, jay,., .:?,' ` m ?,: r t. yY?
T i? ? {, } i 13•, ? y y a,?it '1 (t...a r'?r ,'?tr t ? '1° ?ne,,,,?r 1?ijC !s"V.. gt's(`?1 *?'b 'r?'•t's;? •e ^" r1
£ 5 ?" y? r? 5 yPyy, ?' ?y?. ? v s. +,, Nr' (. ( , ?1.? t Y,?, r??+? ? s,,. y ?i•, yM ?.. s
?' ?y. 4° t ':?,y ?•'?'< 1 ? ?' :+?,V?+ '?S a9 .? ? i? ° ! MPr ?'" `YM }, ? ' ,,P t 5'?.i?t ?^ S+k'.N, Y?ar agF''.L?'U,'. $Mj°'R _
r >? rr; ' ? .ad;Vt' F a ,?Y t h a.,s ?• x? ? .,?° : Y Is
t ? ?,}y?.? ? '4 i % :%. ^i??^? 1 fV?Y1 "K V ?yh eTJu ?•?Y"'??'?q'. ?.Gj .?? rte'? M''
'y.'h r . ,
0.?l.Tw?y,?,,kl?rf. .,tWa ,Y•:,1+1`F°31? ?! w,' ^!' r ub. :.TS j 4 d- A °
r SR". f" F 7ua6. 3i.k .., , >{i•' fl 1.,nt n .t`n ',,+?x,t ?` c g
s??
Fe ? ,? , 0 50 00 ea_5 a +?, "i ,awe +, ,?tw? na?#gr?,F .?,??yi?• ,,?''!' :ti '?+.
a`F` 5 tl , C. S i•Y• HYWe.3.j1 a+•kdY+'.`k ai'S :xr?" t ?'''#!'(t r 3 , 2.
x, ¢rr F C11 h
M1:? scale
,'i ?r P' t.?t"F ?'i?` Cej,rYe?F ?R' r: wA"x y ±??? ""??.t?' ? ?. ?'i??, .?? '?`",? Z^' _ '?', i ? 4? . i?
?yeC..A$ ,,??,}}Y^y'?'' PI -
1. Yx k T.`at+'fjS Y"G ]. '4'yt J{'° b? AMR,
kyq ?d dry kk a?' 'F Yf+a Y 't 3 `??
l? t ?`'+"g :ix yV •? "??t r i °?, ??'???`?? ;fit.
n:?r ? ?i ? Y ?YM1:w.f ? ? ?? ?' .* 4 C?. +•rsyi t,+in tl'.1 kF?,
?. ??? - 7t y ° { t *v ? R? 4 - G k t !< v? ? t .
e ?. 1
{ '?, a t Y .? G xYr I >rh?'S V'!w x 'k' Y ?.. dal 5? .
aCx'Y4 c+,r+,?NW[.,?4s' ?', .,.fin' •tg,,y, c?(}"yy xr `R,, fC "'.?F' L, ° ! .' ° +({- G ?-+"Y ?; ?'ro,,
Pv ? Y hN,,: ?£ .• .'•G? 1 «? ?, ?e4 L ?4+' f ?i ? Y J+ 1}??? ? Y'•
ty 5 ?. y$?"?... ?.i y' ?1#,y? t ??? I i,d ,?Y Y?•, '. a
e` E t ;Y x at .a lIj'rYT t, . a } ?Y i o t. Y'' +hu "?t',7.
A`,T > 18 riffles totaling 720 f 50 ft r
18 pools totaling 1124 2 50 ft
pool : riffle =1.53
average pool spacing = 40 ft'
average pool size = 61 ft
;yt, x
50 ft conservation buffer to
*? ^'? °st, k3,," w?A'i?tr ? ?pY J'i! r °1li YY Y
each side of stream, totalling 4.36
t*t??tte a Y+. ?, rY+ p+' p 1#t}, fw.-;
Y , x aJ?G • t,r e 4° x acres (including channel area).
?r " ., i ?° r) t C y J ? f Y? r a w ? t h:' k f ` F ?W t S
- :. v;: •.e.r,w.,s - rrj';t Hf' x Fr:,c 7' - • y `" t T'. 'f' S;a, s Y M^ r • s •.t,,.?'a '.? ?q e - R e. G?'# - xRYg?ri'-'
<. 1Hx?«=,.y, yf4 V s ?.re ,.•1 a t'. - f a.r?•.• r ,. ?! 'x#t f'` 5 ! 1G 3. ... #, /a`;S '?c ?'Y5 ' P #'' 1 s n 't...?t 1 ;,4. ?' A;;
'}?4 t?+•.,, ..? ?.?. 3i. Si :t +?., ?;?'^/,1 F 6 ,i??' 355 1?' ty{ Yt,: ..,
"?ll4x T f+ '?P?A`c. ?. T U I ?.. ?rN
4 :M( .. 1.,.?.: .,`.??{may M1 k' tx ?yt ae z ?1 y-::#,1'r}Yi } FD+ 1 S' e• f ?'? ?( 4':1? jt0"'Y`l 'Y. i?P , i? ??i Ilk °?.tre ?. .}? .° G. ,., :$( j ?r??i ? 'S`iP ? M.
^P S '. ? C •-'.mot`=i S :e•"e ?F??. pIF ..t Y .?,? '.1 . ?? 'f? •IF C° q? '? I '°i t ?,K?r 1.??`??"? t"."?. L K,4i C i't.: 11L?'I.t .?i11 :.. M Y Y,4
J: Pf ? 1!a, ?` r?..'.ye`C, i7?`:?.", Ye ?4 t _ ° t ''?'"'i 4# 4'. ( "'? t, t.?1Ph7e •.. k: e ?" .x :.c ?e. , ?'':xryr d ?AAtr". a.
,: .??',. fit;:#?. .., .?.=-';•°'T:.°swA?k?'? t 7R,.r' ??'e,Y° 'S , ..?,;r ?frae ? 5e.{ ?^:... v' s# a {.'Fa .....:-.'e?la? .?•5e,# ?.
e' '.9r,x .+'•' s dju ? ? '?'W ? pl!` , 7k ?' ' ? .:,r ? y'b;. ,:aTM' t { '" ? V'. ? ([:l,Y ,g? h ? t''Er `. (1 -5 ?a ?•
.,. .+C:t.r. ife?'!A''?,?':ba'}},, ?,; '.v# :r JP? .sd a Y'+ ,;;?-.. 4 '?" ,a2 ?.:f? ki,:i.?y? ?a? ? ,N.•.,?.c
.?t ... ? . Y k aS.`.At? .. ? .. ` .F ?.?+ A0.„? . , . ?,. !.'4`,> :? ti?r ? L. _'ti ?J ( a*'..., .: . , ? ?.° fin. ? r k;.4t..? . ... Y ? ..t .uL?.../.71?'_ ? °iE•"•'??r?t . ?il'?,:4? iw'?.'b"?tE?c'b?t?ir ?'F+'. .,...
HARP The Villages at Reedy Fork, Re For n Plan
Greensboro, NC edy k Tributary Restoratio 7/15101
Starmount Company - Dev. Manager Sheet 3: Riffle, Pool, and Riparian Habitat R.D. Forsythe
Figure 13c. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan, Shee3, Habitat 3i

b xy}x
??
??
0 1n+ / r

[ t ;,"; 'i R cc a' irtL yi?7. , n ?, .e'r Y+`t ad''? ems"
.a'?. -:,? y? ?a ?,, ..R.. - ,fit {•(?? ,+ t j?4??g33y11°°, r ?} ? J?h,..? ?x,,7??,q??.. ??.?
<y. 'y. '?.:u T. .a', . t ate .M Y y',i'cc?' ''7' '•7+5 ?xf,. 3r "t_ ,:rs' S?q_1
s0 100 150 R gg,
5 scale
Yt s
x

,7y ts'4w 45!
TT f c p}
T Y '? a
NOR
+? T Y 5
"'L"lam yf R fr rS ;c, ; ? ? 4?z y S y ^? ,?+:?a ?. ! `.
??}?1t4, fi .' ) Y ? +SZ { .a'xy fi M Yix ?' +? ; Y 'i St (S*.t'°??
'PE'(i_N4+EY .<7^'? a4?"a * a ?A4<? 9P
44
'' 'Vj 4' Me °a 'a.r 8i 4N'RO' } .S
jg!
4, j
F f a 7a ?agt6'.£? ? ? { ? 0 F yp '"':? ? .v Ly?y*. .
y r r T? t
Vr,
'.` { p Y ? 71 y Af
Figure 13d. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan, Sheet 3, Longitudinal Profile
4 ?7 Riffle Zones
Z.M
final grade -.016
qk armored with cobbles
> D84 substrate
A
2.1 ?? `F A"'vy
ff:: Yt t^(5n' Z p

i. '
jf

4
7-

Pool Zones
water slope <.003
bed grade v .007
(valley grade) pool
depths 6" -12"
0410
3z
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should
require 5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway,, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be st mjted:tg 11ig t:istr Engineer having jurisdic-
tion over the location of the proposed activity. y A'hL`i? 11b, '
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT ,
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and.
Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided,.the,permit application cannot, be processed nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and.character of the proposed.activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANTS NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
i C M 41.v, A0 LOS
S-
119 P- M 00A.)
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS 9. AGENTS ADDRESS
C/o Ind.
Q, .Aax /o3.Y9
G ei=?? 6Q.e o? ? ? o -0 3 y S oP?17-6
tis o .ems ti? a? o
7. APPLICANTS PHONE UMBERS WITH AREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NU BERS WITH AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Busines 6 . a, b. Business 3 6 6 / S0
11. STATEMENT OF AU ATION
I hereby authorize. -OF-A-? r s too( Zos to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request; sup le ental i ti in suppo 7permit application.
/ JO 0
AP CA S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
/yam 111"-dL66-S CI D
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if appli ble) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (d apgliaable)...,,: ,
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT £ ! r f)' .
?U?LFOI?? NC_ aY l ,
COUNTY STATE !A(4- JTLAl1lDS
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) p I r t -? m RAJ it)
/},opeox/nw9T? ?? 0 3 6° 83 o 9 yl y y s c.J
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE Fk" I ?j e?ENS ?E'd I7t(61'1Cc? 1' ag /VOf2TIt J-O Tip) 7
SvinM IT i9-VE-VUc F-x lT• .5'ij< s5 Lvc/frF- r-?10 7/214
H /6hW17 % 99,
ENG FORM 4345, Jul 971 EDITION OF SEP 94 IS OBSOLETE (Proponent: CECW-OR)
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project include all features) 7-/J E- S.' re S 8 £ 1,V6 ,EV oPE? 10 /7-H
-rkE t1s46-,f G Es /1-7 - ,??? Fo e4 . zo.IL_'n ' Ga / LL . 6E e oys re v c r, z1,0
TO rl cceSS TIC SzT?, . l /f ?O/9 ?S Gt?? GL C ,20S5 7'? I BUTi9`/%?S
?r Pis - RB P -M 70 _7W
,or??.?.5 0 sr,P rr i? D Ts r?r ?4cry !oc?rrG?.J,
Fog _Z)£SC-41
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
7-HE S r E _r5 25,61416- ?E a trop ?j S.c) P f1J.S 'F_ 6017-H 7-#.F
PF,6?1 FOE.&.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge 'T/Jr" 7>l sGh'?' ?G ES 192 t r9Tc 7 O c 6 D C?ru ST7 ' U c770 •lJ
nEc Ess?2/ i co ?? v,?oP 7-rf.? s?T.E
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
SSE 1?-JT/?cf/ Iv? .Eiv7S
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yep ?7- No IF Y,f S DESCRIBE THE COMP ED ORK
??ur.ollS , ,Z GT3 `?SS6GlG'v (?7?1`{1 ?GTLGnt/?ST?7'? ?
f}vi?o2/? y A)CO tiw39 r,A illW ?2; (?oPics c /}TJ` ffAFZ,
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a
supplemental list).
S ?? r3TTifCff/YI ?'N TS
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application
is complete and accurate. I further certify that I.possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized
agent of the applicant
6_3
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT ATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed. activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized
agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
1 B U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, knowingly
and willfully .falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or
representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall
be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
Block 24 - Adjoining Property Owners
Lot # Name and address
30, Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
Monroe and Madison Township P.O. Box 30013
Ma # 193 Ralei h NC 27622-0013
28 Wysong & Miles Co.
Monroe Township U.S. 29 North
Map # 193 P.O. Box 21168
Greensboro, NC 27420-1168
02 Wysong & Miles Co.
Monroe Township U.S. 29 North
Map # 193 P.O. Box 21168
f Greensboro, NC 27420-1168
06 Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
Madison Township P.O. Box 30013
Ma # 601 Ralei h NC 27622-0013
05 North Jefferson Inc.
Madison Township C/O O.W. Hines
Map # 601 107 Birch Creek Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9205
16 Timothy T. Mericka
Madison Township Sandra R. Mericka
Map # 603 6941 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville NC 27301
13 Carolyn Sharpe Williard
Madison Township 6950 McLeansville Rd.
Ma # 603 McLeansville, NC 27301
05 Joel E. Gibson
Madison Township Ronda S. Gibson
Map # 603 6806 Poplar Grove Trail
Greensboro, NC 27410-8621
10 George Haywood Williams
Madison Township Connie S. Williams
Map # 603 6958 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
01 Frank N. Stevenson
Madison Township Faith H. Stevenson
Map # 603 6964 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
09 Dennis L Roberson
Madison Township Vickie Roberson
Map # 603 6977 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
11 Dennis L Roberson
Madison Township Vickie Roberson

Map # 603 6977 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
12 Wayne Falls
Madison Township Pamela Falls
Map # 603 6981 McLeansville Rd.
McLeansville, NC 27301-9730
Block 24 - Adjoining Property Owners (continued)
Lot # Name and address
07 Terry Lee Busick
Madison Township Patricia S. Busick
Map # 603 7011 McLeansville Rd.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9716
06 James D. Smith
Madison Township Sandra P. Smith
Map # 603 7002 McLeansville Rd.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9716
12 Herbert William Kennedy Jr.
Madison Township C/O Chu Swaney
Map # 603 3136 Battleground Ave.
Greensboro, NC 27408
05 William G. Rudd Jr.
Madison Township 108 Wilson St.
Ma # 603 Eden NC 27288-5231
14 Burton, Herbert W. Heirs
Madison Township C/O Mrs. Herbert W. Burton
Map # 603 5115 Long Island Dr,
Atlanta, GA 30327-4907
Burton, Rhetta N. L/J
03 Wiliam F. Burton III
Madison Township Loretta B. Wenger T/C
Map # 603 1304 Norman Dr.
Eden, NC 2728/8
13 Herbert William Kennedy Jr.
Madison Township C/O Chu Swaney
Map # 603 -3136 Battleground Ave.
Greensboro, NC 27408
William M. Mericka
11 Mary J. Mericka
Monroe Township 5963 Summit Ave.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9704
03 John M. Jenkins
Monroe Township P.O. Box 346
Browns Summit, NC 27214
02 Susan Finley McCanless

Monroe Township 5939 Summit Ave.
Browns Summit NC 27214
Reedy Fork Associates LLC
13 C/O Starmount Company
Monroe Township 600 Green Valley Rd. Suite 300
Greensboro, NC 27408
03 Greentree Inc.
Monroe Township 5925 Summit Ave.
Browns Summit, NC 27214-9704
-40""40py
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200220551 County: Guilford
GENERAL PERMIT REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE VERIFICATION
Property Authorized
owner: Starmont Company Agent: ECS
c/o Ronald Wilson Denise M. Poulos
Address: P.O. Box 10349 Address: 6909 International Drive, Suite 103
Greensboro, NC 274090349 Greensboro, NC 27409
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
Size and Location of Property (Waterbodv. Highway. name/number, town, etc.): Starmont
Company's proposed the Villages of Reedy Fork subdivision property, located off of US29, adjacent
to unnamed tributaries of Reedy Fork Creek, north of Greensboro, in Guilford County, North
Carolina.
Description of Activity: Proposed sanitary sewer line outfall project resulting in approximately 0.02
acre of temporary impacts to the jurisdictional waters of an unnamed tributaries of Reedy Fork
Creek.
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
X Nationwide Permit Number NWP 12
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may
subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General / Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of E ineers regulatory program,
please contact John Thomas at telephone numbe (919) 876- 441, exte ion 25.
s
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date February 14, 2002 Expiration March 18, 2002
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200120410 (NW 14), 200120660 (NW 39) County: Guilford )00
GENERAL PERMIT REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE VERIFICATION
Property Authorized
owner: Starmount Company Agent: ECS
c/o Ronald Wilson C/o Denise M. Poulos
Address: P.O. Box 10349 Address: 6909 International Drive, Suite 103
Greensboro, NC 27404-0349 Greensboro, NC 27409
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
Size and Location of Property (Waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): Starmount
Company's proposed the Villages at Reedy Fork subdivision property located off of-US 29, adjacent
to unnamed tributaries of Reedy Fork. Creek, north of Greensboro, in Guilford County, North
Carolina.
Description of Activity: Proposed construction of subdivision development resulting in impacts to
approximately 0.16 acre of jurisdictional waters associated with road access construction (NW 14)
and approximately 0.003 acre of jurisdictional waters associated with lot fill. (Total of
approximately 0.163 acre of impacts to the jurisdictional waters of unnamed tributaries of Reedy
Fork Creek.)
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
X Nationwide Permit Number' NW 14 & NW 39
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may,
subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General / Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regarding he Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact John Thomas at telephone number 919 876-8441, ext sion 2
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date March 19, 2001 Expiration February 11, 2002
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, V47ETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF:
Stream/Wetland Impact Summa
Crossing #4
This crossing is located in an area where several tributaries to Reedy Fork converge. The crossing was
located at the point where the impact to the tributaries would be minimized. Moving the crossing north or
south of the proposed location would result in greater stream impacts.
In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on both
ends of the culverts.. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culverts
will be placed approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic
organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 513 linear feet of stream channel.
Crossing #5
This crossing is located on a tributary to Reedy Fork. In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, the
road alignment has been re-graded to maximize slopes and minimize the amount of fill over the stream
channel. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culvert will be placed
approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 120 linear feet of stream channel.
Crossing #6
This crossing is located on a tributary to Reedy Fork. In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, the
road alignment has been re-graded to maximize slopes and minimize the amount of fill over the stream
channel. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culvert will be placed
approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 135 linear feet of stream channel.
Crossing #8
This crossing is located in an area where several tributaries to Reedy Fork converge. The crossing was
located at the point where the impact to the largest tributary would be minimized. Moving the crossing
north or south of the proposed location would result in greater stream impacts.
In order to minimize the impact at the crossing, parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on both
ends of the culverts. The vertical alignment of the road has been adjusted to minimize fill in the stream
channel. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the culverts will be
placed approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 673 linear feet of stream channel and 1,740 square feet of
wetland.
The 1111ages at Reedy Fork
Stream/Wetland Impact Summary
p• 2
Crossing #9
The tributary to Reedy Fork at this crossing is very sinuous. The crossing has been located on the portion
of the stream that will result in the least amount of impact. The fill over the pipe was minimized by
following the natural terrain to the extent practical. Parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on
both ends of the culvert. In addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the
culvert will be placed approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of
aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 242 linear feet of stream channel and 603 square feet of wetland.
Crossing #10
The tributary to Reedy Fork at this crossing is very sinuous. The crossing has been located on the portion
of the stream that will result in the least amount of impact. The fill over the pipe was minimized by
following the natural terrain to the extent practical. Parapet walls and wing walls will be constructed on
both ends of the culvert. In "addition, 2:1 side slopes will be used at the crossing. The bottom of the
culvert will be placed approximately 12 inches below the channel bottom to facilitate movement of
aquatic organisms.
This crossing will impact approximately 389 linear feet of stream channel and 6,308 square feet of
wetland.
Summary of Impacts
Stream Impacts: 2,072 Linear Feet
Wetland Impacts: 8,651 Square Feet
Irt'°PPR???t\?e17/ 'V?+ ? Tt}??X / ?• ? r 1?/?,Ip,, k3} .rr ? .,-?.-r.:

l
'? ? ? `
???? ? -:?l???///jjj»»»??T?w?.. "iJL??. k. •.:°i?
:?
?i?l/ Qlie
???, ??-;
?/ nas
`1A

. '-. -
9
IOC,.
n
S

O
0
?- - r ?r „ C `mil 1 ,? .
ti.
SOURCE: FIGURE 1 C USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, _ LTD SITE LOCATION MAP
BROWNS SUMNUT, NC THE VILLAGES AT REEDY FORK
QUADRANGLE, DATED 1951 AND GREENSBORO, NC
REVISED 1994 FENGINEERING
SCALE: I"= 4,000' S U LT I N G ECS PROJECT G-1001
ICES,LTD
a?
g°=
lrj?
o - ? ? NORFpLK ?
?? Sa/1h'ERN RA/(Rp,40 ?
s d <
>i
O c v
r,, e
gl' RpAO
y
n ?
a
BROlwSlr ROAO
I S70
j -Im e- f Y
i a ® ?4ar O r
M
ti ® o I co
® t?, O Itt? 2 n
Tr rw in
cr ?: t Ib u
co a ® o
CEO ?' I N
cn IIp a RL =3 Cp3 o
a. a r eOCJ O
o rn5
rn
g MO
> CO
m r.
-< 023
N
> co
F"
D o °
D o a OVO 37714SNOPW
O ' o
T e
2
1 \ _
CD 0 ?X f
o0
Op
pO op0O 0o 00
\
\ 00 00 0 \
p00 0o0p0 °0oo / / \ \
°p0pO° ° 0°
\\
--? °0 0 00
00 0
0 •? \
.14
to
D
\ / \ y
000 C?
• L I ? l ?
o
19,
\ c ? /
\ \ a ,? ppC?OY
\ \? ?O \
v?wo \\ \ \
o0+ 222 AM
NO'DN° \ \ \ ?j J
IZO r>"
+ ? I$
>m
m \
zm Cy+;0f \
;?? oN
>0- ;+z \

D
U
D
TI
D
D
7

D

z m
r x
m ?

"0 z
? G7
O
C7

o

Z m
r
W
O

I?
x FR
N m
^5 ? m
Vlm
1?0
J Z

Op
r > Z X
r C
7D
C, T o ;K
0+ M 1 T
M
9
>
0
00
ND
Fn 'O
CW
m to X

C
u - \X 1? \
cn o o ITi
zo -=v, co
p m
N > z rn /
D m\n o n'?
o?p?rn?o-o
?moNM
n,D II I O a / I
? c
- r
10
x
00
m
z
I 'm( c ? o?
-TI M
y ?

?
I

D

O
C
--I
r
M
-1 000
° 0
O
o0

O o0
•00
m p 0
0
C) po
00
0
O 000
z 00
0
0
Op
00
Op
000
J

Z W

000 Z
<
DD 00 O
Ul
J
W ?
C7

°
OOp
000
Op
Op0
0 0
000
000
O00
O00
000
•p 0
:Cl O
OO
X 000
0
D 00
po
°
Z o
°00
o
m O
0
°
-i O

? m
x
O
m
n z

O
z
_
D
z
z
m
r
W
O

0

x
NDtn rn
rn
v 0
?DZxo
c ?a0;IKU M
m D N >
m m
y ;D
+ Z
>*
C
O 00
W O
N ?
O
D
1
.J
(w7r OX \
20 m M \
O Tai p y 58, Cl) Q\ \
o_? o { -? \
ra \Z a -n
D? V?? 111 r /? -_?
G D + 0
Fl o E , ?
OR i+ Z I \ \
n D U 1
m /
b
77 00 00+?j
I
/
r /
o
x
? (n m
rn
?
o>:v
Z -c
r DZr.0
N NV ) x m
r- >00
ow >
A
m

0
?J p °
O 0 00
m
- 0 0°
)
--C
? 0
o
O 0 00
z o00

(
°
000
o°
OO
ooO
00

Z N
G ?
--i
CY)
v

W

z
G

O
0

(D
v
CF)

C)o cyl

(00_
O V ?
O 70 p
W

000 O
D

o° O
o°
000
0°0
000

00
0 0
00
0°O
000
000
0
00
D OO
o0°O
D

'D
0
o0p
0
O
z 0
00°0°
O
M l o
0°0
°
-1 o

:;u r ri
x
O
m
n z

O
z
C7
_
D
Z
Z
rrl

Ico O0
o?
(A So tn rn \\
rq ID
00D m rn 0 No\ ?
DZD? J \ \ /
c ?.z T-1 /
m_n+ . ? III \ \\\ -? \
Drpp
p ? m p in 614-n
OD?j
n n G D _ ? \
m
> 000
0
0000 000
> 0000000000 co
o°o°o°°°o° o ° o
z 00 00 0
o 0o o°o 00 000 ° o o°o o
(n 00000000000 ^^ 0
0000000,
000000°
000000,
00 0
O

0°0°0°0°0 0 0 0
00000000
00000000
00000 0 0 0 Q Z
m r
/-i
m
x
N
'Zi
? I
i
TO-(
.
? o0
- O
00
0
D 00
O
0O01
O
C 0
0
r 0 I
00
m O
-I 00
I
00
O
O
00
I
m 00
C) O
00
O 0
00
Z O
00
O
V U
O
00
00
00
00
00
O0
00
00
000
00
I
D
Z
r
m
O I
A
n
O
? I
z
0)--I
(00
N ?
?O
O -?
O
D
0
O N =
o

? z -
n /
000 /z
0
0
N -
t
O
C L
m 0 it rn1
X _ O
c f)
m
o ,
z
i
A,
i
i
0
00
x )C
0 I
0
0
o

D oo I
00

O oo
I
r O0

m 1)0

-i o
1
" 0 0
D
X 00

O
o I
m
o
- C7 00
--j o
O 00
Z O
00
0

Z

I
m
L<
I W
z sfl

O
I
n

D
Z
I
Z z
m <
r
I rn

o L

I
n

6001
00
00
00
00
0001
00
D
m
Z
r
m
O
m
n
O
z
c
m0
D N ; m
;ID N o 5 C0
Z
r- DZr.Z
C NNC)M
D A+ I
DNN? M
r
m rr*i to
+z?
o 0
q a
0
v ?
O
O)0
TI
0
O
D
0

/
o a (vi
O- ?
0,
0 0
rD- Z z
to
L+??rn
Z D D U O N
O > m O N
\+ z
C)M O
DD
/.16
00
4 -4 G o

/
M Cf)

\/ O
(T1 °-V V

/m
i
i
0

z
I /
x /
°
x O/
n ?
i
i

i
°
00
Lu )(
°
0
0
O
ICJ
D OC
OO

O 0
0
0 I
o0
r-
M 00

-+
o I
00

°
O
o
I
m °
O
0
n 00
o
O 00
Z 0
00
0

z

'rn
iz z
m <
r
I rn
CC)
"
O rn
?
I O
p

o
00
o
00
0 0
00
0 0
00
0 0
00
0 0
1
0
00
00

D

Z
r
m

O
-,
m
C-)

O
Z

?F4VN ?
r^
Z
m V,
;?
O
n q
> X
Z

C/) (n OD 0
> n+; ;a
> V• 0 N M
r
m ?
+
? O
z
0
0
°- >
C
_
l
-' o
N O
TI
O
D
f f` T If x 11' w 1
WMP
u '
f'` rro?r I? ??,fJrJ1 ....?dat ? i??.
r I (1 a`+ j R (?p I{i..°. f ?t ???,`....l??.r (S ti` 1?'1` r\s:,??hk'?' t V {?i
?' ? . ? ? '; / r ? i , L. ? +?.?, ? ? r?`,,.tt?i4?L.?..,.y. ?`T :1`..r ly i j? ? r j ? ••,,``,.,,tts7 ?`w
r'. ": ?'? jr.r ? Wis.. '' ",?h ?? ?.. a ?'?l^?` ? 'r?."'? ?j ?????? \: .. t ?'y ??
T-t
BRYAN
1 ? ?' \ 5t
faro , i
r l TOra:aaektC - t V55AIrm
s
L Con""?mnw'CaadnA.tvf trws t 567 AWN
3. TOW w""w W",Ak am A&"
"~ t 'a' • .,,'; I - 4 Toif',tlwAetof9Q*wx t i 847EF,
I TowtbevNaGetSdatm4kuiah t v.
r I P t `< Too&Ui 44 Cfft* t *ONr ttaredae" t X=LF,
1 %, , rl ?: '} ? L PoftfS'Nk lIA64f.
i Z T4bMCtly
MbsGMfaAranm+FbtOOnpAxttro.?eOemwtetikAS
.... .l? as gq? C ^^, 1•? - kpaRnrEeUroaFteSdtparn rp?RdaRiwNonpt3rtt?y
4 }j "tfi(i ao?tdAxaiyllWewweyaoddokwtwdar
7 .+?t Silo({ ?,
i , ? t r? i•• ? f ..,? ,??, 'y 0" 4" U6a,3,4pdawM1
PARK x n n^?" ' \..: y l t H i 4' 1 Yt ; r
AND GOLF r,'f• fit;;" i' E, ;s ; J 4",` ,; ,`ti?i „•.
COURSE fS F ?, of srr r• 'E ,t? ! ll < t {!v„ • 11 1 V i a {i
? „' ? /,, ?i,• j !Ells ?\,.'f.r'! l r , ¢ ? l? # yr,w 1\' )? ?,?\,?l; }.`\?•. (, t , ? ?.? i t;,i?1?>';?? {
, r, ? . 7 ? ".?? ? r• ?,.i 0 :.%?,i4rh7 .??i:! {{ ? ,?,,, f e?,, w,aty „? ?' :'.f??• ? , ;,? itx , ., ,4 ?? ? 4 r?.% i SWY't ri R?pt.sl I
44
7 ^.?,.K0k 'tr rr <` .+: ti J ;l?`t•; s, a?.?.,,• ...?.. ?? i' ?' ?`;, r I .r tV 15?' x'?' J{'•., d,( :x;
's .rt i;•a? 1 'J?I1 ?^6?' 1- s 5 »,I i'(rr .r+y, t.!•1,.. T t
...........
f.??, (( 6 ti I,
r e / 1: r , x ` t +? i51' ! 4ni , b, r f?...,, lw• l
,,,V p rf '•Iis Rr?'I.i. t .?_,,.?. 1,,e 1!"?+:;,s rr 1r?.,ia ? \? ..,;,.."ti„•> 1.??; ?•.I I [ liir>? l i-E i y`!
'?'^ssl? ? ?? I ?,Y? ;li i r ` i ?' x . ' '????r `'' '! r ?...?_`,?i. ?.. ?1 .t??s, 4 f?; ?`•. ?' w w? }7?y??;,
"""^r 1 ?; •\:i r r ( ?J. J ? !`, .' •.i a 't`i`'{ R• `; r „ '?.. l = .:?'.*.as. ,,. ?: ``,.. ,. a
.,, '1? 4W >1 e ?rr i:• ? ?• .41s?,.? t '4i ?1'\.A <"t \..:: . ± t. , t f .;r• A ?. S i
??j i,'1 .? ? ,,l l!J *? r ? yy)) l+ iQri ? t..• , ??, ,?"??'? , 5x? lti".^..,.., ''•. Vti4c -? ?'^. ,?i?.....:::? 4... ? ?'?. ` `,iI ° i
1,'?I ?,ti I t r 4 f Y ? ? l , "k=; ?• ? `.. j b+., '?..,, ?', ? 1 ?, r I ` ? ?'. 1,,. .- `?
f ?i r A.? i i? `'.?,r, J,it'?'? ! `?; r'°.'..?rrrt ,.;rr 'ut '., tit,?.••,A ??i ! «``^? `'C ,' ?.?y ' yti ?..?\ ? r i? ? R
,
7i1 ? ? 1? ?? y!',. i ?l t? c.... 1 t% '. ??? i ? ,.I f " /.ij i'?1Rt 7` f I I t •?" r. ? "?"' "2?..ti "'. r'; '?c,? ,?y:, l?r, "7 .? ',.
t' , i l ? '.? i'11 .,? °`r J V v? ? r if ils' ,? ?? ? ?•.!^ "` L ? ?'??'?!td„ t 1 r ?r' r ? > f!?' yp ? r r'l ?,:xlJ•r 7 i f i M r"?, ? 3, Y .?1 ? 1 ? . ? --?-. "».`'? "`"?R+??{?,, r? `r r i ?))
„1' ??. i? t ? ,. /,:? s 7 R i. ...+ illirl l.. I '?, ?^ L ?;.. .:4rT¢ ?r" f ' t'{ld „? ?i 1J
x
t !.? ???,. ?f a/ li x ii / ?,. "'d ??? ?t ??`'• 1l? :? A x:« ( 1 .`...,, ?,e'!•..j> :bt. .yi 1R.islo. d
?',`I . J?_ 1 ?%` Jn ,t r '•? l?it?a?x fi; {rr i . '? ??,', 1 , `•??? l". ,, ?+? ,h? .? ? f: _ti ?'Is? ?,..... ..,? y t
!
f 4 l?, 4 ,? 1' r?•1
'1
,, ;t `. (Ii(? i >ri i 1 '`v` %'?x;7.f r ;'r •'? ! ` `?• ?, ' " s i i "' ' i 1 _
t 1 t !vr lr.
1d
;; ` ., r, ?,".. t;;w,r, / ftf +? :?•8;n1 ?.? 'x =x,
,? • r t,1'?. ll r ? + j',y t w ? ,
N ><?t !•i't^`5 1( l *,. r v: ,??.. ? 1 r;r'?j?
r?'r; ?; ? ? ?;' ? t s ".r ?.?i o ,r ? ? .,?!',, ?'`,? < i .1• `Y>f ,? r .?''r'r , r ? . x y?1 •L4.rr. ' ..•»,•" ' l i
r..M? r h r,. r ?,l•`•x,? 1;Ir l?1 ??`,;ViJ}?j?, ?rx1 xt. i ?x,.. .?`ti •,t' rl?A. '`....,., ^f'?t....E? i.
r??},
R Y>r,. ?x, ,?( •,7 ?+ s,• v.. r?r;1?.r; '? <,»r ? :?.?.A';f ?,? ??'I s ?....,.;: "i? f( ? ?, t. ?'M ?y
'0 ''?w w ' t? ? ?? ?•1'{ .J ?.?/?l f `. ?n ,` ? y ^-.. 0 . u.•wrs , \1 l n
/Al
?jn
?' .,; ra • . s ? ? w ? tt ,.J r , V r { I ????t t s ? s? ? ? i 1 p "' '9„*' i .`i ? rr ` J t?
t °` ?>,,?' ?is I +- t ti i s, a''rr• ? '.r 1?1i ? ? ,,, .,e, r s . '(i
,? S ? c w1-: , i', ! r ? tAlt ?./' ??`?,• lR W
'? • V `t` \St? rw." ode ??? ??.?. ? ?rx1 V .,r .G_? , ! '<,, ```..,w??jiss Y? ?. ?,?,?.1 2 c:r°- '? -
I,q
F
PROCTOR & GAMBLE MORRIS
PA I.? art t ' e s ?/?
f j?J t J r
?.}{q,? a; J 1? •?" '^ s ? 'l? F.%r?i { nit ?r'f w4?1S1? f?r?`.'bt14t??1 ?11i(!?/?????'S a
?? t'4, `b+"?•w,.? ?? ?,1• ? t". 'y ?'ti.,t,,. ? ;, ? ? _ °. 1 ? (Ij t ? r Y' ` 1.1 ? n?; `t Sl4 ( 4.. ttl? ? s
j
}1 't} iti r ?. , 1 fpy.1\ j?jr R115' G ?t
Ott 1».tM,`
..1 f ( a
jV,..,,.f'?.!'? C"^`'• «s ?/ ? ,rC ( ? ? r L ,<x?tip r? t' rr ?rltal'E?1J{"fir r}? r e'<.:?tlrr 1 s ' r'rc?v
r wft r r \", ?, t ? 4rc? ?11`j r', S ?/Ir t?
'°'. s = r 1 ....';?ti1r'.?1{,•., ,?` !r' l lwrrl i? ? ?1? :.r' a j ? '?! I r 1 r+< ?' fd 4 ...
.. "5.!c'l (?I. ,_. i? '.?r ?'x ?? "?7 ?.'?s .Pr.. ,.,. „xttr; v .A '_>?. Jli..+t. _ ,.a 11?? r UI'R
dt
t ` a
iw

* r. k
CO
rLF M I
R R !C.
4i ?t a -1 9 J'.
r

r
ati
"Environmental Preservation and Impacts Analysis Plan"
The Villages at Reedy Fork
LEGEND: Greensboro North Carolina
PROPERTY Stamwunt CompaN - Development Manager
- SECnON BOUNDARY Evans Engineering- Erpinaers
C(PRESERVATION Engineering Consuil?p Services, Ltd.- Environrne?SaentW
WA LDR int?ra6or - PianaenvLarndscape Am h1tects

=EXISTING UtiLRY EASEMENT Smokes. Pierce. McLendon, N & Leonard-
En =Consultentand Attorney
!IDENTIFIED WETLANDS
0 STREAM CROSSING SCA4.r-Aw-ir
a zsc m ,ruarveo,son nwn

Ci
? 4. r.
by i
Aw-
y i
?K
{ R
4
} l* b .
?Ek ? F
0 so 100 150 ft
w?F? N.r s
=x 5 scale

11, L111w
4 -f T
" Artificial Nickpoint
for grade control
1 (e.g. transverse rock
ll
r
.
ul y,
a
weir extending late
*.'F to top of bank), not
".. needed if bedrock
encountered in new
i °

i4
allignment

y
L. .
A

i
.,,.,. r?xr•a :,.-.., :'1?''. x•.?,,.F,# ,k F.},.. `., as sA..;i" < 'w* .?;.r', .ta ... :'s? h'?r ??'' Sv r.rz 4v a?.?: yx. Tr xY'? #`: ac?rnss'?''' y5,':ri{ ::'r. - ?.'SI*
6. F!d}F??,A?^";"f '•. ?`u. i? r5 ''l l.' !g # F ;a ?'44b ak'?'. S' 5,.?'.#:.1.x ?yN,'. ?k S1 Rtytkrf.. d.yii s'? ?i?J7?`. Aa ?.. ..b !.? fir,'; 3?.
..rr,d
?., h yP. .R .NV+u? .d. ?k F:fl
4y1• 4?'x•.y?2r-,y?. ?•:?k.7" +?`i• ?, +k?,a; ?,,?Y`e r': x't f e* ?'y[ T?s FA e'u" ,(F ?jfi rsr
lG'?,'. irX .3r1v: ?a.a'q?.'. ak+?r., ',•3rH .v.-, tae,. . y. ea. :a' .. it.'?'1 .. '?yy;.. zsx
aka °.. M5 ,,
HARP The Villages at Reedy Fork, Reed Fork Tributary Restoration Plan 7/15/01
Greensboro, NC Y ? l R.D. Forsythe
Starmount Company - Dev. Manager Sheet 1. Channel Re-alignment & P anforlm
aq
Figure 13a. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan, Sheet 1, Stream Re-alignment Planform
.. A 'tv
k `± T
r ?` a
y? k Krf
tt Y'? ? +? ? a?• d? ?.?? y h Fh?•A4F `f.+"+?`^M",1 3'V Yq
150 ft
4? { M" glad 0 ? ati
-:? 'a ?s, e•R ?t y. tAt£?T
k i a* '1yi'aJ?
W. j }r '.','T ^ E:
scale
?' .. +C., ?h 4r.- y/` ? 1 ,Y• x9p s Af ? ??r?' i?' ?>?SV'?? ??s?,5+. ?:
`-.4 *Im,H1t alb''a! ('i y w M1 r?).' x M ..u.
N, Vp
iy f''?`.y5'?F'}'' aa•'t} a. x
x

?, ?' `i?? I l A?4 AAS.1 {a?'e ?tti"kYA,y^S? ui?'A?.'??+'?'{ "r'`?.?' ro ? '°?• t?? "Yt ?
Materials
J ? ?'j,« yr! * ? ><k4 fi? ?'P ^1t' ?W
1.1.5 top soil if existing
substrate not loam
y h I ; K. {rr .?;;
1' Channel sand & gravel
substrate
P 1f k l k ??}} J
X G' layer of Riffle armor
Coin ber log
?Y
aV? Point Bar - Gravel
iAY N?'?x? fi r P ° - staked in coir fiber log forouter
bend toe protection
?;,, ,' 4tY biodegradable erosion control
W ?w
S"I Y?t11 AI kw :?:••% J i 7? y4?'? la K c 3t'r P'P
matting CX,
Y1 live staked withriparian
'Cq !u,PSF r gy A 4' >
<? ,'N? zr< r species
r2... Live staked withhardwood
r !f iy?ti xd ` 4 y1 v N
_ \ ? ?'t;./,?,"^t?°t?G+ ?t r "",'Tf¢f x +, ?' t t k. f
ti'* r? "`k ?'a . •? ,'-^,?>? Aw?SyKr^ / \ nµt;???:'?x*{?t?;??S9ee ? c ? i. ?lk? s ,•y ?n x
?;• p 3w' -..' sa ?z ?' „b ';` ?•+ `v?' s. - r ?Fy`b "? '"' ' i i t u,. z 'f'Y?r 'atir:
451 K
$` ? ?? ? ? `" ' ?'6 `?? ?? ?`??n 3? ??????"??'IIIIIIIII81111N811 ????? ??? IIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIII r 1 ???Illllllllliliillllll
' _ ? xsr gat+
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIC::::r 1......,
?d illy..r2... ..Jilll Illlll:::1`2....11{111 ..
'f 4, n'xrYx Kk het" r3'`+'x es,r J/ ,g Y-4 ,'i'.i .R.«?, ,a _Muaftione? B?
2.w-:% t.La1 J rrrxsYa?r- -` V
3;1 bank slopes 20
y { q r R r 7w + Yk' xti ?ktiP t y! y ?P t
g ----71 17 ???'4` s,"'A r^`y.'r ^ ar, i?.°r;"'4r^3 e:?ds / ,fit 5+ x.,kyk?. ` x } 13
f.i* Aa Y?n~i° `? -71? ?... ?I a a r? >k.?v + t 1 17 { ? •11AM ` 3 y ,
.. ?, ?P>l 1,? i J`y
' ` A i?[,- J 4'?r!^x5?'+ 4 4 x'rk II'1
Bedrock J saprolibe
2
40 30 20 10 Oft 10 20 30 40
t
2,1 bank slopes
g?
t ; A 20 I
-W -A
20
Alf
s 1
r?
floodplal aluvial soil
6
2 Bedrock sa. Mite A
5 5
40 30 20 10 Oft 10 20 30 40
The Villages at Reedy Fork, Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan
HARP Greensboro, NC Starmount Company - Dev. Manager Sheet 2: -Banks and Typical .Sections
Figure 13b. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan, Sheet 2, Banks and Typical Cross Sections
7/15/01
R.D. Forsythe
30
a r 76M? t '"
Y: . f i t ? Sax ? S3?'s 5 d x y
0 5 150 ft
scale
18 riffles totaling 720 t 50 ft
18 pools totaling 1124 f 50 ft
pool ; riffle =1.53
average pool spacing = 40 ft
average pool size = 61 ft
50 ft conservation buffer to
each side of stream, totalling 4.36
acres (including channel area).

The Villages at Reedy Fork, Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan
HARP Greensboro,, NC
Starmount Company- Dev. Manager Sheet 3: Riffle, Pool, and Riparian Habitat
Figure 13c. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan, Shee3, Habitat
7

7/15101
R.D. Forsythe
31
?`' ?., t »• .,? .i? ? ?a 4.rs ?{ k' ?C, er.ati,y?}atN^'y .+t p.F, 'y.o
x'. Y,yy r Y.eiCa,} $ t FT s "y xYw$+{+''Sr ae'h x 4 y 3? ax "y7
n. ii",, ?`.dtSY ? ? ? e `x ro°??n,+' ?.? 4's Y ?. ?S.Y ?»A• ?'•F'd '4'r s.
4 r& ?,t„a r r & a Y° S h t 6 t q
?a1 x°t? ?rrr w.n+r}?'T?r ..n??k P? Kk
yr, <?'t? fe%rg `k 1 ;S"i in
,?{,?y?" er?7ones
FAS?' i^ rx; .y } R e..c ti;. .?,?„ t '+,? y+ ? } e r As N X016
cobbles
=f? ubstrate
PAK
.}iV .' A
??,y'?;
T" h{
1 N
?? tY rxa x y i ry!
4?r,,?;$ ? „?^ 0 5D 100 150ft.
??Sf}?t?"zeH
scale
M-A
a ?. ry FV?1? 4 j J [ 1-?% Yyp }?]J? ?.
,?{ x` ?rar, tK Pool Zones
1A'
Y Mj?!la.a?r ?YgW. ,?y t'F r R"a b;r '?" !'r'V .?Z'k? I? q! /later slope <.003
4
bed grade N .007
u; ?? .. a +e ? gr. r"? x 'ia 5a?,trxi ? ? •???,?. t? ?*i??,
L•pb , ?9iµ?'QC,?k,yjrk$iY?k?fi?x $ ?:? .(valley.. grade) pool
s.; d ? J i r ?3,^tfr Y ?! ?v"..R •,,.{+ e i s it ;r
?+
1
depths +2A
owl
. { i3°'?y.?'u,?"..icy?ct,"aw`7 ,?>,7ti'?"ry.wi?'??x?t?r4Pgffi ?iefi?r ?"?rF f,?'?4•,L?YJ f ?? ?".'?
.F!c z A'?i a 5tr+ ap dF'?,. t "';*tt?'Gy {.'y!• Y rnw ; F ,r.e(r a {e fj rS Fr ,e 4??h
...a,?rg
000
38
684
680
676
672
iVVV
HARP The Villages at Reedy Fork, Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan
Greensboro, NC Sheet 4: Longitudinal Profile
Starmount Company - Dev. Manager
Figure 13d. Reedy Fork Tributary Restoration Plan, Sheet 3, longitudinal Profile
7/15/01
R.D. Forsythe
3 Z
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
February 19, 2003
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200320436
Mr. Ronald Wilson
Starmount Company
Post Office Box 10349
Greensboro, North Carolina 27409-0349
Dear Mr. Wilson:
i?
Reference is made to the application of January 15, 2003, submitted on your behalf by Ms.
Denise Poulos of Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd., for individual Department of the Army
(DA) permit authorization for the proposed placement of fill material into 2,072 linear feet of
stream channel and 0.19 acre of wetlands associated with the construction of six road crossings
required for the development of the Villages at Reedy Fork subdivision. The project is located
adjacent to Reedy Fork, in the Cape Fear River Basin, east of NC 29, north of Greensboro,
Guilford County, North Carolina.
On February 6, 1990, the DA and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) signed a
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) establishing procedures to determine the type and level of
mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. This
MOA provides for first, avoiding impacts to waters and wetlands through the selection of the
least damaging, practical alternative; second, taking appropriate and practical steps to minimize
impacts on waters and wetlands; and finally, compensating for any remaining unavoidable
impacts to the extent appropriate and practical. Following a review of the application, it was
determined that several items of information required for us to process your pending application
in full compliance with this MOA, are either lacking or insufficient. We request that you
provide the following information in support of your permit application currently under review:
a. Permits for work within wetlands or other special aquatic sites are available only if the
proposed work is the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative, however the plans
submitted with your application do not provide enough detail to allow us to make this
determination. The plans submitted with your permit application do not clearly identify the
boundaries of the stream channels. Please provide revised plans that clearly depict the locations
of the streams and extent of wetlands. In addition, the plans should identify the limits of
disturbance within the wetland areas and the acreage of each impact.
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical Construction Materials • Environmental
January 15, 2003
Mr. John Domey w ,J
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetland/401 Unit lit)
R
1621 Mail Service Center u U f
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 r
22 t
Subject: Copy of Individual Permit Application
The Villages at Reedy Fork +t, E `LANDS GLOP
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina SECTtpM
ECS Project G-1001 Dear Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed please find two copies of the application submitted to the..U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for
proposed. impacts associated with The Villages at Reedy Fork. Attached to this letter is a check for
$475.00 for the Water Quality Certification Fee.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please contact me at (336) 856-,7150 if you have
questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
emse M. oulos, LSS
Principal Scientist
6909 International Drive, Suite 103 • Greensboro, NC 27409 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen, MD • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, M • Cornelia, GA • Dallas, TX
Danville, VA • Frederick,. MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Raleigh, NC • Richmond, VA
Roanoke, VA • San Antonio, TX • Williamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC -' Winchester, VA
' ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
January 15, 2003
Mr. John Thomas
U.S.. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 -
Raleigh, NC 27615 3 { t f ?, i i . g,
i ' h..,.,a.?.,...,..x # i
Reference: Individual Permit Application i1
The Villages at Reedy Fork Y' h 23
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina a.
ECS Project G-1001 ti .. 3tL,lNDSTVGO/UTP O¦
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Enclosed please find two copies of the application prepared for The Villages at Reedy Fork. The
application is for authorization to impact approximately 2,072 linear feet of stream channel and
approximately 0.19 acres of wetlands associated with road construction. The roads will provide access to
the site. _
.'The site is approximately 1,735 acres in area and is located on Highway 29 in Greensboro (Figure.1).
The site is being . developed with The Villages at Reedy Fork. Reedy Fork and its .tributaries cross the
site. As shown on the Environmental Preservation and Impacts Analysis Plan and the Stream Crossings
Key-Map, several roadways must be constructed in order to develop the site. The site will be developed
in phases over a period of time. At this time, we are applying for a Department of the Army Permit to
impact 2,072 linear feet of stream channel and 8,651 square feet (0.198 acres) of wetlands. The proposed
impacts are illustrated on the attached exhibits for Site 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10. Please note, a bridge across
Reedy Fork is planned for. Site 7. We do not anticipate that streams or wetlands will be impacted by this
crossing.
Approximately 367 acres of the site will be set aside as preservation area/common elements. Included in
that area are at least ten acres of wetlands and several miles of stream channel A Stream Mitigation &
Restoration Plan dated July 20, 2001 was prepared for the site by HARP in order to mitigate for impacts
to streams associated with Site 1, 2, and 3. These impacts were permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Action ID 200,120410 and 200120660) and by the.NCDWQ (#010382). When complete,
approximately 1,825 linear feet of stream channel will be restored. We are requesting that this
restoration, along with preservation of undisturbed sections of stream channels and wetlands in other
areas, be considered adequate mitigation for this project.
6909 International Drive, Suite 103 • Greensboro, NC 27409.• [phone] • Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen, MD • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, IL • Cornelia, GA • Dallas, TX
Danville, VA • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Raleigh, NC • Richmond, VA
Roanoke, VA • San Antonio, TX • Williamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC • Winchester, VA
DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT
THE ATTACHED CHECK IS IN PAYMENT OF ITEMS DESCRIBED BELOW. IF NOT CORRECT PLEASE NOTIFY US PROMPTLY. NO RECEIPT DESIRED.
Engineering Consulting Services LTD.
DATE ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
X6

A22
WETLANDS GRO
?u =WATEil UA!, SE UP
T1ON,
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEER
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
February 19, 2003
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200320436
Mr. Ronald Wilson
Starmount Company
Post Office Box 10349
Greensboro, North Carolina 27409-0349
Dear Mr. Wilson:
WfifiE
Reference is made to the application of January 15, 2003, submitted on your behalf by Ms.
Denise Poulos of Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd., for individual Department of the Army
(DA) permit authorization for the proposed placement of fill material into 2,072 linear feet of
stream channel and 0.19 acre of wetlands associated with the construction of six road crossings
required for the development of the Villages at Reedy Fork subdivision. The project is located
adjacent to Reedy Fork, in the Cape Fear River Basin, east of NC 29, north of Greensboro,
Guilford County, North Carolina.
On February 6, 1990, the DA and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) signed a
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) establishing procedures to determine the type and level of
mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. This
MOA provides for first, avoiding impacts to waters and wetlands through the selection of the
least damaging, practical alternative; second, taking appropriate and practical steps to minimize
impacts on waters and wetlands; and finally, compensating for any remaining unavoidable
impacts to the extent appropriate and practical. Following a review of the application, it was
determined that several items of information required for us to process your pending application
in full compliance with this MOA, are either lacking or insufficient. We request that you
provide the following information in support of your permit application currently under review:
a. Permits for work within wetlands or other special aquatic sites are available only if the
proposed work is the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative, however the plans
submitted with your application do not provide enough detail to allow us to make this
determination. The plans submitted with your permit application do not clearly identify the
boundaries of the stream channels. Please provide revised plans that clearly depict the locations
of the streams and extent of wetlands. In addition, the plans should identify the limits of
disturbance within the wetland areas and the acreage of each impact.
b. It is necessary for you to have taken all appropriate and practical steps to minimize
wetland losses. Please indicate all that you have done, especially regarding the modification of
plans and proposed construction techniques, to minimize adverse impacts (i.e., to reduce the
discharge of fill material into waters of the United States as much as practicable). Your response
should provide more detailed information regarding additional impacts to waters of the U.S. that
may result from construction of utilities, grading, or other site preparation activities required for
the completion of the project. If no further impacts will be required for completion of the
project, your application should state that no further impacts are anticipated.
c. The MOA requires that appropriate and practical mitigation will be required for all
unavoidable adverse impacts remaining after all appropriate and practical minimization has been
employed. Your application proposes to offset impacts to 2,072 linear feet of stream channel and
0.198 acre of wetlands with the restoration of approximately 1,825 linear feet of stream channel
and the preservation of approximately 367 acres containing at least ten acres of wetlands and
several miles of stream channel in unspecified locations. Due to the extensive impacts associated
with your project, and in light of past impacts totaling 1,025 linear feet of stream channel and
0.035 acre of wetland, you are strongly encouraged to revise your mitigation proposal to provide
for stream restoration at a minimum 2:1 ratio for all impacts to wetlands and to streams that are
perennial or exhibit important aquatic function, proposed in your current application. Please note
that any additional impacts to streams or wetlands identified in your revised permit application
should be accounted for in the modified mitigation proposal.
If your revised application continues to include preservation as a method of mitigating lost
wetland and stream functions resulting from development of the site, please provide additional
information justifying the use of preservation (e.g., threat of future impact to preservation areas,
exceptional resource, etc.). Also specify the proposed method of preservation (e.g., conservation
easement, restrictive covenants, etc.), along with maps identifying the specific location and size
of wetlands and streams proposed for preservation.
This information is required to complete your DA permit application and is essential to our
expeditious processing of your application. Please be aware that any placement of fill material
into jurisdictional waters of the United States without authorization by a DA permit will be
considered a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1311).
Finally, please note that a review of our records indicates that there are several structures
within the vicinity of the project that are either listed or eligible for inclusion on the National
Register of Historic Places. It is also possible that there may be prehistoric and historic
archaeological sites located within the project boundary that are subject to Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act. You are encouraged to contact Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
with the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources at 919-733-4763 to initiate a review
of your proposed project.
2
A-
Y
Should you have any further questions regarding your DA permit application or wish to
schedule a consultation with interested Federal and State agencies, please do not hesitate to
contact me at telephone [phone], Extension 26.
Sincerely,
Todd J. Tugwell
Regulatory Project Manager,
Raleigh Field Office
Copies Furnished:
Ms. Denise Poulos
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd.
6909 International Drive
Suite 103
Greensboro, North Carolina 27409
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
4618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4618
3
5
i _
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
January 15, 2003
Mr. John Thomas
U.S.. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse. Road, Suite 120 - -
Raleigh, NC 27615
Reference: Individual Permit Application
The Villages at Reedy Fork , g l JAN 2 2 2103
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
7V hTLR?40S GROUP
ECS Project G-1001
. .;._ .. !A; ,t ? ;QUALITY SECTION.
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Enclosed please find two copies of the application prepared for The Villages at Reedy Fork. The
application is for authorization to impact approximately 2,072 linear. feet of stream channel and
approximately 0.19 acres of wetlands associated with road construction. The roads will provide access to
the site.
The site is approximately 1,735 acres in area and is.located on Highway 29 in Greensboro (Figure .1).
The site is being. developed with The Villages at Reedy Fork. Reedy Fork and its :tributaries cross the
site. As shown on the Environmental Preservation and Impacts Analysis Plan and the Stream Crossings
Key Map, several roadways must be constructed in order to develop the site. The site will be developed
in phases over a period of time. At this time, we are. applying for a Department of the Army Permit to
impact. 2,072 linear feet of stream channel and 8,651 square feet (0.198 acres) of wetlands. The proposed
impacts are illustrated on the attached exhibits for Site 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10. Please note, a bridge across
Reedy Fork is planned for:Site 7. We do not anticipate that streams or wetlands will be impacted by this
crossing.
Approximately 367 acres of the site will be set aside as preservation area/common elements. Included'in
that area are at least ten acres of wetlands and several miles of stream channel. A Stream Mitigation &
Restoration Plan dated July 20, 2001 was prepared for the site by HARP in order to mitigate for impacts
to streams associated with Site 1, 2, and 3. These impacts were permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Action ID 200,120410 and 200120660) and by the.NCDWQ (#010382). When complete,
approximately 1,825 linear feet of stream channel will be restored. We are requesting that this
restoration, along with preservation of undisturbed sections of stream channels and wetlands in other
areas, be considered adequate mitigation for this project.
6909 International Drive, Suite 103 • Greensboro, NC 27409 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
Offices: Aberdeen, MD • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, EL • Cornelia, GA • Dallas, TX
Danville, VA • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Raleigh, NC • Richmond, VA
Roanoke, VA • San Antonio, TX • Williamsburg, VA Wilmington, NC • Winchester, VA