20091193 Ver 1_Application_20091109

3
o a
I BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
Q-
G Mr. Tom Steffens
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
T Washington Regulatory Field Office
V3 Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000

Mr. Robert Ridings
Wetlands/401 Unit
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
SUBJECT: NWP3 and WQC # 3687 request in order to place riprap in Deep Creek, an
impounded tributary to Roanoke Rapids Lake, to stop scour under and around footing
of Bridge 86 as well as add riprap around the entire bent and on stream bank slopes
underneath bridge on SR 1400 (Thelma Road) in Halifax County, NC.
Dear Sirs:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to fill in a sizable
scour hole occurring under and adjacent to bent 1 of Deep Creek Bridge 86. As well as
surround entire bent with riprap to prevent further scour and finally add riprap to failing
concrete slope underneath bridge- This activity proposes to permanently impact a total of
0.02 areas of open water. The NCDOT anticipates that this stabilization activity will be
authorized under an USACE Nationwide Permit 3 (NWP 3) and a NCDWQ General
Water Quality Certificate # 3687 (NWP 3).
No sites eligible for listing on the National Register occur within the area of potential
effect. This project will not affect listed or eligible historic properties.
MINIMIZATION INFORMATION
Impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the
protection of surface waters and wetlands, plus all work will be performed from a barge.
0
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
November 4, 2009
0
4§
Ov 41
ak, 2009 0
EuGENE A. Cowry JR.
SECRETARY
091193
[phone] x 3532 [e-mail]
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3 1 65
A pre-construction meeting with the Division Environmental Officer, Bridge Maintence
Engineer and Contractor will take before work is performed
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Chad
Coggins, Division Environmental Officer at [phone]. Your time and effort are
appreciated.
Respe&eene, ours,
R. E. C h., PE
Division Engineer
[phone] x 3532 [e-mail]
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
O?pF W ALFZq
9
_h
1 1 > _+
n rQ? ? o -c
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Verson 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. NWP3 or General Permit (GP) number.
1c. Has the NW P or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification- Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ®No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
I g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. -Project Information
2a. Name of project: Bridge No. 86 (SR 1400) over Deep Creek
2b. County. Halifax
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Roanoke Rapids
2d. Subdivision name: WA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: WA
3b. Deed Book and Page No. WA
3c. Responsible Parry (for LLC it
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: WA
3e. City, state, zip: WA
3f. Telephone no.: WA
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: WA
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: NCDOT
4b. Name: Richard E. Greene
4c. Business name
(if applicable): NCDOT Division 4
4d. Street address: 509 Ward Blvd
4e. City, state, zip: Wilson, NC 27895-3165
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.: [phone]
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Chad Coggin
5b. Business name
(if applicable): NCDOT Div. 4
5c. Street address: 509 Ward Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip: Wilson, NC 27895-3165
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no.: [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
Ia. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): WA
Latitude: 36.4647 N Longitude: - 77.7544
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: NIA acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Deep Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin: Roanoke
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The prevailing land uses in the vicinity of this project include rural residential and vacation homesites, and undeveloped
woodlands.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
The bridge spanning Deep Creek has an outside to outside width of 34 feet.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the proposed project is to fill and stabilize an existing scour hole that is undermining Bent 1, add some
riprap around footing and to fill and stable the failing concrete slope protection around the western end of the bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Deep Creek is an impounded tributary to Roanoke Rapids Lake. Water depth at the bridge is approximately 15' with
some current and limited visibility, depending on lake levels, wind conditions, etc. Due to those conditions, combined with
a narrow bridgehoadway, NMOT proposes to do all work from a barge that wig be towed to the site. A skidsteer type
piece of equipment (i.e.'Bobcar) will be used to offload approximately 48 cubic yards of riprap from the barge deck into
the scour hole (26' X 1(Y X 4' deep) and around footing. A diver(s) will be observing the operation underwater to ensure
that the scour hale is filled property without unduly distributing riprap onto the surrounding undisturbed bottom. The
concrete slope protection will also be armored with riprap from the base up to a point between the ordinary high water
mark and the base of the bridge deck on the western end which will be approximately another 10 cubic yards. The total
estimated additional riprap needed will be 58 cubic yards.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
/

? Yes ? No ® Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. ti the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company.
Name (ti known): Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
? Yes ? No ® Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help W instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sedans were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
® Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Welland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number- (PER) or (Corps-404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? POT ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER El Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
[-I INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
ff there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterlmdy type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent(P)or
Temporary T
01 ®P ? T Deep Creek Fill Impounded .02
02 ? PC] T Deep Creek
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4L Total open water impacts .02
4g. Comments: The waterbody referred to as Deep Creek is an impounded reach of Roanoke Rapids Lake.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
tf pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
SL Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes; permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If projectwill impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this forth.
6a.
? Nenae ? Tar-Pamfoo ? Other.
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
I a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
During the design phase aftematives to the applicant preferred measure were considered. The only viable alternative to that
proposed is to replace the existing substructure. Drawbacks to this option are a lengthy bridge closure and a significant
increase in construction costs.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
In an effort to minimize impacts, NCDOT proposes to limit the placement of riprap to those areas of the existing scour hole,
the adjacent bent and the concrete slope protection where it will be effective in preventing the substructure from being
undermined further orfailing outright. A diver or divers famiTiarwith bridge construction, engineering, and maintenance
practices will be in the water to observe the placement of the rgrrap and ensure that it is deposited accurately.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b- If ycs, mitigatim is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option vnll be used for this
jects
pro ? Mitigation bank

? Payment to in lieu fee program

? Permillee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool []cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wettard mitigation requested: acres
4g_ Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments -
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a pemailtee responsible mfgation plant, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ? No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
pennittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-Geu fee fund).
6h. Commends:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stomwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ? No
2c. ff this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why. There will be no increase in impervious
surfaces as a result of this project.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e_ Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWO Stonmwater Program
? DWO 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local govemmenfs jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
? NSW
3b. Which of the following local"plemented Stormwater management programs ?
USMP
apply (check all that apply): ® Water Supply Watershed
? Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQStomrwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
[I HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented Stormwaber management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
® Other. NCDOT NPDES permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ? No
attached?
5_ DWQ 407 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stonmwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Utt3 submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la- Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstatellocal) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federallstate) [aril?
lb- If you answered "yesr to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Ad (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered W to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA fnal approval
? Yes ? No
meter.)
Comments
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DING Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after4he-fact pert application? ? Yes ®No
2c_ if you answered "yes to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative impacts (D'.' 'Q Requirement)
3a. Will this project (bas_d on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ? No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered °yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ puHuy_ if you answered "no,- provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the uitirnate treatment nteUwds and disposition (non-discharge or disdsrge) of wastewater generated frorn
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be created or discharged as a result of this project
Page 10 of 11
PCN For - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Ad
? Yes No
impacts?
5c. tf yes, indicate the USFWS Field /ice you have contacted. ? Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCNHP GIS layer Search
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Wit this project occur in or rear an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?.
Perthnerd GIS layers were checked and concurrence was received from Travis Wilson (NCWRC).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cuhturai Resources (Corps Regtdrernent)
7a. Wig this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
gnvgmments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
=i us te.g_ Naficrel Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
NuTth C uoiina history and archaeobgy)7
7b. ;.rhaat data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
open water
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in a FEMAtdesgnated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
3b. u yes, expleir t ituw project meets FEMA requirements: This activity will not s gn ticardfy raise the elevation of any land or
water within the 100 year flDOdplain.
8c. What source(s) do you use to make the fl3odptain determination? NC Fbodmaps

AppticanUAgend's Printed Name Applicant/Agents Signature Date
(Agmt's signer is valid only d w authwvation lenm from the aplificarn
le ed.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
? Raegh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Feb Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCNHP GIS layer Search
& Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a- Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
bb. vv;: data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Pertinent GIS layers were checked
t ?_ Hisaaric ar Preh:s aric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
I
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation

®
? Yes No

zralnus "e r Noi ro! His: is TruEt designation or roTM,rtics significant in
3
1 North Camlina hismry and archaentnoy)? I I
?b. What data sources did you use to determn a whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? ;
i fumn warns {
8. Flood Zone OP-Manation (Corps Requirement)

{7(` ea. W 14 this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No

t .u a ..a r ti ?rw vY.w.. I
5c, What ?Mmmmn(s) did "MI3 ? to ma"e tthe flnodr_tair fiete-"Jre i ' NC F hdr r s
1 t I
N I
Applicant(Agent's Primed Name ApJzcxWAgem's Si ure Date
(Agents sgnahady if an letter fr m the al pli a t
is
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
ACME Mapper 2,0 - 6.3 km WxS W of Roanoke Rapids Lake NU Page 1 of 1

3M r
? ZUSGS -USES v
`• \~,', '•.? yr_ _. ``: •, !'rN \ .? .?+.^" ? .
I ?-: sr ; "'t$GS J) ?- • / ? ?I?GS ?r ?• '',`1 \ i I f "~??:.. _?' ' .
iV?
IA ?f ~• 1,
/r c=am r88.'_ '_ 1? •;? ?.• ?, _it , I ?j?1 `r!(
t , . ?, - tt s y ri -
\? t/'? ; ft } 1• t"- ',I 1• ,.,/ yii f
I.. ?ti ,`-• y. ,'1p l J t \?_:?^? }'?•la?\,`?? /
`?,,; S ? , f?.USGS(r ;i•,•? \/L?J l ?USGS ?;' \,,t?• ,\•.--? t ?
. ,l ?• ' l . --'J \` '` ? ` V \ :;ems- ? ; ? <?`
?yIm: i
Z7- t
j IJ t ?.." \ l a ', . ?`i .Ir,? •?t` j f/tlr ?,,'1 rt ?r?r - ?y.
I l ?' ??i '??`Zi
_ -'• jr:? ti, u t Vj.-,'1 _ ,? ?,.•Y jt_JS?r,1\ r 'dj t. 'tl,yz=-f
! _ \ , - - -.•.' ?t?r~r IIIi i,:=r: J{{{1\', ,?+ ' i `\ ?? \`'• 1, 7•? ?\
-
' ti, °T?y?'=_.: ?• :.; ?•;?:?.Sf- I?,' n"y.?t - a ` i \.?`.,y •r /l'
7 1 r?? l' 1`'•.Jr !•? 7 VC. ,? I , it - , < < 11 !'{ I
r 1 ,./ 1 .?49'J??
•-?r\'.f '.?/ -,Y .i /?? ,+' t ?`•• i r•1p1 r,, ?! \ \?( \,` ? f???i 1?\???.i?r'
?rJr t/?}^?'?(ri ,l1 }uy' y? ,?lt.r''`? •}t??X?ll'y ?.y ., r?.?f\,Y.?l ))5}? `?l(r(/
i l y ?1 ,. / i „i- .. .p. v: "'. }. / ! \`' 1 I t I 1 it i •-1m erOy ISGS {' SerVl? 'by arras, rver
http://mapper.acme.com/ 11/4/2009
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ATTENTION 'POSTING CHANGE SV 31 / TEST 35
DMSION OF HIGHWAYS P.M. ISSUED
BRIDGE MANAGEMENT UNIT
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
INSPECTION TYPE: 4 Year Underwater Inspection
COUNTY HALIFAX BRIDGE NUMBER 410086
ROUTE SR1400
Inspection Date 0610312009
ACROSS DEEP CREEK
INSPECTION CYCLE 4 YRS
Inspected By BRAD CLEAVER
Type Work Performed
Man Hours (Spec. Work Only)
0
EQUIPMENT USED COMPRESSOR 0 WET SUIT 0 COMMUNICATION -AMRON
SCUBA XQ DRY SUIT XQ COMMUNICATION OTS QX
LIGHTS QX ROPE Q UNDERWATER PHOTOS TAKEN Q
BOAT Q CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Q
DATE DIVER CURRENT VISIBILITY METEOROLOGY DEPTH DIVE TIME
6/2/2009 JCB SLIGHT 1' 80 DEG. 15' :20

Bridge I&A Form 1(82)H FIELD INSPECTION REPORT
State of North Carolina
Dept. of Transportation Bridge Insaecion & Analysis
Division of Highways
Team Leader BRAD CLEAVER
Assisted By JCB/JVB
Item No. Grade
36b 6 CONCRETE COLUMNS:
CONCRETE EXHIBITS SCALE TO 1/4"
C-1 HAS A SPALL 0.5 S.F. BY 3" DEEP ON F-2, F-3 AT FOOTING.
C-2 HAS A SPALL 1 S.F. BY 3" DEEP ON F-3, F-4 NEAR FOOTING.
36e 6 CONCRETE FOOTONGS:
CONCRETE EXHIBITS SCALE TO 1/4"
39 4 SLOPE PROTECTION:
CONCRETE SLOPE PROTECTION EXTENDS FROM EACH END BENT AND LINES THE
CHANNEL. THEPROTECT/ON`HAS-BEENUNDERMINED-(SEESKETCFf-FE)R-pCTEr4Tf
OFU%M) THE-U/M HAS CAUSED FRACTURES AND SETTLEMENT OF UP TO 3'%
RIP-RAP HAS BEEN PLACED OVER THE SLOPE PROTECTION AT END BENT 2. NO
U/M OF SUBSTRUCTURE UNITS WAS NOTED.
45c 4 CONTRACTION SCOUR:
CONCRETE SLOPE PROTECTION EXTENDS FROM EACH END BENT AND LINES THE
CHANNEL. THE PROTECTION HAS BEEN UNDERMINED (SEE SKETCH FOR EXTENT
OF U/M) THE U/M HAS CAUSED FRACTURES AND SETTLEMENT OF UP TO 3'.
RIP-RAP HAS BEEN PLACED OVER THE SLOPE PROTECTION AT END BENT 2. NO
U/M OF SUBSTRUCTURE UNITS WAS NOTED. PLANS INDICATE THE FOUNDATION IS
A' SP_READ`F_OOTING:GN=EROIDIBL-E.BEDROCK.
45d 4 CONCRETE SLOPE PROTECTION EXTENDS FROM EACH END BENT AND LINES THE
CHANNEL. THE PROTECTION HAS BEEN UNDERMINED (SEE SKETCH FOR EXTENT
OF U/M) THE U/M HAS CAUSED FRACTURES AND SETTLEMENT OF UP TO 3'.
RIP-RAP HAS BEEN PLACED OVER THE SLOPE PROTECTION AT END BENT 2. NO
U/M OF SUBSTRUCTURE UNITS WAS NOTED.
61 YES SCOUR AND U/M SLOPE PROTECTION.
62 YES SV 31 / TTST 35
,
74 U PLANS INDICATE THE FOUNDATION IS A SPREAD FOOTING ON EROIDIBLE
BEDROCK.
BRIDGE INSPECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION FOR MAINTENANCE REPAIRS

Bridge: 410086 County HALIFAX . Date: 06/03/2009
These Repairs Should Be Made Within Twelve Months From Date of This Inspection

MMS
Code Description of
Function Unit Quantity Remarks Est.
Cost
3348 Maintain
Concrete
Substructure
Components LF 50 SCOUR-HAS CAUSED PARTIAL
FAILURE OF THE CONCRETE SLOPE
PROTECTION'. SCOUR HOLES ARE.
APPROACHING BENT 1 FOOTING (SEE
SKETCH FORD/M_DETAILS ).
ENCOMPASS BENT "1 W/R 7 RIP=RAP
SEo-.r kvIt '2_6XI6 X9d,,p
3
e, crj .f)C.u buJ_
io yds'
S ?oQY Pfo ° ti ? ? ??
Key
?T, Priority Maintenance Item 4?, Critical Finding Item ?? Priority Maintenance Level Not Determined
Bridge Inspection Field Sketch
- AS BUILT CONDITION
CONTINIOUS
COLUMN
EARTH
FOOTER

- FAILED SP/SCOUR
CONTINIOUS
CONCRETE SLOPE

COLUMN - >
EARTH 'Vo
qr?r
iPE PROTECTION 1 FOOTER
'OoOdu
od dti
\T-
? SLUR HOLE 4FT VERTICAL X UP TO 10FT PROBE
?rp?4P
EF -

\ PLAN VIEW
True Description
ELEVATION SCOUR/DAMAGE
Bridge No: 410086 Dawn By. JCB '6/3/2009 FkNiR :S0162000231
• r , ? - - _. _. Y.-... ? - - - Cn.+.+ .wee ao.= 6R
/r 1h 1
r
`??+GGdaA R?
r
-
_ - r r
- ? ? - rt/TE2/oG BESET
__ 3?C7'/O S/ 17rC el BE
.. - '-... Bring A.Am 4. ov A-9
X
P? .
da"61ps of 41
s - nv_s.. ?..f
-E &lb JEML? 'M
?f
Structure 410086 County HALIFAX Date: 06/03/2009 Structure Photos
35?,mvs
+" ? :" a +rw ? `s:*? ?' f^•
LOOKING WEST
LOOKING NORTH
Structure 410086 County HALIFAX Date: 06/0312009 Structure Photos
BENT 1. SPAN 2